Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Kismet Positively Regulates Glutamate Receptor Localization and Synaptic Transmission at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction

  • Rupa Ghosh,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Srikar Vegesna,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Ramia Safi,

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, United States of America

  • Hong Bao,

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America

  • Bing Zhang,

    Affiliation Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America

  • Daniel R. Marenda ,

    fliebl@siue.edu (FLWL); daniel.marenda@drexel.edu (DRM)

    Affiliations Department of Biology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America, Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Faith L. W. Liebl

    fliebl@siue.edu (FLWL); daniel.marenda@drexel.edu (DRM)

    Affiliation Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, Illinois, United States of America

Kismet Positively Regulates Glutamate Receptor Localization and Synaptic Transmission at the Drosophila Neuromuscular Junction

  • Rupa Ghosh, 
  • Srikar Vegesna, 
  • Ramia Safi, 
  • Hong Bao, 
  • Bing Zhang, 
  • Daniel R. Marenda, 
  • Faith L. W. Liebl
PLOS
x

Abstract

The Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is a glutamatergic synapse that is structurally and functionally similar to mammalian glutamatergic synapses. These synapses can, as a result of changes in activity, alter the strength of their connections via processes that require chromatin remodeling and changes in gene expression. The chromodomain helicase DNA binding (CHD) protein, Kismet (Kis), is expressed in both motor neuron nuclei and postsynaptic muscle nuclei of the Drosophila larvae. Here, we show that Kis is important for motor neuron synaptic morphology, the localization and clustering of postsynaptic glutamate receptors, larval motor behavior, and synaptic transmission. Our data suggest that Kis is part of the machinery that modulates the development and function of the NMJ. Kis is the homolog to human CHD7, which is mutated in CHARGE syndrome. Thus, our data suggest novel avenues of investigation for synaptic defects associated with CHARGE syndrome.

Introduction

Synapses in the nervous system must be stable yet labile to retain existing memories and help form new memories. Several synaptic signaling molecules are important for synapse formation and/or maintenance including Wnts [1], [2], bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) [3], and neurotrophins [4] amongst others. These signaling molecules alter intracellular signaling and target cell transcription to convert transient cellular changes to stable, functional alterations [5] that ultimately maintain long-term synaptic connections and synaptic activity. Transcriptional activation is required for long-term potentiation (LTP) [6], [7], which is characterized by enhanced synaptic transmission as a result of increased synaptic activity, and learning and memory [8]. Epigenetic modifications of chromatin structure are also required for LTP and memory [9].

Epigenetics have been defined as “the structural adaptation of chromosomal regions so as to register, signal or perpetuate altered activity states[10]. This regulation of chromatin structure enables transcription factors to recognize essential cis-regulatory elements and control gene expression. Chromatin remodeling enzymes like the Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding (CHD) family of ATPases regulate transcription by altering the structure of chromatin [11] and maintaining heritable states of transcription [12]. CHD proteins are well conserved and participate in neural development in both vertebrates [13][17] and invertebrates [18].

Kismet (Kis) is the Drosophila ortholog of mammalian Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding Protein 7 (CHD7). Kis was shown to localize to a majority of active transcription sites on salivary gland polytene chromosomes, suggesting that Kis may regulate the transcription of multiple target genes during development [12]. However, the functional relevance of this binding for developmental processes is unclear. Studies in fly larval salivary glands suggest that Kis functions to enable elongation by RNA Polymerase II [12], [19] and functions upstream of the histone H3K4 methyltransferases Trithorax and Ash1 [19], [20]. Kis is required for proper locomotion, memory, axon development, and circadian rhythms [18], [21]. Ubiquitous knockdown of Kis produces flies that are unable to fly and exhibit a prominent postural defect where they hold their wings apart and below their bodies [18]. Collectively, these reports suggest that CHD proteins like Kis may regulate synapse development. Although CHD7 has been implicated in neural crest formation [14] and neurogenesis [15], [22], there are no reports of Kis or CHD7 function in synapse formation or maintenance.

Here we describe the function of Kis in synapse development using the glutamatergic Drosophila NMJ. Glutamatergic synapses are highly plastic and exhibit the capacity to alter protein composition and localization to maintain excitability [23][26]. Both presynaptic activity [27] and the number and subtype of postsynaptic receptor [28] can be changed to ensure proper synaptic strength. Our results suggest that Kis function is important for motor neuron morphology, synaptic transmission, and the localization of the cell adhesion molecule FasII and postsynaptic proteins including GluRs and Dlg.

Materials and Methods

Drosophila Stocks

Fly stocks were maintained at 25°C on standard fly food. The kisLM27 allele was generated by EMS mutagenesis as previously described [29]. kisk13416 and all Gal4 lines were obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center. UAS-kisRNAi.b was obtained from Vienna Drosophila RNAi Center (VDRC stock #46685). UAS-Dlg and UAS-FasII were gifts from Vivian Budnik [30], [31]. Kismet-GFP was a gift from Alan Spradling [32].

Behavioral Testing

25–50 wandering third instar larvae from a non-isogenic background were used for behavioral testing as previously described [33]. Larvae were washed with phosphate solution to rid them of food particles and placed on a non-nutritive agar surface for acclimatization. To measure muscle contractions, an 8.5 cm diameter agar plate was used to provide the larva with a crawling surface. Peristaltic contractions were made using a Leica Mz 125 stereomicroscope for 30 sec per larva. Three trials per larva were performed as previously described [33][35].

The crawling behavior of each larva was recorded using Sony DCR-SR47 Handycam with Carl Zeiss optics. The video recording was processed using iMovies software (Apple Inc.) to convert the video file into frames for manual analysis using NIH Image J software. Frame-by-frame analysis of crawling distance was performed manually for each larva. Three trials were performed for each larva. The numerical output generated was used to calculate total distance crawled by the larva.

Immunohistochemistry

Fly stocks for third instar larval dissections were raised on standard Drosophila media. Dissections were performed on Sylgard-coated petri dishes in Roger's Ringer solution (135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 5 mM TES, 72 mM sucrose) supplemented with 2 mM glutamate [36]. Animals were fixed for 30 min in either Bouin's fixative (when GluR or Brp antibodies were used) or 4% paraformaldehyde (for all other antibodies). Primary antibodies obtained from the Iowa Developmental Hybridoma Bank included α-Brp/nc82 (1∶50), α-CSP (1∶200), α-DLG (1∶1000), α-FasII (1∶5), α-GluRIIA (1∶100), and α-Syt (1∶100). α-GluRIIB (1∶2000) and α-GluRIIC (1∶5000) antibodies were gifts from Aaron DiAntonio [37]. Mouse monoclonal acetylated tubulin (1∶1000) was obtained from Sigma Aldrich. Rhodamine labeled phallotoxin (1∶200) from Invitrogen was used to label F-actin. Fluorescently conjugated goat α-rabbit or goat α-mouse secondary antibodies (1∶400, Jackson Immunoresearch Labs) were used along with α-HRP (1∶125, Jackson Immunoresearch Labs). Larvae were mounted on slides using Vectashield (Vector Labs). Images from the A3 or A4 6/7 NMJ were obtained using an Olympus Fluoview 1000 laser scanning confocal microscope.

