Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Soil Methane Sink Capacity Response to a Long-Term Wildfire Chronosequence in Northern Sweden

  • Niall P. McNamara ,

    nmcn@ceh.ac.uk

    Affiliation Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, United Kingdom

  • Ruth Gregg,

    Affiliations Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, United Kingdom, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom

  • Simon Oakley,

    Affiliation Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, United Kingdom

  • Andy Stott,

    Affiliation NERC Life Sciences Stable Isotope Facility, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, United Kingdom

  • Md. Tanvir Rahman,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology and Hygiene, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh

  • J. Colin Murrell,

    Affiliation School of Environmental Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom

  • David A. Wardle,

    Affiliation Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden

  • Richard D. Bardgett,

    Affiliations Faculty of Life Sciences, Michael Smith Building, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, United Kingdom, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom

  • Nick J. Ostle

    Affiliations Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, United Kingdom, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom

Soil Methane Sink Capacity Response to a Long-Term Wildfire Chronosequence in Northern Sweden

  • Niall P. McNamara, 
  • Ruth Gregg, 
  • Simon Oakley, 
  • Andy Stott, 
  • Md. Tanvir Rahman, 
  • J. Colin Murrell, 
  • David A. Wardle, 
  • Richard D. Bardgett, 
  • Nick J. Ostle
PLOS
x

Abstract

Boreal forests occupy nearly one fifth of the terrestrial land surface and are recognised as globally important regulators of carbon (C) cycling and greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon sequestration processes in these forests include assimilation of CO2 into biomass and subsequently into soil organic matter, and soil microbial oxidation of methane (CH4). In this study we explored how ecosystem retrogression, which drives vegetation change, regulates the important process of soil CH4 oxidation in boreal forests. We measured soil CH4 oxidation processes on a group of 30 forested islands in northern Sweden differing greatly in fire history, and collectively representing a retrogressive chronosequence, spanning 5000 years. Across these islands the build-up of soil organic matter was observed to increase with time since fire disturbance, with a significant correlation between greater humus depth and increased net soil CH4 oxidation rates. We suggest that this increase in net CH4 oxidation rates, in the absence of disturbance, results as deeper humus stores accumulate and provide niches for methanotrophs to thrive. By using this gradient we have discovered important regulatory controls on the stability of soil CH4 oxidation processes that could not have not been explored through shorter-term experiments. Our findings indicate that in the absence of human interventions such as fire suppression, and with increased wildfire frequency, the globally important boreal CH4 sink could be diminished.

Introduction

The Earth’s boreal forests lie between 45° and 70°N and account for one third of all forested lands [1], covering between 9–12 million km2. As such, they play a major role in global carbon (C) storage and greenhouse gas regulation [2]. It is estimated that 37% of all terrestrial C is stored in boreal forests, which is greater than combined temperate and tropical stocks [1]. Currently, there is mounting concern for these high latitude C stores as they are predicted to undergo some of the strongest warming resulting from global climate change [3]. A possible consequence of rising temperatures is enhanced likelihood of wildfire ignitions and conflagration of forest biomass and organic soil by lightning strikes and human activity. It has been suggested that wildfire events could increase in frequency, intensity and extent as a result of a greater availability of drier fuel materials following more persistent and extreme drought events, and longer growing seasons due to earlier snow melt [4]. To date, both increases and decreases in fire events have been recorded, with diminishing fire frequency being associated with improved fire suppression techniques and habitat fragmentation as a result of land-use change [4]. This means that climate-driven increases in severe wildfire events may in part be balanced by human activity to suppress forest fires. Nonetheless, boreal forest wildfires burn between 3 and 23.6 million ha/year, representing an average of 13 million ha/year [5]. Wildfire events can have significant, large scale and prolonged impacts on terrestrial C storage as a consequence of both direct and indirect effects. In the short term, fire results in the conversion of forest biomass and soil organic C to CO2 that is released to the atmosphere [67], whilst a smaller fraction of biomass enters soils as more recalcitrant black carbon [8]. Black carbon or charcoal additions can have varying effects on soil processes, at least for decades, including altering nutrient availability and increasing decomposition [9]. In the longer term, wildfires act as a fundamental regulator of succession, and thus C sequestration processes [2].

