We cloned a new glycoside hydrolase family 6 gene, Hicel6C, from the thermophilic fungus Humicola insolens Y1 and expressed it in Pichia pastoris. Using barley β-glucan as a substrate, recombinant HiCel6C protein exhibited neutral pH (6.5) and high temperature (70°C) optima. Distinct from most reported acidic fungal endo-β-1,4-glucanases, HiCel6C was alkali-tolerant, retaining greater than 98.0, 61.2, and 27.6% of peak activity at pH 8.0, 9.0, and 10.0, respectively, and exhibited good stability over a wide pH range (pH 5.0−11.0) and at temperatures up to 60°C. The Km and Vmax values of HiCel6C for barley β-glucan were 1.29 mg/mL and 752 μmol/min·mg, respectively. HiCel6C was strictly specific for the β-1,4-glucoside linkage exhibiting activity toward barley β-glucan, lichenan, and carboxy methylcellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na), but not toward laminarin (1,3-β-glucan). HiCel6C cleaved the internal glycosidic linkages of cellooligosaccharides randomly and thus represents an endo-cleaving enzyme. The predominant product of polysaccharide hydrolysis by HiCel6C was cellobiose, suggesting that it functions by an endo-processive mechanism. The favorable properties of HiCel6C make it a good candidate for basic research and for applications in the textile and brewing industries.
Citation: Xu X, Li J, Zhang W, Huang H, Shi P, Luo H, et al. (2015) A Neutral Thermostable β-1,4-Glucanase from Humicola insolens Y1 with Potential for Applications in Various Industries. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0124925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124925
Academic Editor: Israel Silman, Weizmann Institute of Science, ISRAEL
Received: November 20, 2014; Accepted: March 10, 2015; Published: April 24, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA022105, 2012AA022207) and the National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of China (31225026) and the China Modern Agriculture Research System (CARS-42). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Cellulose, which consists of glucose monomer units linked by β-1,4-glucosidic bonds, is the most abundant carbohydrate on Earth and is considered to be a major renewable energy source . Celluloses can be converted to valuable products such as biofuels, chemicals, and animal feed . Due to its highly complex structure, the complete hydrolysis of cellulose requires the synergistic action of three categories of cellulases. Endo-1,4-β-d-glucanases (EC188.8.131.52) attack amorphous regions on soluble and insoluble 1,4-β-glucan substrates in a random manner to generate oligosaccharides and new chain ends, exo-1,4-β-d-glucanases (i.e. cellobiohydrolase, EC 184.108.40.206 and EC220.127.116.11) release cellobiose residues from the reducing or nonreducing ends of the glucan, while β-d-glucosidases (EC 18.104.22.168) degrade cellobiose to release glucose [3, 4].
Endo-1,4-β-glucanases are crucial enzymes in cellulose degradation for biomass conversion and for various industrial processes used in the textile, brewing and wine, animal feed, laundry, and pulp and paper industries . Based on similarities in the amino acid sequences and structures of the proteins, endo-β-1,4-glucanases are classified into 11 glycoside hydrolase (GH) families designated GH5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 44, 45, 48, 51, and 74 . The GH6 family includes both endoglucanases (E.C22.214.171.124) and cellobiohydrolases (E.C126.96.36.199) both of which hydrolyze cellulose in a predominantly endo or processive manner from the non-reducing end to generate cellooligosaccharide or cellobiose (http://www.cazy.org).
Neutral endo-glucanases are favored by the textile industry for biostoning of indigo-dyed denim fabric because they have less aggressive effects on the fabric and have superior low backstaining properties . Because of their high reaction rate and excellent stability at high temperatures, thermophilic endo-glucanases present an outstanding option for the brewing industry to improve the brewing process at elevated temperatures. However, most commercially available cellulases are derived from mesophilic filamentous fungi such as Trichoderma spp., Penicillium spp., and Aspergillus spp. and have acidophilic properties . Therefore, novel endo-glucanases with high efficiency, neutral activity, and good thermostability are in great demand.
Filamentous fungi of the Humicola spp. are excellent producers of neutral thermostable cellulases for industrial applications [9–12]. Thermophilic Humicola insolens Y1 can produce a variety of GH enzymes with neutral pH and high temperature optima [13–15]. In this study, we cloned a novel GH6 gene (Hicel6C) from H. insolens Y1, expressed it in Pichia pastoris, and determined the biochemical properties of the recombinant HiCel6C protein. Compared to other reported fungal endo-glucanases, HiCel6C is thermophilic and alkali-tolerant and has potential for applications in the textile and brewing industries.
