Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Does Long-Term High Fat Diet Always Lead to Smaller Hippocampi Volumes, Metabolite Concentrations, and Worse Learning and Memory? A Magnetic Resonance and Behavioral Study in Wistar Rats

  • Zuzanna Setkowicz,

    Affiliation Department of Neuroanatomy, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

  • Agata Gaździńska,

    Affiliation Military Institute of Aviation Medicine, Warsaw, Poland

  • Joanna J. Osoba,

    Affiliation Department of Neuroanatomy, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

  • Karolina Karwowska,

    Affiliation Department of Neuroanatomy, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

  • Piotr Majka,

    Affiliation Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

  • Jarosław Orzeł,

    Affiliations Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

  • Bartosz Kossowski,

    Affiliations Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

  • Piotr Bogorodzki,

    Affiliations Mossakowski Medical Research Centre Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland

  • Krzysztof Janeczko,

    Affiliation Department of Neuroanatomy, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

  • Mariusz Wyleżoł,

    Affiliation Military Institute of Aviation Medicine, Warsaw, Poland

  • Stefan P. Gazdzinski

    sgazdzin@wiml.waw.pl

    Affiliation Military Institute of Aviation Medicine, Warsaw, Poland

Does Long-Term High Fat Diet Always Lead to Smaller Hippocampi Volumes, Metabolite Concentrations, and Worse Learning and Memory? A Magnetic Resonance and Behavioral Study in Wistar Rats

  • Zuzanna Setkowicz, 
  • Agata Gaździńska, 
  • Joanna J. Osoba, 
  • Karolina Karwowska, 
  • Piotr Majka, 
  • Jarosław Orzeł, 
  • Bartosz Kossowski, 
  • Piotr Bogorodzki, 
  • Krzysztof Janeczko, 
  • Mariusz Wyleżoł
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a worldwide epidemic with more than 600 million affected individuals. Human studies have demonstrated some alterations in brains of otherwise healthy obese individuals and elevated risk of neurodegenerative disease of old age; these studies have also pointed to slightly diminished memory and executive functions among healthy obese individuals. Similar findings were obtained in animal models of obesity induced by high fat diet. On the other hand, low carbohydrate high fat diets are currently promoted for losing weight (e.g., Atkin’s style diets). However, the long-term effects of such diets are not known. Additionally, high fat diets leading to (mild) ketonemia were shown to improve brain function in elderly humans and in some animal models.

Aim

To evaluate the hypothesis that long-term use of a high fat diet was associated with decreases in spatial memory, smaller hippocampi and hippocampi metabolite concentrations in Wistar rats.

Methods

Twenty five male Wistar rats were put on high fat diet (HFD; 60% calories from fat, 30% from carbohydrates) on their 55th day of life, while 25 control male rats (CONs) remained on chow. Adequate levels of essential nutrients were provided. Both groups underwent memory tests in 8-arm radial maze at 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month. 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy was employed to measure concentrations of tNAA (marker of neuronal integrity) at one month and one year, whereas MRI was used to evaluate hippocampal volumes.

Results

Obese rats (OBRs) consumed similar amount of calories as CONs, but less proteins. However, their protein intake was within recommended amounts. Throughout the experiment OBRs had statistically higher concentrations of blood ketone bodies than CONs, but still within normal values. At post-mortem assessment, OBRs had 38% larger fat deposits than CONs (p<0.05), as evaluated by volume of epididymis fat, an acknowledged marker of fat deposits in rats. Contrary to our expectations, OBRs had better scores of memory behavioral tasks than CONs throughout the experiment. At one year, their hippocampi were by 2.6% larger than in CONs (p = 0.05), whereas concentration of tNAA was 9.8% higher (p = 0.014).

Conclusion

Long-term HFD in our study resulted in better memory, larger hippocampal volumes, as well as higher hippocampal metabolite concentrations, possibly due to increased levels of blood ketone bodies. The results should be interpreted with caution, as results from animal models do not necessarily directly translate in human condition.

Introduction

Obesity is a disorder characterized by excessively high amount of body fat. Worldwide prevalence of obesity has reached epidemic proportions. In 2014, more than 1.9 billion adults, 18 years and older, were overweight. Of these over 600 million were obese. Once considered a problem only in high-income countries, obesity is now dramatically on the rise in low- and middle-income countries (WHO fact sheet No 311, updated January 2015). Human studies demonstrate some alterations in brains of otherwise healthy obese individuals (e.g., [1]). On general population level, otherwise healthy obese and overweight humans demonstrate worse performance on tests of learning, memory, and executive functions than their counterparts at healthy weight [2, 3]. Furthermore, increase in BMI during lifetime has been associated with decline in executive functions and memory [4, 5]. However, improvement in spatial abilities with increasing BMI was noted [5].

