Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Peroxisomes Are Required for Lipid Metabolism and Muscle Function in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Joseph E. Faust,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Arvind Manisundaram,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Pavlina T. Ivanova,

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and the Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

  • Stephen B. Milne,

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and the Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

  • James B. Summerville,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • H. Alex Brown,

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacology and the Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America

  • Michael Wangler,

    Affiliation Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • Michael Stern,

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

  • James A. McNew

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America

Peroxisomes Are Required for Lipid Metabolism and Muscle Function in Drosophila melanogaster

  • Joseph E. Faust, 
  • Arvind Manisundaram, 
  • Pavlina T. Ivanova, 
  • Stephen B. Milne, 
  • James B. Summerville, 
  • H. Alex Brown, 
  • Michael Wangler, 
  • Michael Stern, 
  • James A. McNew


Peroxisomes are ubiquitous organelles that perform lipid and reactive oxygen species metabolism. Defects in peroxisome biogenesis cause peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs). The most severe PBD, Zellweger syndrome, is characterized in part by neuronal dysfunction, craniofacial malformations, and low muscle tone (hypotonia). These devastating diseases lack effective therapies and the development of animal models may reveal new drug targets. We have generated Drosophila mutants with impaired peroxisome biogenesis by disrupting the early peroxin gene pex3, which participates in budding of pre-peroxisomes from the ER and peroxisomal membrane protein localization. pex3 deletion mutants lack detectible peroxisomes and die before or during pupariation. At earlier stages of development, larvae lacking Pex3 display reduced size and impaired lipid metabolism. Selective loss of peroxisomes in muscles impairs muscle function and results in flightless animals. Although, hypotonia in PBD patients is thought to be a secondary effect of neuronal dysfunction, our results suggest that peroxisome loss directly affects muscle physiology, possibly by disrupting energy metabolism. Understanding the role of peroxisomes in Drosophila physiology, specifically in muscle cells may reveal novel aspects of PBD etiology.


Peroxisomes are small, spherical, single-membrane bound organelles found in almost all eukaryotic cells. Most biochemical pathways in peroxisomes involve lipid metabolism, including β-oxidation of fatty acids (FAs), α-oxidation of branched chain FAs, and ether lipid biosynthesis [1]. Peroxisomes also participate in reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism. Sources of ROS, such as oxidases that produce H2O2, and antioxidant enzymes, such as catalase, are present in peroxisomes [2].

Peroxisome Membrane Biogenesis

The formation of a mature, metabolically active peroxisome depends on the activity of Peroxin (Pex) proteins [3]. Peroxisomes can form de novo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) or divide autonomously from pre-existing organelles. The membrane for the organelle must be defined and proteins must be inserted into the membrane and the matrix. Pex3 is a peroxisomal membrane protein (PMP) that is required for de novo production from the ER as well as for ongoing membrane protein import from the cytosol [4][8]. During de novo organelle biogenesis, newly synthesized Pex3 localizes to the ER, concentrates into foci, and is carried away from the ER in buds that mature into peroxisomes [4]. Yeast, flies, and human cells lacking Pex3 display a complete block in peroxisome biogenesis [9][11]. In addition to the de novo biogenesis pathway, existing peroxisomes can grow and divide [12].

Membrane and Matrix Protein Import

The import of proteins into the membrane and matrix of the peroxisome is a highly orchestrated process involving the action of many Pex proteins [13]. Two models exist for the insertion of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs). In the classical model, Pex19 chaperones newly synthesized, cytoplasmic PMPs to the peroxisome and facilitates their insertion into the peroxisomal membrane [14], [15]. An alternative model suggests that all PMPs first insert in the ER membrane and are carried in buds that mature into peroxisomes [16]. These two pathways are not mutually exclusive, and most likely, both are utilized. The majority of Pex proteins are dedicated to the import of proteins into the peroxisomal matrix via two defined pathways. Proteins containing a peroxisome targeting signal (PTS) type 1 (PTS1), consisting of the C-terminal tripeptide SKL or other selected variants [17], are bound by cytoplasmic Pex5, shuttled to the peroxisome, and transported across the membrane [18]. A few proteins contain an N-terminal PTS type 2 (PTS2) motif that is recognized by the Pex7 receptor, and transported into the peroxisome in a similar fashion to PTS1-containing proteins [19]. The PTS2 system is not conserved across species. D. melanogaster and C. elegans appear to have lost the PTS2 system entirely and rely solely on the PTS1 import pathway [20], [21]. In addition to its roles in membrane biogenesis and PMP insertion, Pex3 has been implicated in pexophagy and peroxisome inheritance during cytokinesis [22], [23].

