Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genomic and Post-Translational Modification Analysis of Leucine-Rich-Repeat Receptor-Like Kinases in Brassica rapa

  • Jana Jeevan Rameneni ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Jana Jeevan Rameneni, Yeon Lee

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Korea

  • Yeon Lee ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Jana Jeevan Rameneni, Yeon Lee

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 305–764, Korea

  • Vignesh Dhandapani,

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Korea

  • Xiaona Yu,

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Korea

  • Su Ryun Choi,

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Korea

  • Man-Ho Oh ,

    manhooh@cnu.ac.kr (MHO); yplim@cnu.ac.kr (YPL)

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, College of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, 305–764, Korea

  • Yong Pyo Lim

    manhooh@cnu.ac.kr (MHO); yplim@cnu.ac.kr (YPL)

    Affiliation Molecular Genetics and Genomics Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305–764, Korea

Genomic and Post-Translational Modification Analysis of Leucine-Rich-Repeat Receptor-Like Kinases in Brassica rapa

  • Jana Jeevan Rameneni, 
  • Yeon Lee, 
  • Vignesh Dhandapani, 
  • Xiaona Yu, 
  • Su Ryun Choi, 
  • Man-Ho Oh, 
  • Yong Pyo Lim
PLOS
x

Abstract

Among several receptor-like kinases (RLKs), leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinases (LRR-RLKs) are a major group of genes that play crucial roles in growth, development and stress responses in plant systems. Given that they have several functional roles, it is important to investigate their roles in Brassica rapa. In the present study, 303 LRR-RLKs were identified in the genome of B. rapa and comparative phylogenetic analysis of 1213 combined LRR-RLKs of B. rapa, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa and Populus trichocarpa helped us to categorize the gene family into 15 subfamilies based on their sequence and structural similarities. The chromosome localizations of 293 genes allowed the prediction of duplicates, and motif conservation and intron/exon patterns showed differences among the B. rapa LRR-RLK (BrLRR-RLK) genes. Additionally, computational function annotation and expression analysis was used to predict their possible functional roles in the plant system. Biochemical results for 11 selected genes showed variations in phosphorylation activity. Interestingly, BrBAK1 showed strong auto-phosphorylation and trans-phosphorylation on its tyrosine and threonine residues compared with AtBAK1 in previous studies. The AtBAK1 receptor kinase is involved in plant growth and development, plant innate immunity, and programmed cell death, and our results suggest that BrBAK1 might also be involved in the same functions. Another interesting result was that BrBAK1, BrBRI1, BrPEPR1 and BrPEPR2 showed activity with both anti-phosphotyrosine and anti-phosphothreonine antibodies, indicating that they might have dual-specificity kinase activity. This study provides comprehensive results for the BrLRR-RLKs, revealing expansion of the gene family through gene duplications, structural similarities and variations among the genes, and potential functional roles according to gene ontology, transcriptome profiling and biochemical analysis.

Introduction

The Brassicaceae family is one of the major groups in the plant kingdom, composed of 340–360 genera and over 3,700 species distributed worldwide [1]. Among the six most cultivated species, the mesopolyploid Brassica rapa (AA genome, 2n = 2x = 20) is an economically, agronomically and scientifically important crop. Plants, animals and other multi-cellular organisms carry out inter- and intracellular communications with cell-surface receptor-like kinases (RLKs) through chemical signals. The first RLK was identified in maize [2] and subsequently RLKs were found in other plant species, including Arabidopsis and rice, which contain 610 and 1132 genes, respectively [3]. Furthermore, Arabidopsis RLKs were subdivided into 44 subfamilies according to phylogenetic analysis, and roughly 21 different extracellular domains were predicted [4].

Leucine-rich-repeat receptor-like kinases (LRR- RLK) form one of the major super-families in plant species and consist of an N-terminal LRR as an extracellular domain (ECD) and a C-terminal kinase domain. The LRR domain is 20–30 amino acids in length, is the major class of ECD [5] found among all of the RLKs in plant species, and is predicted to be involved in protein–protein interactions [6]. Additionally, LRR motifs comprise at least eight different classes with varying numbers and arrangements of LRRs in the sequence [4,5]. The protein kinase domain forms a lobe structure that consists of approximately 250–300 amino acids and has two sub-divisions, protein-serine/threonine kinases and protein tyrosine kinases. It is also divided into twelve sub-domains that are highly conserved and involved in catalytic activity, specifically in functions related to cell development [7]. Previously, these genes were predicted to be involved in different functions and placed in three different groups: (1) plant organ growth and development, (2) functions related to biotic and abiotic stresses and (3) multiple functions. For example, In A. thaliana, SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE (SERK) is involved in anther development and disease resistance [8], ERECTA (ER) functions in both ovule development and bacterial wilt [9,10], STRUBBELIG-RECEPTOR FAMILY (SRF) that functions in development of organs like leaves, stem and flower [11], FLAGELLIN-SENSITIVE 2 (FLS2) and PEP1 RECEPTOR (PEPR) is involved in both pathogen recognition and defense response and similarly, EF-TU RECEPTOR (EFR) is involved in enhancing immunity against few bacterial disease in rice, [12, 13, 14]. In addition, PHYTOSULFOKIN RECEPTOR 1 (PSKR1) is involved in cell proliferation and also in defense response against bacterial pathogens in Arabidopsis [15], BAK1-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 1 (BIR1) is involved in both cell death and plant growth in temperature dependent manner [16], and BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE (BRI1) along with BRI1 ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE1 (BAK1) is involved in Brassinosteroid signaling [17]. Generally, Kinases that are involved in phosphorylation are conserved with positively charged arginine (R) and negatively charged aspartate (D) amino acid residues at the activation site, based on the conservation of the arginine (R) residue these kinases are divided into RD and non-RD type [18,19]. Likely, RD kinases are capable of auto-phosphorylation of the stimulation loop that is necessary for kinase activity. Conversely, non-RD kinases are mainly involved in plant immunity against microbes [18,19].

In this work, the whole genome sequence (WGS) of B. rapa [20] was used to identify B. rapa LRR-RLK (BrLRR-RLK) genes genome-wide. As these genes are important for functions related to plant morphological characters and plant stress resistance [5], characterizing this gene family will be useful for the genetic improvement of B. rapa. Because of the breeding and scientific importance of Chiifu (Chinese cabbage) among all the Chinese cabbage varieties, it was used for the identification of 303 BrLRR-RLK genes in the B. rapa genome. Furthermore, using these genes along with LRR-RLK genes from rice, Arabidopsis and Populus, a comparative phylogeny was constructed and we determined the motif patterns and intron/exon structures for all of the genes. Additionally, the computational functional annotations, the expression patterns among six tissues [21] and the biochemical activity of selected genes were also investigated.

