Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Atomic Force Microscopy Reveals a Morphological Differentiation of Chromobacterium violaceum Cells Associated with Biofilm Development and Directed by N-Hexanoyl-L-Homoserine Lactone

  • Anara A. Kamaeva,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia, RSE «Republican Collection of Microorganisms», Astana, Republic of Kazakhstan

  • Alexey S. Vasilchenko,

    Affiliations Department of Microbiology, Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia, Laboratory of Disbiosis, Institute of Cellular and Intracellular Symbiosis, RAS, Orenburg, Russia

  • Dmitry G. Deryabin

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, Orenburg State University, Orenburg, Russia

Atomic Force Microscopy Reveals a Morphological Differentiation of Chromobacterium violaceum Cells Associated with Biofilm Development and Directed by N-Hexanoyl-L-Homoserine Lactone

  • Anara A. Kamaeva, 
  • Alexey S. Vasilchenko, 
  • Dmitry G. Deryabin


Chromobacterium violaceum abounds in soil and water ecosystems in tropical and subtropical regions and occasionally causes severe and often fatal human and animal infections. The quorum sensing (QS) system and biofilm formation are essential for C. violaceum's adaptability and pathogenicity, however, their interrelation is still unknown. C. violaceum's cell and biofilm morphology were examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM) in comparison with growth rates, QS-dependent violacein biosynthesis and biofilm biomass quantification. To evaluate QS regulation of these processes, the wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 and its mini-Tn5 mutant C. violaceum NCTC 13274, cultivated with and without the QS autoinducer N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL), were used. We report for the first time the unusual morphological differentiation of C. violaceum cells, associated with biofilm development and directed by the QS autoinducer. AFM revealed numerous invaginations of the external cytoplasmic membrane of wild-type cells, which were repressed in the mutant strain and restored by exogenous C6-HSL. With increasing bacterial growth, polymer matrix extrusions formed in place of invaginations, whereas mutant cells were covered with a diffusely distributed extracellular substance. Thus, quorum sensing in C. violaceum involves a morphological differentiation that organises biofilm formation and leads to a highly differentiated matrix structure.


Chromobacterium violaceum is a Gram-negative, facultative anaerobic, non-sporing beta-proteobacterium that is abundant in soil and water ecosystems in tropical and subtropical regions [1][3]. As a typical saprophyte, this bacterium occasionally becomes an aggressive opportunistic pathogen causing severe and often fatal human and animal infections [4][8].

The remarkable versatility and adaptability of C. violaceum have been explained by complete genome sequencing of this bacterium [9]; this revealed 4,431 open reading frames (ORFs) associated with energy generation, transport, signal transduction, cell motility, secretion, and secondary metabolism [10], [11], such as is important for mammalian pathogenicity proteins [12]. Finally, a large number of ORFs related to the regulation of gene expression were also found, and widespread utilisation of inducible quorum sensing systems to detect and respond to changes in cell population density have been demonstrated.

C. violaceum uses a LuxIR-type quorum sensing system [13][15] in which CviI is an N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (C6-HSL) synthase, and CviR is a cytoplasmic receptor protein (DNA-binding transcription factor) that activates gene expression following binding to the diffusible autoinducer C6-HSL [16]. Among a number of quorum sensing-controlled genes, the most well known is the vioABCDE-operon [17]. Expressed at high cell density, VioA – E proteins carry out the enzymatic oxidation and coupling of two molecules of tryptophan to give a rearranged pyrrolidone-containing scaffold in the final purple pigment violacein [18].

Another important activity of C. violaceum is self-produced polymer matrix (biofilm) formation [19] that structures the bacterial consortia and is linked to virulence through resistance to antibiotics, disinfectives and phagocytosis. Like several pathogenic bacteria, C. violaceum has the hmsHFR-CV2940 operon, whose products synthesise the N-acetyl-D-glucosamine monomer and polymerise it in the biofilm exopolysaccharide [20]. Furthermore, bacteria communicate with each other in biofilms by diffusible autoinducers, though the role of cell-to-cell signalling in C. violaceum biofilm development is not characterised.