Peroxisomes and Human Health

Impaired peroxisomal membrane biogenesis or protein import, caused by mutations in various pex genes, lead to a wide spectrum of human diseases, known collectively as peroxisome biogenesis disorders (PBDs) [24]. Peroxisome dysfunction disrupts many biochemical pathways and affects almost every organ system. In Zellweger syndrome (ZS), patients display defects in neuronal development, craniofacial malformations, and low muscle tone (hypotonia). Neuronal dysfunction is clearly present in PBD patients and is thought to be responsible for the observed hypotonia. However, myopathy has also been observed in PBD patients [25], [26], suggesting that muscles may be sensitive to peroxisome loss independent of neuronal involvement. There is no cure or effective therapy for ZS and afflicted patients usually die in infancy. The etiology of ZS is still unclear, but accumulation of very long chain FAs (VLCFAs) and low levels of ether lipids have been suggested to play causative roles [24].

Animal Model Systems

Mice with impaired peroxisome biogenesis have been generated and serve as useful animal models for PBDs [27]. These animals show many phenotypes similar to PBD patients, including early death, VLCFA accumulation, neuronal migration defects, and locomotor problems. Drosophila have recently become an attractive system to study peroxisome biology and potentially model PBDs. The majority of human peroxisomal metabolic enzymes have homologs in D. melanogaster [20]. Three recent studies have shown that mutations in multiple Drosophila pex genes produce some phenotypes shared with mouse models and PBD patients [10], [28], [29].

In order to design effective therapeutics for PBDs, more mechanistic details are needed regarding the effects of peroxisome disruption on whole animal physiology. To this end, we have begun to characterize the effects of disrupting early peroxisome biogenesis on Drosophila physiology. Peroxisome biogenesis can be inhibited by a chromosomal mutation in pex3 or by RNAi-mediated reduction in pex3 mRNA. In the absence of Pex3, flies exhibit no detectable peroxisomes and show impaired lipid metabolism. Longer acyl chain triacylglycerols (TAGs) are elevated and the level of ceramide-phosphoethanolamine (CerPE), the fly analog of the essential lipid sphingomyelin, is reduced in pex3 mutants. Flies with impaired peroxisome biogenesis specifically in muscle tissues show impaired muscle function, possibly due to altered energy metabolism. Human PEX3 expression fully rescues peroxisome loss in the pex3 deletion mutant. These flies containing “humanized” peroxisomes will be a useful model for examining pathological mutations in human PEX3.


Peroxisome Distribution in Drosophila

Drosophila peroxisomes have been visualized previously in various tissues [10], [28][33]. We expanded the tissues examined, focusing primarily on larval tissues involved in energy metabolism: the gut, fat body, oenocytes, body wall muscles, and the epidermis. Nutrients are absorbed from the diet as they travels through the gut. Excess energy is stored as triacylglycerol within lipid droplets in the fat body, similar to adipose tissue in mammals. Depending on metabolic demands, lipids are mobilized from the fat body and are likely broken down in oenocytes, hepatocyte-like cells [34]. Larval body wall muscles have intensive energy demands, provided partially through lipid metabolism. Epidermal cells line the larval body wall between the cuticle and muscles.

A peroxisomal matrix marker was generated by appending the PTS1 targeting signal, –KNPPETKSKL, of Carnitine O-acetyltransferase (CRAT; CG1041) on enhanced Yellow Fluorescent Protein (eYFP-PTS1) and tissue specific expression was achieved by means of the GAL/UAS system [35]. eYFP-PTS1 localizes to the matrix of peroxisomes, which are visible as punctae in the cytoplasm. All tissues examined, including the gut (Fig. 1B), fat body (Fig. 1A), oenocytes (Fig. 1C), muscles (Fig. 1D), epidermal cells (Fig. 1E), and early embryos (Fig. 1F), contain abundant peroxisomes. Some cell types, such as oenocytes and gut, contain more peroxisomes than other tissues.

Figure 1. Peroxisome distribution in D. melanogaster.

