Figures
Abstract
Astrocytic gliomas, which are derived from glial cells, are considered the most common primary neoplasias of the central nervous system (CNS) and are histologically classified as low grade (I and II) or high grade (III and IV). Recent studies have shown that astrocytoma formation is the result of the deregulation of several pathways, including the RB/E2F pathway, which is commonly deregulated in various human cancers via genetic or epigenetic mechanisms. On the basis of the assumption that the study of the mechanisms controlling the INK4/ARF locus can help elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of astrocytic tumors, identify diagnostic and prognostic markers, and help select appropriate clinical treatments, the present study aimed to evaluate and compare methylation patterns using bisulfite sequencing PCR and evaluate the gene expression profile using real-time PCR in the genes CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CDC6, Bmi-1, CCND1, and RB1 in astrocytic tumors. Our results indicate that all the evaluated genes are not methylated independent of the tumor grade. However, the real-time PCR results indicate that these genes undergo progressive deregulation as a function of the tumor grade. In addition, the genes CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and RB1 were underexpressed, whereas CDC6, Bmi-1, and CCND1 were overexpressed; the increase in gene expression was significantly associated with decreased patient survival. Therefore, we propose that the evaluation of the expression levels of the genes involved in the RB/E2F pathway can be used in the monitoring of patients with astrocytomas in clinical practice and for the prognostic indication of disease progression.
Citation: Ferreira WAS, Araújo MD, Anselmo NP, de Oliveira EHC, Brito JRN, Burbano RR, et al. (2015) Expression Analysis of Genes Involved in the RB/E2F Pathway in Astrocytic Tumors. PLoS ONE 10(8): e0137259. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137259
Editor: Javier S. Castresana, University of Navarra, SPAIN
Received: April 9, 2015; Accepted: August 13, 2015; Published: August 28, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Ferreira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.
Funding: This work was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes), and by research funds from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (483032/2010-7), Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) and from Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas do Pará (132/2010). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Astrocytomas are tumors derived from glial cells known as astrocytes. They are considered the most common primary neoplasias of the central nervous system (CNS) and differ in their location, age, size, invasive potential, morphology, tendency to progress, and clinical course [1]. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), astrocytomas can be classified into four grades: pilocytic astrocytoma (grade I), low-grade astrocytoma (grade II), anaplastic astrocytoma (grade III) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (grade IV), the latter being the most aggressive and malignant form [1–3].
Despite the advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, astrocytic tumors remain a challenge for medicine. Current treatments for such tumors include radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and surgical resection. However, the response to these treatments is still poor, and the median survival of patients with the most aggressive tumor type rarely reaches two years [4, 5].
As with most cancer types, astrocytomas develop because of genetic and epigenetic changes that accumulate as the tumor progresses [1, 6, 7]. However, limited data are available on the molecular changes that occur in most astrocytoma grades, of which GBM is the most studied. Previous genomic studies have indicated that the formation of GBMs results from the deregulation of three main pathways: the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/tyrosine kinase (RTK) PI3K/AKT pathway, p53, and RB/E2F [6, 8, 9].
The RB/E2F pathway coordinates several important biological processes, including cell migration and differentiation, development, apoptosis, mitosis, DNA replication and repair, and cell cycle checkpoints [10, 11,12]. This pathway is composed of five protein families: INK4 family (p16INK4A, encoded by the CDKN2A gene; p15INK4B, encoded by the CDKN2B gene; p18INK4C; and p19INK4D), D-type cyclins (cyclins D1, D2, and D3), cyclin-dependent protein kinases (CDK4 and CDK6), RB family proteins (RB, p107, and p130), and transcription factors of the E2F family (heterodimers of E2F1-8 with DP1-2) [13].
Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins form large multimeric complexes which are involved in gene silencing by chromatin organization changes [14]. They can be divided into two major groups: Repressive Complex Policomb 1 (PRC1) and Repressive Complex Policomb 2 (PRC2) [15]. The Bmi-1 gene is a member of the Polycomb 1 (PcG1) gene cluster and functions as a transcriptional repressor of several genes via acetylation, methylation, and mono-ubiquitination of histones and methylation of chromatin [14]. Furthermore, some studies show that the Bmi-1 gene is also related in self-renewal and differentiation of normal and tumor stem cells [16, 17], prevents senescence and immortalizes cells by activating telomerase [18], hematopoiesis [19], neural and skeletal development [19], cell cycle [20], and protection against oxidative stress and DNA damage [21].
One of the most studied pathways of Bmi-1 that is associated with cancer is the RB/E2F pathway. The Bmi-1 directly or indirectly represses the transcription of CDKN2A and/or p14ARF in a dose-dependent manner, and consequently promotes increased cell proliferation [22]. The promoter silencing and consequent loss of INK4A/ARF locus expression has been important for both the progression and prognosis of various hematological cancers [23, 24].
The human CDC6 gene codes for an AAA+ ATPase that binds to the replication origin recognition complex (ORC) and facilitates the recruitment of the mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) complex [25]. High levels of CDC6 can transcriptionally inactivate the INK4/ARF locus [26]. CDC6 binds specifically to the regulatory domain (RD) of this locus, recruits histone deacetylases (HDACs), particularly HDAC1 and HDAC2, and induces the heterocromatinization, suppressing the entire locus. Additionally, it recruits Bmi-1 to the regulatory domain (RD) of INK4/ARF locus repressing the entire locus [27].
Deregulation of components of the RB/E2F pathway via genetic and epigenetic changes occurs frequently in most cancer types, including gastrointestinal tract endocrine tumors [28], adenocarcinoma [29, 30], basal cell carcinoma [31], and astrocytomas [6, 32], making it an important target in oncology studies.
Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the expression and methylation profiles of the genes CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CDC6, Bmi-1, CCND1, and RB1 in astrocytic tumors in the northern region of Brazil.
Materials and Methods
Collection of tumor samples and study approval by the Research Ethics Committee
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Institute (Instituto de Ciências da Saúde–ICS) of UFPA (Process No. 025/06), and the use of nervous system samples was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Ophir Loyola Hospital, and a written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Astrocytoma samples were obtained from biopsies of patients from the Ophir Loyola Hospital, Belém, Pará, Brazil. Additionally, ten non-neoplastic samples were collected in the same Hospital. All tissue samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored in RNAlater (Life Technologies) at -70°C until the extraction stage. Tissue samples were collected and stored by the research group of the Francisco Mauro Salzano Laboratory of Molecular Biology at the Federal University of Pará (Universidade Federal do Pará –UFPA).
Sample processing
Extraction and quantification of genomic DNA and total RNA.
To obtain total RNA, tissue samples were homogenized in liquid nitrogen and subjected to the chemical extraction of total RNA using TRIzol (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the specifications provided by the manufacturer. The quality of RNA samples was assessed by electrophoresis on 3% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. The RNA samples were quantitated using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and stored at -70°C.
