The anterior-posterior patterning of the vertebrate limb bud requires closely coordinated signaling interactions, including Sonic Hedgehog (Shh)-mediated counteraction of the Gli3 transcription factor in the distal and posterior mesenchyme of the limb bud. Suppressor of Fused (Sufu), an intracellular negative regulator of Shh signaling via Gli2 and Gli3, is implicated in early development of the mouse limb bud. However, how Sufu is involved in the genetic regulation of limb bud patterning still remains elusive. In this study, we show that the conditional deletion of Sufu in the mesenchyme of the early limb bud results in polydactyly with loss of digit identity and supernumerary bones in the wrist and the ankle. These pattern alterations are associated with anterior expansion of HoxD genes located at the 5’ end of the cluster. By focusing on gene expression analysis of Shh/Gremlin1/Fgf signaling critical for the establishment and maintenance of anterior-posterior patterning, we show that early response to loss of Sufu involves anterior prolongation of Fgf4 and Fgf8 expression in the apical ectodermal ridge at E10.5. We also reveal the anterior activation of Shh-dependent posterior markers Ptc1, Gli1 and Gremlin in limb buds lacking Sufu. Furthermore, we find that loss of Sufu leads to attenuated levels of repressor Gli2 and repressor Gli3 in the early limb bud. Moreover, expression of Hand2 is activated in the entire limb bud at the early outgrowth stage in the mutant lacking Sufu. Thus, we provide evidence that Sufu is involved in the genetic network that restricts the posterior expression of Gli2/3/Hand2 and Gremlin/Fgf in limb bud patterning.
Citation: Li J, Wang Q, Cui Y, Yang X, Li Y, Zhang X, et al. (2015) Suppressor of Fused Is Required for Determining Digit Number and Identity via Gli3/Fgfs/Gremlin. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0128006. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128006
Academic Editor: Moises Mallo, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, PORTUGAL
Received: October 28, 2014; Accepted: April 21, 2015; Published: May 22, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by the following grants: The National Natural Science Foundation of China (31201089),(31071287) and (31371471); The Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LZ12C12002); and Science and Technology Support of Zhejing (2013C37024). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Anterior-posterior (A-P) patterning and outgrowth of the vertebrate limb bud are coordinated by two critical centers during limb bud development [1–3]: the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA) [4, 5] in the posterior mesenchyme and the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) in the distal ectoderm . Sonic hedgehog (Shh), the secreted signal molecule, is expressed in the ZPA and is sufficient for the determination of polarizing activity . When Shh is ectopically expressed in the anterior limb bud mesenchyme, digit duplications are induced, resulting in extra digits (polydactyly) . Recent studies have established that two critical regulatory signaling pathways, closely coordinated between Shh and Fibroblast Growth Factors (FGFs), are critical for the determination of limb bud patterning. In these models, Gremlin, the secreted antagonist for Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMPs), relays Shh signaling from the posterior mesenchyme and positively regulates the expression of Fgfs (Fgf4 and Fgf8) in the AER [7, 8]. The AER, by releasing FGFs, is required for underlying mesenchymal proliferation and survival . FGFs in turn maintain the expression of Shh in the posterior mesenchyme [2, 3]. They act as transcription feedback loops in the transcriptional regulation of each other [1–3, 7].
Shh signaling in the vertebrate is mediated by Gli transcription factors (Gli1-3) , Glis in turn induce the expression of Shh targets including Gli1 and Ptc1 [9, 10]. Among these Glis, Gli3 is the only one essential for patterning of the limb bud, while the targeted deletion for Gli1 or Gli2 displays normal limb development comparable to the wild type [9, 11–13]. Mutations of GLI3 in humans are associated with malformation of limb development [14, 15]. Distinct genetic deficiencies of Gli3 allele in mice exhibit the polydactylous phenotypes [16–18]. Notably, homozygous Gli3 -/- displays more severe pre-axial polydactyly than heterozygous Gli3+/- , indicating that Gli3 functions as a regulator in the identity of digit patterning along the posterior to anterior axis.
It has been shown that genetic antagonism of Gli3 is required for the restriction of posterior mesenchymal expression of transcription factors Hand2 and 5’ end HoxD clusters [11, 20], leading to the pre-patterning the posterior-anterior mesenchyme prior to the induction of Shh [2, 11, 20]. The absence of Shh signaling promotes formation of the Gli3 repressor (Gli3R) by proteolytic cleavage of the full-length Gli3 (Gli3F) [21, 22]. The level of Gli3R was inhibited by premature activation of Shh signaling that caused the AER’s and the ZPA's failure to form . Thus, in the early pre-patterning limb bud, Gli3R represents the majority of Gli3 in the anterior mesenchyme [22, 23].
In mammals, Suppressor of Fused (Sufu), an intracellular PEST-domain- containing protein, is the negative regulator of Gli activities, both in the presence and absence of cilia [24–26]. Biochemical analyses have established that in the absence of Shh signal, Sufu restrains Gli3 in the cytoplasm, promoting its processing into a repressor. Binding of hedgehog ligands triggers the dissociation of Sufu from Gli3, thus preventing the formation of Gli3R and allows Gli3 to move into the nucleus as an activator [26–28]. Targeted ablation of mouse Sufu results in global activation of hedgehog signaling and early embryonic lethality, indicating that Sufu is critical for mouse development [29, 30]. Inactivation of Sufu has revealed its critical roles in embryonic patterning, including ventralization of the neural tube [29, 30] and impaired mid-hindbrain patterning . It is noted that Sufu is mostly expressed in developing embryonic structures where the patterning is under control by Shh signaling, including in the developing limb bud [32, 33]. However, how Sufu is genetically involved in the anterior-posterior limb bud patterning surprisingly remains elusive.
