Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Characterization of Effector and Memory T Cell Subsets in the Immune Response to Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle

  • Mayara F. Maggioli ,

    mayaramaggioli@gmail.com

    Affiliations Infectious Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States of America, Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America

  • Mitchell V. Palmer,

    Affiliation Infectious Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States of America

  • Tyler C. Thacker,

    Affiliation Infectious Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States of America

  • H. Martin Vordermeier,

    Affiliation Tuberculosis Research Group, Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency-Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, United Kingdom

  • W. Ray Waters

    Affiliation Infectious Bacterial Diseases of Livestock Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States of America

Characterization of Effector and Memory T Cell Subsets in the Immune Response to Bovine Tuberculosis in Cattle

  • Mayara F. Maggioli, 
  • Mitchell V. Palmer, 
  • Tyler C. Thacker, 
  • H. Martin Vordermeier, 
  • W. Ray Waters
PLOS
x

Abstract

Cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT assays are primarily a measure of central memory T cell (Tcm) responses with humans; however, this important subset of lymphocytes is poorly characterized in cattle. Vaccine-elicited cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT responses correlate with protection against bovine tuberculosis in cattle. However, whether this assay measures cattle Tcm responses or not is uncertain. The objective of the present study was to characterize the relative contribution of Tcm (CCR7+, CD62Lhi, CD45RO+), T effector memory (Tem, defined as: CCR7-, CD62Llow/int, CD45RO+), and T effector cells (CCR7-, CD62L-/low, CD45RO-), in the immune response to Mycobacterium bovis. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from infected cattle were stimulated with a cocktail of M. bovis purified protein derivative, rTb10.4 and rAg85A for 13 days with periodic addition of fresh media and rIL-2. On day 13, cultured PBMC were re-stimulated with medium alone, rESAT-6:CFP10 or PPDb with fresh autologous adherent cells for antigen presentation. Cultured cells (13 days) or fresh PBMCs (ex vivo response) from the same calves were analyzed for IFN-γ production, proliferation, and CD4, CD45RO, CD62L, CD44, and CCR7 expression via flow cytometry after overnight stimulation. In response to mycobacterial antigens, ~75% of CD4+ IFN-γ+ cells in long-term cultures expressed a Tcm phenotype while less than 10% of the ex vivo response consisted of Tcm cells. Upon re-exposure to antigen, long-term cultured cells were highly proliferative, a distinctive characteristic of Tcm, and the predominant phenotype within the long-term cultures switched from Tcm to Tem. These findings suggest that proliferative responses of Tcm cells to some extent occurs simultaneously with reversion to effector phenotypes (mostly Tem). The present study characterizes Tcm cells of cattle and their participation in the response to M. bovis infection.

Introduction

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a chronic bacterial disease of animals that may also infect humans. Mycobacterium bovis, the main agent causing bTB, is a member of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, which also comprises: M. tuberculosis (M. tb), M. canettii, M. africanum, M. pinnipedii, M. microti, M. caprae and M. mungi [1, 2]. This genetically related group of bacteria causes TB with comparable pathology in a wide variety of hosts [3, 4]. Great strides have been made over the past century in the control of bTB in cattle and to limit the risk to humans (e.g., pasteurization of milk for dairy products); however, the disease persists as a significant socioeconomic hardship for livestock farmers with estimates of >50 million cattle infected worldwide, costing $3 billion annually. The WHO (World Health Organization), in conjunction with FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) and OIE (Office International des Épizooties), recently classified bTB as a neglected zoonosis.

An essential component of the immune response to TB in humans, cattle and mice is the production of IFN-γ by T helper 1 (Th1) CD4 T cells [510]. Immune deficiencies affecting CD4 T cells (e.g., HIV infection) and IL-12/IFN-γ /STAT1 signaling pathways result in more severe disease upon TB infection in humans [11,12]. Given the importance of Th1 cells in the immune response to TB, it is not surprising that IFN-γ release assays (IGRA) and delayed type hypersensitivity (i.e., skin test) responses are useful correlates of infection (reviewed by Schiller et al. [13] for cattle and Walzl et al. [14] for humans). Widely utilized in IGRAs, early secretory antigenic target-6 (ESAT-6) and culture filtrate protein-10 (CFP-10) are potent inducers of Th-1 cytokines [15]. ESAT-6 and CFP-10 are co-secreted proteins encoded by the RD-1 region of the genome of M. tb complex mycobacteria. Such genes are absent in all M. bovis bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) strains and most other non-tuberculous mycobacteria species [1619]. Diagnostic IGRA’s are measures of ‘ex vivo’ immune responses relying on rapid production of IFN-γ in response to mycobacterial antigen stimulation in short-term (16–24 h) whole blood or peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures. Ex vivo assays for use in bTB diagnosis are generally considered a measure of T cell effector responses and are frequently used to measure immune responses to bTB vaccines prior to and after challenge with virulent M. bovis [9,20]. While most protective bTB vaccines elicit ex vivo IFN-γ responses, not all vaccines that induce this response provide protection [21]. Additionally, levels of IFN-γ elicited by vaccination do not necessarily correlate with the level of protection afforded by the vaccine [22]. Thus, the identification of correlates of protection is needed to prioritize vaccine candidates for evaluation in costly BL-3 vaccination/challenge efficacy trials.

Recent vaccine efficacy studies in cattle have demonstrated that long-term cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT (so called, cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT) responses are positive predictors of vaccine efficacy [2325] and duration of immunity [26]. Protection provided by vaccination is partial and protected animals have reduced mycobacterial burden and associated pathology following experimental infection. In this assay, PBMCs are stimulated with antigens for 10–13 days and maintained by fresh media exchange and exogenous IL-2. After this initial culture period, cells are re-stimulated for an additional 20 h in the presence of autologous antigen presenting cells (APC) in anti-IFN-γ coated ELISPOT plates. Studies with samples from humans have demonstrated that cultured ELISPOT responses are primarily a measure of T cell memory (Tcm) cells [2729].

Sallusto et al. [30] identified two functionally distinct subsets of memory T cells (i.e., CD45RA-/CD45RO+) in mice and humans based on expression of the lymphoid homing receptors CD62L and CCR7. These two subsets are: (1) Tcm cells which express CD62L and CCR7 and are preferentially located in lymphoid tissues and (2) effector memory T (Tem) cells which lack CD62L and CCR7 expression and are preferentially located in peripheral tissues or remain blood associated, either circulating or contained within splenic red pulp or hepatic sinusoids [31]. Tem cells show immediate effector functions, maintaining preformed cytotoxic granules for rapid cytolysis of infected host cells [32]. Tcm cells show elevated proliferation and IL-2 production capabilities, being able to generate Tem and effector cells [33] whereas Tem cells undergo relatively little proliferation and secrete minimal IL-2 upon restimulation [28,31,33]. While Tcm and Tem have different roles in the immune response, both subsets are thought to be important for protection against pathogens. Still, due to the high proliferative capacity and long life span of Tcm, the eliciting of Tcm is believed to provide long-term protection.

The cultured ELISPOT assay measures memory responses, primarily Tcm in humans [2729]. Godkin et al. [27] tracked hepatitis C virus HLA-DR11-restricted epitopes in the course of the long-term culture, demonstrating that cultured ELISPOT IFN-γ production was due to long-lived CD4+ Tcm expressing CCR7. The fundamental role of CCR7+ CD4 cells was also reported by Todryk et al. [34]; these authors assessed the effect of depletion of CCR7 expressing cells on ex vivo or cultured ELISPOT responses to either influenza antigenic peptides or M. tb purified protein derivative (PPD). The depletion of CCR7+ cells dramatically reduced cultured ELISPOT responses, yet had only a minimal effect on ex vivo responses. Supportive of the idea that the cultured ELISPOT response is a measure of Tcm responses, several studies have shown the association of responses measured by this assay with protection against malaria, suppression of viral recrudescence in hepatitis B virus carriers, low viremia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and favorable outcomes in human TB [28,3538].

