Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Membrane Bound GSK-3 Activates Wnt Signaling through Disheveled and Arrow

  • Anirudh G. Mannava,

    Affiliation Yale-NUS College and Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Block MD6, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 14 Medical Drive, Level 10 South, 10-02M, Singapore 117599, Singapore

  • Nicholas S. Tolwinski

    nicholas.tolwinski@yale-nus.edu.sg

    Affiliation Yale-NUS College and Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Block MD6, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 14 Medical Drive, Level 10 South, 10-02M, Singapore 117599, Singapore

Membrane Bound GSK-3 Activates Wnt Signaling through Disheveled and Arrow

  • Anirudh G. Mannava, 
  • Nicholas S. Tolwinski
PLOS
x

Abstract

Wnt ligands and their downstream pathway components coordinate many developmental and cellular processes. In adults, they regulate tissue homeostasis through regulation of stem cells. Mechanistically, signal transduction through this pathway is complicated by pathway components having both positive and negative roles in signal propagation. Here we examine the positive role of GSK-3/Zw3 in promoting signal transduction at the plasma membrane. We find that targeting GSK-3 to the plasma membrane activates signaling in Drosophila embryos. This activation requires the presence of the co-receptor Arrow-LRP5/6 and the pathway activating protein Disheveled. Our results provide genetic evidence for evolutionarily conserved, separable roles for GSK-3 at the membrane and in the cytosol, and are consistent with a model where the complex cycles from cytosol to membrane in order to promote signaling at the membrane and to prevent it in the cytosol.

Introduction

The Wnt or Wingless (Wg in Drosophila) signaling pathway is essential for the proper development of animals. Wnt signals control cell differentiation, proliferation, migration, polarity, and patterning [1,2]. In humans, Wnt components have been found to affect stem cell maintenance and tumor progression [1,2]. There are several types of Wnt pathways, including polarity determination and ion concentration branches [3,4]. Here we concentrate on the canonical branch of signaling, where the basic step is the regulation of Armadillo/β-catenin (Arm/β-cat) protein levels. When the pathway is active, Arm protein levels increase followed by translocation to the nucleus and transcriptional activation. In the absence of ligand, the pathway is turned off by the formation of a degradation complex consisting of the scaffold proteins Axin and APC and the kinases CKI and GSK-3 (Shaggy, Zw3). This complex controls the phosphorylation state of Arm with N-terminal phosphorylation tagging it for proteasome-mediated degradation. When signaling is activated, Wnt binding initiates the movement of the destruction complex to the plasma membrane where it becomes the activating complex adding the transmembrane receptors Frizzled (Fz) and Arrow (LRP5/6, Arr) and the signaling protein Disheveled (Dsh). This complex activates signaling by counteracting the destruction of Arm causing increased Arm protein levels. Arm in turn translocates to the nucleus where it activates transcription in conjunction with the transcription factor TCF [2,5,6].

The Wnt ligands were discovered over 30 years ago [7], but the pathway mechanism was established through genetic screens in the late 1980’s [810], biochemistry, genetic epistasis, and cancer cell studies starting in the early 1990’s [1114]. The membrane-proximal activating complex, however, is more recent. The key discovery underpinning this complex was an unexpected activating function of GSK-3 when expressed in a membrane-tethered form [15]. Previously, the membrane-proximal events of Wnt signal transduction were poorly understood. The discovery of a positive role for GSK-3 went some way to bridge the gap between ligand binding and destruction complex inhibition. The current model posits a mechanism where ligand mediated receptor activation leads to GSK-3 mediated phosphorylation of Arrow on PPPSPxS motifs creating binding sites for Axin disrupting the destruction complex [15,16]. This is an important advance as Axin appears to be the rate-limiting component, and its levels are regulated through proteasomal degradation in a signal dependent manner [1719].

Here we report that a membrane-tethered form of GSK-3 activates Wnt signaling in Drosophila embryos. We use epistasis to characterize the pathway position of membrane-tethered GSK-3 as compared to untethered GSK-3. We find that membrane-tethered GSK-3 is unable to activate signaling unless functional copies of Arrow and Dsh are present. These results support a model where a membrane-proximal complex must form in order for signal to be transmitted.