Neuroimaging studies also demonstrate brain alterations in otherwise healthy obese individuals. Our proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) of healthy middle-aged and elderly individuals showed that higher BMI was related to lower absolute concentrations of tNAA throughout the white matter and in the frontal gray matter [6, 7]. tNAA consists of N-acetylaspartate and N-Acetylaspartylglutamate. In human research tNAA is an accepted marker of neuronal viability, observed only in mature neurons and their processes; decreased tNAA reflects neuronal loss, atrophied dendrites and axons, and/or derangements in neuronal energetics [8]. tNAA concentrations are lowered consistently throughout neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, and alcohol dependence.

Obesity epidemic was triggered by is excessive caloric consumption [9]. On the other hand, epidemiological studies were not able to conclusively identify nutritional factors leading to poorer cognition [10]; even the role of dietary fat in cognitive decline is not clear (e.g., [11]). Nonetheless, animal studies using high fat diets (HFD) have generally demonstrated detrimental effects of these diets on memory and hippocampal morphology [12, 13], although glucose treatment [14], environmental enrichment [15], or physical activity [16] partially mitigated their effects. It is important to note that fat content in HFD by weight ranges from 10% [17] to 40% [18]. A study by Auer and colleagues [16] demonstrated that HFD led to lower concentrations of hippocampal metabolites including tNAA. A recent study in Cockayene syndrome mice demonstrated that high fat diet (60% energy from fat) may delay aging processes [18]. In humans, low carbohydrate high fat diets are currently promoted for losing weight (Atkin’s style diets). In Poland, followers of so called Kwasniewski diet (more than 70% energy intake from fat) demonstrated normal blood fasting glucose, insulin, HDL, triglycerides, blood pressure among, with elevated LDL [19] (long-term effects of this diet were not evaluated). Similarly, some studies demonstrated similar effects of Eskimo diet that contains large amounts of fat from animal origin [20, 21]. However, it should be noted that Eskimo population has broader access to other diets nowadays [22]. Additionally, high fat diets leading to mild ketonemia were shown to improve brain function in the elderly [23], whereas ketogenic diets lead to cognitive improvements in animal models and in patients suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy [24]. Unfortunately, the levels of blood ketone bodies were no evaluated in majority of studies (on animal) models claiming detrimental effects of high fat diet on the brain and its function.

Here, we utilized three complementary methods to evaluate long-term effects of HFD on the brain and its function in Wistar rats. A radial maze was used to measure spatial memory in rats, MRI was utilized to evaluate hippocampal volumes in vivo. Additionally, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) at short echo time was applied to measure the concentrations and their changes due to the dietary treatment of the major brain metabolites: [8]: (1) tNAA (see above); (2) glutamate (Glu), an important molecule in cellular metabolism mostly found within neurons; it is also the main excitatory neurotransmitter and a potential marker of neuronal viability; striatal Glu levels were related to tNAA concentrations and neurocognition; its concentration can be reliably measured in field strengths of 3T and higher, (3) choline-containing compounds (tCho), which are believed to be primarily involved in cell membrane breakdown and synthesis; (4) creatine-containing metabolites (tCr) involved in cell bioenergetics, and (5) myo-inositol (Ino) that is considered a marker of glial cell numbers and an osmoregulator. Finally, we compared concentrations of taurine (Tau), an osmoregulator, and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), major inhibitory neurotransmitter between groups. These measures were selected because they are often used in human studies of aging.

We evaluated the hypothesis that long-term use of high fat diet leads to decreases in spatial memory and smaller hippocampi and hippocampi metabolite concentrations in Wistar rats.

Results and Discussion

Breeding

Daily energy intake, body mass changes throughout the experiment, blood glucose levels and concentrations of blood ketone bodies are depicted in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Daily energy intake (A), changes in body weight during the experiment (B), changes in glucose blood levels (C), and changes in blood levels of ketone bodies (D) in controls and HFD-fed rats.

*P<0.05, ***P<0.01. The “spikes” in levels of ketone bodies were caused by short-lived increases in concentrations of ketone bodies in single animals.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139987.g001

Groups had similar caloric intake and OBRs had similar body mass as CONs, consistent with previous studies that did not observe differences in body mass between obese and control groups (e.g., [2527]). However, at the time of being sacrificed, OBRs had 38% more epididymis fat (p<0.05, n = 32), an accepted marker of fatness in rats [28]. It demonstrates that OBRs had larger body fat depositions than the CONs, consistent with the planned effects of the diet. Blood level of sugar in OBRs was significantly elevated after 8th month of the experiment, but still within normal values. Blood concentration of ketone bodies were elevated throughout the experiment in OBRs compared to CONs (0.22±0.04mM vs. 0.14±0.03mM), reaching the range of mild ketonemia [29]. At the time of being sacrificed, OBRs had 5.8% heavier brains than CONs (1.80g vs. 1.63g, p<0.01). The raw data is provided in S1 Table.

