Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

BraLTP1, a Lipid Transfer Protein Gene Involved in Epicuticular Wax Deposition, Cell Proliferation and Flower Development in Brassica napus

  • Fang Liu,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

  • Xiaojuan Xiong,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

  • Lei Wu,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

  • Donghui Fu,

    Affiliation The Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Agronomy College, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China

  • Alice Hayward,

    Affiliation Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia

  • Xinhua Zeng,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

  • Yinglong Cao,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

  • Yuhua Wu,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

  • Yunjing Li,

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

  • Gang Wu

    wugang@caas.cn

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China

BraLTP1, a Lipid Transfer Protein Gene Involved in Epicuticular Wax Deposition, Cell Proliferation and Flower Development in Brassica napus

  • Fang Liu, 
  • Xiaojuan Xiong, 
  • Lei Wu, 
  • Donghui Fu, 
  • Alice Hayward, 
  • Xinhua Zeng, 
  • Yinglong Cao, 
  • Yuhua Wu, 
  • Yunjing Li, 
  • Gang Wu
PLOS
x

Abstract

Plant non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) constitute large multigene families that possess complex physiological functions, many of which remain unclear. This study isolated and characterized the function of a lipid transfer protein gene, BraLTP1 from Brassica rapa, in the important oilseed crops Brassica napus. BraLTP1 encodes a predicted secretory protein, in the little known VI Class of nsLTP families. Overexpression of BnaLTP1 in B. napus caused abnormal green coloration and reduced wax deposition on leaves and detailed wax analysis revealed 17–80% reduction in various major wax components, which resulted in significant water-loss relative to wild type. BnaLTP1 overexpressing leaves exhibited morphological disfiguration and abaxially curled leaf edges, and leaf cross-sections revealed cell overproliferation that was correlated to increased cytokinin levels (tZ, tZR, iP, and iPR) in leaves and high expression of the cytokinin biosynthsis gene IPT3. BnaLTP1-overexpressing plants also displayed morphological disfiguration of flowers, with early-onset and elongated carpel development and outwardly curled stamen. This was consistent with altered expression of a a number of ABC model genes related to flower development. Together, these results suggest that BraLTP1 is a new nsLTP gene involved in wax production or deposition, with additional direct or indirect effects on cell division and flower development.

Introduction

Plant non-specific lipid-transfer proteins (nsLTPs) are small, abundant, basic, secreted proteins in higher plants [1], [2]. nsLTPs contain an 8 cysteine motif (8 CM) structure comprising eight cysteine residues linked with four disulphide bonds that stabilize a hydrophobic cavity that allows for the in vitro loading of a broad variety of lipid compounds [3], [4].

nsLTPs are encoded by multigene families that were originally subdivided into type I (9 kDa) and type II (7 kDa) on the basis of molecular mass. More recently, several anther specific proteins in Maize (Zea mays) and rice (Oryza sativa) that displayed considerable homology with nsLTPs that have been proposed as a third type (type III) [5], [6], which differ in the number of amino acid residues interleaved in the 8 CM structure. Recently, fifty two rice nsLTP genes, 49 Arabidopsis nsLTP genes and 156 putative wheat nsLTP genes were identified through genome-wide analyses [7]. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that the rice and Arabidopsis nsLTPs cluster into nine different clades, distinguished by a variable number of inter-cysteine amino acid residues [8]. Most studies to date have concentrated on type I, II and III family members, with limited functional analysis of these other six structural types of nsLTPs.

Characterised nsLTPs have been implicated in variable and complex physiological functions, mainly related to stress resistance and development, including cuticular wax synthesis [8], [9], [10], [11], abiotic stress [12], [13], [14], disease resistance [9], [15], [16], [17],[18], male reproductive development [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], and cell development [25], [26], [27].

One nsLTP family member, a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid transfer protein LTPG, was reported to function either directly or indirectly in cuticular lipid deposition, and mutant plant lines with decreased LTPG expression had reduced wax load on the stem surface [10]. Lee et al [9] reported that disruption of LTPG1 gene altered cuticular lipid composition, but not total wax and cutin monomer loads, and caused increased susceptibility to the fungus Alternaria brassicicola. Another gene, LTPG2, functionally overlaps with LTPG/LTPG1 during cuticular wax export or accumulation, and the total cuticular wax load was reduced in both ltpg2 and ltpg1 ltpg2 siliques [11]. These LTPG genes belong to type G nsLTPs classified by Edstam et al [28], and are not included in Boutrot's classification system [7].

Plant epidermal wax forms a hydrophobic layer covering aerial plant organs. This constitutes a barrier against nonstomatal water loss, as well as biotic stresses, and provides protection against pathogens [29]. Cuticular wax contains very-long-chain fatty acids (VLCFA) and their derivatives, such as alkanes and alcohols, with chain lengths of 20–34 carbons, and wax composition varies with species, organ, and developmental state [30]. Synthesis of VLCFA in the epidermis via acyl-CoA dehydratase PAS2 is essential for the proper control of cell proliferation in Arabidopsis [31]. Moreover, it was suggested that VLCFA, or its downstream derivatives or metabolites might function as signaling molecules to suppress cytokinin biosynthesis in the vasculature, thus fine-tuning cell division in internal tissue [31].

Despite progress in the functional analyses of these nsLTPs involved in cuticular wax deposition, the exact functions of most nsLTPs remain unclear, and complex expression profiles suggest disparate and unpredictable gene functions of unknown nsLTPs [22], [23], [27]. Most studies to date have focused on functions of type I, II and III nsLTP family members in many species, with few studies on type VI nsLTPs. Thus, the exploration of their roles may prove interesting, especially in non-model or crop species. In this study, we characterized a type VI nsLTP gene BraLTP1 from Brassica rapa, and investigated its biological function in the important allotetraploid oil crop, B. napus. Our results suggest that BraLTP1 has the basic characteristics of the nsLTPs gene family and is involved in wax deposition, cell proliferation and flower development. To our knowledge few reports linked nsLTPs to cell proliferation in plants, and nsLTP genes (excluding LTPG) involved in wax metabolisms in vivo have less been reported. This study will help to deepen our understanding of nsLTP family gene function and pave the way for the application of nsLTP gene in Brassica breeding.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

The plants used in this study were grown in pots containing mixture of moss peat (PINDSTRUP, Danmark) and field soil with the proportion of 3∶1 in a plant growth room set to 20°C±2°C under a 16/8 h photo-period at a light intensity of 44 umol m−2 s−1 and 60–90% relative humidity.

