Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genetic Variation in the Mcp-1 Gene Promoter Associated with the Risk of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

  • Lan Li ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lan Li, Ji Eun Ryoo

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Science, CHA University, Bundang CHA Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

  • Ji Eun Ryoo ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Lan Li, Ji Eun Ryoo

    Affiliation Hankuk Academy of Foreign Studies, Yongin, Republic of Korea

  • Kyung-Ju Lee,

    Affiliation Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHA University, CHA General Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

  • Bum-Chae Choi,

    Affiliation Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CL Women’s Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea

  • Kwang-Hyun Baek

    baek@cha.ac.kr

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Science, CHA University, Bundang CHA Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea

Genetic Variation in the Mcp-1 Gene Promoter Associated with the Risk of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

  • Lan Li, 
  • Ji Eun Ryoo, 
  • Kyung-Ju Lee, 
  • Bum-Chae Choi, 
  • Kwang-Hyun Baek
PLOS
x

Abstract

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a pivotal chemokine in the inflammatory response, which plays an important role in recruiting monocytes to sites of injury and infection. However, the exact mechanism of Mcp-1 associated with PCOS risk was unknown. In this study, we explored whether the Mcp-1 -2518G>A polymorphism increases the risk of PCOS. We performed a comparative study of -2518G>A polymorphism of the Mcp-1 gene with PCOS. In addition, luciferase reporter assay was performed to evaluate the Mcp-1 transcriptional activity. A strong association was observed between the -2518G>A polymorphism of Mcp-1 gene and PCOS (p-value = 0.016, odd ratio (OR) = 0.693). A p-value under 0.05 is considered statistically significant. The genotype and allelic frequencies were assumed to be in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The luciferase assays in 2 cell lines showed that the Mcp-1 -2518G>A substitution can increase the expression of Mcp-1. MCP-1 levels in serum for PCOS group were significantly higher than those in serum for controls (p-value = 0.02). Furthermore, the patients carrying a genotype A/A had significantly increased levels of MCP-1 in serum compared with levels of the MCP-1 of the patients with genotypes G/G and G/A (p-value = 0.031). This is the first study on the genetic variation of the Mcp-1 gene and PCOS. This finding suggests that the Mcp-1 -2518G>A polymorphism is associated with PCOS risk by affecting transcriptional activity, leading to an increased expression level of Mcp-1.

Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), a very common endocrine disorder that causes up to 30% of infertility, affects 4 to 8% of the women [1,2]. It is often accompanied with symptoms like ovarian dysfunction, androgen excess, obesity, and insulin resistance (IR) [1,36]. Although it is a common reproductive disease, its etiology is still not fully understood. It is now believed that PCOS is caused by combination of genetic and environmental factors[2]. Familial aggregation of PCOS indicates that genetic factors play an important role in its pathogenesis [7,8]. Up to now, the genetic research of PCOS focused on various types of genes responsible for symptoms manifest in PCOS patients. It is reported that PCOS patients tend to show characteristics of obesity, cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and reproductive failure [912]. A shared genetic background among these diseases or symptoms indicates common biological pathways underlying their etiology.

Recently, several studies suggest that women with PCOS have altered circulatory levels of multiple markers of inflammation, which might also reflect a state of chronic low grade inflammation [13,14]. Additionally, chronic inflammation is associated with increased risk for CVD as well as long-term complications of PCOS [15,16]. Furthermore, PCOS has major metabolic consequences related to IR [17]. It is now evident that subclinical inflammation and IR are important predictors of CVD [18,19].

Adipose tissues are human body's major endocrine organ responsible for secretion of hormones with roles of metabolism, reproduction, and cardiovascular function [20]. It is now realized that the decrease in the level of adiponectin secreted solely by adipocytes is highly associated with obesity, diabetes, and atherosclerosis[21]. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a secretary factor of adipocytes, is one of the important members of C-C chemokine family, consists of 76 amino acids, and plays a key role in the recruitment of monocytes/macrophage to inflammatory foci [22]. Of note, MCP-1 is also involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, diabetes and obesity related diseases [23]. Interestingly, high glucose upregulates MCP-1 expression in endothelial cells and monocytes [24]. Another study described the overlapping pathways between blood sugar regulation and inflammation in PCOS[25]. In the case of obese patients, MCP-1, which restricts the amount of insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by adipocytes, tends to be over-expressed in adipose tissues [26]. Insulin induces the secretion of substantial amounts of MCP-1 in IR 3T3-L1 adipocytes and IR obese mice [27]. Human MCP-1 (hMCP-1) transcription is controlled by two distinct regions within the 5’-flanking sequence of the gene [28]. The first element contains two NF-κB binding sites and is essential for cytokine/chemokine-dependent regulation, while the other element contains a GC box that regulates tissue-specific expression [26,29]. In addition, the variants located at position -2518 in the distal region were proposed to regulate Mcp-1 expression [30]. However, the variant -2518G>A of Mcp-1 and its association with PCOS had not been evaluated yet.