UAS-eYFP-PTS1 was expressed in various tissues and imaged in fixed samples by confocal microscopy. Peroxisomes are present in all tissues examined including, (A) Fat body (lsp>eYFP-PTS1), (B) Gut (act5c>eYFP-PTS1), (C) Oenocytes (BO>eYFP-PTS1), (D) Muscles (24B>eYFP-PTS1), and (E) Epidermal cells (act5c>eYFP-PTS1). (F) Embryos expressing PMP34-Cerulean were imaged by epifluorescence microscopy. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Characterization of pex3 Mutants

In order to inhibit peroxisome biogenesis, we chose pex3 as our target for mutagenesis. Pex3 is involved in the early steps of de novo biogenesis of peroxisomes from the ER and yeast, flies and human cells lacking pex3 have no detectable peroxisomes [9][11]. We generated a pex3 deletion mutant by mobilizing a P-element transposon (P{EPgy2}Pex3EY19206) in the 5′ untranslated region of the pex3 gene and screening for imprecise excision events. One imprecise excision allele, pex32, carries a 789 bp deletion containing the first non-coding exon, intron one, and part of exon two including the translational start site and 285 bp of the coding sequence (Fig. 2A). We used a precise excision of the P-element, pex3rev, as well as genomic and cDNA rescue transgenes as controls for phenotypic analysis. pex32 mutants reared on standard cornmeal/agar died before the wandering third instar larval stage (Fig. 2D). The larval lethality failed to complement a chromosomal deficiency Df(3L)BSC837, which uncovers the pex3 locus [36]. The pex32 lethality also failed to complement the previously reported pex31 deletion allele [10]. Genomic and cDNA rescue significantly improved viability of the pex32 mutant (Fig. 2D), but did not fully rescue indicating that expression levels or tissue specific expression may not have been fully recapitulated. Additionally, pex32 mutant larvae are smaller than age-matched pex3rev control larvae (Fig. 2E). When grown on grape juice plates, most pex32 flies survived to the pupal stage and some escaper adults were observed. These few adult escapers were severely disabled, could not fly, and died within several days.

Figure 2. pex32 is a null mutant.

(A) A schematic of the pex3 genomic region showing the EP element insertion site and the deleted region in pex32. (B) Immunoblot of total protein extracts from wandering third instar larvae show that Pex3 protein is undetectable in the pex32 mutants, but can be detected by the addition of a genomic fragment containing pex3 or expression of a fly or human cDNA transgene. The Myc-tagged transgenic protein is a higher molecular weight than endogenous Pex3. 37.5 µg of total protein was loaded in lanes 2–8. (C) Immunoblot with increasing amounts of pex32 protein shows that Pex3 protein is undetectable. Total protein amounts loaded in lanes 2–6, were 37.5 µg, 37.5 µg, 75 µg, 112.5 µg, and 37.5 µg. The intensities of the Tubulin bands in lanes 3–6, relative to lane 2, are 30%, 94%, 124%, and 108%.(D) Adult fly viability measurements show that the loss of pex3 (pex32) results in nonviable Drosophila 0±0% (n = 381) compared to controls (pex3rev; 99.5±0.4%; n = 472), genomic rescue (72±12.9%; n = 185), and fly cDNA rescue (48.2±10.9%, n = 46). (E) Imaging of wandering third instar larvae shows that pex32 larvae are smaller than pex3rev control larvae.

To determine if pex32 makes a protein product, we generated anti-Pex3 antibodies in rabbits using recombinant Pex3- His6 protein. Anti-Pex3 serum recognizes recombinant Pex3-His6 and endogenous Pex3 protein in total protein extracts from pex3rev larvae (Fig. 2B), yet no Pex3 band is visible in extracts from pex32 larvae (Fig. 2B and 2C). The genomic pex3 rescue fragment was sufficient to restore Pex3 protein to detectable levels, similar to wildtype, in pex32 (Fig. 2B). Pex3 protein is not detectable by immunoblotting when a UAS-dPex3-Myc transgene was driven by the weak global driver, arm-GAL4 (Fig. 2B). However, the same transgene driven by the strong, global driver, act5c-GAL4, produces levels of Pex3 protein higher than endogenous levels (Fig. 2B). Similarly, act5c-GAL4 driving human pex3 transgene (UAS-hPex3-Myc) also produced Pex3 protein, detectable by anti-Myc antibodies, but at levels lower than Drosophila pex3 (Fig. 2B).

