Figures
Abstract
Background
Cysteine biology is important for the chemosensitivity of cancer cells. Our research has focused on the epigenetic silencing of cysteine dioxygenase type 1 (CDO1) in colorectal cancer (CRC). In this study, we describe detection of CDO1 methylation in the plasma of CRC patients using methylation specific PCR (Q-MSP) and extensive analysis of the PCR reaction.
Methods
DNA was extracted from plasma, and analysed for methylation of the CDO1 gene using Q-MSP. The detection rate of CDO1 gene methylation was calculated and compared with that of diluted DNA extracted from “positive control” DLD1 cells. CDO1 gene methylation in the plasma of 40 CRC patients that were clinicopathologically analysed was then determined.
Results
(1) The cloned sequence analysis detected 93.3% methylation of the promoter CpG islands of the CDO1 gene of positive control DLD1 cells and 4.7% methylation of the negative control HepG2 CDO1 gene. (2) DLD1 CDO1 DNA could not be detected in this assay if the extracted DNA was diluted ∼1000 fold. The more DNA that was used for the PCR reaction, the more effectively it was amplified in Q-MSP. (3) By increasing the amount of DNA used, methylated CDO1 could be clearly detected in the plasma of 8 (20%) of the CRC patients. However, the percentage of CRC patients detected by methylated CDO1 in plasma was lower than that detected by CEA (35.9%) or CA19-9 (23.1%) in preoperative serum. Combination of CEA/CA19-9 plus plasma methylated CDO1 could increase the rate of detection of curable CRC patients (39.3%) as compared to CEA/CA19-9 (25%).
Conclusion
We have described detection of CDO1 methylation in the plasma of CRC patients. Although CDO1 methylation was not detected as frequently as conventional tumor markers, analysis of plasma CDO1 methylation in combination with CEA/CA19-9 levels increases the detection rate of curable CRC patients.
Citation: Yamashita K, Waraya M, Kim MS, Sidransky D, Katada N, Sato T, et al. (2014) Detection of Methylated CDO1 in Plasma of Colorectal Cancer; A PCR Study. PLoS ONE 9(12): e113546. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113546
Editor: Diego Calvisi, University of Medicine, Greifswald, Germany
Received: June 7, 2014; Accepted: October 25, 2014; Published: December 3, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Yamashita et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Cytosine DNA methylation of the promoter region of tumor suppressor genes is a common cancer phenomenon [1], [2], and could provide good candidate biomarkers for detection of minimal residual disease using methylation specific PCR amplification [3], [4]. DNA methylation alterations differ from genomic alterations such as mutations in that methylation abnormalities occur frequently enough for application to clinical diagnosis [5]. For example, we have identified N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor type 2A (NMDAR2A) [6], deafness, autosomal dominant 5 (DFNA5) [7], Oncostatin M receptor-β (OSMR) [8], and cysteine dioxygenase 1 (CDO1) [9] as cancer-prone frequently methylated genes in colorectal cancer (CRC) by using pharmacological unmasking microarrays [1], [2]. Of these genes, the cancer-prone genes that was most frequently methylated in primary CRC was CDO1 [9].
Cysteine biology has recently gained attention in terms of tumor biology because it involves reactive oxygen (ROS) production and influences the chemosensitivity of cancer cells through the CD44-xCT (cancer stem cell marker-cysteine transporter) axis [10], [11]. CDO1 affects cytosine metabolism, resulting in the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the reduction of cell viability and growth [12], [13]. Hence, CDO1 is believed to be a critical tumor suppressor gene, and could be a marker of the chemo-resistance of cancer cells.
Since DNA methylation was first detected in the plasma of esophageal cancer patients [14], methylated DNA has been repeatedly found in the plasma of various cancers including CRC [15]. SEPT9 promoter was considered to be the most promising tumor marker, because 69% of the primary CRC tissues were positive for this methylation, whereas it was not detected in 86% of the controls. Further validation studies proved that a plasma SEPT9 methylation assay could detect CRC with high sensitivity [16], [17].
In the present study, we addressed the outstanding CDO1 hypermethylation that was observed in primary CRC tissues: 91% of the tumor tissues were positive for CDO1 methylation, whereas it was not detected in 93% of the controls [9]. We describe detection of CDO1 methylation in the plasma of CRC patients and extensive analysis of the PCR reaction.