Results

Membrane tethered GSK-3 activates signaling

GSK-3 and CKI comprise a dual kinase phosphorylation mechanism activating Arm degradation and turning off signaling [20,21]. Upstream, GSK-3 and CKI phosphorylate Arrow and turn on signaling [15]. The former function is epistatic to the latter, and GSK-3 mutants have a strong “naked” phenotype coinciding with Wnt pathway hyper-activation (Fig 1A) [13,22,23]. Loss of GSK-3 in Drosophila embryos results in high levels of Arm protein. This loss of function phenotype and pathway activation can be rescued with the overexpression of a wild-type form of GSK-3, but not a kinase deficient form (Table 1, and [24]). In wild-type adult fly tissues, over expression of GSK-3 can block signaling whereas a kinase dead form has no effect [24], but this does not occur in embryos as overexpression is more difficult in the presence of a large quantity of maternal mRNA. To test for the upstream function of GSK-3, we generated a membrane-tethered form of GSK3 (contains a Src myristoylation sequence at the N-terminus [2527]) and expressed it in embryos. As opposed to untethered GSK-3, myr-GSK-3 led to strong activation of signaling known as the naked phenotype similar to zw3 loss of function mutants (Fig 1A1G). Epidermal cells expressing myr-GSK-3 made fewer denticles and denticle precursors much like GSK-3 mutants (Fig 1E1G), whereas cells expressing untethered GSK-3 did make denticles (Fig 1B and 1C). Additionally, the level of Arm protein increased with myr-GSK-3 expression as compared to wild-type embryos (Fig 2A) suggesting that the pathway was being activated normally downstream of myr-GSK-3.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Expression of membrane-tethered GSK-3 activates Wnt signaling.

(A) Loss of GSK-3 (zw3M11-1 germline clones maternally and zygotically mutant) embryos show hyper-activated Wnt signaling or the naked phenotype. (B) Overexpression of GSK-3 has no effect on cuticle patterning. (C) Expression of membrane-tethered myr-GSK-3 shows the hyper-activated Wnt signaling or the naked phenotype. (D) Wild-type cuticle for comparison. (E-E”‘) A wild-type embryo at stage ~15 with junctions and cell outlines in green (Arm) and denticle precursors in red (pTyr). (F-F”‘) Similar stage embryo (M/Z) mutant for GSK-3 shows no denticle precursors. (G-G”‘) Membrane-tethered GSK-3 expression also prevents denticle precursors from forming. Scale bar = 10μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121879.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Expression of membrane-tethered GSK-3 increases embryonic levels of Arm.

(A) Western blot comparing total Arm protein levels between five embryos expressing myr-GSK-3 and 5 wild-type embryos. (B) Western blot comparing total GSK-3 protein levels. Higher band represents expressed GSK-3 as this has a 3XHA tag, making it slightly larger than the endogenous GSK-3 directly below. (C) Cuticle of embryo expressing myr-GSK-3 kinase dead variant using ArmGal4. (D) Cuticle of embryo expressing myr-GSK-3 kinase dead variant using ArmGal4 in an embryo maternally and zygotically mutant for GSK-3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121879.g002

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary of cuticle phenotypes from various pathway mutants expressing the four forms of GSK-3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121879.t001

In order to establish the level of construct expression (UAS-Zw3-HA and UAS-myr-Zw3-HA) in the embryos, we performed western blots with protein extracts from embryos expressing the two constructs and probed for the presence of both endogenous GSK-3 and the exogenous expressed constructs with a pan-GSK-3 antibody (Fig 2B). The blot demonstrates that expression of exogenous GSK-3 relative to endogenous GSK-3 is comparable, showing that in embryos GSK-3 is not over-expressed but rather expressed at a similar level to the endogenous gene.

In a control experiment, we generated a myr-GSK-3 kinase dead form where two lysines from the ATP binding domain are mutated inactivating the kinase activity (KK83-84MI)[24]. This form did not activate signaling, nor did it rescue GSK-3 mutants (Fig 2C and 2D). Cells expressing the kinase dead form of myr-GSK-3 KK-MI did form denticles similarly to untethered GSK-3 and in contrast to myr-GSK-3, demonstrating that kinase activity at the membrane is required for pathway activation.

