Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Spatio-Temporal Differences in Dystrophin Dynamics at mRNA and Protein Levels Revealed by a Novel FlipTrap Line

  • Frederique Ruf-Zamojski ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Frederique Ruf-Zamojski, Vikas Trivedi

    Current address: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Neurology Department, New York, New York 10029, United States of America

    Affiliation California Institute of Technology, Biological Imaging Center, Beckman Institute, Division of Biology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States of America

  • Vikas Trivedi ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Frederique Ruf-Zamojski, Vikas Trivedi

    Affiliation California Institute of Technology, Department of Bioengineering, Pasadena, California 91125, United States of America

  • Scott E. Fraser,

    Current address: University of Southern California, Molecular and Computational Biology, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States of America

    Affiliation California Institute of Technology, Biological Imaging Center, Beckman Institute, Division of Biology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States of America

  • Le A. Trinh

    letrinh@usc.edu

    Current address: University of Southern California, Molecular and Computational Biology, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States of America

    Affiliation California Institute of Technology, Biological Imaging Center, Beckman Institute, Division of Biology, Pasadena, California 91125, United States of America

Spatio-Temporal Differences in Dystrophin Dynamics at mRNA and Protein Levels Revealed by a Novel FlipTrap Line

  • Frederique Ruf-Zamojski, 
  • Vikas Trivedi, 
  • Scott E. Fraser, 
  • Le A. Trinh
PLOS
x

Abstract

Dystrophin (Dmd) is a structural protein that links the extracellular matrix to actin filaments in muscle fibers and is required for the maintenance of muscles integrity. Mutations in Dmd lead to muscular dystrophies in humans and other vertebrates. Here, we report the characterization of a zebrafish gene trap line that fluorescently labels the endogenous Dmd protein (Dmd-citrine, Gt(dmd-citrine) ct90a). We show that the Dmd-citrine line recapitulates endogenous dmd transcript expression and Dmd protein localization. Using this Dmd-citrine line, we follow Dmd localization to the myosepta in real-time using time-lapse microscopy, and find that the accumulation of Dmd protein at the transverse myosepta coincides with the onset of myotome formation, a critical stage in muscle maturation. We observed that Dmd protein localizes specifically to the myosepta prior to dmd mRNA localization. Additionally, we demonstrate that the Dmd-citrine line can be used to assess muscular dystrophy following both genetic and physical disruptions of the muscle.

Introduction

Dystrophin (Dmd) is an essential structural protein in the Dystrophin Associated Protein Complex (DAPC) of skeletal muscles that links the extracellular matrix to the cytoskeletal actin filaments of the myofibril [1, 2]. Mutations in components of the DAPC result in muscular dystrophy, a condition characterized by progressive muscle weakness and degeneration. Dmd mutations are the cause of approximately 90% of all human forms of muscular dystrophies. In particular, DMD is the gene that is mutated in most cases of Becker Muscular Dystrophy and Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (BMD and DMD, respectively) [36]. DMD is an X-linked recessive, fatal disorder. It has been estimated that 1 in 3,500 to 5,000 boys suffers from DMD [7, 8], and that approximately three to six of every 100,000 live births are affected by BMD [9, 10].

Several vertebrate models have been developed to study DMD [11], ranging from mdx mice [12, 13] and dystrophic golden retriever dogs [14], to DMD-deficient cats [15], and mutant zebrafish [1618]. Several zebrafish alleles of dmd mutations were identified by the Tubingen screen [16], including dmdtm90c, dmdta222a and dmdtj7. Twelve additional alleles have been identified and referenced by the Zebrafish Mutation Project conducted at the Sanger Institute [19]. The dystrophin-deficient zebrafish dmdta222a (Sapje mutant) has a nonsense mutation in exon 4 of dmd [17]. The Sapje-like mutant was isolated more recently, and carries a dmd splice site mutation within exon 62 [18]. The Sapje and Sapje-like alleles recapitulate the muscle degeneration phenotypes observed in humans [17, 18], providing a good model for the study of muscular dystrophies [20]. These genetic models have provided many insights into the molecular lesions that can lead to muscular dystrophy; however, real-time monitoring of Dmd expression and localization in vivo, in order to assess both wildtype muscle development and progression of muscle dystrophy at the cellular and protein level, remains a challenge. The challenge results, in part, from the large size of Dmd, a 427 KDa protein that is encoded by 79 exons [21, 22]. The Dmd protein is composed of four major domains: 1) an actin-binding N-terminal domain, 2) a large array of 24 spectrin-repeats that form triple-helical coiled coils, 3) a cysteine-rich domain composed of EF-hands and a ZZ zinc finger motif and 4) a C-terminal domain that binds components of the DAPC [23, 24]. In addition, four proline-rich hinge domains link the spectrin-repeats in the Dmd protein. These hinge domains have been shown to influence muscle maturation and maintenance, as well as the structures of the myotendinous junction and of the neuromuscular synapses [25]. This modular organization of the Dmd protein into large, well-conserved protein domains suggests that a compact insertion, such as a fluorescent protein, might be added by genetic engineering without disrupting the function of Dmd.

Immunocytochemical localization of Dmd protein in skeletal muscles shows a reproducible progression with development. In humans, Dmd protein is initially detected in the cytoplasm of skeletal muscles, but it is later localized to the plasma membrane after 10 weeks of gestation [26, 27], and is localized mainly at the neuromuscular junction upon birth. It has long been suggested that different isoforms account for the differential localizations of Dmd, as different staining patterns have been observed using different antibodies against specific domains of Dmd [27]. The differential localization of Dmd can be recapitulated in primary muscle cell cultures, as Dmd is detected in the sarcoplasm during early myoblast fusion, and at the cell membrane in more differentiated myotubes [28]. In zebrafish embryos, Dmd protein has been reported to be localized to the myosepta [18, 2935]. In adult zebrafish there is a shift in Dmd localization (starting around 7 days post fertilization) to a more widespread sarcolemmal expression [36, 37] and to the muscle cell membranes [37].

Vertebrate skeletal muscle arises from the paraxial mesoderm, which becomes segmented into the repeated structure of the somites, forming sequentially in an anterior to posterior pattern (reviewed in [38]). In zebrafish, the first pair of somites is formed at 10.5 hours post-fertilization (hpf). The next 5 pairs appear every 20 minutes thereafter, followed by the remaining 24 pairs every 30 minutes at 28.5°C [39, 40]. Each somite is separated from its rostral and caudal neighbors by a sheet of extracellular matrix, the vertical myoseptum, and each somite is divided into dorsal and ventral muscle masses by another sheet of matrix that forms the horizontal myoseptum. The muscle fibers that arise from each somite are thought to use the myosepta for attachment. Dmd appears to play a role in this attachment [17], as failure of these attachments to form during the development of sapje mutant embryos, results in muscular dystrophy phenotypes [41]. Although multiple studies demonstrate that Dmd is an important player in muscle development, structure, maintenance and signaling, all analyses of Dmd localization have been based on fixed specimens. For example, in the live imaging study of muscle fiber attachment in Sapje mutants [35], the Dmd protein dynamics could not be assessed. As muscular dystrophy is a progressive disorder, the ability to follow Dmd and the progression of the disease in real time would be informative; however, there has been no animal model with a fluorescently tagged Dmd protein that would permit such studies.

