Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Characterization of Bacterial Communities Associated with the Tyrian Purple Producing Gland in a Marine Gastropod

  • Ajit Kumar Ngangbam,

    Affiliation Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia

  • Abdul Baten,

    Affiliation Southern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia

  • Daniel L. E. Waters,

    Affiliation Southern Cross Plant Science, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia

  • Steve Whalan,

    Affiliation Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia

  • Kirsten Benkendorff

    kirsten.benkendorff@scu.edu.au

    Affiliation Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480, Australia

Characterization of Bacterial Communities Associated with the Tyrian Purple Producing Gland in a Marine Gastropod

  • Ajit Kumar Ngangbam, 
  • Abdul Baten, 
  • Daniel L. E. Waters, 
  • Steve Whalan, 
  • Kirsten Benkendorff
PLOS
x

Abstract

Dicathais orbita is a marine mollusc recognised for the production of anticancer compounds that are precursors to Tyrian purple. This study aimed to assess the diversity and identity of bacteria associated with the Tyrian purple producing hypobranchial gland, in comparison with foot tissue, using a high-throughput sequencing approach. Taxonomic and phylogenetic analysis of variable region V1-V3 of 16S rRNA bacterial gene amplicons in QIIME and MEGAN were carried out. This analysis revealed a highly diverse bacterial assemblage associated with the hypobranchial gland and foot tissues of D. orbita. The dominant bacterial phylum in the 16S rRNA bacterial profiling data set was Proteobacteria followed by Bacteroidetes, Tenericutes and Spirochaetes. In comparison to the foot, the hypobranchial gland had significantly lower bacterial diversity and a different community composition, based on taxonomic assignment at the genus level. A higher abundance of indole producing Vibrio spp. and the presence of bacteria with brominating capabilities in the hypobranchial gland suggest bacteria have a potential role in biosynthesis of Tyrian purple in D. orbita.

Introduction

Tyrian purple is a dye of historical and religious importance [1, 2] and its indole precursors are reported to have potential anticancer and antimicrobial properties [38]. Muricid molluscs are the only natural source of Tyrian purple [2], which is formed as a secondary metabolite from indoxyl sulfate precursors stored in the hypobranchial gland [4, 9]. The main pigment in Tyrian purple (6, 6’ dibromoindigo) was the first marine natural product to be structurally elucidated [10], however, even a century later, little information is available on its biosynthesis or the potential role of endosymbiotic bacteria in its production [4]. 6, 6’ Dibromoindigo is the brominated derivative of the blue dye indigo, produced by plants [11, 12] and a range of bacteria [1315]. The formation of halogenated marine natural products (mostly containing chlorine and bromine), requires enzymes, such as halogenases and haloperoxidases [16]. Bromoperoxidases are believed to be involved in the bromination of indoxyl sulfate precursors, resulting in Tyrian purple biosynthesis in muricid molluscs [17, 18]. Several marine bacteria such as Psychrobacter sp., Vibrio sp., Pseudomonas sp. and Streptomyces sp. produce halogenases [1923], while Pseudomonas sp. [2426], Streptomyces sp. [2730] and Synechococcus sp. [31] are known to produce bromoperoxidases.

Bacterial profiling using pyrosequencing is an efficient approach for identifying the diversity of endo-symbiotic bacteria and their interactions within marine invertebrates. For instance, metagenome analysis has revealed the remarkable diversity of bacterial symbionts in sponges [32, 33] and the presence of biosynthetic genes in sponge microbial symbionts [34, 35]. Other studies have highlighted the host–symbiont biochemical interactions between Proteobacterium sp. and the deep sea tube worm, Riftia sp. [3638]. Thus, targeted metagenomic studies can elucidate a range of species associations and functional relationships.

The Australian muricid, Dicathais orbita, provides a useful model for studying Tyrian purple, and the biosynthesis of anticancer brominated indoles more generally [4]. In preliminary studies, three indole producing bacteria were cultured from the Tyrian purple producing hypobranchial glands of D. orbita. However, these studies relied on traditional culture methods and yielded a relatively low number of bacteria, with just 16 distinct strains isolated from all tissues, only three of which were from the Tyrian purple producing gland [39]. Culturing most marine bacteria is difficult, with only an estimated 0.001–0.1% of marine microbes being successfully cultured [40]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the diversity of bacteria associated with the Tyrian purple producing hypobranchial gland using high-throughput sequencing (454 GS FLX Titanium) of the variable region V1-V3 of the 16S rRNA bacterial gene. Comparison of these sequences with equivalent sequences isolated from foot tissue will contribute to the identification of bacteria specifically associated with, or more abundant in, the Tyrian purple producing hypobranchial gland. A further aim was to identify bacteria with potential to produce indoles and brominated compounds, based on their taxonomic affiliation.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and maintenance

Adult specimens of D. orbita were collected under permit number F89/1171-6.0 and P10/0069-1.0 issued by Department of Primary Industries, (NSW) Australia. Six live snails were collected from the intertidal rocky reefs of Flat Rock, Ballina (28°84′ S and 153°60′ E), NSW, Australia, during low tides in April and July 2014. Snails were held in aerated seawater tanks for a maximum of 24 hours before processing.

Snail dissection and total DNA extraction

The hard shell of D. orbita was removed by applying pressure between the primary body whorl and spire using a bench vice [41]. The hypobranchial glands and the foot were carefully rinsed by pipetting with sterile sea water to remove any sediment before dissecting. Total genomic DNA from triplicate female and male hypobranchial glands, as well as the female and male foot, was extracted using the QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and concentrations were determined with agarose gel electrophoresis and a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific) and then stored at –20°C pending analysis. Only those samples that passed quality control checks were used in the 16s rDNA bacterial profiling libraries, so in total only duplicate samples were obtained for each gender and tissue combination.

Roche GS- FLX amplicon sequencing

Bacterial diversity of the biosynthetic organ (hypobranchial glands) and non-biosynthetic tissues (foot) of D. orbita were characterised by high-throughput sequencing (454 GS FLX amplicon sequencing) [42] using the primer pair of 27F/519R that targeted the variable region V1-V3 of 16S rRNA bacterial gene [43, 44]. DNA samples were shipped to Macrogen Inc, South Korea [45] for high-throughput sequencing. GS FLX data processing was performed using Roche GS FLX software (v 2.9) in two stages, image processing and signal processing. Image processing involves normalization of raw images and generation of raw signals. In the signal processing stage, correction, filtering, and raw signal trimming were done prior to base calling with corresponding quality score of reads. Sequence reads from each sample were segregated with in-house script (Macrogen) using the tag (Barcode) sequences, and by matching the initial and final bases of the reads to the known tag sequences used in the preparation of the libraries.

