Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Association of ADORA1 rs2228079 and ADORA2A rs5751876 Polymorphisms with Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome in the Polish Population

  • Piotr Janik ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Piotr Janik, Mariusz Berdyński

    piotr.janik@wum.edu.pl

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

  • Mariusz Berdyński ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Piotr Janik, Mariusz Berdyński

    Affiliation Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

  • Krzysztof Safranow,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Medical Chemistry, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland

  • Cezary Żekanowski

    Affiliation Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Centre, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland

Association of ADORA1 rs2228079 and ADORA2A rs5751876 Polymorphisms with Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome in the Polish Population

  • Piotr Janik, 
  • Mariusz Berdyński, 
  • Krzysztof Safranow, 
  • Cezary Żekanowski
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by motor and vocal tics. Hyperactivity of dopaminergic transmission is considered a prime abnormality in the pathophysiology of tics. There are reciprocal antagonistic interactions between adenosine and dopamine transmission. The aim of the study was to analyze the association of two polymorphisms, rs2228079 in ADORA1 and rs5751876 in ADORA2A, with the risk of GTS and co-morbid disorders.

Material and Methods

A total of 162 Polish GTS patients and 270 healthy persons were enrolled in the study. Two polymorphisms were selected on the basis of knowledge of SNPs frequencies in ADORA1 and ADORA2A. Chi-square test was used for allelic and genotypic association studies. Association of genotypes with age of tic onset was analyzed with Mann-Whitney test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to find independent predictors of GTS risk.

Results

We found that the risk of GTS was associated with rs2228079 and rs5751876 polymorphisms. The GG+GT genotypes of rs2228079 in ADORA1 were underrepresented in GTS patients (p = 0.011), whereas T allele of rs5751876 in ADORA2A was overrepresented (p = 0.017). The GG genotype of rs2228079 was associated with earlier age of tic onset (p = 0.046). We found also that the minor allele G of rs2228079 was more frequent in GTS patients with depression as compared to the patients without depression (p = 0.015). Also the genotype GG was significantly more frequent in patients with obsessive compulsive disorder/behavior (OCD/OCB, p = 0.021) and depression (p = 0.032), as compared to the patients without these co-morbidities. The minor allele T frequency of rs5751876 was lower in GTS patients with co-morbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (p = 0.022), and TT+TC genotypes were less frequent in the non-OCD anxiety disorder group (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

ADORA1 and ADORA2A variants are associated with the risk of GTS, co-morbid disorders, and may affect the age of tic onset.

Introduction

Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) is a neuropsychiatric disorder manifesting by multiple motor tics and one or more vocal tics, lasting longer than a year, with the age of onset <18 years [1]. In addition to tics, many patients with GTS exhibit a variety of mental disorders and behavioral symptoms such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), poor impulse control, conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, anxiety, depression, temper outbursts, rage attacks, self-injuries, and inappropriate sexual behavior [2, 3]. Although the etiology of GTS remains unknown, a predominant contribution of genetic factor is acknowledged [47]. Susceptibility genes associated with GTS include: Slit and Trk-like 1 (SLITRK1), L-histidine decarboxylase (HDC), mitochondrial inner membrane protease subunit 2 (IMMP2L), neuroligin 4, X-linked (NLGN4X), and contactin-associated protein 2 (CNTNAP2) [812]. However, these genes contribute to a minority of GTS cases only and a substantial role of environmental factors such as infections, neuroimmunological disturbances, prenatal and peri-natal complications, psychosocial stressors and androgen influences have also been established [1317].

The pathophysiology of tics and co-morbid mental disorders remains poorly understood. Evidence supports an involvement of the cortico-striatal-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) circuit in GTS pathology, however, the primary anatomical site of the abnormality remains controversial. The dysfunction of neurotransmission within the CSTC circuit is known to play a significant role in the pathophysiology of tics. Although numerous neurotransmitters participate in CSTC signal transmission, dopaminergic dysfunction is considered the prime abnormality in GTS since dopamine antagonists bring about tic suppression. Still, several lines of evidence support a role of other neurotransmitters in the pathogenesis of tics and associated psychiatric disorders [1821].