Using in vivo data generated from a library of point mutations in a CviR-regulated promoter, Stauff and Bassler [16] scanned the C. violaceum genome to predict quorum sensing-regulated CviR binding sites. It has been confirmed that CviR controls cviI (see below) and chitinase [16], [21], and it also participates in the expression of transcriptional regulators, guanine deaminase, and the type VI secretion-related gene. However, the DNA motif bound by CviR is absent in the hmsHFR-CV2940 operon. Thus, a canonical quorum-sensing control of C. violaceum biofilm formation is still unknown.

These inconsistent data have led us to investigate biofilm formation by a wild-type C. violaceum strain and its mini-Tn5 mutant, the latter of which is deficient in autoinducer production but retains the QS mechanisms in response to exogenous C6-HSL. Using atomic force microscopy (AFM), we have revealed for the first time a morphological differentiation of C. violaceum cells associated with biofilm formation and directed by C6-HSL.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 was acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (LGC Standarts, UK), and C. violaceum NCTC 13274 from the National Collection of Type Cultures (Health Protection Agency, UK). The mini-Tn5 mutant of the wild-type strain has an insertion in the cviI gene, and it is deficient in the production of its own autoinducer but retains the ability to respond on N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone and a variety of other (C4–C8) short-chain HSLs [22], [23]. Therefore, C. violaceum NCTC 13274 is colourless, but produces a characteristic purple pigment violacein by incubation with C6-HSL, which is widely used as an indicator in the study of quorum sensing mechanisms.

C. violaceum ATCC 31532 was grown in 3 ml of Luria–Bertani (LB) broth (AppliChem GmbH, Germany) with 10 mg/ml glucose at 30°C. C. violaceum NCTC 13274 was cultivated in the same conditions with and without 0.1 µM of C6-HSL obtained from the Cayman Chemical Company (Ann Arbor, USA). At 24, 48 and 72 h intervals, the biomass from single vials was collected, and bacterial growth was observed by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm (OD450) using a Stat Fax 303 6VIS microstrip reader (Awareness Technology Inc., (Palm, USA).

Violacein extraction

Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 5 min (MiniSpin, Eppendorf, 1 ml), and the supernatant was removed. To extract violacein, 200 µl of 95% ethanol was added and samples were vortexed at room temperature for 5 min. After centrifugation (10,000× g for 5 min), the upper phase containing violacein was collected, and the culture was re-extracted with a second volume of ethanol. The extracts were combined, and the relative concentrations of violacein were measured using a microstrip reader at 575 nm (OD575) [24].

Crystal violet binding assay

The biofilm biomass quantification of C. violaceum was determined by crystal violet staining [25]. Because the dye and violacein have very similar wavelength spectra (maximal absorbance 540 and 575 nm for crystal violet and violacein, respectively), the protocol for biofilm quantification was slightly modified, and ethanol extracted colourless air-dryed biomass (see above) was used for the binding assay. A total of 200 µl of an aqueous solution of crystal violet (0.1%) was added to each well and incubated at room temperature. The staining solution was removed, and probes were washed twice (10,000× g for 5 min) with 200 µl of deionised water to remove excess dye. The dye that was strongly bounded to the biofilm was solubilised with 200 µl of 95% ethanol for 5 min, washed and re-extracted with a second volume of ethanol. Relative quantitative determinations of crystal violet were measured in combined samples by reading the optical density at 540 nm (OD540) [26].

Atomic force microscopy

For AFM, the planktonic and biofilm-forming C. violaceum were individually imaged. Planktonic bacteria were pipetted out by touching the top of the tips to the corner of each well, washing from the cultivation media (3,000× g for 5 min), re-suspending in deionised water; then droplets of 15-µl bacterial suspensions were applied to a freshly cleaved mica surface (5×5 mm). Remaining biofilms were carefully transferred under sterile conditions to a mica surface immediately. Samples were dried with controlled 93% humidity according to [27].

The observations was obtained with an atomic force microscope SMM-2000 (JSC “Proton-MIET Plant”, Russia) in contact mode in air. The instrument was equipped with silicon nitride cantilever MSCT-AUNM (Veeco Instruments Inc., USA) with a pyramidal (V-shaped) tip with a typical radius of ∼10 nm and a spring constant of 0.01 N/m.

During AFM imaging, the root-mean-square roughness (Rrms – the standard deviation of the Z values) for the height images were conducted over 5- µm by 5- µm areas on different biofilm surfaces and was calculated using SMM-2000 software. The images were flattened and plane fitted prior to analysis.