Genomic DNA was extracted using a standard protocol with phenol-chloroform-isoamyl as previously described by Sambrook & Russell [33].
The DNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA), and the integrity of the extracted genomic DNA was assessed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.
cDNA synthesis and real-time PCR.
For the cDNA synthesis, we used the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Applied Biosystems), following the manufacturer's instructions.
The expression of the genes CDKN2B, CDKN2A, CDC6, Bmi-1, CCND1, and RB1 was quantitated by real-time PCR using the Taqman system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The cDNA samples were amplified using an ABI 7500 Fast thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and Taqman Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
All reactions were performed in triplicate. For the analysis of real-time PCR data, the relative gene expression was calculated using cycle threshold (Ct) values, which were converted into relative expression values according to the 2-ΔΔCT method. The Ct values of GAPDH transcripts (endogenous control of gene expression in non-neoplastic astrocytes of the human temporal lobe) were used for normalization.
Treatment of DNA with sodium bisulfite and bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP).
To evaluate the correlation between the gene expression levels obtained by real-time PCR and the methylation pattern, a fragment of the promoter region of the genes studied was sequenced using BSP. For this purpose, the genomic DNA was chemically modified using sodium bisulfite according to the protocol described by Herman et al. [34]. This treatment promotes the deamination of non-methylated cytosines, converting them to uracil, whereas methylated cytosines are not affected. Subsequently, the samples were purified using the Wizard DNA Purification kit (Promega), following the manufacturer's instructions, and the DNA samples were resuspended in 50 μL of ultrapure water and stored at -20°C until use.
For the primer design, we analyzed the sequences of the promoter regions 1.0 kb upstream and 0.5 kb downstream from the transcription initiation sites of each gene using the software Methyl Primer Express v1.0 (Applied Biosystems). Each PCR was performed in a final reaction volume of 25 μL containing 2 μL of sodium bisulfite-treated DNA; 2.5 μL of 10X reaction buffer; 1 μL of MgCl2 (1.5 mM); 0.5 μL of each dNTP (10 mM) (Life Technologies); 1 μL of each primer (10 mM); 0.3 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Inc.); and ultrapure H2O to complete the final reaction volume.
The amplification conditions and the primers used for each gene are detailed in Table 1.
The PCR amplification products were analyzed on 3% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and subsequently purified using the EZ-10 Spin Column PCR Product Purification kit (Bio Basic/Ludwig Biotec), following the manufacturer's instructions.
The purified DNA was sequenced using the dideoxy chain-termination method according to the methodology described by Sanger et al. [37]. The sequencing reaction was performed using the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Standard kit (Applied Biosystems) version 3.1 and analyzed on an ABI 3130 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
The obtained sequences were aligned manually using the software BioEdit version 7.0.9 [38]. The methylation patterns of gene sequences were analyzed using the software BISMA (Bisulfite Sequence DNA Methylation Analysis) [39] and BiQ Analyzer [40]. In this study, we considered a gene hypermethylated when >15% of the CpG islands examined were methylated.
To verify the accuracy of the BSP sequencing, we included in each run of all genes the control DNA from the EpiTect PCR Control DNA Set (Qiagen) that had contained both bisulfite-converted 100% methylated as well as unmethylated DNA as positive controls and unconverted unmethylated DNA as a negative control.
Statistical analysis
To analyze the BSP data, differences in the methylation frequencies among the tumor grades and the association between the methylation of the promoter region/mRNA and clinical parameters (age, gender, and tumor grade) were evaluated using the chi-squared test.
For the real-time PCR analysis, differences among the groups were analyzed using a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s comparison. Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the association between survival and the level of gene expression, and the samples were divided into two groups, low survival rate (<24 months) and high survival rate (≥24 months), following the method proposed by Skiriutè et al. [41]. The statistical significance of the tests was set at p<0.05.
The association of the expression levels of the studied genes was analyzed using a non-parametric Spearman’s rho test. A correlation coefficient (r) ≥ 0.7 indicated a strong correlation, r < 0.7 and r ≥ 0.3 indicated a moderate correlation, and r < 0.3 indicated a weak correlation. Positive r values indicated proportional magnitudes, whereas negative r values indicated inversely proportional magnitudes.
All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 5 version 5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc., USA), and the statistical significance of all tests was set at p<0.05.
Results
Clinical data
The 58 analyzed samples were from patients with a mean age of 47.06 years (range 14–83 years). Of the 58 samples, 22 cases were classified as grade II (37.9%), with a mean age of 36.09 years (14–64 years), 13 cases were classified as grade III (22.4%), with a mean age of 42.84 years (18–61 years), and 23 cases were designated grade IV (39.6%), with a mean age of 59.95 years (26–83 years). Of the 58 cases, 35 were men (60.03%), and 23 were women (39.97%).
The relative expression of CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and RB1 is decreased in astrocytomas
The relative expression of the genes CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and RB1 was significantly decreased in all the examined tumor grades. Pairwise comparison between the tumor grades indicated that the relative expression of the CDKN2A and CDKN2B transcripts was approximately 1.3-fold lower in grade IV glioblastoma compared with that in grade II astrocytoma (p<0.001) (Fig 1A and 1B). The pairwise comparison indicated no significant differences in the relative expression of both genes between grade II and grade III glioblastomas.
Real-time qRT-PCR was used to determine the relative CDKN2B (A), CDKN2A (B), and (C) RB1 mRNA levels in astrocytomas. The expression of these genes reduces with increasing grade of malignancy. Data are expressed as fold-change in mRNA expression compared with that of a normal brain control (the relative expression of the control equals 1). The horizontal lines indicate the median expression level in each tumor grade. Statistical significance is denoted by * (p≤0.05), ** (p<0.01) and *** (p<0.001).
The relative expression of the RB1 transcript was 1.6-fold lower in glioblastoma samples compared with grade II samples and 1.4-fold lower compared with grade III samples (Fig 1C).
These results indicate that the underexpression of these genes is stage-specific and is more evident in high-grade tumors (WHO grade IV); consequently, underexpression of these genes may be associated with the aggressiveness of astrocytic tumors.
No significant differences were observed in the relative expression of the genes CDKN2B, CDKN2A, and RB1 as a function of gender, age, and survival.
The relative expression of Bmi-1, CCND1, and CDC6 is increased in astrocytomas
The relative expression of the genes Bmi-1, CCND1, and CDC6 was significantly increased in samples from all the tumor grades analyzed, and grade IV tumors were the most frequent.