Bioinformatics analysis

Sequences were filtered for low quality bases and chimeric sequences. Only sequences of 100 bp., or more, were selected for final analysis. All sequence analyses were performed using QIIME version 1.8.0 [46] and open-reference operational taxonomic units (OTUs) picking strategy was employed. OTUs were picked based on 97% sequence similarity using UCLUST algorithm [47] and taxonomies were assigned against the well curated Silva_119 database [48]. The parameters used for OTU picking and taxonomic assignments are as follows: pick_otus.py -i all.merged.min100bp.fasta—-threads = 8 and assign_taxonomy.py -i rep_set.fna–r /Silva119_for_Qiime/rep_set/97/Silva _119_ rep _set 97.fna -t/Silva119_for_Qiime/taxonomy /97/ taxonomy_97_all_levels.txt -o taxonomy _results/ -e 0.01—uclust_similarity = 0.85. Sample specific OTUs were retrieved from all the OTUs and aligned against the same database by BLAST [49]. Finally, the taxonomic classification were plotted using metagenome analyser (MEGAN5) [50].

All 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA- http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena) under accession number PRJEB9174.

Statistical analyses

A full model two factor permutational analysis of variance was run using Primer v. 6 with PERMANOVA add-on, to compare the bacterial communities between the hypobranchial gland and foot tissue of male and female D. orbita. Bray Curtis similarity matrices with a dummy value of 1 were generated from the untransformed OTU data at the genus level. Initial analyses were performed using the number of reads as a covariate to establish whether the unequal number of reads between samples influenced the outcomes. However, as the covariate was not significant (Pseudo F = 9.83, p = 0.96), the covariate was removed and the results are presented from the reduced two factor model. Additional analyses were also performed using a reduced data set excluding the low read samples (i.e. F1H, F2F and M2H) and these produced comparable results to the full data set (S1 Table). All PERMANOVA analyses were performed using 9999 permutations. Principal Coordinates Ordination (PCO) was undertaken to represent the data graphically. Similarity of Percentages (SIMPER) was run to establish which bacterial taxa contributed to the dissimilarity between the hypobranchial gland and foot tissue.

The DIVERSE function in PRIMER 6 was used to analyse the genus richness and diversity (Shannon’s H index), which was calculated from the relative abundance (% of reads) for each distinct OTU in each sample, but excluding the unassigned taxa. Univariate PERMANOVAs of genus richness and diversity were performed using Euclidean distance similarity matrices.

Results

Bacterial profiling of the hypobranchial gland and foot of Dicathais orbita

A total of 149,804 reads, with an average length of 436.301 base pairs, were obtained from the eight samples (four hypobranchial gland and four foot) of D. orbita (Table 1). Total acceptable reads, for operational taxonomic unit (OTU) assignment for the eight samples, ranged from 637 to 36,728 in the hypobranchial gland and foot (Table 1). At least one replicate from each sample type had > 15,000 reads. The total number of shared (non-overlapping) operational taxonomic units (OTUs) resulting from the bacterial profiling data set was 3585. The foot samples had a higher number of OTUs than the hypobranchial gland, across all taxonomic levels (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary of Dicathais orbita hypobranchial gland and foot tissue 16S rRNA bacterial profiling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.t001

Rarefaction curves indicated the richness of bacterial taxa had not peaked at the maximum number of sequences read, with the exception of female hypobranchial gland 2, which reached an asymptote of < 70 bacterial genera after ~ 10,000 sequences (Table 1). The number of OTUs is likely to be highly under-represented in the other female hypobranchial gland sample (F1H = 17) and male hypobranchial gland 2 (M2H = 71, Table 1), due to the low number of sequence reads (Fig 1). The alpha diversity rarefaction plots also showed that the female hypobranchial gland had lower bacterial diversity than the male hypobranchial gland and foot samples of D. orbita (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Alpha diversity showing the richness of bacterial community diversity within Dicathais orbita foot (F2F, F3F, M2F and M3F) and hypobranchial gland samples (F1H, F2H, M1H and M2H) (F = female; M = male).

The phylogenetic diversity metric consists of genus richness based on 3585 observed OTUs at the 97% sequence similarity level and 443 possible observed genus. Sample with reads of more than 3000 are visible.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.g001

Bacterial taxonomic diversity of the hypobranchial gland and foot of Dicathais orbita

Altogether, 28 different bacterial phyla were observed in the bacterial profiling data set; however, only dominant phyla are presented (Fig 2). Bacterial groups that could not be assigned to any phyla equated to 6.8%. The dominant phylum was Proteobacteria, representing 32.2% of the bacterial abundance in all D. orbita samples (Fig 2). Bacteria from the phylum Tenericutes were more abundant in the hypobranchial gland compared to the foot (Fig 2). Bacteriodetes were more abundant in foot tissues than female hypobranchial glands (Fig 2). Bacteria from the phylum Spirochaetes were also more abundant in the foot than the hypobranchial gland samples (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Phylum-level taxonomic diversity associated with the female (F) and male (M) hypobranchial gland (F1H, F2H, M1H and M2H) and foot (F2F, F3F, M2F and M3F) of Dicathais orbita bacterial profiling.

All the minor phyla and unnamed, but previously identified bacterial phyla (such as BD1-5, CKC4, candidate division BRC1, OD1, OP8, SR1, TM7, SHA-109, and TM6) are grouped into “Bacteria Other”.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.g002

Phylogenetic analysis revealed male foot tissue (M3F) had greater taxonomic diversity than the hypobranchial gland (Fig 3). Flavobacteriales, Sphingobacteriales and Rhodobacterales were more common in the foot, while Vibrionales was more dominant in hypobranchial gland (Fig 3). Vibrionales was the dominant order in the female hypobranchial gland (Fig 3A) and representatives from this order were observed in all samples of the foot and hypobranchial gland (Fig 3). Mycoplasma, in the phyla Tenericutes, was found to be more dominant in the hypobranchial gland when compared to D. orbita foot samples (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Phylogenetic tree of Dicathais orbita samples generated from 16S rRNA sequences by MEGAN.

