Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Zolpidem Reduces Hippocampal Neuronal Activity in Freely Behaving Mice: A Large Scale Calcium Imaging Study with Miniaturized Fluorescence Microscope

Zolpidem Reduces Hippocampal Neuronal Activity in Freely Behaving Mice: A Large Scale Calcium Imaging Study with Miniaturized Fluorescence Microscope

  • Tamara Berdyyeva, 
  • Stephani Otte, 
  • Leah Aluisio, 
  • Yaniv Ziv, 
  • Laurie D. Burns, 
  • Christine Dugovic, 
  • Sujin Yun, 
  • Kunal K. Ghosh, 
  • Mark J. Schnitzer, 
  • Timothy Lovenberg


Therapeutic drugs for cognitive and psychiatric disorders are often characterized by their molecular mechanism of action. Here we demonstrate a new approach to elucidate drug action on large-scale neuronal activity by tracking somatic calcium dynamics in hundreds of CA1 hippocampal neurons of pharmacologically manipulated behaving mice. We used an adeno-associated viral vector to express the calcium sensor GCaMP3 in CA1 pyramidal cells under control of the CaMKII promoter and a miniaturized microscope to observe cellular dynamics. We visualized these dynamics with and without a systemic administration of Zolpidem, a GABAA agonist that is the most commonly prescribed drug for the treatment of insomnia in the United States. Despite growing concerns about the potential adverse effects of Zolpidem on memory and cognition, it remained unclear whether Zolpidem alters neuronal activity in the hippocampus, a brain area critical for cognition and memory. Zolpidem, when delivered at a dose known to induce and prolong sleep, strongly suppressed CA1 calcium signaling. The rate of calcium transients after Zolpidem administration was significantly lower compared to vehicle treatment. To factor out the contribution of changes in locomotor or physiological conditions following Zolpidem treatment, we compared the cellular activity across comparable epochs matched by locomotor and physiological assessments. This analysis revealed significantly depressive effects of Zolpidem regardless of the animal’s state. Individual hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells differed in their responses to Zolpidem with the majority (∼65%) significantly decreasing the rate of calcium transients, and a small subset (3%) showing an unexpected and significant increase. By linking molecular mechanisms with the dynamics of neural circuitry and behavioral states, this approach has the potential to contribute substantially to the development of new therapeutics for the treatment of CNS disorders.


Understanding how drugs affect complex neuronal networks is critical for the future of neuroscience drug discovery. Therefore, it is essential to invest in the development and applications of new technologies that will enable researchers to study functional neuronal networks. Recently, the BRAIN initiative outlined a set of experimental techniques that hold the most promise to advance our understanding of brain function and brain disorders [1]. One of the highlighted techniques is calcium imaging of neuronal activity, particularly in behaving animals [1], [2], [3].

Imaging neuronal calcium dynamics in behaving animals with miniaturized integrated fluorescent microscopes takes advantage of several recent break-throughs in technology: using viral vectors to express fluorescent indicators in a targeted genetically identified neuronal population [4]; the use of micro-optics to visualize deep brain structures; and utilization of semiconductor optoelectronics for rapid image acquisition [5], [6]. Using a miniaturized (<2g) integrated fluorescent microscope (nVista, Palo Alto, CA) allows for high-speed imaging at the cellular level of hundreds of neurons in multiple brain regions, including evolutionally conserved deep structures, in freely behaving rodents [5], [6], [7].

This technology, especially if used in combination with other recording techniques, is a transformative new platform for neuroscience drug discovery research. This powerful combination has the ability to efficiently identify compounds that either disrupt normal neuronal activity, or restore normal network activity that was affected by disease, stress or pharmacological manipulations. The traditional drug discovery process is based on a drug’s ability to affect isolated biological targets in artificial systems with subsequent validation in functional and behavioral assays. The latter is often uninformative because the same underlying changes in neuronal networks can have distinct species-specific behavioral effects; conversely, apparently similar behaviors can have different underlying causes. Despite the need to directly investigate drug effects on neuronal activity in freely behaving animals, this step was often omitted because, until recently, techniques lacked the necessary neuronal yield and were not easily integrated into industrial settings. High throughput in-vivo calcium imaging overcomes these limitations.

To demonstrate the potential of this approach for drug discovery, we conducted a proof-of-concept study investigating the effects of Zolpidem on hippocampal neuronal activity measured with the genetically-encoded calcium indicator GCaMP3. Zolpidem was selected for these studies as it (a) is widely used as a therapeutic agent; (b) is pharmacologically well-characterized; (c) has a straightforward behavioral and physiological readout (sleep); (d) has not been characterized in terms of impact on the neuronal activity in behaving animals.

Zolpidem is a short-acting nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic that potentiates GABA transmission by acting on GABA A receptors (reviewed in [8][10]). Because GABA A receptors are widespread in the brain, Zolpidem was proposed for use as a therapeutic agent in a wide variety of CNS disorders such as epilepsy [11], [12], anxiety [13][17], pain management [18][20], deep coma and disorders of consciousness [21][27] and many more (reviewed in [28]). It is also one of the most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of insomnia in the world: in the US alone it accounts for more than 30 million of yearly prescriptions [8]. Growing concern about the adverse effects of Zolpidem has led to reduction in prescribed dosage in some patients and several FDA-issued warnings regarding ataxia, impaired performance, slower reaction time, higher risk for motor accidents, complex abnormal behaviors and amnesia [8], [29][31]. The mechanisms of Zolpidem amnesia - specifically, inability to recall episodes that happened while patients were under the influence of Zolpidem - are currently poorly understood [32]. Furthermore, surprisingly little is known about Zolpidem’s effects on neuronal activity in the hippocampus, a structure that is crucial for the normal cognition and episodic memory. While a number of studies investigated effects of Zolpidem on neuronal activity in hippocampal slices [33][40], to the best of our knowledge, there are no prior studies investigating Zolpidem effects in hippocampal neurons in vivo, let alone in freely behaving animals.

In this study, we used a miniature integrated fluorescence microscope (nVista) to track somatic calcium dynamics of hundreds of hippocampal neurons expressing the calcium indicator GCaMP3 under CamKII promoter. We selected a dose of Zolpidem (10 mg/kg) that closely reproduces sleep-inducing effects in humans: decreased wake time and latency to sleep with specific increases in non-rapid eye movement sleep (NREM) (reviewed in [8], [41][42]). After verifying that the imaging procedure did not disrupt the sleep-inducing and sleep-promoting effects of Zolpidem, we investigated effects of Zolpidem on calcium dynamics of individual of CA1 principal hippocampal neurons in freely behaving mice. We found that Zolpidem significantly lowered the frequency of calcium transients in the hippocampus of freely behaving mice. To investigate whether decreases in calcium signaling following Zolpidem treatment could be explained by a decrease in motor activity, we compared the frequencies of calcium transients between the vehicle and drug conditions in the epochs matched by the locomotive states. To further reduce ambiguity in the interpretation of the observed drug effects, we accounted for Zolpidem changes in the vigilance, cognitive and sensory processing factors by studying neuronal activity during physiological (vehicle) and drug-induced (Zolpidem) NREM. We accomplished this step by simultaneous measuring of body temperature, electroencephalogram (EEG), electromyogram (EMG) and locomotor activity concurrently with imaging.


Viral Vector

The University of Pennsylvania Penn Vector Core custom produced AAV2/5 vector expressing GCaMP3 (HHMI/Janelia Farm) via the CaMKII promoter (AAV5.CaMKII.GCaMP3.3WPRE.hGH, titer 9.3e12 GC/ml). After imaging experiments, we verified the levels of GCaMP3 expression in CA1 pyramidal neurons (an example is shown in Fig. S1). In several separate experiments, we used anti-PV (Alpha; clone 2E11; Vector Laboratories Catalog # VP-P963), anti-GABA (Sigma Catalog # A2052; and Sigma Catalog #A0310), GAD67 (Abcam Catalog # ab26116) and anti-CAMK2 (Sigma Catalog # SAB4503244) antibodies to verify GCaMP3 and CaMKII co-expression as well as the absence of expression in the cells expressing some of the common markers of inhibitory interneurons.

Drug preparation

Before each imaging session Zolpidem (Zolpidem Tartrate BP, Mfg. by M/s. Aarti Drugs Ltd., Tarapur) was dissolved in ultrapure water to 1 mg/ml. The mice were weighed before each imaging session and given an oral gavage of the same volume of vehicle (ultrapure water) and Zolpidem (10 mg/kg).


All animal experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals adopted by the US National Institutes of Health (Janssen IACUC protocol 100–311); the IACUC committee specifically approved this study. Male C56BL/6 mice, aged 8–12 weeks at start, were housed individually with enrichment under controlled conditions with lights on at 6 am, 12∶12 light/dark schedule. The mice underwent two separate surgical procedures under Isoflurane (1.5–2.5%) with analgesic treatment (Buprenex, 0.05 mg/kg sc). During the first surgery, the viral vector was injected (900 nL) into CA1 (AP: −1.9 mm; ML: 1.4; DV: 1.64 mm from Bregma) (Franklin and Paxinos, 2004). Upon full recovery (1–2 weeks later), an optical guide tube was implanted over CA1 [5], [7]. To prevent mechanical compression of the CA1, a cylindrical column of neocortical tissue (∼1 mm3) directly above CA1was removed, without disturbing the structure being imaged. During the second surgical procedure, a subset of animals also received a subcutaneously implanted telemetric device (PhysioTel F20-EET; Data Sciences International, St. Paul, MN) for polysomnographic recordings [43][44]. In the animals equipped for telemetry, we coupled the devices to two sets of stainless steel electrodes: one implanted in the frontal and parietal cortex for the electroencephalogram (EEG); the second in dorsal nuchal muscles for the electromyogram (EMG). We assessed the quality of the viral expression, the placement of the optical cannula (Fig. S1), electrodes and overall health of the tissue by histological examination after experiments were completed. The animals with incorrect placements, levels of fluorescence or any signs of phototoxic damage (reduced density of cell bodies in CA1, darkening of the fluorescent tissue under the optical cannula, less fluorescence in the cell bodies under the cannula than in the surrounding CA1 tissue etc.) were excluded from the analysis.

