Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Association between Appendectomy and Subsequent Colorectal Cancer Development: An Asian Population Study

  • Shih-Chi Wu,

    Affiliations Trauma and Emergency Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan

  • William Tzu-Liang Chen,

    Affiliations School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Chih-Hsin Muo,

    Affiliation Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Tao-Wei Ke,

    Affiliation Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

  • Chu-Wen Fang,

    Affiliation Department of Surgery, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan

  • Fung-Chang Sung

    fcsung1008@yahoo.com

    Affiliations Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, Institute of Clinical Medical Science, China Medical University College of Medicine, Taichung, Taiwan

Association between Appendectomy and Subsequent Colorectal Cancer Development: An Asian Population Study

  • Shih-Chi Wu, 
  • William Tzu-Liang Chen, 
  • Chih-Hsin Muo, 
  • Tao-Wei Ke, 
  • Chu-Wen Fang, 
  • Fung-Chang Sung
PLOS
x

Abstract

Objectives

The appendix may modulate colon microbiota and bowel inflammation. We investigated whether appendectomy alters colorectal cancer risk.

Methods

We identified a cohort of 75979 patients who underwent appendectomy between 1997 and 1999 based on the insurance claims of Taiwan. A comparison cohort of 303640 persons without appendectomy was selected randomly, frequency matched by age, sex, comorbidity and entry year was also selected. We monitored subsequent colorectal cancer development in both cohorts.

Results

The overall colorectal cancer incidence was 14% higher in the appendectomy patients than in the comparison cohort (p <0.05): the highest incidence was observed for rectal cancer, and the lowest incidence was observed for cancer of the cecum-ascending colon for both cohorts. Men were at higher risk than women. Subjects ≥ 60 years had an HR of 12.8 compared to those <60 years. The incidence of colorectal cancer was much higher in 1.5-3.5 years post appendectomy follow-up than for the comparisons (HR of 2.13). Patients who received an incidental appendectomy had an HR of 2.90 when compared to the comparisons.

Conclusions

Results of our study suggest that appendectomy in patients with appendicitis is likely associated with the development of colorectal cancer in the post-surgery period.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is a common cancer that results in more than 600,000 deaths globally each year.[1] The risk factors of colorectal cancer include old age, male gender, a low-fiber diet, smoking, drinking, diabetes, genetics and environment.[2] Inflammation has also been implicated in the risk of cancers.[3] Chronic intestinal inflammation, namely inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is recognized as an important risk factor that promotes the development of colon cancer,[45] although the cellular and microbial mechanisms remain unclear. Recent studies have found that up-regulated Interleukin-17, Interleukin-23 and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT 3) play an important role in driving tumor growth in patients with intestinal inflammation.[57]

The human gut microbiota plays a critical role in both luminal diseases and systemic diseases (e.g., diabetes mellitus) of the host.[2] Inflammation may interact with the changes in gut microbiota and development of colorectal cancer.[1, 89]

The vermiform appendix in humans is generally regarded as a vestigial structure. However, studies suggest that it serves as a “safe house” for biofilm formation to preserve and protect commensal bacteria needed for the epithelial mucosa in the colon.[1011] Biofilms are most abundant in the appendix, cecum and ascending colon (right side colon). The microbiota and biofilm in the large bowel might be changed after removal of the appendix (i.e., appendectomy). The role of appendectomy in inflammatory bowel disease is of concern, whether as a cause or a consequence. Patients who underwent appendectomy are associated with a 1.6- to 2.1-fold increased risk of Crohn’s disease but are less likely to have ulcerative colitis.[1215] The inflammatory responses differ in ulcerative colitis and appendicitis post-appendectomy[1415]. These conditions reflect an essential role of the appendix in the ecology of the microbiota and inflammation of the large bowel. Studies have rarely investigated whether the removal of the appendix changes the microbiota ecology and risk of colorectal cancer. In the present study, using longitudinal insurance claims data, we explored the link between patients who underwent appendectomy and the risk of subsequent colon cancer.

