Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genetic Diversity in Oxytocin Ligands and Receptors in New World Monkeys

  • Dongren Ren ,

    dren@unomaha.edu

    Affiliations Callitrichid Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America, Key Laboratory for Animal Biotechnology of Jiangxi Province and Ministry of Agriculture of China, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330045, China, Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America

  • Guoqing Lu,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America

  • Hideaki Moriyama,

    Affiliation School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, United States of America

  • Aaryn C. Mustoe,

    Affiliation Callitrichid Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America

  • Emily B. Harrison,

    Affiliations Callitrichid Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America, Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America

  • Jeffrey A. French

    Affiliations Callitrichid Research Centre, Department of Psychology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America, Department of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, United States of America

Genetic Diversity in Oxytocin Ligands and Receptors in New World Monkeys

  • Dongren Ren, 
  • Guoqing Lu, 
  • Hideaki Moriyama, 
  • Aaryn C. Mustoe, 
  • Emily B. Harrison, 
  • Jeffrey A. French
PLOS
x

Abstract

Oxytocin (OXT) is an important neurohypophyseal hormone that influences wide spectrum of reproductive and social processes. Eutherian mammals possess a highly conserved sequence of OXT (Cys-Tyr-Ile-Gln-Asn-Cys-Pro-Leu-Gly). However, in this study, we sequenced the coding region for OXT in 22 species covering all New World monkeys (NWM) genera and clades, and characterize five OXT variants, including consensus mammalian Leu8-OXT, major variant Pro8-OXT, and three previously unreported variants: Ala8-OXT, Thr8-OXT, and Phe2-OXT. Pro8-OXT shows clear structural and physicochemical differences from Leu8-OXT. We report multiple predicted amino acid substitutions in the G protein-coupled OXT receptor (OXTR), especially in the critical N-terminus, which is crucial for OXT recognition and binding. Genera with same Pro8-OXT tend to cluster together on a phylogenetic tree based on OXTR sequence, and we demonstrate significant coevolution between OXT and OXTR. NWM species are characterized by high incidence of social monogamy, and we document an association between OXTR phylogeny and social monogamy. Our results demonstrate remarkable genetic diversity in the NWM OXT/OXTR system, which can provide a foundation for molecular, pharmacological, and behavioral studies of the role of OXT signaling in regulating complex social phenotypes.

Introduction

Oxytocin (OXT) is a cyclic nonapeptide hormone synthesized primarily by neurons in hypothalamic nuclei. The OXT peptide is released from the posterior pituitary into the systemic circulation in response to a variety of stimuli such as suckling, parturition, and stressors [1]. OXT acts centrally to facilitate a wide spectrum of reproductive and social functions in mammals [14]. OXT is involved in the regulation of multiple facets of social relationships in mammals, including social monogamy [57]. It has been long-held that OXT is strongly conserved among eutherian mammals (‘consensus’ mammalian Leu8-OXT: Cys-Tyr-Ile-Gln-Asn-Cys-Pro-Leu-Gly) [1, 8]. Recently however, a novel OXT variant was identified in four species of New World monkeys (NWM), involving a substitution from leucine to proline at position eight (Pro8-OXT) [9]. However, it is currently unknown whether novel OXT variants are present throughout NWM (Platyrrhini), which consists of 17 genera distributed across Cebidae, Atelidae, and Pitheciidae clades. We therefore analyzed the genomic coding regions for OXT in 22 species representing each genus in Platyrrhini. Given that OXT actions are mediated by a specific G protein-coupled receptor [1], we also characterized the genomic regions coding for its receptor (OXTR). We then contrasted nucleotide and amino acid substitutions in OXTR, characterized the physicochemical properties of OXT and OXTR variants, and estimated coevolutionary relationships between OXT and OXTR. Additionally, given the relatively high percentage of NWM species exhibiting social monogamy (more than 50%) relative to other primate or mammalian clades [10], we statistically evaluated the association between OXT/OXTR variants and social monogamy.

