Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The Impact of Comorbid Depression on Educational Inequality in Survival after Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Cohort of 83 062 Patients and a Matched Reference Population

The Impact of Comorbid Depression on Educational Inequality in Survival after Acute Coronary Syndrome in a Cohort of 83 062 Patients and a Matched Reference Population

  • Merete Osler, 
  • Eva Prescott, 
  • Ida Kim Wium-Andersen, 
  • Else Helene Ibfelt, 
  • Martin Balslev Jørgensen, 
  • Per Kragh Andersen, 
  • Terese Sara Høj Jørgensen, 
  • Marie Kim Wium-Andersen, 
  • Solvej Mårtensson
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Patients with low socioeconomic position have higher rates of mortality after diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), but little is known about the mechanisms behind this social inequality. The aim of the present study was to examine whether any educational inequality in survival after ACS was influenced by comorbid conditions including depression.

Methods

From 2001 to 2009 all first-time ACS patients were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry. This cohort of 83 062 ACS patients and a matched reference population were followed for incident depression and mortality until December 2012 by linkage to person, patients and prescription registries. Educational status was defined at study entry and the impact of potential confounders and mediators (age, gender, cohabitation status, somatic comorbidity and depression) on the relation between education and mortality were identified by drawing a directed acyclic graph and analysed using multiple Cox regression analyses.

Findings

During follow-up, 29 583(35.6%) of ACS patients and 19 105(22.9%) of the reference population died. Cox regression analyses showed an increased mortality in the lowest educated compared to those with high education in both ACS patients and the reference population. Adjustment for previous and incident depression or other covariables only attenuated the relations slightly. This pattern of associations was seen for mortality after 30 days, 1 year and during total follow-up.

Conclusion

In this study the relative excess mortality rate in lower educated ACS patients was comparable with the excess risk associated with low education in the background population. This educational inequality in survival remained after adjustment for somatic comorbidity and depression.

Introduction

A large number of studies reviewed in Table 1 [122] have shown that patients with low socioeconomic position (SEP) have higher rates of mortality after diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Furthermore, some of these studies have examined factors that might explain this social inequality [1,57,911,14,15,1822]. ACS patients with low SEP more often have ACS risk factors [7,10,20], more severe ACS and somatic comorbidity [1,4,5,7,9,10,14,15,18,2022], wait longer for acute treatments [2,6,7,22, 23] and receive less advanced treatments [1,2,57,9,12,1921, 24,25]. However, in most studies adjustment for ACS risk factors and severity of the disease, somatic comorbidity, waiting time and treatment factors only seem to explain a part of the social inequality in survival after ACS [1,6,7,911,14,15,1822]. Depression is more frequent in groups with lower SEP and is also a significant prognostic factor for ACS [26,27] and might thus contribute to explain the social inequality in survival after ACS [28] but this is scarcely investigated. As Table 1 shows, 12 of the studies listed in Table 1[1,47,9,10,14,15,19,21,22] have examined the influence of comorbidity on the association between SEP and survival after ACS, but they have only accounted for somatic comorbidity, but not examined the influence of depression. Further, none of the studies have included a reference population to compare whether the social inequality in mortality in ACS patients compares to the mortality inequality in the general population. A difference between ACS patients and the reference population might reflect the influence of factors attributed to the disease (ACS). The aims of the present study were 1: to examine whether educational status was associated with mortality in first time ACS patients compared to a matched reference population and 2: to explore if any educational differences in mortality were explained by comorbid conditions including depression.

thumbnail
Table 1. Studies exploring the association between socioeconomic position (SEP) and survival after incident Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141598.t001

Methods

The present study was based on linking information from the following Danish population based registers: The National Patient Register (NPR), the Civil Registration System (CPR), The Danish Prescription Register (DPR), and the Integrated Database for Labour Market Research (IDA) [29] using the unique 10 digit person identification number as key. The study was evaluated and approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency. Informed consent was not obtained as patient information was anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis. The anonymous data files are available at a server in Statistics Denmark.