Globally, soils are the largest natural terrestrial CH4 sink through biological oxidation by methantrophic bacteria. It is widely accepted that in aerobic soils, methanotrophic activity [10] can be impaired for up to a century following soil disturbance events such as land use change or nitrogen addition [11]. To date, fire as a driver of this disturbance has received relatively little attention. At least in the short term (decadal), fire can increase [1213], decrease [14] or have no change [15] for the net soil CH4 sink, however, the underlying processes are poorly understood and are likely to be ecosystem dependent. Beneath forested organic rich wet soils recent fires have also been shown to alter soils from CH4 sink to source [16]. Critically, however, the effects of increased or decreased wildfire frequency on soil CH4 processes over longer (centennial or millennial) time scales is uncertain. The paucity of detailed studies of microbial CH4 oxidation in boreal forest soils represents a serious gap in understanding that we sought to address in this study.

Here, we used a unique natural boreal forest fire chronosequence to determine the effects of historic fire disturbance on soil microbial methanogenesis and methanotrophy. This involved the study of 30 boreal forested islands located in freshwater lakes in Northern Sweden. These islands range in surface area from 0.02 to 15 ha. Lightning strikes were generally more frequent and thus more recent on larger islands; some large islands have burned as recently as 60 years ago while some small islands have not burned for 5,000 years [1720]. Consistent with previous work across this island gradient, we have classified these islands as early (time since last fire (mean ± SE) = 585 ± 233 years; area > 10 ha; n = 10), mid (2,180 ± 385 years; area of 0.1 to 1.0 ha; n = 10) and late (3,250 ± 439 years; area < 0.1 ha; n = 10) successional stages [1719]. Using this natural fire chronosequence and substituting space for time, we aimed to better understand how ecosystem retrogression, as driven by wildfires, affects the soil-atmosphere exchange of CH4. We made a series of in-situ and ex-situ measurements of soil CH4 fluxes to characterise net CH4 fluxes during two successive growing seasons across the gradient of 30 islands.

Results and Discussion

The effect of time elapsed since last wildfire event on in situ net soil CH4 fluxes was examined using a static chamber method (n = 5 per island, 30 islands). Results show that the net soil CH4 sink significantly increases (R2 = 0.40, P<0.001) with time since last wildfire disturbance (Fig 1). We propose that this effect is mediated by successional changes in the plant community since fire disturbance. As time since fire increases, vegetation community composition shifts from domination by early successional Pinus sylvestris and Vaccinium myrtilus, to the late successional Picea abies and Empetrum hermaphroditum [18, 20]. The late succession plant community is characterised by having recalcitrant litter inputs, impaired productivity and decomposer activity, and greater humus depth and C storage (S1 Table) [1720]. The build-up of soil organic matter was observed to increase significantly with time since fire disturbance (R2 = 0.41; P ≤ 0.001), with a significant correlation between greater humus depth and net soil CH4 oxidation rates (R2 = 0.35; P ≤ 0.001; Fig 2). Soil moisture variation in the top 25 cm of humus, a common driver of short-term soil CH4 oxidation rates, was found to have a weak but positive correlation with the net CH4 oxidation rates (R2 = 0.15; P = 0.03, Table 1), whilst no relationship was identified with bulk density. Using island area classes that corresponded with plant successional classifications, early successional islands showed significantly lower net CH4 oxidation than islands at mid or late successional stages (Table 2). Overall, these results offer strong evidence that deeper soils of later post-fire successional forest stages provided conditions for enhanced methanotrophic activity.

thumbnail
Fig 1. In situ CH4 flux versus time since last fire.

In situ 2006 CH4 chamber flux data versus time since last fire (R2 = 0.4; P = 0.001). Each data point represents the mean of five measurements made on each island at the same time. 10 depth measurements were made per island.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. In situ CH4 flux versus depth of humus.

