Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Generation of Pet1210-Cre Transgenic Mouse Line Reveals Non-Serotonergic Expression Domains of Pet1 Both in CNS and Periphery

  • Barbara Pelosi,

    Current address: Laboratory of Neural Differentiation, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Unit of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

  • Sara Migliarini,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Unit of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

  • Giulia Pacini,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Unit of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

  • Marta Pratelli,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Unit of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy

  • Massimo Pasqualetti

    Affiliations Department of Biology, Unit of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems @UniTn, Rovereto, Italy

Generation of Pet1210-Cre Transgenic Mouse Line Reveals Non-Serotonergic Expression Domains of Pet1 Both in CNS and Periphery

  • Barbara Pelosi, 
  • Sara Migliarini, 
  • Giulia Pacini, 
  • Marta Pratelli, 
  • Massimo Pasqualetti


Neurons producing serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) constitute one of the most widely distributed neuronal networks in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) and exhibit a profuse innervation throughout the CNS already at early stages of development. Serotonergic neuron specification is controlled by a combination of secreted molecules and transcription factors such as Shh, Fgf4/8, Nkx2.2, Lmx1b and Pet1. In the mouse, Pet1 mRNA expression appears between 10 and 11 days post coitum (dpc) in serotonergic post-mitotic precursors and persists in serotonergic neurons up to adulthood, where it promotes the expression of genes defining the mature serotonergic phenotype such as tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (Tph2) and serotonin transporter (SERT). Hence, the generation of genetic tools based on Pet1 specific expression represents a valuable approach to study the development and function of the serotonergic system. Here, we report the generation of a Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line in which the Cre recombinase is expressed under the control of a 210 kb fragment from the Pet1 genetic locus to ensure a reliable and faithful control of somatic recombination in Pet1 cell lineage. Besides Cre-mediated recombination accurately occurred in the serotonergic system as expected and according to previous studies, Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line allowed us to identify novel, so far uncharacterized, Pet1 expression domains. Indeed, we showed that in the raphe Pet1 is expressed also in a non-serotonergic neuronal population intermingled with Tph2-expressing cells and mostly localized in the B8 and B9 nuclei. Moreover, we detected Cre-mediated recombination also in the developing pancreas and in the ureteric bud derivatives of the kidney, where it reflected a specific Pet1 expression. Thus, Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line faithfully drives Cre-mediated recombination in all Pet1 expression domains representing a valuable tool to genetically manipulate serotonergic and non-serotonergic Pet1 cell lineages.


In mammals, neurons producing serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) are generated early during embryonic development in the ventral hindbrain and progressively cluster into B1–B9 raphe nuclei that project to the whole central nervous system (CNS), from the anterior brain to the spinal cord [1], [2], [3]. The extensive and capillary organization of serotonergic terminals together with the existence of at least 15 different 5-HT receptors distributed in the CNS accounts for the multitude of physiological and behavioural functions mediated by brain serotonin, from the regulation of circadian rhythms [4] and mood [5], to social interaction [6] and sexuality [7]. Moreover, in addition to its function in neurotransmission, growing evidences support a role for serotonin in developmental processes as cellular proliferation, migration, neuronal differentiation and brain circuitry formation [8][12]. Consistently, an altered serotonergic signalling has been associated with neuropsychiatric disorders in humans thought to have neurodevelopmental basis, such as schizophrenia and autism [13],[14].

During the last years, growing efforts have been made to generate suitable genetic tools to target serotonergic neurons in order to study their development and function [15][18]. Advances in mouse molecular genetics have brought new insights into the comprehension of the molecular cascade involved in serotonergic neuron specification [19][24], as well as of the projection network of raphe nuclei [11], [25]. Altogether, these studies have been crucial to reconsider serotonergic system, rather than a homogenous ensemble, a complex and heterogeneous population with distinct morphological, molecular and electrophysiological characteristics [22], [24][29].

The transcriptional pathways of serotonergic neuron differentiation require a combination of secreted molecules and transcription factors such as Shh, Fgf4/8, Nkx2.2 and Lmx1b, and converge on the activation of the ETS transcription factor Pet1 (plasmacytoma expressed transcription factor 1, official name Fev) [24], [30]. The onset of Pet1 expression in the mouse has been described to occur approximately as early as 10.5 dpc in post-mitotic precursors within the mantle layer, in the rostral hindbrain from rhombomere (r) 1 to r3, (i.e. rostral serotonergic domain), and one day later in r5-r7 (i.e. caudal cluster) [30][32]. In these domains Pet1 expression precedes the appearance of markers of serotonergic terminal differentiation, such as tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (Tph2) and serotonin transporter (SERT), and is maintained up to adulthood [30].

Thus, thanks to its early and specific expression, Pet1 represents the ideal candidate gene to be used in Cre recombinase/loxP-based strategies to specifically target serotonergic neurons. Such an approach represents a powerful tool to map the genetic lineage of Pet1 expressing cells and to characterize the molecular identity of distinct subpopulations of serotonergic neurons through intersectional strategies [33]. Moreover, a Cre recombinase-expressing line targeting serotonergic neurons could be used in conditional knock out approaches to investigate the involvement of specific genes in the development and functioning of serotonergic system, as well as in studies aimed to map serotonergic structural and functional connections in the brain.

In this context, the availability of BAC (Bacterial Artificial Chromosome)-based homologous recombination in E. coli approach allows the generation of large transgenic constructs, thus providing the presence of long distance acting regulatory elements required for the proper temporal- and tissue-specific expression of the gene of interest as well as reducing positional effect, that otherwise might drive transgene expression outside promoter-specific cell populations [34][39].

In the present study we used an E. coli homologous recombination based-approach to generate a Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line, in which 210 kb of Pet1 locus drive the expression of the Cre recombinase. Our analysis showed that in Pet1210-Cre mice Cre-mediated somatic recombination specifically occurs in serotonergic neurons of the raphe nuclei. Moreover, we demonstrated that Pet1 is expressed also in a population of non-serotonergic neurons within the raphe nuclei and in non-neuronal districts such as the ureteric bud derivatives of the kidney and the pancreas, starting from 9.5 dpc and 11.5 dpc, respectively. The Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line thus widens our knowledge on Pet1 gene expression and represents a valuable tool to promote Cre-mediated somatic recombination both in serotonergic and non-serotonergic Pet1 cell progeny.

Materials and Methods


Mice were housed in standard Plexiglas cages at constant temperature (22±1°C) and maintained on a 12/12 h light/dark cycle, with food and water ad libitum. Experimental protocols were conducted in accordance with the Ethic Committee of the University of Pisa and approved by the Veterinary Department of the Italian Ministry of Health.

