Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

On the Origin and Evolution of the Extant System of B Chromosomes in Oryzomyini Radiation (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae)

  • Karen Ventura ,

    Affiliations Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Instituto de Recursos Naturais - Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Itajubá, Minas Gerais, Brazil

  • Patricia Caroline Mary O’Brien,

    Affiliation Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

  • Camila do Nascimento Moreira,

    Affiliation Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda,

    Affiliation Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith

    Affiliation Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom

On the Origin and Evolution of the Extant System of B Chromosomes in Oryzomyini Radiation (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae)

  • Karen Ventura, 
  • Patricia Caroline Mary O’Brien, 
  • Camila do Nascimento Moreira, 
  • Yatiyo Yonenaga-Yassuda, 
  • Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith


Heterogeneous supernumerary chromosomes (Bs) are recognized in the oryzomyines Holochilus brasiliensis, Nectomys rattus, N. squamipes, Oligoryzomys flavescens and Sooretamys angouya, representing about 10% of all known B-containing rodent species. They provide an outstanding model for understanding the origin, evolution and diversity of Bs in a phylogenetic context. Therefore, whole chromosome-specific probes were generated from flow-sorted Holochilus brasiliensis (HBR) autosomes 11 and 25+26 and chromosomes X, Y and Bs. Hybridizations were performed on male metaphases of 15 Oryzomyini species of which 3 are B-containing species. The results reveal that among the species sampled, 12 of them, belonging to a monophyletic Oryzomiyini subclade, are positive for an anonymous Oryzomyini shared heterochromatic region (OSHR) on both sex chromosomes. The OSHR is also present on Bs of Holochilus brasiliensis, Nectomys rattus and N. squamipes but not on Bs of O. flavescens and S. angouya. Two distinct additional OSHR/autosome associations are observed on S. angouya. The three species that are OSHR negative belong to an outgroup. Molecular dating suggests that the OSHR originated between 7.8 and 3 Mya on ancestral sex chromosomes. A tentative explanation for the OSHR-positive nature of B regions in three species could be that transposable elements (TEs) from this specific sex chromosome region may have invaded existing B chromosomes. The presence of the OSHR on entire Xp and Yp adjacent to interstitial telomeric sequences at pericentromeric positions, as observed in Drymoreomys albimaculatus, show a similar organization as on B chromosomes in Nectomys squamipes. The diversity of the Oryzomyini Bs in number, size, morphology and genetic content may be explained by the independent origin of B chromosomes in different subgroups of species, with Bs in Holochilus brasiliensis, Nectomys squamipes and N. rattus sharing the OSHR with sex chromosomes, and those in Oligoryzomys flavescens and Sooretamys angouya lacking OSHR in Bs. The species-specific pattern of Bs is probably a consequence of their independent evolutionary origin.


Supernumerary (B) chromosomes are found in about 15% of eukaryotic species, including animals, plants and fungi [1], and, in most cases, their genomic functions and molecular composition remain obscure [1,2]. The karyotypes of about 70 mammalian species have been characterized by the presence of B chromosomes, of which 50 species belong to the order Rodentia [3]. In Brazilian rodents, heterogeneous supernumeraries are known in the genome of nine species [4,5]. Among them, and representing about 10% of all known B-containing species of Rodentia, are Holochilus brasiliensis, Nectomys squamipes, Nectomys rattus, Oligoryzomys flavescens and Sooretamys angouya, belonging to the monophyletic Oryzomyini (Sigmodontinae), a group comprising 33 Neotropical genera, and about 140 species [68], which originated from a rapid adaptive radiation [9,10].

Oryzomyini have an exceptional range of diploid and fundamental numbers, with polymorphism of autosomes and sex chromosomes in some species [1116]. Their B chromosomes show great diversity in terms of number, size, morphology of Bs, DNA replication, banding patterns and presence/absence of interstitial telomeric signals (ITS) [4,11].