Here, we characterize a gene trap line in which full-length Dmd is fused to the fluorescent protein Citrine (Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a). We demonstrate that the fusion protein (Dmd-citrine) and transcript (dmd-citrine) recapitulate the endogenous expression of the Dmd protein and transcript. Interestingly, we observe a spatial difference of dmd transcript localization during development that is not reflected at the protein level. Real-time analysis in Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos show that, unlike its transcript, Dmd protein is expressed at the myosepta as soon as it is detected, and this protein localization becomes more defined and sharper as the skeletal muscle develops. Finally, we illustrate that the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line can be used to assess muscle phenotypes in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Zebrafish

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the California Institute of Technology. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the California Institute of Technology (Permit Number: 1227). Wild-type embryos were obtained from AB and TL strains. Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a transgenic embryos were obtained from a screen performed in the laboratory [42]. Adult fish were maintained as described in [43].

RNA injections and morpholino experiments

For RNA microinjection, 2.3nL of a 50ng/μL mRNA encoding for membrane-mCherry and H2B-cerulean were injected into 1-cell stage embryos. The plasmids used were pCS-H2B-cerulean and pCS-membrane-mCherry [44]. They were linearized with NotI, purified using a Qiagen nucleotide removal spin column and used as template for in vitro transcription with the Ambion Message Machine kit (Life Technology, catalogue #AM1340). Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a zebrafish embryos were injected at the 1-cell stage with 10ng of dmd morpholino antisense oligonucleotide (dmd AS2 morpholino from [45], sequence: 5'-TTGAGTCCTTTAATCCTACAA TTTT-3’) or 10ng of inverted dmd morpholino / control morpholino (AS2 inverted from [45], sequence: 5'- TTTTAACATCCTAATTTCCTGAGTT-3’). Morpholinos were diluted following manufacturer instructions (Gene Tools). Embryos were then raised, at 28.5°C, to the desired stage for analysis.

Immunohistochemistry

Embryos were raised to the stage required, dechorionated, and anesthetised in 0.01% tricaine before being fixed in 4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA). Following fixation, embryos were pre-incubated in Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) with DMSO and Triton (PBDT; 1X PBS, 0.1% Triton-100, 1% Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), 1% DMSO) for 1h at room temperature. Incubation with the primary antibody was performed overnight at 1:200 dilution in PBDT, followed by washing and incubation with a secondary Alexa- coupled antibody (546nm, Invitrogen) for 4h at room temperature (RT) in PBDT. Primary antibodies used were: anti-Dmd (Mandra-1, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB)), anti-Myosin heavy chain fast isoforms (F59, DSHB), anti-Myosin heavy chain slow muscle fibres (S58, DSHB), anti-Tropomyosin (CH1, DSHB), anti-Laminin (Sigma, catalogue #L9393), and anti-GFP to recognize Citrine (Torrey Pines Biolabs, catalogue #TP-401).

Imaging, reconstructions and analysis

Imaging was performed on a Zeiss LSM510 inverted confocal microscope. Embryos were placed into agarose moulds [44] and imaged with the following lasers: 514nm to excite Citrine; 543nm to excite Bodipy-TR, Alexa-546 and membrane-mCherry; 458nm to excite H2B-cerulean. Images were taken using a water-immersion 40X 1.1NA Apochromat objective using the Zeiss LSM software and time-lapse imaging was performed using the Zeiss multi-time macro. To permit accurate comparisons, all embryos in a given experiment were imaged using the same laser power, gain detector settings and scanning speed. For live imaging, BODIPY-TR (Life Technology, catalogue #C34556) was used as a counterstain. 3D reconstructions and projections were performed using Imaris 6.4 (Bitplane). Custom written codes in MATLAB 2013b were used to quantify the number of pixels and their intensities. The kymograph was generated by assigning all the pixels of a given time point one single color.

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (ISH)

Chromogenic ISHs were performed and imaged as described in [46]. A digoxigenin (DIG) probe was synthesized using a plasmid template that contained a 2Kb fragment of the 3’ end of the dmd gene. Embryos were dechorionated and fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C before being dehydrated in a series of methanol and phosphate buffered saline with Tween (PBST; 1X PBS, 0.1% Tween-20). Proteinase K was used to permeabilize embryos before washing and pre-hybridized at 70°C for 1h. Hybridization was performed overnight at 70°C and DIG probe was detected with 1:5,000 anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase. Stained embryos were imaged with both wide-field and confocal microscopes. To improve the 3D localization and resolution of the ISHs, we used the technique described by Trinh and colleagues [46] to detect the far-red fluorescence of the NBT/BCIP chromogenic stain using a 510 LSM Zeiss confocal microscope.

Western-blotting

Batches of 20 embryos (72 hpf) were dechorionated and pooled together per condition in egg water (0.6g/L aquarium salt in water, 0.01mg/L methylene blue) and 0.01% Tricaine. Anesthetized embryos were de-yolked in calcium-free Ringer’s solution (116mM NaCl, 2.9mM KCl, 5mM HEPES pH 7.2), rinsed two times in fresh calcium-free Ringer’s solution before being put into Tris buffer saline with NP40 (1% NP40, 150mM NaCl, 50mM Tris-HCl pH8) with anti-proteases (Roche, Complete Mini, catalogue #04693159001). After 30 minutes on ice and vortexing, the samples were centrifuged at top speed for 15 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and used for Western blotting. Standard Western-blotting techniques were followed using gradient 4–15% Tris-Acetate gels (Bio-Rad). Membranes were incubated in primary antibody, followed by washing and incubating in anti-mouse-conjugated goat horseradish peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibody (1: 10,000). Dmd was detected using the Mandra-1 antibody (DSHB, 1:1,000) and Tubulin using anti-alpha Tubulin, clone DM1A (Sigma, 1:3,000). We detected a single band at greater than 180kDa in the Westerns, indicating that this antibody may not detect all isoforms of Dmd. The blots were finally incubated in Western Lightning Chemiluminescence Reagent (Perkin Elmer), as suggested by the manufacturer, and exposed to film.

