Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Temporal and Anatomical Host Resistance to Chronic Salmonella Infection Is Quantitatively Dictated by Nramp1 and Influenced by Host Genetic Background

  • Wendy P. Loomis,

    Affiliation Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Matthew L. Johnson,

    Affiliation Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Alicia Brasfield,

    Affiliation Department of Comparative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Marie-Pierre Blanc,

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Jaehun Yi,

    Affiliation Department of Comparative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Samuel I. Miller,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, Departments of Medicine and Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Brad T. Cookson,

    Affiliations Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

  • Adeline M. Hajjar

    hajjar@uw.edu

    Affiliation Department of Comparative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America

Temporal and Anatomical Host Resistance to Chronic Salmonella Infection Is Quantitatively Dictated by Nramp1 and Influenced by Host Genetic Background

  • Wendy P. Loomis, 
  • Matthew L. Johnson, 
  • Alicia Brasfield, 
  • Marie-Pierre Blanc, 
  • Jaehun Yi, 
  • Samuel I. Miller, 
  • Brad T. Cookson, 
  • Adeline M. Hajjar
PLOS
x

Correction

21 Jan 2015: The PLOS ONE Staff (2015) Correction: Temporal and Anatomical Host Resistance to Chronic Salmonella Infection Is Quantitatively Dictated by Nramp1 and Influenced by Host Genetic Background. PLOS ONE 10(1): e0117648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117648 View correction

Abstract

The lysosomal membrane transporter, Nramp1, plays a key role in innate immunity and resistance to infection with intracellular pathogens such as non-typhoidal Salmonella (NTS). NTS-susceptible C57BL/6 (B6) mice, which express the mutant Nramp1D169 allele, are unable to control acute infection with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium following intraperitoneal or oral inoculation. Introducing functional Nramp1G169 into the B6 host background, either by constructing a congenic strain carrying Nramp1G169 from resistant A/J mice (Nramp-Cg) or overexpressing Nramp1G169 from a transgene (Nramp-Tg), conferred equivalent protection against acute Salmonella infection. In contrast, the contributions of Nramp1 for controlling chronic infection are more complex, involving temporal and anatomical differences in Nramp1-dependent host responses. Nramp-Cg, Nramp-Tg and NTS-resistant 129×1/SvJ mice survived oral Salmonella infection equally well for the first 2–3 weeks, providing evidence that Nramp1 contributes to the initial control of NTS bacteremia preceding establishment of chronic Salmonella infection. By day 30, increased host Nramp1 expression (Tg>Cg) provided greater protection as indicated by decreased splenic bacterial colonization (Tg<Cg). However, despite controlling bacterial growth within MLN as effectively as 129×1/SvJ mice, Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg mice eventually succumbed to infection. These data indicate: 1) discrete, anatomically localized host resistance is conferred by Nramp1 expression in NTS-susceptible mice, 2) restriction of systemic bacterial growth in the spleens of NTS-susceptible mice is enhanced by Nramp1 expression and dose-dependent, and 3) host genes other than Nramp1 also contribute to the ability of NTS-resistant 129×1/SvJ mice to control bacterial replication during chronic infection.