In situ 2006 CH4 flux versus depth of humus (R2 = 0.35; P ≤ 0.001). Each data point represents the mean of five measurements made on each island at the same time. 10 depth measurements were made per island.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Soil moisture determinations (%) made from soil cores from early, mid and late succession islands.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Net CH4 oxidation rate of early, mid and late succession islands for in situ and ex situ soil core measurements.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.t002

We targeted CH4 flux measurements on the uppermost 25 cm of the soil profile where previous studies have shown evidence of maximal methanotrophic activity [2122]. Intact 25 cm deep soil cores (n = 4 per island x 30) were sampled from each island. These cores were then examined in ex situ laboratory incubations where we did not detect a relationship between net CH4 fluxes and time since last fire, or with successional stage (Table 2). This result, combined with net field CH4 flux data, suggests that significant CH4 oxidation must be occurring at depths greater than 25 cm. To investigate this we returned to the islands in of the following year and collected whole humus soil profile cores (up to 85 cm depth to bedrock) from each island. These were taken back to the laboratory to carry out CH4 flux measurements under controlled environmental conditions. Another possible cause for the lack of observed differences in CH4 oxidation rates from the 25 cm cores was our ex-situ methodologies; ex-situ approaches by their nature are disruptive, for example, through altering diffusional rates of CH4 from the atmosphere or by removing the supply of CH4 from deeper anaerobic regions. By measuring CH4 fluxes from deeper cores we aimed to confirm that this was not the case. During the second year’s campaign soils were considerably wetter than in the previous (Table 1). The observed rates of ex situ CH4 oxidation from the deep cores was lower than the previous in situ and ex situ measurements made during the previous year, however, net CH4 oxidation rates were in the order Late > Mid > Early successional islands (Table 2). Thus, comparing net CH4 oxidation results from our 25 cm and the deep cores indicate that methanotrophic activity is prevalent in deeper soil layers that form under the prolonged absence of wildfire.

Based on our in-situ results from our first campaign we hypothesised that methanogenic processes were concurrent in deeper humus layers, thus potentially priming methanotrophic activity through provision of additional CH4 substrate supply [23]. During our second field campaign we therefore used a natural abundance stable isotope in situ approach to gain additional insight into CH4 processes at depth. For this, a series of sub-surface CH4 concentration measurements were made across the islands at a range of soil depths. These measurements allowed us to initially determine whether we could detect above ambient concentrations of CH4 as evidence of active methanogenesis in the soil profile. Concentration of CH4 measured in the humus profile were consistently below ambient levels, suggesting that either methanogenesis was not dominant in these soils during the peak growth season (Fig 3A), or that rapid oxidation of CH4 by the methanotroph community was removing any endogenous CH4 production. Analyses of the stable 13/12C isotope ratio of CH4 in these samples confirmed that methanogenesis was not occuring, as δ13C values of 13CH4 were enriched relative to atmospheric CH4 (Fig 3B). It has been shown that methanotrophs preferentially assimilate lighter isotopes, leaving residual CH4 that is 13C enriched [24]. Our results demonstrated that both CH4 concentrations and the δ13C values of 13CH4 were strongly influenced by the depth of the humus profile (Table 2). Using these data, we quantified the CH4 oxidation rate at sub-surface depths in situ using a ‘top-to-bottom difference’ 13C-CH4 modelling approach [2425]. We found that soils typically oxidised between 2–5% of CH4 in the atmosphere (Table 3), with deeper soils leading to a higher cumulative CH4 oxidation rate (Table 4). As these soils were not found to produce CH4, the supply of this substrate to deeper soil profile was from the atmosphere. This increasing CH4 oxidation at depth corresponded to the sub-surface minimum CH4 concentrations detected in the humus profile recorded with our in-situ depth measurements (Fig 3A), and also in ex situ profile cores (up to 85 cm) taken during the second field campaign (S2 and S3 Tables). Collectively, these results support the notion that increasing time since wildfire has indirectly affected the CH4 oxidation process by enabling the development of deeper humus profiles which harbour the niches necessary for methanotrophs.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Mean in situ concentration depth profiles of CH4 (a) and distribution of δ13C-CH4 (b) in boreal forest soils.