For Kis protein immunolabeling, the w; P{GawB}D42, P{UAS-n-syb-GFP. E}3/TM3, Sb1 (Bloomington stock #9263) was used to highlight motor neurons and α-Kismet (gift from John Tamkun) was used at 1∶100. For Kismet-GFP detection, motor neurons were visualized with Elavc155-Gal4 driving expression of P{10XUAS-IVS-mCD8::RFP}attP2 (Bloomington Stock #32218) and Kis protein was visualized with Kismet-GFP [32]. Wandering third instar larval brains and body wall muscles were dissected and fixed with paraformaldehyde as described [18]. DAPI was used to visualize nuclei.

GluR cluster sizes were measured as previously described [38] from Z-projected confocal images using NIH ImageJ. Relative fluorescence intensities were quantified by obtaining the mean fluorescence intensity for each NMJ from Z-projected confocal images using Adobe Photoshop (v. CS2) and subtracting the mean fluorescence intensity obtained from an identical area of the muscle or non-NMJ area. Brp density was calculated by counting the number of fluorescent puncta from Z-projected confocal images and dividing by the total NMJ area as indicated by HRP labeling. Apposition of GluRIIC to Brp was measured by quantifying the number of GluRIIC clusters located within 1 µm of a Brp puncta using Z-projected images. Unapposed GluRIIC clusters included any cluster that was located a distance greater than 1 µm from Brp. The unopposed clusters number was divided by the total number of GluRIIC clusters to obtain a percentage.

The number of 6/7 NMJ boutons were counted using the “cell counter” plugin for NIH Image J software. Axonal branches were quantified by manual counting of any bifurcation that included at least two boutons.

Electrophysiology

Two-electrode voltage clamp recordings were obtained at room temperature from muscle 6 of segments A3 or A4. Third instar larval fillet dissections were performed on Sylgard-coated cover slips in Drosophila standard saline (135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 5 mM TES, 72 mM sucrose). Muscles were clamped at −60 mV using an Axoclamp 900A amplifier (Molecular Devices). Electrodes filled with 3M KCl that had resistances of 10–20 MΩ were used for intracellular recordings. A 1 Hz stimulus of 10 V was delivered to segmental nerves using an electrode filled with bath saline connected to a Grass S88 stimulator and SIU5 isolation unit (Grass Technologies). Electrophysiological recordings were digitized with a Digidata 1443 digitizer (Molecular Devices) and analyzed using PClamp software (v. 10.4). 180 s of minis per larva were used for analysis. Quantal content was calculated by dividing the eEJC area (nA*ms) by the mEJC area (nA*ms). Intracellular recordings of excitatory junction potentials were also conducted as previously described [39].

Microarray Studies and data analysis

Microarray analysis was performed by Seqwright (Houston, Tx). 10 total white pre-pupae (as staged by [40]) each from genotypes Da-Gal4/+ and Da-Gal4/UAS:kismet RNAi. b were used. RNA for each sample was isolated by Seqwright from frozen tissues using Qiagen RNeasy Mini kit. The RNA quality of each sample was checked on RNA Nano chip using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. All RNA samples displayed no degradation with two sharp ribosomal peaks. Affymetrix's GeneChip One-cycle target labeling kit was used for cDNA synthesis and in vitro transcription. Affymetrix GeneChip Drosophila Genome 2.0 array was used for this study and the data were processed by Affymetrix Software Expression Console using MAS5.0 Analysis Algorithms to produce. DAT,. CEL, and CHP files of each sample following Seqwright standard procedures.

To produce gene ontology tables, gene lists identified from the microarray analysis were analyzed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) (http://www.david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov) [41], [42]. Genes whose expression differed significantly (p<0.05) between Da-Gal4 and Da-Gal4/UAS:kismet RNAi.b and showed a twofold or greater change in expression (up- or downregulated) were used for subsequent DAVID analysis.

Quantitative RT-PCR

For mutant analyses, total RNA was extracted from 8-12 third instar larvae using Trizol as previously described [43], [44]. qRT-PCR was performed in a single step using the iScript One-Step RT-PCR Kit with Sybr Green (Bio-Rad). For RNAi analyses, total RNA was extracted from third instar larval body walls from which the CNS and ventral nerve cord had been removed. After Trizol extraction, the samples were treated with DNase and column purified. Reverse transcription was carried out using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription kit (Invitrogen). Taqman probes (Applied Biosystems) to GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC and Act5c were used for the real-time reaction using the “StepOnePlus” instrument (Applied Biosystems). Appropriate controls were maintained throughout this study. 100 ng of RNA was added to each reaction. For mutant analysis, ΔC(t) values were calculated by subtracting the C(t) value of the GluR-specific reaction from the C(t) value obtained for GAPDH. For RNAi analysis, Act5c was used as the reference gene and analysis was performed by calculating fold change in expression (RQ) from ΔΔC(t) values. Each reaction was performed in triplicate and three biological replicates were performed and used for data analysis.

Statistical Analyses

Statistics were performed using Graph Pad Prism (v 5.01). Statistical comparisons included student's t-tests for analysis of kismet mutant phenotypes, and, for RNAi analysis, a one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey or Games-Howell tests depending on the variation between data sets. Statistical significance in figures is represented by:* = p<0.05, ** = p<0.001, and *** = p<0.0001. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (SEM). Summary statistics including means, SEM, number of animals, and additional information can be found in Table S1.

Results

Kismet is localized to motor neuron and muscle nuclei

We sought to further explore the role Kis may play in synaptic development using the Drosophila NMJ as a model system. Kis has been shown to regulate RNA polymerase II-mediated transcription [12], [19]. Therefore, we first examined the localization of Kis protein in third instar larvae using both immunolabeling for the long isoform of Kis (Kis-L; [12]) and a Kis-GFP protein trap stock [32]. We had previously shown that Kis is localized in the nuclei of multiple cells in the ventral nerve cord (VNC) of third instar larvae [18]. To determine first that Kis localizes to neurons, we labeled neurons in the third instar VNC by driving expression of a membrane-tagged RFP with elav-Gal4 and focusing on the midline of the VNC. We then analyzed the localization of Kis-GFP within this tissue. As previously reported [18], Kis localized to multiple nuclei within the VNC including the nuclei of multiple neurons (Figure 1A). To verify that these neurons were motor neurons, we labeled motor neurons by driving n-syb-GFP with the motor neuron-specific D42-Gal4 driver. We observed that Kis localized to the nuclei of VNC motor neurons (Figure S1A). Using both methods, we also observed Kis localized in multinucleated postsynaptic muscles (Figure 1B and Figure S1B). We did not observe Kis localized outside of the nucleus in either analyses. These results are consistent with the role of Kis as a transcription regulator [19] and indicate that Kis may regulate both pre- and postsynaptic components of the NMJ via its nuclear actions.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Kis localizes to the nucleus of motor neurons and muscles.