Adenosine is an important modulator of striatal neurotransmission whose role in GTS has not been thoroughly investigated yet. In the nervous system adenosine acts as an energy dependent neuromodulator through combined presynaptic, postsynaptic and non-synaptic actions [22, 23]. Extracellular adenosine regulates several functions in the brain, including neuronal viability, membrane potential, propagation of action potentials, and astrocytic function [22]. Adenosine acts through four subtypes of receptors: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3. A1 and A2A receptors are predominantly expressed in the brain and are largely responsible for the central effects of adenosine [24, 25]. The most abundant and homogeneously distributed adenosine receptor in the brain is A1, whose physiological action involves inhibition of synaptic transmission and neuron hyperpolarization [26]. In contrast, the A2A receptor is expressed at a high level only in the striatum, the olfactory tubercle and the nucleus accumbens and its functions in the brain include facilitation of neurotransmitter release and regulation of sensorimotor integration in basal ganglia [27]. Thus, these two adenosine receptors have opposite physiological actions. Interestingly, they have been shown to form heterodimers where A2A receptor can control the A1 receptor functionality, whereas the reverse does not occur [28].

A1 and A2 receptors have been found in dopamine-rich regions of the brain and co-localized with dopamine D1 and D2 receptors on striatopallidal GABAergic neurons. This co-localization of adenosine and dopamine receptors allows their direct interactions in the membrane through formation of heteromeric complexes and also a cross-talk in intracellular signaling [2931]. A1-D1 receptor interaction would modulate the functioning of the medium spiny striatal neurons of the direct pathway, whereas A2-D2 receptor interaction would affect transmission through the indirect pathway of the striatum [32, 33]. Additionally, most evidence suggests that A1 and D1, and A2A and D2 receptors act antagonistically to regulate GABA-ergic striatal output neurons. Stimulation of A1 and A2A receptors counteracts, respectively, D1- and D2- receptor-mediated neurotransmission, tending to reduce locomotor activity, and antagonism of either of these two adenosine receptors promotes locomotor activity [3436]. The antagonistic interactions between the two receptors have also been shown at the level of adenylyl cyclase, with D2 receptor preventing A2A receptor-mediated protein phosphorylation and gene expression [28, 31, 37]. This antagonism has implications for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease which is associated with reduced level of dopamine in the striatum. A2A receptor antagonists have the potential to be effective for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease [38, 39]. In contrast to Parkinson’s disease, GTS is considered to be related to a hyperdopaminergic state within the CSTC circuit.

In the present study we tested the hypothesis that the increased dopaminergic neurotransmission in GTS could be related to variants of ADORA1 and ADORA2A genes. We analyzed the association of ADORA1 rs2228079 and ADORA2A rs5751876 polymorphisms (selected as described below) with the incidence and clinical phenotype of GTS.

Material and Methods

Ethics Statement

The study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Medical University of Warsaw (KB/2/2007, KB/53/A/2010), and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. All participants aged ≥18 years signed informed consent form prior to their inclusion in the study, and their legal guardians gave a written consent on behalf of individuals under 18.

Study participants

The cohort of GTS cases comprised 162 unrelated patients aged 4–54 years (mean age: 19.9 ± 8.7 years; 131 males (80.9%), 75 children and 87 adults defined as ≥18 years, 53.7%). The family history was positive in 80 (49.7%) patients, and was unknown for one patient. The mean age of tic onset was 7.5±3.2 years. One-hundred and twenty five (77.2%) patients had at least one of the following co-morbidities: ADHD n = 63 (38.9%), OCD/OCB n = 70 (43.2%), learning disorder n = 51 (31.5%), depression n = 25 (15.4%), non-OCD anxiety disorder n = 34 (21.0%), conduct disorder n = 12 (7.4%), while 37 (22.8%) had none of the above. As a control group we enrolled 270 unrelated, ethnically and gender matched individuals with no diagnosed mental, neurological or general disorder, aged 12–53 years (mean age: 21.5 ± 3.0 years; 200 males, 74.1%). The patients were evaluated for the clinical diagnosis of GTS and co-morbid psychiatric disorders at the time of examination according to DSM-IV-TR [1]. Learning disorders were diagnosed if they had been confirmed by psychologist’s evaluation. Obsessive Compulsive Behavior (OCB) was diagnosed if obsessions and compulsions were egosyntonic in contrast to egodystonic symptoms which characterized OCD. The diagnosis of co-morbid mental disorders was also made based on earlier psychiatric examinations that had been performed before the time of patients’ evaluation. However, for some adults the earlier medical records and the results of psychiatric examinations were not available. In those patients some data were retrospective based on reports from patients.

Genetic analysis and selection of SNPs

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes using standard salting-out method. Intronic primers were used to amplify all coding exons of ADORA1 (2 and 3 according to ENST00000367236) and all coding exons of ADORA2A (2 and 3 according to ENST00000337539) in a subgroup of 50 GTS patients (Table in S1 Table). Amplicons were purified with Exonuclease I / FastAP (Fermentas) and sequenced on an ABI PRISM 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) using the BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems).

