We report here that (4R,9Z)-hexadec-9-en-4-olide [(R)-desmolactone] is a sex attractant or sex pheromone for multiple species and subspecies in the cerambycid genus Desmocerus. This compound was previously identified as a female-produced sex attractant pheromone of Desmocerus californicus californicus. Headspace volatiles from female Desmocerus aureipennis aureipennis contained (R)-desmolactone, and the antennae of adult males of two species responded strongly to synthetic (R)-desmolactone in coupled gas chromatography-electroantennogram analyses. In field bioassays in California, Oregon, and British Columbia, traps baited with synthetic (R)-desmolactone captured males of several Desmocerus species and subspecies. Only male beetles were captured, indicating that this compound acts as a sex-specific attractant, rather than as a signal for aggregation. In targeted field bioassays, males of the US federally threatened subspecies Desmocerus californicus dimorphus responded to the synthetic attractant in a dose dependent manner. Our results represent the first example of a “generic” sex pheromone used by multiple species in the subfamily Lepturinae, and demonstrate that pheromone-baited traps may be a sensitive and efficient method of monitoring the threatened species Desmocerus californicus dimorphus, commonly known as the valley elderberry longhorn beetle.
Citation: Ray AM, Arnold RA, Swift I, Schapker PA, McCann S, Marshall CJ, et al. (2014) (R)-Desmolactone Is a Sex Pheromone or Sex Attractant for the Endangered Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle Desmocerus californicus dimorphus and Several Congeners (Cerambycidae: Lepturinae). PLoS ONE 9(12): e115498. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115498
Editor: Cesar Rodriguez-Saona, Rutgers University, United States of America
Received: September 17, 2014; Accepted: November 24, 2014; Published: December 18, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Ray et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Funding for this project was provided by the Robert Borcer Endowment (Xavier University, www.xavier.edu, to AMR), National Science Foundation Division of Biological Infrastructure (www.nsf.gov) grant number #0847965 (to CJM), and the National Research Initiative of the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (www.csrees.usda.gov), grant number #2009-35302-05047 (to JGM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Volatile pheromones are widely used for detection, monitoring, and in some cases, control of insect pests , , and a substantial amount of research has been devoted to the development of methods to exploit pheromones for effective pest management. These efforts have included the development of pheromone-based monitoring methods for invasive insect pests such as the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar (L.) and the Japanese beetle Popillia japonica Newman , . Such methods are particularly useful for detection of invasive species because of their sensitivity and selectivity, i.e., pheromone-baited traps can be used to detect very low density populations, such as occur when an invasive pest is first introduced, with minimal cross-attraction of non-target species . In addition, pheromone-based monitoring methods are generally far simpler, far more effective, and less costly and labor intensive than visual searches for a target pest or signs of infestation .
The same characteristics of sensitivity and selectivity should make pheromone-based sampling methods an ideal means of detecting and sampling rare, threatened, or endangered species. Despite these obvious advantages, pheromone-based methods have been exploited for these purposes in only a very few cases (e.g., the moth Actias ( = Graellsia) isabellae (Graëlls) , ; wood cockroaches as food for endangered bird species ; the scarab beetle Osmoderma eremita Scopoli and the click beetle Elater ferrugineus L. ) in part because of the high cost of identifying and developing pheromones as a means to study populations of rare or endangered species .
The valley elderberry longhorn beetle (VELB), Desmocerus californicus dimorphus Fisher (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), was listed as threatened by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in 1980 . Since that time, D. californicus dimorphus has been the subject of extensive research, including studies of the effects of invasive ants , dust , habitat fragmentation , and outcomes of various mitigation plans on beetle populations , –. In response to a petition by a private legal foundation, the USFWS proposed to remove VELB from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in 2012, using population density and distribution data summarized in a 5-year review of the status of the beetle as the basis for the proposed delisting , . These data were collected by laborious and relatively ineffective visual surveys for adult beetles and for beetle emergence holes (e.g., , ). Panelists who reviewed the proposal to delist VELB noted a need to develop more sensitive and less labor-intensive survey methods, such as a pheromone or attractant lure that could be used to reliably detect beetles at low population densities .
Over the past decade, extensive progress has been made in the identification of volatile sex or aggregation pheromones for cerambycid beetles, with pheromones or suspected pheromones now known for several hundred species in the subfamilies Cerambycinae, Lamiinae, Prioninae, Spondylidinae, and Lepturinae (e.g., –). Overall, these results have demonstrated that, as with many other insects, volatile pheromones play a crucial role in mate location in this family. Recent studies also have demonstrated the utility of pheromones as a sensitive tool for surveying cerambycid species in a variety of habitats (e.g., , ), with extensive data sets generated on seasonal phenology, geographic range, and distribution for a number of species (e.g., , , ).