Generation of the Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line

To generate the BAC-Cre construct we took advantage of a recombination-based strategy carried out in bacteria. To this aim we obtained a Pet1210-Cre targeting vector containing both the Cre recombinase cDNA and a kana/Neo resistance gene flanked by two 500 bp long homology arms. Briefly, Pet1210-Cre left arm (Pet1210LA) has been cloned in frame with Cre recombinase using an overlapping Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-based strategy [40]. Briefly, Pet1210LA and Cre recombinase have been separately amplified by means of PCR using BAC_RP23_165D11 and a pSG5-Cre plasmid as templates, respectively. Amplification of Pet1210LA was performed using the following primers: forward 5′ ATTATTCTCGAGGGGAGGTAGAAAAAGACGCACGTA 3′, reverse 5′ TTGGTGTACGGTCAGTAAATTGGACATCGCTGCCGGGGACTGGGC 3′. Cre recombinase cDNA was amplified using the following primers: forward 5′ GCCCAGTCCCCGGCAGCGATGTCCAATTTACTGACCGTACACCAA 3′, reverse 5′ ATTATTCTCGAGCAGACAATGATAAGATACATTGATGAGTTT 3′. Overlapping sequences for Pet1210LA and Cre recombinase are underlined, and the XhoI site is shown in bold. The amplified fragments were used simultaneously in a second round of PCR using the forward primer of Pet1210LA and the reverse primer of Cre recombinase to obtain a 1.7 kb fragment in which the second codon of Cre recombinase is in frame with the first ATG codon of Pet1 gene. A kana/Neo resistance cassette flanked by two FRT sites for Flp recombinase-mediated excision obtained from a pSVKeoX1FRT plasmid was placed 3′ to the Pet1210LA_Cre construct. Pet1210-Cre right arm (Pet1210RA) was generated by means of PCR, using RP23_165_D11 BAC clone as template and the following primers: forward 5′ ATTATTGTCGACAGGTGGTACCAGGGACCAGCC 3′, reverse 5′ ATTATTGTCGACTCGCGCTAGCCGAGTCTGAGC 3′. Upon homologous recombination of the Pet1210-Cre targeting vector within the RP23_165_D11 BAC, the Pet1210RA also leads to a deletion of 52 nucleotides downstream the first ATG codon of Pet1 gene. Pet1210RA was subcloned into the XhoI restriction site of Pet1210LA_Cre/pSVKeoFRT plasmid, to generate the Pet1210LA_Cre/pSVKeoFRT/Pet1210RA targeting vector. Pet1210LA_Cre/pSVKeoFRT/Pet1210RA vector and RP23_165_D11 BAC were co-electroporated in E. coli DY380 cells to obtain the Pet1210-Cre recombined BAC [39]. After linearization with PI-SceI restriction enzyme, the Pet1210-Cre recombined BAC was diluted in injection buffer (0.1 mM EDTA; 100 mM NaCl; 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 1x polyamine mix) and microinjected into the male pronucleus of fertilized FVB/N mouse eggs and both presence and copy number of the transgene were assessed by Southern blot analysis. Pet1210-Cre positive founders were mated to the ACTB::FLPe deleter [41] to excise the selection cassette. PCR using primers across the remaining FRT-site (forward: 5′ CGCCTGCTGGAAGATGGCGA 3′; reverse: 5′ CCTTTGGTCCACCGAACTTGC 3′) was performed and amplicon sequencing confirmed that the Flp-mediated recombination occurred correctly. In order to evaluate the integrity of the BAC transgene within the mouse genomic DNA specific primers for the pBACe3.6 backbone were designed as follows: forward 5′ CTAGTAGACTTAATTAAGGATCGAT 3′, reverse 5′ CCGCAAATTTATTAGAGCAATATAG 3′ (5′-end of the PI-SceI linearized transgene, expected amplicon size: 142 bp); forward 5′ CAGGCCTACCCACTAGTCAATT 3′, reverse 5′ TGCTGCTGTTTAGGGATCTGCA 3′ (3′-end of the PI-SceI linearized transgene, expected amplicon size: 254 bp). Transgenic animals were backcrossed to C57BL/6J animals for nine generations to obtain pure C57BL/6J background. Mice were routinely genotyped by PCR in standard conditions using the following primers for Cre recombinase: forward 5′ CGCCACGACCAAGTGACAGCA 3′, reverse 5′ CAGGCTAAGTGCCTTCTCTACA 3′.


Pregnant females were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, the embryos dissected out of the uterus and fixed o/n in 4% paraformaldeyde (PFA) at 4°C. Adult animals were anaesthetized with Avertin and perfused intracardially with 4% PFA. Brains were dissected out, post-fixed o/n in PFA at 4°C and embedded in either 2.5% agarose or tissue-tek for sectioning with vibratome or cryostat, respectively.

For immunostaining specimens were incubated with primary antibodies o/n at 4°C in PBS containing 5% heat-inactivated lamb serum and 0.5% Triton X-100. Primary antibody dilutions: rabbit anti-5-HT (Sigma) 1∶500; chicken anti-eGFP/eYFP (Abcam) 1∶1000; mouse anti-calbindin-D-28K (Sigma), 1∶200. Fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibody were used as follow: Rhodamine Red-X goat anti-rabbit IgG 1∶500; Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-chicken IgG 1∶200; Rhodamine Red-X goat anti-mouse IgG 1∶500 (all by Molecular Probes). Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma), 0.5 µg/ml.

X-gal chromogenic reaction

X-gal staining was performed on 9.5 dpc, 10.5 dpc, 11.5 dpc, 13.5 dpc Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R whole embryos and on P1 or P10, P30 and adult Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R kidney and brains, respectively. Dissected tissues or whole embryos were fixed in 2% formaldehyde solution prepared in PBS for 30 minutes, and subsequently processed for X-gal staining solution containing 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2% NP40, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate and 1 mg/ml X-gal (Sigma) in PBS for 4–16 h at 30°C. Samples were post-fixed in 4% PFA at 4°C o/n.

β-galactosidase stained specimens were cut at 50 µm with a vibratome or clarified in methyl salicylate pure solution to enhance contrast between X-gal staining and non-stained tissues.

In situ hybridization

In situ hybridization was performed as previously described [11]. Briefly, animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and fresh brain tissue was dissected out, embedded in Tissue Tek (Sakura), frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C until used. 14 µm cryostat sections were cut and hybridization was performed according to protocols using either digoxigenin-, fluorescein- or 35S-labelled antisense RNA probes. In digoxigenin-labelled in situ hybridization experiments, NBT/BCIP (Roche) was used as substrate for alkaline phosphatase, while in radioactive in situ hybridization sections were exposed to Biomax MR X-ray films (Kodak) for two to seven days. For double ISH, sections were hybridized simultaneously with DIG- and fluorescein-labelled probes. A two-step chromogenic reaction using NBT/BCIP and HNPP/Fast Red Fluorescent Detection Set (Roche) was performed to visualize DIG- and fluorescein-labelled riboprobes. Specimens were counterstained with DAPI.

Image acquisition and data analysis

For brightfield acquisitions, both sections and whole mount samples were observed and photographed with a light microscope or with a MacroFluo microscope equipped with DS-SMc digital cameras (Nikon). Fluorescence images were taken with Eclipse Ti microscopes (Nikon) or with a SP5 confocal microscope (Leica), using 10x and 63x objectives.

For cell counting, double ISH experiments were performed on three distinct C57BL/6J wild-type animals. Tph2- and Pet1-positive neurons in B9, B8, B7, B5–B6 and B1–B3 raphe nuclei were counted using ImageJ software. On average three to four sections depending on the antero-posterior extension of each nucleus were examined. In order to avoid counting cells twice, serial sections 70 µm distance one from another were analysed. For each section two to four 10x images were captured both in brightfield and in TRITC channel to visualize NBT/BCIP, DIG-labelled, or Fast Red, fluorescein-labelled, positive neurons, respectively. Images were converted to 8-bit grayscale and a threshold function was manually applied to remove sub-threshold signal using ImageJ software. For each image, only cells showing labelling clearly above the background level were counted. Pet1+/Tph2+ and Pet1+/Tph2 neurons were then counted per each raphe nucleus and the obtained values were expressed as relative percentages.


Generation of a Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line driving Cre-mediated recombination in the raphe nuclei

In order to minimize positional effect and to guarantee the presence of all Pet1 regulatory elements, the RP23_165_D11 BAC clone comprising 170 kb upstream and 40 kb downstream the Pet1 gene locus has been used to drive the expression of Cre recombinase in a transgenic-based approach in the mouse. A homologous recombination strategy in DY380 E. coli strain [39] was used to generate the Pet1210-Cre transgene (Figure S1). After pronuclear injection, Southern Blot analysis on genomic DNA using a probe designed against the Kana/Neo DNA sequence allowed the identification of four independent Pet1210-Cre founders, three of which showed germline transmission, namely founder-female 3 (FF3), founder-female 9 (FF9) and founder-male 3 (FM3). Pet1210-Cre founders were intercrossed to ACTB::FLPe deleter mice [41] to remove the Kana/Neo resistance cassette to avoid possible transcriptional interference with the Pet1 promoter. Genomic DNA was assayed by PCR and sequencing to assess correct Flp-mediated excision of the FRT-flanked Kana/Neo cassette (not shown). Eventually, the three Pet1210-Cre founders were backcrossed to a C57BL/6J background for at least nine generations. The transgenic mice appeared to be morphologically normal, had a normal lifespan and were fertile, thus suggesting no consequences due to the passenger genes (i.e. Cdk5r2, Cryba2, Ccdc108, Ihh and Nhej1) included in the Pet1210-Cre BAC construct (Figure S1).