The mice were allowed to fully recover (4–6 weeks) before the final preparation for the imaging experiments. First, under Isoflurane (1–1.5%) sedation, the lens (GRINtech GmbH, 0.44 pitch length, 0.47 NA) was affixed into the optical guide tube [5], [7] using UV-curing adhesive (Norland, NOA 81). The microscope (nVista; Inscopix, Palo Alto, CA) was used to assess a suitable imaging site by observing the overall patterns of fluorescence, blood vessels and other landmarks of the site suitable for imaging. Once the GCaMP3 fluorescence in the imaging field was verified under the camera’s LED source, the microscope’s baseplate was permanently fixed to the skull using LED curing cement [7]. The microscope’s baseplate affixed to the skull allowed for repeated attachment of the microscope and reproducible imaging from the same area of the CA1 region of the hippocampus. The microscope was removed between imaging sessions and attached under a light sedation before each imaging session.

Prior to the actual imaging experiment, the mice were habituated for 3–6 days. The habituation sessions were identical to the actual imaging sessions except that the vehicle was dosed and a “dummy” scope (Inscopix, Palo Alto) that mimics the actual microscope’s shape and weight was used.

Imaging session in open field arena

The timing of the imaging session is shown on Fig. 1A. At the beginning of the session, the microscope was attached to the baseplate under brief light anesthesia (<1 min, 0.5–1% Isoflurane). After recovery from sedation (30–45 minutes), the mice were placed in the open field arena and 5 minutes of baseline imaging data were collected. The animals were then dosed with the vehicle, and imaged during 45 minute period. To avoid potential photobleaching, an “interrupted” imaging regime was used whereby the imaging and, correspondingly, LED illumination lasted no more than 10 minutes, with at least 5 minutes between each imaging interval (Fig. 1A). After collecting 30 minutes of post-vehicle data, the animals were dosed with Zolpidem (10 mg/kg s.c.) and imaged over 45 minute period to collect 30 minutes of post-Zolpidem data.

Figure 1. Experimental session and imaging data analysis procedure.

A: timeline of imaging sessions. We imaged in “interrupted regime” (“On”, red; “Off”, blue) for 45 minutes in vehicle and Zolpidem periods to collect 30 min of neuronal data in each period. B: Spatial locations of independent components (ICs) corresponding to the individual cells (“IC Spatial Filters”) identified by PCA/ICA cell sorting algorithm. C: Relative fluorescent changes (ΔF′(t)/F′0 = (F′(t) – F′0)/F′0, where F′0 is the projected mean intensity for all frames) for five representative cells (ICs, highlighted on panel B and illustrated by Video S1) are calculated and plotted across time. Ca2+ transients were identified by searching each trace for local maxima that had peak amplitude more than two standard deviations (st. dev., y-axis) from the baseline (defined as the median of the trace calculated across the entire session); an occurrence of a calcium transient is indicated as a tick mark.

Imaging session with multimodal recordings

The multimodal recording sessions were the same as in the open field with the following modifications: (1) the imaging was performed while animals were freely behaving in the animal’s home cage placed in a sleep recording chamber [43][45]; (2) the post-vehicle and post-Zolpidem 3-hour long sessions were conducted separately (with<one week between sessions) conducted with the “interrupted” regime with each imaging fragment lasting 4 minutes with 2 minute non-imaging intervals between the fragments; and (3) the 10 min baseline (pre-treatment) data was collected while the mice explored a novel circular arena with enrichment and treats. The latter was done to elicit maximal cellular response and facilitate subsequent cellular extraction, identification and alignment across the imaging sessions.

Sleep recording and analysis

To determine states of vigilance, body temperature, EEG and EMG signals were recorded for 3 hour following vehicle and drug administration and the signals were then digitized (100 Hz sampling rate) using Dataquest A.R.T. software (Data Science International). EEG/EMG recordings were binned into 10 sec intervals and classified according to the vigilance state as previously described [43][45]. To verify that the imaging procedure did not disrupt normal and Zolpidem-induced sleep patterns, a separate group of animals not equipped for the imaging was used for the sleep pattern comparison (“Telemetry only” vs “Telemetry+Imaging” animals, Table 1). Analysis of sleep-wake parameters included (a) latency to NREM sleep (defined as the time interval to the first six consecutive NREM epochs during 3 hour post-dosing measurement period); (b) latency to REM sleep (the first two consecutive REM epochs during 3 hour post-dosing measurement period), (c) duration of NREM and REM sleep (minutes per 2 hours of post-dosing). The total wake time was calculated by subtracting the duration of REM and NREM from the total time of the sleep duration measurement period (120 min). To assess the potential impact of combined imaging and telemetry on an animal’s locomotor activity, the ambulatory displacements were detected on the “Activity” channel and were subsequently quantified in 10-sec intervals (“Activity counts”, Table 1; 2 animals were excluded from this analysis due to the questionable quality of the signals on the “Activity” channel). A two-way mixed-design ANOVA (implemented under “anovan” function in Matlab) was used to establish the statistical significance of the factors of drug conditions (Zolpidem vs. vehicle) and protocols (“Telemetry only” vs “Telemetry+Imaging”); and a paired t-test (ttest(X) function in Matlab) was used to compare each parameter within a group.

Table 1. Similar sleep-promoting effects of Zolpidem in “Telemetry+Imaging” and “Telemetry only” mice.

For the analysis of neuronal activity during NREM, the epochs were selected according to the following criteria: a 4 min bin of uninterrupted unambiguous NREM which consisted of 24 uninterrupted 10-sec bins classified as “NREM” and was flanked by at least 4 of consecutive 10-sec NREM bins. The alignment between the imaging system and multimodal data collection was done by recording, on a separate channel, the state of the imaging system transmitted through an analog channel in nVista and subsequently digitized at 100 Hz.

Behavioral recording and analysis

An overhead camera connected to an automated video tracking system (VideoTrack; ViewPoint Behavior Technology) on a PC computer recorded and digitized (30 Hz sampling rate) the x- and y-position in a 50 × 50 cm arena. The system automatically detected the large ambulatory movements (>7.2 cm/min), small movements (<7.2 cm and >0.2 cm/min) and inactivity (<0.2 cm/min). The velocity (measured as displacements, in cm, over periods of time, in minutes) was calculated in 1-sec bins. Alignment between the imaging and the video tracking systems was done by triggering imaging through the VideoTrack software.

Processing and analysis of calcium imaging videos

A custom in-house Matlab script was used to preform image analysis as we briefly describe here. Since the original high-definition data provided finer spatial resolution than necessary for analysis of cellular activity, a spatial down-sampling of 16x was applied and the image cropped to visualize the area containing optimal cellular signal activity. Correction for the slight lateral displacement (motion artifact) was achieved by applying an image registration (ImageJ plugin TurboReg implemented under the MatLab interface) to align all movie frames to a single movie target. To identify the individual cells, the registered images were expressed as relative change in fluorescence, ΔF′(t)/F′0 = (F′(t) – F′0)/F′0, where F′0 is the projected mean intensity for all frames. Spatial filters corresponding to individual cells were identified using a cell-sorting algorithm that applies principal and independent component analyses [5][7], [46]. Cells’ spatial filters were based on Ca2+ activity over the entire session. Each cell’s thresholded spatial filter was used to extract the individual cell’s Ca2+ activity from the ΔF′(t)/F′0 stack. The Ca2+ transients were identified by searching each trace for local maxima that had peak amplitude more than two s.d. from the baseline (defined as the median of the trace calculated across the entire session) for at least 0.5 sec at a separation of 300 ms from adjacent Ca2+ transients.

Statistical analysis of neuronal data

The calcium transients event rate for each individual cell was calculated across both treatment conditions (vehicle and Zolpidem) to determine the effect of Zolpidem on individual cells and population activity. To compare event rates across drug conditions (vehicle vs Zolpidem), the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test (WSR) was used on the data pooled across cells and binned into 1-minute intervals. To take into account the number of animals used in the experiments, and the variations between animals, we also performed a one-tailed WSR tests on the averaged values obtained for each animal thus using sample “n” as number of animals rather than the number of cells. To compare neuronal activity during active and inactive periods, 1-minute intervals containing at least one large ambulatory movement (>7.2 cm/min displacements) were designated as active, while 1-minute intervals during which total displacements were less than 0.2 cm were designated as inactive. To study Zolpidem effects on the level of individual cells, the event rates (calculated in 2-minute bins) were compared using Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (MWW) test. Initially, cells with a significant change (p<0.05) were identified; these cells were then subdivided into two groups depending on the direction of change (increased or decreased event rate). To address the concern that the observed drug effects on the level of individual cells are not above the level expected by chance, we first calculated the normalized drug index for each cell: (post-drug event rate - post-vehicle event rate)/(post-drug event rate+post-vehicle event rate). The expected (if Zolpidem had no effect) distribution of drug indices was then constructed by re-sampling (with replacement) post-vehicle bins within each cell (1000 shuffles, “bootstrp” Matlab function). A cell was considered to have a significant effect if its index value was outside the 99% confidence interval for the expected distribution.