Sequence analysis of coding exons and exon-intron boundaries in the 50 GTS patients revealed only two single synonymous polymorphisms: one in ADORA1 exon 2 (rs2228079, c.306T>G, A102A) and one in ADORA2A exon 3 (rs5751876, c.1083T>C, Y361Y). ADORA1 rs2228079 and ADORA2A rs5751876 polymorphisms were chosen on the basis of their relative frequencies in the general population, as well as in a subgroup of 50 Polish GTS patients. More specifically, we analyzed coding sequences of exons 2 and 3 (both in the ADORA1 and ADORA2A genes). We identified only two SNPs, i.e. ADORA1 rs2228079 and ADORA2A rs5751876. It is consistent with our unpublished results of analysis of the whole exome of one hundred Polish subjects not having GTS which revealed only the aforementioned two SNPs in ADORA1 and ADORA2A genes. Additionally, data presented by Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) suggest that other exonic variants of the ADORA1 and ADORA2A genes are private ones with a frequency up to dozens per 100,000 alleles. Thus the performed analyses prompted us to confine the association study to the two silent exonic SNPs in ADORA1 and ADORA2A (rs2228079 and rs5751876, respectively). As in the case of other genetic association studies it is possible that both silent variants are in linkage disequilibrium with true risk conferring variants located in the not analyzed intronic sequences. It is also possible that the SNPs could influence putative epigenetic mechanisms. Both polymorphisms were then determined in the whole group of patients and controls, using the same fluorescent sequencing method, however, confined to SNP-bearing exons (i.e. ADORA1 exon 2 and ADORA2A exon 3).

Statistical analysis

Chi-square test was used for both allelic and genotypic association studies. Association of genotypes with age of tic onset was analyzed with Mann-Whitney test. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to find independent predictors of GTS risk. The study sample size was sufficient to detect with 80% probability the true effect size measured as odds ratio (OR) equal to 1.50 or 0.65 for the differences in allele frequencies of the two polymorphisms between GTS and control group. Statistica 10 program was used for statistical calculations. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

The genotype frequencies of both SNPs were in accordance with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium both in the control and patient groups (p>0.1 for rs2228079, p>0.3 for rs5751876).

Incidence of GTS

Significant associations were found between variants of the ADORA1 and ADORA2A genes and the incidence of GTS. The minor allele frequency (MAF) of ADORA1 rs2228079 was lower but not significantly (p = 0.069), and of ADORA2A rs5751876 was significantly higher in GTS patients compared to control group (Table 1). When the TT genotype was used as a reference, ADORA1 rs2228079 genotypes GG+GT (dominant model, p = 0.011) and GT (p = 0.008) were statistically significantly associated with lower risk of GTS. The presence of ADORA2A rs5751876 genotype TT (recessive model) and TT+TC (dominant model) was associated with higher risk of GTS (Table 1). Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender showed that the presence of ADORA1 rs2228079 allele G (genotypes GG+GT) is an independent factor associated with lower risk of GTS, while a higher number of ADORA2A rs5751876 T alleles is associated with a higher risk of GTS (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 1. Genotype and allele distribution of the rs2228079 and the rs5751876 in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome and controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136754.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of independent factors associated with presence of GTS as dependent variable (GTS patients vs controls)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136754.t002

Co-morbidity

Allelic and genotypic association of both analyzed SNPs with co-morbid disorders were shown in Table 3. The minor allele G of rs2228079 was more frequent in GTS patients with depression than in patients without depression (OR 2.11, 95% CI:1.15–3.89, p = 0.015). The MAF of ADORA2A rs5751876 (allele T) was lower in GTS patients with ADHD compared to those without ADHD (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37–0.93, p = 0.022). The genotype GG of ADORA1 rs2228079 (recessive model) was significantly more frequent in patients with OCD/OCB (OR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.14–7.21, p = 0.021) and depression (OR 2.94, 95% CI: 1.06–8.13, p = 0.032) than in patients without these co-morbidities. There was also a non-significant trend toward an association between the GG genotype in ADORA1 rs2228079 and non-OCD anxiety disorders. ADORA2A rs5751876 genotypes TT+TC (dominant model) were significantly associated with a lower risk of non-OCD anxiety disorders (OR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.21–1.0, p = 0.045). All mentioned significant allelic and genotypic associations with the GTS co-morbidities remained statistically significant in multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for gender (data not shown).

thumbnail
Table 3. Genotypic and allelic association analysis of ADORA1 rs2228079 and ADORA2A rs5751876 variants with co-morbid disorders in patients with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136754.t003

Gender

A higher frequency of ADORA2A rs5751876 T allele was found in males than in females, and this difference was statistically significant in controls (36.5% vs 26.4%, p = 0.030) but not in GTS patients (44.3% vs 32.3%, p = 0.085). No association between gender and ADORA1 genotype was found.