Vector construction

The coding sequence of BraLTP1 was amplified from B. rapa accession Chiifu genomic DNA using primers designed to the published B. rapa sequence Bra011229 (http://brassicadb.org/brad/index.php) [32]. Primers were as follows: BraLTP1-F: 5′- GAGCTCACAACTTCCTTCAAAGCCACA-3′ and BraLTP1-R: 5′-GGATCCCAAACCTCATGGCACAATGTA-3′, containing 5′ restriction enzyme sites for SacI and BamHI respectively. PCR was carried out in 50 µL, with 50 ng DNA, 0.4 mM dNTPs, 0.2 µM each primer, 0.5 U LA Taq (TaKaRa, Japan) and 1×LA Taq buffer II (TaKaRa, Japan). Conditions were: 94°C for 3 min, 30 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min and 72°C for 1 min. PCR product was checked by gel electrophoresis and target fragment was recovery and purified. The purified PCR product was cleaved using SacI and BamHI, and ligated between the CaMV 35S promoter and a terminal poly A sequence in the vector PBI121s (Fig. 1B), derived by modifying the multiple cloning site and deleting the GUS gene of PBI121 [33]. Positive clones by PCR using the above gene specific primers were chosen and sequenced (sangon company of Shanghai, China) to make sure they were correct. Standard molecular techniques [34], [35] were used for DNA manipulation.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Basic protein characteristics of BraLTP1 and vector construction.

(A) Analysis of the deduced amino acid sequences of BraLTP1 with its homologous sequences in other cruciferae; variable sites (dark grey)the nsLTP-like conserved 8 CM domain (light gray) with conserved cysteine residues (asterisks) and putative extracellular secretory signals (underlined). Sequences are from Arabidopsis thaliana AtLTP1 (AT4g30880), B. rapa BraLTP1 (Bra011229) [32], B. oleracea BolLTP1 (Bol018048) [60], B. napus BnaLTP1 (AY208878), and B. napus BnaLTP2 (KM062522). (B) T-DNA region of the BnaLTP1 overexpression construct containing BnaLTP1 driven by the CaMV 35S promoter. LB = Left border, RB = Right border, poly A = poly A terminator, nptII = kanamycin resistance, NOS Ter = nopaline synthase terminator, NOS Pro = nopaline synthase promoter. (C) Analysis of BraLTP1 mRNA levels in 10-week-old wild type (WT) and T0 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic plants by qRTPCR. Transgenic plants include BraLTP1-1, -6, -7, -19, -20, -21, -22, -28, -29, -32, -34 and -39. Standard errors were derived from three repeated experiment for the expression levels of each plants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g001

Genetic transformation

The 35S::BraLTP1 fragment in PBI121s was introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 by electroporation, and positive clones were selected on on LB agar plates at 37°C, supplemented with appropriate concentration of antibiotics (gentamicin 50 mg L−1, rifampicin 50 mg L−1 and kanamycin 50 mg L−1) and PCR verified. A single positive colony was used to transform B. napus cv. Zhongshuang 6, an elite Chinese cultivar in China, as follows: Seeds of Zhongshuang 6 were soaked in 75% ethanol for 1 min and for 10–15 min in a 1.5% mercuric chloride solution. Five to six days after germination under darkness, etiolated hypocotyls were cut in 7 mm segments and mixed with 50 mL Agrobacterium in liquid DM media (MS+30 g L−1 sucrose+100 µM acetosyringone, pH 5.8) (OD ∼0.3) for 0.5 h. Surface air dried hypocotyls were then transferred to co-cultured medium (MS+30 g L−1 sucrose+18 g L−1 manitol+1 mg L−1 2, 4-D+0.3 mg L−1 kinetin+100 µM acetosyringone+8.5 g agrose, pH 5.8) for 2 days and then to a selection medium (MS+30 g L−1 sucrose+18 g L−1 manitol+1 mg L−1 2, 4-D+0.3 mg L−1 kinetin+20 mg L−1 AgNO3+8.5 g L−1 agrose+25 mg L−1 kanamycin+250 mg L−1 carbenicillin pH 5.8) for proliferation. After 3 weeks, hypocotyl callus was transferred to regeneration medium (MS+10 g L−1 glucose+0.25 g L−1 xylose+0.6 g L−1 MES hydrate+2 mg L−1 zeatin+0.1 mg L−1 indole-3-acetic acid+8.5 g L−1 agrose+25 mg L−1 kanamycin+250 mg L−1 carbenicillin, pH 5.8) for 2 weeks. Hypocotyls were transferred to new regeneration media every 2 weeks for 3∼4 regeneration cycles before transfer to radication medium (MS+10 g L−1 sucrose+10 g L−1 agar, pH 5.8) for rooting (about 3 weeks). Transformed plants with roots were transplanted into pots and grown as described. For the construct, more than 60 independent 35S::BraLTP1 T0 transgenic plants were generated, and more than 85% were positive transformants as detected using a forward primer designed to the CaMV 35S sequence (35S-F: 5′-AGGACACGCTGAAATCACCA-3) and a reverse primer designed to BraLTP1 (D-BraLTP1-R: 5′-GGATCCCAAACCTCATGGCACAATGTA-3′). T1 seeds of PCR-positive transformants were harvested and grown to T2 generation for phenotype identification.

Protein sequence analysis

BraLTP1 was aligned to homologous amino acid sequences from several cruciferae including Arabidopsis, B. rapa, B. napus and B. oleracea, using Align X multiple sequence alignment software (Vector NTI Advance 11.0, 2008 Invitrogen corporation). Homology search were conducted using BLAST 2.0 program of the National Center of Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Conserved domains were identified using CDD (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cdd/) and the signal peptide was determined by SignalP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/).

Wax analysis

Epicuticular waxes were extracted from ∼100 mg B. napus leaf disks from the fourth fully-expanded leaf from the apex for each plant by mixing in chloroform for 1 min, with 150 µl 100 µg L−1 triacontane added as an internal standard. The chloroform was then evaporated under gaseous N2, and the following steps for wax analysis was as described previously [36].