While responses measured by cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT following vaccination correlate to protection with bTB; the phenotype of the responding cells within the long-term cultures has not been determined for cattle in response to neither vaccination nor infection. A better understanding of the cattle immune system may enable the development of improved vaccine strategies and consequently, greater protection against this zoonotic disease of cattle. In the present study, we characterize effector and memory T cell subsets in the immune response to M. bovis infection of cattle.

Materials and Methods

Animal Use Ethics

All studies were approved by the National Animal Disease Center Animal Care and Use (Protocol #’s ACUP-2508 and ACUP-2688) / Institutional Biosafety (Permit #’s IBC-0285A and IBC-0004RA) committees and performed under appropriate project licenses within the conditions of the Animal Welfare Act originally signed into law in 1966 and in accordance with the most recent amendments. All animals were housed in appropriate biological containment facilities at the National Animal Disease Center. Animals did not develop clinical signs of bTB (such as: cough, dyspnea, anorexia and weight loss); however, one animal (from the non-infected control group) was euthanized by intravenous administration of sodium pentobarbital due to an umbilical infection.

Mycobacterium bovis aerosol challenge procedures

Two field strains of M. bovis were used for challenge inoculum: 95–1315 (Michigan white-tailed deer isolate) and 10–7428 (Colorado dairy isolate). Low passage (≤ 3) cultures of both strains were prepared using standard techniques in Middlebrook 7H9 liquid media (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) supplemented with 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose complex (OADC) plus 0.05% Tween 80 (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri). Holstein steers (~ 6 months of age) were obtained from a bTB-free herd in Sioux Center, IA and housed in a biosafety level-3 (BSL-3) facility at NADC in separate rooms based upon treatment group. For the first experiment, treatment groups consisted of non-infected steers (n = 7) and animals receiving 104 colony-forming units (cfu) of M. bovis 95–1315 (n = 8), or M. bovis 10–7428 (n = 8). For the second study, a single group of steers (n = 8) received 104 cfu M. bovis 10–7428. For both studies, M. bovis challenge inoculum was delivered to restrained calves (~9 months of age) by aerosol as described by Palmer et al. [39]. Briefly, inoculum was nebulized into a mask (Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada) covering the nostrils and mouth, allowing regular breathing and delivery of the mycobacteria to the lungs via the nostrils. The process continued until the inoculum, a 1 ml PBS wash of the inoculum tube, and an additional 2 ml PBS were delivered—a process taking ~10 min. Strict biosafety protocols were followed to protect personnel from exposure to M. bovis throughout the study, including BSL-3 containment upon initiation of M. bovis challenge in animal rooms and standard laboratory practices for handling M. bovis cultures and samples from M. bovis-infected animals.

Mycobacterial isolation and assessment of lesions

All calves were euthanized ~4 months after challenge by intravenous administration of sodium pentobarbital. Tissues were examined for gross lesions and processed for microscopic analysis and isolation of M. bovis. Tissues collected included: lung; liver; mandibular, parotid, medial retropharyngeal, mediastinal, tracheobronchial, hepatic, and mesenteric lymph nodes. Lymph nodes were sectioned at 0.5 cm intervals and examined. Each lung lobe was sectioned at 0.5–1.0 cm intervals and examined separately. Lungs and lymph nodes (mediastinal and tracheobronchial) were evaluated using a semi-quantitative gross pathology scoring system adapted from Vordermeier et al.[9]. Tissues collected for microscopic analysis were fixed by immersion in 10% neutral buffered formalin. For microscopic examination, formalin-fixed tissues were processed by standard paraffin-embedment techniques, cut in 5 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Adjacent sections from samples containing caseonecrotic granulomata suggestive of bTB were stained by the Ziehl-Neelsen technique for identification of acid-fast bacteria. Microscopic tuberculous lesions were staged (I-IV) based on a scoring system developed by Wangoo et al. [40].

Ex vivo and long-term cell culture

PBMC were isolated from buffy coat fractions of blood collected in 2 × acid-citrate-dextrose solution. Complete RPMI medium for PBMC cell culture was RPMI 1640 (GIBCO, Grand Island) supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 25 mM HEPES buffer, 100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin, 1% non-essential amino acids (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 2% essential amino acids (Sigma), 1% sodium pyruvate (Sigma), 50 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), and 10% (v/v) fetal bovine sera (FBS). Long-term cell cultures were generated by stimulating 2 × 106/ml PBMC with a cocktail of M. bovis PPD (PPDb, 5 μg/ml, Prionics Ag, Sclieren, Switzerland) rAg85A (1 μg/ml, LIONEX Diagnostics and Therapeutics GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany), rTB10.4 (1 μg/ml, LIONEX Diagnostics and Therapeutics GmbH), and rESAT-6/CFP-10 (1 μg/ml, kind gift from Chris Minion, Iowa State University) in complete RPMI medium. Cells were cultured (2 × 106 cells/well, 1 ml/well) in 24 well flat-bottom microtiter plates (Nunc, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Media containing human rIL-2 (Sigma, 10 U/ml) was used to replace media from the PBMC cultures at days 3 and 7. Fresh media without IL-2 was used at days 10 and 12. For ELISPOT assays, at day 13, cultured cells were added (2 × 104 of cultured PBMC/well) to anti-bovine IFN-γ capture-mAb (Serotec, Oxford, UK) coated 96-well ELISPOT plates (Millipore, Watford, UK) and incubated in the presence of autologous APCs and either PPDb (5 μg/ml), rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml), pokeweed mitogen (PWM, Sigma) (1μg/ml) or medium alone. Autologous APCs were isolated by adherence incubating 1 × 105 freshly isolated PBMC in complete medium at 39°C/5% CO2 for 90 min in ELISPOT plates. Non-adherent cells were discarded and the adherent cells (APCs) washed four times with warm RPMI 1640 media. Fresh complete media containing antigen and long-term cultured cells were then incubated 20h at 39°C/5% CO2. For flow cytometric analysis, cultured cells were added (2 × 104 of cultured PBMC/well) to round-bottom well plates and incubated in the presence of APCs and either PPDb (5 μg/ml), rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml), PWM (1 μg/ml) or medium alone. Autologous APCs were prepared as described for the ELISPOT assay. Fresh complete media containing antigen and long-term cultured cells were then incubated 16 h at 39°C/5% CO2 with Brefeldin A (Sigma, 10 μg/ml) added at 4 h of culture.

IFN-γ ELISPOT

The IFN-γ ELISPOT assay was performed as described by Vordermeier et al. [41] and Whelan et al., [25]. Briefly, polyvinyldifluoride 96-well ELISPOT plates (Millipore) were coated at 4°C overnight with an anti-bovine IFN-γ capture mAb (Serotec), followed by a blocking step (10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in RPMI 1640 media, for 2 h at 39°C/5% CO2). Autologous APCs were isolated by adherence on coated and blocked ELISPOT plates. Long-term cultured cells (2 × 104 of cultured PBMC/well) were added to ELISPOT plates (Millipore, Watford, UK) and incubated with either PPDb (5 μg/ml), rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml), PWM (1 μg/ml) or medium alone for 20 h at 39°C/5% CO2. Spot forming cells (SFC) were detected following the Vectastain ABC-AP Kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) standard procedures.

Flow Cytometry

Following the appropriate culture duration, cells were pooled from individual animals according to in vitro treatments (i.e., stimulation). Cells were stained as described by Maue et al. [42], with the primary antibodies and appropriate secondary antibodies listed on the Table 1. CD4 T cells were analyzed as a separate panel, while CD8 and γδ T cells staining was performed together to enable the analysis of CD8 expressing γδ T cells. Intracellular staining was performed following BD Perm/Wash instructions (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

thumbnail
Table 1. Primary and secondary monoclonal antibodies and proliferation staining reagents.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.t001

For cell-trace labeling, cells were labeled with CellTrace Violet (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) following kit instructions. Briefly, either freshly isolated or long-term cells (cultured for 13 days) were resuspended at 1 × 107 cells in PBS containing 10 μM/ml of the cellTrace dye with immediate vortexing to ensure rapid homogenous staining of cells. Staining was performed at 20°C and cell were incubated for 5 min. Cells were washed three times with PBS containing 10% FBS and cultured for additional six days in the presence of APCs and antigens in round-bottom 96-well plates before cell staining with primary and secondary antibodies. For the long-term cultured cells the culture length was 19 days. Flow cytometric analysis was performed with a BD LSR flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star Inc., San Carlos, CA).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Analysis of Variance followed by Tukey’s or Šídák’s multiple comparisons test or Student’s t test using GraphPAD Prism 6.0 (GraphPAD Software Inc., La Jolla, CA).

