Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Novel Biosurfactant Produced by Aureobasidium pullulans L3-GPY from a Tiger Lily Wild Flower, Lilium lancifolium Thunb.

  • Jong Shik Kim ,

    jskim@gimb.or.kr (JSK); bsyun@jbnu.ac.kr (BSY)

    Affiliation Gyeongbuk Institute for Marine Bioindustry, 22 Haeyanggwahak-gil, Uljin, Gyeongbuk 767–813, Republic of Korea

  • In Kyoung Lee,

    Affiliation Division of Biotechnology and Advanced Institute of Environmental and Bioscience, Chonbuk National University, 79 Gobong-ro, Iksan, Chonbuk 570–752, Republic of Korea

  • Bong Sik Yun

    jskim@gimb.or.kr (JSK); bsyun@jbnu.ac.kr (BSY)

    Affiliation Division of Biotechnology and Advanced Institute of Environmental and Bioscience, Chonbuk National University, 79 Gobong-ro, Iksan, Chonbuk 570–752, Republic of Korea

A Novel Biosurfactant Produced by Aureobasidium pullulans L3-GPY from a Tiger Lily Wild Flower, Lilium lancifolium Thunb.

  • Jong Shik Kim, 
  • In Kyoung Lee, 
  • Bong Sik Yun
PLOS
x

Abstract

Yeast biosurfactants are important biotechnological products in the food industry, and they have medical and cosmeceutical applications owing to their specific modes of action, low toxicity, and applicability. Thus, we have isolated and examined biosurfactant-producing yeast for various industrial and medical applications. A rapid and simple method was developed to screen biosurfactant-producing yeasts for high production of eco-friendly biosurfactants. Using this method, several potential niches of biosurfactant-producing yeasts, such as wild flowers, were investigated. We successfully selected a yeast strain, L3-GPY, with potent surfactant activity from a tiger lily, Lilium lancifolium Thunb. Here, we report the first identification of strain L3-GPY as the black yeast Aureobasidium pullulans. In addition, we isolated a new low-surface-tension chemical, designated glycerol-liamocin, from the culture supernatant of strain L3-GPY through consecutive chromatography steps, involving an ODS column, solvent partition, silica gel, Sephadex LH-20, and an ODS Sep-Pak cartridge column. The chemical structure of glycerol-liamocin, determined by mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, indicates that it is a novel compound with the molecular formula C33H62O12. Furthermore, glycerol-liamocin exhibited potent biosurfactant activity (31 mN/m). These results suggest that glycerol-liamocin is a potential novel biosurfactantfor use in various industrial applications.

Introduction

A surfactant molecule has both hydrophilic and hydrophobic moieties that can accumulate at interfaces, reduce surface and interfacial tensions, and form aggregate structures such as micelles, which consist of external hydrophilic moieties and internal hydrophobic moieties [16]. In recent years, increasing concern has been placed on the environmental impacts of chemical surfactants [6]. Biosurfactants produced intracellularly or extracellularly by microorganisms such as yeast, fungi, and bacteria are biodegradable and eco-friendly materials having lower toxicity than synthetic surfactants [16], and biosurfactants have been developed as suitable alternatives for antimicrobial and biomedical agents [7]. Biosurfactants produced by yeasts have many potential applications, because products with a “generally regarded as safe” (GRAS) status are not toxic or pathogenic, allowing for use in food and pharmaceutical industries [8]. Furthermore, biosurfactants are used for specific purposes, depending on their complex chemical structures, and they are useful in the same applications as synthetic surfactants, with similar physical and chemical properties such as reducing surface tension and improving stability at various temperatures and pH [16]. Therefore, biosurfactants have been widely used in various industrial fields including the fields of medicine, food, cosmetics, detergent, pulp and paper, secondary recovery of crude oil, onshore and offshore oil decontamination, and oil and fat degradation [4, 5].

