Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Methoprene-Tolerant (Met) Knockdown in the Adult Female Cockroach, Diploptera punctata Completely Inhibits Ovarian Development

  • Elisabeth Marchal,

    Current address: Research group of Molecular Developmental Physiology and Signal Transduction, Department of Biology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Affiliation Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

  • Ekaterina F. Hult,

    Affiliation Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

  • Juan Huang,

    Affiliation Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

  • Zhenguo Pang,

    Affiliation Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

  • Barbara Stay,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, United States of America

  • Stephen S. Tobe

    stephen.tobe@utoronto.ca

    Affiliation Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

Methoprene-Tolerant (Met) Knockdown in the Adult Female Cockroach, Diploptera punctata Completely Inhibits Ovarian Development

  • Elisabeth Marchal, 
  • Ekaterina F. Hult, 
  • Juan Huang, 
  • Zhenguo Pang, 
  • Barbara Stay, 
  • Stephen S. Tobe
PLOS
x

Abstract

Independent of the design of the life cycle of any insect, their growth and reproduction are highly choreographed through the action of two versatile hormones: ecdysteroids and juvenile hormones (JH). However, the means by which JH can target tissues and exert its pleiotropic physiological effects is currently still not completely elucidated. Although the identity of the one JH receptor is currently still elusive, recent evidence seems to point to the product of the Methoprene-tolerant gene (Met) as the most likely contender in transducing the action of JH. Studies on the role of this transcription factor have mostly been focused on immature insect stages. In this study we used the viviparous cockroach Diploptera punctata, a favorite model in studying JH endocrinology, to examine the role of Met during reproduction. A tissue distribution and developmental profile of transcript levels was determined for Met and its downstream partners during the first gonadotropic cycle of this cockroach. Using RNA interference, our study shows that silencing Met results in an arrest of basal oocyte development; vitellogenin is no longer transcribed in the fat body and no longer taken up by the ovary. Patency is not induced in these animals which fail to produce the characteristic profile of JH biosynthesis typical of the first gonadotropic cycle. Moreover, the ultrastructure of the follicle cells showed conspicuous whorls of rough endoplasmic reticulum and a failure to form chorion. Our study describes the role of Met on a cellular and physiological level during insect reproduction, and confirms the role of Met as a key factor in the JH signaling pathway.

Introduction

Juvenile hormone plays a prominent and diverse role in the regulation of insect development, being implicated in moulting, metamorphosis, reproduction, ageing, polymorphism and caste differentiation in social insects. JH orchestrates insect moulting and metamorphosis together with the ecdysteroids. The hormone is considered to have an anti-metamorphic action i.e. the presence of JH during certain critical periods which results in the continuation of the larval stage. Following the decline in JH titer in the latter half of the final larval stage, an ecdysteroid surge ensues in the absence of JH, and a metamorphic moult takes place. JH rises again in the adult stage of many insects species to regulate female reproductive maturation. Despite the importance of JH, its exact signal transduction pathway remains poorly understood. There is, however, accumulating evidence that Methoprene-tolerant (Met), a basic-helix-loop-helix (bHLH)/Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) protein, transduces the anti-metamorphic action of JH in both hemimetabolous as well as holometabolous insects [1] and as reviewed by [2], [3]. Drosophila melanogaster Met mutants are resistant to toxic doses of JH or its analog methoprene (JHA) [4], [5]. Moreover, both Drosophila as well as Tribolium castaneum recombinant Met binds JH with nanomolar affinity [6], [7]. Key functional evidence for the anti-metamorphic action of Met was obtained in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum in which knockdown of its transcription by RNA interference (RNAi) resulted in a premature larval-pupal metamorphosis and precocious development of adult structures [8], [9].

Recently, the study of the JH signaling pathway has been a prominent topic in insect research and has resulted in the characterization of several factors downstream of the candidate JH receptor, Met, of which Krüppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1) and the Broad-complex (Br-C) are the most studied. Kr-h1, the expression of which is highly dependent on JH, encodes a C2,H2 zinc-finger type transcription factor [1]. A combination of RNAi experiments and JHA treatments have shown that Kr-h1 is an early JH-response gene downstream of Met, mediating the anti-metamorphic action of JH in both Drosophila and Tribolium as well as in Hemimetabola, the cockroach, Blattella germanica and the linden bug Pyrrhocoris apterus [1], [10][13]. The expression of Br-C, encoding an ecdysone-regulated member of the Bric-à-brac-Tramtrack Broad (BTB)/Pox virus and Zinc finger (POZ) family of transcription factors, is regulated by JH and can be induced by exogenous methoprene [14]. Br-C was demonstrated to act downstream of the antimetamorphic signaling of JH, being critical for embryonic and nymphal development in Hemimetabola [15][18] and specifying pupal features in Holometabola [14], [19], [20].

The elucidation of the JH signaling pathway has mainly been focused on the anti-metamorphic action of this pleiotropic hormone and there are very few reports on the role of Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C during reproduction of insects. These studies have suggested that the role of Met is conserved in different JH-controlled processes in hemimetabolous as well as holometabolous insects, ranging from the antimetamorphic action of JH to oogenesis, oviposition and regulation of Vg mRNA levels, to reduced fecundity, regulation of mating, sex pheromone production and regulation of lipid metabolism [1], [5], [9], [10], [12], [13], [21][27]. This suggests that the pleiotropic functions of JH are reliant on a single receptor, but the differing actions may be controlled by partnering or targeting distinct components.

The anti-metamorphic role of JH appears to have been widely conserved in insects with diverse developmental strategies, whereas the role of JH in reproduction appears to have been subject to some modifications. Contradictory data on the exact role of both JH as well as ecdysteroids have been found in insects belonging to different orders. Girardie & Girardie [28] have suggested five patterns to describe the action of different hormones in female reproduction: 1) hormone-independent development; 2) ecdysteroid-dependent; 3) JH and ecdysteroid-dependent; 4) JH and ecdysteroid-dependent with a predominant action of JH and 5) only JH-dependent. In contrast to highly evolved insects, in which endocrine regulation of oocyte development requires both JH and ecdysteroids with Vg synthesis taking place in both fat body and ovary, cockroaches, an order of basal insects, demonstrate a clear correlation between cycles of JH biosynthetic activity by the corpora allata (CA), and oocyte growth and vitellogenesis. Allatectomy and CA implantation experiments have shown that oocyte maturation, fat body vitellogenin (Vg) production and the uptake of Vg by the ovaries are all JH-dependent processes in these animals [29][32].