In the current study, we approach the genetic roles of Sufu in regulating early limb bud patterning by using Dermo1-Cre mediated tissue specific deletion of Sufu in the limb bud mesenchyme. We show that the ablation of Sufu leads to the polydactylous digit defect, indicating the functional requirement of Sufu for determination of digit number and identity. We further demonstrate that the Shh signaling/Gremlin/Fgfs are ectopically expanded to the anterior limb bud in the Sufu mutant. Notably, the levels of Gli2R and Gli3R are reduced in the Sufu mutant, coincident with the ectopic expression of Hand2. Our study suggests that Sufu is integrated into the gene network that restricts the activation and maintenance of the Shh pathway to the posterior limb bud mesenchyme.
Materials and Methods
All animal experiments were carried out in strict accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals at Hangzhou Normal University, and were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of (HNLA-2012-125). Mice were routinely maintained in a specific pathogen free (SPF) animal facility and received access to water and chow ad libidum. Enough space was provided for mice that no more than 5 animals were kept in a small cage and 10 animals in a large cage. The mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation for sample collection. All efforts were made to minimize the usage quantity of the mice. There was no in vivo animal experiment in our study.
Exon 7 of the mouse Sufu gene was flanked by two LoxP sites to generate a conditional Sufu targeting mouse strain (S1 Fig). Homozygote (Sufufx/fx) mice are maintained on C57BL/6/129 background. Dermo1-Cre and EIIa-Cre mice and R26R mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Maine), and maintained on a C57BL/6 background. The morning when vaginal plugs were detected was considered as embryonic day zero. Totally, about 20 male and 320 female mice were used for sample collection.
Skeletal preparation and digit analysis
Skeletal preparations with Alcian blue and Alizarin red staining were performed as previously described . Briefly, skinned mice were fixed in 100% ethanol for 2 days, dehydrated in 100% ethanol and acetone for 2 days. Samples were stained in mixture solution composing of 1 volume (vol) of 0.1% Alcian Blue, 1 vol 0.1% Alizarin Red solution, 1 vol acetic acid, 17 vol ethanol. Samples were then treated by KOH and cleared by glycerol.
Criteria for determination digit number and limb pattern
The criteria as described by Joyner and colleagues  were modified and used for the determination of digit number and autopod patterning in this study. According to these criteria, the term “digit” in this manuscript means a complete distal-proximal digit ray, composed of a metacarpal/metatarsal bone in the proximal side and associated phalanges on the distal side. Cartilaginous fragments forming in the metatarsal position without ossification are not termed as digits.
X-gal staining and in situ hybridization
To detect the Cre activity in embryonic limb buds, embryos carrying R26R/Dermo1-Cre alleles were collected and fixed for whole mount and cryostat section X-Gal staining as previously described [35, 36]. For detection of gene expression pattern, embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) overnight. Whole mount and section in situ hybridization were performed following the procedures as previously described [34, 35].
Immunohistochemistry and western blot analyses
To detect the expression of Sufu in the wild type and Sufu mutant limb buds, the samples with horizontal paraffin sections were subjected to immunohistochemical analysis with Sufu antibody (1:200) according to the method depicted previously . For immunoblot analysis, whole cell protein lysates were prepared from dissected embryonic limb buds at embryonic day 10.25 (E10.25), E10.5, and E11.5. 40 μg of protein lysates were run on a 7.5% PAGE gel and transferred onto membrane for blot analysis as described previously . Sufu antibody (1:1000) and Gli2 antibody (1:1000) were purchased from Abcam (ab52913 and ab26056, respectively). Gli3 antibody (1:1000) was from R&D System (AF3690). The gray values of immunoblot bands were evaluated with Image-Pro Plus software (version 6.0). The relative expression level of a protein was calculated by dividing its gray value by that of the corresponding reference protein. The significance of expression differentiation between wild type and mutant samples was analyzed with Student’s t test.
Results and Discussion
Sufu is expressed in the limb bud mesenchyme during early development
Whole mount in situ hybridization was conducted in the developing limb buds between E9.5 and E11.5 to display the Sufu RNA expression using mouse Sufu riboprobe. Sufu transcripts were found in limb buds throughout these stages (Fig 1A, 1C and S2 Fig), consistent with previous observations in chick and mice [32, 33] and predominantly expressed in the mesenchyme and slightly in the ectoderm (S2 Fig).
A-D: Whole mount in situ hybridization shows the expression of Sufu in fore- (A, B) and hind- (C, D) limb buds at E10.5. Noted the significantly reduced Sufu transcript in the SufuDermo1Cre mutant limb buds (B, D), in comparison with the wild type (A, C). E-F: Immunohistochemical staining of the limb bud section using antibody against Sufu protein in wild type (E) and SufuDermo1Cre(F). G-L: X-Gal staining of R26R/Dermo1-Cre. Whole-mount samples show Cre activity in the limb buds (G-I). J and K are sections of H and I, respectively. L is a horizontal section of I. Note the weaker staining in the core mesenchyme of the forelimb bud (arrowhead in J), compared to the hind limb bud (K). No Cre activity was detected in the limb bud epithelium (arrows in J and K). Mes: mesenchyme; Epi: epithelium; FL: forelimb bud; HL: hind limb bud.
