Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The ERECTA, CLAVATA and class III HD-ZIP Pathways Display Synergistic Interactions in Regulating Floral Meristem Activities

  • Udi Landau,

    Affiliation The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences & Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel

  • Lior Asis,

    Affiliation The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences & Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel

  • Leor Eshed Williams

    leor.williams@mail.huji.ac.il

    Affiliation The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant Sciences & Genetics in Agriculture, The Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel

The ERECTA, CLAVATA and class III HD-ZIP Pathways Display Synergistic Interactions in Regulating Floral Meristem Activities

  • Udi Landau, 
  • Lior Asis, 
  • Leor Eshed Williams
PLOS
x

Abstract

In angiosperms, the production of flowers marks the beginning of the reproductive phase. At the emergence of flower primordia on the flanks of the inflorescence meristem, the WUSCHEL (WUS) gene, which encodes a homeodomain transcription factor starts to be expressed and establishes de novo stem cell population, founder of the floral meristem (FM). Similarly to the shoot apical meristem a precise spatial and temporal expression pattern of WUS is required and maintained through strict regulation by multiple regulatory inputs to maintain stem cell homeostasis. However, following the formation of a genetically determined fixed number of floral organs, this homeostasis is shifted towards organogenesis and the FM is terminated. In here we performed a genetic study to test how a reduction in ERECTA, CLAVATA and class III HD-ZIP pathways affects floral meristem activity and flower development. We revealed strong synergistic phenotypes of extra flower number, supernumerary whorls, total loss of determinacy and extreme enlargement of the meristem as compared to any double mutant combination indicating that the three pathways, CLV3, ER and HD-ZIPIII distinctively regulate meristem activity and that they act in parallel. Our findings yield several new insights into stem cell-driven development. We demonstrate the crucial requirement for coupling floral meristem termination with carpel formation to ensure successful reproduction in plants. We also show how regulation of meristem size and alternation in spatial structure of the meristem serve as a mechanism to determine flower organogenesis. We propose that the loss of FM determinacy due to the reduction in CLV3, ER and HD-ZIPIII activity is genetically separable from the AGAMOUS core mechanism of meristem termination.

Introduction

In angiosperms, the production of flowers marks the beginning of the reproductive phase. At the emergence of flower primordia on the flanks of the inflorescence meristem, the WUSCHEL (WUS) gene, which encodes a homeodomain transcription factor, starts to be expressed in a few cells known as the organizing center (OC). WUS then specifies stem cell identity in the overlying cells to establish de novo stem cell population, founder of the floral meristem (FM) [13]. The stem cells divide and their daughter cells can either remain stem cells or proliferate before being incorporated into floral organ primordia. To maintain the organization of the FM, an homeostasis which is the balance between stem cell renewal, cell proliferation and cell differentiation, must be kept [4]. Similar to the shoot apical meristem (SAM), stem cell homeostasis within the FM is mediated by the CLAVATA–WUS feedback loop [57]. However, following the formation of a genetically determined fixed number of floral organs, this homeostasis is shifted towards organogenesis and the FM activity terminates. Genetic studies have identified numerous mutants in which the homeostasis between stem cell population size and cells that are recruited for floral organ primordia formation is disrupted, leading to a decrease or increase in floral organ number. For example mutations in WUS, TOUSLED and AUXIN RESISTANT 6 genes lead to reduced meristem size and organ number [1,8,9], whereas loss-of-function alleles of CLAVATA3 (CLV3), ULTRAPETALA1 (ULT1) and PLURIPETATA lead to an increase in FM size and floral organ number [5,6,10,11].

In Arabidopsis thaliana the flowers consist of four sepals, four petals, six stamens and a bi-carpellate gynoecium arising in four concentric whorls in a centripetal chronological manner (i.e. with the outer whorls developing before the inner ones).