Water loss determination

For water loss analysis of detached leaves, leaves were detached from 8-week-old plants, placed on a petri dish for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h, and weighed [37]. Three independent experiments were performed, with 5 plants for each line in each experiment.

Leaf phenotype analysis

B. napus leaves were fixed for 24 h in 4% paraformaldehyde. After dehydration using an ethanol series (75% for 4 h, 85% for 2 h, 90% for 2 h, 95% for 1 h and 100% for 30 min twice) the leaves were cleared twice with xylene for 2 h each. The leaves were infiltrated and subsequently embedded in paraffin wax according to the method of Hu et al [38]. Seven micromolar sections were obtained using a Leica RM 2016 microtome (Leica, Nanterre Cedex, France) and stained with 1% safranin for 6 h. After dehydration using an ethanol series (50%, 70% and 80% for 3 min each), sections were stained with 0.5% fast green for 30 min and then dehydrated with 100% ethanol for 5 min. Observations were made and images were acquired with a Leica DM 2500 (Leica microsystems, DFC420C). Six leaf disks with 1.5 cm diameter were hole-punched from the 4th leaf of 8-week-old plants and weighed to estimate weight/unit leaf area. For quantification of cytokinin, sampling of ∼100 mg fresh leaves from 4-week-old seedlings was repeated three times, and extraction and determination of cytokinin content were conducted as per Nobusawa et al [31].

Real-Time PCR

RNA was extracted using a TIANGEN RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (DP 432) according to the manufacturer's instructions. First-strand cDNAs were synthesized from DNaseI-treated total RNA using a TIANGEN FastQuant RT Kit (with gDNase) (KR106) according to the manufacturer's instructions. For transgene expression level and co-segregation experiments, real-time PCR was done using PCR SuperReal PreMix Plus (probe) (TIANGEN). The reaction system and process were followed by the manufacturer's instructions, and four replicates were performed for each cDNA sample. PCR primers and TaqMan probes were designed on the basis of the BraLTP1 cDNA sequences as follows: sense: RT-BraLTP1-F: 5′-ATCGGTCTAGCAATGATC-3′, RT-BraLTP1-R: anti-sense: 5′-AGCACATTCTCTCATCAG-3′, RT-BraLTP1-probe: 5′-CTCGATGTCTCCTTGGCACG-3′. Specific primers for the B. napus Actin gene (GenBank accession number: AF111812.1) were used as an internal control (Actin-F: 5′-CACAGGAAATGCTTCTAAG-3′, Actin-R: 5′-GGATGGATATAGATCGTACC-3′, Actin-probe: 5′-ACTCACCACCACGAACCAGAA-3′). For transcriptional profiling of cell division and flower related genes, real-time PCR was done using PCR SuperReal PreMix Plus (SYBR Green) (TIANGEN). The reaction system and process followed the manufacturer's instructions, as above in four replicates for each cDNA sample. Table 1 provides information about the genes and primers used for the real-time PCR. Specially, IPT1, IPT4, IPT6 in Arabidopsis all correspond to the one Brassica napus IPT gene. Real-time PCR was performed in an optical 96-well plate with a Bio Rad CFX96 Real-Time System (C1000 Thermal Cycler) (Applied Biosystems, Hercules City, CA, USA).

thumbnail
Table 1. Primers for real-time PCR checking genes related to cytokinin synthesis and flower development.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.t001

Results

Protein sequence characterization

The B. rapa LTP1 coding region is predicted to encode a protein of 109 amino acid residues (Fig. 1A). Similarity searches revealed that BraLTP1 has 84% overall amino acid identity with AtLTP1 of Arabidopsis, 98% identity with both BolLTP1 from Brassica oleracea and BnaLTP1 from B. napus (which are 100% similar to each other), and 100% identity with BnaLTP2 of B. Napus (while gene sequences were 98% similar). B. napus (Brassica AC genome) is an allotetraploid species resulting from a cross between B. rapa (A genome) and B. oleracea (C genome) and thus it is not surprising that it contains LTP protein copies corresponding 100% to the A and C genomes derived from both of these diploid species (Nagaharu., 1935). All species possessed highest levels of sequence similarity in the nsLTP-like domain regions (light shaded amino acids 29 to 99) (Fig. 1A). A putative extracellular secretary signal (amino acids 1 to 22 in Arabidopsis and 1–19 in the other Brassica species) was 100% conserved in the Brassica species (Fig. 1A). Nine amino acid substitutions exist in the nsLTP-like domains between AtLTP1 and the Brassica genes. The eight strictly conserved cysteine residues in all plant LTPs that form four intrachain disulfide bridges, were also 100% conserved among all aligned sequences.

In Arabidopsis, nine classes of nsLTP were identified that contain a variable number of inter-cysteine amino acid residues [7]. The number of amino acids between the eight cysteines in the 8 CM motif of BrLTP1 and it's aligned sequences are 10, 16, 0, 9, 1, 22 and 9, with a methionine and a valine residue present 10 and 4 aa before Cys7. These characteristics place the BraLTP1, AtLTP1, BolLTP1, and BnaLTP1/2 proteins as secreted LTPs in class VI of plant nsLTPs.

Overexpression of BraLTP1 in B. napus

Given the 100% similarity between the B. rapa LTP1 and B. napus LTP2 proteins, and the relative agronomic importance of B. napus, we carried out functional analysis of BraLTP1 in B. napus. Overexpression of BraLTP1 driven by the CaMV 35S promoter in 12 independent transformants of the B. napus L. cultivar Zhongshuang 6 showed expression levels 415 times to 2314 times higher than in wild type using qRTPCR (our primers could analyse BraLTP1 from Brassica rapa and its homologous gene from Brassica napus without difference) (Fig. 1C). The most visually striking feature of the BraLTP1 overexpression lines was a distinctly green leaf phenotype, with no waxy surface visible on either the abaxial or adaxial surfaces compared with the wild type (Fig. 2). Additional morphological differences in BraLTP1 overexpressing plants included humpy and wrinkled leaf surfaces, abaxially curvature of leaf edges, and a significant reduction in total plant size relative to the wild type and negative segregants (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3A). These phenotypes were widespread in most lines, and we chose two 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic lines (BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22) for further study due to their low copy numbers, morphologically clear phenotype and high transgene expression, enabling easy generation and comparison to negative segregates as controls.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Leaf morphology of 35S::BraLTP1 overexpression line 22 (BraLTP-22).