Age of tic onset

The GG genotype of ADORA1 rs2228079 was significantly associated with an earlier age at onset of the disease—GG vs. GT+TT: 6.3±3.0 vs 7.7±3.2 years, p = 0.046. This association remained significant (p = 0.025) in multivariate linear regression analysis adjusted for gender.

Raw data

The raw data underlying the findings of the study are presented in Table in S2 Table.

Discussion

The dysfunction of neurotransmission in the cortex and the basal ganglia, mainly overactivity of the dopaminergic system, plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of tics. According to a classical basal ganglia model, hyperkinetic disorders such as tics are a result of an increased cortical excitability due to either a reduction of the indirect pathway transmission or an increase of the direct pathway signalling [1821]. Enkephalinergic neurons of the indirect pathway express predominantly A2A-D2 heteromeric receptor complexes, while dynorphinergic neurons of the direct pathway express predominantly A1-D1 heteromers. There is a mutual antagonistic interaction between the two receptors forming a heterodimer, thus stimulation of one receptor decreases the binding capacity of the other [3236]. Another fact that has drawn our attention to abnormal functioning of adenosine receptors as a possible contribution to the pathophysiology of tics is the clinical observation that consumption of caffeine-rich products such as coffee, certain soft drinks (e.g. coke) and black tea may deteriorate tics in some GTS patients [40]. Caffeine is a competitive antagonist of adenosine receptors and enhances dopaminergic activity [41]. Therefore we decided to analyze the contribution of ADORA1 and ADORA2A variants in a group of Polish GTS patients and controls.

A significant association was found both in the allelic and genotypic analysis between the risk of GTS and the examined SNPs of the genes coding for adenosine A1 and A2 receptors (Table 1). Multivariate analysis proved that both SNPs are gender-independent factors associated with a lower (ADORA1 rs2228079 GG+GT genotypes, dominant model) or higher (ADORA2A rs5751876 T allele, additive model) GTS risk (Table 2). We also found that a variant of ADORA1 could be related to an earlier age of tic onset. We hypothesize that the binding affinity of A1 and A2A receptors for adenosine could depend on the variants of the encoding genes. Although both variants examined are synonymous they could affect gene expression. The most likely explanation is a linkage to functional variants located in coding and/or regulatory regions. It has also been shown that synonymous variants do influence mRNA stability and translation rate [42]. For instance, the rs5751876 polymorphism in the Japanese population is completely linked with three other variants (rs2298383, rs5751876, and rs35320474), which results in two haplotypes (A and B). Haplotype AA (with allele T of rs5751876) has a higher risk of developing acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion (AESD). Moreover, mRNA expression in the brain is significantly higher in AA than in AB and BB individuals of Caucasian background. Similarly, ADORA2A protein level and cellular cAMP production are significantly higher in the AA than in the BB haplotype carriers. The rs5751876 polymorphism is also linked with variants likely to alter the level of mRNA i.e. rs22983836 located in the putative promoter region with regulatory element predicted in silico and rs35320474 located in the 3`UTR including U-rich motifs [43].

Another mechanism affecting ADORA1 protein level based on codon usage bias is also plausible [44]. The GCG codon corresponding to the minor G allele is 2.5-fold less frequently used than the GCT one corresponding to the major allele in humans [45]. This difference is even more pronounced for the ADORA1 gene (NM_000674.2, GCT frequency 0.34 vs. GCG, 0.09). It is well known that the use of synonymous codons is neither random nor neutral. For instance, synonymous mutations in DRD2 and MDR1 genes have been shown to affect mRNA stability and translation [46, 47]. Also in silico analysis suggests that codon bias plays an important role in translation efficiency in humans, with significant differences between tissues and developmental stages [48, 49]. Thus it seems likely that translation rate and/or folding of ADORA1 protein could be modulated via the codon bias mechanism i.e., depend on the rs2228079 polymorphism.