pex32 Mutants Lack Peroxisomes

We next examined the effect of Pex3 loss on peroxisome biogenesis. The peroxisomal matrix marker, UAS-eYFP-PTS1, was driven by the weak global arm-GAL4 driver and the hepatocyte-like oenocytes cells, were examined in wandering 3rd instar larvae. Many peroxisomes were visible as punctae in the cytoplasm of oenocytes in pex3rev wandering 3rd instar larvae (Fig. 3A), but no punctae are present and eYFP-PTS1 remains diffuse in the cytoplasm in the pex32 mutant (Fig. 3B). This result indicates that pex32 mutants lack peroxisomes that can import PTS1 cargo. Larvae expressing Drosophila (Fig. 3C) or Human (Fig. 3D) pex3 cDNA in the pex32 genetic background recover cytoplasmic punctae, indicating the presence of peroxisomes. These results demonstrate that the impaired biogenesis in pex32 is due to the loss of pex3 and that Human Pex3 can replace the function of Drosophila Pex3 and restore peroxisome biogenesis.

Figure 3. Peroxisome biogenesis is impaired in pex32 mutants.

Peroxisomes were visualized by confocal microscopy in hepatocyte-like, oenocyte cells of third instar larvae. UAS-eYFP-PTS1 was driven by the arm GAL4 driver in various backgrounds. (A) Peroxisomes are abundant in oenocytes of pex3rev control larvae. (B) eYFP-PTS1 is diffuse in the cytoplasm of pex32 larvae indicating that peroxisomes are absent. Some cells contain bright spots, but it is unclear if these are peroxisomes. Peroxisomes are restored when fly (C) or human (D) pex3 cDNA are expressed in the pex32 background. Scale bar = 10 µm.

pex32 Mutants have Altered Lipid Metabolism

The major biochemical pathways in peroxisomes involve lipid metabolism, such as β-oxidation of FAs, ether lipid synthesis, etc. We predicted that lipid metabolism would be altered if peroxisome biogenesis was blocked and tested this prediction by performing lipidomic analysis on pex32 mutants using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The abundance of major lipid classes, polar lipids, diacylglycerols (DAG), and TAG, were not significantly altered in the pex32 mutant compared to the pex3rev control (Fig. 4A). However, the composition of FAs in storage lipids (TAGs) were changed. Longer acyl chain length TAGs are elevated and shorter acyl chain length TAGs are reduced in pex32 (Fig. 4B). Similar changes in TAG chain length were observed in larvae with reduced pex3 (Fig. S1). A UAS-inducible transgene (UAS-pex3.IR) encoding a hairpin RNA that targets pex3 for degradation by RNAi (Fig. 5A) was used to reduce the level of Pex3. When the UAS-pex3.IR was driven by the global GAL4 driver, daughterless (DaG32), longer acyl chain length TAGs are elevated and shorter acyl chain TAGs are reduced (Fig. S1). In addition to these changes in TAG acyl chain length, we found that the insect specific lipid CerPE is significantly reduced in pex32 (Fig. 4C). Insects use CerPE in place of sphingomyelin, a sphingolipid important in neuronal membranes [37]. This result suggests a previously unknown contribution of peroxisomes to CerPE biosynthesis.

Figure 4. Peroxisome loss causes aberrant lipid metabolism.

(A) Mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of larval lipids shows that the levels of the major lipid classes, Polar lipids, DAG, and TAG are unchanged in pex32 mutants. (B) However, pex32 mutants have elevated longer acyl chain length TAG species. (C) CerPE levels are decreased in pex32. (D) Survival analysis of larvae under starvation conditions reveals that larvae lacking Pex3 (pex32) are hypersensitive to starvation. Starvation sensitivity can be partially rescued by expression of genomic pex3 or pex3 cDNA.

Figure 5. RNAi knockdown of pex3 reduces peroxisome numbers and impairs viability.