The adaxial (A) and abaxial (underside) (B) morphology of a representative wild type (WT) leaf (left) and 35S::BnaLPT1 (right) are shown. WT leaves appear glaucous with a smooth surface compared to 35S::BnaLTP1, which has an unglaucous, dark green and bumpy leaf surface with abaxial edge-curling.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Cosegregation experiments of two 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic lines.

(A) Phenotype of 5-week-old T1 plants segregating for BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22. (B) PCR results using primers spanning the CaMV 35S promoter and BraLTP1 in the vector, with DNA of corresponding plant in panel (A) as templates. (C) Transcript level of BraLTP1 for each plant shown directly above in panel (A). PCR-positive transformants show high BraLTP1-expression and displayed the typical overexpression phenotypes including dark-green, wrinkled, curly leaves and smaller stature compared with their negative segregants (BraLTP1-20N and BraLTP1-22N).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g003

To confirm that these phenotypes resulted from specific over-expression of BraLTP1 rather than tissue culture or vector insertion effects, we performed co-segregation analysis. Leaf samples of positive and negative segregants of BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22 lines, together with wild type, were selected based on genomic PCR for the insert (Fig. 3B) and real-time PCR of BraLTP1 expression (Fig. 3C). Plants of BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22 that were positive for the insert and had high BraLTP1 transcript level also had the phenotypes described above, while negative segregants of these lines showed the same phenotype as the wild type controls (Fig. 3A, B and C). Therefore, 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic phenotypes perfectly cosegregated with overexpression of the BraLTP1 gene.

Overexpressing BraLTP1 reduces cuticular wax in leaves

Mutant analyses have implicated a role for nsLTPs in the transport of waxes or cutin monomers [8], [9], [10], [11], however overexpression of nsLTPs has seldom been reported. To determine whether the visible leaf phenotypes of the B. napus BraLTP1 overexpressor lines resulted from decreased cuticle wax, the density of wax crystals on the leaf surface was assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A clear reduction in wax crystal density was observed on leaves of the BraLTP1-22 plants, accompanied by altered crystal shape and form (Fig. 4). This suggested that aletred epicuticular wax might lead to the visible phenotypes of BraLTP1 overexpressing leaves.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Epicuticular wax and cuticle layer of air-dried adaxial leaf surfaces of wild type (WT), the BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22 overexpressor using scanning electron microscopy.

The experiments were repeated for 3 times with at least five plants for each time. (A) Wax crystals on the WT leaf were dense, with high proportion of tubular-like wax crystals. (B and C) Wax crystals are sparsely distributed on BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22 B. napus leaves. Bar = 5 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g004

To determine the chemical composition of BraLTP1 overexpressing leaves in greater detail, gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses were performed. A 78% reduction in levels of the C31 alkane, hentriacontane, a major component of cuticular waxes, was seen in BraLTP1-22 leaves (49.6 µg g−1) relative to wild type (221.3 µg g−1). A second major wax constitutent, C29 alkane (nonacosane), was decreased by 44% in the overexpressor line relative to wild type; from 1431.7 µg g−1 to 82.8 µg g−1. Other wax components were similarly reduced, ranging from 17% to 80% reductions (Fig. 5). Despite these defects in cuticular wax, BraLTP1-22 overexpressors did not display any organ fusions, unlike some other mutants with cuticle defects [39], [40]. Together these results suggest a broad-range, non-specific reduction in wax deposition in B. napus.plants overexpressing BraLTP1.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Cuticular wax composition and loads in leaves of BnaLTP1-22 overexpression line and wild type (WT) B. napus.

Error bars indicate SE of three 6 biological repeats (t-test: **P<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g005

Distortion of the cuticular layer often results in an increased permeability of leaves [41], [42], [43]. To test this, water loss assays of detached leaves from BraLTP1-20, BraLTP1-22 and wild type were performed. A significantly higher rate of water loss occurred for the detached leaves of BraLTP overexpressing lines when compared with wild type (Fig. 6). This is consistent with the observed abnormal cuticular layer of overexpressor leaves, suggesting that wax defects can result in perturbed cuticle permeability. The result also hints that BraLTP1 could be important for plant water relations and drought tolerance.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Water loss of detached leaves of wild type (WT), BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22 plants.

The data are the means ± SD of three replicates (n = 5 for each experiment); P<0.01 (ANOVA, P = 6.53×10−56).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g006

Overexpression of BraLTP1 promotes cell overproliferation in leaf

In addition to the wax phenotype, the cellular morphology and weight of per unit leaf area was examined (Fig. 7A and B). BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22 leaves were 0.033 g cm−2 and 0.031 g cm−2 respectively, significantly higher than negative segregants and wild type, which varied from 0.024 g cm−2 to 0.026 g cm−2 (P<0.01) (Fig. 7A). To examine changes at the cellular, structural level, paraffin-wax-embedded leaf cross-sections stained with Safranin and fast green were examined. This demonstrated that in BraLTP1 overexpressing lines, the cellular layer of both palisade tissue and parenchyma tissue was increased; with palisade cells, parenchyma cells and epidermic cells smaller and more compact than negative segregants and wild type sections (Fig. 7B). Thus, increased cellular layering and a compact cell arrangement likely led to the increase in weight for per unit leaf area. This underlying change in leaf cell layer number and density likely contributes to the visible morphological defects including leaf curling.

thumbnail
Figure 7. Overexpression of BraLTP1 promotes cell proliferation.

(A) The weight of per unit leaf area of wild type (WT), BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22 and their segregated negative controls BraLTP1-20N and BraLTP1-22N. Leaf disks were collected from the fourth fully-expanded leaf from the apex taken from 8-week-old plants. Data are the mean±SD from three independent experiments using leaves of five plants. **Significant differences at the levels of P<0.01. (B) Representative leaf cross-sections of segregating 35S::BraLTP1 and WT plants. The fourth fully-expanded leaf from the apex were taken from 6-week old plants of WT, 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic plants (BraLTP1-20 and BraLTP1-22), and null segregates of these two lines (BraLTP1-20N and BraLTP1-22N). The experiments were repeated for 3 times. Bar = 200 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g007

To correlate these changes to cytokinin composition, we quantified cytokinin content, including the levels of the cytokinins isopentenyladenine (iP) and trans-zeatin (tZ), and of their riboside (iPR and tZR), As observed in BraLTP1-22 line, the BraLTP1 overexpressing leaves contained significantly higher amounts of tZ, tZR, iP, and iPR when compared with the wild type (P<0.01, Fig. 8), consistent with more cell accumulation in leaves (Fig. 7B). This indicates that active cytokinins are highly synthesized in leaves overexpressing BraLTP1.

thumbnail
Figure 8. Cytokinin content in BraLTP1 overexpressing leaves.