We recently identified the female-produced sex pheromone of Desmocerus californicus californicus Horn as a single compound, (4R,9Z)-hexadec-9-en-4-olide, given the common name (R)-desmolactone. This pheromone was attractive to male D. californicus californicus in field trials conducted in southern California . Because pheromone structures are highly conserved within and among related cerambycid species (e.g., , ), we hypothesized that female VELB also might use (R)-desmolactone as a sex pheromone. If this were the case, the pheromone could be used as a tool to obtain more accurate estimates of population sizes and distributions than can be obtained from visual surveys for adults or for emergence holes. We also reasoned that (R)-desmolactone may be a “generic” pheromone for other species and subspecies of Desmocerus.
Thus, the objectives of the present study were: 1) to determine whether (R)-desmolactone was an attractant for VELB, 2) to test (R)-desmolactone and its enantiomer as an attractant or sex pheromone for other North American Desmocerus species and subspecies, 3) where possible, to analyze headspace volatiles and conduct coupled gas chromatography-electroantennogram analyses to confirm that female beetles produce (R)-desmolactone. We also tested the antennal responses of Desmocerus species males to synthetic (R)- and (S)-desmolactone.
Biology and Distribution of Species and Subspecies
The genus Desmocerus Dejean in the cerambycid subfamily Lepturinae is endemic to North America, and contains three species and seven recognized subspecies , . Both subspecies of Desmocerus californicus are native to California, but VELB is restricted to the Sacramento and San Joaquin River valleys , . The four subspecies of D. aureipennis are found in mountain and coastal regions west of the Rocky Mountains in California, Oregon, and Washington in the United States, and British Columbia in Canada. The nominate subspecies, D. a. aureipennis Chevrolat, is distributed from the Sierra Nevada Mountains (California) north to Vancouver Island (British Columbia, Canada) , D. aureipennis cribripennis Horn is found along the Pacific Coast from central California to the Queen Charlotte Islands in Canada [PAS, pers, obs.], , D. aureipennis lacustris Linsley and Chemsak is endemic to the mountains of western Oregon , and D. aureipennis piperi Webb is found in the northern Rocky Mountains ,  (the latter subspecies is not included in the present manuscript). For simplicity, we follow the taxonomy of D. aureipennis as described by Linsley and Chemsak . However, morphological characters are often not sufficient to separate individuals of different Pacific Northwest populations of D. aureipennis (e.g., ), and nomenclatural changes are anticipated [PAS, pers. obs.]. Desmocerus palliatus (Forster) occurs throughout eastern North America from Ontario, Canada to Alabama and northern Georgia, and west to Kansas in the United States  (see Fig. 1 for photos of species and subspecies included in the present manuscript).
A: D. a. aureipennis; B: D. a cribripennis; C: D. a. lacustris; D. D. c. dimorphus (VELB); E. D. palliatus. (Photo of D. palliates by Paul Bedell).
The biology of all Desmocerus species and subspecies is similar . Members of the genus are unusual among lepturines because their larvae develop in stems and roots of living elderberry (Sambucus spp.: Adoxaceae) rather than in decaying wood , –. Adults emerge from March to August (depending on elevation and latitude), and feed on the leaves and flowers of the host plant , . Adults mate on the host, and females lay eggs in bark crevices . Adults are seldom encountered in the field , , and specimens of most taxa are fairly uncommon in entomology collections .
Methods and Materials
Field bioassays were conducted in California, Missouri, Oregon (USA), and British Columbia (Canada) during May - August 2012 and April - June 2013 (see Table 1 for site information). We tested responses of adult VELB (California), D. aureipennis subspecies (Oregon and British Columbia), and D. palliatus (Missouri) to the enantiomers and/or the racemate of desmolactone (Table 2). Funnel traps as described in Ray et al.  were used at all sites. Trap funnels were treated with a fluoropolymer suspension (Fluon, Northern Products Inc., Woonsocket, RI, USA) to render the surfaces slippery and improve capture of beetles . Traps were positioned ∼10 m apart in approximately linear transects and were suspended from branches of Sambucus shrubs or from branches of other tree species near patches of Sambucus (see Table 1 for host species). Pheromone lures consisted of clear low-density polyethylene sachets (“Zipper” seal sample bags, 2 in ×3 in, 0.002 in wall thickness, #01-816- 1A; Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA), which were loaded with solutions of (R)- or (S)-desmolactone (10 mg in 990 µl of ethanol), 20 mg of the racemic mixture (in 980 µl ethanol), or 1 ml ethanol only as a control. (R)- and (S)-desmolactones [(4R,9Z)- and (4S,9Z)- hexadec-9-en-4-olides] were synthesized as described in Ray et al. . Lures were suspended with wire from the side of the funnel (see Table 2 for treatments and replicates at each site).
Traps were checked for beetles every 2-7 d (Table 2). Lures were replaced after 7 d and traps were shifted along transects to control for location effects. Captured beetles were sexed using the sexually dimorphic characters of antennal length, width of the elytra, color of the elytra (in sexually dichromatic species), and shape of the terminal abdominal sternite .