Study cohort

ACS patients were derived from the NPR, which provides information on date of admission and discharge diagnosis (according to International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10) of all diseases leading to hospital admission and outpatient’s visits by citizens in Denmark since 1979 and 1995, respectively. For this study, all first time hospitalizations of ACS in subjects over 15 years of age occurring from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2009 were identified (n = 97 793) by the following specific ICD10 codes: I20.0 Unstable angina pectoris, I21.0-I21.3 ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), I21.4 Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and I21.9 an acute myocardial infarction non specified (AMI). A comparable reference population was established by 1:1 matching on gender, age, and municipality on time of ACS diagnose using information from the CPR. A reference person might later develop ACS and become a case, while an ACS case could not be sampled as reference.

Data

Socioeconomic position.

Information on SEP was obtained from the IDA database which holds individual level information on socioeconomic variables such as education, income and attachment to the labour marked since 1980. For the present study education was defined as the highest level of education registered at study entry and grouped in three categories: Basic education (7–9 grade of obligatory schooling), medium education (high school degree or vocational), higher education (more than high school degree). Information on educational status was not available for those born before 1921 (n = 25 010) and for 4 098 other subjects, e.g. adult immigrants. The 14 731 ACS patients and 14 377 of the reference population with missing information were excluded from the present analyses.

Outcome measures.

The population was followed for time of death by all causes in the CPR. To investigate whether the social difference in mortality varied over time and to allow comparison with results from previous studies, deaths within 30 days and one year after study entry as well as at end of follow-up (December 2012) were main outcomes.

Covariables.

Hospital main or secondary diagnosis of depression in both ACS patients and the reference population were obtained from the NPR using ICD-10 codes: F31.3–33;34.1. Use of antidepressant medication was obtained from the DPR which contains information on outpatient prescription drug use by all citizens of Denmark since 1995. Each prescription record contains detailed information on the drug dispensed (Anatomic Therapeutical Classification (ATC) system name), the date and the civil registration number of the person purchasing the drug. We obtained information about every prescription of antidepressants claimed by cohort members from 1995 to 2012 using the ATC codes N06A. Previous depression was defined as any discharge diagnosis of depression or medication with prescription of antidepressants for at least the last five years and up to fifteen years preceding the ACS event or study entry (for the reference population sample). Incident depression was defined as any discharge diagnosis of depression or medication with prescription of antidepressants after ACS event or study entry and the following two years. About 13% of depression cases had a ICD-10 code, while the remaining 87% were defined by an ATC-code. Antidepressants might be prescribed for various diseases and single prescriptions seem to be more frequent in subjects with no recorded depression diagnosis [30]. Consequently, we performed a sensitivity analysis excluding the 10% of cohort members who had been defined with an incident depression due to a single purchase of antidepressants. We also examined whether type of diagnosis definition (ICD-10 or ATC code) changed the influence of comorbid depression on the association between education and mortality.

Information on gender, age and cohabitation status from the CPR were also included as potential confounding or mediating factors together with data on somatic comorbidity and purchase of statins (ACT-code:C10AA) five years preceding study entry. Statin use might influence the development of depression [31] or other comorbidities and has been associated with SEP in previous studies [32]. Comorbidities were defined with data from DPR and NPR on medical treatment or hospitalization for stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, obesity, diabetes and liver-, kidney-, connective tissue and inflammatory diseases. The diseases included were assumed to be associated with both SEP and mortality. Each disease was dichotomized to yes/no and the total number of comorbidities was counted and grouped as 0; 1 to 2 and 3 or more.

Statistical analyses

We analysed the association between educational status at study entry and mortality after 30 days, one year and at end of follow up using Cox regression with time since study entry as the underlying time scale. Person-years of follow-up were accumulated from time of study entry and were terminated at time of death, emigration, or the end of follow–up, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 5.0 years (range: 0.0–12.0 years). The covariables included in the multiple regression models were selected based on the directed acyclic graph [33] presented in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Directed acyclic graph of the assumed relationship between education and mortality with paths used for identifying potential confounding and mediating factors.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141598.g001

The inspection of the 17 paths linking education and mortality identified somatic comorbidity and depression as mediators and age and gender as confounding covariables. The influence of somatic comorbidities was examined both by entering the 9 disease item and as a sum score. Incident depression was entered as a time-dependent variable in the models. The proportional hazard assumption was examined by inspection of cumulative incidence plots and tested on the basis of Schoenfeld’s residuals. We examined whether the association between education and mortality was the same in ACS patients as in the reference by including an interaction term (Education*ACS patients/reference-status) tested using the likelihood ratio test. To explore if any educational differences in mortality were modified by comorbid depression, we introduced and tested the interaction term (Education*depression). All statistical analyses were carried out in STATA version 13.

