Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

HLA Class I and Class II Associations with ESRD in Saudi Arabian Population

HLA Class I and Class II Associations with ESRD in Saudi Arabian Population

  • Nuha Mahmoud Hamdi, 
  • Fadel Hassan Al-Hababi, 
  • Amr Ekhlas Eid
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Chronic renal failure (CRF) leads in the majority of instances to end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring renal replacement therapy. Our interest was to evaluate the possible associations of HLA class I and class II antigens with ESRD independent of other factors, in Saudi Arabia population.

Methodology

A retrospective study to determine the HLA class I and class II polymorphisms and their association with ESRD, was performed on 350 patients with ESRD, and 105 healthy unrelated control. Patients and control groups were typed by SSOP lumenix techniques. The alleles positively associated to the ESRD were: HLA-B*15, B*18, B*49 - DRB1*03, negatively associated alleles were A*26, HLA-B*39, B*50. The haplotypes positively associated with ESRD were: HLA-A*01-DRB1*13 and HLA-A*30-DRBI*03. The negatively associated haplotypes were: HLA-A*02-B*39, A*02-B*50, A*24-B*35, A*24-B*58, A*24-DRB1*16, A*68-DRB1*04, A*02-DQB1*03, A*29-DQB1*02, A*29-DOB1*05 and B*27-DRB1*07 and the last one is the most significant protective haplotypes.

Conclusion

The high Relative Risk (RR) observed and its statistical correlation reflect the strength of the described association between HLA antigens and ESRD.

Introduction

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is now one of the major health problems globally and early diagnosis is vital to prevent the development of end-stage renal failure (ESRD) which is defined as the need for renal replacement therapy such as dialysis or Kidney Transplant [1]. Various factors have been shown to be associated with ESRD such as age, gender, genetics, race, hypertension, and smoking etc. [2]. Although, the exact reasons for the growth of the ESRD program are unknown, it is postulated that changes in the demographics of the population, differences in disease burden among racial groups and under-recognition of earlier stages of CKD and of risk factors for CKD may partially explain this growth [3]. Genome-wide strategies have been used to pinpoint genes that contribute to the risks of development of these disorders [4].

In a recent systemic review based on 44 studies from Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) showed that the incidence of ESRD has increased while the prevalence and mortality rate of ESRD in the GCC has not been reported sufficiently. The leading primary causes of ESRD recorded in the countries of GCC is diabetes which co-morbid conditions being hypertension and hepatitis C virus infection, the most common death was cardio vascular disease and sepsis [5]. The prevalence of CKD in the young Saudi population is around 5.7% [1]. According to the Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation (SCOT) annual report in 2012, the incidence of dialysis in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was 129 new cases per million population (PMP) with 3666 new patients in 2012 [6].

This compares to 360 PMP, 585 PMP and in the United States and Europe, respectively [7], [8]. While the prevalence of dialysis patients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 2012 was 499 new cases PMP with 14,171 dialysis patients [6]. This country showed higher prevalence that other developing countries which, it is vary from less than 100 PMP and 163 PMP in sub-Saharan Africa and India respectively, to about 330 PMP in Jordan and 360 PMP in Iran [9][11].

The rising prevalence is due largely to two main factors; the ageing of the population and the global epidemic of diabetes. An increasing prevalence of the most common causes of ESRD in the GCC: the prevalence of obesity that is associated with multi-chronic diseases have been reported, which exceeds that in the developed countries because of their rapid economic growth and associated changes in lifestyle [12], [13]. The International Diabetes Federation reports that five of the countries of the GCC ranked globally among the top ten countries in the world for diabetes prevalence [14].

The most common causes in Saudi Arabia is diabetic nephropathy (DN) prevalence as a cause of ESRD is 17.27%, glomerulonephritis 12.68%, hypertensive nephropathy prevalence is 7.75%, Secondary glomerulonephritis/Vasculitis haemolyticureamic syndrome (HUS) is 1.7%, uncertain aetiology, and other conditions, that are rarely reported as causes of ESRD, such as schistosomiasis, tuberculosis, sickle cell nephropathy and contrast nephropathy 19.59% [15]. Co-morbidities associated with ESRD diabetes prevalence is 47.85%, hypertension prevalence is 77.88%, cardiovascular disease prevalence is 14.51% and vascular disease as a co-morbidity condition as 11.7% [15].