Differences between treatments in the number of beetles captured per trap per trapping period were tested with the nonparametric Friedman's test (blocked by date and replicate; PROC FREQ with CMH option; ) because assumptions of analysis of variance were violated by heteroscedasticity . We excluded from analyses any dates when no beetles were captured. Data from bioassays conducted in British Columbia were square root transformed due to the great range in number of beetles captured across dates (see Results). Differences between pairs of means were tested with the REGWQ means-separation test to control maximum experimentwise error rates .
All work with D. californicus dimorphus was carried out under USFWS recovery permit # 797233 (to RAA), and work at the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge was carried out under USFWS SUP#81627-13-0010 (to RAA). Work at the Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge was carried out under USFWS SUP #33560-2012-0012 (to AMR). Work at the Logsden, OR field site was conducted on private land, and permission was granted by the property owner, David Nafzinger (to PAS). Work at the Ashland, OR field site was conducted on private land, and permission was granted by Woodie Tesh at Mt. Ashland Ski Area (to PAS). Work at Colony Farm in BC was conducted under a Metro Vancouver Parks Board permit issued to SM.
Source of Beetles for Headspace Analyses and/or Coupled Gas Chromatography-Electroantennogram Detection (GC-EAD)
Adults of D. a. aureipennis were collected from leaves of S. nigra ssp. cerulea on 2 August 2012 at the Ashland, OR field site (Table 1; see above for permission). One female and one male were collected in copula, while the mating status of other individuals was unknown. Adult males of D. a. lacustris were collected in traps baited with (R)-desmolactone at the Logsden, OR field site (Table 1; see above for permission).
Pupae and teneral adults of D. palliatus were collected 4–6 May 2012 from healthy S. nigra ssp. canadensis plants growing at the Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge near Mound City in northwest Missouri (see Table 1; see above for permit information). Pupae and teneral adults were cut from pupal chambers in the roots of infested plants. Individual beetles were placed into tissue paper tubes (∼6 cm long, ∼0.5 cm in diameter), and the tube was misted with water. Paper tubes were placed in individual glass vials, and shipped to the University of California, Riverside for chemical analysis. All adults had emerged upon arrival in California, but only males survived for analysis.
Shipments of live beetles followed the protocols required by USDA permit P526P-09-01886 (to JGM).
Collection of Volatiles
Volatiles were collected from male and female D. a. aureipennis in a greenhouse under ambient conditions between 9 and 13 August 2012. Headspace odors were collected from either two males held together or two single females held in separate glass chambers made from 500 ml canning jars with Teflon lids. The results of field bioassays (see below) suggested that females would produce attractants, and that males would not. Thus, we collected headspace from individual females to increase the likelihood of obtaining replicated samples from the limited numbers of specimens available to us. Stems of S. nigra ssp. cerulea (with inflorescences and leaves) were provided as a food source and replaced every 1–2 d, as needed. Airflow of ca.1 l/min was provided by a flow meter-controlled vacuum source with charcoal-filtered (6-14 mesh, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) room air being pulled through the chamber. Collectors consisted of 6 mm outer diameter glass tubes with ca. 1.5–2 cm long beds of thermally desorbed 50–200 mesh activated charcoal (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) held in place by Soxhlet-extracted (pentane, then ethyl acetate) glass wool plugs. Collectors were connected to the vacuum source and the chamber using ¼ in to ¼ in Swagelok unions, with Teflon ferrules (Swagelok, San Diego Valve and Fitting Co., San Diego CA, USA). Volatiles were collected for 4 d, after which the collectors were eluted with 3 rinses of dichloromethane to a final volume of ca. 250 µl. Extracts were stored at ∼−20°C until needed.
Analyses of Extracts
Coupled GC-EAD analyses were performed with DB-17 and DB-Wax columns (both 30 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). Helium was used as carrier and makeup gas. The GC oven was programmed from 100°C for 1 min, 15°C per min to 275°C for DB-17 and 250°C for DB-Wax, hold for 40 min. Extracts (1 µl aliquots) were analyzed in splitless mode. The effluent from the columns was split equally between the GC detector and the EAD. The portion directed to the EAD was diluted in a humidified air stream that was directed over the antennal preparation, which consisted of the excised terminal 4–5 antennal segments of a male beetle, with the distal tip excised with a razor blade, placed between two saline-filled glass capillary electrodes (7.5 g NaCl, 0.21 g CaCl2, 0.35 g KCl, and 0.20 g NaHCO3 in 1 l Milli-Q purified water). The glass electrodes were fitted with 0.2 mm diam. gold wires that connected to a custom built EAD amplifier, with the amplifier gain at 100X amplification. A single antennal preparation was used for as many as ten runs.
