Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Effortless Attention as a Biomarker for Experienced Mindfulness Practitioners

  • Guaraci Ken Tanaka,

    Affiliations Institute of Applied Neuroscience (INA), Rio de Janeiro,Brasil, Mente Aberta, Brazilian Center for Mindfulness and Health Promotion, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brasil, Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Tolou Maslahati,

    Affiliation Faculty of Human Sciences, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

  • Mariana Gongora,

    Affiliation Brain Mapping and Sensory Motor Integration, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Juliana Bittencourt,

    Affiliations Institute of Applied Neuroscience (INA), Rio de Janeiro,Brasil, Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, Veiga de Almeida University, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Luiz Carlos Serramo Lopez,

    Affiliation Behavioral Ecology and Psychobiology Laboratory, Department of Systematics and Ecology, Universidade Federal da Paraiba (UFPB), Paraíba, Brasil

  • Marcelo Marcos Piva Demarzo,

    Affiliation Mente Aberta, Brazilian Center for Mindfulness and Health Promotion, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brasil

  • Henning Budde,

    Affiliations Faculty of Human Sciences, Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, Sport Science, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland

  • Silmar Teixeira,

    Affiliation Brain Mapping and Plasticity Laboratory, Federal University of Piauí (UFPI), Piaui, Brasil

  • Luis Fernando Basile,

    Affiliations Laboratory of Psychophysiology, Faculdade da Saúde, UMESP, São Paulo, Brazil, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Javier Garcia Campayo,

    Affiliation Migue Servet University Hospital, Aragonese Institute of Health Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

  • Mauricio Cagy,

    Affiliation Biomedical Engineering Program, COPPE, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Pedro Ribeiro,

    Affiliations Brain Mapping and Sensory Motor Integration, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, Institute of Applied Neuroscience (INA), Rio de Janeiro,Brasil, Bioscience Department, School of Physical Education of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

  • Bruna Velasques

    bruna_velasques@yahoo.com.br

    Affiliations Institute of Applied Neuroscience (INA), Rio de Janeiro,Brasil, Bioscience Department, School of Physical Education of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, Neurophysiology and Neuropsychology of Attention, Institute of Psychiatry of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil

Effortless Attention as a Biomarker for Experienced Mindfulness Practitioners

  • Guaraci Ken Tanaka, 
  • Tolou Maslahati, 
  • Mariana Gongora, 
  • Juliana Bittencourt, 
  • Luiz Carlos Serramo Lopez, 
  • Marcelo Marcos Piva Demarzo, 
  • Henning Budde, 
  • Silmar Teixeira, 
  • Luis Fernando Basile, 
  • Javier Garcia Campayo
PLOS
x

Abstract

Objective

The present study aimed at comparing frontal beta power between long-term (LTM) and first-time meditators (FTM), before, during and after a meditation session. We hypothesized that LTM would present lower beta power than FTM due to lower effort of attention and awareness.

Methods

Twenty one participants were recruited, eleven of whom were long-term meditators. The subjects were asked to rest for 4 minutes before and after open monitoring (OM) meditation (40 minutes).

Results

The two-way ANOVA revealed an interaction between the group and moment factors for the Fp1 (p<0.01), F7 (p = 0.01), F3 (p<0.01), Fz (p<0.01), F4 (p<0.01), F8 (p<0.01) electrodes.

Conclusion

We found low power frontal beta activity for LTM during the task and this may be associated with the fact that OM is related to bottom-up pathways that are not present in FTM.

Significance

We hypothesized that the frontal beta power pattern may be a biomarker for LTM. It may also be related to improving an attentive state and to the efficiency of cognitive functions, as well as to the long-term experience with meditation (i.e., life-time experience and frequency of practice).

Introduction

Many studies seek to understand the neurophysiology of sustained attention [15]. In conditions when more external stimuli than can be fully processed activate the central nervous system (CNS), attentional impairments result, such as stress, distraction, forgetfulness, anxiety, memory loss, and fatigue [68]. This impairment is discussed in studies of working memory, default mode network, and attentional disorder studies. Recent studies have demonstrated the role of meditation as an important tool for attention management [911].