Genes of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) (major histocompatability complex (MHC)) are located on short arm of chromosome six which are inherited in a co-dominant manner from parents to the offspring [16]. The HLA system is being paid more and more attention because it is very significant in polymorphous immunological reactions [17]. Histocompatibility testing has great importance in the selection of kidney recipient candidates and donors for transplantation, particularly HLA-DRB1, HLA-A, and HLA-B alleles, which code for molecules with a central role in the immune response and an essential role in the control of self recognition and consequently defense against microorganisms [18]. Previous studies have shown that certain polymorphisms of HLA class I and class II may influence the susceptibility to ESRD [19].

This study was conducted to determine protective and susceptible role of HLA class I and class II alleles and haplotypes in end stage renal disease patients.

Materials and Methods

Population Samples

This study investigated 350 unrelated Saudi patients were diagnosed with End Stage Renal disease (226 men/124 women, mean age ± SD, 43.2±16.67 years. For statistical comparison 105 healthy donors were recruited as control (58 men, 47 women, 30.3±15.43) from King Saud Medical City, King Fahad dialysis Center (table 1). HLA typing was performed in Department of immunology at Riyadh Regional Laboratory. Before launching into research, the research and clinical trials committee clearance from King Saud Medical City (KSMC).

DNA extraction and DNA typing of HLA loci

10 mL of blood was collected from the patients and normal donors after obtaining prior informed consent. DNA was isolated from blood samples by a fully automated system (MagNA Pure Compact, Roche) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The isolated DNA was stored at −80°C to be used for PCR. HLA-A, HLA-B HLA-DRB1 and DQRB1genotyping was performed by using LABType polymerase chain reaction reversed sequence-specific oligonucleotide (PCR-rSSO) (Luminex, One Lambda, Canoga Park, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, target DNA was amplified using specific primer sets that are biotinylated at 5 terminus for labeling the PCR product to allow its detection by R-Phycoerythrin-conjugated Streptavidine (SAPE). PCR product was denatured, neutralized, and rehybridized to oligonucleotide probes bound to fluorescently coded microbeads. Then biotinylated hybridized amplicons on microbeads were allowed to be labeled with SAPE. Luminex 100 flow analyzer detected the fluorescent intensities of Phycoerythrin (PE) on each microbeads. The retrieved output was analyzed by HLA Fusion software (ONE LAMBDA, INC, USA) for allele identification.

Statistical analysis

HLA alleles and haplotype frequencies were estimated by direct counting in patients and in healthy controls to compare the differences between the allele frequencies in the control and ESRD groups, a 2×2 contingency table analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test. The strength of association between HLA alleles was estimated by Relative Risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant and was considered sufficient to reject the null hypothesis. Values with relative risk higher than 1 were considered positive association with ESRD risk. Other alleles which express relative risk lowers than 1 were considered negative association with ESRD protection (A line on the software used for statistical analysis like SPSS, OpenEpi with Version no. 20).

Results and Discussion

Since the mid-1980's, there has been marked increase in the incidence and prevalence of ESRD around the world [20]. Various pathologies may be associated to HLA alleles and/or haplotypes such as idiopathic membranous nephropathy, minimal change nephritic syndrome, immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis and familiar focal glomerulonephritis [21], [22]. Family studies of the HLA class II system in acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis in the population of Zulia State confirm in the association between HLA alleles and the disease [23].

Idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis is associated with HLA-DR2 in Japanese patients and with HLA-DR3 in Caucasians [24]. Similarly, compared to the Greek population, a higher frequency of HLA-DRB1*0301 has been reported in British patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy [25]. Also anti-glomerular basement membrane nephritis in Japanese patients has a strong association with DRB1*1501 [26]. Although the presence of certain HLA alleles may be associated with increased susceptibility to renal disease, other HLA alleles may be protective, for example, DRB1*07 is negatively associated with membranous glomerulonephritis in Caucasians [27].