Amounts of tZ, tZR, iP, and iPR were measured in leaves of 4-week-old BraLTP1-22 and wild type (WT). Data are presented as mean±SD (n = 3).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g008

BraLTP1 affects flower development

In the reproductive phase of the B. napus lifecycle, overexpressing BraLTP1 resulted in early development of longer carpels and outward bending stamen in the flower. Early in flower development, carpels grew out of the apical flower buds, with the outward bending stamens clearly visible from the slightly opened sepals, giving an observably distinct phenotype from wild type flowers (Fig. 9A, B and C). Microscopic examination of the petals in the bud showed a variable severity of this phenotype in different lines. In the moderate version of this phenotype, the four petals developed into nearly normal petals upon flower opening (Fig 9A, B and D), while in severe phenotype, poorly developed, shriveled petals were found resulting in only one to three petals in the opened flowers (data not show). These phenotypes occurred not only in primary inflorescences but also in other branched inflorescences. In addition, bumpy sepals and siliques with all distributed longitudinal ridges on the surface, similarly to the bumpy phenotype of leaves, were observed in 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic B. napus lines (Fig. 9D and E). Cross-section of sepals and siliques did not show a difference in cell proliferation between transgenic plants and wild type (data not show). Microscopic examination of the ovules within the carpels revealed developing embryos and endosperm, indicating self-compatibility and good fertilization; pollen viability identification revealed that pollen production was also normal (data not show). Silique filling occurred effectively, thus BraLTP1 over-expression had few detrimental effects on plant fertility (Fig. 9E).

thumbnail
Figure 9. Morphological deformities of BraLTP1 overexpressing flowers.

(A) Lateral view of wild type (WT) and 35S::BraLTP1 (BraLTP1-22) primary inflorescences. (B) Top view of WT and 35S::BraLTP1 (BraLTP1-22) inflorescences. (C and D) elongated carpel, outward bending stamen (arrow indicated), and disorganized sepals of open (D) and budded (C) flowers of 35S::BraLTP1(BraLTP1-22) vs normal development of WT plants. (E) Silique epidermis of 35S::BraLTP1 (BraLTP1-22) and WT plants; arrow indicates the longitudinal ridges that all disturbed in different places.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g009

Co-regulated genes to cytokinin synthesis and flower organ development

The transcript abundance of 10 genes involved in the cytokinin synthesis pathway, and 13 genes involved in floral organ development, were investigated by real-time PCR in the wrinkled leaves of BraLTP1 overexpression lines as well as in wild type (Table 1).

In Arabidopsis, seven genes for adenosine phosphates isopentenyl transferase (AtIPT1 and AtIPT3 to AtIPT8) have been identified as cytokinin biosynthesis genes [44], [45]. IPT and CYP735A, are responsible for the differential distribution of de novo synthesis pathways for isopentenyladenine (iP), trans zeatin (tZ) [46]. Recently, a novel uridine ribohydrolase, URH1, was characterized that degrades isopentenyladenosine in Arabidopsis [47]. In leaves of BraLTP1 overexpression lines, the cytokinin biosynthesis genes IPT3 were significantly increased (P<0.01), with 3.8 times of expression levels in wild type, while IPT7, IPT9 and CYP735A2 were decreased (P<0.01), and there was no significant change in IPT1, IPT2, IPT4, IPT5, IPT6, IPT8, CYP735A1 and URH1 (P>0.05) (Fig. 10A).

thumbnail
Figure 10. Transcript abundance of various cyctokinin-related (A) and flowering-related (B) genes in 35S::BraLTP1 (BraLTP1-22) and wild type (WT) plants as determined by qRTPCR.

Data is the average of three plants with standard errors. Asterixes indicate significant differences to WT (** P<0.01).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110272.g010

The ABC model of flower development describes how the combinatorial interaction of three classes of genes directs the development of four types of floral organs [48], [49]. Here, in BraLTP1 overexpression lines, the expression level of genes involved in flower development including AP1, AP2, AP3, PI, CRC were significantly decreased in the abnormally-developed flowers, while AG, SPT and LEUNIG were significantly increased. There was no significant change in AINTEGUMENTA (Fig. 10B).

The decreased transcript levels of AP1, AP2, AP3, PI are consistent with the phenotype of BraLTP1 overexpressing flowers in B. napus, with short and humpy sepals and outwardly bent stamens. Furthermore, the increased expression levels of AG, SPT and LEUNIG were consistent with the over-developed longer carpels. These results, plus phenotypic data suggest that BraLTP1 plays a role in flower development.

Discussion

Functional characterization of BraLTP1

In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of an nsLTP-like gene from B. rapa; BraLTP1. Sequence analysis showed that the BraLTP1 protein is a single copy gene in the ‘A’ genome of B. rapa, with a homologous gene in B. olercaea, ‘C’ genome and two corresponding ‘A’ and ‘C’ genome copies in the amphidiploid ‘AC’ genome of B. napus. BnaLTP1 was first reported by Dong [50] as a B. napus seed specific gene named Bn15D18B (genbank number: AY208878), which was differentially screened in a seed-cDNA library harvested 15 days after pollination (DAP). The amino acid similarity of Arabidopsis, B. rapa, B. oleracea and B. napus LTP1 copies is high and extends throughout the whole protein, with increasing divergence consistent with the older evolutionary relationship of Arabidopsis. The configuration of the 8CM domain and inter-cysteine amino acid residues places BraLTP1 in class VI of nsLTP, which in Arabidopsis is composed predominantly of uncharacterized proteins including At1g32280.1, At4g30880.1, At4g33550, and At5g56480.1 [7]. Until recently, all type VI nsLTP genes were less studied, with unknown functions, providing good opportunity to expose new physiological functions of this family in processes such as cell division, as shown herein.