In order to characterize the newly generated transgenic lines, we first tested the Cre somatic recombination efficiency by intercrossing Pet1210-Cre transgenic animals obtained from the 3 distinct founders to the ROSA26R conditional reporter line, in which β-galactosidase is constitutively expressed upon Cre-mediated recombination [42].

It is reported that in the mouse hindbrain Pet1 expression starts around 10.5 dpc in the rostral serotonergic domain, and about one day later in the caudal raphe nuclei [31], [32]. X-gal staining analyses revealed that Cre-mediated recombination had occurred already in the hindbrain of 11.5 dpc Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R mouse embryos showing two longitudinal dark blue stripes lateral to the floorplate defining the rostral serotonergic domain. Conversely, β-galactosidase staining in the medullary domain was barely detectable at this stage, reflecting the rostro-caudal temporal order in the generation of raphe serotonergic neurons (Figure 1a). At 12.5 dpc the analysis on sagittal sections and hindbrain flat-mount preparation from the three distinct founders showed that the transgene was expressed both in the anterior r1-r3-derived and in the posterior r5-r7-derived hindbrain regions, with the exception of the r4-derived territory, thus mirroring the endogenous expression of the Pet1 gene (Figure 1b and Figure S2 a–c). At P1, β-galactosidase-expressing neurons have migrated from their original position in the ventral region of the hindbrain and reached their final location in the brainstem, defining dorsal, medial and medullary clusters of serotonergic neurons (Figure 1c), in line with the morphogenetic movements of the developing serotonergic system occurred at this stage [43]. β-galactosidase staining was confirmed in all serotonergic B1–B9 raphe nuclei of adult Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R transgenic mice (Figure 1d–g, d’-g’), but not in ectopic districts as assessed by a detailed analysis on coronal sections throughout Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R mouse brains (Figure 1h–i, h’-i’, h’’-I’’). Finally, we compared β-galactosidase staining pattern to Pet1 mRNA distribution at both foetal (i.e. 12.5 dpc and 15.5 dpc) and postnatal stages (i.e. P10 and P30). Results showed that the transgene expression nicely correlates to Pet1 endogenous expression (Figure S3), and to that of the specific marker of terminally differentiated 5-HT neurons such as Tph2. Thus, in the Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line Cre recombinase expression likely mirrors Pet1 spatio-temporal localization in the raphe nuclei during both foetal development and post-natal life. As the three founders showed similar Cre activity, we selected the FF9-derived mice, which showed the strongest β-galactosidase signal, to perform the detailed analysis described below. For this founder further genomic analysis was performed in order to assess the integrity of the BAC transgene and the transgene copy number integrated into the genome. Evidence that the BAC transgene was intact within the chromosomal DNA of Pet1210-Cre mice was deduced by the amplification of the 142 bp and 254 bp fragments corresponding to the 5′- and 3′-end, respectively, of the PI-SceI linearized BAC backbone (Figure S1 c). Furthermore, Southern blot analysis showed that the BAC transgene was integrated as a single copy into the genome of FF9-derived mice (Figure S1 d).

Figure 1. Pet1210-Cre mouse line drives Cre recombinase activity in the serotonergic system.

(a) Dorsal view of a cleared X-gal stained Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R embryo at 11.5 dpc showing that Cre-mediated somatic recombination has occurred in the rostral raphe (arrow). (b) Sagittal section of 12.5 dpc Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R embryo highlighting the presence of the reporter in both the rostral (arrows) and caudal (arrowheads) clusters of developing serotonergic neurons. (c) In P1 Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R brains X-gal staining highlights serotonergic neurons migrated towards their terminal locations within the rhombencephalon. (d–g, d’–g’) Representative coronal sections throughout the antero-posterior extent of the raphe of an adult (P45) Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R brain showing Cre-mediated recombination specifically occurred in all serotonergic nuclei, namely B8–B9 (d, d’), B7 (e, e’), B5–B6 (f, f’) and B1–B3 (g, g’). (h-h’’, i-i’’) no β-galactosidase staining is detectable in anterior brain regions such as cortex (h-h’), hippocampus (h, h’’), substantia nigra (i-i’) and thalamus (i, i’’). Scale bar: 1 mm (a, d–i), 900 µm (c), 600 µm (b), 300 µm (d’-i’, h’’, i’’).

Identification of a non-serotonergic Pet1+ cell population in the raphe

We then intercrossed the Pet1210-Cre mice with the ROSA26YFP conditional reporter line [44], in which the YFP reporter gene is constitutively activated upon Cre expression, in order to assess the Cre-mediated recombination activity at a cellular level. Combined double immunohistochemistry experiments were performed using specific antibodies against YFP and 5-HT on sections from Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP double transgenic mouse brains (Figure 2 a–e).

Figure 2. Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line promotes somatic recombination in a non-serotonergic cell population within the raphe nuclei.

Representative low (a, b, c, d, e) and high (a’-a’’’, b’-b’’’, c’-c’’’, d’-d’’’, e’-e’’’) magnification confocal images of coronal sections of adult Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP brains, showing the distribution of YFP (green) and 5-HT (red) immunoreactivity within B8–B9 (a-a’’’), B8 (b-b’’’), B7 (c-c’’’), B6 (d-d’’’), and B1–B3 (e-e’’’) serotonergic nuclei. Boxes highlight the region of each raphe nucleus shown at higher magnification. Cells immunoreactive for both YFP and 5-HT (YFP+/5-HT+, arrowheads) or exclusively YFP but not 5-HT (YFP+/5-HT, arrows) were detected along the antero-posterior extent of the raphe highlighting variable representativeness among the different nuclei. Scale bar: 200 µm (a–e), 30 µm (a’-a’’’, b’-b’’’, c’-c’’’, d’-d’’’, e’-e’’’).

Results highlighted a discrepancy between YFP and 5-HT immunoreactivity within the raphe nuclei along the rostro-caudal extent of the hindbrain. In particular, while virtually all 5-HT-immunoreactive cells resulted positive for YFP (YFP+/5-HT+), several YFP-immunoreactive cells resulted to be devoid of serotonin (YFP+/5-HT, Figure 2 a’-a’’’, b’-b’’’, c’-c’’’, d’-d’’’, e’-e’’’). In particular, the fraction of YFP+/5-HT vs YFP+/5-HT+ cells displayed a rostral-to-caudal decreasing ratio, being sizable in the rostral median raphe (MR) B8-B9 nuclei (Figure 2 a-a’’’, b’-b’’’), while in dorsal raphe (DR) B7 (Figure 2 c-c’’’), B6 (Figure 2 d-d’’’) and caudal B1–B3 nuclei (Figure 2 e-e’’’) only few YFP+/5-HT were present.