Materials and Methods

Data source

The Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Program is a single-payer system with approximately 99.5% of the population in Taiwan being covered. The Bureau of Health Insurance has entrusted the National Health Research Institutes to manage and establish the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) for researchers. We obtained claims data on inpatients from the catastrophic illness patient registry (CIPR) of the institutes. Patients with colorectal cancer applied for the CIPR cards based on colorectal pathology. The cardholders are exempted from the cost sharing required under the NHI program. Data files were linked by patient identifications, which had been scrambled before releasing the data to researchers according to the Personal Information Protection Act of the Department of Health. The International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision. Clinical Modification ICD-9-CM was used to identify diseases. We conducted this study with the approval of the Ethics Review Committee at Chinese Medical University and Hospital.

Although written informed consent was not provided by the participants for the use of their clinical records in this study, the patient records/information was anonymized and de-identified prior to the analysis.

Study subjects

Based on the inpatient claims data, we identified 84408 patients who underwent appendectomy (treatment codes of 47.0 and 47.1) due to appendicitis in 1997–1999. We excluded those with cancer history [(ICD-9-CM) 140–208] in CIPR (n = 1174), inflammatory bowel disease [IBD, (ICD-9-CM) 555 and 556] at admission before the operation date (at least 12 months from the start of 1996 to the operation date, n = 179), and patients with a diagnosis of CRC within 18 months of appendectomy (n = 7076).

The remaining 75979 patients were included in this study as the appendectomy cohort; the date of 18 months post appendectomy was defined as the entry date to initiate follow-up. Therefore, subjects in the appendectomy cohort had the washout period for cancer for a minimum of 30 months. For each appendectomy case, we randomly selected 4 comparison subjects from the inpatient claims data who were free of appendicitis and had no cancer history or IBD. They were frequency matched for age (5-year stratum), gender, and comorbidities including hypertension (ICD-9-CM 401–405), diabetes (ICD-9-CM 250), hyperlipidemia (ICD-9-CM 272) and colorectal adenomas (ICD-9-CM 211.3 and 211.4), and urbanization level of living areas (Fig. 1). All comorbidities were determined based on the hospitalization records by the entry date. The urbanization level was grouped into 5 levels according to NHI report: level 1 was the highest urbanization for living areas and level 5 was the lowest.

End point

Study subjects were followed beginning on the entry date and ending on the date of colorectal cancer diagnosis (ICD-9-CM 153–154) identified in the CIPR. Alternatively, subjects were censored because of withdrawal from insurance, death or to the end of 2011.

Statistical analysis

The data analysis compared the distributions of sex, age and comorbidities between the appendectomy and comparison cohorts. The standardized difference was used to quantify differences in means or prevalence between the two cohorts for continuous or categorical matching variables, respectively. The incidences of colorectal cancer were calculated for both cohorts by sex and age. Sex- and age-specific hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of colorectal cancer for the appendectomy cohort compared with the comparison cohort were measured using Cox proportional hazard regression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the cumulative incidence in the follow-up period between the two cohorts, examined using the log-rank test. We also estimated the site-specific colorectal cancer incidence incorporating HR estimates for the sites of hepatic flexure and transverse colon (ICD-9-CM 153.0 and 153.1), splenic flexure and descending colon (ICD-9-CM 153.2 and 153.7), sigmoid (ICD-9-CM 153.3), cecum and ascending colon (ICD-9-CM 153.4 and 153.6), rectal cancer (ICD-9-CM 154), mixed type and others. The effect of different types of appendectomy was also assessed by comparisons with the comparison cohort. In a future analysis, we will estimate the risk of colorectal cancer stratified by the follow-up years. All tests were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.) and R 2.11.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). A statistically significant level was set at p <0.05 with 2-sided probability.

