Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

High Levels of Diversity Uncovered in a Widespread Nominal Taxon: Continental Phylogeography of the Neotropical Tree Frog Dendropsophus minutus

  • Marcelo Gehara ,

    Affiliations Division of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany, Pós-graduação em Sistemática e Evolução, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, Brasil

  • Andrew J. Crawford,

    Affiliations Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panamá, Republic of Panama

  • Victor G. D. Orrico,

    Affiliation Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Zoologia, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Ariel Rodríguez,

    Affiliation Division of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

  • Stefan Lötters,

    Affiliation Trier University, Biogeography Department, Trier, Germany

  • Antoine Fouquet,

    Affiliation CNRS-Guyane - USR3456, Immeuble Le Relais - 2, Cayenne, French Guiana

  • Lucas S. Barrientos,

    Affiliation Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia

  • Francisco Brusquetti,

    Affiliation Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil; Instituto de Investigación Biológica del Paraguay, Asunción, Paraguay

  • Ignacio De la Riva,

    Affiliation Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain

  • Raffael Ernst,

    Affiliation Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Dresden, Germany

  • Giuseppe Gagliardi Urrutia,

    Affiliation Peruvian Center for Biodiversity and Conservation (PCRC), Nanay, Iquitos, Peru

  • Frank Glaw,

    Affiliation Zoologische Staatssammlung München, München, Germany

  • Juan M. Guayasamin,

    Affiliation Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Centro de Investigación de la Biodiversidad y el Cambio Climático (BioCamp), Cotocollao, Quito, Ecuador

  • Monique Hölting,

    Affiliation Museum of Zoology, Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Dresden, Germany

  • Martin Jansen,

    Affiliation Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

  • Philippe J. R. Kok,

    Affiliation Amphibian Evolution Lab, Department of Biology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

  • Axel Kwet,

    Affiliation German Herpetological Society (DGHT), Mannheim, Germany

  • Rodrigo Lingnau,

    Affiliation Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, Francisco Beltrão, PR, Brasil

  • Mariana Lyra,

    Affiliation Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Jiří Moravec,

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic

  • José P. Pombal Jr,

    Affiliation Departamento de Vertebrados, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  • Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic,

    Affiliation Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Caracas, Venezuela

  • Arne Schulze,

    Affiliation Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Department of Zoology, Darmstadt, Germany

  • J. Celsa Señaris,

    Affiliation Laboratorio de Ecología y Genética de Poblaciones, Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Caracas, Venezuela

  • Mirco Solé,

    Affiliation Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Rodovia Ilhéus-Itabuna, Bahia, Brasil

  • Miguel Trefaut Rodrigues,

    Affiliation Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Biociências, Departamento de Zoologia, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Evan Twomey,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, United States of America

  • Celio F. B. Haddad,

    Affiliation Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, UNESP, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Miguel Vences,

    Affiliation Division of Evolutionary Biology, Zoological Institute, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany

  •  [ ... ],
  • Jörn Köhler

    Affiliation Hessisches Landesmuseum Darmstadt, Department of Zoology, Darmstadt, Germany

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

High Levels of Diversity Uncovered in a Widespread Nominal Taxon: Continental Phylogeography of the Neotropical Tree Frog Dendropsophus minutus

  • Marcelo Gehara, 
  • Andrew J. Crawford, 
  • Victor G. D. Orrico, 
  • Ariel Rodríguez, 
  • Stefan Lötters, 
  • Antoine Fouquet, 
  • Lucas S. Barrientos, 
  • Francisco Brusquetti, 
  • Ignacio De la Riva, 
  • Raffael Ernst


22 Oct 2014: The PLOS ONE Staff (2014) Correction: High Levels of Diversity Uncovered in a Widespread Nominal Taxon: Continental Phylogeography of the Neotropical Tree Frog Dendropsophus minutus. PLOS ONE 9(10): e111829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111829 View correction


Species distributed across vast continental areas and across major biomes provide unique model systems for studies of biotic diversification, yet also constitute daunting financial, logistic and political challenges for data collection across such regions. The tree frog Dendropsophus minutus (Anura: Hylidae) is a nominal species, continentally distributed in South America, that may represent a complex of multiple species, each with a more limited distribution. To understand the spatial pattern of molecular diversity throughout the range of this species complex, we obtained DNA sequence data from two mitochondrial genes, cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and the 16S rhibosomal gene (16S) for 407 samples of D. minutus and closely related species distributed across eleven countries, effectively comprising the entire range of the group. We performed phylogenetic and spatially explicit phylogeographic analyses to assess the genetic structure of lineages and infer ancestral areas. We found 43 statistically supported, deep mitochondrial lineages, several of which may represent currently unrecognized distinct species. One major clade, containing 25 divergent lineages, includes samples from the type locality of D. minutus. We defined that clade as the D. minutus complex. The remaining lineages together with the D. minutus complex constitute the D. minutus species group. Historical analyses support an Amazonian origin for the D. minutus species group with a subsequent dispersal to eastern Brazil where the D. minutus complex originated. According to our dataset, a total of eight mtDNA lineages have ranges >100,000 km2. One of them occupies an area of almost one million km2 encompassing multiple biomes. Our results, at a spatial scale and resolution unprecedented for a Neotropical vertebrate, confirm that widespread amphibian species occur in lowland South America, yet at the same time a large proportion of cryptic diversity still remains to be discovered.


The application of molecular methods has expedited tremendously the discovery and characterization of global biological diversity [1]. This is particularly true for amphibians, where the rate of species descriptions has accelerated enormously in the past 20 years [2][7]. Integrative approaches that combine multiple lines of evidence have allowed taxonomists to define and name many of these evolutionary independent lineages as proper species [8][11]. The improved delimitation of species diversity, transforming one widely distributed species into several species, each with a smaller range, in many cases has notable impact on conservation. For instance, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) status of certain populations may change from ‘Least Concern’ to one of the various threat categories or simply ‘Data Deficient’ [12][14].

Cryptic genetic diversity is now so commonly reported in molecular studies of amphibian species that the existence of nominally widespread tropical species has been called into question [15], [16]. However, supposedly widespread species occurring across multiple biomes and countries are rarely comprehensively sampled across their complete geographic range in screenings of genetic diversity [5], [6] or phylogeographic studies [17][21]. Sampling of species from across vast continental areas and across political borders is often handicapped by financial, logistic and political factors.

In the Neotropics, nominal taxa such as Rhinella margaritifera (Bufonidae), Leptodactylus fuscus (Leptodactylidae), and Scinax ruber (Hylidae) are prominent examples of anuran species once considered to occur across nearly the entire tropical lowlands of South America. Evidence has accumulated that many such putatively widespread species could in fact be complexes of cryptic taxa (e.g. [20], [22]). However, given limited genetic sampling and the difficulty in reviewing material from all countries hosting populations, their relationships and systematics remain in many cases as unclear as they were decades ago [23], [24].

A further example of a putatively widespread Neotropical amphibian species is Dendropsophus minutus (Peters, 1872), a small hylid frog of 21–28 mm snout-vent length, distributed in Cis-Andean South America, including the Andean slopes, the Amazon Basin, the Guiana Shield, down to the Atlantic Forests of southeastern Brazil, with an elevational record from near sea level up to 2,000 m [25]. Variation in coloration, osteology, advertisement calls and larval morphology [6], [26][29], along with molecular data from limited parts of the species' distribution [21] suggest that the nominal D. minutus might represent a species complex. However, the sheer size of its supposed geographical range along with nomenclatural and taxonomic complexity (six junior synonyms, [25]) and unresolved relationships in the D. minutus species group [30] have so far made these frogs inaccessible to revision.

In this case study, we use D. minutus to understand to what degree a tropical, small-sized anuran has the potential to be continentally widespread with limited genetic structure within its range, as expected for a single species. In addition to conservation concerns, this question has important implications for South American biogeography in general and amphibian systematics and evolution in particular. Evidence is accumulating that body size in amphibians has a positive correlation with range size [31], [32], but contrary to this trend many Holarctic amphibians occur with little genetic substructure across the vast ranges they colonized after the last glaciation, despite sometimes moderate to small body sizes (examples in [16]). Whether such patterns also exist across vast ranges in tropical regions, with their distinct historical climatic dynamics [33], is an open question. Deciphering possible cryptic diversity within the nominal D. minutus would also help inform conservation assessments which typically use species'geographic distributions as criteria for conservation status [13].