In this context, mindfulness meditation is one important method that increases attention performance. Specially, some studies demonstrated that a specific type of mindfulness, Open Monitoring (OM) [12], increases posterior alpha power with a high frontal theta power [13,14]. Researchers also observed that experienced OM meditators showed an increase of occipital and frontoparietal gamma activity, due to an improvement of sensory awareness [15,16]. Beta activity in relation to meditation has only been investigated in a few studies until now. In the current literature we have found four studies that examined beta power and meditation. One study observed the general increase of beta power in the elderly meditation novices [17]. Dor-Ziderman et al. (2013) investigated the long-term OM and observed a beta power decrease in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex [17,18]. Further studies showed a different pattern of frontal beta power when compared to another meditation practice [19,20].

OM meditation favors sustained attention without judgment of ongoing phenomena [12]. These mindfulness properties are thought to improve self-regulation and stress management by allowing individuals to refrain from trying to control the content of mind [2123]. Nevertheless, we suggest that frequency plays an important role when comparing long-term meditators (LTM) with first-time meditators (FTM), particularly regarding activity in the frontal areas [20,21,24]. Beta band frequency (13-30Hz) is associated with attention, vigilance and processing information [25,26], but the literature regarding the neurophysiology of frontal beta activity and meditation is scant. We observed a lack of consistent reports on the regulatory mechanisms of beta oscillations related to the self-awareness process in OM. In this context, the aim of the present study was to investigate frontal beta power differences between long-term and first-time meditators, before, during and after a meditation session. We expected increased beta for both groups during OM versus during rest, before and after OM, but generally lower beta in LTM vs. FTM due to lower sustained attention effort expected in the group of experienced meditators.

Materials and Methods

Participants

We recruited twenty-one participants, out of which eleven were experienced meditators (7 men, mean age 43,8 ± 17,53) and ten were healthy first-time meditators (5 men, mean age 40,10 ± 14,72). The group of experienced meditators includes monks and laymen from various Buddhist traditions, and were recruited from three major meditation centers (i.e., Zen, Kadampa and Vipassana), localized around the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). The group of first-time meditators (i.e., control group) was recruited at the UFRJ. We contacted all the participants two weeks before starting the research. The condition for the experienced meditators was to have been practicing regularly at least for the last five years (12,23 years of practice ± 7,65), while living under the same social conditions as the control group (i.e. in the same city, and to be exposed to the same environment; i.e., no secluded life in Buddhist centers). All participants were medication-free and had no sensory, motor, cognitive or attention deficits that could affect their performance. Subjects gave their written consent (according to the Helsinki Declaration) to participate in the study. The Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) approved the experiment.

Task protocol

Subjects sat in a straight position, in a darkened and noise-free room, to minimize sensory interference. First, we recorded 4 minutes of resting EEG (resting instructions were particularly emphasized for meditators, to refrain them from entering the meditative state). After that the subjects were recorded while performing the OM for 40 minutes. The experiment ended by recording 4 minutes of rest again. An auditory signal marked the beginning and end of each stage.

Mindfulness instructions for LTM and FTM were: “pay attention to whatever comes into your awareness. Whatever it is, a stressful thought, an emotion or body sensation, just let it pass in an effortless way, without trying to maintain it or change it in any way, until something else comes into your consciousness”[27]. The researcher gave the instructions right before the start of the practice, as we believed this would promote better motivation as a first attempt of a new activity. Due to its simplicity, the technique could be implemented by all subjects, and we considered this as particularly important, since subjects reported that they had no problems to follow the instructions.

EEG recording

The International 10/20 EEG electrode system (Jasper, 1958) was used with a 20-channel EEG system (Braintech-3000, EMSA Medical Instruments, Brazil). The 20 electrodes were arranged on a nylon cap (ElectroCap Inc., Fairfax, VA, USA) yielding mono-polar derivation using the earlobes as reference. The impedance of EEG and EOG electrodes was kept between 5–10 kΩ. The amplitude of the recorded data was less than 70μV. The EEG signal was amplified with a gain of 22.000 Hz, analogically filtered between 0.01Hz (high-pass) and 80Hz (low-pass), and sampled at 200 Hz. The software Data Acquisition (Delphi 5.0) from the Brain Mapping and Sensory Motor Integration Lab, was employed with the notch (60 Hz) digital filter.