Generally, two primary origins of B chromosomes have been considered [17,18]. The most widely accepted view is that they are derived from an intragenomic fragment of the autosomal (A) complement [19], as in the plants Crepis capillaris [20] and Secale cereale [19], in Drosophila subsilvestris [21] and Abracris flavolineata [22], in Rattus rattus [23] and in the Siberian roe deer Capreolus pygargus [24]. Although less well supported, B chromosomes could be derived from the sex chromosomes, as suggested in the case of the W chromosome in the New Zealand frog Leiopelma hochstetteri [25,26], and the Y chromosome in the collared lemming, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus [27]. An alternative view is that interspecific hybridization provides foreign DNA from a closely related species, as is presumed for the Amazon molly Poecilia formosa [28] and as demonstrated in two species of the wasp Nasonia [29]. The presence of Bs in some species is associated with amplification of certain genome regions and their initial accumulation within the population may occur as a result of meiotic drive (for review see [3]).

In mammals, supernumerary chromosomes have been investigated by FISH with telomeric or rDNA sequences, by chromosome microdissection, by BAC mapping and by DNA sequencing [23,24,3035]. These modern approaches to investigating B chromosomes from animals and plants have improved our knowledge of their origin, composition, sequence accumulation, gene content and derived transcripts—for review see [36]. Although such different levels of DNA-sequence comparisons have been used to investigate the origin of Bs, in Oryzomyini they have been studied only for their similarity to autosomes and sex chromosomes in terms of morphology, size or meiotic behaviour.

Materials and Methods

The whole chromosome-specific painting probes of Holochilus brasiliensis (HBR) HBR X, HBR Y, HBR supernumeraries (B1 and B2) and the two autosomal probes (HBR 11 and HBR 25, 26) were generated from flow-sorted chromosomes at the Cambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK. The primary fibroblast cell lines came from one male Holochilus brasiliensis with 2n = 56+2Bs (Fig 1A and 1B). The chromosomes of HBR were arranged by size according to their position in the flow karyotype. On the hybridized metaphases, the HBR chromosomes were identified by 4′,6- diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) differential staining. The chromosome-specific paints were made by degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR) on flow-sorted chromosomes [37, 38]. Briefly, the chromosomes were stained with Hoechst 33258 (2 μg/ml) and Chromomycin A3 (40 μg/ml) in the presence of magnesium sulfate (2.5 mmol/l) for 2 h. Sodium sulfite (25 mmol/l) and sodium citrate (10 mmol/l) were added 15 min prior to flow sorting. Chromosome sorting was performed using a dual-laser cell sorter (MoFlo; Beckman Coulter). Approximately 400 chromosomes were sorted from each peak in the flow karyotypes directly into PCR tubes containing 30 μl of distilled water. Each sample was amplified by DOP-PCR using the primer 6MW [37]. Primary PCR products were labeled using cyanine 3 (Cy3)-dUTP (GE Healthcare Lifesciences) or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-12-dUTP (Roche)–final concentration 0,1mM—by taking 1 μl of product to a second DOP-PCR using the same primer.

Fig 1. Karyotype and characterization of HBR probes.

(a) GTG-banded karyotype of a male Holochilus brasiliensis (2n = 56+2Bs). Black square with B1 and B2 after telomeric FISH. Inset, supernumeraries B1 and B2, and sex chromosomes in RBG and CBG-banding pattern. (b) Flow karyotype of a male Holochilus brasiliensis (2n = 56+2Bs). The peaks containing the single HBR B1, B2, X, Y and 11 and the two chromosomes HBR 25, 26 are indicated in bold.