The present study is a multinational collaborative effort to sample nominal D. minutus across its entire range and at a spatial resolution unprecedented for a Neotropical vertebrate. Based on mitochondrial DNA sequences as a proxy for overall genetic diversity, we identify genealogical lineages currently subsumed within D. minutus and putative allies and assess their historical relationships and geographic ranges. Although there are some data on morphology and bioacoustics, we only partially discuss these here and refrain from making taxonomic decisions, but instead provide a roadmap for future integrative studies. Our focus, therefore, is on the biogeographical implications of the phylogeographic origins and evolutionary history of the D. minutus species group. We reveal here that this species complex exists as a mixture of both geographically widespread lineages and probable microendemic lineages.


Data collection and laboratory methods

No experiments were conducted using living animals. All field researches and collecting of specimens were approved by competent authorities, these being: Instituto Chico Mendes – ICMBio, Brazil, through collection permits granted to MG (21710-2), VGDO (19920), RL (26957-1), MTR (10126-1), CFBH (22511-1) and JPP (12600-2); Museo Nacional de Historia Natural – Colección Boliviana de Fauna, La Paz, Bolivia (permits: CBF CITE No. 02/2006 and No. 81/2007); DGB and the INRENA (granted permits to IDLR for collecting Bolivian and Peruvian material respectively); The Guyana Environmental Protection Agency and the Guyanese Ministry of Amerindian Affairs and Environmental Protection Agency of Guyana through research permit granted to PJRK's (180609 BR 112); Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial of Colombia through research and collecting permit granted to AJC (No. 15 of 26 July 2010 and access to genetic resources permit No. 44); Ministerio Venezolano del Poder Popular para el Ambiente through permits granted to FJMRR and MHNLS (collection permit #4156, period 2009-2010; access to genetic resources permit #0076 of 22 February 2011). Samples from Ecuador were obtained under permits MAE-DPP-2011-0691 and 05-2011-Investigación-B-DPMS/MAE. Voucher specimens were euthanized using methods that do not require approval by an ethics committee. None of the species collected for this study is listed in the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora – CITES (

We analyzed 407 samples of specimens identified as Dendropsophus aperomeus, D. delarivai, D. minutus, D. stingi or D. xapuriensis which we here consider together with D. limai (not included in our analysis), to constitute the Dendropsophus minutus species group (see Results, Figures 13 and Figures S1-2). The D. minutus species group was defined by Faivovich et al. (2005) [30] to comprise D. delarivai, D. limai, D. minutus and D. xapuriensis. These authors tentatively allocated Dendropsophus aperomeus to the D. minimus species group (in accordance with [34]). However, later molecular phylogenetic analyses suggested different positions for D. aperomeus [35][38]. Dendropsophus stingi has not been associated with any species group so far [30], but shares morphological characters with D. minutus [28], [39]. Because of their unsolved relationships, D. aperomeus and D. stingi were included in our study.

Figure 1. Dendropsophus minutus tree with lineage distribution part 1.

50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree and distribution maps of mtDNA lineages 1–18. Asterisks represent nodes with posterior probability equal to 1. Posterior probabilities lower than 0.9 are not shown.

Figure 2. Dendropsophus minutus tree with lineage distribution part 2.

50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree and distribution maps of mtDNA lineages 19–28. Asterisks represent nodes with probability equals to 1. Probabilities lower than 0.9 are not shown.

Figure 3. Dendropsophus minutus tree with lineage distribution part 3.

50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree and distribution maps of mtDNA lineages 29–43. Asterisks represent nodes with probability equals to 1. Probabilities lower than 0.9 are not shown.

Genomic DNA was extracted in multiple laboratories using various routine methodologies. We used polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing with PCR primers on automated Sanger sequencers to obtain DNA sequences of two mitochondrial gene fragments: the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and the 5′ portion of the cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene, the latter corresponding to the standard DNA barcode fragment [40]. See Supplementary Materials for detailed protocols and primers. Sequence alignment was performed using the MUSCLE algorithm [41] as implemented in the software MEGA version 5.0 [42]. 16S sequences were available for all samples (407), while COI sequences were only available for a subset of these (335). Gapped regions of the 16S alignment were treated as missing data. To fill the concatenated alignment missing COI sequences were also treated as missing data. All newly determined sequences were deposited in GenBank (accession numbers: KJ817824 - KJ817835, KJ833032 - KJ833585, KJ933533 - KJ933690, KJ940033 - KJ940049, see also Table S1 for detailed information of data collection).

Substitution rate estimation and monophyly of the Dendropsophus minutus species group

To evaluate the monophyly of the D. minutus group and to estimate a substitution rate that could be used for calibrating the phylogeographic analysis (see below), we constructed a time-calibrated 16S gene tree with node constraints based on fossil and geographic evidence [30], [43], [44], comprising sequences of 216 species of hylids (Table S2), including all Dendropsophus species available from GenBank, plus 28 sequences representing the main clades of the D. minutus group. Regions of the 16S DNA sequence data that did not overlap our 16S alignment were excluded to ensure that the fragments used in the substitution rate estimation and in the phylogeographic analysis were the same. Additionally we included one sequence representing each main clade of D. minutus found in this study.

The calibrated tree was estimated using Bayesian Inference with posterior probabilities via a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling as implemented in the software BEAST version 1.7.2. We used a temporal calibration scheme similar to what was used in previous studies of hylids and other amphibians [44], [48][50], as follows. We constrained three nodes with uniform priors based on fossil evidence: 1) most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of Acris and Pseudacris to 15 million years (Ma) or older; 2) MRCA of Hyla squirella and H. cinerea to 15 Ma or older; and 3) MRCA of all Hyla as 33 Ma or older [51]. Additionally, we assumed the MRCA of Phyllomedusinae and Pelodryadinae to be related to the separation between South America and Australia [52], [53]. Therefore, we applied a fourth constraint to the respective MRCA of the two subfamilies using a normal prior with 40 Ma of mean and standard deviation of 6 Ma to allow a higher sampling probability around this value (quantiles: 5% = 30 Ma and 95% = 49.9 Ma) while avoiding hard boundaries. See Methods S1 for further information.

Substitution models were selected using the Akaike Information Criterion [45] in jModeltest version 0.1 [46] which suggested a GTR+I+Γ model for the 16S data set. A coalescent constant size tree prior was used with a lognormal uncorrelated relaxed clock model. The chain was run for 108 steps, sampling every 104 steps. We repeated the analysis five times to ensure convergence of posterior distributions. A maximum credibility clade tree was summarized using Tree Annotator version 1.7.2 provided in the BEAST 1.7.2 package. The first 20% of the trees were discarded as burn-in after empirical assessment of appropriate chain convergence and mixing with Tracer version 1.5 [47]. We used the median of the posterior density of the substitution rate (ucld.mean) obtained by this analysis as prior for phylogeographic analysis of the D. minutus complex. See Methods S1 for additional information.

Gene tree inference, GMYC analysis and genetic distance calculations

We estimated an ultrametric mitochondrial gene tree using BEAST software, and all available 16S and COI sequences of the D. minutus group (1,068 bp concatenated alignment). As outgroups we included samples of Dendropsophus nanus, D. bipunctatus and D. microcephalus. We subdivided the data set into three partitions: (1) 16S, (2) third codon positions of COI, and (3) combined first and second positions of COI, and implemented a GTR+I+Γ model for each of the partitions, as suggested by the software PartitionFinder [54]. Bayesian inference of an ultrametric phylogenetic tree, using BEAST software, followed the method described above for the taxonomically more inclusive 16S data set.

The resulting ultrametric consensus tree was used as an input to estimate the number of statistically (and presumed evolutionarily) distinct lineages using the generalized mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) algorithm. Mitochondrial DNA sequence variation can provide a preliminary yet objective estimate of the number of phenetic clusters or evolutionary lineages represented in a given dataset [55], [56]. Of the many available algorithms [57], [58], we applied the GMYC algorithm which identifies clusters of mtDNA haplotypes by testing for a transition between fast coalescent rates within clusters relative to slower times to common ancestry among clusters, i.e., as described by a stochastic birth-only Yule model in forward time [59]. GMYC is expected to perform best under dense spatial sampling and limited migration [60], [61], two criteria which our study of the D. minutus species group would seem to meet (see below). Each statistically significant cluster identified by GMYC may correspond to a deep conspecific lineage or possibly an undescribed species, depending on support from other available taxonomic data [62]. The GMYC algorithm requires only an ultrametric tree as input, for which we used the concatenated 2-gene dataset (see above). We compared the likelihood of a single versus multiple transition threshold model via a χ2 likelihood ratio test [63]. All GMYC calculations were performed using the ‘splits’ package, downloaded as ‘gmyc.pkg.0.9.6.R’ for the R statistical platform [64].