During the screening for biosurfactant-producing yeasts, we isolated a yeast strain, which was identified as Aureobasidium pullulans, from a Lilium lancifolium Thunb. tiger lily. A. pullulans is ubiquitous yeast reportedly found in various locations, including soil, water, plant leaves, painted walls, bathroom surfaces, hypersaline water in solar salterns, and Arctic glacier ice [811]. A. pullulans produces polysaccharides such as pullulan and β-glucan, which have been utilized previously for various industrial and medical applications [1215]. Recently, there have been reports on A. pullulans with regard to (poly) malic acid [1622], lipase [23], laccase [24], mannitol oils [25], biocontrol [26, 27], lipid composition [28, 29], and siderophores [30]. A. pullulans strains also reportedly produce biosurfactants of heavy oils [31]. The A. pullulans L3-GPY strain that we isolated exhibited potent biosurfactant activity. In this report, we describe the phylogenetic identification of this biosurfactant-producing yeast, isolation and structural determination of the active compound (glycerol-liamocin), and the biosurfactant activity.

Materials and Methods

Screening of potential biosurfactant-producing yeast

The tiger lily is perennial plant species that flowers each summer and is widely distributed in residential areas and non-residential areas in Korea. We sampled tiger lilies without specific permission, because no specific permissions for sample collection were required under local and national laws. Sampling site is located at N 36° 59' 54.49" and E 129° 24' 17.28".

Media for yeast-screening included the following types: DG18 agar (Dichloran-Glycerol 18%; MB Cell, Seoul), DOB (Drop Out Base) with CSM (Complete Amino Acid Supplement Mixture) agar (MP Bio, CA, USA), GPY agar (4% glucose, 0.5% peptone, 0.5% yeast extract, and 1.5% agar), and SCG agar (Sabouraud Chloramphenicol Gentamicin; MB Cell, Seoul). Antibiotics (100 mg/L chloramphenicol and streptomycin) were added to each medium to repress bacterial growth, and 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.4% l-sorbose were added to repress fungal growth. Yeasts were cultured on DG18, DOB with CSM, GPY, and SCG agar media in square plates (245 × 245 × 25 mm, Nunc Bio-Assay Dish; Thermo Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark).

L. lancifolium (formerly L. tigrinum) samples were aseptically collected from a residential area in Uljin by using autoclaved scissors and forceps and were placed in clean plastic bags. The samples were stored in a cooler during transfer to the laboratory in Uljin and then processed the same day. Each sample was washed 3 times with 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer and stored in an autoclaved container. Several washed leaf samples were placed in tubes (Falcon, Los Angeles, CA) with a maximum volume of 10 mL of 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer, and samples were homogenized using an autoclavable hand homogenizer (T10 basis; IKA, Germany). Homogenized samples (1 mL) were placed on sterile solid media, plated using a glass spreader, and incubated at 25°C for 2–5 d. Yeast colonies that grew were selected with an autoclaved toothpick and inoculated into 96-deep-well plates for liquid culture at 25°C and 800 rpm for 48 h. Drops of culture broth (20 μL) were tested with the drop-collapse method on hydrophobic parafilm using an 8-channel pipette, and the size of the droplet was confirmed by comparison with water; the spreading diameters of droplets on parafilm were measured upon addition of culture fluid. Selected biosurfactant producers were streaked three times on agar plates to isolate pure yeast colonies, and the isolates were cultured repeatedly in GPY liquid medium and on agar plates with 20% glucose until single, separate colonies grew, to avoid cross-contamination during cultivation. The yeast selected for further studies was deposited in the Korean Culture Center of Microorganisms (KCCM) and cultured on GPY with glucose as a carbon source.

Sequencing of the yeast isolate

The primer sets used to amplify 18S rRNA and elongase (ELO) genes for the A. pullulans L3-GPY strain are described in previous reports: NS1, NS3, and NS8 [32] and ELO2-F and ELO2-R [33], respectively. For PCR, DNA was extracted from an A. pullulans L3-GPY colony growing on an agar plate by the InstageneTM Matrix method, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).