In this study, we conducted experiments to determine the association between the 2518G>A polymorphism MCP-1 and women with PCOS. In addition, functional assays were performed to evaluate the effect of this SNP in PCOS.

Materials and Methods

Subjects

A total of 375 Korean women were recruited from the Fertility Center of the CHA General Hospital in Korea for the study. Among them, 220 women had PCOS while the other 155 were healthy control subjects. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The diagnosis of PCOS was based on the criteria proposed by the 2003 ASRM/ESHRE Rotterdam consensus. Blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA as an anti-clotting factor and stored at -20°C until use. Genomic DNA was extracted from the blood of PCOS patients and control women, and 100 ng/μl genomic DNA was used for PCR. Amplified products were purified using Bioneer’s AccuPrep PCR purification kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea). Plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), prolactin (PRL), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), and testosterone (T) were measured with a chemiluminescent analyzer (Beckman Coulter Inc., Fullerton, CA, USA). Serum glucose and insulin levels were measured by enzymatic and chemiluminescent methods, respectively. Using radioimmunoassay (RIA) (Siemens, Los Angeles, CA, USA), total T and free testosterone concentrations were measured in serums of patients with PCOS and controls. The intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) values were 4.0–11% and 5.9–12% for total testosterone, and 4.0–17% and 8.0–18.3% for free testosterone, respectively.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Fertility Center of the CHA General Hospital. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Genetic analysis

To investigate the association between the -2518G>A polymorphism of Mcp-1 gene and PCOS, polymerase chain reaction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) analysis was performed for all samples.

The variant -2518G>A of Mcp-1 was amplified using a forward primer 5’-CCG AGA TGT TCC CAG CAC AG- 3’ and a reverse primer 5’-ATC TCT GGA AAG TGA CTT GGC- 3’ by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The cycling parameters were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, and finally at 72°C for 5 min. Amplification products were purified using Bioneer’s AccuPrep PCR purification kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea). The PCR fragment was 321 bp in length, and was digested with the enzyme Pvu II (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) for 6 hrs at 37°C. Digestion of the allele G produced two fragments with a length of 222 bp and 99 bp (Fig 1). For genotyping of SNP, the digested DNA fragments were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and visualized by an ultraviolet transilluminator.

thumbnail
Fig 1. RFLP analysis of the G/A polymorphism in the promoter region of the Mcp-1 gene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123045.g001

Cell culture

3T3L1 cells (mouse embryonic fibroblast cell line, ATCC CL-173) and OVCAR-3 (human ovarian carcinoma cell line, ATCC HTB-161) cells were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM, Gibco-BRL) and RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum, GIBCO BRL) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (GIBCO BRL), respectively. The cells were grown at 37° C in the presence of 5% carbon dioxide in a humidified incubator.

Construction of luciferase reporter plasmids

Reporter plasmids were constructed by inserting two lengths of the 5’-upstream region of the human MCP-1 gene between the Kpn I and Hind III sites of the pGL3-Basic Vector (Promega Madison, WI) [28]. After cloning, all plasmids were verified by DNA sequencing.

Transient transfection and luciferase reporter gene assay

For the reporter gene assay, 3T3L1 cells (1 x 105 cells) were seeded into 2ml medium containing 10% FBS in each well of 12-well culture plate, and then cultured 24 hrs. OVCAR3 cells were plated at a density of 1.5 x 105 cells per well on 12-well plates for 24 hrs. Plasmids were transiently cotransfected with 1 μg of the vector DNA containing either -2518G allele or -2518A allele by Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), according to the manufactures protocol. As an internal standard, all plasmids were cotransfected with 0.2 μg of pRL-SV40, which contains the Renilla luciferase gene to normalize the luciferase activity. 48 hrs after transfection, cells were treated with 10 ng/ml recombinant TNF-α (Peprotech Inc. Rocky Hill, NJ), and were harvested after an additional 24 hrs. Relative luciferase activity was measured with a luminometer (Infinite M200 Pro, Tecan, Salzburg, Austria) using a dual-Luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the instructions. For the data analysis, the firefly values were divided by the Renilla values, and the data are expressed as the ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase activity. Independent triplicate experiments were performed for each plasmid.