Using the clusters identified in the GMYC analysis, we calculated the uncorrected pairwise p-distances between these lineages and the mean p-distances within lineages using the 16S sequences only with pairwise deletion in the software MEGA5 [42]. Additionally, to determine the geographical extent of each lineage we used the occurrence data to generate minimum convex polygons representing the distribution range of each lineage observed in more than two localities. We then calculated the area (in km2) of each polygon using a Winkel-tripel projection in ArcGIS 10 software (ESRI, Redlands, CA).

Phylogeographic analysis and connectivity surfaces

To reconstruct dispersal pathways within the D. minutus species group we applied a phylogeographic method that reconstructs geographical coordinates at the nodes of the genealogy using continuous trait reconstruction assuming a log-normal Relaxed Random Walk model implemented in BEAST software. The method estimates ancestral traits and topology simultaneously in a Bayesian framework, taking into account uncertainty of the topology [65]. For details of our implementation of this method, see Methods S1. Analyses assumed a coalescent prior with constant population size and an uncorrelated log-normal relaxed clock model [66], as well as an HKY+Γ model of substitution for each of the partitions used also in the gene tree estimation (see above). We ran three independent chains of 5×108 iterations with different random seeds sampling every 50,000 steps. In order to calibrate the tree we used the substitution rate previously estimated for the 16S fragment using a wider time tree analysis of Dendropsophus (see above). Mixing of parameter sampling, effective sample size (ESS) and convergence were checked in Tracer 1.5. The resulted tree was summarized with Tree Annotator 1.7.2. The software SPREAD [67] was used to generate a kml (Keyhole Markup Language) file which was plotted in a Google Earth map (

To obtain independent support for these dispersal pathways derived from phylogeographic analysis, we constructed conductance maps for the D. minutus species group based on Species Distribution Models (SDM) using the software Circuitscape version 3.5.8 [68]. This approach does not incorporate phylogeographic information but uses circuit theory to predict connectivity between localities or areas in heterogeneous landscapes. The algorithm explicitly incorporates effects of limited and irregular habitat extent accounting for multiple pathways and wider habitat bands connecting populations [69]. SDMs can be taken as possible conductive surfaces where highly suitable areas would have high conductance (or low resistance to dispersion) and low suitability areas would have low conductance (or high resistance to dispersion). We thus used a correlative niche model approach and derived a SDM to be used as a base layer for constructing conductivity surfaces.

As our data might represent multiple cryptic species or lineages, a SDM generated on the basis of all samples could be affected by the magnitude of the differences in climatic niches among the different lineages. To assess the extent of climatic niche diversification in the D. minutus group, we plotted the first two PC scores of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) calculated from the values of 19 bioclimatic variables associated with each locality. Given the strong overlap of bioclimatic niches, especially of the majority of lineages 19–43 (Figure S3), i.e., the D. minutus complex, we combined these for constructing a single SDM. A robust test of niche conservatism between the lineages (as presented by [70]) was not applicable in our study because only a low number of localities was available for most lineages and because these tests often overestimate niche differentiation and are highly sensitive to sampling bias [71]. We furthermore projected the SDM to climatic scenarios representing past warm and cold extremes of the Late Pleistocene (Last Interglacial, 120 kyrBP, Last Glacial Maximum, 21 kyrBP). The SDM was constructed using six bioclimatic variables (see Methods S1) [72] using MaxEnt version 3.3.3a [73], [74]. The maps of the SDMs obtained for the present and past climate scenarios (see Figure S4) were then used as the input for Circuitscape along with the localities of the whole D. minutus group to calculate a conductance map between all pairs of sampled localities. The four resulting conductance maps were averaged. In addition, to highlight areas that under different models maintained high conductance, we applied a 25% quartile threshold to generate binary conductance maps, keeping the grids with higher values of conductance. The maps were then superimposed and spatially summed to highlight the areas of high sustained conductance (stable corridors). All geospatial processing was performed in ArcGis 10 (ESRI; Redlands, CA). See Methods S1 for detailed methodology.


The 16S tree containing all Dendropsophus for which sequences were available recovered the monophyly of the D. minutus species group (Figure S1). Within the group, the clade containing samples representing lineages 19–43 received a maximal posterior probability (1.0) and is defined here as the D. minutus complex (Figures 13, Figure S2B-D), given that lineage 25 contains samples from the type locality of D. minutus (Figures S2B). The substitution rate for the 16S fragment estimated from this analysis was 7.35×10−3/site/Ma [median of ucld.mean parameter (95% HPD = 6.1–8.7×10−3)], or 1.47% total divergence per Ma. The exclusion of the third temporal constraint involving the MRCA of the genus Hyla (Methods S1) did not change substantially the substitution rate estimate.

The 16S sequences had an average of 477 base pairs (bp) across individuals (standard deviation: 9.6) while the COI sequences had an average of 586 bp (standard deviation: 19.8). The alignment of all 16S sequences of the D. minutus species group contained 407, while the COI fragment contained 335 samples. The GMYC analysis on the concatenated data identified 43 entities excluding the outgroup samples, consisting of 31 clusters and 12 ‘singletons’, i.e., an entity consisting of a single concatenated mtDNA haplotype. The likelihood ratio test failed to reject the single-threshold GMYC model (χ2 9 d.f. = 6.09, P-value = 0.7308), thus the following results are based on this simpler model, which tends to be more conservative in estimating number of statistically significant clusters.

Most of the mitochondrial lineages containing more than one sample received strong nodal support (Figures 13). The lineages splitting off from basal nodes of the tree (lineages 1–18) are distributed in the Guiana Shield, and in the Andean region of Peru, Ecuador and Colombia, with an eastern extralimital clade assembling disjunt localities in Mato Grosso and Pará (lineages 9–10; Figure 1).

The remaining lineages are in general more widely distributed in central and eastern South America (Figures 23). Lineages are largely allopatric but several cases of sympatry were observed (Figure S5). The uncorrected pairwise distances between lineages for the 16S gene ranged from 0.7 to 13%, while within-lineage p-distances ranged from 0.0 to 1.8% (Table S3).

Most of the lineages (45%) were found in only one or two localities. Fifty per cent of the lineages were only found in areas smaller than 10 km2, and more than 70% have known ranges smaller than 10,000 km2. Eight out of the 43 lineages have a distribution larger than 100,000 km2 (Figure 4). Largest range sizes were found in northeastern Brazil (Caatinga domain; 997,262 km2, lineage 36), eastern Bolivia and western Brazil (Cerrado, Chaco and Dry Forest domains; 293,321 km2, lineage 33) and the Guiana Shield (269,741 km2, lineage 2).

Figure 4. Comparative range size of lineages.

Range size of lineages within the Dendropsophus minutus complex. Most lineages appear to be microendemic and are only recorded from one or two localities while eight lineages have ranges larger than 100,000 km2.

The phylogeographic analysis suggested an Amazonian origin for the D. minutus group (Figure 5A), with subsequent dispersal to the Atlantic Forest, Guiana shield and the Andean region (Figures 5B and 5C). From there, lineages then dispersed outward from the Atlantic Forest and Amazonia into the southern Atlantic Forest and eastern Paraguay, northeastern and central Brazil, and to the Guiana Shield (Figures 5C and 5D). The conductance analysis with Circuitscape software resulted in the most stable conductance areas along the Brazilian Atlantic coast, central Brazil, northeastern Argentina (Misiones region) and northern Bolivia. The analysis suggested three paths of connectivity between eastern Brazil and the Amazonian region: 1) across northeastern Brazil; 2) across central Brazil; and 3) across southern Brazil, the third being the most stable (Figure 6).

Figure 5. Phylogeographic reconstruction of Dendropsophus minutus group.

Phylogeographical analysis of the Dendropsophus minutus group based on the 16S+COI mitochondrial dataset using a Relaxed Random Walk model for continuous trait reconstruction in Beast software. A) center of origin of the D. minutus group. B) Dispersal to west Amazonia, Guiana Shield, Andean region of Peru and eastern Brazil; polygon at the east represent the geographic origin of lineages representing the D. minutus complex. C) Dispersal from east Brazil to lowland of Bolivia; further dispersal to Guiana Shield, Peruvian and Colombian areas. D) Recent dispersals to northeast and south Brazil, east Paraguay and Guiana shield. Green polygons and red branches indicate relatively older events while dark polygons and black branches indicate later events. Maps were generated using google earth (

Figure 6. Estimated conductance maps for Dendropsophus minuts complex.

Conductance maps constructed with the program Circuitscape. Conductances were estimated according to a spacial distribution modeling for the D. minutus complex projected to four different climatic scenarios. Conductance maps were averaged and thresholded to show stable dispersal corridors (see methods for details).