Materials and Methods
Strains, plasmids, media, and chemicals
Humicola insolens Y1 CGMCC 4573 was cultured routinely in wheat bran medium at 42°C as described previously . Escherichia coli Trans1-T1 (TransGen, China) was cultivated in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C for gene cloning and sequencing. Pichia pastoris GS115 (Invitrogen, USA) was cultivated in yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) medium at 30°C and used for gene expression. The plasmids pEASY-Blunt (TransGen) and pPIC9 (Invitrogen) were used as cloning and expression vectors, respectively. Substrates including barley β-glucan, lichenan, laminarin, birch wood xylan, 4-nitrophenyl β-d-cellobioside (pNPC), 4-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG), and carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na) were purchased from Sigma (USA). A DNA purification kit, DNA polymerase, and restriction endonucleases were purchased from TaKaRa (Japan). T4 DNA ligase was purchased from Promega.
Minimal dextrose (MD) medium, buffered glycerol complex (BMGY) medium, and buffered methanol complex (BMMY) medium were prepared according to the manual of the Pichia Expression Kit (Invitrogen).
Cloning of an Hicel6C cDNA
Total RNA was extracted from H. insolens Y1 using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen) after 48 h of cultivation in wheat bran medium. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript RT reagent kit (TaKaRa). The glucanase encoding gene, Hicel6C, was identified in the genome sequence of H. insolens Y1 (whole genome sequencing in progress). An Hicel6C cDNA incorporating a C-terminal His6-tag coding sequence was generated using the specific primers Hicel6CF 5′-GGGAATTCGCTCCCAGCCCCAAGAGC-3′ (EcoRI site underlined) and Hicel6CR 5′- GCGGCCGCTTAGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGGTGCCAGAACTTGAAGATGG-3′ (NotI site underlined) and cloned into the vector pEASY-Blunt for sequencing.
The Hicel6C protein sequence translated from the gene sequence was analyzed using FGENESH software (http://linux1.softberry.com/berry.phtml). An amino acid sequence alignment was analyzed using blastp software (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Multiple sequence alignments were performed using the ClustalW software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalW/). A signal peptide sequence was predicted using SignalP 4.1 Server software (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/). Potential N-glycosylation sites were predicted using the online NetNglyc server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/). Protein functional analysis was performed using the InterProScan software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/InterProScan/). Homology modeling and calculations of protein ionization and electrostatic potentials were performed using the Accelrys Discovery Studio 2.5 software with Cel6A (1BVW_A) and Cel6B (1DYS_A) from H. insolens serving as templates.
Heterologous expression in P. pastoris
The Hicel6C cDNA sequence lacking the signal peptide coding sequence was digested with EcoRI and NotI and ligated into the corresponding sites of the pPIC9 vector to create an in-frame fusion with the α-factor signal peptide yielding pPIC9-Hicel6C. The recombinant plasmid was linearized using BglII and transformed into P. pastoris GS115 competent cells by electroporation using a Gene PulserX cell Electroporation System (Bio-Rad, USA). Positive transformants were cultured on MD plates and grown for 1–2 days at 30°C until single colonies appeared. These colonies were then transferred to 5 mL of BMGY medium and grown at 30°C for 2 d. The cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 1 mL of BMMY medium containing 0.5% methanol for induction. Following induction, the culture supernatant was collected by centrifugation (12,000 × g, 4°C, 10 min) for use in a glucanase activity assay with barley β-glucan as the substrate. The positive transformant exhibiting the highest endo-glucanase activity was selected for fed-batch-mode fermentation in a 3-L fermenter containing 2 L of growth medium. The entire procedure was carried out according to the Invitrogen Pichia Expression Kit manual with some modifications. The positive transformant was first grown in a 250-mL flask containing 50 mL of yeast peptone dextrose medium at 30°C with agitation at 220 rpm for 48 h followed by overnight growth in a 1-L flask containing 200 mL of the same medium at 30°C and 220 rpm. Then the entire culture was transferred into a 3-L fermenter containing 2 L of basal salt medium with PMT1 trace salts solution and grown at 30°C and pH 6 with agitation at 1000 rpm and an aeration rate of 1.5 vvm. A glucose-fed batch phase was activated by addition of 25% glucose in PMT1 solution at 36 mL/h/L for 4 h when the glucose in the medium was completely consumed. A mixture of glucose and methanol (8:1) was then added at a rate of 9 mL/h/L to acclimatize the cells to methanol. The final methanol-fed batch phase was initiated for induction and expression of the recombinant protein for 108 h. The glucose was consumed completely and the dissolved oxygen level was maintained above 20% during the process. During induction/expression, the glucanase activity in the culture supernatant was assayed at multiple time intervals.