Memory

Data used in the analyses is provided in S2 Table. Generally, OBRs had better memory than CONs. At every control stage of the experiment they were able to find the reward faster. The differences in the total time spent in the maze before the reward was reached by the animal were statistically significance at the 6th and 9th and 12th month of life (see Fig 2). A similar pattern was found for time of walking (movement). Moreover, the vast majority of tests performed at the age of three, six and nine months detected significantly shorter average periods of immobility in OBRs. Significantly shorter walking distance characterized OBRs at the age of 9 months (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Exemplary parameters of the animal behavior during five-day maze tests performed/repeated at the 9th month of age.

(A) the total time (seconds) spent in the maze before the reward was reached by the animal on day 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th, (B) the time of walking (seconds) to reach the reward, (C) the time of immobility (seconds), (D) the total walking distance (meters). Abbreviations: White and black graphs characterize control and high-fat high carbohydrate diet-treated animals, respectively. The graphs show median values (squares), 25–75% variability ranges (vertically arranged rectangles), and maximal and minimal values (whiskers). Decimal indexes located below the graphs indicate statistical significance of intergroup differences at a given maze test (Mann–Whitney U-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139987.g002

Hippocampal volumes

At one year, there was no significant difference in the absolute volume of the brain or the total cortex between the two groups (p>0.70). However, contrary to our hypotheses, the average hippocampal volume was 2.6% larger in OBRs than in CONs (p = 0.05, Fig 3A). For hippocampal volumes normalized to individual brain volumes, there was a trend for on average 2.1% larger hippocampi volume in OBRs than in CONs (p>0.05). No changes were found in the remaining 50 regions of the brain. Data used in these analyses is provided in S3 Table.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Hippocampal volumes (A) and concentration of metabolities: (B) N-acetylaspartate+N-acetylaspartylglutamate (tNAA), (C) glutamate (Glu) and (D) creatine+phosphocreatine (tCr).

White and black graphs represent control (CONs) and high-fat high carbohydrate diet-treated (OBRs) animals, respectively. The graphs show median values with 25–75% variability range and maximal and minimal values. Decimal indexes indicate statistical significance of intergroup differences (Mann–Whitney U-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139987.g003

Metabolite concentrations

Contrary to our hypothesis, the concentration of tNAA and Glu were respectively (9.8%, p = 0.014 and 8.6%, p = 0.045) higher in OBRs than in CONs (Fig 3B and 3C, respectively). Additionally, tCr was 8.2% higher in OBRs than in CONs (p = 0.045, Fig 3D). There were no differences in tCho, Ino, Tau and GABA concentrations (p>0.05).

These differences were not premorbid, as OBRs had significantly larger lifetime increases in tNAA and tCr than CON between 1st (before switching to HFD) and 12th month (p<0.01). Data used in all the above analyses is provided in S3 Table.

Summary of Findings and General Discussion

In this study, the high-fat diet lead to mild ketonemia, small blood glucose elevations, as well as it better behavioral scores in OBRs throughout lifetime, larger hippocampi and higher concentrations of tNAA and Glu, the marker of neuronal viability and the main excitatory neurotransmitter, respectively.

Larger fat deposits at similar body weight in OBRs than in CONs point to smaller lean body mass, which is consistent with studies on the effects of ketogenic diets [30] or diets inducing mild ketonemia [29]. Better memory in OBRs is consistent with studies of the effects of ketogenic diets on memory (see [24]). Ketogenic diet increases glucose and ketone bodies uptake in the brain of aged rats [31, 32]. Moreover, elevated ketone levels were reported to be positively correlated with memory performance [23, 24]. It has to be stressed that future studies designed to evaluate the long-term effects of mild ketonemia on the brain and its function are necessary.

Our results show similarity to a study by Patten and colleagues [33], who observed that polyunsaturated fatty acids provided by the diet for 11 months improved the learning ability by enhancing synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Similarly to our study, the animals fed the high-calorie diet spent much less time and ran shorter distances in the maze than the control group. Consistent with it, Gunstad and colleagues demonstrated that increase in body mass index (BMI) in humans was associated with improvement in spatial abilities [5] that are likely hippocampal-dependent. Additionally, a high-fat diet (>70% caloric intake from fats) in a Polish nutritional sect did not lead to elevation in triglycerides and LDL to HDL ratio, insulin resistance or systemic inflammation [19]. Similar findings were reported in Eskimo population [20, 21]. Consistent with this, we observed lowered expression of gliosis-associated markers (markers of inflammation) in hippocampi in OBRs [34].