ELISA

Serum samples were collected and stored at -70°C until used. MCP-1 levels in serum were determined using a commercially available ELISA Kit (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacture’s instruction.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using Hap Analysis (NGRI, Seoul, Korea; www.hap.ngri.re.kr) and GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) and χ² tests were used to analyze the association between PCOS and healthy controls. Data of luciferase reporter gene assays were determined by two-way analysis of variance, and the significance of differences was determined using the unpaired t-test or Turkey-Kramer test. The statistical power was calculated using SPSS 12.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the study population

The analysis of the clinical and biochemical characteristics of the control subjects and PCOS cases are shown in Table 1. We followed the 2003 ASRM/ESHRE Rotterdam consensus as the diagnostic criteria of PCOS. The patients were diagnosed by polycystic ovarian morphology using ultrasonography, oligo- or amenorrhea, and clinical or biochemical hyperandrogenism (Table 1). 155 healthy control subjects did not show any PCOS syndrome. Of the 220 patients, 150 patients (68.18%) had polycystic ovaries and oligo-/amenorrhea, 25 patients (11.36%) had oligo-/amenorrhea and hyperandrogenism, 22 patients (10.00%) had polycystic ovaries and hyperandrogenism, and 23 patients (10.46%) had polycystic ovaries, oligo-/amenorrhea, and hyperandrogenism. Accordingly, we performed the analysis for specific sub-group association with quantitative traits of PCOS with the SNP -2518G>A. Clinical and metabolic features of the patients with PCOS according to the genotypes of this SNP are shown in Table 2. In addition, we did not find significant relationship between the variant in Mcp-1 gene in obese controls and PCOS women. Body mass index (BMI), waist/hip ratio (WHR), obesity, and hormone values were considered during PCOS diagnoses (Table 1). In particular, DHEA-S level was slightly higher in the PCOS patients, whereas the concentrations of LH, T, and free T were dramatically higher in the PCOS patient group (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Clinical and biochemical profiles of 155 normal controls and 220 patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123045.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. Clinical features of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) according to the genotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123045.t002

Association between the MCP-1 -2518G>A polymorphism and PCOS risk

For our study, the frequencies of G/G, G/A, and A/A genotypes of -2518G/A polymorphism in MCP-1 gene was analyzed by RFLP analysis and the result showed different proportion (P-value = 0.016, odd ratio (OR) = 0.693) between PCOS and control groups. The frequencies of GG, GA, and AA genotypes were 102 (46.3%), 84 (38.2%), and 34 (15.5%), among the cases, and 57 (36.8%), 62 (40%), 36 (23.2%), among the controls, respectively. Regarding the X2 test, both groups were in agreement with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE, p-value = 0.21) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Allele frequencies of G/A polymorphisms of the MCP-1 gene in controls (n = 155) and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients (n = 220).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123045.t003

Effect of the MCP-1 -2518G/A polymorphism on transcriptional activity

To investigate whether the Mcp-1 -2518G>A polymorphism is associated with the Mcp-1 transcriptional activity; we generated luciferase reporter vectors by using pGL3-basic vector with either -2518G or -2518A allele. Then, we used them for transfection with the 3T3L1 and OVCAR3 cells. As shown in Fig 2, the -2518A allele had a significant increase in the relative luciferase activities, compared to the one that with the -2518G allele in these two cell lines (two-way ANOVA, F1, 6 = 386.81, p< 0.0001 Alleles; F2, 6 = 324.40, p< 0.0001 TNF-α treatment; F2, 6 = 218.02, p< 0.0001 Alleles*TNF-α treatment, and F2, 6 = 132.42, p< 0.0001 Alleles; F1, 6 = 21.39, p = 0.0036 TNF-α treatment; F2, 6 = 8.97, p = 0.0158 Alleles*TNF-α treatment, respectively). These results suggest that the -2518A allele in the promoter region is associated with an increased transcriptional activity of the Mcp-1 gene.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Two constructs were transiently transfected into 3T3L1 (A), and OVCAR3 (B) cell lines, respectively.

