Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Oncogenic NRAS Primes Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells for Differentiation

  • Cornelia Brendel ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Cornelia Brendel, Sabine Teichler

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Sabine Teichler ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Cornelia Brendel, Sabine Teichler

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Axel Millahn,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Thorsten Stiewe,

    Affiliation Molecular Oncology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Michael Krause,

    Affiliation Molecular Oncology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Kathleen Stabla,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Petra Ross,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Minh Huynh,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Thomas Illmer,

    Affiliation Medical Clinic I, University Clinic of Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany

  • Marco Mernberger,

    Affiliation Molecular Oncology, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Christina Barckhausen,

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

  • Andreas Neubauer

    neubauer@mailer.uni-marburg.de

    Affiliation Department of Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Philipps University of Marburg, and University Clinic Giessen and Marburg, Marburg, Germany

Oncogenic NRAS Primes Primary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells for Differentiation

  • Cornelia Brendel, 
  • Sabine Teichler, 
  • Axel Millahn, 
  • Thorsten Stiewe, 
  • Michael Krause, 
  • Kathleen Stabla, 
  • Petra Ross, 
  • Minh Huynh, 
  • Thomas Illmer, 
  • Marco Mernberger
PLOS
x

Abstract

RAS mutations are frequently found among acute myeloid leukemia patients (AML), generating a constitutively active signaling protein changing cellular proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis. We have previously shown that treatment of AML patients with high-dose cytarabine is preferentially beneficial for those harboring oncogenic RAS. On the basis of a murine AML cell culture model, we ascribed this effect to a RAS-driven, p53-dependent induction of differentiation. Hence, in this study we sought to confirm the correlation between RAS status and differentiation of primary blasts obtained from AML patients. The gene expression signature of AML blasts with oncogenic NRAS indeed corresponded to a more mature profile compared to blasts with wildtype RAS, as demonstrated by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and real-time PCR analysis of myeloid ecotropic viral integration site 1 homolog (MEIS1) in a unique cohort of AML patients. In addition, in vitro cell culture experiments with established cell lines and a second set of primary AML cells showed that oncogenic NRAS mutations predisposed cells to cytarabine (AraC) driven differentiation. Taken together, our findings show that AML with inv(16) and NRAS mutation have a differentiation gene signature, supporting the notion that NRAS mutation may predispose leukemic cells to AraC induced differentiation. We therefore suggest that promotion of differentiation pathways by specific genetic alterations could explain the superior treatment outcome after therapy in some AML patient subgroups. Whether a differentiation gene expression status may generally predict for a superior treatment outcome in AML needs to be addressed in future studies.

Introduction

12% to 19% of acute myeloid leukemia patients carry a gain-of-function mutation within the RAS genes [1,2,3,4], while NRAS is most frequently affected [5,6]. In addition, signaling of the RAS cascade is frequently enhanced by aberrations of other players of this pathway, even when RAS genes are not mutated [7,8,9,10]. Although oncogenic RAS is often involved in leukemic transformation of a susceptible progenitor cell, RAS can also promote differentiation in hematopoietic cells [11,12,13,14,15].

Common AML treatment regimens include the nucleoside analog cytarabine (AraC, 1β-arabinofuranosylcytosine). AraC incorporation into DNA during S phase gives rise to a replication blocking lesion. As a consequence, the DNA damage response, that also involves p53, is activated [16,17]. In AML samples derived from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8525 study, we have previously shown that patients whose blasts harbored oncogenic RAS mutations benefitted most from post-induction dose-escalation of cytarabine [4]. To deeper understand the molecular basis for this phenomenon, we took advantage of a murine MLL-ENL driven mouse model where we demonstrated a synergism between mutant (mt) RAS and AraC with regard to myeloid differentiation. This effect was p53 dependent and accompanied by a stronger, AraC provoked DNA damage response of mtRAS compared to wildtype (wt) RAS cells [17].

In order to ask if these findings [17] were also active in primary AML cells, we first sought to perform gene expression analysis. Until now, a unique gene expression pattern associated with oncogenic RAS mutations has not been described in AML. This may be due to the genetic heterogeneity of this disease as several genetic aberrations have been described in AML [18] which translate into a distinct biology and prognosis in case of inv(16). On this well-defined genetic background of a core binding factor (CBF) leukemia with good prognosis, we analyzed gene expression in an AML cohort positive for inversion inv(16) or CBFB-MYH11 (cohort 1), which is frequently associated with oncogenic RAS mutations [5,19].