Diversity in the Dendropsophus minutus species group

Given the numerous divergent lineages and high degree of differentiation revealed here, our molecular approach shows that more than one species could be hidden behind the name Dendropsophus minutus. At this stage, we refrain from any formal taxonomic action, as the clarification of the taxonomic status of the populations involved requires thorough integrative revision. In a few cases, there exists information on morphology and calls, but data are not sufficient to either support or reject species status for individual lineages, or allocate available names with certainty. In at least one example GMYC has been found to overestimate the number of species when compared to an integrative approach [75]. Thus, it is possible that several of the lineages identified by this method may not correspond to distinct species. Despite this qualification, some conclusions concerning species diversity can be derived from our results based on monophyly and GMYC results.

Concerning lineages in the D. minutus species group not belonging to the D. minutus complex (lineages 1–18; Figure 1), our analyses revealed multiple deeply differentiated lineages. Our results under the criteria of mitochondrial monophyly and statistically distinct genealogical lineage (GMYC) suggest recognition of the nominal taxa D. aperomeus, D. delarivai, D. stingi and D. xapuriensis as members of the D. minutus species group, whose monophyly has not previously been rigorously tested and the relationships among its species has not been studied. In two cases (D. aperomeus, D. stingi) the species were not previously allocated to the D. minutus species group [28], [30], [34], [39], [76]. Kaplan (1994) [28] acknowledged that D. stingi was morphologically similar to D. minutus, while Köhler and Lötters (2001) [39] pointed to similarities of D. aperomeus and D. delarivai (the latter species at that time being tentatively allocated to the D. minutus group based on phenetic similarities), and Wiens et al. (2005) [35] found D. aperomeus to be related to D. minutus. The relationships of D. aperomeus and D. minutus also remained unresolved in the analysis of Pyron and Wiens (2011) [37].

Among the D. minutus species group members external to the D. minutus complex, lineages 1–6 are Guianan, while 7–18 are primarily distributed along the Andean foothills, and all show well-pronounced molecular differentiation and divergence. Among lineages 1–6, there is moderate genetic differentiation. Considering mitochondrial reciprocal monophyly and GMYC results as criteria, and being taxonomically conservative, one available name, Hyla goughi Boulenger, 1911 (type locality: Trinidad), should likely be removed from the synonymy of D. minutus and allocated to populations comprised by all or some of lineages 1–6. As a conservative estimate, we hypothesize that lineages 7–18 comprise seven distinct species, i.e., five named taxa and two undescribed species (lineages 9+10 and 11+12).

Within the D. minutus complex (i.e., D. minutus sensu lato), GMYC analyses revealed 25 divergent clades (lineages 19–43 in Figures 2 and 3, Figure S2B-D). In several cases, these lineages occur in sympatry (e.g., lineages 19 and 20; 19 and 36; 22 and 27; 27 and 28; 34 and 42). In one case (lineages 30 and 33; Figure 3) genetic differentiation between allopatric lineages is concordant with consistant differences in larval morphology (A. Schulze unpubl. Data, [6]), suggesting species differentiation. However, larval morphology of D. minutus has not yet been explored globally across its range. There are some descriptions of external morphology mainly based on single (or closely located) populations (e.g. [77], [78][84]) and one description of internal larval buccal morphology [85]. While larval morphology may offer an alternative source of abundant taxonomic characters [86], [87] it also can be highly plastic, suggesting that more data need to be collected and coded with care (e.g. [88], [89]).

Advertisement calls among populations which, according to our analyses, would represent distinct lineages, were in some cases shown to be very similar or even identical [26], [90]. The certain assignment of calls to any mitochondrial lineage may require sequencing of voucher specimens having recorded calls. On the other hand, call differences have been found among some lineages within D. minutus sensu lato identified here through molecular analyses [6], thus potentially providing further support for the presence of additional cryptic species.

Our analysis included topotypic material that may correspond to some of the available names currently regarded as synonyms of D. minutus. If additional integrative taxonomic studies are able to link unique diagnostic traits to our mtDNA clades, the following synonyms may require revalidation: Hyla pallens Lutz, 1925 (lineage 28), H. velata Cope, 1887 (lineage 33), and H. bivittata Boulenger, 1888 (lineage 39). On the other hand, H. suturata Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926 (lineage 28), and H. emrichi Mertens, 1927 (lineage 39) likely represent junior synonyms of H. pallens and H. bivittata, respectively. Samples from the type locality of Hyla minuta Peters, 1872 form a distinct clade (lineage 25) and do not cluster with samples from any other locality studied here (see Figures S2B-D). Results of the GMYC analyses should be interpreted with caution, however, as genealogical clusters identified by this method may correspond to species but may also simply be conspecific phylogeographic lineages [75].

At some localities our analyses revealed up to three independent lineages of the D. minutus species group occurring in sympatry or at least in very close proximity (e.g., lineages 21, 24, 37; lineages 22, 27, 28; lineages 7, 18, 30; lineages 2, 3, 5; Figures 2 and 3; Figure S5). Several of the sympatric yet highly divergent lineages are found in or close to areas recognized as Quaternary refugia (southern Bahia and southeastern São Paulo) [91], [92]. Phenotypically or genetically distinct groups that are able to maintain their genetic integrity in sympatry may be interpreted as biological species [93]. However, divergent mtDNA lineages in sympatry could also be the product of recent secondary contact between previously isolated yet conspecific (and freely interbreeding) populations [94]. Therefore, we prefer to interpret these sympatric entities as Deep Conspecific Lineages pending additional evidence for possible species status [7], [95].

Biogeographic origins of the Dendropsophus minutus species group

The region of likely origin of the D. minutus group as suggested by the mitochondrial history (Figure 5A) corresponds to the Amazon Basin. The estimated time frame of coalescence of all mtDNA lineages at 18.0 Ma (95% HPD, 14.6–21.4 Ma) falls in the Early to Middle Miocene, a period following the first peak of mountain building in the Andes (∼23 Ma) and when, according to Hoorn et al. (2010) [33], western Amazonia was characterized by a large wetland formation of shallow lakes and swamps known as the Lake Pebas System (11–17 Ma). This was apparently an important period for the diversification of the Neotropical fauna and flora in the Amazonian region [33], [96], [97]. For instance, this period coincides with the diversification of other anurans such as the Allobates trilineatus complex 14.0–15.0 Ma [98], the Rhinella marina complex 10.7–17.2 Ma [99], the genus Phyzelaphryne 9.0–18 Ma [100] and the Amazonian Adelophryne clade 13.0–24.0 Ma [100]; as well as with the diversification of Amazonian gymnophthalmids of the genus Leposoma around 13.9 Ma [101].

The phylogeographic reconstruction of the D. minutus group suggests dispersal to the Andes and the Guiana Shield after its initial diversification between 8.0–11.0 Ma (Figures 5A and B), with additional recent dispersals (Figures 5C and D). This is in remarkable concordance with the pattern observed in dendrobatid frogs for which dispersals from the Amazon Basin into the same regions were reconstructed at 8.8–10.8 Ma, followed by another more recent wave 0.7–6.0 Ma [98]. Concomitant with the first dispersal wave there was a first long distance dispersal of D. minutus from the Amazonia to the Atlantic Forest.

An old relationship between Amazonia and an Atlantic Forest area at southeastern Bahia has long been proposed (the “Hiléia Bahiana” [102]). Independent molecular-based studies have recovered similar relationships (e.g. [103]) and studies with amphibians have provided additional evidence for this scenario [100], [104][107]. Some authors proposed that climatic changes in the Eocene, leading to the formation of a diagonal band of open and dry biomes (currently Caatinga, Cerrado and Chaco biomes) separating the Atlantic Forest from Amazonia, likely caused ancient vicariance of forest dwelling amphibians [103], [105], [106]. Accordingly, only generalist species that tolerate both dry and humid conditions could disperse across this potential environmental barrier, and therefore would be distributed in both wet-forest biomes [100]. On the other hand, evidence of Miocene dispersal of forest-dwelling frogs suggests the possibility of relatively more recent forested connections between Atlantic Forest and Amazonia [100], [107]. Our analysis recovers a Late Miocene dispersal of D. minutus from Amazonia to eastern Brazil (8–13 Ma) (Figures 5B, C and D). However, frogs of the group are currently found in a variety of habitats, including savannas and deciduous forest. Thus, this first dispersal event could have occurred without the necessity of dense forest continuity and may be unrelated to ancient dispersal of forest dweling species.

