Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Transcriptomic Profiling of Spleen in Grass-Fed and Grain-Fed Angus Cattle

  • Yaokun Li,

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, P. R. China

  • José A. Carrillo,

    Affiliation Department of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States of America

  • Yi Ding,

    Affiliation Department of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States of America

  • Yanghua He,

    Affiliation Department of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States of America

  • Chunping Zhao,

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, P. R. China

  • Jianan Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States of America

  • George E. Liu,

    Affiliation Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Building 306, Room 111, BARC-East, Beltsville, Maryland, 20705, United States of America

  • Linsen Zan ,

    zanlinsen@163.com (LZ); songj88@umd.edu (JS)

    Affiliation College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, P. R. China

  • Jiuzhou Song

    zanlinsen@163.com (LZ); songj88@umd.edu (JS)

    Affiliation Department of Animal & Avian Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States of America

Abstract

The grass-fed cattle obtain nutrients directly from pastures containing limited assimilable energy but abundant amount of fiber; by contrast, grain-fed steers receive a diet that is comprised mainly of grains and serves as an efficient source of high-digestible energy. Besides energy, these two types of diet differ in a large number of nutritional components. Additionally, animals maintained on rich-energy regimen are more likely to develop metabolic disorders and infectious diseases than pasture raised individuals. Thus, we hypothesize that spleen–a relevant immune organ–may function differently under disparate regimes. The objective of this study was to find the differentially expressed genes in the spleen of grass-fed and grain-fed steers, and furtherly explore the potential involved biopathways. Through RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq), we detected 123 differentially expressed genes. Based on these genes, we performed an Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and identified 9 significant molecular networks and 13 enriched biological pathways. Two of the pathways, Nur77 signaling in T lymphocytes and calcium-induced T lymphocyte apoptosis which are immune related, contain a pair of genes HLA-DRA and NR4A1 with dramatically altered expression level. Collectively, our results provided valuable insights into understanding the molecular mechanism of spleen under varied feeding regimens.

Background

In many countries, cattle constitute a main source of protein and other nutrients, such as lipids and minerals. Among several breeds specialized for meat production, Aberdeen Angus stands out for its extensive contribution to the beef industry, especially in the United States. Using this breed, numerous and valuable research has been performed to improve growth and meat quality traits. Interestingly, many studies demonstrated that different feeding regimens could alter the nutritional composition of beef. Stearic acid, the only saturated fatty acid exerting impact on serum cholesterol, displays higher level in grass finished beef compared with grain-fed beef [1]. Several investigators also reported significant differences in omega-3: omega-6 ratio between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle [2,3]. Beta-carotene, the precursor of vitamin A, is significantly higher in muscle of pasture-fed steers compared to grain-fed animals [4]. Additionally, vitamin A could contribute for the integrity of mucous membrane and skin, protecting individuals against bacterial and viral infection [5,6]. Meanwhile, vitamin A could also modulate immune function through influencing white blood cells [7,8]. Several studies suggested that the amount of α-tocopherol (the most biologically active form of vitamin E) is higher in the meat of cattle finished on pasture than the grain-fed cattle [911]. Moreover, it was demonstrated that the variation of the dietary protein concentration could influence the expression of the immune genes, altering the immunological system [12,13]. It also has been reported that high-energy diets fed to maximize individuals’ performance could lead to higher incidence of metabolic disorders [14]. Therefore, grain-fed cattle suffer stronger metabolic stress than pasture-fed steers; and they tend to easily have respiratory and infectious disease.

Spleen–the largest lymphatic organ in the body–plays a critical role in the immune system. It constitutes the main filter of the body for blood-borne antigens and pathogens, as well as an important organ for erythrocyte homeostasis and iron metabolism [15]. The spleen is composed of red and white pulp. The white pulp contains B cell and T cell zones, and generates antigen-specific immune response protecting individuals against viral, bacterial and fungal infection. The red pulp mainly filters blood and regulates iron recycling from aged red blood cells. However, limited information about spleen transcriptome has been reported and the molecular mechanism of bovine spleen remains largely unknown.