Statistical analysis

All the experiments were performed at least three times in triplicate. The data are reported as means ± standard deviation. Two-tailed t-test statistics were used at significance levels of 0.05 and 0.01.


Growth, violacein production and biofilm formation by wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532

In order to evaluate if violacein production and biofilm formation were dependent on cell density, C. violaceum ATCC 31532 was grown in LB broth for 24, 48 and 72 h (Fig. 1). This experiment showed a typical growth (OD450) curve with maximal progression in 24 h followed by a gradual increase to the late stationary phase. Production of violacein was detected at 24 h, but the most growth of characteristic OD575 was established at high cell density between 48 and 72 h where this value increased 3.4-fold. On the other hand, the biofilm production was quite similar to the growth rate, and the OD540 after crystal violet staining increased proportionally to an OD450. Thus, violacein and biofilm in the wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 differentially corresponded to cell density and only the first developed in a fashion similar to a quorum-dependent parameter.

Figure 1. Time course (a) of the cell density (OD 450) for violacein (OD 575) and biofilm (OD 540) production by wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532, growing in LB broth for 24, 48 and 72 h.

AFM imaging of wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 cells and biofilm

The planktonic and biofilm-forming bacteria growing for 24, 48 and 72 h were immobilised on a mica surface to observe the cells' general morphology and detailed surface topography (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. AFM images (a–f) and schematic model of extracellular matrix secretion (g–i) by wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532, growing for 24 (a, d, g), 48 (b, e, h) and 72 h (c, f, i) in biofilmic (a–c; g–i) and planktonic (d–f) conditions.

Scale bar – 1 µm.

The 24-h individual C. violaceum cells had a characteristic elongated shape, and based on AFM, the cells were 2.45±0.31 µm length, 0.85±0.09 µm wide and 0.34±0.07 µm high and without distinctions between planktonic and biofilm-forming bacteria. However, the surface topography of these cells was significantly different, and unusual invaginations (about 30–40 per cell taking into consideration 50% cell surface visibility) of the external membrane in biofilm-forming bacteria were observed (fig. 2 a). Based on AFM profiles, the invaginations had a 171±43 nm diameter (Fig. 3 c).and a 31.1±7.5 nm depth, whereas the distance from their centres were nearly 288±80 nm (Fig. 3 e).

Figure 3. Dimensional specifications of morphological features on the surface of cells (invagination and extrusion) were assessed on the basis of AFM profile data carried out through two adjoined invaginations or extrusion.

Distance was defined as a spacing between points located: in center of two adjoined invaginations (a) or on the top of two adjoined extrusions (b). Diameter of invaginations and extrusions is defined as a distance between two points that are located on two crossing lines (solid line and dotted line). Precise morphometry of C. violaceum ATCC 31532 cells surfaces (in biofilm conditions), revealed: diameters of invaginations (c) and extrusions (d); distances between centres of two adjoined invaginations (e) and two adjoined extrusions (f) (histograms and average value).

At 48 h invaginations similar to these observed with biofilm-forming cells at 24 h (fig. 2 a) are observed on planktonic cells (Fig. 2 e), while biofilm-forming bacteria became essentially different at the same time (Fig. 2 b). High-resolution AFM images (Fig. 2 b) of biofilm-forming bacterial cells surfaces showed that the bacteria were covered with granular structures, and hill-like extrusions had appeared.

The extrusions' average diameter measured by AFM profiles was 250±61 nm (Fig. 3 d), and the average distance from their tops was 289±97 nm (Fig. 3 f). The arrangement and distance centre-to-centre of the 24-h invaginations and 48-h extrusions (P = 0.4673) have assured us of their spatial interrelation, that the extrusions formed in place of the previous invaginations. On the other hand, comparison of C. violaceum growth and AFM images has allowed us to explain processes occurring by biofilm's matrix production.

At 72 h, AFM revealed the granulated biofilm surface and contours of biofilm-forming bacterial cells (Fig. 2 c). At the same time, the planktonic bacteria changed and also developed extrusions on their surface (Fig. 2 f). In addition, flagella (approx. 20 nm in diameter) and some other thinner fimbrial structures were detected in planktonic samples.