In this study, we examined whether the same key players in the JH pathway responsible for the action of JH are also important in transducing the JH signal in reproduction of the viviparous cockroach, D. punctata. Previous work on this animal focused mainly on the physiology of JH, and therefore much is known on the order of reproductive events during the first gonadotropic cycle (as reviewed by [33]). Immediately following the final moult, females mate; this stimulates oocyte growth and JH biosynthesis in the CA. Between day 2 and 3, vitellogenesis commences as the levels of vitellogenin, the precursor of vitellin, rise in the haemolymph and the fat body. When oocytes attain a length of about 0.8 mm, they begin to incorporate vitellogenin from the haemolymph [34]. Elevated JH titer between day 2 and day 4 stimulates this synthesis and uptake [35], [36]. As oocyte growth and vitellogenin accumulation continue, rates of JH biosynthesis begin to decline from day 5. When oocytes reach approximately 1.6 mm in length, the accumulation of vitellogenin slows, the spaces between the follicle cells close and the cells start to deposit chorion [37], [38]. By day 7, the rate of JH production has declined to day 1 levels, choriogenesis is complete and ovulation occurs.

The present study uses RNA interference strategies to examine the role of Met and its downstream targets, Kr-h1 and Br-C in the first gonadotropic cycle of D. punctata. This molecular study now verifies that these proteins are key factors in the JH signaling pathway and confirms the important role of JH in vitellogenesis and oocyte development in D. punctata.

Materials and Methods

Animals

The D. punctata colony was maintained at 27–28°C and animals were fed lab chow and water at libitum. To obtain pools of synchronized animals, newly molted female adult cockroaches were picked from the colony, placed in separate containers and provided with water and lab chow. Mated status was confirmed by the presence of a spermatophore.

Tissue collection

D. punctata adult females were dissected in sterile cockroach ringer solution (150 mM NaCl, 12 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2.2H2O, 3 mM MgCl2.6H2O, 10 mM HEPES, 40 mM glucose, pH 7.2) using a dissecting microscope. For each animal, basal oocyte lengths were recorded. Selected tissues were dissected and cleaned of unwanted fat body in sterile saline, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen to prevent RNA degradation and stored at −80°C until further processing.

Sequencing of Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C

Degenerate primer sequences were designed for Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C based on conserved amino acid sequences found upon generating a multiple sequence alignment of several Arthropod orthologs. Primers used for degenerate PCR are listed in Table S1. Partial sequences were obtained using these primers in a standard T-gradient PCR using Taq DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich) and a D. punctata pooled cDNA sample containing fat body, epidermis and embryo cDNA. After purification, the resulting DNA fragments were subcloned into a pJET 1.2/blunt cloning vector (CloneJet PCR Cloning Kit, Thermo Scientific) and sequenced following the protocol outlined in the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Ready Reaction Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). For Met, the partial sequence was completed using 5′-RACE (Rapid Amplification of cDNA Ends) and 3′-RACE strategies, following the protocol outlined in the Roche 5′/3′ RACE Kit. Primers used for RACE are listed in Table S1.

Quantitative realtime PCR (q-RT-PCR)

Primers for q-RT-PCR were designed using IDT's (Integrated DNA Technologies) PrimeQuest design tool (http://eu.idtdna.com/PrimerQuest/Home/Index). Primer sets were validated by determining relative standard curves for each gene transcript using a five-fold serial dilution of a calibrator cDNA sample. Efficiency and correlation coefficients (R2) were determined for each primer pair. Primers used for q-RT-PCR are listed in Table S2. Reactions were performed in triplicate on a CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) as described previously [39]. A dissociation protocol was included to confirm absence of primer dimer formation.

Sample preparation.

Several tissues were collected from adult females for use in tissue distribution and developmental profiling using q-RT-PCR. Three biologically independent pools of 10 animals each were collected. Pooled samples were homogenised with RNase-free pestles and total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Lipid Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. An additional DNase treatment (RNase-free DNase set, Qiagen) was performed to eliminate potential genomic DNA contamination. Because of the small size of the CA, RNA from this tissue was extracted using the RNAqueous-Micro Kit (Ambion), followed by the recommended DNase step. Purity and concentration of the resulting RNA samples were measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific.). Only intact RNA was used in subsequent PCR reactions. An equal amount of RNA was transcribed in subsequent cDNA synthesis using Superscript III and random hexamers in a final volume of 20 µl following the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen Life Technologies). All samples were reverse transcribed together in a single run. The resulting cDNA samples were diluted 10-fold with PCR grade water. A calibrator sample was prepared by pooling 5 µl of each cDNA sample. In the same run, negative control reactions were set up without reverse transcriptase enzyme to test for genomic DNA contamination. To measure the effect of Met RNAi on transcript level, fat body was dissected from 6–8 individual animals (n = 6–8). RNA extraction and cDNA sample preparation were performed as described above.

Selection of reference genes.

Prior to target gene profiling, previously described housekeeping genes [39] were tested for their stability in the designed tissue distribution, temporal profiling and RNAi experiments. The optimal housekeeping genes were selected using geNorm and Normfinder software as described previously [39].

Determination of target gene expression.

All q-RT-PCR reactions were performed in triplicate on a CFX384 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) in a 10 µl volume containing 5 µl IQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), 1 µl forward and reverse primer (5 µM), 2 µl of MQ-water and 1 µl of cDNA. A two-step thermal cycling profile was used: 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 59°C for 30 s. Target specificity was confirmed by running a few representative PCR products on an agarose gel containing GelRed (Biotium). After electrophoresis, only a single band could be visualized using UV, which was further cloned and sequenced (CloneJET PCR Cloning Kit, Fermentas). For each tested cDNA sample, the normalisation factor for the reference genes relative to the calibrator samples was calculated and used to determine the normalised expression levels of the target genes relative to the calibrator, as described by Vandesompele et al., 2002 [40].

RNA interference and methoprene treatment

dsRNA constructs for Met and the negative control were prepared using the MEGAscript RNAi Kit (Ambion). The negative control construct (-pJET) was designed in a non-coding region of the pJET 1.2/blunt cloning vector (CloneJet PCR Cloning Kit, Thermo Scientific). T7 promoter sequences were added to the constructs using a single PCR with T7 promoters appended to both PCR primers (see Table S3). These fragments were subcloned and sequenced as described above. Sequences were analysed for presence of the T7 promoter sites and PCR amplicons were used in an overnight, high yield transcription reaction resulting in annealed dsRNA transcripts. Remaining ssRNA and DNA was removed in a nuclease digestion reaction. The RNA was further purified by phase-solid phase adsorption purification, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Ambion). Purity and concentration of the dsRNA was checked with a nanodrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.). Five-fold diluted dsRNA was run on a 1.2% agarose gel to examine the integrity of the constructs and efficiency of duplex formation.

Adult females were injected with 2 µg of either Met dsRNA or -pJET dsRNA diluted in 6 µl of cockroach saline immediately after their final moult (day 0). This treatment was repeated every other day until tissue was assayed. Fat body, CA and ovary were dissected on days 2, 4 and 6 after adult moult. Fat body was immediately stored in liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction. CA were dissected and cleaned in TC199 medium (GIBCO; 1.3 mM Ca2+, 2% Ficoll, methionine-free) for use in the radiochemical assay (RCA). Oocyte length was measured and ovary was collected in 50 µl of Vg extraction buffer (PBS; 0.02 M phosphate, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 7.0).