In this project, we hypothesized that the spleen transcriptome might exhibit distinct characteristics under grass-fed and grain-fed regimes, which could result in different spleen function, especially affecting the immune response. To test it, we sampled spleen tissues from grass-fed and grain-fed Angus steers and performed a comparative study of gene expression using RNASeq method. Then, based on the differentially expressed genes (DEGs), we implemented a functional analysis and identified potential mechanisms that could contribute to the difference observed between both groups.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

We collected spleen samples from two randomly chosen animals per group, totaling four samples. The animals were born and raised at the Wye Angus farm, which has produced genetically similar progenies. The genetic resemblance among individuals permitted us to better control the variation between experimental individuals, constituting an excellent resource to perform scientific research. All animals included in this study received the same diet until weaning. Next, we assigned the animals to one certain diet at random, and exclusively raised them under that regimen until termination. The diet of grain-fed group consisted of soybean, shelled corn, corn silage and trace minerals. The grass-fed steers normally received alfalfa harvested from land without any fertilizers, pesticides or other chemicals; during wintertime, bailage was supplied. Grass-fed individuals ate no animal, agricultural or industrial byproducts and never consumed any type of grain. Grain–fed animals reached the market weight around 14 month-old; however, grass-fed steers needed approximately 200 additional days to achieve the same weight. Immediately after termination at the Old Line Custom Meat Company (Baltimore, MD), a small piece of spleen was incised, washed and frozen at -80°C for posterior processing.

RNA extraction and sequencing

We extracted total RNA individually (two animals per group) by using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) followed by DNase digestion; Qiagen RNeasy column was utilized for purification (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). RNA samples were dissolved in RNAse-free H2O, and checked for integrity and quality with a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer and a 1.5% agarose gel. The samples were labeled through adding 6-bp adaptors and then pooled for sequencing. Finally, the RNA-seq library was sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2000 device, as described previously [16].

Data analysis and bioinformatics

First, we checked the quality of the raw reads through FastQC, which is an online tool that thoroughly examines the reads and generates a detailed and extensive quality assurance report [17]. Then, employing Bowtie (Ultrafast, memory-efficient short read aligner), we aligned the reads to the reference genome (Bos_taurus_UMD3.1/bosTau6) downloaded from the UCSC (http://genome.ucsc.edu/). During this step, we trimmed the first 15 bases of each read (50 bp) to avoid low Phred quality scores, which resulted in 35 bp tags. Via the summarizeOverlaps function implemented in R, we executed the reads counting for each gene. Subsequently, we identified the differentially expressed genes using the generalized linear model (GLM) approach included in the edgeR software package, which required a designed matrix to describe the two treatment conditions grass-fed and grain-fed. The edgeR package estimated an effective library size applying a scaling factor based on the library size. The normalization in this approach is model-based and the original counts remain the same without any type of transformation. For variance calculation, we first estimated a common dispersion for all reads and then forced the tagwise variation towards the common dispersion based on a Bayesian strategy, which resulted in higher sensitivity for detection. Finally, we applied the false discovery rate (FDR) of <0.1 as a threshold to call the genes with different expression levels.

After we obtained the DEGs list, we performed a GO enrichment analysis and examined the biological processes, cellular components and molecular functions associated with those DEGs through the online software DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.7 [18]. Fisher’s exact test was used to determine the enrichment of the GO terms. Additionally, we identified the enriched networks, molecular functions and pathways in the Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA, Ingenuity Systems, and www.ingenuity.com) platform, which was a highly convenient application [1921]. During the IPA analysis, the p-value obtained via Fisher’s exact test was used as a significance criterion.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis

Through qRT-PCR on the iCycler iQ PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), we validated and compared the expression of 9 randomly selected DEGs from the RNA-Seq analysis. We obtained the template cDNA by employing the iScript First Strand Synthesis System Kit (Bio-Rad) for reverse transcription PCR with 500 ng of total RNA. The qRT-PCR reactions were performed with a QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We designed the primers using an online tool (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/); the primer sequences are provided in S1 Table. We chose GAPDH as the control gene [22]. For each sample, we performed three technical and two independent biological replicates.