Thus, using AFM, we report for the first time the morphological differentiation of C. violaceum ATCC 31532 cells increasing with cultivation time and preliminarily developed in biofilm-forming cells, whereas similar changes in the planktonic cells have developed late. However, the quorum-sensing control of C. violaceum cell differentiation and biofilm formation remains unclear.

Growth, violacein production and biofilm formation by the mutant strain C. violaceum NCTC 13274

In order to evaluate the effects of quorum sensing on biofilm formation, we investigated the mini-Tn5 mutant strain C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cultivated without and with the natural autoinducer N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. Time course of cell density (a), for violacein production (b) and biofilm formation (c) by wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 in comparison with mutant strain C. violaceum NCTC 13274, growing in LB broth without and with 0.1 µM C6-HSL.

When C. violaceum NCTC 13274 were grown for 24, 48 and 72 h, both in LB broth and in LB broth with 0.1 µM C6-HSL, violacein production differed cardinally (“no” or “yes”), whereas growth rates and growth curves were comparable. After 24 h of incubation, the OD450 value of a colourless culture, grown in the absence of autoinducer, was approximately 11.0% higher than that in the presence of C6-HSL, and approximately 22.9% higher than that of the wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532. In our opinion, this could be due to energy savings on violacein biosynthesis in comparison with HSL-deficient strain, but 48 and 72 h growth rates of the colourless cultures became less than those of pigmented ones. On the other hand, violacein production by C. violaceum NCTC 13274 incubated with C6-HSL was significantly higher than that of the wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532, and the characteristic OD575 in comparison with a wild strain increased 4.2-fold in 24 h, 5.3-fold in 48 h and 1.9-fold in 72 h, respectively. We suspect it was because exogenous C6-HSL was available at the growth start, and C. violaceum NCTC 13274 developed violacein biosynthesis irrespective of the cell density: growth curves for wild-type and mutant strains were very similar.

Contrary to the qualitative distinctions of violacein production, biofilm formation by C. violaceum NCTC 13274 with and without C6-HSL only differed quantitatively. These processes were quite similar in C. violaceum NCTC 13274 growing with C6-HSL and in the wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532, while staining of colourless culture using the crystal violet revealed only 64.0–70.3% biofilm biomass in comparison with the pigmented culture.

In brief, if the mini-Tn5 insertion in the cviI gene led to the block in violacein biosynthesis, and the exogenous autoinducer restored and strengthened it considerably, then biofilm formation decreased quantitatively, and the autoinducer only restored it. Thus, violacein production developed like a quorum-dependent parameter, whereas biofilm formation occurred in a non-canonical fashion, i.e. biofilm formation occurred without direct control by a QS-inducer, but was associated with luxR/luxI genes.

AFM imaging of C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cells and comparative study of biofilms' surfaces

To confirm or reject the quorum-sensing control of biofilm formation, C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cells cultivated with and without C6-HSL were imaged by the AFM technique (Fig. 5 and Fig. S1).

Figure 5. AFM images of biofilm-forming C. violaceum NCTC 13274, growing in LB broth without (a–c) and with 0.1 µM C6-HSL (d–f) for 24 (a, d), 48 (b, e) and 72 h (c, f).

Scale bar – 1 µm.

Surprisingly, 24-h biofilm-forming cells growing without autoinducer displayed a smooth surface (Fig. 5 a), whereas cells in the presence of C6-HSL had numerous invaginations (Fig. 5 d). The topography of invaginations of C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cells growing with autoinducer was very similar in depth and diameter to that in the the wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532. At the same time, there were more invaginations (about 50–80 per cell taking into consideration 50% cell surface visibility), the distance from their centres was less (155±21 nm), and the arrangement was more ordered. These data strongly suggest that C. violaceum cells differentiate in a quorum-dependent manner that is naturally developed in culture growth, and which is cancelled without autoinducer and resumes with exogenous C6-HSL.

At 48 h, AFM revealed the numerous extrusions on the C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cell's surfaces growing with C6-HSL. This extrusions were like wild-type biofilm-forming cells (see above), and the number per cell, such as distance from extrusion tops, was very similar to the 24-h invaginations.