Significant differences were observed in the relative expression of Bmi-1 (Fig 2A) and CCND1 (Fig 2C) between grades II and IV astrocytomas (p<0.001 for both), with a 1.15-fold and 1.31-fold increase in their expression in GBM samples, respectively. In addition, significant differences were observed in the expression of CDC6 between grade II and IV astrocytomas (p<0.0001), with a 1.38-fold increase in its relative expression in GBM samples, and between levels III and IV astrocytomas (p<0.05), with a 1.27-fold increase in its gene expression in GBM samples (Fig 2B). Although no significant differences were observed as a function of age and gender, a significant association was found between increased transcript expression and decreased patient survival (Bmi-1, p = 0.0002; CDC6, p<0.0001; CCND1, p<0.0001).
Real-time qRT-PCR was used to determine the relative Bmi-1 (A), CDC6 (B), and CCND1 (C) mRNA levels in astrocytomas. The expression of these genes was highly upregulated in GBM (Grade IV) as compared to grades II and III. Data are expressed as the fold-change in mRNA expression compared with that of a normal brain control (the relative expression of the control equals 1). The horizontal lines indicate the median expression level in each tumor grade. Statistical significance is denoted by * (p≤0.05), ** (p<0.01) and *** (p<0.001).
Gene expression association in different astrocytoma grades
The relative expression of CDKN2B, CDKN2A, CDC6, Bmi-1, CCND1 and RB1 was analyzed using pairwise combinations (Table 2). In grade II astrocytomas, a moderate inverse correlation was observed only between the expression of RB1 and Bmi-1 (r = -0.5968, p = 0.001) (Table 2, Fig 3).
Analyzing the samples belonging to grade II astrocytomas, we found that the only significant negative correlation was between Bmi-1 and RB1 genes.
In grade III astrocytomas, there was a moderate correlation between the relative expression levels of Bmi-1 and CDKN2B (r = -0.5824, p<0.05) (Fig 4A), Bmi-1 and CCND1 (r = 0.6099, p<0.05) (Fig 4B), and CDKN2B and CDKN2A (r = 0.5585, p<0.05) (Fig 4C), and there was a strong correlation between the relative expression levels of CDKN2B and CCND1 (r = -0.7967, p<0.01) (Fig 4D) (Table 3).
(A) Bmi-1 and CDKN2B; (B) Bmi-1 and CCND1; (C) CDKN2B and CDKN2A; and (D) CDKN2B and CCND1.
However, the analysis of grade IV astrocytomas indicated a moderate correlation between the relative expression levels of Bmi-1 and CDC6 (r = 0.4704, p<0.05) (Fig 5A), Bmi-1 and RB1 (r = -0.4931, p<0.05) (Fig 5B), Bmi-1 and CCND1 (r = 0.4360, p<0.05) (Fig 5C), CDC6 and RB1 (r = -0.5109, p<0.05) (Fig 5D), CDKN2B and CDKN2A (r = 0.5287, p<0.01) (Fig 5E), and CDKN2B and CCND1 (r = -0.4597, p<0.01) (Fig 5F); there was a strong correlation between the relative expression levels of CCND1 and RB1 (r = -0.7667, p<0.001) (Fig 5G) (Table 4).
(A) Bmi-1 and CDC6; (B) Bmi-1 and RB1; (C) Bmi-1 and CCND1; (D) CDC6 and RB1; (E) CDKN2B and CDKN2A; (F) CDKN2B and CCND1; and (G) CCND1 and RB1.
Absence of methylation of the promoter regions of CDKN2B, CDKN2A, CDC6, Bmi-1, and RB1
The sequencing results indicate that all the fragments of the promoter regions evaluated were not methylated and that, consequently, there was no association of this state with histological grade, age, or gender or with the relative expression of the transcripts analyzed.
Discussion
In the present study, the relative expression of the genes CDKN2B, CDKN2A, CDC6, Bmi-1, CCND1, and RB1 was evaluated at the transcript level, and these results were correlated with their methylation pattern. These genes are directly involved in the RB/E2F pathway, which functionally coordinates diverse biological processes, including cell differentiation, migration, growth, apoptosis, DNA replication, mitosis, DNA repair, and cell cycle checkpoints [10, 11, 12].
Previous studies have shown that genes associated with the RB1/E2F pathway are commonly deregulated in many human cancers via genetic or epigenetic mechanisms, resulting in the activation of E2F and leading to the transcription of several genes that regulate cell growth [29, 42–44].
Methylation and expression of the genes CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and RB1 in astrocytomas
The genes CDKN2A, CDKN2B, and RB1 function as tumor suppressors; their decreased expression occurs via several mechanisms, including methylation, and contributes to the development of neoplasias [29, 45–52].
In our study, the genes CDKN2B, CDKN2A, and RB1 were not methylated and hipoexpressed in all the tumor grades analyzed.
The results in the literature differ in relation to the pattern of methylation of the CDKN2A promoter region in astrocytomas [53–55]. Our results are consistent with those of Muñoz et al. [53], who evaluated hypermethylation frequency in the promoter region of five tumor suppressor genes, including CDKN2A, in astrocytomas and in cell culture lines. These authors found no evidence of hypermethylation in CDKN2A, suggesting that hypermethylation may not be an important mechanism in the activation of this gene in astrocytomas, considering that CDKN2A is primarily inactivated in astrocytomas via mutations and homozygous deletions [53].
In contrast, the absence of methylation of CDKN2B found in our study is consistent with the results of Yu et al. [56], who used methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in conjunction with the sequencing of 17 genes, including CDKN2B, in astrocytoma samples. These authors found that CDKN2B exhibited a uniform non-methylated pattern in all astrocytoma grades. In addition, our results corroborate those of Ohta et al. [57], who used the MSP and immunohistochemistry techniques in malignant astrocytic tumors (grades III and IV). These authors found that the promoter region of CDKN2B is hypermethylated in a very small percentage of cases (7%) and that methylation in CDKN2B was not associated with patient survival or with any clinicopathological characteristic, including tumor grade, cell proliferation activity, and responsiveness to adjuvant therapy. Our results are also consistent with those of studies that suggest that CDKN2B is commonly inactivated by homozygous deletions [58, 59] and, less frequently, via methylation of the promoter region [6].
Despite the findings on the methylation pattern, the real-time PCR results indicated that CDKN2A and CDKN2B were 1.3-fold underexpressed in GBM (Fig 3B). These findings are corroborated by those of Zolota et al. [60], who showed via immunohistochemistry that CDKN2A is most commonly expressed in low-grade astrocytic tumors compared with high-grade tumors.
The underexpression in high-grade astrocytomas often occurs because of the loss of chromosome 9p [59, 61, 62]. In addition, the underexpression of CDKN2A in high-grade tumors may be associated with other factors, including cellular control via microRNAs and cell cycle regulatory proteins, such as those of the Polycomb group [63]. With regard to CDKN2B, a few studies have investigated its expression in astrocytic tumors, indicating that the known mechanisms that can change its expression are loss of heterozygosity (LOH), homozygous deletion, point mutations, and hypermethylation of the promoter region [64].