(A) TNF-α induced a significant increase in luciferase activity from all the constructs. Moreover, the transcription activity of AA constructs was approximately 5 fold greater than the activity of GG constructs in 3T3L1 cells. (B) The OVCAR3 cells transfected with -2518A allele had a 3 fold increase in reporter gene activity as compared with the -2518G allele. Luciferase activity of each construct was normalized against internal control of Renilla luciferase. Each experiment was performed three times. Data indicate a mean value with SEM from 3 independent experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. ns, not significant. Data were analyzed by a two-way analysis of variance, and significant differences were determined by Tukey-Kramer test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123045.g002

ELISA

We further measured serum MCP-1 levels of the freshly collected blood samples of control subjects (n = 25) and patients with PCOS (n = 30). Interestingly, the MCP-1 levels were significantly different between PCOS patients and controls (72.64 ± 12.58 pg/ml vs 118.0 ± 14.11 pg/ml, P = 0.02; Fig 3A). In addition, the patients with genotypes G/G and G/A had significantly decreased MCP-1 levels in serum compared with those of the carriers with the genotype A/A (P = 0.031; Fig 3B).

thumbnail
Fig 3. MCP-1 levels in the serum of controls (n = 25) and PCOS patients (n = 30) were quantified by ELISA (mean ± SEM of duplicate wells).

A, 72.64 ± 12.58 pg/ml in controls; 118.0 ± 14.11 pg/ml in PCOS patients. *P< 0.05. Data were analyzed by unpaired t-test. B, Serum MCP-1 levels in women with PCOS according to the genotypes of SNP -2518G>A. Data are presented as means ±SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123045.g003

Discussion

Inflammation is considered as a normal, yet sometimes a chronic issue that causes some problems [31]. For PCOS, chronic inflammation creates IR and influences the way ovaries produce and release eggs [32]. Besides, chronic low-grade of inflammation found in obese patients is characterized by macrophage accumulation in adipose tissues and abnormal cytokine production is a key marker of obesity and T2DM [3336].

In this study, we have investigated one of the pivotal adipocyte secretary factors, Mcp-1, and analyzed data on the relationship between the -2518G>A polymorphism of Mcp-1 and Korean women with PCOS. Our study demonstrated that the -2518G>A polymorphism of Mcp-1 is associated with PCOS. After identifying the correlation between the gene polymorphism and PCOS, we further analyzed to better understand the susceptibility of the Mcp-1 gene variation in the development of PCOS. Further luciferase reporter assay showed that the Mcp-1 -2518G>A substitution can increase the transcription activity of the Mcp-1 gene in vitro. Additionally, after cells were treated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL), the -2518G>A allele showed a significant increase in the relative luciferase activities, compared to those with the -2518G allele in 3T3L1 and OVCAR3 cell lines (all P<0.05). These data suggest that the -2518G in the promoter region is associated with an increased transcriptional activity of the Mcp-1 gene. To support the in vitro data, we performed ELISA for the quantitative assay of MCP-1, to demonstrate that the patients with the Mcp-1 polymorphism have increased MCP-1 levels. This profile suggests that they may present a lower degree of chronic inflammation than usually seen in PCOS from other ethnicities [3739].

There was no substantial research showing the correlation between the variant of Mcp-1 and PCOS. Only a small case-control study in China has reported that PCOS patients tend to show high Mcp-1 levels, increasing the risk of atherogenesis [40]. One study conducted in Turkey showed that lean and young PCOS patients have high Mcp-1 levels, which can serve as the early indications of cardiovascular disease and vascular damage [37]. Furthermore, several studies have also demonstrated that women with PCOS have elevated MCP-1, which was verified in PCOS and control subjects after adjustment for age and body mass index [13,38,40,41]. Another study performed at Denmark University Hospital indicated that plasma Mcp-1 and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 α are increased in patients with PCOS and associated with adiposity [38]. Furthermore, the variant of Mcp-1 can be a future predictor for long-term kidney graft failure [42]. Mcp-1 AA genotype and A allele have been proposed to play a specific role in determining diabetic susceptibility (DN), but they do not seem to be important in clinical manifestations of DN in a Turkish population [43].