Furthermore, Pancani et al. [35] did not observe any deterioration of learning in a water maze in F344 rats fed high fat diet for 4.5 months. Recently, Beilharz and colleagues [36] showed that a short-term diet (from 5 till 21 days) rich in fats and sugars did not impair the ability to recognize new objects in rats. Thus, the better memory in OBRs might result from an increased level of cholesterol following this type diet application. However, a large body of studies providing smaller percent of energy from fat reported detrimental effects of high-fat diet on memory in animal models [13, 17, 3741], possibly due to larger proportion of saturated and trans-fats, or increased caloric intake. In particular, Molteni with colleagues [38] reported that diet rich in saturated fats and refined sugars impaired spatial learning and lead to certain neurochemical abnormalities in the hippocampal formation, which is one of the brain areas most involved in learning and memory{Winocur, 1999 #796}. However, glucose administration improved spatial memory at least short-term [14].

Thus, prospective studies evaluating the effects of nutrition and physical activity on cognitive functions and markers of neurodegeneration are needed. They should also measure the concentrations of blood ketone bodies and clarify the effects for factors not accounted for in this study, such as potential insulin resistance, the potential role of gut microbiota [42] and genetic differences between individual specimens [43].

Conclusion

This study provides consistent evidence (independent methodologies) that a high fat diet may have positive effects on the hippocampus and its function, as measured with behavior, MRI volumetry, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Caution should be exercised when attempting to generalize our results to humans. Non-dietary factors, such as stress, insufficiency of physical activity, lack of involvement/withdrawal from life activities, depressive symptoms common in obese humans may underpin the link between human obesity and neurodegenerative disease in old age may mediate the link between excessive caloric intake, high fat diet, obesity and poorer cognitive performance in humans. Prospective studies designed to evaluate the long-term effects of mild ketonemia on the brain and its function are necessary.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Male Wistar rats aged 45–50 days were randomly divided into two groups, i.e. rats fed HFD (OBRs) and controls (CONs) fed standard control diet (Labofeed-Morawski, Poland). By weight, the HFD consisted of about 36.5% lard (47% saturated fats, 49% mono- and poly unsaturated fats), 36.9% sucrose, 14.0% proteins, 4.0% vitamins, 1% cellulose, 3% starch/dextrin, essential minerals and trace elements; in terms of energy: 61% came from fats, 28% from sugars, and 11% from proteins. The control diet (4.7% lard; 37.0% starch/dextrin, 25.3% proteins, 4.0% vitamins, 3.9% fiber, 3.2% ash and essential minerals and trace elements) was used throughout the experiment; it translates to 14% energy from fats, 51% from carbohydrates, and 35% from proteins. Smaller protein content in HFD than in the control diet is consistent with human [44, 45] and some animal studies (e.g., [46]).

The animals were housed under conditions of controlled temperature (21 ± 2°C) and illumination (12-h light/dark cycle) in individual cages with unlimited voluntary access to food and water. Every three days food portions that were delivered to the cages and those left uneaten by the animals were weighed to calculate food intake. The animals were weighed every two weeks and the blood levels of ketone bodies and glucose were measured every week in the beginning of the dark phase (with Optium Xido glucometer, Abbott Diabetes Care Ltd., Oxon, UK), excluding weeks/days when behavioral tests were performed) over the period of 12 months [47]. After all experiments the animals were sacrificed with by a lethal dose of pentobarbital and their brain were prepared for post-mortem analyses. The results will be published elsewhere.

All procedures involving the use of animals were approved by the Bioethical Commission of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland, in accordance with international standards.

Behavioral tests

Animals from the two examined groups were subjected to memory test in a radial eight arm maze at 3rd, 6th, 9th, and 12th month of life; each procedure lasted for five days. One day before the training, the food rations were reduced to the half of daily demand according to established procedures [48]. The animals were habituated to the experimental conditions by placing them into the maze for 10 minutes per day during subsequent five days without any reward.

Thereafter, the spatial learning and memory was performed once on each of five consecutive days. A small piece of unsalted and unsweetened crunchy corn was a reward for both control and experimental groups. Following behavioral tests performed before the experiment, this kind of reward was selected from among the other types of food such as chocolate, cakes, candies, fruits, meat and living or dead insects, as there were no effects of diet on performance within a few weeks after introducing HFD. The reward was always placed in the same arm of the maze and the tested animal was placed in the maze center. The experimenter was out of sight of the animal, hidden behind white walls surrounding the maze and showing no visual markers. Behavior was recorded using the system Videomex-One (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA) and the following parameters were automatically calculated: (1) entire time spent in the maze, (2) time of walking (movement), (3) time of immobility, and (4) distance covered by the animal. All trials were finished within 10 minutes.

