Background and Methods
In order to obtain further information on the pathophysiology of functional tremor, we assessed tactile discrimination threshold and proprioceptive temporal discrimination motor threshold values in 11 patients with functional tremor, 11 age- and sex-matched patients with essential tremor and 13 healthy controls.
Tactile discrimination threshold in both the right and left side was significantly higher in patients with functional tremor than in the other groups. Proprioceptive temporal discrimination threshold for both right and left side was significantly higher in patients with functional and essential tremor than in healthy controls. No significant correlation between discrimination thresholds and duration or severity of tremor was found.
Citation: Tinazzi M, Fasano A, Peretti A, Bove F, Conte A, Dall'Occhio C, et al. (2014) Tactile and Proprioceptive Temporal Discrimination Are Impaired in Functional Tremor. PLoS ONE 9(7): e102328. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102328
Editor: François Tremblay, University of Ottawa, Canada
Received: May 3, 2014; Accepted: June 12, 2014; Published: July 22, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Tinazzi et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The data set contains identifying human information, and it is available upon request. Requests may be sent to Dr. Michele Tinazzi (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist and that the co-author Alfonso Fasano is a PLOS ONE Editorial Board member. As specifically requested, the authors confirm that this does not alter their adherence to PLOS ONE Editorial policies and criteria.
Patients with functional movement disorders may have a range of movement abnormalities including tremor.,  Although the clinical features in patients with functional movement disorders are well described, the pathophysiology of these conditions is largely unknown. Over the years, neurophysiological and neuroimaging studies, have attempted to define a neurobiological model for some of these conditions.– Studies with transcranial magnetic stimulation are limited to patients with functional dystonia and demonstrated cortical and spinal inhibitory motor system abnormalities similar to those described in the organic forms.,  Unlike patients with primary dystonia, patients with functional dystonia nevertheless have normal sensorimotor cortical plasticity.
We have previously found that the somatosensory processing underlying the ability to perceive two tactile stimuli as separate in time (TDT) was impaired in patients with functional dystonia. Others reported an abnormal TDT in primary dystonias,,  in non-manifesting DYT1 mutation carriers, in unaffected relatives, and in Parkinson's disease.–
Another measure for assessing somatosensory processing is the proprioceptive temporal discrimination motor threshold (TDMT), defined as the shortest interval at which the subject perceives two externally-induced passive movements as separate in time. The TDMT is normal in patients with focal dystonia and abnormal in those with essential tremor (ET).,  Because ET probably involves the cerebellar and brainstem oscillating loops, an abnormal TDMT could depend on cerebellar dysfunction. Accordingly, TDMT testing disclosed abnormal findings also in patients with cerebellar degenerative ataxias.
Given that previous imaging studies in patients with various functional movement disorders – including functional tremor (FT) – showed abnormal activation in both basal ganglia and cerebellum, as well as in several cortical areas,, , ,  which are also involved in tactile and proprioceptive temporal discrimination,,  we conjectured that TDT and TDMT testing might disclose abnormal temporal processing in patients with FT. Therefore, we investigated TDT and TDMT in patients with FT, ET and healthy controls (HC).
We recruited 11 right-handed patients with documented or clinical evidence of FT according to Fahn and Williams criteria, as confirmed by two independent neurologist experts in movement disorders. Results were compared with those of a group of 13 age-matched normal control subjects and with those of 11 right-handed patients fulfilling diagnostic criteria for ET (Table 1). The severity of arm tremor was rated by means of Tremor Rating Scale (TRS). Subjects received detailed information about experimental procedures and provided written informed consent before attending to the study. No participant exhibited cognitive decline or any other limitation of the ability to provide an informed consent, therefore no next of kin or legally authorised representative was involed in this process. The ethical committee of Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Italy, approved the study.
Stimuli and procedure
Each upper limb was tested separately, and the order of presentation including the stimuli procedure was counterbalanced across subjects. To maintain subjects' attention throughout the procedure and to disclose possible perseverative responses, the ascending series for each procedure included catch trials (3 for each series) delivered at an interstimulus interval of 0 msec.