Materials and Methods

Identification, mapping, and duplication analysis of LRR-RLK genes in B. rapa

Previously published Arabidopsis thaliana LRR-RLK protein sequences were retrieved and these genes were submitted to a Pfam batch search (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/search#tabview=tab1) to find the Pfam IDs. A protein alignment was retrieved for the Pfam IDs (PF00560, PF08263, PF12799, PF13516, PF13855, PF00069, PF07714) in the Stockholm format from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam.org/family/pf00069#tabview=tab3) and using this as a reference, we searched for LRR-RLKs among the protein sequences of B. rapa downloaded from the BRAD database (http://brassicadb.org/brad/). Redundant sequences were removed using our own Perl script and further confirmed by manual and Pfam batch searches. The BLAST-like Alignment Tool (BLAT) and TBlastN software were employed to map the positions of the LRR-RLK genes on the B. rapa chromosomes. Multiple sequence alignment and comparative analysis were performed to identify the duplicated BrLRR-RLK genes in the whole genome of B. rapa. The candidate genes were named BrLRR-RLK1 to BrLRR-RLK303 based on their positions counted from top to bottom on chromosomes A01 to A10. An A. thaliana ortholog search was carried out with the mega BLAST tool, which compared the full coding sequences of the BrLRR-RLK genes and all available A. thaliana genes. Highly similar (e-value > e-45) homologous pairs were filtered out with in-home developed Perl scripts and further the resulted orthologs were cross checked with BRAD database and considered as orthologous genes.

Intron/exon analysis

The evolution and functions of a particular gene can be predicted through intron and exon patterns. Thus, to determine the intron and exon distribution and splicing phases of the 303 BrLRR-RLKs, we compared the BrLRR-RLK coding sequences (CDSs) and corresponding genomic sequences using the online Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn).

Conserved motifs and gene ontology annotation

The Multiple Expectation Minimization for Motif Elicitation (MEME) tool (http://meme.nbcr.net/meme/cgi-bin/meme.cgi) [22] was used with default parameters to identify the conserved motifs within the 303 BrLRR-RLK protein sequences. A maximum of 25 motifs were searched and the types of motifs were determined using the Simpler Modular Architecture Research Tool (SMART) (http://smart.embl-heidelberg.de/) and a Pfam batch search (http://pfam.sanger.ac.uk/search#tabview=tab1) [23]. Additionally, basic information for the BrLRR-RLK protein sequences like PI, length (aa) and molecular weight was collected using the sequence manipulation suite (SMS) V. 2 (http://www.bioinformatics.org/sms2/index.html). To identify BrLRR-RLK gene divergence, signal peptides and transmembrane domains were predicted using the online tool Phobius (http://phobius.sbc.su.se/) [24].

The molecular function, biological process and cellular component annotations were mapped from plant proteins that had high-scoring segment pairs (HSPs) with the BrLRR-RLK proteins in a BlastP alignment using the Blast2Go software and the data was retrieved in the text file format.

Phylogenetic tree construction

Using the ClustalX-2.0 software package with default parameters [25], multiple sequence alignments were performed with the LRR-RLK protein sequences of A. thaliana, B. rapa, Oryza sativa, and Populus trichocarpa. The neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap iterations was used for phylogenetic tree construction with the aligned LRR-RLK protein sequences. A circular phylogenetic tree was generated using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) V5.1 software package (http://www.megasoftware.net/mega.php) [26].

Heat map expression pattern of LRR- RLK genes in B. rapa using RNA-seq data

For BrLRR-RLK gene expression analysis, RNA-seq data under accession no. GSE43245 previously produced and analyzed by Tong et al. [21] were downloaded from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). These data included six tissues of B. rapa accession Chiifu-401-42: callus, root, stem, leaf, flower, and silique. Transcript abundance was recorded as fragments per kilobase of exon model per million mapped (FPKM), and a heat map of the BrLRR-RLK genes was generated using the CIMminer online software (http://discover.nci.nih.gov/cimminer/oneMatrix.do).

Cytoplasmic domain construction for recombinant proteins

Total RNA was extracted from leaf tissues of B. rapa Chiifu (Chinese cabbage) using TRI reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA) [27] and 2 μg of DNase-treated RNA was reverse transcribed into single-strand cDNA with Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems). Eleven predicted BrLRR-RLK gene sequences from the Brassica database were compared by BlastN with the Arabidopsis genome information (AGI) CDS dataset to confirm their sequence identity. Then, the 11 selected genes were synthesized using gene-specific primers (S1 Table) and Accuprime pfu DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems) with PCR conditions of 95°C for 2 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 20 sec, 60°C for 40 sec, and 72°C for 2 min, with a final 72°C for 5 min. The amplified fragments were purified and cloned into the pENTRY-TOPO vector (Applied Biosystems) and confirmed as BrLRR-RLK genes through sequence analysis. Recombinant Flag-BrLRR-RLKs were amplified using pFLAG-MAC (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) and the PCR products were digested with specific enzymes and purified by agarose gel electrophoresis. The resulting fragments were ligated into pFLAG-MAC, which was digested with enzymes, followed by heat shock transformation into E. coli (DH5α) and plasmid extraction. The mutations were confirmed by sequence analysis.

Recombinant protein and immunoblot analysis

Flag-BrLRR-RLK-CDs were expressed in BL21 (DE3) pLysS E. coli cells (Novagen, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and cultures were induced with 0.3 mM IPTG at 23°C for 16 h. Flag-BrLRR-RLK-CD cell lysate preparation and in vitro phosphorylation assay conditions were as previously described [28]. Recombinant Flag-BrLRR-RLK cytoplasmic domain proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinyl difluoride membranes, and immunoblot analysis was carried out using anti-Flag antibodies (1:5,000 dilution), anti-phosphothreonine antibodies (1:500 dilution), and anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies (1:500 dilution). Protein quantification was done using Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining and immunoblots were scanned using an Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Bioscience, Lincoln, NE, USA) for visualization.

Results and Discussion

LRR-RLK gene identification and chromosomal locations in the B. rapa genome

A total of 303 non-redundant BrLRR-RLK genes were identified in the B. rapa genome and were confirmed through manual and Pfam searches for the presence of both ECDs and kinase domains (KDs) in the sequences. The homologous LRR-RLK genes identified in B. rapa in our study are reported in A. thaliana, O. sativa and P. trichocarpa to have important functional roles related to plant growth and development [2932]. Most of the BrLRR-RLK genes contained leucine rich repeats (LRRs) in their ECDs, which play a major role in protein–protein interactions [6], whereas transmembrane (TM) domains and signal peptides (SP) are signatures of membrane RLK proteins [5]. In total, 293 genes, BrLRR-RLK1 to BrLRR-RLK293, were physically located on the 10 chromosomes and whereas the remaining 10 genes, BrLRR-RLK294 to BrLRR-RLK303 were mapped on scaffolds using the BLAT and TblastN software. The BrLRR-RLK genes were randomly distributed among all 10 chromosomes, with A01 and A06 having the most (39 genes) and A10 having the least (10 genes) (Fig 1 and Table 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Chromosomal distribution of 293 BrLRR-RLK genes.