In this study, we cloned and functionally analysed a type VI nsLTP in B. napus. Over-expression of the BraLTP1 gene caused growth defects in the seedling and reproductive organs of B. napus. These included a distinct green, disorganized leaf surface with curled edges and abnormally developed flower. Decreased levels of epicuticular wax accumulated on the leaf epidermis, and cell layering and cell density were increased in the mesophyll cell of BraLTP1 overexpressing leaves. Increased cytokinin levels including of tZ, tZR, iP, and iPR and increased expression of the cytokinin-synthesis gene IPT3 in BraLTP1 overexpression lines correlated well with the enhanced cell proliferation phenotype. Overexpression of BraLTP1 also led to the altered transcription of many important ABC model flower development genes, coinciding with the visible morphological and developmental perturbations in these lines. Overall, our experiments suggest that BraLTP1 is an important nsLTP gene affecting wax deposition, cell proliferation, and leaf and flower morphology development in B. napus.

Overexpressing BraLTP1 leads to a reduction of wax load

NsLTPs are proposed to play a role in the delivery of wax components during the assembly of the cuticle [26], [51]. Previous studies suggested that in nsLTP mutants such as ltpg1, ltpg2 and ltpg1ltpg2, wax load decreases with the reduced expression of nsLTP genes [10], [11], [12]. Therefore, we hypothesised that overexpressing nsLTP1 in B. napus might lead to wax enrichment. However, in BraLTP1 overexpressing plants, wax accumulation was decreased in seedling leaves. The amount of wax on BraLTP1-22 leaves was significantly reduced with proportional deficiencies in the component aldehydes, alkanes, alcohols and acids compared with wild type. This universal reduction, with no specific component alteration, in 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic plants suggested that the effect of BraLTP1 overactivity was not substrate specific.

There are a few possible explanations for this contradicting observation: (1) the genes above belong to glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored LTPs, which are different from the type VI BraLTP1 and exercise different mechanisms in vivo; (2) overexpression of BraLTP1 may lead to disordered or destructive secretion of wax out of cells, which is subsequently lost from the surface; (3) overexpression of BraLTP1 gene somehow feedback inhibits, or competitively inhibits, other nsLTPs with important complimentary lipid synthesis or transport abilities. Until recently, functional analysis of wax-synthesis-related nsLTP genes has focused on mutants, while transgenic overexpression is seldom reported. To our knowledge the only prior overexpression study was on LTP3 in Arabidopsis, overexpression of LTP3 enhanced freezing and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis but with no change of cuticular wax seen [15]. Further investigation of the molecular mechanism of BraLTP1 action will shed more light on its function in wax metabolism and feedback regulation.

Overexpressing BraLTP1 leads to cell overproliferation

Besides wax load reduction, we also found that (1) 35S::BraLTP1 transgenic B. napus plants exhibit disorganized leaf patterning/morphology; (2) mesophyll cells were over proliferated, with increased cell layer number and cell density, and; (3) cytokinin levels were significantly increased and (4) the cytokinin-synthesis gene IPT3 was increased 3.8 fold in transgenic leaves. It is known that wax is composed of VLCFA and their derivatives, thus our data is consistent with Nobusawa et al [31], wherein VLCFA synthesis in the epidermis confines cytokinin biosynthesis via IPT3 to the vasculature and restricts cell proliferation. While it is also possible that BraLTP1 itself plays a direct role in cell division by affecting related genes. However, the internal mechanism remains to be clarified.

The decreased expression of other cytokinin synthesis related genes seen here may be due to feedback downregulation through the pathway, or functionally differentiated roles of IPTs in response to environmental conditions. VLCVA, its derivatives, or VLCFA-related lipids, may function as signaling molecules to control cell division by affecting cytokinin related gene transcription [31], [52], [53], [54]. Further studies are needed to examine such possibilities and explore the specific mediators or ligands which suppress cell proliferation in tissues. Mutant material in Nobusawa's study was difficult to observe macroscopically because of severe growth defects and in our experiment, overexpressing line for BraLTP1 gene analysis produced a moderate, morphologically observable phenotype that produced fertile seed for continued research, shedding important light on the system for study of plant-enviroment interaction.

Overexpressing BraLTP1 led to altered flower morphology

Some studies have reported that nsLTPs are involved in flower development. For example, multiple nsLTP genes were identified to be differentially expressed in petals during different developmental periods in carnation flowers, suggesting their contributions to petal development [55]. FIL1, a non-specific lipid-transfer protein with an nsLTP-like domain was reported to be important in petal and stamen formation in Antirrhinum [56]. The identification of Antirrhinum nsLTPs as target genes of the class B MADS box transcription factors DEFICIENS, suggested a function during late petal and stamen development [57]. Kotilainen et al [58] reported that the gltpl gene in Gerbera hybrida var. Regina was expressed only in the corolla and carpels and was developmentally regulated during corolla development.

In the ABC model of flower development, the A-class genes APETALA1 (AP1) and AP2 confer sepal. Their activity overlaps with B-class genes APETALA3 (AP3) and PISTILLATA (PI), which develops into petals. B-class genes and the C-class gene AGAMOUS (AG) specify stamen, while AG promotes carpel development [48], [49]. Two newly characterized genes, CRABS CLAW (CRC) and SPATULA (SPT), function similarly to AG to promote carpel differentiation. LEUNIG and AINTEGUMENTA are also putative genes affecting carpel development [59]. In our study, overexpressing BraLTP1 led to altered expression levels of class ABC genes, which control flower organogenesis, with AP1, AP2, AP3, PI decreased. This is consistent with the morphological defects of sepals and stamens seen. The expression level of AG, SPT and LEUNIG were increased, which may result in the early development of longer carpels (Fig. 10B). Combined with previous studies of nsLTP on flower development, we speculate that BraLTP1 may affect flower development through the regulation of morphologically important cellular components like the cell wall and cuticle, to affect flower-related genes.

Conclusion

This study identifies a novel nsLTP gene BraLTP1 that influences wax deposition, cell proliferation and flower development when overexpressed in B. napus. Although the precise biological role is yet to be determined, we suggest that BraLTP1 may link the metabolism of wax lipids and/or cell wall components in the epicuticular, or internal plant interfaces, to the coordinated execution of developmental programs, including cell division and flower development. Therefore, BraLTP1 likely plays important roles in different developmental periods in plants.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: FL DF GW. Performed the experiments: XX LW XZ YC YW. Analyzed the data: FL AH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: YL. Wrote the paper: FL DF AH GW.