Heat-shock treatment

Batches of 20 6-somite stage Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos were dechorionated and pooled together in 0.5mL egg water (0.6g/L aquarium salt in water, 0.01mg/L methylene blue) in an Eppendorf tube, before being subjected to heat-shock at 40°C for 30 minutes in a water bath. After heat-shock treatment, embryos were placed into 28.5°C egg water and incubated until morphological and molecular assessments could be performed. Control Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos were kept at 28.5°C for the entire time as a comparison.

In situ Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR)

20 25-mer probes were designed against exon 2 of the dmd mRNA; seven 25mer probes were used for the detection of tropomyosin 3, and six for the detection of citrine (sequences provided in supplemental information). In situ HCR was performed as described in [47, 48]. Briefly, zebrafish embryos were fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C, followed by washing in PBS and a series of dehydrations and rehydrations in methanol and PBST. Pre-hybridization was done in 50% hybridization buffer (HB; 50% formamide, 2X Saline Sodium Citrate (SSC), 9mM citric acid, 0.1% Tween-20, 500 μg/mL tRNA and 50 μg/mL Heparin) for 30min at 55°C. Hybridization was performed overnight in 50% HB with 6pmol of each probe at 55°C. The next day the specimens were washed in a series of 50% HB and 2X SSC, followed by a series of 2X SSC (300mM NaCl, 30mM Na3Citrate-2H20) and PBST washes. The samples were pre-hybridized in 40% HB (40% formamide, 2X SSC, 9mM citric acid pH6, 0.5% Tween 20, 2.5 mg/mL tRNA, 250 ug/mL Heparin) for 30min at 45°C and the fluorescently labelled hairpins were snap-cooled before use. After overnight incubation at 45°C with the hairpins, the embryos were washed and mounted for imaging. For counterstaining of the nuclei, 1ug/mL of DAPI in PBS was added to samples after in HCR reaction was completed and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 1hr before imaging.

Results

Identification of a gene trap in the dmd locus

From a gene trap screen in which the Tol2-based FlipTrap vector was randomly integrated into the zebrafish genome, we isolated a line (ct90aGT) that exhibited expression in the developing muscle (Fig 1b1e). The FlipTrap vector contains an internal exon encoding a variant of yellow fluorescent protein, citrine [42]. When integrated into the intron of actively expressed genes, citrine is transcribed as an artificial exon to create a fusion transcript with the trapped locus. Translation of the trapped transcript leads to expression of a full-length Citrine fusion protein (Fig 1a). In the ct90aGT line, the Citrine fusion protein expression is visible starting at 18 hpf, by wide-field and confocal microscopy, in the somite boundaries (Fig 1b1e). This expression increases over developmental time as indicated by an increase in Citrine fluorescence (Fig 1b1e). By 6dpf, Citrine fusion protein expression was detected in all skeletal muscle including cranial muscles (Fig 1d and 1e).

thumbnail
Fig 1. FlipTrap Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line allows visualization of Dmd protein.

(a). Schematic of the FlipTrap vector inserted within dmd locus. Citrine insertion (green) occurs within intron 4–5 in dmd in the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a trap line (top) and upon translation produces a fluorescently tagged full-length functional Dmd protein (bottom). The exons (blue rectangles), introns (blank line) and domains of the protein are not drawn to scale. (b-e). Wide-field fluorescent images of Dmd-Citrine expression in the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line, in the trunk skeletal muscles (b-c) at 24hpf (b) and 32hpf (c); (d-e). Expression in the cranial skeletal muscle at 6dpf (lateral (d) and ventral (e) views). Ventral view showing expression in the skeletal muscle of the branchial arches. Scale bars: (b)-(c) 100μm, (d)-(e) 25μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.g001

Molecular analysis by 3’ Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends (3’-RACE) with primers against the citrine sequence [42] revealed that the FlipTrap vector inserted between exons 4 and 5 of the dystrophin (dmd) locus (Fig 1a). Both exons 4 and 5 are in phase zero, as is the artificial citrine exon, creating an in-frame fusion protein. Protein domain prediction suggests that the gene trap creates a fusion protein with Citrine between the two CH domains in the N-terminal calponin homology domain of Dmd (Fig 1a), and would not be expected to disrupt the function of Dmd. Consistent with this prediction, Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a homozygous individuals are viable and do not exhibit muscular dystrophy as would be expected if the insertion in dmd were mutagenic [41]. Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a homozygous individuals are viable into adulthood and show no noticeable morphological or behavioral phenotypes that have been indicative of mutations in dmd such as swimming defects. Western blot analysis indicates that the Dmd-citrine fusion protein is expressed as a single protein, approximately 30 KDa larger than the Dmd protein, consistent with the citrine exon’s predicted molecular mass of 30 KDa. While multiple isoforms have been documented for Dmd [49], our data suggest that the gene trap insertion leads to a single isoform being tagged in the ct90aGT line.

Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a recapitulates endogenous Dmd protein expression

Expression and co-localization analyses indicate that the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line recapitulates the expression and localization of endogenous Dmd protein. First, subcellular localization analysis of Dmd-citrine in ct90aGT embryos by co-expression of membrane (membrane-mCherry) and nuclear (H2B-cerulean) labels reveal that Dmd-citrine localizes to the myoseptal junctions at the sarcoplasmic side of the sarcolemma, and is excluded from the interior of the muscle cells (Fig 2a). Second, co-localization analysis by antibody staining for proteins expressed in the either muscle fibers or myosepta indicate that Dmd-citrine co-localizes with myoseptal components (Fig 2b2e). Myosin heavy chain and Tropomyosin are expressed in the muscle fibers while Laminin localizes to the extracellular matrix of the myosepta [50, 51]. Antibody co-localization experiments performed on these proteins in ct90aGT embryos show that Dmd-citrine localizes to the myosepta, similar to Laminin (Fig 2e). Finally, immunohistochemistry with antibodies performed on endogenous Dmd and Citrine in ct90aGT embryos show that Dmd and Dmd-citrine colocalize (Fig 2b). The colocalization between Dmd and Dmd-citrine can be detected at the myoseptum starting at 18-19somite, suggesting that there is no difference in the maturation time of Dmd and Dmd-citrine protein. Collectively, these results show that the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line accurately reflects Dmd expression in zebrafish embryos.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a trap line recapitulates endogenous Dmd protein expression.