PCR was performed with 20 ng of genomic DNA as the template in a 30-μL reaction mixture with EF-Taq DNA polymerase (Solgent, Korea). The PCR program included the following steps: 95°C for 5 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 2 min, 55°C for 60 s, and 72°C for 60 s; and a final extension step for 10 min at 72°C. Thereafter, the amplification products were purified using a multiscreen filter plate (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA). Sequencing reactions were performed using a PRISM BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems) was added to the DNA samples containing the extension products. The mixture was incubated at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 5 min on ice, and then analyzed using an ABI Prism 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). DNA sequencing of isolates was performed by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, Korea). The nucleotide sequences reported in this paper were deposited in DDBJ/GenBank under the following accession numbers: AB746215 (18S rRNA) and AB746250 (ELO).

Phylogenetic analysis of A. pullulans isolate L3-GPY

Nucleotide sequences of 18S rRNA and ELO genes were aligned using the ClustalW2 program on the EMBL-EBI website. A BLAST search was used to identify GenBank sequences representing the most closely related strain to A. pullulans L3-GPY. Phylogenetic trees were constructed by the neighbor-joining method [34] using MEGA5 for Windows, including bootstrap analyses based on 1000 samples, and evolutionary distances were calculated with the Kimura 2-parameter method [35].

Separation and purification of glycerol-liamocin from A. pullulans L3-GPY

Culture broth from A. pullulans L3-GPY was lyophilized, dissolved in water, and filtered with gauze. The filtrate was subjected to flash C18 reversed-phase (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) column chromatography. The column was washed with 70% aqueous methanol and then eluted with 90% aqueous methanol. The eluate was concentrated under reduced pressure to remove methanol, and the aqueous concentrate was partitioned with ethyl acetate. Surfactant activity was detected in the ethyl acetate-soluble portion. Then, the ethyl acetate-soluble phase was concentrated under reduced pressure, and the concentrate was separated on a column of silica gel (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and eluted with an increasing amount of methanol in chloroform (CHCl3:MeOH, 50:1 to 10:1 [v/v]). Fractions showing activity were combined, concentrated, subjected to Sephadex LH-20 (Amersham Biosciences, Uppsala, Sweden) column chromatography, and eluted with 50% aqueous methanol. After the activity of fractions was evaluated, active fractions were collected and concentrated under reduced pressure. Then, the concentrate was separated on a Sep-Pak C18 cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA) and eluted with a gradient from 50%–70% aqueous methanol to yield the purified, active compound, glycerol-liamocin (3.7 mg). The isolation and purification procedures for glycerol-liamocin are depicted in Fig 1.

Structure analysis of glycerol-liamocin

To determine the chemical structure of glycerol-liamocin, the high-resolution mass was determined using electrospray ionization (ESI)-QTRAP-3200 Mass Spectrometer (ESI-MS; Applied Biosystems). Ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) spectra were recorded on Shimadzu UV-300 and FT-IR Equinox 55 spectrophotometers, respectively. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained on a JEOL JNM-ECA600, 600 MHz FT-NMR Spectrometer at 600 MHz for 1H NMR and at 150 MHz for 13C NMR in CD3OD. Chemical shifts are given in ppm (δ), with tetramethylsilane as the internal standard.

Surfactant activity of glycerol-liamocin

Surfactant activity was determined by dissolving the compound in water, loading 20 μL of the resulting solution on a hydrophobic support (parafilm), and measuring the degree of spreading as increasing droplet diameter size. Increased spreading was considered to represent increased biosurfactant activity, because of decreased surface tension [3638]. An equal amount of distilled water was used as a control. Surface tension (N/m) variation was measured using a Sigma Model 700 Tensiometer (KSV Instruments Ltd., Helsinki, Finland).

Results and Discussion

Selection and phylogenetic identification of a novel biosurfactant producer

We isolated a yeast strain, L3-GPY, with potent surface activity from a tiger lily, Lilium lancifolium Thunb, which was screened among other yeast isolates from the homogenized flower samples by the drop-collapse test. Our phylogenetic analysis of 18S rRNA gene sequences from genomic DNA of biosurfactant producer L3-GPY showed that this isolate is an ascomycetous yeast belonging to class Dothideomycetes, order Dothideales, and family Dothioraceae. The black yeast is the closest species to A. pullulans. Additionally, A. pullulans gene sequences share high similarity with many 18S rRNA genes of yeast and fungi. Therefore, the yeast could not be identified based on only the 18S rRNA genes (Fig 2A).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Phylogenetic trees of (a) 18S rRNA gene and (b) elongase gene (ELO) from A. pullulans L3-GPY with reference sequences.