Diversification and dispersal within the Dendropsophus minutus complex

The polygon corresponding to the reconstructed area of origin of the D. minutus complex encompasses potentially climatically stable areas within the Atlantic Forest [108]. From here, the complex further diversified. Within the Atlantic Forest, sympatry of lineages was observed within or close to Pleistocene refugia (lineages 19 and 20; lineages 21 and 24; lineages 22, 23, 25, 26, 27 and 28; Figure 2) suggesting that these stable areas [91], [92], [108] might be related to the persistence of deeply divergent lineages. The inferred history of lineage diversification further recovers two discontinuities also found in other vertebrates, possibly representing suture zones [109]. The first of these is located at the southern border of the state of São Paulo, Brazil, represented by the southern limit of the distribution of lineages 26 and 40, and the northern limit of lineage 39, a discontinuity that has also been observed in pit vipers and toads [92], [110], [111]. The second possible suture zone is in the state of Espirito Santo, Brazil, represented by the northern limit of lineages 21, 23 and 24, and the southern limit of lineage 19 (Figs. 23; Fugure S6), coinciding with genetic breaks observed in toads, geckos, foxes and woodcreepers [92], [112][114].

After the initial diversification of the D. minutus complex in the Atlantic Forest, our phylogeographic inference suggests subsequent dispersal to other areas of eastern South America, central Brazil and Amazonia, supporting a southern dispersal route between Amazonia and the Atlantic Forest (Figures 5C and D). Distribution patterns of different vertebrate groups, as well as climatic and floristic evidence, suggest recent dispersal corridors between these forested areas [103], [107], [114][116]. On the other hand, the phylogeography of tropical rattlesnakes adapted to dry biomes suggests past connectivity between open area formations that are currently isolated [117], [118]. These results combined with paleoclimatic models of the Atlantic Forest and Cerrado [108], [119] support the past existence of a dynamic interplay of dispersal corridors and temporary barriers across the South American lowlands. Our conductance analysis that took into account contrasting climatic scenarios suggests the existence of stable stretches of favorable habitat for D. minutus along northern and particularly southern Amazonia during the Pleistocene, which would have allowed recent dispersal between forested areas of South America, corroborating the phylogeographic results (Figure 6).

The stable habitat corridor inferred along southern Amazonia (Figure 6) was proposed previously as the main floristic connection between the Atlantic Forest and Amazonia [120] and phylogeographic analyses of some species of small mammals corroborate this hypothesis [103]. Moreover, the palynological record from different continents of the southern hemisphere suggest the existence of a band of moisture at this latitude (∼23°S) during the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) [121], which raises the possibility that this same corridor may have persisted even earlier. The presence of a mosaic of forest and open formations, and higher moisture, could have generated conditions necessary for the existence of a Pleistocenic southern dispersal route for D. minutus.

Widespread amphibian species in the Neotropics

Data presented herein provide conclusive evidence for a strong genetic subdivision of the nominal species Dendropsophus minutus as currently understood. Current taxonomy conservatively assumes a putatively widespread species encompassing a vast area of South America (from approximately latitude 11.0°N to 35.0°S), distributed across several biomes. Our results, however, reveal high genetic diversity within D. minutus that would suggest the existence of numerous distinct species, leading to an important increase in number of species. If this hypothesis is confirmed through further studies, the existence of an increased number of species with decreased range sizes would have important consequences for the definition of centers of endemism and for assessing conservation status.

Despite revealing a substantial amount of cryptic genetic diversity within D. minutus sensu lato, our results also confirm the existence of widespread Neotropical species of anurans. While we cannot yet confirm which of the mitochondrial lineages within the D. minutus complex will merit a status as separate species, we can inversely conclude that in most cases, all samples assigned to one mtDNA lineage should be conspecific. Although cases of distinct amphibian species with low mtDNA differentiation exist (e.g. [86]) and phenomena of mtDNA introgression can potentially blur species identities (e.g. [122], [123]), such cases remain exceptional. Therefore, these factors are unlikely to substantially affect our calculation of range sizes according to which a total of eight mtDNA lineages have ranges >100,000 km2 (lineages 2, 19, 33, 34, 36, 39 41, 42). In the most inflationist taxonomic scenario, with each of these lineages representing separate species, our dataset still provides evidence for a species of lowland Neotropical amphibian (lineage 36) occupying an area of almost one million km2, encompassing multiple biomes across a distance of about 1,600 km between its two most distant populations.

The most widespread lineages within D. minutus sensu lato have distributions restricted to or centered in Brazil and occur within rather open habitats, while lineage 2 of the D. minutus group (with a range of almost 270,000 km2) occurs in rainforest. Various of the lineages known from only few or single sites (e.g., lineages 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16) occur in the Andean foothills or on mountain slopes. Nevertheless, in the Andean area, a higher sampling density is needed before it can be concluded with certainty that those lineages are restricted to small ranges. Hence, the distribution of mitochondrial lineages in the D. minutus group indicates that in open lowland areas of South America, small-sized species of anurans can be widespread.

A plea for collaboration in taxonomy and large scale phylogeography

Whether a researcher is interested in taxonomic or biogeographic questions concerning widespread species groups and complexes, this study points to several advantages of analysing spatialy dense and geographically complete datasets. Large-scale analyses are of course pivotal to understanding processes at a continental level. Patterns may be misinterpreted when looking at a limited geographical area and/or limited sample size. Widespread groups suchs as D. minutus group are suitable for continental analyses, but they are often associated with taxonomic difficulties because of the lack of comprehensive datasets. Also, certain biogeographic analyses, like those performed here, damand extensive data. Through collaboration we can increase the efficiency of data collection, thus overcoming the problem of incomplete datasets.

The taxonomic and conservation crisis we are currently facing, where some species will be extinct before the community becomes aware of their existence [124], underscores the urgency and importance of collaborative work. Species extinction represents the loss of the genealogical and biogeographic information embedded in its evolutionary history. Broad collaboration among scientists is necessary to rapidly tackle taxonomic and biogeographic questions. As in other areas of science, we feel that in taxonomy and biogeography the establishment of multi-investigator, multi-institutional and multi-national consortia dealing with widely distributed and taxonomically convoluted groups will improve quality and speed of taxonomic revision, consequently improving our understanding of biodiversity patterns, the evolutionary processes that generated them, and the conservation status of tropical organisms.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

16S genealogy of the genus Dendropsophus: partial view of the 50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree derived from Bayesian phylogenetic inference of 216 mitochondrial 16S sequences of Hylidae species plus 28 exemplars of the D. minutus group, that was performed for the substitution rate estimations using the program BEAST 1.7.2. The Dendropsophus minutus group is highlighted by the dashed line and the Dendropsophus minutus complex by the grey box. Node numbers indicate posterior probabilities which are only shown when higher than 0.8. Numbers between brakets indicate lineage number acording with the GMYC results or GenBank accession numbers.



Figure S2.

A. Dendropsophus minutus tree with samples names and annotations Part 1. 50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree, lineages 1–18. Asterisks represent nodes with probability equals to 1. Probabilities lower than 0.9 are not shown. Annotations refer to samples of particular interest, mainly samples collected at or close to the type locality of certain nominal taxa. B. Dendropsophus minutus tree with samples names and annotations Part 2. 50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree, lineages 19–28. Asterisks represent nodes with probability equals to 1. Probabilities lower than 0.9 are not shown. Annotations refer to samples of particular interest, mainly samples collected at or close to the type locality of certain nominal taxa. C. Dendropsophus minutus tree with samples names and annotations Part 3. 50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree, lineages 29–36. Asterisks represent nodes with probability equals to 1. Probabilities lower than 0.9 are not shown. Annotations refer to samples of particular interest, mainly samples collected at or close to the type locality of certain nominal taxa. D. Dendropsophus minutus tree with samples names and annotations Part 4. 50% Maximum Clade Credibility tree, lineages 37–43. Asterisks represent nodes with probability equals to 1. Probabilities lower than 0.9 are not shown. Annotations refer to samples of particular interest, mainly samples collected at or close to the type locality of certain nominal taxa.



Figure S3.

PCA of climatic variables. PCA plots showing the first two principal components separately for lineages 1–18 (left) and 19–43 (right). Symbols and colours match those in Figs. 13. Loadings of the first two principal components were as follows (separated by colon): annual mean temperature 0.324, 0; mean monthly temperature range −0.122, 0.274; isothermality 0.192, 0; temperature seasonality −0.245, −0.13; maximum temperature warmest month 0.269, 0; minimum temperature coldest month 0.336, 0; temperature annual range −0.214, 0.123; mean temperature wettest quarter 0.274, 0; mean temperature driest quarter 0.336, 0; mean temperature warmest quarter 0.282, 0; mean temperature coldest quarter 0.339, 0; annual precipitation 0.187, −0.292; precipitation wettest month 0.226, 0; precipitation driest month 0, −0.477; precipitation seasonality 0, 0.421; precipitation wettest quarter 0.224, 0; precipitation driest quarter 0, −0.482; precipitation warmest quarter −0.113, −0.184; precipitation coldest quarter 0.132, −0.331. Main result of this analysis: the first two principal components (PCs) accounted for 64% of the climatic variance, with highest loadings for temperature variables along PC 1 (minimum temperature coldest month, mean temperature driest quarter, mean temperature coldest quarter) and precipitation variables along PC 2 (precipitation driest month, precipitation seasonality, precipitation of driest quarter). The PCA suggests that within the D. minutus group, the climatic niches (i.e., 19 bioclimatic temperature and precipitation dimensions) are rather similar, even when the two main groups are compared (i.e. lineages 1–18 vs. 19–43). Some lineages from the periphery of the known geographic distribution of the group, including lineages 1–18, are weakly separated (lineages 9, 11–13 15, 16).