On the other hand, C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cultivated without C6-HSL had no invaginations or extrusions, while high-resolution AFM revealed that the bacterial cell surfaces had been covered with a diffusely distributed extracellular substance.

The study of the C. violaceum NCTC 13274 planktonic cells without C6-HSL also shown their smooth surface (Fig. S1 a–c) but addition of autoinducer restored their morphological differentiation (Fig. S1 d–f), however it was less pronounced compared with biofilm-forming cells.

Because AFM is capable of surface morphology imaging with nanometre resolution, we used this technique for comparative study of mature 72-h biofilms formed by the wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 and mini-Tn5 mutant strain C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cultivated with and without C6-HSL.

Figure 6 shows that C. violaceum ATCC 31532 produced relatively smooth biofilm consisting of tightly associated polymer blocks, and the average surface roughness was only 13.0±2.65 nm.

Figure 6. Cross sections (a–c), where x-axis is a heights of relief points and y-axis is a cross sections distance; and roughness values (d–f) of biofilm surfaces, produced by wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 (a, d) and mutant strain C. violaceum NCTC 13274, growing without (b, e) and with 0.1 µM C6-HSL (c, f).

Noticeably, deficiency in autoinducer production C. violaceum NCTC 13274 exhibited a more irregular biofilm surface structure with a average roughness of 70.2±12.5 nm (P = 0.0007) that was probably caused by breakage of the quorum-dependent secretion machinery. At last, topography AFM images of biofilms formed by C. violaceum NCTC 13274 cultivated with exogenous C6-HSL shows that there is no significant difference between roughness in the wild-type and mutant strains (average value 5.08±0.73 nm; P = 0.0018).

Thus, quorum sensing in C. violaceum does not control intracellular exopolysaccharide biosynthesis but probably involves the secretion of these molecules as extracell biofilm structure development, and AFM shows unusual bacterial cell morphological differentiation, which is associated with biofilm development and is directed by N-hexanoyl-L-homoserine lactone.


Biofilm formation is the result of a complex process that involves mono- and polysaccharide biosynthesis, its transport through a microbial cell wall and a subsequent arrangement of structure and architecture of the biofilm matrix [28][30]. Among diverse regulatory mechanisms postulated for biofilm formation, the significant system is quorum sensing that involves production, release and detection of small signalling molecules (autoinducers). This allows microbial cells to activate target gene expression in a cell density-dependent manner, including genes involved in biofilm development and maturation [31][34]. However, because these mechanisms vary between different bacterial species, the role of quorum sensing in biofilm formation cannot be described in general terms [35].

Several independent research groups have demonstrated that quorum sensing is essential for biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to express virulence factors. This microorganism has hierarchically arranged quorum sensing, with the LasIR on top, controlling the RhlIR, and the additional PQS/HHQ/MvfR systems [36], [37]. In particular, lasI mutants that did not produce the specific autoinducer 3-oxo-C12-HSL formed thinner and undifferentiated biofilms than in wild-type, and mutant biofilms appeared normal when P. aeruginosa grew in the presence of a synthetic signalling molecule [38]. However, in some recent studies, there was no apparent difference in the biofilms formed by the quorum-sensing mutants and the wild-type strains [39], [40]. Finally, the detailed P. aeruginosa virulence regulatory network did not show the direct quorum-sensing control of biofilm formation, delocalised on cell regulatory pathways under the key BfiSR, MifR and BfmSR activators [41].

C. violaceum has a simple unicomponent quorum-sensing system [13][15] where the cviI gene encodes the autoinducer (C6-HSL) synthase, and cviR encodes a cytoplasmic receptor protein that binds C6-HSL and activates expression of target genes [16]. However quorum-sensing control of biofilm formation by C. violaceum is not clear because specific CviR binding sites are absent in the exopolysaccharide biosynthesis operon [16].

Here, we describe the use of atomic force microscopy (AFM) combined with classical bacteriological techniques to reveal and quantify C. violaceum quorum sensing and biofilm formation. In these experiments, wild-type and cviI mutant bacteria allow to estimate both phenomena in violacein production and crystal violet staining tests, respectively. In turn, the use of AFM allows visualisation of cell morphology, matrix distribution and biofilm formation that can be carried out in their native state and under physiological conditions. Thus, AFM requires minimal sample preparation and creates 3D images with nanometer or sub-nanometer resolutions.