The depth at surface (0 cm) represents the ambient concentration and δ13C-CH4 value. Error bars represent ± standard error (n = 10). The changes in CH4 and CO2 concentration and δ13C-CH4 with depth were only significant in mid and late successional stages (P ≤ 0.05). Statistical analyses of data are shown in Table 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.g003

thumbnail
Table 3. Percentage of atmospheric CH4 oxidised in the soil profile and statistical analysis of whole profile % CH4 oxidised for early, mid and late succession islands.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Statistical analyses for the effects of, and interactions between, depth and sucessional stage on in situ profile CH4 concentration, δ13C-CH4 and % CH4 oxidised.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.t004

Our study reveals, for the first time, that across contrasting islands differing in exposure times to historical fire disturbance, net CH4 oxidation processes vary predictably. Specifically, we have shown that low productivity, old growth boreal forest ecosystems that have not burned for up to 5000 years develop deeper humus layers, leading to enhanced soil microbial CH4 oxidation. Crucially, our results indicate that disturbance of these humus C stores will threaten the stable microhabitat conditions required for methanotrophs to thrive. In the future, climate change is expected to result in increased wildfire ignitions from lightning and increased fire season length [26]. These same drivers are also expected to increase wildfire severity which will in turn promote soil organic matter loss and methanotrophic community disturbance. Together, these global changes could reduce the apparent natural CH4 sink capacity of late succession boreal forest soils, with potential feedback to greenhouse gas forced climate warming. Our results indicate that in the absence of human interventions, such as fire suppression, the globally important boreal CH4 sink could be diminished by future wildfire events.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was made on 30 freshwater islands in the Boreal forest region of northern Sweden. These islands are part of an archipelago of over 400 islands within the lakes Uddjaure and Hornaven (N65° 15’ N; 17° 43’ to 66° 99’ N; 17° 55’ E). These islands are not within national reserves, and the land is public and not government protected. We confirm that all national and international rules were complied with during the field work and no specific permissions were required to access the islands. The research did not involve measurements on humans or animals. The soil and plant material collected for this study had negligible effects on broader ecosystem functioning. We have no commercial interests or conflicts of interest in performing this work.

Study System

The lakes were formed when the retreat of land ice 9,000 years ago left behind granite and moraine boulders to form the foundation of the current islands. All of these islands are of the same geological age and experience the same climatic conditions, having a mean annual precipitation of 750 mm and mean temperature of +13°C in July and -14°C in January. All islands are the same distance from the shore irrespective of island size which prevents confounding effects of erosion, wind and radiation. The forested portions of the islands are not subjected to other major disturbances such as flooding and ice formation, as the level of the lake is always below the level of the lowest forested vegetation. The only extrinsic factor which varies among the islands is wildfire frequency [1719]. The 30 islands are of varying size (0.02 to 15 ha) with lightning strikes being more frequent on larger islands as they have a larger area to intercept these strikes. The age of major wildfire events was previously determined using 14C dating of buried charcoal fragments and through examination of fire scars from the last 250 years [1720]. These islands collectively form a retrogressive chronosequence, with retrogression increasing with decreasing island size. A description of island properties is given in S1 Table.