Results

Alignment of Reads and Gene Expression Analysis

We totally had four experimental samples; the alignment levels were 70.73%, 65.92%, 82.10% and 81.54%, respectively (Fig 1). For the statistical analysis, we applied the edgeR package implemented in R to detect the genes with divergent expression profiles in the spleen of grass-fed and grain-fed steers. The threshold of FDR <0.1 was used to call the significant difference. Following this strategy, we finally found 123 genes with distinct expression levels in both groups (Fig 2). From those genes, we found that 87 were highly expressed and the other 36 genes were down regulated in the spleen of grass-fed bovines compared with the grain-fed group. According to the log2FC ≥5 criteria, 52 genes in grass-fed steers spleen expressed higher than in grain finished group and only 9 genes increased their activity in the grain-fed animals. The top 10 DEGs in the spleen of both groups can be seen in Table 1. Among these genes, the expression levels of ENDOU, CD9, TMEM45B, SLC4A9, HADH, OVOL1 and FGFBP1 in grass-fed animals exceeded the levels observed in the grain-fed group, whereas the expression abundance of the genes LOC534630, RBMX2 and DOCK6 diminished in grass-fed steers. The complete list of DEGs between these two groups can be found in S2 Table.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Alignment level of RNA-Seq reads to the Bovine Genome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Differentially expressed spleen genes between grass-fed and grain-fed steers.

MA-plot was obtained from two independent biological replicates at an FDR of 0.1. The black points represent the genes without expression difference. FC means fold-change. CPM means counts per million.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Top 10 differentially expressed genes in the spleen of grass-fed and grain-fed Angus Cattle.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.t001

Validation of DEGs

We used qRT-PCR to confirm the expression level of 9 genes, which were randomly selected from the DEGs list. Through contrasting the qRT-PCR result with the RNA-Seq analysis, we found 100% consistency (Fig 3). Genes SLCO4A1 and DOCK6 were dramatically over expressed in grain-fed spleen. The other 7 genes showed less activity in grain finished steers compared with the grass-finished group. Collectively, the qRT-PCR validation of those 9 genes proved the accuracy of the RNA-Seq analysis.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Validation of differentially expressed genes.

The mean value of log2 (fold-change) for each group was compared in the bar chart for the 9 selected genes. qPCR data was normalized by GAPDH expression for each sample. Means of significant (FDR≤0.1) fold changes were computed for qPCR and DESeq using sample from the same 4 animals in each analysis. FC means fold-change.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.g003

Gene Ontology Analysis

We used the online software DAVID (version 6.7) to perform the Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and identify functional characteristics of the DEGs discovered in our present study. We primarily focused on biological process, cellular component and molecular function remarkably enriched with the gene set. The result could be seen in Table 2. The most significant GO terms were peptide cross-linking in biological process, plasma membrane part for cellular component and growth factor binding in molecular function. Most of the biological processes are related to development, adhesion and membrane transport. For cellular component, the GO terms enriched with the DEGs have large influence on plasma membrane and cell junction. However, in terms of molecular function, we only found one significant GO term: growth factor binding.

thumbnail
Table 2. Gene Ontology (GO) terms enriched with differentially expressed genes (P<0.05).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.t002

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis

We employed the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) online software to detect the canonical pathways involving the DEGs. The thirteen most significant ingenuity canonical pathways can be seen in Table 3. A large proportion of the pathways acted on biosynthesis and the function of T lymphocyte, which would provide valuable insights into explaining the molecular mechanism of spleen function.

thumbnail
Table 3. Canonical pathways enriched with differentially expressed genes by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) (P < 0.05)