During early flower development, the flower primordium becomes separated from the inflorescence meristem and starts to grow larger very quickly in all directions to increase meristem size and to provide sufficient cells for the formation of floral organ primordia [12]. The sepal primordia appear first concurrently with further increase in the diameter of the developing flower primordium [13]. Next the petal and stamen primordia become visible. At floral stage 6 (stages according to Smyth et al. [13]), simultaneously with FM termination a rim at the central dome of the flower primordium grows upward to produce a hollow tube that will become the gynoecium consisting of two fused ovule-bearing carpels [14,15]. Early in flower development, at floral stage 3, WUS activates the expression of the AGAMOUS (AG) MADS-box gene, a central factor in specifying stamen and carpel identities [16]. AG in turn terminates floral stem cell maintenance by repressing WUS expression thus promoting meristem determinacy [2,1719]. Mutations in AG cause the formation of indeterminate meristem which produces flowers-within-flower phenotype with no stamens and carpels [2022]. Accordingly, late stage ag mutant flower still shows strong WUS expression in the center of a regular size floral meristem [17].

Therefore, to allow proper flower development, a precise spatial and temporal expression pattern of WUS is required and maintained through strict regulation by multiple regulatory inputs.

It was shown by several independent groups that the ERECTA receptor like kinase (ER), the CLAVATA (CLV) signaling pathway and class III HD ZIP (HD-ZIPIII) factors regulate SAM size via regulation of WUS expression [2332].

Our recent study demonstrated that all three act in separate pathways at the SAM and have similar functions in the FM [33]. Here, we further address how loss-of-function in those pathways affects FM activity and flower development, and demonstrates the importance of cell proliferation regulation for correct flower organogenesis to ensure successful reproduction.

Results and Discussion

The ERECTA, CLAVATA and class III HD-ZIP pathways synergistically regulate floral meristem activity

To investigate the interaction of the ER, CLV and HD-ZIPIII pathways in regulating floral meristem activity, we analyzed flowers of single, double and triple mutant combinations of clv3-2, er and jabba-1D (jba-1D). In the jba-1D mutant overexpression of miR166g leads to decrease in several HD-ZIPIII transcripts level leading to up-regulation of WUS expression and enlargement of the SAM [25]. No detailed analysis of FM size or floral organ numbers has been reported for jba-1D. Loss of function of the three ER family genes leads to flattened and broadened SAM and aberrant flower development [34].Yet the single mutant does not exhibit increase in FM size or in floral organ number. However, the clv3-2 mutant exhibits enlarged floral meristem and increased number of floral organs [5,6].

Analyzing the flowers of the single double and triple mutant combinations we observed two major categories of phenotypes. The first is increase in floral organ numbers, [Fig 1], extra whorls S1 Fig and fasciated FM, all which can be attributed to an enlargement of the FM. To date, in all identified mutants that display enlarged FM but no reduction in floral organ numbers, the increase in meristem size was the results of WUS up-regulation [10,3032,35]. Therefore the first category of phenotype is likely to be a result of WUS up-regulation or an expansion of the WUS expression domain.

thumbnail
Fig 1. The ERECTA, CLAVATA and class III HD-ZIP pathways display synergistic interaction in regulating floral organ numbers.

[A,B] Phenotypes of ER mutants, clv3-2 and jba 1D/+, single, double and triple mutants. Top views of [A] flowers under optical binocular microscope and [B] fruits by scanning electron microscopy, from single double and triple mutant plants. Combinations of double and triple mutants with clv3-2 display increase in numbers of all floral organs (A) and extra carpels (B) [4 carpels in clv3-2 (Col), 5 in clv3-2 (Ler) and clv3-2 jba 1D/+ and 8 in clv3-2 jba 1D/+ er-20]. Scale bars: Panel A- 500μM and B- 100μM [C] Floral organ and primary carpel number are altered in single, double and triple mutants. Numbers of organs appear in the colored code BAR. Genotypes are marked from 1–8 as follow: 1. Col. 2. Ler. 3. clv3-2 (Col), 4. clv3-2 (Ler). 5. jba 1D/+ 6. jba 1D/+ er-20. 7. clv3-2 jba 1D/+ and 8. clv3-2 jba 1D/+ er-20. Data are shown in percentages. N = 45. In all double and triple combinations the numbers of flowers with supernumerary organ compared with their background [Col or Ler] are highly significant. For each line the significance of the categorical partition of organs number was calculated using Fisher`s exact test (p < 0.05) in comparison to its background (i.e Col or Ler). The P values are listed in S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125408.g001

The second category is supernumerary whorls [Figs 2 and 3] and a total loss of determinacy [Figs 2E and 3D] that can be attributed to extended meristem activity. As was shown previously for mutants such as clv3, ag and ult1, this phenotype of extended meristem activity is most likely the outcome of prolonged WUS expression [10,17].

thumbnail
Fig 2. Siliques from plants of clv3-2 single, double and triple mutants exhibiting extra whorl.