For cross-species hybridization, metaphases were obtained from cell cultures of male individuals belonging to 14 Oryzomyini species, as follows: Cerradomys subflavus (2n = 56), Sooretamys angouya (2n = 58+2 small heterochromatic metacentric Bs), Pseudoryzomys simplex (2n = 56), Nectomys rattus (NRA, 2n = 52+1 large submetacentric B), Nectomys squamipes (2n = 56+2 medium submetacentric Bs), Drymoreomys albimaculatus (DAL, 2n = 62), Oligoryzomys nigripes (2n = 62), O. flavescens (2n = 64+1 dot-like B), O. fornesi (2n = 62), O. moojeni (2n = 70), Neacomys spinosus (2n = 64), Oecomys sp. (2n = 80), Hylaeamys megacephalus (2n = 54) and Euryoryzomys russatus (2n = 80). The cultures came exclusively from cell lines deposited on the Cell bank "Banco de Células de Vertebrados do Laboratório de Citogenética" at Departamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo. They were established between 1988 and 1992 and belong to an Institution recognized by CGEN (Brazilian Council of Genetic Heritage Management) as "Fiel Depositária de Amostras do Componente do Patrimônio Genético" or Trust Depositary of the Genetic Heritage Component Samples, and are accessible by permission (D.O.U.: 24/6/2003, Seção 1, P 119,

Within species and cross-species hybridizations were performed according to Yang et al. [38]. First, denaturation of 1μl of the labeled HBR paints was performed at 75°C for 10 min in the presence of 10 μl of hybridization buffer (50% deionized formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 20xSSC, 0.5 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.3). To reduce highly repetitive DNA signals pre-annealing was performed at 37°C for 30 min. The slides, prior to hybridization, were denatured in 70% formamide/2xSSC solution at 65°C for 2 min.

Same-species hybridizations were performed overnight at 37°C and cross-species hybridizations for 48h at 37°C. Post-hybridization washes included 2×5 min incubations in 50% formamide/2×SSC at 42°C followed by 2×5 min incubations in 2×SSC and immersion for 4 min in 4xSSC, 0.05% Triton X-100 “Sigma”). FISH with telomeric probes “Telomere PNA FISH Kit/FITC or Cy3 “Dako” was employed following the manufacturer’s protocol on HBR metaphases, and in conjunction with HBR B paints in DAL. The slides were counterstained with DAPI diluted with Vectashield and analysed with a Zeiss Axiophot fluorescence microscope equipped with software for image capture (Isis karyotyping system, MetaSystems). The results were discussed within the evolutionary context of the Oryzomyini radiation, considering the phylogenetic relationships and dating of the diversification of Sigmodontinae taxa as presented by Percequillo et al. [7], Avaria-Llautureo [39] and Parada et al. [40].


The hybridizations show the presence of homologous DNA segments on Bs in three of the five analysed Oryzomyini B-containing species following chromosome painting using whole HBR Bs, HBR X, HBR Y and HBR autosomes as probes.

The first results, using HBR B as probes, highlight partial homology among the Bs of Holochilus brasiliensis, Nectomys squamipes and N. rattus. No paint signal was detected either on the dot-like B of Oligoryzomys flavescens or on the Bs of Sooretamys angouya. These five species exhibited variable patterns of hybridization on specific regions of their X and Y chromosomes, and Sooretamys angouya also presents two autosome pairs partially painted by the HBR B probe. Given the specific HBR B painting patterns observed on segments of the sex chromosomes and on the autosomes of S. angouya, the genomes of the other 10 species (8 genera), without supernumeraries, were also included in the sample, giving a total of 15 species investigated by painting probes.

The same-species hybridization using HBR Y and HBR X as probes exhibits signal on the whole HBR Y and pericentromeric region of HBR X (Fig 2a), and the whole HBR X and pericentromeric region of HBR Y (Fig 2b), respectively. Both probes hybridize to the whole HBR B1 and B2. HBR B probe hybridizes to regions of HBR X and HBR Y, in addition to both Bs (Fig 2c and Table 1).

Fig 2. Same-species hybridization patterns on male Holochilus brasiliensis (2n = 56+2Bs) metaphases.

(a) Whole HBR Y, HBR B1 and B2 and, region of HBR X painted by HBR Y probe; (b) Whole HBR X, HBR B1 and B2 and, region of HBR Y painted by HBR X probe. (c) Whole HBR B1 and B2, and regions of HBR Y and HBR X painted by HBR B1 or B2 probes. Painted chromosomes or regions are in pink.