Outer circle with colored blocks illustrates different crucifer building blocks on chromosomes. The RD (red color) and non-RD (aqua color) type genes are distributed on chromosomes A01 to A10 in inner circle and paralogous copies are marked with different colored lines in center.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. The complete information and characteristics of B. rapa LRR-RLK genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.t001

Among non-RD types, the highest number (23 genes) was found on chromosome A01 and the remaining 109 genes were distributed randomly among the other chromosomes including scaffolds. In the case of RD type genes, 25 genes were mapped on A06, followed by 21 on A03, and the least number (4 genes) were found to be on scaffolds (S2 Table). Orthologous genes are homologous genes found in two different species but which originated from a common ancestor, and if a gene is duplicated and occupies two different positions in the same genome, then the two copies are considered paralogous [33]. In our analysis, around 143 genes were duplicated and formed 143 paralogous copies (Fig 1 and S3 Table). We also identified 11 BrLRR-RLK genes that were not orthologous to A. thaliana LRR-RLK genes (S2 Table). Surprisingly, 31 BrLRR-RLK genes were missing from crucifier genome building blocks that were confirmed by computational and manual curation, whereas the remaining 272 genes were categorized under 23 genomic blocks (GB) with a maximum of 30 in GB “U” and a minimum of 1 in “G”; moreover, 35 and 12 BrLRR-RLK genes have undergone tandem and segmental duplications (Fig 1, S2 Table and S3 Table). These results indicate that the duplication and uneven distribution of the genes on the chromosomes and GBs occurred because of duplication events during the process of evolution [3436].

Comparative phylogenetic analysis of LRR-RLK genes in A. thaliana, B. rapa, O. sativa, and P. trichocarpa

To identify the evolutionary relationships between the BrLRR-RLKs and other species, multiple alignments of 222, 303, 309 and 379 LRR-RLK proteins of A. thaliana, B. rapa, O. sativa and P. trichocarpa, respectively, were used for comparative phylogenetic analysis. The 1213 LRR-RLK proteins were divided into 15 subfamilies (I to XIV) according to the node support between the LRR-RLK genes [4,29,37] and to differentiate the subfamilies, each was indicated with a random color (Fig 2 and S1 Fig). Subfamily XII contained the most genes (186), followed by subfamilies III (181), XI (162), I (117), X (92), VII (88), VIII-2 (86), II (68), VI (52), V (43), VIII-1 (41), XIII (35) and IX (29), with the least number of genes in subfamilies XIV and IV (16 each) (S1 Fig). The origin of the RLK genes was predicted to be before the speciation of plants, animals, fungi and protists but expansion of this super-family might have occurred throughout land plant evolution [4,37]. The LRR-RLK genes of B. rapa and A. thaliana were evenly distributed among all the subfamilies but the rice and Populus LRR-RLK genes formed monophyletic clusters consisting of species-specific genes [30,38]. Similarly, monocot and dicot LRR-RLK genes were observed in all the subfamilies, indicating that expansion of the family might have occurred before their divergence [39]. Additionally, in our comparative phylogenetic analysis we observed that all the subfamilies comprised 30–80% monocot genes, but most contained 50–60% monocot genes. Surprisingly, subfamilies XII and VII contained the least number of dicot genes (20% and 25%, respectively). Comparison between monocot and dicot LRR-RLK gene numbers among the subfamilies revealed that gene duplication might have occurred largely within subfamilies XI in monocots and dicots, III and I in dicots and XII in monocots (S1 Fig). Since sister pairs denote the closest relatives of a group in a phylogenetic tree, we analyzed and predicted 342 pairs, this covered 56.3% of the total number of genes used in this study. These sister pairs included 288 pairs in the same species and 154 cross-species pairs, among which the highest number of cross-species pairs was 149 (AtLRR-RLK- BrLRR-RLK) (S2 Fig) and the least number was 1 (PtLRR-RLK- BrLRR-RLK). In the case of same-species pairs, the most pairs (140) were present in P. trichocarpa (PtLRR-RLK- PtLRR-RLK) followed by 92 in rice (OsLRR-RLK- OsLRR-RLK), 48 in B. rapa (BrLRR-RLK- BrLRR-RLK) and 8 in A. thaliana (AtLRR-RLK- AtLRR-RLK). Same-species sister pairs were observed in all the subfamilies but the cross-species pairs, except for AtLRR-RLK-BrLRR-RLK, were restricted to subfamilies III and I; furthermore, the maximum bootstrap values were found among these sister pairs (S1 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of LRR-RLKs of B. rapa, A. thaliana, O. sativa and P. trichocarpa.

The circular tree was generated using MEGA5.0 with 1213 genes through the neighbor-joining method. The genes were divided into 14 clusters (I to XIV) indicated in different colors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.g002

Additionally, subfamilies II, VIII-1, IX, XIII and XIV consisted of RD type BrLRR- RLK genes and subfamilies III, IV, V and XII were composed of non-RD type genes, while subfamilies I, VI, VII, VIII-2, X and XI had both RD and non-RD type BrLRR-RLK genes (S2 Table). Non-RD kinases are known to function mainly as pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) while RD kinases are involved in activation of the non-RD kinases [19,40]. Moreover, in our phylogeny we determined some of the important RD and non-RD LRR-RLK genes in different subfamilies that are involved in several functions related to plant growth and development, defense and plant immunity (S2 Table) [29,30,41].

Intron/exon structure and duplication analysis of BrLRR-RLK genes

Intron/exon patterns can be used as a source of information for predicting the evolutionary relationships and functions of genes, so we used the genomic and coding sequences of the 303 BrLRR-RLK genes to identify intron/exon structure. Variations in intron/exon patterns among the subfamilies were clearly observed, irrespective of RD or non-RD type BrLRR-RLK genes. Intron position conservation and intron density varies widely in eukaryotic genes [42]; accordingly, in our analysis all 15 subfamilies of BrLRR-RLK genes showed varying intron patterns. The highest number of introns, 24, was observed in a gene (BrLRR-RLK267/Bra007759) of subfamily XIII, the remaining genes of which contained between 0 and 22 introns. This was followed by subfamilies VIII-2 (12–23 introns), VIII-1 (12–21), I (0–18), V (8–15), II (5–10), VI (1–10), XI (1–10), III (1–9), XIV (2–5), XII (1–5), X (0–4), IV and IX (1–3), and VII (0–2) introns. Even though subfamilies VII, IV, IX, X, XII, III and XI had 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 9 and 10 introns at maximum, most BrLRR-RLK genes in these subfamilies had only one exon or 1–2 introns (Fig 3A and 3B, S2 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Intron/exon distribution of the 303 BrLRR-RLKs.