Introduction

Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi are human pathogens that cause systemic typhoid fever in infected individuals. Infection with several other serovars, including Typhimurium, Enteritidis, and Dublin, usually results in gastroenteritis in humans (hence the designation non-typhoidal Salmonellae-NTS), although a variety of immunological lesions, such as HIV-induced CD4+ T cell depletion, genetic defects in oxidative stress pathways (Chronic Granulomatous Disease), and administration of IFN or TNF inhibitors, have been associated with more severe illness in humans [1]. In mice, one inherited form of susceptibility to Salmonella infection is associated with a missense mutation in macrophage-encoded solute carrier family 11a member 1 (Slc11a1, hereafter referred to as natural resistance-associated macrophage protein, or Nramp1), which transports divalent cations out of bacteria-containing phagosomes, potentially inhibiting bacterial metallo-enzymes required for survival of many intracellular pathogens [2], [3]. NTS infection of susceptible (Nramp1G169D) mouse strains, such as C57BL/6 and BALB/c, leads to acute, systemic infection while resistant mice encoding the wild type Nramp1 allele (Nramp1G169), including strains 129×1/SvJ, A/J, and C3H, develop long-term chronic colonization [4][6]. In both models, Salmonella cross the epithelial barrier and colonize the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) prior to systemic spread to the spleen and liver [4], [7][9]. Susceptible C57BL/6 mice are unable to control systemic replication and succumb to acute infection within a week of infection whereas resistant 129×1/SvJ mice, despite early dissemination of the bacteria, control systemic replication and survive infection [4]. While Salmonella is progressively cleared from systemic tissues in 129×1/SvJ mice, MLN colonization persists and can act as a reservoir for relapsing infections [4], [10]. We hypothesized that C57BL/6 mice genetically engineered to express the resistant Nramp1G169 allele would survive the acute phase of infection and establish persistent Salmonella colonization, allowing us to study protective immunological responses in chronically infected mice. Interestingly, we found that expression of Nramp1G169 was sufficient to control bacterial replication in MLN but not in systemic tissues even in transgenic C57BL/6 mice overexpressing Nramp1G169, which has been shown to promote survival during acute Salmonella infection [11], [12]. Therefore, these data also reveal that resistant mouse strains, such as 129×1/SvJ, encode factors other than Nramp1 that contribute significantly to controlling bacterial replication within systemic tissues.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Washington.

Generation of C57BL/6 Nramp-Cg mice

C57BL/6 mice consomic for A/J chromosome 1 were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. These were then backcrossed to C57BL/6 mice and the presence of Nramp1G169 was determined by sequencing. Marker-assisted breeding, also known as speed congenics, allowed us to monitor progressive replacement of flanking A/J sequences with C57BL/6 over the course of 5 backcross generations using in-house Illumina SNP genotyping [13]. Based on the SNP locations, crossover events occurred between bases 52,159,056 and 69,117,243 at the 5′ end, and between bases 76,984,491 and 85,664,769 at the 3′ end (from build 34 of the mouse genome). Thus Nramp-Cg mice encode between 7.9 and 33.6 Mbp of flanking A/J sequences in chromosome 1 (see Figure S1). These were then bred to homozygosity.

Other mice

Nramp-Tg mice, generated by Philipe Gros [11] and provided to us by Ferric Fang, carry an Nramp1 transgene derived from 129sv genomic DNA [11]. Two single nucleotide polymorphisms have been identified within the Nramp1 gene between 129sv and A/J mice but neither SNP alters the amino acid sequence [14]. C57BL/6 and 129×1/SvJ mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Mice were bred and/or housed in a barrier facility at the University of Washington in ventilated racks with constant access to food and water.

Real-time PCR

Bone-marrow derived macrophages were generated as previously described [15] and harvested after 7 days of culture. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol Reagent, (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) followed by DNase treatment and cDNA synthesis. Oligo dT primed cDNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and Minus-RT controls were run for each sample. Relative Nramp1 expression levels were determined using Real-time PCR with Brilliant II SYBR Green qPCR reagent. The amplification was performed with an initial 2 min incubation at 50°C and 10 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C, 15 s and 60°C, 1 min. Specificity of amplification was assessed using a melt-curve analysis and β-actin was used to normalize the data between samples. The Nramp1 primers were designed using Probe Finder v2.48 (Roche, Indianapolis, IN) yielding a 78 bp product with forward primer 5′-TAC CAG CAA ACC AAT GAG GA −3′ and reverse primer 5′- CCT GGG GAA GAT CTT AGC ATA GT-3′. β-actin primers were previously described [15].