Imaging procedure did not disrupt the sleep-promoting effects of Zolpidem

To assess whether the imaging surgical preparations and imaging procedures (anesthesia, microscope attachment, illumination, tethering etc.) disrupted the sleep-promoting effects of Zolpidem, we conducted a study to compare the effects of Zolpidem in a group of animals in which we conducted telemetry (EEG/EMG and locomotor activity) recordings only (“Telemetry only”) to another group in which telemetry was conducted at the same time as calcium imaging (“Telemetry+Imaging”). When orally dosed at the beginning of the light phase, Zolpidem (10 mg/kg) was effective in inducing and prolonging sleep duration in both groups of mice. As shown in Table 1, Zolpidem similarly shortened the latency for NREM sleep in “Telemetry only” (−91%) and “Telemetry+Imaging” (−94%) groups as compared to vehicle treatment (two-way mixed-design ANOVA; significant drug effect: Zolpidem vs vehicle, p<10−4; non-significant effect of the protocol: “Telemetry only” vs. “Telemetry+Imaging”, p = 0.39; non-significant interaction, p = 0.34). In a comparable manner, the time spent in wake was reduced in “Telemetry only” (−38%) and “Telemetry+Imaging” (−44%) groups (two-way mixed ANOVA; significant drug effect: p<10−4; non-significant effect of the protocol: p = 0.09; non-significant interaction, p = 0.33); whereas NREM sleep duration was increased in “Telemetry only” (+29%) and “Telemetry+Imaging” (+46%) groups during the first 2 hours after dosing relative to vehicle treatment (two-way mixed ANOVA; significant drug effect: p<10−4; non-significant effect of the protocol: p = 0.14; non-significant interaction, p = 0.25). Zolpidem also reduced locomotor activity in both groups (two-way mixed ANOVA performed on activity counts; significant drug effect: p = 0.0096; non-significant effect of the protocol: p = 0.4462; non-significant interaction, p = 0.93). Changes in the REM sleep state were not significant following zolpidem dosing vs. vehicle in both groups, although a tendency toward an increase in REM latency and a decrease in REM duration were observed.

Zolpidem decreased the frequency of calcium transients in CA1

The timing of a typical experimental session used to collect imaging videos of the fluorescent cellular signal after oral administration of the vehicle (water) and Zolpidem (10 mg/kg) is shown on Fig. 1A. The Videos S1 and S2 show example of an imaging session following treatment with vehicle and Zolpidem. From the recorded imaging videos, the location of each individual cell was extracted (Methods, “Processing and analysis of calcium imaging videos”; Fig. 1B) and the individual calcium dynamics assessed across the session (Fig. 1C). The distributions of detected individual calcium transients (Methods, “Processing and analysis of calcium imaging videos”) were statistically compared between vehicle and drug conditions (Methods, “Processing and analysis of calcium imaging videos”; an occurrence of a calcium transient is indicated as a tick mark on a raster plots on Fig. 1C, “Events” and Fig. 2A). The frequency of calcium transients detected following Zolpidem administration was lower in comparison to vehicle (Fig. 2A: a raster plot of a representative session; Fig. 2B: distribution of calcium transients in vehicle and Zolpidem periods in the example session; Fig. 2C: summary plot of all sessions). In the data combined across 5 recording sessions, Zolpidem decreased the frequency of calcium transients by 71% (from 0.7120 to 0.2087 events/min/cell, p<0.0001, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test).

Figure 2. Zolpidem decreased frequencies of calcium transients in CA1.

A: Calcium transients (indicated by tick marks) detected in individual cells (vertical axis) are plotted across time following vehicle (water, left) and Zolpidem (10 mg/kg, right) administration in a representative animal. B: Histogram of calcium transients (“Event Rate”) in the representative animal. C: Average rate of calcium transients (s.e.m. error bar) in all animals used in the study. Zolpidem decreased the frequency of calcium transients by 71% (from 0.7120 to 0.2087 events/min/cell, p<0.0001, Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test).

Post-Zolpidem decrease in the frequency of calcium transients was not a by-product of post-Zolpidem decrease in motor activity

The animals’ locomotor activity was continuously monitored during the imaging sessions. Quantification of the animals’ displacements over the course of the session was carried out in 1 second time bins. In confirmation of previous studies, Zolpidem significantly lowered the animals’ locomotor activity (MWW test on distribution of instances of displacements exceeding 0.2 cm/min counted in 1-min bins; p<0.0001, n = 5 animals). Correspondingly, there was a significant difference in frequencies of calcium transients between active and inactive periods in vehicle (active: 0.8172±.0163; inactive: 0.6287±0.0206; WSR test, p<.001) and Zolpidem conditions (active: 0.3695±.0214; inactive: 0.1981±.0146; mean average value given in units of events/min/cell for each condition ± s.e.m; correspondence between average frequency of calcium transients and average speed is illustrated in Fig. S2).

To account for the contribution of decreased locomotion to the observed neuronal effects, we compared the frequency of calcium transients (vehicle vs. Zolpidem) measured in 1-minute bins during which the animals were inactive; inactivity bins were defined as bins with total displacements of less than 0.2 cm. An example of a typical imaging session demonstrating this approach is shown on Fig. 3A. The animal’s speed is plotted as a function of time below the corresponding raster plot of calcium transient events; the identified inactive periods are indicated as green shading overlaid on the raster plot. In this session, the rate of detected calcium transients was counted only during inactive Zolpidem periods and was significantly lower than during inactive vehicle periods (WSR test, p<0.0001; Fig. 3B). The suppressive effect of Zolpidem on the frequency of calcium transients was consistent across sessions within the identified inactive periods, and this effect was highly significant in the data combined across sessions (WSR test, p<0.0001, n = 943 cells, Fig. 3C). On average, rate of detected calcium transients dropped from 0.60 events/min/cell in post-vehicle inactive periods to 0.20 events/min/cell in post-Zolpidem inactive periods (67% decrease). This result indicated that Zolpidem decreased net neuronal activity in the hippocampus beyond what is expected from decreased locomotion.

Figure 3. Decrease in locomotion was not sufficient to explain Zolpidem-induced decrease in neuronal activity.

A: Raster plot of calcium transients in individual cells (vertical axis) following vehicle (left) and Zolpidem (10 mg/kg, right) administration in an example animal with identified inactive (displacements <−.2 cm/min) periods (green shading). The corresponding speed (in cm/min) trace is plotted below the raster plot. B: Comparison of average frequencies of calcium transients (number of events/minute/cell) during active periods (black bars) and inactive periods (green bars) in the representative animal (s.e.m. error bar). C: Average rate of calcium transients (s.e.m. error bar) in all animals with identified inactive periods following both vehicle (left) and Zolpidem (right) administration.

Individual hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells differed in their responses to Zolpidem

We assessed the changes in rate of calcium transients between vehicle and Zolpidem imaging periods for each individual cell (Methods, “Statistical analysis of neuronal data”). Cells that showed a significant Zolpidem effect (MWW test, p<0.05) were subdivided into two groups depending on the direction of change (increased or decreased event rate). The approach is illustrated on the raster plot on Fig. 4A: in this representative session, the majority of individual cells (shown in blue) decreased their activity following Zolpidem administration relative to the vehicle, while some of the cells either increased their activity (shown in red) or had no significant change (shown in black, p>0.05, MWW test). Fig. 4B illustrates spatial positions for the cells within each class.

Figure 4. Individual hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells differed in their responses to Zolpidem.

A: Representative raster plot of calcium transients in individual cells (n = 195) that are color-coded depending on their response to Zolpidem (Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test, p<0.05 criterion of significance): significant decrease (blue); significant increase (red), non-significant change (black). B: Locations of individual cells identified in the same representative imaging session, layered atop a mean fluorescent image. C: Rate of calcium transients post-Zolpidem (“Zolpidem Event Rate”) vs post-vehicle (“Vehicle Event Rate”); each dot is an individual cell (n = 1275). The majority of individual neurons (65%) significantly lowered neuronal activity following Zolpidem administration; 32% of neurons did not show a significant change; and a small neuronal subset (∼3%) showed a significant increase.

This result was consistent across the sessions: the majority of individual neurons significantly lowered the frequency of calcium transients following Zolpidem administration (as exemplified by a majority of points falling below the unity line on the scatter plot shown on Fig. 4C): 65% (829 out of 1275) of individual neurons significantly decreased activity, while 32% of neurons (405 out of 1275) did not show a significant change. A small neuronal subset (∼3%, 41 out of 1275; shown in red on Fig. 4 A–C) significantly increased their activity following Zolpidem administration. To assess whether the effect of significant increase was a result of a type I statistical error (false positives), we performed the following additional analysis. We first calculated a normalized drug index for each cell: (post-drug event rate - post-vehicle event rate)/(post-drug event rate+post-vehicle event rate). The expected (if the drug had no effect) distribution of drug indices was constructed by re-sampling (with replacement) vehicle bins within each cell (1000 shuffles, “bootstrp” Matlab function) (Fig. S3A). The distribution of the constructed indices was centered on zero, as was expected if there was no difference in calcium transients’ rate between treatment conditions. The observed distribution of actual indices (Fig. S3B) was heavily shifted toward extreme negative values of the index (“−1”), indicative of much lower activity following Zolpidem administration; however, the indices formed a continuous range with a monotonic rightward decrease (toward “+1” values of the index) with some of the cells in our sample (18 out of 1275) having index values exceeding 99% confidence interval of the expected distribution. This result confirmed that individual pyramidal neurons in CA1 differed with respect to their response to Zolpidem, forming a continuous range of the responses with the predominant effect of decreased activity following drug treatment.