Sufu null mutants are lethal before limb bud outgrowth [29, 30]. To elucidate the genetic role of Sufu in limb bud development, we generated a conditional Sufu targeting mouse strain by flanking exon 7 with two LoxP sites (Sufuflox) (S1 Fig). The EIIa-cre mouse line carrying a cre transgene under the control of the adenovirus EIIa promoter was used for germ line deletion of the LoxP-flanked Sufu gene . Deletion of Sufu with EIIa-Cre mouse led to embryonic lethality at E9.5 with the same phenotype as Sufu null mutants [29, 30], indicating a loss of Sufu function (S1 Fig). Ablation of Sufu in the limb bud mesenchyme was achieved by crossing Sufuflox to mouse line carrying Dermo1-Cre allele to generate Sufufx/fx/Dermo1-Cre (SufuDermo1Cre). The X-Gal staining of Sufufx/+/R26R reporter mice showed that Dermo1-Cre line exhibited weaker Cre recombination activity in the forelimb bud mesenchyme at E9.5, but this activity strengthened in majority of the mesenchyme in both fore- and hind limbs at E10.5 (Fig 1G–1L). Whole mount in situ hybridization showed that Sufu expression was significantly diminished in SufuDermo1Cre limb buds, in comparison with wild type (Fig 1A–1D). Immunohistochemical staining of SufuDermo1Cre mutant also confirmed that Sufu protein was indeed absent in the limb bud mesenchyme but retained in the epithelium (Fig 1E and 1F), indicating a Dermo1-Cre targeted removal of Sufu in the mesenchyme.
Loss of Sufu in the limb bud mesenchyme results in polydactyly
SufuDermo1Cre mice died shortly after birth due to the craniofacial defects (data not shown). Mutant pups developed grossly observable abnormalities on the digit pattern for both forelimbs and hind limbs, compared to wild type controls (Fig 2A–2D). To assess the defects in detail, skeletal staining with Alcian Blue for cartilage and Alizarin Red for ossified bone were performed at E16.5 and P0. The autopod skeletons of wild type mice are asymmetrically arranged such that digit one consists of two phalanges; the four posterior digits consist of three phalanges. There is proper articulation between the proximal phalange and its adjoining metapodial elements (metatarsal and metacarpal) and between each phalange (Fig 2E, 2I, 2G and 2K). SufuDermo1Cre mutant limbs developed polydactlylous autopods (Fig 2F, 2J, 2H and 2L). The forelimb in SufuDermo1Cre exhibited splitting of the anterior-most cartilaginous digit forming the distal-most bifurcations (arrowheads in Fig 2F and 2J, n = 10/10). Digits 2–4 are all composed of three phalanges were always distinguishable (Fig 2F and 2J, n = 10/10), while the posterior-most digit was always a poorly differentiated cartilaginous element without identifiable phalanges (Fig 2F and 2J, 10/10). Mutant hind limbs (9/10) contained 7–8 digits that completely lacked identity (Fig 2H and 2L), in comparison with the wild type (Fig 2G and 2K), indicating the requirement of Sufu for the determination of the digit number and anterior/posterior polarity. The polydactyly in mutant hind limb was more severe than in the mutant forelimb (Fig 2F, 2H, 2J, and 2L), which might be caused by differential Cre activity between the fore- and hind-limb buds (Fig 1J and 1K). Moreover, the articulations between the metatarsal and metacarpal bones in the mutant limb were poorly differentiated compared to that in the wild type limb (Fig 2E–2L). Skeletal preparations also revealed that the bone ossification in the phalanges was delayed (Fig 2I–2L), which was similar to that of Gli3 deficiency [11, 18, 20].
A-D: Abnormalities of autopods in SufuDermo1Cre. E-T: Skeletal preparations of Alcian blue/Alizarin Red staining show the alteration of digit number and identity. Note the varying abnormalities in the fore- and hind limbs. Split of the anterior-most digit occurred in forelimb of the Sufu mutant (F, J versus E, I and arrowheads). Mutant hind limb developed 7 digits with complete loss of identity (H, L versus G, K). Phalangeal numbers distal to the metatarsals/metacarpals are not distinguishable in mutants (J, L versus I, K in wild type). Both fore- and hind limbs developed supernumerary bone elements in the wrist and the ankle of the mutant (N, P versus M, O in wild type). Note that the forelimb developed thicker radius (R versus Q), while the hind limb contained splitting of both the fibula and tibia (T versus S).
Sufu deletion resulted in limbs with supernumerary tarsal/carpal bones
One unexpected limb defect in SufuDermo1Cre was the formation of the supernumerary tarsals and carpals (Fig 2M–2P). These supernumerary bones are unidentifiable as defined bones due to incomparable shape to corresponding bones in the wild type (Fig 2M and 2O). These phenotypes were found neither in Gli3 null mutants [11, 19], nor in the constitutive activator/repressor Gli3 mutants [16, 17]. Moreover, the radius in the mutant forelimb was overgrown (Fig 2Q and 2R), and the tibia and fibula in the mutant hind limbs seem to be split in most of the mutants (Fig 2S and 2T) (10/12). These data suggest the requirement of Sufu for patterning of both the autopod and the zeugopod, consistent with its function in mediating the chondrocyte differentiation in the long bone growth plate .