Myr-GSK-3 functions downstream of Wnt to activate signaling

In Drosophila embryos the primary Wnt molecule responsible for patterning the embryo is Wingless (Wg or Wnt1) [28,29]. Wg binds to receptors on the plasma membrane beginning the formation of the activation complex, activating signaling and causing the naked cell fate [6]. All the events of signal transduction should therefore be downstream of Wnt, and we proceeded to test this by expressing myr-GSK-3 in wg mutants. We found that the absence of Wnt had no effect on the activity of myr-GSK-3 (Fig 3, Table 1), whereas untethered and kinase dead forms did not change the wg phenotype, showing that myr-GSK-3 is downstream of Wnt.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Membrane-tethered GSK-3 functions downstream of Wnt.

(A) Cuticle of an embryo zygotically mutant for Wnt (wgIG22) shows the classic segment polarity phenotype [29] and a loss of all naked cuticle. (B) Expression of wild-type GSK-3 using ArmGAL4 in Wnt mutants showed no effect, or the wg phenotype. (C) Expression of myr-GSK-3 in Wnt mutants led to the naked phenotype showing that myr-GSK-3 is epistatic to Wnt and functions downstream. (D) Kinase function is required as myr-GSK-3-KKMI failed to cause a naked phenotype in Wnt mutant embryos. Embryonic staining using ectopic tag HA in green and DNA in blue. (E-F) Close up of embryonic expression of GSK-3 shows high cytoplasmic expression. (G-H) Myr-GSK-3 localizes strongly to the plasma membrane. Scale bar = 10μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121879.g003

Myr-GSK-3 requires Arrow to activate signaling

The membrane function of GSK-3 is to phosphorylate specific residues on the Wnt co-receptor Arrow (Arr, or Lrp 5/6 in vertebrates) [15,3032]. When Wnt signaling is on, GSK-3 phosphorylates Arr providing binding sites for Axin and preventing the destruction complex from forming. As this function appears to be separate, we sought to place it genetically into the signal transduction pathway. We first looked at the localization of GSK-3 and myr-GSK-3 and found that the untethered form is predominantly cytoplasmic, but the tethered form is enriched at the plasma membrane of embryonic epithelial cells (Fig 3E3H). The destruction complex role of GSK-3 is upstream of Arm, but downstream of Dsh and the receptors (Table 1, [18]). For example, a dsh, zw3 double mutant gives a naked phenotype whereas a dsh single mutant shows a wg cuticle. This downstream function masks the upstream activating role genetically, but the myr-GSK-3 flies can now be used to overcome this limitation.

As the membrane complex function involves phosphorylation of Arr, we started by testing the interaction of Arr and myr-GSK-3. We made embryos maternally and zygotically mutant (dominant female sterile germline clones [33]) for arr and expressed myr-GSK-3 within them using the Gal4/UAS system [34]. Mutant arr (M/Z) embryos give a strong wingless-like phenotype [35], but are rescued by a paternal wild-type copy [35]. Expression of myr-GSK-3 had no effect in arr mutant embryos (Fig 4A), note denticle producing cells expressing myr-GSK-3. This experiment shows that Arr must be present for myr-GSK-3 mediated pathway activation.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Myr-GSK-3 functions upstream of Arrow, Arm, and Disheveled.

(A) arr2 (M/Z) mutant embryos expressing myr-GSK-3 (HA magenta) fail to prevent formation of denticles (pTyr Green). (B) dshV26 (M/Z) mutant embryos expressing myr-GSK-3 (HA magenta) also fail to prevent formation of denticles (pTyr Green). (C) Expression of myr-GSK-3 in GSK-3 mutant embryos shows no effect as no denticles are formed (HA red, pTyr green). (D-F) Cuticles of an allelic series of arm mutants expressing myr-GSK3 show variable phenotypes. (D) Expression of myr-GSK-3 in armXM19 (M/Z) mutant embryos shows no effect. (E) armO43A01 (M/Z) embryos tend to fall apart leaving a crumbs phenotype. (F) Expression of myr-GSK-3 can rescue the cuticle integrity to a small degree. Scale bar = 10μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121879.g004