Table 1. Name of the species, morphology of sex chromosomes, number and position of the painted OSHR segments on chromosomes X and Y and, numbers of Bs, number and position of the painted OSHR segments on Bs, after hybridization of HBR Y or HBR Bs chromosome-specific DNA as probes.

HBR Y and HBR B paints gave congruent patterns of hybridization on both X and Y chromosomes in cross-species chromosome painting in all 12 species, except for Oecomys sp., Hylaeamys megacephalus and Euryoryzomys russatus in which no hybridization signals were observed (Fig 3 and Table 1). With respect to the B-containing species, congruent regions on Bs were also painted by both probes, except for O. flavescens and S. angouya, for which Bs did not show any hybridization signal, although two small acrocentric autosome pairs of S. angouya were partially painted by HBR Y and B paints (Figs 4 and 5). These autosomes are also partially homologous to the HBR 11 and HBR 25, 26 paints (Fig 5). Detailed results on the same and cross-species hybridizations using HBR Y or HBR B as probes are presented in Table 1. The HBR X-specific probe paints, in all analysed species, the entire X chromosome besides painting the same chromosome regions on Y and Bs as found when using HBR Bs as probes, (data not shown).

Fig 3. Cross-species painting patterns on sex chromosomes of 12 Oryzomyini species after in situ hybridization using HBR B1 or B2 or HBR Y (except in Holochilus brasiliensis for which the pattern of hybridization presented is exclusively obtained when HBR Bs are used as probes, see Fig 2c), as presented on Table 1: (a-l) On the left, X and Y painted regions indicating the OSHR in pink. On the right, the morphology of the sex chromosomes is shown by CBG-banding pattern or DAPI.

Species names are indicated below the chromosomes. Species Oecomys sp., Euryoryzomys russatus and Hylaeamys megacephalus are outgroup sensu Percequilo et al. [7] and Avaria-Llautureo et al. [39], and their chromosomes did not present any painted region after HBR Y and HBR Bs paint probes hybridizations. See details of painted segments in Table 1.

Fig 4. Cross- species hybridization on metaphases of B-containing species.

(a) Hybridization of HBR B1 as probe on a female N. rattus (2n = 52+1B). In pink: positive signals on partial X (Xp and pericentromeric regions), and partial B (Bp, distal and proximal Bq, inset). (b) Hybridization on male of N. squamipes (2n = 56+2Bs) using HBR B1 as probe. Mostly B1 and B2 and partial X and Y are painted simultaneously, in pink. (c) Hybridization of HBR Y painting probe on a male of Sooretamys angouya (2n = 58+2Bs). The painted regions are in pink and localized at the pericentromeric regions of the X, Y and of four autosomes. Note that both small acrocentric supernumeraries (B1 and B2) are not painted. Asterisks indicate the autosomes. (d) Hybridization of HBR B1 as probe on a male of O. flavescens. Only partial X and Y exhibited positive signals. On the right side, the same metaphases are show after DAPI staining where X, Y and B indicated the respective chromosomes.

Fig 5. Patterns of hybridization on Sooretamys angouya X, Y and on the OSHR-containing autosomes 24 and 26.

(a) Dual-colour hybridization on the OSHR positive X, Y, 24 and 26. (A) HBR B (red) and HBR 11 (green) signals on S. angouya chromosomes. Note the associated signal on chromosome 24 (b) Dual-colour hybridization using HBR B (red) and HBR 25, 26 (green) as probes. Observe the autosomal/OSHR (green/red) associations on chromosome 26. Chromosomes X, Y, 24 and 26 are indicated and the white frame insets homologous pairs from different metaphases.

Both sex chromosomes of Drymoreomys albimaculatus and the Bs of Nectomys squamipes show interstitial telomeric sites (ITS) adjacent to the HBR B and Y painting signals (Fig 6).