Bacterial infections

For IP infections, S. Typhimurium strain SL1344 was grown aerobically overnight in LB, pelleted, resuspended in PBS, and diluted to an appropriate concentration based on the O.D. at 600 nm. The inoculum was administered in 200 µl PBS intraperitoneally; actual CFU administered was verified by plating on LB plates (1600, 1770 and 1130 CFU respectively). For oral infections, S. typhimurium strain SL1344::lux (rederived in SL1344 from strain Xen 26; Caliper Life Sciences, now Perkin Elmer) was grown statically overnight in LB. Bacteria were enumerated using a Multisizer 4 (Beckman Coulter). Mice received either 5×107 CFU (colonization experiments) or 1×108 CFU (survival assays) in 200 µl in PBS +5% bicarbonate via oral gavage. Spleens, livers, and/or MLN were harvested at designated points post infection, homogenized, and serial dilutions were plated to determine the number of CFU per organ. Groups of 8–10 mice were infected orally with SL1344::lux for survival assays. Mice were weighed daily and scored for signs of clinical illness, i.e. ruffled fur, hunched posture and lethargy (scale of 0–3). At the start of the experiment, body weights were statistically indistinguishable between mouse strains (Figure S2A). Endpoint criteria for euthanasia were set at 20% weight loss (Figure S2B) or a score of 2.5 or greater in 2 out of 3 clinical categories.

Statistics

Prism software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA) was used for all statistical analyses with test indicated in the figure legend.

Results

Analysis of Nramp1 expression in congenic and transgenic mice

The Nramp1 gene is actively transcribed in susceptible C57BL/6 mice [16]. However, the G169D missense mutation results in improper maturation/membrane integration and thus rapid degradation of the protein [3]. C57BL/6 mice that overexpress the resistant Nramp1G169 allele from a transgene (Nramp-Tg) have been shown to survive acute intravenous infection with S. Typhimurium [11]. To address the question of whether overexpression of Nramp1 is required to control Salmonella infection, we generated a congenic C57BL/6 strain carrying the Nramp1 locus from chromosome 1 of A/J mice (Nramp-Cg). Relative RNA transcript levels were compared in bone marrow-derived macrophages cultured from C57BL/6, Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg mice. Macrophages were chosen for source RNA as they express high levels of Nramp1. We found that Nramp-Cg macrophages expressed equivalent levels of Nramp1 RNA as C57BL/6 macrophages whereas Nramp-Tg macrophages expressed 4-fold more Nramp1 RNA (Figure 1).

thumbnail
Figure 1. Relative expression of Nramp1 in macrophages from C57BL/6, Nramp-Cg, and Nramp-Tg mice.

Real-time PCR was performed on total RNA extracted from BMDMs cultured from indicated mouse strains and normalized to β-actin levels. Shown are the means of the results from 3 separate BMDM preparations. ** P<0.01, n.s. = not significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111763.g001

Nramp1 is sufficient to control acute S. Typhimurium infection

To determine whether congenic expression of Nramp1G169 confers resistance to acute Salmonella infection, C57BL/6, Nramp-Cg, Nramp-Tg and 129×1/SvJ mice were challenged IP with virulent Salmonella strain SL1344 and bacterial colonization was measured in relevant organs (spleen and liver) 3 days later. As expected, bacterial titers in spleens and livers of 129×1/SvJ mice were significantly lower (40 fold) than in susceptible C57BL/6 mice (p<0.01) (Figure 2). Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg spleens were colonized at levels equivalent to that seen in 129×1/SvJ mice, with no observed Nramp1 gene dosage effect. Liver colonization was lower in Nramp-Tg mice, reaching statistical significance relative to 129×1/SvJ but not Nramp-Cg (Figure 2B).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Nramp1+ C57BL/6 mice control systemic colonization during acute IP Salmonella infection.

C57BL/6 (black diamond), Nramp-Cg (red circle), Nramp-Tg (blue square), and 129×1/SvJ (green triangle) mice were infected intraperitoneally and bacterial titers in the (A) spleen and (B) liver were measured 3 days later. Shown are the combined results from 3 independent experiments (lines indicate median values). Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric t test. ** P<0.01, *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111763.g002