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.t003

Molecular subnetwork

We can examine the gene networks to predict the participation of other interacting molecules in the pathways. Those molecules might also play diverse key roles in spleen function. To assess this, we performed Fisher’s exact test based on the IPA molecular library, and found a total of 9 significant molecular networks (S3 Table). Fig 4 shows the 4 most remarkable networks. The first network (Fig 4A) consists of 22 DEGs and its most essential functions constitute cancer, cell morphology and cell death, and survival. The second network includes 17 DEGs and the functions of cancer, cell-to-cell signaling and interaction, respiratory system development and function are enriched in this structure (Fig 4B). The main functions of the third network involve cancer, inflammatory disease and connective tissue disorders; 16 genes from the DEGs list participate in this system (Fig 4C). The fourth network, which incorporates 14 DEGs, principally relates to cancer, nucleic acid metabolism, organismal injury and abnormalities (Fig 4D).

thumbnail
Fig 4. The top four molecule networks identified by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA).

A: The most significant molecular network identified IPA. B: The second most significant molecular network identified by IPA. C: The third most significant molecular network identified by IPA. D: The fourth most significant molecular network identified by IPA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.g004

Discussion

Since the appearance of organic products, the reality about their benefits and disadvantages has become controversial. Thus numerous studies have been performed to detect the true difference between organic and conventional food, and the possible consequence for the human and animal health [2325]. Transcriptome sequencing constitutes an effective method to estimate gene expression through counting extensive number of sequenced reads [26]. Transcriptome analysis of different species including Caenorhabditis elegans, yeast, plants and mammals has been completed for diverse purposes [2730]. However, transcriptomic data for spleen of bovines under different diets has not been disclosed. Considering that different feeding regimes would contribute to disparate probabilities in getting metabolic and infectious disease, and that spleen constitutes one of the most important immune organs; we expected to observe the DEGs associated with immune response as a result of distinct diets. The identification of those genes will lead to a better understanding of the functional mechanism of spleen in particular conditions. Several investigators have reported that the levels of the precursor of Vitamin A and E and cancer fighting antioxidants, including glutathione and superoxide dismutase activity, were different between pasture-fed and grain-fed beef [31,32]. Additionally, previous studies suggested that modification of the protein abundance in the diet could alter the expression of immune-related genes, further regulating and reshaping the immune response [12,13].

Studies on chicken showed that 177 genes exhibited different expression levels in the spleen after Salmonella enteritidis infection; among these genes, 99 were down-regulated and the other 78 were up-regulated [33]. In our present study, we detected 123 DEGs between grass-fed and grain-fed spleen of Angus cattle. In the grass-finished group, 87 were up-regulated while the other 36 decreased their gene activity. Regarding the top 10 most statistically significant genes, CD9 encodes a member of the transmembrane 4 superfamily and associates with lymphoid tissue structure and development, immune cell trafficking, hematopoiesis, lipid metabolism and inflammatory response; studies suggested that CD9 congregating at the T-cell side of the immunological synapse (IS) participates in the immune response and might support the integrin-mediated signaling at the IS [34,35]. SLC4A9, DOCK6 and FGFBP1 mainly interact with cancer. TMEM45B also showed altered expression level; however, limited information about TMEM45B existed; we hypothesized that this might be a potential gene to regulate the function of spleen. In our DEGs list, we also detected the same gene Notch4, which was discovered as the differentially expressed gene in the developmental process of spleen [36]. This gene is one of the members of Notch signaling pathway; it can regulate cell fate decisions and inhibit endothelium apoptosis [37].

Via GO enrichment analysis, we identified the genes CHRNA3, CLIC1, SLC4A9, SLC9A2, SLC5A1 and ATP1A2 which participate in the process of iron transport exerting effects on bacterial virulence and host immune response [38]. We also found a large number of genes functioning in the plasma membrane; four genes CHRNA3, CLIC1, KCTD1 and KCNMA1 were discovered in iron channel complex; except KCTD1, all others were associated with cancer. Meanwhile, the IPA analysis unveiled that HLA-DRA and NR4A1 were integrated into the Nur77 Signaling in T Lymphocytes pathway. These two genes were also associated with the calcium-induced T lymphocyte apoptosis pathway, which could exert effects on immunization. Additionally, several studies reported that HLA-DRA could affect tumors and NR4A1 has been correlated with various carcinomas [39,40]. Although considerable research has examined these two genes, no literature addressing their functions in the spleen has been published. Accordingly, it might be interesting to perform functional experiment of these genes on spleen to better understand their function in the immunological system.