Purification and identification of recombinant HiCel6C
The culture supernatant was collected by centrifugation (6000 × g, 4°C, 20 min) to remove cell debris and undissolved materials followed by concentration through a Vivaflow 200 ultrafiltration membrane with a 10-kDa molecular weight cut-off (Vivascience, Germany). The crude enzyme was loaded onto a His-Trap Sepharose XL FPLC column (Amersham Pharmacia, Sweden) pre-equilibrated with NTA0 buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, 0.5 M NaCl, 10% glycerol) and eluted using a linear gradient of imidazole (0.0–0.5 M) in NTA0 buffer at a flow rate of 3.0 mL/min. Fractions with high enzymatic activity were collected. The purity of the protein was determined by SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250. For identification, the protein band was excised from the gel, digested with trypsin, and sequenced using liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS/MS) at the Institute of Apicultural Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. To determine the protein concentration, a Bradford assay was used with bovine serine albumin as the standard. To remove N-glycosylation, purified recombinant HiCel6C (2 μg) was treated with 500 U of endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H (Endo H) for 2 h at 37°C according to the supplier's instructions (New England Biolabs, USA) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The native molecular weight (MW) of HiCel6C was determined by size exclusion chromatography using a 3-mL elution volume and a Superdex 200 exclusion column (Amersham Pharmacia, Sweden). The column was equilibrated and eluted with appropriate buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.2) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min and calibrated with lysozyme from chicken egg white (MW = 14,300), α-chymotrypsinogen A from bovine pancreas (MW = 24,500), albumin egg (MW = 45,000), and albumin bovine V (MW = 67,000). The apparent MW of HiCel6C was calculated from the calibration curve of log (MW) vs. elution volume.
Glucanase activity assay
Glucanase activity was determined using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method . The standard assay system consisted of 100 μL of appropriately diluted enzyme and 900 μL of 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 6.5) containing 1.0% (w/v) barley β-glucan at 70°C for 10 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of 1.5 mL of DNS reagent and then boiled for 5 min. When the reaction mixture cooled to room temperature, the absorbance at 540 nm was determined. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1 μmol of reducing sugar per minute under the above conditions. Glucose was used as the standard.
Biochemical characterization of purified recombinant glucanase
Barley β-glucan was used as the substrate for biochemical characterization of purified recombinant HiCel6C. The optimal pH of the purified recombinant HiCel6C was determined in various buffers with pH values ranging from 3.0 to 11.0 at 70°C for 10 min. The pH stability of HiCel6C was determined by measuring the residual enzymatic activity under standard conditions (pH 6.5, 70°C, and 10 min) after incubation at 37°C for 1 h at various pH values of 2.0–12.0. The buffers used were 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 2.0–8.0), 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0–9.0), and 100 mM glycine-NaOH (pH 9.0–12.0).
The optimal temperature for HiCel6C activity in the temperature range 40–90°C was determined by measuring activity in 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 6.5) for 10 min. The thermostability of the enzyme was determined by measuring the residual activity under standard conditions after incubation at 60, 65, and 70°C for various time periods.
To study the effects of metal ions and chemical reagents on the activity of purified recombinant HiCel6C, various metal ions (KCl, NaCl, CaCl2, CoCl2, NiCl2, CuSO4, MgSO4, MnSO4, ZnSO4, FeCl3, Pb(CH3COO)2, or AgNO3) or reagents (SDS, β-mercaptoethanol, CTAB, or EDTA) were added to the reaction system to a final concentration of 1 or 10 mM. The residual enzyme activity was determined under the standard assay conditions. An experiment without any added ion or chemical reagent was carried out as a control.
Substrate specificity and kinetic analysis
The substrate specificity of HiCel6C was assayed at 70°C for 10 min in 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 6.5) containing 1.0% (w/v) barley β-glucan, laminarin, lichenan, birch wood xylan, Avicel, or CMC-Na or 4 mM pNPC and pNPG. The kinetic parameters Km and Vmax of HiCel6C were examined in 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 6.5) containing 0.2–10 mg/ml barley β-glucan at 70°C for 5 min. The resulting data were plotted using the Lineweaver-Burk method.