Notably, both variants seem to act in opposite directions. The minor allele G of ADORA1 rs2228079 could enhance adenosine transmission through A1 receptor and therefore decrease dopamine action via the striatal direct pathway, thereby reducing tic severity. In contrast, the minor allele T of ADORA2A rs5751876 variant would decrease the affinity of A2A receptor for adenosine, consequently enhancing dopaminergic transmission and thus increasing the risk of GTS. We hypothesize that the functional imbalance between the direct and indirect pathways dependent on the activity of adenosine receptors due to abnormal expression of ADORA1 and ADORA2A genes could be responsible for the appearance of tics. Indeed, multivariate logistic regression analysis (Table 2) suggests that the diplotype comprising ADORA1 TT and ADORA2A TT genotypes is associated with the highest risk of GTS. The proportion of subjects with the TT/TT diplotype is 8.6% in the GTS group and 1.1% in the control group (OR = 8.419, 95%CI = 2.381–29.771, p = 0.00015). This effect could be due to a direct or a functional interaction between A1 and A2A receptors, or both. However, the association should be treated with caution, since the number of TT/TT diplotype individuals is rather low in our study groups.

Several lines of evidence support a potential role of the glutamatergic system in GTS. Extensive interaction between the glutamate and dopamine neurotransmitter systems has been established [21]. A1-A2 receptor heterodimers are located in presynaptic striatal glutamatergic synapses and control the striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission [5052]. It is possible that abnormal functioning of A1 and A2 receptors may affect the glutamatergic transmission in GTS. Moreover, the existence of oligomeric complexes comprised of adenosine, dopamine and glutamate receptors (e.g. A2A/D2/mGlu5 receptor complex) has also been demonstrated. These receptor oligomers are located on enkephalin medium spiny neurons in the striatum and control their excitability [53, 54]. The A2A/mGlu5 receptor synergism in the rat striatum has been established, and it has been suggested that A2A/mGlu5 receptor co-stimulation blocks D2-receptor-mediated transmission [28]. Thus, down-regulation of the A2A/mGlu5 receptor complex could potentiate D2 receptor activity.

We also found that both polymorphisms studied were associated with co-morbid disorders in GTS patients. The GG genotype of ADORA1 rs2228079 was found significantly more frequently in patients with OCD/OCB, depression and, at borderline significance, with non-OCD anxiety disorder. OCD is integral to GTS in contrast to depression and non-OCD anxiety disorders, usually considered not to be genetically linked to GTS [55]. Among these factors, OCD has been shown to have a high rate of co-morbidity with depression and non-OCD anxiety disorders [5558]. The three disorders are common in patients with GTS and the present study has shown that they could have the same genetic background.

It is generally accepted that GTS and ADHD are not genetically related. However, O'Rourke et al. have suggested that the two disorders combined with OCD may in fact have overlapping neurobiology [59]. Indeed, our results agree with the latter hypothesis. We found an association between rs5751876 variant and co-morbid ADHD, a higher number of T alleles of rs5751876 predicting a lower risk of co-occurring ADHD. Interestingly, there was also a similar relationship between ADORA2A rs5751876 and non-OCD anxiety disorders, but only in the dominant model: the T allele was associated with a lower risk (Table 3). Thus, we found that non-OCD anxiety disorders were related to variants of the two studied genes: rs2228079 of ADORA1 (not reaching significance) and rs5751876 of ADORA2A (significantly), which is not in line with earlier reports considering anxiety symptoms as secondary to GTS [60].

Conclusions

We have found a significant association of the SNPs studied with the risk of GTS, co-morbidity, and age of tic onset.

Limitations

The major limitation of the study is a relatively small sample size and the fact that only protein-coding parts of ADORA1 and ADORA2A genes were analyzed. Thus, the present findings should be verified for larger groups of patients and controls, preferably also for different populations. Moreover, a role of other functional polymorphisms in ADORA1 and ADORA2A cannot be excluded in conferring liability to GTS. The patients were evaluated for co-morbid disorders only once (one-time registration) and we cannot exclude that some new psychiatric disorders might develop over time, especially in young children. The associations of co-morbid conditions with variants of the two studied genes must be interpreted with cautious because of small number of patients with particular psychiatric disorder. The data regarding the age of tic onset and the diagnosis of co-morbid disorders in some adult patients were retrospective, based on reports from parents or patients and were, therefore, subject to recall bias.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136754.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Dataset of raw values underlying the findings of the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136754.s002

(XLS)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: PJ MB CZ. Performed the experiments: PJ MB. Analyzed the data: PJ MB KS CZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: PJ MB KS. Wrote the paper: PJ MB KS CZ.