Thus, our results raised the question whether the unexpected presence of YFP+/5-HT cells in the adult mouse brain could be due to an ectopic activity of the Cre recombinase or to a specific, novel expression domain of Pet1 gene in a non-serotonergic cell subpopulation. To answer this question, we performed combined double in situ hybridization experiments on adult wild-type mice using specific riboprobes for both Pet1 and Tph2, with the latter being expressed selectively in all terminally differentiated serotonergic neurons within the raphe nuclei (Figure 3 a–e). Consistently with immunohistochemistry data, few neurons expressing Pet1 but devoid of Tph2 were detected in dorsal and caudal raphe B6 (Figure 3 d-d’’), B7 (Figure 3 c-c’’) and B1–B3 (Figure 3 e-e’’) nuclei whereas in B9 (Figure 3 a-a’’) and B8 (Figure 3 b-b’’) raphe nuclei a substantial number of non-serotonergic neurons resulted positive for Pet1 expression. In order to quantify this observation, both Pet1+/Tph2+ and Pet1+/Tph2 neurons were counted in B9, B8, B7 and B6 rostral raphe nuclei and in the B1–B3 caudal cluster. Analysis showed that in B1–B3 group, in B6 and in B7 raphe nuclei the percentage of Pet1+/Tph2 neurons was 1.5%, 1.1% and 0.8%, respectively, while in B8 and in B9 nuclei it reached 17.6% and 25.5%, respectively (Figure 3f). Further, to address at the cellular level whether in our Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line the Cre recombinase promoted somatic recombination mirroring the Pet1 expression pattern, we used two distinct riboprobe combinations (i.e. Pet1 and YFP, or Tph2 and YFP) to perform double ISH on serial coronal sections of adult Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP. Analyses of results confirmed that the reporter YFP is present in all Pet1+ neurons as highlighted by co-expression of Pet1 and YFP (Figure 4 c-c’’), and demonstrated that the Pet1 promoter is also active in non-serotonergic neurons as shown by the partially overlapping expression of Tph2 and YFP (Figure 4 b-b’’), in line with the presence of a Pet1+/Tph2 neuronal population in the raphe system (Figure 4 a-a’’). Moreover, as NBT/BCIP deep purple chromogenic precipitate may quench the fluorescence generated by the HNPP/Fast Red substrate, masking the Tph2 signal in Pet1 positive neurons, we repeated double ISH on coronal sections at the level of B8 raphe nucleus swapping the detection methods for Pet1 (HNPP/Fast Red) and Tph2 (NBT/BCIP) riboprobes as an additional control. We intentionally let the staining with NBT/BCIP substrate proceed until saturation was reached, so that Tph2 expressing neurons showed a very dark blue signal likely masking any underlying fluorescence. In spite of that, Pet1-only positive neurons identified by alkaline-phosphatase activity using HNPP/Fast Red substrate were still clearly visible (Figure 4 d-d’’). Together, these data indicate that Pet1210-Cre mouse line promotes Cre recombinase expression in all serotonergic neurons and identifies for the first time a novel, non-serotonergic raphe neuronal population expressing Pet1.

Figure 3. Pet1 gene is expressed in a non-serotonergic raphe cell population in adult mice.

(a–e’’) Low (a, b, c, d, e) and high (a’-a’’, b’-b’’, c’-c’’, d’-d’’, e’-e’’) magnification images of double ISH performed on coronal sections obtained from adult wild-type mice at the level of B9 (a-a’’), B8 (b-b’’), B7 (c-c’’), B6 (d-d’’), and B1–B3 (e-e’’) raphe nuclei. In each picture, Pet1 expression is highlighted by a dark blue staining (a-a’, b-b’, c-c’, d-d’, e-e’), while Tph2 gene expression is visualized as a red precipitate (a-a’, b-b’, c-c’, d-d’, e-e’), or as a red fluorescence (a’’, b’’, c’’, d’’, e’’). Boxed areas indicate the regions shown in higher magnification images. In all the raphe nuclei two distinct populations of neurons expressing either both Pet1 and Tph2 (arrowheads), or only Pet1 (arrows) are present. (f) Ratio of Pet1+/Tph2+ vs Pet1+/Tph2 neuronal population in distinct raphe nuclei of adult wild-type mice reported as percentage. Histogram shows that Pet1-positive non-serotonergic neurons are significantly represented in rostral B8 and B9 as compared to more posterior nuclei. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Scale bar: 100 µm (a–e), 25 µm (a’-a’’, b’-b’’, c’-c’’, d’-d’’, e’-e’’).

Figure 4. Pet1210-Cre transgene specifically identify Pet1-expressing, non-serotonergic raphe neurons.

Double ISH performed on serial coronal sections of adult Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP mouse brains at the level of B8 raphe nucleus using combination of Pet1/Tph2 (a-a’’), YFP/Tph2 (b-b’’), YFP/Pet1 (c-c’’) and Tph2/Pet1 (d-d’’) riboprobes. In each combination the former probe is highlighted using the NBT/BCIP substrate, while the latter using the Fast Red chromogen. Boxed areas are shown at higher magnification in brightfield (a’, b’, c’, d’) or fluorescence (a’’, b’’, c’’, d’’). While all Pet1-positive cells also express YFP (arrowheads in c’-c’’), the presence of a Pet1-positive, non-serotonergic cell population was confirmed with all the other probe combinations (arrows in a’-a’’, b’-b’’, d’-d’’). Scale bar: 100 µm (ad), 25 µm (a’-a’’, b’-b’’, c’-c’’d’-d’’).

Pet1 gene is expressed in developing pancreas and kidney

Analysis of the spatio-temporal domain of the Cre recombinase activity in the Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R mouse embryos from all the three founders at both 11.5 dpc and 13.5 dpc revealed the presence of β-galactosidase staining in additional potential Pet1 expression domains outside the CNS unprecedentedly described (Figure 5). At 11.5 dpc Cre-mediated recombination was identified in the anlage of the pancreas and in the ureteric bud of the developing kidney, which at this stage forms a small branch at the level of the hindlimbs at the terminal extremity of tubular structures on each side of the caudal abdominal region (Figure 5 a–c). At 13.5 dpc, X-gal staining performed on parasagittal sections of Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R embryos corroborated the presence of Cre recombinase activity in the developing pancreas and in the branching ureteric bud of the kidney (Figure 5 d–i). Additionally, X-gal staining performed on whole organs or sections obtained from Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R pups at birth or adult animals, showed that while both pancreas and kidneys confirmed the presence of X-gal staining, no reporter expression was evident in all the other Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R organs analysed (Figure S4).

Figure 5. Pet1 drives Cre-mediated recombination in the developing pancreas and kidney.

X-gal staining performed on Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R whole mount 11.5 dpc embryos (a–c), and on sagittal sections at the level of the developing pancreas (d–f) and kidney (g–i) of 13.5 dpc embryos obtained from FF3 (a, d, g), FF9 (b, e, h) and FM3 (c, f, i) founder mouse lines. At 11.5 dpc a clear expression of the reporter is present at comparable levels in the three founder lines in both the developing pancreas (arrows) and kidneys (arrowheads), while it is still barely detectable in the hindbrain (asterisks). At 13.5 dpc X-gal staining highlights cells in the developing pancreas (d–f) and in the branching ureteric bud of the kidney (g–i) where Cre-mediated somatic recombination has occurred. Scale bar: 600 µm (ac), 150 µm (gi), 100 µm (df).

The presence of β-galactosidase activity in both pancreas and kidneys of mice derived from all the Pet1210-Cre founders prompted us to hypothesize that the expression of the conditional reporter was due to specific, previously unreported Pet1 expression domains, rather than an ectopic activation of Cre recombinase. To address this hypothesis we performed ISH experiments on pancreas and kidneys from 15.5 dpc Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP embryos, using specific riboprobes for Pet1 and YFP. Results indicated that YFP and Pet1 are expressed in the same pancreatic domains, nicely correlating with the pancreatic islet cell marker Nkx2.2 (Figure S5 a–c). Moreover, despite in the hindbrain the expression of Pet1 normally preludes to the acquisition of a serotonergic phenotype, we could not detect either Tph2 or Tph1 expression in the developing pancreas (Figure S5 d–e).

To assess the presence of Pet1 mRNA in the kidney, due to its low expression level, we performed radioactive ISH on coronal sections of 10.5 dpc, 11.5 dpc and 12.5 dpc from Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP embryos, using specific 35S-labeled riboprobes against YFP and Pet1 (Figure 6 a–f). Analysis of autoradiograms showed detectable Pet1 expression in the developing kidney, which correlated with YFP expression in double Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP transgenic embryos at 10.5 dpc (Figure 6 a–b). At 11.5 dpc radioactive ISH showed that Pet1 is expressed in the nephric ducts at the level of the hindlimbs, with a similar pattern of YFP mRNA distribution (Figure 6 c–d). Radioactive ISH performed as a control on 12.5 dpc wild-type embryos, showed that no YFP expression was detectable, while Pet1 expression was still present in the kidney at this stage (Figure 6 e–f).