Results

Table 2 shows that in both ACS patients and in the reference population, subjects with low educational status had more somatic comorbidities and were more often statin users than the highly educated cohort members. Previous depression was also more frequent among the lower educated who also had higher rates of incident depressions. During 12 years follow-up, 29 583 (35.6%) of ACS patients and 19 105 (22.9%) of the reference population died. The crude death rates were highest among the lowest educated (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Characteristics of patients admitted first time with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a reference population in Denmark.

According to educational status at study entry.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141598.t002

Due to the higher mortality in ACS patients, the absolute number of deaths, e.g. 1 year after study entry attributed to low education was 95 per 1000 py compared to 30 per 1000 py in the reference population. The Cox regression analyses showed a gradually increasing mortality rate during the first 30 days after study entry in the middle and lower educated compared to those with high education in both ACS patients and the reference population (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Association between educational status and all-cause mortality in patients admitted first time with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and a reference population in Denmark.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141598.t003

Adjustment for the suggested confounding and mediating factors (Fig 1) had very slight influence on the associations. Similar associations with a dose-response pattern between educational level and mortality were seen for mortality after 1 year and during total follow-up. The tests for interactions also showed that the estimates for the influence of educational status on mortality did not differ between ACS patients and the reference population. Similar did comorbid depression not modify the relation between educational level and mortality. The sensitivity analyses based on the 13% of depression cases defined only by ICD-10 codes or with exclusion of the 10% with only a single prescription of antidepressants, gave results very similar to those presented in Table 3 based on depression defined by a discharge diagnosis or purchase of antidepressants independent of number of prescriptions purchased.

Discussion

In agreement with a number of previous studies outlined in Table 1 we found that low educational status was associated with increased mortality after ACS. Although depression and somatic comorbidities were associated with education, these variables had limited impact on the association between education and mortality for both ACS patients and the reference population. As expected,low education was also associated with increased mortality in the reference population but to our surprise the relative mortality risks for lower educated were similar for ACS patients and the reference population. This indicates that the social inequality in survival after ACS is not a result of differences in the treatment of these patients but rather caused by some more common background factors, such as family environment [34].

The strengths of the present study are the large, unselected cohort of all patients admitted with first time ACS in the period from 2001 to 2009 in Denmark and the inclusion of a reference population. Importantly, however, subjects who experienced a fatal ACS event outside hospital as first manifestation of the disease were not included, but they form a minority of ACS patients with SEP inequalities similar to those for ACS patients dying in hospital [8,14]. Thus, we find it unlikely that this would influence the findings of the present study. Other strengths include valid information on educational status collected at the individual patient level, however, this information was missing for cohort members born before 1920 independent of their educational or disease risk. Consequently, we find it unlikely that it could induce selection bias. Information on previous and incident depression was classified based on hospital diagnoses and purchase of antidepressants from nation-wide registers with high completeness and good validity. The use of purchases of antidepressants in the definition of depression is a limitation due to risk of misclassification of cases that use antidepressants for other conditions and of the less severe depressions, which may be untreated or treated with psychotherapy. A random misclassification of this covariate might have reduced its explanatory impact. However, in sensitivity analysis based on the depression cases defined only by ICD-10 codes or when excluding those with only a single prescription of antidepressants, results were similar to those presented in this paper, thereby supporting the validity of the results.

In conclusion, the relative excess mortality rate in lower educated ACS patients seems to be comparable with the excess risk associated with low education in the background population and this inequality was not explained by somatic comorbidity or depression. Due to the higher mortality in ACS patients the absolute number of deaths attributed to low education was higher among these than in the reference population.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MO. Performed the experiments: MO. Analyzed the data: MO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MO SM. Wrote the paper: MO EP IKWA EI MBJ PKA TSHJ MKWA SM.

