Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Natural Hybridization and Introgression between Ligularia cymbulifera and L. tongolensis (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) in Four Different Locations

  • Jiaojun Yu,

    Affiliations: Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, P. R. China, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P. R. China

  • Chiaki Kuroda,

    Affiliation: Department of Chemistry, Rikkyo University, Tokyo, Japan

  • Xun Gong

    gongxun@mail.kib.ac.cn

    Affiliation: Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, P. R. China

Natural Hybridization and Introgression between Ligularia cymbulifera and L. tongolensis (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) in Four Different Locations

  • Jiaojun Yu, 
  • Chiaki Kuroda, 
  • Xun Gong
PLOS
x

Abstract

Natural hybridization has been considered to represent an important factor influencing the high diversity of the genus Ligularia Cass. in the Hengduan Mountains, China. Natural hybridization has been confirmed to occur frequently in Ligularia. To date, however, it has been demonstrated only within a single population. In this paper, we present evidence of natural hybridization in Ligularia from four different locations. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA and three chloroplast intergenic spacers (trnK-rps16, trnL-rpl32 and trnQ-5'rps16) of 149 accessions of putative hybrids and their putative parents (L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis) were analyzed for evidence of hybridization. The ITS data clearly distinguished two putative parental species and sympatric L. vellerea and supported the hypothesis that those morphological intermediates were products of natural hybridization between L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis. Moreover, several identified morphological parents were actual introgressed products. Because of hybridization and introgression, chloroplast DNA sequences generated a poorly resolved network. The present results indicate that varying degrees of hybridization and introgression occur differently depending on the habitat context. We conclude that gene flow caused by natural hybridization in Ligularia indeed plays an important role in the species diversity.

Introduction

The importance of hybridization in plant speciation and evolution has been debated for decades, with opposing views of hybridization as either a creative evolutionary force or evolutionary noise [1][8]. Natural hybridization may occur at either the homoploid (i.e., between two species of the same ploidy) or the polyploid level, each with its attendant genetic and evolutionary consequences. The consequences of hybridization may include introgression affecting one or both taxa, the formation of hybrid (especially alloploid) species, or the development of reticulate patterns of evolution within a group [1], [5].

The genus Ligularia Cass. [9], [10] consists of approximately 120 species mainly distributed in eastern Asia, 112 species of which are known in China [10]. The majority of Ligularia distributed in the Hengduan Mountains region are endemic [9], [11]. The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (QTP), adjacent and closely related to the Hengduan Mountains region because of the collision between India and Eurasia, is one of the important alpine biodiversity hotspots. The mechanisms for plant diversification on the QTP include, e.g., allopatric speciation via geographic isolation, diploid hybridization and introgression, and allopolyploidy [12], [13]. The high species diversity of the genus Ligularia is considered to have arisen from rapid and continuous allopatric speciation in small and isolated populations, combined with interspecific diploid hybridization in the QTP and adjacent areas of eastern Asia [11], [14]. Natural hybrids have commonly been found in certain areas populated by Ligularia [11], [15], [16]. Ligularia × maoniushanensis X. Gong & Y. Z. Pan is the first natural hybrid reported as a result of comprehensive study [17]. Furthermore, based on an examination of the chemical similarities of L. lamarum (Diels) C. C. Chang and L. subspicata (Bureau & Franchet) Handel-Mazzetti, Saito et al. [18] presumed that the two species hybridize with other Ligularia species in certain populations. A study on natural hybridization between L. subspicata and L. vellerea (Franchet) Handel-Mazzetti confirmed this conjecture [16]. Yu et al. [15] studied a mixed location with 6 Ligularia species. Based on morphological and molecular data (cpDNA and ITS sequences, ISSR markers), bidirectional but asymmetric hybridization and introgression were detected between L. subspicata and L. nelumbifolia (Bureau & Franchet) Handel-Mazzetti. Hybridization is very common in Ligularia, with various forms and progenies. However, these instances were all found in a single plot, and there has been no natural hybridization reported from multiple sites to date.