Fig 6.

Characterization of Drymoreomys albimaculatus X and Y, and Nectomys squamipes B after hybridization using HBR Y and telomeric sequences as probes (a) Sex chromosomes of a male Drymoreomys albimaculatus after dual-colour FISH. HBR Y signals are red and telomeric sequences are green. (b) Medium metacentric B of N. squamipes after dual-colour FISH. HBR Y signals are green and telomeric sequences are red. Note the pericentromeric ITS linked to OSHR on the X and Y chromosomes of D. albimaculatus and on N. squamipes supernumerary.


This study indicates the valuable contribution of chromosome painting to the recognition of an anonymous sequence shared by sex chromosomes, B chromosomes and autosomes in some species belonging to the Oryzomyini tribe. The shared region of homology, which is revealed after HBR B or Y hybridizations (hereafter termed the Oryzomyini shared heterochromatic region–OSHR) was not found in all Oryzomyini but only in 12 out of the 15 species analyzed. Remarkably, the 12 species showing the OSHR form a monophyletic clade arising during the Messinian period (about 6 million years ago) [7, 39, 40].

OSHR is therefore a synapomorphy for a node dated between 7 and 3 Mya according to Avaria-Llautureo [39] and between 7.8 and 4.8 Mya according Parada et al. [40], both corresponding to clades C and D reported by Percequillo et al. [7]. When present, the OSHR is localized in distinct regions of the X and Y chromosomes and also in the Bs of H. brasiliensis, N. rattus and N. squamipes. S. angouya showed OSHR in two acrocentric autosomes pairs in addition to regions of the X and Y chromosomes but not in the B chromosome.

The origin of OSHR

We suggest a single and sex chromosome origin for OSHR since its presence in the X and Y is a synapomorphy in the species belonging to clade OSHR +.

The polymorphisms of OSHR, due to reshuffling or possible transposition principally on the Y chromosomes of P. simplex, O. fornesi and N. spinosus (Fig 3) argues in favour of these regions being TE donors once fragments emerge following translocation or transposition events.

The phylogenetic reconstructions presented by Parada et al. [40] show D. albimaculatus as sister to the genus Eremoryzomys in a basal position of the OSHR + clade. This species exhibits a particular organization of OSHR on the X and Y chromosomes when compared to the OSHR + species. D. albimaculatus sex chromosomes are similar in size, morphology and also in the amount and distribution of OSHR on Xp and Yp adjacent to terminal telomeric sequences and to the pericentromeric ITS (Fig 6a). A similar organization is observed in B chromosomes of N. squamipes and this suggests that OSHR may have led to the pericentromeric ITS (Fig 6b).

The B chromosomes of Oryzomyini

Although the present data give support for a monophyletic origin of the OSHR, no evidence is found for a single origin of the extant B chromosomes in the Oryzomyini radiation since the four genera, including the species carrying B chromosomes (Holochilus, Sooretamys, Nectomys and Oligoryzomys), belong to different subclades. The additional fact that B chromosomes in Sooretamys angouya and Oligoryzomys flavescens lack OSHR is against a single origin of B chromosomes in this group.

The OSHR is shared by the Bs of Holochilus and the two Nectomys species, and the size of these particular segments is quite variable even between the two Nectomys species. Although a monophyletic origin for the Bs in Nectomys is possible, the homology found among them is only partial. The physical mapping of non-anonymous repetitive DNAs, such as satellite DNAs, gene families like rDNA (45S and 5S), histone genes, etc. could help to test this hypothesis since a monophyletic origin should imply a high number of shared DNA sequences between the two OSHR-painted Bs. However, their content differs between the two species within the same genera, in the absence and presence of ITS in Nectomys squamipes and N. rattus respectively.