Bootstrap cutoff values of 75% are noted at the branch junctions.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.g002

To identify to which species or interspecies the strain belongs, a deep clade phylogenetic analysis of L3-GPYELO was performed, which revealed that the yeast strain is most closely related to Group 1 of A. pullulans interspecies, together with A. pullulans var. pullulans (Fig 2B).

The NCBI BLAST search results showed 98% or 99% identity with the group, including A. pullulans EXF-915 and EXF-2449, and the results showed 91% identity with A. pullulans var. subglaciale, which is in Group 3, including EXF-2479 and EXF-3640. The strain has ≤90% identity with A. pullulans var. melanogenum, which is in Group 2. Both the BLAST search and phylogenetic analyses of 18S rRNA and ELO genes suggested that the biosurfactant producer should be classified in Group 1, which includes A. pullulans var. pullulans, based on results of the previous study by Zalar et al. [33]. To date, studies have focused on A. pullulans production of pullulan and other chemicals; hence, this report reveals that A. pullulans also produces a novel type biosurfactant.

Chemical structure of glycerol-liamocin

The chemical structure, as determined by MS and NMR data, of the active compound glycerol-liamocin, represents a novel biosurfactant. Glycerol-liamocin was obtained as a colorless glycolipid. The molecular weight of glycerol-liamocin was determined to be 650 g/mol by ESI-MS measurement, which provided a quasi-molecular ion peak at mass: charge (m/z) 673.6 [M+Na]+ in positive mode (Fig 3). The molecular formula was established to be C33H62O12 by high-resolution ESI-MS measurement (m/z 673.4160 [M+Na]+, Δ+2.1 mmu) in combination with 1H and 13C NMR data. This molecular formula dictates 3 degrees of unsaturation.

The 1H NMR spectrum of glycerol-liamocin measured in CD3OD shows signals from seven oxygenated methines and two oxygenated methylenes at δ 3.5–5.1, three methylenes at δ 2.4–2.6, 15 methylenes from alkyl chains at δ 1.3–1.8, and three methyls at δ 0.91 (Table 1).

Although the 13C NMR spectrum displays many overlapping signals, 33 carbon signals were assigned based on DEPT and HMQC spectra. All proton-bearing carbons were verified by the HMQC spectrum, and the 13C NMR spectrum in combination with DEPT and HMQC spectra displays three overlapping ester carbonyl carbons at δ 171.8; seven oxygenated methine carbons at δ 71.9 (×2), 69.7 (×2), 67.1, 65.5, and 65.4; two oxygenated methylene carbons at δ 65.3 and 62.7; 18 methylene carbons at δ 22–43; and three methyl carbons at δ 13.1. The 1H-1H COSY and TOCSY spectra established three similar partial structures, two 3,5-dihydroxydecanoyl moieties and one glycerol (Fig 4). The C-5 positions of two 3,5-dihydroxydecanoyl groups should be acylated, based on the proton chemical shift values appearing downfield of δH 5.07. The overall chemical structure of glycerol-liamocin was determined by the HMBC spectrum (Fig 4). Long-range correlations of the methylene protons at δ 4.19 and 4.09 and the methylene protons at δ 2.53 and 2.42 to the carbonyl carbon at δ 171.8 (C-1) revealed that the glycerol moiety is attached to C-1 via an ester linkage. The methine proton at δ 5.07 and the methylene protons at δ 2.53 and 2.42 exhibited long-range correlations to the carbonyl carbon at δ 171.8 (C-2), suggesting that three 3,5-dihydroxydecanoyl moieties are connected to each other through ester linkages between the 1- and 5-positons. As a result of our literature survey and structural investigations, we determined that glycerol-liamocin a new glycerol derivative of 3,5-dihydroxydecanoic polyesters, such as exophilin A and liamocins, which were previously isolated as antibacterial compounds from the culture broth of Exophiala pisciphila NI10102 [39] and novel extracellular mannitol oils from A. pullulans NRRL50380 [25], respectively. The NMR spectral data of 3,5-dihydroxydecanoyl moieties are well matched with those of exophilin A and liamocins [25, 39].