Zolpidem suppressed the frequency of calcium transients during NREM sleep

To factor out contribution of differing physiological states on the observed drug effects, we compared the frequency of calcium transients between vehicle and Zolpidem imaging periods in the epochs matched by an identified physiological state (NREM), the duration of which was specifically increased by Zolpidem (Table 1). Prior experiments indicated that 3 hour imaging session would be necessary for the appropriate statistical comparison of neuronal data during continuous unambiguous NREM between Zolpidem and vehicle condition (when animals spent less time in NREM). To minimize potential photobleaching, we conducted the experiment in 2 separate 3-hour long sessions (Methods, “Imaging with multimodal recordings”). We tracked activity of the same individual cells (n = 478) in both sessions: the vehicle session (Fig. 5A, “Vehicle”) and Zolpidem session (Fig. 5A, “Zolpidem”). To facilitate identification and alignment of individual cells across sessions, we collected 10 minutes of pre-treatment baseline data while animals were actively exploring a novel environment (Fig. 5A, “Baseline”). The frequency of calcium transients during baseline periods was significantly different across sessions (1.33 events/minute/cell in Zolpidem session vs 1.29 in vehicle session; WSR test, p<0.001), most likely due to the variations in the animal’s exploratory activity or other behavioral factors.

Figure 5. Neuronal activity during Zolpidem-induced NREM sleep was lower than neuronal activity during physiological NREM.

A: Raster plots of calcium transients in 478 individual cells (vertical axis) during pre-treatment active wake periods (“Baseline”) and post-treatment NREM periods (“NREM”) in two imaging sessions (“Vehicle” and “Zolpidem”). B: Average frequencies of calcium transients (“Event Rate”: number of events/minute/cell) during pre-treatment active wake (in both Vehicle and Zolpidem sessions, black bars), physiological NREM (“Vehicle”, grey bar) and Zolpidem-induced NREM (“Zolpidem”, grey bar). The error bars are the s.e.m. for each condition across all cells. Zolpidem NREM neuronal activity was significantly lower than vehicle NREM neuronal activity (0.09 and 0.15 events/minute/cell, respectively, 40% change, p<0.004, WSR test).

The frequency of calcium transients during NREM was substantially lower than during active exploration (baseline) in both vehicle and Zolpidem conditions (WSR test, p<0.001; Fig. 5B; average event rates during baseline and NREM are shown as black and grey bars, respectively). During the vehicle session, activity dropped from 1.29 to 0.15 events/minute/cell (89% decrease; Fig. 5B, left). In the Zolpidem session, the frequency of calcium transients dropped from 1.33 to 0.09 events/minute/cell (93% decrease; Fig. 5B, right). It is important to note that while differences in the frequency of calcium transients during the active wake (baseline periods) of the two different sessions could reflect a difference in behavioral and cognitive factors of active wake, during continuous unambiguous NREM (Methods, “Sleep recording and analysis”) contributions of sensory, cognitive, emotional and locomotive states are minimal. Nevertheless, the frequency of calcium transients during Zolpidem NREM was significantly lower than during vehicle NREM (0.09 and 0.15 events/minute/cell, respectively, 40% change, p<0.004, WSR test; Fig. 5B, gray bars). This finding further reinforces our conclusion that Zolpidem suppressed calcium fluorescent signals in memory-related structures to below normal physiological levels.


Visualizing neuronal activity with high resolution has until now been extremely challenging in freely behaving animals. Here, we used large-scale calcium-imaging with a miniaturized fluorescence microscope to study effects of a pharmacological agent in the hippocampus of freely behaving mice. This technique allows investigation of the effects of pharmacological agents in (a) deep, evolutionary preserved homologous structures such as hippocampus; (b) relevant brain circuits with largely preserved natural connectivity within those circuits; (c) after systemic administration of a drug; (d) while simultaneously observing drug’s effect on animal’s behavior and physiology. While it is possible to achieve (a)-(d) by other techniques such as multi-electrode array recordings, calcium imaging is advantageous for the drug discovery settings because it has higher neuronal yield and allows investigation of drug effects in genetically identified neuronal populations [2][5].

We investigated the effects of Zolpidem, a commonly used treatment for insomnia, on the calcium dynamics of neurons expressing GCaMP3 calcium indicator in the hippocampus, a brain structure that is critically involved in memory, cognition and conscious experience (reviewed in [49][59]). We selected the dose of Zolpidem (10 mg/kg) that in mice evokes sleep effects similar to the effects of therapeutic doses in humans: decreased wake duration, increased sleep duration with specific increase in NREM, and reduced latencies to sleep with specific reduction in NREM latency (reviewed in [8], [9], [42]). We verified that the imaging procedure did not disrupt sleep-inducing and sleep-promoting effects of Zolpidem (Table 1).

A novel, to the best of our knowledge, result in this study is that Zolpidem (10 mg/kg, p.o.) decreased activity of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons of freely behaving mice (Fig. 2C): the rate of detected calcium transients after systemic administration of Zolpidem dropped 3-fold relative to the vehicle. This result is in line with a recent study that investigated the effects of a local application of Zolpidem on neuronal activity in somatosensory cortex of anesthetized mice [61]: the authors found that evoked neuronal calcium activity decreased approximately 3-fold following Zolpidem application (10 µM). Similarly, Zolpidem (1 mg/kg, i.v.) administration led to a 3–4 fold decrease in firing rate of medial septum neurons of anesthetized rats [62]. The alignment between the effects observed in anesthetized and freely behaving animals addresses the concern that the previously observed Zolpidem effects could be a by-product of the interaction between Zolpidem and anesthetics [60][61]. The tendency of Zolpidem to suppress neuronal activity in vivo is in agreement with the findings in hippocampal slices where Zolpidem was consistently found to potentiate inhibitory currents [34][40], [63]. It is generally assumed that increased inhibitory currents detected in hippocampal slices would translate into decreased activity of hippocampal cells in behaving animals; our study provides direct evidence in support of this hypothesis.

The suppression of calcium fluorescent signals following Zolpidem administration exceeded levels expected from decreases in locomotion (Fig. 3B–C). It was important to take this potential confounding factor into account because (a) it is known that neuronal activity in the hippocampus is related to the animal’s locomotive state [64][67]; specifically, the probability of a neuron’s discharge increases as a function of velocity [47]; and (b) Zolpidem is known to lower locomotor activity in rodents [12], [48], [68][72] and impair motor performance in humans [73][84]. Here, we employed a simple and conceptually straightforward method to factor out the contribution of locomotion by selecting time periods during which freely behaving mice were inactive. This was possible due to this technique’s high neuronal yield which allowed enough statistical power to meaningfully compare neuronal data collected even over the short periods of time. Our finding that Zolpidem significantly lowered the frequency of calcium transients relative to the vehicle during periods matched by locomotion (Fig. 3A–C) indicated that the effect of Zolpidem observed in the hippocampus is not a simple by-product of decreased locomotion caused by pharmacologically induced changes elsewhere in the brain, for example, motor cortex [85][86] or basal ganglia [87]. Instead, it is likely that the decreased locomotion can be in part a consequence of Zolpidem’s suppressive action in the hippocampus. This suggestion is in line with previous work [88], which demonstrated that direct intra-hippocampal injection of Zolpidem (10 µg/site) caused marked decrease of locomotion in rats.

It is important to characterize drug effects at the level of individual neurons as studying exclusively net changes could lead to misinterpretations of the pharmacological effects. For example, a given post-drug change in net neuronal activity can be due to some minor yet consistent changes across individual cells, or because of the major changes in a minority of neurons. Furthermore, pharmacological agents can differentially influence activity of distinct neuronal subpopulations. In this case, no changes in net neuronal activity can either mean that a drug doesn’t have an effect or that a drug evokes opposite responses in different neuronal populations. These cases can be easily differentiated by studying calcium dynamics on a level of genetically identified individual cells. To demonstrate this approach, we characterized the effects of Zolpidem at the level of individual pyramidal (excitatory) CA1 hippocampal neurons, taking advantage of a selective promoter CaMKII. While the net effect of Zolpidem on calcium fluorescent signaling was predominantly suppressive, individual hippocampal pyramidal neurons in CA1 differed with respect to their responses to Zolpidem (Fig. 4A–C). We broadly classified individual cells into two categories depending on whether the distributions of calcium transients in post-vehicle and post-Zolpidem periods differed significantly. The majority (68% of cells) showed significant change (MWW test, p<0.05). We then further subdivided significant cells into 2 categories depending on the direction of the change. The majority of neurons with significant change (829 out of 870) decreased their activity following Zolpidem administration; while a small subpopulation of neurons (41 out of 870) significantly increased their activity.

Because the pharmacology of Zolpidem has been extensively characterized [89][90], it is possible to explain the mechanism by which Zolpidem decreases the activity of individual CA1 pyramidal neurons. Zolpidem is a positive allosteric agonist of GABAA α1-containing receptors (reviewed in [8][10], [91][95]) that mediate influx of chloride ions and thus hyperpolarize neurons. GABAA α1-containing receptors mediate the bulk of inhibitory drive in mature mammalian brain (reviewed in [42], [93], [96][97]) and are expressed at a high level in most of the neurons in CA1 region of the rodent hippocampus [97][104]. Therefore, in the majority of CA1 pyramidal neurons that express GABAA α1-containing receptor, Zolpidem would potentiate inhibitory currents. That, in turn, would result in the decreased activity, as directly observed in our experiments. Correspondingly, the neurons that did not show a significant change post-Zolpidem presumably lack α1 subunit containing GABAA receptors. From the in vitro literature [104][107], we estimated that ∼30% of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells lack α1 subunit containing GABAA receptors; this number closely matches 32% of neurons with no significant Zolpidem effect in our sample.