Myr-GSK-3 requires Dsh to activate signaling

Dsh is the upstream activating protein that inhibits the destruction complex. Genetically, it is upstream of GSK-3 and the destruction complex. Molecularly, its role appears to be in nucleating the activation complex at the membrane [36]. We investigated whether Dsh was required for myr-GSK-3 pathway activation. Loss of dsh in germline clone embryos (M/Z) mutants gives a strong wingless-like phenotype [10]. We expressed myr-GSK-3 in dsh (M/Z) mutant embryos but did not observe signal activation (Fig 4B), note denticle producing cells expressing myr-GSK-3. This experiment shows that Dsh is required for myr-GSK-3 mediated pathway activation.

As a final control, we also expressed myr-GSK-3 in arm (M/Z) mutant embryos in an allelic series of phenotype severity. In the two signaling loss of function alleles, armF1a (milder form) and armXM19 (stronger form) [26,37] we did not observe any effect on patterning with expression of myr-GSK-3 (Table 1, Fig 4D). In the strong loss of function arm043A01, however, where adherens junctions are disrupted and embryos fall apart during development (crumbs phenotype [38,39]), we did observe a mild rescue of cuticle integrity but no signaling activation (Fig 4E and 4F). These results show that Arm is required for myr-GSK-3 signaling activation, but additionally show that activation of the membrane-proximal complex can still inhibit degradation of Arm to the extent that adhesion function returns.

Discussion

Recent findings in the Wnt signal transduction pathway have shown that the mechanism of this pathway is still not entirely understood. In this paper we focused on the genetics of GSK-3 and its two roles in the signal transduction pathway. We find that the activating role in the membrane signal-activating complex is conserved in Drosophila. We show that the activation occurs downstream of the extracellular ligand, but requires the membrane complex components Arr and Dsh to be present. This function is dependent on the kinase activity of GSK-3 as a kinase dead version cannot activate signaling. These results show the evolutionary conservation of this pathway from Drosophila to vertebrates.

We are not able to answer the pressing question, however, as to how the destruction complex moves out of the cytoplasm, rearranges in the presence of Dsh/Arrow and activates signaling, a hot topic in the Wnt field [40,41]. Our results only show that both are required for the proper transduction of signals. From a genetic perspective, our findings formally show that GSK-3 kinase activity has two separable roles required for signal transduction. Myr-GSK-3 is targeted to the membrane through a lipid modification, where in the presence of Dsh and Arrow it activates signaling. If the role of the activating complex was simply to localize GSK-3 to the membrane, then Dsh and Arrow would be dispensable, but our epistasis experiments show this to not be true. We therefore believe that to be able to phosphorylate LRP5/6, GSK-3 requires the presence of complex components to facilitate phosphorylation (Fig 5). As our western blot shows, the expression levels achieved in embryos are not high compared to the endogenous GSK-3 expression, and certainly much lower than those achieved in tissue culture cells [15,40]. Similarly, we had previously failed to get strong Wnt activation in embryos with a membrane-tethered cytoplasmic domain of Arrow [17] whereas this worked very well in cultured cells [42]. Taken together, these results suggest that at the levels of expression achievable in Drosophila embryos, the membrane-proximal activation complex is required for membrane-tethered GSK-3 to be able to activate signaling.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Simplified model for the membrane-proximal Wnt signaling activating complex.

Wnt binding brings together the receptor Fz and the co-receptor Arrow/LRP5 or 6 extra-cellularly. Inside the cell, Axin and Dsh interact through their DIX domains bringing GSK-3 into proximity with phosphorylation sites on Arrow. In the absence of Dsh or Arrow, even membrane tethering of GSK-3 isn’t sufficient to activate Wnt signaling as the complex fails to form. ID on Axin is short for interaction domain, as this is the region mapped for CKI, GSK-3 and β-catenin interaction [57].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121879.g005

Dsh is required under normal circumstances to activate signaling. It binds to Fz through the PDZ domain and to Axin through both their DIX domains [43,44]. Once the external binding of Wnt to both LRP and Fz is included, a five protein complex holds the receptors in place forming the activation complex (Fig 5). Interestingly, two studies argued that membrane tethering of APC and Axin is sufficient to inactivate signaling, or to reconstitute the destruction complex at the membrane [27,45]. It will be interesting to dissect the specifics of these models, as these results imply that simple membrane localization does not activate signaling, and suggests that it is the composition of the complex perhaps controlled through phosphorylation that determines whether signaling will be turned on or off [40]. Further, it is most intriguing that apart from GSK-3 other components including APC and Axin appear to have complicated roles in the pathway suggesting that much work remains before we fully understand the canonical Wnt signaling pathway [4648].