Data analysis

Data analysis was performed by using MATLAB 5.3 (Mathworks, Inc.) and EEGLAB toolbox (http://sccn.ucsd.edu/eeglab). We applied a visual inspection and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to remove possible sources of artifacts produced by the task (i.e., blink, muscle). We collected the data using the bi-auricular reference. Furthermore the data was transformed (re-referenced) to common average reference, after conducting the artifact elimination by ICA filtering.

At first, we divided the tasks (rest 1, meditation, rest 2) into segments of 6000 data points, corresponding to 30-second blocks. Secondly, as meditation trials lasted 40 minutes [28,29,25], we chose to analyze eight blocks (total of 4 min), corresponding to the moment between 30–34 minutes, which is consistent with the moment in which experienced meditators recognize entering a deeper state [26]. For that moment we had 24 trials of 30-second blocks. A fast Fourier transform method was used to obtain the mean power amplitudes in the beta (13–30 Hz) band.

The number of samples was 6000 (30s × 200Hz) with rectangular windowing. We calculated absolute beta power on each lead individually every four seconds, totaling seven excerpts for each block. Thus, 1680 was the total data of the control group (24 trials x 7 absolute power samples x 10 subjects) and 1848 the total data of the meditator group (24 trials x 7 absolute power samples x 11 subjects). In fact, this sampling rate is commonly used in other frequencies, but we focused on the beta band due to a specific analyzis [30,31]. As the data was not normally distributed, a logarithmic transformation was used.

Statistical analysis

In the statistical analysis, we log10-transformed the EEG absolute power values by the SPSS software (version 15.0) to approximate a normal distribution. We performed a two-way ANOVA and a post hoc test (Bonferroni) to analyze the factor group (LTM x FTM) and moment (rest 1, meditation and rest 2) of absolute beta power for each electrode individually. The effect size was calculated as Cohen's d, i.e., changes' mean divided by changes' SD.

We also performed a t-test for all frontal electrodes (Fp1, Fp2, F3, Fz, F4, F7 and F8) comparing LTM versus FTM groups for each moment (rest 1, meditation and rest 2).

Results

We analyzed absolute beta power in the frontal area (i.e., Fp1, Fp2, F3, Fz, F4, F7 and F8 electrodes). The two-way ANOVA revealed an interaction between the group and moment factors for the Fp1 (p<0.01), F7 (p = 0.01), F3 (p<0.01), Fz (p<0.01), F4 (p<0.01), F8 (p<0.01) electrodes. Examining the Fp1 interaction, we identified a difference between rest 1 and rest 2; and between meditation and rest 2 for LTM. Specifically, we found a higher beta power for rest 2 when compared to the other moments. We did not find a difference between rest 1 and meditation for LTM. For the FTM group, we observed a difference between rest 1 and meditation; and between rest 1 and rest 2. This group presented lower beta power for rest 1 when compared to the other moments. In other words, beta is increased from rest 1 during meditation for FTM and there is no difference from rest 1 to meditation for LTM (Fig 1 and Table 1). For this electrode, a t-test between groups showed significant difference only for rest 1 and meditation (Table 2). For F3 and Fz, both FTM and LTM had lower beta power at rest 1, when compared to meditation and rest 2 (Fig 1 and Table 1). For these electrodes, a t-test between groups showed significant difference for rest 1, meditation and rest 2 (Table 2). For F4, the LTM and FTM had lower beta power at rest 1 when compared to meditation and rest 2 (Fig 1 and Table 1). As opposed to that, FTM beta power was lower at rest 2, when compared to meditation and higher than rest 1 (Fig 1 and Table 1). For this electrode, a t-test between groups showed significant difference only for meditation and rest 2 (Table 2). For F7, both LTM and FTM had lower beta power at rest 1, when compared to meditation and rest 2 (Fig 1 and Table 1). For this electrode, a t-test between groups showed significant difference for rest 1, meditation and rest 2 (Table 2). Examining the interaction for F8, we found a difference between meditation and rest1, and meditation and rest 2 for LTM. We also identified difference among all the moments for FTM (Table 1). For this electrode, a t-test between groups showed significant difference for rest 1, meditation and rest 2 (Table 2).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Comparisons of LONG-TERM (LTM) and FIRST-TIME (FTM) meditators in the moment (rest 1 (●); meditation (■); rest 2 (▲)) for all frontal electrodes.