Our basic conclusion was that dependence between quorum sensing and biofilm formation in C. violaceum is not typical for luxI/luxR manner. The evidence for this comparison was as follows: (i) different dynamics of strictly quorum-dependent violacein and biofilms production during wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532 growth; (ii) the absolute block of violacein biosynthesis in the C. violaceum NCTC 13274 insertion mutant, whereas biofilm production is few lower than in cases of wild type and mutant strain with inducer; (iii) the considerable strengthening in C. violaceum NCTC 13274 violacein biosynthesis by exogenous C6-HSL in comparision with wild-type strain C. violaceum ATCC 31532, whereas biofilm formation was slightly increased to reach its wild type value only. Thus, like P. aeruginosa [39], [40], the C. violaceum wild-type strain and quorum-sensing mutants did not show apparent quantitative differences in the biofilm formation.

Surprisingly, AFM revealed an unusual C. violaceum cell morphological differentiation, associated with biofilm development and directed by a quorum-sensing autoinducer. AFM revealed numerous invaginations of the external cytoplasmic membrane of wild-type cells, which was repressed in the mutant strain and restored by exogenous C6-HSL. With increasing bacterial growth, the extrusions composed apparently from biofilm matrix were formed in place of invaginations, whereas mutant cells were covered with a diffusely distributed extracellular substance. Finally, quorum sensing-controlled C. violaceum formed a fine biofilm structure that differed from non-QS-controlled C. violaceum. In summary, our results suggest that quorum sensing controls biofilm quality but not quantity, and without this control bacteria produce undifferentiated biofilms, unlike wild-type biofilm. Therefore, authors assume that biofilm under QS-control become strong and steady against mechanical and chemical stress as shown peviously in [38].

As part of our experimental result, we were interested in determining the mechanisms of morphological differentiation and biofilm matrix development controlled by quorum sensing. The present study by AFM confirmed the existence of C. violaceum's cytoplasmic membrane invaginations as revealed by transmission electron microscopy previously [42]. On this basis, we propose the association of the invaginations with bacterial mesosomal-like structures that are rich in biosynthetic enzymes (Fig. 7), although we do not yet know which quorum-sensing controlled genes are involved in this process. For example, quorum-sensing controlled type VI secretion [16], whose multi-component machine is implicated in biofilm formation [43] and related biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance [44].

Figure 7. Predicted model of topological spatial relations between mesosomal-like structures (1), type VI secretion proteins (2) and membrane invaginations (3) in C6-HSL induced Chromobacterium violaceum cells.

This art was generated by Corel Draw 13 (Corel Corp.) and Adobe Photoshop CS 5 (Adobe Sys. Inc.).

Thus, it is possible that the intracellular mesosomes [42], the surface's invaginations (present work), and the outer membrane vesicles [45][47] are simultaneous manifestations of one phenomenon of bacterial cell differentiation associated with QS-controlled biofilm development

Future investigation of this mechanism could reveal insights into both the function of quorum sensing in biofilm formation and the features of bacterial cell morphological differentiation associated with biofilm development and directed by quorum-sensing autoinducers.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

AFM images (height signal) of C. violaceum NCTC 13274 growing for 24 (a, d), 48 (b, e) and 72 h (c, f) in planktonic conditions without (a–c) and with 0.1 µM C6-HSL (d–f). Scale bar – 1 µm.


Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: DGD. Performed the experiments: AAK ASV. Analyzed the data: AAK ASV DGD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: DGD. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: DGD ASV.