A = Female hypobranchial gland (F2H); B = Male hypobranchial gland (M1H); C = Female foot (F3F); D = Male foot (M3F). All these sample types have more than 15,000 reads.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.g003

Altogether, 443 known bacterial genera were identified in the foot and hypobranchial gland of the D. orbita bacterial profiling dataset, based on >97% sequence similarity. In total there were 169 distinct bacterial genera present in the foot,52 in the hypobranchial gland and 222 common bacterial genera between the foot and hypobranchial gland of D. orbita. On average, a higher number of distinct bacterial genera were recorded in the foot compared to hypobranchial gland samples (Fig 4A). Univariate PERMANOVA analysis confirmed there was significantly different genus richness between tissue types (Pseudo F = 8.54, p = 0.04). However, genus richness was not significantly different between genders (Pseudo F = 6.33, p = 0.06), and there was no interaction between gender and tissue type (Pseudo F = 2.49, p = 0.86).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Mean (+s.e.) number of OTUs in the hypobranchial gland and foot tissue of Dicathais orbita, showing the mean proportion unique to individuals samples of foot and hypobranchial gland tissue.

(A) = OTUs richness, (B) = H index/diversity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.g004

Using Shannon’s diversity index to assess richness and evenness of the bacterial communities, higher diversity was consistently detected in the foot compared to the hypobranchial gland of D. orbita (Fig 4B). Univariate PERMANOVA analysis revealed genus diversity (Hˊ) was significantly higher in the foot than the hypobranchial gland (Pseudo F = 18.44, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference according to gender (Pseudo F = 3.71, p = 0.13), and no interaction between gender and tissue (Pseudo F = 1.79, p = 0.25).

Bacterial community structure in the hypobranchial gland and foot of Dicathais orbita

Principal Coordinates Ordination (PCO) revealed separation of bacterial communities, based on genera level OTUs, between the hypobranchial gland and foot samples (Fig 5). The bacterial communities of hypobranchial gland samples were more variable and also showed separation between male and females, whereas foot samples clustered together on the left hand side of the plot (Fig 5). Multivariate analyses of genera OTUs associated with the hypobranchial gland and foot of D. orbita, revealed a significant difference between these tissues (Pseudo F = 5.46, p = 0.02). However, there was no significant difference according to gender (Pseudo F = 0.58, p = 0.67) and no interaction between gender and tissue (Pseudo F = 2.01, p = 0.17). Similar results were found when just the presence and absence of bacteria in the samples are considered (rather than relative abundance). Here, the PCO plot also revealed a general pattern of foot samples clustering separately and hypobranchial gland samples being more variable between the individual snails than foot samples (S1 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Principal Coordinates Ordination (PCO) of bacterial genus composition, based on a Bray Curtis similarity matrix of the relative abundance of OTUs at 97% sequence similarity level for the hypobranchial gland (purple) and foot (orange) of female (F) and male (M) Dicathais orbita.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.g005

SIMPER (Similarity of percentages) analysis revealed high dissimilarity between the bacterial communities of the hypobranchial gland and foot of D. orbita (Table 2, Average dissimilarity = 68.51%). Of the 443 bacterial genera, four contributed approximately 50% of the dissimilarity between the tissues. Vibrio and Mycoplasma were more abundant in the hypobranchial gland, whereas Chitinophagaceae and Spirochaeta were more abundant in the foot (Table 2). A relatively small number of genera (e.g. Mycoplasma, Vibrio), along with an average of approximately 8% unassigned bacteria contributed to the similarity between hypobranchial gland samples of D. orbita (S2 Table). However, 30 diverse bacteria contributed to 90% of the similarity between the foot samples (S2 Table).

thumbnail
Table 2. Similarity of percentages (SIMPER) analysis showing the bacterial genus that contribute most to the differences between hypobranchial gland and foot of Dicathais orbita (Average dissimilarity = 68.51).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.t002

Biosynthetic capabilities of the bacterial symbionts

Of the possible 443 bacterial genera identified from the tissues of D. orbita, only 22 bacterial species are known to have biosynthetic capabilities directly relevant to Tyrian purple precursor biosynthesis (Fig 6, S3 Table). A greater proportion of the bacteria found only in the hypobranchial glands (9.6%) were found to have indole and/ or brominating capabilities compared to those only found in the foot (0.6%, Fig 6). There were 21 indole producing species detected across 9 genera (Fig 6) and the majority of these were Vibrio spp. common to both the foot and hypobranchial gland samples (Fig 6). Three species were detected that are known to produce both indoles and brominated secondary metabolites and a further three species produce bromoperoxidase enzymes (Fig 6, S3 Table). More specifically, bacteria from three genera that were detected more frequently in the hypobranchial gland, namely Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Synechococcus, are known to produce bromoperoxidase (S3 Table). Pseudomonas spp., and several other bacteria found in the hypobranchial gland, are also known to produce oxidised sulphur metabolites, whereas three sulphur reducing bacteria were found exclusively in the foot tissue (S3 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Venn diagram showing shared and non-shared bacterial species between the hypobranchial gland and foot of Dicathais orbita.

The number of species that have biosynthetic capabilities relevant to Tyrian purple production are highlighted in different colours (Orange = indole producers; Blue = brominating enzymes; Purple = indole producers and brominating capabilities).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.g006

Discussion

This study determined differences in bacterial community composition in the Tyrian purple producing hypobranchial gland and the non-biosynthetic foot tissues of the muricid mollusc, D. orbita. Bacterial taxa representing 3585 OTUs from 28 different phyla, 243 families and 443 genera (Table 1) were observed in the bacterial profiling data set of D. orbita. Phylogenetic analysis highlighted the presence of more complex bacterial communities in the foot compared to the hypobranchial gland, and this was supported by significantly lower OTU richness and diversity in the gland than the foot. PCO and multivariate analysis revealed significantly different bacterial community structure between the two tissues, and dissimilarity analysis revealed a higher abundance of Vibrio, Mycoplasma and unassigned bacteria in the biosynthetic hypobranchial gland. Consistent with previous culture studies [39], Vibrios were the dominant indole producing bacteria detected. However, 16S rDNA bacterial profiling also revealed the presence of bromoperoxidase producing bacteria such as Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Synechococcus, and bacteria known to produce brominated secondary metabolites, such as Pseudoalteromonas and Propionigenium, in the Tyrian purple producing gland.

The taxonomic diversity of symbiotic bacteria, with a dominance of Proteobacteria in D. orbita, is comparable with previous 16S rDNA analyses of marine mollusc associated bacteria. Metagenomic (16S rDNA) bacterial diversity studies of the molluscan sea slug, Elysia chlorotica, from a total number of reads among samples ranging from 4601 to 11374, produced 199 to 889 OTUs derived from 5 to 9 distinct phyla [51]. Another metagenomic study of the 16S rRNA gene of a bivalve mollusc (internal body parts without the shell) resulted in the discovery of 3553 OTUs from 44 phyla, in which Proteobacteria was found to be the most abundant phylum [52]. The metagenome of the digestive tract of a marine limpet also revealed diverse microbial communities with the most dominant phylum being Proteobacteria [53]. Indeed, Proteobacteria accounts for more than 40% of all known prokaryotic genera [54] and is the dominant bacterial phyla reported from other marine invertebrate taxa, including the sponge Halichondria sp. [55], the coral Porites astreoides [56] and the oyster Crassostrea sp.[57].