Tactile TDT testing was conducted according to previous standardized protocols.,  The value at which the subject recognized the two tactile stimuli as sequential for at least 3 consecutive intervals was defined as the TDT.
In order to assess TDMT, the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles were selectively stimulated with a procedure extensively described in previous studies.,  We defined the TDMT as the shortest interval elapsing between two paired electrical stimuli in which the subjects blindfolded perceived two separate index finger abductions (in response to FDI stimulation) and wrist flexions (in response to FCR stimulation) for at least three consecutive intervals.
Online Material S1 contains additional information on clinical features, neurophysiological procedures and statistical analysis.
No differences were found between the three groups of subjects (FT, ET, HC) for age or gender distribution. Severity (TRS scores – Table 1) and duration of tremor were comparable between patients with ET and those with FT (p = 0.554 and p = 0.667).
TDT values in both right and left hands were higher in patients with FT than in those with ET and HC. Repeated-measures ANOVA identified a main effect of Group (F(2,32) = 11.5, p<0.001, effect size = 0.85), but no main effect of Side (F(1,32) = 0.14, p = 0.716, effect size = 0.06) or a Side × Group interaction (F(2,32) = 0.47, p = 0.632, effect size = 0.17) (Figure 1 A).
A) Tactile temporal discrimination thresholds (TDT) obtained in healthy controls (HC), patients with essential tremor (ET) and functional tremor (FT) after stimuli applied separately to the right (blue bars) and left (grey bars) hand; B) Temporal discrimination movement thresholds (TDMT) obtained in HC, and patients with ET, and FT after stimuli applied separately to the right (blue bars) and left (grey bars) first dorsal interosseous (FDI); C) and flexor carpii radialis (FCR) muscles.
TDMT values in both the right and left FDI and FCR muscles were higher in patients with FT and ET than in HC. Repeated-measures ANOVA identified a main effect of Group (F(2,32) = 7.42, p = 0.002, effect size = 0.68), but no main effect of Side (F(1,32) = 0.33, p = 0.568, effect size = 0.10) or a Side × Group interaction (F(2,32) = 0.16, p = 0.852, effect size = 0.10) (Figure 1B and C). ANOVA also identified a main effect of muscle (F(1,32) = 380.9, p<0.001, effect size = 3.46) with higher TDMT values in FCR than in FDI muscle. The Muscle × Group (F(2,32) = 0.78, p = 0.468, effect size = 0.22) and the Side × Muscle (F(1,32) = 0.19, p = 0.670, effect size = 0.08) interactions were not significant. Nor was the triple interaction Group × Side × Muscle (F(2,32) = 1.34, p = 0.276, effect size = 0.29).
In the four FT patients with unilateral tremor (Patients n° 5, 8, 9, 10 of Table 1), TDT and TDMT values of the affected side were not significantly different from those of the unaffected side.
In patients with FT and ET Spearman rank correlation analysis disclosed no significant correlation between TDMT or TDT abnormalities and duration or severity of tremor.
To assess the reproducibility of TDT and TDMT measurements, the experiment was repeated in 5 patients with FT (patients n. 4–8 in Table 1) who accepted to be re-tested after a mean 10.4±2.2 months had elapsed. When comparing follow-up with baseline evaluation, tremor remained unchanged between and no difference was found in TDT values (right: 104±29 vs. 100±28.5; left: 107±28.2 vs. 112±24.9) (values expressed as ms±SD; for all comparisons, p>0.131). Nor did follow-up TDMT values for FDI or FCR muscle differ from baseline values (right FDI: 115.5±14.2 vs. 115.5±11.2; left: 117.5±17 vs. 114.5±16.6; right FCR: 132.5±7.5 vs. 130.5±12; left: 135±14.1 vs. 128±18.7) (values expressed as ms±SD; for all comparisons, p>0.144).
Our study shows that patients with FT have higher TDT and TDMT values than HC and ET patients hence FT patients have an impaired temporal processing of both tactile and proprioceptive stimuli. In ET we confirm our previous finding showing that the TDT is normal whereas the TDMT is increased compared to HC.