The OSHR segments in the B chromosomes are variable in number, size and content, varying from whole Bs in Holochilus brasiliensis to parts of Bs in Nectomys (Table 1 and Figs 2 and 3). In Nectomys squamipes meiotic data confirm that Bs behave as univalents and are never found paired with autosomes or sex chromosomes [4]. As they may occur once, without recombination, Bs are thus free to proceed along independent evolutionary paths [23] giving rise to the diversity we find in Oryzomyini. The subsequent invasion of the B chromosomes by sequences or DNA families other than OSHR is also possible as proposed by Fantinatti et al. [41] for cichlid fishes.

A close relationship between sex and B chromosomes has been suggested among animals, and it is evident that they share some traits such as heterochromatin distribution, repetitive DNA accumulation and loss of gene activity [2]. Our results suggest a single common origin for OSHR, probably arising from 3 to 7 Mya, first exclusively as sex chromosome elements. A tentative explanation is that TEs in OSHR could be transposed to pre-existing Bs after their origin, or independently to A chromosomes. In this respect, although B chromosomes apparently share the OSHR region, actually the hybridization demonstrates only TEs contained in it. A comparative analysis of genomic sequences among sex, A and B chromosomes might help to elucidate this question. The heterogeneous system of Bs that we describe in N. rattus, N. squamipes, Sooretamys angouya, O. flavescens and H. brasiliensis seems to have evolved by independent drift through species-specific mechanisms of differentiation.


We thank Dr. Maria José de Jesus Silva for kindly providing the D. albimaculatus spread metaphases and Camilla Brunno Di-Nizo for technical support with cell cultures. Grants were received from Capes, CNPq and Fapesp BP.PD 2009/54300-00 to KV, and from the Wellcome Trust to MAF-S.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KV PCMO YY-Y. Performed the experiments: KV PCMO CNM. Analyzed the data: KV PCMO CNM YY-Y MAF-S. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KV YY-Y MAF-S. Wrote the paper: KV PCMO YY-Y MAF-S.