In conclusion, the A allele of Mcp-1 SNP rs1024611 is associated with higher levels of MCP-1 and a protective factor for PCOS. Also, we have identified a functionally significant -2518G>A polymorphism in the Mcp-1 promoter region, which may contribute to the development of PCOS. However, the findings in the present study were only from a Korean population. Therefore, further validation of the variant of MCP-1 in vivo and larger studies with various ethnic backgrounds are required for a better understanding of pathogenesis for PCOS.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank members of the Fertility Center and Stem Cell Institute at CHA University and Ms. Hyo Geun Jang at CHA General Hospital.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: LL JER KJL BCC KHB. Performed the experiments: LL JER. Analyzed the data: LL JER KJL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BCC KJL KHB. Wrote the paper: LL JEL KHB.

References

  1. 1. King J. Polycystic ovary syndrome. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2006; 51: 415–422. pmid:17081931
  2. 2. Barthelmess EK, Naz RK. Polycystic ovary syndrome: current status and future perspective. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2014; 6: 104–119. pmid:24389146
  3. 3. Li S, Zhu D, Duan H, Tan Q. Genetic investigation into ethnic disparity in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013; 29: 878–882. pmid:23895299
  4. 4. Shi Y, Zhao H, Shi Y, Cao Y, Yang D, Li Z, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies eight new risk loci for polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat Genet. 2012; 44: 1020–1025. pmid:22885925
  5. 5. Norman RJ, Dewailly D, Legro RS, Hickey TE. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet. 2007; 370: 685–697. pmid:17720020
  6. 6. Ehrmann DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352: 1223–1236. pmid:15788499
  7. 7. Ewens KG, Stewart DR, Ankener W, Urbanek M, McAllister JM, Chen C, et al. Family-based analysis of candidate genes for polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 95: 2306–2315. pmid:20200332
  8. 8. Fauser BC, Diedrich K, Bouchard P, Dominguez F, Matzuk M, Franks S, et al. Contemporary genetic technologies and female reproduction. Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 829–847. pmid:21896560
  9. 9. Caserta D, Adducchio G, Picchia S, Ralli E, Matteucci E, Moscarini M. Metabolic syndrome and polycystic ovary syndrome: an intriguing overlapping. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2014; 30: 397–402. pmid:24552422
  10. 10. Moran L, Teede H. Metabolic features of the reproductive phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 15: 477–488. pmid:19279045
  11. 11. Sravan Kumar P, Ananthanarayanan PH, Rajendiran S. Cardiovascular risk markers and thyroid status in young Indian women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a case-control study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40: 1361–1367. pmid:24750325
  12. 12. Shang K, Jia X, Qiao J, Kang J, Guan Y. Endometrial abnormality in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod Sci. 2012; 19: 674–683. pmid:22534323
  13. 13. Duleba AJ, Dokras A. Is PCOS an inflammatory process? Fertil Steril. 2012; 97: 7–12. pmid:22192135
  14. 14. Ebejer K, Calleja-Agius J. The role of cytokines in polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013; 29: 536–540. pmid:23368758
  15. 15. Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Paterakis T, Kandarakis HA. Indices of low-grade inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1092: 175–186. pmid:17308143
  16. 16. Sirmans SM, Weidman-Evans E, Everton V, Thompson D. Polycystic ovary syndrome and chronic inflammation: pharmacotherapeutic implications. Ann Pharmacother. 2012; 46: 403–418. pmid:22388330
  17. 17. Traub ML. Assessing and treating insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. World J Diabetes. 2011; 2: 33–40. pmid:21537458
  18. 18. Paneni F, Costantino S, Cosentino F. Insulin resistance, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2014; 16: 419. pmid:24781596
  19. 19. Roberson LL, Aneni EC, Maziak W, Agatston A, Feldman T, Rouseff M, et al. Beyond BMI: The "Metabolically healthy obese" phenotype & its association with clinical/subclinical cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality—a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 14. pmid:24400816
  20. 20. Prins JB. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002; 16: 639–651. pmid:12468412
  21. 21. Ahima RS. Adipose tissue as an endocrine organ. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14 Suppl. 2006; 5: 242s–249s.