Materials and Methods

Animals

As described in detail previously [11], a total of 22 NWM species were sampled, which covered all three clades, and at least one species per genus. The species, DNA source, sex, and institutional source of each sample are presented in S1 Table. All sequences of OXTR generated in our study were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers: KF701336-KF701379). Sequences for OXT and OXTR for all other primates (hominoid, Old World, and prosimian primates) were accessed from UCSC Gene Browser/NCBI/Ensembl.

Ethics Statement

All samples were accessed from archival blood or tissue banks, or from extracted DNA samples provided by the institutions listed in S1 Table. As described in detail previously [11], all institutions are licensed and/or accredited by appropriate agencies (e.g., USDA, AZA). IACUC information is also provided in S1 Table where relevant.

Amplification and Sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood or tissue samples using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following manufacture’s protocol. Nested primers were used to amplify the OXTR region (S2 Table). All primers were designed based on the OXT and OXTR conserved genomic regions in several taxa including human, Callithrix jacchus and rhesus macaque (UCSC Genome Browser, http://genome.ucsc.edu/). All target regions in 22 species were amplified following manufacture’s protocol and then sequenced directly in two directions.

Evolutionary Analysis

Sequences for OXT and OXTR for primates other than NWM were accessed from UCSC Gene Browser/NCBI/Ensembl. A molecular phylogenetic tree of OXTR was generated using the Maximum Likelihood method (1000 bootstrap), and the model with the lowest Bayesian Information Criterion score was selected (Tamura-parameter + G + I model) in MEGA 6.0 [12]. A Bayesian approach as implemented in MrBayes 3.1.2 was also used to infer phylogenetic relationships and to establish posterior probabilities for each node [13]. Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations were run for 1,000,000 generations using a sample frequency of 10 and a burn-in of 25,000. Default setting for the prior probabilities on the model parameters (nst = 6) were used.

Assessment of coevolution between OXT and OXTR was evaluated according to previous methods [14]. Briefly, two pairwise evolutionary distance matrices were obtained in MEGA 6.0 using the genomic coding sequences of OXT (27 nucleotides) and OXTR (1170 nucleotides). A linear regression analysis was used to measure the correlation between pairwise evolutionary distances matrices between OXT and OXTR. The linear correlation coefficient was computed, and significance levels were tested. The isoelectric point (pI) and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) of OXT and OXTR N-termini were predicted for representative species representing the five OXT ligands on the ExPASy Server [15].

We classified amino acid substitutions as conservative or radical according changes in polarity, charge, and volume categories: substitutions with a change in one or more categories were classified as radical, while substitutions with no changes in the three categories were classified as conservative [16].

Classification of Social Monogamy

As described in detail previously [11], social monogamy in mammals refers to a long-term or sequential living arrangement between an adult male and an adult female: sharing the same territory, high rates of sociosexual behavior between pairmates, and often, but not always, biparental care. Classification of species as social monogamous was based on recent surveys [10, 17], and the classification does not imply that the species are characterized by genetic monogamy [18].

Phylogeny-trait Association Analysis

The presence of a statistical association between OXTR-derived phylogeny and social monogamy was performed with BaTS phylogeny-trait analyses (version 1.0; monophyletic clade (MC) size statistics; 1,000 replicates) [19]. BaTS analysis is based on the null hypothesis (represented by the expected MC statistic) that no single tip bearing a given character trait (in our case, social monogamy) is more likely to share that trait with adjoining taxa than we would expect due to chance. BaTS incorporates statistical error arising from phylogenetic uncertainty and provides error intervals for hypothesis testing. A higher observed than expected MC value suggests an increased phylogeny-trait association, and a significant association (P < 0.05) between a particular trait value and its distribution on a phylogeny indicates a potential causative relationship.