Sufu deficiency disrupted the posterior restriction of 5’ HoxD gene expression
The posterior nested expression of 5’HoxD transcription factors were critically regulated in limb patterning. HoxD11 is critical for zeugopod and carpal/tarsal patterning, while HoxD12 and HoxD13 are essential for autopod patterning [16, 39]. In mouse limb development, HoxD11 is critical for zeuogopod and carpal/tarsal patterning. In SufuDermo1Cre limb buds, HoxD11 expression was anteriorly up-regulated in both the fore- and hind-limb buds at E11.5 and E12.5 (Fig 3A–3H), suggesting a molecular alteration for excessive growth of the zeugopod. In early limb buds during E11.5 and E12.5, HoxD12 expression in the wild type was restricted to the posterior mesenchyme (Fig 3I, 3M, 3K and 3O), corresponding to digit condensations except digit 1. HoxD13 was expressed similarly but more anteriorly than HoxD12 at E11.5 and in all digit condensations at E12.5 (Fig 3Q, 3U, 3S and 3W). However, transcript localizations of all three HoxD genes were anteriorly expanded in SufuDermo1Cre (arrowheads in Fig 3B, 3F, 3D, 3H, 3J, 3N, 3L, 3P, 3R, 3V, 3T and 3X), which suggest an altered spatial expression of 5’HoxD genes in early and late patterning of limb buds.
A-X: Whole-mount in situ hybridization of limb buds showing the alteration of HoxD11, HoxD12, and HoxD13 in SufuDermo1Cre at E11.5 (A-D; I-L; Q-T) and E12.5 (E-H; M-P; U-X). Note the anteriorly expanded expression for all three genes.
Sufu deletion causes anterior expansion of AER and ZPA activity
Most polydactylous limb phenotypes, if not all, are associated with the alteration of limb bud polarity. AER and ZPA are two signaling centers that control the early limb bud polarities. To identify the genes involved in the development of polydactylous defects in SufuDermo1Cre, we analyzed the expression of molecules that are potentially involved in AER and ZPA signaling interactions before manifestation of any morphological defects.
Fgf4 expression within the AER was anteriorly expanded in SufuDermo1Cre in early patterning limb buds at E10.5 (Fig 4C and 4G) in comparison with that in the wild type (Fig 4A and 4E). At E11.5, when Fgf4 was down-regulated in the AER of the wild type control (Fig 4B and 4F), its transcripts in SufuDermo1Cre was detected in the anterior ectoderm (Fig 4D and 4H). Fgf8 was expressed in the entire AER at E10.5 in the wild type limb bud, along the anterior/posterior axis (Fig 4I, 4I’, 4M, 4M’). At E11.5, the thickness of the AER and the expression of Fgf8 were decreased in the wild type (Fig 4J, 4J’, 4N and 4N’). However, in SufuDermo1Cre, Fgf8 expression was intensified in the anterior-most ectodermal ridge of fore- and hind limb buds at both stages (Fig 4K, 4K’, 4L, 4L’, 4O, 4O’, 4P and 4P’). Thus, the anterior expansion of Fgf4 and up-regulation of Fgf8 in the AER reflects the expanded AER in SufuDermo1Cre.
A-H: Whole-mount in situ hybridization of limb buds showing the expression of Fgf4 in the AER was anteriorly expanded in SufuDermo1Cre. The Fgf4 transcript in the anterior AER was detected at E10.5 (arrowheads in C, G versus A, E in the wild type), which became evident at E11. 5 (arrowheads in D, H versus B, F in the wild type). I-P: Fgf8 expression along the AER was intensified and expanded in SufuDermo1Cre (K, O, L, P versus I, M, J, N in the wild type). I’-P': Front views of AER (inserts in I-P, respectively).
Our data revealed that in contrast to the wild type forelimb bud, where the Shh was undetectable from E11.5 and on, in the Sufu mutant, Shh was still detectable in the posterior forelimb bud at E11.5 (S3 Fig). Interestingly, Shh was also detected in the anterior forelimb bud of the Sufu mutant at E11.5, albeit weakly, and becomes more evident at E12.5 (S3 Fig). Thus, our results indicate an ectopic activation of Shh expression in the absence of Sufu. There were no differences in the Shh expression pattern in the hind limb buds (S3 Fig). Additionally, expression of Gli1 and Ptc1, two downstream target genes of Shh, were altered in limb buds lacking Sufu. The expression of Gli1 was anteriorly activated by E11.5 (Fig 5C and 5D versus 5A and 5B in wild type and S4 Fig). Anterior expansion of Ptc1 was detected in E11.5 mutant limb buds (Fig 5G and 5H versus 5E and 5F in wild type and S4 Fig). In brief, our data revealed up-regulation of Shh signaling in limb buds lacking Sufu. It has been known that during limb bud patterning Shh maintains Fgf expression in the posterior AER through positively regulating expression of Gremlin in the posterior mesenchyme to counteract the negative regulation of BMP [2, 3]. The expression of Gremlin was anteriorly expanded in both the fore- and hind limb buds in SufuDermo1Cre by E10.5 (Fig 5K and 5O), compared to in wild type littermates (Fig 5I and 5M). In the E11.5 mutant limb bud, ectopically expressed Gremlin RNA was detected in the distal mesenchyme along the anterior and posterior axis (Fig 5L and 5P versus 5J and 5N in wild type). These data thus suggest that the Shh/Fgf signaling loop is ectopically activated in the anterior limb bud in mutants lacking Sufu, which indicates that Sufu is integrated in the Shh pathway to maintain the posterior-anterior patterning. The ectopically activated posterior markers Shh, Gli1, Ptc1, and Gremlin in the anterior limb bud, together with the anterior expanded Fgf4 and Fgf8 within the AER account for the development of the polydactylous digit pattern in SufuDermo1Cre.