Significantly different bacterial community structure, with a higher richness and diversity of OTUs, was observed in the foot relative to the hypobranchial gland samples of D. orbita (Figs 35). This is consistent with a previous study on heterotrophic culturable bacteria, where no bacterial biochemical activity was detected in the homogenised glands and significantly fewer species were isolated from swabs of the hypobranchial gland in comparison to the foot tissue of D. orbita [39]. The lower Shannon’s diversity index from the hypobranchial gland coupled with the SIMPER analyses imply the bacterial community in this gland is dominated by two abundant symbiotic genera (i.e. Mycoplasma, Vibrio), some unassigned, possibly novel bacteria and a larger number of genera detected in low abundance, many of which may be rare opportunists or contaminants. This pattern of bacterial diversity is consistent with a highly specialised internal environment; indeed the hypobranchial gland has a low pH [39] and produces secretions containing antibacterial sulphated mucopolysaccharides and brominated indoles that would be expected to kill the majority of opportunistic bacteria [41, 58]. Mycoplasma, the best known genus in the class Mollicutes, are common parasites in marine organisms and can persist in extreme environments including low pH and low oxygen [59, 60]. They lack a cell wall and are unaffected by many antibiotics [61]. They are also common laboratory contaminants [62], but may exist as parasites or commensals within the hypobranchial gland, which provides a rich source of carbohydrates. To establish the potential for vertical or horizontal transmission of the bacterial symbionts in D. orbita, future bacterial profiling studies could include samples of the egg capsules, water and benthic substrate for comparison. Interestingly, a preliminary study on the culturable heterotrophic bacteria from D. orbita tissues identified at least one indole producing bacteria common to the hypobranchial gland and egg capsules [39]. The precursors of Tyrian purple are found in the egg capsules [3], as well as the female capsule gland, which lies adjacent to the hypobranchical gland in D. orbita [1, 63] suggesting a potential role of vertical transmission of biosynthetic symbiotic bacteria.

The dominance of Vibrionaceae in the hypobranchial glands of D. orbita implies these bacteria are selectively retained or are able to multiply within this unusual mucus producing organ. Vibrios are commonly associated with marine organisms [6466] and species such as V. parahaemolyticus, V. orientalis and V. campbellii are pathogens of marine invertebrates [6769] with V. orientalis, V. harveyi, V. coralliilyticus and V. splendidus being specific mollusc pathogens [68, 7072]. However, Vibrio species can also be endosymbionts such as those found in the viscera of the muricid, Nucella lapillus, and mucus of the sea slug, Elysia rufescens [73, 74], as well as V. fischeri, which is found in squid bioluminescent organs [19]. Vibrio species are known, not only for their symbiotic relationships with marine molluscs, but also for the production of important secondary metabolites [7577]. A previous study successfully cultured three indole producing Vibrio species from the biosynthetic organs of D. orbita [39]. Many additional indole producing Vibrio species from the hypobranchial gland of D. orbita were identified in this study (S3 Table). The relatively high concentration of these Vibrios in the hypobranchial gland, and their capacity for indole synthesis, suggest they may contribute to Tyrian purple precursor synthesis in the hypobranchial glands of Muricidae. Indole producing Vibrio species, including V. orientalis and V. coralliilyticus were found exclusively in the hypobranchial gland, but not in the foot. A range of other bacterial genera that produce indoles were also detected in the hypobranchial gland. These include Bacillus, [78] Propionigenium, [79] and Pseudomonas, which produce indoles such as indole-3-acetic acid [80]. Hence, indole precursors may be opportunistically acquired from more than one bacterial species for Tyrian purple production in muricids.

It has been suggested bromoperoxidase plays a role in Tyrian purple biosynthesis through the addition of bromine to the 6-position of tyrindoxyl sulphate [81, 82]. This is supported by evidence of bromoperoxidase activity in Trunculariopsis (Murex) trunculus hypobranchial gland homogenates [17] and histochemical sections from D. orbita hypobranchial and rectal glands [18, 83]. Several bacterial genera were detected in our bacterial profiling studies that are known to produce bromoperoxidase (S3 Table), including Pseudomonas [24] and bacteria of the Bacillaceae family [84]. The cyanobacterium, Synechococcus produce vanadium dependent bromoperoxidase [31]; this enzyme is implicated in the biosynthesis of marine halogenated natural products of pharmacological importance [85] and can also react with indole to produce region specific brominated indole products [85, 86]. Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Synechococcus were all present in the hypobranchial gland of D. orbita and these bromoperoxidase producing bacterial genera are the priorities for future targeted culture work to further investigate their role in Tyrian purple production in D. orbita. Future studies could also apply functional metagenomics approaches to uncover the brominating enzymology associated with the hypobranchial glands of Muricidae by screening specifically for bromoperoxidase and brominase genes [87].

Several other marine bacteria found in the hypobranchial glands are known to produce halogenases and could provide an alternative path for brominating indole precursors of Tyrian purple. Halogenating enzymes such as brominases, responsible for the synthesis of polybrominated metabolites, including phenol and imidazole structures, have been identified in marine bacteria [87]. Tribromoimidazole, a brominated secondary metabolite found within the eggs of muricid molluscs, may be produced by brominase activity [88]. Pseudomonas sp. also produce halogenase enzymes [21] and we detected Pseudomonas spp. in the hypobranchical glands of D. orbita. Other marine studies have isolated a tryptophan 6-halogenase with brominating activity from Streptomyces sp. [23] and a novel halogenase gene from Psychrobacter sp. (associated with the marine sponge Crambe crambe) [22], a genus that was also detected in our D. orbita study. Other bacteria detected in the hypobranchial gland of D. orbita, including Vibrio, and Pseudoalteromonas, have previously been found to produce brominated secondary metabolites (S3 Table). For example, Vibrio sp. (strain KMM-81-1) associated with the marine sponge (Dysidea sp.) produces brominated secondary metabolites [89], and several species of Pseudomonas produce brominated nitrophenyl pyrrole compounds [90, 91], while Pseudoalteromonas sp. can produce pentabromopseudilin and bromophene [92]. However, these bacteria were not specifically associated with the hypobranchial glands of D. orbita and thus appear less likely candidates for providing tissue localised precursors to Tyrian purple.