Methods
Cell lines and plasma samples
The CRC cell line DLD1 was kindly provided by the Cell Resource Centre for Biomedical Research, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University (Sendai, Japan). The hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2 was purchased from the RIKEN BioResource Centre (Ibaraki, Japan). DLD1 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Carlsbad, CA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). HepG2 cells were grown in DMEM medium (GIBCO), supplemented with 10% FBS.
Plasma from 20 (for the preliminary study) and 40 (for the validation study) patients with primary CRC was collected before the patients underwent surgical resection at the Kitasato University Hospital from September 1, 2009 to June 30, 2011. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kitasato University. Participants provided their written informed consent to participation in this study prior to surgery.
CRC stage was categorized according to the TNM classification, 7th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the 7th edition of the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Cancer (JCCC) staging system. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.
DNA extraction
Free floating circulating DNA was extracted from plasma using the MagNA Pure Compact Nucleic Acid Isolation kit I (Roche Applied Science, Mannhein, Germany) and a Roche MagNA Pure device. Plasma (400 µL: small amounts, and 1 to 2.5 ml: large amounts) were distributed in MagNA Pure wells and were, extracted following the kit protocol. Genomic DNA was eluted in 100 uL aliquots. And genomic DNA from cell lines was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN Sciences, Hilden).
Bisulfite Treatment of DNA and Sequencing Analysis
For DNA denaturing, DNA extracted from the plasma of CRC patients (final volume 100 µL) or 2 µg of genomic DNA obtained from cell lines, were incubated with 5 µg of salmon sperm DNA in 0.3 mol/l NaOH for 20 min at 50°C. The DNA sample was then diluted with 500 µl of 2.5 mol/l sodium metabisulfite (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO)/125 mmol/l hydroquinone (Sigma)/0.4 mol/l sodium hydroxide solution, and placed at 70°C for 1.5 hours. The sample was subsequently applied to a column (Wizard DNA Clean-UP System, Promega Inc., Madison, WI), incubated with 0.3 mol/l NaOH for 10 min, and then treated with 3 mol/l ammonium acetate for 5 min. The sample was precipitated in 100% ethanol, and the DNA was resuspended in 25 or 50 µl of LoTE composed of 10 µM Tris-HCl, pH 8 and 2.5 µM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), pH 8. The DNA from cell lines was subsequently amplified using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Bisulfite treatment results in the chemical modification of unmethylated, but not methylated, cytosines to uracils, allowing the distinction between methylated and unmethylated genomic DNA. Primer sequences for the genes of interest were designed to recognize these DNA alterations (Table S1). The primer products were sequenced using a Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).
For analysis of the cloned sequences, the PCR products were inserted into the pCR4-TOPO vector using a TOPO TA cloning kit for sequencing (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Ten clones were selected for each sample, which were then sequenced using semi-nested primers (Table S1).
Quantitative-Methylation-specific PCR (Q-MSP)
TaqMan methylation specific PCR (Q-MSP) was carried out in triplicate using the iQ Supermix (Bio-Rad), and the iCycler iQ Real-Time PCR Detection system (Bio-Rad). PCR conditions and the primer sequences are provided in Table S1. Serial dilutions of bisulfite modified DNA from DLD1 were used as the methylation positive control to construct a calibration curve on each plate, and modified DNA from HepG2 cells was used as negative control.
Statistical Analysis
Categorical variables were evaluated by Fisher's exact test. Survival was calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analyses of prognostic factors for progression free survival (PFS) were performed using the log-rank method. PFS was defined as time from surgery to progression (recurrence or R1/2 operation) or deaths from any causes, and data on surviving patients were censored at the last follow-up. The median follow-up was 46 months (range: 0–55 months).
Results
Promoter DNA hypermethylation of the CDO1 gene by analysis of cloned sequence from human cancer cell lines for establishment of positive and negative controls for quantitative methylation analysis
Although CDO1 is clearly hypermethylated in cancer cell lines [9], the degree of CDO1 promoter hypermethylation of cloned CDO1 promoter sequences has not been determined. Using bisulfite treatment of DNA followed by sequence analysis, we analyzed the methylation level of the CDO1 promoter sequence cloned from PCR amplified genomic DNA of DLD1 (methylation positive) and HepG2 (methylation negative) cells. This assay indicated methylation of 93% and 4.7% of the CpG sites of the CDO1 promoter region in DLD1 and HepG2 cells, respectively (Fig. 1a). We therefore considered that DLD1 and HepG2 cell lines were appropriate for use as positive and negative controls, respectively, for CDO1 methylation analysis.