[A] Extra whorl of carpels develops inside primary carpels of double and triple mutants. SEM views of dissected fruit revealing the fifth whorl of carpels growing from inside the initial carpels [from left to right: clv3-2 (Col), clv3-2 (Ler), and clv3-2 jba 1D/+]. Stigma and carpel are false-colored with purple and green, respectively. Dissected clv3-2 jba 1D/+ er-20 fruit reveals an indeterminate floral meristem (dark green) producing numerous whorls of carpels within carpels. [B] SEM views of dissected jba 1D/+ er-20 fruit showing no extra whorl. [C] Dissected clv3-2 (Col) silique shows extra carpel developed within a primary carpel [red arrow]. [D] Dry clv3-2 (Ler) silique revealing 3 extra whorls of carpels—fifth, sixth and seventh growing inside each other [red arrows]. [E] Top: clv3-2 jba 1D/+ er-20 sphere-shaped siliques with 8 fused carpels. Lower: later in development the silique displays numerous carpels and a gigantic meristem erupting through the center of the gynoecium indicating a permanent loss of determinacy. Scale bars: Panel A, C and D 500μM, E 1 mm. [F] Arabidopsis flower at stage 6. Top: in wild type flower as the gynoecium no meristem is visible. Lower: In clv3-2 mutants gynoecium develop while flower meristem is still active (in purple) and WUS is still expressed (blue) [14].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125408.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Coordinated FM termination and carpel formation ensure successful reproduction.

[A-D] SEM analysis of jba-1D/+er-20 clv3-2 flower and silique [A] flower at stage 7 showing the gynoecial tube with meristem at the center [false-colored with purple]. [B] The active meristem blocks the medial ridge growth and septum formation. [C] gynoecia exhibits multiple whorls of multi-fused carpels within carpels. [D] extremely fascinated meristem encircled by multiple whorls of ectopic fused carpels. [E – G] SEM of transverse dissected siliques. [E and F] Col and jba-1D/+er-20 respectively display two fused carpels, septum and developing seed. [G] In jba-1D/+er-20 clv3-2 the space inside the gynoecium is filled with meristem and ectopic carpels and exhibits no septum. [H] In jba-1D/+er-20 clv3-2 developing ovule primordia projecting on the placenta are visible (highlighted with a square). [I] Transverse section through WT ovary showing the septum [S] stretching from one replum to another, placenta, ovules, and transmitting tract [TT] Krizek, BA [50]. Scale bars: A and B 25μM C, D G and H 500 μM E and F 250 μM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125408.g003

In the single or combined mutants studied, all floral organs were present in higher numbers [Fig 1C], indicating that the increase in organ and whorls numbers result from either an increase in the stem cell population or from the temporal alteration in stem cell termination rather than an homeotic conversion of one organ type into another. An enlarged stem cell population provides more cells for organogenesis allowing more organ primordia to develop.

Among the single mutants, clv3-2 displayed the most dramatic increase in floral organ number, particularly for stamens and carpels with more than 80% of flowers producing at least one extra stamen and up to a total of 10 stamens, and all flowers producing at least one extra primary carpel [Fig 1]. Furthermore, we observed two types of supernumerary carpels within the gynoecium of the clv3-2 flowers: one that developed from extended meristem activity, seen as ectopic carpel inside the primary carpel [Fig 2A and 2F], and the other arising from the septum [Fig 2C]. We also observed abnormally wide repla S1 Fig, which might be due to enhanced carpel margin meristem activity [36]. Clark et al [5] showed that the clv3-2 FMs are significantly taller and only slightly wider than wild-type FMs. This may explain the much greater increase in numbers of stamens and carpels arising from the inner pair of whorls as compared to numbers of sepals and petals arising from the perianth whorl, the outermost two whorls. In the jba-1D/+ single mutant low percentage of flowers exhibits increased floral organ number although these flowers occasionally displayed petals arising on consecutive whorls, seen as a petal on top of another petal S1 Fig, suggesting that in jba-1D/+ the FM expands laterally thus providing more cells for the development of extra perianth whorl. Both the Ler background and jba-1D/+ enhanced the clv3-2 flower phenotypes of floral organ numbers [Fig 1] and extra whorl numbers [Fig 2D], displaying up to 3 extra whorls of carpels formed within carpels. However, the enhancement of clv3-2 by jba-1D/+ was stronger than the enhancement by Ler. Indeed, clv3-2 jba-1D/+ double mutants showed increased numbers of floral organ in all whorls [Fig 1C], with an average of 4.5 sepals, 4.7 petals, 8.5 stamen and 5 carpels [S1 Table]. This increase suggests that the FMs of the clv3-2 jba-1D/+ double mutant expanded both laterally and horizontally. Among clv3-2 jba-1D/+ flowers, 46% and 61% developed 5 sepals and 5 petals, respectively, indicating that the FM is already enlarged at early stages of flower development, since sepal primordia arise at flower stage 3, shortly after the emergence of the flower primordium [13]. Altogether, these results suggest that defects in the CLV3 and HD-ZIPIII pathways result in strong up-regulation of WUS, starting at the onset of its expression and leading to a born enlarged FM.