Figure S4.

Spatial distribution models used as resistance layers in the Circuit Scape analysis.



Figure S5.

Distribution of all mitochondrial lineages. Map showing the distribution of all mitochondrial lineages in the Dendropsophus minutus group as revealed by this study. Symbols refer to those used in Figs. 13.



Table S1.

Complete data collection with genbank accession numbers, voucher numbers and locality information.



Table S2.

Species used in the substitution rate estimation with respective Genbank accession numbers.



Table S3.

Uncorrected pairwise p-distance among lineages and average within lineage p-distance.



Table S4.

List of primers used in this study with respective anealing temperatures.



Table S5.

Localities and coordinates used in the Spatial Distribution Modeling.



Methods S1.

Supplementary methods.




We are grateful to numerous friends and colleagues who provided samples, information or helped in the field. Diego Baldo, Santiago Castroviejo-Fisher, and José M. Padial kindly provided sequences and/or tissues. Julian Faivovich (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”-CONICET) provided sequences of specimens from Argentina. PJRK warmly acknowledges D. Bruce Means (Coastal Plains Institute and Land Conservancy, USA) for the loan of additional critical tissue samples. Meike Kondermann and Gabi Keunecke helped with laboratory procedures in Braunschweig and Jakob Fahr provided usefull recommendations for GIS analysis. Diana Flores was in charge of laboratory procedures at BioCamb, Ecuador. Fieldwork in Guyana was made possible through the help of the Iwokrama International Centre, particularly R. Thomas-Caesar and C. I. Bovolo.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MG MV JK. Performed the experiments: MG AJC VGDO SL AF LSB FB IR RE GGU FG JMG MH MJ PJRK AK RL ML JM JPP FJMR AS JCS MS MTR ET CFBH MV JK. Analyzed the data: MG AJC AR SL MV JK. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MG AJC VGDO SL AF LSB FB IR RE GGU FG JMG MH MJ PJRK AK RL ML JM JPP FJMR AS JCS MS MTR ET CFBH MV JK. Wrote the paper: MG AJC VGDO MV JK.