We here show that indeed oncogenic NRAS is associated with a more differentiated gene expression signature in human inv(16) AML. Secondly, we analyzed whether AraC and oncogenic NRAS cooperate in promoting differentiation. To this end, we used myeloid cell lines as well as a second cohort of 22 primary AML cases (cohort 2). AML cells with oncogenic NRAS mutations showed more pronounced differentiation after AraC treatment ex vivo.

Patients, Materials and Methods

Patient information and isolation of mononuclear cells

Two different AML patient cohorts were used in this study (Table 1). Samples from the Study Alliance Leukemia study group (SAL), Dresden, Germany (cohort 1): AML patients enrolled into the AML2003 trial that were positive for inversion inv(16) or positive for the PCR transcript CBFB-MYH11. The CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene/transcript was detected by classical cytogenetic analysis or PCR [20]. The study was approved by the ethics committees of the University of Dresden and participating centers in agreement with the Helsinki Declaration and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00180102, AML 2003-Standard-Therapy vs. Intensified Therapy for Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients under 60 Years) [21]. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient [21]. Mononuclear cells were isolated from bone marrow (BM) of 34 AML patients with inversion16 with/without NRAS12/13, 61 or KRAS mutation S1 Table) by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Hypaque (1.077 g/mL).

Samples from Marburg (cohort 2): Mononuclear cells were isolated from BM or peripheral blood (PB) of 22 untreated AML patients (S2 Table) by density gradient centrifugation. The patients gave written informed consent.

Analysis of RAS status

Samples from Dresden (cohort 1): high-performance liquid chromatography based method or peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping as described previously [6,22,23]. Samples from Marburg (cohort 2): high resolution melting (HRM) PCR with SYTO9 (Invitrogen) on a rotor-gene 6000 device (Corbett Research) [24]. For more details see S1 MaterialsMethods.

Microarray and GSEA

Microarray-based expression analysis was performed as described previously [25] with 34 AML patient samples with inversion 16 karyotype with/without NRAS12/13, 61 or KRAS12/13 mutation (cohort 1). MIAME compliant microarray data are available in the ArrayExpress database (www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress, accession number E-MTAB-2090). GSEA was conducted only with mtNRAS (n = 12, S1 Table) and wtRAS samples (n = 19, S1 Table) using standard parametrization and the GSEA software (version 2.0.10) with a weighted signal-to-noise metric. As reference gene set database, curated gene sets derived from the Molecular Signature Database. More information about enriched gene sets can be found in: Ivanova et al. 2002; Croonquist et al. 2003; Jaatinen et al. 2006; Ben-Porath et al. 2008 [26,27,28,29]. For more details see S1 Materials and Methods.

Quantitative real-time PCR for MEIS1 expression

PCR for MEIS1 was performed under following conditions: 95°C 15 min; then 45 cycles of 94°C 15 sec, 60°C 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec. Primer sequences: GAPDH-for: 5’-CTCCTCCAC CTTTGACGCTG-3’, GAPDH-rev: 5’-ACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCC-3’. MEIS1-for: 5’-ACGG CATCTACTCGTTCAGG-3’, MEIS1-rev: 5’-GTTGTCCAAGCCATCACCTT-3’. GAPDH served as internal reference gene. For details see S1 Materials and Methods.

Morphology analysis of cytospin slides

The AML cell lines HL-60 (mtNRAS) and U937 (wtRAS; both purchased from German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures) were seeded at a density of 5x104/ml. After incubation with 100 nM or 350 nM AraC (controls with corresponding amount of DMSO) for 48h, cytospin slides (2x104 cells/spot) were prepared and stained according to the May-Grünwald-Giemsa method.

Quantitative real-time PCR for CD14 expression

PCR of U937 and HL-60 cells was performed under following conditions: 95°C 15 min; then 45 cycles of 94°C 15 sec, 57°C 30 sec, 72°C 30 sec. Primer sequences: GAPDH: see MEIS1 PCR. CD14-for: 5’-GTTCGGAAGACTTATCGACCA T-3’, CD14-rev: 5’-ACAAGGTTCTGGCGTGGT-3’. For more details see S1 Materials and Methods.