Of the three double-mutant combinations studied, jba-1D/+ er-20 showed the lowest percentage of flowers with supernumerary organs [Fig 1]. Moreover, this double mutant did not produce extra carpel whorls [Fig 2B]. Our analysis showed that in the combinations carrying mutation in ER, the carpels and siliques were shorter and wider S2 Fig, as has been previously reported for er mutants [37,38]. In wild type flower the gynoecium develops from two congenitally fused carpels that arise from the center of the meristem as a tube [14,15]. Therefore the wide carpels in er backgrounds S2 Fig might be due to an increase in the width of the FM central zone resulting in a wider gynoecial tube. Uchida et al. [28] showed that loss of function of all three ER family genes leads to lateral expansion of the WUS expression domain, resulting in flattened and broadened SAMs. A lateral expansion of the WUS domain was also shown in jba-1D/+ seedling SAM [25]. We propose that reduction in both ER and HD-ZIPIII activity in the FM leads to lateral expansion of the WUS domain, resulting in spatially alteration of the meristem so that the stem cell population expands horizontally at the expense of a reduced peripheral zone. As a consequence more cells remain as stem cells with strong pluripotent signals that are not competent to differentiate and to be recruited for primordia initiation, leaving fewer cells for the periphery. This can provide an explanation for the low percentage of flowers with supernumerary floral organs that were observed in jba-1D/+ er-20 plants. The evidence that introducing er-20 to clv3-2 jba-1D/+ suppresses the increased number of sepals, petals and stamens phenotype observed in clv3-2 jba-1D/+ but not the supernumerary carpel phenotype [S1 Table], further support this idea that er-20 changes the meristem structure, leading to a reduced peripheral zone from where sepals petals and stamens are formed. In the clv3-2 jba-1D/+ er-20 the most dramatic increase was detected in the number of primary carpels in all the flowers [Fig 1]. We found flowers with up to 14 carpels, all of which developed from the primary gynoecial tube [data not shown]. Our findings suggest that in the triple mutant compared with WT all the FM domains are expanded, providing more cells for all whorls. In addition, the triple mutant flowers exhibited reiteration of multi-fused carpel within carpels that encircle a gradually growing everlasting meristem [Fig 3C] until it bursts and becomes a gigantic meristem [Figs 2E and 3D]. Introducing wus-1 into the triple mutant background resulted in a wus-1 phenotype, indicating that wus is fully epistatic to the three pathways [data not shown], thus in agreement with previously reported data [25,33].

These strong synergistic phenotypes observed in the triple mutant of extra flower number, supernumerary whorls, total loss of determinacy and extreme enlargement of the meristem as compared to any double mutant combination, indicate that the CLV3, ER and HD-ZIPIII pathways regulate FM activity in parallel.

Coordinated FM termination and carpel formation ensure successful reproduction

The flowers of the triple mutant continued to produce carpels while stem cells were still proliferating. This provides additional evidence that carpel identity specification and floral stem cell termination are two separable processes [39]. Yet scanning electron microscope analysis of the triple mutant flower at stage 7, which reveals a dome shaped meristem at the center of the gynoecial tube [Fig 3A], strongly emphasizes the fundamental requirement for coordination between those two independent processes to ensure successful reproduction of plants [2,4042].