Ligularia cymbulifera (W. W. Smith) Handel-Mazzetti and L. tongolensis (Franchet) Handel-Mazzetti belong to the series Lapathifolia S. W. Liu [19]. They are widely distributed in the Hengduan Mountains, are especially abundant near Zhongdian, Yunnan, and occupy a great variety of habitats ranging from 2000 to 4000 m in altitude. Morphological intermediates are often present where the two species are sympatrically distributed. In certain populations, a portion of the individuals are different from other, typical individuals of the species. These morphological intermediates and variant individuals are considered to be progenies of crosses between L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis based on their intermediate morphological traits and the partial overlap of the flowering period.

In the current study, the ITS region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA of all the sampled individuals was sequenced to determine the hybrid status of the morphological taxon. If hybridization was confirmed, we sequenced three chloroplast intergenic spacers (trnK-rps16, trnL-rpl32 and trnQ-5'rps16) for all collections to determine the relationship between these progenies and the two putative parents. In particular, we paid attention to the extent, direction and dynamics of introgression between the two species. In addition, we also took advantage of the existence of four independent hybrid zones to compare the outcome of hybridization in each zone and test the hypothesis that hybrid zones can evolve differently and / or result from independent hybridization processes.

Materials and Methods

Material collection and molecular methods

Four mixed-growing populations of Ligularia cymbulifera, L. tongolensis and their putative progenies were chosen for our study. Two other populations with only one species each (L. cymbulifera or L. tongolensis) were also chosen as references (Table S1 in S1 File, Figure S1 in S2 File). At the six locations, no specific permissions were required for scientific research. No endangered or protected species were involved at the sampling locations. Other Ligularia species found in these locations were collected to verify whether the genetic material of the putative hybrids had been contaminated by other materials. Plants were identified according to the diagnostic morphological characteristics according to Flora of China [10]. Briefly, sympatric L. vellerea differs from the putative parents and hybrids in terms of the raceme inflorescence and a densely long white lanate circle at the stem base. L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis mainly differ in the size and pubescence of the leaves, the capitula number of the inflorescence and the length of the peduncle (Table 1). Young leaves were collected and dried in silica gel in the field for DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the silica gel–dried leaf tissue using the cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide method [20] with minor modifications.

thumbnail
Table 1. Key morphological differences among Ligularia cymbulifera, L. tongolensis and putative hybrids.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.t001

The ITS region of the nuclear ribosomal DNA of all the sampled individuals was amplified using primers ITS4 and ITS5 [21]. PCR was conducted in a total reaction volume of 20 µL containing 10–30 ng template DNA, 2.0 µL 10× PCR buffer with (NH4)2SO4, 1.3 µL MgCl2 (25 mM), 0.5 µL dNTP (2.5 mM each), 0.3 mM each primer and 0.75 unit of Taq polymerase (Takara). The amplifications were performed as follows: 1 cycle, 94°C, 5 min; 30 cycles, 94°C, 45 sec; 55°C, 1 min; 72°C, 40 sec, followed by a final extension of 1 cycle, 72°C, 5 min. The PCR products were purified by electrophoresis through a 1.2% agarose gel, and then an E.Z.N.A. Gel Extraction Kit (Omega, Guangzhou, China) was used. All accessions were subjected to sequencing with amplification primers in an ABI 3700 DNA automated sequencer with the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, U.S.A.). The sequences were aligned and compared in SeqMan (DNASTAR, Beijing, China) [22]. Although direct sequencing was successful for most L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis, it produced chimeric or unreadable peaks in the chromatograms for the putative hybrids. Hence, cloning sequencing was performed subsequently for the putative hybrid. Purified PCR products were cloned into plasmids using the pUM-T vector system (Bioteke Corporation, Beijing, China). Four to 20 positive clones were selected for each amplification product and cultured to isolate plasmids. Positive clones with the correct size inserts were confirmed using colony PCR. The plasmids with correct inserts were sequenced using ITS4 and ITS5 primers.

Four cpDNA fragments were amplified using the following universal primers: trnL-rpL32, trnQ-5′rps16, and trnK-rps16 [23]. PCR was conducted in a reaction volume of 20 µL containing 10–30 ng template DNA, 2.0 µL 10× PCR buffer with (NH4)2SO4, 1.0 µL MgCl2 (25 mM), 1.0 µL dNTP (2.5 mM each), 0.3 mM each primer and 1.5 unit of Taq polymerase (Takara). The amplification conditions were as follows: 1 cycle, 94°C, 4 min; 30 cycles, 94°C, 45 sec; 53°C, 45 sec; 72°C, 1 min or 50 sec, followed by 1 cycle, 72°C, 7 min. PCR products were purified and then directly sequenced using the methods mentioned above. New DNA sequences were deposited in Genbank under accession numbers KM036217-KM036281.