(A) Confocal images of Kis-GFP expression in midline of third instar larval ventral nerve cord expressing RFP in all neurons using the Elavc155-Gal4 driver. Neurons are labeled in red (Elav), nuclei in blue (DAPI), and Kis in green (Kis-GFP). Note presence of Kis-GFP in neuron nuclei. Right panels show individual channels. Scale bar  = 10 µm. (B) Confocal images of Kis-GFP expression in multi-nucleated muscle cells of muscles 6 and 7 in third instar larval NMJs. Muscles are labeled with phalloidin (PHL, red), muscle nuclei in blue (DAPI), and Kis in green (Kis-GFP). Note presence of Kis-GFP in muscle nuclei. Right panels show individual channels. Scale bar  = 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.g001

Loss of Kismet function slightly alters synaptic morphology

Both the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons are important for the structure, stability, and the maintenance of synapses (for review see [45]). The microtubule cytoskeleton is essential for both synaptic function and muscle morphology as it forms and provides stability to structural components of neurons and synapses [46], [47]. To determine whether kis influences the dynamics of the synaptic cytoskeleton like other chromatin remodeling enzymes [48][50], we labeled both the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons at the NMJ using two kis mutant alleles. kisk13416 is a weak adult-viable hypomorph due to the insertion of a transposable element in the 5′ end of the gene [51] while kisLM27 is a strong protein null allele [29]. Because kisLM27 nulls are early larval lethal, we used the heteroallelic kisLM27/kisk13416 combination, which is pupal lethal. Mutations in kis do not affect gross muscle morphology as indicated by phalloidin, which labels F-actin [52], or the size of ventral body wall muscles 6 (Figures 2A–B) and 7 (data not shown, w1118 = 17930±1173 µm2, n = 9; kisk13416 = 16980±543.5 µm2, n = 9, p = 0.47; kisLM27/kisk13416 = 17150±682.8 µm2, n = 8, p = 0.61). Similarly, there were no significant differences in the levels of acetylated tubulin at the synapse or in the muscle of kis mutants compared with controls (Figures 2C–D). Post-translational acetylation of α-tubulin occurs at stable microtubules [53].

thumbnail
Figure 2. Kis negatively affects growth of the presynaptic motor neuron but does not alter cytoskeletal proteins at the NMJ.

(A) Confocal images of third instar larval NMJs, muscles 6 and 7, labeled with α-HRP (white) to detect presynaptic neuronal membranes and phalloidin (red). Scale bar  = 20 µm (B) Quantification of muscle 6 sizes in w1118, kisk13416, and kisLM27/kisk13416. (C) Confocal micrographs of 6/7 NMJs from third instar larvae immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-acetylated tubulin (green). Scale bar  = 20 µm (D) Quantification of mean relative synaptic acetylated tubulin levels (top histogram) and mean relative muscle acetylated tubulin levels (bottom histogram). (E) Quantification of total boutons (left histogram) and branches (right histogram) per 6/7 NMJ.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.g002

Given the role of transcriptional regulators such as AP-1 [54] and Zfh1 [55] in NMJ development and morphology, we next examined NMJ morphology in kis mutants and in animals after ubiquitous knockdown of kis using the UAS/Gal4 system [56]. Ubiquitous knockdown of Kis was achieved using the da-Gal4 driver to express a UAS:kismet RNAi.b transgene (da>kisRNAi.b), which was previously shown to strongly reduce Kis protein levels (roughly 90% overall) and severely reduce adult motor function [18]. While we noticed a trend indicating the numbers of boutons per 6/7 NMJ were slightly increased in both kis mutants compared with controls (Figure 2E), this increase was not statistically significant. However, ubiquitous knockdown of kis resulted in a significant increase in the total number of boutons in da>kisRNAi.b (data not shown, 94.4545±5.9043, p<0.001) when compared to outcrossed controls da-Gal4/+ (57.3636±4.3469) and UAS-kisRNAi.b/+ (70.7273±4.8450, p<0.001). We also observed a significant increase in the total number of branches in kisLM27/kisk13416 larvae, but not kisk13416 larvae compared to w1118 controls (Figure 2E). Taken together, these data suggest that kis influences NMJ morphology but does not affect ventral body wall muscle size or muscle morphology.

Kismet selectively regulates the levels of the cell adhesion molecule FasII and the postsynaptic protein Dlg

Several synaptic proteins serve as markers of synaptic plasticity at the Drosophila NMJ such as Bruchpilot (Brp), Cysteine String Protein (CSP), Discs Large (Dlg), Fasciclin II (FasII), and Synaptotagmin (Syt). To determine if the loss of kis affects other synaptic proteins, we first examined the number of active zones, sites of neurotransmitter release, by immunolabeling for the T-bar associated protein Brp [57], [58]. We did not observe any significant difference in the density of Brp puncta in either kis mutant compared to control larvae (Figure S2A). Similarly, mutations in kis did not produce a significant change in relative fluorescence for the synaptic vesicle markers CSP and Syt (Figure S2B–C).

Interestingly, we observed a significant increase in synaptic levels of both FasII and Dlg in kis mutants (Figure S3). Dlg is a postsynaptic scaffolding protein that stabilizes GluRIIB-containing clusters [59] while FasII is an activity-dependent cell adhesion molecule [60]. kis mutant larvae exhibited a significant increase in the relative fluorescence intensity of Dlg compared to w1118 controls (Figure S3A). Similarly, FasII immunoreactivity was significantly increased in kis mutants (Figure S3B) compared to w1118 controls. Taken together, these data suggest that Kis may serve as a negative regulator of FasII and Dlg at the synapse but does not significantly affect multiple presynaptic proteins including the functional presynaptic markers Brp, CSP, and Syt.

Kismet positively regulates postsynaptic GluR localization in larval muscles

Recently our labs independently identified kis as necessary for GluR localization/expression via two separate approaches. First, through a microarray analysis of kis loss of function pupae (Tables S2S3), we found that the expression level of the GluR subunits GluRIIB and GluRIIC were significantly reduced. Second, we also identified mutations in kis in a forward genetic screen for phenotypes that affect the localization of GluRIIA in third instar larval muscles (data not shown). To further explore the connection between kis function and GluR expression, we next examined ionotropic GluRs (iGluRs) at third instar larval NMJ in kis loss of function mutants and after ubiquitous knockdown of Kis. There are five iGluR subunits expressed in Drosophila muscles including GluRIIA, GluRIIB, GluRIIC, GluRIID, and GluRIIE. These subunits are most similar in structure and function to vertebrate AMPA and kainate receptors [37], [61], [62]. The five subunits form two distinct tetrameric GluR complexes, which contain either GluRIIA or GluRIIB, plus the remaining essential GluRIIC, -IID, and -IIE subunits [37], [62].