Data represent the mean ± SD frequency of logged absolute beta power (log10 transformed) for each electrode. A 2 × 3 ANOVA showed significantly differences in the marked bars (p < 0.05; exact values in Table 1). (* represents significant p values) The bars represent the moments that demonstrate difference between them when we examining the interaction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138561.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Group x Moment t-test of within groups effects showing p-values and effect size (Cohen’s d) representing differences between two groups.

(* represents significant p values).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138561.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Group x Moment Interaction.

T-Test of between groups for each moment, showing p-values and effect size representing differences between two groups. (* represents significant p values).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138561.t002

We found a main effect for group and moment for the Fp2 electrode. A main effect for group with a lower absolute beta power was found for the LTM, when compared to the FTM. A main effect for moment with a lower absolute beta power was found at rest 1, rather than for meditation and rest 2; also beta was lower at meditation than at rest 2 (Fig 2). To further explore the Fp2 result, we applied a one-way ANOVA for each group separately. We did not find differences between rest1-meditation, only for LTM (Fig 1 and Table 1). We found significant differences between groups for all frontal electrodes together (Fp1, Fp2, F3, Fz, F4, F7 and F8) using a t-test for each moment (p<0.01) (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 2. A 2 × 3 ANOVA design showed a main effect for group and moment for Fp2 electrode.

a) Comparisons of LTM and FTM absolute beta power (logged mean ± SD) (log10 transformed) showed significant differences between groups (p = 0.02); b) Comparisons of rest 1, meditation and rest 2 absolute beta power (logged mean ± SD) (log10 transformed) showed a significant increase for rest 1 to meditation (p = 0.01), meditation to rest 2 (p<0.01) and rest 1 to rest 2 (p<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138561.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. A t-test showed a significant difference for frontal beta activity in the rest 1 (p<0.01), meditation (p<0.01) and rest 2 (p<0.01) when compared LTM to FTM.

All frontal electrodes are included (Fp1, Fp2, F3, Fz, F4, F7 and F8) and separated for each moment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138561.g003

Discussion

The aim of this study was to clarify the neurophysiology of absolute beta power in the frontal area comparing FTM and LTM performing OM meditation. We hypothesized that attentional regulation promotes an altered frontal beta modulation[3234]. We observed that the maintenance of attention in the present moment produced lower frontal beta power in LTM when compared to FTM (Fig 3), representing a specific meditative trait. Our preliminary results indicate a beta power increase in the frontal area during meditation for both groups. The findings are supported by the previous studies relating beta activity and attentional state [3537,24,38]. Therefore, some studies have shown different understanding about OM mechanisms, as discussed below.

Frontal beta rhythm is prevalent during attentional activity. However, its role in the meditative state remains unclear. Beta is a low-mid frequency range rhythm that is detected when subjects are alert and in an attentive state [5,35], and also reflects the oscillation of the anticipatory processes in the motor system [36,39]. Moreover, this process seems to be different in OM. Previous studies demonstrated that OM improves self-regulation and stress management by allowing individuals effortless attention processing [4042].

The literature has shown that the intensity and life-time experience of meditation practice contribute to the progression of the mental training [32,43,44]. Moreover, previous studies have shown that OM practice improves the maintenance of attention depending on the time of training and may contribute to the efficiency of the cognitive processes such as executive processing (i.e. working memory)[34]. Likewise, LTM are able to modulate emotion and cognition through the bottom-up pathways without the main influence of the prefrontal cortex[33].

The opposite pattern is noted with FTM, showing a high cognitive control to modulate attention and perception, suggesting a top-down regulation[32,33]. In this case, it is expected that the FTM present higher beta power. Our results are in agreement with this hypothesis. We found a similar beta pattern for both groups at all the moments investigated (rest 1, meditation, rest 2). However, we observed that FTM presented a higher beta band during meditation when compared to LTM for all electrodes observed, except for the right prefrontal cortex (i.e., Fp2), as showed in Fig 1. In other words, we suggest that FTM`s higher beta in the frontal cortex occurs due to the fact that this group exerts more effort to maintain the attention fixed on a specific thought or sensation, also called “object” (i.e. breath, body sensation); this is seen in FTM more than in LTM, who are already better trained to sustain the OM practice[19].