Analysis of hydrolysis products
The reaction system containing 3 U of purified HiCel6C, 0.6 mg of cellooligosaccharide (cellobiose, cellotriose, cellotetraose, cellopentaose, or cellohexaose), and 10 mg of CMC-Na or 2 mg of barley β-glucan in 1 mL of 200 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 6.5) was incubated at 50°C for 20 h. For analysis of initial products, the reaction system containing 0.3 U of purified HiCel6C and 0.2 mg of cellohexaose in 1 mL of 200 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 6.5) was incubated at 70°C for 10 min. The excess enzyme was removed from the reaction system using a Nanosep centrifugal 3K device (Pall, USA). The hydrolysis products were analyzed using high-performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC) with a model 2500 system from Dionex (USA). Glucose and cellooligosacchardies were used as standards.
Results and Discussion
Cloning and sequence analysis of an Hicel6C cDNA from H. insolens Y1
We isolated a 1149-bp, full-length Hicel6C cDNA from H. insolens Y1 that encoded a polypeptide 382 amino acids in length. The deduced HiCel6C protein contained a putative signal peptide at the N-terminus (residues 1–18) and a GH6 catalytic domain. The calculated molecular mass and pI value were estimated to be 41.7 kDa and 7.26, respectively. Further sequence analysis using the NetNGlyc Server identified three potential N-glycosylation sites (Asn-Xaa-Thr/Ser, where Xaa is not Pro). The deduced HiCel6C amino acid sequence shared the highest identity of 83% with a putative GH6 protein from Chaetomium atrobrunneum (AGV05123.1) and sequence identities of 57 and 38% with endo-β-1,4-glucanase (Cel6B, Q7SIG5.1) and cellobiohydrolase II (Cel6A, Q9C1S9.1), respectively, from H. insolens (Fig 1). Based on sequence alignment and homology modeling, HiCel6C has greater sequence and structural similarity to H. insolens Cel6B . Both enzymes have an open N-terminal loop which is conserved among GH6 family members, but lack the C-terminal active-site-enclosing loop which is present in their cellobiohydrolase counterparts (S1 Fig). The two putative conserved catalytic residues of HiCel6C were predicted to be Asp152 and Asp330 corresponding to Asp139 and Asp316 of Cel6B.
Sequences include the HiCel6A and HiCel6B glucanases from H. insolens (1BVW_A and 1DYS_A), CcCel6A and CcCel6C from Coprinopsis cinerea (3VOG_A and 3A64_A), and TrCel6A from Trichoderma reesei (3CBH_A). Identical and conserved residues are shaded in black and gray, respectively. Putative catalytic residues, D152 and D330, are indicated by asterisks. Potential N-glycosylation sites are boxed.
Expression, purification, and identification of HiCel6C
Using cDNA generated from strain Y1 as template and Hicel6CF and Hicel6CR primers, we amplified a fragment of the Hicel6C gene lacking the signal peptide coding sequence. The resulting sequence was digested with EcoRI and NotI and ligated into the vector pPIC9. The recombinant plasmid pPIC9-Hicel6C was integrated into the chromosome of P. pastoris GS115. The transformant exhibiting the highest endo-glucanase activity was selected for high-cell-density fermentation in a 3-L fermenter. Recombinant HiCel6C protein was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity by Ni-NTA affinity chromatography (S2 Fig). The yield of HiCel6C was approximately 200.2 mg/L. The purified fractions from the fifth and sixth collection tubes, which had the highest protein concentrations (S2 Fig), were combined for further activity analysis. Size exclusion chromatography revealed that HiCel6C eluted as a single peak with a MW of approximately 36.3 kDa, suggesting that HiCel6C was monomeric in solution (S3 Fig). The lower apparent MW after size exclusion chromatography than the calculated molecular weight of 41.7 kDa may be due to nonglobular folding of the protein. Purified HiCel6C migrated as a single band of ~50.0 kDa on SDS-PAGE which was greater than its calculated molecular weight. After deglycosylation with Endo H, the molecular mass decreased by ~8 kDa (Fig 2). N-glycosylation often occurs when proteins are expressed heterologously in P. pastoris . The observed variation in apparent molecular mass of HiCel6C can be ascribed to glycosylation of its three putative N-glycosylation sites.
Lanes: M, molecular mass markers; 1, culture supernatant of recombinant P. pastoris GS115 harboring Hicel6C; 2, purified recombinant HiCel6C protein; 3, HiCel6C deglycosylated by treatment with Endo H.