(a). Single optical section confocal images of live 30hpf ct90aGT embryo show that Dmd-citrine fusion protein is localized at the somite border. Dmd is in green (citrine), nuclei are in blue (H2B-cerulean), and membranes are in red (membrane-mCherry mRNA injected). (b). Antibody staining for Citrine and endogenous Dmd in the trap line confirms their co-localization at the somite border. Anti-Citrine label is in green and anti-Dmd label is in red. (c-f). Antibody staining for Citrine and endogenous muscle proteins. Myosin heavy chain (c) and Tropomyosin (d) are expressed in the muscle fibers while Laminin (e) localizes to the extracellular matrix of the myosepta. Scale bar = 10μm (a), 20μm (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.g002

Temporal differences in the localization of dmd transcript and Dmd protein during somite development

Dmd transcript has been reported to be spatially distinct in both mature and developing muscles. In human skeletal muscles, dmd transcripts are localized preferentially to the sub-sarcolemma of muscle cells, both in normal and DMD/BMD patients [52]. In contrast, in developing zebrafish muscle, dmd mRNA is initially detected throughout the cytoplasm of myoblasts and localizes to the transverse myosepta by 24hpf [32, 36, 53]. To assess the localization of dmd mRNA and determine if the dmd-citrine transcript recapitulates the endogenous localization of dmd, we employed in situ Hybridization Chain Reaction (HCR) [48] to simultaneously detect dmd and dmd-citrine transcripts in ct90aGT embryos. The dmd HCR probes bind to both dmd and dmd-citrine transcripts, while the citrine probes bind only to dmd-citrine transcripts (Fig 3a3n). Using this combination of probes, we found that dmd and dmd-citrine fusion transcripts both localize predominantly to the transverse myosepta in 48hpf embryos (Fig 3g3i and 3l3n). Additionally, dmd and dmd-citrine probes localize as dots in the nuclei suggesting that the HCR probes are labeling nascent transcripts (Fig 3i, 3j and 3n3o). The citrine probe labels a single dot in heterozygous ct90aGT embryos and two dots in homozygous embryos; the dmd probe labels two dots in all embryos (Fig 3i and 3n inset, Fig 3j and 3o, S1 Fig). These data are consistent with heterozygous ct90aGT embryos having a single copy of the gene trap and homozygous ct90aGT embryos having two copies. More importantly, the dmd and citrine probes show colocalization at the myosepta and in the nuclei in homozygous embryos indicating that dmd-citrine recapitulates dmd transcript localization.

thumbnail
Fig 3. The Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a trap line enables visualizing differential expression in homozygous and heterozygous embryos via in situ HCR.

(a, f, k) Schematic of in situ HCR experiment showing dmd and citrine HCR probe binding sites within dmd and dmd-citrine transcript. The dmd HCR probe should bind to both dmd and dmd-citrine transcripts, while citrine HCR probe binds only to dmd-citrine transcript. (b-e, g-j, l-o). in situ HCR analysis of dmd (blue) and dmd-citrine (green) transcript in wild type (b-e), heterozygous (g-j) and homozygous (l-o) Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos. Tmp3 transcripts counter-stain muscles in red. Insets in (d),(i) and (n) show zoomed in view of transcription sites in the nuclei. Two dots are detected in homozygous embryos (k-n) whereas only one dot is detected in the nuclei of heterozygous ct90aGT embryos (f-i) while no citrine dots are detected in wild types embryos (a-d), consistent with the copy number of citrine inserted in the respective embryos. (e, j, o) Magnified images of the three types of embryos with nuclei stained in DAPI and the transcripts indicated by arrowheads. Scale bar (b-d, g-i, l-n)20μm (e,j,o)10μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.g003

To further characterize the localization of dmd transcript, we performed a time-course of dmd expression using chromogenic in situ hybridization. Assessing the expression of dmd in one hour developmental time intervals starting at 19.5 hpf, we found that dmd transcript switches from a non-localized diffused pattern in the cytoplasm of the muscle cells at 21.5hpf, to a restricted pattern at the transverse myosepta at 22.5 hpf (Fig 4a4d), where it remains throughout development. The same switch from a diffused to localized pattern is observed when detecting dmd transcript by HCR in situ hybridization (S2 Fig), with the exception that in situ HCR also detects the nuclear dots in all developmental stages.

thumbnail
Fig 4. dmd mRNA and Dmd protein expression show differences in spatial expression.

(a-d). Chromogenic in situ hybridization for dmd in wild type embryos at 18hpf (a,b) and 22hpf (c,d). (a,c) Wide field image of 18hpf and 22hpf embryos stained for dmd expression. (b,d) 3D projections of confocal z-stack of embryos in (a) and (c), respectively. Fluorescent signal of NBT/BCIP stain for dmd transcript reveals spatial confinement of transcript between somites. (e-p). Confocal image of dmd-citrine transcript (f,j,n) detected by in situ HCR and antibody staining for DMD-citrine protein (e,i,m) in Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a (e-l) and wildtype (m-p) embryos at 18hpf and 26hpf. Counter-stain with antibody to Ctnnb1 in blue (g,k,o). (h,l,p) Merged of image of (e-g, i-k, and m-o). Comparison of protein and transcript expression at 18hpf (e-h) and 26 hpf (i-l) in Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos show that DMD protein localize exclusively to the myosepta while dmd-citrine mRNA is expressed in the cytoplasm at 18hpf and becomes more localized to the myosepta at 26hpf. Dmd-citrine expression in the nucleus can be seen as dots that appear similar in distribution between 18hpf and 26hpf. (m-p) DMD-citrine protein (m) and transcript (n) are not detected in wildtype embryos. Anti-Citrine antibody staining is in green, citrine mRNA HCR is in red and anti-Ctnnb1 antibody is in blue. Scale bars (a) 50μm (b,m) 20 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.g004

The differential distribution of dmd transcript led us to ask whether dmd protein exhibits a similar change in localization during development. To assess mRNA and protein in the same sample, we performed in situ HCR to detect dmd transcript followed by immunohistochemistry to detect Dmd protein with an antibody to Citrine (Fig 4e4l). This dual detection approach revealed that Dmd protein is restricted to the myosepta from the onset of Dmd protein expression, at 18 hpf, when dmd transcript is diffusely dispersed in the cytoplasm (Fig 4e4h). By 26 hpf both dmd transcript and protein are localized to the myosepta with nascent dmd transcripts detected as small dots in nuclei of muscle fibers (Fig 4i4l)).

Dynamics of Dmd protein localization during somitogenesis

The Citrine fluorescent signature in the ct90aGT line enables real-time analysis of Dmd localization during somitogenesis (Fig 5a5h); S3 Fig, S1 Movie). Dmd-citrine could be detected at low levels in the somite boundaries starting at 18–18.5 hpf (Fig 5a and 5e). The expression increases in intensity from the anterior to posterior somites (Fig 5a5h). In vertebrates, the somatic muscles develop from the paraxial mesoderm in an anterior-to-posterior wave. In zebrafish, this anterior-to-posterior developmental pattern initiates after gastrulation (12 hpf) during which dmd transcripts have been detected [36]. However, we detect Dmd-citrine protein localization at the somite boundaries 6 hours after transcripts can be detected, at 18 hpf, indicating that there is a significant delay between transcriptional active and protein maturation.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Dmd Protein expression increases both in intensity and area over development.