A-H: Whole mount in situ hybridization of hind limb buds showing the expression of Shh targeted genes. The expressions of Gli1 (A, B and arrowheads in C, D) and Ptc1 (E, F and arrowheads in G, H) were activated in the anterior limb bud mesenchyme in SufuDermo1Cre. I-P: Whole-mount in situ hybridization of limb buds showing that Gremlin expression was anteriorly expanded in both the fore- (K, L and arrowheads versus I, J) and hind limb buds (O, P and arrowheads versus M, N).
Sufu deficiency results in the down-regulation of repressor Gli2/Gli3
Our in situ hybridization showed that the level of Gli3 transcripts was not obviously changed in the SufuDermo1Cre limb bud (Fig 6A–6H), consistent with a previous study  in Prx1-Cre;Sufuf/- mutants where Sufu was also ablated in the mesenchyme of the early limb bud , suggesting that limb bud patterning defects might be due to the altered Gli3 in protein level. To examine the impact of Sufu deficiency on Gli3 forms in the early limb bud, we analyzed the protein lysates extracted from limb buds at E10.25, E10.5, and E11.5 by Western blot. Our results (n≥3) showed that there was a clear decrease in Gli3R level in the SufuDermo1Cre mutant compared to the wild type at E10.25 and E11.5 (Fig 6Q and S5 Fig), while there were no obvious variations of Gli3F compared to wild type control (Fig 6Q). Semi-quantitative analysis confirmed the reduction of Gli3R in the mutant at E10.25, E11.5, as well as E10.5 (Fig 6R). Given Sufu is a negative modulator promoting Gli3R formation in the absence of Shh , the anterior reduction of Gli3 repressor (Fig 6Q and 6R) in the Sufu mutant limb bud at E10.25 could be a consequence of Sufu loss of function. To further distinguish the Sufu and Shh regulation of Gli3 in the anterior and posterior regions, the forelimb buds at E10.25 and E10.5, when Shh was constrained in the posterior region, were divided into two halves along the central axis. Western blot analysis revealed that the Gli3R was primarily located in the anterior forelimb bud (S5 Fig). However, the decrease of Gli3R was more evident in the posterior region, likely related to different levels of Sufu deletion (S5 Fig and Fig 1). Nonetheless, our data confirmed that Sufu modulates Gli3R in early limb bud patterning, consistent with the recent report that showed failed establishment of A-P limb polarity with ectopic expression of posterior markers in the anterior of limb bud and down-regulation of anterior molecular markers in limb buds lacking Sufu .
A-P: Whole-mount in situ hybridization showing the expression of Gli3 and Hand2. Expression of Gli3 in limb buds of the Sufu mutant (C, D, G, H) was comparable to the wild type (A, B, E, F). Anterior expansion of Hand2 transcript was exhibited at E11.5 (L, P and arrowheads), compared to the wild type (J, N). Note the global distribution of Hand2 transcripts in the entire hind limb bud (P versus L for forelimb bud). Q: Western blots show the decreased Gli2R protein (arrowhead) and Gli3R protein (arrowhead) in limb bud lysates at E10.25. R: Semi-quantitative analysis of the expression of Gli3R in Sufu mutant (M) limb buds compared with wild type (Wt). Student’s t test of significance with *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
While anterior Gli3R acts primarily in the establishment of limb A-P patterning [11, 12], Gli2Fcan compensate for Gli3F in posterior limb patterning . To examine whether Sufu modulates Gli2R and Gli2F, we also analyzed the Gli2 protein by Western blot. Similar to Gli3R, the level of Gli2 (Gli2R) was reduced in the E10.25 SufuDermo1Cre limb buds (Fig 6Q). However, the Sufu deletion did not impact the level of full length Gli2 (Gli2F) (Fig 6Q). These data suggest that Sufu modulates the balance between the repressor and full-length forms of both Gli3 and Gli2 in the early limb bud, consistent with previous literature [18, 23].
To further examine whether loss of Sufu affects the establishment of A-P limb bud polarity through altering the antagonistic action of Gli3R and Hand2 in SufuDermo1Cre, we examined the expression level of posterior marker Hand2. Coincident with the reduced Gli3 in the anterior mesenchyme, the expression of Hand2 was ectopically activated in the anterior forelimb bud at E11.5 of SufuDermo1Cre (Fig 6I–6L), while the Hand2 transcripts are localized throughout the hind limb bud (Fig 6M–6P). Taken together, these data suggest that the establishment of A-P limb pattern is abrogated in the mutant limb bud lacking Sufu [20, 23]. To confirm this possibility, we examined the expression of Pax9, an anterior marker downstream of Gli3 in the development of the anterior autopod [40, 41]. In situ hybridization exhibited that the Pax9 expression in anterior limb buds was diminished in SufuDermo1Cre limb buds at E11.5 (S6 Fig), suggesting the altered anterior fate of the Sufu mutant limb bud.