The precise brain areas and circuits responsible for TDT changes remain unclear. Studies in healthy subjects attribute a crucial role in controlling the TDT to SI and pre-SMA cortical areas,  and investigations in patients with movement disorders or focal brain lesions suggest that abnormal TDT values reflect changes in basal ganglia and cerebellum., , , ,  Proprioceptive sensory information for the TDMT travels through the dorsal spinocerebellar tract and is processed through a distributed neural network in which the cerebellum and the parietal cortex play a prominent role.– Consistent with this hypothesis a functional MRI study in healthy subjects disclosed a larger number of voxels activated during electrically induced ankle dorsiflexion than in subjects at rest, and specifically contralateral SI and SII and cerebellum. Overall studies in HC suggest that TDT and TMDT variables depend on cortico-subcortical circuits that only partially overlap.
The abnormalities we found in TDT and TDMT in FT may be due to a specific impairment in attention.,  Although it is well known that FT disappears with distraction, we believe that an impaired attention is unlikely to play a role, given that tremor was absent during experiment (no patient had resting tremor). Nonetheless, patients with functional symptoms have a general increase in attention towards the body and new physical signs can easily be elicited during the examination by focusing attention onto the body. However, we believe that the impairment of the tactile and proprioceptive temporal discrimination seen in FT patients represents an intrinsic feature of FT. First, we tried to minimize the bias due to possible changes in attention by delivering catch trials (3 for each series) with 0 msec interstimulus interval, as already described in previous studies;, ,  second, FT patients performed similarly on repeated tests, while we should have found a marked variability if these results would have been caused by attention deficits; third, we found a consistent bilateral pattern of impairment also in patients with unilateral symptoms; finally, abnormal temporal processing of somatosensory input in FT is in line with the abnormal TDT we reported in patients with functional dystonia, although in that study we did not test the TDMT.
Functional neuroimaging studies performed during specific tasks in patients with functional movement disorders documented an abnormal activation in brain areas involved in motor planning and execution, including basal ganglia, cerebellum, parietal cortex and SMA, and in temporoparietal junction and limbic regions (insula, amygdala and cingulated cortex) involved in multisensory integration and motor prediction., , ,  Neurons in the insula respond to simple, innocuous, cutaneous stimuli and integrate tactile, gustatory, olfactory, visual, auditory and visceral stimuli with emotional and attentional information. Because tactile and proprioceptive afferent inputs processing requires a correct sensory integration in the limbic structures, dysfunction in the limbic circuits present in functional disorders may explain the abnormalities in TDT and TDMT we observed. Abnormal activation in prefrontal regions, commonly reported in patients with functional motor symptoms,– could also alter the performance of self-report tasks including temporal discrimination.
Our study has a few limitations. The small sample size and cross-sectional design might have made our results difficult to interpret. Our study, nonetheless, compares favourably with the existing literature on functional neurological disorders, in which most studies have small sample sizes (from one to eight patients) due to the difficulties in enrolling these patients. For the same reason, we decided to characterize the patients only clinically without performing additional tests which would had required a multisession study design. Although a possible role played by psychotropic medications might be another confounding factor, our previous observations in organic tremor excludes this possibility because we did not find any effect of medication on TDT or TDMT. The strength of our study design is that we included patients with tremor who were clinically homogeneous and compared the results with those obtained not only in HC but also in patients with ET.
In conclusion, the finding that patients with FT have an abnormality of both TDT and TDMT (and not of one of the two, as seen in dystonia, ET and cerebellar degeneration) supports the hypothesis that in FT there is an unspecific impairment of sensory processing involving non-encoding neural structures. Future studies addressing whether patients with FT also present abnormalities in temporal processing of other sensory modalities would give further insight into the pathophysiology of FT.
Conceived and designed the experiments: MT AF AC AB. Performed the experiments: AP FB AC. Analyzed the data: MT GD MF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AP AC MF AB CD CA. Contributed to the writing of the manuscript: MT AF AC GD AB.
- 1. Edwards MJ, Bhatia KP (2012) Functional (psychogenic) movement disorders: merging mind and brain. Lancet Neurol 11: 250–260.