  1. 1. Camacho JPM, Sharbel TF, Beukeboom LW(2000) B chromosome evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol 355: 163–178.
  2. 2. Camacho JPM, Schmid M, Cabrero J (2011) B chromosomes and sex in animals. Sex Dev 5: 155–166. pmid:21430369
  3. 3. Trifonov VA, Dementyeva PV, Beklemisheva VR, Yudkin DV, Vorobieva NV, Graphodatsky AS (2010) Supernumerary chromosomes, segmental duplications, and evolution. Russ J Genet 46: 1094–1096.
  4. 4. Silva MJJ, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y (2004) B chromosomes in Brazilian rodents. Cytogenet Genome Res. 106: 257–263. pmid:15292600
  5. 5. Ventura K, Sato-Kuwabara Y, Fagundes V, Geise L, Leite YLR, Costa LP, et al. (2012a) Phylogeographic structure and karyotypic diversity of the Brazilian shrew mouse (Blarinomys breviceps, Sigmodontinae) in the Atlantic Forest. Cytogenet Genome Res 138: 19–30.
  6. 6. D’Elía G, Pardiñas UFJ, Teta P, Patton JL (2007) Definition and diagnosis of a new tribe of sigmodontine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae), and a revised classification of the subfamily. Gayana 71: 187–194.
  7. 7. Percequillo AR, Weksler M, Costa LP (2011) A new genus and species of rodent from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae: Oryzomyini), with comments on oryzomyine biogeography. Zool J Linnean Soc 161: 357–390.
  8. 8. Pine RH, Timm RM, Weksler M (2012) A newly recognized clade of trans-Andean Oryzomyini (Rodentia: Cricetidae), with description of a new genus. J Mammal 93: 851–868.
  9. 9. Smith MF, Patton JL (1999) Phylogenetic relationships and the radiation of sigmodontine rodents in South America: evidence from cytochrome b. J Mammal Evol 6: 89–128.
  10. 10. Weksler M, Percequillo AR, Voss RS (2006) Ten new genera of oryzomyine rodents (Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae). Amer Mus Novitates 3537:1–2911.
  11. 11. Silva MJJ, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y (1998) Heterogeneity and meiotic behaviour of B and sex chromosomes, banding patterns and localization of (TTAGGG)n sequences by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the neotropical water rat Nectomys (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Chromosome Res 6: 455–462. pmid:9865784
  12. 12. Silva MJJ, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y (1997) New karyotypes of two related species of Oligoryzomys genus (Cricetidae, Rodentia) involving centric fusion with loss of NORs and distribution of telomeric (TTAGGG)n sequences. Hereditas 127: 217–229. pmid:9474904
  13. 13. Andrades-Miranda J, Oliveira L, Lima-Rosa C, Nunes A, Zanchin N, et al. (2001) Chromosome studies of seven species of Oligoryzomys (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae) from Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy 82: 1080–1091.
  14. 14. Sbalqueiro I, Mattevi M, Oliveira L, Solano M (1991) B chromosome system in populations of Oryzomys flavescens (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil. Acta Theriol 36: 193–199.
  15. 15. Gardner AL, Patton JL (1976) Karyotypic variation in Oryzomyini rodents (Cricetidae) with comments on chromosomal evolution in the Neotropical cricetine complex. Occas Pap Mus Zool Univ Mich 49: 1–48.
  16. 16. Almeida EJC, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y (1991) Pericentric inversions and sex chromosome heteromorphisms in Oryzomys nigripes (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Caryologia 44: 63–73.
  17. 17. Jones RN, Rees H (1982) B chromosomes. New York: Academic Press.
  18. 18. Green DM (1990) Muller’s ratchet and the evolution of supernumerary chromosomes. Genome. 33: 818–824.
  19. 19. Martis MM, Klemme S, Banaei-Moghaddam AM, Blattner FR, Macas J, et al. (2012) Selfish supernumerary chromosome reveals its origin as a mosaic of host genome and organellar sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 13343–13346. pmid:22847450
  20. 20. Jamilena M, Garrido-Ramo M, Ruíz-Rejón M, Ruíz-Rejón C, Parker JS (1995) Characterization of repeated sequences from microdissected B chromosomes of Crepis capillaris. Chromosoma 104: 113–120. pmid:8585988
  21. 21. Gutknecht J, Sperlich D, Bachmann L (1995) A species specific satellite DNA family of Drosophila subsilvestris appearing predominantly in B chromosomes. Chromosoma 103: 539–544. pmid:7621703
  22. 22. Bueno D, Palacios-Gimenez OM, Cabral-de-Mello DC (2013) Chromosomal mapping of repetitive DNAs in the grasshopper Abracris flavolineata reveal possible ancestry of the B chromosome and H3 histone spreading. PLoS One 8:e66532. pmid:23826099