The RB1 gene is crucial for cellular control mechanisms, including cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, and senescence [65], and several human tumors exhibit mutations, homozygous deletions, and methylation in the RB1 promoter [66–68]. The functional loss of this gene disrupts checkpoints in G1, changes the rate of autophagy, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastasis, and causes structural defects in the centromeric region of chromosomes, affecting the recruitment of chromatin components (cohesin and condensin II) [68] and increasing genomic instability, chromosome and subchromosome ploidy (local amplifications and gains and losses of chromosomal arms), and error rates in chromosome segregation [68–70].
In astrocytomas, loss of heterozygosity in RB1 is the most common event and is associated with increased tumor cell proliferation and decreased survival in more than one third of patients [71].
Although hypermethylation of the RB1 promoter region is the second most common event in astrocytomas, our results indicate that RB1 was not methylated in all the samples analyzed, regardless of the tumor grade. Bello et al. [72] demonstrated that the methylation frequency is 19% in pilocytic astrocytomas, 35% in grade II astrocytomas, and 13% in anaplastic astrocytomas. In GBM, the frequency of hypermethylation varies between 15% and 43% [73]. The discrepancy between our methylation results and those of other studies may have occurred because we analyzed a different fragment of the promoter region or because of the different techniques used; the two aforementioned studies used the MSP technique, whereas we used the BSP technique, which is considered more accurate than MSP.
Methylation and expression of CCND1, CDC6, and Bmi-1 in astrocytomas
The genes CCND1, CDC6 and Bmi-1, when overexpressed, promote the proliferation of tumor cells. In our study, all these genes were not methylated and overexpressed in all the tumor grades analyzed.
The human CDC6 gene codes for an AAA+ ATPase that binds to the replication origin recognition complex (ORC) and facilitates the recruitment of the mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) complex [25]. After the formation of this complex and the subsequent binding of regulatory factors and replication fork components, double-stranded DNA opens for replication. The phosphorylation of the N-terminal domain of CDC6 exposes the nuclear export sequence (NES), transporting it to the cytoplasm during the G2 and M phases. During mitosis, the CDC6 protein is degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
Our results indicate that the overexpression of CDC6 is associated with increased tumor grade. The overexpression of CDC6 induces re-replication [74, 75], which is a form of replication stress, results in increased genomic instability and promotes malignant behavior [74, 76–79]. High levels of CDC6 protein were reported in 55% of brain tumors [80]. CDC6 is also overexpressed in 50% of cases of non-small cell lung cancer [76] and mantle cell lymphoma [81].
On the basis of these results and on the premise that human CDC6 is essential for initiation of DNA replication [82], we can infer that the overexpression of CDC6 in astrocytic tumors can aid in cell cycle progression and progression from low-grade to high-grade tumors. Cell culture studies have shown that the suppression of CDC6 in G1 prevents cells from entering into the S phase [83, 84]. Furthermore, recent studies have found that CDC6 silencing by RNA interference (RNAi) prevents cell proliferation and induces apoptosis [85, 86].
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that evaluated the methylation pattern of CDC6 in astrocytomas. However, our results are contrary to those reported by Bastian et al. [87], who reported the occurrence of hypermethylation of the CDC6 promoter in prostate tumors. In addition, Jin and Fondel [88] suggest that a major mechanism of regulation of CDC6 expression involves changes in the patterns of histone methylation and acetylation.
The Bmi-1 gene is a member of the Polycomb 1 (PcG1) gene cluster and functions as a transcriptional repressor of several genes via acetylation, methylation, and mono-ubiquitination of histones and methylation of chromatin [89].
Increasing evidence indicates that Bmi-1 is overexpressed in several cancer types, including leukemia, hepatocellular carcinoma, laryngeal carcinoma, lung cancer, breast cancer, and colon cancer [90–97].
Our gene expression results corroborate these findings, showing that Bmi-1 was overexpressed in all tumor grades evaluated; this expression was 1.15-fold higher in GBM compared with that in grade II astrocytomas. Therefore, the increase in tumor grade is positively correlated with the prognosis of patients with increased expression of this gene.
Li et al. [98] demonstrated that Bmi-1 was overexpressed in 93.9% of glioma samples from 297 patients evaluated and that this expression was inversely correlated with the survival time of patients and positively correlated with disease prognosis. In addition, the authors demonstrated that Bmi-1 confers resistance to apoptosis in glioma cells via the IKK-NF-kB pathway, suggesting that this is a useful prognostic marker for gliomas.
Mihic-Probs et al. [99] reported that in 64% of primary melanomas and in 71% of metastatic melanomas, Bmi-1 is overexpressed and associated with the clinical course of the disease. Recent studies have found a positive correlation between Bmi-1 levels and survival and recurrence in patients with tongue cancer, squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, and non-small cell lung cancer [100, 101].
It is known that Bmi-1 promotes cell proliferation by suppressing the RB pathway [102]. We also found a negative correlation between the relative expression levels of CDKN2B and Bmi-1. Although a direct association between these two genes has not been reported, it is known that in human squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, there is a negative correlation between high levels of Bmi-1 and the regulatory transcriptional region in the INK4-ARF locus, known as the regulatory domain (RD), resulting in changes in the transcriptional levels of CDKN2A and CDKN2B [103].
The CCND1 gene is part of the cyclin family; cyclins bind to and activate CDKs, phosphorylate pRB, and, ultimately, induce the transcription of several genes necessary for cell entry into the S-phase [104].
D-type cyclins are highly important in the assessment of several cancer types because they have a positive effect on several oncogenic pathways [105, 106]. In tumors, many studies have reported that this gene may undergo amplification, rearrangements, and overexpression or undergo methylation in the promoter region [6, 64, 106, 107].
Our real-time PCR results indicate that CCND1 was overexpressed in 58.3% of cases (35/60) and that when the relative expression of this transcript was correlated with histological astrocytoma grades, its expression levels were approximately 5-fold higher in grades III and IV tumors compared with the levels in grade II tumors. The overexpression of CCND1 is one of the most frequently observed changes in various cancer types [108]. Moreover, it is known that overexpression of CCND1 results in RB dysfunction, resulting in the promotion of cell proliferation, which is considered a hallmark of carcinogenesis [109, 110].
Wang et al. [111] infected two glioblastoma cell lines (SHP-44 and U251) with shRNA and observed that silencing of CCND1 inhibited cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and increased their invasive capacity. In contrast, the overexpression of CCND1 increased the proliferation and invasive capacity of both human glioblastoma cell lines but reduced apoptosis. Therefore, the ability to suppress the malignant phenotype by decreasing CCND1 expression may provide a new approach for gene therapy in patients with glioblastoma.