In summary, while the essential role of Sufu in mouse development has been previously demonstrated , the in vivo genetic function of Sufu in regulation of limb bud patterning, which occurs after E9.5 in mouse embryogenesis when Sufu null-mutants die , has been unknown. By generating the mesenchyme-specific deletion of Sufu in limb buds, we present evidence that Sufu is directly involved in the determination of digit number and digit identity. Our data indicate that Sufu regulates digit patterning through the modulation of the Shh/Gli3 pathway in the early limb bud, as exhibited by the digit phenotype similar among various Gli3 mutants [16, 18, 23]. Moreover, we also demonstrate that Sufu functions as a genetic modulator of both Gli2R and Gli3R levels in early limb bud patterning, consistent with the notion of genetic quantities of Gli2 and Gli3 as activators and repressors determine the regulation of the skeletal morphogenesis, digit number and digit identity [16, 18, 23]. We found that the repressor forms of Gli2 and 3 were significantly decreased in Sufu mutant limb buds at the early patterning stage, while the full length forms remained similar between the wild type and mutant, providing in vivo evidence that Sufu is a genetic regulator of Gli2 and Gli3 isoforms critical for limb bud patterning. In addition, our data that ectopic expression of posterior markers in the anterior limb bud lacking Sufu suggest that Sufu is a negative regulator of Shh signaling in early limb bud patterning . It has been shown previously that the counteraction between Shh signaling and Gli3 determines the patterning along the anterior-posterior axis of the limb bud [16,17,21,24,40]. However, pre-patterning of the posterior specificity of the early limb bud prior to the activation of Shh signaling is established by anterior Gli3 restriction of posterior Hand2 expression . In the absence of Shh signaling, Gli3R acts to induce the AER and the ZPA, which are subsequently maintained by activated Shh signaling that antagonizes the formation of GliR, as described in detail previously [1, 11, 12, 16, 17, 23]. Unbalanced production of either Gli3R or Gli3F exhibited polysyndactyly and loss of digit identity, while the limb bud expressing both forms results in the development of a limb indistinguishable from the wild type [16, 17, 42]. On the other hand, premature activation of Shh signaling inhibited the formation of Gli3R , causing ectopic Hand2 expression in the anterior limb bud  and thus the failure to establish the anterior and posterior limb identities. Once established in the posterior limb bud, Shh signaling is the major coordinator for Gli3R and Gli3F balance. Loss of Sufu in the early limb bud prior to the activation of Shh signaling reduced the levels of Gli3R, but did not significantly affect the level of Gli3F, suggesting that Sufu is indispensable for the formation of identity and the regulation of digit number via Gli3R. Moreover, our Gli2R data indicate that Sufu modulate Gli2R in digit patterning, supporting the importance of Gli2, together with Gli3, in regulation of the limb anterior-posterior polarity .
S1 Fig. Gene targeting procedure for conditional Sufu knockout mouse.
A: In the targeting construct, exon 7 of Sufu gene was flanked by two LoxP sites. B: Homologous recombination was genotyped by PCR using primer pairs designed in (A). C: Phenotype of SufuEIIaCre at E9.5 with cephalic and neural tube defects.
S2 Fig. Expression pattern of Sufu in the early developmental stages of limb buds.
A-F: Whole-mount in situ hybridization shows expression of Sufu. Transcript is distributed in both the forelimb bud (A, C, and E) and the hind limb bud (D, F). B and B’ are horizontal sections of D and F, respectively.
S3 Fig. Shh expression in limb bud of SufuDermo1Cre.
A-J: Whole-mount in situ hybridization showing the Shh expression pattern in the Sufu mutant (D, E, I, J) and the wild type (A, B, G, H).
S4 Fig. Expression of Gli1 and Ptc1 in the forelimb bud.
A-H: Whole-mount in situ hybridization showing the anterior expansion of the Gli1 transcript (A–D) and the Ptc1 transcript (E–H).
S5 Fig. Immunoblot analysis of the effect of Sufu deletion on the Gli3 forms.
A: Western blot shows the Gli3 isoforms affected by Sufu deletion in the anterior and posterior of forelimb buds at E10.25 and E10.5. B:Semi-quantitative analysis of the expression of Gli3R in Sufu mutant (M) limb buds compared with wild type (Wt). FLA: anterior of forelimb bud; FLP: posterior of forelimb bud. Student’s t test of significance with *P<0.05, **P<0.01.
The authors thank all members of the Zhang laboratory at the Institute of Developmental and Regenerative Biology, Hangzhou Normal University for their assistance during the generation of these data. We thank the Gene targeting/transgenic core facility for technical assistance in generation of the Sufu mutant mouse line.
Conceived and designed the experiments: ZYZ JYL QHW ZZ XYZ. Performed the experiments: JYL QHW YC XQY YL XYZ. Analyzed the data: JYL QHW XQY YL XYZ ZZ ZYZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JYL MSQ ZZ QHW ZYZ. Wrote the paper: ZYZ JYL ZZ.
- 1. Zeller R, Lopez-Rios J, Zuniga A. Vertebrate limb bud development: moving towards integrative analysis of organogenesis. Nature reviews Genetics. 2009;10(12):845–58. pmid:19920852.
- 2. Panman L, Galli A, Lagarde N, Michos O, Soete G, Zuniga A, et al. Differential regulation of gene expression in the digit forming area of the mouse limb bud by SHH and gremlin 1/FGF-mediated epithelial-mesenchymal signalling. Development. 2006;133(17):3419–28. Epub 2006/08/16. 133/17/3419 [pii] pmid:16908629.