thumbnail
Fig 4. Chemical structure of glycerol-liamocin elucidated by two-dimensional NMR experiments.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.g004

Surface tension properties of glycerol-liamocin

To examine surfactant properties of glycerol-liamocin, a sample of culture medium and the size of glycerol-liamocin were compared with water as the control by the drop-collapse test (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Picture illustrating the surface tension of glycerol-liamocin in aqueous solution dropped on a hydrophobic film.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.g005

When a surfactant with hydrophobic and hydrophilic moieties is added to water, surface tension decreases. In contrast, as intermolecular interactions increase, surface tension increases. Glycerol-liamocin exhibited a low surface tension of 31.5 mN/m at 1.5 mg/L, compared to that of water (72.8 mN/m). Furthermore, these results reveal that glycerol-liamocin exhibits lower surface tension than other surfactants, despite its low concentration. Thus, glycerol-liamocin was confirmed as an effective biosurfactant, with greater surfactant activity than other known surfactants [40].

The yield of glycerol-liamocin was very low compared to liamocins (0.5 to 6 g liamocins/L) [25]. In this study, we isolated and examined the compound showing the most potent biosurfactant-specific activity from A. pullulans L3-GPY culture broth, but there are many other major components with less activity than glycerol-liamocin that are under investigation.

In conclusion, A. pullulans, a microorganism isolated from a tiger lily flower, exhibited low surface tension activity. The active compound, glycerol-liamocin, was purified from the culture filtrate, and its chemical identity was determined to be a novel compound, based on extensive MS and NMR structural analyses. Further, purified glycerol-liamocin exhibited potent biosurfactant activity. In future studies, additional research on biosurfactant production by A. pullulans will enhance further understanding of potential biotechnological applications.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Numerical data of 1H NMR spectrum of glycerol-liamocin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Numerical data of 13C NMR spectrum of glycerol-liamocin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s002

(TIFF)

S3 Fig. Numerical data of DEPT spectrum of glycerol-liamocin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s003

(TIFF)

S4 Fig. Numerical data of 1H-1H COSY spectrum of glycerol-liamocin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s004

(TIFF)

S5 Fig. A partial structure of glycerol-liamocin confirmed by numerical data of 1H- 1H COSY spectrum of glycerol-liamocin and shown using bold lines.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s005

(TIFF)

S6 Fig. Numerical data of TOCSY spectrum of glycerol-liamocin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s006

(TIFF)

S7 Fig. A partial structure of glycerol-liamocin confirmed by numerical data of TOCSY spectrum of glycerol-liamocin and shown using bold lines.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s007

(TIFF)

S8 Fig. Numerical data of HMQC spectrum of glycerol-liamocin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s008

(TIFF)

S9 Fig. Numerical data of HMBC spectrum of glycerol-liamocin.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s009

(TIFF)

S10 Fig. A three-dimensional structure of glycerol-liamocin and numerical data of 1H NMR spectrum and 13C NMR spectrum.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122917.s010

(TIFF)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the research program of Gyeongsangbuk-Do and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), via a grant from the Korean government (MSIP) (no. NRF-2014R1A2A1A11052888).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JSK. Performed the experiments: JSK IKL. Analyzed the data: JSK BSY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JSK IKL. Wrote the paper: JSK BSY.