The functional interactions of the members of RB/E2F pathway have been elucidated. In G0 and in the early stages of G1, RB is hypophosphorylated and forms complexes with members of the E2F family of transcription factors. The complexes formed prevent E2F from binding to the promoters of the genes associated with the G1/S transition [67]. Once engaged in cell proliferation, pRB is progressively hyperphosphorylated by CDK4 and CDK6 in the late G1 phase, promoting progression to the S phase. The INK4 family proteins (p16INK4A and p15INK4B) bind to and inhibit the activity of CDK4 and CDK6, maintaining pRB in a hypophosphorylated state [112]. In addition, p16INK4A and p15INK4B compete with D-type cyclins for CDK4/6 to prevent the formation of active kinase complexes. In this pathway, proteins of the INK4 and RB families function as tumor suppressors, whereas D-type cyclins, CDK4/6, and E2F promote tumor proliferation [43].
Our results suggest that there is an intense, coordinated deregulation of the entire RB/E2F pathway that is associated with tumor progression and patient prognosis. Despite the need for further studies with a larger sample size to confirm our results, we suggest that evaluation of the gene expression levels of members of this pathway can be used in the monitoring of patients with astrocytomas in clinical practice and for the prognostic indication of disease progression.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a master fellowship to W. A. Ferreira, provided by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes), and by research funds from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Pará (FAPESPA).
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: BNB NPA EHCO RRB MLH. Performed the experiments: WASF MDA. Analyzed the data: BNB WASF RRB JRNB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BNB NPA EHCO JRNB RRB MLH. Wrote the paper: WASF BNB. Approved the final version: WASF MDA NPA EHCO JRNB RRB MLH BNB.
References
- 1. Riemenschneider MJ, Jeuken JW, Wesseling P, Reifenberger G. Molecular diagnostics of gliomas: state of the art. Acta Neuropathol. 2010; 120: 567–584. pmid:20714900
- 2. Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G. Molecular neuropathology of gliomas. Int J Mol Sci. 2009; 10: 184–212. pmid:19333441
- 3. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol. 2007; 114: 97–109. pmid:17618441
- 4. González-Gómez P, Anselmo NP, Mira H. BMPs as therapeutic targets and biomarkers in astrocytic glioma. BioMed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 549742. pmid:24877113
- 5. Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer brain tumor and radiotherapy groups, National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 987–996. pmid:15758009
- 6. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways. Nature. 2008; 455: 1061–1068. pmid:18772890
- 7. Ferreira WAS, Araújo MD, Anselmo NP, Harada ML, Borges BN. Analysis of the Methylation Pattern of SOX2 and OCT4 Genes in Astrocytomas. J Genet Genome Res. 2015; 2: 012.
- 8. Chow LM, Endersby R, Zhu X, Rankin S, Qu C, Zhang J, et al. Cooperativity within and among Pten, p53, and Rb pathways induces high-grade astrocytoma in adult brain. Cancer Cell. 2011; 19: 305–316. pmid:21397855
- 9. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008; 321: 1807–1812. pmid:18772396
- 10. Cam H, Dynlacht BD. Emerging roles for E2F: beyond the G1/S transition and DNA replication. Cancer Cell. 2003; 3: 311–316. pmid:12726857
- 11. Cao L, Peng B, Yao L, Zhang X, Sun K, Xianmei Y, et al. The ancient function of RB-E2F pathway: insights from its evolutionary history. Biol Direct. 2010; 5: 55. pmid:20849664
- 12. Chen HZ, Tsai SY, Leone G. Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: an exit from cell cycle control. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9: 785–797. pmid:19851314
- 13. Pinheiro DR, Ferreira WA, Borges BN. INK4/ARF and gastric carcinogenesis. Transl Gastrointest Cancer. 2015; 4(4): 265–271.
- 14. Sparmann A, van Lohuizen . Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer. Nature Rev. 2006; 6: 846–856.
- 15. Levine SS, Weiss A, Erdjument-Bromage H, Shao Z, Tempst P, Kingston RE. The core of the polycomb repressive complex is compositionally and functionally conserved in flies and humans. Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 22: 6070–6078. pmid:12167701
- 16. Lukacs RU, Memarzadeh S, Wu H, Witte ON. Bmi-1 is a crucial regulator of prostate stem cell self-renewal and malignant transformation. Cell Stem Cell. 2010; 7: 682–93. pmid:21112563
- 17. Zacharek SJ, Fillmore CM, Lau AN, Gludish DW, Chou A, Ho JW, Zamponi R, Gazit R, Bock C, Jäger N, Smith ZD, Kim TM, Saunders AH, Wong J, Lee JH, Roach RR, Rossi DJ, Meissner A, Gimelbrant AA, Park PJ, Kim CF. Lung stem cell self-renewal relies on BMI1-dependent control of expression at imprinted loci. Cell Stem Cell. 2011; 9: 272–281. pmid:21885022
- 18. Park IK, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Bmi1, stem cells, and senescence regulation. J Clin Invest. 2004; 113: 175–179. pmid:14722607
- 19. van der Lugt N M, Domen J, Linders K, van Roon M, Robanus- Maandag E, te Riele H, van der Valk M, Deschamps J, Sofroniew M, van Lohuizen M, Berns A. Posterior transformation, neurological abnormalities, and severe hematopoietic defects in mice with a targeted deletion of the bmi-1 proto-oncogene. Genes Dev. 1994; 8: 757–769. pmid:7926765
- 20. Voncken JW, Niessen H, Neufeld B, Rennefahrt U, Dahlmans V, Kubben N, Holzer B, Ludwig S, Rapp UR. MAPKAP kinase 3pK phosphorylates and regulates chromatin- association of the polycomb group protein Bmi1. J Biol Chem. 2003; 280: 5178–87.