(a-h). 3D projections of confocal Z-stacks images in developing trunk of Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos from the 20 to 26 somites stages (19–22 hpf), showing expression of Dmd-citrine (a-d, green) and the vital stain BodipyTR methyl ester (e-h, red) from dorsal and lateral view. (i-l) Quantitation of Dmd-citrine fluorescent signal in confocal time-lapse. (i). Kymograph of Dmd-citrine expression color-coded according to developmental stage. The spatial shift in expression appears to be due to tissue growth and expression enhancement over time. (j). Histogram of fluorescent pixel intensities color-coded according to developmental stage with intensity in X-axis and frequency in Y-axis. Plot shows Dmd-citrine expression increasing over time resulting in shift slope along the X-axis (blue to red). The inset shows the same plotted on a log scale to enhance observation. (k). Mean pixel intensity plotted against development stage showing increase in fluorescent intensity of Dmd-citrine as development progresses. The error bars denote the variation among all the pixels at that particular stage. (l). Total pixel count of Dmd-citrine fluorescent plotted against developmental time showing that Dmd-citrine expression increase in spatial area over time. Scale bar = 20μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.g005

To quantify the spatio-temporal dynamics of Dmd-citrine expression, we mapped the pixel intensity of the fluorescence signal over time (Fig 5i5l). Kymographs of the Dmd-citrine expression show that the Dmd-citrine protein shifts in space over time (Fig 5l). However, fluorescent images indicate that Dmd-citrine expression remains at the myoseptum (Fig 5a5h) suggesting that the shift in space may be due to movement of the tissue or growth of the embryo. The shift in Dmd-citrine expression is unlikely due to an increase in the overall size of the somites, as the width of each somite remains constant and the distance between each myoseptum remains the same (Fig 5a5l). The shift in Dmd-citrine protein expression is accompanied by an increase in the total area in which Dmd-citrine can be detected in each developing somite (Fig 5i, 5k and 5l), indicating that more Dmd-citrine proteins are accumulating at the myoseptum over time. To quantify the relative levels of Dmd-citrine in time, we mapped the fluorescent intensity from the time-lapse analysis. We find that the relative mean pixel intensity increases over developmental time, indicating that more fluorescent signal can be detected per unit area (Fig 5k). Additionally, more pixels have fluorescent signature over developmental time (Fig 5l), indicating that as the somites mature more Dmd-citrine proteins are localizing to the myosepta.

Using the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line for phenotyping muscular dystrophy

The ability to detect Dmd protein in vivo enables the use of the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line to assess muscle phenotypes. First, we asked how morpholino anti-sense knockdown of Dmd would affect Dmd-citrine expression in ct90aGT embryos. Injection of a previously published ATG morpholino against dmd [45] resulted in a significant decrease in the amount of Dmd-citrine fluorescence detected in ct90aGT embryos (Fig 6a and 6b) compared to control. The decrease in Dmd-citrine fluorescence correlated with a reduction of Dmd protein detected by Western-blot (Fig 6c). In addition, ct90aGT morpholino knockdown embryos exhibited dystrophy phenotype in which the muscles fibers are disorganized, the sarcolemma borders are not precisely defined and the muscle fibers vary in size (data not shown).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Phenotyping of muscular dystrophy with Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a.

(a,b). Dmd-citrine expression in control (a) and dmd morphants (b). Embryos in (a) and (b) were imaged with the same laser power and gain settings. (c) Western-blot of protein extracts from WT (lanes 1, 2) and Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a (lanes 3, 4) embryos with antibody to DMD and tubulin (loading control). Embryos for protein extracts were injected with control morpholino (lanes 1 and 3) and dmd morpholino (lanes 2 and 4, n = 3–6). Arrows point to size difference between Dmd and Dmd-citrine. (d,e) Widefield fluorescent image of 32hpf ct90aGT embryos untreated (d) and treated with heat-shocked at 6-somites stage. Arrow point to defects in Dmd-citrine expression visible between somites 16–25. (f-i) Heat-shocked embryos stained for Dmd (f,g; green) and anti-MHC (h,i; red) at 32hpf. Scale bars (d,e) 50μm (f-i) 20 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.g006

In addition to morpholino knockdown, we asked whether the ct90aGT line could be used to assess other muscular dystrophy phenotypes. Heat-shocks given during somitogenesis have been shown to result in somite abnormalities, with defects appearing later than the given treatment and not affecting somite formation at the time of the shock [5456]. We performed heat-shock on ct90aGT embryos to determine the affects of heat-shock on Dmd-citrine expression. Performing a single 30-minute heat-shock treatment in 6-somite stage (12 hpf) embryos from the Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a line resulted skeletal muscle defects between somites 16–25 at 32 hpf (Fig 6d6i). In the defective somites, disorganized muscle fibers are accompanied by an absence of Dmd-citrine localization at the myoseptum (Fig 6g and 6i). This phenotype is consistent with Dmd-citrine role as structural protein important linking the skeletal muscle to the extracellular matrix.

Discussion

We describe a zebrafish gene trap line, Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a that expresses a Dmd-citrine protein fusion allowing the dynamic study of muscular dystrophy. We have shown that the expression of Dmd-citrine in these embryos recapitulates endogenous Dmd protein and mRNA localization. The tagging of Dmd with citrine did not seem to affect the interaction of Dmd with its DAPC partners. Defects in protein interactions within the DAPC would have lead to dystrophic phenotypes, and we did not observe any phenotypes in homozygous Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos. This transgenic line enables spatio-temporal study of Dmd dynamics in a live vertebrate animal model.

dmd transcript has been described to exhibit spatial differences in localization during development. We have found that dmd transcript transitions from a cytoplasmic localization in the myoblast to a discrete localization pattern in the myoseptum between 21.5 hpf and 22.5 hpf (Fig 4(a)4(d)). This transition in localization pattern coincides with a developmental stage when myoblasts fuse to form myotubes [57]. The syncytial nature of the myotubes may allow dmd transcripts to be discretely localized to the myoseptum. In the individual myoblast, the cell membrane may serve as a physical barrier for localization to the myosepta. Consistent with this hypothesis, we observe localization of dmd transcript in the myoseptum in 21.5 hpf embryos when cytoplasmic dmd transcript could be detected, indicating that localization of the transcript can occur at these earlier stages in development.

Quantitative analysis of the time-lapse data shows that not only does the mean signal intensity of Dmd-citrine increase (by ~ 45%) as development proceeds but the total expression area near the myoseptum increases as indicated by a 40% increase in the total number of pixels (Fig 5l). These results suggest that, as the myoblasts transitions to syncytial fibers, more Dystrophin is recruited to the myosepta. The accumulation of Dmd to the myosepta, as the muscle fibers mature, hints towards its importance in providing the mechanical anchoring for contracting muscle. Consistent with a role in anchoring muscle fibers, morpholino knockdown of Dmd show a progressive loss of Dmd-citrine expression and defects in muscle integrity. Additionally, heat shock experiments that result in discrete muscle integrity defects between somites 15–25 also results in lost of Dmd-citrine localization at these disrupted somites.