- 2. Feinstein A, Stergiopoulos V, Fine J, Lang AE (2001) Psychiatric outcome in patients with a psychogenic movement disorder: a prospective study. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 14: 169–176.
- 3. Stone J, Edwards MJ (2011) How "psychogenic" are psychogenic movement disorders? Mov Disord 26: 1787–1788.
- 4. Espay AJ, Morgante F, Purzner J, Gunraj CA, Lang AE, et al. (2006) Cortical and spinal abnormalities in psychogenic dystonia. Ann Neurol 59: 825–834.
- 5. Voon V, Brezing C, Gallea C, Hallett M (2010) Emotional stimuli and motor conversion disorder. Brain 133: 1526–1536.
- 6. Schrag AE, Mehta AR, Bhatia KP, Brown RJ, Frackowiak RS, et al. (2013) The functional neuroimaging correlates of psychogenic versus organic dystonia. Brain 136: 770–781.
- 7. Avanzino L, Martino D, van de Warrenburg BP, Schneider SA, Abbruzzese G, et al. (2008) Cortical excitability is abnormal in patients with the "fixed dystonia" syndrome. Mov Disord 23: 646–652.
- 8. Quartarone A, Rizzo V, Terranova C, Morgante F, Schneider S, et al. (2009) Abnormal sensorimotor plasticity in organic but not in psychogenic dystonia. Brain 132: 2871–2877.
- 9. Morgante F, Tinazzi M, Squintani G, Martino D, Defazio G, et al. (2011) Abnormal tactile temporal discrimination in psychogenic dystonia. Neurology 77: 1191–1197.
- 10. Tinazzi M, Frasson E, Bertolasi L, Fiaschi A, Aglioti S (1999) Temporal discrimination of somesthetic stimuli is impaired in dystonic patients. Neuroreport 10: 1547–1550.
- 11. Scontrini A, Conte A, Defazio G, Fiorio M, Fabbrini G, et al. (2009) Somatosensory temporal discrimination in patients with primary focal dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 80: 1315–1319.
- 12. Fiorio M, Stanzani C, Rothwell JC, Bhatia KP, Moretto G, et al. (2007) Defective temporal discrimination of passive movements in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Lett 417: 312–315.
- 13. Bradley D, Whelan R, Walsh R, Reilly RB, Hutchinson S, et al. (2009) Temporal discrimination threshold: VBM evidence for an endophenotype in adult onset primary torsion dystonia. Brain 132: 2327–2335.
- 14. Artieda J, Pastor MA, Lacruz F, Obeso JA (1992) Temporal discrimination is abnormal in Parkinson's disease. Brain 115: 199–210.
- 15. Conte A, Modugno N, Lena F, Dispenza S, Gandolfi B, et al. (2010) Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and somatosensory temporal discrimination in Parkinson's disease. Brain 133: 2656–2663.
- 16. Conte A, Khan N, Defazio G, Rothwell JC, Berardelli A (2013) Pathophysiology of somatosensory abnormalities in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol 9: 687–697.
- 17. Tinazzi M, Stanzani C, Fiorio M, Smania N, Moretto G, et al. (2005) Temporal discrimination of two passive movements in humans: a new psychophysical approach to assessing kinaesthesia. Exp Brain Res 166: 184–189.
- 18. Tinazzi M, Fasano A, Di Matteo A, Ricciardi L, Bovi T, et al. (2013) Temporal discrimination in patients with dystonia and tremor and patients with essential tremor. Neurology 80: 76–84.
- 19. Tinazzi M, Fiorio M, Stanzani C, Moretto G, Smania N, et al. (2006) Temporal discrimination of two passive movements in writer's cramp. Mov Disord 21: 1131–1135.
- 20. Elble R, Deuschl G (2011) Milestones in tremor research. Mov Disord 26: 1096–1105.
- 21. Tinazzi M, Morgante F, Peretti A, Mariotti C, Panzeri M, et al. (2013) Impairment of tactile and proprioceptive temporal discrimination in cerebellar ataxia. Plos One 8: e78628.