Figure 6. Pet1 is expressed in the ureteric bud-derived tissues during kidney development.

(a–f) Radioactive ISH performed on coronal section of 10.5 dpc (a–b), 11.5 dpc (c–d) and 12.5 dpc (e–f) Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP (a–d) and wild-type (e–f) embryos. Results show presence of Pet1 mRNA expression in the nephric duct (arrowheads) already at 10.5 dpc (a), mirroring YFP reporter expression (b). At 11.5 dpc both Pet1 and YFP expression is highlighted in the two forming ureteric buds (c–d, arrowheads), while Pet1 but not the reporter expression is detectable in 12.5 dpc wild-type embryos (e–f), confirming the specificity of Pet1 expression in the developing kidney. (g–j’) X-gal staining performed on whole-mount 9.5 dpc (g, g’), 10.5 dpc (h, h’), 13.5 dpc (i, i’) Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R mouse embryos and on coronal sections of a P1 Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP mouse kidney (j, j’). Staining performed at different stages of development traces Pet1-expressing cell lineage during ureteric bud formation as highlighted in boxed regions shown in the higher magnification images (g’, h’, i’). Cre-mediated recombination has already occurred at 9.5 dpc in some scattered cells in the caudal nephric duct (g’). X-gal stained cells become more numerous at 10.5 dpc (h’) and depict the ureteric bud branching at 13.5 dpc (i’). At P1, X-gal staining highlights that Cre expressing cells have contributed to the formation of the collecting duct system (j) and ureter (j’). (k–n’) Brightfield (k, k’) and fluorescence images of whole-mount 13.5 dpc Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP kidneys immunostained for YFP (l, l’) and calbindin-D28K (m, m’). Merge images (n, n’) show colocalization of Cre recombinase activity and the specific ureteric bud-derivative marker calb-D28K during kidney development. Scale bar: 1.2 mm (i), 600 µm (h), 500 µm (e, f, kn), 400 µm (ad, g, j), 200 µm (h’i’), 100 µm (j’, k’n’), 80 µm (g’).

In order to fate map the Pet1 expressing cells in the developing kidneys, we performed β-galactosidase staining on whole mount Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R specimens at different developmental stages relevant in kidney development, from 9.5 dpc to P1 (Figure 6 g–j), and in adult (Figure S4). The expression of the reporter became detectable as early as 9.5 dpc in scattered cells along the developing nephric duct (Figure 6 g-g’). At 10.5 dpc X-gal staining was present in the nephric duct showing an increasing intensity toward its caudal end (Figure 6 h-h’). At 13.5 dpc β-galactosidase staining nicely highlighted that ureteric bud underwent already through different rounds of branching forming a tree-like structure (Figure 6 i-i’). Finally, in P1 mice X-gal staining was present in cells belonging to the collecting duct epithelium (Figure 6 j-j’). Importantly, no X-gal staining was observed within the metanephric mesenchyme, thus suggesting that in Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line Cre-mediated recombination occurred specifically within the ureteric bud precursors. No Cre recombinase activity was detected in the adrenal gland of Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R mice (Figure S4 c, i-i’) as expected in agreement with Fyodorov and collaborators (1998) [45].

In order to confirm that Pet1 expression is localized within the ureteric bud derivatives, we performed immunohistochemistry experiments on Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP whole mount kidneys at 13.5 dpc using antibodies against YFP and the specific marker for ureteric bud calbindin-D28K [46]. Results showed that cells expressing YFP were also immunoreactive for calbindin-D28K, which stains both tips and stalks of ureteric bud branches (Figure 6 k–n, k’-n’). In contrast, not all calbindin-D-28K+ cells expressed YFP, indicating that Cre-mediated recombination in the kidney occurred in a subset of calbindin-D28K expressing cells.

Thus, the characterization of the Pet1210-Cre transgenic line allowed the identification of novel expression domains outside the CNS where Cre activity faithfully recapitulates Pet1 expression.


In the present study we reported the generation and the comprehensive characterization of the Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line, in which a BAC-derived 210 kb genomic fragment of Pet1 gene locus was used to drive Cre recombinase expression. To date, it represents the largest Pet1 genomic region used to drive Pet1-like transgene expression. We observed that in Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line the 210 kb region driving Cre recombinase expression was able to recapitulate the timing of the endogenous Pet1 expression during serotonergic system development, as well as the spatial distribution within B1–B9 raphe nuclei. This result, together with the absence of reporter expression in extra-raphe domains in the brain, indicated a reliable, Pet1-driven, spatial and temporal control of Cre expression in the Pet1210-Cre mouse line. These results are in line with the peculiarities of BAC-based transgenesis, that limits positional effects and guarantees the presence of long-range acting regulatory elements as well, likely promoting transgene expression in an endogenous-like manner independently of the integration site [34], [36][38], [47]. Furthermore, despite the expression of Pet1 in serotonergic neurons observed in our Pet1210-Cre transgenic mice is consistent with data previously obtained with other Pet1-based transgenic mouse lines [16], [22], [48], [49], in the present study we demonstrated that Pet1 expression in the raphe is present in a wider domain than previously described, as assessed by double IHC characterization of Pet1210-Cre transgenic line and by ISH experiments on wild-type animals with different combination of Pet1 and Tph2 probe staining. Interestingly, we observed that within the raphe system the non-serotonergic Pet1-positive neurons are unevenly rather than homogeneously distributed along the raphe, with a substantial number in B8 and B9 nuclei, as compared to DR and caudal cluster B1–B3, where only few Pet1+/Tph2 cells were present.

It has been well established that the majority of neurons populating the raphe are not serotonergic, even though the term raphe is often used as a synonym of serotonergic [50][52]. Both dorsal raphe and median raphe nuclei, which together provide the main serotonergic innervation to the brain, are also composed by a heterogeneous population of neurons expressing different transmitter substances, such as glutamate [53], GABA [54], or peptides (e.g. corticotropin-releasing factor and substance P) [29]. The composition and the distribution of non-serotonergic neurons, as well as serotonergic neurons, show distinct pattern in DR and MR nuclei, often reflecting different target brain regions or subregions of the same brain structure such as amygdala, hippocampus and medial septum among the others [28], [50], [55][57]. Retrograde tracing studies have demonstrated that a large population of non-serotonergic neurons of the MR expresses the vesicular glutamate transporter VGLUT3, while in DR serotonin and VGLUT3 are often overlapping [57], [58]. The evidence that other transmitter substances may be co-released with serotonin hampers the study of non-serotonergic populations of the raphe and, therefore, the possibility to better characterize the Pet1+/Tph2 neuronal population. Although beyond the intent of the present study, multiple labelling studies would be of great interest in future research in order to identify the molecular and neurotransmission characteristics of Pet1+/Tph2 cells. In this regard, intersectional and subtractive strategies have provided powerful tools to map cell subtypes with great precision [22], [59], [60]. Jensen and collaborators have shown that serotonergic neurons can be genetically defined on the basis of their rhombomeric origin more than their final localization in adult serotonergic nuclei. In particular, it has been reported that while DR (B7, B6, B4) neurons derive uniquely from r1, median nuclei (B9, B8, B4) derive from r1–r3 precursors [22]. Thus, in line with this study, it can be hypothesized that the Pet1-positive non-serotonergic neurons present in raphe nuclei likely arise from a heterogeneous population of precursors deriving from r1 to r3. The combination of suitable transgenic and conditional reporter mouse lines in an intersectional approach may represent a valuable tool to dissect the developmental origin and the nature of Pet1-positive, non 5-HT neurons. The possibility to shed light on the molecular identity of Pet1+/Tph2 neurons will potentially impact on those studies in which the Pet1 regulatory region has been used to drive Cre recombinase expression, in order to specifically target serotonergic neurons. Indeed, in light of our results, the non-serotonergic expression might have contributed to the observed phenotypes resulting from Pet1-driven Cre-mediated somatic recombination in conditional knockouts.