Magnetic Resonance image acquisition and processing

At one month and at 12th month, brains of the examined animals were scanned with Bruker BioSpec 70/30 Avance III system working at 7T, with a transmit cylindrical radiofrequency coil (15 cm inner diameter) and a receive-only coil array (2x2 elements) positioned over the animal’s head. The animals were positioned prone with the head placed in the stereotactic apparatus and were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane in a mixture of oxygen and air. Respiration, heart rate, and oxygen saturation were monitored throughout the experiment. Rectal temperature was kept at 37°C by placing the animal on top of temperature controlled warm water blanket. Tripilot scans were used for accurate positioning of the animals inside the magnet.

Structural MR images covering the brain without olfactory bulb were acquired with T2-weighted TurboRARE (TR/TE = 4700/30ms, RARE factor = 4, resolution = 125x 125x500μm, no gap, NEX = 7, TA = 27 min) for brain parcellation (see below).

MR images were resampled to isotropic resolution of 125μm/vox and then processed with N4 algorithm [49] to correct for intensity inhomogenity. Afterwards, a single image was chosen randomly and the brain outline was drawn semi automatically using the ITK-Snap software [50] and transferred to the other images using the Symmetric normalization (SyN) nonlinear image registration algorithm (ANTS software package [51]. Skull stripped brain images were then parceled by warping to the template proposed by Valdes-Hernandez et al. [52] that included 50 brain, mostly cortical regions. This template was extended by manual parcellation of the hippocampus (PM). All parcelled images were visually reviewed to assure quality. Exemplary parcellation of hippocampi is depicted in Fig 4. Absolute volumes were reported. Additionally, to account for intersubject variability, hippocampal volumes were scaled to the whole brain and compared between groups.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Exemplary parcellation of hippocampus: red = hippocampus, yellow = cortex, blue = cerebro-spinal fluid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139987.g004

1H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy acquisition and processing

To obtain the spectra of brain metabolites, localized proton spectroscopy at short echo was performed using PRESS sequence (TR/TE = 3500/20 ms, 256 averages, 8,192 points, TA = 15min) with VAPOR water suppression, the outer volume suppression, and frequency drift correction (flip angle 7 deg.). No eddy current correction was performed at this step. Each measurement was carried out in a single volume of interest (8 x 2 x 2 mm3) encompassing hippocampus (Fig 5). The FASTMAP shimming procedure was performed. The unsuppressed water line width was typically maintained at around 10–15 Hz. Metabolite concentrations were determined using a linear combination analysis method LCModel (Stephen Provencher Inc, Oakville, Ontario, Canada; [53] (Fig 6). The unsuppressed water signal measured from the same volume of interest was used as internal reference for absolute metabolite quantification. Metabolite concentrations are reported in institutional units (i.u.).

All spectra were visually reviewed for quality. Only metabolites that demonstrated good reliability on test-retest [54] were used in analyses: tNAA (N-Acetylaspartate + N-Acetylaspartylglutamate), tCr (Creatine + Phosphocreatine), tCho (Glycerophosphocholine +Phosphocholine), Ins (myo-Inositol), GABA (γ-Aminobutyric Acid), and Tau (Taurine).

Statistical analyses

Due to non-Gaussian distribution of parameters, median values and non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test are reported. Per cent differences between groups were calculated based on medians (imaging data, physiology, but not behavior). Hippocampal volumes had Gaussian distribution and a parametric t-test was used. For not hypothesized contrasts Bonferroni corrections were applied. A significance level of p<0.05 (after correction for multiple comparisons) was considered statistically significant. In follow-up analyses, relationships between measures were evaluated using appropriate statistics. All statistical tests were conducted with SPSS-21 for Windows (SPSS; Chicago, IL).

Supporting Information

S3 Table. MRI and MRS data for spectroscopy and volumetric analyses

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139987.s003

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We extend our gratitude to Ewelina Kaniewska and Gabriel Gazdzinski for follow-up analyses and discussions.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SPG ZS. Performed the experiments: JJO KK JO BK. Analyzed the data: ZS JJO KK PM BK JO PB AG SPG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KJ PM AG MW. Wrote the paper: ZS AG PM JO BK KJ MW SPG.