In a separate RNAi experiment, adult females were injected with Met dsRNA on day 0 as described above. On day 2 these animals were given a booster injection of Met dsRNA and topically treated with 100 µg of methoprene dissolved in 5 µl of acetone. Control animals were injected with –pJET dsRNA and topically treated with 5 µl acetone.

Protein & Immunoassays

Single dissected ovaries were homogenised and extracted twice in 50 µl PBS according to Mundall et al. [34]. Total ovary protein content was determined using a Bradford [41] assay performed according to the manufacturer's (Sigma-Aldrich) 96-well plate protocol.

Vitellin content was measured using an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Vitellin standards were prepared as described by Stoltzman and Stay [42]. Plates were coated overnight at 4°C with unknowns (40 ng/100 µl) and standards (1.56–100 ng/100 µl) in PBS, washed 3 times with PBS-0.05% Tween (PBST) and blocked with 1% BSA in PBS for 30 min. After 3 washes with PBST, plates were incubated for 1 hour at RT with 100 µl/well of a rabbit polyclonal antibody (1∶2000 in 1% BSA) against D. punctata mature egg homogenate [42]. Plates were washed 4 times with PBST, incubated for 1 hour at RT with 100 µl/well goat anti-rabbit IgG HRP-linked antibody (1∶3000 in 1% BSA, Cell Signaling), washed 6 times with PBST, and then treated with TMB solution (BioShop) according to the manufacturer. Absorbance was measured at 650 nm with a Molecular Devices SpectraMax Plus 384 microplate reader.

Microscopy

To examine patency, freshly dissected ovarioles were stained with 1% Evans Blue and processed as described in Pascual et al. [43]. To view overall structure, a subset of oocytes were fixed for 3d in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, post fixed for 1 hour with 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M phosphate buffer, dehydrated in an ascending ethanol series, and embedded in Spurr's resin. Sections (1 µm) were cut with a Leica EM UC6 ultramicrotome, then mounted and stained with methylene blue and toluidine blue. All light microscopy was performed using a Leica DMI3000 inverted microscope.

For fluorescence imaging, ovarioles were fixed and stained with phalloidin–TRITC (cytoskeleton; Sigma) and DAPI (nuclei; Sigma) as per Cruz et al. [44], then examined with a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope.

Transverse 100 nm ultrathin sections were taken near the midpoint between the anterior and posterior ends of the basal oocytes embedded in Spurr's resin above. Ultrathin sections were mounted and stained according to [45] and follicle cell ultrastructure was then imaged using a Hitachi HT-7700 transmission electron microscope and AMT Image Capture Engine Software. All images were post processed in Adobe Photoshop.

Radiochemical assay (RCA)

Rates of JH release were measured using the in vitro radiochemical assay (RCA) originally described by Tobe & Pratt [46] and Pratt & Tobe [47]. Day 0 to day 7 female cockroaches were immobilized on ice and their oocytes measured. CA were dissected and transferred to TC199 medium in a sterile environment. A short-term in vitro assay for JH release in TC199 medium (GIBCO) [2% Ficoll, 1.3 mM CaCl2·2H2O and 3 µCi/ml l-[methyl-14C]methionine (55 mCi/mmol; American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc.) followed by rapid partition was conducted. A single corpus allatum was measured and measurements are means of 8 biologically independent RCA results (n = 8) according to Feyereisen and Tobe [48] and Tobe and Clarke [49].

Results

Genes involved in JH signaling are conserved in D. punctata

Partial cDNAs encoding the JH receptor Met and its downstream targets Kr-h1 and Br-C were isolated from D. punctata. This was accomplished by a RT-PCR approach using degenerate primers based on conserved motifs. For Met, 5′-RACE and 3′-RACE experiments were performed to complete the sequence. Blastx National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database searches revealed that the Diploptera orthologs showed substantial similarity to the previously described Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C sequences and were therefore named DippuMet, DippuKr-h1 and DippuBr-C. To simplify, these will be referred to as Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C. Translation of Met cDNA revealed a 950 amino acid protein sequence. Figure S1A shows a multiple sequence alignment of Met with orthologs from different insect species. The main functional domains appear to be well conserved: the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) region and two PAS domains: PAS-A and the C-terminal PAS-B, which was recently shown to be sufficient for JH binding [6]. The partial translated amino acid sequence of Kr-h1 contains seven of the eight classical and highly conserved C2H2 Zn-finger domains and the LP(L/P)RKR motif located at the C-terminus [50] (Figure S1B). The partial amino acid sequence of Br-C contains the BTB domain. Met and partial Kr-h1 and Br-C sequences were deposited in the NCBI GenBank and have the following accession numbers respectively: KJ564130, KJ564131 and KJ564132.

The tissue specificity and temporal expression profile of Met, Kr-h1, Br-C and Vg were examined by q-RT-PCR

The tissue distribution of Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C on day 4 following the adult moult is very broad, with all genes expressed in both nervous tissue as well as peripheral tissues (Figure 1). Expression of Met was highest in the cockroach fat body (Figure 1A). For Kr-h1 high relative mRNA levels were found in the CA, ovary and fat body (Figure 1B). As expected, the expression of Vg is limited to the fat body (Figure 1D). The relatively high amount of Vg mRNA in the nerve cord is believed to be caused by the remaining presence of difficult-to-remove fat body from this fragile tissue. Since this study focused on the downstream effects of JH on insect reproduction and Met and Kr-h1 mRNA quantities were found to be relatively high in the fat body, the expression of Met, Kr-h1, Br-C and Vg was measured every day throughout the first gonadotropic cycle of the female cockroach in this tissue (Figure 2). The developmental profile of Met showed the continuous presence of its transcript during oocyte maturation from day 0 to day 7 (Figure 2A). The temporal profile of Kr-h1, on the other hand, shows a rapid increase on day 1 and a significant decline on day 5, which correlates with changes in JH biosynthesis in the CA (Figure 2 inset). Similarly, expression of Br-C rises rapidly commencing on day 1 and remains high until oviposition. As expected, the expression of Vg shows dynamic changes throughout oocyte maturation (Figure 2D), rising on day 1, reaching a maximum on day 4 and dropping dramatically on day 5.

thumbnail
Figure 1. DippuMet, DippuKr-h1, and DippuBr-C are broadly expressed across tissues of D. punctata.