- 21. Li SK, Smith DK, Leung WY, Cheung AM, Lam EW, Dimri GP, Yao KM. FoxM1c counteracts oxidative stress-induced senescence and stimulates Bmi-1 expression. J Biol Chem. 2008; 283: 16545–16553. pmid:18408007
- 22. Jacobs JJ, Kieboom K, Marino S, DePinho RA, van LM. The oncogene and Polycomb- group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the Ink4a locus. Nature. 1999; 397: 164–168. pmid:9923679
- 23. Lessard J, Sauvageau G. Bmi-1 determines the proliferative capacity of normal and leukaemic stem cells. Nature. 2003; 423: 255–260. pmid:12714970
- 24. Hosen N, Yamane T, Muijtjens M, Pham K, Clarke MF, Weissman IL. Bmi-1-green fluorescent protein-knock-in mice reveal the dynamic regulation of bmi-1 expression in normal and leukemic hematopoietic cells. Stem Cells. 2007; 25:1635–1644. pmid:17395774
- 25. Gonzalez MA, Tachibana KE, Laskey RA, Coleman N. Control of DNA replication and its potential clinical exploitation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5: 135–141. pmid:15660109
- 26. Gonzalez S, Serrano M. A new mechanism of inactivation of the INK4/ARF locus. Cell cycle. 2006; 5: 1382–4. pmid:16855387
- 27. Agherbi H1, Gaussmann-Wenger A, Verthuy C, Chasson L, Serrano M, Djabali M. Polycomb mediated epigenetic silencing and replication timing at the Ink4a/ARF locus during senescence. PLoS. One. 2009; 4(5): e5622. pmid:19462008
- 28. Li AF, Li AC, Tsay SH, Li WY, Liang WY, Chen JY. Alterations in the p16INK4a/cyclin D1/RB pathway in gastrointestinal tract endocrine tumors. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008; 130: 535–542. pmid:18794045
- 29. Do Nascimento Borges B, Burbano RM HML, Harada ML. Analysis of the methylation patterns of the p16 INK4A, p15 INK4B, and APC genes in gastric adenocarcinoma patients from a Brazilian population. Tumour Biol. 2013; 34: 2127–2133. pmid:23504555
- 30. Do Nascimento Borges B, Burbano RM HML, Harada ML. Absence of CIP1/KIP1 hypermethylation in gastric cancer patients from Northern Brazil. In Vivo. 2010; 24: 579–582. pmid:20668328
- 31. Kanellou P, Zaravinos A, Zioga M, Spandidos DA. Deregulation of the tumour suppressor genes p14(ARF), p15(INK4b), p16(INK4a) and p53 in basal cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2009; 160: 1215–1221. pmid:19298278
- 32. Ushio Y, Tada K, Shiraishi S, Kamiryo T, Shinojima N, Kochi M, et al. Correlation of molecular genetic analysis of p53, MDM2, p16, PTEN, and EGFR and survival of patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma. Front Biosci. 2003; 8: e281–e288. pmid:12700122
- 33.
Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000.
- 34. Herman JG, Graff JR, Myöhänen S, Nelkin BD, Baylin SB. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996; 93: 9821–9826. pmid:8790415
- 35. Kawamata N, Inagaki N, Mizumura S, Sugimoto KJ, Sakajiri S, Ohyanagi-Hara M, et al. Methylation status analysis of cell cycle regulatory genes (p16INK4A, p15INK4B, p21 Waf1/Cip1, p27Kip1 and p73) in natural killer cell disorders. Eur J Haematol. 2005; 74: 424–429. pmid:15813917
- 36.
Borges BN. Análise de polimorfismos genéticos e do padrão de hipermetilação Como marcadores de tumores gástricos na população paraense [Analysis of genetic polymorphisms and hypermethylation pattern as gastric tumor markers in a population from Pará, Brazil]. Doctoral Dissertation, Federal University of Pará. 2010.
- 37. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977; 74: 5463–5467. pmid:271968
- 38. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment Editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999; 41: 95–98.
- 39. Rohde C, Zhang Y, Jurkowski TP, Stamerjohanns H, Reinhardt R, Jeltsch A. Bisulfite sequencing data presentation and compilation (BDPC) web server—a useful tool for DNA methylation analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36: e34. pmid:18296484
- 40. Bock C, Reither S, Mikeska T, Paulsen M, Walter J, Lengauer T. BiQ analyzer: visualization and quality control for DNA methylation data from bisulfite sequencing. BioInformatics. 2005; 21: 4067–4068. pmid:16141249
- 41. Skiriutė D, Steponaitis G, Vaitkienė P, Mikučiūnas M, Skauminas K, Tamašauskas A, et al. Glioma malignancy-dependent NDRG2 Gene methylation and Downregulation correlates with poor patient outcome. J Cancer. 2014; 5: 446–456. pmid:24847385
- 42. Di Fiore R, D'Anneo A, Tesoriere G, Vento R. RB1 in cancer: different mechanisms of RB1 inactivation and alterations of pRb pathway in tumorigenesis. J Cell Physiol. 2013; 228: 1676–1687. pmid:23359405
- 43. Knudsen ES, Wang JY. Targeting the RB-pathway in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2010; 16: 1094–1099. pmid:20145169
- 44. Nevins JR. The Rb/E2F pathway and cancer. Hum Mol Genet. 2001; 10: 699–703. pmid:11257102
- 45. Simpson DJ, Hibberts NA, McNicol AM, Clayton RN, Farrell WE. Loss of pRb expression in pituitary adenomas is associated with methylation of the RB1 CpG island. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 1211–1216. pmid:10728677
- 46. Merlo A, Herman JG, Mao L, Lee DJ, Gabrielson E, Burger PC, et al. 5' CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat Med. 1995; 1: 686–692. pmid:7585152
- 47. Costello JF, Frühwald MC, Smiraglia DJ, Rush LJ, Robertson GP, Gao X, et al. Aberrant CpG-island methylation has non-random and tumour-type-specific patterns. Nat Genet. 2000; 24: 132–138. pmid:10655057
- 48. Esteller M, Sparks A, Toyota M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Capella G, Peinado MA, et al. Analysis of adenomatous polyposis coli promoter hypermethylation in human cancer. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 4366–4371. pmid:10969779
- 49. Stirzaker C, Millar DS, Paul CL, Warnecke PM, Harrison J, Vincent PC, et al. Extensive DNA methylation spanning the Rb promoter in retinoblastoma tumours. Cancer Res. 1997; 57: 2229–2237. pmid:9187126
- 50. Sakai T, Toguchida J, Ohtani N, Yandell DW, Rapaport JM, Dryja TP. Allele-specific hypermethylation of the retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene. Am J Hum Genet. 1991; 48: 880–888. pmid:1673287
- 51. Ohtani-Fujita N, Dryja TP, Rapaport JM, Fujita T, Matsumura S, Ozasa K, et al. Hypermethylation in the retinoblastoma gene is associated with unilateral, sporadic retinoblastoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997; 98: 43–49. pmid:9309117