Both kis loss of function mutants exhibited a significant decrease in GluRIIA cluster size compared to w1118 controls (Figure 3A). GluR cluster size has been shown to correlate with receptor function [38] and is used as an indicator of the number of postsynaptic receptors [59]. This corresponded to a 57.6% reduction in mean relative fluorescence intensity in kisLM27/kisk13416 mutants compared to controls. Further, there was a small but non-significant reduction in GluRIIB cluster size in kisk13416 homozygous larvae and a significant reduction in GluRIIB cluster size in kisLM27/kisk13416 mutant larvae compared to w1118 controls (Figure 3B). Although there was no significant change in GluRIIC cluster size in either kis mutants (Figure 3C), there was a significant reduction in mean relative GluRIIC fluorescence levels in both kis mutants compared to w1118 controls (Figure 3C). The significant reduction in GluRIIC relative fluorescence without a corresponding reduction in GluRIIC cluster size indicates there is likely a loss of GluRIIC puncta in kis mutants. Similar to our mutant analyses, knockdown of kis in all tissues using the da-Gal4 driver also resulted in significant decreases in GluRIIA, GluRIIB, and GluRIIC cluster sizes (Figure S4). Collectively, these data suggest that Kis positively influences synaptic levels of iGluRs.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Kis positively regulates localization of postsynaptic glutamate receptors.

High resolution confocal images of 6/7 NMJs from third instar larvae immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-GluRIIA (A, green), α-GluRIIB (B, green), or α-GluRIIC (C, green). Scale bar  = 5 µm. Histograms show quantification of GluR cluster sizes (left histograms) and mean relative GluR fluorescence (right histograms) in genotypes listed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.g003

Given the role of Kis in transcription elongation [12], [19], we next analyzed the relative levels of iGluR mRNAs in both kis mutants and RNAi knockdowns. We did not observe a significant decrease in GluRIIA, GluRIIB, or GluRIIC transcript levels in kisk13416 homozygous mutant larvae, kisLM27/kisk13416 larvae, or ubiquitous Kis knockdowns when compared to controls (data not shown). Taken together, these data suggest that Kis may be involved in the localization and clustering of postsynaptic iGluR subunits by influencing other synaptic transcripts but may not be involved in the transcriptional regulation of iGluR subunits. Thus, mutations in kis may secondarily affect iGluRs as a consequence of other synaptic perturbations.

Because we observed significant effects on both Dlg and FasII expression levels in kis mutants (Figure S3), we sought to determine whether the increased synaptic levels of Dlg or FasII could explain the loss of postsynaptic iGluRs observed in kis mutants. We overexpressed Dlg or FasII in all tissues using the actin5c-Gal4 driver. Ubiquitous overexpression of Dlg or FasII, however, did not significantly affect GluRIIA cluster sizes (Figure S5) suggesting that the relative increase in either Dlg or FasII likely did not contribute to the loss of iGluRs observed in kis mutants.

Kismet positively regulates neurotransmission and quantal content

The reduction in synaptic iGluRs, increase in synaptic levels of Dlg and FasII, and change in morphology of the presynaptic motor neuron in kis mutants collectively suggest that Kis may regulate synaptic development without significantly affecting iGluR mRNA levels. We therefore examined neurotransmission using two-electrode voltage clamp and found significant reductions in both evoked excitatory junctional current (eEJC) amplitudes, miniature excitatory junctional current (mEJC) amplitudes, an indicator of spontaneous neurotransmission, and quantal content in kis mutants compared with controls (Figure 4). There were no significant differences in mEJC frequency (data not shown, w1118 = 3.438±0.373 Hz, n = 13, kisk13416 = 3.423±0.827 Hz, n = 12, p = 0.986, kisLM27/kisk13416 = 3.014±0.450 Hz, n = 12, p = 0.473). Similarly, knockdown of Kis in all tissues resulted in a significant reduction in the amplitude of excitatory junction potentials (EJPs, data not shown). These data suggest that kis function is important for neurotransmission at the Drosophila larval NMJ.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Kis positively regulates evoked synaptic transmission.

(A) Representative evoked excitatory junctional currents (eEJCs) from control and kis mutants. Muscles were voltage clamped at −60 mV and a 10V, 1 Hz stimulus was applied to the presynaptic motor neuron. (B–C) Representative mEJC traces from control and kis mutants. (D) Quantification of eEJC amplitudes, quantal content, and mEJC amplitudes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.g004

Kismet affects the alignment of postsynaptic receptors with presynaptic active zones

Proper synaptic function requires the precise localization of both pre- and postsynaptic components such that each postsynaptic iGluR cluster is directly apposed to a presynaptic active zone [63]. Because of the defects we observed in iGluR clustering (Figure 3C) and synaptic transmission, we quantified the number of iGluR clusters (visualized by GluRIIC) that were unopposed to active zones as indicated by Brp puncta. Mutations in kis do not affect the density of Brp puncta (Figure S2A) but may affect the number of postsynaptic GluRIIC clusters (Figure 3C). There was a significant increase in the number of GluRIIC clusters unapposed to Brp puncta in kis mutant larvae compared to control larvae (Figure 5) suggesting that kis mutants contain fewer functional synapses. Collectively, these data indicate that Kis, by affecting transcription of synaptic target genes, may function to regulate the relative distribution and localization of specific synaptic proteins to facilitate proper synaptic development and function.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Kis influences the apposition of postsynaptic GluRs with presynaptic active zones.

(A) High resolution confocal images of third instar larval NMJs, muscles 6 and 7, immunolabeled with α-HRP (gray), α-Brp (magenta), and α-GluRIIC (green). Arrows indicate examples of GluRIIC clusters that are unapposed to an active zone as indicted by Brp immunlabeling. Scale bar  = 5 µm. (B) Quantification of the per cent of GluRIIC clusters that are unopposed to a Brp puncta.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.g005

Kismet exhibits tissue-specific effects on iGluR clustering and locomotion

Kis is strongly expressed in both presynaptic motor neuron nuclei as well as in muscle nuclei (Figure 1). To determine the tissue-specific effects of kis loss of function on NMJ development, we used two drivers including Dcr2;;elav-Gal4 to knockdown Kis in neurons and Dcr2;;24B-Gal4 to knockdown Kis in postsynaptic muscles. To validate the effects we observed with Kis knockdown using da-Gal4, we utilized a second Gal4 line (actin5c-Gal4) as a positive control for ubiquitous knockdown. We focused our analysis on GluRIIB since it exhibited the most severe reduction at kisLM27/kisk13416 mutant NMJs (Figure 3B). Consistent with our previous results using da-Gal4, ubiquitous Kis knockdown with actin5c-Gal4 resulted in a significant reduction in GluRIIB cluster size (Figure 6B). Knockdown of Kis in neurons but not muscles produced both a significant decrease in GluRIIB cluster size (Figure 6B) and an increase in motor neuron branches (Figure 6C). In contrast, knockdown of Kis in muscles alone resulted in a significant increase in synaptic boutons (Figure 6C). Taken together, our data suggests that Kis may regulate synaptic gene products that function in the motor neuron to help properly localize postsynaptic iGluRs. Kis gene products function in both motor neurons and muscle to regulate NMJ morphology.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Kis is important pre- and postsynaptically for NMJ development.