(A) A schematic of the pex3 genomic region shows the area targeted by the inverted repeat. (B) Immunoblot of total protein extracts from wandering third instar larvae shows that Pex3 protein levels are reduced when UAS-pex3.IR is driven by global GAL4 drivers. The weak, global driver armadillo (arm) driving UAS-pex3.IR does not detectably reduce Pex3 levels. The medium strength global driver, daughterless (DaG32), driving UAS-pex3.IR reduces Pex3 levels at 18°C and room temperature. The strong global driver, actin 5c (act5c), driving UAS-pex3.IR reduces the level of Pex3 even further. (C) Adult viability of flies expressing pex3.IR driven by global GAL4 drivers was measured. Weak knockdown (arm>pex3.IR) did not appreciably decrease viability (95.3±1.0%; n = 190). At 18°C, viability of DaG32>pex3.IR flies was reduced to 25.2±1.5% (n = 330). At room temperature, viability of DaG32>pex3.IR flies fell to 1±0.5% (n = 444). At both temperatures, some flies died as pupae or pharate adults and remained trapped in the pupal case. Viability of act5c>pex3.IR flies was also reduced (11.9±6.5%; n = 106). (D) Microscopy of wandering third instar larval epidermal cells shows that peroxisome numbers are severely reduced when UAS-pex3.IR is driven by the act5c GAL4 driver compared to controls lacking the RNAi transgene (E).

Altered TAG chain length raised the possibility that lipid metabolism might be defective in pex32. This prompted us to examine the ability of the pex32 larvae to survive under starvation conditions, where lipid catabolism is required for survival. We found that pex32 mutants are hypersensitive to starvation (Fig. 4D) suggesting that peroxisomes, likely through β-oxidation of FAs, contributes to starvation-induced TAG breakdown and overall energy metabolism in the animal.

Global Loss of pex3

Many tissues, including the nervous system, muscles, and liver are affected in PBD patients; however, tissue-specific peroxisomal function has not been significantly examined. We selectively inhibited peroxisome biogenesis in specific tissues by RNA interference to uncover tissue specific roles. Peroxisomal loss, accomplished by pex3 knockdown, was first examined in all tissues for comparison with the pex32 mutant. Global expression of UAS-pex3.IR decreased Pex3 levels dependent on the relative strength of the global GAL4 drivers (Fig. 5B). With the weak arm-GAL4 driver, Pex3 levels are slightly reduced from the control (76% of arm>+). The intermediate strength DaG32-GAL4 driver reduces Pex3 levels to 24% of wildtype (at both 18°C and 23°C). The strong act5c-GAL4 driver further reduces Pex3 levels to 14% of wildtype. Peroxisome abundance, revealed by the peroxisomal matrix marker eYFP-PTS1, is also reduced when UAS-pex3.IR is driven by act5c-GAL4 (Fig. 5E) compared to controls lacking UAS-pex3.IR (Fig. 5D).

Viability of pex3 knockdown larvae was positively correlated with Pex3 levels. arm>pex3.IR flies have 95.3% ±1.0% viability while act5c>pex3.IR flies have 11.9% ±6.5% viability. DaG32>pex3.IR viability is very low, 1.0% ±0.5% at 23°C, but increased to 25.2% ±1.5% at 18°C (Fig. 5C), presumably a consequence of the known temperature dependence of GAL4. However, the Pex3 levels in DaG32>pex3.IR flies at 23°C and 18°C and indistinguishable by immunoblotting (Fig. 5B) suggesting that undetectably small differences in Pex3 protein levels can have substantial effects on viability.

Tissue-specific Loss of pex3

We next expressed the pex3 RNAi transgene in a variety of tissues and found that muscles are sensitive to the loss of peroxisomes when screened for viability (Table 1). Peroxisome numbers are severely reduced in larval body wall muscles (Fig. 6B) when UAS-pex3.IR is driven by the Mef2-GAL4 muscle driver compared to controls lacking UAS-pex3.IR (Fig. 6A). Stronger pex3 knockdown in muscles, achieved by co-expression of the RNAi component Dicer (Dcr), resulted in lethality at the pharate adult stage (Fig. 6C). Most of these pharate adults had begun eclosing as indicated by the open operculum, the opening in the pupal case through which the adult emerges. Viability of Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr is thus reduced to 34% ±1% compared to 99.6% ±0.2% for Mef2>dcr controls (Fig. 6D). Wing expansion is also significantly impaired in Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr flies (Fig. 6G) compared to Mef2>dcr controls (Fig. 6F). Of the Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr flies that successfully eclose, 88% ±3% have crumpled wings compared to 0.5% ±0.3% for Mef2>dcr controls (Fig. 6H). Finally, Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr decreases locomotion, as determined by a climb test, in which the time required to crawl 5 cm was measured. Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr animals took 11.2±0.8 seconds to crawl 5 cm while the Mef2>dcr controls needed only 3.3±0.2 seconds to travel the same distance (Fig. 6E and Video S1). Knockdown of pex3 with another muscle driver, 24B-GAL4, also results in trapped eclosion, crumpled wings, and decreased locomotion (Table 1 and data not shown). This suggests that the loss of peroxisomes specifically in muscles impairs locomotion and two processes that require muscle function, eclosion from the pupal case and wing expansion. The impaired locomotion observed in flies with reduced pex3 is unlikely to be consequence of inappropriate innervation since evoked excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) were normal in pex32 mutant larvae (Fig. S3). Additionally larval body wall muscle structure and synaptic bouton morphology at neuromuscular junctions appear normal in pex32 mutants (Fig. S2).