- 22. Nowak DA, Fink GR (2009) Psychogenic movement disorders: aetiology, phenomenology, neuroanatomical correlates and therapeutic approaches. Neuroimage 47: 1015–1025.
- 23. Voon V, Gallea C, Hattori N, Bruno M, Ekanayake V, et al. (2010) The involuntary nature of conversion disorder. Neurology 74: 223–228.
- 24. Lacruz F, Artieda J, Pastor MA, Obeso JA (1991) The anatomical basis of somaesthetic temporal discrimination in humans. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 54: 1077–1081.
- 25. Pastor MA, Day BL, Macaluso E, Frackowiak RS (2004) The functional neuroanatomy of temporal discrimination. J Neurosci 24: 2585–2591.
- 26. Fahn S, Williams DT (1988) Psychogenic dystonia. Adv Neurol 50: 431–455.
- 27. Deuschl G, Bain P, Brin M (1998) Consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor. Ad Hoc Scientific Committee. Mov Disord 13 Suppl 32–23.
- 28. Fahn S, Tolosa E, Marin C (1988) Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins.
- 29. Fiorio M, Tinazzi M, Bertolasi L, Aglioti SM (2003) Temporal processing of visuotactile and tactile stimuli in writer's cramp. Ann Neurol 53: 630–635.
- 30. Conte A, Rocchi L, Nardella A, Dispenza S, Scontrini A, et al. (2012) Theta-burst stimulation-induced plasticity over primary somatosensory cortex changes somatosensory temporal discrimination in healthy humans. PLoS One 7: e32979.
- 31. Tinazzi M, Fiorio M, Fiaschi A, Bologna M, Suppa A, et al. (2009) Sensory functions in dystonia: insights from behavioral studies. Mov Disord 24: 1427–1436.
- 32. Manganelli F, Dubbioso R, Pisciotta C, Antenora A, Nolano M, et al. (2013) Somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold is increased in patients with cerebellar atrophy. Cerebellum 12: 456–459.
- 33. Bosco G, Poppele RE (2001) Proprioception from a spinocerebellar perspective. Physiol Rev 81: 539–568.
- 34. Butterworth S, Francis S, Kelly E, McGlone F, Bowtell R, et al. (2003) Abnormal cortical sensory activation in dystonia: an fMRI study. Mov Disord 18: 673–682.
- 35. Proske U, Gandevia SC (2009) The kinaesthetic senses. J Physiol 587: 4139–4146.
- 36. Francis S, Lin X, Aboushoushah S, White TP, Phillips M, et al. (2009) fMRI analysis of active, passive and electrically stimulated ankle dorsiflexion. Neuroimage 44: 469–479.
- 37. Koch G, Oliveri M, Caltagirone C (2009) Neural networks engaged in milliseconds and seconds time processing: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation and patients with cortical or subcortical dysfunction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 364: 1907–1918.
- 38. van Poppelen D, Saifee TA, Schwingenschuh P, Katschnig P, Bhatia KP, et al. (2011) Attention to self in psychogenic tremor. Mov Disord 26: 2575–2576.
- 39. Pareés I, Saifee TA, Kassavetis P, Kojovic M, Rubio-Agusti I, et al. (2012) Believing is perceiving: mismatch between self-report and actigraphy in psychogenic tremor. Brain 135: 117–123.
- 40. Augustine JR (1996) Circuitry and functional aspects of the insular lobe in primates including humans. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 22: 229–244.
- 41. Nagai M, Kishi K, Kato S (2007) Insular cortex and neuropsychiatric disorders: a review of recent literature. Eur Psychiatry 22: 387–394.
- 42. Cojan Y, Waber L, Carruzzo A, Vuilleumier P (2009) Motor inhibition in hysterical conversion paralysis. Neuroimage 47: 1026–37.
- 43. de Lange FP, Toni I, Roelofs K (2010) Altered connectivity between prefrontal and sensorimotor cortex in conversion paralysis. Neuropsychologia 48: 1782–8.
- 44. Roelofs K, de Bruijn ER, Van Galen GP (2006) Hyperactive action monitoring during motor-initiation in conversion paralysis: an event-related potential study. Biol Psychol 71: 316–25.