We tested the responses of the antenna of a single male D. a. aureipennis to extracts of headspace volatiles collected from females (replicated three times), to headspace volatiles collected from males (replicated twice), and to synthetic (R)-desmolactone (one replicate). We tested the responses of an antenna from each of two male D. a. lacustris to synthetic (R)- and (S)-desmolactone (maximum of two GC-EAD runs per male, but multiple injections of standards during each run). Responses of an antenna from each of three individual male D. palliatus to synthetic (R)- and (S)-desmolactone were also tested (one GC-EAD run per individual male, but multiple injections of standards during each run). Extracts of headspace volatiles from female D. a. lacustris and D. palliatus were not available (see above). The differences in the number of GC-EAD analyses between species were a direct result of the limited number of individual beetles available (see above).
Aeration samples also were analyzed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with an Agilent 6890N GC interfaced to a 5975C mass selective detector (Agilent, Santa Clara CA, USA). The GC was equipped with an HP5-MS column (30 m×0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film; Agilent, Santa Clara CA, USA), programmed from 40°C/1 min, 10°C per min to 280°C. Samples were injected in splitless mode.
A sample from a female D. auripennis auripennis that contained desmolactone was reanalyzed on a Betadex B chiral stationary phase GC column (30 m×0.25 mm i.d., 0.25 µm film; J&W Scientific, Folsom CA), programmed from 185°C for 50 min, then 10°C per min to 220° for 40 min. (R)- and (S)-desmolactone standards were run under the same conditions, with retention times of 39.17 and 40.04 min respectively.
Dose Response Study
We tested the responses of adult male VELB to different doses of synthetic (R)-desmolactone during field bioassays at the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge from 27 March–16 May 2014 (see S1 Figure, S1 Table). Traps and lures were as described above, but traps were separated by ∼50 m to minimize interference between adjacent traps. We tested responses of adult male VELB to traps baited with 1, 3.3, 10, or 33 mg doses of (R)-desmolactone in 0.5 ml isopropyl alcohol (solvent), versus a solvent control. Each block contained five traps, each trap was baited with one of the five treatments, and six total blocks were deployed in three separate conservation units within the refuge (see S1 Table). Traps were checked every 7–10 d for the duration of the bioassay, resulting in six trap checks. Traps were shifted one position along the transect every 7 d to control for location effects, and lures were replaced every 14 d. The dose response study was conducted under the USFWS permits listed above (to RAA). Statistical analyses were as described above, and trapping periods when no beetles were captured were excluded from analysis.
In bioassays in California testing attraction to synthetic pheromone, traps baited with (R)-desmolactone captured 33 male VELB, whereas traps baited with racemic desmolactone captured a single male (Table 2). No beetles were captured in traps baited with the (S)-enantiomer or in control traps. As many as seven male beetles were caught in a single trap during one five-day trapping period. We did not capture any female beetles, nor did we capture any other insects in consistent or significant numbers.
During bioassays in British Columbia, traps baited with (R)-desmolactone captured 232 males of D. aureipennis cribripennis, whereas traps baited with the racemate captured 168 males, and traps baited with the (S)-desmolactone and control treatments caught one male each (Table 2). A maximum of 180 male beetles were captured in a single trap baited with (R)-desmolactone, and a maximum of 80 male beetles were captured in a trap baited with racemic desmolactone during one seven-day trapping period.
In Logsden, Oregon, traps baited with (R)-desmolactone captured five male D. a. lacustris, whereas traps baited with racemic desmolactone and the solvent control captured no beetles (Table 2). Bioassays in Ashland, Oregon captured 22 male D. a. aureipennis in traps baited with (R)-desmolactone, with a maximum of 12 beetles in a single trap during one seven-day trapping period. Five male beetles were captured in traps baited with racemic desmolactone, with a maximum of four beetles in a single trap during a trapping period. No beetles were captured in control traps at the Ashland site (Table 2).
Bioassays in Missouri testing attraction of D. palliatus to (R)- and (S)-desmolactones captured seven male beetles in traps baited with (R)-desmolactone. A maximum of six individuals were captured in a single trap during a single seven-day trapping period, and no beetles were caught in traps baited with (S)-desmolactone or in control traps (Table 2). However, treatment means were not significantly different.
Analysis of Headspace Extracts
Analysis of headspace volatiles collected from adult D. a. aureipennis revealed a sex-specific peak in extracts from females that elicited strong responses from the antenna of a male beetle in GC-EAD analyses (Fig. 2). Analysis by coupled GC-MS confirmed that the mass spectrum and GC retention time of the active compound matched those of an authentic standard, and further analysis on a chiral stationary phase column demonstrated that the extract contained pure (R)-desmolactone. The extracts of headspace volatiles collected from male beetles did not contain desmolactone, nor any other compounds that elicited responses from antennae in GC-EAD analyses.
Upper trace is the chromatogram, lower inverted trace is the electroantennogram signal from the antenna of a male beetle. Insert shows the GC and antennal responses to an authentic standard of (R)-desmolactone. DB-5 column, 40°C/1 min, then 10°C/min to 275°C, hold 40 min.
When challenged with synthetic (R)- and (S)-desmolactone, the antenna of a male D. a. lacustris responded to both enantiomers, with the response to the latter enantiomer being substantially weaker than that to the (R)-enantiomer (Fig. 3). The responses of the antennae of both male beetles that were available to test were consistent within each replicate.