To identify the purified protein, seven peptides, KSPKPSTPTGDVNPFEGK, KQIVGLVLYNLPDR, DGLQLYKDTFVKPYAEK, PNLPLAAKEFATVLK, GFATNVSNYNPFNALVR, VHLPGAR, and AGEWFDEYAQMLVKNADKSIFK, obtained by LC-ESI-MS/MS were compared to the deduced HiCel6C amino acid sequence. The complete match of these sequences indicated that the purified protein was in fact recombinant HiCel6C.
Characterization of purified recombinant HiCel6C
Most fungal endo-β-1,4-glucanases—such as endoglucanase II from Trichoderma reesei , EglA from Aspergillus niger VTCC-F021 , and EgG5 from Phialophora sp. G5 —have an acidic pH optimum (pH 4.0–6.0). However, the cellulases and hemicellulases from Humicola sp. such as rCBH1.2 from H. grisea var. thermoidea (pH optimum of 8.0)  and XynA and Man5A from H. insolens Y1 [13, 14] are alkali-tolerant. HiCel6C exhibited a similar preference for alkaline conditions with a pH optimum of 6.5 (Fig 3A) and it retained greater than 98% of its peak activity at pH 8.0 and 61.2 and 27.6% of peak activity at pH 9.0 and 10.0, respectively. The enzyme was also stable over a wide pH range of 5.0–11.0 at 37°C with retention of greater than 80% of activity after 1 h of incubation. When the temperature was increased to 60°C, HiCel6C activity was stable only in the pH range 5.0–11.0 (Fig 3B). The profile splitting in Fig 3A and 3B was caused by buffer changes required for the assay. Due to the strength and nature of ions, enzyme activity may vary considerably in different buffer systems even at identical pH. Electrostatic potential analysis indicated that the number of basic residues located on the HiCel6C protein surface was greater than for its acidophilic counterparts (data not shown). This characteristic may be an important factor in the high adaptability and stability of HiCel6C under alkaline conditions. Previous studies demonstrated that neutral cellulases tend to cause much less indigo backstaining and higher abrasion than acid enzymes during biostoning of denim garments [23, 24]. The excellent alkali-tolerance of neutral HiCel6C makes it particularly well suited for applications in the textile industry.
(A) Effect of pH on β-1,4-glucanase activity. (B) Effect of pH on the stability of β-1,4-glucanase activity. (C) Effect of temperature on β-1,4-glucanase activity. (D) Thermostability of purified recombinant HiCel6C. Buffers used were 100 mM Na2HPO4-citric acid (pH 2.0–8.0), 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0–9.0), and 100 mM glycine-NaOH (pH 9.0–12.0).
The optimal temperature for HiCel6C activity was estimated to be 70°C (Fig 3C) which is greater than generally known fungal endo-β-1,4-glucanases which have temperature optima of 50–60°C and are stable up to 50–55°C. Under high temperature conditions, β-1,4-glucanases from thermophilic fungi are more active and more stable than those from mesophiles [25–27]. To date, only a few fungal endo-β-1,4-glucanases, such as those from Talaromyces emersonii CBS394.64 , Penicillium pinophilum , and Phialophora sp. G5 , have been shown to have temperature optima similar to or higher than that of HiCel6C. We also investigated the thermal stability of purified HiCel6C (Fig 3D). After incubation at 60°C for 1 h, the enzyme retained greater than 90% of its initial activity. Thermostable endoglucanases are of great interest due to their potential applications in various industrial processes such as bioconversion of biomass into fermentative products, improvement of barley malting in brewing, and modification of the coarse mechanical pulp and reduction of the amount of chlorine used for bleaching in the pulp and paper industry.
The effects of metal ions and chemical reagents on HiCel6C activity were determined at concentrations of 1 and 10 mM (Table 1). Most metal ions and chemicals had no significant effect on HiCel6C activity with the exceptions of CTAB and Cu2+ at 10 mM and Mn2+ at 1 and 10 mM. HiCel6C exhibited significant resistance to SDS at concentrations of 1 and 10 mM, retaining 76.3 and 31.6% of activity, respectively. Thus HiCel6C has properties that are advantageous for applications in laundry detergents and the textile industry.