While Zolpidem predominantly lowered the frequency of calcium transients, some neurons (∼3%) responded with a marked increase in their activity (rasters on Fig. 2 and Fig. 4), which means that in some neurons a GABA agonist shifted the balance toward excitation. Since this result appeared somewhat counterintuitive given pharmacological properties of Zolpidem, we interrogated some of the possible explanations. After investigating each animal separately, we confirmed the presence of this effect in all animals. We also verified the placement of each optical cannula over the CA1 region with an intact cellular layer. The cells with increased activity following Zolpidem were randomly interspersed across the entire field (Fig. 4B), and there was no apparent clustering in the parts of the optical cannula most susceptible to the inflammatory damage (cannula’s periphery) or phototoxic damage (center of the cannula). We also ruled out the possibility that the presence of individual “increasing” cells was the result of a type I statistical error (false positives) by an additional analysis in which we compared the observed distribution of the cellular responses to the distribution expected if Zolpidem had no effect (Results, “Individual hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells differed in their responses to Zolpidem”; Fig. S3). We suggest that the observed increase in activity-related fluorescent signals, rather than being a direct pharmacological action of Zolpidem on individual CA1 neurons that expressed Zolpidem-sensitive receptors, could be a network phenomenon. For example, it could be a consequence of the changed speed of signal propagation in a recurrent network [108], or otherwise changed network dynamics that would shift activity of some neurons toward a bursting regime that is more detectable by the GCaMP3 sensor [7], [46]. This can be tested experimentally by using a calcium sensor that can reliably detect individual spikes [109][110]. The most likely explanation, however, is that post-Zolpidem increased activity is a consequence of a release from tonic inhibition that exists, although seems quite rare, in CA1 pyramidal neurons [101], [111][119]. Zolpidem could suppress sensitive interneurons that provide tonic inhibition to neighboring pyramidal neurons, which would result in an increased activity. This idea can be tested in future calcium-imaging studies by computing correlations between pyramidal-interneuron pairs expressing differently colored calcium indicators.

One of the key points of this study was to introduce the multimodal recording approach (simultaneous measurement of body temperature, electroencephalographic, electromyographic and locomotor activity concurrently with calcium imaging) to drug discovery and to demonstrate that this approach allows for in-depth investigation of the connections between changes in the calcium signals and the physiological parameters commonly associated with the drug action. We compared calcium dynamics of individual hippocampal cells following vehicle or Zolpidem administration during NREM sleep. We selected this period because (a) Zolpidem specifically increases NREM, as was observed in current study (Table 1) and previous studies [9], [120][123]; and (b) NREM is associated with natural locomotor, behavioral and cognitive inactivity and sensory disconnection from the environment (reviewed in [41][42]). It was important to factor out the contribution of locomotor, behavioral, cognitive and sensory changes from changes in post-Zolpidem hippocampal calcium fluorescent signals because (a) hippocampal activity is known to be influenced by all of these factors [47], [49][59]; and (b) these factors are known to be changed by Zolpidem (recently reviewed in [28]).

The NREM sleep was associated with a low rate of detected calcium transients in CA1 (Fig. 5A–B). This result was expected, because one of the pronounced and diagnostic features of NREM is the presence of the “down” states linked to reduced neuronal activity in multiple brain regions including the hippocampus (reviewed in [41], [124][129]). The novel finding in this experiment was that Zolpidem further suppressed hippocampal calcium signals during NREM. Additional studies are needed to investigate whether the changes in hippocampal neuronal activity during post-Zolpidem NREM are connected to some subtle changes in the EEG spectral characteristics [130][132].

This study shows that it is now feasible to investigate the effects of pharmacological agents on activity of large number of genetically identified neurons in relevant brain circuits in freely behaving animals with concurrent measure of behavioral and physiological parameters. By linking molecular mechanisms, neural circuit dynamics and animal behavior, this approach has the potential to deepen our understanding of normal and abnormal brain function and how brain networks are impacted by pharmacological agents. For example, the observed suppression of hippocampal activity following Zolpidem administration provides a direct experimental evidence for a simple mechanistic explanation of adverse effects of Zolpidem on episodic memory [13], [16], [28], [73][74], [133][140]: Zolpidem, when administered systemically in doses that promote sleep, prevents normal functioning of the hippocampus, a structure critically involved in the episodic memory, by lowering below physiological level activity of the majority of hippocampal principal neurons that express GABA A receptors. In addition to the early screening for the potential cognitive side effects on the level of neuronal networks in behaving animals, this approach may have much wider implications for the neuroscience drug discovery process. Currently, the general direction of the field is to find highly selective compounds that interact with a single molecular target. The current early stage process involves compound screening on the level of isolated molecular targets in artificial systems with subsequent validation in behavioral and functional assays in preclinical species. The major difficulty in the process is a very low efficiency and a weak translation from the early stages to the later stages, most notably from preclinical to clinical studies. This could be due to the following factors: (a) an involvement of a given molecular target in a given physiological or pathophysiological process is often partial or just hypothetical; (b) the effects on the level of overexpressed targets in artificial systems are often distinct from the effects in a living organism of a preclinical animal; (c) the behavioral expression of a given condition, especially in case of psychiatric and mood disorders, could be different between preclinical animals and humans despite analogous underlying neuronal network physiology or pathology; and (d) it is possible that a particular behavioral or physiological expression of a disorder could only be reversed by acting on multiple molecular targets. The latter could explain why some of the very effective compounds against a given disorder lack selectivity and thus influence function of multiple molecular targets. Not surprisingly, such compounds were discovered mostly by serendipity [141] because the current drug discovery process discourages discovery of such agents. Studying drug action at the neuronal network level will favor discovery of compounds that reverse pathological neuronal network states regardless of particular molecular selectivity or species-specific behavioral expressions. The approach used in this study could be used for the early screening of the compounds at the level of relevant neuronal networks. Combined with concurrent monitoring of behavioral and physiological parameters, this novel platform could become a valuable resource for identifying and cataloging network signatures of different brain disorders and their behavioral expressions in preclinical species. We believe that this approach promises to bypass the current limitations of drug screening process and has the potential to contribute to the discovery of new breakthrough treatments for CNS disorders.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Histological examination of the tissue following the imaging procedures. A: A representative example of placement of the optical cannula over CA1 region of the hippocampus (coronal slice, scale bar: 180 µm). Green: GCaMP3 fluorescence. Blue: DAPI staining. B: A representative example of the GCaMP3 fluorescence (green) under the optical cannula (scale bar: 88 µm).


Figure S2.

Average rate of calcium transients in all animals used in the study plotted versus average speed of the animals in each condition (indicated by the shape of the marker; vehicle: circles; Zolpidem: squares).


Figure S3.

Distributions of normalized drug index: (post-drug event rate - post-vehicle event rate)/(post-drug event rate+post-vehicle event rate). A: The distribution of drug indices expected if Zolpidem had no effect was constructed by re-sampling, with replacement, vehicle data bins within each cells (1000 shuffles). B. The observed distribution of drug indices calculated for each cell (n = 1275). Vertical line indicates 99% confidence interval (3 s.d.) calculated from the expected distribution.


Video S1.

Representative videos of imaging sessions with vehicle and Zolpidem illustrate Ca2+ transients identification applied to five representative traces shown on Fig. 1C. Ca2+ transients were identified by searching each trace for local maxima that had peak amplitude more than two standard deviations (st. dev., y-axis) from the baseline (defined as the median of the trace calculated across the entire session); an occurrence of a calcium transient is indicated as a tick mark.


Video S2.

Representative movies of imaging sessions with vehicle and Zolpidem (in the absence of ambulatory movements in both conditions). The two movies (shown side-by-side; Vehicle on the left and Zolpidem on the right) display relative change in fluorescence (ΔF′(t)/F′0; shown on 5% scale and sped-up 10 times) recorded in the same 640×570 µm2 imaging field.



We thank Howard Hughes Medical Institute/Janelia Farm Research Campus and Dr. L. Looger for GCaMP3 plasmid; University of Pennsylvania and Dr. J. Wilson for the viral vector; Dr. Kevin Sharp and the vivarium staff for animal care; and Dr. G. Gendimenico editorial comments. We gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Jonathan Shelton, Dr. Eric Cocker and Dr. Srishti Gulati for their skillful technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TB YZ LB MS PB. Performed the experiments: TB LA. Analyzed the data: TB SO LB CD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TB SO LA LB CD SY KG TL PB. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: TB SO LA CD PB.