(A) Confocal micrographs of third instar larval 6/7 NMJs immunolabled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-GluRIIB (green). Insets show high magnification image of a single terminal bouton. Scale bar  = 20 µm. (B) Quantification of GluRIIB cluster size in µm2 in genotypes listed indicates that knockdown of kis in all cells or presynaptic neurons but not postsynaptic muscles results in a significant reduction in GluRIIB cluster size. (C) Quantification of the number of 6/7 NMJ boutons (left) and branches (right) in the genotypes listed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.g006

To extend our findings into functional behavior and to further analyze the tissue-specific effects of Kis, we next analyzed the effects of ubiquitous and tissue-specific knockdown of Kis on larval locomotive behavior by examining the frequency of muscle contractions and total crawling distance. Larval locomotion is the result of central pattern generators producing bursts of neuronal activity [64], which lead to contractions of both dorsal and ventral body wall muscles [65]. Thus, larval locomotion relies, at least in part, on proper glutamatergic neurotransmission [66]. There was a significant reduction in both the frequency of muscle contractions (Figure 7A) and distance crawled (Figure 7B) by larvae after ubiquitous knockdown of Kis compared to controls. Presynaptic knockdown of Kis, but not muscle-specific knockdown of Kis, also led to a significant reduction in the frequency of muscle contractions produced and total distance crawled by these larvae compared to controls (Figure 7). Taken together, these data suggest that Kis influences both the function of and development of the glutamatergic NMJ.

thumbnail
Figure 7. Kis functions predominantly in motor neurons to influence larval behavior.

(A) Quantification of the number of muscle contractions per 30 seconds from third instar larvae in genotypes listed. Muscle contractions were quantified as the number of full body, entire peristaltic waves (originating forward or backward) generated by each third instar larvae. The mean muscle contraction was determined from three consecutive trials per larvae performed for genotypes listed. (B) Quantification of crawling distance in cm/min from third instar larvae in genotypes listed. Manual analysis of 60 video frames per larvae. Three trials per larvae were carried out to calculate the average. The mean was used as a single data point in the analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.g007

Discussion

Our results are the first to demonstrate a role for Kis in synaptic development and function of the Drosophila NMJ. The functional role is likely related to Kis influencing transcription of target genes involved in iGluR localization and apposition to presynaptic release sites. Kis mRNA is expressed ubiquitiously early in embryogenesis [67] and Kis protein has been detected in larval salivary glands [12], central nervous system [18], retina [29], and in the adult wing [68]. Our results indicate that Kis is localized to ventral motor neuron and muscle nuclei (Figure 1, Figure S1). Although we did not find that Kis directly regulated iGluR transcript levels, the proposed role of Kis in transcription elongation [19] implies that Kis-mediated transcriptional regulation of target genes relevant to synaptic function could collectively regulate synapse development. Indeed, our microarray results from kis loss of function pupae identified many potential target genes that encode synaptic proteins and transcription factors that we have not tested in this particular study (Tables S2S5).

Kismet regulates synapse function and morphology

Kis contains an ATPase domain, two chromodomains, and a BRK domain [67], [69] suggesting that it promotes chromatin remodeling. Chromatin remodeling enzymes including those that regulate DNA methylation, histone modifications, and nucleosome positioning may positively or negatively influence transcription in response to developmental cues and neural activity [70]. In mammals, chromatin modifying enzymes including nBAF complexes containing BAF53b [71] and histone deacetylase 2 (HDAC2) [72] regulate hippocampal dendritic density and synaptic activity. We find that reduced kis levels result in an overgrowth of the presynaptic motor neuron (Figure 2) and a significant reduction in the amplitudes of both evoked and spontaneous (i.e. mEJCs) synaptic currents and quantal content (Figure 4). The reduction in mini amplitudes may reflect the reduction in synaptic iGluRs (Figure 3) we observe in kis mutants. The endocytosis mutants brain tumor [73] and dap160 [74], [75] exhibit increases in the number of synaptic boutons and decreases in evoked EJPs. Although mEJP amplitudes are significantly increased in these mutants [73], [75], mutations that affect endocytosis differentially influence spontaneous activity. The G-actin sequestering protein, twinfilin, positively regulates endocytosis and localization of GluRIIA but does not influence spontaneous neurotransmission [76]. Our collective data suggest that mutations in kis lead to a defect at the level of vesicular release, vesicular loading, or synaptic vesicle endocytosis, which over time may lead to reduced receptor clustering, larval motor behavior, and other synaptic changes.

Kismet regulates the localization of synaptic proteins including Dlg, FasII, and iGluRs

Synaptic transmission is also affected by mutations that disrupt the apposition of GluRs to Brp. Microtubule star (mts), which encodes the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 2A [77], and rab3 mutants [78] both exhibit a significant increase in the percentage GluRIIC clusters unopposed to Brp similar to kis mutants (Figure 5). mts positively regulates evoked neurotransmission and mEJP amplitudes [77] similar to Kis. Conversely, rab3 is important for short-term facilitation but does not influence mEJP amplitudes or quantal content [78]. These data indicate that iGluR apposition to Brp is affected by disparate synaptic mechanisms and may be a general indicator of altered synaptic signaling. Since we observe a significant decrease in GluRIIC fluorescence without a significant decrease in GluRIIC cluster size in the kis mutants we analyzed, we hypothesize that 1) there are fewer GluRIIC clusters (decreased fluorescence) and 2) the GluRIIC clusters that are present are not properly aligned with presynaptic active zones.

Changes in synaptic function may lead to compensatory changes in the synapse over time. We observe an increase in the relative fluorescence of Dlg and FasII in kis mutants (Figure S3). An increase in the levels of FasII over time would promote the formation of additional synapses through an increase in the total number of boutons [30], which is what we observe in kis mutants. While loss of kis in third instar larvae results in a reduction in iGluR cluster sizes (Figure 3, Figure S4), we did not observe a significant effect on GluRIIA, GluRIIB, and GluRIIC transcripts in kis mutants or as a result of ubiquitous Kis knockdown. Although this result appears contradictory to our microarray results (Table S3), iGluR transcript levels were measured in third instar mutant larvae while Kis knockdown pupae were used for the microarray. Given that Kis is involved in transcription elongation and epigenetic control of transcription [12], [19], our data suggests that the loss of GluRs from the synapse may be secondary to other synaptic changes instead of a decrease in Kis-mediated iGluR transcription. Indeed, our tissue-specific analyses suggest that the decreased iGluR levels in postsynaptic muscles may be due to defective signaling from presynaptic motor neurons (Figure 6).

Synaptic mechanisms underlying CHARGE Syndrome

kis is the Drosophila homolog of CHD7 in humans [18]. Haploinsufficiency of CHD7 is associated with CHARGE syndrome, an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by multiple developmental symptoms that include hypotonia, limb abnormalities, and cranial nerve defects [79][83]. Individuals with CHARGE syndrome can display delayed or impaired motor coordination and adaptive motor skills, as well as musculoskeletal anomalies [79], [84].