  1. 1. Gallis M, Logan NF (2005) Chromobacterium bergonzini 1881, 153 AL. In DJBrenner, NRKrieg, JTStaley (ed) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 824–827.
  2. 2. Antunes LCM, Ferreira RBR, Buckner MMC, Finlay BB (2010) Quorum sensing in bacterial virulence. Microbiology 156: 2271–2282.
  3. 3. Rajalakshmi G, Sankaravadivoo A, Prabhakaran S (2011) Characterization of Chromobacterium violaceum isolated from spoiled vegetables and antibiogram of violacein. J Adv Lab Res Bio II: 22–27.
  4. 4. Richard C (1993) Chromobacterium violaceum, opportunist pathogenic bacteria in tropical and subtropical regions. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 86: 169–173.
  5. 5. Lee J, Kim JS, Nahm CH, Choi JW, Kim J, et al. (1999) Two cases of Chromobacterium violaceum infection after injury in a subtropical region. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 37: 2068–2070.
  6. 6. Dyer NW, Krogh DF, DeVold R, Wilson SL, White DG (2000) Chromobacteriosis in a Chinese red panda (Ailurus fulgens styani). J Vet Diagn Invest 12: 177–179.
  7. 7. Durán N, Menck CF (2001) Chromobacterium violaceum: a review of pharmacological and industiral perspectives. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 27: 201–222.
  8. 8. Yang C-H, Li Y-H (2011) Chromobacterium violaceum infection: A clinical review of an important but neglected infection. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association 74: 435–441.
  9. 9. Brazilian National Genome Project Consortium (2003) The complete genome sequence of Chromobacterium violaceum reveals remarkable and exploitable bacterial adaptability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 11660–11665.
  10. 10. Silva R, Araripe JR, Rondinelli E, Ürményi TP (2004) Gene expression in Chromobacterium violaceum. Genet Mol Res 3: 64–75.
  11. 11. Hungria M, Nicolás MF, Guimarães CT, Jardim SN, Gomes EA, et al. (2004) Tolerance to stress and environmental adaptability of Chromobacterium violaceum. Genet Mol Res 3: 102–116.
  12. 12. Alves de Brito CF, Carvalho CMB, Santos FR, Gazzinelli RT, Oliveira SC, et al. (2004) Chromobacterium violaceum genome: molecular mechanisms associated with pathogenicity. Genet Mol Res 3: 148–161.
  13. 13. Fuqua C, Winans SC, Greenberg EP (1994) Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell-density responsive transcriptional regulators. J Bacteriol 176: 269–275.
  14. 14. Fuqua C, Winans SC, Greenberg EP (1996) Census and consensus in bacterial ecosystems: the LuxR-LuxI family of quorum-sensing transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol 50: 727–751.
  15. 15. Fuqua C, Parsek MR, Greenberg EP (2001) Regulation of gene expression by cell-to-cell communication: acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing. Annu Rev Genet 35: 439–468.
  16. 16. Stauff DL, Bassler BL (2011) Quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum: DNA recognition and gene regulation by the CviR receptor. J Bacteriol 193: 3871–3878.
  17. 17. Hoshino T (2011) Violacein and related tryptophan metabolites produced by Chromobacterium violaceum: biosynthetic mechanism and pathway for construction of violacein core. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91: 1463–1475.
  18. 18. Balibar CJ, Walsh CT (2006) In vitro biosynthesis of violacein from L-tryptophan by the enzymes VioA-E from Chromobacterium violaceum. Biochemistry 45: 15444–15457.
  19. 19. Hoiby N, Johansen HK, Ciofu O, Jensen RØ, Bjarnsholt T, et al. (2007) Foreign body infections - biofilms and quorum sensing. Ugeskrift for laeger 169: 4163–4166.
  20. 20. Becker S, Soares C, Porto LM (2009) Computational analysis suggests that virulence of Chromobacterium violaceum might be linked to biofilm formation and poly-NAG biosynthesis. Genet Mol Res 32: 640–644.
  21. 21. Chernin LS, Winson MK, Thompson JM, Haran S, Bycroft BW, et al. (1998) Chitinolytic activity in Chromobacterium violaceum: substrate analysis and regulation by quorum sensing. J Bacteriol 180: 4435–4441.
  22. 22. Fuqua C, Greenberg P (2002) Listening in on bacteria: acyl-homoserine lactone signalling. Molecular cell biology 3: 685–695.
  23. 23. Steindler L (2007) Venturi V (2007) Detection of quorum-sensing N-acyl homoserine lactone signal molecules by bacterial biosensors. FEMS Microbiol Lett 266: 1–9.
  24. 24. Wang Y, Ikawa A, Okaue S, Taniguchi S, Osaka I, et al. (2008) Quorum sensing signaling molecules involved in the production of violacein by Pseudoalteromonas. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72: 1958–1961.