(A) Subfamily (VIII-2 to V), (B) Subfamily (III to X). The genes consist of intronic regions (black line) and/or exonic regions (green line), and blue denotes regions upstream/downstream of the genes and splicing phases: 0 refers to phase 0, 1 to phase 1, and 2 to phase 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.g003

Among the important RD and non-RD BrLRR-RLK genes, SRF29, FEI2, ERL1, RHS16, MRH1 and MEE39 had 10 or more introns, SERK1/3/4, TOAD2 and NIK1/2 had 5–10 introns, and TMK1, IMK2, TMKL1, MRLK, PRK2, FLS2, EFR, GSO2, SOBIR1, BAM13, IKU2, PEPR1/2, FLO5, CLV1, HSL1/2, MEE62, BRI1, PSKR1, BIR1, BRL1/3, VH1 and EXS had fewer than five introns and several genes had only one exon (Fig 3A and 3B, S3 Table). Similarly, previous studies have been shown that the introns influence gene expression through Intron Mediated Expression (IME) and Intron-Dependent Spatial Expression (IDSE) and a study on ERECTA gene given that multiple introns in specific location enhances its expression [4345]. In general, position of a intron indicates its conservation and site of gene expression in a plant [42,43], so in this study we performed manual calibration and found that almost all of the BrLRR-RLK genes had a greater number of splicing phase 2 introns, indicating a highly prone site for mutation in the intron and much less conservation. Intron phase 1 is intermediate and was the second most common phase found among the genes, but phase 0, which indicates highly conserved introns, was rare among these genes [46]. The results of our study, number of introns and splicing phases can be used further as a resource for identifying the affect of introns on BrLRR-RLK genes in different tissues.

Conserved motif identification in B. rapa LRR-RLK genes

The 303 BrLRR-RLK genes were divided into different groups (I–XIV) (S3 Fig) based on the phylogeny [4,5,37] and 25 motifs were identified through the MEME online tool and used to annotate the domain types. In total, 10 LRR motifs (9–13, 15, 17–19 and 25) were found in the BrLRR-RLK genes, with a common motif pattern among most of the genes in a subfamily and variation among the subfamilies. All 11 protein kinase motifs (1–8, 14, 16 and 20) were found in most of the genes in subfamilies II, IV, V, VII, VIII-1, VIII-2, IX, X and XIII but the remaining families did not have all 11 kinase motifs, which may have been because of the kinase domain size (Fig 4). Some additional motifs were also identified. The DUF1191 motif (22) was restricted to subfamilies VIII-2, VIII-1 and I. Similarly, the melactin motif (24) was identified in the genes of VIII-2 and one gene each in subfamilies VIII-1 and VI. Furthermore, unknown motifs (21, 23) were observed in subfamilies III, IV, XI, VII, XIII and X; motif 21 was found in II, I, VI and XII, and motif 23 was in V, XIII and XIV (Fig 4 and S4 Fig). These results support our BrLRR-RLK subfamily classification based on the phylogeny and also suggest that genes with different sets of protein domains in their sequences may have subfamily-specific functions in plant growth and development [29,37,39,47]. In addition, the motifs had varying lengths (11–36 aa) and numbers of sites (24–297), which are shown in Table 2. In the case of LRR motif types, the 303 BrLRR-RLK genes mostly contained LRR_8, followed by the leucine-rich-repeat N-terminal domain (LRRNT), LRR_6 and LRR_4, whereas the protein kinase motifs were mixed with protein kinase and protein kinase_Tyr (tyrosine kinase) [3,7] (Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Motif distribution among the BrLRR-RLK genes.

Twenty-five motifs in these genes were identified using the MEME search tool and grouped according to the phylogenetic tree. Each color indicates a different motif as shown at the bottom of the figure. Please refer to S5 Fig for the full size version of Fig 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.g004

thumbnail
Table 2. The amino acid patterns and characteristics of the 25 motifs identified in the 303 BrLRR-RLK genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.t002

In general, kinases are divided into two types, arginine-aspartate (RD) and non-arginine-aspartate (non-RD), based on the conservation of the amino acid Arg (R) in their sub-domains [48]. In this study, we identified 171 RD type and 132 non-RD BrLRR-RLK genes based on the conservation of the ‘RD’ amino acids (S2 Table and S4 Table). Similarly, previous results suggest that the percentage of non-RD type kinases is low in Arabidopsis and rice, and, moreover, this type of kinase plays a crucial role in pathogen recognition activity [48]. The average number of motifs was greater in subfamilies VII, X, XI and XII, and a few genes in XIII, but there was no specific difference between RD and non-RD type kinases. Additionally, among the 303 BrLRR-RLK genes, only 234 genes contained a transmembrane domain, and regarding SPs, 276 genes contained one SP, whereas eight genes had two SPs, which were mostly found in subfamilies III and XI, and only one gene had three SPs (in subfamily III); the remaining eight genes lacked a SP (S2 Table).

Classification of B. rapa LRR-RLRR- RLK genes according to their functions

Gene ontology annotations for the 303 BrLRR-RLK genes were retrieved using the Blast2Go software under the biological process, molecular function and cellular component categories. In the biological process category, the BrLRR-RLK genes were involved in 918 different processes with the highest number (249 genes) involved in cellular processes, followed by cellular metabolic processes (239), and phosphorylation and phosphate-containing compound metabolic processes (232) (S3 Table). Similarly, previous reports published on Arabidopsis suggest that LRR-RLK genes play roles in different cellular processes in relation to organ development and phosphorylation [10,4951]. Furthermore, the BrLRR-RLK genes were associated with 74 different molecular functions, with the highest number of genes involved in transferase activity, transferring phosphorus-containing groups (268), kinase activity (267), binding (233), phosphotransferase activity, and ‘alcohol group as acceptor and protein kinase activity’ (241). Consistent with our observations, previous studies have reported the important roles of LRR-RLK genes in relation to metabolic activities [3,5,40,51]. In general, receptor kinases are important for cell-to-cell interactions, so many of these proteins are associated with the cell surface [5,37]. Here, the BrLRR-RLK genes were associated with 66 different cellular components including the membrane (251), ‘cell and cell part’ (221), and ‘cell periphery and plasma membrane’ (207) (S5 Table).