Result and Discussion

Five OXT Variants in NWM

We identified five distinct OXT ligands in NWM. The five ligands were ‘consensus’ mammalian OXT (Leu8-OXT), the most common OXT variant, Pro8-OXT, and three previously unreported OXT variants (Ala8-OXT, Thr8-OXT and Phe2-OXT; Fig 1A, S3 Table). At least one genus in all three NWM clades possessed non-consensus mammalian OXT (i.e., a ligand other than Leu8-OXT); thus, OXT ligand variation is widespread in NWM. The consensus phylogeny suggests that Platyrrhini and Catarrhini shared a common ancestor ~ 43.5 million years ago (MYA), with the Platyrrhini emerging 20–27 MYA [20]. Pitheciidae, the first of the three Platyrrhini clade emerged ~20.5 MYA and display three OXT ligands (Leu8, Thr8, and Ala8; the latter two variants appearing in genera that emerged ~ 14 MYA) [2022]. Cebidae and Atelidae, sister clades to Pitheciidae, later emerged and radiated at about 20 MYA. All Cebidae express Pro8-OXT, and Atelidae display three OXT ligands (Leu8, Pro8, and Phe2). It is likely that the ancestor of NWM expressed Leu8-OXT, since this OXT ligand appears to be ancestral and is found in two of three NWM clades and in all available sequences of Catarrhini. Thus, considerable differentiation of the OXT coding region continued after the separation of the three NWM clades, suggesting multiple substitution events leading to OXT ligand diversity.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Five OXT ligands identified in New World monkeys and their distribution in a phylogenetic tree generated from OXTR nucleotide sequences.

A. 2-D structure of mammalian consensus Leu8-OXT, and other four OXT variants, including Pro8-OXT, Ala8-OXT, Thr8-OXT and Phe2-OXT. The 2-D structures of oxytocin ligands were created in ChemDraw Pro 12.0. Different colors indicate different OXT ligands. B. OXT ligands (representing by different colors as in Fig 1A) are distributed in a phylogenetic tree inferred from OXTR nucleotides. If posterior probability (upper) and bootstrap support (lower) are < 50, no value is shown at nodes. Scale bar indicates the branch length in nucleotide substitutions per site.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125775.g001

When comparing the sequences of OXT-like nonapeptides across vertebrates, positions 1, 6, 7 and 9 are generally conserved, relative to the more variable positions 2–5 and 8 [1, 23]. The neurohypophyseal nonapeptides are classified into OXT and arginine vasopressin (AVP) families based on the amino acid at position eight [1]. Compared with other OXT residues, the eighth amino acid appears to be most critical for biological functions regulated by OXT [24], and a single amino acid substitution can dramatically alter the structure, physicochemical properties, and physiological properties of OXT [8, 25]. All amino acid substitutions in NWM OXT variants have at least one physicochemical change from the corresponding amino acids in consensus mammalian OXT [16], and thus represent radical substitutions. Three variants (Ala8, Thr8, and Phe2) have modest changes in OXT structure relative to consensus mammalian Leu8-OXT (Fig 1A). Pro is the only amino acid where the side chain connects to the protein backbone twice, and Pro adds a tight turn structure that changes the direction of the polypeptide chain [26]. As a consequence, Pro8-OXT presents as a radically different structure from the other OXT ligands. Although all OXT ligands possess the same isoelectric point (pI), we noted marked differences in grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) across OXT ligands, with Pro8-OXT being the most hydrophilic (Fig 2B). The Pro8 substitution in OXT leads to an alteration in molecular structure, particularly in the linear portion of the ligand (amino acids 7–9; Fig 1A), which interacts with the OXTR N-terminal domain [27, 28].

thumbnail
Fig 2. Analysis of N-terminus of OXTR in primates.