(a) Sequence analysis of the cloned CDO1 promoter. The frequency of methylated CpG islands in the cloned CDO1 promoter from the positive control, DLD1 cells, and the negative control, HepG2 cells. (b) Q-MSP efficacy for PCR amplification of CDO1 and β-actin was excellent. (c) Sensitivity of CDO1 methylation detection using Q-MSP was assayed using 2-fold dilutions (from 100 to 3.125 ng/PCR) of cloned CDO1 promoters from DLD1 and HepG2 cells. (d) Q-MSP of CDO1 methylation in in DLD1 cells using 10-fold dilutions (100, 10, 1, 0.1, and 0.01 ng/PCR) of the cloned CDO1 promoter. A concentration as low as 1 ng/PCR reaction of the positive control DLD1 cell DNA can be clearly detected. However, DNA at 1000 fold dilution (0.1 ng/PCR) can be barely be detected. Note that detection is less sensitive when lower amounts of DNA are applied.
Q-MSP of the methylated CpG sites of CDO1 gene clearly amplified a specific signal in the positive control, DLD1, but not in the negative control, HepG2
We next quantified methylated CDO1 after bisulfite DNA treatment using Q-MSP with the same set of primers and probe that was previously reported [9]. Using this method, amplified signals could be clearly identified. The efficacy of PCR amplification of methylated CDO1 was excellent and was found to be comparable with β-actin amplification efficacy (Fig. 1b). Q-MSP of CDO1 methyaltion indicated that methylation could be clearly detected when the DNA template from DLD1 cells was used at concentrations of 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, and 3.125 ng/PCR reaction, whereas no methylation at all could be detected in negative control HepG2 DNA templates (Fig. 1c). We used fluorescence of 0.35 as the threshold line in this assay, because the negative control is always below this threshold. When the DNA template was further diluted concentrations of 100, 10, 1, 0.1, and 0.01 ng/PCR reaction were analyzed, Q-MSP of CDO1 DNA from DLD1 detected methylation in PCR reactions using 100, 10, or 1 ng/reaction, whereas it could barely detect methylation in PCR reactions using 0.1 or 0.01 ng/reaction. No methylation was detected at any concentration of DNA in reactions using the HepG2 negative control DNA (Fig. 1d). These findings suggested that even dense CDO1 methylation such as that found in DLD1 cells can barely be detected using Q-MSP when the DNA is diluted about 1000 fold, and that detection is less sensitive when less DNA is applied. Therefore, in order to detect minimally residual disease of cancer in body fluids, it would be better to be able to use a higher volume of DNA than that usually used for quantitative analysis of DNA methylation.
Detection of methylation of the CpG island sequence of the CDO1 gene in the plasma of CRC patients by Q-MSP using a low amount of template DNA
We then examined the sensitivity of detection of CDO1 methylated DNA in the plasma of 20 CRC patients. In this preliminary experiment, we extracted DNA from 400 µl of CRC patients plasma. Half of the extracted DNA was applied to triplicate assays of both CDO1 and β-actin. Thus the plasma volume for each individual assay was 33.3 µl, which designated as 1 template volume. CDO1 methylation was detected in only 2 (10%) of the 20 CRC patients, while β-actin methylation was detected in all samples (Fig. 2). Fig. 2a shows a CDO1 positive cases; methylation of CDO1-3 was clearly detected, but that of CDO1-1 and CDO1-2 was marginal, because the signals were below threshold. However, this level of methylation may be valid, as PCR of 1/1000 dilution of the positive control exhibited a similar signal (Fig. 1d). In contrast, CDO1 negative cases never exhibited any signal at all of amplified CDO1 methylation (Fig. 2b). For these experiments, the amounts of DNA extracted from the initial 400 µl of plasma averaged 435 ng, ranging from 160 ng to 2000 ng. Therefore the amount of DNA applied to 1 PCR reaction corresponded to at least 16.7 (1/6) ng/reaction. This amount of DNA is thought to be sufficient for Q-MSP, if methylated alleles are included (see Fig. 1c). However, the Ct value for β-actin ranged from 34 to 38, which was totally different to that obtained when performing Q-PCR of cell lines, in which the usual Ct value of β-actin is around 28. This result suggested that detection of plasma DNA was less sensitive than that of DNA from cell lines, likely due to DNA degradation or other unknown reasons. Sufficient DNA for the PCR reaction was present only in 1 of 26 (64 fold) to 210 (1024 fold). This meant that the initial plasma volume used for DNA extraction should ideally be increased 100 to 1000 fold (i.e. to 4–40 ml plasma) for assay of plasma DNA using Q-MSP. Therefore, to obtain enough plasma DNA to detect minimal residual disease, more DNA than that used in this preliminary study would be needed. Thus our initial preliminary study had not used optimal conditions for detection of CDO1 methylation in plasma.