Differential expression analysis of B. rapa LRR-RLK genes

The expression abundance of a gene in different tissues can be used as a source of information for identifying its function in particular tissues; thus, expression data for the 303 BrLRR-RLK genes were extracted separately from a whole transcriptome dataset [21]. The genes were grouped according to subfamily, and a heat map was generated to analyze the expression variation among six different tissues of Chiifu—callus, root, stem, leaf, flower and silique (Fig 5). Furthermore, a few BrLRR-RLK genes were named after their A. thaliana homologs (S2 Table). Numerous expression variations were observed in the heat map of BrLRR-RLK genes so these genes were clustered into groups according to their expression levels. In addition to silique, the genes BrLRR-RLK34, 207 and 224 of subfamily VIII-2 had detectable differential expression in all the tissues whereas the remaining genes of this subfamily have failed to express in any of the tissues so the expression results can be depicted as may be they have functional roles during different developmental stages (Fig 5). The genes BrLRR-RLK245, 248 and 261 of subfamily VI and BrLRR-RLK26, 64, 212 and 258 of subfamily XI had a high expression level in all tissues except that BrLRR-RLK245 and 212 had moderate expression in the silique. Jones et al. [52] reported that MRH1 is mainly involved in root hair elongation during tip growth in Arabidopsis; similarly in our results, a homolog of MRH1, BrLRR-RLK12 of subfamily VI, had high expression in the root compared with other tissues. The genes of subfamily VIII-1 showed detectable to high expression abundance in all the tissues except for BrLRR-RLK249, which was not expressed in the flower or silique.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Transcript abundance of 303 B. rapa LRR-RLK genes.

Microarray-based expression data for the genes downloaded from the Geo database were examined in six different tissues: callus, root, stem, leaf, flower and silique. The genes were grouped according to subfamily and the color scale at the bottom represents the expression values of the genes in the tissues. Please refer to S6 Fig for the full size version of Fig 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.g005

Generally, SERK genes function in anther development, male gametophyte maturation and disease resistance, whereas NIK genes function in signaling during virus infection [8,53,54]. Here, the genes BrLRR-RLK95 (SERK4) and 168 of subfamily II were only expressed in siliques, BrLRR-RLK110 was not expressed in any tissue and most of the remaining genes of this subfamily had detectable expression variation among all the tissues. In subfamily I, the genes BrLRR-RLK84, 126 and 215 had moderate to high expression in all tissues but the remaining genes of this subfamily had undetectable or no expression in a few tissues; moreover, the MEE and RHS genes of this subfamily are involved in embryo and root hair development [55,56] (Fig 5). A low to moderate expression level was observed for all three genes of subfamily XIV; conversely, in subfamily IV, four genes had moderate to high expression levels in most of the tissues. Among the 13 BrLRR-RLK genes of subfamily V, most showed detectable transcript abundance in all six different tissues; additionally, their homologous genes SRF1–8 and SUB/SRF9 of A. thaliana play major roles in leaf, stem, flower and inflorescence morphology and are also involved in cell wall biology, basic cell processes and abiotic stress [11,57]. Among the 52 genes of subfamily III, most had high expression levels in vegetative tissues like roots, stems and leaves compared with callus, flowers and siliques (Fig 5). Few homologs of the subfamily III genes have been published. Valon et al. [58] showed that TMKL1 is transcriptionally active in different organs and also regulates the development of silique maturation. Similarly, AtPRK2 is involved in pollen tube growth [59] and IMK functions in cell proliferation and cell fate determination [30].

In general, the subfamily XII genes EFR and FLS2 are up-regulated during biotic stress [41]. Accordingly, all 25 genes of subfamily XII had detectable expression or a complete absence of transcripts in most of the tissues. In subfamilies XI, VII, XIII and X, most of the genes showed high expression levels in roots, stems and leaves, and in addition, a few genes also showed moderate to high expression levels in callus, flowers and siliques (Fig 5). Their homologous genes are involved in different functions: CLV1, BAM1, BAM2 and BAM3 in cell differentiation and control of size in the shoot and floral meristem, GSO in normal development of the epidermal surface of embryos, HSL2 in flower abscission, TOAD2 and RPK1 in embryonic pattern formation, FEI2 in synthesis of cell wall components, ERL1 and ERL2 in promoting organ growth and flower development and BRL1, BRL3 and BRI1 in normal vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis shoots [10,49,6065]. Likewise, SOBIR1, PEPR1, PEPR2 and PSKR1 are mainly involved in defense responses, BRI1 and BAK1 in brassinosteroid signaling, and BIR1 in plant resistance [1417,66]. These expression data may be a valuable resource for further investigation of the functional significance of the BrLRR-RLK genes in B. rapa.

Biochemical analysis of BrLRR- RLK genes

For biochemical analysis, we created 11 BrLRR-RLK constructs with the cytoplasmic domain, which consisted of a juxtamembrane domain, kinase domain and C-terminal region. Previous studies suggested that Arabidopsis BAK1 identifies and phosphorylates E. coli proteins in vitro and a wide range of cytoplasmic domains including the juxtamembrane domain, and the C-terminal region regulates BAK1 kinase activity and specificity through auto-phosphorylation and trans-phosphorylation [67]. We transformed Flag-tagged recombinant protein expression constructs for LRR-RLK cytoplasmic domains into BL21 E. coli cells and then performed comparative biochemical assays with the recombinant proteins. The phosphorylation levels of the expressed recombinant proteins were assessed with phosphorylation-specific antibodies, anti-phosphothreonine and anti-phosphotyrosine.

The expression levels of the 11 recombinant LRR-RLK proteins were detected with anti-Flag. As shown in Fig 6, seven LRR-RLKs showed auto- and trans-phosphorylation activity. Even though RD kinases have auto-phosphorylation ability, some of the RD kinases (BrPSKR1 and BrPSY1) in our analysis did not phosphorylate tyrosine and/or threonine residues. This might have been because of a lack of catalytic activity at the target kinase [68]. Coomassie brilliant blue (CBB) staining of the total recombinant E. coli crude extract showed the protein expression. Interestingly, BrBAK1 had strong auto-phosphorylation and trans-phosphorylation of tyrosine and threonine residues compared with AtBAK1 in previous studies [69,70]. These data suggest that BrBAK1 has much stronger kinase activity, which might be a very interesting result because the BrBAK1 signaling pathway is involved in plant growth and development, plant innate immunity, programmed cell death, and other novel mechanisms with a different pattern compared with AtBAK1. Another interesting result was that the highly accumulated BrBAK1, BrBRI1, BrPEPR1 and BrPEPR2 proteins showed activity with both anti-phosphotyrosine and anti-phosphothreonine antibodies, indicating that they might have dual-specificity kinase activity.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Auto-phosphorylation of recombinant BrLRR- RLK’s in E. coli.