Our results provide general information regarding the molecular mechanism and functional difference of spleen under variable feeding regimes. However, we recognized that our study suffered some limitations. Identification of the DEGs and the follow-up pathway/network analysis were conducted merely relying on the computational strategy; extensive experimental validation work is still needed. Therefore, overexpression and inhibition of relevant genes should be advisable for functional validation of our findings.

Conclusions

In this study, we identified the genes and pathways that may influence the function of spleen in different diets. Totally, 123 DEGs were discovered between grass-fed and grain-fed cattle. According to those DEGs, 13 significant molecular networks involved in cancer, inflammatory and respiratory disease, were found in the IPA system. Most of the pathways enriched with the DEGs were associated with T lymphocyte and biosynthesis. In conclusion, our results contributed insights into understanding the mechanism of spleen to strengthen the disease resistance of animals.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Primers used for quantitative real-time PCR validation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.s001

(XLS)

S2 Table. Differentially expressed genes in the spleen of grass-fed and grain-fed cattle at a strict false discovery rate (FDR) <0.1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.s002

(XLS)

S3 Table. The 8 most significant molecular networks found by Fisher’s exact test in the IPA system.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135670.s003

(XLS)

Acknowledgments

We thank USDA and China Scholarship Council for their supports of this study.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LZ. Analyzed the data: JAC YH. Wrote the paper: YL YD. Revised manuscript: JAC YH. Did the Ingenuity Pathway analysis: YL JAC GEL. Helped to draft the manuscript: JS CZ. Did the qPCR validation: JL.