(a) A representative positive case was shown. The β-actin gene was assayed as an internal control for bisulfite treated DNA. Even for this positive case, detection of methylated CDO1 is not stable, because all the templates did not overcome the threshold level. (b) A representative negative case is shown. Note that the β-actin level is lower than expected.
Detection of the methylated CpG island sequence of the CDO1 gene by Q-MSP using increased amounts of DNA from the plasma of CRC patients
We then examined DNA extracted from the equivalent of 3 template volumes for detection of CDO1 methylation in the plasma of the 20 CRC patients. This assay detected 4 cases (20%) that were positive for methylation of CDO1 in plasma. Moreover clearer signals were obtained than when one template volume was used, indicating that the sensitivity of the assay may be greatly augmented by increasing the amount of the plasma-derived DNA (Fig. 3).
(a) E-1-69 (b) E-2-10 (c) E-2-31 (d) E-2-32 that were positive for methylation of CDO1 in plasma when the template DNA was extracted from a higher volume of plasma.
We then examined 40 independent CRC cases by Q-MSP using DNA extracted from a larger volume of plasma (1.0 to 2.5 ml plasma corresponding to 5 to 12.5 template volumes based on our initial template volume definition). The average amount of DNA extracted DNA was 1491 ng, (ranging from 580 ng to 2590 ng). This assay detected clear CDO1 methylation in 8 the 40 CRC cases (20%). Clear methylation was detected in 1 of 6 (16.7%), 2 of 10 (20.0%), 1 of 13 (7.7%), and 4 of 11 (36.4%) of stage I, II, III, and IV CRC cases, respectively (Fig. 4a). The higher the stage, the higher the methylation level that was detected (Fig. 4b). Patients' backgrounds are shown in Table 1. Although CDO1 methylation is more frequently found in CRC patients with distant metastasis, the prognosis of patients with methylated CDO1 in plasma was not significantly worse than patients in which no methylated CDO1 was detected in plasma (Fig. 4c). Below threshold signal corresponded to 1/1000 dilution of the positive control (Fig. 4d). If such a marginal below threshold signal of CDO1 methylation was included as a positive signal, then methylation was detected in all 40 of the CRC patients.
(a) Q-MSP analysis of methylated CDO1 using a high amount of plasma-derived DNA of CRC patients at differential stages. (b) Representative positive cases are shown according to stage. A picture of colon fiber in the primary cancer is included in each figure. (c) Survival curve of CRC patients according to methylated CDO1 levels in the plasma. (d) Representative cases showing marginal positive case are shown.
Combination of methylated CDO1 with increased serum CEA/CA19-9 for detection of curable stage I to III colorectal cancer
Of the above 40 patients, 39 were informative regarding the preoperative value of serum CEA and CA19-9. CEA was positive (>5.0 ng/ml) in 14 of these 39 patients (35.9%), while CA19-9 was positive (>37.0 IU/ml) in 9 of these 39 patients (23.1%). The rate of detection of CRC according to stage was calculated with respect to CEA, CA19-9, the CEA/CA19-9 combination, or the CEA/CA19-9/plasma CDO1 methylation combination (Fig. 5a). The rate of detection of stage IV CRC by CEA, CA19-9, or CEA/CA19-9 was high. However combining plasma CDO1 methylation data with CEA/CA19-9 did not increase the detection rates. On the other hand, CDO1 increase the detection rates of Stage I, II, and III CRC, which are regarded as curable (Fig. 5a). Although only 21% of such curable patients could be detected based on CEA levels, CDO1 combination increased the detection rate of such curable patients to 39.3% (Fig. 5b).