Substrate specificity and kinetic parameters
The highest enzymatic activity of the purified HiCel6C was exhibited against barley β-glucan (100.0%) followed by lichenan (60.5%) and CMC-Na (13.6%), but no activity was shown against laminarin (1,3–1,6-β-glucan), 4-nitrophenyl β-d-cellobioside (pNPC), or 4-nitrophenyl β-d-glucopyranoside (pNPG) (Table 2). The HiCel6C activity was strictly specific for the β-1,4-glucoside linkage. The higher activity of HiCel6C against barley β-glucan than CMC-Na may be ascribed to the fact that CMC is highly substituted with methoxy side chains which interfere with the enzyme activity . Moreover, HiCel6C was inactive against Avicel, filter paper, and birch wood xylan. The inactivity against crystalline substrates such as Avicel may be ascribed to the presence of a single catalytic domain in HiCel6C without a carbohydrate-binding module.
When using barley β-glucan as the substrate, the specific activity and Km and Vmax values of purified recombinant HiCel6C were 372 U/mg, 1.29 mg/mL, and 752 μmol/min·mg, respectively.
Analysis of hydrolysis products
To explore the mode of action of HiCel6C, we analyzed the products of cellooligosaccharide hydrolysis by HiCel6C using high-performance anion exchange chromatography (HPAEC). HiCel6C did not degrade cellobiose, but had low activity against cellotriose to produce glucose and cellobiose (S4 Fig). In the presence of HiCel6C, cellotetraose was degraded completely with cellobiose as the main product. Under the same conditions, cellopentaose was hydrolyzed to cellobiose, cellotriose, and small amounts of glucose. The products of cellohexaose hydrolysis during the initial 10 min included cellobiose, cellotriose, cellotetraose, and a trace amount of glucose (S5 Fig). Upon further incubation, cellohexaose was hydrolyzed completely to cellobiose, cellotriose, and a small amount of glucose (S4 Fig). These results indicated that HiCel6C cuts cellooligosaccharides randomly and thus represents a typical endo-cleaving enzyme. HiCel6C provides another example of GH6 endoglucanases that lack the C-terminal active-site-enclosing loop. The C-terminal active-site-enclosing loop may be the crucial element that differentiates GH6 endo- and exo-glucanases. This hypothesis was verified by site-directed mutation of the C-terminus-proximal loop in cellobiohydrolase A of Cellulomonas fimi, which enhanced its endoglucanase activity .
We also examined the reaction products generated hydrolysis of barley β -glucan and CMC-Na by HiCel6C (Fig 4). Cellobiose was the predominant hydrolysis product of both barley β-glucan and CMC-Na followed by small amounts of glucose and cellotriose. This result provided evidence for a potential processive mechanism of HiCel6C activity similar to that of Cel5 from Hahella chejuensis , Cel5H from S. degradans , and EG1 from V. volvacea  all of which have been reported to be processive endoglucanases of the GH5 family.
1–5, hydrolysis products of CMC-Na after incubation with HiCel6C for 5 min, 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, and 24 h, respectively; 6, cellooligosaccharides standards. G1, glucose; G2, cellobiose; G3, cellotriose; G4, cellotetraose; G5, cellopentaose; and G6, cellohexaose.
We identified a novel GH6 endo-β-1,4-glucanase gene from H. insolens Y1 and overexpressed it in P. pastoris GS115. Recombinant HiCel6C protein exhibited optimal activity at pH 6.5 and 70°C when barley β-glucan was used as substrate. HiCel6C was alkali-tolerant and remained stable over a pH range of 5.0–11.0 and at temperatures up to 60°C. Substrate specificity and hydrolysis product analysis indicated that HiCel6C is a typical β-1,4-glucanase with an endo-cleaving mode. These properties make HiCel6C of considerable interest for basic research and for various industrial applications, especially in the textile and brewing industries.
S1 Fig. Modeled structures of the active-center loops of the H. insolens GH6 cellulases HiCel6C (blue), HiCel6B (yellow), and HiCel6A (red).
S2 Fig. Recombinant HiCel6C purified by Ni-NTA chromatography.
(A) Profile of the purified protein corresponding to the collection tubes; (B) SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified protein. M: protein markers; lanes 1–5: fractions corresponding to collection tubes 4–8.
S3 Fig. Size exclusion chromatography of purified HiCel6C.
(A) Calibration curve of standard proteins showing the relationship between retention volume and the log MW of the macromolecules. (B) Profile of purified HiCel6C.
S4 Fig. HPAEC analysis of products of cellooligosaccharide hydrolysis by HiCel6C.
1, cellohexaose; 2, cellopentaose; 3, cellotetraose; 4, cellotriose; 5, cellobiose; 6, cellooligosaccharide standards. G1, glucose; G2, cellobiose; G3, cellotriose; G4, cellotetraose; G5, cellopentaose; and G6, cellohexaose.