Upper trace is the chromatogram, lower inverted trace is the electroantennogram signal from the beetle antenna. DB-5 column, 40°C/1 min, then 10°C/min to 275°C, hold 40 min. Large peaks interspersed between the (R)- and (S)-desmolactone peaks on the GC trace are from the solvent used in the injections.
Antennae of male D. palliatus responded strongly to (R)-desmolactone, with a weaker response to (S)-desmolactone (Fig. 4). It was not possible to collect headspace volatiles from or conduct GC-EAD analyses with VELB because of permit prohibitions on handling or working with the beetles in the laboratory.
Upper trace is the chromatogram, lower inverted trace is the electroantennogram signal from the beetle antenna. DB-5 column, 40°C/1 min, then 10°C/min to 275°C, hold 40 min. Large peaks interspersed between the (R)- and (S)-desmolactone peaks on the GC trace are from the solvent used in the injections.
Dose response study
In bioassays to determine the optimal dose of pheromone for attracting VELB males, traps baited with different doses of synthetic (R)-desmolactone captured a total of 63 male VELB, whereas control traps caught no beetles. Beetles were captured at two of the three conservation units where traps were deployed. Treatments differed significantly in the number of beetles captured in traps. Traps baited with 10 mg dose captured significantly more beetles than traps baited with any other dose (number of beetles captured in 10 mg treatment = 43, Friedman's Q = 27.31, P<0.0001). Traps baited with the 10 mg doses captured a mean of 1.94±0.43 (SE) beetles per trapping period. Treatment means for the three other doses were not significantly different from solvent controls (Fig. 5).
In field bioassays in California, Oregon, Missouri, and British Columbia, traps baited with synthetic (R)-desmolactone or racemic desmolactone captured males of several Desmocerus species and subspecies. During field bioassays at the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge in 2013, we captured significantly more male VELB in traps baited with (R)-desmolactone, than in traps baited with the racemic desmolactone. This result suggests that the presence of the (S)-enantiomer at least partially inhibited the responses of males, as has been observed in tests of racemic versus enantiomerically pure pheromones of other cerambycid species (e.g., ).
Among the subspecies of D. aureipennis, we captured 400 males of D. a. cribripennis in traps baited with (R)-desmolactone and the racemate, four individuals in traps baited with (S)-desmolactone, and only one individual in the control. This result shows that male D. a. cribripennis are strongly attracted to the (R)-enantiomer, and the (S)-enantiomer does not entirely inhibit the response of males in this subspecies. During bioassays in Oregon, only small numbers of males were captured during bioassays, and low statistical power obscured any differences between treatments. Nevertheless, most of the D. a. aureipennis (Ashland) and D. a. lacustris (Logsden) males were captured in traps baited with (R)-desmolactone, suggesting that this compound has at least some level of field activity. We also captured few individuals of D. palliatus during bioassays in Missouri, and treatment means were not significantly different. Nevertheless, all of the beetles were captured in traps baited with (R)-desmolactone.
Only male Desmocerus were captured in all field trials, indicating that (R)-desmolactone is a sex attractant rather than an aggregation pheromone. Female-produced sex pheromones have been identified in one other lepturine species (Ortholeptura valida, ), and in several genera of the cerambycid subfamily Prioninae (e.g., Prionus  and Tragosoma ). In contrast, only male-produced pheromones that attract both sexes have been found to date in the cerambycid subfamilies Cerambycinae, Lamiinae, and Spondylidinae (reviewed by ). It is likely too early to draw conclusions regarding patterns in use of volatile pheromones in lepturines, because pheromones have been identified from species in only two of the 216 lepturine genera . Moreover, among lepturines, both Desmocerus and Ortholeptura have unusual life histories, with larvae developing in living or recently dead hosts, rather than decomposed hosts . As such, the adaptive significance and taxonomic distribution of volatile pheromone production in the Lepturinae remains to be determined.
Through analysis of headspace volatiles, we confirmed that D. a. aureipennis females produce (R)-desmolactone. We were unable to obtain females of the other species and subspecies to verify that they also produced this compound. Nevertheless, the strong and specific responses elicited from antennae of male D. palliatus to synthetic (R)-desmolactone suggest that this compound is at least one component of their sex pheromone. Due to limitations on our collecting permit, we were unable to use VELB of either sex for headspace or coupled GC-EAD analyses. Nevertheless, the data from D. a. aureipennis and D. c. californicus suggest that females of VELB are almost certain to produce (R)-desmolactone, a hypothesis supported by attraction of male VELB to traps baited with (R)-desmolactone.