Relative mRNA quantity of DippuMet (A), DippuKr-h1 (B), DippuBr-C (C), and DippuVg (D) was measured in the tissues of mated female animals four days after imaginal moult. Grey bars represent the mean over three independent pools of ten animals and technical replicates, normalized to Tub and EF1α. Vertical error bars indicate SEM. Brain (Br), corpora allata (CA), nerve cord (NC), midgut (Mg), Malpighian tubules (MT), fat body (Fb), and ovary (Ov).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.g001

thumbnail
Figure 2. DippuMet mRNA levels are stable in the fat body, whereas DippuKr-h1, DippuBr-C and DippuVg fluctuate.

Measurements were taken from the fat body each day during the first gonadotropic cycle (day 0 to day 7 after imaginal moult), for target genes DippuMet (A), DippuKr-h1 (B), DippuBr-C (C), and DippuVg (D). Data points represent the mean over three independent pools of ten animals and technical replicates, normalized to Tub and EF1α. Inset shows JH biosynthesis per individual corpus allatum for each day during the time period target gene transcript levels were measured in control animals (n = 12). Vertical error bars indicate SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.g002

Met is effectively silenced upon dsRNA treatment and the expression levels of JH signaling genes are affected following silencing of Met

To test whether Met is required in the first gonadotropic cycle of D. punctata, RNAi-mediated knockdown of this gene was performed by injecting dsRNA into the haemocoel of day 0 adult females. Two different dsRNA constructs were designed to minimize the probability of off-target effects. Since preliminary experiments yielded the same phenotype, only one construct was chosen to conduct an in depth study. Control animals were injected with a dsRNA construct made in the non-coding region of the pJET 1.2/blunt cloning vector following the same treatment scheme. Two µg of dsRNA were injected every other day starting from day 0. The efficiency of RNAi-mediated knockdown was confirmed using q-RT-PCR (Figure 3). The fat body was assayed on days 4 and 6 of adult female development. As shown in Figure 3A, injection of Met dsRNA effectively silenced the transcript level of this gene in treated animals compared to control animals. Transcript levels dropped 57% and 83% on day 4 and day 6, respectively.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Knockdown of DippuMet by RNAi results in significant downregulation of DippuMet (A) DippuKr-h1 (B), DippuBr-C (C) and DippuVg (D).

Measurements were taken from the fat body on days 4 and 6 of the first gonadotropic cycle. Data points represent the mean of 7–8 individual animals, (n = 7–8) and three technical replicates, normalized to Tub and EF1α. Vertical error bars indicate SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.g003

Kr-h1 is a potential target downstream of Met.

Not surprisingly, the expression of target genes downstream of Met was also significantly affected upon silencing the JH receptor (Figure 3B–D). Relative mRNA levels for Kr-h1 were found to be 55% and 58% downregulated on days 4 and 6 respectively. Transcript levels of Br-C were not affected on day 4, but on day 6, a 71% knockdown was observed.

Silencing Met impacts the expression of Vg.

A very obvious downregulation of expression was observed for Vg in the fat body on both days 4 and 6 of adult female maturation, with knockdowns of 91% and 81% in Met dsRNA-injected animals compared to control animals (Figure 3D).

Met and Kr-h1 expression are regulated by JH biosynthesis

Similar effects on transcript levels were found on day 4 of ovarian maturation in animals in which genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes (HMGR and JHAMT) in the JH biosynthesis pathway were silenced starting from day 0. Rates of JH biosynthesis dropped dramatically, and levels of Met and Kr-h1 were found to be significantly lower in comparison to controls injected with –pJET dsRNA (Figure S2). These findings confirm that the amount of Met transcript and that of its downstream target Kr-h1 is dependent on the rates of JH biosynthesis.

Blocked basal oocyte development fails to induce the characteristic JH biosynthetic profile during the first gonadotropic cycle

Changes in JH release from CA in the two treatment groups were analysed using an in vitro radiochemical assay (Figure 4A). JH biosynthesis by CA was significantly affected in day 4 animals. Met dsRNA treated animals did show the initial rise in JH biosynthesis on day 2, but failed to form the characteristic peak on day 4 observed in control animals (Figure 2 inset and Figure 4A).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Oocyte growth and JH biosynthesis are inhibited as a consequence of DippuMet dsRNA treatment.

JH biosynthesis for individual corpus allatum (A) and length of basal oocytes (B) dissected during first gonadotropic cycle of mated female D. punctata injected with either control (blue circles) or Met dsRNA (red triangles). Vertical bars indicate SEM, N = 8–20. CD, difference in overall size of 6-day-old basal oocyte from control (C) versus Met dsRNA (D) treated animals, follicle cell nuclei are stained with DAPI. EJ, transverse sections of basal oocytes showing follicle cells (Fc), intercellular gaps (arrows), yolk spheres (arrowheads), lipid spheres (L) and chorion (Ch). Scale bars indicate 200 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.g004

Silencing Met by RNAi causes a complete cessation of basal oocyte development

Oocytes cease growth in Met dsRNA-treated animals.

The overall effect of dsRNA treatment on female reproduction was examined by measuring basal oocyte lengths every other day of the gonadotropic cycle. As only the basal oocytes in the D. punctata ovary develop during the first cycle, the length of the basal oocyte was used as a measure for oocyte growth and development. Compared to controls, basal oocyte growth was completely arrested on day 0 of the gonadotropic cycle in Met dsRNA treated female cockroaches (Figure 4B). The overall size difference of day 6 oocytes in treated (Figure 4D) relative to control (Figure 4C) animals is well illustrated by the staining of the follicle cells of basal oocytes with DAPI. Arrested development became even more obvious when examining transverse sections of the developing ovaries using light microscopy. As seen in Figure 4 E–G, the control oocytes undergo dramatic changes between days 2 and 6. On day 4, large intercellular spaces appear between the follicle cells. This phenomenon, termed ‘patency’, allows the uptake of vitellogenin from the haemolymph into the developing oocytes. As the oocytes attain their full size on day 6, intercellular spaces close and chorion formation takes place. These changes were not observed in the ageing oocytes of Met dsRNA treated animals as can be seen in Figure 4H–J. Moreover, ectopic application of methoprene on the Met dsRNA-treated animals did not rescue the block of oocyte growth in these animals (Figure S3).

Juvenile hormone acts through Met to regulate vitellogenesis.

In addition to the significant downregulation of Vg mRNA shown above (Figure 3D), dramatic reductions were also observed at the protein level. Total protein and vitellin content were measured every other day from day 0 to day 6 in the developing ovary. Both remained constant in the Met dsRNA-treated animals, whereas vitellin content rose dramatically during maturation of the control female ovary (Fig 5A & B). This suggests that knockdown of Met resulted in absence of uptake of any vitellogenin that might have been present in the haemolymph.

thumbnail
Figure 5. Patency is abolished in DippuMet dsRNA-treated animals.