Results

Aerosol M. bovis infection of cattle elicits long-term cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT responses

Aerosol inoculation to cattle with M. bovis 95–1315 or M. bovis 10–7428 resulted in a similar distribution and severity of gross and microscopic tuberculous lesions as well as mycobacterial colonization, primarily affecting the lungs and lung-associated lymph nodes [43]. Specific cell-mediated and antibody responses, including kinetics of the response as well as antigen recognition profiles, were also comparable between the two treatment groups [43,44].

With bTB vaccine efficacy studies, long-term cultured (i.e., 14 days) IFN-γ ELISPOT responses to vaccination (i.e., BCG, M. bovis ΔRD1, and viral-vectored Ag85) negatively correlates with mycobacterial burden and TB-associated pathology and positively correlates with vaccine-induced protection [2325]. As with vaccination, M. bovis infection also elicited long-term cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT responses in cattle (Fig 1). Three weeks after infection, long-term cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT responses by PBMCs from infected cattle to rESAT-6:CFP10 and PPDb exceeded (P < 0.05) respective responses by PBMCs from non-infected calves (Fig 1A). Similar results were detected with ex vivo (i.e., short-term) responses (Fig 1B). Also, Tcm and ex vivo responses did not differ (P > 0.05) between M. bovis 95-1315- and 10-7428-infected groups (S1 Fig). The weak response detected to PPDb by non-infected cattle in both ex vivo and long-term cultures was likely due to prior exposure to non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM, a common occurrence in US dairy cattle) as pre-infection whole blood (18 h stimulation) IFN-γ responses to M. avium PPD (PPDa) exceeded (P < 0.05) respective responses to PPDb (S2 Fig). Using intracellular cytokine staining, IFN-γ responses to PPDb and to rESAT-6:CFP10 were also detected in long-term PBMC cultures at 3, 6, 8, and 12 weeks after aerosol infection (Fig 1C). Responses increased (P < 0.05) from 3 and 6 to 12 weeks after infection. These findings demonstrate that infection of cattle with virulent M. bovis elicits long-term cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT responses, which are considered a surrogate of Tcm responses in humans [34,38,45].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Long-term cultured and ex vivo IFN- γ responses by cattle after M. bovis aerosol challenge.

Cultured ELISPOT analysis was performed ~3 weeks after challenge with virulent M. bovis. Long-term cultured cells were generated by stimulating PBMC with a cocktail of rAg85A (1 μg/ml), rTB10.4 (1 μg/ml), and rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml) antigens as well as PPDb (5 μg/ml) for 13 days followed by transfer to ELISPOT plates with APCs and addition of either rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium alone. For the ex vivo response, freshly isolated PBMCs were stimulated with rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium alone for 16h. Medium control responses were subtracted from antigen-stimulated responses and results are presented as mean spot forming cells (SFC)/million cells (± SEM, n = 8) for (A) long-term culture or (B) ex vivo conditions. (C) The kinetics of the response is shown as the percent of CD4+ cells producing IFN-γ in long-term cultures at 3, 6, 8, and 12 weeks post infection (WPI n = 6). Two-way ANOVA (Šídák’s multiple comparison post-test).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.g001

Analysis of IFN-γ production in long-term cultures reveals a dominant contribution by Tcm

The expression of CD45RO, CD4, CCR7 and intracellular expression of IFN-γ by PBMC cells was evaluated following long-term or ex vivo culture (Fig 2). CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ following long-term culture predominantly co-expressed CD45RO and CCR7 surface antigens (Fig 3), consistent with the Tcm phenotype described for humans and mice (S3 Fig) [26],[46]. The phenotype of cells responding to PPDb (CD4+ IFN-γ+) was compared under ex vivo versus long-term culture conditions (Fig 3A and S4A Fig). The predominant cell phenotype responding to antigenic stimulation in long-term cultures was that of Tcm cells, whereas few Tcm were present under ex vivo conditions (P < 0.01, % Tcm in long-term versus ex vivo cultures). In contrast, effector cells contributed to ex vivo IFN-γ production, but only minimally to the long-term culture response (P < 0.05). Tem cells contributed to IFN-γ production in both ex vivo (~50%) and long-term cultures (~25%). The respective overall effector/memory CD4 T cells (i.e. CD4+ IFN-γ+/- cells) proportions under both long- and short-term conditions are shown in S4B Fig The relative contribution of Tcm, Tem and effector CD4+ T cells in the response to PPDb (Fig 3B) and to rESAT-6:CFP10 (Fig 3C) remained the same over the course of infection (i.e., at 6, 8, and 12 weeks after challenge). In general a greater number of responding cells (IFN-γ+) were observed in the long-term cultured assay as compared to the ex vivo assay (Fig 3), perhaps due to the greater percentage of CD4 cells within long-term cultures (S5 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Representative gating strategy for evaluation of CD45RO and CCR7 expression on CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ.

Approximately 8 weeks after aerosol challenge with M. bovis, long-term cultures were generated by stimulating PBMC with a cocktail of rAg85A (1 μg/ml), rTB10.4 (1 μg/ml) and rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml) as well as PPDb (5 μg/ml) for 13 days followed by transfer of cells to ELISPOT plates with APCs and restimulation with PPDb. Gating hierarchy (gating sequence as depicted by the arrows): (A) Single cells (within the oblong gate), (B) Lymphocytes (within the polygon gate), (C) CD4+ cells, (D) CD4+ cells producing IFN-γ, and (E) CD45RO and CCR7 expression for determination of effector/memory phenotypes.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Frequencies of Tcm, Tem and effector cells producing IFN-γ in response to mycobacterial antigens in long-term and ex vivo assays.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from calves ~ 8 weeks after challenge with virulent M. bovis. Cells were stimulated with a cocktail of rAg85A (1 μg/ml), rTB10.4 (1 μg/ml), and rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml) as well as PPDb (5 μg/ml) for 13 days followed by transfer to 96 well round bottom plates with APCs and addition of media alone, PPDb or rESAT-6:CFP10 for an additional 16h. For ex vivo culture, PBMC were stimulated with media alone, PPDb or rESAT-6:CFP10 for 16 h. (A) Relative contribution of Tcm, Tem, and T effector cells to IFN-γ production in response to PPDb by long-term (i.e., 14-day) (left) and ex vivo (i.e., 16 h) (right) cultures, 8 weeks after M. bovis challenge. Data are presented in percentages (pies) and as mean (± SEM) number of cells producing IFN-γ / 104 cells (histograms) (n = 16). Relative contribution of Tcm, Tem and T effector cells to IFN-γ production in response to PPDb (B) or to rESAT-6:CFP10 (C) in long-term cultures at three, six, eight or 12 weeks post-infection (WPI, n = 6). Tcm, Tem and effector cell phenotypes were as defined in Fig 2 and S3 Fig Tcm and Effector T cell contribution to IFN-γ production differs (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, paired Student's t-tests) between short- and long-term cultures.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.g003

Tcm cells highly expressed (P < 0.05) CD62L and CD44 in response to either rESAT-6:CFP10 or PPDb stimulation (Fig 4). Expression of CD62L was intermediate with Tem and low to non-existent with effector cells (Fig 4A). CD44 expression was low in both Tem and effector cells (Fig 4B).

thumbnail
Fig 4. CD62L and CD44 expression by Tcm, Tem and effector CD4+ cells in long-term (14 day) cultures.