Our results suggest that pheromone structures may be conserved within closely related lepturine species, as has been found with other cerambycid subfamilies . We previously hypothesized that (R)-desmolactone might be a species-specific, rather than a generic, attractant because preliminary bioassays during summer 2011 did not capture individuals of D. palliatus or any of the subspecies of D. aureipennis . However, the present more comprehensive study provides evidence that (R)-desmolactone is likely to be a generic attractant for males of all species in the genus Desmocerus. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that (R)-desmolactone alone is sufficient to attract male beetles to traps, suggesting that host plant volatiles are not critical for attraction of these species. Nevertheless, host plant volatiles may enhance attraction of beetles to traps baited with (R)-desmolactone, and, this may warrant further research.
In 2012, the USFWS reviewed the status of VELB populations and concluded that the beetle should be delisted, based on survey data suggesting that VELB no longer met the criteria for a threatened species . However, the USFWS based the decision to delist on “minimal surveys” to assess geographic distribution of VELB populations, and admitted that there were “data uncertainties” as to whether sufficient habitat would remain for VELB if federal protection was eliminated . As a result of a review of survey data, the USFWS delayed and recently has withdrawn the proposal to delist VELB . Thus, there will likely be continued interest in exploration of more accurate methods for surveying and monitoring VELB populations. The current method for surveying for VELB consists of visual inspection of trees for adults or identification of emergence holes, the latter being prone to false positives and false negatives because beetles may emerge from roots below the soil line, emergence holes may be obscured over time, or holes made by other insects, such as woodboring bees, may be mistakenly attributed to VELB (e.g., , ).
The results from the research described here have important implications for preservation and restoration of habitat for VELB, because we have shown that pheromone-baited traps can provide a sensitive and efficient method of detecting VELB populations. For example, we captured 34 male VELB in 2013, a total which exceeds the total number of specimens known when the subspecies was originally recognized as threatened . During the subsequent dose response survey in 2014, we captured an additional 63 males, showing that traps baited with (R)-desmolactone can be used to detect and document the geographic range of this subspecies. Traps baited with (R)-desmolactone exclusively attract males, and so females remain in the population, available for mating and oviposition. Furthermore, our current traps are designed to capture beetles alive (e.g., ), and careful placement and frequent monitoring of traps will minimize mortality and lessen potential effects of trapping on populations. The relatively low volatility of the pheromone suggests that lures will likely remain attractive for several weeks, and possibly for the entire flight season of VELB, so that replacement of the lures may not be necessary.
Traps baited with synthetic (R)-desmolactone are probably the most sensitive and effective method developed to date to assess presence of VELB. Protected conservation lands include extensive areas of habitat restored to benefit VELB (e.g., , ). However, because current survey methods for VELB are unreliable (see above), it is often impossible to know whether the site has been recolonized by VELB. Traps baited with (R)-desmolactone could be used for this purpose, and as such, could become a valuable tool for landowners and resource managers. In fact, our 2014 field bioassays at the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge were conducted at three conservation units where habitat restoration was initiated ∼15 years ago, including a riparian woodland, an elderberry savanna, and a mixed riparian scrub and woodland area (see S1 Figure, S1 Table). The fact that we captured beetles at two of three restored refuge sites demonstrates that the habitat restoration efforts have been effective at reestablishing or maintaining VELB populations.
In contrast, we did not capture any VELB at a third conservation unit, McIntosh Landing South, although traps were deployed in an area with abundant elderberry shrubs. Furthermore, no above-ground emergence holes were observed in any of the elderberry plants at this site. This result suggests that appropriate habitat is not necessarily an indication that VELB are present or have recolonized an area following extirpation and habitat restoration. Current federal guidelines require that habitat restoration activities to benefit VELB be monitored for a minimum of 10 years following initial restoration . However, these guidelines do not require demonstration that VELB has indeed successfully recolonized a site. The results presented here suggest that the USFWS could revise its VELB Conservation Guidelines  to include the use of pheromone-baited traps to demonstrate successful recolonization by VELB at restoration sites, conservation banks that provide VELB credits, or other sites that are protected to provide habitat for the beetle.
Map showing locations of three conservation units within the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge (Glenn Co., CA USA) where dose response studies were conducted for VELB.
Location data and descriptions of habitat for the three conservation units within the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge where dose response studies were conducted for VELB. GPS coordinates indicate the position of the first trap in each replicate.
We thank R. Mitchell (University of Arizona), E. Graham (USDA Forest Service), L. Hanks (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), and R. Waterworth (University of California, Riverside) for advice on statistical analysis, and D. Weichert, K. Moroney, J. Silveira (USFWS), D. Nafziger, and the Mt. Ashland Ski Area for access to field sites and permits. R. Jensen and S. Cox assisted with field bioassays. R. Morris provided information on distribution of D. palliatus.
Conceived and designed the experiments: AMR RAA IS PAS JSM JGM. Performed the experiments: AMR RAA PAS SM JSM JGM. Analyzed the data: AMR RAA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AMR RAA IS SM CJM JSM JGM. Wrote the paper: AMR RAA IS PAS SM CJM JSM JGM.
- 1. Hardie J, Minks AK (1999) Pheromones of non-lepidopteran insects associated with agricultural plants. Wallingford: CABI Publishing. 466 p.