References

  1. 1. Thoma S, Kaneko Y, Somerville C (1993) A non-specific lipid transfer protein from Arabidopsis is a cell wall protein. The Plant Journal 3: 427–436.
  2. 2. Kader JC (1996) Lipid-Transfer Proteins in Plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47: 627–654.
  3. 3. Vergnolle C, Arondel V, Jolliot A, Kader JC (1992) Phospholipid transfer proteins from higher plants. Methods Enzymol 209: 522–530.
  4. 4. Shin DH, Lee JY, Hwang KY, Kim KK, Suh SW (1995) High-resolution crystal structure of the non-specific lipid-transfer protein from maize seedlings. Structure 3: 189–199.
  5. 5. Lauga B, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Combes D (2000) Characterization of MZm3-3, a Zea mays tapetum-specific transcript. Plant Sci 157: 65–75.
  6. 6. Boutrot F, Guirao A, Alary R, Joudrier P, Gautier MF (2005) Wheat non-specific lipid transfer protein genes display a complex pattern of expression in developing seeds. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Structure and Expression 1730: 114–125.
  7. 7. Boutrot F, Chantret N, Gautier MF (2008) Genome-wide analysis of the rice and Arabidopsis non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLtp) gene families and identification of wheat nsLtp genes by EST data mining. BMC Genomics 9: 86.
  8. 8. Pyee J, Yu H, Kolattukudy PE (1994) Identification of a lipid transfer protein as the major protein in the surface wax of broccoli (Brassica oleracea) leaves. Arch Biochem Biophys 311: 460–468.
  9. 9. Lee SB, Go YS, Bae HJ, Park JH, Cho SH, et al. (2009) Disruption of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid transfer protein gene altered cuticular lipid composition, increased plastoglobules, and enhanced susceptibility to infection by the fungal pathogen Alternaria brassicicola. Plant Physiol 150: 42–54.
  10. 10. Debono A, Yeats TH, Rose JK, Bird D, Jetter R, et al. (2009) Arabidopsis LTPG is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid transfer protein required for export of lipids to the plant surface. Plant Cell 21: 1230–1238.
  11. 11. Kim H, Lee SB, Kim HJ, Min MK, Hwang I, et al. (2012) Characterization of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid transfer protein 2 (LTPG2) and overlapping function between LTPG/LTPG1 and LTPG2 in cuticular wax export or accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 53: 1391–1403.
  12. 12. Hincha DK (2002) Cryoprotectin: a plant lipid-transfer protein homologue that stabilizes membranes during freezing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357: 909–916.
  13. 13. Liu KH, Lin TY (2003) Cloning and characterization of two novel lipid transfer protein I genes in Vigna radiata. DNA Seq 14: 420–426.
  14. 14. Guo L, Yang H, Zhang X, Yang S (2013) Lipid transfer protein 3 as a target of MYB96 mediates freezing and drought stress in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 64: 1755–1767.
  15. 15. Carvalho Ade O, Gomes VM (2007) Role of plant lipid transfer proteins in plant cell physiology-a concise review. Peptides 28: 1144–1153.
  16. 16. Blein JP, Coutos-Thevenot P, Marion D, Ponchet M (2002) From elicitins to lipid-transfer proteins: a new insight in cell signalling involved in plant defence mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 7: 293–296.
  17. 17. Maldonado AM, Doerner P, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ, Cameron RK (2002) A putative lipid transfer protein involved in systemic resistance signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature 419: 399–403.
  18. 18. Jung HW, Tschaplinski TJ, Wang L, Glazebrook J, Greenberg JT (2009) Priming in systemic plant immunity. Science 324: 89–91.
  19. 19. Foster GD, Robinson SW, Blundell RP, Roberts MR, Hodge R, et al. (1992) A Brassica napus mRNA encoding a protein homologous to phospholipid transfer proteins, is expressed specifically in the tapetum and developing microspores. Plant Science 84: 187–192.
  20. 20. Ariizumi T, Amagai M, Shibata D, Hatakeyama K, Watanabe M, et al. (2002) Comparative study of promoter activity of three anther-specific genes encoding lipid transfer protein, xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase and polygalacturonase in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Reports 21: 90–96.
  21. 21. Imin N, Kerim T, Weinman JJ, Rolfe BG (2006) Low temperature treatment at the young microspore stage induces protein changes in rice anthers. Mol Cell Proteomics 5: 274–292.
  22. 22. Park SY, Jauh GY, Mollet JC, Eckard KJ, Nothnagel EA, et al. (2000) A lipid transfer-like protein is necessary for lily pollen tube adhesion to an in vitro stylar matrix. Plant Cell 12: 151–164.
  23. 23. Chae K, Gonong BJ, Kim SC, Kieslich CA, Morikis D, et al. (2010) A multifaceted study of stigma/style cysteine-rich adhesin (SCA)-like Arabidopsis lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) suggests diversified roles for these LTPs in plant growth and reproduction. J Exp Bot 61: 4277–4290.
  24. 24. Chae K, Kieslich CA, Morikis D, Kim SC, Lord EM (2009) A gain-of-function mutation of Arabidopsis lipid transfer protein 5 disturbs pollen tube tip growth and fertilization. Plant Cell 21: 3902–3914.
  25. 25. Nieuwland J, Feron R, Huisman BA, Fasolino A, Hilbers CW, et al. (2005) Lipid transfer proteins enhance cell wall extension in tobacco. Plant Cell 17: 2009–2019.
  26. 26. Sterk P, Booij H, Schellekens GA, Van Kammen A, De Vries SC (1991) Cell-specific expression of the carrot EP2 lipid transfer protein gene. Plant Cell 3: 907–921.
  27. 27. Eklund DM, Edqvist J (2003) Localization of nonspecific lipid transfer proteins correlate with programmed cell death responses during endosperm degradation in Euphorbia lagascae seedlings. Plant Physiol 132: 1249–1259.
  28. 28. Edstam MM, Viitanen L, Salminen TA, Edqvist J (2011) Evolutionary history of the non-specific lipid transfer proteins. Mol plant 4: 947–964.
  29. 29. Riederer M, Muller C (2006) Biology of the Plant Cuticle. Oxford: UK: Blackwell: 11–125.