(a) CRC detection rate of CEA, CA19-9, combination of CEA/CA19-9, and combination of CEA/CA19-9/plasma CDO1 methylation according to CRC stage. (*) indicates p<0.01. (**) indicates p<0.05. (b) Curable CRC (stage I to III) detection rate was increased by combining plasma CDO1 methylation data.
Discussion
Since it was discovered that cancer-specific alterations in blood can be detected in cancer patients, numerous tumor markers have been developed for clinical application. In CRC, serum CEA and CA19-9 are well recognized as such useful markers [18], [19]. Since high values of serum CEA and CA19-9 are frequently detected in stage IV colorectal cancer, these markers are useful for the prediction of prognosis or for case of early detection of recurrence in the outpatient center [18]. Because these markers can sometimes detect recurrence earlier than diagnostic imaging such as CT or echo, they are indispensable for physicians who treat CRC as a clinical tool. On the other hand, unfortunately these markers are not sufficient to detect cancer when applied to the detection of curable CRC. The pre-operative CRC detection rates of CEA and CA19-9 are about 30∼50% or Stage I CRC and 10∼20% for stage III CRC [20]. If a novel tumor marker in blood could be used in combination with such classical tumor markers, this would increase the detection rate of curable CRC and these markers would show promise for the purpose of screening CRC in medical examination [21].
Alterations that are to be used as tumor markers must be cancer specific. The methylation of the CDO1 promoter region that was assayed in the current study was originally identified by robust screening of a pharmacological unmasking microarray that was carried out to explore cancer-prone methylation[1], [2], [9]. By using such an array we have identified numerous novel genes with cancer-prone methylation. NMDAR2A [6], DFNA5 [7], OSMR [8], and CDO1 [9]. Of these genes, CDO1 stood out with regard to sensitivity and specificity for the differential detection of CRC from the corresponding normal mucosa. Similar CDO1 methylation traits were confirmed in various other cancers such as breast, esophageal, lung, bladder, and gastric cancer. Because such cancer-prone methylation is rare, analysis of CDO1 methylation has great clinical potential for detection of minimal residual disease in human body fluids such as blood.
SEPT9 is considered to be the first molecule in which frequent methylation was successfully detected in the plasma of CRC patients by using real time PCR [16], [17]. The detection rate of methylated SEPT9 in the plasma of curable CRC patients with Stage I to III is remarkably high, being over 60% [22]. Intriguingly, such a high detection rate of a methylated DNA in the plasma of patients with curable CRC was also shown by using another method. Thus, by using the methyl BEAMing method, Li et al. demonstrated that plasma methylated Vimentin could be detected in the about 40–60% of curable CRC at stage I to III, and that the sensitivity of detection was higher than that of the serum value of CEA [21]. Based on these results, analysis of methylated DNA is a very promising candidate tool for blood diagnosis of cancer, and plasma CDO1 methylation that was the focus of this study considered as one such candidate DNA. Cancer specificity and sensitivity of CDO1 methyaltion was proven to be equal to those of either SEPT9 or Vimentin methylation in CRC, where the AUC of the ROC curve to differentiate cancer tissues from the corresponding normal mucosa was 0.96 [9].
In contrast to these promising reports, there have been some disappointing reports with regard to the detection rates of methylated genes in plasma [14]. The detection rate of methylated CDO1 in plasma is a disappointing 20% of the total CRC patients assayed, and is about 35% in stage IV CRC. In our current study, we made DNA templates of the CDO1 promoter of DLD1 cells, positive control for CDO1 methylation, diluted the DNA up to 100,000 fold, and compared the CDO1 methylation detection level of different dilutions. This assay showed that the smaller the amount of DNA template that is applied, the poorer is the efficacy of PCR detection. Allowing for -actin amplification efficacy, the amount of DNA in the total DNA content of plasma that could function as a template for Q-MSP PCR amplification of CDO1” was unexpectedly extremely small (the efficacy was calculated as 1/100 to 1/1000). In our current study, the sensitivity of methylated CDO1 by conventional Q-MSP is above 1/1000 dilution of the extracted DNA (Fig. 1d), which is much inferior to that of the BEAMing assay (which showed 1/10,000 dilution sensitivity) [23]. When the volume of plasma used for DNA extraction was increased by 3X (defined as three template volumes), clearer signal was obtained in Q-MSP. However, increasing the plasma volume used for DNA extraction by 10X (ten template volumes) did not provide as good a detection rate as that obtained using 3 template volume. Since 10 to 12 template volumes were used for Q-MSP PCR amplification of methylated SEPT9 [16], the number of DNA templates of our study were not so small as those used in the SEPT9 study. However methylated DNA detection rates were much lower in the present study than in the SEPT9 study, since methylated SEPT9 was detected in around 60% of curable CRC [16].