References

  1. 1. Alfaia CPM, Alves SP, Martins SIV, Costa ASH, Fontes CMGA, Lemos JPC, et al. (2009) Effect of the feeding system on intramuscular fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid isomers of beef cattle, with emphasis on their nutritional value and discriminatory ability. Food Chemistry 114: 939–946.
  2. 2. Leheska JM, Thompson LD, Howe JC, Hentges E, Boyce J, Brooks JC, et al. (2008) Effects of conventional and grass-feeding systems on the nutrient composition of beef. Journal Of Animal Science 86: 3575–3585. pmid:18641180
  3. 3. Garcia PT, Pensel NA, Sancho AM, Latimori NJ, Kloster AM, Amigone MA, et al. (2008) Beef lipids in relation to animal breed and nutrition in Argentina. Meat Science 79: 500–508. pmid:22062910
  4. 4. Descalzo AM, Insani EM, Biolatto A, Sancho AM, Garcia PT, Pensel NA, et al. (2005) Influence of pasture or grain-based diets supplemented with vitamin E on antioxidant/oxidative balance of Argentine beef. Meat Science 70: 35–44. pmid:22063278
  5. 5. Smith DR, Wood R, Tseng S, Smith SB (2002) Increased beef consumption increases apolipoprotein A-I but not serum cholesterol of mildly hypercholesterolemic men with different levels of habitual beef intake. Experimental Biology And Medicine 227: 266–275. pmid:11910049
  6. 6. Hunninghake DB, Maki KC, Kwiterovich PO, Davidson MH, Dicklin MR, Kafonek SD. (2000) Incorporation of lean red meat into a National Cholesterol Education Program Step I diet: A long-term, randomized clinical trial in free-living persons with hypercholesterolemia. Journal Of the American College Of Nutrition 19: 351–360. pmid:10872897
  7. 7. Beauchesne-Rondeau E, Gascon A, Bergeron J, Jacques H (2003) Plasma lipids and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic men fed a lipid-lowering diet containing lean beef, lean fish, or poultry. American Journal Of Clinical Nutrition 77: 587–593. pmid:12600847
  8. 8. Melanson K, Gootman J, Myrdal A, Kline G, Rippe JM (2003) Weight loss and total lipid profile changes in overweight women consuming beef or chicken as the primary protein source. Nutrition 19: 409–414. pmid:12714091
  9. 9. De la Fuente J, Diaz MT, Alvarez I, Oliver MA, Furnols MFI, Sanudo C, et al. (2009) Fatty acid and vitamin E composition of intramuscular fat in cattle reared in different production systems. Meat Science 82: 331–337. pmid:20416720
  10. 10. Yang A, Brewster MJ, Lanari MG, Tume RK (2002) Effect of vitamin E supplementation on alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene concentrations in tissues from pasture- and grain-fed cattle. Meat Science 60: 35–40. pmid:22063103
  11. 11. Insani EM, Eyherabide A, Grigioni G, Sancho AM, Pensel NA, Descalzo AM. (2008) Oxidative stability and its relationship with natural antioxidants during refrigerated retail display of beef produced in Argentina. Meat Science 79: 444–452. pmid:22062904
  12. 12. Cross ML, Gill HS (1999) Modulation of immune function by a modified bovine whey protein concentrate. Immunology And Cell Biology 77: 345–350. pmid:10457202
  13. 13. Brunner FS, Schmid-Hempel P, Barribeau SM (2014) Protein-poor diet reduces host-specific immune gene expression in Bombus terrestris. Proceedings Of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 281.
  14. 14. Smith RA (1998) Impact of disease on feedlot performance: A review. Journal Of Animal Science 76: 272–274. pmid:9464908
  15. 15. Bronte V, Pittet MJ (2013) The Spleen in Local and Systemic Regulation of Immunity. Immunity 39: 806–818. pmid:24238338
  16. 16. Li RW, Schroeder SG (2012) Cytoskeleton remodeling and alterations in smooth muscle contractility in the bovine jejunum during nematode infection. Funct Integr Genomics 12: 35–44. pmid:22203460
  17. 17. S. A (2010) FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available online at: http://wwwbioinformaticsbabrahamacuk/projects/fastqc.
  18. 18. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A (2010) Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol 11: R14. pmid:20132535
  19. 19. Abdel-Aziz HO, Takasaki I, Tabuchi Y, Nomoto K, Murai Y, Tsuneyama K, et al. (2007) High-density oligonucleotide microarrays and functional network analysis reveal extended lung carcinogenesis pathway maps and multiple interacting genes in NNK [4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyle)-1-butanone] induced CD1 mouse lung tumor. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 133: 107–115. pmid:16977459