It is possible bacteria may be responsible for several steps which occur early in the Tyrian purple biosynthetic pathway. Enzymes such as sulphur transferase and sulphur reductase may be involved in contributing the methane thiol group on the indole ring of tyrindoxyl sulfate. High concentrations of mercaptan and dimethyl disulfide are present in muricid hypobranchial glands that produce Tyrian purple [1, 4, 93]. Pseudomonas found in the hypobranchial gland is known to utilize dimethyl disulfide [94]. Several bacteria that metabolise sulphur, such as V. orientalis and V. coralliilyticus are exclusively found in the hypobranchial gland and also utilize dimethylsulfoniopropionate, an organosulfur compound that produces dimethyl sulphide and methanethiol as a breakdown product [95, 96]. Sulfitobacter mediterraneus was detected in the foot and hypobranchial gland and is a sulfite-oxidizing bacteria [97] that may catalyse the production of indoxyl sulfate. Thus, it is possible the various sulphur metabolizing bacteria found in the hypobranchial gland play important roles in Tyrian purple precursor production.

A difference in the 16s rRNA bacterial profiles of male and female hypobranchial glands was expected on the basis that previous chemical studies have suggested a difference in the oxidation and reduction state of indole dye precursors in male and female hypobranchial glands. Specifically, the female glands were found to contain higher amounts of reduced methanethiol derivatised indoles, such as tyrindoleninone and tyriverdin, whereas males contained more oxidised end-products 6-bromoisatin and 6,6’dibromoindirubin [1]. This could imply the presence of sulfur-reducing bacteria in the female hypobranchial glands, although we actually found more evidence for known sulfur-reducing bacteria in the foot tissue (S3 Table) and none were unique to the female hypobranchial gland. Nevertheless, the reducing environment of the female gland could explain why the bacterial community structure was noticeably more distinct from the foot communities than the male glands (Fig 5) and the tendency towards lower phylogenetic complexity in the female compared to male hypobranchial glands (Table 1, Fig 3). However, consistent with a previous culture based study [39], there were no significant difference in the bacterial communities isolated from male and female samples and no interaction between tissue and gender. In both studies the lack of a significant gender effect could be influenced by a consistent bacterial community structure within the foot tissues and low power to detect a gender difference, specifically in the hypobranchial glands, due to relatively high variability and low replication of male and female samples within this tissue type (e.g. Fig 5 PCO). Consequently, future functional metagenomics studies aimed specifically towards examining the sulphur metabolising bacteria in male and female hypobranchicial glands of Muricidae are warranted.

Overall, a larger number of bacterial taxa were found in the foot compared with the hypobranchial gland of D. orbita, however, a higher abundance of Vibrio and some unique microbial symbionts were observed in the hypobranchial gland. Some of the bacteria identified in the hypobranchial gland are known to produce indole and bromoperoxidase or other enzymes which may contribute to Tyrian purple precursor synthesis. Future studies will aim to culture these microbial symbionts associated with the hypobranchial gland and further analysis will be undertaken to identify genes that may be associated with Tyrian purple precursor production.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Principal Coordinates Ordination (PCO) of bacterial genus associated with hypobranchial gland (purple) and foot (orange) of female (F) and male (M) Dicathais orbita after presence/ absence transformation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Summary of statistical analyses for genus level using a reduced data set (F2H, M1H, F3F, M2F and M3F) excluding samples with low number of reads (F1H, M2H and F2F).

Univariate PERMANOVA was performed on Euclidean distance similarity matrices for genus level OTU richness and diversity, whereas multivariate PERMANOVA was performed using Bray-Curtis similarity matrices for community composition based on the number of reads.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Similarity of percentages (SIMPER) analysis showing the bacterial genus that contribute the most to the similarity in A) hypobranchial gland (Average similarity: 45.47) and B) the foot of Dicathais orbita (Average similarity: 60.14).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.s003

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Dicathais orbita associated bacteria that have been previously shown to produce indoles, brominated secondary metabolites or enzymes associated with their biosynthesis or sulphur metabolizing bacteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140725.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We appreciate feedback on the draft manuscript from Bijayalakshmi Devi Nongmaithem, Roselyn Regino, Jeanette Travis (SCU) and two anonymous reviewers.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KB AB AKN DW SW. Performed the experiments: AKN AB. Analyzed the data: AKN AB KB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KB DW AB. Wrote the paper: AKN KB DW AB SW.