Materials and Methods

Crosses and expression of UAS constructs

Maternally mutant eggs were generated by the dominant female sterile technique [49]. Oregon R was used as the wild-type strain. Please see Flybase for details on mutants used (flybase.bio.indiana.edu). Mutants used: wgIG22, zw3M11-1, dshV26, arr2, armXM19, armF1a, and armO43A01 [37]. For mis-expression experiments, the ArmGAL4 2nd chromosome and daGAL4 3rd chromosome drivers were used. All X-chromosome mutants use FRT 101 except for dshV26 that has FRT 18E and second chromosome arr2 mutants use the G13 FRT. The following crosses were conducted:

  1. zw3M11-1 FRT101/ovoD1 FRT101; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-myr-GSK-3
  2. zw3M11-1 FRT101/ovoD1 FRT101; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-GSK-3
  3. zw3M11-1 FRT101/ovoD1 FRT101; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-GSK-3 KK-MI
  4. zw3M11-1 FRT101/ovoD1 FRT101; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-myr-GSK-3 KK-MI
  5. armF1a FRT101/ovoD1 FRT101; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-myr-GSK-3
  6. armXM19 FRT101/ovoD1 FRT101; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-myr-GSK-3
  7. armO43A01 FRT101/ovoD1 FRT101; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-myr-GSK-3
  8. dshV26 FRT18E/ovoD2 FRT18E; arm-Gal4/+ females x UAS-myr-GSK-3
  9. arr2 FRTG13/ovoD1 FRTG13; da-Gal4/+ females x arr2/+; UAS-myr-GSK-3
  10. wgIG22, Arm-Gal4/+ x wgIG22; UAS-myr-GSK-3

Most X chromosomes were marked with the yellow mutation or the balancers were marked GFP to simplify analysis. For all crosses more than 100 embryos were analyzed in multiple, separate experiments (n >100).

UAS-transgenes and GAL4 driver lines

Two ubiquitous drivers were used for expression of transgenes: the weaker armadillo-GAL4 and the stronger daughterless-GAL4 [34]. UAS constructs were made using Gateway recombination (Invitrogen). Myristoylated constructs were made by adding a sequence identical to the NH2 terminus of src (MGNKCCSKRQGTMAGNI) to the NH2 terminus of GSK-3 by PCR. This sequence has proven to be very effective for membrane targeting of Arm [2527,37]. The PCR products were then transferred by Gateway cloning (Invitrogen) into pUASg.attB with COOH-terminal 3XHA tag (A kind gift from J. Bischof and K. Basler, Zurich) [50]. Transgenes were injected into attP2 (Strain #8622) P[CaryP]attP2 68A4 by BestGene Inc. (California) [51]. Kinase dead GSK-3 was made by mutating lysines KK83-84MI in the ATP binding domain [24]).

Antibodies and Immunofluorescence.

Embryos were fixed with Heat-Methanol treatment [52] or with heptane/4% formaldehyde in phosphate buffer (0.1M NaPO4 pH 7.4) [26]. The antibodies used were: anti-Armadillo (mAb N2 7A1, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences, Iowa City, IA 52242), anti-HA (ratAb 3F10 and mouse 12CA5, Roche), rabbit anti-Armadillo [53], phospho-tyrosine pY99 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-β-tubulin (E7, DSHB), and anti-Sexlethal (mAb M-14, DSHB). Staining, detection and image processing as described in [54].

Western Blotting.

Embryos were selected for fertilization and developmental stage, lysed in extract buffer (50mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1mM EDTA, 10% Glycerol, Complete Mini Protease, Sigma) or RIPA lysis buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), the extracts were separated on 7.5% SDS-PAGE, and blotted as described in Peifer et al.[55]. To compare expression levels of endogenous and exogenous GSK-3, the embryo extracts were made in a similar manner and separated on SDS-PAGE (4–20%) and blotted using Rabbit Anti-Zw3 primary antibody [56].