Analysis of and FLT3 status

5ng of DNA of cohort 2 were used for PCR with fluorophore-labeled primers in a Biorad T100 thermal cycler. Primer sequences originate from Kiyoi et al., 1999 [30]. PCR program: 95°C 5 min; 30 cycles of 94°C 30 sec, 57°C 30 sec, 72°C 1 min; then 60°C 45 min. PCR products were analyzed on an ABI PRISM 310 genetic analyzer with GeneScan analysis software.

In vitro cell culture and analysis of differentiation of primary AML cells by flow cytometry

Primary AML blasts (irrespective of karyotype, cohort 2, S2 Table) obtained from frozen PB or BM were seeded on a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) layer. For enrichment of MSC, spongiform bone fragments were obtained from hip replacement surgery. The procedures were approved by the ethics committee at Philipps University Marburg (study no. 64/01 and 25/10) and patients gave written informed consent. For more information, see Brendel et al., 2005 [31]. Primary AML blasts were cultivated in RPMI-1640 medium, containing 20% FCS and 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.

After 24h, medium was changed, AraC was added and 48h later cells were harvested. Concomitant with the actual samples, HL-60 cells (oncogenic NRAS) were treated with AraC and analyzed for differentiation by flow cytometry in the same manner and used as positive control (S3 Table).

Samples were incubated with the following antibodies for 20 min at 4°C in PBS selected according to patients differentiation marker profile: CD45-PerCP-Cy5.5 (2D1, BD, #332784), CD11c–PE (B-ly6, BD, #333149), CD15-FITC (HI98, BD, #332778), CD34-PE (8G12, BD, #345802); HLA-DR-FITC (B8.12.2, Beckman Coulter, #PNIMO463U), CD14-PE (M5E2, BD, #345785) or CD117-APC (104D2, BD, #333233). DNA was counterstained with 4',6-Diamidinophenyl-indole (DAPI) before analysis on an LSRII cytometer (BD Biosciences). Results were analyzed independently in a blinded manner with FLOWJO 9.6.4 or FACS-DIVA 6.0 software. Myeloblast/immature leukemias (FAB class M0, M1, M2) were considered as „differentiating (positive)“, if either CD15 or CD11c increased, or HLA-DR or CD34 decreased. Monocytic leukemias (FAB class M4, M5) were considered positive for differentiation when CD15 declined, CD14, HLA-DR or CD11c increased, because immature monocytes often express CD15 highly and CD14 weekly. HLA-DR is strongly expressed on immature blasts and on mature monocytes. CD15 is weekly expressed on immature monocytes but strongly expressed in mature granulocytes [32]. For more details see S1 Materials and Methods.

Statistics

Mann Whitney test and student’s t-test were calculated by Prism software (Graphpad Software, Inc.), Fisher’s exact test via http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/statistics/fisher.htm.

Results

Gene expression pattern of AML patients with inversion 16 and oncogenic RAS mutations

We were interested whether our previous observation [17] that oncogenic RAS is linked to a more differentiated phenotype also holds true for primary human AML blasts. To this end, we performed a GSEA in order to highlight potential differentiation-associated pathways. The 31 treatment-naïve AML patients samples (cohort 1, Table 1 and S1 Table) analyzed by GSEA harbored an inversion 16 karyotype associated with a CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene or expressed a CBFB-MYH11 fusion transcript. 12 of 31 AML patients additionally carried oncogenic NRAS (12/13 or 61) mutations.

Among the 50 most strongly enriched gene sets for each genotype (wt or mtNRAS, S5 and S6 Tables), we found several differentiation- or stemness-associated gene sets (Fig 1). Fig 1A shows the enrichment of mtNRAS regulated genes in mtNRAS samples, which corroborates the validity of our data. A gene set representing differentiation and maturation of hematopoietic cells was found to be enriched in mtNRAS samples (Fig 1B), while immaturity-associated gene sets, including a gene set representing an association with the stem cell factor MYC, were enriched in the wtNRAS cohort (Fig 1C–1E).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Impact of NRAS status on the transcriptome of primary AML blasts.