  1. 1. Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Working Group (16 Sep 2013). Interim Report. Available:
  2. 2. Alivisatos AP, Andrews AM, Boyden ES, Chun M, Church GM, et al. (2013) Nanotools for neuroscience and brain activity mapping. ACS Nano. 2013 Mar 26 7(3): 1850–66
  3. 3. Deisseroth K, Schnitzer MJ (2013) Engineering approaches to illuminating brain structure and dynamics. Neuron. 2013 Oct 30 80(3): 568–77
  4. 4. Knöpfel T (2012) Genetically encoded optical indicators for the analysis of neuronal circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Oct 13(10): 687–700
  5. 5. Ghosh KK, Burns LD, Cocker ED, Nimmerjahn A, Ziv Y, et al. (2011) Miniaturized integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat Methods. 8(10): 871–8.
  6. 6. Mukamel EA, Nimmerjahn A, Schnitzer MJ (2009) Automated analysis of cellular signals from large-scale calcium imaging data. Neuron. 63(6): 747–60.
  7. 7. Ziv Y, Burns LD, Cocker ED, Hamel EO, Ghosh KK, et al. (2013) Long-term dynamics of CA1 hippocampal place codes. Nature Neuroscience. 16(3): 264–6.
  8. 8. Greenblatt DJ, Roth T (2012) Zolpidem for insomnia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012 Apr 13(6): 879–93
  9. 9. Sanger DJ (2004) The pharmacology and mechanisms of action of new generation, non-benzodiazepine hypnotic agents. CNS Drugs. 2004; 18 Suppl 1: 9–15; discussion 41, 43–5.
  10. 10. Richey SM, Krystal AD (2011) Pharmacological advances in the treatment of insomnia. Curr Pharm Des. 2011 17(15): 1471–5.
  11. 11. Vlainić J, Pericić D (2010) Zolpidem is a potent anticonvulsant in adult and aged mice. Brain Res. 2010 Jan 15 1310: 181–8
  12. 12. Pericić D, Vlainić J, Strac DS (2008) Sedative and anticonvulsant effects of zolpidem in adult and aged mice. J Neural Transm. 2008 Jun; 11 5(6): 795–802
  13. 13. Zanin KA, Patti CL, Sanday L, Fernandes-Santos L, Oliveira LC, et al. (2013) Effects of zolpidem on sedation, anxiety, and memory in the plus-maze discriminative avoidance task. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Apr 226(3): 459–74
  14. 14. Zahreddine N, Richa S (2013) Non-Antidepressant Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Feb 4.
  15. 15. Rowlett JK, Kehne JH, Sprenger KJ, Maynard GD (2011) Emergence of anti-conflict effects of zolpidem in rhesus monkeys following extended post-injection intervals. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Apr 214(4): 855–62
  16. 16. Huang MP, Radadia K, Macone BW, Auerbach SH, Datta S (2010) Effects of eszopiclone and zolpidem on sleep-wake behavior, anxiety-like behavior and contextual memory in rats. Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jun 26 210(1): 54–66
  17. 17. Fava M, Asnis GM, Shrivastava R, Lydiard B, Bastani B, et al. (2009) Zolpidem extended-release improves sleep and next-day symptoms in comorbid insomnia and generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Jun 29(3): 222–30
  18. 18. Tashjian RZ, Banerjee R, Bradley MP, Alford W, Fadale PD (2006) Zolpidem reduces postoperative pain, fatigue, and narcotic consumption following knee arthroscopy: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blinded study. J Knee Surg. 2006 Apr; 1 9(2): 105–11.
  19. 19. Pick CG, Chernes Y, Rigai T, Rice KC, Schreiber S (2005) The antinociceptive effect of zolpidem and zopiclone in mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2005 Jul 81(3): 417–23.
  20. 20. Rode F, Jensen DG, Blackburn-Munro G, Bjerrum OJ (2005) Centrally-mediated antinociceptive actions of GABA(A) receptor agonists in the rat spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005 Jun 1 516(2): 131–8.
  21. 21. Du B, Shan A, Zhang Y, Zhong X, Chen D, et al. (2014) Zolpidem arouses patients in vegetative state after brain injury: quantitative evaluation and indications. Am J Med Sci. 2014 Mar 347(3): 178–82
  22. 22. Pistoia F, Sarà M, Sacco S, Franceschini M, Carolei A (2013) Silencing The Brain May Be Better Than Stimulating it. The GABA Effect. Curr Pharm Des. 2013 Sep 10.
  23. 23. Machado C, Estévez M, Rodríguez R, Pérez-Nellar J, Chinchilla M et al.. (2013) Zolpidem Arousing Effect In Persistent Vegetative State Patients: Autonomic, Eeg And Behavioral Assessment. Curr Pharm Des. 2013 Sep 10.
  24. 24. Snyman N, Egan JR, London K, Howman-Giles R, Gill D, et al. (2010) Zolpidem for persistent vegetative state-a placebo-controlled trial in pediatrics. Neuropediatrics. 2010 Oct 41(5): 223–7
  25. 25. Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Demertzi A, Lugo Z, Vanhaudenhuyse A, et al. (2014) Effect of zolpidem in chronic disorders of consciousness: a prospective open-label study. Funct Neurol. 2014 Jan 11: 1–6
  26. 26. Mura E, Pistoia F, Sarà M, Sacco S, Carolei A et al.. (2013) Pharmacological modulation of the state of awareness in patients with Disorders of Consciousness: an Overview. Curr Pharm Des. 2013 Sep 11.
  27. 27. Whyte J, Myers R (2009) Incidence of clinically significant responses to zolpidem among patients with disorders of consciousness: a preliminary placebo controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 May 88(5): 410–8
  28. 28. Fitzgerald AC, Wright BT, Heldt SA (2014) The behavioral pharmacology of zolpidem: evidence for the functional significance of α1-containing GABA(A) receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 May 231(9): 1865–96
  29. 29. Diezi L, Renard D, Rothuizen LE, Livio F (2014) [Pharmacovigilance update]. Rev Med Suisse. 2014 Jan 15 10(412–413): 119–22.
  30. 30. Kuehn BM (2013) FDA warning: Driving may be impaired the morning following sleeping pill use. JAMA. 2013 Feb 20 309(7): 645–6
  31. 31. FDA Drug Safety Communication: Risk of next-morning impairment after use of insomnia drugs; FDA requires lower recommended doses for certain drugs containing zolpidem (Ambien, Ambien CR, Edluar, and Zolpimist). Available:
  32. 32. Perouansky M, Pearce RA (2011) How we recall (or don't): the hippocampal memory machine and anesthetic amnesia. Can J Anaesth. 2011 Feb 58(2): 157–66
  33. 33. Cope DW, Halbsguth C, Karayannis T, Wulff P, Ferraguti F, et al. (2005) Loss of zolpidem efficacy in the hippocampus of mice with the GABAA receptor gamma2 F77I point mutation. Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Jun 21(11): 3002–16.
  34. 34. Higashima M, Kinoshita H, Koshino Y (1998) Differences in the effects of zolpidem and diazepam on recurrent inhibition and long-term potentiation in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett. 1998 Apr 3 245(2): 77–80.
  35. 35. Goldstein PA, Elsen FP, Ying SW, Ferguson C, Homanics GE, et al. (2002) Prolongation of hippocampal miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents in mice lacking the GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subunit. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Dec 88(6): 3208–17.
  36. 36. Liang J, Cagetti E, Olsen RW, Spigelman I (2004) Altered pharmacology of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors on CA1 hippocampal neurons is consistent with subunit changes in a model of alcohol withdrawal and dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004 Sep 310(3): 1234–45.
  37. 37. Manuel NA, Davies CH (1998) Pharmacological modulation of GABA(A) receptor-mediated postsynaptic potentials in the CA1 region of the rat hippocampus. Br J Pharmacol. 1998 Dec 125(7): 1529–42.
  38. 38. Mokler DJ, Galler JR, Luebke JI (2001) Development and modulation of GABA(A) receptor-mediated neurotransmission in the CA1 region of prenatally protein malnourished rats. Nutr Neurosci. 2001 4(2): 109–19.
  39. 39. Rovira C, Ben-Ari Y (1993) Developmental study of benzodiazepine effects on monosynaptic GABAA-mediated IPSPs of rat hippocampal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 1993 Sep 70(3): 1076–85.
  40. 40. Zeng XJ, Tietz EI (1999) Benzodiazepine tolerance at GABAergic synapses on hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. Synapse. 1999 Mar 15 31(4): 263–77.
  41. 41. Brown RE, Basheer R, McKenna JT, Strecker RE, McCarley RW (2012) Control of sleep and wakefulness. Physiol Rev. 2012 Jul 92(3): 1087–187
  42. 42. Harrison NL (2007) Mechanisms of sleep induction by GABA(A) receptor agonists. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 68 Suppl 5: 6–12.
  43. 43. Shelton J, Bonaventure P, Li X, Yun S, Lovenberg T, et al. (2009) 5-HT7 receptor deletion enhances REM sleep suppression induced by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, but not by direct stimulation of 5-HT1A receptor. Neuropharmacology. 2009 Feb 56(2): 448–54
  44. 44. Dugovic C, Shelton JE, Aluisio LE, Fraser IC, Jiang X, et al. (2009) TW (2009) Blockade of orexin-1 receptors attenuates orexin-2 receptor antagonism-induced sleep promotion in the rat. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2009 Jul 330(1): 142–51
  45. 45. Dugovic C, Shelton JE, Yun S, Bonaventure P, Shireman BT, et al. (2014) Orexin-1 receptor blockade dysregulates REM sleep in the presence of orexin-2 receptor antagonism. Front Neurosci. 2014 Feb 14 8: 28
  46. 46. Barretto RP, Ko TH, Jung JC, Wang TJ, Capps G, et al. (2011) Time-lapse imaging of disease progression in deep brain areas using fluorescence microendoscopy. Nat Med. 17(2): 223–8.
  47. 47. McNaughton BL, Barnes CA, O'Keefe J (1983) The contributions of position, direction, and velocity to single unit activity in the hippocampus of freely-moving rats. Exp Brain Res. 1983 52(1): 41–9.