The present study showed that class I HLA-A*02 (ESRD 25.86% vs. con 26.67%) is the most frequent allele in ESRD and control groups of Saudi Arabian population. Other common alleles include A*01 (ESRD 10% vs. con 7.14%) (%), A*03 (ESRD 7.86% vs. con 6.19%), A*24 (ESRD 25.86% vs. con 26.67%), A*31 (ESRD 6.29% vs. con 7.62%), A*30 (ESRD 7% vs. con 4.76) and A*68 (ESRD 8.14% vs. con 10.48%) were the most frequent detected, with no significant difference between the ESRD patient and the control group. On the other hand HLA-A*26 (ESRD 5.14% vs. con 9.52%, p = 0.0318, RR = 0.54, CI = 0.3196 to 0.9123), showed a significant negative association with ESRD and emerged as a protective allele in ESRD (Table2).

thumbnail
Table 2. The frequency and associations of HLA A* alleles in ESRD patients and healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t002

The most common alleles in class I HLA B* alleles were B*07, (ESRD 8.29% vs. con 6.67%), B*08 (ESRD 8.86% vs. con 8.57), B*15 (ESRD 9.86% vs. con 3.81%, p = 0.0044), B*18 (ESRD 4.14% vs. con 0.95, p = 0.0277, B*35 (ESRD 6.43% vs. con 8.57%), B*39 (ESRD n = 11, 1.57%, vs. con 5.24%, p = 0.0076), B*49 (ESRD 4.29% vs. con 0.95%, p = 0.0181, RR = 4.5, CI = 1.0844 to 18.6739), B*50 (ESRD 11.57% vs. con 17.62% p = 0.026, and 51*(ESRD 15.86% vs. con 19.05%) in both ESRD patient and control group (Table 3). Positive significant difference for B*15 (RR = 2.5875, CI = 1.2650 to 5.2925), B*18 (RR = 4.35, CI = 1.0466 to 18.0795), B*49 as risk factor for ESRD and negative significant difference for B*39 (RR = 0.3, CI = 0.1319 to 0.6821), B*50 (RR = 0.656757, CI = 0.4596 to 0.9386) as a protective factor for ESRD were observed (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. The frequency and associations of HLA B* alleles in ESRD patients and healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t003

In a study at the King Khalid University Hospital, which investigated 235 Saudi patients with ESRD and 60 normal, healthy individuals, the most common alleles in both groups were HLA-A2, A68, A24, A3, HLA-B51, B50, B7, B8 with no any significant difference between the two groups [20] [20]. Another report from the Azerbaijan republic, which investigated 26 patients with ESRD and 51 healthy controls, HLA-A2, A3, A24, and HLA-B35, B51 and B18 were the most frequently detected HLA antigens in all subjects. A significant association was found between susceptibility to ESRD and HLA-A11, A33 and HLA-B49 (P<0.05) [28].

In another study from Zulia and Venezuela on 188 patients with ESRD and 107 controls, HLA-B38, B51, B53 and B62 were positively associated with ESRD andHLA-A9, B12, B17, B40 and B48 were negatively associated with ESRD [23].

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is leading cause of ESRD worldwide. It affects approximately 30% of patients with long-standing type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Also familiar clustering of DN suggests genetic predisposition factor plays a role in the pathogenesis of this disease [29] [29]. Of the 12844 Saudi patients on dialysis, about 24% are in the active waiting list for transplantation with another 20% being evaluated for inclusion in the waiting list. The data showed that 31% of the dialysis patients are hypertensive, 14% are diabetic in addition to 30% suffer of both diabetes and hypertension [6].

For class II HLA-DRB1 our study showed that the most frequent alleles were DRB1*03 (ESRD n = 121, 17.29% vs. con n = 22, 10.48%), 04 (ESRD n = 99, 14.14% vs. con n = 40, 19.05), DRB1*07 (ESRD n = 110, 15.71 vs. con n = 43, 20.48), DRB1*11 (ESRD n = 71, 10.14% vs. con n = 15, 7.14%), DRB1*13 (ESRD n = 114, 16.29% vs. con n = 28, 13.33%) and DRB1*15 (ESRD n = 78, 11.14% vs. control, n = 27, 12.86%) in ESRD and control groups with no significant difference between the two group, except for DRB1*03 (p = 0.0173, RR = 1.65, CI = 1.0762 to 2.5296) as a risk factor for ESRD (Table 4). In HLA-DQB1 alleles showed common frequencies for DQB1*02 (ESRD n = 232, 33.14% vs. control n = 64, 30.77%), DQB1*03 (ESRD n = 167, 23.86% vs. control n = 61, 29.33%), DQB1*05 (ESRD n = 82, 11.71% vs. con n = 28, 13.46%) and DQB1*06 (ESRD n = 201, 28.71% vs. con n = 54, 25.96%) in ESRD and control groups with no significant difference (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 4. The frequency and associations of HLA DRB1 alleles in ESRD patients and healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. The frequency and associations of HLA DQB1 alleles in ESRD patients and healthy controls.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t005