References

  1. 1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR). 4th ed., text revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
  2. 2. Cavanna AE, Rickards H. The psychopathological spectrum of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37: 1008–1015. pmid:23131314
  3. 3. Cohen SC, Leckman JF, Bloch MH. Clinical assessment of Tourette syndrome and tic disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37: 997–1007. pmid:23206664
  4. 4. Deng H, Gao K, Jankovic J. The genetics of Tourette syndrome. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8: 203–213. pmid:22410579
  5. 5. Paschou P. The genetic basis of Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37: 1026–1039. pmid:23333760
  6. 6. Paschou P, Fernandez TV, Sharp F, Heiman GA, Hoekstra PJ. Genetic susceptibility and neurotransmitters in Tourette syndrome. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2013;112: 155–177. pmid:24295621
  7. 7. State MW. The genetics of Tourette Disorder. Curr Opon Genet Dev. 2011;21: 302–309.
  8. 8. Abelson JF, Kwan KY, O’Roak BJ, Baek DY, Stillman AA, Morgan TM, et al. Sequence variants in SLITRK1 are associated with Tourette’s syndrome. Science. 2005;310: 317–320. pmid:16224024
  9. 9. Ercan-Sencicek AG, Stillman AA, Ghosh AK, Bilguvar K, O'Roak BJ, Mason CE, et al. L-histidine decarboxylase and Tourette syndrome. New Eng J Med. 2010;362: 1901–1908. pmid:20445167
  10. 10. Lawson-Yuen A, Saldivar JS, Sommer S, Picker J. Familial deletion within NLGN4 associated with autism and Tourette syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16: 614–618. pmid:18231125
  11. 11. Petek E, Windpassinger C, Vincent JB, Cheung J, Boright AP, Scherer SW, et al. Disruption of a novel gene (IMMP2L) by a breakpoint in 7q31 associated with Tourette syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;68: 848–858. pmid:11254443
  12. 12. Verkerk AJ, Mathews CA, Joosse M, Eussen BH, Heutink P, Oostra BA, et al.; Tourette Syndrome Association International Consortium for Genetics. CNTNAP2 is disrupted in a family with Gilles de la Tourette syndrome and obsessive compulsive disorder. Genomics. 2003;82: 1–9. pmid:12809671
  13. 13. Alexander GM, Peterson BS. Testing the prenatal hormone hypothesis of tic-related disorders: gender identity and gender role behavior. Dev Psychopathol. 2004;16: 407–420. pmid:15487603
  14. 14. Burd L, Severud R, Klug MG, Kerbeshian J. Prenatal and perinatal risk factors for Tourette disorder. J Perinat Med. 1999;27: 295–302. pmid:10560082
  15. 15. Hyde TM, Aaronson BA, Randolph C, Rickler KC, Weinberger DR. Relationship of birth weight to the phenotypic expression of Gilles de la Tourette’s syndrome in monozygotic twins. Neurology. 1992;42: 652–658. pmid:1549232
  16. 16. Leckman JF, Price RA, Walkup JT, Ort S, Pauls DL, Cohen DJ, et al. Nongenetic factors in Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987;44: 100. pmid:3467660
  17. 17. Martino D, Dale RC, Gilbert DL, Giovannoni G, Leckman JF. Immunopathogenic mechanisms in tourette syndrome: A critical review. Mov Disord. 2009;24: 1267–1279. pmid:19353683
  18. 18. Berardelli A, Curra A, Fabbrini G, Gilio F, Manfredi M. Pathophysiology of tics and Tourette syndrome. J Neurol. 2003;250: 781–787. pmid:12883917
  19. 19. Felling RJ, Singer HS. Neurobiology of Tourette syndrome: current status and need for further investigation. J Neurosci. 2011;31: 12387–12395. pmid:21880899
  20. 20. Hoekstra PJ, Anderson GM, Limburg PC, Korf J, Kallenberg CG, Minderaa RB, et al. Neurobiology and neuroimmunology of Tourette’s syndrome: an update. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004;61: 886–898. pmid:15095010
  21. 21. Singer HS, Morris C, Grados M. Glutamatergic modulatory therapy for Tourette syndrome. Med Hypotheses. 2010;74: 862–867. pmid:20022434
  22. 22. Fredholm BB, Chen JF, Cunha RA, Svenningsson P, Vaugeois JM. Adenosine and brain function. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2005;63: 191–270. pmid:15797469
  23. 23. Sebastiao AM, Ribeiro JA. Fine-tuning neuromodulation by adenosine. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2000;21: 341–346. pmid:10973087
  24. 24. Dunwiddie TV, Masino SA. The role and regulation of adenosine in the central nervous system. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24: 31–55. pmid:11283304