Results

We included 75979 patients in the appendectomy cohort and 303640 subjects who did not undergo appendectomy in the comparison cohort (Table 1). Both cohorts had a similar mean age (31.8 years), were predominantly composed of males and had similar prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and colorectal adenomas.

thumbnail
Table 1. Distribution of demographic characteristics and comorbidity between the appendectomy and comparison cohorts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118411.t001

By the end of 2011, the incidences of colorectal cancer were 4.35 and 3.81 per 1000 person-years in cohorts that underwent and did not undergo appendectomy, with an HR of 1.14 (95% CI = 1.02–1.28) for patients with appendectomy compared to the comparisons (Table 2). Men had a higher incidence of the disease than women in both cohorts, with an HR of 1.15 (95% CI = 1.05–1.27). Patients who underwent appendectomy at age ≥ 60 years had a much higher incidence of colorectal cancer than the younger subjects in both cohorts; the patients 60 years and older had an HR of 12.8 compared with patients younger than 60 years. The age patterns in men and women were similar. The cumulative incidence for colorectal cancer in patients with appendectomy was 0.04% greater than the comparisons after the 14-year follow-up period (15.5-year post appendectomy follow-up) (Fig. 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Cumulative proportional incidence of colorectal cancer between the appendectomy and comparison cohorts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118411.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Incidence and hazard ratios of colorectal cancer by age and gender.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118411.t002

In general, the site-specific incidences of colorectal cancer were higher in the appendectomy cohort than in the comparison cohort (Table 3). The incidence of rectal cancer was the highest in both cohorts (1.85 vs. 1.67 per 10000 person-years). Cecum and ascending colon cancer had the lowest incidence in both cohorts. The incidence of colorectal cancer was 1.02- and 2.90-fold higher in patients who underwent an appendectomy and incidental appendectomy than in the comparisons (3.89 and 11.04 vs. 3.81 per 10000 person-years) (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 3. Incidence of colorectal cancer by site and hazard ratio of the site-specific appendectomy cohort to the comparison cohort.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118411.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Incidence and hazard ratio of colorectal cancer in different types of appendectomy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118411.t004

In the analysis stratified by follow-up the year, colorectal cancer appeared much earlier in the appendectomy cohort than in the comparison cohort, with incidences of 5.52 and 2.60 per 10000 person-years in 1.5–3.5 years post appendectomy follow-up, respectively, and an HR of 2.13 (95% CI = 1.63–2.77) for the appendectomy cohort. The incidence in the appendectomy cohort was declining, while that in the comparison cohort was not. The incidence in year 6.5 was slightly lower in the appendectomy cohort, with an insignificant HR of 0.98. (Table 5)

thumbnail
Table 5. Incidence and hazard ratio of colorectal cancer during post appendectomy follow-up.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118411.t005

Discussion

In this large retrospective cohort study with a 14-year follow-up, we found that patients who underwent an appendectomy had a 1.14-fold higher risk of colorectal cancer than the general population. The risk of cancer was 12.8-fold higher for older subjects compared with younger subjects. The results are reliable because the robustness of this relationship is supported by accurate diagnosis of both appendectomy and colorectal cancer with histological confirmation.

Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and is one of the major causes of cancer-related death in the world. Approximately 20% of all cases of the disease can be attributed to genetic factors.[1617] Another large portion of the cases might be related to environmental causes rather than genetic factors. Among the environmental factors, the role of chronic intestinal inflammation in tumor development has received great attention in recent decade, particularly the roles of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.[1821] The large bowel microbiota plays a role in the development of colitis-associated cancer (CAC).[2223] Ulcerative colitis has accounted for up to 18–20% of CAC, while Crohn's disease accounted for up to 8%.[20, 2425] There are overlapping mechanisms in tumor formation between colorectal cancer and CAC.[2628] On the other hand, previous studies on the relationship between appendix inflammation and colorectal cancer have been insufficient.[2930]