Figure 6. Peroxisome loss causes muscle defects.

pex3 knockdown in wandering third instar larval body wall muscles (B, Mef2>eYFP-PTS1, pex3.IR) leads to a reduction in muscle peroxisome numbers compared to controls (A, Mef2>eYFP-PTS1). (C) pex3 knockdown in muscles (Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr) causes some flies to die as fully formed, pharate adults trapped in the pupal case. (D) Viability of Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr flies is reduced to 34.1±1%. (E) Climb tests of adult flies with reduced pex3 in muscles shows that Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr flies display impaired locomotor ability, as measured by the time required to climb 5 cm (11.2±0.8 sec) compared to controls (3.3±0.2 sec). Some Mef2>pex3.IR,dcr flies (G) have “crumpled” wings compared to Mef2>dcr control flies (F), possibly due to impaired muscle function required for wing expansion. (H) Of the flies that successfully eclose, 88.4±2.7% have crumpled wings. Scale bar = 20 µm.


Consistent with previous studies, we have found that peroxisomes are present in all tissues we examined in Drosophila melanogaster (Fig. 1), but the abundance of peroxisomes per cell is not uniform in all tissues [10], [28][33]. We have generated a pex3 mutant that lacks detectable peroxisomes (Fig. 3B) and does not survive to adulthood (Fig. 2D), also consistent with a previously reported pex3 allele [10]. Impaired peroxisome biogenesis specifically in muscles impairs muscle function (Fig. 6). Muscle dysfunction is also seen in PBD patients, but is thought to be a secondary consequence of neurological defects. We suggest that muscle function may require peroxisomal metabolism independent from any neurological effects.

Lipid Metabolism

Alterations in lipid metabolism were also observed in pex32 mutants (Fig. 4). The primary biochemical pathway in peroxisomes is β-oxidation of FAs. In yeast and plants, all β-oxidation occurs in peroxisomes. In mammals, peroxisomes and mitochondria are metabolically linked and coordinate β-oxidation. FAs with longer acyl chain lengths are preferentially broken down in peroxisomes while medium and shorter chain FAs are preferentially broken down in mitochondria. There is likely a handoff of chain-shortened FAs from peroxisomes to mitochondria. The relative contribution of mitochondria and peroxisomes in Drosophila is unknown. It is likely that longer acyl chain FAs are broken down in peroxisomes since mutants defective in peroxisome biogenesis accumulate small amounts of VLCFAs [10], [28]. We also see elevated longer acyl chain TAGs and reduced shorter acyl chain length TAGs in pex32 mutants (Fig. 4B). VLCFAs are low abundance lipids and likely below the detection limit of the analysis described here. The lipids measured in our LC-MS analysis represent the major classes present in the larvae.

pex32 mutants are also hypersensitive to starvation (Fig. 4D). Excess nutrients are stored in the fat body primarily as TAG within storage organelles called lipid droplets. During starvation, lipids are mobilized from the fat body, circulate as DAGs in the hemolymph and are broken down by β-oxidation in target tissues [34]. Although mitochondrial β-oxidation genes are up-regulated during starvation [38], indicating an important role for mitochondrial β-oxidation in the starvation response, our data suggests that peroxisomes are also required for survival during starvation. Starved yeast display a similar requirement for peroxisomes; mutations in peroxisome biogenesis genes decrease yeast survival under starvation conditions [39]. This starvation sensitivity is associated with decreased lipid droplets as pex3Δ yeast have fewer, smaller lipid droplets [40]. The decrease in lipid droplets could reflect impaired lipid storage and could interfere with lipid mobilization. We did not observe a change in total TAG levels in pex32 mutants (Fig. 4A). However, whole larvae were used in our analysis and we cannot exclude the possibility that tissue-specific differences were present.