Total soluble protein (A) and vitellin (B) extracted from single ovary of control (blue circles) and DippuMet dsRNA (red triangles) animals during the first gonadotropic cycle. Vertical bars indicate SEM, N = 5–7. CH, morphology of the basal oocyte follicular epithelium from 4-day-old control and DippuMet dsRNA ovaries. Follicle cells were fluorescence stained (C–D) for cell nuclei (DAPI, blue), and F-actin (phalloidin-TRITC, red), or stained with Evans blue (E-F) for intercellular spaces (arrows). GH, Evans blue staining of control and DippuMet dsRNA ovaries dissected from attempted rescue animals with 100 µg topical methoprene. Scale bars indicate 50 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.g005

Patency is not induced in Met dsRNA treated animals.

To further investigate whether patency occurs in control versus Met dsRNA treated animals, ovarioles were stained with DAPI and Phalloidin-TRITC to allow for visualization of the morphology of the basal oocyte follicular epithelium using confocal microscopy. On day 4, oocytes from Met knockdown animals show smaller tightly packed follicle cells with no interfollicular spaces, in contrast to the control oocytes in which large intercellular spaces occur to facilitate uptake of vitellogenin into the developing oocytes (Figure 5C & D). The lack of patency in Met dsRNA-treated animals was further confirmed by examining the degree of Evans Blue penetration into the interfollicular spaces of live, unfixed and freshly dissected oocytes. It was apparent that the basal oocytes dissected from the control animals showed spaces between all the follicle cells on day 4 (Figure 5E). These were not observed between the significantly smaller follicle cells of the Met dsRNA treated animals (Figure 5F). Furthermore, application of methoprene did not rescue the failed induction of patency in the Met RNAi animals (Figure 5 G–H), thereby strongly suggesting that Met is necessary for the action of juvenoids in developing patency in the follicular cell layer of D. punctata oocytes.

Follicle cell ultrastructure differs and chorion formation does not occur in Met RNAi-treated animals.

To examine the morphology of organelles within the follicle cells, TEM images were studied at several time points during the gonadotropic cycle. By day 4, short strands of rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER) were found in control animals compared to the conspicuous whorls of RER throughout the follicle cells of Met dsRNA-treated animals (Figure 6A & B). By day 6, the chorion and vitellin membrane are apparent in controls but do not appear in the treated animals. Short interconnected networks of RER appear in the follicle cells of controls, whereas the encircling membranes of RER remain in the follicle cells of treated animals (Fig. 6C & D). Moreover, bacteroides seem to accumulate in the Met dsRNA treated animals. These gram-negative bacteria are destined to enter the oocyte and become incorporated into the mycetocyte cells of the fat body. These bacteria appear more numerous in the Met dsRNA treated animals because the basal oocyte remains small, whereas they become less conspicuous as the oocyte increases in size in the control animals.

thumbnail
Figure 6. Follicle cell ultrastructure is affected by DippuMet dsRNA-treatment.

Transmission electron micrographs of the interface between follicle cells (FC) and oocytes (O) from control animals undergoing vitellin uptake (A), early chorion (Ch) formation (C), and DippuMet dsRNA-treated animals undergoing autophagic vacuole formation on day 4 (B) and day 6 (D). Plates show the nucleus (N), rough endoplasmic reticulum (arrowheads), bacteroides (b) and vitellin membrane (VM). AD are shown at the same magnification; scale bars indicate 2 µm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.g006

Discussion

This study has analyzed the expression and function of the JH receptor, Met, during the first gonadotropic cycle of the viviparous cockroach, D. punctata. Based on the results presented, it can be concluded that the Diploptera ortholog of the JH receptor Met is a key factor in regulating the vitellogenic action of JH during the first gonadotropic cycle of D. punctata and in the transduction of the JH signal.

The distributions of Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C in the tissues of D. punctata show that these genes are expressed ubiquitously in both nervous and peripheral tissues, as was previously reported for Kr-h1 in larval B. germanica [10]. This is consistent with the role of these genes in transducing the signal of the pleiotropic JH. Moreover, temporal expression profiles of Met and Kr-h1 in the fat body are consistent with previous reports examining the expression of these genes in larval stages. Met mRNA is continuously present, with little major fluctuation, whereas the temporal profile of the Kr-h1 transcript appears to be more dynamic, responding to changes in circulating JH titer [1], [10], [11], [24], [52]. Relative expression of Kr-h1 closely follows the increase and decrease in the rates of JH biosynthesis by the CA. Alignments of the amino acid sequences of Met, Kr-h1 and Br-C reveal a high degree of conservation in the main functional domains of these proteins, previously reported to play key roles in transducing the antimetamorphic JH signal of other insects [1], [2], [8][12], [14], [19], [24], [51].

Our results demonstrate that Kr-h1 expression is highly dependent on Met and JH, whereas Br-C expression is not. Silencing Met not only resulted in a significant reduction of Met mRNA expression levels, but also of its downstream target Kr-h1. Similar results were reported in a very recent study focused on the reproductive cycle of P. apterus [27]. This was not apparent for Br-C for which expression rises after adult moult and stays high throughout the first gonadotropic cycle. Expression of Br-C seems to be much less dependent on JH. Knockdown of Met only resulted in a downregulation of Br-C expression on day 6, when JH production is low. Furthermore, silencing of HMGR and JHAMT, two genes considered to encode rate-limiting enzymes in the JH biosynthetic pathway, yielded a similar outcome. Both Met and Kr-h1 were significantly downregulated, but not Br-C. Our study is consistent with previous reports studying immature stages of the hemimetabolous P. apterus, in which knockdown of Met showed a strong dependence of Kr-h1 expression on Met, which was not clearly observed for Br-C [1]. Further study is needed to identify the exact role of Br-C during cockroach reproduction.

Since ovarian maturation is dependent on JH in D. punctata females, this animal may be an ideal model for analyzing whether the function of JH in reproduction employs the same or a similar molecular signaling pathway as occurs in metamorphosis. In this animal, JH is known to regulate oocyte growth, vitellogenin production in the fat body and uptake of vitellogenin by the basal oocytes [29][32]. Results from the knockdown of Met during the first gonadotropic cycle indicate that Met is a key player in JH signal transduction during reproduction. Silencing of Met resulted in a complete block of basal oocyte development. Treatment with Met dsRNA not only resulted in the downregulation of Vg mRNA quantities in the fat body, but also suppressed the induction of patency and uptake of vitellogenin into the developing oocytes, and arrested basal oocyte growth. Moreover, knockdown of Met also affected the ultrastructure of the follicle cells. In treated animals, neither the chorion nor vitellin membrane was observed and whorls of RER were found throughout follicle cells. Circular formations of ER are linked to the early stages of autophagy, whereas short strands of RER, as seen in controls, are associated with active protein synthesis [53]. The inactive CA of ovariectomized mated females show whorls of smooth ER, similar to the RER structures observed in the Met dsRNA-treated follicle cells (50). It is known that stimulation from the developing ovary is required for morphological changes in the mitochondria and smooth ER associated with increased JH biosynthesis in the CA [54]. This suggests that Met may be involved in communication, or feedback between the CA and ovary that promotes cellular activity and protein synthesis.