The use of Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line allowed the tracing of Pet1 expressing cell progeny in the developing pancreas. Indeed, our data are consistent with the report by Ohta and collaborators, who have shown, using the ePet-Cre transgenic mouse line [61], that Pet1 is expressed in both developing and adult pancreas, peaking at E14.5 and co-localizing with endocrine-specific markers such as glucagon and insulin or specific transcription factors as Nkx2.2. In the same study, the analysis of Pet1 mutant animals showed a reduction of the expression of insulin genes, resulting in glucose clearance and insulin secretion defects. Interestingly, Pet1 does not directly promote Tph2 expression in the pancreas, suggesting that the Pet1-mediated regulation of either pancreatic β-cell or serotonergic neuron development proceeds via distinct genetic cascades [61]. More importantly, to our knowledge the present work provides the first evidence of Pet1 expression in kidney. Lack of previous reports showing Pet1 expression in the ureteric bud derivatives may be due to a sub-threshold expression level and/or to a transient expression within this structure. In this regard, an approach based on Cre/loxP system that induces a sustained reporter expression upon somatic recombination can reveal both sub-detectable and transient expression domains, that otherwise would be difficult to label with canonical immunohistochemistry- or in situ hybridization-based methods.

Our findings on the spatio-temporal expression domain of Pet1 go beyond the results obtained using the previously generated ePet1-Cre transgenic mouse line, in which presence of Pet1 in the kidney was excluded [62]. This discrepancy might be due to a number of factors, with the most likely being that the regulatory elements necessary to drive a Pet1-like expression in the kidney are likely included in the 210 kb Pet1 entire regulatory region of the Pet1210-Cre transgene, and not present in the 40 kb region used to generate the ePet1-Cre transgene [62]. In good agreement with our observation that Pet1 is expressed in mammalian kidney, microarray analysis performed on mouse and rat transcriptomes indicated that Pet1 transcript was enriched in the ureteric bud as compared to other cell types in the developing kidney such as the metanephric mesenchyme [63]. Nevertheless, although Pet1 expression has been shown in the adrenal gland by Fyodorov and collaborators [45], Cre recombinase activity in this district was not detected either by Scott and collaborators [16], or from our analysis, using ePet-Cre and ePet-YFP, or Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse lines, respectively. The presence of an intact recombined BAC in Pet1210-Cre mice suggests that the specific enhancer driving expression of Pet1 in the adrenal gland may be a long-range acting regulatory element, which is not likely present in the 210 kb genomic region contained in the RP23_165_D11 BAC clone.

Interestingly, as already observed for pancreas development [61], also in the kidney Pet1 is co-expressed with other transcription factors shared with the serotonergic differentiation pathway. It has been reported that LMX1B mutation causes nephropathies and, often, renal failure in human patients affected by Nail-Patella syndrome [64], [65]. Mouse Lmx1b is expressed in podocytes of the kidney, and its genetic ablation results in kidney defects resembling those observed in Nail-Patella syndrome patients [66], [67]. On the other hand, the functional role of Pet1 in the kidney has not been yet characterized. It is known that chromosomal translocations in which Ewing’s sarcoma (EWS) gene is fused to a variety of transcription factors, including human FEV, can lead to the onset of different subsets of Ewing tumours [68], [69], with some of them occasionally occurring in the kidney [70].

On the whole, the use of Pet1210-Cre transgenic mouse line allowed the identification of novel Pet1 expression domains both in the hindbrain and in the developing kidney. As the expression of the reporter is permanently induced following recombination, this line will allow long-term analysis of Pet1-expressing cell types, both in serotonergic neurons as well as in non-serotonergic cell populations of the raphe. Moreover, this mouse line constitutes a valuable model for studying molecular mechanisms of renal and pancreatic development and function by induction or silencing of specific genes in epithelial ureteric bud-derivatives and islet cells, respectively. Finally, given the expression of Pet1 in extra-serotonergic neurons within the raphe system, when using Pet1-driving Cre transgenic mouse lines in conditional gene targeting approaches or fate mapping studies aimed to target serotonergic cells, it should be taken into great consideration that the phenotype observed might arise from a combined, rather than serotonergic-specific, somatic recombination.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Pet1210-Cre allele generation. Diagram showing the wild-type Pet1 genomic locus contained within the RP23_165D11 BAC clone (a), the targeting vector for the homologous recombination in E. coli DY380 cells and the resulting Pet1210-Cre transgenic allele before and following Flp-mediated recombination. (b) Southern Blot analysis performed on genomic DNA obtained from Pet1210-Cre founders after BamHI digestion and hybridization with a probe against Kana/Neo cassette. Among the founders analysed, 4 presented the expected band at 2.6 kb. Founder-male 3 (FM3, lane 1), founder-female 3 (FF3, lane 7) and founder-female 9 (FF9, lane 10) showed germline transmission. (c) A 142 bp fragment at the 5′-end and a 254 bp fragment at the 3′-end of the transgene were amplified from the Pet1210-Cre FF9 founder genomic DNA and from the pBACe3.6 backbone assessing the integrity of the BAC transgene within mouse genomic DNA. (d) Southern Blot analysis performed on genomic DNA obtained from Pet1210-Cre FF9 founder after NotI digestion and hybridization with a probe capable to discriminate wt Pet1 locus vs Pet1210-Cre transgene. A clear lower hybridization intensity of the Pet1210-Cre transgene (4.2 kb) as compared to the Pet1 wt allele (3.1 kb) confirms the presence of a single copy of the transgene. L: ladder; wt: wild-type genomic DNA; tg+: Pet1210-Cre FF9 derived genomic DNA; BAC: RP23_165D11 BAC clone.


Figure S2.

Pet1 drives Cre-mediated recombination in the serotonergic domains of the three Pet1210-Cre founders. Flat mount preparations of 12.5 dpc hindbrains obtained from Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R double transgenic FF3 (a), FF9 (b) and FM3 (c) embryos. X-gal staining is present both in the rostral and caudal raphe and absent in the r4-derived territory with a comparable pattern among the three distinct founders. r4: rhombomere 4. Scale bar: 500 µm.


Figure S3.

Pet1210-Cre somatic recombination mirrors Pet1 spatio-temporal expression in the serotonergic system. Representative sagittal 12.5 dpc, and coronal 15.5 dpc, P10 and P30 Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R double transgenic (a, d, g, j) or wild-type (b–c, e–f, h–i, k–l) brain sections stained with X-gal chromogenic reaction or hybridized with a Pet1 (b, e, h, k) or a Tph2 (c, f, i, l) riboprobe, respectively. Note that at all the stages analysed β-galactosidase activity parallels with both Pet1 and Tph2 expression. Scale bar: 1 mm (ac), 200 µm (di), 150 µm (jl).


Figure S4.

Cre-mediated recombination outside the raphe in Pet1210-Cre mouse line selectively occurs in pancreas and kidney. X-gal staining performed on whole-mount tissues from Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R (a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l) and ROSA26R (a’, b’, c’, d’, e’, f’, g’, h’, i’, j’, k’, l’) animals at P 0.5 (a–f’) or adult (g–l’), showing the early post-natal and terminal distribution of Pet1-expressing cell progeny both in the brain and in peripheral organs. Cre-mediated recombination occurs specifically in hindbrain (a), pancreas (b) and kidneys (c) of P 0.5 double transgenic pups, and it is confined to the mature raphe system (g, g’), pancreatic beta cells (h, h’) and renal UB-derived collecting ducts and ureter (i, i’) in adults. Evidence of Cre-mediated recombination was undetectable in whole-mount specimens and on sections of adrenal glands (arrow in c, insets in i and i’, respectively). No reporter expression is present either in heart (d, j), spleen (e, k) or liver (f, l) of Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26R, or in organs from ROSA26R mice (a’, b’, c’, d’, e’, f’, g’, h’, i’, j’, k’, l’). Scale bar: 1.7 mm (g-g’, i-i’, j-j’, k-k’, l-l’), 1.5 mm (a-a’), 1 mm (b-b’, c-c’, f-f’, inset in i-i’), 750 µm (d-d’, e-e’, h-h’).