The OM practice provides a dynamic flow of attention different from focused attention[45]. Some mindfulness body scan studies have shown a misperception decrease and a sensitivity increase[4648] in case of distress deriving from unpleasant body sensations, such as pain sensitization[49,50]. Recently, Engel and Fries (2010)[36] demonstrated that top-down and bottom-up frontal beta activities are associated with expectancy of the following event, thus also manifesting attentional activity[51].

Although we did not measure the level of expectancy of our subjects, we hypothesized that the beta power increased in FTM was also associated with the level of expectancy and low flexibility of sustained attention without focus on a specific object. In this context, the differences between the groups are associated with the meditator´s ability to modulate sensation and perception strategies [32]. The OM meditative state depends on a specific mental training which is optimized by the experience and/or time of practice, and it is only generated arousal and motivation [51].

Other recent studies have implicated different pathways to explain lower frontal activity during the attentional process, observing that the prefrontal cortex does not modulate attention processing during the OM practice. The discussion is based on the bottom-up processing during OM meditative state. This meditative practice, often viewed as an emotional regulation strategy, has been associated with a lower frontal cortex activity [32,52]. At the same time hyperactivity occurs in the prefrontal cortex when related to an altered state working memory, executive attention, emotional reappraisal and cognitive monitoring[32,33,53].

Furthermore, this increased activity is also associated with the narrative focus, occurring mainly in the medial prefrontal cortex. The typical narrative focus (e.g. discursive thought) impairs attention-task performance, involving mental elaboration and evocation and overloading working memory processies [54]. Examining the interaction in Fp1, we observed that for FTM the rest 1 is different from the meditation moment; and we did not find this difference for the LTM (Fig 1 and Table 1). Our results also demonstrated that lower beta power found for LTM is related to effortless attention, which is not found for FTM. This finding suggest that experienced meditators are trained to maintain the attention state even before starting the meditation; which suggests that the meditation training regularity improves attention. The LTM medial prefrontal cortex (Fz) showed higher beta power at rest 1, due to the maintenance of the self-referential mental processing even when not meditating[51]. This pattern was different during meditation on account of a lower activity of the LTM supporting the effortless hypothesis. In both situations, increased beta power was observed during meditation, but the FTM showed higher power than LTM.

In conclusion, LTM have a particular trait, which differentiates them when compared to FTM. Lower frontal beta activity is associated with the particularity of OM being related to bottom-up pathways. On the other hand, an increased activity in the frontal area has been found when attention was focused on a specific object, used as an attentive state maintenance tool by FTM more than by LTM. We hypothesize that this pattern associated with LTM improved their attentive state, while maintaining low cognitive demands. Due to the enhanced learning, related both to time and intensity of practice, it may be a promising biomarker to differentiate experienced mindfulness practitioners in further studies.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GKT MC PR. Performed the experiments: GKT. Analyzed the data: MG JB ST BV HB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LFB LCSL. Wrote the paper: GKT TM ST MPD JGC BV.