Due to the low sensitivity for the assay (20%) of plasma methylated CDO1, the utility of the test for population screening for CRC will require improved sensitivity for detection of early cancers and advanced adenomas. There may be ways to achieve possible improvements as follows; 1) 3.5 to 5 ml of plasma should be collected for DNA extraction. 2) CDO1 PCR primer concentrations were increased. 4) A subject was positive if any of the three PCR replicates were positive, because a third PCR measurement necessarily increases sensitivity and decreases specificity. Our next challenge would be reached by such devises to improve sensitivity for detection of minute cancer cells. If we can increase the sensitivity by the above devises, we will collect the plasma from healthy persons and can determine the most optimal cut-off value of methylated CDO1 in CRC patients.
There are 2 possible explanations for the fact that the detection rate of CDO1 methylation were much inferior to those of SEPT9 methylation in the plasma of CRC patients. Thus, the detection rate as determined using Q-MSP could be elevated by reducing the threshold level. For example, in Fig. 4d, this stage IV was judged as negative for CDO1 methylation. However, the threshold was reduced, this case could be considered as positive. It is possible that the threshold can be further reduced. Although we didn't assay the plasma of a healthy person, the threshold should be determined in comparison to the detection rate of a healthy control as previously shown [16]. The second explanation is that the level of methylated CDO1 in plasma is less than that of methylated SEPT9. CDO1 is involved in cysteine metabolism, and cysteine biology has recently gained attention in terms of cancer stem cell theory. The cysteine transporter xCT is associated with, the cancer stem cell marker CD44, and with an increased cysteine concentration in the cytoplasm of cancer stem cells, resulting in inhibition of ROS generation and chemoresistance. Cancer stem cells are believed to survive longer in primary cancer tissues, suggesting that less DNA may be derived from cancer stem cells than from otherwise cells. If the latter theory is correct, methylated CDO1 is not appropriate for use as a plasma tumor marker. If the former theory is correct, detection rates of cancer cells based on plasma methylated CDO1 could be increased by improvement of the detection system. In our current study, the amount of DNA that is useful for such detection was shown to be low in plasma. Therefore, the use of nested PCR is a promising approach for such analysis in the near future.
In conclusion, analysis of methylated CDO1 in plasma is disappointing with regard to detection rate. However plasma methylated CDO1 is independent of serum CEA/CA19-9, so the combination of these markers could increase the detection rate of curable CRC. On the other hand, the CRC detection rate was not increased by combination of plasma methylated CDO1 data with CEA/CA19-9 levels in Stage IV CRC. Therefore, if the CRC detection rate based on methylated CDO1 in plasma were to be increased by using the novel detection system described above, plasma methylated CDO1 analysis would be a promising tool for detection of curable CRC by medical examination of blood. Moreover, since CDO1 methylation is universally found in other cancers, this technique may be a broadly applicable method for cancer detection by using blood.
Supporting Information
Table S1.
PCR production and sequence of primers and fluorescent probe.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113546.s001
(XLSX)
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: KY M. Watanabe. Performed the experiments: M. Waraya KY. Analyzed the data: M. Waraya KY NK TS TN. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: M. Waraya KY MK. Wrote the paper: KY DS M. Watanabe TS TN.
References
- 1. Yamashita K, Upadhyay S, Osada M, Hoque MO, Xiao Y, et al. (2002) Pharmacologic unmasking of epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2:485–495.
- 2. Kim MS, Yamashita K, Baek JH, Park HL, Carvalho AL, et al. (2006) N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor type 2B is epigenetically inactivated and exhibits tumor-suppressive activity in human esophageal cancer. Cancer Res 66:3409–3418.
- 3. Matsubayashi H, Canto M, Sato N, Klein A, Abe T, et al. (2006) DNA methylation alterations in the pancreatic juice of patients with suspected pancreatic disease. Cancer Res 66:1208–1217.