Figure S5.

Pet1 expression in the developing pancreas correlates with the reporter distribution in Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP mouse line. Images of serial coronal sections at the level of pancreas of Pet1210-Cre/ROSA26YFP 15.5 dpc embryos hybridized with Pet1 (a), YFP (b), Nkx2.2 (c), Tph1 (d) and Tph2 (e) riboprobes. Pet1 expression correlates with the expression of both YFP and Nkx2.2, while neither Tph2 nor Tph1 expression is detected in the pancreas at this stage. Scale bar: 300 µm (a–e).



We thank E. Lari and other members of our laboratory for technical assistance, valuable discussions and comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge the Center for Nanotechnology Innovation for the use of the confocal microscope. We also thank the following colleagues for kind gifts of reagents: Dr. D. Court (DY380 cells), Dr. S. Dymecki (ACTB::FLPe mouse line), Dr. P. Soriano (ROSA26R), Dr. F. Costantini (ROSA26YFP).

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: BP M. Pasqualetti. Performed the experiments: BP SM GP M. Pasqualetti M. Pratelli. Analyzed the data: BP SM M. Pasqualetti. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: BP M. Pasqualetti.


  1. 1. Lidov HG, Molliver ME (1982) Immunohistochemical study of the development of serotonergic neurons in the rat CNS. Brain Res Bull 9: 559–604.
  2. 2. Wallace JA, Lauder JM (1983) Development of the serotonergic system in the rat embryo: an immunocytochemical study. Brain Res Bull 10: 459–479.
  3. 3. Dahlstrom A, Fuxe K (1964) Evidence for the existence of monoamine-containing neurons in the central nervous system. i. demonstration of monoamines in the cell bodies of brain stem neurons. Acta Physiol Scand Suppl SUPPL 232: 1–55.
  4. 4. Morin LP (1999) Serotonin and the regulation of mammalian circadian rhythmicity. Ann Med 31: 12–33.
  5. 5. Ruhe HG, Mason NS, Schene AH (2007) Mood is indirectly related to serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine levels in humans: a meta-analysis of monoamine depletion studies. Mol Psychiatry 12: 331–359.
  6. 6. Olivier B (2005) Serotonergic mechanisms in aggression. Novartis Found Symp 268: 171–183; discussion 183–179, 242–153.
  7. 7. Hull EM, Muschamp JW, Sato S (2004) Dopamine and serotonin: influences on male sexual behavior. Physiol Behav 83: 291–307.
  8. 8. Bonnin A, Goeden N, Chen K, Wilson ML, King J, et al. (2011) A transient placental source of serotonin for the fetal forebrain. Nature 472: 347–350.
  9. 9. Cote F, Fligny C, Bayard E, Launay JM, Gershon MD, et al. (2007) Maternal serotonin is crucial for murine embryonic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 329–334.
  10. 10. Gaspar P, Cases O, Maroteaux L (2003) The developmental role of serotonin: news from mouse molecular genetics. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 1002–1012.
  11. 11. Migliarini S, Pacini G, Pelosi B, Lunardi G, Pasqualetti M (2013) Lack of brain serotonin affects postnatal development and serotonergic neuronal circuitry formation. Mol Psychiatry 18: 1106–1118.
  12. 12. Riccio O, Potter G, Walzer C, Vallet P, Szabo G, et al. (2009) Excess of serotonin affects embryonic interneuron migration through activation of the serotonin receptor 6. Mol Psychiatry 14: 280–290.
  13. 13. Sodhi MS, Sanders-Bush E (2004) Serotonin and brain development. Int Rev Neurobiol 59: 111–174.
  14. 14. Whitaker-Azmitia PM (2001) Serotonin and brain development: role in human developmental diseases. Brain Res Bull 56: 479–485.
  15. 15. Narboux-Neme N, Pavone LM, Avallone L, Zhuang X, Gaspar P (2008) Serotonin transporter transgenic (SERTcre) mouse line reveals developmental targets of serotonin specific reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Neuropharmacology 55: 994–1005.
  16. 16. Scott MM, Wylie CJ, Lerch JK, Murphy R, Lobur K, et al. (2005) A genetic approach to access serotonin neurons for in vivo and in vitro studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102: 16472–16477.
  17. 17. Weber T, Bohm G, Hermann E, Schutz G, Schonig K, et al. (2009) Inducible gene manipulations in serotonergic neurons. Front Mol Neurosci 2: 24.
  18. 18. Zhuang X, Masson J, Gingrich JA, Rayport S, Hen R (2005) Targeted gene expression in dopamine and serotonin neurons of the mouse brain. J Neurosci Methods 143: 27–32.
  19. 19. Cheng L, Chen CL, Luo P, Tan M, Qiu M, et al. (2003) Lmx1b, Pet-1, and Nkx2.2 coordinately specify serotonergic neurotransmitter phenotype. J Neurosci 23: 9961–9967.
  20. 20. Ding YQ, Marklund U, Yuan W, Yin J, Wegman L, et al. (2003) Lmx1b is essential for the development of serotonergic neurons. Nat Neurosci 6: 933–938.
  21. 21. Jacob J, Storm R, Castro DS, Milton C, Pla P, et al. (2009) Insm1 (IA-1) is an essential component of the regulatory network that specifies monoaminergic neuronal phenotypes in the vertebrate hindbrain. Development 136: 2477–2485.
  22. 22. Jensen P, Farago AF, Awatramani RB, Scott MM, Deneris ES, et al. (2008) Redefining the serotonergic system by genetic lineage. Nat Neurosci 11: 417–419.
  23. 23. Pattyn A, Simplicio N, van Doorninck JH, Goridis C, Guillemot F, et al. (2004) Ascl1/Mash1 is required for the development of central serotonergic neurons. Nat Neurosci 7: 589–595.
  24. 24. Kiyasova V, Gaspar P (2011) Development of raphe serotonin neurons from specification to guidance. Eur J Neurosci 34: 1553–1562.
  25. 25. Bang SJ, Jensen P, Dymecki SM, Commons KG (2012) Projections and interconnections of genetically defined serotonin neurons in mice. Eur J Neurosci 35: 85–96.
  26. 26. Andrade R, Haj-Dahmane S (2013) Serotonin neuron diversity in the dorsal raphe. ACS Chem Neurosci 4: 22–25.
  27. 27. Bang SJ, Commons KG (2011) Forebrain GABAergic projections from the dorsal raphe nucleus identified by using GAD67-GFP knock-in mice. J Comp Neurol 520: 4157–4167.
  28. 28. Calizo LH, Akanwa A, Ma X, Pan YZ, Lemos JC, et al. (2011) Raphe serotonin neurons are not homogenous: electrophysiological, morphological and neurochemical evidence. Neuropharmacology 61: 524–543.
  29. 29. Valentino RJ, Commons KG (2005) Peptides that fine-tune the serotonin system. Neuropeptides 39: 1–8.
  30. 30. Hendricks T, Francis N, Fyodorov D, Deneris ES (1999) The ETS domain factor Pet-1 is an early and precise marker of central serotonin neurons and interacts with a conserved element in serotonergic genes. J Neurosci 19: 10348–10356.
  31. 31. Pattyn A, Vallstedt A, Dias JM, Samad OA, Krumlauf R, et al. (2003) Coordinated temporal and spatial control of motor neuron and serotonergic neuron generation from a common pool of CNS progenitors. Genes Dev 17: 729–737.
  32. 32. Pfaar H, von Holst A, Vogt Weisenhorn DM, Brodski C, Guimera J, et al. (2002) mPet-1, a mouse ETS-domain transcription factor, is expressed in central serotonergic neurons. Dev Genes Evol 212: 43–46.