References

  1. 1. Lutz A, Slagter HA, Rawlings NB, Francis AD, Greischar LL, et al. (2009) Mental training enhances attentional stability: neural and behavioral evidence. J Neurosci 29: 13418–13427. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2789281&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 3 November 2012. pmid:19846729
  2. 2. Mitchell DJ, McNaughton N, Flanagan D, Kirk IJ (2008) Frontal-midline theta from the perspective of hippocampal “theta”. Prog Neurobiol 86: 156–185. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18824212. Accessed 5 November 2012. pmid:18824212
  3. 3. Fiebelkorn IC, Snyder AC, Mercier MR, Butler JS, Molholm S, et al. (2012) Cortical cross-frequency coupling predicts perceptual outcomes. Neuroimage 69c: 126–137. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811912011330. Accessed 26 November 2012.
  4. 4. Klimesch W (2012) Α-Band Oscillations, Attention, and Controlled Access To Stored Information. Trends Cogn Sci 16: 606–617. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3507158&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 28 April 2014. pmid:23141428
  5. 5. Chiesa A, Serretti A (2010) A systematic review of neurobiological and clinical features of mindfulness meditations. Psychol Med 40: 1239–1252. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19941676. Accessed 28 October 2012. pmid:19941676
  6. 6. Borghini G, Vecchiato G, Toppi J, Astolfi L, Maglione A, et al. (2012) Assessment of mental fatigue during car driving by using high resolution EEG activity and neurophysiologic indices. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012: 6442–6445. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23367404. pmid:23367404
  7. 7. Vago DR, Silbersweig DA (2012) Self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-transcendence (S-ART): a framework for understanding the neurobiological mechanisms of mindfulness. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 296. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3480633&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 7 August 2013. pmid:23112770
  8. 8. Lavretsky H (2009) Complementary and alternative medicine use for treatment and prevention of late-life mood and cognitive disorders. Aging health 5: 61–78. Complementary. pmid:19956796
  9. 9. Kabat-zinn J, Massion A, Kristeller J, Peterson LG, Fletcher KE, et al. (1992) Effectiveness of a Meditation-Based Stress Reduction Program in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders. Am J Psychiatry 149: 936–943. pmid:1609875
  10. 10. Yu X, Fumoto M, Nakatani Y, Sekiyama T, Kikuchi H, et al. (2011) Activation of the anterior prefrontal cortex and serotonergic system is associated with improvements in mood and EEG changes induced by Zen meditation practice in novices. Int J Psychophysiol 80: 103–111. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21333699. Accessed 30 October 2012. pmid:21333699
  11. 11. Dickenson J, Berkman ET, Arch J, Lieberman MD (2012) Neural correlates of focused attention during a brief mindfulness induction. Soc Cogni Affect Neurosci: 40–47. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22383804. Accessed 7 November 2012.
  12. 12. Lutz A, Slagter HA, Dunne JD, Davidson RJ (2008) Attention regulation and monitoring in meditation. Trends Cogn Sci 12: 163–169. Attention. pmid:18329323
  13. 13. Lagopoulos J, Xu J, Rasmussen I, Vik A, Malhi GS, et al. (2009) Increased Theta and Alpha EEG Activity. J Altern Complement Med 15: 1187–1192. pmid:19922249
  14. 14. Chiesa A (2009) Zen meditation: an integration of current evidence. J Altern Complement Med 15: 585–592. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19422285. pmid:19422285
  15. 15. Cahn BR, Delorme A, Polich J (2010) Occipital gamma activation during Vipassana meditation. Cogn Process 11: 39–56. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2812711&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 9 November 2012. pmid:20013298
  16. 16. Ferrarelli F, Smith R, Dentico D, Riedner BA, Zennig C, et al. (2013) Experienced mindfulness meditators exhibit higher parietal-occipital EEG gamma activity during NREM sleep. PLOS One 8: e73417. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3756031&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 5 November 2013. pmid:24015304
  17. 17. Ahani A, Wahbeh H (2013) Change in physiological signals during mindfulness meditation. Int IEEE EMBS Conf Neural Eng: 1738–1381. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6696199. Accessed 6 June 2014. pmid:24748422
  18. 18. Dor-Ziderman Y, Berkovich-Ohana A, Glicksohn J, Goldstein A (2013) Mindfulness-induced selflessness: a MEG neurophenomenological study. Front Hum Neurosci 7: 582. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3781350&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 28 May 2014. pmid:24068990
  19. 19. Hinterberger T, Schmidt S, Kamei T, Walach H (2014) Decreased electrophysiological activity represents the conscious state of emptiness in meditation. Front Psychol 5: 99. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3925830&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 23 May 2014. pmid:24596562