Phylogenetic and network analysis

Minor variation (usually one or two nucleotide sites) between some clones may have resulted from PCR errors caused by Taq DNA polymerase. Putative PCR-mediated recombinants were excluded before further phylogenetic analysis. All sequences were aligned in Clustal X [24] complemented with PAUP 4.0. Information about variable sites was obtained using the program DnaSP 4.0 [25]. The aligned sequences were used to infer the phylogeny of the sampled individuals using the criterion of maximum parsimony, implemented in PAUP* version 4.0b [26]. Parsimony analyses were performed using a heuristic search with tree bisection and reconnection (TBR) branch swapping, the Multrees option, ACCTRAN optimization, and 1000 random addition replicates for the nuclear and chloroplast datasets. Sequences of three Ligularia species, L. lingiana, L. subspicata, and L. nelumbifolia, were downloaded from GenBank (accession numbers: JF767227-JF767229, JF767236, JF767237, JF767242, JF767272, JF767273, JF767276, JF767247, JF767248, JF767250) as outgroups in the parsimony analyses. The nrITS networks and chloroplast networks were constructed using the program TCS version 1.21 [27]. The parsimony probability was set at 95%; therefore, haplotypes related with a probability of parsimony of >95% would be connected, and those with a probability of <95% would be unlinked. The graph generated from TCS 1.21 was drawn with Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA, U.S.A.).

Results

nrDNA ITS4-5 analysis

The length of all the ITS sequences was 753 bp, with 49 variable sites. A total of 15 haplotypes were identified (Table S2 in S1 File). Ligularia vellerea, which appeared in the hybrid population, showing 18 specific variable sites (at position 96, 100, 174, 202, 208, 250, 263, 275, 295, 443, 447, 506, 542, 579, 585, 606, 630, 673), could be clearly distinguished from the putative parental species and hybrids (Hap 15) (Table S2 in S1 File).

All individuals in the two reference populations (Jiajinshan and Suochonghe) were homologous and independent, as no double peaks were present in the direct sequences. For one of the putative parental species, L. cymbulifera, ten collections from the reference population shared haplotype H1 and H3. Except for three collections from Desha, most L. cymbulifera (Pc, Xc and Lc) in the mixed-growing populations were pure and shared haplotype H1, which was also present in the reference population (Table 2). These three special L. cymbulifera were morphologically different from typical L. cymbulifera in the forms of their leaf base and inflorescence. Their direct sequences were similar to those of the putative hybrids and had double peaks at more than 10 sites. The cloned sequences showed that each of the three individuals shared two haplotypes, H4 and H8. Another putative parent, L. tongolensis, appeared more variable than L. cymbulifera. Except for the mixed population from Desha, several of the L. tongolensis collections in the other three populations were not as pure as expected. These conflicting individuals were cloned as well. For those pure individuals (no double peaks in direct sequences), L. tongolensis shared haplotype H8 in Desha, H9 in Xiaoxueshan, H10 in Pachahai, and H12 in the Jiajinshan reference population and the Jiawa mixed population (Table 2). All the putative natural hybrids exhibited more than 10 double peaks, and the cloned sequences (including those inconsistent individuals of putative pure parents) mainly included two sequence types; other haplotypes not included in the pure sequences may have resulted from PCR and plasmid amplification error. The putative hybrids shared the same copies with the putative parents L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis.

thumbnail
Table 2. Distribution of ITS4-5 haplotypes and three cpDNA haplotypes in 6 locations.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.t002

A strict consensus tree from the maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was generated to show the phylogenetic relationships (Fig. 1). The MP tree indicated that the haplotypes of putative parental species and putative hybrids formed two clusters (cluster A and B), respectively, and that sympatric L. vellerea formed a cluster with one of the outgroups, L. lingiana. In cluster A, H1 and H3 represent homologous individuals of L. cymbulifera that were detected in direct sequences in most locations (except for in Desha). Haplotypes H1–H7 were all detected in cloned sequences. In cluster B, H8–H10 and H12 represented homologous individuals of L. tongolensis that were detected in direct sequences. Haplotypes H8–H14 were all detected in cloned sequences. Among the cloned sequences (Table 2), each cloned individual possessed one haplotype that clustered with the sequences from each parental species haplotype (haplotypes). Hence, all the putative hybrid accessions are products of hybridization between L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis [28]. Thus, sympatric L. vellerea is apparently not involved in the hybridization between L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships of the nrITS4-5 haplotypes of L. cymbulifera, L. tongolensis, their putative hybrids and sympatric L. vellerea from south-western China (H1–H15) generated by PAUP.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.g001