(A) Anti-phosphotyrosine immunoblots showing auto-phosphorylated proteins. (B) BrLRR-RLK genes showing auto-phosphorylation on anti-phosphothreonine residues. (C) Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining of total extracted crude proteins. (D) Recombinant BrLRR-RLK protein expression levels were detected with an anti-FLAG antibody.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.g006

To further confirm the auto-phosphorylation of the Flag-BrBRI1 receptor kinase, we induced the recombinant protein in E. coli cells and analyzed the protein over a time course of incubation after adding IPTG. As shown in Fig 7, Flag-BrBRI1 auto-phosphorylation showed a gradual increase from 6 to 16 h (approx. size 45 kDa and 150 kDa) and more E. coli proteins were phosphorylated by the Flag-BrBRI1 receptor kinase. Similarly, in anti-phosphothreonine analysis, auto-phosphorylation was observed from 4 h and showed the highest signal intensity at 16 h at around 50 kDa; in addition, several E. coli proteins were trans-phosphorylated. Compared with the phosphorylation of BrBRI-Flag with anti-phosphothreonine at 4 h, tyrosine auto-phosphorylation was observed at 6 h (Fig 7). These data suggest that specific threonine phosphosites were phosphorylated faster than specific tyrosine phosphosites on BrBRI1 in vitro. Similar to our results, previous research also proved that AtBRI1 kinase has the ability to phosphorylate at serine/threonine and tyrosine residues, which helps in different functions related to plant growth and development [71,72]. This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the broad role of Tyr and Thr phosphorylation for the function of B. rapa LRR-RLKs.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Immunoblot analysis of FLAG-BrBRI1 kinase phosphoprotein production over a time course.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.g007

Conclusion

Our results for the BrLRR-RLK gene family suggest that duplications led to the expansion of the gene family. Comparative phylogenetic analysis allowed us to predict sequence similarities and identify the genes specific to each subfamily and the variations among monocot and dicot species (A. thaliana, B. rapa, O. sativa and P. trichocarpa). Motif and structural analysis showed motif conservation and intron/exon pattern variations among the subfamilies. In addition, gene ontology and expression analysis revealed various functional roles and tissue-specific expression variations. Finally, biochemical analysis demonstrated the type of receptor kinase activity occurring in cells. These results will be a major resource for studying the adaptive evolution, molecular mechanisms and functions of LRR-RLKs in the near future.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Rectangular phylogenetic tree of LRR-RLKs from B. rapa, A. thaliana, O. sativa and P. trichocarpa.

The tree was generated using MEGA5.0 through the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap iterations and the genes were divided into 14 clusters (I to XIV, indicated in different colors).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Rectangular phylogenetic tree of LRR-RLKs from B. rapa and A. thaliana.

The tree was generated using MEGA5.0 through the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap iterations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. B. rapa phylogenetic analysis of LRR-RLK genes.

The tree was generated using MEGA5.0 through the neighbor-joining method with 1000 bootstrap iterations. The 14 clusters (I to XIV) are indicated in different colors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Amino acid conservation of the 25 motifs distributed in the B. rapa LRR-RLK genes.

The motifs were identified using the MEME search tool.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. Gene-specific primers used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s007

(DOC)

S2 Table. Detailed information and characteristics of the identified BrLRR-RLK genes.

(A) RD and (B) non-RD type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s008

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Details of the LRR-RLK gene duplications identified in the genome of B. rapa.

(A) Paralogical copies of B. rapa LRR-RLK genes and (B) Tandem and Segmental duplications of B. rapa LRR-RLK genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s009

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Amino acid sequence alignment for RD and non-RD type LRR-RLK genes identified in B. rapa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s010

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Gene Ontology of the 303 BrLRR-RLK genes.

(A) Biological process, (B) molecular function and (C) cellular localization.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142255.s011

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Golden Seed Project (No. 213002-04-3-SB110), Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF), Rural Development Administration (RDA) and Korea Forest Service (KFS). This research was also supported in part by research fund of Chungnam National University and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2014R1A1A401006751).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JJR VD YL MHO YPL SRC. Performed the experiments: JJR VD YL MHO XY. Analyzed the data: JJR VD YL MHO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MHO YPL SRC. Wrote the paper: JJR VD YL MHO SRC.