  30. 30. Samuels L, Kunst L, Jetter R (2008) Sealing plant surfaces: cuticular wax formation by epidermal cells. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59: 683–707.
  31. 31. Nobusawa T, Okushima Y, Nagata N, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, et al. (2013) Synthesis of very-long-chain fatty acids in the epidermis controls plant organ growth by restricting cell proliferation. PLoS Biol 11: e1001531.
  32. 32. Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, Sun R, Wu J, et al. (2011) The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat Genet 43: 1035–1039.
  33. 33. Gleave A (1992) A versatile binary vector system with a T-DNA organisational structure conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant Molecular Biology 20: 1203–1207.
  34. 34. Maniatis TA, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1992) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  35. 35. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  36. 36. Todd J, Post-Beittenmiller D, Jaworski JG (1999) KCS1 encodes a fatty acid elongase 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase affecting wax biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 17: 119–130.
  37. 37. Hua D, Wang C, He J, Liao H, Duan Y, et al. (2012) A plasma membrane receptor kinase, GHR1, mediates abscisic acid- and hydrogen peroxide-regulated stomatal movement in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24: 2546–2561.
  38. 38. Hu Z, Wang X, Zhan G, Liu G, Hua W, et al. (2009) Unusually large oilbodies are highly correlated with lower oil content in Brassica napus. Plant Cell Rep 28: 541–549.
  39. 39. Kurdyukov S, Faust A, Trenkamp S, Bar S, Franke R, et al. (2006) Genetic and biochemical evidence for involvement of HOTHEAD in the biosynthesis of long-chain alpha-,omega-dicarboxylic fatty acids and formation of extracellular matrix. Planta 224: 315–329.
  40. 40. Bird D, Beisson F, Brigham A, Shin J, Greer S, et al. (2007) Characterization of Arabidopsis ABCG11/WBC11, an ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter that is required for cuticular lipid secretion. Plant J 52: 485–498.
  41. 41. Li C, Wang A, Ma X, Pourkheirandish M, Sakuma S, et al. (2013) An eceriferum locus, cer-zv, is associated with a defect in cutin responsible for water retention in barley (Hordeum vulgare) leaves. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126: 637–646.
  42. 42. Tanaka T, Tanaka H, Machida C, Watanabe M, Machida Y (2004) A new method for rapid visualization of defects in leaf cuticle reveals five intrinsic patterns of surface defects in Arabidopsis. Plant J 37: 139–146.
  43. 43. Lu S, Zhao H, Parsons EP, Xu C, Kosma DK, et al. (2011) The glossyhead1 allele of ACC1 reveals a principal role for multidomain acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase in the biosynthesis of cuticular waxes by Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 157: 1079–1092.
  44. 44. Kakimoto T (2001) Identification of plant cytokinin biosynthetic enzymes as dimethylallyl diphosphate:ATP/ADP isopentenyltransferases. Plant Cell Physiol 42: 677–685.
  45. 45. Takei K, Sakakibara H, Taniguchi M, Sugiyama T (2001) Nitrogen-dependent accumulation of cytokinins in root and the translocation to leaf: implication of cytokinin species that induces gene expression of maize response regulator. Plant Cell Physiol 42: 85–93.
  46. 46. Kudo T, Kiba T, Sakakibara H (2010) Metabolism and long-distance translocation of cytokinins. J Integr Plant Biol 52: 53–60.
  47. 47. Jung B, Florchinger M, Kunz HH, Traub M, Wartenberg R, et al. (2009) Uridine-ribohydrolase is a key regulator in the uridine degradation pathway of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21: 876–891.
  48. 48. Bowman JL, Smyth DR, Meyerowitz EM (1991) Genetic interactions among floral homeotic genes of Arabidopsis. Development 112: 1–20.
  49. 49. Coen ES, Meyerowitz EM (1991) The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353: 31–37.
  50. 50. Dong J, Keller W, Yan W, Georges F (2004) Gene expression at early stages of Brassica napus seed development as revealed by transcript profiling of seed-abundant cDNAs. Planta 218: 483–491.
  51. 51. Yeats TH, Rose JK (2008) The biochemistry and biology of extracellular plant lipid-transfer proteins (LTPs). Protein Sci 17: 191–198.
  52. 52. Black PN, Faergeman NJ, DiRusso CC (2000) Long-chain acyl-CoA-dependent regulation of gene expression in bacteria, yeast and mammals. J Nutr 130: 305S–309S.
  53. 53. Worrall D, Ng CK, Hetherington AM (2003) Sphingolipids, new players in plant signaling. Trends Plant Sci 8: 317–320.
  54. 54. Savchenko T, Walley JW, Chehab EW, Xiao Y, Kaspi R, et al. (2010) Arachidonic acid: an evolutionarily conserved signaling molecule modulates plant stress signaling networks. Plant Cell 22: 3193–3205.
  55. 55. Harada T, Torii Y, Morita S, Masumura T, Satoh S (2010) Differential expression of genes identified by suppression subtractive hybridization in petals of opening carnation flowers. J Exp Bot 61: 2345–2354.
  56. 56. Nacken WK, Huijser P, Beltran JP, Saedler H, Sommer H (1991) Molecular characterization of two stamen-specific genes, tap1 and fil1, that are expressed in the wild type, but not in the deficiens mutant of Antirrhinum majus. Mol Gen Genet 229: 129–136.
  57. 57. Bey M, Stuber K, Fellenberg K, Schwarz-Sommer Z, Sommer H, et al. (2004) Characterization of antirrhinum petal development and identification of target genes of the class B MADS box gene DEFICIENS. Plant Cell 16: 3197–3215.
  58. 58. Kotilainen M, Helariutta Y, Elomaa P, Paulin L, Teeri TH (1994) A corolla- and carpel-abundant, non-specific lipid transfer protein gene is expressed in the epidermis and parenchyma of Gerbera hybrida var. Regina (Compositae). Plant Mol Biol 26: 971–978.
  59. 59. Liu Z, Franks RG, Klink VP (2000) Regulation of gynoecium marginal tissue formation by LEUNIG and AINTEGUMENTA. Plant Cell 12: 1879–1892.
  60. 60. Liu S, Liu Y, Yang X, Tong C, Edwards D, et al. (2014) The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nat Commun 5: 3930.