References

  1. 1. Westley C, Benkendorff K. Sex-specific Tyrian purple genesis: precursor and pigment distribution in the reproductive system of the marine mollusc, Dicathais orbita. J Chem Ecol. 2008; 34: 44–56. pmid:18075711
  2. 2. Cooksey CJ. Tyrian purple: 6,6’-dibromoindigo and related compounds. Molecules 2001; 6: 736–769.
  3. 3. Benkendorff K, Bremner JB, Davis AR. Tyrian purple precursors in the egg masses of the Australian muricid, Dicathais orbita: A possible defensive role. J Chem Ecol. 2000; 26: 1037–1050.
  4. 4. Benkendorff K. Natural product research in the Australian marine invertebrate Dicathais orbita. Mar Drugs. 2013; 11: 1370–1398. pmid:23612370
  5. 5. Westley CB, McIver CM, Abbott CA, Le Leu RK, Benkendorff K. Enhanced acute apoptotic response to azoxymethane-induced DNA damage in the rodent colonic epithelium by Tyrian purple precursors: A potential colorectal cancer chemopreventative. Cancer Biol Ther. 2010; 9: 371–379. pmid:20150770
  6. 6. Edwards V, Benkendorff K, Young F. Marine compounds selectively induce apoptosis in female reproductive cancer cells but not in primary-derived human reproductive granulosa cells. Mar Drugs. 2012; 10: 64–83. pmid:22363221
  7. 7. Esmaeelian B, Benkendorff K, Johnston MR, Abbott CA. Purified brominated indole derivatives from Dicathais orbita induce apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in colorectal cancer cell lines. Mar Drugs. 2013; 11: 3802–3822. pmid:24152558
  8. 8. Esmaeelian B, Abbott CA, Le Leu RK, Benkendorff K. 6-bromoisatin found in muricid mollusc extracts inhibits colon cancer cell proliferation and induces apoptosis, preventing early stage tumor formation in a colorectal cancer rodent model. Mar Drugs. 2014; 12: 17–35.
  9. 9. Baker JT, Sutherland MD. Pigments of marine animals VIII. Precursors of 6,6′-dibromoindigotin (Tyrian purple) from the mollusc Dicathais orbita Gmelin. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968; 1: 43–46.
  10. 10. Freidlander P. Ueber den farbstoff des antiken purpura aus Murex brandaris. Chem Ber. 1909; 42: 765–770.
  11. 11. Maugard T, Enaud E, Choisy P, Legoy MD. Identification of an indigo precursor from leaves of Isatis tinctoria (Woad). Phytochemistry. 2001; 58: 897–904. pmid:11684187
  12. 12. Bechtold T, Turcanu A, Geissler S, Ganglberger E. Process balance and product quality in the production of natural indigo from Polygonum tinctorium Ait. applying low-technology methods. Bioresour Technol. 2002; 81: 171–177. pmid:11800482
  13. 13. Lim HK, Chung EJ, Kim JC, Choi GJ, Jang KS, Chung YR, et al. Characterization of a forest soil metagenome clone that confers indirubin and indigo production on Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71: 7768–7777. pmid:16332749
  14. 14. Qu Y, Pi W, Ma F, Zhou J, Zhang X. Influence and optimization of growth substrates on indigo formation by a novel isolate Acinetobacter sp. PP-2. Bioresour Technol. 2010; 101: 4527–4532. pmid:20156680
  15. 15. Qu Y, Zhang X, Ma Q, Ma F, Zhang Q, Li X, et al. Indigo biosynthesis by Comamonas sp. MQ. Biotechnol Lett. 2012; 34: 353–357. pmid:22038546
  16. 16. Gribble GW. Amazing organohalogens: Although best known as synthetic toxicants, thousands of halogen compounds are, in fact, part of our natural enviornment. American scientist. 2004; 92: 342–349.
  17. 17. Jannun R, Coe EL. Bromoperoxidase from the marine snail, Murex-trunculus. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 1987; 88: 917–922.
  18. 18. Westley C, Benkendorff K. The distribution of precursors and biosynthetic enzymes required for Tyrian purple genesis in the hypobranchial gland, gonoduct, an egg masses of Dicathais orbita (Gmelin, 1791) (Neogastropoda: Muricidae). Nautilus. 2009; 123: 148–153.
  19. 19. Small AL, McFall-Ngai MJ. Halide peroxidase in tissues that interact with bacteria in the host squid Euprymna scolopes. J Cell Biochem. 1999; 72: 445–457. pmid:10022605
  20. 20. Nishiguchi MK, Lopez JE, Boletzky SV. Enlightenment of old ideas from new investigations: more questions regarding the evolution of bacteriogenic light organs in squids. Evol Dev. 2004; 6: 41–49. pmid:15108817
  21. 21. Wynands I, Pee KH. A novel halogenase gene from the pentachloropseudilin producer Actinoplanes sp. ATCC 33002 and detection of in vitro halogenase activity. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004; 237: 363–367. pmid:15321684
  22. 22. Ozturk B, de Jaeger L, Smidt H, Sipkema D. Culture-dependent and independent approaches for identifying novel halogenases encoded by Crambe crambe (marine sponge) microbiota. Sci Rep. 2013; 3: 2780. pmid:24071658
  23. 23. Zeng J, Zhan J. Characterization of a tryptophan 6-halogenase from Streptomyces toxytricini. Biotechnol Lett. 2011; 33: 1607–1613. pmid:21424165
  24. 24. Itoh N, Morinaga N, Kouzai T. Purification and characterization of a novel metal-containing nonheme bromoperoxidase from Pseudomonas putida. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994; 1207: 208–216. pmid:8075154
  25. 25. van Pee KH, Lingens F. Purification of bromoperoxidase from Pseudomonas aureofaciens. J Bacteriol. 1985; 161: 1171–1175. pmid:3972772
  26. 26. Wiesner W, van Pee K-H, Lingens F. Purification and properties of bromoperoxidase from Pseudomonas pyrrocinia. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1985; 366: 1085–1092. pmid:4091967
  27. 27. Lingens F. Purification and molecular and catalytic properties of bromoperoxidase from Streptomyces phaeochromogenes. J Gen Microbiol. 1985; 131: 1911–1916. pmid:4056738
  28. 28. van Pee KH, Sury G, Lingens F. Purification and properties of a nonheme bromoperoxidase from Streptomyces aureofaciens. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler. 1987; 368: 1225–1232. pmid:3118902
  29. 29. Zeiner R, van Pee KH, Lingens F. Purification and partial characterization of multiple bromoperoxidases from Streptomyces griseus. J Gen Microbiol. 1988; 134: 3141–3149. pmid:3151989
  30. 30. Knoch M, van pee KH, Vining LC, Lingens F. Purification, properties and immunological detection of a bromoperoxidase-catalase from Streptomyces venezuelae and from a chloramphenicol-nonproducing mutant. J Gen Microbiol. 1989; 135: 2493–2502. pmid:2628543
  31. 31. Johnson TL, Palenik B, Brahamsha B. Characterization of a functional vanadium‐dependent bromoperoxidase in the marine cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. cc93111. J Phycol. 2011; 47: 792–801.
  32. 32. Webster NS, Taylor MW, Behnam F, Lucker S, Rattei T, Whalan S, et al. Deep sequencing reveals exceptional diversity and modes of transmission for bacterial sponge symbionts. Environ Microbiol. 2010; 12: 2070–2082. pmid:21966903