Analysis of long-term cultured PBMCs was performed ~ 8 weeks after aerosol challenge with virulent M. bovis. Cells were stimulated with a cocktail of rAg85A (1 μg/ml), rTB10.4 (1 μg/ml), and rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml), as well as PPDb (5 μg/ml) for 13 days followed by transfer to 96 well round bottom plates with APCs and addition of PPDb or rESAT-6:CFP10. Data are presented as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI, y-axis, ± SEM) of CD62L or CD44 by CD4+ cells of the various effector / memory subsets (x-axis). (A) CD62L expression by Tcm, Tem and effector cells in response to PPDb and rESAT-6:CFP10. (B) CD44 expression on Tcm, Tem and effector cells in response to PPDb and rESAT-6:CFP10. Tcm, Tem and effector cell phenotypes were as defined in Fig 2 and S3 Fig Paired Student's t-tests (n = 8).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.g004

Tcm cells possess high proliferative capability

Human CD4 memory T cells, predominantly those exhibiting Tcm phenotype, proliferate in response to cytokine and antigenic stimulations, differentiating into Tem or effector T cells in vitro [30,47]. To assess the proliferative capacity of bovine Tcm cells following long-term culture, cells were harvested at day 13 and stained with CellTrace Violet. CellTrace Violet stained cells were re-stimulated with rESAT-6:CFP10 or PPDb for additional six days, without IL-2 (S5 Fig). For comparative purposes, freshly isolated PBMC were isolated and stained with CellTrace Violet and cultured for six days (short-term culture). Cells proliferated in response to antigenic stimulation under both long- and short-term conditions (Table 2). CD4 T cells were the most proliferative fraction (P < 0.05), followed by γδ, CD8 T cells, and CD8 expressing γδ T cells. In response to rESAT-6:CFP10 stimulation, the number of CD4 T cells proliferating in long-term cultures exceeded (P < 0.05) that of short-term cultures. Similarly, the CellTrace Violet mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was significantly lower (P = 0.003), indicating greater cell proliferation in rESAT-6:CFP10-stimulated CD4 T cells in long- vs short-term cultures (Fig 5 and Fig 6). Greater percentages of CD4 T cells (P < 0.05) proliferated under long-term culture in response to either rESAT-6:CFP10 (Fig 6A) or PPDb (Fig 6B). These findings demonstrate that bovine Tcm cells are highly proliferative in response to repeated stimulation with recall antigen.

thumbnail
Table 2. Lymphocyte subset proliferative responses of M. bovis-infected cattle under short or long-term culture condition.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.t002

thumbnail
Fig 5. Proliferation of cell subsets in response to mycobacterial antigens.

Approximately 7 weeks after M. bovis challenge, PBMCs from infected cattle were either long or short-term cultured (6 days). Long-term cells consisted of PBMCs cultured in the presence of rAg85A, rTB10.4, rESAT-6:CFP10 and PPDb for 13 days (n = 4). Subsequently, cells were stained with CellTrace violet dye and re-stimulated with either rESAT-6:CFP10 or medium in the presence of APCs for an additional six days. Short-term cells consist of CellTrace Violet-stained PBMC from M. bovis-infected cattle cultured for six days in the presence of either rESAT-6:CFP10 or medium (n = 4). Proliferative responses of cells under both culture conditions were compared for each T cell subset. Data are presented as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI, y-axis) of CellTrace Violet for analysis of proliferation of T cell subsets (x-axis). Two-way ANOVA, n = 6, Šídák’s multiple comparison post-test.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. Long-term cultured cells have higher proliferative responses than short-term cells.

Long-term and short-term cultured PBMCs were analyzed ~ 7 weeks after aerosol challenge with virulent M. bovis. Long-term cells consist of PBMC from M. bovis aerosol infected cattle cultured in the presence of rAg85A, rTB10.4, rESAT-6:CFP10 and PPDb for 13 days and then CellTrace violet-stained and re-stimulated with either rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium in the presence of fresh autologous adherent cells for an additional six days. Short-term cells consist of CellTrace violet-stained PBMC from M. bovis aerosol infected cattle cultured for six days in the presence of either rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium. The gating strategy was performed in accordance with procedures described in Fig 2A for single cells, and as shown in S3 Fig for lymphocytes, and CD4+ cells. (A) Percentages of CD4+ cells proliferating (low Celltrace dye MFI) in response to rESAT-6:CFP10 within long or short-term cultures. (B) Percentages of CD4+ cells proliferating (low Celltrace dye MFI) in response to PPDb within long or short-term cultures. (C) Memory/effector phenotype of proliferating CD4+ cells within long-term or short-term cultures in response to rESAT-6:CFP10. (D) Memory/effector phenotype of proliferating CD4+ cells within long-term or short-term cultures in response to PPDb. For panels A and B, cell proliferation differs (**P < 0.01, n = 6 paired Student's t-tests) between long and short-term cultures to either rESAT-6:CFP10 or PPDb. For panels C and D, Tcm and effector cell content differs (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01, n = 4 paired Student's t-tests) between short-term and long-term cultures to either rESAT-6:CFP10 or PPDb.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.g006

Given the robust participation of CD4 T cells in the long-term proliferative response and the fact that Tcm cells are believed to generate effector cells, the phenotype of these cells (i.e., 14-day cultured cells re-stimulated with antigen for an additional 6 days) was further assessed. Again, PBMCs cultured under short-term culture conditions (6 days only) were used for comparison (Fig 6). The distribution of CD4 T cells into Tcm and effector subsets was different between short- and long-term conditions following stimulation with rESAT-6:CFP10 (Fig 6C) or PPDb (Fig 6D). Greater (P < 0.05) numbers of Tcm cells were present in long-term (13 + 6 days) versus short-term (6 days) cultures; while more effector cells were present (P < 0.05) in short—versus long-term cultures. The numbers of Tem and naïve cells were similar between the two conditions. Tem cells were the main population in both cultures, whereas few naïve cells persisted under either culture condition (Fig 6C and 6D). These findings indicate that highly proliferative Tcm cells partially revert to effector (predominately Tem) phenotypes upon additional exposure to antigen for 6 days (Fig 6C and 6D as compared to Fig 3).

Discussion

This study characterizes Tcm cells in cattle and their participation in the immune response to M. bovis infection. As early as 6 weeks after M. bovis infection, CD4+ Tcm cells (CD45RO+, CCR7+) were detected in long-term, antigen-stimulated PBMC cultures upon recall stimulation with specific (i.e., rESAT-6:CFP-10) or complex (i.e., PPDb) antigens of M. bovis (Fig 3). Antigen-specific CD4 cells, as detected by IFN-γ production via either ELISPOT (Fig 1A and 1B) or intracellular cytokine staining (Figs 1C, 2 and 3), within long-term PBMC cultures were predominately (~76%) Tcm cells (CD45RO+ / CCR7+), with the remainder being Tem cells (CD45RO+ / CCR7-, ~23%) (Fig 3). Bovine Tcm were highly proliferative as antigen restimulation of cells within long-term cultures induced robust proliferation of CD4+ cells that significantly exceeded that of short-term culture cells (Table 2, Figs 5, 6A and S5 Fig). Further phenotypic analyses of repeat stimulated cultures indicated that a sub-population of bovine Tcm reverted to effector (both Tem and T effector) phenotypes upon repeat exposure to M. bovis antigens (Fig 6B). The identification and characterization of CD4 Tcm and Tem subpopulations in cattle should prove useful for development of vaccines and the understanding of the immunopathogenesis for many infectious diseases of cattle.