This is in contrast to a study on Saudi population, which showed that in HLA-DRB1 *04, 07, 13, 03 (17), as the most frequently occurring class II alleles of both groups. While in HLA-DQB1 *02 and HLA-DQB1*06 were the most frequent alleles, with no significant difference between the groups except in DQB1*03 (8) (P = 0.04), which showed a positive association with ESRD [20].

The antigen frequencies were then compared to other studies on populations with close ethnicity Arab population. A recent study with Sudanese subjects showed that for the HLA-A loci, HLA-A2, 30, 3, 24, 1 and A68 were the most frequent antigens and for HLA-B loci HLA-B51, B41, B39, B57, B35, B50 and B52, were the most frequent antigens. HLA-DR13 and DR15 showed the highest antigen frequencies in the DR alleles. In HLA-DQ, DQ1 showed the highest gene frequency [30] [30]. In the Jordanian population A*0201 and B*0713, were the most frequent HLA class I alleles found and DRB1*0704, DRB1*0401 and DRB1*1501 were the most frequent [31] [31]. Another study on the HLA distribution in Egyptian patients with ESRD (n = 100) and normal healthy controls (n = 100), showed that the highest frequency for class I HLA-B35 (28%), B21 (18%) and class II HLA-DRB1*03 (29%) and DRB1*04 (29%). The number of individuals with HLA-B35 was significantly higher in the patient group (P = 0.025), whereas individuals with HLA-B5, B18 were significantly lower in the patient group (P = 0.044 and 0.048 respectively) [32].

This study was carried out without regard to primary renal disease leading to ESRD and focused on the final outcomes. This would help to avoid unexplained causes contributed by many known or unknown diseases. However, several studies provided the evidence that genetic polymorphism and epigenetic variations determine the individual susceptibility of patients to develop rapid progressive kidney disease [33]. A negative association between most A locus antigens and chronic glomerulonephritis and hypertensive nephrosclerosis were found In Turkish patients. And positive association were found between the HLA-B58 and HLA-DRB1*03 with amyloidosis and diabetic nephropathy, respectively [27]. Another Egyptian study among 457 individuals comprising 207 ESRD patients and 250 healthy controls showed that HLA-A2, -B8 and DRB1*3 and HLA-DRB1*11 were significantly correlated with diabetic nephropathy, in addition the B8-DR3 haplotype was shown to be susceptible to DM [34].

There is large variability in the frequency of HLA alleles present in the population ethnic groups. These differences in the results published by different authors are due to the variability in the frequency of HLA alleles present in the population ethnic groups. Also, may be due to the difference in the linkage disequilibrium between the HLA alleles and genes within or flanking the MHC region involved in immune response may play a role in ESRD progression. For instance the polymorphism in genes encoding the cytokines IL-6, IL-4 TNF-α and INF- γ have been shown that may be involved in the progression to ESRD [35][37].