The effect of Met dsRNA-treatment on rates of JH biosynthesis in D. punctata provides insights into these feedback mechanisms acting between the CA and ovary. A very recent study showed that the transcription of genes directly involved in the JH biosynthetic pathway closely follow CA activity in D. punctata (Huang, Marchal, Hult and Tobe, unpublished results, data available upon request). Furthermore, silencing of two of these genes –HMGR and JHAMT – effectively abolished JH biosynthesis, downregulated Vg expression in the fat body and significantly reduced oocyte growth and the induction of patency (Huang, Marchal, Hult and Tobe., unpublished results, data available upon request). This result was expected, as both JH biosynthesis and Vg transcription require a functional JH biosynthetic pathway. However, Met dsRNA-treatment also had a significant effect on rates of JH biosynthesis. Treated animals failed to produce the characteristic peak of JH on day 4 of the first gonadotropic cycle. Since the RNAi response appears to be systemic in D. punctata, Met would also be knocked down in the CA of these animals. Therefore, it is possible that the positive feedback mechanism by which JH produced by the CA stimulates its own biosynthesis, likely through its action on the maturing ovary and the subsequent release of a stimulatory factor from the ovary [55].

The normal pattern of JH biosynthesis in the CA during the first gonadotropic cycle of mated females (as seen in Figure 2 inset) is known to require the presence of the ovary [30], [32], [56]. Previous reports have shown that ovariectomy of females soon after the adult molt results in a low level of JH biosynthesis throughout the first gonadotropic cycle [32]. Furthermore, Rankin and Stay [30] have shown that the size of the basal oocytes is a good indicator of the degree to which the developing ovary can induce JH biosynthesis. The ovary acquires this ability at the start of vitellogenesis but loses it post-vitellogenesis. At present, the exact nature of the ovarian factor(s) involved in this modulation of JH production is unknown. There is however a report that a stage-specific peptidergic factor from the ovary can stimulate JH production [55]. This ovarian factor is produced by basal oocytes ranging in length from 0.76 to 1.15 mm (in day 2 and 3 adult females), which is consistent with our results showing a failure to induce the characteristic pattern of JH biosynthesis following the blockage of ovarian development by silencing Met. It is currently unknown whether JH itself or the presence of Vg in the haemolymph induces patency. However, oocytes in the Met dsRNA treated animals do reach a size at which they are competent to take up Vg from the haemolymph [30]. It can therefore be suggested that the failure to induce patency does not result indirectly from a lack of oocyte development, but is a consequence of a decreased JH titer and blocked JH signal transduction.

While it is clear that Met is critical for vitellogenesis in D. punctata, there is likely to be cross talk with other pathways. Recent studies have identified that not only JH, but also nutritional signals, mediated by the very conserved insulin-like peptide (ILP)/TOR pathways, act as key regulators in insect vitellogenesis [25], [57][59]. A detailed study in Tribolium revealed that JH (signaling) acts upstream of insulin signaling. RNAi-induced silencing of JH biosynthesis (JHAMT) or signaling (Met) in T. castaneum resulted in decreased expression of genes encoding ILPs. Moreover, Vg expression was severely impaired by reducing phosphorylation of the ILP downstream factor FOXO (fork head transcription factor). Dephosphorylated FOXO inside of the nucleus was shown to bind a DNA response element in the Vg promoter, thereby possibly directly regulating its transcription. These effects could be rescued by injection of bovine insulin. Studies in the mosquito, Aedes aegypti and the cockroach, Blattella germanica, have demonstrated feedback of the ILP/TOR pathways on the JH biosynthetic activity of the CA, thus placing JH downstream of the ILP/TOR pathway [60][62]. In starved B. germanica, silencing FOXO resulted in increased Vg mRNA levels in the fat body and a rise in JH biosynthetic activity. These reports underline the intricate interplay between nutritional signals and JH in the reproductive events in the fat body of insects. At this point, further study will be needed to investigate the involvement of the ILP/TOR pathway in the regulation of vitellogenesis in D. punctata.

In summary, our data show conclusively that knock down of the expression of Met at the start of the first gonadotropic cycle effectively blocks basal oocyte development and maturation, as indicated by smaller basal oocytes, a dramatic reduction in the expression of vitellogenin in the fat body, a failure to induce patency and the lack of uptake of vitellogenin into the developing oocytes. We conclude that Met and its downstream partner Kr-h1 are essential factors in the JH signal transduction pathway during the first gonadotropic cycle of the cockroach, D. punctata.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Amino acid sequence alignment of Diploptera proteins with several functionally characterized ortholog insect proteins (A) DippuMet with Met from the red flour beetle, T. castaneum ([8], [9], GenBank accession number NP_001092812.1), the fruit fly D. melanogaster ([4], [5], [7], Genbank accession numbers NP_511126.2 and NP_511160.2), the migratory locust, Locusta migratoria (GenBank accession number the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus ([1], GenBank accession number AEW22976.1) and the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus ([1], GenBank accession number AEW22977.1). The main functional domains are indicated: the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) region and two PAS domains (PAS-A and PAS-B). Eight amino acids in the PAS-B domain involved with JHIII binding in Tribolium Met are indicated with asterisks [6]. (B) DippuKr-h1 with Kr-h1 proteins from the red flour beetle, T. castaneum ([11], GenBank accession number NP_001129235.1), the fruit fly D. melanogaster ([12], GenBank accession number CAA06544.2), the linden bug, P. apterus ([1], GenBank accession number AEW22979.1), the blood-sucking bug R. prolixus ([1], GenBank accession number AEW22980.1) and the German cockroach B. germanica ([10], GenBank accession number CCC55948.1). The eight zinc-finger motifs are indicated. (C) DippuBr-C with Br-C proteins from the red flour beetle, T. castaneum ([14], [19]. GenBank accession number NP_001104734.1), the fruit fly D. melanogaster (as reviewed by [2] GenBank accession number CAA38476.1), the linden bug, P. apterus ([1], GenBank accession number AEW22982.1) and the German cockroach B. germanica [18].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.s001

(PDF)

Figure S2.

Knockdown of DippuHMGR-DippuJHAMT by RNAi results in significant downregulation of DippuMet, DippuKr-h1, DippuVg. Measurements were taken from the fat body on day 4 of the first gonadotropic cycle. Data points represent the mean 5 individual animals, (n = 5) and three technical replicates, normalized to Tub and EF1α. Vertical error bars indicate SEM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.s002

(PDF)

Figure S3.

Effect of topical application of methoprene on oocyte growth in DippuMet dsRNA treated animals versus control animals (n = 5). Plus sign (+) indicates whether animals were treated with acetone or 100 µg of methoprene.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.s003

(PDF)

Table S1.