(A-E) Enrichment plots as obtained by GSEA software for the gene sets CROONQUIST_NRAS_SIGNALING_UP, positive control; IVANOVA HEMATO-POIESIS_MATURE_CELL; JAATINEN_HEMATOPOIETIC_STEM _CELL _UP; BENPORATH_MYC_TARGETS_WITH_EBOX; IVANOVA_HEMATOPOIESIS_INTER-MEDIATE_PROGENITOR. Primary AML blasts harboring wtNRAS were compared with mtNRAS (12/13 or 61) blasts. (F) Relative expression of MEIS1 in primary AML blasts carrying wtRAS or mtNRAS as examined by real-time PCR. The graph shows the median with 95% confidence interval. Results were normalized to MEIS1 expression of mtNRAS blasts. GAPDH expression served as internal control. *: p = 0.025 (Mann Whitney test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.g001

Expression of the homeobox gene MEIS1 in AML inversion 16 patient samples with wtRAS/mtNRAS

Homeobox (HOX) genes, among which is MEIS1, are typically downregulated during hematopoietic stem cell differentiation and maturation and are considered as stemness markers [33]. This prompted us to measure MEIS1 expression by quantitative real-time PCR in 31 samples of primary AML blasts obtained from patients with inversion 16 (cohort 1). 12 patients harbored oncogenic NRAS, 19 patients carried wtRAS genes. Indeed, MEIS1 expression was significantly higher (1.9-fold) in blasts with wtRAS than in mtNRAS blasts (Fig 1F).

Oncogenic NRAS together with cytarabine drives AML cells into myeloid differentiation in vitro

On the basis of the gene expression data, we sought to substantiate our observation by comparing the differentiation response of wtRAS and mtNRAS cells to AraC treatment. Fig 2A shows the morphological differentiation response provoked by AraC treatment in the two AML cell lines HL-60 (mtNRAS) and U937 (wtRAS). While brightening and granulation of the cytoplasm indicate differentiation of HL-60 cells after AraC treatment, this effect could not be observed in U937 cells. The morphological changes of HL-60 cells were accompanied by increased expression (32.6-fold) of the differentiation marker CD14 (Fig 2B). In order to investigate if AraC also provokes differentiation in primary mtRAS blasts, we used 22 samples from AML patients with or without NRAS mutation (cohort 2; S2 Table) and treated them in vitro with AraC. The cells were subsequently examined by flow cytometry by probing for a patient specific selection of the markers CD11c, CD15, CD14, CD117, CD34 or HLA-DR, which are frequently used to assess differentiation of myeloid cells. Fig 3A represents a sample of the wtRAS and the mtNRAS cohort, while the left panel exemplifies gating for blasts (BL) and lymphocytes (LC). The analyzed wtRAS blasts (upper 2 panels) were obtained from a treatment-naïve, 77-year-old Caucasian man suffering from AML type FAB M2 (patient 5, S2 and S4 Tables). The expression of CD11c remained constant on AML BL under AraC treatment, which was interpreted as a non-differentiation response. Analysis of CD11c expression on LC served as internal control and was not affected. The results obtained with primary AML blasts received from a treatment-naïve 57-year-old Caucasian woman diagnosed with AML type FAB M2 and harboring an NRAS12/13 mutation (lower 2 panels; patient 17, S2 and S4 Tables) provide a representative example of an in vitro differentiation response of the mtNRAS cohort, reflected in an increase of CD11c expression. In summary, 7 of 10 (70%) mtNRAS samples displayed an AraC-triggered change of at least one differentiation-indicating marker, whereas only 2 of 12 (17%) wtRAS samples did (Fig 3B, histograms of all patients see S4 Table). FLT3-ITD (Internal tandem duplication) mutation is not accompanied by an induction of differentiation (Fig 3C). In this patient cohort, NRAS status significantly correlated with in vitro differentiation upon AraC treatment.

thumbnail
Fig 2. AraC induces differentiation in the mtNRAS harboring AML cell line HL-60.

(A) May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining of HL-60 and U937 (wtRAS) cells 48h after AraC treatment at indicated doses. (B) CD14 expression in HL-60 and U937 cells 48 h after AraC-treatment at indicated doses as determined by quantitative real-time PCR. GAPDH was used for normalization. The graph shows the median with 95% confidence interval. Results were normalized to the respective control of each cell line. **: p = 0.002 (Student’s t-test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. AraC induces differentiation predominantly in primary AML blasts with oncogenic NRAS.