References

  1. 1. Desai JD, Banat IM. Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61: 47–64. pmid:9106364
  2. 2. Kitamoto D, Isoda H, Nakahara T. Functions and potential applications of glycolipid biosurfactants-from energy-saving materials to gene delivery carriers. J Biosci Bioeng. 2009;94: 187–201.
  3. 3. Ron EZ, Rosenberg E. Natural roles of biosurfactants. Environ Microbiol. 2001;3: 229–236. pmid:11359508
  4. 4. Singh A, Hamme JDV, Ward OP. Surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology: Part 2. Application aspects. Biotechnol Adv. 2007;25: 99–121. pmid:17156965
  5. 5. Van Hamme JDV, Singh A, Ward OP. Physiological aspects: Part 1 in a series of papers devoted to surfactants in microbiology and biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 2006;24: 604–620. pmid:16979315
  6. 6. Myers D. Surfactant Science and Technology. 3rd ed. New Jersey. Wiley-VCH; 2006.
  7. 7. Rodrigues L, Banat IM, Teixeira J, Oliveira R. Biosurfactants: potential applications in medicine. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57: 609–618. pmid:16469849
  8. 8. Amaral PFF, Coelho MAZ, Marrucho IMJ, Coutinho JAP. Biosurfactants from yeasts: characteristics, production and application. In: Sen R. editor. Biosurfactants, Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media; 2010. pp. 236–249.
  9. 9. Deshpande MS, Rale VB, Lynch JM. Aureobasidium pullulans in applied microbiology: a status report. J Enzyme Microb Technol. 1992;14: 514–527.
  10. 10. Gunde-Cimerman N, Sonjak S, Zalar P, Frisvad JC, Diderichsen B, Plemenitas A. Extremophilic fungi in Arctic ice: a relationship between adaptation to low temperature and water activity. Phys Chem Earth. 2003;28: 1273–1278.
  11. 11. Gunde-Cimerman N, Zalar P, de Hoog GS, Plemenitas A. Hypersaline waters in salterns-natural ecological niches for halophilic balck yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000;32: 235–240. pmid:10858582
  12. 12. Muramatsu D, Iwai A, Aoki S, Uchiyama H, Kawata K, Nakayama Y, et al. β-glucan derived from Aureobasidium pullulans is effective for the prevention of influenza in mice. PLoS One. 2012;7: e41399. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041399. pmid:22844473
  13. 13. Cheng KC, Demirei A, Catchmark JM. Pullulan: biosynthesis, production, and applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;92: 29–44. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3477-y. pmid:21800030
  14. 14. Yurlova NA, de Hoog GS. A new variety of Aureobasidium pullulans characterized by exopolysaccharide structure, nutritional physiology and molecular features. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1997;72: 141–147. pmid:9298193
  15. 15. Singh RS, Saini GK, Kennedy JF. Pullulan: Microbial sources, production and applications. Carbohyd Polym. 2008;73: 515–531.
  16. 16. Cao W, Qi B, Zhao J, Qiao C, Su Y, Wan Y. Control strategy of pH, dissolved oxygen concentration and stirring speed for enhancing β-poly (malic acid) production by Aureobasidium pullulansipe-1. J Chem Technol Bitechnol. 2013;88: 808–817.
  17. 17. Leathers TD, Manitchotpisit P. Production of poly(β-L-malic acid)(PMA) from agricultural biomass substrates by Aureobasidium pullulans. Biotechnol Lett. 2013;35: 83–89. doi: 10.1007/s10529-012-1045-x. pmid:22955679
  18. 18. Manitchotpisit P, Skory CD, Peterson SW, Price NP, Vermillion KE, Leathers TD. Poly(β-L-malic acid) production by diverse phylogenetic clades of Aureobasidium pullulans. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;39: 125–132. doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1007-7. pmid:21720775
  19. 19. Liu S, Steinbuchel A. Investigation of poly((β-L-malic acid) production by strains of Aureobasidium pullulans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;46: 273–278.
  20. 20. Nagata N, Nakahara T, Tabuchi T. Fermentation production of poly(β-L-malic acid), a polyelectrolytic biopolyester, by Aureobasidium pullulans. Biosci Biotech Bioch. 1993;57: 638–642.
  21. 21. Zan Z, Zou X. Efficient production of polymalic acid from raw sweet potato hydrolysate with immobilized cells of Aureobasidium pullulans CCTCC M2012223 in aerobic fibrous bed bioreactor. J Chem Technol Bitechnol. 2013;88: 1822–1827.