  1. 1. Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, et al. (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 148–155.
  2. 2. Köhler J, Vieites DR, Bonett RM, García FH, Glaw F, et al. (2005) New amphibians and global conservation: a boost in species discoveries in a highly endangered vertebrate group. BioScience 55: 693–696.
  3. 3. Vences M, Köhler J (2008) Global diversity of amphibians (Amphibia) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595: 569–580.
  4. 4. Fouquet A, Gilles A, Vences M, Marty C, Blanc M, et al. (2007) Underestimation of species richness in Neotropical frogs revealed by mtDNA analyses. PLoS One 2: e1109.
  5. 5. Funk WC, Caminer M, Ron SR (2012) High levels of cryptic species diversity uncovered in Amazonian frogs. Proc Biol Sci 279: 1806–1814.
  6. 6. Jansen M, Bloch R, Schulze A, Pfenninger M (2011) Integrative inventory of Bolivia's lowland anurans reveals hidden diversity. Zool Scripta 40: 567–583.
  7. 7. Vieites DR, Wollenberg KC, Andreone F, Köhler J, Glaw F, et al. (2009) Vast underestimation of Madagascar's biodiversity evidenced by an integrative amphibian inventory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 8267–8272.
  8. 8. Biju SD, van Bocxlaer I, Mahony S, Dinesh KP, Radhakrishnan C, et al.. (2011) A taxonomic review of the Night Frog genus Nyctibatrachus Boulenger, 1882 in the Western Ghats, India (Anura: Nyctibatrachidae) with description of twelve new species. Zootaxa 3029.
  9. 9. Funk WC, Angulo A, Caldwell JP, Ryan MJ, Cannatella DC (2008) Comparison of morphology and calls of two cryptic species of Physalaemus (Anura: Leiuperidae). Herpetologica 64: 290–304.
  10. 10. Glaw F, Köhler J, De la Riva I, Vieites DR, Vences M (2010) Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis. Zootaxa 2383: 1–82.
  11. 11. Padial AA, De la Riva I (2009) Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic Amazonian species of Pristimantis (Anura: Strabomantidae). Zool J Linnean Soc 155: 97–122.
  12. 12. Maciel DB, Nunes I (2010) Comparison of morphology and calls of two cryptic species of Physalaemus (Anura: Leiuperidae) from the rock meadows of Espinhaço range, Brazil. Zootaxa: 53–61.
  13. 13. Angulo A, Icochea J (2010) Cryptic species complexes, widespread species and conservation: lessons from Amazonian frogs of the Leptodactylus marmoratus group (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Syst Biodivers 8: 357–370.
  14. 14. Gehara M, Canedo C, Haddad CFB, Vences M (2013) From widespread to microendemic: molecular and acoustic analyses show that Ischnocnema guentheri (Amphibia: Brachycephalidae) is endemic to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Conservation Genetics 14: 973–982.
  15. 15. Wynn A, Heyer WR (2001) Do geographically widespread species of tropical amphibians exist? An estimate of genetic relatedness within the neotropical frog Leptodactylus fuscus (Schneider 1799) (Anura Leptodactylidae). Trop Zool 14: 255–285.
  16. 16. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2008) Amphibian phylogeography: a model for understanding historical aspects of species distribution. Heredity: 109–119.
  17. 17. Elmer KR, Davila JA, Lougheed SC (2007) Cryptic diversity and deep divergence in an upper Amazonian leaflitter frog, Eleutherodactylus ockendeni. BMC Evol Biol 7: 247.
  18. 18. Noonan BP, Gaucher P (2005) Phylogeography and demography of Guianan harlequin toads (Atelopus): diversification within a refuge. Mol Ecol 14: 3017–3031.
  19. 19. Symula R, Schulte R, Summers K (2003) Molecular systematics and phylogeography of Amazonian poison frogs of the genus Dendrobates. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26: 452–475.
  20. 20. Camargo A, De Sá RO, Heyer WR (2006) Phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA sequences reveal three cryptic lineages in the widespread neotropical frog Leptodactylus fuscus (Schneider, 1799) (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Biol J Linn Soc 87: 325–341.
  21. 21. Hawkins MA, Sites JW Jr, Noonan BP (2007) Dendropsophus minutus (Anura: Hylidae) of the Guiana Shield: using DNA barcodes to assess identity and diversity. Zootaxa 1540: 61–67.
  22. 22. Fouquet A, Vences M, Salducci MD, Meyer A, Marty C, et al. (2007) Revealing cryptic diversity using molecular phylogenetics and phylogeography in frogs of the Scinax ruber and Rhinella margaritifera species groups. Mol Phylogenet Evol 43: 567–582.
  23. 23. Duellman WE (1956) The frogs of the hylid genus Phrynohyas Fitzinger, 1843. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan: 1–47.
  24. 24. Duellman WE (1971) A taxonomic review of South American hylid frogs, genus Phrynohyas. Occas pap Mus Nat Hist (Lawrence) 1–21.
  25. 25. Frost DR (2013) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 5.6. Electronic Database accessible at American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Accessed 2013 Dec.
  26. 26. Cardoso AJ, Haddad CFB (1984) Variabilidade acústica em diferentes populações e interações agressivas de Hyla minuta (Amphibia, Anura). Ciência e Cultura: 1393–1399.
  27. 27. Donnelly MA, Myers CW (1991) Herpetological results of the 1990 Venezuelan expedition to the summit of Cerro Guaiquinima, with new Tepui reptiles. Am Mus Novit: 1–54.
  28. 28. Kaplan M (1994) A new species of frog of the genus Hyla from the Cordillera Oriental in northern Colombia with comments on the taxonomy of Hyla minuta. J Herpetol 28: 79–87.
  29. 29. Murphy JC (1997) Amphibians and reptiles of Trinidad and Tobago. Malabar: Krieger Publ.
  30. 30. Faivovich J, Haddad CFB, Garcia PCA, Frost DR, Campbell JA, et al.. (2005) Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with special reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 294: : 240 pp.
  31. 31. Etienne RS, Olff H (2004) How dispersal limitation shapes species-body size distributions in local communities. Am Nat 163: 69–83.
  32. 32. Pabijan M, Wollenberg KC, Vences M (2012) Small body size increases the regional differentiation of populations of tropical mantellid frogs (Anura: Mantellidae). J Evol Biol 25: 2310–2324.
  33. 33. Hoorn C, Wesselingh FP, ter Steege H, Bermudez MA, Mora A, et al. (2010) Amazonia through time: Andean uplift, climate change, landscape evolution, and biodiversity. Science 330: 927–931.
  34. 34. Duellman WE (1982) A new species of small yellow Hyla from Perú (Anura: Hylidae). Amphibi Reptil 3: 153–160.
  35. 35. Wiens JJ, Fetzner JW, Parkinson CL, Reeder TW (2005) Hylid frog phylogeny and sampling strategies for speciose clades. Syst Biol 54: 778–807.
  36. 36. Wiens JJ, Kuczynski CA, Hua X, Moen DS (2010) An expanded phylogeny of treefrogs (Hylidae) based on nuclear and mitochondrial sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55: 871–882.
  37. 37. Pyron RA, Wiens JJ (2011) A large-scale phylogeny of Amphibia including over 2800 species, and a revised classification of extant frogs, salamanders, and caecilians. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61: 543–583.
  38. 38. Motta A, Castroviejo-Fisher S, Venegas P, Orrico V, Padial J (2012) A new species of the Dendropsophus parviceps group from the western Amazon Basin (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae). Zootaxa: 18–30.
  39. 39. Köhler J, Lötters S (2001) Description of a small tree frog, genus Hyla (Anura, Hylidae), from humid Andean slopes of Bolivia. Salamandra 37: 175–184.
  40. 40. Hebert PD, Ratnasingham S, de WaardJR (2003) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Biol Sci 270: S96–S99.
  41. 41. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 1792–1797.
  42. 42. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using Maximum Likelihood, evolutionary eistance, and Maximum Parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739.
  43. 43. Sanmartin I, Ronquist F (2004) Southern hemisphere biogeography inferred by event-based models: plant versus animal patterns. Syst Biol 53: 216–243.
  44. 44. Wiens JJ, Graham CH, Moen DS, Smith SA, Reeder TW (2006) Evolutionary and ecological causes of the latitudinal diversity gradient in hylid frogs: treefrog trees unearth the roots of high tropical diversity. Am Nat 168: 579–596.
  45. 45. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716–723.
  46. 46. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 25: 1253–1256.
  47. 47. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2009) Tracer v1.5 Available at Accessed 2012 July.
  48. 48. Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR, Cannatella DC (2007) Geological and climatic forces driving speciation in the continentally distributed trilling chorus frogs (Pseudacris). Evolution 61: 2086–2103.
  49. 49. San Mauro D, Vences M, Alcobendas M, Zardoya R, Meyer A (2005) Initial diversification of living amphibians predated the breakup of Pangaea. Am Nat 165: 590–599.
  50. 50. Smith SA, Stephens PR, Wiens JJ (2005) Replicate patterns of species richness, historical biogeography, and phylogeny in Holarctic treefrogs. Evolution 59: 2433–2450.
  51. 51. Holman JA (1998) Pleistocene amphibians and reptiles in Britain and Europe. New York: Oxford University Press. vi, 254 p. p.
  52. 52. McLoughlin S (2001) The breakup history of Gondwana and its impact on pre-Cenozoic floristic provincialism. Aust J Bot 49: 271–300.
  53. 53. Scher HD, Martin EE (2006) Timing and climatic consequences of the opening of Drake Passage. Science 312: 428–430.
  54. 54. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S (2012) Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1695–1701.
  55. 55. Goldstein PZ, DeSalle R (2011) Integrating DNA barcode data and taxonomic practice: determination, discovery, and description. Bioessays 33: 135–147.
  56. 56. Nielsen R, Matz M (2006) Statistical approaches for DNA barcoding. Syst Biol 55: 162–169.
  57. 57. Boykin LM, Armstrong KF, Kubatko L, De Barro P (2012) Species delimitation and global biosecurity. Evol Bioinform Online 8: 1–37.
  58. 58. Paz A, Crawford AJ (2012) Molecular-based rapid inventories of sympatric diversity: a comparison of DNA barcode clustering methods applied to geography-based vs clade-based sampling of amphibians. J Biosci 37: 887–896.
  59. 59. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, et al. (2006) Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst Biol 55: 595–609.
  60. 60. Lohse K (2009) Can mtDNA barcodes be used to delimit species? A response to Pons et al. (2006). Systematic Biology 58: 439–442.
  61. 61. Papadopoulou A, Monaghan MT, Barraclough TG, Vogler AP (2009) Sampling error does not invalidate the Yule-coalescent model for species delimitation. A response to Lohse (2009). Syst Biol 58: 442–444.
  62. 62. Padial J, Miralles A, De la Riva I, Vences M (2010) The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology 7: 16.
  63. 63. Monaghan MT, Wild R, Elliot M, Fujisawa T, Balke M, et al. (2009) Accelerated species inventory on Madagascar using coalescent-based models of species delineation. Systematic Biology 58: 298–311.
  64. 64. R Core Team (2014) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: URL: Accessed 2014 Jan.
  65. 65. Lemey P, Rambaut A, Welch JJ, Suchard MA (2010) Phylogeography takes a relaxed random walk in continuous space and time. Mol Biol Evol 27: 1877–1885.
  66. 66. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol 4: e88.