- 52. Greger V, Debus N, Lohmann D, Höpping W, Passarge E, Horsthemke B. Frequency and parental origin of hypermethylated RB1 alleles in retinoblastoma. Hum Genet. 1994; 94: 491–496. pmid:7959682
- 53. Muñoz J, Inda MM, Lázcoz P, Zazpe I, Fan X, Alfaro J, et al. Promoter methylation of RASSF1A associates to adult secondary glioblastomas and pediatric glioblastomas. ISRN Neurol. 2012; 2012: 576578. pmid:22389839
- 54. Costello JF, Berger MS, Huang HS, Cavenee WK. Silencing of p16/CDKN2 expression in human gliomas by methylation and chromatin condensation. Cancer Res. 1996; 56: 2405–2410. pmid:8625319
- 55. Wolter M, Reifenberger J, Blaschke B, Ichimura K, Schmidt EE, Collins VP, et al. Oligodendroglial tumors frequently demonstrate hypermethylation of the CDKN2A (MTS1, p16INK4a), p14ARF, and CDKN2B (MTS2, p15INK4b) tumor suppressor genes. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001; 60: 1170–1180. pmid:11764089
- 56. Yu J, Zhang H, Gu J, Lin S, Li J, Lu W, et al. Methylation profiles of thirty four promoter-CpG islands and concordant methylation behaviours of sixteen genes that may contribute to carcinogenesis of astrocytoma. BMC Cancer. 2004; 4: 65. pmid:15367334
- 57. Ohta T, Watanabe T, Katayama Y, Yoshino A, Yachi K, Ogino A, et al. Aberrant promoter hypermethylation profile of cell cycle regulatory genes in malignant astrocytomas. Oncol Rep. 2006; 16: 957–963. pmid:17016577
- 58. Wemmert S, Bettscheider M, Alt S, Ketter R, Kammers K, Feiden W, et al. p15 promoter methylation–a novel prognostic marker in glioblastoma patients. Int J Oncol. 2009; 34: 1743–1748. pmid:19424593
- 59. Yin D, Ogawa S, Kawamata N, Tunici P, Finocchiaro G, Eoli M, et al. High-resolution genomic copy number profiling of glioblastoma multiforme by single nucleotide polymorphism DNA microarray. Mol Cancer Res. 2009; 7: 665–677. pmid:19435819
- 60. Zolota V, Tsamandas AC, Aroukatos P, Panagiotopoulos V, Maraziotis T, Poulos C, et al. Expression of cell cycle inhibitors p21, p27, p14 and p16 in gliomas. Correlation with classic prognostic factors and patients' outcome. Neuropathology. 2008; 28: 35–42. pmid:18181833
- 61. Bleeker FE, Molenaar RJ, Leenstra S. Recent advances in the molecular understanding of glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2012; 108: 11–27. pmid:22270850
- 62. Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, Horstmann S, Nishikawa T, Di Patre PL, et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res. 2004; 64: 6892–6899. pmid:15466178
- 63. Witkiewicz AK, Knudsen KE, Dicker AP, Knudsen ES. The meaning of p16(ink4a) expression in tumors: functional significance, clinical associations and future developments. Cell Cycle. 2011; 10: 2497–2503. pmid:21775818
- 64. Sakellariou S, Liakakos T, Ghiconti I, Hadjikokolis S, Nakopoulou L, Pavlakis K. Immunohistochemical expression of P15 (INK4B) and SMAD4 in advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 2008; 28: 1079–1083. pmid:18507057
- 65. Manning AL, Dyson NJ. pRB, a tumor suppressor with a stabilizing presence. Trends Cell Biol. 2011; 21: 433–441. pmid:21664133
- 66. Halaban R. Rb/E2F: a two-edged sword in the melanocytic system. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005; 24: 339–356. pmid:15986142
- 67. Iaquinta PJ, Lees JA. Life and death decisions by the E2F transcription factors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007; 19: 649–657. pmid:18032011
- 68. Manning AL, Longworth MS, Dyson NJ. Loss of pRB causes centromere dysfunction and chromosomal instability. Genes Dev. 2010; 24: 1364–1376. pmid:20551165
- 69. Amato A, Lentini L, Schillaci T, Iovino F, Di Leonardo A. RNAi mediated acute depletion of retinoblastoma protein (pRb) promotes aneuploidy in human primary cells via micronuclei formation. BMC Cell Biol. 2009; 10: 79. pmid:19883508
- 70. Coschi CH, Martens AL, Ritchie K, Francis SM, Chakrabarti S, Berube NG, et al. Mitotic chromosome condensation mediated by the retinoblastoma protein is tumor-suppressive. Genes Dev. 2010; 24: 1351–1363. pmid:20551166
- 71. Kim Y-H, Lachuer J, Mittelbronn M, Paulus W, Brokinkel B, Keyvani K, et al. Alterations in the RB1 pathway in low-grade diffuse gliomas lacking common genetic alterations. Brain Pathol. 2011; 21: 645–651. pmid:21470325
- 72. Bello MJ, Gonzalez-Gomez P, Alonso ME, Anselmo NP, Arjona Dolores AC, Lopez- Marin I, et al. Methylation analysis of cell cycle control genes RB1, p14 ARF and p16 INK4a in human gliomas. Cance Ther. 2004; 2: 187–194.
- 73. Gonzalez-Gomez P, Bello MJ, Alonso ME, Arjona D, Lomas J, de Campos JM, et al. CpG island methylation status and mutation analysis of the RB1 gene essential promoter region and protein-binding pocket domain in nervous system tumours. Br J Cancer. 2003; 88: 109–114. pmid:12556968
- 74. Liontos M, Koutsami M, Sideridou M, Evangelou K, Kletsas D, Levy B, et al. Deregulated overexpression of hCdt1 and hCdc6 promotes malignant behavior. Cancer Res. 2007; 67: 10899–10909. pmid:18006835
- 75. Green BM, Finn KJ, Li JJ. Loss of DNA replication control is a potent inducer of gene amplification. Science. 2010; 329: 943–946. pmid:20724634
- 76. Karakaidos P, Taraviras S, Vassiliou LV, Zacharatos P, Kastrinakis NG, Kougiou D, et al. Overexpression of the replication licensing regulators hCdt1 and hCdc6 characterizes a subset of non-small-cell lung carcinomas: synergistic effect with mutant p53 on tumor growth and chromosomal instability—evidence of E2F-1 transcriptional control over hCdt1. Am J Pathol. 2004; 165: 1351–1365. pmid:15466399
- 77. Halazonetis TD, Gorgoulis VG, Bartek J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science. 2008; 319: 1352–1355. pmid:18323444
- 78. Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. Genomic instability—an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010; 11: 220–228. pmid:20177397
- 79. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011; 144: 646–674. pmid:21376230
- 80. Ohta S, Koide M, Tokuyama T, Yokota N, Nishizawa S, Namba H. Cdc6 expression as a marker of proliferative activity in brain tumors. Oncol Rep. 2001; 8: 1063–1066. pmid:11496317
- 81. Pinyol M, Salaverria I, Bea S, Fernández V, Colomo L, Campo E, et al. Unbalanced expression of licensing DNA replication factors occurs in a subset of mantle cell lymphomas with genomic instability. Int J Cancer. 2006; 119: 2768–2774. pmid:17036332
- 82. Borlado LR, Méndez J. CDC6: from DNA replication to cell cycle checkpoints and oncogenesis. Carcinog. 2008; 29: 237–243.