Our study represents an expanded analysis for HLA haplotype among Saudi healthy population and its association in ESRD cases. Two loci heterogeneity haplotype, HLA A*02-B*51 (ESRD 4.58% vs. 6.03%) was the most common. A02- B50 (ESRD 3.35% vs. con 6.58%) and A02-B07 (ESRD 2.86% vs. con 2.47%) were less frequent, A02-DRB113 (ESRD 4.33% vs. con 2.48%) and A02-DRB1 03 (ESRD 4.08% vs. con 6.61%), A02-DQB102 (ESRD 8.49% vs. con 9.64%) and A02-DQB1 06 (ESRD 7.35% vs. con 7.44%) (Tables: 6, 7 and 8). Furthermore, B08-DRB1 03 (ESRD 3.67% vs. con 2.53%) and B51-DRB1 13 (ESRD 3.29% vs. con 3.93%) are the common haplotypes (Tables 9 and 10). However, no significant difference between the ESRD patients and control haplotypes were observed.

thumbnail
Table 6. Main high-frequency HLA A–B haplotype and their frequencies in ESRD patients and healthy controls (haplotype frequency ≥1.5%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t006

thumbnail
Table 7. Main high-frequency HLA A – DRB1 haplotype and their frequencies in ESRD patients and healthy controls (haplotype frequency ≥1.5%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t007

thumbnail
Table 8. Main high-frequency HLA A – DQB1 haplotype and their frequenciesin ESRD patients and healthy controls (haplotype frequency ≥1.5%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t008

thumbnail
Table 9. Main high-frequency HLA B– DRB1 haplotype and their frequencies in ESRD patients and healthy controls (haplotype frequency ≥1.5%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t009

thumbnail
Table 10. Main high-frequency HLA B– DQB1 haplotype and their frequencies in ESRD patients and healthy controls (haplotype frequency ≥1%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111403.t010

However, the haplotypes that showed statistically significant values with negative association with ESRD protection were A2-B50 (p = 0.0098, RR = 0.5098, CI = 0.3123 to 0.8322), A24-B35 (p = 0.0441, RR = 0.3731, CI = 0.1483 to 0.9383), A*68-DRB1*04 (p = 0.049, RR = 0.4696, CI = 0.2301 to 0.9581), A*02-DQB1*03 (p = 0.0429, RR = 0.6146, CI = 0.3942 to 0.9582). The A01-DRB1 13 (p = 0.0123, RR = 12.1829, CI = 0.7386 to 200.9482) and A30 -DRB1 03 (p = 0.0123, RR = 12.1829, CI = 0.7386 to 200.9482) showed statistically significant values with positive association with ESRD risk.

The haplotypes investigation of ESRD from Zulia, Venezuela population showed positive association with ESRD in: A2-B51, A2-B53, A23-B38 and A68-B38. The A42-B12, A9-B35 and A28-B40 haplotypes were negatively associated with ESRD, expressing relative risk lower than 1 [16]. On the correlations between HLA haplotype and various forms of glomerulopathy, HLA-A2, -B8 and DRB1*3 and HLA-DRB1*11 significantly correlated with diabetic nephropathy, respectively. B8-DR3 haplotype is susceptible to DM [34].

A study investigating the incidence of kaposi's sarcoma after renal transplantation reported a remarkably high frequency of HLA-A2 (83.3%) among patients compared to normal individuals (43.6%) [38]. In addition, a Canadian study found a higher percentage (69%) of the HLA-A2 allele in young patients with diabetic ESRD compared to normal, healthy individuals (36%), with the majority of patients showing either the HLA-A2-DR4 or HLA-DR8 haplotypes.

In developing countries like Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, which share a similar cultural background, ethnicity, socio-demographic distributions and socioeconomic development, many reports, has been shown evidence of increasing prevalence of the most common causes of ESRD [5]. Also there is increasing in the prevalence of obesity in these countries and its associated multichronic diseases, exceeds that in the developed countries because of their rapid economic growth and associated changes in lifestyle [12], [13]. Since certain haplotypes particularly two loci and three loci are common to some of the racial groups, it would be possible to find small disparity between population within these countries in the HLA frequencies and haplotype. Hence, there is a need to compare haplotype frequencies among the populations from different regions of Saudi Arabia and GCC. This would be important for creating a national registry and organ-sharing network for GCC people.

In conclusion, this study throws light on the frequency and distribution of HLA class I and class II alleles and haplotypes that confer susceptibility and protection in the Saudi Arabian patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). However a larger study encompassing more number of patients and controls would be needed to assess the clinical relevance of the results obtained. In the future, molecular diagnostics on HLA polymorphisms may serve to identify patients with survival advantages and could be used by physicians to plan their treatment in the GCC.