The networks based on haplotypes identified from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) of L. cymbulifera, L. tongolensis, their putative hybrids and sympatric L. vellerea were generated to show their relationships (Fig. 2). Sympatric L. vellerea was a completely separate component of the ITS network. Except for the totally distinct part of L. vellerea (part C), the nrITS network resolved two major parts (part A and B, which correspond to cluster A and B in the phylogenetic tree of Fig. 1) that were correlated with the two putative parents (L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis) (Fig. 2). Because one ITS haplotype (H1) was shared in all the L. cymbulifera and most of the putative hybrids, it was the most common haplotype in the network. Part A of the network included not only the putative parental L. cymbulifera and hybrid clones but also several individuals of another putative parent, L. tongolensis. The results indicate that these individuals (X12 in Xiaoxueshan; Pt3, Pt4 and Pt7 in Pachahai; and Lt2 and Lt7 in Jiawa) of L. tongolensis were introgressed by L. cymbulifera. In part B of the network, the four mixed populations had a special haplotype. There were also three individuals (Dc1, Dc2 and Dc3) of L. cymbulifera having L. tongolensis clones, which indicates that L. cymbulifera were introgressed by L. tongolensis in Desha. In the Desha population, the number of L. tongolensis was much greater than that of L. cymbulifera, with nearly no typical L. cymbulifera to be found; in other populations, however, L. cymbulifera was very easy to recognize. Unlike the Desha population, in which individuals of L. tongolensis shared only one ITS haplotype (H8), L. tongolensis in other populations were heterogeneous. In the three mixed populations, individuals of L. tongolensis had different haplotypes for pure individuals; additionally, a portion of the actual introgressed individuals shared haplotypes with both L. tongolensis and L. cymbulifera. For putative hybrids, both the L. tongolensis and L. cymbulifera ITS types were found in cloned sequences.

thumbnail
Figure 2. TCS networks based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (nrITS) sequences.

Rectangular areas in the nrITS network represent nrITS haplotypes and circle areas represent haplotypes not detected. Blue and red characters represent sequences of pure individuals in reference and sympatric populations. Purple characters represent sequences of individuals possess introgressed sequences. (a) Population locality, J, Jiajinshan; Cd, Reference Daocheng; D, Desha; P, Pachahai; X, Xiaoxueshan; L, Jiawa; (b) taxa: v, L. vellerea; t, L. tongolensis; c, L. cymbulifera; h, putative hybrids. Numbers following taxon initials are sample numbers and clone numbers (if any). (TIFF)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.g002

Combined three cpDNA intergenic spacer regions analysis

The trnK-rps16, trnL-rpl32 and trnQ-5'rps16 spacers aligned sequences were 923, 928 and 978 bp, respectively. The combined length varied from 3523 to 3571 bp, containing a total of 20 variable sites (Table S3 in S1 File). Twenty-seven haplotypes (H1–H27) were identified among all collections (Table S3 in S1 File). Ligularia vellerea, which was sympatric with the hybrid populations (Xiaoxueshan and Pachahai) and already excluded from the possibility of participation in nuclear donors based on ITS, shared their special haplotypes H23-H27. Because chloroplast DNA is maternally inherited in Ligularia [29], the possibility of L. vellerea being a plastid donor was rejected. In contrast to the ITS4-5, each taxon in each population had more than two chloroplast haplotypes (Table 2).