- 4. Kim MS, Louwagie J, Carvalho B, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Park HL, et al. (2009) Promoter DNA methylation of oncostatin m receptor-beta as a novel diagnostic and therapeutic marker in colon cancer. PLoS One 4:e6555.
- 5. Yamashita K, Sakuramoto S, Watanabe M (2011) Genomic and epigenetic profiles of gastric cancer: potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Surg Today 41:24–38.
- 6. Kim MS, Chang X, Nagpal JK, Yamashita K, Baek JH, et al. (2008) The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor type 2A is frequently methylated in human colorectal carcinoma and suppresses cell growth. Oncogene 27:2045–2054.
- 7. Kim MS, Chang X, Yamashita K, Nagpal JK, Baek JH, et al. (2008) Aberrant promoter methylation and tumor suppressive activity of the DFNA5 gene in colorectal carcinoma. Oncogene 27:3624–3634.
- 8. Kim MS, Louwagie J, Carvalho B, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Park HL, et al. (2009) Promoter DNA methylation of oncostatin m receptor-beta as a novel diagnostic and therapeutic marker in colon cancer. PLoS One 4:e6555.
- 9. Brait M, Ling S, Nagpal JK, Chang X, Park HL, et al. (2012) Cysteine dioxygenase 1 is a tumor suppressor gene silenced by promoter methylation in multiple human cancers. PLoS One 7:e44951.
- 10. Ishimoto T, Nagano O, Yae T, Tamada M, Motohara T, et al. (2011) CD44 variant regulates redox status in cancer cells by stabilizing the xCT subunit of system xc(-) and thereby promotes tumor growth. Cancer Cell 19:387–400.
- 11. Nagano O, Okazaki S, Saya H (2013) Redox regulation in stem-like cancer cells by CD44 variant isoforms. Oncogene 32:5191–5198.
- 12. Prabhu A, Sarcar B, Kahali S, Yuan Z, Johnson JJ, et al. (2014) Cysteine catabolism: a novel metabolic pathway contributing to glioblastoma growth. Cancer Res 74:787–796.
- 13. Jeschke J, O'Hagan HM, Zhang W, Vatapalli R, Calmon MF, et al. (2013) Frequent inactivation of cysteine dioxygenase type 1 contributes to survival of breast cancer cells and resistance to anthracyclines. Clin Cancer Res 19:3201–3211.
- 14. Kawakami K, Brabender J, Lord RV, Groshen S, Greenwald BD, et al. (2000) Hypermethylated APC DNA in plasma and prognosis of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1805–1811.
- 15. Lofton-Day C, Model F, Devos T, Tetzner R, Distler J, et al. (2008) DNA methylation biomarkers for blood-based colorectal cancer screening. Clin Chem 54:414–423.
- 16. Grützmann R, Molnar B, Pilarsky C, Habermann JK, Schlag PM, et al. (2008) Sensitive detection of colorectal cancer in peripheral blood by septin 9 DNA methylation assay. PLoS One 3:e3759.
- 17. deVos T, Tetzner R, Model F, Weiss G, Schuster M, et al. (2009) Circulating methylated SEPT9 DNA in plasma is a biomarker for colorectal cancer. Clin Chem 55:1337–1346.
- 18. Katoh H, Yamashita K, Kokuba Y, Satoh T, Ozawa H, et al. (2008) Surgical resection of stage IV colorectal cancer and prognosis. World J Surg 32:1130–1137.
- 19. Katoh H, Yamashita K, Kokuba Y, Satoh T, Ozawa H, et al. (2008) Diminishing impact of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in prognosis of Dukes' C colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 28:1933–1941.
- 20. Yamashita K, Watanabe M (2009) Clinical significance of tumor markers and an emerging perspective on colorectal cancer. Cancer Sci 100:195–199.
- 21. Li M, Chen WD, Papadopoulos N, Goodman SN, Bjerregaard NC, et al. (2009) Sensitive digital quantification of DNA methylation in clinical samples. Nat Biotechnol 27:858–863.
- 22. Tóth K, Sipos F, Kalmár A, Patai AV, Wichmann B, et al. (2012) Detection of methylated SEPT9 in plasma is a reliable screening method for both left- and right-sided colon cancers. PLoS One 7:e46000.
- 23. Dressman D, Yan H, Traverso G, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B (2003) Transforming single DNA molecules into fluorescent magnetic particles for detection and enumeration of genetic variations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8817–8822.