  20. 20. Hauswald A, Übelacker T, Leske S, Weisz N (2015) What it means to be Zen : Marked modulations of local and interareal synchronization during open monitoring meditation. Neuroimage 108: 265–273. Available: pmid:25562827
  21. 21. Kubota Y, Sato W, Toichi M, Murai T, Okada T, et al. (2001) Frontal midline theta rhythm is correlated with cardiac autonomic activities during the performance of an attention demanding meditation procedure. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 11: 281–287. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11275489. pmid:11275489
  22. 22. Colzato LS, Ozturk A, Hommel B (2012) Meditate to create: the impact of focused-attention and open-monitoring training on convergent and divergent thinking. Front Psychol 3: 116. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3328799&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 8 November 2013. pmid:22529832
  23. 23. Perlman DM, Salomons T V, Davidson RJ, Lutz A (2010) Differential effects on pain intensity and unpleasantness of two meditation practices. Emotion 10: 65–71. Differential. pmid:20141303
  24. 24. Moraes H, Ferreira C, Deslandes A, Cagy M, Pompeu F, et al. (2007) Beta and alpha electroencephalographic activity changes after acute exercise. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 65: 637–641. Available: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2007000400018&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en. Accessed 29 July 2014. pmid:17876406
  25. 25. Segal ZV, Williams JMG, Teasdale JD (2002) Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach to preventing relapse. New York: Guilford Press. 351 p.
  26. 26. Huang H-Y, Lo P-C (2009) EEG dynamics of experienced Zen meditation practitioners probed by complexity index and spectral measure. J Med Eng Technol 33: 314–321. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19384707. Accessed 7 January 2015. pmid:19384707
  27. 27. Brewer JA, Worhunsky PD, Gray JR, Tang Y-Y, Weber J, et al. (2011) Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 20254–20259. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3250176&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 11 August 2013. pmid:22114193
  28. 28. Soler J, Cebolla A, Feliu-Soler A, Demarzo MMP, Pascual JC, et al. (2014) Relationship between meditative practice and self-reported mindfulness: the MINDSENS composite index. PLOS One 9: e86622. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3899282&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 15 November 2014. pmid:24466175
  29. 29. Kabat-zinn J (1990) Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illnessNo Title. New York: Delacorte Press.
  30. 30. Cartier C, Bittencourt J, Peressutti C, Machado S, Paes F, et al. (2012) Premotor and occipital theta asymmetries as discriminators of memory- and stimulus-guided tasks. Brain Res Bull 87: 103–108. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22056992. Accessed 6 January 2013. pmid:22056992
  31. 31. Bittencourt J, Machado S, Teixeira S, Schlee G, Salles JI, et al. (2012) Alpha-band power in the left frontal cortex discriminates the execution of fixed stimulus during saccadic eye movement. Neurosci Lett 523: 148–153. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394012008865. Accessed 3 February 2015. pmid:22771570
  32. 32. Chiesa A, Serretti A, Jakobsen JC (2013) Mindfulness: top-down or bottom-up emotion regulation strategy? Clin Psychol Rev 33: 82–96. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23142788. Accessed 8 November 2013. pmid:23142788
  33. 33. van den Hurk PAM, Janssen BH, Giommi F, Barendregt HP, Gielen SC (2010) Mindfulness meditation associated with alterations in bottom-up processing: psychophysiological evidence for reduced reactivity. Int J Psychophysiol 78: 151–157. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20633581. Accessed 12 November 2012. pmid:20633581
  34. 34. Benchenane K, Tiesinga PH, Battaglia FP (2011) Oscillations in the prefrontal cortex: a gateway to memory and attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21: 475–485. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21429736. Accessed 29 October 2012. pmid:21429736
  35. 35. Travis F, Shear J (2010) Focused attention, open monitoring and automatic self-transcending: Categories to organize meditations from Vedic, Buddhist and Chinese traditions. Conscious Cogn 19: 1110–1118. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20167507. Accessed 9 November 2012. pmid:20167507
  36. 36. Engel AK, Fries P (2010) Beta-band oscillations—signalling the status quo? Curr Opin Neurobiol 20: 156–165. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20359884. Accessed 30 May 2014. pmid:20359884
  37. 37. Bob P, Zimmerman EM, Hamilton EA, Sheftel JG, Bajo SD, et al. (2013) Conscious attention, meditation, and bilateral information transfer. Clin EEG Neurosci 44: 39–43. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23171535. Accessed 26 May 2014. pmid:23171535
  38. 38. Roca-Stappung M, Fernández T, Becerra J, Mendoza-Montoya O, Espino M, et al. (2012) Healthy aging: relationship between quantitative electroencephalogram and cognition. Neurosci Lett 510: 115–120. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22266305. Accessed 11 November 2012. pmid:22266305