  48. 48. Ramirez AD, Gotter AL, Fox SV, Tannenbaum PL, Yao L, et al. (2013) Dual orexin receptor antagonists show distinct effects on locomotor performance, ethanol interaction and sleep architecture relative to gamma-aminobutyric acid-A receptor modulators. Front Neurosci. 2013 7: 254
  49. 49. Behrendt RP (2013) Hippocampus and consciousness. Rev Neurosci. 2013 24(3): 239–66
  50. 50. Burgess N, Maguire EA, O'Keefe J (2002) The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory. Neuron. 2002 Aug 15 35(4): 625–41.
  51. 51. Eichenbaum, H; Cohen NJ (1993). Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System. MIT Press.
  52. 52. Eichenbaum H (2004) Hippocampus: cognitive processes and neural representations that underlie declarative memory. Neuron. 2004 Sep 30 44(1): 109–20.
  53. 53. Henke K (2010) A model for memory systems based on processing modes rather than consciousness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Jul 11(7): 523–32
  54. 54. Henson RN, Gagnepain P (2010) Predictive, interactive multiple memory systems. Hippocampus. 2010 Nov 20(11): 1315–26
  55. 55. Moser MB, Moser EI (1998) Functional differentiation in the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1998 8(6): 608–19.
  56. 56. Colgin LL, Moser EI, Moser MB (2008) Understanding memory through hippocampal remapping. Trends Neurosci. 2008 Sep 31(9): 469–77
  57. 57. Packard MG (2009) Anxiety, cognition, and habit: a multiple memory systems perspective. Brain Res. 2009 Oct 13 1293: 121–8
  58. 58. Schacter DL (2012) Constructive memory: past and future. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14(1): 7–18.
  59. 59. Squire, LR; Schacter DL (2002). The Neuropsychology of Memory. Guilford Press.
  60. 60. Ahrens MB, Orger MB, Robson DN, Li JM, Keller PJ (2103) Whole-brain functional imaging at cellular resolution using light-sheet microscopy. Nat Methods. 2013 May 10(5): 413–20
  61. 61. Jessen SB, Brazhe A, Lind BL, Mathiesen C, Thomsen K et al.. (2014) GABAA Receptor-Mediated Bidirectional Control of Synaptic Activity, Intracellular Ca2+, Cerebral Blood Flow, and Oxygen Consumption in Mouse Somatosensory Cortex In Vivo. Cereb Cortex. 2014 Mar 31. [Epub ahead of print].
  62. 62. Ujfalussy B, Kiss T, Orbán G, Hoffmann WE, Erdi P, et al. (2007) Pharmacological and computational analysis of alpha-subunit preferential GABA(A) positive allosteric modulators on the rat septo-hippocampal activity. Neuropharmacology. 2007 Mar 52(3): 733–43.
  63. 63. Taketo M, Yoshioka T (2000) Developmental change of GABA(A) receptor-mediated current in rat hippocampus. 2000 96(3): 507–14.
  64. 64. Chen G, King JA, Burgess N, O'Keefe J (2013) How vision and movement combine in the hippocampal place code. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 2 110(1): 378–83
  65. 65. Foster TC, Castro CA, McNaughton BL (1989) Spatial selectivity of rat hippocampal neurons: dependence on preparedness for movement. Science. 1989 Jun 30 244(4912): 1580–2.
  66. 66. Kemere C, Carr MF, Karlsson MP, Frank LM (2013) Rapid and continuous modulation of hippocampal network state during exploration of new places. PLoS One. 2013 Sep 2 8(9): e73114
  67. 67. Mizumori SJ, Garcia PA, Raja MA, Volpe BT (1995) Spatial- and locomotion-related neural representation in rat hippocampus following long-term survival from ischemia. Behav Neurosci. 1995 Dec 109(6): 1081–94.
  68. 68. Crestani F, Martin JR, Möhler H, Rudolph U (2000) Mechanism of action of the hypnotic zolpidem in vivo. Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Dec 131(7): 1251–4.
  69. 69. Depoortere H, Zivkovic B, Lloyd KG, Sanger DJ, Perrault G, et al. (1986) Zolpidem, a novel nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic. I. Neuropharmacological and behavioral effects. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1986 May 237(2): 649–58.
  70. 70. Murphy HM, Ihekoronze C, Wideman CH (2011) Zolpidem-induced changes in activity, metabolism, and anxiety in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2011 Mar 98(1): 81–6
  71. 71. Sanger DJ, Morel E, Perrault G (1996) Comparison of the pharmacological profiles of the hypnotic drugs, zaleplon and zolpidem. Eur J Pharmacol. 1996 Oct 10 313(1–2): 35–42.
  72. 72. Vlainić J, Pericić D (2009) Effects of acute and repeated zolpidem treatment on pentylenetetrazole-induced seizure threshold and on locomotor activity: comparison with diazepam. europharmacology. 2009 Jun 56(8): 1124–30
  73. 73. Berlin I, Warot D, Hergueta T, Molinier P, Bagot C, et al. (1993) Comparison of the effects of zolpidem and triazolam on memory functions, psychomotor performances, and postural sway in healthy subjects. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Apr 13(2): 100–6.
  74. 74. Danjou P, Paty I, Fruncillo R, Worthington P, Unruh M, et al. (1999) A comparison of the residual effects of zaleplon and zolpidem following administration 5 to 2 h before awakening. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1999 Sep 48(3): 367–74.
  75. 75. Farber RH, Burke PJ (2008) Post-bedtime dosing with indiplon in adults and the elderly: results from two placebo-controlled, active comparator crossover studies in healthy volunteers. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Mar 24(3): 837–46
  76. 76. Leufkens TR, Lund JS, Vermeeren A (2009) Highway driving performance and cognitive functioning the morning after bedtime and middle-of-the-night use of gaboxadol, zopiclone and zolpidem. J Sleep Res. 2009 Dec 18(4): 387–96
  77. 77. Lucchesi LM, Braga NI, Manzano GM, Pompéia S, Tufik S (2005) Acute neurophysiological effects of the hypnotic zolpidem in healthy volunteers. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005 May 29(4): 557–64.
  78. 78. Meskali M, Berthelon C, Marie S, Denise P, Bocca ML (2009) Residual effects of hypnotic drugs in aging drivers submitted to simulated accident scenarios: an exploratory study. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2009 Dec 207(3): 461–7
  79. 79. Otmani S, Demazières A, Staner C, Jacob N, Nir T, et al. (2008) Effects of prolonged-release melatonin, zolpidem, and their combination on psychomotor functions, memory recall, and driving skills in healthy middle aged and elderly volunteers. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Dec 23(8): 693–705
  80. 80. Verster JC, Volkerts ER, Olivier B, Johnson W, Liddicoat L (2007) Zolpidem and traffic safety - the importance of treatment compliance. Curr Drug Saf. 2007 Sep 2(3): 220–6.
  81. 81. Evans SM, Funderburk FR, Griffiths RR (1990) Zolpidem and triazolam in humans: behavioral and subjective effects and abuse liability. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1990 Dec 255(3): 1246–55.
  82. 82. Vermeeren A (2004) Residual effects of hypnotics: epidemiology and clinical implications. CNS Drugs. 2004 18(5): 297–328.
  83. 83. Vermeeren A, Vuurman EF, Leufkens TR, Van Leeuwen CJ, Van Oers AC, et al. (2014) Residual effects of low-dose sublingual zolpidem on highway driving performance the morning after middle-of-the-night use. Sleep. 2014 Mar 1 37(3): 489–96
  84. 84. Gunja N (2013) In the Zzz zone: the effects of Z-drugs on human performance and driving. J Med Toxicol. 2013 Jun 9(2): 163–71
  85. 85. Di Lazzaro V, Pilato F, Dileone M, Ranieri F, Ricci V, et al. (2006) GABAA receptor subtype specific enhancement of inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2006 Sep 15; 575(Pt 3): 721–6.
  86. 86. Mohammadi B, Krampfl K, Petri S, Bogdanova D, Kossev A, et al. (2006) Selective and nonselective benzodiazepine agonists have different effects on motor cortex excitability. Muscle Nerve. 2006 Jun 33(6): 778–84.
  87. 87. Abe K (2008) Zolpidem therapy for movement disorders. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov. 2008 Jan 3(1): 55–60.
  88. 88. Nazar M, Siemiatkowski M, Członkowska A, Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H, Płaźnik A (1999) The role of the hippocampus and 5-HT/GABA interaction in the central effects of benzodiazepine receptor ligands. J Neural Transm. 1999 106(5–6): 369–81.
  89. 89. Doble A (1999) New insights into the mechanism of action of hypnotics. J Psychopharmacol. 1999 13(4 Suppl 1): S11–20.
  90. 90. Drover DR (2004) Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of short-acting hypnosedatives: zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2004 43(4): 227–38.
  91. 91. Graham D, Faure C, Besnard F, Langer SZ (1996). Pharmacological profile of benzodiazepine site ligands with recombinant GABAA receptor subtypes. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 6, 119–125.10.1016/0924-977X(95)00072-W.
  92. 92. Kostowski W (1995) Recent advances in the GABA-A-benzodiazepine receptor pharmacology. Pol J Pharmacol. 1995 May-Jun 47(3): 237–46.
  93. 93. Sieghart W, Sperk G (2002). Subunit composition, distribution and function of GABA(A) receptor subtypes. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2, 795–816.10.2174/1568026023393507.
  94. 94. Da Settimo F, Taliani S, Trincavelli ML, Montali M, Martini C (2007) GABA A/Bz receptor subtypes as targets for selective drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2007 14(25): 2680–701.
  95. 95. Rudolph U, Crestani F, Benke D, Brünig I, Benson JA, et al. (1999) Benzodiazepine actions mediated by specific gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptor subtypes. Nature. 1999 Oct 21; 401(6755): 796–800. Erratum in: Nature 2000 Apr 6 404(6778): 629.
  96. 96. McKernan RM, Rosahl TW, Reynolds DS, Sur C, Wafford KA, et al. (2000) Sedative but not anxiolytic properties of benzodiazepines are mediated by the GABA(A) receptor alpha1 subtype. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jun 3(6): 587–92.