- 83. Hateboer G, Wobst A, Petersen BO, Le Cam L, Vigo E, Sardet C, et al. Cell cycle-regulated expression of mammalian CDC6 is dependent on E2F. Mol Cell Biol. 1998; 18: 6679–6697. pmid:9774682
- 84. Yan Z, DeGregori J, Shohet R, Leone G, Stillman B, Nevins JR, et al. Cdc6 is regulated by E2F and is essential for DNA replication in mammalian cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998; 95: 3603–3608. pmid:9520412
- 85. Lau E, Zhu C, Abraham RT, Jiang W. The functional role of Cdc6 in S-G2/M in mammalian cells. EMBO Rep. 2006; 7: 425–430. pmid:16439999
- 86. Feng CJ, Lu XW, Luo DY, Li HJ, Guo JB. Knockdown of Cdc6 inhibits proliferation of tongue squamous cell carcinoma Tca8113 cells. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013; 12: 173–181. pmid:22974333
- 87. Bastian PJ, Ellinger J, Heukamp LC, Kahl P, Müller SC, von Rücker A. Prognostic value of CpG island hypermethylation at PTGS2, RAR-beta, EDNRB, and other gene loci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2007; 51: 665–674, discussion 674. pmid:16956712
- 88. Jin F, Fondell JD. A novel androgen receptor-binding element modulates Cdc6 transcription in prostate cancer cells during cell-cycle progression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009; 37: 4826–4838. pmid:19520769
- 89. Sparmann A, van Lohuizen M. Polycomb silencers control cell fate, development and cancer. Nature Rev Cancer. 2006; 6: 846–856.
- 90. Abdouh M, Facchino S, Chatoo W, Balasingam V, Ferreira J, Bernier G. BMI1 sustains human glioblastoma multiforme stem cell renewal. J Neurosci. 2009; 29: 8884–8896. pmid:19605626
- 91. Chen R, Nishimura MC, Bumbaca SM, Kharbanda S, Forrest WF, Kasman IM, et al. A hierarchy of self-renewing tumor- initiating cell types in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell. 2010; 17: 362–375. pmid:20385361
- 92. Chiba T, Miyagi S, Saraya A, Aoki R, Seki A, Morita Y, et al. The polycomb gene product BMI1 contributes to the maintenance of tumor-initiating side population cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008; 68: 7742–7749. pmid:18829528
- 93. He S, Iwashita T, Buchstaller J, Molofsky AV, Thomas D, Morrison SJ. Bmi-1 overexpression in neural stem/progenitor cells increases proliferation and neurogenesis in culture but has little effect on these functions in vivo. Dev Biol. 2009; 328: 257–272. pmid:19389366
- 94. Kim JH, Yoon SY, Kim CN, Joo JH, Moon SK, Choe IS, et al. The Bmi-1 oncoprotein is overexpressed in human colorectal cancer and correlates with the reduced p16INK4a/p14ARF proteins. Cancer Lett. 2004; 203: 217–224. pmid:14732230
- 95. Leung C, Lingbeek M, Shakhova O, Liu J, Tanger E, Saremaslani P, et al. Bmi1 is essential for cerebellar development and is overexpressed in human medulloblastomas. Nature. 2004; 428: 337–341. pmid:15029199
- 96. Schuringa JJ, Vellenga E. Role of the polycomb group gene BMI1 in normal and leukemic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Curr Opin Hematol. 2010; 17: 294–299. pmid:20308890
- 97. Silva J, García JM, Peña C, García V, Domínguez G, Suárez D, et al. Implication of Polycomb Members Bmi-1, Mel-18, and Hpc-2 in the regulation of p16INK4a, p14ARF, h-TERT, and c-MYC expression in primary breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12: 6929–6936. pmid:17145810
- 98. Li J, Gong LY, Song LB, Jiang LL, Liu LP, Wu J, et al. Oncoprotein Bmi-1 renders apoptotic resistance to glioma cells through activation of the IKK-nuclear factor-kappaB pathway. Am J Pathol. 2010; 176: 699–709. pmid:20035051
- 99. Mihic-Probst D, Kuster A, Kilgus S, Bode-Lesniewska B, Ingold-Heppner B, Leung C, et al. Consistent expression of the stem cell renewal factor BMI-1 in primary and metastatic melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2007; 121: 1764–1770. pmid:17597110
- 100. Häyry V, Mäkinen LK, Atula T, Sariola H, Mäkitie A, Leivo I, et al. Bmi-1 expression predicts prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Br J Cancer. 2010; 102: 892–897. pmid:20145620
- 101. Vrzalikova K, Skarda J, Ehrmann J, Murray PG, Fridman E, Kopolovic J, et al. Prognostic value of Bmi-1 oncoprotein expression in NSCLC patients: a tissue microarray study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008; 134: 1037–1042. pmid:18264721
- 102. Jiang L, Li J, Song L. Bmi-1, stem cells and cancer. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai) 2009; 41: 527–534.
- 103. Poi MJ, Knobloch TJ, Sears MT, Warner BM, Uhrig LK, Weghorst CM, Li J. Alterations in RDINK4/ARF-mediated en bloc regulation of the INK4-ARF locus in human squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Mol Carcinog. 2013.
- 104. Trimarchi JM, Lees JA. Sibling rivalry in the E2F family. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2002; 3: 11–20. pmid:11823794
- 105. Deshpande A, Sicinski P, Hinds PW. Cyclins and cdks in development and cancer: a perspective. Oncogene. 2005; 24: 2909–2915. pmid:15838524
- 106. Musgrove EA, Caldon CE, Barraclough J, Stone A, Sutherland RL. Cyclin D as a therapeutic target in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011; 11: 558–572. pmid:21734724
- 107. Santarius T, Shipley J, Brewer D, Stratton MR, Cooper CS. A census of amplified and overexpressed human cancer genes. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010; 10: 59–64. pmid:20029424
- 108. Diehl JA. Cycling to cancer with cyclin D1. Cancer Biol Ther. 2002; 1: 226–231. pmid:12432268
- 109. Knudsen ES, Knudsen KE. Tailoring to RB: tumour suppressor status and therapeutic response. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008; 8: 714–724. pmid:19143056
- 110. Mizuarai S, Machida T, Kobayashi T, Komatani H, Itadani H, Kotani H. Expression ratio of CCND1 to CDKN2A mRNA predicts RB1 status of cultured cancer cell lines and clinical tumor samples. Mol Cancer. 2011; 10: 31. pmid:21447152
- 111. Wang J, Wang Q, Cui Y, Liu ZY, Zhao W, Wang CL, et al. Knockdown of cyclin D1 inhibits proliferation, induces apoptosis, and attenuates the invasive capacity of human glioblastoma cells. J Neurooncol. 2012; 106: 473–484. pmid:21912938
- 112. Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. Living with or without cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev. 2004; 18: 2699–2711. pmid:15545627