Memory cells elicited either by vaccination [30,48] or during pathogen clearance [15,32] are thought to provide long-term protection due to their prolonged life-span, proliferation potential, and plasticity [7,33,48]. While events governing immunological memory during chronic infections (wherein the antigenic stimulation persists) are not well understood, a significant Tcm response is associated with a favorable outcome for chronic infections, such as HIV and TB (e.g., latency and self-healing with TB and subclinical disease with HIV) [31,38]. Still, the relative importance of Tcm for protective immunity against TB is not fully established. Tcm and ex vivo responses are detected in M. tb-infected patients [33,37] and loss of Tcm responses (as measured by cultured IFN-γ ELISPOT) is associated with clinical disease progression [27,37]. Likewise, Tcm responses in the absence of ex vivo IFN-γ production indicate disease remission, either by self-healing [34,38] or anti-mycobacterial therapy, reinforcing the role that pathogen clearance has on Tcm function and/or maintenance [34,37]. Intriguingly, in spite of the presence of Tcm cells, patients receiving curative treatment are still susceptible to M. tb re-infection [28,31,49]. In the current set of experiments, each of the calves had mild progressive disease and were responsive to TB antigens in both cultured and ex vivo IFN-γ ELISPOT assays—similar to what occurs in humans with the mild active form of M. tb infection [38]. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that both Tem and Tcm cells were elicited relatively early after infection (3 weeks post-infection, Fig 1). It is uncertain if Tcm responses by the animals would decrease as the disease progresses, but it is frequently reported that animals in late stages of infection become anergic to measures of cell-mediated immunity, yielding false negative results upon skin test or ex vivo IFN-γ assays [5052]. Prolonged infection trials with cattle are difficult due to biocontainment costs and ethical issues associated with extended duration of housing large animals within restrictive facilities. Thus, further studies to characterize the progression of Tcm responses to M. bovis infection in cattle may require sampling of field reactors with various clinical manifestations of the disease including: chronic progressive disease, M. bovis detected yet no visible lesions (i.e., analogous to latency in humans), and severe disseminated disease.

Although IFN-γ is key to a successful containment of mycobacterial infections, the interaction between pathogens and host is intricate. Several factors and cytokines may be relevant to M. bovis infection outcome. Together with IFN-γ, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is crucial for the control of mycobacterial infections of humans and mice [53]. Also, T cells producing multiple cytokines have been recently identified and may play an important role in infection outcome. Polyfunctional T cells co-producing IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 are associated with infection control in HIV, hepatitis C, leishmaniasis and malaria (reviewed in [54,55]). With TB, conflicting data indicate that polyfunctional T cell responses are associated with either clinical disease (i.e., as a biomarker of active TB) or infection control [55]. Polyfunctional T cells were also recently described in cattle in the response to M. bovis infection [56] and to anti-mycobacterial vaccines [57]. Studies on polyfunctional responses of bovine memory T cells under our system (long-term cultured cells) are currently in progress. Additionally, TNF-α and IL-2 have been evaluated in cattle for diagnostic purposes [58,59].

Upon M. tb infection, the primary immune response may take days to weeks to develop relying on exposure of naive T cells to antigens in secondary lymphoid organs, expansion of antigen-specific cells, and homing of effector cells to the site of infection [60]. With TB, this 2–3 week delay in the response at the primary site of infection seems to be advantageous for the bacteria, and is observed during infection in cattle, humans, and mice [61]. In theory, the delay allows the pathogen an opportunity to establish a niche and to direct the ensuing immune response in favor of bacterial persistence and chronic immune stimulation. A more rapid homing of antigen-specific cells to the site of infection (e.g., as may occur in vaccinated animals) might be advantageous to the host, allowing more effective induction of immune responses (e.g., different activation status, cytokine profile) and circumvention of the pathogens regulation of host immunity [14,62,63]. These factors may partially explain why Tcm responses elicited by vaccination appear to be beneficial to the host, while similar Tcm responses are detected in infected animals with progressive disease. The presence of a robust TB-specific Tcm population elicited by vaccination prior to infection may lead to pathogen clearance before establishment of immune evasion tactics by the pathogen. Present findings provide a basis for future studies to determine the relative role of these Tcm and Tem subsets in vaccine-elicited protection.

Lymphocyte homing and trafficking to sites of inflammation and lymphoid organs are mediated by the expression of numerous surface adhesion molecules, such as CCR7, CD62L and CD44. CD62L mediates cell adhesion to peripheral lymph node vascular addressins (e.g., GlyCAM-1 and MAdCAM-1) [64]. The expression of CD62L on naïve and memory T cells facilitates cell rolling on endothelium in secondary lymphatic organs, contributing to the compartmentalization of the immune response [64]. CD44 expression on T cells is up regulated upon activation, thereby promoting movement through the extracellular matrix via interactions with hyaluronic acid and fibronectin [65]. In vitro stimulation of antigen specific T cells is known to up-regulate CD44 while concurrently down regulating CD62L expression in humans [66], mice [67] and cattle [56,68]. As in humans [66], bovine T cells expressing CD44 upon ex vivo stimulation frequently co-express CD45RO, while down regulating CD62L [56,68]. In the present study, CD44 expression on CD4 cells did not differ between Tem and effector cells under ex vivo or long-term culture conditions (Fig 4B). It is noteworthy that in the present study the expression of CD62L and CD44 was evaluated only among IFN-γ producing cells; thus, comparisons between resting/unstimulated versus responding/stimulated cells were not performed as previously described [68]. Also, the gating strategy employed (based on CCR7 and CD45RO expression) may also have contributed to the apparently discrepant findings. In the present work, the expression of CD62L was down regulated in effector cells, intermediate on Tem cells, and high on Tcm cells (Fig 4A). Although Tcm cells highly expressed CD62L, these cells maintained high CD44 expression. The relevance of the level of CD44 expression by memory T cells is controversial for both mice [15,69,70] and humans [66,69]. Although few authors investigated T cell memory responses in cattle [24,26,41,7173], to our knowledge no other description of the expression of CD44 by bovine Tcm cells (as defined by CCR7 and CD45RO expression) has been published, making direct comparisons not possible. However, data from mice suggest that although the expression of CD44 is dispensable for early expansion, trafficking and cytokine production of Th1 cells; expression of CD44 is required for long-term cell survival and anamnestic responses to re-infection [70]. In humans and mice it is long known that, together with CD62L, CCR7 plays a major role for cell homing to secondary lymphoid organs (SLO). For cattle, CCR7 expression is required for CD4 T cell migration to SLO, while homing of γδ T cells to SLO is not mediated by CCR7 expression [74]. To our knowledge further cytometric analysis of CCR7 positive cells into Tcm and naïve subsets, as well the antigen specific memory response to infection has not been done in cattle. Totté et al. [73] reported a subset of CD4 cells with Tcm characteristics after Mycoplasma mycoides infection and pathogen clearance. Upon restimulation, cells expressing CD62L were highly proliferative, while being less prone to down regulate CCR7 transcription. Conversely, cells lacking CD62L showed greater IFN-γ production, lower proliferation and down regulation of CCR7 transcription. Our findings indicate that in response to antigenic stimulation, Tcm cells strongly proliferated (Figs 5 and 6A) and were capable of switching to Tem and effector cells (CCR7 down regulation—Fig 6B).

We also analyzed the contribution of γδ, CD8 and CD8-expressing γδ T cells to the proliferative response of long- and short-term cultures. In cattle, CD8+ T-cells can bear either α/β or γ/δ TCR, with profound impacts on antigen specificity and immunological memory, as classical antigen-specific immunological memory resides in α/β T-cells [75,76]. In BCG vaccinated animals, CD8 memory responses were elicited within the CD8 α/β TCR expressing cells, but not the CD8 expressing γδ T cells [76]. In the present study, γδ CD8+ T cells showed greater proliferation under short-term culture conditions, while the proliferative response of γδ+ CD8+ T cells did not differ based on culture length (i.e., short- vs long-term). However, γδ+ CD8+ T cells constituted only a small population under both culture conditions (Table 1).

In summary, the present study demonstrates Tcm cells in the response to experimental M. bovis challenge. Our findings suggest that upon repeat in vitro stimulation Tcm cells proliferate into different effector cell types. The association of Tcm cells with vaccine-elicited protection, as well as in infection outcome, is still to be determined.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Cattle infected with either M. bovis 95–1315 or M. bovis 10–7428 have similar long-term cultured and ex vivo IFN-γ responses after M. bovis aerosol challenge.

Cultured ELISPOT analysis was performed ~3 weeks after challenge with virulent M. bovis. Long-term cultured cells were generated by stimulating PBMC with a cocktail of rAg85A (1 μg/ml), rTB10.4 (1 μg/ml), and rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml) antigens as well as PPDb (5 μg/ml) for 13 days followed by transfer to ELISPOT plates with APCs and addition of either rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium alone. For the ex vivo response freshly isolated PBMCs were stimulated with rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium alone for 16h. Medium control responses were subtracted from antigen-stimulated responses and results are presented as mean spot forming cells (SFC)/million cells (± SEM, n = 8) for (A) long-term culture or (B) ex vivo conditions. Responses did not differ between M. bovis 95–1315 and M. bovis 10–7428 infection groups (Two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Evaluation of IFN-γ responses to M. avium-derived PPD (PPDa) and M. bovis-derived PPD (PPDb) before challenge.