- 2. Suckling DM, Tobin PC, McCullough DG, Herms DA (2012) Combining tactics to exploit Allee effects for eradication of alien insect populations. J Econ Entomol 105:1–13.
- 3. USDA (2012)Gypsy Moth Program Manual. Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine. Washington, D. C. 275 p.
- 4. Ladd TL, Klein MG, Tumlinson JH (1981) Phenethyl propionate + eugenol + geraniol (3-7-3) and Japonilure - a highly effective joint lure for Japanese beetles (Coleoptera, Scarabaeaidae). J Econ Entomol 74:665–667.
- 5. Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: Communication by smell and taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 391 p.
- 6. Nehme M, Keena M, Zhang A, Baker T, Xu Z, et al. (2010) Evaluating the use of male-produced pheromone components and plant volatiles in two trap designs to monitor Anoplophora glabripennis. Environ Entomol 39:169–176.
- 7. Millar JG, McElfresh JS, Romero C, Vila M, Mari-Mena N, et al. (2010) Identification of the sex pheromone of a protected species, the Spanish moon moth Graellsia isabellae. J Chem Ecol 36:923–932.
- 8. Maurel N, Andrieux T, Chanselme D, Braud Y, Breton F, et al. (2013) Cartographie d'Actias isabellae galliaegloria dans les Alpes françaises à l'aide d'un piège attractif non destructif utilisant une phéromone synthétique (Lep. Saturniidae). Oreina 23:13–18.
- 9. Eliyahu D, Nojima S, Santangelo RG, Carpenter S, Webster FX, et al. (2012) Unusual macrocyclic lactone sex pheromone of Parcoblatta lata, a primary food source of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 109:E490–E496.
- 10. Svensson GP, Liedtke C, Hedenström E, Breistein P, Bång J, et al. (2012) Chemical ecology and insect conservation: Optimising pheromone-based monitoring of the threatened saproxylic click beetle Elater ferrugineus. J Insect Conserv 16:549–555.
- 11. USFWS (1980) Listing the valley elderberry longhorn beetle as a threatened species with critical habitat. Federal Register 45:52803–52807.
- 12. Huxel GR (2000) The effect of the Argentine ant on the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Biol Invasions 2:81–85.
- 13. Talley TS, Holyoak M, Piechnik DA (2006) The effects of dust on the federally threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Environ Manage 37:647–658.
- 14. Collinge SK, Holyoak M, Barr CB, Marty JT (2001) Riparian habitat fragmentation and population persistence of the threatened valley elderberry longhorn beetle in central california. Biol Conserv 100:103–113.
- 15. USFWS (1984)Valley elderberry longhorn beetle recovery plan. Portland. 62 p.
- 16. Morrison ML, Smallwood S, Hall LS (2003) Creating habitat through plant relocation lessons from valley elderberry longhorn beetle mitigation. Ecol Restor 21:95–100.
- 17. Talley TS, Fleishman E, Holyoak M, Murphy DD, Ballard A (2007) Rethinking a rare-species conservation strategy in an urban landscape: The case of the valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Biol Conserv 135:21–32.
- 18. Holyoak M, Koch-Munz M (2008) The effects of site conditions and mitigation practices on success of establishing the valley elderberry longhorn beetle and its host plant, blue elderberry. Environ Manage 42:444–457.
- 19. USFWS (2006) Valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus) 5-year review: Summary and evaluation. Sacramento. 28 p.
- 20. USFWS (2012) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; removal of the valley elderberry longhorn beetle from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife; proposed rule. Federal Register 77:60237–60276.
- 21. Atkins North America (2013) Peer review of the scientific findings in the proposed rule to delist the valley elderberry longhorn beetle. 84 p.
- 22. Hanks LM, Millar JG (2013) Field bioassays of cerambycid pheromones reveal widespread parsimony of pheromone structures, enhancement by host plant volatiles, and antagonism by components from heterospecifics. Chemoecology 23:21–44.
- 23. Pajares JA, Álvarez G, Ibeas F, Gallego D, Hall DR, et al. (2010) Identification and field activity of a male-produced aggregation pheromone in the pine sawyer beetle, Monochamus galloprovincialis. J Chem Ecol 36:570–583.
- 24. Fonseca MG, Vidal DM, Zarbin PHG (2010) Male-produced sex pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Hedypathes betulinus: Chemical identification and biological activity. J Chem Ecol 36:1132–1139.
- 25. Paschen MA, Schiff NM, Ginzel MD (2012) Role of volatile semiochemicals in the host and mate location behavior of Mallodon dasystomus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). J Insect Behav 25:569–577.
- 26. Silk PJ, Sweeney J, Wu J, Price J, Gutowski JM, et al. (2007) Evidence for a male-produced pheromone in Tetropium fuscum (F.) and Tetropium cinnamopterum (Kirby)(Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Naturwissenschaften 94:697–701.