A previous study reported that the number of natural killer cells in the appendix tissue is the highest in patients with appendix inflammation and lowest in patients with colon cancer and normal appendices.[29] Lai et al. used hospital medical records to evaluate 1873 patients with appendicitis and found that 16 of them also had colorectal cancer. No further follow-up observations were conducted. However, in their study, the colorectal cancer rate in appendicitis patients (8.54 per 1,000) is much greater than the incidence in the general population (3.19 per 10,000).[30] Appendicitis is thus considered the first manifestation of colon cancer, indicating a close relationship between the appendix and colon cancer. Our follow-up study also found that the colorectal cancer risk is higher for appendectomy patients than for the general population, although it is not as high as the rate found by Lai et al. The mechanism of cancer development associated with appendicitis may not be similar to the mechanism of cancer development associated with appendectomy.

This study also found that the cancer risk is higher for elderly patients who underwent appendectomy, particularly in older men. The higher incidences in older patients might be attributed to age-related decreases in immunity [3133] and age-related changes in the large bowel microbiota, [3436] which make the individual more susceptible to the development of malignancy.

The biofilms of the large bowel are abundant in the appendix, cecum and right side colon.[10] Impairing the growth of these biofilms may lead to dysbiosis and may make the tissue vulnerable to inflammation, ultimately leading to the development of colorectal cancer. [37] In the present study, the incidences of cancer among all colon sites are elevated after appendectomy. However, we found the lowest incidence of colorectal cancer in the cecum and the ascending colon in both cohorts (Table 3). The previous abundant biofilm in cecum and ascending colon may be with lesser degree of dysbiosis and lesser declination in biofilm protective effect than in the rectum, which resulted in lower potential for malignancy. This finding may support the “safe house” hypothesis of biofilms in the appendix.[1011] Further study is needed to explore whether the protective effect of biofilms decreases after appendectomy.

It is important to note that the colorectal cancer incidence is higher within 3.5 years of follow-up for those with appendectomy. It is not clear whether the cancer risk in this period is associated with appendicitis or is associated with the impaired colon microbiota because of appendectomy. The risk decreases to the level of the general population 6.5 years later. The change in the colon microbiota after appendectomy may have only a short-term rather than long-term impact on colorectal carcinogenesis. The intestinal ecology may achieve balance as time passes. However, further investigation is required.

More than 500 widely diverse bacterial species of normal human commensal microbiota have been estimated to live in the gut. [3839] Some specific strains of bacteria are pathogenic and can cause cancer.[4043] Among the anaerobes, Fusobacterium species may link appendicitis and subsequent colorectal cancer.[4446] Fusobacterium nucleatum/necrophorum are responsible for the majority of cases of acute appendicitis,[4748] while Fusobacterium genomic sequences have been associated with IBD, including ulcerative colitis, and are enriched in colorectal carcinomas.[4956] McCoy et al. found that subjects with a high abundance of Fusobacterium had an odds ratio of 3.66 (95% CI 1.37–9.74) to develop colorectal cancer [54]. It is plausible that patients undergoing appendectomy are at a higher risk of developing IBD and subsequent colorectal carcinogenesis because of lacking the function of appendix as”safe house”. [1011, 5356]

The older subjects had an HR of 12.8 compared with the younger subjects (Table 2). To the best of our knowledge, no report has emphasized age difference in the relationship between appendicitis and the development of colorectal cancer. In the present study, the distributions of baseline comorbidities were not significantly different between the appendectomy and comparison cohorts (Table 1). The increased hazard ratios in older subjects may be attributed to the alteration of the intestinal ecology after removal of the appendix rather than the impact of aging itself.

This study also showed that patients who undergo incidental appendectomy are at a higher risk of subsequent colorectal cancer (HR 2.90, Table 4). It is possible that such patients could in fact have undetected cancer or have related high-risk conditions. To reduce misclassification, we excluded patients with colorectal cancer that was detected within 18 months after the appendectomy. Therefore, removal of an ordinary appendix is also associated with a higher incidence of subsequent colorectal cancer. This result may provide further evidences in the “safe house” hypothesis of the appendix.