- 3. Verheyden JM, Sun X. An Fgf/Gremlin inhibitory feedback loop triggers termination of limb bud outgrowth. Nature. 2008;454(7204):638–41. pmid:18594511; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2840222.
- 4. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E, Tabin C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell. 1993;75(7):1401–16. pmid:8269518.
- 5. Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Harris MP, Simandl BK, Li Y, Beachy PA, et al. Manifestation of the limb prepattern: limb development in the absence of sonic hedgehog function. Developmental biology. 2001;236(2):421–35. pmid:11476582.
- 6. Fernandez-Teran M, Ros MA. The Apical Ectodermal Ridge: morphological aspects and signaling pathways. Int J Dev Biol. 2008;52(7):857–71. pmid:18956316.
- 7. Khokha MK, Hsu D, Brunet LJ, Dionne MS, Harland RM. Gremlin is the BMP antagonist required for maintenance of Shh and Fgf signals during limb patterning. Nature genetics. 2003;34(3):303–7. pmid:12808456.
- 8. Boulet AM, Moon AM, Arenkiel BR, Capecchi MR. The roles of Fgf4 and Fgf8 in limb bud initiation and outgrowth. Developmental biology. 2004;273(2):361–72. Epub 2004/08/26. S0012-1606(04)00428-2 [pii]. pmid:15328019.
- 9. Bai CB, Auerbach W, Lee JS, Stephen D, Joyner AL. Gli2, but not Gli1, is required for initial Shh signaling and ectopic activation of the Shh pathway. Development. 2002;129(20):4753–61. pmid:12361967.
- 10. Bai CB, Stephen D, Joyner AL. All mouse ventral spinal cord patterning by hedgehog is Gli dependent and involves an activator function of Gli3. Dev Cell. 2004;6(1):103–15. pmid:14723851.
- 11. te Welscher P, Zuniga A, Kuijper S, Drenth T, Goedemans HJ, Meijlink F, et al. Progression of vertebrate limb development through SHH-mediated counteraction of GLI3. Science. 2002;298(5594):827–30. pmid:12215652.
- 12. Litingtung Y, Dahn RD, Li Y, Fallon JF, Chiang C. Shh and Gli3 are dispensable for limb skeleton formation but regulate digit number and identity. Nature. 2002;418(6901):979–83. Epub 2002/08/29. nature01033 [pii]. pmid:12198547.
- 13. Park HL, Bai C, Platt KA, Matise MP, Beeghly A, Hui CC, et al. Mouse Gli1 mutants are viable but have defects in SHH signaling in combination with a Gli2 mutation. Development. 2000;127(8):1593–605. pmid:10725236.
- 14. Biesecker LG. Strike three for GLI3. Nat Genet. 1997;17(3):259–60. pmid:9354780.
- 15. Wild A, Kalff-Suske M, Vortkamp A, Bornholdt D, Konig R, Grzeschik KH. Point mutations in human GLI3 cause Greig syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(11):1979–84. pmid:9302279.
- 16. Hill P, Gotz K, Ruther U. A SHH-independent regulation of Gli3 is a significant determinant of anteroposterior patterning of the limb bud. Developmental biology. 2009;328(2):506–16. Epub 2009/03/03. S0012-1606(09)00133-X [pii]. pmid:19248778.
- 17. Wang C, Ruther U, Wang B. The Shh-independent activator function of the full-length Gli3 protein and its role in vertebrate limb digit patterning. Dev Biol. 2007;305(2):460–9. pmid:17400206; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1952533.
- 18. Bowers M, Eng L, Lao Z, Turnbull RK, Bao X, Riedel E, et al. Limb anterior-posterior polarity integrates activator and repressor functions of GLI2 as well as GLI3. Dev Biol. 2012;370(1):110–24. pmid:22841643; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3432687.
- 19. Zuniga A, Zeller R. Gli3 (Xt) and formin (ld) participate in the positioning of the polarising region and control of posterior limb-bud identity. Development. 1999;126(1):13–21. Epub 1998/12/03. pmid:9834182.
- 20. te Welscher P, Fernandez-Teran M, Ros MA, Zeller R. Mutual genetic antagonism involving GLI3 and dHAND prepatterns the vertebrate limb bud mesenchyme prior to SHH signaling. Genes & development. 2002;16(4):421–6. pmid:11850405; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC155343.
- 21. Pan Y, Bai CB, Joyner AL, Wang B. Sonic hedgehog signaling regulates Gli2 transcriptional activity by suppressing its processing and degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(9):3365–77. pmid:16611981; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1447407.
- 22. Wang B, Fallon JF, Beachy PA. Hedgehog-regulated processing of Gli3 produces an anterior/posterior repressor gradient in the developing vertebrate limb. Cell. 2000;100(4):423–34. pmid:10693759.
- 23. Zhulyn O, Li D, Deimling S, Vakili NA, Mo R, Puviindran V, et al. A switch from low to high Shh activity regulates establishment of limb progenitors and signaling centers. Dev Cell. 2014;29(2):241–9. pmid:24726283.
- 24. Liu J, Heydeck W, Zeng H, Liu A. Dual function of suppressor of fused in Hh pathway activation and mouse spinal cord patterning. Dev Biol. 2012;362(2):141–53. pmid:22182519.