While the IP infection model has been used extensively to study acute Salmonella infection, oral infection more closely mimics human disease. We therefore compared Salmonella colonization in C57BL/6, Nramp-Cg, Nramp-Tg and 129×1/SvJ mice during an acute oral infection. By day 5 post infection, expression of functional Nramp1G169 in Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg mice led to better control of bacterial replication in both the MLN (5–10 fold lower) and spleen (>50 fold lower) compared to C57BL/6 mice expressing Nramp1D169 (Figure 3), and was not significantly different from 129×1/SvJ mice. Significantly fewer bacteria crossed the intestinal mucosa and colonized the MLN of Nramp-Tg compared to Nramp-Cg mice (Figure 3A). In contrast to IP infection, spleens of orally infected Nramp-Tg mice contained 60-fold fewer Salmonella than spleens of Nramp-Cg mice (Figure 3B) indicating a dose-dependent contribution of Nramp1 expression to controlling systemic bacterial replication during the early stages of infection using a relevant GI model.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Dose dependent contribution of Nramp1 to control of acute oral Salmonella infection.

C57BL/6 (black diamond), Nramp-Cg (red circle), Nramp-Tg (blue square), and 129×1/SvJ (green triangle) mice were infected orally and bacterial titers in the (A) MLN and (B) spleen were measured 5 days later. Shown are the combined results from 3 independent experiments (lines indicate median value). Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric t test. ** P<0.01, *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111763.g003

While Nramp1 expression enhances survival of C57BL/6 mice, additional genetic factors are required for long-term survival and systemic control of bacterial replication during persistent Salmonella infection

Since Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg mice control bacterial replication as well as 129×1/SvJ mice during the first 5 days, we asked whether C57BL/6 mice expressing Nramp1G169 survive as well as 129×1/SvJ mice during the establishment of chronic Salmonella infection (Figure 4). As expected, susceptible C57BL/6 mice succumbed to oral infection with a median survival rate of 12 days. Median survival was significantly increased in Nramp-Cg, Nramp-Tg, and 129×1/SvJ mice (p<0.0001 for each compared to C57BL/6) (Figure 4). Interestingly, Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg mice succumbed to oral Salmonella infection more rapidly than 129×1/SvJ mice, which showed 100% survival at day 50 post infection, with median survival values of 29 and 44 days, respectively (p<0.01 for both Cg and Tg strains compared to 129×1/SvJ). These data show that Nramp1 expression is not sufficient to promote long-term survival of susceptible C57BL/6 mice.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Nramp1 expression promotes survival of C57BL/6 mice, but Nramp1+ C57BL/6 mice eventually succumb to persistent Salmonella infection.

C57BL/6 (black diamond; n = 10), Nramp-Cg (red circle; n = 8), Nramp-Tg (blue square; n = 8), and 129×1/SvJ (green triangle; n = 9) mice were infected orally with Salmonella. Mice were monitored daily, as described in Methods, and euthanized when they reached the designated endpoint. Shown are representative results from 2 independent experiments. Data were analyzed using the log rank (Mantel-Cox) test. All comparisons were highly significant (P<0.01) unless otherwise noted.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111763.g004

Tissue-specific contributions of Nramp1 to control of S. Typhimurium replication

The difference in survival between Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg mice did not reach statistical significance on day 50 (Figure 4), suggesting that Nramp1 overexpression in Nramp-Tg mice does not enhance the overall control of bacterial replication compared with Nramp-Cg hosts. However, median time to death does not provide information regarding anatomical restriction or tissue-specific control of bacterial replication. Therefore, we compared MLN and spleen colonization in Nramp-Cg, Nramp-Tg and 129×1/SvJ mice on day 30 post infection (Figure 5). Day 30 was chosen as a late time point where sufficient mice of each strain survived for tissue harvesting. Despite significant differences in survival on day 30 (Figure 4), we observed surprisingly equivalent colonization of the MLN across all Nramp1+ strains (Figure 5A) suggesting that expression of Nramp1 by resident macrophages is sufficient to control Salmonella replication in infected MLN. In contrast, splenic bacterial colonization levels differed significantly in each of the mouse strains tested (Figure 5B). Increased host Nramp1 expression (Tg>Cg) resulted in decreased splenic bacterial colonization (Tg<Cg). However, the spleens of both Nramp1+ C57BL/6 strains (Tg and Cg) harbored more Salmonella than spleens from 129×1/SvJ mice. These data suggest that host responses and/or selective pressures differ significantly between MLN and spleens. As a result, the contribution of Nramp1 expression to the restriction of systemic bacterial growth is anatomically distributed with host genes other than Nramp1 contributing to the ability of NTS-resistant 129×1/SvJ mice to effectively control splenic colonization.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Tissue-specific contributions of Nramp1 expression for controlling bacterial replication.