  33. 33. Wang G. Diversity and biotechnological potential of the sponge-associated microbial consortia. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 33: 545–551. pmid:16761166
  34. 34. Pimentel-Elardo SM, Grozdanov L, Proksch S, Hentschel U. Diversity of nonribosomal peptide synthetase genes in the microbial metagenomes of marine sponges. Mar Drugs. 2012; 10: 1192–1202. pmid:22822366
  35. 35. Schirmer A, Gadkari R, Reeves CD, Ibrahim F, DeLong EF, Hutchinson CR. Metagenomic analysis reveals diverse polyketide synthase gene clusters in microorganisms associated with the marine sponge Discodermia dissoluta. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71: 4840–4849. pmid:16085882
  36. 36. Handelsman J. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004; 68: 669–685. pmid:15590779
  37. 37. Felbeck H, Jarchow J. Carbon release from purified chemoautotrophic bacterial symbionts of the hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia pachyptila. Physiol Zool. 1998; 71: 294–302. pmid:9634176
  38. 38. Laue BE, Nelson DC. Characterization of the gene encoding the autotrophic ATP sulfurylase from the bacterial endosymbiont of the hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia pachyptila. J Bacteriol. 1994; 176: 3723–3729. pmid:8206850
  39. 39. Ngangbam AK, Waters DLE, Whalan S, Baten A, Benkendorff K. Indole producing bacteria from the biosynthetic organs of Muricid mollusc could contribute to Tyrian purple production. J Shellfish Res. 2015; 34: 443–454.
  40. 40. Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol Rev. 1995; 59: 143–169. pmid:7535888
  41. 41. Westley CB, Lewis MC, Benkendorff K. Histomorphology of the hypobranchial gland in Dicathais orbita (Gmelin, 1791) (Neogastropoda: Muricidae). J Molluscan Stud. 2010; 76: 186–195.
  42. 42. Binladen J, Gilbert MTP, Bollback JP, Panitz F, Bendixen C, Nielsen R, et al. The use of coded PCR primers enables high-throughput sequencing of multiple homolog amplification products by 454 parallel sequencing. PloS one. 2007; 2: e197. pmid:17299583
  43. 43. Fagervold SK, Romano C, Kalenitchenko D, Borowski C, Nunes-Jorge A, Martin D, et al. Microbial communities in sunken wood are structured by wood-boring bivalves and location in a submarine canyon. PloS one. 2014; 9: e96248. pmid:24805961
  44. 44. Kumar PS, Brooker MR, Dowd SE, Camerlengo T. Target region selection is a critical determinant of community fingerprints generated by 16S pyrosequencing. PLoS One. 2011; 6: e20956. pmid:21738596
  45. 45. Macrogen. Available: http://dna.macrogen.com/eng.
  46. 46. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature methods. 2010; 7: 335–336. pmid:20383131
  47. 47. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26: 2460–2461. pmid:20709691
  48. 48. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, et al. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007; 35: 7188–7196. pmid:17947321
  49. 49. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997; 25: 3389–3402. pmid:9254694
  50. 50. Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome research. 2007; 17: 377–386. pmid:17255551
  51. 51. Devine SP, Pelletreau KN, Rumpho ME. 16S rDNA-based metagenomic analysis of bacterial diversity associated with two populations of the kleptoplastic sea slug Elysia chlorotica and its algal prey Vaucheria litorea. Biol Bull. 2012; 223: 138–154. pmid:22983039
  52. 52. Cleary DF, Becking LE, Polonia AR, Freitas RM, Gomes NC. Composition and predicted functional ecology of mussel-associated bacteria in Indonesian marine lakes. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2015: 1–14.
  53. 53. Dudek M, Adams J, Swain M, Hegarty M, Huws S, Gallagher J. Metaphylogenomic and potential functionality of the limpet Patella pellucida’s gastrointestinal tract microbiome. Int J Mol Sci. 2014; 15: 18819–18839. pmid:25334059
  54. 54. Kersters K, De Vos P, Gillis M, Swings J, Vandamme P, Stackebrandt E. Introduction to the Proteobacteria. The Prokaryotes: Volume 5: Proteobacteria: Alpha and Beta Subclasses. 2006: 3–37.
  55. 55. Naim MA, Morillo JA, Sorensen SJ, Waleed AA, Smidt H, Sipkema D. Host-specific microbial communities in three sympatric North Sea sponges. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014; 90: 390–403. pmid:25088929
  56. 56. Wegley L, Edwards R, Rodriguez‐Brito B, Liu H, Rohwer F. Metagenomic analysis of the microbial community associated with the coral Porites astreoides. Environ Microbiol. 2007; 9: 2707–2719. pmid:17922755
  57. 57. Trabal Fernandez N, Mazon-Suastegui JM, Vazquez-Juarez R, Ascencio-Valle F, Romero J. Changes in the composition and diversity of the bacterial microbiota associated with oysters (Crassostrea corteziensis, Crassostrea gigas and Crassostrea sikamea) during commercial production. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014; 88: 69–83. pmid:24325323
  58. 58. Laffy PW, Benkendorff K, Abbott CA. Suppressive subtractive hybridisation transcriptomics provides a novel insight into the functional role of the hypobranchial gland in a marine mollusc. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics & Proteomics 2013; 8: 111–122.
  59. 59. Maniloff J, McElhaney RN, Finch LR, Baseman JB. Mycoplasmas: molecular biology and pathogenesis. American Society for Microbiology.1992.
  60. 60. Giebel J, Meier J, Binder A, Flossdorf J, Poveda JB, Schmidt R, et al. Mycoplasma phocarhinis sp. nov. and Mycoplasma phocacerebrale sp. nov., two new species from harbor seals (Phoca vitulina L.). Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1991; 41: 39–44. pmid:1995034
  61. 61. Razin S, Yogev D, Naot Y. Molecular biology and pathogenicity of mycoplasmas. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998; 62: 1094–1156. pmid:9841667
  62. 62. Nikfarjam L, Farzaneh P. Prevention and detection of Mycoplasma contamination in cell culture. Cell J. 2012; 13: 203–212. pmid:23508237
  63. 63. Rudd D, Ronci M, Johnston MR, Guinan T, Voelcker NH, Benkendorff K. Mass spectrometry imaging reveals new biological roles for choline esters and Tyrian purple precursors in muricid molluscs. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:13408. pmid:26324173
  64. 64. Cheng CA, Hwang DF, Tsai YH, Chen HC, Jeng SS, Noguchi T, et al. Microflora and tetrodotoxin-producing bacteria in a gastropod, Niotha clathrata. Food Chem Toxicol. 1995; 33: 929–934. pmid:7590540
  65. 65. Chimetto LA, Cleenwerck I, Alves N Jr., Silva BS, Brocchi M, Willems A, et al. Vibrio communis sp. nov., isolated from the marine animals Mussismilia hispida, Phyllogorgia dilatata, Palythoa caribaeorum, Palythoa variabilis and Litopenaeus vannamei. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011; 61: 362–368. pmid:20305064