Interestingly we found that, during early zebrafish embryo development, dmd mRNA transcripts first appeared diffused in the cytoplasm before being localized at the myosepta. We did not observe such a differential pattern for Dmd protein. Dmd-citrine is initially detected at the myoseptum between the 18–19 somite stages prior to the localization of the mRNA at the myoseptum. This temporal difference in the localization of the mRNA and protein to the myosepta suggests that DMD-citrine is translated or matures into detectable fluorescence at the myoseptum. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies to Dmd suggests that the temporal maturation of Dmd and Dmd-citrine are similar as both proteins are detected at the myoseptum starting at the 18–19 somite stage. At this stage cell fusion should be completed in the anterior somites, but is not yet complete in the posterior somites [58]. Consistent with this anterior to posterior wave of maturation of the somites, we observe a similar anterior to posterior wave of localization of Dmd-citrine to the myoseptum in the time-lapse microscopy (Fig 5, S4 movie).

As development progresses, we see significant decrease in cytoplasmic distribution of dmd transcript over 4 hours from 18hpf to 22hpf. In situ HCR shows the nascent transcript sites in the nucleus with nearly no localization of dmd-citrine or dmd mRNA in the cytoplasm by 26hpf when most of the myoblasts have completed fusion (Fig 4, S2 Fig). There is a possibility that Dmd protein is present in the cytoplasm at levels below our detection limit; however, our data indicate that the majority of the Dmd protein are localized to the myosepta. Previous work on dynamics of mRNA-protein (mRNP) nucleocytoplasmic transport in mammalian cells has shown that the cytoplasmic diffusion coefficient of dystophin mRNAs is low [59]. It would be of interest to assess the dynamics of Dmd protein that is predicted to be slower given it’s large size (427 KDa protein). Therefore increasing localization of the transcript itself at the myoseptal junctions might facilitate effective translation or maturation of Dmd-citrine into detectable fluorescence at the site of its activity. This localization might be helpful in bypassing the time required for protein diffusion from the cytoplasm of fusing myoblasts or mature myotomes to the somite boundaries, thereby making the availability of Dystrophin, for anchoring, limited only by the rate of on-site translation. The ct90aGT line provides opportunities for future studies to test these hypotheses.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Co-localization of dmd and dmd-citrine transcript in Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos via in situ HCR.

(a-c) in situ HCR of dmd (red), citrine (green) and tpm3 in Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos. Tpm3 labels the cytoplasm of the myocytes while both dmd and citrine are detected at the myosepta and in the nucleus. Dmd and citrine transcripts show overlap expression at the myosepta. (d) Merge of (a-c).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.s001

(EPS)

S2 Fig. Differential localization of dmd transcript over developmental time as detected via in situ HCR.

(a) in situ HCR of dmd-citrine (red) in ct90aGT embryos counter-stained for tpm3 (blue). tpm3 Counter-stain show the nuclei by negative contrast. Inset shows zoomed in view of active transcription sites in the nuclei. (b-d) 3D projections of confocal z-stacks of dmd transcripts stained by in situ HCR at 21hpf (b), 22hpf (c), and 25hpf (d). dmd transcript transitions from the entire somite to the somite boundaries as development progresses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.s002

(EPS)

S3 Fig. Time lapse imaging of Dmd-citrine expression in Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a trap line.

3D projections of confocal Z-stacks images in developing trunk of Gt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryos from the 18 to 35 hpf, showing expression of Dmd-citrine (green) and the vitalstain BodipyTR methyl ester (red) from dorsal view. The expression of Dmd-Citrinefusion (green) increases with development. The microscope gain has been kept high inorder to detect citrine expression as early as possible. Images taken from frames withinSupplemental movie 1. Scale bar = 20μm

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.s003

(EPS)

S1 Movie. Time-lapse of Dmd-citrine.

Time-lapse movie from confocal z-stack projections of Dmd-citrine (green) expression inGt(dmd-citrine)ct90a embryo stained with BodipyTR methyl ester from 18 to 35 hpf. Dorsal view image.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128944.s004

(MOV)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) Center of Excellence in Genomic Science grant P50HG004071 (SEF) and by a Muscular Dystrophy Association Development grant (FRZ). We would like to thank members of the Fraser laboratory for technical help and discussions. We would like to thanks all members of the Bernheim laboratory, specifically Dr. Stéphane König and Prof. Laurent Bernheim, as well as Dr. Richard Fish at the University of Geneva, for their help and helpful discussions. The Dmd MANDRA-1, S58, F59 and CH1 antibodies were obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, developed under the auspices of the NICHD, and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biology, Iowa City, IA 52242.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FRZ VT LAT SEF. Performed the experiments: FRZ VT LAT. Analyzed the data: FRZ VT LAT SEF. Wrote the paper: FRZ VT LAT SEF.