  23. 23. Stitou S, Guardia RD, Jimenez R, Burgos M (2000) Inactive ribosomal cistrons are spread throughout the B Chromosomes of Rattus rattus (Rodentia, Muridae): implications for their origin and evolution. Chromosome Res 8: 305–311. pmid:10919721
  24. 24. Trifonov VA, Dementyeva PV, Larkin DM, O’Brien PCM, Perelman PL, Yang F, Ferguson-Smith MA, Graphodatsky SA (2013) Transcription of a protein-coding gene on B chromosomes of the Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus). BMC Biology 11: 90. pmid:23915065
  25. 25. Green DM, Zeyl CW, Sharbel TF (1993) The evolution of hypervariable sex and supernumerary (B) chromosomes in the relict New Zealand frog, Leiopelma hochstetteri. J Evol Biol 6: 417–441.
  26. 26. Sharbel TF, Green DM, Houben A (1998) B chromosome origin in the endemic New Zealand frog Leiopelma hochstetteri through sex chromosome evolution. Genome 41: 14–22. pmid:9549055
  27. 27. Berend SA, Hale DW, Engstrom MD, Greenbaum IF (2001) Cytogenetics of collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus). II. Meiotic behavior of B chromosomes suggests a Y-chromosome origin of supernumerary chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 95: 85–91. pmid:11978976
  28. 28. Schartl M, Nanda I, Schlupp I, Wilde B, Epplen JT, Schmidt M, et al (1995) Incorporation of subgenomic amounts of DNA as compensation for mutational load in a gynogenetic fish. Nature 373: 68–71.
  29. 29. Perfectti F, Werren JH (2001) The interspecific origin of B chromosomes: experimental evidence. Evolution 55: 1069–73. pmid:11430644
  30. 30. Wurster-Hill DH, Ward OG, Davis BH, Park JP, Moyzis RK, Meyne J (1998) Fragile sites, telomeric DNA sequences, B chromosomes, and DNA content in raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides, with comparative notes on foxes, coyote, wolf, and raccoon. Cytogenet Cell Genet 49: 278–281.
  31. 31. McQuade LR, Hill RJ, Francis D (1994) B-chromosome system in the greater glider, Petauroides volans (Marsupialia: Pseudocheiridae). II. Investigation of B chromosome DNA sequences isolated by micromanipulation and PCR. Cytogenet Cell Genet 66: 155–161. pmid:8125012
  32. 32. Trifonov VA, Perelman PL, Kawada SI, Iwasa MA, Oda SI, Graphodatsky AS (2002) Complex structure of B-chromosomes in two mammalian species: Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia) and Nyctereutes procyonoides (Carnivora) revealed by microdissection. Chromosome Res 10: 109–116. pmid:11993931
  33. 33. Rubtsov NB, Karamysheva TV, Andreenkova OV, Bochkaerev MN, Kartavtseva IV, Roslik GV, et al (2004) Comparative analysis of micro and macro B chromosomes in the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Murinae) performed by chromosome microdissection and FISH. Cytogenet Genome Res 106: 289–294. pmid:15292605
  34. 34. Graphodatsky AS, Kukekova AV, Yudkin DV, Trifonov VA, Vorobieva NV, Beklemisheva VR, et al (2005) The proto-oncogene C-KIT maps to canid B chromosomes. Chromosome Res 13: 113–122. pmid:15861301
  35. 35. Matsubara K, Yamada K, Umemoto S, Tsuchiya K, Ikeda N, Nishida C, et al (2008) Molecular cloning and characterization of the repetitive DNA sequences that comprise the constitutive heterochromatin of the A and B chromosomes of the Korean field mouse (Apodemus peninsulae, Muridae, Rodentia). Chromosome Res 16: 1013–1026. pmid:18949567
  36. 36. Houben A, Banaei‑Moghaddam AM, Klemme S, Timmis JN (2014) Evolution and biology of supernumerary B chromosomes. Cell Mol Life Sci 71: 467–478. pmid:23912901
  37. 37. Telenius H, Pelmear A, Tunnacliffe A, et al (1992) Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 4:257263 pmid:1382568
  38. 38. Yang F, Carter NP, Shi L, Ferguson-Smith MA (1995) A comparative study of karyotypes of Muntjacs by chromosome painting. Chromosoma 103: 642–652. pmid:7587587
  39. 39. Avaria-Llautureo J, Hernández CE, Boric-Bargetto D, Canales-Aguirre CB, Morales-Pallero B, et al. (2012) Body size evolution in extant Oryzomyini rodents: Cope’s rule or miniaturization? PLoS One 7: e34654. pmid:22509339
  40. 40. Parada A, Pardiñas UFJ, Salazar-Bravo J, D'Elía G, Palma ER (2013) Dating an impressive Neotropical radiation: molecular time estimates for the Sigmodontinae (Rodentia) provide insights into its historical biogeography. Mol Phylogen Evol 66: 960968.
  41. 41. Fantinatti BEA, Mazzuchelli J, Valente GT, Cabral-de-Mello DC, Martins C (2011) Genomic content and new insights on the origin of the B chromosome of the cichlid fish Astatotilapia latifasciata. Genetica 139: 1273–1282. pmid:22286964