Determining in situ CH4 fluxes

The in situ gas fluxes were measured over one week using a static chamber method during August 2006 (n = 5 per island; chamber volume = 0.0054 m3, diameter = 0.2 m). Cylindrical chamber base rings were installed and subsequently removed on the day of measurement. The installation involved gently cutting the base ring into the humus to 5 cm depth. Headspace gas samples, 9 ml, were drawn at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes after an opaque chamber lid was sealed onto the base ring. Samples were stored in exetainer vials (Labco, UK) for up to one month prior to analyses. Concentrations of CH4 were analysed by gas chromatography, on a PerkinElmer Autosystem XL Gas Chromatograph (GC) with Flame Ionization Detector, and results were calibrated using certified gas standards. CH4 was separated isothermally on a 2 m Poropak Q 50–80 mesh packed column at 40°C, with N2 as the carrier gas. The mean detectable concentration change was 0.05 ppm CH4 which was equivalent to 3 μg CH4 m-2 hr-1 [27]. Where fluxes fell below this detection limit they were still included in the analyses following others [2729]. Calculations of the rates of exchange of CH4 are based on a standard linear regression methodology [30].

Determining ex situ CH4 fluxes from intact cores

We measured CH4 fluxes from ex situ cores from the top 25 cm of soil (or to the bedrock where soil depth was less than 25 cm) in 2006 and then through the entire humus profile to the bedrock (20–85 cm depth) in 2007. In August 2006, four intact cores (11 cm diameter, 25 cm depth) were removed from each island (40 per island size classification) and were weighed on the day of collection. Cores were stored at 12°C in the dark until measurement and were maintained at their field collected moisture content using an artificial rain solution. The artificial rain solution was made up according to a formula which results in rainwater with a pH of 5.6 with a conductivity of 22.4 μS (S4 Table). Cores were grouped into late, mid and early successional stage dependent upon the island from which they were removed (n = 10). Soil CH4 fluxes were measured using the static chamber method (volume = 0.0008 m3) with sampling at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 and 150 minutes after headspace closure. In 2007, one full profile core (0.15 m diameter) was collected from each island humus profile to the bedrock in July 2007. A similar static chamber approach (volume = 0.0021 m3, diameter = 0.15 m) for measuring soil CH4 fluxes, applied under the same measurement conditions as previously described. Sample storage using 3.6 ml exetainers vials, GC analysis and data analysis was as described for the in situ CH4 sample analyses. Soil moisture was calculated after drying soils in an oven at 105°C until no further moisture loss was recorded.

In situ depth profiles of δ13CH4 and concentrations of CH4, and CO2

In situ gas samples were collected from within the soil atmosphere in the humus profiles of each island over 4 days in July 2007. Four stainless steel sampling probes (19 gauge, 0.69 mm inner diameter) were inserted into the soil profiles 30 minutes before soil atmosphere samples were collected at 15, 35, 55 and 75 cm depth (dead-space volume = 0.06, 0.13, 0.21, 0.28 ml, respectively). From each probe a 100 ml sample was collected with 90 ml being transferred to a 50 ml Wheaton bottle with butyl rubber stopper and crimp top seals and 9 ml to a 3.6 ml exetainer vial. After collection each butyl rubber stopper and crimp top was sealed with wax. Analyses of the δ13C values of CH4 were completed within one month at the Natural Environmental Research Council Life Sciences Mass Spectrometry Facility at the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, using an Isoprime Ltd Tracegas Preconcentrator coupled to an Isoprime Ltd Isoprime isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Samples were initially passed through a Magnesium perchlorate/Carbosorb scrubber trap at 20 ml min-1 to eliminate water and CO2. The CH4 was then oxidized in a combustion furnace using a braided platinum/copper/nichrome furnace wire inside a ceramic furnace tube of 200 mm x 0.4 mm i.d. heated in a furnace at 950°C. A preparation flow rate of 10 psi was required to give a flow rate of 20 ml min-1 through the furnace at full operating temperature. Precisions were better than or equal to 0.2 ‰. The δ13C of CH4 was expressed in per mil and calculated with respect to Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB). Reference CO2 was calibrated to National Institute of Standard Technology (NIST) certified reference materials (N.I.S.T. 8559 and 8561) and working CH4 standards (Scientific and Technical Gases Ltd).