References

  1. 1. Volkow ND WG, Baler RD. Reward, dopamine and the control of food intake: implications for obesity. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(1):36–46.
  2. 2. Gunstad J, Paul RH, Cohen RA, Tate DF, Spitznagel MB, Gordon E. Elevated body mass index is associated with executive dysfunction in otherwise healthy adults. Compr Psychiatry. 2007;48(1):57–61. pmid:17145283.
  3. 3. Stanek KM, Strain G, Devlin M, Cohen R, Paul R, Crosby RD, et al. Body Mass Index and Neurocognitive Functioning Across the Adult Lifespan. Neuropsychology. 2013;27(2):141–51. pmid:WOS:000316528700001.
  4. 4. Sabia S, Kivimaki M, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG, Singh-Manoux A. Body mass index over the adult life course and cognition in late midlife: the Whitehall II Cohort Study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009;89(2):601–7. pmid:WOS:000262608700019.
  5. 5. Gunstad J, Lhotsky A, Wendell CR, Ferrucci L, Zonderman AB. Longitudinal Examination of Obesity and Cognitive Function: Results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34(4):222–9. pmid:WOS:000275967100005.
  6. 6. Gazdzinski S, Kornak J, Weiner MW, Meyerhoff DJ. Body mass index and magnetic resonance markers of brain integrity in adults. Annals of Neurology. 2008;63(5):652–7. pmid:WOS:000255960600014.
  7. 7. Gazdzinski S, Millin R, Kaiser LG, Durazzo TC, Mueller SG, Weiner MW, et al. BMI and Neuronal Integrity in Healthy, Cognitively Normal Elderly: A Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study. Obesity. 2010;18(4):743–8. pmid:WOS:000276665200016.
  8. 8. Ross B, Tran T, Bhattacharya P, Watterson DM, Sailasuta N. Application of NMR Spectroscopy in Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 2011;11(1):93–114. pmid:WOS:000286222500007.
  9. 9. Young LR, Nestle M. The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic. American Journal of Public Health. 2002;92(2):246–9. pmid:WOS:000173558000025.
  10. 10. Gillette-Guyonnet S, Secher M, Vellas B. Nutrition and neurodegeneration: epidemiological evidence and challenges for future research. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2013;75(3):738–55. pmid:WOS:000314654800015.
  11. 11. Morris MC, Tangney CC. Dietary fat composition and dementia risk. Neurobiology of Aging. 2014;35 Suppl 2:S59–64. pmid:MEDLINE:24970568.
  12. 12. Freeman LR, Haley-Zitlin V, Rosenberger DS, Granholm A-C. Damaging effects of a high-fat diet to the brain and cognition: A review of proposed mechanisms. Nutritional Neuroscience. 2014;17(6):241–51. pmid:WOS:000342507200001.
  13. 13. Granholm A-C, Bimonte-Nelson HA, Moore AB, Nelson ME, Freeman LR, Sambamurti K. Effects of a saturated fat and high cholesterol diet on memory and hippocampal morphology in the middle-aged rat. Journal of Alzheimers Disease. 2008;14(2):133–45. pmid:WOS:000256624400002.
  14. 14. Greenwood CE, Winocur G. Glucose treatment reduces memory deficits in young adult rats fed high-fat diets. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 2001;75(2):179–89. pmid:WOS:000167283400006.
  15. 15. Winocur G, Greenwood CE. The effects of high fat diets and environmental influences on cognitive performance in rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 1999;101(2):153–61. pmid:WOS:000080541900002.
  16. 16. Bauer L, Dick D, Bierut L, Bucholz K, Edenberg H, Kuperman S, et al. Obesity, Smoking, and Frontal Brain Dysfunction. American Journal on Addictions. 2010;19(5):391–400. pmid:ISI:000281059000002.
  17. 17. Farr SA, Yamada KA, Butterfield DA, Abdul HM, Xu L, Miller NE, et al. Obesity and hypertriglyceridemia produce cognitive impairment. Endocrinology. 2008;149(5):2628–36. pmid:18276751.
  18. 18. Morten Scheibye-Knudsen SJM , Evandro F. Fang, Teruaki Iyama, Theresa Ward, James Wang, Christopher A. Dunn, Nagendra Singh, Sebastian Veith, Hasan-Olive Md Mahdi, Aswin Mangerich, Mark A. Wilson, Mark P. Mattson, Linda H. Bergersen, Victoria C. Cogger, Alessandra Warren, Le Couteur David G., Ruin Moaddel, David M. Wilson III, Deborah L. Croteau, Rafael de Cabo, Vilhelm A. Bohr. A High-Fat Diet and NAD+ Activate Sirt1 to Rescue Premature Aging in Cockayne Syndrome. Cell Metabolism. 2014;20(5):16. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.10.005.