Recommendation

The association of HLA alleles and/or haplotype could be used as a risk classification marker and thereby progression to much more severe disease could be protected or diagnosed earlier. This would require further investigation with larger number of patients and healthy individuals and with every disease may cause ESRD. A great need to compare haplotype frequencies among the populations from different regions of Saudi Arabia and GCC populations to develop a national registry and organ-sharing network for GCC people.

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful for Mr Khalid Abdulrahman, Director of Riyadh regional laboratory, for his encouragement and support. And we thank our staff and technicians in Riyadh regional laboratory.

Author Contributions

Wrote the paper: NMH FHA AE. Made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretations of data: NMH FHA AE. Responsible for overall experiments: NMH FHA AE.

References

  1. 1. Alsuwaida AO, Farag YM, Al Sayyari AA, Mousa D, Alhejaili F, et al. (2010) Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (SEEK-Saudi investigators) - a pilot study. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 21: 1066–1072.
  2. 2. McClellan W, Speckman R, McClure L, Howard V, Campbell RC, et al. (2007) Prevalence and characteristics of a family history of end-stage renal disease among adults in the United States population: Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) renal cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 1344–1352.
  3. 3. Obrador GT, Pereira BJG (2008) Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease and screening recommendations.
  4. 4. Braunwald E (2001) Harrison's principles of internal medicine. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Publishing Division.
  5. 5. Hassanien AA, Al-Shaikh F, Vamos EP, Yadegarfar G, Majeed A (2012) Epidemiology of end-stage renal disease in the countries of the Gulf Cooperation Council: a systematic review. JRSM Short Rep 3: 38.
  6. 6. The Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation (SCOT) (2012) The annual report of The Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation (SCOT).
  7. 7. U.S. Renal Data System (2008) USRDS Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States.
  8. 8. Grassmann A, Gioberge S, Moeller S, Brown G (2005) ESRD patients in 2004: global overview of patient numbers, treatment modalities and associated trends. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20: 2587–2593.
  9. 9. Modi GK, Jha V (2006) The incidence of end-stage renal disease in India: a population-based study. Kidney Int 70: 2131–2133.
  10. 10. Barsoum RS (2006) Chronic kidney disease in the developing world. N Engl J Med 354: 997–999.
  11. 11. Aghighi M, Mahdavi-Mazdeh M, Zamyadi M, Heidary Rouchi A, Rajolani H, et al. (2009) Changing epidemiology of end-stage renal disease in last 10 years in Iran. Iran J Kidney Dis 3: 192–196.
  12. 12. Ng SW, Zaghloul S, Ali HI, Harrison G, Popkin BM (2011) The prevalence and trends of overweight, obesity and nutrition-related non-communicable diseases in the Arabian Gulf States. Obes Rev 12: 1–13.
  13. 13. Al-Nozha MM, Al-Mazrou YY, Al-Maatouq MA, Arafah MR, Khalil MZ, et al. (2005) Obesity in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 26: 824–829.
  14. 14. Federation ID (2010) Latest diabetes figures paint grim global picture.
  15. 15. Al-Sayyari AA, Shaheen FA (2011) End stage chronic kidney disease in Saudi Arabia. A rapidly changing scene. Saudi Med J 32: 339–346.
  16. 16. Shiina T, Inoko H, Kulski JK (2004) An update of the HLA genomic region, locus information and disease associations: 2004. Tissue Antigens 64: 631–649.
  17. 17. Stanevicha V, Eglite J, Zavadska D, Sochnevs A, Shantere R, et al. (2007) HLA class II DR and DQ genotypes and haplotypes associated with rheumatic fever among a clinically homogeneous patient population of Latvian children. Arthritis Res Ther 9: R58.
  18. 18. Fudenberg HH (1984) Basic immunogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press. 302 pp.