Nramp-Cg (red circle), Nramp-Tg (blue square), and 129×1/SvJ (green triangle) mice were infected orally and bacterial titers in the (A) MLN and (B) spleen were measured 30 days later. Shown are the combined results from 3 independent experiments (lines indicate median value). Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric t test. ** P<0.01, *P<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111763.g005

Discussion

Control of Salmonella replication in vivo is complex and differences in mouse genetic background can profoundly affect susceptibility to NTS (reviewed in [17]). Naturally-occurring mutations and targeted deletion of Nramp1 result in susceptibility to acute IP or IV infection [6], while expression of Nramp1 from a transgene promotes acute survival of otherwise susceptible mice [11]. We confirmed previous findings that Nramp1 expression is important for innate resistance during the acute phase of infection using the transgenic mice (Nramp-Tg) and congenic C57BL/6 mice carrying the Nramp1 locus from resistant A/J mice (Nramp-Cg) (Figure 2). While Nramp-Tg macrophages express approximately 4-fold more Nramp1 transcript than Nramp-Cg cells (Figure 1), we observed no Nramp1 dose-dependent difference in colonization between Nramp-Cg and Nramp-Tg mice during acute IP-induced Salmonella infection (Figure 2). However, when Salmonella was delivered orally, acute colonization was reduced in both the MLN and spleen of Nramp-Tg mice compared to Nramp-Cg mice (Figures 3). These data suggest that Nramp1 plays a more important role in controlling acute bacterial replication when the bacteria are transiting through the gut epithelium to reach systemic sites.

Despite early control of splenic colonization, Nramp1+ C57BL/6 mice did not survive chronic oral infection (Figure 4). While the resistant Nramp1G169 allele is not sufficient to confer long-term survival to C57BL/6 mice, it does contribute to restriction of bacterial replication in MLN but not systemic sites, such as the spleen, suggesting that the function of macrophage-encoded Nramp1G169 is anatomically compartmentalized. MLN are a critical tissue for restricting growth and dissemination of Salmonella. During trafficking from the gastrointestinal tract to the bloodstream, bacteria pass through the MLN, being brought there by gut-resident dendritic cells [8]. Within the MLN Salmonella are taken up by macrophages and most are degraded in an Nramp1-dependent manner [4], [10], [18]. However, some bacteria persist and replicate within MLN macrophages, thus creating a chronic reservoir of Salmonella responsible for relapsing infections [4], [10]. Mesenteric lymphadenectomised mice display increased spleen and liver colonization, increased severity of relapsing infection and increased mortality following oral inoculation, thus demonstrating the importance of MLN as filters protecting systemic tissues [8], [10]. Equivalent CFU in chronically infected Nramp-Cg, Nramp-Tg and 129×1/SvJ MLN (Figure 5A) suggests that expression of Nramp1 in MLN macrophages is sufficient to control Salmonella replication in this tissue. Why then is Nramp1 expression not sufficient to control splenic colonization?