  22. 22. Zou X, Zhou Y, Yang ST. Production of polymalic acid and malic acid by Aureobasidium pullulans fermentation and acid hydrolysis. Biotech Bioeng. 2013;110: 2105–2113. doi: 10.1002/bit.24876. pmid:23436475
  23. 23. Leathers TD, Rich JO, Anderson AM, Manitchotpisit P. Lipase production by diverse phylogenetic clades of Aureobasidium pullulans. Biotechnol Lett. 2013;35: 1701–1706. doi: 10.1007/s10529-013-1268-5. pmid:23801121
  24. 24. Rich JO, Manitchotpisit P, Peterson SW, Leathers TD. Laccase production by diverse phylogenetic clades of Aureobasidium pullulans. Rangsit J Arts Sci. 2011;1: 41–47.
  25. 25. Price NPJ, Manitchotpisit P, Vermillion KE, Bowman MJ, Leathers TD. Structural characterization of novel extracellular liamocins (mannitol oils) produced by Aureobasidium pullulans strain NRRL 50380. Carbohydr Res. 2013;370: 24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2013.01.014. pmid:23435167
  26. 26. Mari M, Martini C, Spadoni A, Rouissi W, Bertolini P. Biocontrol of apple postharvest decay by Aureobasidium pullulans. Postharvest Biol Technol. 2012;73: 56–62.
  27. 27. Prasongsuk S, Ployngam S, Wacharashindhu S, Lotrakul P, Punnapayak H. Effects of sugar and amino acid supplementation on Aureobasidium pullulans NRRL 58536 antifungal activity against four Aspergillus species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97: 78321–7830.
  28. 28. Certik M, Breierova E, Jursikova P. Effect of cadmium on lipid composition of Aureobasidium pullulans grown with added extracellular polysaccharides. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2005;55: 195–202.
  29. 29. Turk M, Mejanelle L, Sentjure M, Sentjurc M, Grimalt JO, Plemenitas A. Salt-induced changes in lipid composition and membrane fluidity of halophilic yeast-like melanized fungi. Extremophiles. 2004;8: 53–61. pmid:15064990
  30. 30. Ma ZC, Chi Z, Geng Q, Zhang F, Chi ZM. Disruption of the pullulan synthetase gene in siderophore-producing Aureobasidium pullulans enhances siderophore production and simplifies siderophore extraction. Process Biochem. 2012;47: 1807–1812.
  31. 31. Manitchotpisit P, Price NP, Vermillion KE, Leathers TD, Punnapayak H. Heavy oils produced by Aureobasidium pullulans. Biotechnol Lett. 2011;33: 1151–1157. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0548-1. pmid:21293903
  32. 32. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplication and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego. Academic press; 1990. pp. 315–322.
  33. 33. Zalar P, Gostincar C, de Hoog GS, Ursic V, Sudhadham M, Gunde-Cimerman N. Redefinition of Aureobasidium pullulans and its varieties. Stud Mycol. 2008;61: 21–38. doi: 10.3114/sim.2008.61.02. pmid:19287524
  34. 34. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4: 406–425. pmid:3447015
  35. 35. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28: 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. pmid:21546353
  36. 36. Hewald S, Josephs K, Bolker M. Genetic analysis of biosurfactant production in Ustilago maydis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71: 3033–3040. pmid:15932999
  37. 37. Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Pickford R, Derrick JP, Lamers GEM, Thomas-Oates JE, et al. Characterization of two Pseudomonas putida lipopeptide biosurfactants, putisolvin I and II, which inhibit biofilm formation and break down existing biofilms. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51: 97–113. pmid:14651614
  38. 38. Morita T, Konishi M, Fukuoka T, Imura T, Kitamoto D. Discovery of Pseudozyma rugulosa NBRC 10877 as a novel producer of the glycolipid biosurfactants, mannosylerythritol lipids, based on rDNA sequence. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;73: 305–313. pmid:16733733
  39. 39. Doshida J, Hasegawa H, Onuki H, Shimidzu N. Exophilin A, a new antibiotic from a marine microorganism Exophiala pisciphila. J Antibiot. 1996;49: 1105–1109. pmid:8982339
  40. 40. Campos-Takaki GM, Sarubbo LA, Albuquerque CDC. Environmentally friendly biosurfactants produced by yeast. In: Sen R. editor. Biosurfactants, Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media; 2010. pp. 250–260.