  33. 33. Jensen P, Dymecki SM (2014) Essentials of recombinase-based genetic fate mapping in mice. Methods Mol Biol 1092: 437–454.
  34. 34. Casanova E, Fehsenfeld S, Mantamadiotis T, Lemberger T, Greiner E, et al. (2001) A CamKIIalpha iCre BAC allows brain-specific gene inactivation. Genesis 31: 37–42.
  35. 35. Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Court DL (2001) Recombineering: a powerful new tool for mouse functional genomics. Nat Rev Genet 2: 769–779.
  36. 36. Giraldo P, Montoliu L (2001) Size matters: use of YACs, BACs and PACs in transgenic animals. Transgenic Res 10: 83–103.
  37. 37. Gong S, Zheng C, Doughty ML, Losos K, Didkovsky N, et al. (2003) A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes. Nature 425: 917–925.
  38. 38. Heintz N (2001) BAC to the future: the use of bac transgenic mice for neuroscience research. Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 861–870.
  39. 39. Lee EC, Yu D, Martinez de Velasco J, Tessarollo L, Swing DA, et al. (2001) A highly efficient Escherichia coli-based chromosome engineering system adapted for recombinogenic targeting and subcloning of BAC DNA. Genomics 73: 56–65.
  40. 40. Horton RM, Hunt HD, Ho SN, Pullen JK, Pease LR (1989) Engineering hybrid genes without the use of restriction enzymes: gene splicing by overlap extension. Gene 77: 61–68.
  41. 41. Rodriguez CI, Buchholz F, Galloway J, Sequerra R, Kasper J, et al. (2000) High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxP. Nat Genet 25: 139–140.
  42. 42. Soriano P (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21: 70–71.
  43. 43. Dahlstrom A, Fuxe K (1964) Localization of monoamines in the lower brain stem. Experientia 20: 398–399.
  44. 44. Srinivas S, Watanabe T, Lin CS, William CM, Tanabe Y, et al. (2001) Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev Biol 1: 4.
  45. 45. Fyodorov D, Nelson T, Deneris E (1998) Pet-1, a novel ETS domain factor that can activate neuronal nAchR gene transcription. J Neurobiol 34(2): 151–163.
  46. 46. Thomson RB, Ward DC, Quaggin SE, Igarashi P, Muckler ZE, et al. (1998) cDNA cloning and chromosomal localization of the human and mouse isoforms of Ksp-cadherin. Genomics 51: 445–451.
  47. 47. Schedl A, Montoliu L, Kelsey G, Schutz G (1993) A yeast artificial chromosome covering the tyrosinase gene confers copy number-dependent expression in transgenic mice. Nature 362: 258–261.
  48. 48. Liu C, Maejima T, Wyler SC, Casadesus G, Herlitze S, et al. (2010) Pet-1 is required across different stages of life to regulate serotonergic function. Nat Neurosci 13: 1190–1198.
  49. 49. Song NN, Xiu JB, Huang Y, Chen JY, Zhang L, et al. (2011) Adult raphe-specific deletion of Lmx1b leads to central serotonin deficiency. PLoS One 6: e15998.
  50. 50. Aznar S, Qian ZX, Knudsen GM (2004) Non-serotonergic dorsal and median raphe projection onto parvalbumin- and calbindin-containing neurons in hippocampus and septum. Neuroscience 124: 573–581.
  51. 51. Descarries L, Watkins KC, Garcia S, Beaudet A (1982) The serotonin neurons in nucleus raphe dorsalis of adult rat: a light and electron microscope radioautographic study. J Comp Neurol 207: 239–254.
  52. 52. Kohler C, Steinbusch H (1982) Identification of serotonin and non-serotonin-containing neurons of the mid-brain raphe projecting to the entorhinal area and the hippocampal formation. A combined immunohistochemical and fluorescent retrograde tracing study in the rat brain. Neuroscience 7: 951–975.
  53. 53. Soiza-Reilly M, Commons KG (2011) Glutamatergic drive of the dorsal raphe nucleus. J Chem Neuroanat 41: 247–255.
  54. 54. Jankowski MP, Sesack SR (2004) Prefrontal cortical projections to the rat dorsal raphe nucleus: ultrastructural features and associations with serotonin and gamma-aminobutyric acid neurons. J Comp Neurol 468: 518–529.
  55. 55. Commons KG, Connolley KR, Valentino RJ (2003) A neurochemically distinct dorsal raphe-limbic circuit with a potential role in affective disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 28: 206–215.
  56. 56. Halberstadt AL, Balaban CD (2006) Serotonergic and nonserotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus send collateralized projections to both the vestibular nuclei and the central amygdaloid nucleus. Neuroscience 140: 1067–1077.
  57. 57. Jackson LN, Chen LA, Larson SD, Silva SR, Rychahou PG, et al. (2009) Development and characterization of a novel in vivo model of carcinoid syndrome. Clin Cancer Res 15: 2747–2755.
  58. 58. Gras C, Herzog E, Bellenchi GC, Bernard V, Ravassard P, et al. (2002) A third vesicular glutamate transporter expressed by cholinergic and serotoninergic neurons. J Neurosci 22: 5442–5451.
  59. 59. Awatramani R, Soriano P, Rodriguez C, Mai JJ, Dymecki SM (2003) Cryptic boundaries in roof plate and choroid plexus identified by intersectional gene activation. Nat Genet 35: 70–75.
  60. 60. Robertson SD, Plummer NW, de Marchena J, Jensen P (2013) Developmental origins of central norepinephrine neuron diversity. Nat Neurosci 16: 1016–1023.
  61. 61. Ohta Y, Kosaka Y, Kishimoto N, Wang J, Smith SB, et al. (2011) Convergence of the insulin and serotonin programs in the pancreatic beta-cell. Diabetes 60: 3208–3216.
  62. 62. Scott MM, Krueger KC, Deneris ES (2005) A differentially autoregulated Pet-1 enhancer region is a critical target of the transcriptional cascade that governs serotonin neuron development. J Neurosci 25: 2628–2636.
  63. 63. Schmidt-Ott KM, Yang J, Chen X, Wang H, Paragas N, et al. (2005) Novel regulators of kidney development from the tips of the ureteric bud. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 1993–2002.
  64. 64. Dreyer SD, Zhou G, Baldini A, Winterpacht A, Zabel B, et al. (1998) Mutations in LMX1B cause abnormal skeletal patterning and renal dysplasia in nail patella syndrome. Nat Genet 19: 47–50.
  65. 65. McIntosh I, Dreyer SD, Clough MV, Dunston JA, Eyaid W, et al. (1998) Mutation analysis of LMX1B gene in nail-patella syndrome patients. Am J Hum Genet 63: 1651–1658.
  66. 66. Chen H, Lun Y, Ovchinnikov D, Kokubo H, Oberg KC, et al. (1998) Limb and kidney defects in Lmx1b mutant mice suggest an involvement of LMX1B in human nail patella syndrome. Nat Genet 19: 51–55.
  67. 67. Rohr C, Prestel J, Heidet L, Hosser H, Kriz W, et al. (2002) The LIM-homeodomain transcription factor Lmx1b plays a crucial role in podocytes. J Clin Invest 109: 1073–1082.
  68. 68. Ng TL, O’Sullivan MJ, Pallen CJ, Hayes M, Clarkson PW, et al. (2007) Ewing sarcoma with novel translocation t(2;16) producing an in-frame fusion of FUS and FEV. J Mol Diagn 9: 459–463.
  69. 69. Peter M, Couturier J, Pacquement H, Michon J, Thomas G, et al. (1997) A new member of the ETS family fused to EWS in Ewing tumors. Oncogene 14: 1159–1164.
  70. 70. Berg T, Kalsaas AH, Buechner J, Busund LT (2009) Ewing sarcoma-peripheral neuroectodermal tumor of the kidney with a FUS-ERG fusion transcript. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 194: 53–57.