- 27. Ray AM, Zunic A, Alten RL, McElfresh JS, Hanks LM, et al. (2011) Cis-vaccenyl acetate, a female-produced sex pheromone component of Ortholeptura valida, a longhorned beetle in the subfamily Lepturinae. J Chem Ecol 37:173–178.
- 28. Wickham JD, Harrison RD, Lu W, Guo Z, Millar JG, et al. (2014) Generic lures attract cerambycid beetles in a tropical montane rain forest in southern China. J Econ Entomol 107:259–267.
- 29. Barbour JD, Millar JG, Rodstein J, Ray AM, Alston DG, et al. (2011) Synthetic 3,5-dimethyldodecanoic acid serves as a general attractant for multiple species of Prionus (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 104:588–593.
- 30. Hanks LM, Reagel PF, Mitchell RF, Wong JC, Meier LR, et al. (2014) Seasonal phenology of the cerambycid beetles of east-central Illinois. Ann Entomol Soc Am 107:211–226.
- 31. Ray AM, Swift IP, McElfresh JS, Alten RL, Millar JG (2012) (R)-desmolactone, a female-produced sex pheromone component of the cerambycid beetle Desmocerus californicus californicus (subfamily Lepturinae). J Chem Ecol 38:157–167.
- 32. Rodstein J, Millar JG, Barbour JD, McElfresh JS, Wright IM, et al. (2011) Determination of the relative and absolute configurations of the female-produced sex pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Prionus californicus. J Chem Ecol 37:114–124.
- 33. Chemsak JA (2005) Illustrated revision of the Cerambycidae of North America. Vol. II: Lepturinae. Burbank: Wolfsgarden Books. 446 p.
- 34. Linsley EG, Chemsak JA (1972) The Cerambycidae of North America: Part VI, no. 1. Taxonomy and classification of the subfamily Lepturinae. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. 138 p.
- 35. Halstead JA, Oldham JA (2000) New distribution records for the elderberry longhorn beetle Desmocerus californicus Horn (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Pan-Pac Entomol 76:74–76.
- 36. Hart CJ, Cope JS, Ivie MA (2013) A checklist of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of Montana, USA, with distribution maps. Coleopt Bull 67:133–148.
- 37. Swaine JM, Hopping R (1928) Lepturini of America north of Mexico. Part I. National Museum of Canada Bulletin 52:1–97.
- 38. Michelsen A (1963) Observations on the sexual behaviour of some longicorn beetles, subfamily Lepturinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Behaviour 22:152–166.
- 39. Švácha P, Danilevsky M (1988) Cerambycoid larvae of Europe and Soviet Union (Coleoptera: Cerambycoidea). Part III. Acta Univ Carol Biol 32:1–205.
- 40. Davis A, Comstock JA (1924) Larva and pupa of Desmocerus californicus (Horn). Bull South Calif Acad Sci 23:179–180.
- 41. Burke HE (1921) Biological notes on Desmocerus, a genus of roundhead borers, the species of which infest various elders. J Econ Entomol 14:450–452.
- 42. Barr CB (1991) The distribution, habitat, and status of the valley elderberry longhorn beetle Desmocerus californicus dimorphus Fisher (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Sacramento. 134 p.
- 43. Graham EE, Mitchell RF, Reagel PF, Barbour JD, Millar JG, et al. (2010) Treating panel traps with a fluoropolymer enhances their efficiency in capturing cerambycid beetles. J Econ Entomol 103:641–647.
- 44. SAS Institute (2011) SAS/STAT 9.3 User's Guide. Cary: SAS Institute Inc. Available: http://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/stat/#stat93. Accessed 2014 September 1.
- 45. Sokal R, Rohlf F (1994) Biometry: The Principles and Practices of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd Edition. New York: WH Freeman. 880 p.
- 46. Mitchell RF, Millar JG, Hanks LM (2013) Blends of (R)-3-hydroxyhexan-2-one and alkan-2-ones identified as potential pheromones produced by three species of cerambycid beetles. Chemoecology 23:121–127.
- 47. Ray AM, Barbour JD, McElfresh JS, Moreira JA, Swift I, et al. (2012) 2,3-hexanediols as sex attractants and a female-produced sex pheromone for cerambycid beetles in the prionine genus Tragosoma. J Chem Ecol 38:1151–1158.
- 48. Tavakilian G (15 November 2013). Base de données Titan sur les Cerambycidés ou Longicornes. Available: http://lully.snv.jussieu.fr/titan/. Accessed 2014 September 1.
- 49. USFWS (2014) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; withdrawal of the proposed rule to remove the valley elderberry longhorn beetle from the federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife; proposed rule. Federal Register 79:55874–55917.
- 50. River Partners (2007) VELB habitat and colonization of remnant and planted elderberry along the Stanislaus and San Joaquin Rivers. Modesto. 89 p.
- 51. USFWS (1999) Conservation guidelines for the valley elderberry longhorn beetle. Sacramento. 15 p.
- 52. Bolli R (1994) Revision of the genus Sambucus. Berlin: J. Cramer. 254 p.