A. Alignment of the 38 OXTR amino acids in New World monkeys (NWM, rectangle framed) and non-NWM primates. Sequences for non-NWM primates accessed from NCBI, UCSC or Ensembl. A dot represents identity with human OXTR amino acid. B. The isoelectric point (pI) and grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) of OXT (top) and N-termini of OXTR (bottom). Plots include Pro8-OXT species (Callithrix) and non-Pro8-OXT species (Homo, Macaca, Alouatta, Pithecia and Cacajao). All OXT ligands show the same pI value, but exhibit marked differences in GRAVY, with Pro8-OXT being most hydrophilic. N-termini of Callithrix OXTR, possessing lower pI and GRAVY values, are distinct from N-termini from other representative species. Symbol colors for OXTR correspond to ligand variation. Larger negative numbers in GRAVY indicate a more hydrophilic molecule; pI values less than 7.3 indicate that molecules carry a net negative charge, relative to the pH in brain tissue.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125775.g002

OXTR Diversity and Coevolution with OXT

Given the diversity in OXT ligand structure in NWM, we expected corresponding changes in the sequences of NWM OXTR. Our examination of OXTR sequences, relative to the human OXTR, showed that the proportion of predicted OXTR amino acid substitutions in genera with Pro8-OXT was significantly higher than in genera with Leu8-OXT (Fig 3A). For example, although Callithrix (Pro8-OXT) is phylogenetically closer to human (Leu8-OXT) than the prosimian Otolemur (Leu8-OXT) [20], Callithrix shows more differences in OXTR sequences than Otolemur (Fig 3B). Since the overall three-dimensional OXTR architecture plays a significant role in ligand-receptor interactions and subsequent intracellular processes [24], it is likely there are complicated alterations in OXTRs that do not correspond in a straightforward manner to differences in OXT ligand structure.

thumbnail
Fig 3. OXTR structural variation in primates with Leu8-OXT and Pro8-OXT.

A. Proportion of amino acid substitutions across species (relative to human OXTR) in the four extra- and intracellular and seven transmembrane elements of the OXTR. Values represent mean ± SEM for primates with Leu8-OXT (n = 11; OXTR sequences of Tarsius and Microcebus are not available) and Pro8-OXT (n = 10). Sample sizes were not sufficient to include species with Ala8-, Thr8-, and Phe2-OXT in this analysis. Asterisks indicate significant differences (independent samples t test, P < 0.02). B. Representative OXTR models for species with Pro8-OXT (Callithrix) and Leu8-OXT (Otolemur), relative to human OXTR (coloured molecules represent substitutions). Although Callithrix is phylogenetically closer to human than Otolemur based on conventional phylogeny, Callithrix OXTR residues are more variable than Otolemur, especially in the N-terminus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125775.g003

We expected that changes in OXT ligand structure would correspond to changes in the N-terminus of the OXTR, which is involved in OXT recognition and binding [27, 28]. The N-terminus showed significantly higher proportions of amino acid substitutions (16.3%) in species with Pro8-OXT than in species with consensus Leu8-OXT (9.1%; Figs 2A and 3A). Multiple substitutions in the N-terminus constituted radical physicochemical changes (S4 Table). The pI and GRAVY plots for selected primate OXTR N-termini (Fig 2B) reveal distinct physicochemical characteristics among species with different OXT ligands, and Callithrix OXTR has the lowest pI and GRAVY scores. The physiochemical properties of Pro8-OXT and Callithrix OXTR suggest a high binding potential because both of them are hydrophilic. The OXTR N-terminus interacts with the linear C-terminal tripeptide region of OXT [27, 28].

Since four of five NWM OXT ligands have amino acid differences in this tripeptide region, it is likely that the modified N-termini in NWM OXTR arose in concert with changes in OXT sequence. To test this possibility, we statistically evaluated ligand-receptor coevolution by determining the correlation coefficient of pairwise evolutionary distances matrices among OXT and OXTR [14]. We found evidence supporting significant coevolution among OXT ligands and their corresponding OXTR across primates (r = 0.62, P < 0.001).

We generated a molecular phylogenetic tree for primates based on OXTR genomic sequences (Fig 1B). In general, the OXTR phylogeny corresponds to the conventional molecular phylogeny of primates on a clade level [20], with a clear separation of hominoid, Old World, New World, and prosimian primates. In the NWM, though the bootstrap and posterior probability support values for each node between clades are lower, the genera within same clade clustered together with high support values. Pro8-OXT was found in all the genera in Cebidae. Interestingly, the one exception to OXTR-conventional phylogeny correspondence is Ateles, whose OXTR clusters with the family Cebidae and not with congeners in the clade Atelidae. However, like Cebids, Ateles has a coding sequence for Pro8-OXT. Pro8-OXT distribution in OXTR tree partially supports the notion of ligand-receptor coevolution. Similar coevolutionary processes have been demonstrated in a host of pituitary peptide hormones and their cellular receptors, including LH, FSH, and prolactin [29, 30].

