The invasion of the northwestern Atlantic by the Indo-Pacific lionfish has developed extraordinarily fast, and is expected to cause one of the most negative ecological impacts among all marine invasions. In less than 30 years, lionfish have dramatically expanded their distribution range to an area encompassing the eastern coast of the USA, Bermuda, the entire Caribbean region and the Gulf of Mexico. The rapidity of the lionfish spread has raised concerns in other parts of the Atlantic that may be under the reach of the invasion. Despite the anticipation that lionfish would eventually extend their range throughout most of the eastern coast of South America, it had not been recorded in Brazil until now. Here we report the first lionfish appearance for the Brazilian coast and show that the individual collected by us is genetically linked to the invasive Caribbean population. Since small-range endemics are found in several locations in Brazil and are among the species that are most vulnerable to extinction, we recommend urgent control, management and education measures aimed at minimizing the effects of this impending invasion.
Citation: Ferreira CEL, Luiz OJ, Floeter SR, Lucena MB, Barbosa MC, Rocha CR, et al. (2015) First Record of Invasive Lionfish (Pterois volitans) for the Brazilian Coast. PLoS ONE 10(4): e0123002. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0123002
Academic Editor: Benjamin Ruttenberg, California Polytechnic State University, UNITED STATES
Received: October 24, 2014; Accepted: February 26, 2015; Published: April 22, 2015
Copyright: © 2015 Ferreira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Data Availability: Sequence files are available from the Genbank database (accession numbers KP641131 and KP641132).
Funding: Financial support was provided by the California Academy of Sciences, CNPQ (Brazilian National Research Agency), FAPERJ (Rio de Janeiro State research funding agency) and ECOHUB (Brazilian ecological research funding agency).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The invasion of the northwestern Atlantic by the Indo-Pacific lionfishes, Pterois volitans and P. miles (hereafter referred to as lionfish), has developed extraordinarily fast [1,2], and is expected to cause one of the most negative ecological impacts among all marine invasions . In less than 30 years, lionfish have dramatically expanded their non-native distribution range to an area of roughly 7.3 million km2, encompassing the eastern coast of the USA, Bermuda, the entire Caribbean region and the Gulf of Mexico [1,4].
Despite being an iconic representative of the coral reef fauna, lionfish are habitat generalists also found in mangroves, seagrasses, mud bottoms, mesophotic reefs and even estuaries [5–7], surviving well in low salinity waters . Therefore, their expansion should not be constrained by the Amazon-Orinoco Plume (AOP), a huge freshwater and sediment discharge of the Amazon and Orinoco Rivers that represents a substantial barrier for reef-associated organisms’ dispersal between the Caribbean and the coast of Brazil [9,10]. Here we report the first lionfish appearance in the Brazilian coast and show results of a genetic analysis of this first individual.
The first lionfish found in the Brazilian coast was spotted by a group of recreational divers on May 10, 2014, in the rocky shores of Arraial do Cabo, in the southeastern coast of Brazil (22°57'8.69"S, 42° 0'32.71"W, Fig 1). It was an adult specimen (25 cm TL; Fig 2), which remained on the same patch reef for at least two days until it was collected using a hand spear and identified morphologically as Pterois volitans. Tissue samples from gill and muscle were collected and preserved in ethanol. Stomach contents were also preserved in ethanol. The specimen was fixed in formalin, preserved in ethanol and vouchered at the ichthyology collection of the Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (CIUFES 3252). In order to elucidate the provenance of the Brazilian lionfish, we sequenced two mitochondrial DNA genes: cyt b (cytochrome b) and COI (cytochrome oxidase I). Methodology for sequencing followed standard techniques described in detail by Hamner et al.  for cyt b and Valdez-Moreno et al.  for COI.
Satellite image by NOAA (http://maps.ngdc.noaa.gov/viewers/bathymetry/).
Results and Discussion
Because of strong founder effects, the Caribbean lionfish population has a unique genetic signature that differs from their Indo-Pacific native counterparts [2,11,12]. Therefore, if the genetic signature of the lionfish captured in Brazil matches Indo-Pacific individuals, we would assume that the individual did not originate from populations in the Caribbean. However, the DNA sequences from the Brazilian lionfish matched Caribbean individuals of Pterois volitans: the 810 base pairs cyt b sequence (Genbank accession no. KP641131) that we obtained is 100% identical to haplotype C, the second most common haplotype in the US Atlantic coast , and the 652 base pairs COI sequence (Genbank accession no. KP641132) from our fish is 100% identical to haplotype B, the most common haplotype in Mexico .
The lionfish invasion of the Brazilian coast was expected to start closer to the Amazon mouth, in either the north or the northeast region of Brazil. Our finding at Arraial do Cabo, a subtropical reef ~5,500 km away from the Caribbean, is surprising and raises the question of whether this individual is the outcome of a long-distance larval dispersal event from a Caribbean source or a secondary release from the aquarium trade. Even though we cannot rule out the latter hypothesis, two observations make it unlikely: first, export data from the US (where Brazil gets most of its imported marine fish) indicate that Caribbean lionfish are very rarely exported (R. Talbot pers. comm.); second, the lionfish analyzed here was collected in Cabo Frio, a sparsely populated area with no major aquarium stores and very few hobbyists. In addition, the lack of records in northeastern Brazil may also be explained by the relatively lower frequency of diving in that region. Therefore, it is our opinion that the lionfish recorded here arrived in Brazil via natural larval dispersal from the Caribbean.