Mechanisms underlying the symptoms associated with CHARGE syndrome are currently not clear. We have previously shown that kis loss of function leads to defective adult motor behavior. Ubiquitous knockdown of kis produces flies that are unable to fly and exhibit a prominent postural defect where they hold their wings apart and below their bodies [18]. This postural defect is reminiscent of defects associated with muscles and neuromuscular synaptic transmission and is consistent with hypotonia related postural problems often observed in CHARGE individuals [84]. Our current data suggest that defective synaptic function translates to defective motor behavior in animals with decreased kis function (Figure 7). Loss of kis function leads to defects in motor coordination as assayed through larval crawling. The aberrations observed in synaptic transmission and synaptic development in kis mutant larvae may also be present in mammals with decreased CHD7 function, including CHARGE individuals.

In summary, we describe, for the first time, the function of the CHD7 homolog, Kis, in synaptic development. Our results suggest that Kis function is important for proper synaptic transmission, localization of synaptic proteins, motor neuron morphology, and larval motor behavior. We suggest that the aberrant synaptic activity in kis mutants leads to decreased levels of and altered localization of postsynaptic GluRs over time, further affecting motor behavior and NMJ function.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Kis localizes to the nucleus of motor neurons and muscles. (A) Confocal images of third instar larval ventral nerve cord immunolabeled with α-Kis-L (red), DAPI (blue), and UAS-n-syb-GFP driven by the motor neuron specific driver D42-Gal4 (green). Neurons are labeled in green (Elav), nuclei in blue (DAPI), and Kis-L in red. Note presence of Kis-L in motor neuron nuclei. Right panels show individual channels. Scale bars  = 20 µm. (B) Confocal images of third instar larval NMJs, muscles 6 and 7, immunolabeled with α-Kis-L (red), α-Phalloidin (green) and DAPI (blue). Right panels show individual channels. Scale bar  = 100 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Kis does not alter Brp, CSP, or Syt levels. High resolution confocal images of 6/7 third instar larval NMJs immunolabled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-Brp (A, green), α-CSP (B, green), or α-Syt (C, green). Top panels show merged images. Quantification of relative fluorescence is shown in the right subpanels. Scale bar  = 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s002

(TIF)

Figure S3.

Kis negatively influences synaptic Dlg and FasII levels. (A) High resolution confocal micrographs 6/7 NMJs from third instar larvae immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-Dlg (green). Right histogram shows quantification of mean relative Dlg levels in genotypes listed. (B) Confocal images of third instar larval NMJs, muscles 6 and 7, immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-FasII (green). Right histogram shows quantification of mean relative Dlg fluorescence in genotypes listed. Scale bar  = 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s003

(TIF)

Figure S4.

Ubiquitous knockdown of Kis regulates postsynaptic glutamate receptor localization. (A) High resolution confocal images of third instar larval muscles 6 and 7 NMJs immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-GluRIIA (green). Quantification of GluRIIA cluster size in µm2 shown in right histogram. (B) Confocal micrographs of third instar larval muscles 6 and 7 NMJs immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-GluRIIB (green). Right histogram shows quantification of GluRIIB cluster size in µm2. (C) Confocal images of third instar larval muscles 6 and 7 NMJs immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) and α-GluRIIC (green). Quantification of GluRIIC cluster size in µm2 shown in right histogram. Scale bar  = 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s004

(TIF)

Figure S5.

Ubiquitous overexpression of Dlg and FasII does not alter GluR localization. (A) Confocal images of third instar larval 6/7 NMJs immunolabeled with α-HRP (magenta) to label presynaptic motor neurons and α-GluRIIA (green). Dlg and FasII were overexpressed ubiquitously using the Actin5c-Gal4 driver. Insets show high magnification image of a single terminal bouton. Scale bar  = 20 µm. (B) Quantification of GluRIIA cluster size in µm2. (C) Quantification of the number of 6/7 NMJ boutons (left) and branches (right) in the genotypes listed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s005

(TIF)

Table S1.

Summary statistics for all data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s006

(XLSX)

Table S2.

Selected Gene Ontology clusters related to nervous system function mis-regulated in response to kismet knockdown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s007

(DOCX)

Table S3.

Synapse target genes showing decreased expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s008

(DOCX)

Table S4.

Neurotransmitter receptor genes showing decreased expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s009

(DOCX)

Table S5.

Neurotransmitter receptor genes showing increased expression.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113494.s010

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center and the Iowa Developmental Hybridoma Bank for fly stocks and antibodies. We would like to thank the Drexel CIC for imaging. We are grateful for the assistance of Carrie Gonzalez in the immunohistochemistry work to determine GluRIIC-Brp apposition.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: RG BZ DRM FLWL. Performed the experiments: RG SV RS HB FLWL. Analyzed the data: RG RS HB BZ DRM FLWL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: BZ DRM FLWL. Wrote the paper: RG BZ DRM FLWL.