References

  1. 1. Arahata K, Ishiura S, Ishiguro T, Tsukahara T, Suhara Y, Eguchi C, et al. Immunostaining of skeletal and cardiac muscle surface membrane with antibody against Duchenne muscular dystrophy peptide. Nature. 1988;333(6176):861–3. Epub 1988/06/30. pmid:3290683
  2. 2. Zubrzycka-Gaarn EE, Bulman DE, Karpati G, Burghes AH, Belfall B, Klamut HJ, et al. The Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene product is localized in sarcolemma of human skeletal muscle. Nature. 1988;333(6172):466–9. Epub 1988/06/02. pmid:3287171.
  3. 3. Hoffman EP, Brown RH Jr, Kunkel LM. Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy locus. Cell. 1987;51(6):919–28. Epub 1987/12/24. pmid:3319190.
  4. 4. Kunkel LM, Hejtmancik JF, Caskey CT, Speer A, Monaco AP, Middlesworth W, et al. Analysis of deletions in DNA from patients with Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Nature. 1986;322(6074):73–7. Epub 1986/07/03. pmid:3014348.
  5. 5. Kunkel LM, Monaco AP, Bertelson CJ, Colletti CA. Molecular genetics of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1986;51 Pt 1:349–51. Epub 1986/01/01. pmid:3472731.
  6. 6. Monaco AP, Neve RL, Colletti-Feener C, Bertelson CJ, Kurnit DM, Kunkel LM. Isolation of candidate cDNAs for portions of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Nature. 1986;323(6089):646–50. Epub 1986/10/16. pmid:3773991.
  7. 7. Emery AEH. Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press; 1993.
  8. 8. Emery AE. Muscular dystrophy into the new millennium. Neuromuscul Disord. 2002;12(4):343–9. Epub 2002/06/14. doi: S0960896601003030 [pii]. pmid:12062251.
  9. 9. Mostacciuolo ML, Miorin M, Pegoraro E, Fanin M, Schiavon F, Vitiello L, et al. Reappraisal of the incidence rate of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies on the basis of molecular diagnosis. Neuroepidemiology. 1993;12(6):326–30. Epub 1993/01/01. pmid:8309507.
  10. 10. Emery AE. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases--a world survey. Neuromuscul Disord. 1991;1(1):19–29. Epub 1991/01/01. pmid:1822774.
  11. 11. Collins CA, Morgan JE. Duchenne's muscular dystrophy: animal models used to investigate pathogenesis and develop therapeutic strategies. Int J Exp Pathol. 2003;84(4):165–72. Epub 2003/11/25. pmid:14632630.
  12. 12. Bulfield G, Siller WG, Wight PA, Moore KJ. X chromosome-linked muscular dystrophy (mdx) in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984;81(4):1189–92. Epub 1984/02/01. pmid:6583703; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC344791.
  13. 13. McArdle A, Edwards RH, Jackson MJ. How does dystrophin deficiency lead to muscle degeneration?—evidence from the mdx mouse. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 1995;5(6):445–56. Epub 1995/11/01. pmid:8580726.
  14. 14. Cooper BJ, Winand NJ, Stedman H, Valentine BA, Hoffman EP, Kunkel LM, et al. The homologue of the Duchenne locus is defective in X-linked muscular dystrophy of dogs. Nature. 1988;334(6178):154–6. Epub 1988/07/14. pmid:3290691.
  15. 15. Winand NJ, Edwards M, Pradhan D, Berian CA, Cooper BJ. Deletion of the dystrophin muscle promoter in feline muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 1994;4(5–6):433–45. Epub 1994/09/01. pmid:7881288.
  16. 16. Granato M, van Eeden FJ, Schach U, Trowe T, Brand M, Furutani-Seiki M, et al. Genes controlling and mediating locomotion behavior of the zebrafish embryo and larva. Development. 1996;123:399–413. Epub 1996/12/01. pmid:9007258.
  17. 17. Bassett D, Currie PD. Identification of a zebrafish model of muscular dystrophy. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2004;31(8):537–40. Epub 2004/08/10. pmid:15298547.
  18. 18. Guyon JR, Goswami J, Jun SJ, Thorne M, Howell M, Pusack T, et al. Genetic isolation and characterization of a splicing mutant of zebrafish dystrophin. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(1):202–11. Epub 2008/10/30. pmid:18957474; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2644651.
  19. 19. Kettleborough RN, Busch-Nentwich EM, Harvey SA, Dooley CM, de Bruijn E, van Eeden F, et al. A systematic genome-wide analysis of zebrafish protein-coding gene function. Nature. 2013;496(7446):494–7. pmid:23594742; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3743023.
  20. 20. Gibbs EM, Horstick EJ, Dowling JJ. Swimming into prominence: the zebrafish as a valuable tool for studying human myopathies and muscular dystrophies. Febs J. 2013;280(17):4187–97. Epub 2013/07/03. pmid:23809187.
  21. 21. Coffey AJ, Roberts RG, Green ED, Cole CG, Butler R, Anand R, et al. Construction of a 2.6-Mb contig in yeast artificial chromosomes spanning the human dystrophin gene using an STS-based approach. Genomics. 1992;12(3):474–84. Epub 1992/03/01. pmid:1559699.
  22. 22. Monaco AP, Walker AP, Millwood I, Larin Z, Lehrach H. A yeast artificial chromosome contig containing the complete Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Genomics. 1992;12(3):465–73. Epub 1992/03/01. pmid:1559698.
  23. 23. Koenig M, Monaco AP, Kunkel LM. The complete sequence of dystrophin predicts a rod-shaped cytoskeletal protein. Cell. 1988;53(2):219–28. Epub 1988/04/22. pmid:3282674.
  24. 24. Abmayr S, Chamberlain J. The Structure and Function of Dystrophin. In: Winder SJ, editor. Molecular Mechanisms of Muscular Dystrophies: Eurekah; 2005.
  25. 25. Banks GB, Judge LM, Allen JM, Chamberlain JS. The polyproline site in hinge 2 influences the functional capacity of truncated dystrophins. PLoS Genet. 6(5):e1000958. Epub 2010/05/27. pmid:20502633.
  26. 26. Tome FM, Matsumura K, Chevallay M, Campbell KP, Fardeau M. Expression of dystrophin-associated glycoproteins during human fetal muscle development: a preliminary immunocytochemical study. Neuromuscular disorders: NMD. 1994;4(4):343–8. Epub 1994/07/01. pmid:7981591.
  27. 27. Chevron MP, Girard F, Claustres M, Demaille J. Expression and subcellular localization of dystrophin in skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscles during the human development. Neuromuscul Disord. 1994;4(5–6):419–32. pmid:7881287.
  28. 28. Miranda AF, Bonilla E, Martucci G, Moraes CT, Hays AP, Dimauro S. Immunocytochemical study of dystrophin in muscle cultures from patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and unaffected control patients. Am J Pathol. 1988;132(3):410–6. Epub 1988/09/01. pmid:3046367; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1880758.
  29. 29. Webb SE, Cheung CC, Chan CM, Love DR, Miller AL. Application of complementary luminescent and fluorescent imaging techniques to visualize nuclear and cytoplasmic Ca(2)(+) signalling during the in vivo differentiation of slow muscle cells in zebrafish embryos under normal and dystrophic conditions. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2012;39(1):78–86. Epub 2011/08/10. pmid:21824171.