Degenerate primer and RACE primer sequences for cloning partial DippuMet, DippuKr-h1 and DippuBr-C cDNAs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.s004

(DOCX)

Table S2.

Oligonucleotide sequences for primers used in q-RT-PCR for reference and target genes. Efficiencies and R2 values are indicated.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.s005

(DOCX)

Table S3.

Nucleotide sequences of primers used in making the dsRNA constructs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106737.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to Dr. Jennifer Mitchell for use of the q-RT-PCR equipment and to Audrey Darabie for technical assistance.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EM EFH SST. Performed the experiments: EM EFH JH ZP. Analyzed the data: EM EFH JH BS SST. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: SST. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: EM EFH BS SST.

References

  1. 1. Konopova B, Smykal V, Jindra M (2011) Common and distinct roles of juvenile hormone signaling genes in metamorphosis of holometabolous and hemimetabolous insects. Plos One 6: e28728.
  2. 2. Jindra M, Palli SR, Riddiford LM (2013) The juvenile hormone signaling pathway in insect development. Annu Rev Entomol 58: 181–204.
  3. 3. Riddiford LM (2012) How does juvenile hormone control insect metamorphosis and reproduction? Gen Comp Endocr 179: 477–484.
  4. 4. Ashok M, Turner C, Wilson TG (1998) Insect juvenile hormone resistance gene homology with the bHLH-PAS family of transcriptional regulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95: 2761–2766.
  5. 5. Wilson TG, Fabian J (1986) A Drosophila melanogaster mutant resistant to a chemical analog of juvenile hormone. Dev Biol 118: 190–201.
  6. 6. Charles JP, Iwema T, Epa VC, Takaki K, Rynes J, et al. (2011) Ligand-binding properties of a juvenile hormone receptor, Methoprene-tolerant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 21128–21133.
  7. 7. Miura K, Oda M, Makita S, Chinzei Y (2005) Characterization of the Drosophila Methoprene-tolerant gene product. Juvenile hormone binding and ligand-dependent gene regulation. FEBS J 272: 1169–1178.
  8. 8. Konopova B, Jindra M (2007) Juvenile hormone resistance gene Methoprene-tolerant controls entry into metamorphosis in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10488–10493.
  9. 9. Parthasarathy R, Tan AJ, Palli SR (2008) bHLH-PAS family transcription factor methoprene-tolerant plays a key role in JH action in preventing the premature development of adult structures during larval-pupal metamorphosis. Mech Dev 125: 601–616.
  10. 10. Lozano J, Belles X (2011) Conserved repressive function of Kruppel homolog 1 on insect metamorphosis in hemimetabolous and holometabolous species. Sci Rep 1: 163.
  11. 11. Minakuchi C, Namiki T, Shinoda T (2009) Kruppel homolog 1, an early juvenile hormone-response gene downstream of Methoprene-tolerant, mediates its anti-metamorphic action in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Dev Biol 325: 341–350.
  12. 12. Minakuchi C, Zhou X, Riddiford LM (2008) Kruppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1) mediates juvenile hormone action during metamorphosis of Drosophila melanogaster. Mech Dev 125: 91–105.
  13. 13. Zou Z, Saha TT, Roy S, Shin SW, Backman TWH, et al. (2013) Juvenile hormone and its receptor, methoprene-tolerant, control the dynamics of mosquito gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: E2173–E2181.
  14. 14. Konopova B, Jindra M (2008) Broad-complex acts downstream of Met in juvenile hormone signaling to coordinate primitive Holometabolan metamorphosis. Development 135: 559–568.
  15. 15. Erezyilmaz DF, Riddiford LM, Truman JW (2006) The pupal specifier broad directs progressive morphogenesis in a direct-developing insect. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 6925–6930.
  16. 16. Erezyilmaz DF, Rynerson MR, Truman JW, Riddiford LM (2009) The role of the pupal determinant broad during embryonic development of a direct-developing insect. Dev Genes Evol 219: 535–544.
  17. 17. Piulachs MD, Pagone V, Belles X (2010) Key roles of the Broad-Complex gene in insect embryogenesis. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40: 468–475.
  18. 18. Huang JH, Lozano J, Belles X (2013) Broad-complex functions in postembryonic development of the cockroach Blattella germanica shed new light on the evolution of insect metamorphosis. Bba-Gen Subjects 1830: 2178–2187.
  19. 19. Parthasarathy R, Tan A, Bai H, Palli SR (2008) Transcription factor broad suppresses precocious development of adult structures during larval-pupal metamorphosis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Mech Dev 125: 299–313.
  20. 20. Suzuki Y, Truman JW, Riddiford LM (2008) The role of broad in the development of Tribolium castaneum: implications for the evolution of the holometabolous insect pupa. Development 135: 569–577.
  21. 21. Abdou MA, He QY, Wen D, Zyaan O, Wang J, et al. (2011) Drosophila Met and Gce are partially redundant in transducing juvenile hormone action. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 41: 938–945.
  22. 22. Baumann AA, Benoit JB, Michalkova V, Mireji PO, Attardo GM, et al. (2013) Juvenile hormone and insulin suppress lipolysis between periods of lactation during tsetse fly pregnancy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 372: 30–41.
  23. 23. Bilen J, Atallah J, Azanchi R, Levine JD, Riddiford LM (2013) Regulation of onset of female mating and sex pheromone production by juvenile hormone in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 18321–18326.
  24. 24. Kayukawa T, Minakuchi C, Namiki T, Togawa T, Yoshiyama M, et al. (2012) Transcriptional regulation of juvenile hormone-mediated induction of Kruppel homolog 1, a repressor of insect metamorphosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 11729–11734.
  25. 25. Parthasarathy R, Sun Z, Bai H, Palli SR (2010) Juvenile hormone regulation of vitellogenin synthesis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 40: 405–414.
  26. 26. Sheng ZT, Xu JJ, Bai H, Zhu F, Palli SR (2011) Juvenile hormone regulates vitellogenin gene expression through insulin-like peptide signaling pathway in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. J Biol Chem 286: 41924–41936.
  27. 27. Smykal V, Bajgar A, Provaznik J, Fexova S, Buricova M, et al. (2014) Juvenile hormone signaling during reproduction and development of the linden bug, Pyrrhocoris apterus. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 45: 69–76.