In wild-type flowers, following the initiation and growth of the gynoecial tube, the medial ridges meet and fuse to form the septum, which divides the fruit, stretching from the inner side of one replum to the other replum while the ovule primordia arise from the placenta [Fig 3I]. Later, cells in the middle of the septum will form the transmitting tract, a specialized tissue essential for pollen tube growth [15].

In Col, Ler, jba-1D/+ and jba-1D/+ er-20 double mutant, the gynoecium internal tissues developed properly, leading to successful fertilization and seed production [Fig 3E and 3F]. In clv3-2 single and double mutants, the septum and the transmitting tract developed normally, and fertilization occurred prior to the development of the supernumerary carpel whorls that later disrupted the septum [Fig 2A and 2D]. In contrast, the triple mutant FM showed strong meristematic activity and loss of determinacy. Upon the rising of the gynoecial tube, the active meristem physically blocked the development of the septum and consequently the formation of the transmitting tract [Fig 3A and 3B]. Dissecting mature fruits, we found dense meristematic tissue filling the inner spaces of the gynoecium [Fig 2A]. Though at later stages, when the meristem erupts, some ovules can be seen developing on the exposed placenta [Fig 3H]; with no transmitting tract the pollen tube is incapable of reaching the ovules thus resulting in infertile silique.

We conclude that, although carpel specification and floral stem cell termination are separable processes, both processes must be strictly coordinated for successful reproduction.

The robust activity of the FM causes FM indeterminacy

Many regulators governing the temporal repression of WUS to terminate floral stem cell proliferation are part of the AG network, acting as AG activators or downstream to AG [2,19,4347]. AG has recently been shown to directly repress WUS expression by binding to the WUS locus and recruiting the Polycomb Group (PcG) factor CURLY LEAF for chromatin silencing via deposition of Histone3 Lysine27 repressive methylation marks at WUS [19].

Although a decrease in the activity of CLV3, ERECTA and HD-ZIPIII results in loss of determinacy, we propose that these pathways are genetically separable from the AG core mechanism of meristem termination: The AG gene is required for carpel development as demonstrated by the ag mutant having no carpels. Also, we have previously shown that AG is required to confer the jba-1D/+er-20 ectopic carpel phenotype [33]. Since the jba-1D/+ er-20 clv3-2 triple mutant flowers continually producing carpels it is likely that the AG gene is highly expressed and that AG did not lose its function, however fails to repress WUS.

We hypothesize that, due to a reduction in these three pathways that restricts WUS expression, the WUS locus is fully occupied by the transcriptional machinery complexes, keeping it in an active chromatin state and preventing the AG-dependent chromatin modifier mechanism to act. The result would be a failure in shutting down WUS and a total loss of FM determinacy. A future challenge will be to test the molecular basis of this hypothetical scenario.

In summary, the analysis of flowers from combined mutants demonstrates that CLV3, ER and HD-ZIPIII participate to regulate FM activity, presumably through distinct pathways, all controlling WUS expression. We show that meristem activity termination is not a prerequisite for carpel formation but that coupling FM termination with carpel formation is crucial for seed formation. We also demonstrate that regulation of meristem size is one mechanism that leads to determine flower organogenesis.

Materials and Methods

Growth conditions and plant materials

Plants were grown on soil under long days (16 hours light/8 hours dark) and temperatures of 18–22°C. The plant materials used in this study were: Columbia (Col-0), Landsberg erecta (Ler), jba-1D [25],clv3-2 [7], er-20 [33], ag-1 (SALK_014999) and wus-1 [1], ordered from ABRC). Double mutants were generated by crossing jba-1D/+ plants to clv3-2 and er-20 plants and by crossing jba-1D/+er-20 plants to clv3-2 plants.

Microscopy

Plant images were captured using an Olympus SZX7 Stereomicroscope.

Scanning electron microscopy was performed by fixing tissue in methanol as described [48] and using a JEOL 5410 LV scanning electron microscope.

Floral organ counting and Statistical analysis

Floral organ counting was performed as described by Fiume et al. [49]. Statistical analysis was carried out using JMP 10 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). For each line the significance of the categorical partition of organs number was calculated using Fisher`s exact test (p < 0.05) in comparison to it background (i.e Col or Ler).

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Flower and fruit phenotype of the different mutants.