References

  1. 1. Alter DA, Naylor CD, Austin P, Tu JV. Effects of socioeconomic status on access to invasive cardiac procedures and on mortality after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1359–1367. pmid:10536129
  2. 2. Salomma V, Miettinen H, Niemelä M, Ketonen M, Mähönen M, Immonen-Räihä P et al. Relation of socioeconomic position to the case fatality, prognosis and treatment of myocardial infarction events; the FINMONICA MI Register Study. J Epidemiol Comm Health 2001; 55:475–482.
  3. 3. Cesana G, Ferrario M, Gigante S, Sega R, Toso C, Achilli F. Socio-occupational differences in acute myocardial infarction case-fatality and coronary care in a northern Italian population. Int J Epidemiol 2001;30 Suppl 1:S53–S58. pmid:11759853
  4. 4. Rasmussen JN, Rasmussen S, Gislason GH, Buch P, Abildstrom SZ, Kober L et al. Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006;60:351–356. pmid:16537354
  5. 5. Alter DA, Chong A, Austin PC, Mustard C, Iron K, Williams JI et al. Socioeconomic status and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2006;144:82–93. pmid:16418407
  6. 6. Bernheim SM, Spertus JA, Reid KJ, Bradley EH, Desai RA, Peterson ED et al. Socioeconomic disparities in outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2007;153:313–319. pmid:17239695
  7. 7. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Killian JM, Therneau TM, Jacobsen SJ, Roger V. Neighbourhood income and individual education: Effect on survival after myocardial infarction. Mayo Clin Porc 2008; 83:663–9.
  8. 8. Rosvall M, Gerward S, Engström G, Hedblad BO. Income and short-term case-fatality after myocardial infarction in whole middle-aged population of Malmö, Sweden. Eur J Public Health 2008;18:233–8.
  9. 9. Rosvall M, Chaix B, Lynch J, Lindström , Merlo J. The association between socioeconomic position, use of revascularisation procedures and five-year survival after recovery from acute myocardial infarction. BMC Public Health 2008;8:44 pmid:18241335
  10. 10. Gerber Y, Benyamini Y, Goldbourt U, Drory Y. Neigbohood socioeconomic context and long-term survival after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2010: 121:375–83. pmid:20065165
  11. 11. Molshatzski N, Drory Y, Myers V, Goldbourt U, Benyamini Y, Steinberg DM et al. Role of socioeconomic status measures in long-term mortality risk predication after myocardial infarction. Med Care 2011;49:673–8. pmid:21666512
  12. 12. Metha RH, O´Shea Jc; Stebbins AL, Granger C B, Armstrong PW, White HD et al. Association of mortality with years of education in patients with ST-segment elevation Myocardial infraction treated with fibrinolysis. J Am Coll Cardiology 2011; 57:138–147.
  13. 13. Lammintausta A, Immonen-Räihä P, Airaksinen JKE, Torppa J, Harald K, Ketonen M, Lehto S et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in the morbidity and mortality of acute coronary event in Finland: 1988 to 2000. Ann Epidemiol 2012,22:87–93. pmid:22226031
  14. 14. Oeffelen AAM, Agyemang C, Bots ML, Stronks K, Koopman C, Rossem L et al. The relation between socioeconomic status and short-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction perisist in the elderly: results from nationwide study. Eur J Epidemiol 2012;27:605–13. pmid:22669358
  15. 15. Stirbu I, Looman C, Nijhof GJ, Reulings PG, Machenbach JF. Income inequalitites in case death of ischaemic heart disease in the Netherlands: a national record-linkage study. J Epidemiol Comm Health 2012;66:1159–66.
  16. 16. Yang D, Dzayee DAM, de Faire U, Alfredsoson L, Moradi T. Incidence and case fatality after day 28 of first time myocardial infarction in Sweden 1987–2008. Prev Cardiol 2011; 19:1304–15.
  17. 17. Foraker RE, Patel MD, Whitsel EA, Suchindran CM, Heiss G, Rose KM. Neighborhood socioeconomic disparities and 1 year case fatality after incident myocardial infarction: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) community Surveillance (1992–2002). Am Heart J 2013;165:102–7. pmid:23237140
  18. 18. Coady SA, Johnson N J, Hakes JK, Sorlie PD. Individual education, area income, and mortality and recurrence of myocardial infarction in a Medicare cohort: the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. BMC Public Health 20014;14:705.