(A) Left panel: Example of gating for lymphocytes (LC) and AML blasts (BL) according to SSC/CD45 signals after live gating. wtRAS panels: CD11c expression of wtRAS AML blasts (left) and LC (right) in untreated samples (solid grey curve) or samples treated with 100 nM AraC (black line). mtRAS panels: CD11c expression of mtNRAS12/13 blasts (left) and LC (right) treated as indicated above. (B) Summary of the in vitro responses to AraC treatment in terms of differentiation of 22 primary AML blasts with or without NRAS mutation. Samples with differentiation describes the portion of samples with differentiation response (diff. ↑) to AraC in relation to all samples in the wtRAS or mtNRAS cohort, respectively. Fisher`s exact test: p = 0.02. (C) Summary of the in vitro responses to AraC treatment in terms of differentiation of 22 primary AML blasts with or without FLT3-ITD. Fisher`s exact test: p = 0.19.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.g003

Discussion

The RAS genes encode for a highly conserved group of small GTPase proteins. RAS is physiologically activated upon ligand binding to receptors such as receptor tyrosine kinases. The ligands, and the cellular context, dictate the cellular outcome after activation of the RAS pathway. While gain-of-function mutations of RAS represent one of the most abundant aberrations in human cancer, their prognostic significance for AML patients remains controversial. Some studies have reported that mutated RAS has a negative or no impact on clinical outcome of AML patients, whereas others have described a positive influence of oncogenic RAS [19,30,34,35,36,37,38,39]. Potential reasons for the inconsistent conclusions could be the consideration of different clinical parameters such as patient age or genetic heterogeneity. In addition, the treatment may be of major influence on the outcome, depending on the oncogenic background of the respective AML.

In previous studies we and others have shown that oncogenic RAS dictates poor risk in AML patients treated with low dose AraC [4], while it is beneficial when patients are treated with high dose AraC (HiDAC) [4,36] with respect to relapse risk or overall survival. Several reports suggested that oncogenic RAS itself triggers the DNA damage response by provoking replication stress [40,41]. In line with the activation of the DNA damage response by oncogenic RAS, we found that the addition of DNA-damaging or replication stress-inducing agents to cells expressing oncogenic RAS drives a p53-dependent, DNA-damage induced myeloid differentiation. It is conceivable that excessive replication stress resulting from high-dose AraC treatment and replication stress induced by oncogenic RAS cooperate in promoting differentiation of AML blasts.

For the present study, we sought to analyze whether the previous observations that oncogenic RAS is associated with more pronounced differentiation holds also true in primary AML cells employing whole genome gene expression analysis and GSEA of AML patients included in a multicenter trial (AML2003) [21]. In order to minimize confounders of different underlying genetic lesions, only patients with a specific genetic aberration, namely inversion 16, were selected. Indeed, oncogenic NRAS was associated with a specific expression pattern, and among the top 50 gene sets (S5 and S6 Tables), several sets of stemness or differentiation genes could be found. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first analysis showing a specific gene expression pattern (i.e. differentiation) associated with RAS mutations in AML. This finding is corroborated by Shen et al., who discovered a role for RAS in myeloid differentiation [12,13].

If oncogenic RAS is associated with differentiation, we next sought to study whether this effect could be enhanced by additional replication stress, for instance caused by AraC. Our data show that AraC induces myeloid differentiation in terms of morphology and protein surface expression preferentially in mtNRAS cells. Interestingly, internal tandem duplications of the FLT3 gene, also known to activate the MAPK signaling pathway, did not cause the same effect on differentiation. We conclude that AML cells with oncogenic NRAS are more prone to AraC-driven differentiation as compared to AML cells with wildtype NRAS, and that the NRAS mutation is the pivotal lesion for this effect.

Therefore, depending on the cellular context where it is expressed, oncogenic RAS may trigger differentiation that is even more enhanced when cells are exposed to the replication blocking agent AraC. We therefore suggest that induction of myeloid differentiation may be a rational target of chemotherapy that has previously not been appreciated in AML other than acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL).