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaoping Liu and Nicole Kaplan who made and tested the original Gsk-3 constructs, and Yale-NUS students Victoria Long, Sean Saito, Anya Evtushenko, Joan Ongchoco, and Graham Link for their help. We thank Jan Gruber for discussions, Roel Nusse for fly Zw3 antibody, and J. Bischof and K. Basler for constructs. This work was supported by an Academic Research Fund (AcRF) grant (MOE2014-T2-2-039) of the Ministry of Education, Singapore to N. Tolwinski.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NST. Performed the experiments: NST AGN. Analyzed the data: NST AGN. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: NST. Wrote the paper: NST.

References

  1. 1. Clevers H, Loh KM, Nusse R (2014) Stem cell signaling. An integral program for tissue renewal and regeneration: Wnt signaling and stem cell control. Science 346: 1248012. pmid:25278615
  2. 2. Clevers H, Nusse R (2012) Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell 149: 1192–1205. pmid:22682243
  3. 3. Schlessinger K, Hall A, Tolwinski N (2009) Wnt signaling pathways meet Rho GTPases. Genes Dev 23: 265–277. pmid:19204114
  4. 4. van Amerongen R, Mikels A, Nusse R (2008) Alternative wnt signaling is initiated by distinct receptors. Sci Signal 1: re9. pmid:18765832
  5. 5. Logan CY, Nusse R (2004) The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 20: 781–810. pmid:15473860
  6. 6. Tacchelly-Benites O, Wang Z, Yang E, Lee E, Ahmed Y (2013) Toggling a conformational switch in Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: regulation of Axin phosphorylation. The phosphorylation state of Axin controls its scaffold function in two Wnt pathway protein complexes. Bioessays 35: 1063–1070. pmid:24105937
  7. 7. Nusse R, Varmus HE (1982) Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell 31: 99–109. pmid:6297757
  8. 8. Wieschaus E, Riggleman R (1987) Autonomous requirements for the segment polarity gene armadillo during Drosophila embryogenesis. Cell 49: 177–184. pmid:3105892
  9. 9. Rijsewijk F, Schuermann M, Wagenaar E, Parren P, Weigel D, Nusse R (1987) The Drosophila homolog of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell 50: 649–657. pmid:3111720
  10. 10. Perrimon N, Mahowald AP (1987) Multiple functions of segment polarity genes in Drosophila. Dev Biol 119: 587–600. pmid:3803719
  11. 11. Peifer M, Wieschaus E (1990) The segment polarity gene armadillo encodes a functionally modular protein that is the Drosophila homolog of human plakoglobin. Cell 63: 1167–1176. pmid:2261639
  12. 12. Siegfried E, Perkins LA, Capaci TM, Perrimon N (1990) Putative protein kinase product of the Drosophila segment-polarity gene zeste-white3. Nature 345: 825–829. pmid:2113617
  13. 13. Siegfried E, Chou TB, Perrimon N (1992) wingless signaling acts through zeste-white 3, the Drosophila homolog of glycogen synthase kinase-3, to regulate engrailed and establish cell fate. Cell 71: 1167–1179. pmid:1335365
  14. 14. Su LK, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW (1993) Association of the APC tumor suppressor protein with catenins. Science 262: 1734–1737. pmid:8259519
  15. 15. Zeng X, Tamai K, Doble B, Li S, Huang H, Habas R, et al. (2005) A dual-kinase mechanism for Wnt co-receptor phosphorylation and activation. Nature 438: 873–877. pmid:16341017
  16. 16. Tamai K, Zeng X, Liu C, Zhang X, Harada Y, Chang Z, et al. (2004) A mechanism for Wnt coreceptor activation. Mol Cell 13: 149–156. pmid:14731402
  17. 17. Tolwinski NS, Wehrli M, Rives A, Erdeniz N, DiNardo S, Wieschaus E (2003) Wg/Wnt signal can be transmitted through arrow/LRP5,6 and Axin independently of Zw3/Gsk3beta activity. Dev Cell 4: 407–418. pmid:12636921