  28. 28. Girardie J, Girardie A (1998) Endocrine regulation of oogenesis in insects. Ann N Y Acad Sci 839: 118–122.
  29. 29. Engelmann F (1979) Insect vitellogenin: identification, biosynthesis, and role in vitellogenesis. Adv in Insect Phys 14: 59.
  30. 30. Rankin SM, Stay B (1984) The changing effect of the ovary on rates of juvenile hormone synthesis in Diploptera punctata. Gen Comp Endocr 54: 382–388.
  31. 31. Roth LM, Stay B (1961) Oocyte development in Diploptera punctata (Eschscholtz) (Blattaria). J Insect Physiol 7: 186–202.
  32. 32. Stay B, Tobe SS (1978) Control of juvenile hormone biosynthesis during reproductive cycle of a viviparous cockroach 2. Effects of unilateral allatectomy, implantation of supernumerary corpora allata, and ovariectomy. Gen Comp Endocr 34: 276–286.
  33. 33. Marchal E, Hult EF, Huang J, Stay B, Tobe SS (2013) Diploptera punctata as a model for studying the endocrinology of arthropod reproduction and development. Gen Comp Endocr 188: 85–93.
  34. 34. Mundall EC, Tobe SS, Stay B (1981) Vitellogenin fluctuations in hemolymph and fat body and dynamics of uptake into oocytes during the reproductive cycle of Diploptera punctata. J Insect Physiol 27: 821–827.
  35. 35. Mundall EC, Tobe SS, Stay B (1979) Induction of vitellogenin and growth of implanted oocytes in male cockroaches. Nature 282: 97–98.
  36. 36. Stay B, Tobe SS (1977) Control of juvenile hormone biosynthesis during the reproductive cycle of a viviparous cockroach 1. Activation and inhibition of corpora allata. Gen Comp Endocr 33: 531–540.
  37. 37. Stay B, Ostedgaard LS, Tobe SS, Strambi A, Spaziani E (1984) Ovarian and hemolymph titers of ecdysteroid during the gonadotropic cycle in Diploptera punctata. J Insect Physiol 30: 643–651.
  38. 38. Woodhead AP, Thompson ME, Chan KK, Stay B (2003) Allatostatin in ovaries, oviducts, and young embryos in the cockroach Diploptera punctata. J Insect Physiol 49: 1103–1114.
  39. 39. Marchal E, Hult EF, Huang J, Tobe SS (2013) Sequencing and validation of housekeeping genes for quantitative real-time PCR during the gonadotrophic cycle of Diploptera punctata. BMC Res Notes 6: 237.
  40. 40. Vandesompele J, De Preter K, Pattyn F, Poppe B, Van Roy N, et al.. (2002) Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol 3..
  41. 41. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254.
  42. 42. Stoltzman CA, Stay B (1997) Gonadotrophic and morphogenetic effects of a juvenile hormone analog treatment and ovary presence on last instar male and female Diploptera punctata (Blattaria: Blaberidae). Eur J Entomol 94: 335–348.
  43. 43. Pascual N, Cerdá X, Benito B, Tomás J, Piulachs MD, et al. (1992) Ovarian ecdysteroid levels and basal oocyte development during maturation in the cockroach Blattella germanica (L.). J Insect Physiol 38: 339–348.
  44. 44. Cruz J, Mané-Padrós D, Bellés X, Martín D (2006) Functions of the ecdysone receptor isoform-A in the hemimetabolous insect Blattella germanica revealed by systemic RNAi in vivo. Dev Biol 297: 158–171.
  45. 45. Lindsey BW, Darabie A, Tropepe V (2012) The cellular composition of neurogenic periventricular zones in the adult zebrafish forebrain. J Comp Neurol 520: 2275–2316.
  46. 46. Tobe SS, Pratt GE (1974) The influence of substrate concentrations on the rate of insect juvenile hormone biosynthesis by corpora allata of the desert locust in vitro. Biochem J 144: 107–113.
  47. 47. Pratt GE, Tobe SS (1974) Juvenile hormones radiobiosynthesised by corpora allata of adult female locusts in vitro. Life Sci 14: 575–586.
  48. 48. Feyereisen R, Tobe SS (1981) A rapid partition assay for routine analysis of juvenile hormone release by insect corpora allata. Anal Biochem 111: 372–375.
  49. 49. Tobe SS, Clarke N (1985) The effect of L-methionine concentration on juvenile hormone biosynthesis by corpora allata of the cockroach Diploptera punctata. Insect Biochem 15: 175–179.
  50. 50. Shpigler H, Patch HM, Cohen M, Fan YL, Grozinger CM, et al.. (2010) The transcription factor Kruppel homolog 1 is linked to hormone mediated social organization in bees. Bmc Evol Biol 10..
  51. 51. Konopova B, Jindra M (2009) Juvenile hormone regulates metamorphosis of holometabolous and hemimetabolous insects through Met and Kr-h1 genes. Mech Dev 126: S68–S69.
  52. 52. Minakuchi C, Tanaka M, Miura K, Tanaka T (2011) Developmental profile and hormonal regulation of the transcription factors broad and Kruppel homolog 1 in hemimetabolous thrips. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 41: 125–134.
  53. 53. Johnson GD, Stay B, Rankin SM (1985) Ultrastructure of corpora allata of known activity during the vitellogenic cycle in the cockroach Diploptera punctata. Cell Tissue Res 239: 317–327.
  54. 54. Johnson GD, Stay B, Chan KK (1993) Structure-activity relationships in corpora allata of the cockroach Diploptera punctata: roles of mating and the ovary. Cell Tissue Res 274: 279–293.
  55. 55. Elliott KL, Woodhead AP, Stay B (2006) A stage-specific ovarian factor with stable stimulation of juvenile hormone synthesis in corpora allata of the cockroach Diploptera punctata. J Insect Physiol 52: 929–935.
  56. 56. Stay B, Tobe SS, Mundall EC, Rankin S (1983) Ovarian stimulation of juvenile hormone biosynthesis in the viviparous cockroach, Diploptera punctata. Gen Comp Endocr 52: 341–349.
  57. 57. Parthasarathy R, Palli SR (2011) Molecular analysis of nutritional and hormonal regulation of female reproduction in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 41: 294–305.
  58. 58. Badisco L, Van Wielendaele P, Vanden Broeck J (2013) Eat to reproduce: a key role for the insulin signaling pathway in adult insects. Front Physiol 4: 202.
  59. 59. Badisco L, Marchal E, Van Wielendaele P, Verlinden H, Vleugels R, et al. (2011) RNA interference of insulin-related peptide and neuroparsins affects vitellogenesis in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. Peptides 32: 573–580.
  60. 60. Maestro JL, Cobo J, Belles X (2009) Target of Rapamycin (TOR) mediates the transduction of nutritional signals into juvenile hormone production. J Biol Chem 284: 5506–5513.
  61. 61. Perez-Hedo M, Rivera-Perez C, Noriega FG (2013) The insulin/TOR signal transduction pathway is involved in the nutritional regulation of juvenile hormone synthesis in Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 43: 495–500.
  62. 62. Suren-Castillo S, Abrisqueta M, Maestro JL (2012) FoxO inhibits juvenile hormone biosynthesis and vitellogenin production in the German cockroach. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 42: 491–498.