OXTR Diversity and Social Monogamy

The diversity in OXTR/OXT structures among primates may have important implications for understanding diversity in social systems. In prosimian and Old World primates, the regular expression of social monogamy is rare or absent; in hominoid primates (apes and humans), social monogamy is noted only in gibbons, siamangs and humans [10]. By contrast, social monogamy is a relatively common occurrence in NWM, with more than 50% of species routinely displaying this social system [10]. Neuropeptide signaling in the brain mediated by OXTR may be an important mechanism for social bonding and affiliative behavior in a host of mammalian species [31]. We used BaTS analyses [19] to test for a phylogeny-corrected statistical association between OXTR diversity and social monogamy among primates. These phylogeny-trait analyses revealed that OXTR phylogeny was significantly associated with social monogamy when assessed across all primate genera (26 genera; observed MC = 5.85, expected MC = 2.05 [P = 0.001]) and also when limited to NWM (17 genera; observed MC = 5.81, expected MC = 2.06 [P = 0.004]). Our two findings showing ligand-receptor coevolution and phylogeny-trait association suggest that the OXTR/OXT system may be a factor contributing to social monogamy, a conclusion that is supported by pharmacological and neuroanatomical evidence that OXT is an important modulator of sociality in NWM [32, 33]. We recently demonstrated OXT ligand specificity in behavioral patterns associated with social monogamy in marmosets (Callithrix): pair-bonded marmosets treated with Pro8-OXT (but not Leu8-OXT) showed reduced social and sexual interactions with opposite-sex strangers [34]. These behavioral data are consistent with a functional role for OXT/OXTR signaling diversity in social monogamy.

In addition, we recently characterized coding region for arginine vasopressin (AVP), a nonapeptide neurohormone that is closely related to OXT that also plays an important role in modulating social behavior in mammals [11]. In stark contrast to the data we report in this study, our work on AVP documents no variation in AVP ligand structure and minimal variation in AVPR1a in NWM, including promoter RS3 microsatellites in AVPR1a [11, 35]. This suggests targeted selection for OXT variability in this primate taxon that is characterized by an exceptionally high incidence of social monogamy.

As described in detail previously [11], social monogamy is a complex social behavior. Recent hypotheses regarding the selective pressures leading to this trait include the difficulty of male defense of multiple females [10], protection from male infanticide [17], and certainty of paternity/genetic monogamy [36]. Our data demonstrate considerable variation in the genes coding for OXT ligands and receptors in NWM, a taxon characterized by a high incidence of social monogamy. Our data do not explicitly address the functional consequences of these coding regions variants for OXT and OXTR, and the biological significance of these variants requires confirmation from mRNA and protein analyses. However, there is a confirmation in one species of NWM (Saimiri) that coding sequence variation in ligand produces corresponding differences in OXT and OXTR mRNA and protein structure [9]. This variation may have arisen from one or more of the selective pressures favoring social monogamy, though other possibilities exist, including relaxed functional constraints on OXTR variability. Efforts that explore molecular modeling of neuropeptide ligand-receptor interactions, receptor affinity assays, and in vivo pharmacological and behavioral studies with altered OXT and OXTR will further characterize the functional role of OXT/OXTR system diversity in social monogamy in primates.

Supporting Information

S1 Table. Sample information for the New World monkeys in this study.

* DNA = extracted and purified DNA sample provided by institution; otherwise, we extracted DNA from the source tissue indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125775.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. PCR primers used to amplify genomic coding regions of OXT and OXTR (Underlined primer are the nested primers).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125775.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Oxytocin genomic coding sequence, predicted protein sequence and social monogamy status in primates (New World monkeys are shaded).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125775.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Physicochemical change (radical or conservative) for each substitution in OXTR of New World monkeys.