Isotopic method to determine the quantity of CH4 oxidised

Non-equilibrium or kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) associated with methanotrophy in soils are denoted using the isotope fractionation factor (αox). The KIE represents the different rates of uptake of the CH4 isotopologues (12CH4, 13CH4), with αox being the ratio of the rate constants of isotopically light and heavy CH4 for both physical and biological processes associated with methanotrophy in soil [2425]. The resultant isotopic fractionation factor for CH4 oxidation (αox) is known to vary across boreal soils [24], therefore it was necessary to determine αox for each island. A straightforward and effective method of determining αox is by using the ‘Top-to-Bottom’ δ13C-CH4 approach [2425]. This allows the determination of the fraction of atmospheric CH4 as it passes through soil layers. It involves calculating the difference in δ13C-CH4 values from atmospheric CH4 samples and samples taken from the soil atmosphere at depth. This difference is then added to 19.7 ‰ to take account of fractionation by gas diffusion through the soil due to the higher translational velocity of 12CH4 versus 13CH4 in air filled pores spaces. Diffusion of CH4 into the soil tends to result in isotopic depletion as 12CH4 diffuses more quickly along its gradient than 13CH4 causing 12CH4 to travel further in soil pore space. During the process of CH4 oxidation the remaining CH4 becomes heavier as 12CH4 is more readily oxidised by methanotrophs. The calculated isotope fractionation factors (αox) for this work are given in S4 Table.

To determine the fraction of CH4 oxidised by boreal forest soils, a mass balance model was used that accounted for the fractionation effects of both biological oxidation and transport of CH4 from the atmosphere. The model is adapted from previous work that estimated CH4 oxidation in landfill [31] cover soils, but has since been used in natural systems to investigate CH4 cycling in humid tropical forests [32]. Eq 1 describes the model: Eq 1 where Fo represents the fraction of CH4 oxidised. To calculate the percentage of CH4 oxidised, Fo is multiplied by 100. δsoil and δatmos represent the isotopic composition (‰) of CH4 at soil depths and atmosphere respectively. αtrans is the isotopic fractionation associated with gas transport. There is no method to directly calculate αtrans. Other studies have assumed movement of CH4 by advective transport [31] which involves no isotopic fractionation of CH4 giving a αtrans value of 1. Using this value can result in an underestimation of CH4 oxidation. As in this study, it was not possible to calculate αtrans, Fo was calculated using αtrans values of 1.0195, which is the diffusion fractionation factor reported for temperate forest soils [33].

Ecosystem properties

Using our 2006 collected soil cores, we measured soil pH, % carbon and % nitrogen. Soil pH was determined in a soil:water ratio of 1:3 using the Hanna pH 210 Microprocessor pH Meter. The percentage of soil C and N was analysed by oxidative combustion, followed by thermal conductivity detection using an Elementar Vario EL analyser (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). In July 2007 the humus depth of each island was assessed by taking ten depth measurements along a transect across approximately the centre of each island. Depths were sampled at equal intervals by inserting a metal rod to the bedrock. Additional existing information on vegetation mass, shrub productivity, tree productivity and humus mass are as reported previously [1720].

Statistical Analyses

All analyses were conducted with the R statistical program (R Development Core Team, 2011). Simple regression analyses were used to model the relationship between response variables and predictors (successional age of system from 14C dating, humus development). Differences in island soil moisture content, in situ and ex situ CH4 fluxes between successional stages (Early, Mid and Late) were tested with the glm function. This same approach was applied when testing for differences between the quantity of CH4 oxidised for successional stages using the stable isotope approach. A constant value, equal to lowest datapoint + 1, was added to each datapoint to ensure all data were non-negative and a quasi-likelihood function with a log link and constant variance parameter used to account for the non-normal distribution. Differences in other CH4 measures (CH4 concentration, δ13C of CH4 and % CH4 oxidised) across successional stages and soil depths were tested with a linear mixed effect model using the lme function in the nlme package. Island was included as a random term to account for dependencies between measures made on the same core. Diagnostic plots of residuals versus fitted values were inspected to ensure there was no bias or heteroscedasticity in model residuals.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Changes in island properties for each successional class across the island size gradient.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Mean CH4 concentration (ppm) in soil air of ex situ cores at stratified depths.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Statistical analyses for the effects of, and interactions between, depth and successional stage on ex situ profile CH4 concentrations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Kinetic Isotope Effect (KIE) for soil methanotrophy on early, mid and late succession islands.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129892.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Micael Jonsson for support in the field and Helen Grant for stable isotope analyses. We thank Aidan Keith and Peter Henrys for statistical advice.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NPM RG JCM DAW RDB NJO. Performed the experiments: NPM RG AS SO MdTR. Analyzed the data: NPM DAW NJO. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NPM NJO JCM AS. Wrote the paper: NPM JCM MdTR DAW RDB NJO.