- 25. Jia J, Kolterud A, Zeng H, Hoover A, Teglund S, Toftgard R, et al. Suppressor of Fused inhibits mammalian Hedgehog signaling in the absence of cilia. Developmental biology. 2009;330(2):452–60. Epub 2009/04/18. S0012-1606(09)00241-3 [pii]. pmid:19371734; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2687323.
- 26. Chen MH, Wilson CW, Li YJ, Law KK, Lu CS, Gacayan R, et al. Cilium-independent regulation of Gli protein function by Sufu in Hedgehog signaling is evolutionarily conserved. Genes & development. 2009;23(16):1910–28. pmid:19684112; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2725943.
- 27. Humke EW, Dorn KV, Milenkovic L, Scott MP, Rohatgi R. The output of Hedgehog signaling is controlled by the dynamic association between Suppressor of Fused and the Gli proteins. Genes & development. 2010;24(7):670–82. Epub 2010/04/03. 24/7/670 [pii]. pmid:20360384; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2849124.
- 28. Ruel L, Therond PP. Variations in Hedgehog signaling: divergence and perpetuation in Sufu regulation of Gli. Genes & development. 2009;23(16):1843–8. pmid:19684109; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2725945.
- 29. Cooper AF, Yu KP, Brueckner M, Brailey LL, Johnson L, McGrath JM, et al. Cardiac and CNS defects in a mouse with targeted disruption of suppressor of fused. Development. 2005;132(19):4407–17. Epub 2005/09/13. 132/19/4407 [pii] pmid:16155214.
- 30. Svard J, Heby-Henricson K, Persson-Lek M, Rozell B, Lauth M, Bergstrom A, et al. Genetic elimination of Suppressor of fused reveals an essential repressor function in the mammalian Hedgehog signaling pathway. Developmental cell. 2006;10(2):187–97. Epub 2006/02/07. S1534-5807(06)00005-0 [pii] pmid:16459298.
- 31. Kim JJ, Gill PS, Rotin L, van Eede M, Henkelman RM, Hui CC, et al. Suppressor of fused controls mid-hindbrain patterning and cerebellar morphogenesis via GLI3 repressor. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2011;31(5):1825–36. Epub 2011/02/04. 31/5/1825 [pii]. pmid:21289193.
- 32. Pearse RV 2nd, Collier LS, Scott MP, Tabin CJ. Vertebrate homologs of Drosophila suppressor of fused interact with the gli family of transcriptional regulators. Developmental biology. 1999;212(2):323–36. Epub 1999/08/06. S0012-1606(99)99335-1 [pii]. pmid:10433824.
- 33. Simon-Chazottes D, Paces-Fessy M, Lamour-Isnard C, Guenet JL, Blanchet-Tournier MF. Genomic organization, chromosomal assignment, and expression analysis of the mouse suppressor of fused gene (Sufu) coding a Gli protein partner. Mammalian genome: official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society. 2000;11(8):614–21. pmid:10920228.
- 34. Zhang Z, Yu X, Zhang Y, Geronimo B, Lovlie A, Fromm SH, et al. Targeted misexpression of constitutively active BMP receptor-IB causes bifurcation, duplication, and posterior transformation of digit in mouse limb. Developmental biology. 2000;220(2):154–67. pmid:10753507.
- 35. Zhu X, Zhao P, Liu Y, Zhang X, Fu J, Ivy Yu HM, et al. Intra-epithelial requirement of canonical Wnt signaling for tooth morphogenesis. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288(17):12080–9. pmid:23525146; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3636893.
- 36. Zhu X, Liu Y, Zhao P, Dai Z, Yang X, Li Y, et al. Gpr177-mediated Wnt Signaling is Required for Fungiform Placode Initiation. J Dent Res. 2014;93(6):582–8. pmid:24736288.
- 37. Lakso M, Pichel JG, Gorman JR, Sauer B, Okamoto Y, Lee E, et al. Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(12):5860–5. pmid:8650183; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC39152.
- 38. Hsu SH, Zhang X, Cheng S, Wunder JS, Hui CC, Alman BA. Suppressor of fused (Sufu) mediates the effect of parathyroid hormone-like hormone (Pthlh) on chondrocyte differentiation in the growth plate. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2012;287(43):36222–8. pmid:22930757; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3476289.
- 39. Davis AP, Capecchi MR. Axial homeosis and appendicular skeleton defects in mice with a targeted disruption of hoxd-11. Development. 1994;120(8):2187–98. pmid:7925020.
- 40. Peters H, Neubuser A, Kratochwil K, Balling R. Pax9-deficient mice lack pharyngeal pouch derivatives and teeth and exhibit craniofacial and limb abnormalities. Genes & development. 1998;12(17):2735–47. Epub 1998/09/10. pmid:9732271; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC317134.
- 41. McGlinn E, van Bueren KL, Fiorenza S, Mo R, Poh AM, Forrest A, et al. Pax9 and Jagged1 act downstream of Gli3 in vertebrate limb development. Mechanisms of development. 2005;122(11):1218–33. Epub 2005/09/20. S0925-4773(05)00101-2 [pii] pmid:16169709.
- 42. Hill P, Wang B, Ruther U. The molecular basis of Pallister Hall associated polydactyly. Human molecular genetics. 2007;16(17):2089–96. Epub 2007/06/26. ddm156 [pii] pmid:17588959.