The MP tree obtained from the four concatenated cpDNA regions is shown in Fig. 3. The tree indicates a poor phylogenetic relationship that differs from our expectations not only for sympatric L. vellerea but also for outgroups embedded in the haplotypes of the putative parental species and hybrids.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships of the cpDNA haplotypes of L. cymbulifera, L. tongolensis, their putative hybrids and sympatric L. vellerea from south-western China (H1–H27) generated with PAUP.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.g003

The networks based on haplotypes identified from three cpDNA intergenic spacer sequences of L. cymbulifera, L. tongolensis, their putative hybrids and sympatric L. vellerea were generated to show their relationships (Fig. 4). Sympatric L. vellerea occupied a separate portion, lacking common haplotypes with the other parts of the cpDNA network. The cpDNA network appeared more confused than the ITS network. Except for the part occupied by L. vellerea, a large loop covered most individuals of the putative parents and hybrids (Fig. 4). The most common haplotype (H7) existed in all the four mixed populations and in almost every taxon related to the hybrids. Because hybridization and introgression were ascertained based on ITS data, the poorly resolved cpDNA network was highly plausible.

thumbnail
Figure 4. TCS haplotype networks based on plastid non-coding regions.

Rectangular areas represent plastid haplotypes, and circle areas represent haplotypes not detected. Blue and red characters represent sequences of individuals in reference populations. (a) Population locality, J, Jiajinshan; cd, Reference Daocheng; D, Desha; P, Pachahai; X, Xiaoxueshan; L, Jiawa; (b) taxa: v, L. vellerea; t, L. tongolensis; c, L. cymbulifera; h, putative hybrids. Numbers following taxon initials are sample numbers.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.g004

Discussion

Probability of occurrence of natural hybrids

Gottlieb [30] proposed several features by which natural hybridization could be identified. These features included a geographical distribution in the region of parental sympatry, morphological intermediacy in several characteristics, partial fertility, biochemical additivity, and experimental synthesis of individuals resembling the hybrid. Although no single criterion can provide a clear answer in testing a hypothesis of hybridization, each criterion that is met provides a higher level of support for a hybrid origin. In fact, the morphological characters of hybrids are not always intermediate because of the effects, e.g., of dominance, epistasis, additivity, and linkage [31]. Nevertheless, intermediate characters remain the most important clue to natural hybridization in a field study.

L. tongolensis and L. cymbulifera are both widely distributed in southwestern and western Sichuan Province, northwestern Yunnan Province and southern Xizang Province [10]. They are abundant near Zhongdian, Yunnan, and occupy a great variety of habitats ranging from 2000 to 4000 m in altitude. L. cymbulifera prefer to grow in homogeneous habitats that are often humid, and L. tongolensis inhabit diverse habitats (X. Gong, personal observation). The putative hybrids between the putative parents were commonly found near Zhongdian, where the two species share a sympatric existence. The wintry highland climate requires species to evolve certain common adaptive mechanisms. Ligularia species often share the same pollinators in the highlands [32], [33]. L. vellerea, L. tongolensis and L. cymbulifera flower from July to August [9], [19]. According to our field observations, nectar-collecting insects had no species preference within Ligularia and shuttled frequently among flowers. This behavior was highly likely to transfer one species' pollen to another species' flowers. Because the three species have nearly the same peak flowering times, it is difficult to reject any of them as possible participants in interspecific hybridization.

Based on data of ITS4-5 and three cpDNA, L. vellerea was absolutely uninvolved in natural hybridization in these mixed populations. The ITS network definitely supports the hypothesis that the morphologically intermediate individuals are the products of hybridization between L. tongolensis and L. cymbulifera.

Diversity of natural hybridization

Because chloroplast DNA is maternally inherited in Ligularia [29], we expected that the cpDNA sequences could determine the direction of natural hybridization between L. tongolensis and L. cymbulifera. Yu et al. [15] studied natural hybridization between Ligularia subspicata and L. nelumbifolia in a mixed location where the directions support the prediction that the minority species usually acts as the maternal parent. Zhou et al. [34] argued for the opposite opinion based on three different hybridizing taxa. Here, we anticipated that the four different mixed locations would verify the hybrid direction.

In Pachahai and Jiawa, the numbers of Ligularia cymbulifera and L. tongolensis were almost the same (L. vellerea were not involved in hybridization, although they were sympatric). Morphological classifications were mostly in accordance with molecular results except for three individuals (Pachahai) and two individuals (Jiawa) of L. tongolensis, which proved to be introgressed individuals. In Pachahai, four hybrids shared a cpDNA haplotype (H12) with pure L. cymbulifera, and six other hybrids shared a common haplotype (H7) with both pure parents. In Jiawa, half of the ten hybrids shared a cpDNA haplotype (H4) with both pure parents, and another four hybrids showed three particular haplotypes that were not detected elsewhere. It is certain only that L. cymbulifera acted as a chloroplast donor (Pachahai). The complementary direction may exist but was not detected because of hybridization and introgression.