The association between appendectomy and subsequent colorectal cancer has been observed in several earlier studies carried out in the 1960s through the 1980s. [5763] No study has ever longitudinally examined the development of colorectal cancer after appendectomy. The present large cohort study revealed that cancer incidence is higher in patients with appendectomy than in the comparisons for each colorectal site. The typical pathophysiology of colon cancer development has a typical time frame of near 10 years, with the polyp-to-cancer transformation cycle averaging 7–10 years.[64, 65] However, in our study, the overall colorectal cancer incidence in the 1.5–3.5 years of follow-up is much higher than that in later years. The finding that the incidence is consistently higher in later years may indicate that the risk remains without the protective role of appendix. This result may deserve attention and further studies.

Dysplastic adenomas are the most common form of premalignant precursor lesions [66]. In molecular features, the APC gene mutations present in the early phase of colorectal cancer formation with approximately 70% of colorectal adenoma.[67] Furthermore, activating mutations of the KRAS oncogene and inactivating mutations of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene could promote adenoma–carcinoma sequence.[68] However, in the present study, whether the shorter latent period for colorectal cancer after appendectomy is attributable to molecular changes after removing appendix is unclear. There may be genetic or environmental dispositions in the Taiwanese species, which deserves further study as well.

Limitation of the study

This study has strengths of including a large study population, the longitudinal design, the reliable diagnosis and the high follow-up rate. However, certain limitations also exist. First, complete lifestyle information with respect to drinking, smoking, diet, socioeconomic status, and genetic factors was not available for the colorectal cancer risk adjustment. However, these factors are related to both appendectomy and colorectal cancer. Thus, the bias derived from this source is modest. Second, despite our meticulous study design and controlling for confounding factors, bias resulting from the retrospective nature of the study may have influenced our results. Third, all data used were anonymous. Therefore, relevant clinical variables, such as pathology findings, cancer staging, imaging results, and serum laboratory data were unavailable in our study. However, the data regarding appendectomy and cancer diagnoses were highly reliable.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this follow-up study using large Asian population data shows that patients with appendicitis are at an elevated risk of colorectal cancer after appendectomy. The overall risk elevation is estimated for 14%, but much greater for the elderly patients. Although further study is necessary to determine whether appendicitis truly increases the cancer risk, and the mechanism by which the cancer risk increase might occur.

Acknowledgments

Disclaimer: This study used the National Health Insurance Research Database established by the National Health Research Institutes with the authorization of the Bureau of National Health Insurance, Department of Health of Taiwan. The interpretations and conclusions contained herein do not represent the opinion of the aforementioned agencies and institutions.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SCW. Performed the experiments: CHM. Analyzed the data: SCW CHM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: WTC TWK CWF. Wrote the paper: SCW CHM FCS.