  18. 18. Tolwinski NS, Wieschaus E (2004) Rethinking WNT signaling. Trends Genet 20: 177–181. pmid:15041171
  19. 19. Lee E, Salic A, Kruger R, Heinrich R, Kirschner MW (2003) The roles of APC and Axin derived from experimental and theoretical analysis of the Wnt pathway. PLoS Biol 1: E10. pmid:14551908
  20. 20. Liu C, Li Y, Semenov M, Han C, Baeg GH, Tan Y, et al. (2002) Control of beta-catenin phosphorylation/degradation by a dual-kinase mechanism. Cell 108: 837–847. pmid:11955436
  21. 21. Doble BW, Woodgett JR (2003) GSK-3: tricks of the trade for a multi-tasking kinase. J Cell Sci 116: 1175–1186. pmid:12615961
  22. 22. Siegfried E, Wilder EL, Perrimon N (1994) Components of wingless signalling in Drosophila. Nature 367: 76–80. pmid:8107779
  23. 23. Peifer M, Sweeton D, Casey M, Wieschaus E (1994) wingless signal and Zeste-white 3 kinase trigger opposing changes in the intracellular distribution of Armadillo. Development 120: 369–380. pmid:8149915
  24. 24. Bourouis M (2002) Targeted increase in shaggy activity levels blocks wingless signaling. Genesis 34: 99–102. pmid:12324959
  25. 25. Zecca M, Basler K, Struhl G (1996) Direct and long-range action of a wingless morphogen gradient. Cell 87: 833–844. pmid:8945511
  26. 26. Tolwinski NS, Wieschaus E (2001) Armadillo nuclear import is regulated by cytoplasmic anchor Axin and nuclear anchor dTCF/Pan. Development 128: 2107–2117. pmid:11493532
  27. 27. Tolwinski NS (2009) Membrane Bound Axin Is Sufficient for Wingless Signaling in Drosophila Embryos. Genetics 181: 1169–1173. pmid:19124571
  28. 28. Dougan S, DiNardo S (1992) Drosophila wingless generates cell type diversity among engrailed expressing cells. Nature 360: 347–350. pmid:1280330
  29. 29. Nusslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E (1980) Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 287: 795–801. pmid:6776413
  30. 30. Davidson G, Wu W, Shen J, Bilic J, Fenger U, Stannek P, et al. (2005) Casein kinase 1 gamma couples Wnt receptor activation to cytoplasmic signal transduction. Nature 438: 867–872. pmid:16341016
  31. 31. Zeng X, Huang H, Tamai K, Zhang X, Harada Y, Yokota C, et al. (2008) Initiation of Wnt signaling: control of Wnt coreceptor Lrp6 phosphorylation/activation via frizzled, dishevelled and axin functions. Development 135: 367–375. pmid:18077588
  32. 32. Cliffe A, Hamada F, Bienz M (2003) A role of Dishevelled in relocating Axin to the plasma membrane during wingless signaling. Curr Biol 13: 960–966. pmid:12781135
  33. 33. Chou TB, Perrimon N (1996) The autosomal FLP-DFS technique for generating germline mosaics in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 144: 1673–1679. pmid:8978054
  34. 34. Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401–415. pmid:8223268
  35. 35. Wehrli M, Dougan ST, Caldwell K, O'Keefe L, Schwartz S, Vaizel-Ohayon D, et al. (2000) arrow encodes an LDL-receptor-related protein essential for Wingless signalling. Nature 407: 527–530. pmid:11029006
  36. 36. Schwarz-Romond T, Merrifield C, Nichols BJ, Bienz M (2005) The Wnt signalling effector Dishevelled forms dynamic protein assemblies rather than stable associations with cytoplasmic vesicles. J Cell Sci.
  37. 37. Tolwinski NS, Wieschaus E (2004) A nuclear function for armadillo/beta-catenin. PLoS Biol 2: E95. pmid:15024404
  38. 38. Colosimo PF, Liu X, Kaplan NA, Tolwinski NS (2010) GSK3beta affects apical-basal polarity and cell-cell adhesion by regulating aPKC levels. Dev Dyn 239: 115–125. pmid:19422025
  39. 39. Kaplan NA, Liu X, Tolwinski NS (2009) Epithelial polarity: interactions between junctions and apical-basal machinery. Genetics 183: 897–904. pmid:19737741