In Desha, the exceptional case in our field research, it was extremely difficult to identify typical L. cymbulifera, and almost all the collections were L. tongolensis and putative hybrids. Only the three L. cymbulifera-like collections actually proved to be introgressed products. One hybrid and two L. cymbulifera-like collections shared a cpDNA haplotype (H2) with most of the reference L. cymbulifera in Suochonghe, which was not too far from Desha; nine hybrids shared a haplotype (H4) with one pure L. tongolensis. We can infer that hybridization was initially bidirectional but occurred predominantly in the form of L. tongolensis ♀ × L. cymbulifera ♂. The hybridization and introgression may continue for a long time, so the actual process cannot be determined with existing methods.

In Xiaoxueshan, although L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis were almost equally represented (L. vellerea were not involved in hybridization, although sympatric), the site was previously dominated by fir and was destroyed by a fire during the 1980s. In the network, this near equality was unique to Xiaoxueshan. Except for three individuals of L. cymbulifera that shared the most common haplotype (H7), other collections at this site revealed population-specific haplotypes. Most L. tongolensis shared haplotype H21, and most hybrids shared haplotype H18, which was the closest to H21 in the network. Most likely, the chloroplast donor at the initial instance of hybridization was L. tongolensis.

In summary, natural hybridization and also introgression between sympatric L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis occurred in multiple places and diverse forms. However, the direction of hybridization is not simply correlated with the number of parent individuals. Many factors, such as differences in flowering times, floral organs, pollen tube germination on different stigmas, and the ratio of mature individuals, may codetermine the direction of hybridization.

Effects on putative parents

Continuous hybridization may affect the independence of the parental taxa, even resulting in reticulate evolution. For the parental species L. cymbulifera, morphological identifications were generally in accordance with the molecular results, except for Desha, which had introgressed individuals. For L. tongolensis, except in Desha, another three mixed locations had a portion of introgressed individuals. Based on ITS data, all the morphological and pure L. cymbulifera had low ITS sequence biodiversity, and L. tongolensis had relatively high ITS sequence variability. The results were consistent with the results of a study of chemical and atpB-rbcL data for 19 individuals of L. tongolensis and 13 individuals of L. cymbulifera from different plots [35].

With respect to the three cpDNA sequences, the network was disordered and unintelligible. Part of our previous study on the barcode Ligularia indicated that L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis had identical sequences for three optional sequences (matK, rbcL, psbA-trnH) (GenBank accession numbers: JF954335-JF954341, JF954362-JF954365, JF942246-JF942252, JF942273-JF942276, JN045182-JN045188, JN045209-JN045212). Therefore, three other fragments were selected in the present study. The trnK-rps16, trnL-rpl32 and trnQ-5'rps16 spacers were known to be more variable than the other chloroplast regions [23]. This also occurred in L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis. However, the three spacers still generated a problematic network. There are several reasons for the difficulty in clarifying the phylogeny: (A) convergent mutations may have caused the same haplotype to arise independently in different species; (B) shared haplotypes may have been inherited from a polymorphic common ancestor due to incomplete lineage sorting; and (C) one species may share haplotypes with another species via introgressive hybridization within a framework of stable species ranges, perhaps assisted by selection. The genus Ligularia has been estimated to have occurred primarily within the last 20 million years, and interspecific diploid hybridization has played a role in the species diversity of this genus [11]. The three spacers we selected may vary significantly in a relatively short evolutionary time period and could not give the expected reliable phylogeny. As is known, convergence is intrinsically unlikely at neutral loci, and if it did occur, it would be expected to yield symmetric allele sharing between the putative parents L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis. However, based on a study by Hanai et al. [35], no haplotypes are shared between L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis in different populations. Our ITS data in allopatric reference populations also confirmed this pattern. Accordingly, the explanations of convergent mutations (A) and incomplete lineage sorting (B) can be excluded in the present study. In addition, our ITS data do show that natural hybridization and introgression occurred between sympatric L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis.