  19. 19. Gnavi R, Rusciani R, Dalmasso M, Gimmaria M, Anselmino M, Roggeri DP et al. Gender, socioeconomic position, revacularisation procedures and mortality in patients presenting with STEMI and NSTEMI in the era of primary PCI. Differneces or inequalitites? Int J Cardiol 2014;176:724–30. pmid:25183535
  20. 20. Kirchberger I, Meisinger C, Golüke H, Heier M, Kuch B, Peters A, et al. Long-term survival among older patients with myocardial infarction by educational level: results from the MONICA/KORA myocardial infarction registry. Int J Equity Health. 2014:13:19. pmid:24552463
  21. 21. Igland J, Vollset SE, Nygård OK, Sulo G, Sulo E, Ebbing M et al. Educational inequalities in 28 days and 1-year mortality after hospitalization for incident myocardial infarction- A natonwide cohort study. Int J Cardiol 2014; 177:874–80. pmid:25453405
  22. 22. Mårtensson S, Gyrd-Hansen D, Prescott E, Andersen PK, Gislason G, Jacobsen RK et al. Does access to invasive examination and treatment influence socioeconomic differences in case fatality for patients admitted first time with non ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction or unstable angina? Eurointervention 2015 Sep 8;11(5). pii: 20140519–01. pmid:26348677
  23. 23. Pell JP, Pell AC, Norrie J, Ford I, Cobbe SM. Effect of socioeconomic deprivation on waiting time for cardiac surgery: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 2000;320:15–18. pmid:10617517
  24. 24. Hanley GE, Morgan S, Reid RJ. Income-related inequity in initiation of evidence-based therapies among patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:1329–1335. pmid:21751053
  25. 25. Rasmussen JN, Rasmussen S, Gislason GH, Abildstrom SZ, Schramm TK, Torp-Pedersen C, et al. Persistent socio-economic differences in revascularization after acute myocardial infarction despite a universal health care system-a Danish study. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2007;21:449–457. pmid:17955357
  26. 26. Lichtman JH, Froelicher ES, Blumenthal JA, Carney RM, Doering LV, Frasure-Smith N, et al. Depression as a risk factor for poor prognosis among patients with acute coronary syndrome: Systematic Review and recommendations. A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129:1350–69. pmid:24566200
  27. 27. Lorant V, Deliege D, Eaton W, Robert A, Philippot P, Ansseau M. Socioeconomic inequalities in depression: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:98–112. pmid:12522017
  28. 28. Mathews K.A., Gallo L.C.,Taylor S.E. Are psychosocial factors mediators of socioeconomic status and health connections? A progress report and blueprint for the future. Ann.N.YAcad Sci 2010; 1186, 146–173.
  29. 29. Thygesen LC, Daasnes C, Thaulow I, Brønnum-Hansen H. Introduction to Danish (nationwide) registers on health and social issues: Structure, acces,legislation and archiving. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39 7 Suppl.:12–16. pmid:21898916
  30. 30. Pasco JA, Jacka FN, Williams LJ, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA et al. Clinical implications of the cytokine hypothesis of depression: the association between use of statins and aspirin and risk of major depression. Psychother Psychosom 2010;79:323–5. pmid:20689351
  31. 31. Gardarsdottir H, Egberts ACG, van Dijk L, Sturkenboom MCJM, Heerdink ER. An algortithm to identify antidepressant users with a diagnosis of depression from prescription data. Pharmacoepidemiol & Drug Safety 2009;18(1):7–15.
  32. 32. Rasmussen JN, Gislason G, Køber L, Rasmussen S, Abildstrøm S,Schramm TK et al Use of statins and beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education J Epidemiol Comm Health 2007;61:1091–7.
  33. 33. Hernan MA, Robins J. Causal Inference. Chapmans Hall/CRC 2015. http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/miguel-hernan/causal-inference-book/
  34. 34. Adler NE., Stewart J. Health disparities across the lifespan: meaning, methods, and mechanisms. Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci 2010, 1186, 5–23. pmid:20201865