Supporting Information

S1 Materials and Methods. Supporting Information about Materials and Methods.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s001

(PDF)

S1 Table. Characteristics of 34 AML Patients of Cohort 1.

Patients carried inv(16) and wtRAS or mtRAS and samples were used for cDNA array; GSEA and MEIS1 analysis using quantitative real time PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s002

(PDF)

S2 Table. Characteristics of 22 AML Patients of Cohort 2.

Samples were obtained before treatment of the patient and used for in vitro cell culture and analysis of differentiation by flow cytometry.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s003

(PDF)

S3 Table. Representative HL-60 Flow Cytometry Histograms of in vitro Differentiation Experiments.

HL-60 positive control, exemplifying live gating and differentiation response. An HL-60 sample was carried along with each experiment with patients’ samples. The occurrence of the HL-60 response in terms of cell death and differentiation induction by AraC confirmed successful performance of the experiment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s004

(PDF)

S4 Table. Representative Patients’ Samples Flow Cytometry Histograms of ex vivo Differentiation Experiments.

For differentiation positive samples, the differentiation indicating marker is depicted. For differentiation negative samples (i.e. no shift with any marker observable), one of the analyzed markers is shown representatively for all markers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s005

(PDF)

S5 Table. List of Top 50 Gene Sets Showing Enrichment in the mtNRAS Cohort.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s006

(PDF)

S6 Table. List of Top 50 Gene Sets Showing Enrichment in the wtNRAS Cohort.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s007

(PDF)

S7 Table. Correlation Between NPM1 Status and Differentiation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123181.s008

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sigrid Bischofsberger and Sandra Stein for excellent technical assistance. Furthermore, we thank the entire staff of the genomics core facility of the Institute of Molecular Biology and Tumor Research (IMT) and the flow cytometry core facility of the Department for Hematology, Oncology and Immunology for their excellent work.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AN C. Brendel ST. Performed the experiments: AM KS PR MK. Analyzed the data: AM ST C. Brendel PR KS TS MM MK MH C. Barckhausen. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TI. Wrote the paper: C. Barckhausen AN C. Brendel ST. Discussions: MH. Proofreading: MH.