References

  1. 1. Warwick SI, Francis A, Al-Shehbaz IA. Brassicaceae: species checklist and database on CD-ROM. Plant Syst Evol. 2006; 259:249–258.
  2. 2. Walker JC, Zhang R. Relationship of a putative receptor protein kinase from maize to the S-locus glycoproteins of brassica. Nature. 1990; 345:743–746. pmid:2163028
  3. 3. Becraft PW. Receptor kinase signaling in plant development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002; 18:163–192. pmid:12142267
  4. 4. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2001b; 107:63–68.
  5. 5. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Plant receptor-like kinase gene family: diversity, function, and signaling. Sci STKE 2001a; 113:re22.
  6. 6. Kobe B, Deisenhofer J. The leucine-rich repeat: A versatile binding motif. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994; 19:415–421. pmid:7817399
  7. 7. Hanks SK, Hunter T. The eukaryotic protein kinase super-family: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 1995; 9:576–596. pmid:7768349
  8. 8. Colcombet J, Boisson-Dernier A, Ros-Palau R, Vera CE, Schroeder JI. Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASES1 and 2 are essential for tapetum development and microspore maturation. Plant Cell 2005; 17:3350–3361. pmid:16284306
  9. 9. Godiard L, Sauviac L, Torii KU, Grenon O, Mangin B, Grimsley NH, et al. ERECTA, an LRR receptor-like kinase protein controlling development pleiotropically affects resistance to bacterial wilt. Plant J 2003; 36:353–365. pmid:14617092
  10. 10. Shpak ED, Berthiaume CT, Hill EJ, Torii KU. Synergistic interaction of three ERECTA-family receptor-like kinases controls Arabidopsis organ growth and flower development by promoting cell proliferation. Development 2004; 131:1491–1501. pmid:14985254
  11. 11. Eyüboglu B, Pfister K, Haberer G, Chevalier D, Fuchs A, Mayer KF, et al. Molecular characterization of the STRUBBELIG-RECEPTOR FAMILY of genes encoding putative leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol.2007; 7: 16. pmid:17397538
  12. 12. Gomez-Gomez L, Boller T. FLS2: an LRR receptor-like kinase involved in the perception of the bacterial elicitor flagellin in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 2000; 5(6):1003–1011. pmid:10911994
  13. 13. Schwessinger B, Bahar O, Thomas N, Holton N, Nekrasov V, Ruan D, et al. Transgenic Expression of the Dicotyledonous Pattern Recognition Receptor EFR in Rice Leads to Ligand-Dependent Activation of Defense Responses. PLoS Pathog 2015; 11(3):e1004809. pmid:25821973
  14. 14. Yamaguchi Y, Huffaker A, Bryan AC, Tax FE, Ryan CA. PEPR2 is a second receptor for the PEP1 and PEP2 peptides and contributes to defense responses in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 2010; 22:508–522. pmid:20179141
  15. 15. Mosher S, Seybold H, Rodriguez P, Stahl M, Davies KA, Dayaratne S, et al. The tyrosine-sulfated peptide receptors PSKR1 and PSY1R modify the immunity of Arabidopsis to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens in an antagonistic manner. The Plant Journal 2013; 73:469–482. pmid:23062058
  16. 16. Wang Z, Meng P, Zhang X, Ren D, Yang S. BON1 interacts with the protein kinases BIR1 and BAK1 in modulation of temperature-dependent plant growth and cell death in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 2011; 67:1081–1093. pmid:21623975
  17. 17. Nam KH, Li J. BRI1/BAK1, a receptor kinase pair mediating Brassinosteroid signaling. Cell 2002, 110: 203–212. pmid:12150928
  18. 18. Krupa A, Preethi G, Srinivasan N. Structural modes of stabilization of permissive phosphorylation sites in protein kinases: distinct strategies in Ser/Thr and Tyr kinases. J Mol Biol 2004; 339: 1025–1039. pmid:15178245
  19. 19. Dardick C, Schwessinger B, Ronald P. Non-arginine-aspartate (non-RD) kinases are associated with innate immune receptors that recognize conserved microbial signatures. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2012; 15:358–366. pmid:22658367
  20. 20. Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, et al. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet 2011; 28:1035–1039.
  21. 21. Tong C, Wang X, Yu J, Wu J, Li W, Huang J, et al. Comprehensive analysis of RNA-seq data reveals the complexity of the transcriptome in Brassica rapa. BMC genomics 2013; 14: 689. pmid:24098974
  22. 22. Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. MEME suite: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:W202–W208. pmid:19458158
  23. 23. Stothard P. The Sequence Manipulation Suite: JavaScript programs for analyzing and formatting protein and DNA sequences. Biotechniques 2000; 28:1102–1104. pmid:10868275
  24. 24. Kall L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer EL. Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction—the phobias web server. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35(Web Server issue):W429–W432. pmid:17483518
  25. 25. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948. pmid:17846036
  26. 26. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739. pmid:21546353
  27. 27. Chomczynski P, Mackey K. Short technical report. Modification of the TRIZOL reagent procedure for isolation of RNA from polysaccharide and proteoglycan-rich sources. Biotechniques 1995; 19: 942–5. pmid:8747660
  28. 28. Oh MH, Wang X, Wu X, Zhao Y, Clouse SD, Huber SC. Autophosphorylation of Tyr-610 in the receptor kinase BAK1 plays a role in brassinosteroid signaling and basal defense gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010; 107:17827–17832. pmid:20876109
  29. 29. Gou X, He K, Yang H, Yuan T, Lin H, Clouse SD, et al. Genome-wide cloning and sequence analysis of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Genomics 2010; 11:19. pmid:20064227
  30. 30. Zan Y, Ji Y, Zhang Y, Yang S, Song Y, Wang J. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of populus leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase genes. BMC Genomics 2013; 14:318. pmid:23663326
  31. 31. Sun X, Wang G-L. Genome-wide identification, characterization and phylogenetic analysis of the Rice LRR-Kinases. PLoS ONE 2011; 6(3): e16079. pmid:21408199
  32. 32. Hwang SG, Kim DS, Jang CS. Comparative analysis of evolutionary dynamics of genes encoding leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase between rice and arabidopsis. Genetica 2011; 139(8):1023–1032. pmid:21879323
  33. 33. Sonnhammer EL, Koonin EV. Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet 2002; 18(12):619–620. pmid:12446146
  34. 34. Schranz ME, Lysak MA, Mitchell-Olds T. The ABC's of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes. Trends Plant Sci 2006; 11(11):535–542. pmid:17029932
  35. 35. Cheng F, Mandáková T, Wu J, Xie Q, Lysak MA, Wang X. Deciphering the diploid ancestral genome of the Mesohexaploid Brassica rapa. Plant Cell 2013; 25(5):1541–1554. pmid:23653472
  36. 36. Kim J, Lee J, Choi J-P, Park I, Yang K, Kim MK et al. Functional innovations of three chronological mesohexaploid Brassica rapa genomes. BMC Genomics 2014; 15:606. pmid:25033750
  37. 37. Shiu SH, Bleecker AB. Expansion of the receptor-like kinase/Pelle gene family and receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2003; 132: 530–543. pmid:12805585
  38. 38. Shiu SH, Li WH. Origins, lineage-specific expansions, and multiple losses of tyrosine kinases in eukaryotes. Mol Biol Evol 2004; 21(5):828–840. pmid:14963097