  19. 19. Crispim JC, Mendes-Junior CT, Wastowski IJ, Palomino GM, Saber LT, et al. (2008) HLA polymorphisms as incidence factor in the progression to end-stage renal disease in Brazilian patients awaiting kidney transplant. Transplant Proc 40: 1333–1336.
  20. 20. Almogren A, Shakoor Z, Hamam KD (2012) Human leucocyte antigens: their association with end-stage renal disease in Saudi patients awaiting transplantation. Br J Biomed Sci 69: 159–163.
  21. 21. Barocci S, Fiordoro S, Santori G, Valente U, Mossa M, et al. (2004) Alport syndrome: HLA association and kidney graft outcome. Eur J Immunogenet 31: 115–119.
  22. 22. Layrisse Z, Rodriguez-Iturbe B, Garcia-Ramirez R, Rodriguez A, Tiwari J (1983) Family studies of the HLA system in acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. Hum Immunol 7: 177–185.
  23. 23. Sergio Rivera P, Márquez G, Cipriani AM, Hassanhi M, Villalobos CC, et al. (2012) HLA class I association with progression to end-stage renal disease in patients from Zulia, Venezuela. J Immunologia 31: 37–42.
  24. 24. Ogahara S, Naito S, Abe K, Michinaga I, Arakawa K (1992) Analysis of HLA class II genes in Japanese patients with idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int 41: 175–182.
  25. 25. Vaughan RW, Tighe MR, Boki K, Alexoupolos S, Papadakis J, et al. (1995) An analysis of HLA class II gene polymorphism in British and Greek idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients. Eur J Immunogenet 22: 179–186.
  26. 26. Kitagawa W, Imai H, Komatsuda A, Maki N, Wakui H, et al. (2008) The HLA-DRB1*1501 allele is prevalent among Japanese patients with anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody-mediated disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23: 3126–3129.
  27. 27. Karahan GE, Kekik C, Oguz FS, Onal AE, Bakkaloglu H, et al. (2010) Association of HLA phenotypes of end-stage renal disease patients preparing for first transplantation with anti-HLA antibody status. Ren Fail 32: 380–383.
  28. 28. Davood PP, Farhadi N, Najafizadeh M (2008) Protective and susceptible HLA class I Genes in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease. Research Journal of Biological Sciences 3: 1344–1346.
  29. 29. Ma ZJ, Sun P, Guo G, Zhang R, Chen LM (2013) Association of the HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 Alleles in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Nephropathy in the Han Ethnicity of China. J Diabetes Res 2013: 452537.
  30. 30. Dafalla AM, McCloskey DJ, Alemam AA, Ibrahim AA, Babikir AM, et al. (2011) HLA polymorphism in Sudanese renal donors. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 22: 834–840.
  31. 31. Sanchez-Velasco P, Karadsheh NS, Garcia-Martin A, Ruiz de Alegria C, Leyva-Cobian F (2001) Molecular analysis of HLA allelic frequencies and haplotypes in Jordanians and comparison with other related populations. Hum Immunol 62: 901–909.
  32. 32. Shaheen Noha FT, El Khashab Saheer (2013) HLA Association in Egyptian patients with End-Stage Renal Disease. The World Congress of Nephrology 2013. Hong Kong.
  33. 33. Tampe B, Zeisberg M (2014) Contribution of genetics and epigenetics to progression of kidney fibrosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29 Suppl 4: iv72–79.
  34. 34. El-Gezawy EM, Baset HA, Nasif KA, Osama A, AbdelAzeem HG, et al. (2011) Human leukocyte antigens as a risk factor for the primary diseases leading to end stage renal disease in Egyptian patients. Egypt J Immunol 18: 13–21.
  35. 35. Ranganath P, Tripathi G, Sharma RK, Sankhwar SN, Agrawal S (2009) Role of non-HLA genetic variants in end-stage renal disease. Tissue Antigens 74: 147–155.
  36. 36. Bloudickova S, Kuthanova L, Hubacek JA (2011) Polymorphisms in IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha and IL-10 in patients on maintenance haemodialysis. Folia Biol (Praha) 57: 30–34.
  37. 37. Monos DS, Kamoun M, Udalova IA, Csanky E, Cizman B, et al. (1995) Genetic polymorphism of the human tumor necrosis factor region in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Linkage disequilibrium of TNFab microsatellite alleles with HLA haplotypes. Hum Immunol 44: 70–79.
  38. 38. Qunibi W, Akhtar M, Sheth K, Ginn HE, Al-Furayh O, et al. (1988) Kaposi's sarcoma: the most common tumor after renal transplantation in Saudi Arabia. Am J Med 84: 225–232.