  20. 20. Pospisil P, Iyer LK, Adelstein SJ, Kassis AI (2006) A combined approach to data mining of textual and structured data to identify cancer-related targets. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 354. pmid:16857057
  21. 21. Mayburd AL, Martlinez A, Sackett D, Liu H, Shih J, Tauler J, et al. (2006) Ingenuity network-assisted transcription profiling: Identification of a new pharmacologic mechanism for MK886. Clin Cancer Res 12: 1820–1827. pmid:16551867
  22. 22. Mitra A, Luo J, Zhang H, Cui K, Zhao K, Song J. (2012) Marek's disease virus infection induces widespread differential chromatin marks in inbred chicken lines. BMC Genomics 13: 557. pmid:23072359
  23. 23. Bjorklund EA, Heins BJ, Dicostanzo A, Chester-Jones H (2014) Growth, carcass characteristics, and profitability of organic versus conventional dairy beef steers. J Dairy Sci 97: 1817–1827. pmid:24472124
  24. 24. Bjorklund EA, Heins BJ, Dicostanzo A, Chester-Jones H (2014) Fatty acid profiles, meat quality, and sensory attributes of organic versus conventional dairy beef steers. J Dairy Sci 97: 1828–1834. pmid:24472126
  25. 25. Holtcamp W (2012) Suspect sweetener: arsenic detected in organic brown rice syrup. Environ Health Perspect 120: A204.
  26. 26. Morozova O, Hirst M, Marra MA (2009) Applications of new sequencing technologies for transcriptome analysis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 10: 135–151. pmid:19715439
  27. 27. Ma X, Zhu YJ, Li CF, Xue P, Zhao YM, Chen SL, et al. (2014) Characterisation of Caenorhabditis elegans sperm transcriptome and proteome. Bmc Genomics 15.
  28. 28. Morita T, Koike H, Hagiwara H, Ito E, Machida M, Sato S, et al. (2014) Genome and Transcriptome Analysis of the Basidiomycetous Yeast Pseudozyma antarctica Producing Extracellular Glycolipids, Mannosylerythritol Lipids. Plos One 9.
  29. 29. Blanco-Ulate B, Vincenti E, Powell ALT, Cantu D (2013) Tomato transcriptome and mutant analyses suggest a role for plant stress hormones in the interaction between fruit and Botrytis cinerea. Frontiers In Plant Science 4.
  30. 30. Naeem A, Drackley JK, Lanier JS, Everts RE, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Loor JJ. (2014) Ruminal epithelium transcriptome dynamics in response to plane of nutrition and age in young Holstein calves. Functional & Integrative Genomics 14: 261–273.
  31. 31. Descalzo AM, Rossetti L, Grigioni G, Irurueta M, Sancho AM, Carrete J, et al. (2007) Antioxidant status and odour profile in fresh beef from pasture or grain-fed cattle. Meat Science 75: 299–307. pmid:22063662
  32. 32. Gatellier P, Mercier Y, Renerre M (2004) Effect of diet finishing mode (pasture or mixed diet) on antioxidant status of Charolais bovine meat. Meat Science 67: 385–394. pmid:22061512
  33. 33. Matulova M, Rajova J, Vlasatikova L, Volf J, Stepanova H, Havlickova H, et al. (2012) Characterization of chicken spleen transcriptome after infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. PLoS One 7: e48101. pmid:23094107
  34. 34. Rocha-Perugini V, Gonzalez-Granado JM, Tejera E, Lopez-Martin S, Yanez-Mo M, Sanchez-Madrid F. (2014) Tetraspanins CD9 and CD151 at the immune synapse support T-cell integrin signaling. Eur J Immunol 44: 1967–1975. pmid:24723389
  35. 35. Wu F, Su P, Chen L, Li M, Liu X, Li Q. (2012) Cloning of arctic lamprey Lethenteron camtschaticum cd9 with roles in the immune response. J Fish Biol 81: 1147–1157. pmid:22957860
  36. 36. Hoffman BG, Williams KL, Tien AH, Lu V, de Algara TR, Ting JP, et al. (2006) Identification of novel genes and transcription factors involved in spleen, thymus and immunological development and function. Genes And Immunity 7: 101–112. pmid:16355110
  37. 37. MacKenzie F, Duriez P, Wong F, Noseda M, Karsan A (2004) Notch4 inhibits endothelial apoptosis via RBP-Jkappa-dependent and-independent pathways. J Biol Chem 279: 11657–11663. pmid:14701863
  38. 38. Baltes N, Tonpitak W, Gerlach GF, Hennig-Pauka I, Hoffmann-Moujahid A, Ganter M, et al. (2001) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae iron transport and urease activity: effects on bacterial virulence and host immune response. Infect Immun 69: 472–478. pmid:11119539
  39. 39. Altmann DM, Takacs K, Trowsdale J, Elliott JI (1993) Mouse mammary tumor virus-mediated T-cell receptor negative selection in HLA-DRA transgenic mice. Hum Immunol 37: 149–156. pmid:8244778
  40. 40. Lee SO, Li X, Khan S, Safe S (2011) Targeting NR4A1 (TR3) in cancer cells and tumors. Expert Opin Ther Targets 15: 195–206. pmid:21204731