As in MLN, macrophages are the major cell type supporting Salmonella replication in the spleen [4], [19]. However, within chronically infected spleens Salmonella preferentially survive and replicate within a subset of macrophages, called hemophagocytic macrophages, that have ingested non-apoptotic cells of hematopoietic lineage, but are killed by macrophages that have phagocytosed nothing or have phagocytosed dead host cells [19], [20]. Nramp1 expression in hemophagocytic macrophages was not tested, but the fact that Salmonella are able to replicate efficiently in these cells suggests that Nramp1, if expressed at all, is not playing a crucial role in controlling bacterial replication within splenic macrophages. Increased Nramp1 copy number did reduce splenic CFU in Nramp-Tg mice compared to Nramp-Cg mice, but bacterial titers were still 66-fold greater than in 129×1/SvJ mice (Figure 5B), demonstrating an important new finding of our study that genes other than Nramp1 are required for systemic control of chronic Salmonella infection. Our data demonstrating that uncontrolled splenic colonization negatively impacts host survival is consistent with studies examining asplenic humans. Patients with functional or anatomic asplenia are at significantly increased risk of overwhelming infection with mortality rates of 50–70% [21]. Interestingly, Salmonella species are the leading cause of infection in patients with sickle cell disease, an important cause of functional asplenia [22].

Studies examining phenotypic and genetic differences between susceptible and resistant mouse strains have identified a large number of loci (other than Nramp1) involved in both innate and adaptive immune mechanisms [23][30]. For example, comparisons between the response of Nramp-Tg and Sv129S6 mice to chronic Salmonella infection showed that Nramp-Tg mice experience more severe inflammatory disease than Sv129S6 mice, with higher levels of proinflammatory serum cytokines (IFNγ, TNFα, IL-1β and IL-2) and chemokines (MCP-1 and CXCL1) and decreased anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4)[27]. While enhanced Th1 responses should promote bacterial clearance in Nramp-Tg spleens, uncontrolled inflammation likely contributes to the increased mortality seen in Nramp1+ C57BL/6 mice (Figure 4).

Adaptive immunity is required for resistance late in infection [31], [32]. Control of bacterial replication in the spleens of 129SvJ × C57BL/6 F1 mice correlates with robust T cell effector function and reduced immune suppression by regulatory T cells [33]. While both C57BL/6 and 129×1/SvJ mice share the same MHC haplotype, differential regulation of T cell responses may account for the ability of 129×1/SvJ mice to control Salmonella replication better/longer than Nramp1+ C57BL/6 mice. Natural killer (NK) cells have recently been shown to regulate T cell immunity via a number of different strategies, including cytokine secretion and perforin-mediated T cell death (reviewed in [34]). Activation of NK cells is controlled by the Ly49 family of class I binding receptors. Of relevance to this study, genetic analysis of the Ly49 gene cluster in 129/J mice identified extensive differences in gene content relative to C57BL/6 mice [29] that correlated with altered NK cell activation in 129/J mice [30]. Additional studies comparing genetic susceptibility to chronic Salmonella infection using the Nramp1+ mouse strains described here would enhance our understanding of factors required for control of acute Salmonella infection and the establishment of persistent infection.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Location of SNP identifying recombination junctions in Nramp-Cg mice. Illumina SNPs that are either of C57BL/6 (black) or A/J (red) origin are shown on a section of Chromosome 1 (outer SNP nucleotide numbers according to Build 34 are indicated in parentheses). Distance between SNP indicated in Mb.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111763.s001

(TIF)

Figure S2.

Comparison of body weight over the course of infection. Average body weight of mice used in Figure 4 (survival). A) Starting weight (in grams) on day 0. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and differences found to be insignificant. B) Weight change over the course of the experiment. At each timepoint, the weight of each mouse was compared to its weight on day 0 and the difference recorded as percent weight change. Shown are average changes in weight over 50 days of infection. During analysis, mice that succumbed to infection were represented by their last recorded weight for the remainder of the timecourse. C57BL/6 (black diamond; n = 10), Nramp-Cg (red circle; n = 8), Nramp-Tg (blue square; n = 8), and 129×1/SvJ (green triangle; n = 9).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111763.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Lisa Nguyen and Cathy Yam for technical assistance, Jeff Furlong for SNP analysis, Edgardo Fortuno 3rd for guidance with real-time PCR and primer design, Ferric Fang for a breeding pair of Nramp-Tg mice, and Christopher B Wilson for guidance during the initiation of the project.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WPL SIM BTC AMH. Performed the experiments: WPL MLJ AB MPB JY AMH. Analyzed the data: WPL SIM BTC AMH. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: WPL SIM BTC AMH.