In Brazil, lower species richness, high endemism and consequent lower functional redundancy of reef fish assemblages  suggest that a potential lionfish invasion will have even direr consequences than in the Caribbean reefs. Historically, the country lacks monitoring programs aimed at early detection of marine invasive species. Furthermore, current regulations concerning aquarium trade of exotic species do not contemplate potential of invasiveness . Since lionfish control efforts seem to be working in many places in the Caribbean [15–17], we suggest the implementation of a monitoring program that includes seldom visited areas in the northeastern region and immediate population control actions through removal in as many areas along the Brazilian coast as possible. This initiative should be embraced by one of the Brazilian Conservation National Action Plans (PAN) programs in development. Lionfish sightings should also be reported to the US Geological Survey, which maintains a comprehensive database (http://nas.er.usgs.gov/sightingreport.aspx). Finally, a strong educational program raising awareness about the dangers of lionfish and other marine invasive species aimed at aquarium shops, aquarium hobbyists and SCUBA divers should be started as soon as possible.
We thank AMA (Arraial do Cabo SCUBA diving association) for bringing the lionfish sighting to our attention. Financial support was provided by the California Academy of Sciences, CNPQ (Brazilian National Research Agency), FAPERJ (Rio de Janeiro State research funding agency) and ECOHUB (Brazilian ecological research funding agency). Capture and euthanasia of the lionfish was performed following the guidelines of the California Academy of Sciences (CAS) animal use and care committee (IACUC).
Conceived and designed the experiments: CELF OJL SRF LAR. Performed the experiments: MBL MCB CRR LAR. Analyzed the data: CRR LAR. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CRR LAR. Wrote the paper: CELF SRF OJL LAR.
- 1. Schofield PJ (2010) Update on geographic spread of invasive lionfishes (Pterois volitans Linnaeus, 1758 and P. miles Bennett, 1828) in the Western North Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean Sea and Gulf of Mexico. Aquat Invas 5: S117–S122. doi: 10.3391/ai.2010.5.S1.024.
- 2. Betancur- R R, Hines A, Acero A, Orti G, Wilbur AE, Freshwater DW (2011) Reconstructing the lionfish invasion: insights into Greater Caribbean biogeography. J Biogeogr 38: 1281–1293. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02496.x.
- 3. Albins MA, Hixon MA (2013) Worst case scenario: potential long-term effects of invasive predatory lionfish (Pterois volitans) on Atlantic and Caribbean coral-reef communities. Env Biol Fishes 96: 1151–1157. doi: 10.1007/s10641-011-9795-1.
- 4. Côté IM, Green SJ, Hixon M (2013) Predatory fish invaders: Insights from Indo-Pacific lionfish in the western Atlantic and Caribbean. Biol Invas 164: 50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.014.
- 5. Claydon JAB, Calosso MC, Traiger SB (2012) Progression of invasive lionfish in seagrass, mangrove and reef habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 448: 119–129. doi: 10.3354/meps09534.
- 6. Kulbicki M, Beets J, Chabanet P, Cure K, Darling E, Floeter SR, et al. (2012) Distributions of Indo-Pacific lionfishes Pterois spp. in their native ranges: implications for the Atlantic invasion. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 446: 189–205. doi: 10.3354/meps09442.
- 7. Jud ZR, Layman CA (2012) Site fidelity and movement patterns of invasive lionfish, Pterois spp., in a Florida estuary. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 414: 69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2012.01.015.
- 8. Jud ZR, Nichols P, Layman C (2015) Broad salinity tolerance in the invasive lionfish Pterois spp. may facilitate estuarine colonization. Env Biol Fishes 98: 135–143. doi: 10.1007/s10641-014-0242-y.
- 9. Rocha LA (2003) Patterns of distribution and processes of speciation in Brazilian reef fishes. J Biogeogr 30: 1161–1171. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00900.x.
- 10. Luiz OJ, Floeter S, Rocha LA, Ferreira CE (2013) Perspectives for the lionfish invasion in the South Atlantic: Are Brazilian reefs protected by the currents? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 485: 1–7. doi: 10.3354/meps10383.
- 11. Hamner RM, Freshwater DW, Whitfield PE (2007) Mitochondrial cytochrome b analysis reveals two invasive lionfish species with strong founder effects in the western Atlantic. J Fish Biol 71: 214–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01575.x.
- 12. Valdez-Moreno M, Quintal-Lizama C, Gómez-Lozano R, García-Rivas MDC (2012) Monitoring an Alien Invasion: DNA Barcoding and the Identification of Lionfish and Their Prey on Coral Reefs of the Mexican Caribbean. PLoS ONE 7: e36636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036636. pmid:22675470
- 13. Halpern BS, Floeter SR (2008) Functional diversity responses to changing species richness in reef fish communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 364: 147–156. doi: 10.3354/meps07553
- 14. Sampaio FDF, Otrensky A (2013) Brazilian environmental legislation as tool to conserve marine ornamental fish. Mar Pol 42: 280–285. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.009.
- 15. Frazer TK, Jacoby CA, Edwards MA, Barry SC, Manfrino CM (2012) Coping with the Lionfish Invasion: Can Targeted Removals Yield Beneficial Effects? Rev Fisheries Sci 20: 185–191. doi: 10.1080/10641262.2012.700655.
- 16. de León R, Vane K, Bertuol P, Chamberland V, Simal F, Imms E, et al. (2013) Effectiveness of lionfish removal efforts in the southern Caribbean. Endangered Species Research 22: 175–182. doi: 10.3354/esr00542.
- 17. Côté IM, Akins L, Underwood E, Curtis-Quick J, Green SJ (2014) Setting the record straight on invasive lionfish control: Culling works. PeerJ PrePrints 2: e398v391. doi: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.398v1.