[A] jba 1D/+ flower exhibits extra petals and extra whorl of petals. The petal emerged in sequential whorls [red arrow]. [B] The clv3-2 (Col) fruit shows abnormal replum development (dark green tissue). [C, D] SEM micrograph of Col (C) and clv3-2 (Col) fruits (D). The clv3-2 (Col) fruit shows wider replum in one out of the five repla. [E] clv3-2 jba 1D/+ fruit. Counting the carpels, we assigned a 0.5 value to partial valves, a phenotype observed in all clv3 double mutants but in high frequently in clv3-2 jba 1D/+ [replum is highlighted by yellow line]. [F] clv3-2 jba 1D/+ er-20 exhibits sphere-shaped fruit with variable valve size [replum is highlighted]. Scale bars: A -1 mm, B E and F -500μM, C and D -100 μM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125408.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Siliques from single double and triple mutants of er-20 clv3-2, and jba 1D/+.

[A,B] typical silique from a wild-type Columbia (Col) (A) and Landsberg erecta (Ler) (B) is composed of two fused carpels [C] clv3-2 (Col) and [D]), clv3-2 (Ler), shows siliques comprised of four to five fused carpels. [E] jba 1D/+[F] jba 1D/+ er-20 [G] clv3-2 jba 1D/+exhibits club-shaped siliques comprised of four to six fused carpels. [H] clv3-2 jba 1D/+ er-20 exhibits short sphere-shaped siliques with numerous extra carpels. Note that siliques from mutants carrying mutation in ERECTA are much shorter and border compared to the background plants. Scale bar: 2mm

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125408.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. Average of floral organ numbers.

Numbers of sepal petal stamen and carpel were counted according to Fiume [49] (number of flowers counted in parentheses) and the mean was calaculated [in bold]. The Std Err Mean appears on the right column.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125408.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Table. P Value for Fisher's Exact test presented in Fig.

1. Number of flower organs of each genotype was compared to the corresponding genotype. The corresponding background on the left compared with mutant on the right [i.e. Col X jba1D+ compared to Col].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125408.s004

(XLSX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LEW UL. Performed the experiments: UL LA. Analyzed the data: LEW UL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LEW. Wrote the paper: LEW.