  25. 25. O'Toole GA (2011) Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. Journal of Visualized Experiments 47: 1–2.
  26. 26. O'Toole GA, Kolter R (1998) The initiation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365 proceeds via multiple, convergent signalling pathways: a genetic analysis. Mol Microbiol 30: 295–304.
  27. 27. Nikiyan HN, Vasilchenko AS, Deryabin DG (2010) Humidity-dependent bacterial cells functional morphometry investigations using atomic force microscope. Int J Microbiol
  28. 28. Davey ME, O'Toole GA (2000) Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 64: 847–867.
  29. 29. Donlan RM (2002) Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces. Emerging Infect Dis 8: 881–890.
  30. 30. Vu B, Chen M, Crawford RJ, Ivanova EP (2009) Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides involved in biofilm formation. Molecules 14: 2535–2554.
  31. 31. de Kievit TR, Iglewski H (2000) Bacterial Quorum sensing in pathogenic relationships. Infection and Immunity 68: 4839–4849.
  32. 32. Waters CM, Bassler BL (2005) Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21: 319–346.
  33. 33. Nadell CD, Xavier JB, Levin SA, Foster KR (2008) The evolution of Quorum sensing in bacterial biofilms. PLOS Biology 6: e14.
  34. 34. Antunes AA, Silva MLRB, da Silva CAA, de Campos-Takaki GM (2006) Characterization of Chromobacterium violaceum isolated from Paca River, Pernambuco, Brazil. Revista de Biologia e Ciências da Terra 1: 48–55.
  35. 35. Hooshangi S, Bentley WE (2008) From unicellular properties to multicellular behavior: bacteria quorum sensing circuitry and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19: 550–555.
  36. 36. Schuster M, Losrtoh CP, Ogi T, Greenberg EP (2003) Identification, timing, and signal specificity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-controlled genes: a transcriptome analysis. Journal of Bacteriology 185: 2066–2079.
  37. 37. Wagner VE, Li LL, Isabella VM, Iglewski BH (2007) Analysis of the hierarchy of quorum-sensing regulation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Anal Bioanal Chem 387: 469–479.
  38. 38. Davies DG, Parsek MR, Pearson JP, Iglewski BH, Costerton JW, et al. (1998) The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science 280: 295–298.
  39. 39. Purevdorj B, Costerton JW, Stoodley P (2002) Influence of hydrodynamics and cell signaling on the structure and behavior of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 4457–4464.
  40. 40. Heydorn A, Ersboll B, Kato J, Hentzer M, Parsek MR, et al. (2002) Statistical analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development: impact of mutations in genes involved in twitching motility, cell-to-cell signaling, and stationary-phase sigma factor expression. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 2008–2017.
  41. 41. Balasubramanian D, Schneper L, Kumari H, Mathee K (2013) A dynamic and intricate regulatory network determines Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence. Nucleic Acids Research 41: 1–20.
  42. 42. Rucinsky TE, Cota-Robles EH (1974) Mesosome structure in Chromobacterium violaceum. Journal of Bacteriology 118: 717–724.
  43. 43. Aschtgen MS, Gavioli M, Dessen A, Lloubès R, Cascales E (2010) The SciZ protein anchors the enteroaggregative Escherichia coli Type VI secretion system to the cell wall. Mol Microbiol 75(4): 886–99.
  44. 44. Zhang ML, Hinz AJ, Nadeau J-P, Mah T-F (2010) Pseudomonas aeruginosa tssC1 links type VI secretion and biofilm-specific antibiotic resistance. Journal of Bacteriology 193: 5510–5513.
  45. 45. Zhurina MV, Kostrikina NA, Parshina EY, Strelkova EA, Yusipovich AI, et al. (2013) Visualization of the extracellular polymeric matrix of Chromobacterium violaceum biofilms by microscopic methods. J Microbiology 82: 517–524.
  46. 46. Yonezawa H, Osaki T, Kurata S, Fukuda M, Kawakami H, et al. (2009) Outer Membrane vesicles of Helicobacter pylori TK1402 are involved in biofilm formation. BMC Microbiology 9: 197
  47. 47. Baumgarten T, Sperling S, Seifert J, von Bergen M, Steiniger F, et al. (2012) Membrane vesicle formation as a multiple-stress response mechanism enhances Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E cell surface hydrophobicity and biofilm formation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 78: 6217–6224.