References

  1. 1. Gallimore AM, Godkin A (2013) Epithelial Barriers, Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer. N Engl J Med.368:282–4 pmid:23323906
  2. 2. Yuhara H, Steinmaus C, Cohen SE, Corley DA, Tei Y, et al. (2011) Is diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for colon cancer and rectal cancer? Am J Gastroenterol.106:1911–21 pmid:21912438
  3. 3. Balkwill F, Mantovani A (2001) Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 357:539–45 pmid:11229684
  4. 4. Ullman TA, Itzkowitz SH (2011) Intestinal inflammation and cancer Gastroenterology 140:1807–16. pmid:21530747
  5. 5. Terzić J, Grivennikov S, Karin E, Karin M (2010) Inflammation and colon cancer. Gastroenterology 138:2101–2114 pmid:20420949
  6. 6. Grivennikov SI (2013) Inflammation and colorectal cancer: colitis-associated neoplasia. Semin Immunopathol.35:229–44 pmid:23161445
  7. 7. Grivennikov SI, Wang K, Mucida D, Stewart CA, Schnabl B, et al. (2012) Adenoma-linked barrier defects and microbial products drive IL-23/IL-17-mediated tumour growth. Nature 491:254–8. pmid:23034650
  8. 8. Arthur JC, Perez-Chanona E, Mühlbauer M, Tomkovich S, Uronis JM, et al. (2012) Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota. Science 338:120–3 pmid:22903521
  9. 9. Vetrano S, Danese S (2013) Colitis, microbiota, and colon cancer: an infernal triangle. Gastroenterology 144:461–3. pmid:23260490
  10. 10. Randal Bollinger R, Barbas AS, Bush EL, Lin SS, Parker W (2007) Biofilms in the large bowel suggest an apparent function of the human vermiform appendix. J Theor Biol. 249:826–31 pmid:17936308
  11. 11. Bollinger RR, Barbas AS, Bush EL, Lin SS, Parker W (2007) Biofilms in the normal human large bowel: fact rather than fiction. Gut 56:1481–2 pmid:17872584
  12. 12. Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom A (2003) Appendectomy Is Followed by Increased Risk of Crohn’s Disease. Gastroenterology 124:40–6 pmid:12512028
  13. 13. Castiglione F, Diaferia M, Morace F, Labianca O, Meucci C, et al. (2012) Risk factors for inflammatory bowel diseases according to the "hygiene hypothesis": a case-control, multi-centre, prospective study in Southern Italy. J Crohns Colitis 6:324–9. pmid:22405169
  14. 14. Andersson RE, Olaison G, Tysk C, Ekbom A (2001) Appendectomy and protection against ulcerative colitis. N Engl J Med. 344:808–14. pmid:11248156
  15. 15. Cheluvappa R, Luo AS, Palmer C, Grimm MC (2011) Protective pathways against colitis mediated by appendicitis and appendectomy. Clin Exp Immunol. 165:393–400. pmid:21707591
  16. 16. Tenesa A, Dunlop MG (2009) New insights into the aetiology of colorectal cancer from genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Genet 10:353–358 pmid:19434079
  17. 17. Rustgi AK (2007) The genetics of hereditary colon cancer. Genes Dev. 21:2525–2538 pmid:17938238
  18. 18. Feagins LA, Souza RF, Spechler SJ (2009) Carcinogenesis in IBD: potential targets for the prevention of colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:297–305 pmid:19404270
  19. 19. Saleh M, Trinchieri G (2011) Innate immune mechanisms of colitis and colitis-associated colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Immunol 11:9–20 pmid:21151034
  20. 20. Rubin DC, Shaker A, Levin MS (2012) Chronic intestinal inflammation: Inflammatory bowel disease and colitis-associated colon cancer. Front Immunol 3:107 pmid:22586430
  21. 21. Lakatos PL, Lakatos L (2008) Risk for colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: changes, causes and management strategies. World J Gastroenterol 14:3937–3947 pmid:18609676
  22. 22. Bellavia M, Tomasello G, Romeo M, Damiani P, Lo Monte AI, et al. (2013) Gut microbiota imbalance and chaperoning system malfunction are central to ulcerative colitis pathogenesis and can be counteracted with specifically designed probiotics: a working hypothesis. Med Microbiol Immunol.202:393–406 pmid:23864544