Responses to PPDa and PPDb prior to challenge were examined using a commercial IFN-γ release assay (i.e., Bovigam, Prionics Ag, Schlieren, Switzerland) according to manufacturer instructions. Briefly, duplicate 250l heparinised whole blood aliquots were distributed in 96-well plates with PPDb (10g/ml, Prionics Ag), PPDa (10g/ml, Prionics Ag), or no antigen and incubated at 39°C/5% CO2 for 20 hours. IFN-γ concentrations in stimulated plasma were determined using a commercial ELISA-based kit (Bovigam, Prionics Ag). Absorbencies of standards (recombinant bovine IFN-γ; Endogen, Rockford, IL) and test samples were read at 450 nm using an ELISA plate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA). Duplicate samples for individual treatments were analyzed and data presented as optical densities at 450 nm of the response to PPDb or PPDa minus the response to no-antigen (mean ± SEM). *Response to PPDa exceeded (P < 0.05, n = 24, paired Student's t-test) the response to PPDb.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Cell function and expression of cell markers on different human T cell memory subsets.

(A) Identification of memory subsets in the human peripheral blood based on the expression of CD45R0, CCR7, CD62L. (B) The differentiation of T cells occurs simultaneously with changes in cell functions. Adapted from Mahnkea et al. [46]

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Effector/memory phenotype of cells producing IFN-γ in response to PPDb under long-term and ex vivo conditions by infection group (A) and the respective efector/memory distribution of total CD4 cells, both IFN-γ+ positive and IFN-γ- (B).

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from calves ~ 8 weeks after challenge with virulent M. bovis (n = 8). Cells were stimulated with a cocktail of rAg85A (1 μg/ml), rTB10.4 (1 μg/ml), and rESAT-6:CFP10 (1 μg/ml) as well as PPDb (5 μg/ml) for 13 days followed by transfer to 96 well round bottom plates with APCs and addition of media alone, PPDb or rESAT-6:CFP10 for an additional 16h. For ex vivo culture, PBMC were stimulated with media alone, PPDb or rESAT-6:CFP10 for 16h. (A) Relative contribution of Tcm, Tem, and T effector cells to IFN-γ production in response to PPDb by long-term (i.e., 14-day) (left) and ex vivo (i.e., 16 h) (right) cultures did not differ between M. bovis 95–1315 (solid) or M. bovis 10–7428 (dashed) infection groups for any of the phenotypes (Two-way ANOVA, Šídák’s multiple comparison post-test). (B) Relative distribution of Tcm, Tem and T effector CD4+ cells in response to PPDb. (mean ± SEM, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; n = 8, Two-way ANOVA, Šídák’s multiple comparison post-test).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Representative cytometric plots of the long-term and short-term cultured proliferative responses to mycobacterial antigens by CD4, CD8 and γδ T cells.

Long-term and short-term cultured PBMCs were analyzed ~ 7 weeks after aerosol challenge with virulent M. bovis. Long-term cells consist of PBMC from M. bovis infected cattle cultured in the presence of rAg85A, rTB10.4, rESAT-6:CFP10 and PPDb for 13 days and then CellTrace violet-stained and re-stimulated with either rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium in the presence of fresh autologous adherent cells for an additional six days. Short-term cells consist of CellTrace violet-stained PBMC from M. bovis infected cattle cultured for six days in the presence of rESAT-6:CFP10, PPDb or medium.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122571.s005

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Jessica Pollock, Emma Frimml-Morgan, Shelly Zimmerman, Molly Stafne, Allen Jensen, Tracy Porter, Bruce Pesch, Sam Humphrey and Kristin Bass for their excellent technical assistance, as well as Rebecca Madison, Doug Ewing, Katie Pille, Jay Steffen, David Lubbers, Robin Zeisness, and Shawn Sperfslage for the excellent care and handling of animals. We also thank Dr. Jodi McGill and Dr. Crystal Loving for helpful discussion and advice concerning experimental design, technical logistics and manuscript preparation.

USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MVP TCT WRW MFM. Performed the experiments: MFM MVP TCT WRW. Analyzed the data: MFM WRW. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HMV. Wrote the paper: MFM MVP TCT HMV WRW.