S5 Fig. HPAEC analysis of the initial products of cellohexaose hydrolysis by HiCel6C.
1, cellooligosaccharides standards. G1, glucose; G2, cellobiose; G3, cellotriose; G4, cellotetraose; G5, cellopentaose; G6, cellohexaose; and 2, control reaction without enzyme; 3, products of cellohexaose hydrolysis by HiCel6C.
The authors sincerely thank the laboratory technicians Zhaohui Zhang and Dr. Rui Ma at the Key Laboratory of Feed Biotechnology of the Ministry of Agriculture for their help in protein purification and English language editing, respectively.
Conceived and designed the experiments: XX JL PS WZ BY YF. Performed the experiments: XX JL. Analyzed the data: XX JL HH PS HL BL YZ. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WZ BY ZZ. Wrote the paper: XX JL PS.
- 1. Bayer EA, Chanzy H, Lamed R, Shoham Y. Cellulose, cellulases and cellulosomes. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 1998;8(5):548–57. pmid:9818257
- 2. Jeya M, Joo AR, Lee KM, Sim WI, Oh DK, Kim YS, et al. Characterization of endo-β-1,4-glucanase from a novel strain of Penicillium pinophilum KMJ601. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85(4):1005–14. pmid:19575195
- 3. Wilson DB. Microbial diversity of cellulose hydrolysis. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14(3):259–63. pmid:21531609
- 4. Tiwari P, Misra BN, Sangwan NS. β-Glucosidases from the fungus Trichoderma: an efficient cellulase machinery in biotechnological applications. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:203735. pmid:23984325
- 5. Bhat M. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 2000;18(5):355–83. pmid:14538100
- 6. Cantarel BL, Coutinho PM, Rancurel C, Bernard T, Lombard V, Henrissat B. The Carbohydrate-Active EnZymes database (CAZy): an expert resource for glycogenomics. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37(Database issue):D233–8. pmid:18838391
- 7. Miettinen-Oinonen A, Londesborough J, Joutsjoki V, Lantto R, Vehmaanperä J. Three cellulases from Melanocarpus albomyces for textile treatment at neutral pH. Enzyme Microbial Tech. 2004;34(3–4):332–41.
- 8. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66(3):506–77. pmid:12209002
- 9. Schulein M. Enzymatic properties of cellulases from Humicola insolens. J Biotech. 1997;57(1–3):71–81. pmid:9127460
- 10. Sorensen HR, Jorgensen CT, Hansen CH, Jorgensen CI, Pedersen S, Meyer AS. A novel GH43 α-L-arabinofuranosidase from Humicola insolens: mode of action and synergy with GH51 α-L-arabinofuranosidases on wheat arabinoxylan. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;73(4):850–61. pmid:16944135
- 11. Souza FHM, Inocentes RF, Ward RJ, Jorge JA, Furriel RPM. Glucose and xylose stimulation of a β-glucosidase from the thermophilic fungus Humicola insolens: A kinetic and biophysical study. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B-Enzymatic. 2013;94:119–28.
- 12. Takashima S, Iikura H, Nakamura A, Hidaka M, Masaki H, Uozumi T. Comparison of gene structures and enzymatic properties between two endoglucanases from Humicola grisea. J Biotechnol. 1999;67(2–3):85–97. pmid:9990734
- 13. Du YL, Shi PJ, Huang HQ, Zhang X, Luo HY, Wang YR, et al. Characterization of three novel thermophilic xylanases from Humicola insolens Y1 with application potentials in the brewing industry. Bioresour Technol. 2013;130:161–7. pmid:23306124
- 14. Luo HY, Wang K, Huang HQ, Shi PJ, Yang PL, Yao B. Gene cloning, expression, and biochemical characterization of an alkali-tolerant β-mannanase from Humicola insolens Y1. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39(4):547–55. pmid:22179540
- 15. Yang XZ, Shi PJ, Huang HQ, Luo HY, Wang YR, Zhang W, et al. Two xylose-tolerant GH43 bifunctional β-xylosidase/α-arabinosidases and one GH11 xylanase from Humicola insolens and their synergy in the degradation of xylan. Food Chem. 2014;148:381–7. pmid:24262572
- 16. Miller GL. Use of Dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959;31 (3):426–8.