pex32 mutants die before the wandering 3rd instar larval stage when reared on standard cornmeal/agar media. Altering diet, and likely nutrient availability, improves viability, but most flies still die as pupae and do not survive to adulthood. Additional studies using defined media will be required to identify the nutrient(s) responsible for this effect. Beginning with the wandering 3rd instar stage, larvae are no longer consuming food and must rely on the metabolism of stored nutrients for metamorphosis. It is possible that peroxisomes are required for at least part of this metabolism. For example, there may be specific lipids that are poor substrates for mitochondrial β-oxidation and require peroxisomes for their degradation. In addition, peroxisomes might also be required for specific biosynthetic pathways required for larval and pupal development. For example, plants require peroxisomal β-oxidation to generate active forms of auxin and jasmonates [41], [42], raising the possibility that there may be specific D. melanogaster metabolites (e.g. hormones) that require peroxisomes for biosynthesis.

A surprising find in our lipidomics analysis was the reduction in CerPE levels in pex32 mutants (Fig, 4C). CerPE is used in insects as an analog of sphingomyelin (SM), which is important for neuronal membrane stability and lateral organization in mammals [37], [43]. The larval brain and wing imaginal disk have relatively high CerPE levels [44]. A recent study found that CerPE is critically important in glial cells, specifically in the wrapping of axon bundles [45]. Wrapping glia in Drosophila may play a similar role to myelination in mammalian, e.g. to insulate motor axons. The same group found that the knockdown of genes involved in peroxisome biogenesis (e.g., pex10), peroxisomal β-oxidation (e.g., bifunctional protein), and ether lipid synthesis (e.g., glyceronephosphate O-acyltransferase) in wrapping glia were among the 736 genes that caused locomotor defects similar to knockdown of CerPE biosynthetic genes [45]. The locomotor defects in these mutants may be directly caused by low CerPE levels. Neither CerPE nor SM is directly synthesized in peroxisomes [46][48] and the effect of peroxisome dysfunction on CerPE levels is likely indirect and remains to be discovered.

Peroxisomes in Muscles

We have observed that knockdown of pex3 specifically in muscles impairs multiple processes that require muscle function, eclosion (Fig. 6C), wing expansion (Fig. 6E), and climbing (Fig. 6H). These results were obtained using two muscle drivers, Mef2 and 24B-GAL4. GAL4 expression is restricted to muscle cells in the Mef2 driver line [49][51]. In the 24B driver line, GAL4 is expressed in somatic muscles and a subpopulation of neurons [35], [52]. The expression patterns of these drivers suggest that loss of pex3 in somatic muscles is responsible for the observed phenotypes. However, we cannot rule out contributions from other tissues that express GAL4 in these driver lines.

Our results are consistent with a previous study that showed pex16 mutant adults have impaired locomotion and the degree of impairment worsens with age [10]. Impaired muscle function is seen in PBD patients and PBD animal models, but is thought to be a consequence of neurological defects [24], [25], [27], [53][55]. Our results suggest that peroxisomes are required for muscle function independent of neurological involvement.

In what ways might peroxisomes be required for muscle function? Peroxisomes may be directly involved in FA metabolism for energy production. If so, then longer acyl chain lipids may accumulate in muscle lacking peroxisome, which could lead to toxicity, specifically to mitochondria. Such FA toxicity could explain the defects in mitochondrial morphology and activity that have been observed in PBD patients and PBD mouse models [25][27], [53], [56][60]. Other peroxisomal substrates, such as bile acid intermediates and phytanic acid, can induce mitochondrial damage [61], [62]. Alternatively, the absence of peroxisomes may also increase ROS levels leading to mitochondrial damage [60]. Because peroxisomes and mitochondria are metabolically linked, breaking the connection between the organelles may have detrimental consequences for the cell.