  39. 39. Gola M, Kamiński J, Brzezicka A, Wróbel A (2012) Βeta Band Oscillations As a Correlate of Alertness—Changes in Aging. Int J Psychol 85: 62–67. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21925215. Accessed 4 June 2014.
  40. 40. Berkovich-Ohana A, Dor-Ziderman Y, Glicksohn J, Goldstein A (2013) Alterations in the sense of time, space, and body in the mindfulness-trained brain: a neurophenomenologically-guided MEG study. Front Psychol 4: 912. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3847819&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 9 June 2014. pmid:24348455
  41. 41. Creswell JD, Irwin MR, Burklund LJ, Lieberman MD, Arevalo JMG, et al. (2012) Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction training reduces loneliness and pro-inflammatory gene expression in older adults: a small randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun 26: 1095–1101. Available: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L52148618. Accessed 23 July 2014. pmid:22820409
  42. 42. Cavanagh K, Strauss C, Cicconi F, Griffiths N, Wyper A, et al. (2013) A randomised controlled trial of a brief online mindfulness-based intervention. Behav Res Ther 51: 573–578. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796713001149. Accessed 10 July 2014. pmid:23872699
  43. 43. Kerr CE, Sacchet MD, Lazar SW, Moore CI, Jones SR (2013) Mindfulness starts with the body: somatosensory attention and top-down modulation of cortical alpha rhythms in mindfulness meditation. Front Hum Neurosci 7: 12. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3570934&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 5 March 2013. pmid:23408771
  44. 44. Vago DR (2014) Mapping modalities of self-awareness in mindfulness practice: a potential mechanism for clarifying habits of mind. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1307: 28–42. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24117699. Accessed 7 September 2014. pmid:24117699
  45. 45. Sedlmeier P, Eberth J, Schwarz M, Zimmermann D, Haarig F, et al. (2012) The psychological effects of meditation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 138: 1139–1171. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22582738. Accessed 11 July 2014. pmid:22582738
  46. 46. Mirams L, Poliakoff E, Brown RJ, Lloyd DM (2013) Brief body-scan meditation practice improves somatosensory perceptual decision making. Conscious Cogn 22: 348–359. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22889642. Accessed 1 March 2013. pmid:22889642
  47. 47. Fox KCR, Zakarauskas P, Dixon M, Ellamil M, Thompson E, et al. (2012) Meditation experience predicts introspective accuracy. PLOS One 7: e45370. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3458044&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 28 July 2014. pmid:23049790
  48. 48. Saggar M, King BG, Zanesco AP, Maclean KA, Aichele SR, et al. (2012) Intensive training induces longitudinal changes in meditation state-related EEG oscillatory activity. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 256. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3437523&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 14 July 2014. pmid:22973218
  49. 49. Ussher M, Spatz A, Copland C, Nicolaou A, Cargill A, et al. (2014) Immediate effects of a brief mindfulness-based body scan on patients with chronic pain. J Behav Med 37: 127–134. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23129105. Accessed 5 March 2013. pmid:23129105
  50. 50. Jha AP, Stanley EA, Kiyonaga A, Wong L, Gelfand L (2010) Examining the protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective experience. Emotion 10: 54–64. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20141302. Accessed 4 June 2013. pmid:20141302
  51. 51. Slagter H, Davidson RJ, Lutz A (2011) Mental training as a tool in the neuroscientific study of brain and cognitive plasticity. Front Hum Neurosci 5: 17. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3039118&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 6 November 2012. pmid:21347275
  52. 52. Grant J a, Courtemanche J, Rainville P (2011) A non-elaborative mental stance and decoupling of executive and pain-related cortices predicts low pain sensitivity in Zen meditators. Pain 152: 150–156. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21055874. Accessed 6 March 2013. pmid:21055874
  53. 53. Brown CA, Jones AKP (2010) Meditation experience predicts less negative appraisal of pain: electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of anticipatory neural responses. Pain 150: 428–438. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20494517. Accessed 26 May 2014. pmid:20494517
  54. 54. Tanaka GK, Peressutti C, Teixeira S, Cagy M, Piedade R, et al. (2014) Lower trait frontal theta activity in mindfulness meditators. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 72: 687–693. Available: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2014000900687&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en. Accessed 19 September 2014. pmid:25252232