References

  1. 1. Budnik V, Salinas PC (2011) Wnt signaling during synaptic development and plasticity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21: 151–159.
  2. 2. Dickins EM, Salinas PC (2013) Wnts in action: from synapse formation to synaptic maintenance. Front Cell Neurosci 7: 162.
  3. 3. Bayat V, Jaiswal M, Bellen HJ (2011) The BMP signaling pathway at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction and its links to neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21: 182–188.
  4. 4. Gomez-Palacio-Schjetnan A, Escobar ML (2013) Neurotrophins and synaptic plasticity. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 15: 117–136.
  5. 5. Lipsky RH (2013) Epigenetic mechanisms regulating learning and long-term memory. Int J Dev Neurosci 31: 353–358.
  6. 6. Middei S, Houeland G, Cavallucci V, Ammassari-Teule M, D'Amelio M, et al. (2013) CREB is necessary for synaptic maintenance and learning-induced changes of the AMPA receptor GluA1 subunit. Hippocampus 23: 488–499.
  7. 7. Ran I, Laplante I, Lacaille JC (2012) CREB-dependent transcriptional control and quantal changes in persistent long-term potentiation in hippocampal interneurons. J Neurosci 32: 6335–6350.
  8. 8. Kida S, Serita T (2014) Functional roles of CREB as a positive regulator in the formation and enhancement of memory. Brain Res Bull.
  9. 9. Day JJ, Sweatt JD (2011) Epigenetic mechanisms in cognition. Neuron 70: 813–829.
  10. 10. Bird A (2007) Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature 447: 396–398.
  11. 11. Murawska M, Brehm A (2011) CHD chromatin remodelers and the transcription cycle. Transcription 2: 244–253.
  12. 12. Srinivasan S, Armstrong JA, Deuring R, Dahlsveen IK, McNeill H, et al. (2005) The Drosophila trithorax group protein Kismet facilitates an early step in transcriptional elongation by RNA Polymerase II. Development 132: 1623–1635.
  13. 13. Adams ME, Hurd EA, Beyer LA, Swiderski DL, Raphael Y, et al. (2007) Defects in vestibular sensory epithelia and innervation in mice with loss of Chd7 function: implications for human CHARGE syndrome. J Comp Neurol 504: 519–532.
  14. 14. Bajpai R, Chen DA, Rada-Iglesias A, Zhang J, Xiong Y, et al. (2010) CHD7 cooperates with PBAF to control multipotent neural crest formation. Nature 463: 958–962.
  15. 15. Hurd EA, Adams ME, Layman WS, Swiderski DL, Beyer LA, et al. (2011) Mature middle and inner ears express Chd7 and exhibit distinctive pathologies in a mouse model of CHARGE syndrome. Hear Res 282: 184–195.
  16. 16. Hurd EA, Poucher HK, Cheng K, Raphael Y, Martin DM (2010) The ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzyme CHD7 regulates pro-neural gene expression and neurogenesis in the inner ear. Development 137: 3139–3150.
  17. 17. Layman WS, McEwen DP, Beyer LA, Lalani SR, Fernbach SD, et al. (2009) Defects in neural stem cell proliferation and olfaction in Chd7 deficient mice indicate a mechanism for hyposmia in human CHARGE syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 18: 1909–1923.
  18. 18. Melicharek DJ, Ramirez LC, Singh S, Thompson R, Marenda DR (2010) Kismet/CHD7 regulates axon morphology, memory and locomotion in a Drosophila model of CHARGE syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 19: 4253–4264.
  19. 19. Srinivasan S, Dorighi KM, Tamkun JW (2008) Drosophila Kismet regulates histone H3 lysine 27 methylation and early elongation by RNA polymerase II. PLoS Genet 4: e1000217.
  20. 20. Dorighi KM, Tamkun JW (2013) The trithorax group proteins Kismet and ASH1 promote H3K36 dimethylation to counteract Polycomb group repression in Drosophila. Development 140: 4182–4192.
  21. 21. Dubruille R, Murad A, Rosbash M, Emery P (2009) A constant light-genetic screen identifies KISMET as a regulator of circadian photoresponses. PLoS Genet 5: e1000787.
  22. 22. Feng W, Khan MA, Bellvis P, Zhu Z, Bernhardt O, et al. (2013) The chromatin remodeler CHD7 regulates adult neurogenesis via activation of SoxC transcription factors. Cell Stem Cell 13: 62–72.
  23. 23. Davis GW (2006) Homeostatic control of neural activity: from phenomenology to molecular design. Annu Rev Neurosci 29: 307–323.
  24. 24. Ljaschenko D, Ehmann N, Kittel RJ (2013) Hebbian plasticity guides maturation of glutamate receptor fields in vivo. Cell Rep 3: 1407–1413.
  25. 25. Marder E, Goaillard JM (2006) Variability, compensation and homeostasis in neuron and network function. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 563–574.
  26. 26. Turrigiano G (2012) Homeostatic synaptic plasticity: local and global mechanisms for stabilizing neuronal function. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a005736.
  27. 27. Jakawich SK, Nasser HB, Strong MJ, McCartney AJ, Perez AS, et al. (2010) Local presynaptic activity gates homeostatic changes in presynaptic function driven by dendritic BDNF synthesis. Neuron 68: 1143–1158.
  28. 28. Beique JC, Na Y, Kuhl D, Worley PF, Huganir RL (2011) Arc-dependent synapse-specific homeostatic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 816–821.
  29. 29. Melicharek D, Shah A, DiStefano G, Gangemi AJ, Orapallo A, et al. (2008) Identification of Novel Regulators of Atonal Expression in the Developing Drosophila Retina. Genetics 180: 2095–2110.
  30. 30. Ashley J, Packard M, Ataman B, Budnik V (2005) Fasciclin II signals new synapse formation through amyloid precursor protein and the scaffolding protein dX11/Mint. J Neurosci 25: 5943–5955.
  31. 31. Budnik V, Koh YH, Guan B, Hartmann B, Hough C, et al. (1996) Regulation of synapse structure and function by the Drosophila tumor suppressor gene dlg. Neuron 17: 627–640.
  32. 32. Buszczak M, Paterno S, Lighthouse D, Bachman J, Planck J, et al. (2007) The carnegie protein trap library: a versatile tool for Drosophila developmental studies. Genetics 175: 1505–1531.
  33. 33. Mhatre SD, Satyasi V, Killen M, Paddock BE, Moir RD, et al. (2014) Synaptic abnormalities in a Drosophila model of Alzheimer's disease. Dis Model Mech 7: 373–385.
  34. 34. Johnson AA, Sarthi J, Pirooznia SK, Reube W, Elefant F (2013) Increasing Tip60 HAT levels rescues axonal transport defects and associated behavioral phenotypes in a Drosophila Alzheimer's disease model. J Neurosci 33: 7535–7547.
  35. 35. Mudher A, Shepherd D, Newman TA, Mildren P, Jukes JP, et al. (2004) GSK-3beta inhibition reverses axonal transport defects and behavioural phenotypes in Drosophila. Mol Psychiatry 9: 522–530.
  36. 36. Augustin H, Grosjean Y, Chen K, Sheng Q, Featherstone DE (2007) Nonvesicular release of glutamate by glial xCT transporters suppresses glutamate receptor clustering in vivo. J Neurosci 27: 111–123.
  37. 37. Marrus SB, Portman SL, Allen MJ, Moffat KG, DiAntonio A (2004) Differential localization of glutamate receptor subunits at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Neurosci 24: 1406–1415.
  38. 38. Featherstone DE, Rushton E, Broadie K (2002) Developmental regulation of glutamate receptor field size by nonvesicular glutamate release. Nat Neurosci 5: 141–146.
  39. 39. Vanlandingham PA, Barmchi MP, Royer S, Green R, Bao H, et al. (2014) AP180 couples protein retrieval to clathrin-mediated endocytosis of synaptic vesicles. Traffic 15: 433–450.
  40. 40. Bainbridge SP, Bownes M (1981) Staging the metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster. J Embryol Exp Morphol 66: 57–80.
  41. 41. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, et al. (2003) DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery. Genome Biol 4: P3.
  42. 42. Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4: 44–57.