  23. 23. Zhu Y, Michelle Luo T, Jobin C, Young HA (2011) Gut microbiota and probiotics in colon tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. 309:119–27. pmid:21741763
  24. 24. Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF (2001) The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut 48:526–535 pmid:11247898
  25. 25. Canavan C, Abrams KR, Mayberry J (2006) Meta-analysis: colorectal and small bowel cancer risk in patients with Crohn's disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23:1097–1104 pmid:16611269
  26. 26. Clevers H (2004) At the crossroads of inflammation and cancer. Cell 118:671–674. pmid:15369667
  27. 27. Atreya I, Neurath MF (2008) Immune cells in colorectal cancer: prognostic relevance and therapeutic strategies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 8:561–572. pmid:18402523
  28. 28. Atreya I, Atreya R, Neurath MF (2008) NF-kappaB in inflammatory bowel disease. J Intern Med 263:591–596. pmid:18479258
  29. 29. Yuan-Kun C, Tao Y (2012) Does a decrease of NK cells in the appendix increase the risk of developing colon cancer? Hepatogastroenterology 59:1819–21 pmid:23115794
  30. 30. Lai HW, Loong CC, Tai LC, Wu CW, Lui WY (2006) Incidence and odds ratio of appendicitis as first manifestation of colon cancer: a retrospective analysis of 1873 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 21:1693–6. pmid:16984591
  31. 31. Solana R, Tarazona R, Gayoso I, Lesur O, Dupuis G, et al. (2012) Innate immunosenescence: effect of aging on cells and receptors of the innate immune system in humans. Semin Immunol. 24:331–41. pmid:22560929
  32. 32. Solana R, Mariani E (2000) NK and NK/T cells in human senescence. Vaccine. 18:1613–20. pmid:10689137
  33. 33. Wong C, Goldstein DR (2013)Impact of aging on antigen presentation cell function of dendritic cells. Curr Opin Immunol. 25:535–41. pmid:23806201
  34. 34. Mäkivuokko H, Tiihonen K, Tynkkynen S, Paulin L, Rautonen N (2010) The effect of age and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on human intestinal microbiota composition. Br J Nutr. 103:227–34. pmid:19703328
  35. 35. Woodmansey EJ (2007) Intestinal bacteria and ageing. J Appl Microbiol. 102:1178–86. pmid:17448153
  36. 36. Tiihonen K, Ouwehand AC, Rautonen N (2010) Human intestinal microbiota and healthy ageing. Ageing Res Rev. 9:107–16. pmid:19874918
  37. 37. Roblin X, Neut C, Darfeuille-Michaud A, Colombel JF (2012) Local appendiceal dysbiosis: the missing link between the appendix and ulcerative colitis? Gut 61:635–6 pmid:21737859
  38. 38. Rastall RA (2004) Bacteria in the gut: friends and foes and how to alter the balance. J Nutr. 134(8 Suppl):2022S–6S. pmid:15284393
  39. 39. Mai V (2004) Dietary modification of the intestinal microbiota. Nutr Rev. 62:235–42. pmid:15291396
  40. 40. Peek RM Jr, Blaser MJ (2002) Helicobacter pylori and gastrointestinal tract adenocarcinomas. Nat Rev Cancer. 2:28–37. pmid:11902583
  41. 41. Gold JS, Bayar S, Salem RR (2004) Association of Streptococcus bovis bacteremia with colonic neoplasia and extracolonic malignancy. Arch Surg. 139:760–5. pmid:15249410
  42. 42. Moore WE, Moore LH (1995) Intestinal floras of populations that have a high risk of colon cancer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 61:3202–7. pmid:7574628
  43. 43. Nakamura J, Kubota Y, Miyaoka M, Saitoh T, Mizuno F, et al. (2002) Comparison of four microbial enzymes in Clostridia and Bacteroides isolated from human feces. Microbiol Immunol. 46:487–90. pmid:12222935
  44. 44. McIntosh GH, Royle PJ, Playne MJ (1999) A probiotic strain of L.acidophilus reduces DMH-induced large intestinal tumors in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Nutr Cancer 35:153–9. pmid:10693169
  45. 45. Rowland IR, Bearne CA, Fischer R, Pool-Zobel BL (1996) The effect of lactulose on DNA damage induced by DMH in the colon of human flora-associated rats. Nutr Cancer 26:37–47. pmid:8844720