  19. 19. Grieb P, Klapcinska B, Smol E, Pilis T, Pilis W, Sadowska-Krepa E, et al. Long-term consumption of a carbohydrate-restricted diet does not induce deleterious metabolic effects. Nutrition research (New York, NY). 2008;28(12):825–33. pmid:MEDLINE:19083495.
  20. 20. Dyerberg J, Bang HO, Hjorne N. Plasma Cholesterol Concentration in Caucasian Danes and Greenland West-Coast Eskimos. Danish Medical Bulletin. 1977;24(2):52–5. pmid:WOS:A1977DE73800003.
  21. 21. Munch-Andersen T, Olsen DB, Sondergaard H, Daugaard JR, Bysted A, Christensen DL, et al. Metabolic profile in two physically active Inuit groups consuming either a western or a traditional Inuit diet. International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 2012;71. pmid:WOS:000308225600002.
  22. 22. Jeppesen C, Bjerregaard P, Jorgensen ME. Dietary patterns in Greenland and their relationship with type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance. Public Health Nutrition. 2014;17(2):462–70. pmid:WOS:000332957800026.
  23. 23. Krikorian R, Shidler MD, Dangelo K, Couch SC, Benoit SC, Clegg DJ. Dietary ketosis enhances memory in mild cognitive impairment. Neurobiology of Aging. 2012;33(2). pmid:WOS:000298171800033.
  24. 24. Hallbook T, Ji S, Maudsley S, Martin B. The effects of the ketogenic diet on behavior and cognition. Epilepsy Research. 2012;100(3):304–9. pmid:WOS:000307530400017.
  25. 25. Koenner AC, Janoschek R, Plum L, Jordan SD, Rother E, Ma X, et al. Insulin action in AgRP-expressing neurons is required for suppression of hepatic glucose production. Cell Metabolism. 2007;5(6):438–49. pmid:WOS:000247115400007.
  26. 26. Kloeckener T, Hess S, Belgardt BF, Paeger L, Verhagen LAW, Husch A, et al. High-fat feeding promotes obesity via insulin receptor/PI3K-dependent inhibition of SF-1 VMH neurons. Nature Neuroscience. 2011;14(7):911–U139. pmid:WOS:000292081700020.
  27. 27. Auer MK, Sack M, Lenz JN, Jakovcevski M, Biedermann SV, Falfan-Melgoza C, et al. Effects of a high-caloric diet and physical exercise on brain metabolite levels: a combined proton MRS and histologic study. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2015;35(4):554–64. pmid:WOS:000352027900005.
  28. 28. Iritani N, Fukuda H, Tada K. Nutritional regulation of lipogenic enzyme gene expression in rat epididymal adipose tissue. Journal of Biochemistry. 1996;120(2):242–8. pmid:WOS:A1996VC48900006.
  29. 29. Courchesne-Loyer A, Fortier M, Tremblay-Mercier J, Chouinard-Watkins R, Roy M, Nugent S, et al. Stimulation of mild, sustained ketonemia by medium-chain triacylglycerols in healthy humans: Estimated potential contribution to brain energy metabolism. Nutrition. 2013;29(4):635–40. pmid:WOS:000316779300008.
  30. 30. Bielohuby M, Menhofer D, Kirchner H, Stoehr BJM, Mueller TD, Stock P, et al. Induction of ketosis in rats fed low-carbohydrate, high-fat diets depends on the relative abundance of dietary fat and protein. American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2011;300(1):E65–E76. pmid:WOS:000285711200009.
  31. 31. Roy M, Nugent S, Tremblay-Mercier J, Tremblay S, Courchesne-Loyer A, Beaudoin J-F, et al. The ketogenic diet increases brain glucose and ketone uptake in aged rats: A dual tracer PET and volumetric MRI study. Brain Research. 2012;1488:14–23. pmid:WOS:000312356800002.
  32. 32. Cunnane S, Nugent S, Roy M, Courchesne-Loyer A, Croteau E, Tremblay S, et al. Brain fuel metabolism, aging, and Alzheimer's disease. Nutrition. 2011;27(1):3–20. pmid:WOS:000285659700002.
  33. 33. Patten AR, Moller DJ, Graham J, Gil-Mohapel J, Christie BR. Liquid Diets Reduce Cell Proliferation but Not Neurogenesis in the Adult Rat Hippocampus. Neuroscience. 2013;254:173–84. pmid:WOS:000327279400016.
  34. 34. Gzielo-Jurek K, Setkowicz Z, Kielbinski M, Ploszaj J, Janeczko K, Gazdzinski S. Lowered expression of gliosis-associated markers in aging rats fed a high-fat diet. Folia Neuropathologica. 2014;12th International Symposium “Molecular basis of pathology and therapy in neurological disorders”:332–3.