  25. 25. Ferraro L, Beggiato S, Tomasini MC, Fuxe K, Antonelli T, Tanganelli S, et al. A(2A)/D(2) receptor heteromerization in a model of Parkinson's disease. Focus on striatal aminoacidergic signaling. Brain Res. 2012;1476: 96–107. pmid:22370145
  26. 26. Palmer TM, Stiles GL. Adenosine receptors. Neuropharmacology. 1995;34: 683–694. pmid:8532135
  27. 27. Fredholm BB. Purinoceptors in the nervous system. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1995;76: 228–239. pmid:7617551
  28. 28. Ciruela F, Gómez-Soler M, Guidolin D, Borroto-Escuela DO, Agnati LF, Fuxe K, et al. Adenosine receptor containing oligomers: Their role in the control of dopamine and glutamate neurotransmission in the brain. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808: 1245–1255. pmid:21316336
  29. 29. Canals M, Marcellino D, Fanelli F, Ciruela F, de Benedetti P, Goldberg SR, et al. Adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor–receptor heteromerization: qualitative and quantitative assessment by fluorescence and bioluminescence energy transfer. J Biol Chem. 2003;278: 46741–46749. pmid:12933819
  30. 30. Ciruela F, Burgueño J, Casadó V, Canals M, Marcellino D, Goldberg SR, et al. Combining mass spectrometry and pull-down techniques for the study of receptor heteromerization. Direct epitope-epitope electrostatic interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors. Anal Chem. 2004;76: 5354–5363. pmid:15362892
  31. 31. Kudlacek O, Just H, Korkhov VM, Vartian N, Klinger M, Pankevych H, et al. The human D2 dopamine receptor synergizes with the A2A adenosine receptor to stimulate adenylyl cyclase in PC12 cells. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28: 1317–1327. pmid:12784121
  32. 32. Ferre S, Fredholm BB, Morelli M, Popoli P, Fuxe K. Adenosine-dopamine receptor–receptor interactions as an integrative mechanism in the basal ganglia. Trends Neurosci. 1997;20: 482–487. pmid:9347617
  33. 33. Fuxe K, Ferre S, Zoli M, Agnati LF. Integrated events in central dopamine transmission as analyzed at multiple levels. Evidence for intramembrane adenosine A2A/dopamine D2 and adenosine A1/dopamine D1 receptor interactions in the basal ganglia. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998;26: 258–273. pmid:9651540
  34. 34. Antoniou K, Papadopoulou-Daifoti Z, Hyphantis T, Papathanasiou G, Bekris E, Marselos M, et al. A detailed behavioral analysis of the acute motor effects of caffeine in the rat: involvement of adenosine A1 and A2A receptors. Psychopharmacology. 2005;183: 154–162. pmid:16205915
  35. 35. El Yacoubi M, Ledent C, Parmentier M, Costentin J, Vaugeois JM. Caffeine reduces hypnotic effects of alcohol through adenosine A2A receptor blockade. Neuropharmacology. 2003;45: 977–985. pmid:14573390
  36. 36. Kumer SC, Vrana KE. Intricate regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase activity and gene expression. J Neurochem. 1996;67: 443–462. pmid:8764568
  37. 37. Kull B, Ferré S, Arslan G, Svenningsson P, Fuxe K, Owman C, et al. Reciprocal interactions between adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors in Chinese hamster ovary cells co-transfected with the two receptors. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;58: 1035–1045. pmid:10509756
  38. 38. Hauser RA, Cantillon M, Pourcher E, Micheli F, Mok V, Onofrj M, et al. Preladenant in patients with Parkinson’s disease and motor fluctuations: a phase 2, double-blind, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10: 221–229. pmid:21315654
  39. 39. LeWitt PA, Guttman M, Tetrud JW, Tuite PJ, Mori A, Chaikin P, et al.; 6002-US-005 Study Group. Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist istradefylline (KW-6002) reduces “off” time in Parkinson’s disease: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial (6002-US-005). Ann Neurol. 2008;63: 295–302. pmid:18306243
  40. 40. Müller-Vahl KR, Buddensiek N, Geomelas M, Emrich HM. The influence of different food and drink on tics in Tourette syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97: 442–446. pmid:18307557
  41. 41. Daly JW, Fredholm BB. Caffeine—an atypical drug of dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1998;51: 199–206. pmid:9716941