  22. 22. Deshmane SL, Kremlev S, Amini S, Sawaya BE. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1): an overview. J Interferon Cytokine Res. 2009; 29: 313–326. pmid:19441883
  23. 23. Kolattukudy PE, Niu J. Inflammation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, and the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1/CCR2 pathway. Circ Res. 2012; 110: 174–189. pmid:22223213
  24. 24. Dragomir E, Tircol M, Manduteanu I, Voinea M, Simionescu M. Aspirin and PPAR-alpha activators inhibit monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 expression induced by high glucose concentration in human endothelial cells. Vascul Pharmacol. 2006; 44: 440–449. pmid:16600694
  25. 25. Sathyapalan T, Atkin SL. Mediators of inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome in relation to adiposity. Mediators Inflamm. 2010; 2010: 758656. pmid:20396393
  26. 26. Simeoni E, Hoffmann MM, Winkelmann BR, Ruiz J, Fleury S, Boehm BO, et al. Association between the A-2518G polymorphism in the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene and insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2004; 47: 1574–1580. pmid:15349727
  27. 27. Sartipy P, Loskutoff DJ. Monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in obesity and insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100: 7265–7270. pmid:12756299
  28. 28. Ueda A, Okuda K, Ohno S, Shirai A, Igarashi T, Matsunaga K, et al. NF-kappa B and Sp1 regulate transcription of the human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 gene. J Immunol. 1994; 153: 2052–2063. pmid:8051410
  29. 29. Xing L, Remick DG. Promoter elements responsible for antioxidant regulation of MCP-1 gene expression. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007; 9: 1979–1989. pmid:17949278
  30. 30. Rovin BH, Lu L, Saxena R. A novel polymorphism in the MCP-1 gene regulatory region that influences MCP-1 expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999; 259: 344–348. pmid:10362511
  31. 31. Ortega-Gomez A, Perretti M, Soehnlein O. Resolution of inflammation: an integrated view. EMBO Mol Med. 2013; 5: 661–674. pmid:23592557
  32. 32. Gonzalez F. Inflammation in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: underpinning of insulin resistance and ovarian dysfunction. Steroids. 2012; 77: 300–305. pmid:22178787
  33. 33. Heilbronn LK, Campbell LV. Adipose tissue macrophages, low grade inflammation and insulin resistance in human obesity. Curr Pharm Des. 2008; 14: 1225–1230. pmid:18473870
  34. 34. Tilg H, Moschen AR. Adipocytokines: mediators linking adipose tissue, inflammation and immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006; 6: 772–783. pmid:16998510
  35. 35. Shoelson SE, Lee J, Goldfine AB. Inflammation and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2006; 116: 1793–1801. pmid:16823477
  36. 36. Guerre-Millo M. Adipose tissue hormones. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002; 25: 855–861. pmid:12508947
  37. 37. Atabekoglu CS, Sonmezer M, Ozmen B, Yarci A, Akbiyik F, Tasci T, et al. Increased monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels indicating early vascular damage in lean young PCOS patients. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95: 295–297. pmid:20869052
  38. 38. Glintborg D, Andersen M, Richelsen B, Bruun JM. Plasma monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha are increased in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and associated with adiposity, but unaffected by pioglitazone treatment. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009; 71: 652–658. pmid:19170716
  39. 39. Hu WH, Qiao J, Zhao SY, Zhang XW, Li MZ. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and its correlation with lipoprotein in polycystic ovary syndrome. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao. 2006; 38: 487–491. pmid:17068620
  40. 40. Hu W, Qiao J, Yang Y, Wang L, Li R. Elevated C-reactive protein and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 157: 53–56. pmid:21530057
  41. 41. Gonzalez F, Rote NS, Minium J, Kirwan JP. Evidence of proatherogenic inflammation in polycystic ovary syndrome. Metabolism. 2009; 58: 954–962. pmid:19375763
  42. 42. Kruger B, Schroppel B, Ashkan R, Marder B, Zulke C, Murphy B, et al. A Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) polymorphism and outcome after renal transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002; 13: 2585–2589. pmid:12239249
  43. 43. Karadeniz M, Erdogan M, Cetinkalp S, Berdeli A, Eroglu Z, Ozgen AG. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) 2518G/A gene polymorphism in Turkish type 2 diabetes patients with nephropathy. Endocrine. 2010; 37: 513–517. pmid:20960176