  35. 35. Pancani T, Anderson KL, Brewer LD, Kadish I, DeMoll C, Landfield PW, et al. Effect of high-fat diet on metabolic indices, cognition, and neuronal physiology in aging F344 rats. Neurobiology of Aging. 2013;34(8):1977–87. pmid:WOS:000319803100006.
  36. 36. Beilharz JE, Maniam J, Morris MJ. Short exposure to a diet rich in both fat and sugar or sugar alone impairs place, but not object recognition memory in rats. Brain Behavior and Immunity. 2014;37:134–41. pmid:WOS:000333071000016.
  37. 37. Winocur G, Greenwood CE. Studies of the effects of high fat diets on cognitive function in a rat model. Neurobiology of Aging. 2005;26 Suppl 1:46–9. pmid:MEDLINE:16219391.
  38. 38. Molteni R, Barnard RJ, Ying Z, Roberts CK, Gomez-Pinilla F. A high-fat, refined sugar diet reduces hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neuronal plasticity, and learning. Neuroscience. 2002;112(4):803–14. doi: Pii s0306-4522(02)00123-9 pmid:WOS:000176905500006.
  39. 39. Stranahan AM, Norman ED, Lee K, Cutler RG, Telljohann RS, Egan JM, et al. Diet-Induced Insulin Resistance Impairs Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity and Cognition in Middle-Aged Rats. Hippocampus. 2008;18(11):1085–8. pmid:WOS:000260914000001.
  40. 40. White CL, Pistell PJ, Purpera MN, Gupta S, Fernandez-Kim SO, Hise TL, et al. Effects of high fat diet on Morris maze performance, oxidative stress, and inflammation in rats: Contributions of maternal diet. Neurobiology of Disease. 2009;35(1):3–13. pmid:WOS:000267095600002.
  41. 41. Jurdak N, Kanarek RB. Sucrose-induced obesity impairs novel object recognition learning in young rats. Physiology & Behavior. 2009;96(1):1–5. pmid:WOS:000263014000001.
  42. 42. Tremaroli V, Backhed F. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature. 2012;489(7415):242–9. pmid:WOS:000308635900032.
  43. 43. Pecoraro N, Ginsberg AB, Warne JP, Gomez F, la Fleur SE, Dallman MF. Diverse basal and stress-related phenotypes of Sprague Dawley rats from three vendors. Physiology & Behavior. 2006;89(4):598–610. pmid:WOS:000242539600021.
  44. 44. Imai E, Tsubota-Utsugi M, Kikuya M, Satoh M, Inoue R, Hosaka M, et al. Animal protein intake is associated with higher-level functional capacity in elderly adults: the Ohasama study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2014;62(3):426–34. pmid:MEDLINE:24576149.
  45. 45. Merchant AT, Anand SS, Vuksan M, Jacobs R, Davis B, Teo K, et al. Protein intake is inversely associated with abdominal obesity in a multi-ethnic population. Journal of Nutrition. 2005;135(5):1196–201. pmid:WOS:000228953600038.
  46. 46. Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Protein intake and energy balance. Regulatory Peptides. 2008;149(1–3):67–9. pmid:WOS:000259382700011.
  47. 47. Quinn R. Comparing rat's to human's age: How old is my rat in people years? Nutrition. 2005;21:3.
  48. 48. Hayes AW. Principles and methods of toxicology: CRC Press; 2007.
  49. 49. Tustison NJ, Avants BB, Cook PA, Zheng Y, Egan A, Yushkevich PA, et al. N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2010;29(6):1310–20. pmid:WOS:000278535800009.
  50. 50. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;31(3):1116–28. pmid:WOS:000238358500015.
  51. 51. Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Medical Image Analysis. 2008;12(1):26–41. pmid:WOS:000254032800004.
  52. 52. Valdes-Hernandez PA, Sumiyoshi A, Nonaka H, Haga R, Aubert-Vasquez E, Ogawa T, et al. An in vivo MRI Template Set for Morphometry, Tissue Segmentation, and fMRI Localization in Rats. Frontiers in neuroinformatics. 2011;5:26–. pmid:MEDLINE:22275894.
  53. 53. Provencher SW. Automatic Quantitation of Localized In Vivo 1H Spectra with LC Model. NMR Biomed. 2001;14:260–4. pmid:11410943
  54. 54. Wijtenburg SA, Rowland LM, Edden RAE, Barker PB. Reproducibility of brain spectroscopy at 7T using conventional localization and spectral editing techniques. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2013;38(2):460–7. pmid:WOS:000323205300025.