References

  1. 1. Network TCGAR Genomic and Epigenomic Landscapes of Adult De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2013); 368: 2059–2074. pmid:23634996
  2. 2. Bowen DT, Frew ME, Hills R, Gale RE, Wheatley K, Groves MJ, et al. RAS mutation in acute myeloid leukemia is associated with distinct cytogenetic subgroups but does not influence outcome in patients younger than 60 years. Blood. (2005); 106: 2113–2119. pmid:15951308
  3. 3. Stirewalt DL, Kopecky KJ, Meshinchi S, Appelbaum FR, Slovak ML, Willman CL, et al. FLT3, RAS, and TP53 mutations in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. (2001); 97: 3589–3595. pmid:11369655
  4. 4. Neubauer A, Maharry K, Mrozek K, Thiede C, Marcucci G, Paschka P, et al. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia and RAS mutations benefit most from postremission high-dose cytarabine: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. (2008); 26: 4603–4609. pmid:18559876
  5. 5. Valk PJ, Bowen DT, Frew ME, Goodeve AC, Lowenberg B, Reilly JT. Second hit mutations in the RTK/RAS signaling pathway in acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16). Haematologica. (2004); 89: 106. pmid:14754614
  6. 6. Schaich M, Ritter M, Illmer T, Lisske P, Thiede C, Schakel U, et al. Mutations in ras proto-oncogenes are associated with lower mdr1 gene expression in adult acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol. (2001); 112: 300–307. pmid:11167822
  7. 7. Garcia-Orti L, Cristobal I, Cirauqui C, Guruceaga E, Marcotegui N, Calasanz MJ, et al. Integration of SNP and mRNA arrays with microRNA profiling reveals that MiR-370 is upregulated and targets NF1 in acute myeloid leukemia. PLoS One. (2012); 7: e47717. pmid:23077663
  8. 8. Scholl C, Gilliland DG, Frohling S. Deregulation of signaling pathways in acute myeloid leukemia. Semin Oncol. (2008); 35: 336–345. pmid:18692684
  9. 9. Weisberg E, Barrett R, Liu Q, Stone R, Gray N, Griffin JD. FLT3 inhibition and mechanisms of drug resistance in mutant FLT3-positive AML. Drug Resist Updat. (2009); 12: 81–89. pmid:19467916
  10. 10. Shih LY, Huang CF, Wang PN, Wu JH, Lin TL, Dunn P, et al. Acquisition of FLT3 or N-ras mutations is frequently associated with progression of myelodysplastic syndrome to acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. (2004); 18: 466–475. pmid:14737077
  11. 11. Chan IT, Gilliland DG. Oncogenic K-ras in mouse models of myeloproliferative disease and acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Cycle. (2004); 3: 536–537. pmid:15020845
  12. 12. Shen S, Passioura T, Symonds G, Dolnikov A. N-ras oncogene-induced gene expression in human hematopoietic progenitor cells: upregulation of p16INK4a and p21CIP1/WAF1 correlates with myeloid differentiation. Exp Hematol. (2007); 35: 908–919. pmid:17533045
  13. 13. Shen SW, Dolnikov A, Passioura T, Millington M, Wotherspoon S, Rice A, et al. Mutant N-ras preferentially drives human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells into myeloid differentiation and proliferation both in vitro and in the NOD/SCID mouse. Exp Hematol. (2004); 32: 852–860. pmid:15345287
  14. 14. Moriya K, Suzuki M, Watanabe Y, Takahashi T, Aoki Y, Uchiyama T, et al. Development of a multi-step leukemogenesis model of MLL-rearranged leukemia using humanized mice. PLoS One. (2012); 7: e37892. pmid:22745659
  15. 15. Chung E, Hsu CL, Kondo M. Constitutive MAP kinase activation in hematopoietic stem cells induces a myeloproliferative disorder. PLoS One. (2011); 6: e28350. pmid:22164275
  16. 16. Ewald B, Sampath D, Plunkett W. Nucleoside analogs: molecular mechanisms signaling cell death. Oncogene. (2008); 27: 6522–6537. pmid:18955977
  17. 17. Meyer M, Rubsamen D, Slany R, Illmer T, Stabla K, Roth P, et al. Oncogenic RAS enables DNA damage- and p53-dependent differentiation of acute myeloid leukemia cells in response to chemotherapy. PLoS One. (2009); 4: e7768. pmid:19890398
  18. 18. Network CGAR Genomic and epigenomic landscapes of adult de novo acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. (2013); 368: 2059–2074. pmid:23634996
  19. 19. Bacher U, Haferlach T, Schoch C, Kern W, Schnittger S. Implications of NRAS mutations in AML: a study of 2502 patients. Blood. (2006); 107: 3847–3853. pmid:16434492
  20. 20. Ritter M, Thiede C, Schakel U, Schmidt M, Alpen B, Pascheberg U, et al. Underestimation of inversion (16) in acute myeloid leukaemia using standard cytogenetics as compared with polymerase chain reaction: results of a prospective investigation. Br J Haematol. (1997); 98: 969–972. pmid:9326197
  21. 21. Schaich M, Parmentier S, Kramer M, Illmer T, Stolzel F, Rollig C, et al. High-dose cytarabine consolidation with or without additional amsacrine and mitoxantrone in acute myeloid leukemia: results of the prospective randomized AML2003 trial. J Clin Oncol. (2013); 31: 2094–2102. pmid:23630210