References

  1. 1. Zhang Y-H, Wooster MJ, Tutubalina O, Perry GLW (2003) Monthly burned area and forest fire carbon emission estimates for the Russian Federation from SPOT VGT. Remote Sens Environ 87: 1–15.
  2. 2. Bradshaw CJA, Warkentin IG, Sodhi NS (2009) Urgent preservation of boreal carbon stock and biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 541–548. pmid:19679372
  3. 3. Soja AJ, Tchebakova NM, French NHF, Flannigan MD, Shugart HH, Stocks BJ, et al. (2007) Climate-induced boreal forest change: Predictions versus current observations. Global Planet Change 56: 274–296.
  4. 4. Girardin G, Ali AA, Carcaillet C, Mudelsee M, Drobyshev I, Hély C et al. (2009) Heterogeneous response of circumboreal wildfire risk to climate change since the early 1900s. Global Change Biol 15: 2751–2769.
  5. 5. Chuvieco E, Englefield P, Trishchenko AP, Luo Y (2008) Generation of long time series of burn area maps of the boreal forest from NOAA–AVHRR composite data. Remote Sens Environ 112: 2381–2396.
  6. 6. Kasischke ES, Hyer EJ, Novelli PC, Bruhwiler LP, French NHF, Sukhinin AI, et al. (2005) Influences of boreal fire emissions on Northern Hemisphere atmospheric carbon and carbon monoxide. Global Biogeochem Cy 19: GB1012.
  7. 7. Kasischke ES, Bruhwiler LP (2002) Emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane from boreal forest fires in 1998. J Geophys Res 107: 8146.
  8. 8. Ohlson M, Dahlberg B, Økland T, Brown KJ, Halvorsen R (2009) The charcoal carbon pool in boreal forest soils. Nature Geosci 2: 692–695.
  9. 9. Pluchon N, Gundale MJ, Nilsson M-C, Kardol P, Wardle DA (2014) Stimulation of boreal tree seedling growth by wood-derived charcoal: effects of charcoal properties, seedling species and soil fertility. Funct Ecol 28: 766–775.
  10. 10. Trotsenko YA, Murrell JC (2008) Metabolic aspects of aerobic obligate methanotrophy. Adv Appl Microbiol 63: 183–229. pmid:18395128
  11. 11. Smith KA, Dobbie KE, Ball BC, Bakken LR, Sitaula BK, Hansen S, et al. (2000) Oxidation of atmospheric methane in Northern European soils, comparison with other ecosystems, and uncertainties in the global terrestrial sink. Global Change Biol 6: 791–803.
  12. 12. Burke RA, Zepp RG (1997) Effect of fire on soil-atmosphere exchange of methane and carbon dioxide in Canadian boreal forest sites. J Geophys Res 102: 29289–29300.
  13. 13. Jaatinen K, Knief C, Dunfield PF, Yrjälä K, Fritze H (2004) Methanotrophic bacteria in boreal forest soil after fire. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 50: 195–202. pmid:19712360
  14. 14. Priemé A, Christensen S (1999) Methane uptake by a selection of soils in Ghana with different land use. J Geophys Res 104: 23617–23622.
  15. 15. Gathany MA, Burke IC (2011) Post-fire soil fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O along the Colorado Front Range. Int J Wildland Fire 20: 836–846.
  16. 16. Nakano T, Takeuchi W, Inoue G, Fukuda M, Yasuoka Y (2006) Temporal variations in soil-atmosphere methane exchange after fire in a peat swamp forest in West Siberia. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 52: 77–88.
  17. 17. Wardle DA, Zackrisson O, Hörnberg G, Gallet C (1997) Influence of island area on ecosystem properties. Science 277: 1296–1299.