  97. 97. Pirker S, Schwarzer C, Wieselthaler A, Sieghart W, Sperk G (2000) GABA(A) receptors: immunocytochemical distribution of 13 subunits in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience. 2000 101(4): 815–50.
  98. 98. Heldt SA, Ressler KJ (2007) Forebrain and midbrain distribution of major benzodiazepine-sensitive GABAA receptor subunits in the adult C57 mouse as assessed with in situ hybridization. Neuroscience. 2007 Dec 5 150(2): 370–85.
  99. 99. Hörtnagl H, Tasan RO, Wieselthaler A, Kirchmair E, Sieghart W, et al. (2013) Patterns of mRNA and protein expression for 12 GABAA receptor subunits in the mouse brain. Neuroscience. 2013 Apr 16 236: 345–72
  100. 100. Kasugai Y, Swinny JD, Roberts JD, Dalezios Y, Fukazawa Y, et al. (2010) Quantitative localisation of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptor subunits on hippocampal pyramidal cells by freeze-fracture replica immunolabelling. Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 32(11): 1868–88
  101. 101. Lee V, Maguire J (2014) The impact of tonic GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition on neuronal excitability varies across brain region and cell type. Front Neural Circuits. 2014 Feb 3 8: 3
  102. 102. Panzanelli P, Gunn BG, Schlatter MC, Benke D, Tyagarajan SK, et al. (2011) Distinct mechanisms regulate GABAA receptor and gephyrin clustering at perisomatic and axo-axonic synapses on CA1 pyramidal cells. J Physiol. 2011 Oct 15; 589(Pt 20): 4959–80
  103. 103. Saari TI, Uusi-Oukari M, Ahonen J, Olkkola KT (2011) Enhancement of GABAergic activity: neuropharmacological effects of benzodiazepines and therapeutic use in anesthesiology. Pharmacol Rev. 2011 Mar 63(1): 243–67
  104. 104. Sperk G, Schwarzer C, Tsunashima K, Fuchs K, Sieghart W (1997) GABA(A) receptor subunits in the rat hippocampus I: immunocytochemical distribution of 13 subunits. Neuroscience. 1997 Oct 80(4): 987–1000.
  105. 105. Vargas-Caballero M, Martin LJ, Salter MW, Orser BA, Paulsen O (2010) alpha5 Subunit-containing GABA(A) receptors mediate a slowly decaying inhibitory synaptic current in CA1 pyramidal neurons following Schaffer collateral activation. Neuropharmacology. 2010 Mar 58(3): 668–75
  106. 106. Perrais D, Ropert N (1999) Effect of zolpidem on miniature IPSCs and occupancy of postsynaptic GABAA receptors in central synapses. J Neurosci. 1999 Jan 15 19(2): 578–88.
  107. 107. Tietz EI, Kapur J, Macdonald RL (1999) Functional GABAA receptor heterogeneity of acutely dissociated hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells. J Neurophysiol. 1999 Apr 81(4): 1575–86.
  108. 108. Buibas M, Silva GA (2011) A framework for simulating and estimating the state and functional topology of complex dynamic geometric networks. Neural Comput. 2011 Jan 23(1): 183–214
  109. 109. Chen TW, Wardill TJ, Sun Y, Pulver SR, Renninger SL, et al. (2013) Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 2013 Jul 18 499(7458): 295–300
  110. 110. Ding J, Luo AF, Hu L, Wang D, Shao F (2014) Structural basis of the ultrasensitive calcium indicator GCaMP6. Sci China Life Sci. 2014 Mar 57(3): 269–74
  111. 111. Brickley SG, Mody I (2012) Extrasynaptic GABA(A) receptors: their function in the CNS and implications for disease. Neuron. 2012 Jan 12 73(1): 23–34
  112. 112. Fernandez FR, White JA (2010) Gain control in CA1 pyramidal cells using changes in somatic conductance. J Neurosci. 2010 Jan 6 30(1): 230–41
  113. 113. Groen MR, Paulsen O, Perez-Garci E, Nevian T, Wortel J et al.. (2014) Development of dendritic tonic GABAergic inhibition regulates excitability and plasticity in CA1 pyramidal neurons. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Apr 23. [Epub ahead of print].
  114. 114. Héja L, Nyitrai G, Kékesi O, Dobolyi A, Szabó P, et al. (2012) Astrocytes convert network excitation to tonic inhibition of neurons. BMC Biol. 2012 Mar 15 10: 26
  115. 115. Yeung JY, Canning KJ, Zhu G, Pennefather P, MacDonald JF, et al. (2003) Tonically activated GABAA receptors in hippocampal neurons are high-affinity, low-conductance sensors for extracellular GABA. Mol Pharmacol. 2003 Jan 63(1): 2–8.
  116. 116. Yoon BE, Jo S, Woo J, Lee JH, Kim T, et al. (2011) The amount of astrocytic GABA positively correlates with the degree of tonic inhibition in hippocampal CA1 and cerebellum. Mol Brain. 2011 Nov 22 4: 42
  117. 117. Zheng F, Khanna S (2001) Selective destruction of medial septal cholinergic neurons attenuates pyramidal cell suppression, but not excitation in dorsal hippocampus field CA1 induced by subcutaneous injection of formalin. Neuroscience. 2001 103(4): 985–98.
  118. 118. Lindquist CE, Birnir B (2006) Graded response to GABA by native extrasynaptic GABA receptors. J Neurochem. 2006 Jun 97(5): 1349–56.
  119. 119. Semyanov A, Walker MC, Kullmann DM (2003) GABA uptake regulates cortical excitability via cell type-specific tonic inhibition. Nat Neurosci. 2003 May 6(5): 484–90.
  120. 120. Alexandre C, Dordal A, Aixendri R, Guzman A, Hamon M, et al. (2008) Sleep-stabilizing effects of E-6199, compared to zopiclone, zolpidem and THIP in mice. Sleep. 2008 Feb 31(2): 259–70.
  121. 121. Anaclet C, Zhang M, Zhao C, Buda C, Seugnet L, et al. (2012) Effects of GF-015535-00, a novel α1 GABA A receptor ligand, on the sleep-wake cycle in mice, with reference to zolpidem. Sleep. 2012 Jan 1 35(1): 103–11
  122. 122. Kopp C, Rudolph U, Tobler I (2004) Sleep EEG changes after zolpidem in mice. Neuroreport. 2004 Oct 5 15(14): 2299–302.
  123. 123. Xu Q, Xu XH, Qu WM, Lazarus M, Urade Y, et al. (2014) A mouse model mimicking human first night effect for the evaluation of hypnotics. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2014 Jan 116: 129–36
  124. 124. Vyazovskiy VV, Harris KD (2013) Sleep and the single neuron: the role of global slow oscillations in individual cell rest. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jun 14(6): 443–51
  125. 125. Crunelli V, Hughes SW (2010) The slow (<1 Hz) rhythm of non-REM sleep: a dialogue between three cardinal oscillators. Nat Neurosci. 2010 Jan 13(1): 9–17
  126. 126. Ji D, Wilson MA (2007) Coordinated memory replay in the visual cortex and hippocampus during sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 2007 10: 100–107.
  127. 127. Inostroza M, Born J (2013) Sleep for preserving and transforming episodic memory. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul 8 36: 79–102
  128. 128. Isomura Y, Sirota A, Ozen S, Montgomery S, Mizuseki K, et al. (2006) Integration and segregation of activity in entorhinal-hippocampal subregions by neocortical slow oscillations. Neuron. 2006 Dec 7 52(5): 871–82.
  129. 129. Vyazovskiy VV, Cirelli C, Tononi G (2011) Electrophysiological correlates of sleep homeostasis in freely behaving rats. Prog Brain Res. 2011 193: 17–38
  130. 130. Lundahl J, Deacon S, Maurice D, Staner L (2012) EEG spectral power density profiles during NREM sleep for gaboxadol and zolpidem in patients with primary insomnia. J Psychopharmacol. 2012 Aug 26(8): 1081–7
  131. 131. Monti JM, Alvariño F, Monti D (2000) Conventional and power spectrum analysis of the effects of zolpidem on sleep EEG in patients with chronic primary insomnia. Sleep. 2000 Dec 15 23(8): 1075–84.
  132. 132. Benoit O, Bouard G, Payan C, Borderies P, Prado J (1994) Effect of a single dose (10 mg) of zolpidem on visual and spectral analysis of sleep in young poor sleepers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1994 Nov 116(3): 297–303.
  133. 133. Inagaki T, Miyaoka T, Tsuji S, Inami Y, Nishida A et al.. (2010) Adverse reactions to zolpidem: case reports and a review of the literature. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2010; 12(6). pii: PCC.09r00849. doi: 10.4088/PCC.09r00849bro.
  134. 134. Isawa S, Suzuki M, Uchiumi M, Murasaki M (2000) The effect of zolpidem and zopiclone on memory. Nihon Shinkei Seishin Yakurigaku Zasshi. 2000 May 20(2): 61–9.
  135. 135. Kleykamp BA, Griffiths RR, McCann UD, Smith MT, Mintzer MZ (2012) Acute effects of zolpidem extended-release on cognitive performance and sleep in healthy males after repeated nightly use. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb 20(1): 28–39
  136. 136. Lieberman JA (2007) Update on the safety considerations in the management of insomnia with hypnotics: incorporating modified-release formulations into primary care. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 9(1): 25–31.
  137. 137. Mednick SC, McDevitt EA, Walsh JK, Wamsley E, Paulus M, et al. (2013) The critical role of sleep spindles in hippocampal-dependent memory: a pharmacology study. J Neurosci. 2013 Mar 6 33(10): 4494–504
  138. 138. Uslaner JM, Tye SJ, Eddins DM, Wang X, Fox SV, et al. (2013) Orexin receptor antagonists differ from standard sleep drugs by promoting sleep at doses that do not disrupt cognition. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Apr 3 5(179): 179ra44
  139. 139. Wilkinson CJ (1995) The acute effects of zolpidem, administered alone and with alcohol, on cognitive and psychomotor function. J Clin Psychiatry. 1995 Jul 56(7): 309–18.
  140. 140. Zammit GK, Kramer JA (2001) The Importance of Residual Effects When Choosing a Hypnotic: The Unique Profile of Zaleplon. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Apr 3(2): 53–60.
  141. 141. Ban TA (2006) The role of serendipity in drug discovery. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. Sep 2006 8(3): 335–344.