References

  1. 1. Alexander KA, Laver PN, Michel AL, Williams M, van Helden PD, Warren RM, et al. Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex pathogen, M. mungi. Emerging Infect Dis. 2010;16: 1296–1299. doi: 10.3201/eid1608.100314. pmid:20678329
  2. 2. Rodriguez-Campos S, Smith NH, Boniotti MB, Aranaz A. Overview and phylogeny of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms: Implications for diagnostics and legislation of bovine tuberculosis. Res Vet Sci. 2014; doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2014.02.009.
  3. 3. Wirth T, Hildebrand F, Allix-Béguec C, Wölbeling F, Kubica T, Kremer K et al. Origin, spread and demography of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.PLoS Pathog. 2008; 4: e1000160. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000160. pmid:18802459
  4. 4. Comas I, Coscolla M, Luo T, Borrell S, Holt KE, Kato-Maeda M. et al. Out-of-Africa migration and Neolithic coexpansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with modern humans. Nat Genet. 2013; 45: 1176–1182. doi: 10.1038/ng.2744. pmid:23995134
  5. 5. Flynn JL, Chan J, Triebold KJ, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Bloom BR. An essential role for interferon gamma in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med. 1993;178: 2249–2254. pmid:7504064
  6. 6. Bold TD, Banaei N, Wolf AJ, Ernst JD. Suboptimal Activation of Antigen-Specific CD4+Effector Cells Enables Persistence of M. tuberculosis in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e1002063. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002063. pmid:21637811
  7. 7. Pollock KM, Whitworth HS, Montamat-Sicotte DJ, Grass L, Cooke GS, Kapembwa MS, et al. T-cell immunophenotyping distinguishes active from latent tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2013;208: 952–968. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit265. pmid:23966657
  8. 8. Torrado E, Cooper AM. What Do We Really Know about How CD4 T Cells Control Mycobacterium tuberculosis? PLoS Pathog. 2011;7: e1002196. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002196. pmid:21829359
  9. 9. Vordermeier HM, Chambers MA, Cockle PJ, Whelan AO, Simmons J. Hewinson RG. Correlation of ESAT-6-Specific Gamma Interferon Production with Pathology in Cattle following Mycobacterium bovis BCG Vaccination against Experimental Bovine Tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2002;70: 3026–3032. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.3026-3032.2002. pmid:12010994
  10. 10. Waters WR, Maggioli MF, McGill JL, Lyashchenko KP, Palmer MV Relevance of bovine tuberculosis research to the understanding of human disease: Historical perspectives, approaches, and immunologic mechanisms. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2014; doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.02.009.
  11. 11. Diedrich CR, Flynn JL. HIV-1/Mycobacterium tuberculosis coinfection immunology: how does HIV-1 exacerbate tuberculosis? Infect Immun. 2011;79: 1407–1417. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01126-10. pmid:21245275
  12. 12. Cooper AM, Solache A, Khader SA. Interleukin-12 and tuberculosis: an old story revisited. Curr Opin Immunol. 2007;19: 441–447. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2007.07.004. pmid:17702558
  13. 13. Schiller I, Oesch B, Vordermeier HM, Palmer MV, Harris BN, Orloski KA. et al. Bovine Tuberculosis: A Review of Current and Emerging Diagnostic Techniques in View of their Relevance for Disease Control and Eradication. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1865-1682.2010.01148.x.
  14. 14. Walzl G, Ronacher K, Hanekom W, Scriba TJ, Zumla A. Immunological biomarkers of tuberculosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11: 343–354. doi: 10.1038/nri2960. pmid:21475309
  15. 15. Andersen P, Smedegaard B. CD4(+) T-cell subsets that mediate immunological memory to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. Infect Immun. 2000;68: 621–629. pmid:10639425
  16. 16. Behr MA Comparative Genomics of BCG Vaccines by Whole-Genome DNA Microarray. Science. 1999;284: 1520–1523. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5419.1520. pmid:10348738
  17. 17. Van Pittius NCG, Gamieldien J, Hide W, Brown GD, Siezen RJ, Beyers AD. The ESAT-6 gene cluster of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other high G+C Gram-positive bacteria. Genome Biol. 2001;2: RESEARCH0044. pmid:11597336
  18. 18. Mahairas GG, Sabo PJ, Hickey MJ, Singh DC, Stover CK. Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis. J Bacteriol. 1996;178: 1274–1282. pmid:8631702
  19. 19. Pym AS, Brodin P, Brosch R, Huerre M, Cole ST. Loss of RD1 contributed to the attenuation of the live tuberculosis vaccines Mycobacterium bovis BCG and Mycobacterium microti. Mol Microbiol. 2002;46: 709–717. pmid:12410828
  20. 20. Vordermeier M, Jones GJ, Whelan AO. DIVA reagents for bovine tuberculosis vaccines in cattle. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2011;10: 1083–1091. doi: 10.1586/erv.11.22. pmid:21806401
  21. 21. Waters WR, Palmer MV, Buddle BM, Vordermeier HM. Bovine tuberculosis vaccine research: historical perspectives and recent advances. Vaccine. 2012;30: 2611–2622. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.018. pmid:22342705
  22. 22. Wedlock DN, Denis M, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Buddle BM.Vaccination of cattle with Danish and Pasteur strains of Mycobacterium bovis BCG induce different levels of IFN gamma post-vaccination, but induce similar levels of protection against bovine tuberculosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007;118: 50–58. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.04.005. pmid:17524495
  23. 23. Vordermeier HM, Villarreal-Ramos B, Cockle PJ, McAulay M, Rhodes SG, Thacker T, et al. Viral booster vaccines improve Mycobacterium bovis BCG-induced protection against bovine tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 2009;77: 3364–3373. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00287-09. pmid:19487476
  24. 24. Waters WR, Palmer MV, Nonnecke BJ, Thacker TC, Scherer CFC, Estes DM, et al. Efficacy and immunogenicity of Mycobacterium bovis DeltaRD1 against aerosol M. bovis infection in neonatal calves. Vaccine. 2009;27: 1201–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.12.018. pmid:19135497
  25. 25. Whelan AO, Wright DC, Chambers MA, Singh M, Hewinson RG, Vordermeier HM. Evidence for enhanced central memory priming by live Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccine in comparison with killed BCG formulations. Vaccine. 2008;26: 166–173. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.11.005. pmid:18055073
  26. 26. Thom ML, McAulay M, Vordermeier HM, Clifford D, Hewinson RG, Villarreal-Ramos B, et al. Duration of immunity against Mycobacterium bovis following neonatal vaccination with bacillus Calmette-Guérin Danish: significant protection against infection at 12, but not 24, months. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2012;19: 1254–1260. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00301-12. pmid:22718125
  27. 27. Godkin AJ, Thomas HC, Openshaw PJ. Evolution of epitope-specific memory CD4(+) T cells after clearance of hepatitis C virus. J Immunol. 2002;169: 2210–2214. pmid:12165552
  28. 28. Reece WHH, Pinder M, Gothard PK, Milligan P, Bojang K, Doherty T, et al. A CD4(+) T-cell immune response to a conserved epitope in the circumsporozoite protein correlates with protection from natural Plasmodium falciparum infection and disease. Nat Med. 2004;10: 406–410. doi: 10.1038/nm1009. pmid:15034567
  29. 29. Todryk SM, Bejon P, Mwangi T, Plebanski M, Urban B, Marsh K, et al. Correlation of memory T cell responses against TRAP with protection from clinical malaria, and CD4 CD25 high T cells with susceptibility in Kenyans. PLoS ONE. 2008;3: e2027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002027. pmid:18446217
  30. 30. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Förster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature. 1999;401: 708–712. doi: 10.1038/44385. pmid:10537110
  31. 31. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A, Araki K, Ahmed R. From vaccines to memory and back. Immunity. 2010;33: 451–463. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.10.008. pmid:21029957
  32. 32. Woodland DL, Kohlmeier JE. Migration, maintenance and recall of memory T cells in peripheral tissues. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9: 153–161. doi: 10.1038/nri2496. pmid:19240755
  33. 33. Champagne P, Ogg GS, King AS, Knabenhans C, Ellefsen K, Nobile M, et al. Skewed maturation of memory HIV-specific CD8 T lymphocytes. Nature. 2001;410: 106–111. doi: 10.1038/35065118. pmid:11242051
  34. 34. Todryk SM, Pathan AA, Keating S, Porter DW, Berthoud T, Thompson F, et al. The relationship between human effector and memory T cells measured by ex vivo and cultured ELISPOT following recent and distal priming. Immunology. 2009;128: 83–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03073.x. pmid:19689738
  35. 35. Yang S-H, Lee C-G, Park S-H, Im S-J, Kim Y-M, Son JM, et al. Correlation of antiviral T-cell responses with suppression of viral rebound in chronic hepatitis B carriers: a proof-of-concept study. Gene Ther. 2006;13: 1110–1117. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302751. pmid:16525482
  36. 36. Calarota SA, Foli A, Maserati R, Baldanti F, Paolucci S, Young MA, et al. HIV-1-specific T cell precursors with high proliferative capacity correlate with low viremia and high CD4 counts in untreated individuals. J Immunol. 2008;180: 5907–5915. pmid:18424710
  37. 37. Goletti D, Butera O, Bizzoni F, Casetti R, Girardi E, Poccia F. Region of difference 1 antigen-specific CD4+ memory T cells correlate with a favorable outcome of tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2006;194: 984–992. doi: 10.1086/507427. pmid:16960787
  38. 38. Millington KA, Gooding S, Hinks TSC, Reynolds DJM, Lalvani A. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific cellular immune profiles suggest bacillary persistence decades after spontaneous cure in untreated tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2010;202: 1685–1689. doi: 10.1086/656772. pmid:20958211