Species distinctiveness is maintained if hybrids are selected by extrinsic and intrinsic selection despite continuous gene flow [36]. In the present study, the putative parents remained distinct from each other, but the genetic diversity increased, e.g., L. tongolensis in Pachahai and Jiawa. The diverse hybrid individuals may adapt to more niches and form new taxa, as is the case for hybridization in sunflowers [37]. The data show that hybridization does occur in Ligularia, but more credible measures, such as SSR, spot investigation, and artificial hybrid experiments, would help provide a better understanding of the way in which hybridization occurred and affected species evolution.

Conclusions

Hybridization is very frequent in Ligularia, appearing between different species, series and subgenera. In this case, the direct and cloned ITS sequences and the three chloroplast regions of the individuals in four populations confirmed that hybridization occurs between L. cymbulifera and L. tongolensis, and this phenomenon was demonstrated simultaneously in several locations separated by long distances. Although gene flow is common in Ligularia, most species maintain their independence. Because of the lack of study of reproductive isolation in Ligularia and selection on hybrid descendants, the impact of natural hybridization on the evolution and speciation of Ligularia is still not clear. Future work should focus on comparing the fitness of hybrids and their parental species and on considering the effect of natural hybridization.

Supporting Information

S1 File.

Table S1, Sample locations for 4 sympatric locations and 2 reference Ligularia populations. Table S2, Variable sites from the aligned sequences (both direct sequencing and cloned sequencing) of ITS4-5 in the 15 haplotypes (H1-H15) of all the collections. Table S3, Variable sites from the aligned sequences of the three chloroplast DNA spaces in the 22 haplotypes (H1-H22) of all the collections.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.s001

(DOCX)

S2 File.

Figure of sample locations for the four mixed populations (dotted area) and two reference populations (triangular area) of Ligularia from south-western China.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0115167.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge two anonymous reviewers for useful comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: XG. Performed the experiments: JY. Analyzed the data: JY. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: JY CK XG. Wrote the paper: JY CK XG.