  22. 22. Thiede C, Bayerdorffer E, Blasczyk R, Wittig B, Neubauer A. Simple and sensitive detection of mutations in the ras proto-oncogenes using PNA-mediated PCR clamping. Nucleic Acids Res. (1996); 24: 983–984. pmid:8600471
  23. 23. Bowen DT, Frew ME, Rollinson S, Roddam PL, Dring A, Smith MT, et al. CYP1A1*2B (Val) allele is overrepresented in a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia patients with poor-risk karyotype associated with NRAS mutation, but not associated with FLT3 internal tandem duplication. Blood. (2003); 101: 2770–2774. pmid:12468438
  24. 24. Krypuy M, Newnham GM, Thomas DM, Conron M, Dobrovic A. High resolution melting analysis for the rapid and sensitive detection of mutations in clinical samples: KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer. (2006); 6: 295. pmid:17184525
  25. 25. Ritter M, Kattmann D, Teichler S, Hartmann O, Samuelsson MK, Burchert A, et al. Inhibition of retinoic acid receptor signaling by Ski in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. (2006); 20: 437–443. pmid:16424870
  26. 26. Ben-Porath I, Thomson MW, Carey VJ, Ge R, Bell GW, Regev A, et al. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat Genet. (2008); 40: 499–507. pmid:18443585
  27. 27. Croonquist PA, Linden MA, Zhao F, Van Ness BG. Gene profiling of a myeloma cell line reveals similarities and unique signatures among IL-6 response, N-ras-activating mutations, and coculture with bone marrow stromal cells. Blood. (2003); 102: 2581–2592. pmid:12791645
  28. 28. Ivanova NB, Dimos JT, Schaniel C, Hackney JA, Moore KA, Lemischka IR. A stem cell molecular signature. Science. (2002); 298: 601–604. pmid:12228721
  29. 29. Jaatinen T, Hemmoranta H, Hautaniemi S, Niemi J, Nicorici D, Laine J, et al. Global gene expression profile of human cord blood-derived CD133+ cells. Stem Cells. (2006); 24: 631–641. pmid:16210406
  30. 30. Kiyoi H, Naoe T, Nakano Y, Yokota S, Minami S, Miyawaki S, et al. Prognostic implication of FLT3 and N-RAS gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. (1999); 93: 3074–3080. pmid:10216104
  31. 31. Brendel C, Kuklick L, Hartmann O, Kim TD, Boudriot U, Schwell D, et al. Distinct gene expression profile of human mesenchymal stem cells in comparison to skin fibroblasts employing cDNA microarray analysis of 9600 genes. Gene Expr. (2005); 12: 245–257. pmid:16355723
  32. 32. Bene MC, Castoldi G, Knapp W, Ludwig WD, Matutes E, Orfao A, et al. Proposals for the immunological classification of acute leukemias. European Group for the Immunological Characterization of Leukemias (EGIL). Leukemia. (1995); 9: 1783–1786. pmid:7564526
  33. 33. Pineault N, Helgason CD, Lawrence HJ, Humphries RK. Differential expression of Hox, Meis1, and Pbx1 genes in primitive cells throughout murine hematopoietic ontogeny. Exp Hematol. (2002); 30: 49–57. pmid:11823037
  34. 34. Paquette RL, Landaw EM, Pierre RV, Kahan J, Lubbert M, Lazcano O, et al. N-ras mutations are associated with poor prognosis and increased risk of leukemia in myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. (1993); 82: 590–599. pmid:8329714
  35. 35. Neubauer A, Dodge RK, George SL, Davey FR, Silver RT, Schiffer CA, et al. Prognostic importance of mutations in the ras proto-oncogenes in de novo acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. (1994); 83: 1603–1611. pmid:8123851
  36. 36. Illmer T, Thiede C, Fredersdorf A, Stadler S, Neubauer A, Ehninger G, et al. Activation of the RAS pathway is predictive for a chemosensitive phenotype of acute myelogenous leukemia blasts. Clin Cancer Res. (2005); 11: 3217–3224. pmid:15867216
  37. 37. Coghlan DW, Morley AA, Matthews JP, Bishop JF. The incidence and prognostic significance of mutations in codon 13 of the N-ras gene in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. (1994); 8: 1682–1687. pmid:7934163
  38. 38. De Melo MB, Lorand-Metze I, Lima CS, Saad ST, Costa FF. N-ras gene point mutations in Brazilian acute myelogenous leukemia patients correlate with a poor prognosis. Leuk Lymphoma. (1997); 24: 309–317. pmid:9156660
  39. 39. Meshinchi S, Stirewalt DL, Alonzo TA, Zhang Q, Sweetser DA, Woods WG, et al. Activating mutations of RTK/ras signal transduction pathway in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. (2003); 102: 1474–1479. pmid:12702504
  40. 40. Di Micco R, Fumagalli M, Cicalese A, Piccinin S, Gasparini P, Luise C, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature. (2006); 444: 638–642. pmid:17136094
  41. 41. Fikaris AJ, Lewis AE, Abulaiti A, Tsygankova OM, Meinkoth JL. Ras triggers ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad-3-related activation and apoptosis through sustained mitogenic signaling. J Biol Chem. (2006); 281: 34759–34767. pmid:16968694