References

  1. 1. Laux T, Mayer KF, Berger J, Jurgens G (1996) The WUSCHEL gene is required for shoot and floral meristem integrity in Arabidopsis. Development 122: 87–96. pmid:8565856
  2. 2. Sun B, Xu Y, Ng KH, Ito T (2009) A timing mechanism for stem cell maintenance and differentiation in the Arabidopsis floral meristem. Genes Dev 23: 1791–1804. pmid:19651987
  3. 3. Mayer KF, Schoof H, Haecker A, Lenhard M, Jurgens G, Laux T (1998) Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 95: 805–815. pmid:9865698
  4. 4. Gross-Hardt R, Laux T (2003) Stem cell regulation in the shoot meristem. J Cell Sci 116: 1659–1666. pmid:12665547
  5. 5. Clark SE, Running MP, Meyerowitz EM (1995) CLAVATA3 is a specific regulator of shoot and floral meristem development affecting the same processes as CLAVATA1 Development 121: 2057–2067.
  6. 6. Durbak AR, Tax FE (2011) CLAVATA signaling pathway receptors of Arabidopsis regulate cell proliferation in fruit organ formation as well as in meristems. Genetics 189: 177–194. pmid:21705761
  7. 7. Brand U, Fletcher JC, Hobe M, Meyerowitz EM, Simon R (2000) Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science 289: 617–619. pmid:10915624
  8. 8. Roe JL, Rivin CJ, Sessions RA, Feldmann KA, Zambryski PC (1993) The Tousled gene in A. thaliana encodes a protein kinase homolog that is required for leaf and flower development. Cell 75: 939–950. pmid:8252629
  9. 9. Ni W, Xie D, Hobbie L, Feng B, Zhao D, Akkara J, et al. (2004) Regulation of flower development in Arabidopsis by SCF complexes. Plant Physiol 134: 1574–1585. pmid:15047903
  10. 10. Carles CC, Lertpiriyapong K, Reville K, Fletcher JC (2004) The ULTRAPETALA1 gene functions early in Arabidopsis development to restrict shoot apical meristem activity and acts through WUSCHEL to regulate floral meristem determinacy. Genetics 167: 1893–1903. pmid:15342527
  11. 11. Running MP, Lavy M, Sternberg H, Galichet A, Gruissem W, Hake S, et al. (2004) Enlarged meristems and delayed growth in plp mutants result from lack of CaaX prenyltransferases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 7815–7820. pmid:15128936
  12. 12. Kwiatkowska D (2006) Flower primordium formation at the Arabidopsis shoot apex: quantitative analysis of surface geometry and growth. J Exp Bot 57: 571–580. pmid:16377735
  13. 13. Smyth DR, Bowman JL, Meyerowitz EM (1990) Early flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2: 755–767. pmid:2152125
  14. 14. Alvarez-Buylla ER, Benitez M, Corvera-Poire A, Chaos Cador A, de Folter S, Gamboa de Buen A, et al (2010) Flower development. Arabidopsis Book 8: e0127. pmid:22303253
  15. 15. Roeder AH, Yanofsky MF (2006) Fruit development in Arabidopsis. Arabidopsis Book 4: e0075. pmid:22303227
  16. 16. Lohmann JU, Hong RL, Hobe M, Busch MA, Parcy F, Simon R, et al. (2001) A molecular link between stem cell regulation and floral patterning in Arabidopsis. Cell 105: 793–803. pmid:11440721
  17. 17. Lenhard M, Bohnert A, Jurgens G, Laux T (2001) Termination of stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis floral meristems by interactions between WUSCHEL and AGAMOUS. Cell 105: 805–814. pmid:11440722
  18. 18. Ming F, Ma H (2009) A terminator of floral stem cells. Genes Dev 23: 1705–1708. pmid:19651982
  19. 19. Liu X, Kim YJ, Muller R, Yumul RE, Liu C, Pan Y, et al. (2011) AGAMOUS terminates floral stem cell maintenance in Arabidopsis by directly repressing WUSCHEL through recruitment of Polycomb Group proteins. Plant Cell 23: 3654–3670. pmid:22028461
  20. 20. Mizukami Y, Ma H (1997) Determination of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by AGAMOUS. Plant Cell 9: 393–408. pmid:9090883
  21. 21. Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1991) Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112: 1–20. pmid:1685111
  22. 22. Yanofsky MF, Ma H, Bowman JL, Drews GN, Feldmann KA, Meyerowitz EM (1990) The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factors. Nature 346: 35–39. pmid:1973265
  23. 23. Uchida N, Shimada M, Tasaka M (2012) Modulation of the balance between stem cell proliferation and consumption by ERECTA-family genes. Plant Signal Behav 7: 1506–1508. pmid:22990445
  24. 24. Shpak ED (2013) Diverse roles of ERECTA family genes in plant development. J Integr Plant Biol 55: 1238–1250. pmid:24016315
  25. 25. Williams L, Grigg SP, Xie M, Christensen S, Fletcher JC (2005) Regulation of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem and lateral organ formation by microRNA miR166g and its AtHD-ZIP target genes. Development 132: 3657–3668. pmid:16033795
  26. 26. Prigge MJ, Otsuga D, Alonso JM, Ecker JR, Drews GN, Clark SE (2005) Class III homeodomain-leucine zipper gene family members have overlapping, antagonistic, and distinct roles in Arabidopsis development. Plant Cell 17: 61–76. pmid:15598805