  30. 30. Kishi S, Bayliss PE, Uchiyama J, Koshimizu E, Qi J, Nanjappa P, et al. The identification of zebrafish mutants showing alterations in senescence-associated biomarkers. pmid:PLoS Genet. 2008;4(8):e1000152. Epub 2008/08/16. pmid:18704191; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2515337.
  31. 31. Pagnon-Minot A, Malbouyres M, Haftek-Terreau Z, Kim HR, Sasaki T, Thisse C, et al. Collagen XV, a novel factor in zebrafish notochord differentiation and muscle development. Dev Biol. 2008;316(1):21–35. Epub 2008/02/19. pmid:18281032.
  32. 32. Bohm S, Jin H, Hughes SM, Roberts RG, Hinits Y. Dystrobrevin and dystrophin family gene expression in zebrafish. Gene Expr Patterns. 2008;8(2):71–8. pmid:18042440.
  33. 33. Jacoby AS, Busch-Nentwich E, Bryson-Richardson RJ, Hall TE, Berger J, Berger S, et al. The zebrafish dystrophic mutant softy maintains muscle fibre viability despite basement membrane rupture and muscle detachment. Development. 2009;136(19):3367–76. Epub 2009/09/09. pmid:19736328; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2739150.
  34. 34. Berger J, Berger S, Jacoby AS, Wilton SD, Currie PD. Evaluation of exon-skipping strategies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy utilizing dystrophin-deficient zebrafish. J Cell Mol Med. 2011;15(12):2643–51. Epub 2011/01/22. pmid:21251213.
  35. 35. Berger J, Berger S, Hall TE, Lieschke GJ, Currie PD. Dystrophin-deficient zebrafish feature aspects of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy pathology. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010;20(12):826–32. Epub 2010/09/21. doi: S0960-8966(10)00591-2 [pii] pmid:20850317.
  36. 36. Bolanos-Jimenez F, Bordais A, Behra M, Strahle U, Sahel J, Rendon A. Dystrophin and Dp71, two products of the DMD gene, show a different pattern of expression during embryonic development in zebrafish. Mech Dev. 2001;102(1–2):239–41. Epub 2001/04/05. pmid:11287201.
  37. 37. Chambers SP, Dodd A, Overall R, Sirey T, Lam LT, Morris GE, et al. Dystrophin in adult zebrafish muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;286(3):478–83. Epub 2001/08/21. S0006-291X(01)95424-5 [pii]. pmid:11511083.
  38. 38. Dubrulle J, Pourquie O. Coupling segmentation to axis formation. Development. 2004;131(23):5783–93. Epub 2004/11/13. pmid:15539483.
  39. 39. Stickney HL, Barresi MJ, Devoto SH. Somite development in zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 2000;219(3):287–303. Epub 2000/11/07. pmid:11066087.
  40. 40. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203(3):253–310. Epub 1995/07/01. pmid:8589427.
  41. 41. Bassett DI, Bryson-Richardson RJ, Daggett DF, Gautier P, Keenan DG, Currie PD. Dystrophin is required for the formation of stable muscle attachments in the zebrafish embryo. Development. 2003;130(23):5851–60. Epub 2003/10/24. pmid:14573513.
  42. 42. Trinh LA, Hochgreb T, Graham M, Wu D, Ruf-Zamojski F, Jayasena CS, et al. A versatile gene trap to visualize and interrogate the function of the vertebrate proteome. Genes Dev. 2011;25(21):2306–20. Epub 2011/11/08. pmid:22056673.
  43. 43. Westerfield M. The Zebrafish Book. Edition 2.1 ed. Eugene OR: University Oregon Press; 1994.
  44. 44. Megason SG. In toto imaging of embryogenesis with confocal time-lapse microscopy. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;546:317–32. Epub 2009/04/21. pmid:19378112; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2826616.
  45. 45. Guyon JR, Mosley AN, Zhou Y, O'Brien KF, Sheng X, Chiang K, et al. The dystrophin associated protein complex in zebrafish. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(6):601–15. Epub 2003/03/07. pmid:12620966.
  46. 46. Trinh LA, McCutchen MD, Bonner-Fraser M, Fraser SE, Bumm LA, McCauley DW. Fluorescent in situ hybridization employing the conventional NBT/BCIP chromogenic stain. Biotechnique. 2007;42(6):756–9.
  47. 47. Choi HM, Beck VA, Pierce NA. Next-generation in situ hybridization chain reaction: higher gain, lower cost, greater durability. ACS Nano. 2014;8(5):4284–94. Epub 2014/04/10. pmid:24712299.
  48. 48. Choi HM, Chang JY, Trinh LA, Padilla JE, Fraser SE, Pierce NA. Programmable in situ amplification for multiplexed imaging of mRNA expression. Nature biotechnology. 2010;28(11):1208–12. Epub 2010/11/03. pmid:21037591; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3058322.
  49. 49. Wein N, Vulin A, Falzarano MS, Szigyarto CA, Maiti B, Findlay A, et al. Translation from a DMD exon 5 IRES results in a functional dystrophin isoform that attenuates dystrophinopathy in humans and mice. Nat Med. 2014;20(9):992–1000. Epub 2014/08/12. doi: nm.3628 [pii] pmid:25108525.
  50. 50. Hall TE, Bryson-Richardson RJ, Berger S, Jacoby AS, Cole NJ, Hollway GE, et al. The zebrafish candyfloss mutant implicates extracellular matrix adhesion failure in laminin alpha2-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(17):7092–7. Epub 2007/04/18. pmid:17438294; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1855385.
  51. 51. Etard C, Roostalu U, Strahle U. Lack of Apobec2-related proteins causes a dystrophic muscle phenotype in zebrafish embryos. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;189(3):527–39. Epub 2010/05/05. pmid:20440001; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2867308.
  52. 52. Mitsui T, Kawai H, Shono M, Kawajiri M, Kunishige M, Saito S. Preferential subsarcolemmal localization of dystrophin and beta-dystroglycan mRNA in human skeletal muscles. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56(1):94–101. pmid:8990133.
  53. 53. Thisse B, Pflumio S, Fürthauer M, Loppin B, Heyer V, Degrave A, et al. Expression of the zebrafish genome during embryogenesis. In: Submission ZDD, editor. 2001.
  54. 54. Pearson M, Elsdale T. Somitogenesis in amphibian embryos. I. Experimental evidence for an interaction between two temporal factors in the specification of somite pattern. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1979;51:27–50. Epub 1979/06/01. pmid:314486.
  55. 55. Primmett DR, Stern CD, Keynes RJ. Heat shock causes repeated segmental anomalies in the chick embryo. Development. 1988;104(2):331–9. Epub 1988/10/01. pmid:3254821.
  56. 56. Roy MN, Prince VE, Ho RK. Heat shock produces periodic somitic disturbances in the zebrafish embryo. Mech Dev. 1999;85(1–2):27–34. Epub 1999/07/23. pmid:10415344.
  57. 57. Snow CJ, Henry CA. Dynamic formation of microenvironments at the myotendinous junction correlates with muscle fiber morphogenesis in zebrafish. Gene expression patterns: GEP. 2009;9(1):37–42. Epub 2008/09/12. pmid:18783736; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2655214.
  58. 58. Srinivas BP, Woo J, Leong WY, Roy S. A conserved molecular pathway mediates myoblast fusion in insects and vertebrates. Nat Genet. 2007;39(6):781–6. Epub 2007/05/29. pmid:17529975.
  59. 59. Mor A, Suliman S, Ben-Yishay R, Yunger S, Brody Y, Shav-Tal Y. Dynamics of single mRNP nucleocytoplasmic transport and export through the nuclear pore in living cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2010;12(6):543–52. Epub 2010/05/11. pmid:20453848.