  46. 46. Tlaskalová-Hogenová H, Stepánková R, Hudcovic T, Tucková L, Cukrowska B, et al. (2004) Commensal bacteria (normal microflora), mucosal immunity and chronic inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Immunol Lett. 93:97–108. pmid:15158604
  47. 47. Swidsinski A, Dörffel Y, Loening-Baucke V, Theissig F, Rückert JC, et al. (2011) Acute appendicitis is characterised by local invasion with Fusobacterium nucleatum/necrophorum. Gut 60:34–40. pmid:19926616
  48. 48. Swidsinski A, Dörffel Y, Loening-Baucke V, Tertychnyy A, Biche-Ool S, et al. (2012) Mucosal invasion by fusobacteria is a common feature of acute appendicitis in Germany, Russia, and China. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 18:55–8. pmid:22249094
  49. 49. Kostic AD, Gevers D, Pedamallu CS, Michaud M, Duke F, et al. (2012) Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 22:292–8. pmid:22009990
  50. 50. Castellarin M, Warren RL, Freeman JD, Dreolini L, Krzywinski M, et al. (2012) Fusobacterium nucleatum infection is prevalent in human colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 22:299–306. pmid:22009989
  51. 51. Ando T, Okamoto A, Sasaki N, Ohkura T, et al. (2009) Seroprevalence of Fusobacterium varium in ulcerative colitis patients in Japan. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 56:67–72. pmid:19484811
  52. 52. Ohkusa T, Sato N, Ogihara T, Morita K, Ogawa M, et al. (2002) Fusobacterium varium localized in the colonic mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis stimulates species-specific antibody. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 17:849–53. pmid:12164960
  53. 53. Rubinstein MR, Wang X, Liu W, Hao Y, Cai G, et al. (2013) Fusobacterium nucleatum Promotes Colorectal Carcinogenesis by Modulating E-Cadherin/β-Catenin Signaling via its FadA Adhesin. Cell Host Microbe. 14:195–206. pmid:23954158
  54. 54. McCoy AN, Araújo-Pérez F, Azcárate-Peril A, Yeh JJ, Sandler RS, et al. (2013). Fusobacterium is associated with colorectal adenomas. PLoS One. 8:e53653. pmid:23335968
  55. 55. Ray K (2011) Colorectal cancer: Fusobacterium nucleatum found in colon cancer tissue—could an infection cause colorectal cancer? Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 8:662. pmid:22083120
  56. 56. Zhu QL, Gao R, Wu W, Qin H (2013) The role of gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 34:1285–300. pmid:23397545
  57. 57. McVay JR (1964) The appendix in relation to neoplastic disease. Cancer 17: 929–37. pmid:14179555
  58. 58. Bierman HR (1968) Human appendix and neoplasia. Cancer 21: 109–18. pmid:5634841
  59. 59. Vobecky J, Caro J, Devroede G (1983) A case-control study of risk factors for large bowel carcinoma. Cancer 51:1958–63. pmid:6831361
  60. 60. Berndt H (1970) Is appendectomy followed by increased cancer risk? Digestion 3: 187–90. pmid:5449666
  61. 61. Howie JGR, Timperley WR (1966)Cancer and appendectomy.Cancer 19:1138–42. pmid:5912328
  62. 62. Hyams L, Wynder EL (1968) Appendectomy and cancer risk: an epidemiological evaluation. J. Chron. Dis. 21: 391–415. pmid:5681125
  63. 63. Moertel CG, Nobrega FT, Elveback LR, Wertz JR (1974) A prospective study of appendicectomy and predisposition to cancer. Surg. Gynecol.Obstet.138: 49–53.
  64. 64. Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP (2014) Colorectal cancer. Lancet 383:1490–502. pmid:24225001
  65. 65. Nakao SK, Fassler S, Sucandy I, Kim S, Zebley DM (2013) Colorectal cancer following negative colonoscopy: is 5-year screening the correct interval to recommend? Surg Endosc. 27:768–73. pmid:23052520
  66. 66. Jass JR (2007) Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features. Histopathology 50: 113–30. pmid:17204026
  67. 67. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (1996) Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell 87: 159–70. pmid:8861899
  68. 68. Fearon ER (2011)Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Pathol 6: 479–507. pmid:21090969