  39. 39. Palmer MV, Waters WR, Whipple DL. Aerosol delivery of virulent Mycobacterium bovis to cattle. Tuberculosis. 2002;82: 275–282. pmid:12623270
  40. 40. Wangoo A, Johnson L, Gough J, Ackbar R, Inglut S, Hicks D, et al. Advanced granulomatous lesions in Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle are associated with increased expression of type I procollagen, gammadelta (WC1+) T cells and CD 68+ cells. J Comp Pathol. 2005;133: 223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2005.05.001. pmid:16154140
  41. 41. Vordermeier HM, Rhodes SG, Dean G, Goonetilleke N, Huygen K, Hill AV, et al. Cellular immune responses induced in cattle by heterologous prime-boost vaccination using recombinant viruses and bacille Calmette-Guerin. Immunology. 2004;112: 461–470. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2004.01903.x. pmid:15196215
  42. 42. Maue AC, Waters WR, Davis WC, Palmer MV, Minion FC, Estes DM. Analysis of immune responses directed toward a recombinant early secretory antigenic target six-kilodalton protein-culture filtrate protein 10 fusion-protein in Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle. Infect Immun. 2005;73: 6659–6667. pmid:16177342
  43. 43. Waters WR, Thacker TC, Nelson JT, DiCarlo DM, Maggioli MF, Greenwald R, et al. Virulence of Two Strains of Mycobacterium bovis in Cattle Following Aerosol Infection. J Comp Pathol. 2014;151(4):410–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2014.08.007. pmid:25306158
  44. 44. Bass KE, Nonnecke BJ, Palmer MV, Thacker TC, Hardegger R, Schroeder B, et al. Clinical and diagnostic developments of a gamma interferon release assay for use in bovine tuberculosis control programs. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20: 1827–1835. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00519-13. pmid:24132602
  45. 45. Keating SM, Bejon P, Berthoud T, Vuola JM, Todryk S, Webster DP, et al. Durable human memory T cells quantifiable by cultured enzyme-linked immunospot assays are induced by heterologous prime boost immunization and correlate with protection against malaria. J Immunol. 2005;175: 5675–5680. pmid:16237057
  46. 46. Mahnke YD, Brodie TM, Sallusto F, Roederer M, Lugli E. The who's who of T-cell differentiation: Human memory T-cell subsets. Eur J Immunol. 2013;43: 2797–2809. doi: 10.1002/eji.201343751. pmid:24258910
  47. 47. Masopust D, Picker LJ. Hidden Memories: Frontline Memory T Cells and Early Pathogen Interception. J Immunol. 2012;188: 5811–5817. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102695. pmid:22675215
  48. 48. Lindenstrom T, Knudsen NPH, Agger EM, Andersen P. Control of Chronic Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection by CD4 KLRG1- IL-2-Secreting Central Memory Cells. J Immunol. 2013;190: 6311–6319. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300248. pmid:23677471
  49. 49. Caminero JA, Pena MJ, Campos-Herreo , Rodríguez B, Afonso O, Martin C, et al. Exogenous Reinfection with Tuberculosis on a European Island with a Moderate Incidence of Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163: 717–720. pmid:11254530
  50. 50. Houlihan MG, Dixon FW, Page NA. Outbreak of bovine tuberculosis featuring anergy to the skin test, udder lesions and milkborne disease in young calves. Vet Rec. 2008;163: 357–361. pmid:18806280
  51. 51. la Rua-Domenech De R, Goodchild AT, Vordermeier HM, Hewinson RG, Christiansen KH, Clifton-Hadley RS. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: A review of the tuberculin tests, γ-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res Vet Sci. 2006;81: 190–210. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.11.005. pmid:16513150
  52. 52. Pollock JM, Neill SD. Mycobacterium bovis Infection and Tuberculosis in Cattle. Vet J. 2002;163: 115–127. doi: 10.1053/tvjl.2001.0655. pmid:12093187
  53. 53. Cooper AM. Cell-mediated immune responses in tuberculosis. Immunology. 2009;27: 393–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132703. pmid:19302046
  54. 54. Caccamo N, Dieli F. Are Polyfunctional Cells Protective in M. tuberculosis Infection? In: Cardona PJ, editor. Understanding Tuberculosis—Analyzing the Origin of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pathogenicity. 2012. doi: 10.5772/35245. Available: http://www.intechopen.com/books/understanding-tuberculosis-analyzing-the-origin-of-mycobacterium-tuberculosis-pathogenicity/are-polyfunctional-cells-protective-in-m-tuberculosis-infection-
  55. 55. Wilkinson KA, Wilkinson RJ. Polyfunctional T cells in human tuberculosis. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40: 2139–2142. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040731. pmid:20853500
  56. 56. Whelan AO, Villarreal-Ramos B, Vordermeier HM, Hogarth PJ. Development of an antibody to bovine IL-2 reveals multifunctional CD4 T(EM) cells in cattle naturally infected with bovine tuberculosis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e29194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029194. pmid:22216206
  57. 57. Dean G, Whelan A, Clifford D, Salguero FJ, Xing Z, Gilbert S. et al. Comparison of the immunogenicity and protection against bovine tuberculosis following immunization by BCG-priming and boosting with adenovirus or protein based vaccines. Vaccine. 2014;32: 1304–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.11.045. pmid:24269321
  58. 58. Rhodes SG, McKinna LC, Steinbach S, Dean GS, Villarreal-Ramos B, Whelan AO, et al. Use of antigen-specific interleukin-2 to differentiate between cattle vaccinated with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and cattle infected with M. bovis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2014;21: 39–45. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00522-13. pmid:24173026
  59. 59. Waters WR, Palmer MV, Whipple DL, Carlson MP, Nonnecke BJ. Diagnostic implications of antigen-induced gamma interferon, nitric oxide, and tumor necrosis factor alpha production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells from Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003;10: 960–966. pmid:12965934
  60. 60. Mackay CR, Marston WL, Dudler L. Naive and memory T cells show distinct pathways of lymphocyte recirculation. J Exp Med. 1990;171: 801–817. pmid:2307933
  61. 61. Bold TD, Ernst JD. Who Benefits from Granulomas, Mycobacteria or Host? Cell. 2009;136: 17–19. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.12.032. pmid:19135882
  62. 62. Józefowski S, Sobota A, Kwiatkowska K. How Mycobacterium tuberculosis subverts host immune responses. Bioessays. 2008;30: 943–954. doi: 10.1002/bies.20815. pmid:18800365
  63. 63. Beaulieu AM, Rath P, Imhof M, Siddall ME, Roberts J, Schnappinger D, et al. Genome-wide screen for Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes that regulate host immunity. PLoS ONE. 2010;5: e15120. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015120. pmid:21170273
  64. 64. Ebert LM, Schaerli P, Moser B. Chemokine-mediated control of T cell traffic in lymphoid and peripheral tissues. Mol Immunol. 2005;42: 799–809. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2004.06.040. pmid:15829268
  65. 65. Dailey MO. Expression of T lymphocyte adhesion molecules: regulation during antigen-induced T cell activation and differentiation. Crit Rev Immunol. 1998;18: 153–184. pmid:9637409
  66. 66. Kovjazin R, Shitrit D, Preiss R, Haim I, Triezer L, Fuks L, et al. Characterization of novel multiantigenic vaccine candidates with pan-HLA coverage against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20: 328–340. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00586-12. pmid:23283639
  67. 67. Kaveh DA, Bachy VS, Hewinson RG, Hogarth PJ. Systemic BCG immunization induces persistent lung mucosal multifunctional CD4 T(EM) cells which expand following virulent mycobacterial challenge. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e21566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021566. pmid:21720558
  68. 68. Waters WR, Rahner TE, Palmer MV, Cheng D, Nonnecke BJ, Whipple DL, et al. Expression of L-Selectin (CD62L), CD44, and CD25 on activated bovine T cells. Infect Immun 2003; 71: 317–326. pmid:12496181
  69. 69. Baaten BJG, Tinoco R, Chen AT, Bradley LM. Regulation of Antigen-Experienced T Cells: Lessons from the Quintessential Memory Marker CD44. Front Immunol. 2012;3: 23–23. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00023. pmid:22566907
  70. 70. Baaten BJG, Li C-R, Deiro MF, Lin MM, Linton PJ, Bradley LM. CD44 regulates survival and memory development in Th1 cells. Immunity. 2010;32: 104–115. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.011. pmid:20079666
  71. 71. Totte P, Mather A, Reslan L, Boublik Y, Niang M, Du Plessis D. et al. Identification of Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides Small Colony Genes Coding for T-Cell Antigens. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology. 2010;17: 1211–1216. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00132-10. pmid:20534794
  72. 72. Totte P, Yaya A, Sery A, Wesonga H, Wade A, Naessens J, et al. Characterization of Anamnestic T-cell Responses Induced by Conventional Vaccines against Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8. doi: 10.1371/annotation/1230acb5-cfc9-48e7-9a4b-569cec5cb05a.
  73. 73. Totte P, Duperray C, Dedieu L. CD62L defines a subset of pathogen-specific bovine CD4 with central memory cell characteristics. Dev Comp Immunol. 2010;34:177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2009.09.005. pmid:19766669
  74. 74. Vrieling M, Santema W, Van Rhijn I, Rutten V, Koets A. T Cell Homing to Skin and Migration to Skin-Draining Lymph Nodes Is CCR7 Independent. J Immunol. 2012;188: 578–584. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101972. pmid:22156593
  75. 75. Machugh ND, Mburu JK, Carol MJ, Wyatt CR, Orden JA, Davis WC. Identification of two distinct subsets of bovine gamma delta T cells with unique cell surface phenotype and tissue distribution. Immunology. 1997;92: 340–345. pmid:9486106
  76. 76. Hogg AE, Worth A, Beverley P, Howard CJ, Villarreal-Ramos B. The antigen-specific memory CD8+ T-cell response induced by BCG in cattle resides in the CD8+gamma/deltaTCR-CD45RO+ T-cell population. Vaccine. 2009;27: 270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.053. pmid:18996428