N-term = N-terminus; TM = transmembrane region; IC = intracellular region; EC = extracellular region; C-term, C-terminus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125775.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank A. Mazor for assistance with figure preparation, C.-H. Chiu who piqued our interest in this system, and L. Young, P. Davis, R. Kellar, J. Blankenship, R. Wong, and the late J. Goodson (to whom this paper is dedicated) for comments on this manuscript. We acknowledge the institutions in S1 Table for providing tissues and/or genomic DNA. For tamarin blood (Saguinus), we thank the National Center for Research Resources (P51 RR013986) and the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs/OD P51 OD011133. For titi monkey tissues (Callicebus), we acknowledge HD053555 and HD071998 to KLB and P51OD01107 to the California National Primate Research Center. We thank the Primate Molecular Ecology and Evolution Laboratory at UT Austin for the Ateles, Lagothrix and Cacajao samples.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JAF DR. Performed the experiments: DR EBH. Analyzed the data: DR GL HM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DR. Wrote the paper: DR JAF ACM.

References

  1. 1. Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F (2001) The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol Rev 81: 629–683. pmid:11274341
  2. 2. Donaldson ZR, Young LJ (2008) Oxytocin, vasopressin, and the neurogenetics of sociality. Science 322: 900–904. pmid:18988842
  3. 3. Ferguson JN, Young LJ, Hearn EF, Matzuk MM, Insel TR, Winslow JT (2000) Social amnesia in mice lacking the oxytocin gene. Nat Genet 25: 284–288. pmid:10888874
  4. 4. Arrowsmith S, Wray S (2014) Oxytocin: its mechanism of action and receptor signalling in the myometrium. J Neuroendocrinol 26: 356–369. pmid:24888645
  5. 5. Neumann ID (2008) Brain oxytocin: a key regulator of emotional and social behaviours in both females and males. J Neuroendocrinol 20: 858–865. pmid:18601710
  6. 6. Lee HJ, Macbeth AH, Pagani JH, Young WS 3rd (2009) Oxytocin: the great facilitator of life. Prog Neurobiol 88: 127–151. pmid:19482229
  7. 7. Heinrichs M, von Dawans B, Domes G (2009) Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 30: 548–557. pmid:19505497
  8. 8. Wallis M (2012) Molecular evolution of the neurohypophysial hormone precursors in mammals: Comparative genomics reveals novel mammalian oxytocin and vasopressin analogues. Gen Comp Endocrinol 179: 313–318. pmid:22995712
  9. 9. Lee AG, Cool DR, Grunwald WC Jr, Neal DE, Buckmaster CL, Cheng MY, et al. (2011) A novel form of oxytocin in New World monkeys. Biol Lett 7: 584–587. pmid:21411453
  10. 10. Lukas D, Clutton-Brock TH (2013) The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science 341: 526–530. pmid:23896459
  11. 11. Ren D, Chin KR, French JA (2014) Molecular Variation in AVP and AVPR1a in New World Monkeys (Primates, Platyrrhini): Evolution and Implications for Social Monogamy. PLoS One 9: e111638. pmid:25360668
  12. 12. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30: 2725–2729. pmid:24132122
  13. 13. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. pmid:12912839
  14. 14. Goh CS, Bogan AA, Joachimiak M, Walther D, Cohen FE (2000) Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. J Mol Biol 299: 283–293. pmid:10860738
  15. 15. Walker JM (2005) The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. 571–607 p.
  16. 16. Zhang J (2000) Rates of conservative and radical nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions in mammalian nuclear genes. J Mol Evol 50: 56–68. pmid:10654260
  17. 17. Opie C, Atkinson QD, Dunbar RI, Shultz S (2013) Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 13328–13332. pmid:23898180