  43. 43. Dickinson WJ (1980) Tissue specificity of enzyme expression regulated by diffusible factors: evidence in Drosophila hybrids. Science 207: 995–997.
  44. 44. Graze RM, McIntyre LM, Main BJ, Wayne ML, Nuzhdin SV (2009) Regulatory divergence in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans, a genomewide analysis of allele-specific expression. Genetics 183: 547–561, 541SI–521SI.
  45. 45. Goellner B, Aberle H (2012) The synaptic cytoskeleton in development and disease. Dev Neurobiol 72: 111–125.
  46. 46. Trotta N, Orso G, Rossetto MG, Daga A, Broadie K (2004) The hereditary spastic paraplegia gene, spastin, regulates microtubule stability to modulate synaptic structure and function. Curr Biol 14: 1135–1147.
  47. 47. Yan Y, Broadie K (2007) In vivo assay of presynaptic microtubule cytoskeleton dynamics in Drosophila. J Neurosci Methods 162: 198–205.
  48. 48. Choudhary C, Kumar C, Gnad F, Nielsen ML, Rehman M, et al. (2009) Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science 325: 834–840.
  49. 49. Park EJ, Hur SK, Lee HS, Lee SA, Kwon J (2011) The human Ino80 binds to microtubule via the E-hook of tubulin: implications for the role in spindle assembly. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 416: 416–420.
  50. 50. Yokoyama H, Rybina S, Santarella-Mellwig R, Mattaj IW, Karsenti E (2009) ISWI is a RanGTP-dependent MAP required for chromosome segregation. J Cell Biol 187: 813–829.
  51. 51. Roch F, Serras F, Cifuentes FJ, Corominas M, Alsina B, et al. (1998) Screening of larval/pupal P-element induced lethals on the second chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster: clonal analysis and morphology of imaginal discs. Mol Gen Genet 257: 103–112.
  52. 52. Small J, Rottner K, Hahne P, Anderson KI (1999) Visualising the actin cytoskeleton. Microsc Res Tech 47: 3–17.
  53. 53. Garnham CP, Roll-Mecak A (2012) The chemical complexity of cellular microtubules: tubulin post-translational modification enzymes and their roles in tuning microtubule functions. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 69: 442–463.
  54. 54. Sanyal S, Sandstrom DJ, Hoeffer CA, Ramaswami M (2002) AP-1 functions upstream of CREB to control synaptic plasticity in Drosophila. Nature 416: 870–874.
  55. 55. Vogler G, Urban J (2008) The transcription factor Zfh1 is involved in the regulation of neuropeptide expression and growth of larval neuromuscular junctions in Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 319: 78–85.
  56. 56. Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401–415.
  57. 57. Wagh DA, Rasse TM, Asan E, Hofbauer A, Schwenkert I, et al. (2006) Bruchpilot, a protein with homology to ELKS/CAST, is required for structural integrity and function of synaptic active zones in Drosophila. Neuron 49: 833–844.
  58. 58. Kittel RJ, Wichmann C, Rasse TM, Fouquet W, Schmidt M, et al. (2006) Bruchpilot promotes active zone assembly, Ca2+ channel clustering, and vesicle release. Science 312: 1051–1054.
  59. 59. Chen K, Featherstone DE (2005) Discs-large (DLG) is clustered by presynaptic innervation and regulates postsynaptic glutamate receptor subunit composition in Drosophila. BMC Biol 3: 1.
  60. 60. Stewart BA, McLean JR (2004) Population density regulates Drosophila synaptic morphology in a Fasciclin-II-dependent manner. J Neurobiol 61: 392–399.
  61. 61. DiAntonio A, Petersen SA, Heckmann M, Goodman CS (1999) Glutamate receptor expression regulates quantal size and quantal content at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Neurosci 19: 3023–3032.
  62. 62. Qin G, Schwarz T, Kittel RJ, Schmid A, Rasse TM, et al. (2005) Four different subunits are essential for expressing the synaptic glutamate receptor at neuromuscular junctions of Drosophila. J Neurosci 25: 3209–3218.
  63. 63. Petersen SA, Fetter RD, Noordermeer JN, Goodman CS, DiAntonio A (1997) Genetic analysis of glutamate receptors in Drosophila reveals a retrograde signal regulating presynaptic transmitter release. Neuron 19: 1237–1248.
  64. 64. Gjorgjieva J, Berni J, Evers JF, Eglen SJ (2013) Neural circuits for peristaltic wave propagation in crawling Drosophila larvae: analysis and modeling. Front Comput Neurosci 7: 24.
  65. 65. Heckscher ES, Lockery SR, Doe CQ (2012) Characterization of Drosophila larval crawling at the level of organism, segment, and somatic body wall musculature. J Neurosci 32: 12460–12471.
  66. 66. Sandstrom DJ (2004) Isoflurane depresses glutamate release by reducing neuronal excitability at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. J Physiol 558: 489–502.
  67. 67. Daubresse G, Deuring R, Moore L, Papoulas O, Zakrajsek I, et al. (1999) The Drosophila kismet gene is related to chromatin-remodeling factors and is required for both segmentation and segment identity. Development 126: 1175–1187.
  68. 68. Terriente-Felix A, Molnar C, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, de Celis JF (2011) A conserved function of the chromatin ATPase Kismet in the regulation of hedgehog expression. Dev Biol 350: 382–392.
  69. 69. Therrien M, Morrison DK, Wong AM, Rubin GM (2000) A genetic screen for modifiers of a kinase suppressor of Ras-dependent rough eye phenotype in Drosophila. Genetics 156: 1231–1242.
  70. 70. Riccio A (2010) Dynamic epigenetic regulation in neurons: enzymes, stimuli and signaling pathways. Nat Neurosci 13: 1330–1337.
  71. 71. Wu JI, Lessard J, Olave IA, Qiu Z, Ghosh A, et al. (2007) Regulation of dendritic development by neuron-specific chromatin remodeling complexes. Neuron 56: 94–108.
  72. 72. Guan JS, Haggarty SJ, Giacometti E, Dannenberg JH, Joseph N, et al. (2009) HDAC2 negatively regulates memory formation and synaptic plasticity. Nature 459: 55–60.
  73. 73. Shi W, Chen Y, Gan G, Wang D, Ren J, et al. (2013) Brain tumor regulates neuromuscular synapse growth and endocytosis in Drosophila by suppressing mad expression. J Neurosci 33: 12352–12363.
  74. 74. Koh TW, Verstreken P, Bellen HJ (2004) Dap160/intersectin acts as a stabilizing scaffold required for synaptic development and vesicle endocytosis. Neuron 43: 193–205.
  75. 75. Winther AM, Jiao W, Vorontsova O, Rees KA, Koh TW, et al. (2013) The dynamin-binding domains of Dap160/intersectin affect bulk membrane retrieval in synapses. J Cell Sci 126: 1021–1031.
  76. 76. Wang D, Zhang L, Zhao G, Wahlstrom G, Heino TI, et al. (2010) Drosophila twinfilin is required for cell migration and synaptic endocytosis. J Cell Sci 123: 1546–1556.
  77. 77. Viquez NM, Fuger P, Valakh V, Daniels RW, Rasse TM, et al. (2009) PP2A and GSK-3beta act antagonistically to regulate active zone development. J Neurosci 29: 11484–11494.
  78. 78. Graf ER, Daniels RW, Burgess RW, Schwarz TL, DiAntonio A (2009) Rab3 dynamically controls protein composition at active zones. Neuron 64: 663–677.
  79. 79. Blake KD, Prasad C (2006) CHARGE syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 1: 34.
  80. 80. Sanlaville D, Verloes A (2007) CHARGE syndrome: an update. Eur J Hum Genet 15: 389–399.
  81. 81. Zentner GE, Layman WS, Martin DM, Scacheri PC (2010) Molecular and phenotypic aspects of CHD7 mutation in CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 152A: 674–686.
  82. 82. Bergman JE, Janssen N, Hoefsloot LH, Jongmans MC, Hofstra RM, et al. (2011) CHD7 mutations and CHARGE syndrome: the clinical implications of an expanding phenotype. J Med Genet 48: 334–342.
  83. 83. Blake KD, Hartshorne TS, Lawand C, Dailor AN, Thelin JW (2008) Cranial nerve manifestations in CHARGE syndrome. Am J Med Genet A 146A: 585–592.
  84. 84. Hartshorne TS, Hefner MA, Davenport SL (2005) Behavior in CHARGE syndrome: introduction to the special topic. Am J Med Genet A 133A: 228–231.