References

  1. 1. Arnold ML (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. 2. Rieseberg LH (1997) Hybrid origins of plant species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:359–389. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.359
  3. 3. Rieseberg LH, Baird SJE, Gardner KA (2000) Hybridization, introgression, and linkage evolution. Plant Mol Biol 42:205–224. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-4221-2_11
  4. 4. Abbott RJ, Ritchie MG, Hollingsworth PM (2008) Speciation in plants and animals: pattern and process. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363:2965–2969. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0096
  5. 5. Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2009) The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:561–588. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092039
  6. 6. Abbott RJ, Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ, Brennan AC (2010) Homoploid hybrid speciation in action. Taxon 59:1375–1386.
  7. 7. Chase MW, Paun O, Fay MF (2010) Hybridization and speciation in angiosperms: a role for pollinator shifts? BMC Biol 8:45. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-45
  8. 8. Abbott R, Albach D, Ansell S, Arntzen JW, Baird SJE, et al. (2013) Hybridization and speciation. J Evol Biol 26:229–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02599.x
  9. 9. Liu SW, Deng DS, Liu JQ (1994) Origin, evolution and distribution of Ligularia Cass.(Compositae). Acta Phytotaxon Sin 32:514–525.
  10. 10. Liu SW, Illarionova ID (2011) Ligularia. In: Wu ZY, Raven PH, Hong DYeditors. Flora of China. Beijing: Science Press & St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press. pp. 371–544.
  11. 11. Liu JQ, Wang YJ, Wang AL, Hideaki O, Abbott RJ (2006) Radiation and diversification within the Ligularia-Cremanthodium-Parasenecio complex (Asteraceae) triggered by uplift of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Mol Phylogen Evol 38:31–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.09.010
  12. 12. Wen J, Zhang JQ, Nie ZL, Zhong Y, Sun H (2014) Evolutionary diversifications of plants on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Frontiers in genetics 5:4. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00004
  13. 13. Liu JQ, Duan YW, Hao G, Ge XJ, Sun H (2014) Evolutionary history and underlying adaptation of alpine plants on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. J Syst Evol 52:241–249. doi: 10.1111/jse.12094
  14. 14. Liu JQ (2004) Uniformity of karyotypes in Ligularia (Asteraceae: Senecioneae), a highly diversified genus of the eastern Qinghai–Tibet Plateau highlands and adjacent areas. Bot J Linn Soc 144:329–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2003.00225.x
  15. 15. Yu JJ, Kuroda C, Gong X (2011) Natural hybridization and introgression in sympatric Ligularia species (Asteraceae, Senecioneae). J Syst Evol 49:438–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00150.x
  16. 16. Yu JJ, Pan L, Pan YZ, Gong X (2014) Natural hybrids between Ligularia vellerea and L. subspicata (Asteraceae: Senecioneae). Plant biodiversity and resources 36:219–226.
  17. 17. Pan YZ, Shi SH, Gong X, Kuroda C (2008) A Natural Hybrid Between Ligularia paradoxa and L. duciformis (Asteraceae, Senecioneae) From Yunnan, China. Ann Mo Bot Gard 95:487–494. doi: 10.3417/2006034
  18. 18. Saito Y, Hattori M, Iwamoto Y, Takashima Y, Mihara K, et al. (2011) Overlapping chemical and genetic diversity in Ligularia lamarum and Ligularia subspicata. Isolation of ten new eremophilanes and a new seco-bakkane compound. Tetrahedron 67:2220–2231. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2011.01.082
  19. 19. Liu SW (1989) Compositae-Senecioneae. In: Ling Y, Liu SWeditors. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Beijing: Science Press. pp. 4–115.
  20. 20. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin 19:11–15.
  21. 21. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJeditors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. New York: Academic Press. pp. 315–322.
  22. 22. Burland TG (1999) DNASTAR's Lasergene sequence analysis software. Methods Mol Biol 132:71–91. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-192-2:71
  23. 23. Shaw J, Lickey EB, Schilling EE, Small RL (2007) Comparison of whole chloroplast genome sequences to choose noncoding regions for phylogenetic studies in angiosperms: the tortoise and the hare III. Am J Bot 94:275. doi: 10.3732/ajb.94.3.275
  24. 24. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
  25. 25. Rozas J, Sanchez-DelBarrio JC, Messeguer X, Rozas R (2003) DnaSP, DNA polymorphism analyses by the coalescent and other methods. Bioinformatics 19:2496–2497. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg359
  26. 26. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony, version 4.0 b10. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  27. 27. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
  28. 28. Koch MA, Dobes C, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Multiple hybrid formation in natural populations: concerted evolution of the internal transcribed spacer of nuclear ribosomal DNA (ITS) in North American Arabis divaricarpa (Brassicaceae). Mol Biol Evol 20:338–350. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg046
  29. 29. Zhang Q, Liu Y. Sodmergen (2003) Examination of the cytoplasmic DNA in male reproductive cells to determine the potential for cytoplasmic inheritance in 295 angiosperm species. Plant Cell Physiol 44:941–951. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcg121
  30. 30. Gottlieb LD (1972) Levels of confidence in the analysis of hybridization in plants. Ann Mo Bot Gard 59:435–446.
  31. 31. Barton NH (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10:551–568. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x
  32. 32. Liu ZJ (2002) Life history strategies of Ligularia virgaurea, an advantage toxic forb in degradative rangland of alpine meadow [Doctor Degree]. Lanzhou,China: Lanzhou University.
  33. 33. Cao Y, Ma RJ, Wang GX (2008) The breeding system of three species of genus Ligularia in the east of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Guihaia 28:302–306.
  34. 34. Zhou RC, Gong X, Boufford D, Wu CI, Shi SH (2008) Testing a hypothesis of unidirectional hybridization in plants: Observations on Sonneratia, Bruguiera and Ligularia. BMC Evol Biol 48:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-149
  35. 35. Hanai R, Gong X, Tori M, Kondo S, Otose K, et al. (2005) Chemical and genetic study of Ligularia tongolensis, Ligularia cymbulifera, and Ligularia atroviolacea in the Hengduan Mountains of China. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 78:1302–1308. doi: 10.1246/bcsj.78.1302
  36. 36. Brennan AC, Bridle JR, Wang A, Hiscock SJ, Abbott RJ (2009) Adaptation and selection in the Senecio (Asteraceae) hybrid zone on Mount Etna, Sicily. New Phytol 183:702–717. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02944.x
  37. 37. Rieseberg LH, Raymond O, Rosenthal DM, Lai Z, Livingstone K, et al. (2003) Major Ecological Transitions in Wild Sunflowers Facilitated by Hybridization. Science 301:1211–1216. doi: 10.1126/science.1086949