  18. 18. Huck M, Fernandez-Duque E, Babb P, Schurr T (2014) Correlates of genetic monogamy in socially monogamous mammals: insights from Azara's owl monkeys. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 281: 20140195. pmid:24648230
  19. 19. Parker J, Rambaut A, Pybus OG (2008) Correlating viral phenotypes with phylogeny: accounting for phylogenetic uncertainty. Infect Genet Evol 8: 239–246. pmid:17921073
  20. 20. Perelman P, Johnson WE, Roos C, Seuanez HN, Horvath JE, Moreira MAM, et al. (2011) A molecular phylogeny of living primates. PLoS Genet 7: e1001342. pmid:21436896
  21. 21. Osterholz M, Walter L, Roos C (2009) Retropositional events consolidate the branching order among New World monkey genera. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50: 507–513. pmid:19135536
  22. 22. Schneider H, Sampaio I (2015) The systematics and evolution of New World primates—A review. Mol Phylogenet Evol 82: 348–357. pmid:24201058
  23. 23. Gruber CW, Koehbach J, Muttenthaler M (2012) Exploring bioactive peptides from natural sources for oxytocin and vasopressin drug discovery. Future Med Chem 4: 1791–1798. pmid:23043476
  24. 24. Koehbach J, Stockner T, Bergmayr C, Muttenthaler M, Gruber CW (2013) Insights into the molecular evolution of oxytocin receptor ligand binding. Biochem Soc Trans 41: 197–204. pmid:23356283
  25. 25. Gazis D (1978) Plasma half-lives of vasopressin and oxytocin analogs after iv injection in rats. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 158: 663–665. pmid:693485
  26. 26. Betts MJ, Russell RC (2003) Amino Acid Properties and Consequences of Substitutions. In: Barnes M. R. and Gray I. C., editors. Bioinformatics for Geneticists. Chichester, England: Wiley. pp. 289–316.
  27. 27. Postina R, Kojro E, Fahrenholz F (1996) Separate agonist and peptide antagonist binding sites of the oxytocin receptor defined by their transfer into the V2 vasopressin receptor. J Biol Chem 271: 31593–31601. pmid:8940177
  28. 28. Wesley VJ, Hawtin SR, Howard HC, Wheatley M (2002) Agonist-specific, high-affinity binding epitopes are contributed by an arginine in the N-terminus of the human oxytocin receptor. Biochemistry 41: 5086–5092. pmid:11955056
  29. 29. Moyle WR, Campbell RK, Myers RV, Bernard MP, Han Y, Wang X (1994) Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs. Nature 368: 251–255. pmid:8145825
  30. 30. Li Y, Wallis M, Zhang YP (2005) Episodic evolution of prolactin receptor gene in mammals: coevolution with its ligand. J Mol Endocrinol 35: 411–419. pmid:16326829
  31. 31. Anacker AM, Beery AK (2013) Life in groups: the roles of oxytocin in mammalian sociality. Front Behav Neurosci 7: 185. pmid:24376404
  32. 32. Smith AS, Ågmo A, Birnie AK, French JA (2010) Manipulation of the oxytocin system alters social behavior and attraction in pair-bonding primates, Callithrix penicillata. Horm Behav 57: 255–262. pmid:20025881
  33. 33. Ragen BJ, Bales KL (2013) Oxytocin and vasopressin in non-human primates. In: Choleris E., Pfaff D. W. and Kavaliers M., editors. Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Related Peptides in the Regulation of Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 288–308.
  34. 34. Cavanaugh J, Mustoe AC, Taylor J, French JA (2014) Oxytocin facilitates fidelity in well-established marmoset pairs by reducing sociosexual behavior toward opposite-sex strangers. Psychoneuroendocrinology 49:1–10. pmid:25038478
  35. 35. Ren D (2014) Genetic diversity of microsatellite RS3 in AVPR1a promoter region in primates. Austin J Biotechnol Bioeng 1:3.
  36. 36. Huck M, Fernandez-Duque E, Babb P, Schurr T (2014) Correlates of genetic monogamy in socially monogamous mammals: insights from Azara's owl monkeys. Proc Biol Sci 281: 20140195. pmid:24648230