References

  1. 1. Gordon MA (2008) Salmonella infections in immunocompromised adults. J Infect 56: 413–422.
  2. 2. Nevo Y, Nelson N (2006) The NRAMP family of metal-ion transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763: 609–620.
  3. 3. Vidal SM, Pinner E, Lepage P, Gauthier S, Gros P (1996) Natural resistance to intracellular infections: Nramp1 encodes a membrane phosphoglycoprotein absent in macrophages from susceptible (Nramp1 D169) mouse strains. J Immunol 157: 3559–3568.
  4. 4. Monack DM, Bouley DM, Falkow S (2004) Salmonella typhimurium persists within macrophages in the mesenteric lymph nodes of chronically infected Nramp1+/+ mice and can be reactivated by IFNgamma neutralization. J Exp Med 199: 231–241.
  5. 5. Plant J, Glynn AA (1974) Natural resistance to Salmonella infection, delayed hypersensitivity and Ir genes in different strains of mice. Nature 248: 345–347.
  6. 6. Vidal S, Tremblay ML, Govoni G, Gauthier S, Sebastiani G, et al. (1995) The Ity/Lsh/Bcg locus: natural resistance to infection with intracellular parasites is abrogated by disruption of the Nramp1 gene. J Exp Med 182: 655–666.
  7. 7. Mastroeni P, Grant AJ (2011) Spread of Salmonella enterica in the body during systemic infection: unravelling host and pathogen determinants. Expert Rev Mol Med 13: e12.
  8. 8. Voedisch S, Koenecke C, David S, Herbrand H, Förster R, et al. (2009) Mesenteric lymph nodes confine dendritic cell-mediated dissemination of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and limit systemic disease in mice. Infect Immun 77: 3170–3180.
  9. 9. Watson KG, Holden DW (2010) Dynamics of growth and dissemination of Salmonella in vivo. Cell Microbiol 12: 1389–1397.
  10. 10. Griffin AJ, Li LX, Voedisch S, Pabst O, McSorley SJ (2011) Dissemination of persistent intestinal bacteria via the mesenteric lymph nodes causes typhoid relapse. Infect Immun 79: 1479–1488.
  11. 11. Govoni G, Vidal S, Gauthier S, Skamene E, Malo D, et al. (1996) The Bcg/Ity/Lsh locus: genetic transfer of resistance to infections in C57BL/6J mice transgenic for the Nramp1 Gly169 allele. Infect Immun 64: 2923–2929.
  12. 12. Brown DE, Libby SJ, Moreland SM, McCoy MW, Brabb T, et al.. (2013) Salmonella enterica Causes More Severe Inflammatory Disease in C57/BL6 Nramp1G169 Mice Than Sv129S6 Mice. Vet Pathol.
  13. 13. Markel P, Shu P, Ebeling C, Carlson GA, Nagle DL, et al. (1997) Theoretical and empirical issues for marker-assisted breeding of congenic mouse strains. Nat Genet 17: 280–284.
  14. 14. Malo D, Vogan K, Vidal S, Hu J, Cellier M, et al. (1994) Haplotype mapping and sequence analysis of the mouse Nramp gene predict susceptibility to infection with intracellular parasites. Genomics 23: 51–61.
  15. 15. Hajjar AM, Ernst RK, Fortuno ES 3rd, Brasfield AS, Yam CS, et al. (2012) Humanized TLR4/MD-2 mice reveal LPS recognition differentially impacts susceptibility to Yersinia pestis and Salmonella enterica. PLoS Pathog 8: e1002963.
  16. 16. Nakanaga K, Maeda S, Myojin Y, Xu DL, Goto Y (1999) Sequence analysis and expression of Nramp-1 gene in Bcgr and Bcgs mice. J Vet Med Sci 61: 717–720.
  17. 17. Roy MF, Malo D (2002) Genetic regulation of host responses to Salmonella infection in mice. Genes Immun 3: 381–393.
  18. 18. Zaharik ML, Cullen VL, Fung AM, Libby SJ, Kujat Choy SL, et al. (2004) The Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium divalent cation transport systems MntH and SitABCD are essential for virulence in an Nramp1G169 murine typhoid model. Infect Immun 72: 5522–5525.