  66. 66. Thompson FL, Iida T, Swings J. Biodiversity of vibrios. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004; 68: 403–431. pmid:15353563
  67. 67. Zhang Z, Li SK, Xie CP, Zhou LZ, Li CB, Liu WH, et al. Innate immune response and gene expression of Scylla paramamosain under Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection. Aquacult Res. 2015; 46: 462–471.
  68. 68. Sutton DC, Garrick R. Bacterial disease of cultured giant clam Tridacna gigas larvae. Dis Aquat Organ. 1993; 16: 47–53.
  69. 69. Wang L, Chen Y, Huang H, Huang Z, Chen H, Shao Z. Isolation and identification of Vibrio campbellii as a bacterial pathogen for luminous vibriosis of Litopenaeus vannamei. Aquacult Res. 2015; 46: 395–404.
  70. 70. Ben-Haim Y, Thompson F, Thompson C, Cnockaert M, Hoste B, Swings J, et al. Vibrio coralliilyticus sp. nov., a temperature-dependent pathogen of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003; 53: 309–315. pmid:12656189
  71. 71. Chen T, Wong N- K, Jiang X, Luo X, Zhang L, Yang D, et al. Nitric oxide as an antimicrobial molecule against Vibrio harveyi infection in the hepatopancreas of Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2015; 42: 114–120. pmid:25449376
  72. 72. Sugumar G, Nakai T, Hirata Y, Matsubara D, Muroga K. Vibrio splendidus biovar II as the causative agent of bacillary necrosis of Japanese oyster Crassostrea gigas larvae. Dis Aquat Organ. 1998; 33: 111–118. pmid:9684317
  73. 73. Pratheepa VK, Silva M, Vasconcelos V. Viscera-associated bacterial diversity among intertidal gastropods from Northern-Atlantic Coast of Portugal. Curr Microbiol. 2014; 68: 140–148. pmid:24026448
  74. 74. Davis J, Fricke WF, Hamann MT, Esquenazi E, Dorrestein PC, Hill RT. Characterization of the bacterial community of the chemically defended Hawaiian sacoglossan Elysia rufescens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013; 79: 7073–7081. pmid:24014539
  75. 75. Ruby EG. Lessons from a cooperative bacterial-animal association: The Vibrio fischeri-Euprymna scolopes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1996; 50: 591. pmid:8905092
  76. 76. Kimbell JR, McFall-Ngai MJ. The Squid-Vibrio Symbioses: From Demes to Genes. Integr Comp Biol. 2003; 43: 254–260. pmid:21680430
  77. 77. Mansson M, Gram L, Larsen TO. Production of bioactive secondary metabolites by marine vibrionaceae. Mar Drugs. 2011; 9: 1440–1468. pmid:22131950
  78. 78. Idris EE, Iglesias DJ, Talon M, Borriss R. Tryptophan dependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2007; 20: 619–626. pmid:17555270
  79. 79. Janssen PH, Liesack W. Succinate decarboxylation by Propionigenium maris sp. nov., a new anaerobic bacterium from an estuarine sediment. Arch Microbiol. 1995; 164: 29–35. pmid:7646317
  80. 80. Patten CL, Glick BR. Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68: 3795–3801. pmid:12147474
  81. 81. Benkendorff K. Chemical diversity in molluscan communities: From natural products to chemical ecology. In: Cosmo A. D. and Winlow W., editors. Neuroecology and neuroethology in molluscs: the interface between behaviour and environment. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2014. pp. 13–41.
  82. 82. Westley C, Vine K, Benkendorff K. A proposed functional role for indole derivatives in reproduction and defense of the Muricidae (Neogastropoda: Mollusca). In: Meijer L, Guyard N, Skaltsounis L and Eisenbrand G, editors. Indirubin, the red shade of indigo. France: Life in Progress, Roscoff; 2006. pp. 31–44.
  83. 83. Westley C. The distribution, biosynthetic origin and functional significance of Tyrian purple precursors in the Australian muricid Dicathais orbita (Neogastropoda: Muricidae). School of Biological sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering. Adelaide, SA, Australia: Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia; 2008. pp. 237.
  84. 84. Read TD, Peterson SN, Tourasse N, Baillie LW, Paulsen IT, Nelson KE, et al. The genome sequence of Bacillus anthracis Ames and comparison to closely related bacteria. Nature. 2003; 423: 81–86. pmid:12721629
  85. 85. Butler A, Carter-Franklin JN. The role of vanadium bromoperoxidase in the biosynthesis of halogenated marine natural products. Nat Prod Rep. 2004; 21: 180–188. pmid:15039842
  86. 86. Martinez JS, Carroll GL, Tschirret-Guth RA, Altenhoff G, Little RD, Butler A. On the regiospecificity of vanadium bromoperoxidase. J Am Chem Soc. 2001; 123: 3289–3294. pmid:11457064
  87. 87. Agarwal V, El Gamal AA, Yamanaka K, Poth D, Kersten RD, Schorn M, et al. Biosynthesis of polybrominated aromatic organic compounds by marine bacteria. Nat Chem Biol. 2014; 10: 640–647. pmid:24974229
  88. 88. Benkendorff K, Pillai R, Bremner JB. 2,4,5-Tribromo-1H-Imidazole in the egg masses of three muricid molluscs. Nat Prod Res. 2004; 18: 427–431. pmid:15248610
  89. 89. Elyakov GB, Kuznetsova T, Mikhailov VV, Maltsev II, Voinov VG, Fedoreyev SA. Brominated diphenyl ethers from a marine bacterium associated with the sponge Dysidea sp. Experientia. 1991; 47: 632–633.
  90. 90. Ajisaka M, Kariyone K, Jomon K, Yazawa H, Arima K. Isolation of the bromo analogues of pyrrolnitrin from Pseudomonas pyrrolnitrica. Agric Biol Chem. 1969; 33: 294–295.
  91. 91. van Pee K, Salcher O, Fischer P, Bokel M, Lingens F. The biosynthesis of brominated pyrrolnitrin derivatives by Pseudomonas aureofaciens. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1983; 36: 1735–1742.
  92. 92. Feher D, Barlow R, McAtee J, Hemscheidt TK. Highly brominated antimicrobial metabolites from a marine Pseudoalteromonas sp. J Nat Prod. 2010; 73: 1963–1966. pmid:20973551
  93. 93. Benkendorff K, Bremner JB, Davis AR. Indole derivatives from the egg masses of muricid molluscs. Molecules. 2001; 6: 70–78.
  94. 94. Ito T, Miyaji T, Nakagawa T, Tomizuka N. Degradation of dimethyl disulfide by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain 76. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007; 71: 366–370. pmid:17284843
  95. 95. Curson ARJ, Fowler EK, Dickens S, Johnston AWB, Todd JD. Multiple DMSP lyases in the gamma-proteobacterium Oceanimonas doudoroffii. Biogeochemistry. 2012; 110: 109–119.
  96. 96. Garren M, Son K, Raina J-B, Rusconi R, Menolascina F, Shapiro OH, et al. A bacterial pathogen uses dimethylsulfoniopropionate as a cue to target heat-stressed corals. ISME J. 2014; 8: 999–1007. pmid:24335830
  97. 97. Pukall R, Buntefuss D, Fruhling A, Rohde M, Kroppenstedt RM, Burghardt J, et al. Sulfitobacter mediterraneus sp. nov., a new sulfite-oxidizing member of the α-Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49: 513–519. pmid:10319472