  39. 39. Shiu SH, Karlowski WM, Pan R, Tzeng YH, Mayer KF, Li WH. Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Cell 2004; 16:1220–1234. pmid:15105442
  40. 40. Diévart A, Clark SE. Using mutant alleles to determine the structure and function of leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2003; 6:507–516. pmid:12972053
  41. 41. Lehti-Shiu MD, Zou C, Hanada K, Shiu SH. Evolutionary history and stress regulation of plant receptor-like kinase/pelle genes. Plant Physiol 2009; 150(1):12–26. pmid:19321712
  42. 42. Rogozin IB, Sverdlov AV, Babenko VN, Koonin EV. Analysis of evolution of exon–intron structure of eukaryotic genes. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2005; 6(2):118–134. pmid:15975222
  43. 43. Morello L, Breviario D. Plant spliceosomal introns: not only cut and paste. Current Genomics 2008; 9:227–238. pmid:19452040
  44. 44. Karve R, Liu W, Willet SG, Torii KU, Shpak ED. The presence of multiple introns is essential for ERECTA expression in Arabidopsis. RNA 2011; 17:1907–1921. pmid:21880780
  45. 45. Chorev M and Carmel L. The function of introns. Front Genet. 2012; 3:55. pmid:22518112
  46. 46. Sharp PA. Speculations on RNA splicing. Cell 1981; 23:643–646. pmid:7226224
  47. 47. Wang J, Tan S, Zhang L, Li P, Tian D. Co-variation among major classes of LRR-encoding genes in two pairs of plant species. J Mol Evol 2011; 72(5–6):498–509. pmid:21626302
  48. 48. Dardick C, Ronald P. Plant and animal pathogen recognition receptors signal through non-RD kinases. PLoS Pathog 2006; 2(1):e2. pmid:16424920
  49. 49. Deyoung BJ, Bickle KL, Schrage KJ, Muskett P, Patel K, Clark SE. The CLAVATA1-related BAM1, BAM2 and BAM3 receptor kinase-like proteins are required for meristem function in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006; 45:1–16. pmid:16367950
  50. 50. ten Hove CA, Bochdanovits Z, Jansweijer VMA, Koning FG, Berke L, Sanchez-Perez GF, et al. Probing the roles of LRR RLK genes in Arabidopsis thaliana roots using a custom T-DNA insertion set. Plant Mol Biol. 2011; 76:69–83. pmid:21431781
  51. 51. Diévart A, Clark SE. LRR-containing receptors regulating plant development and defense. Development 2004; 131 (2): 251–261. pmid:14701679
  52. 52. Jones MA, Raymond MJ, Smirnoff N. Analysis of the root-hair morphogenesis transcriptome reveals the molecular identity of six genes with roles in root-hair development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 2006; 45:83–100. pmid:16367956
  53. 53. Roux M, Schwessinger B, Albrecht C, Chinchilla D, Jones A, Holton N, et al. The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor–like kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BKK1/SERK4 are required for innate immunity to hemibiotrophic and biotrophic pathogens. The Plant Cell 2011; 23: 2440–2455. pmid:21693696
  54. 54. Fontes EPB, Santos AA, Luz DF, Waclawovsky AJ, Chory J. The gemini virus nuclear shuttle protein is a virulence factor that suppresses transmembrane receptor kinase activity. Genes Dev 2004; 18:2545–2556. pmid:15489295
  55. 55. Pagnussat GC, Yu HJ, Ngo QA, Rajani S, Mayalagu S, Johnson CS, et al. Genetic and molecular identification of genes required for female gametophyte development and function in Arabidopsis. Development 2004; 132: 603–614.
  56. 56. Won SK, Lee YJ, Lee HY, Heo YK, Cho M, Cho HT. cis-Element- and transcriptome-based screening of root hair-specific genes and their functional characterization in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 2009; 150:1459–1473. pmid:19448035
  57. 57. Chevalier D, Batoux M, Fulton L, Pfister K, Yadav RK, Schellenberg M, et al. STRUBBELIG defines a receptor kinase-mediated signaling pathway regulating organ development in Arabidopsis. PNAS 2005; 102 (25):9074–9079. pmid:15951420
  58. 58. Valon C, Smalle J, Goodman HM, Giraudat J. Characterization of an Arabidopsis thaliana gene (TMKL1) encoding a putative transmembrane protein with an unusual kinase-like domain. Plant Molecular Biology 1993; 23: 415–421. pmid:8219075
  59. 59. Zhao XY, Wang Q, Li S, Ge FR, Zhou LZ, McCormick S, et al. The juxtamembrane and carboxy-terminal domains of Arabidopsis PRK2 are critical for ROP-induced growth in pollen tubes. Journal of Experimental Botany 2013; 64(18): 5599–5610. pmid:24136420
  60. 60. Clark SE, Williams RW, Meyerowitz EM. The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 1997; 89(4):575–585. pmid:9160749
  61. 61. Tsuwamoto R, Fukuoka H, Takahata Y. GASSHO1 and GASSHO2 encoding a putative leucine-rich repeat transmembrane-type receptor kinase are essential for the normal development of the epidermal surface in Arabidopsis embryos. Plant J 2008; 54(1):30–42. pmid:18088309
  62. 62. Stenvik GE, Tandstad NM, Guo Y, Shi CL, Kristiansen W, Holmgren A, et al. The EPIP peptide of INFLORESCENCE DEFICIENT IN ABSCISSION is sufficient to induce abscission in Arabidopsis through the receptor-like kinases HAESA and HAESA-LIKE2. The Plant Cell 2008, 20: 1805–1817. pmid:18660431
  63. 63. Nodine MD, Yadegari R, Tax FE. RPK1 and TOAD2 are two receptor-like kinases redundantly required for Arabidopsis embryonic pattern formation. Dev Cell 2007; 12(6): 943–956. pmid:17543866
  64. 64. Xu SL, Rahman A, Baskin TI, Kieber JJ. Two leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases mediate signaling linking cell wall biosynthesis and ACC synthase in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2008; 20:3065–3079. pmid:19017745
  65. 65. Delgado AC, Yin Y, Yu C, Vafeados D, García SM, Cheng JC, et al. BRL1 and BRL3 are novel brassinosteroid receptors that function in vascular differentiation in Arabidopsis. Development 2004; 131:5341–5351. pmid:15486337
  66. 66. Liebrand TWH, van den Burg HA, Joosten MHAJ. Two for all: receptor-associated kinases SOBIR1 and BAK1. Trends in Plant Science 2014; 19(2):123–132. pmid:24238702
  67. 67. Oh MH, Wang X, Kim SY, Wu X, Clouse SD, Huber SC. The carboxy-terminus of BAK1 regulates kinase activity and is required for normal growth of Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2014; 5:16. pmid:24550926
  68. 68. Oh MH, Clouse SD, Huber SC. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the BRI1 receptor kinase occurs via a post-translational modification and is activated by the juxtamembrane domain. Front. Plant Sci. 2012; 3:175. pmid:22891071
  69. 69. Oh MH, Wang X, Wud X, Zhao Y, Clouse SD, Huber SC. Functional importance of BAK1 tyrosine phosphorylation in vivo. Plant Signaling & Behavior 2011; 6:400–405. pmid:21350342
  70. 70. Wu X, Oh MH, Kim HS, Schwartz D, Imai BS, Yau PM, et al. Transphosphorylation of E. coli Proteins during Production of Recombinant Protein Kinases Provides a Robust System to Characterize Kinase Specificity. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2012; 3:262. pmid:23226150
  71. 71. Friedrichsen DM, Joazeiro CA, Li J, Hunter T, Chory J. Brassinosteroid insensitive-1 is a ubiquitously expressed leucine-rich repeat receptor serine/threonine kinase. Plant Physiol. 2000; 123:1247–1256. pmid:10938344
  72. 72. Oh MH, Wang X, Kota U, Goshe MB, Clouse SD, Huber SC. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the BRI1 receptor kinase emerges as a component of brassinosteroid signaling in Arabidopsis. PNAS 2009; 106:658–663. pmid:19124768