  27. 27. Green KA, Prigge MJ, Katzman RB, Clark SE (2005) CORONA, a member of the class III homeodomain leucine zipper gene family in Arabidopsis, regulates stem cell specification and organogenesis. Plant Cell 17: 691–704. pmid:15705957
  28. 28. Uchida N, Shimada M, Tasaka M (2013) ERECTA-family receptor kinases regulate stem cell homeostasis via buffering its cytokinin responsiveness in the shoot apical meristem. Plant Cell Physiol 54: 343–351. pmid:22885615
  29. 29. Schoof H, Lenhard M, Haecker A, Mayer KF, Jurgens G, Laux T (2000) The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems in maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 100: 635–644. pmid:10761929
  30. 30. Fletcher JC, Brand U, Running MP, Simon R, Meyerowitz EM (1999) Signaling of cell fate decisions by CLAVATA3 in Arabidopsis shoot meristems. Science 283: 1911–1914. pmid:10082464
  31. 31. Clark SE, Williams RW, Meyerowitz EM (1997) The CLAVATA1 gene encodes a putative receptor kinase that controls shoot and floral meristem size in Arabidopsis. Cell 89: 575–585. pmid:9160749
  32. 32. Jeong S, Trotochaud AE, Clark SE (1999) The Arabidopsis CLAVATA2 gene encodes a receptor-like protein required for the stability of the CLAVATA1 receptor-like kinase. Plant Cell 11: 1925–1934. pmid:10521522
  33. 33. Mandel T, Moreau F, Kutsher Y, Fletcher JC, Carles CC, Eshed Williams L (2014) The ERECTA receptor kinase regulates Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem size, phyllotaxy and floral meristem identity. Development 141: 830–841. pmid:24496620
  34. 34. Shpak ED, Berthiaume CT, Hill EJ, Torii KU (2004) Synergistic interaction of three ERECTA-family receptor-like kinases controls Arabidopsis organ growth and flower development by promoting cell proliferation. Development 131: 1491–1501. pmid:14985254
  35. 35. Ziegelhoffer EC, Medrano LJ, Meyerowitz EM (2000) Cloning of the Arabidopsis WIGGUM gene identifies a role for farnesylation in meristem development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 7633–7638. pmid:10840062
  36. 36. Reyes-Olalde JI, Zuniga-Mayo VM, Chavez Montes RA, Marsch-Martinez N, de Folter S (2013) Inside the gynoecium: at the carpel margin. Trends Plant Sci 18: 644–655. pmid:24008116
  37. 37. Shpak ED, Lakeman MB, Torii KU (2003) Dominant-negative receptor uncovers redundancy in the Arabidopsis ERECTA Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase signaling pathway that regulates organ shape. Plant Cell 15: 1095–1110. pmid:12724536
  38. 38. Torii KU, Mitsukawa N, Oosumi T, Matsuura Y, Yokoyama R, Whittier RF, et al. (1996) The Arabidopsis ERECTA gene encodes a putative receptor protein kinase with extracellular leucine-rich repeats. Plant Cell 8: 735–746. pmid:8624444
  39. 39. Engelhorn J, Moreau F, Fletcher JC, Carles CC (2014) ULTRAPETALA1 and LEAFY pathways function independently in specifying identity and determinacy at the Arabidopsis floral meristem. Ann Bot 114: 1497–1505. pmid:25288633
  40. 40. Zuniga-Mayo VM, Marsch-Martinez N, de Folter S (2012) The class II HD-ZIP JAIBA gene is involved in meristematic activity and important for gynoecium and fruit development in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav 7: 1501–1503. pmid:22951401
  41. 41. Prunet N, Morel P, Negrutiu I, Trehin C (2009) Time to stop: flower meristem termination. Plant Physiol 150: 1764–1772. pmid:19493967
  42. 42. Sun B, Ito T (2015) Regulation of floral stem cell termination in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 6: 17. pmid:25699061
  43. 43. Muller R, Goodrich J (2011) Sweet memories: epigenetic control in flowering. F1000 Biol Rep 3: 13. pmid:21876724
  44. 44. Carles CC, Fletcher JC (2009) The SAND domain protein ULTRAPETALA1 acts as a trithorax group factor to regulate cell fate in plants. Genes Dev 23: 2723–2728. pmid:19952107
  45. 45. Sablowski R (2007) Flowering and determinacy in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 58: 899–907. pmid:17293602
  46. 46. Das P, Ito T, Wellmer F, Vernoux T, Dedieu A, Traas J, et al. (2009) Floral stem cell termination involves the direct regulation of AGAMOUS by PERIANTHIA. Development 136: 1605–1611. pmid:19395638
  47. 47. Sun B, Ito T (2010) Floral stem cells: from dynamic balance towards termination. Biochem Soc Trans 38: 613–616. pmid:20298230
  48. 48. Talbot MJ, White RG (2013) Methanol fixation of plant tissue for Scanning Electron Microscopy improves preservation of tissue morphology and dimensions. Plant Methods 9: 36. pmid:24083940
  49. 49. Fiume E, Pires HR, Kim JS, Fletcher JC (2010) Analyzing floral meristem development. Methods Mol Biol 655: 131–142. pmid:20734258
  50. 50. Krizek BA (2011) Auxin regulation of Arabidopsis flower development involves members of the AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE/PLETHORA (AIL/PLT) family. J Exp Bot 62: 3311–3319. pmid:21511900