- 17. Davies GJ, Brzozowski AM, Dauter M, Varrot A, Schulein M. Structure and function of Humicola insolens family 6 cellulases: structure of the endoglucanase, Cel6B, at 1.6 A resolution. Biochem J. 2000;348 Pt 1:201–7. pmid:10794732
- 18. Conde R, Cueva R, Pablo G, Polaina J, Larriba G. A search for hyperglycosylation signals in yeast glycoproteins. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(42):43789–98. pmid:15280361
- 19. Samanta S, Basu A, Halder UC, Sen SK. Characterization of Trichoderma reesei endoglucanase II expressed heterologously in Pichia pastoris for better biofinishing and biostoning. J Microbiol (Seoul, Korea). 2012;50(3):518–25. pmid:22752917
- 20. Pham TH, Quyen DT, Nghiem NM, Vu TD. Cloning, expression, purification, and properties of an endoglucanase gene (glycosyl hydrolase family 12) from Aspergillus niger VTCC-F021 in Pichia pastoris. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21(10):1012–20. pmid:22031024
- 21. Zhao JQ, Shi PJ, Yuan TZ, Huang HQ, Li ZY, Meng K, et al. Purification, gene cloning and characterization of an acidic β-1,4-glucanase from Phialophora sp. G5 with potential applications in the brewing and feed industries. J Biosci Bioeng. 2012;114(4):379–84. pmid:22621953
- 22. Oliveira GS, Ulhoa CJ, Silveira MH, Andreaus J, Silva-Pereira I, Pocas-Fonseca MJ, et al. An alkaline thermostable recombinant Humicola grisea var. thermoidea cellobiohydrolase presents bifunctional (endo/exoglucanase) activity on cellulosic substrates. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;29(1):19–26. pmid:23054694
- 23. Anish R, Rahman MS, Rao M. Application of cellulases from an alkalothermophilic Thermomonospora sp. in biopolishing of denims. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007;96(1):48–56. pmid:16952150
- 24. Cavaco-Paulo A MJ, Almeida L, Kilburn D. Indigo backstaining during cellulase washing. Textile Res J. 1998;68(6):398–401.
- 25. Busk PK, Lange L. Cellulolytic potential of thermophilic species from four fungal orders. AMB Express. 2013;3(1):47. pmid:23958135
- 26. Li DC, Li AN, Papageorgiou AC. Cellulases from thermophilic fungi: recent insights and biotechnological potential. Enzyme research. 2011;2011:308730. pmid:22145076
- 27. Maheshwari R, Bharadwaj G, Bhat MK. Thermophilic fungi: their physiology and enzymes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64(3):461–88. pmid:10974122
- 28. Wang K, Luo HY, Bai YG, Shi PJ, Huang HQ, Xue XL, et al. A thermophilic endo-1,4-β-glucanase from Talaromyces emersonii CBS394.64 with broad substrate specificity and great application potentials. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014.
- 29. Zhao JQ, Shi PJ, Li ZY, Yang PL, Luo HY, Bai YG, et al. Two neutral thermostable cellulases from Phialophora sp. G5 act synergistically in the hydrolysis of filter paper. Bioresour Technol. 2012;121:404–10. pmid:22868008
- 30. Karlsson J, Momcilovic D, Wittgren B, Schulein M, Tjerneld F, Brinkmalm G. Enzymatic degradation of carboxymethyl cellulose hydrolyzed by the endoglucanases Cel5A, Cel7B, and Cel45A from Humicola insolens and Cel7B, Cel12A, and Cel45Acore from Trichoderma reesei. Biopolymers. 2002;63(1):32–40. pmid:11754346
- 31. Meinke A, Damude HG, Tomme P, Kwan E, Kilburn DG, Miller RC Jr., et al. Enhancement of the endo-β-1,4-glucanase activity of an exocellobiohydrolase by deletion of a surface loop. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(9):4383–6. pmid:7876202
- 32. Ghatge SS, Telke AA, Kang SH, Arulalapperumal V, Lee KW, Govindwar SP, et al. Characterization of modular bifunctional processive endoglucanase Cel5 from Hahella chejuensis KCTC 2396. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(10):4421–35. pmid:24343767
- 33. Watson BJ, Zhang H, Longmire AG, Moon YH, Hutcheson SW. Processive endoglucanases mediate degradation of cellulose by Saccharophagus degradans. J Bacteriol. 2009;191(18):5697–705. pmid:19617364
- 34. Zheng F, Ding SJ. Processivity and enzymatic mode of a glycoside hydrolase family 5 endoglucanase from Volvariella volvacea. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79(3):989–96. pmid:23204424