  18. 18. Wardle DA, Hörnberg G, Zackrisson O, Kalela-Brundin M, Coomes DA (2003) Long term effects of wildfire on ecosystem properties across an island area gradient. Science 300: 972–975. pmid:12738863
  19. 19. Wardle DA, Zackrisson O (2005) Effects of species and functional group loss on island ecosystem properties. Nature 435: 806–810. pmid:15944702
  20. 20. Wardle DA, Jonsson M, Bansal S, Bardgett RD, Gundale MJ, Metcalfe DB (2011) Linking vegetation change, carbon sequestration and biodiversity: insights from island ecosystems in a long term natural experiment. J Ecol 100: 16–30.
  21. 21. Reay DS, Nedwell DB, McNamara N, Ineson P (2005) Effect of tree species on methane and ammonium oxidation capacity in forest soils. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 719–730.
  22. 22. Adamsen APS, King GM (1993) Methane consumption in temperate and subarctic forest soils: Rates, vertical zonation, and responses to water and nitrogen. Applied and Environ Microbiol 59: 485–490.
  23. 23. Knief C, Kolb S, Bodelier PLE, Lipski A, Dunfield PF (2005) The active methanotrophic community in hydromorphic soils changes in response to changing methane concentration. Environ Microbiol 8: 321–333.
  24. 24. Reeburgh WS, Hirsch AJ, Sansone FJ, Popp BN, Rust BN (1997) Carbon kinetic isotope effect accompanying microbial oxidation of methane in boreal forest soils. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 61: 4761–4767.
  25. 25. Maxfield PJ, Evershed RP, Hornibrook ERC (2008) Physical and biological controls on the in situ kinetic isotope effect associated with oxidation of atmospheric CH4 in mineral soils. Environ Sci Technol 42: 7824–7830. pmid:19031867
  26. 26. Beck PSA, Goetz SJ, Mack MC, Alexander HD, Yufang J, Randerson JT, et al. (2011) The impacts and implications of an intensifying fire regime on Alaskan boreal forest composition and albedo. Global Change Biol 17: 2853–2866.
  27. 27. McNamara NP, Black HIJ, Piearce TG, Reay DS, Ineson P (2008) The influence of afforestation and tree species on soil methane fluxes from shallow organic soils at the UK Gisburn Forest Experiment. Soil Use Manage 24: 1–7.
  28. 28. Chan ASK, Parkin TB (2001) Effect of land use on methane flux from soil. J Environ Qual 30: 786–797. pmid:11401268
  29. 29. Sjögersten S, Wookey PA (2002) Spatio-temporal variability and enviromental controls of methane fluxes at the forest-tundra ecotone in the Fennoscandian mountains. Global Change Biology, 8, 885–895.
  30. 30. Holland EA, Robertson GP, Greenberg J, Groffman PM, Boone RD, Gosz J, et al. (1999) Soil CO2, N2O, and CH4 Exchange. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P. editors. Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research. Oxford University Press.
  31. 31. Liptay A, Chanton J (1998) Use of stable isotopes to determine methane oxidation in landfill cover soils. J Geophys Res 103: 8243–8250.
  32. 32. Teh YA, Silver WL, Conrad ME (2005) Oxygen effects on methane production and oxidation in humid tropical forest soils. Global Change Biol 11: 1283–1297.
  33. 33. Tyler SC, Crill PM, Brailsford GW (1994) 13C/12C Fractionation of methane during oxidation in a temperate forested soil. Geochim Cosmochim Ac 58, 1625–1633.