  67. 67. Bielejec F, Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Lemey P (2011) SPREAD: spatial phylogenetic reconstruction of evolutionary dynamics. Bioinform 27: 2910–2912.
  68. 68. McRae BH, Shah VB (2008) Circuitscape 3.5.8.
  69. 69. McRae BH (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60: 1551–1561.
  70. 70. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2008) Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution 62: 2868–2883.
  71. 71. Peterson AT (2011) Ecological niche conservatism: a time-structured review of evidence. Journal of Biogeography 38: 817–827.
  72. 72. Busby JR (1991) BIOCLIM - a bioclimatic analysis and prediction system. Nature Conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis. pp. 64–68.
  73. 73. Phillips SJ, Dudík M (2008) Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161–175.
  74. 74. Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190: 231–259.
  75. 75. Miralles A, Vences M (2013) New metrics for comparison of taxonomies reveal striking discrepancies among species delimitation methods in Madascincus lizards. PLoS One 8: e68242.
  76. 76. Martins M, Cardoso AJ (1987) Novas espécies de hilídeos do estado do Acre (Amphibia: Anura). Rev Bras Biol 47: 549–558.
  77. 77. Bokermann WCA (1963) Girinos de Anfíbios Brasileiros - I (Amphibia - Salientia). An Acad Bras Ciênc 35: 465–474.
  78. 78. Cei JM (1980) Amphibians of Argentina. Monitore Zoologico Italiano (N S), Monogr 2: 609 pp.
  79. 79. Duellman WE (1978) The biology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. Misc publ Univ Kans Mus Nat Hist 65: 1–352.
  80. 80. Hero J-M (1990) An illustrated key to tadpoles occurring in the Central Amazon rainforest, Manaus, Amazonas, Brasil. Amazoniana 11: 201–262.
  81. 81. Heyer WR, Rand AS, Cruz CAG, Peixoto OL, Nelson CE (1990) Frogs of Boracéia. Arq Zool 31: 231–410.
  82. 82. Kenny JS (1969) The Amphibia of Trinidad. Studies on the Fauna of Curaçao and other Caribbean Islands XXIX 29: 1–78.
  83. 83. Lescure J, Marty C (2000) Atlas des Amphibiens de Guyane. Patrimoines Naturels 45: 1–388.
  84. 84. Rossa-Feres DdC, Nomura F (2006) Characterization and taxonomic key for tadpoles (Amphibia: Anura) from the northwestern region of São Paulo State, Brazil. Biota Neotrop 6..
  85. 85. Echeverría DD (1997) Microanatomy of the buccal apparatus and oral cavity of Hyla minuta Peters, 1872 larvae (Anura, Hylidae), with data on feeding habits. Alytes 15: 26–36.
  86. 86. Vences M, Gehara M, Kohler J, Glaw F (2012) Description of a new Malagasy treefrog (Boophis) occurring syntopically with its sister species, and a plea for studies on non-allopatric speciation in tropical amphibians. Amphibi Reptil 33: 503–520.
  87. 87. Vences M, Köhler J, Crottini A, Glaw F (2010) High mitochondrial sequence divergence meets morphological and bioacoustic conservatism: Boophis quasiboehmei sp. n., a new cryptic treefrog species from south-eastern Madagascar. Bonn zool Bul: 241–255.
  88. 88. Reading CJ (2010) The impact of environmental temperature on larval development and metamorph body condition in the common toad, Bufo bufo. Amphibi Reptil 31: 483–488.
  89. 89. Gomes MdR, Peixoto OL (1991) Considerações sobre os girinos de Hyla senicula (Cope, 1868) e Hyla soaresi (Caramaschi e Jim, 1983) (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Acta Biologica Leopoldensia 13: 5–18.
  90. 90. Morais AR, Batista VG, Gambale PG, Signorelli L, Bastos RP (2012) Acoustic communication in a Neotropical frog (Dendropsophus minutus): vocal repertoire, variability and individual discrimination. Herpetol J 22: 249–257.
  91. 91. Carnaval AC, Hickerson MJ, Haddad CFB, Rodrigues MT, Moritz C (2009) Stability predicts genetic diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest hotspot. Science 323: 785–789.
  92. 92. Thomé MT, Zamudio KR, Giovanelli JG, Haddad CF, Baldissera FA Jr, et al. (2010) Phylogeography of endemic toads and post-Pliocene persistence of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55: 1018–1031.
  93. 93. Mallet J (2008) Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363: 2971–2986.
  94. 94. Hewitt GM (2011) Quaternary phylogeography: the roots of hybrid zones. Genetica 139: 617–638.
  95. 95. Vences M, Köhler J, Vieites DR, Glaw F (2011) Molecular and bioacoustic differentiation of deep conspecific lineages of the Malagasy treefrogs Boophis tampoka and B. luteus. Herpetol Notes 4: 239–246.
  96. 96. Antonelli A, Quijada-Mascareñas A, Crawford AJ, Bates JM, Velazco PM, et al.. (2009) Molecular Studies and Phylogeography of Amazonian Tetrapods and their Relation to Geological and Climatic Models. Amazonia: Landscape and Species Evolution: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 386–404.
  97. 97. Antonelli A, Nylander JA, Persson C, Sanmartin I (2009) Tracing the impact of the Andean uplift on Neotropical plant evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 9749–9754.
  98. 98. Santos JC, Coloma LA, Summers K, Caldwell JP, Ree R, et al. (2009) Amazonian amphibian diversity is primarily derived from late Miocene Andean lineages. PLoS Biol 7: e56.
  99. 99. Vallinoto M, Sequeira F, Sodré D, Bernardi JAR, Sampaio I, et al. (2010) Phylogeny and biogeography of the Rhinella marina species complex (Amphibia, Bufonidae) revisited: implications for Neotropical diversification hypotheses. Zoologica Scripta 39: 128–140.
  100. 100. Fouquet A, Loebmann D, Castroviejo-Fisher S, Padial JM, Orrico VGD, et al. (2012) From Amazonia to the Atlantic forest: Molecular phylogeny of Phyzelaphryninae frogs reveals unexpected diversity and a striking biogeographic pattern emphasizing conservation challenges. Mol Phylogenet Evol 65: 547–561.
  101. 101. Pellegrino KC, Rodrigues MT, Harris DJ, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y, Sites JW Jr (2011) Molecular phylogeny, biogeography and insights into the origin of parthenogenesis in the Neotropical genus Leposoma (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae): Ancient links between the Atlantic Forest and Amazonia. Mol Phylogenet Evol 61: 446–459.
  102. 102. Andrade-Lima D (1966) Vegetação. IBGE, Atlas Nacional do Brasil: Rio de Janeiro (Conselho Nacional de Geografia).
  103. 103. Costa LP (2003) The historical bridge between the Amazon and the Atlantic Forest of Brazil: a study of molecular phylogeography with small mammals. J Biogeogr 30: 71–86.
  104. 104. Canedo C, Haddad CFB (2012) Phylogenetic relationships within anuran clade Terrarana, with emphasis on the placement of Brazilian Atlantic rainforest frogs genus Ischnocnema (Anura: Brachycephalidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 65: 610–620.
  105. 105. Fouquet A, Recoder R, Teixeira M Jr, Cassimiro J, Amaro RC, et al. (2012) Molecular phylogeny and morphometric analyses reveal deep divergence between Amazonia and Atlantic Forest species of Dendrophryniscus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 62: 826–838.
  106. 106. Heinicke MP, Duellman WE, Hedges SB (2007) Major Caribbean and Central American frog faunas originated by ancient oceanic dispersal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10092–10097.
  107. 107. de Sá RO, Streicher JW, Sekonyela R, Forlani MC, Loader SP, et al. (2012) Molecular phylogeny of microhylid frogs (Anura: Microhylidae) with emphasis on relationships among New World genera. BMC Evol Biol 12: 241.
  108. 108. Carnaval AC, Moritz C (2008) Historical climate modelling predicts patterns of current biodiversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. J Biogeogr 35: 1187–1201.
  109. 109. Remington CL (1968) Suture-zones of hybrid interaction between recently joined biotas. In: Dobzhansky T, Hecht MK, Steere WC, editors. Evolutionary Biology: Springer US. pp. 321–428.
  110. 110. Grazziotin FG, Monzel M, Echeverrigaray S, Bonatto SL (2006) Phylogeography of the Bothrops jararaca complex (Serpentes: Viperidae): past fragmentation and island colonization in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Mol Ecol 15: 3969–3982.
  111. 111. Amaro RC, Rodrigues MT, Yonenaga-Yassuda Y, Carnaval AC (2012) Demographic processes in the montane Atlantic rainforest: molecular and cytogenetic evidence from the endemic frog Proceratophrys boiei. Mol Phylogenet Evol 62: 880–888.
  112. 112. Pellegrino KCM, Rodrigues MT, Waite AN, Morando M, Yassuda YY, et al. (2005) Phylogeography and species limits in the Gymnodactylus darwinii complex (Gekkonidae, Squamata): genetic structure coincides with river systems in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol J Linn Soc 85: 13–26.
  113. 113. Tchaicka L, Eizirik E, De Oliveira TG, Candido JF Jr, Freitas TR (2007) Phylogeography and population history of the crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous). Mol Ecol 16: 819–838.
  114. 114. Cabanne GS, d'Horta FM, Sari EH, Santos FR, Miyaki CY (2008) Nuclear and mitochondrial phylogeography of the Atlantic forest endemic Xiphorhynchus fuscus (Aves: Dendrocolaptidae): biogeography and systematics implications. Mol Phylogenet Evol 49: 760–773.
  115. 115. Melo Santos AM, Cavalcanti DR, Silva JMCd, Tabarelli M (2007) Biogeographical relationships among tropical forests in north-eastern Brazil. J Biogeogr 34: 437–446.
  116. 116. Wang X, Auler AS, Edwards RL, Cheng H, Cristalli PS, et al. (2004) Wet periods in northeastern Brazil over the past 210kyr linked to distant climate anomalies. Nature 432: 740–743.
  117. 117. Adrian Quijada-Mascareñas J, Ferguson JE, Pook CE, Salomão MDG, Thorpe RS, et al. (2007) Phylogeographic patterns of trans-Amazonian vicariants and Amazonian biogeography: the Neotropical rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus complex) as an example. J Biogeogr 34: 1296–1312.
  118. 118. Wüster W, Ferguson JE, Quijada-Mascarenas JA, Pook CE, Salomao Mda G, et al. (2005) Tracing an invasion: landbridges, refugia, and the phylogeography of the Neotropical rattlesnake (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalus durissus). Mol Ecol 14: 1095–1108.
  119. 119. Werneck FP, Nogueira C, Colli GR, Sites JW, Costa GC (2012) Climatic stability in the Brazilian Cerrado: implications for biogeographical connections of South American savannas, species richness and conservation in a biodiversity hotspot. J Biogeogr 39: 1695–1706.
  120. 120. Por FD (1992) Sooretama: the Atlantic rain forest of Brazil: SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
  121. 121. Ledru MP, Rousseau DD, Cruz FWJR, Riccomini C, Karmann I, et al. (2005) Paleoclimate changes during the last 100,000 yr from a record in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest region and interhemispheric comparison. Quaternary Res 64: 444–450.
  122. 122. Babik W, Szymura JM, Rafinski J (2003) Nuclear markers, mitochondrial DNA and male secondary sexual traits variation in a newt hybrid zone (Triturus vulgaris x T. montandoni). Mol Ecol 12: 1913–1930.
  123. 123. Wielstra B, Arntzen JW (2012) Postglacial species displacement in Triturus newts deduced from asymmetrically introgressed mitochondrial DNA and ecological niche models. BMC Evol Biol 12: 161.
  124. 124. Crawford AJ, Lips KR, Bermingham E (2010) Epidemic disease decimates amphibian abundance, species diversity, and evolutionary history in the highlands of central Panama. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 13777–13782.