  40. 40. Kim SE, Huang H, Zhao M, Zhang X, Zhang A, Semonov MV, et al. (2013) Wnt stabilization of beta-catenin reveals principles for morphogen receptor-scaffold assemblies. Science 340: 867–870. pmid:23579495
  41. 41. Li VS, Ng SS, Boersema PJ, Low TY, Karthaus WR, Gerlach JP, et al. (2012) Wnt signaling through inhibition of beta-catenin degradation in an intact Axin1 complex. Cell 149: 1245–1256. pmid:22682247
  42. 42. Mao J, Wang J, Liu B, Pan W, Farr GH 3rd, Flynn C, et al. (2001) Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Mol Cell 7: 801–809. pmid:11336703
  43. 43. Kishida S, Yamamoto H, Hino S, Ikeda S, Kishida M, Kikuchi A (1999) DIX domains of Dvl and axin are necessary for protein interactions and their ability to regulate beta-catenin stability. Mol Cell Biol 19: 4414–4422. pmid:10330181
  44. 44. Wong HC, Bourdelas A, Krauss A, Lee HJ, Shao Y, Wu D, et al. (2003) Direct binding of the PDZ domain of Dishevelled to a conserved internal sequence in the C-terminal region of Frizzled. Mol Cell 12: 1251–1260. pmid:14636582
  45. 45. Roberts DM, Pronobis MI, Poulton JS, Kane EG, Peifer M (2012) Regulation of Wnt signaling by the tumor suppressor adenomatous polyposis coli does not require the ability to enter the nucleus or a particular cytoplasmic localization. Mol Biol Cell 23: 2041–2056. pmid:22513088
  46. 46. Vleminckx K, Wong E, Guger K, Rubinfeld B, Polakis P, Gumbiner BM (1997) Adenomatous polyposis coli tumor suppressor protein has signaling activity in Xenopus laevis embryos resulting in the induction of an ectopic dorsoanterior axis. J Cell Biol 136: 411–420. pmid:9015311
  47. 47. Takacs CM, Baird JR, Hughes EG, Kent SS, Benchabane H, Paik R, et al. (2008) Dual positive and negative regulation of wingless signaling by adenomatous polyposis coli. Science 319: 333–336. pmid:18202290
  48. 48. Qian L, Mahaffey JP, Alcorn HL, Anderson KV (2011) Tissue-specific roles of Axin2 in the inhibition and activation of Wnt signaling in the mouse embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 8692–8697. pmid:21555575
  49. 49. Chou TB, Perrimon N (1992) Use of a yeast site-specific recombinase to produce female germline chimeras in Drosophila. Genetics 131: 643–653. pmid:1628809
  50. 50. Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K (2007) An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 3312–3317. pmid:17360644
  51. 51. Groth AC, Fish M, Nusse R, Calos MP (2004) Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 166: 1775–1782. pmid:15126397
  52. 52. Muller HA, Wieschaus E (1996) armadillo, bazooka, and stardust are critical for early stages in formation of the zonula adherens and maintenance of the polarized blastoderm epithelium in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 134: 149–163. pmid:8698811
  53. 53. Riggleman B, Schedl P, Wieschaus E (1990) Spatial expression of the Drosophila segment polarity gene armadillo is posttranscriptionally regulated by wingless. Cell 63: 549–560. pmid:2225066
  54. 54. Colosimo PF, Tolwinski NS (2006) Wnt, Hedgehog and junctional Armadillo/beta-catenin establish planar polarity in the Drosophila embryo. PLoS ONE 1: e9. pmid:17183721
  55. 55. Peifer M, Pai LM, Casey M (1994) Phosphorylation of the Drosophila adherens junction protein Armadillo: roles for wingless signal and zeste-white 3 kinase. Dev Biol 166: 543–556. pmid:7529201
  56. 56. Willert K, Shibamoto S, Nusse R (1999) Wnt-induced dephosphorylation of axin releases beta-catenin from the axin complex. Genes Dev 13: 1768–1773. pmid:10421629
  57. 57. Cruciat CM (2014) Casein kinase 1 and Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 31C: 46–55.