  42. 42. Hunt R, Sauna ZE, Ambudkar SV, Gottesman MM, Kimchi-Sarfaty C. Silent (synonymous) SNPs: should we care about them? In: Komar AA, editor. Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. Methods and Protocols. Series: Methods Mol Biol, Vol. 578, 2nd ed. New York: Humana Press; 2009. pp. 23–39.
  43. 43. Shinohara M, Saitoh M, Nishizawa D, Ikeda K, Hirose S, Takanashi J, et al. ADORA2A polymorphism predisposes children to encephalopathy with febrile status epilepticus. Neurology. 2013;80: 1571–1576. pmid:23535492
  44. 44. Behura SK, Severson DW. Codon usage bias: causative factors, quantification methods and genome-wide patterns: with emphasis on insect genomes. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2013;88: 49–61. pmid:22889422
  45. 45. Nakamura Y, Gojobori T, Ikemura T. Codon usage tabulated from the international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28: 292. pmid:10592250
  46. 46. Duan J, Wainwright MS, Comeron JM, Saitou N, Sanders AR, Gelernter J, et al. Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12: 205–216. pmid:12554675
  47. 47. Wang D, Johnson AD, Papp AC, Kroetz DL, Sadee W. Multidrug resistance polypeptide 1 (MDR1, ABCB1) variant 3435C>T affects mRNA stability. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2005;15: 693–704. pmid:16141795
  48. 48. Mort M, Ivanov D, Cooper DN, Chuzhanova NA. A meta-analysis of nonsense mutations causing human genetic disease. Hum Mutat. 2008;29: 1037–1047. pmid:18454449
  49. 49. Waldman YY, Tuller T, Shlomi T, Sharan R, Ruppin E. Translation efficiency in humans: tissue specificity, global optimization and differences between developmental stages. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38: 2964–2974. pmid:20097653
  50. 50. Ciruela F, Casadó V, Rodrigues RJ, Luján R, Burgueño J, Canals M, et al. Presynaptic control of striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission by adenosine A1–A2A receptor heteromers. J Neurosci. 2006;26: 2080–2087. pmid:16481441
  51. 51. Hettinger BD, Lee A, Linden J, Rosin DL. Ultrastructural localization of adenosine A2A receptors suggests multiple cellular sites for modulation of GABAergic neurons in rat striatum. J Comp Neurol. 2001;431: 331–346. pmid:11170009
  52. 52. Ochiishi T, Chen L, Yukawa A, Saitoh Y, Sekino Y, Arai T, et al. Cellular localization of adenosine A1 receptors in rat forebrain: immunohistochemical analysis using adenosine A1 receptor-specific monoclonal antibody. J Comp Neurol. 1999;411: 301–316. pmid:10404255
  53. 53. Ferré S, Agnati LF, Ciruela F, Lluis C, Woods AS, Fuxe K, et al. Neurotransmitter receptor heteromers and their integrative role in “local modules”: the striatal spine module. Brain Res Rev. 2007;55: 55–67. pmid:17408563
  54. 54. Ferré S, Ciruela F, Quiroz C, Luján R, Popoli P, Cunha RA, et al. Adenosine receptor heteromers and their integrative role in striatal function. Sci World J. 2007;7: 74–85.
  55. 55. Robertson MM. Mood disorders and Gilles de la Tourette’s syndrome: an update on prevalence, etiology, comorbidity, clinical associations, and implications. J Psychosom Res. 2006;61: 349–358. pmid:16938513
  56. 56. Gomes de Alvarenga P, de Mathis MA, Dominguez Alves AC, do Rosário MC, Fossaluza V, Hounie AG, et al. Clinical features of tic-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: results from a large multicenter study. CNS Spectr. 2012;17: 87–93. pmid:22789066
  57. 57. Lebowitz ER, Motlagh MG, Katsovich L, King RA, Lombroso PJ, Grantz H, et al. Tourette Syndrome Study Group. Tourette syndrome in youth with and without obsessive compulsive disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;21: 451–457. pmid:22543961
  58. 58. Robertson MM. Tourette syndrome, associated conditions and the complexities of treatment. Brain. 2000;123: 425–462. pmid:10686169
  59. 59. O'Rourke JA, Scharf JM, Platko J, Stewart SE, Illmann C, Geller DA, et al. The familial association of tourette's disorder and ADHD: the impact of OCD symptoms. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2011;156B: 553–560. pmid:21557467
  60. 60. Bedard MA, Agid Y, Chouinard S, Fahn S, Korczyn AD, Lesperance P, et al. The heterogeneous psychopathology of Tourette Syndrome. In: Bedard MA, Agid Y, Chouinard S, Fahn S, Korczyn AD, Lesperance P, editors. Mental and Behavioral Dysfunction in Movement Disorders. Totowa: Humana Press; 2003. pp 443–466.