  19. 19. Nix RN, Altschuler SE, Henson PM, Detweiler CS (2007) Hemophagocytic macrophages harbor Salmonella enterica during persistent infection. PLoS Pathog 3: e193.
  20. 20. McCoy MW, Moreland SM, Detweiler CS (2012) Hemophagocytic macrophages in murine typhoid fever have an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Infect Immun 80: 3642–3649.
  21. 21. Melles DC, de Marie S (2004) Prevention of infections in hyposplenic and asplenic patients: an update. Neth J Med 62: 45–52.
  22. 22. Workman MR, Philpott-Howard J, Bellingham AJ (1996) Managing patients with an absent or dysfunctional spleen. Guidelines should highlight risk of Salmonella infection in sickle cell disease. BMJ 312: 1359–1360; author reply 1361.
  23. 23. Borrego A, Peters LC, Jensen JR, Ribeiro OG, Koury Cabrera WH, et al. (2006) Genetic determinants of acute inflammation regulate Salmonella infection and modulate Slc11a1 gene (formerly Nramp1) effects in selected mouse lines. Microbes Infect 8: 2766–2771.
  24. 24. Trezena AG, Souza CM, Borrego A, Massa S, Siqueira M, et al. (2002) Co-localization of quantitative trait loci regulating resistance to Salmonella typhimurium infection and specific antibody production phenotypes. Microbes Infect 4: 1409–1415.
  25. 25. Caron J, Loredo-Osti JC, Morgan K, Malo D (2005) Mapping of interactions and mouse congenic strains identified novel epistatic QTLs controlling the persistence of Salmonella Enteritidis in mice. Genes Immun 6: 500–508.
  26. 26. Sancho-Shimizu V, Khan R, Mostowy S, Larivière L, Wilkinson R, et al. (2007) Molecular genetic analysis of two loci (Ity2 and Ity3) involved in the host response to infection with Salmonella typhimurium using congenic mice and expression profiling. Genetics 177: 1125–1139.
  27. 27. Brown DE, Libby SJ, Moreland SM, McCoy MW, Brabb T, et al. (2013) Salmonella enterica causes more severe inflammatory disease in C57/BL6 Nramp1G169 mice than Sv129S6 mice. Vet Pathol 50: 867–876.
  28. 28. Yang IV, Wade CM, Kang HM, Alper S, Rutledge H, et al. (2009) Identification of novel genes that mediate innate immunity using inbred mice. Genetics 183: 1535–1544.
  29. 29. Makrigiannis AP, Pau AT, Schwartzberg PL, McVicar DW, Beck TW, et al. (2002) A BAC contig map of the Ly49 gene cluster in 129 mice reveals extensive differences in gene content relative to C57BL/6 mice. Genomics 79: 437–444.
  30. 30. McVicar DW, Winkler-Pickett R, Taylor LS, Makrigiannis A, Bennett M, et al. (2002) Aberrant DAP12 signaling in the 129 strain of mice: implications for the analysis of gene-targeted mice. J Immunol 169: 1721–1728.
  31. 31. Nauciel C, Ronco E, Guenet JL, Pla M (1988) Role of H-2 and non-H-2 genes in control of bacterial clearance from the spleen in Salmonella typhimurium-infected mice. Infect Immun 56: 2407–2411.
  32. 32. Mittrücker HW, Kaufmann SH (2000) Immune response to infection with Salmonella typhimurium in mice. J Leukoc Biol 67: 457–463.
  33. 33. Johanns TM, Ertelt JM, Rowe JH, Way SS (2010) Regulatory T cell suppressive potency dictates the balance between bacterial proliferation and clearance during persistent Salmonella infection. PLoS Pathog 6: e1001043.
  34. 34. Crome SQ, Lang PA, Lang KS, Ohashi PS (2013) Natural killer cells regulate diverse T cell responses. Trends Immunol 34: 342–349.