Through this study we have gained new insights into peroxisome biology in D. melanogaster and examined the effects of peroxisome loss on animal physiology. Peroxisomes are required for Drosophila development, possibly for their role in lipid breakdown during metamorphosis. Not surprisingly, we find alterations in lipid content when peroxisome biogenesis is impaired. Muscle function is also impaired when peroxisome numbers are reduced specifically in muscle cells. These results raise the possibility that the muscle defects seen in PBD patients may be due to problems within the muscle in addition to the known neurological defects. Exploring peroxisome function in Drosophila may have revealed a previously underappreciated role of muscle in the PBD disease state.

Materials and Methods

Drosophila Stocks

The following GAL4 driver lines were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center at Indiana University (BDSC): tub (#5138), act5c (#3954), arm (#1560), r4 (#33832), Lsp2 (#6357), elav (#458), repo (#7415), 24B (#1767), Mef2 (#27390) and Ddc (#7009). The DaG32 (#108252) GAL4 driver line was provided by the Drosophila Genetic Resource Center. BO GAL4 [34] was provided by Dr. Alex Gould. OK6 GAL4 [63] was provided by Dr. Hermann Aberle. D42 GAL4 [64] was provided by Dr. Thomas Schwarz. Gli GAL4 [65] was provided by Dr. Vanessa Auld. amnC651 [66] was provided by Dr. J. Douglas Armstrong. The BDSC also provided UAS-dcr (#24651), EP-Pex3 (#22152), and Dr1/TMS, P(Δ2–3)99B (#1610). The National Institute of Genetics (NIG) in Japan provided UAS-pex3.IR (#6859R-4).

All fly stocks were maintained on cornmeal/agar (6% dextrose, 6.8% cornmeal, 1.2% yeast, 0.72% agar, 2% nipagen) or cornmeal/molasses/agar (8% molasses, 6% cornmeal, 1.5% yeast, 0.6% agar, 1% nipagen, 0.75% propionic acid) Drosophila media at room temperature (23°C).

Plasmid Construction

pJM573 (UAS-eYFP-PTS1 in pUAST).

eYFP was PCR amplified using the oligos KpnI-eYFP (GCGGTACCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAG) and eYFP-PTS1-XbaI (GCTCTAGATTACAACTTCGACTTAGTCTCAGGCGGGTTCTTCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATG). PCR product was digested with KpnI and XbaI and ligated into pUAST cut with the same enzymes.

pJM623 (Tub-dPMP34-cerulean in pCaSpeR 4-tubulin).

Cerulean was PCR amplified using the oligos NotI-GFP (GCGGCCGCAACCATGGTGAGCAAGG) and GFP-XhoI (CTCGAGTTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCC). Cerulean PCR product was cloned into pCR-Blunt II TOPO using a Zero Blunt PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen). Cerulean was cut from pCR-Blunt II TOPO using NotI and XhoI and ligated into pCaSpeR 4-Tubulin cut with the same enzymes. dPMP34 (CG32250) was PCR amplified from a Drosophila Genomics Resource Center (DGRC) cDNA clone (#RE36975) using the oligos KpnI-EcoRI-Dm_PMP34 (GGTACCGAATTCACAAAATGGTGGCCCCCTCG) and Dm_PMP34-NotI (GCGGCCGCGTTGCGCTTAAGCAGC). dPMP34 PCR product was cloned into pCR-Blunt II TOPO using a Zero Blunt PCR cloning kit (Invitrogen). dPMP34 was cut from pCR-Blunt II TOPO using KpnI and NotI and ligated into Cerulean in pCaSpeR 4-Tubulin cut with the same enzymes.

pJM875 (UAS-dPex3-Myc in pUAST attB).

5′ phosphorylated oligos, KpnI-NcoI-myc-XbaI-top (CCCATGGGAACAAAAACTTATTTCTGAAGAAGACTTGTAGT) and KpnI-NcoI-myc-XbaI bottom (CTAGACTACAAGTCTTCTTCAGAAATAAGTTTTTGTTCCCATGGGGTAC) were annealed and ligated into pUAST cut with KpnI and XbaI. dPex3 was PCR amplified from a cDNA clone (DGRC #LD41491) using the oligos BglII-pex3 2 (GCAGATCTATGCTGTCGCGCCTGC) and Dm_pex3-EagI (AACGGCCGAGCGGAGCTAAAGC). PCR product was cut with BglII and EagI and ligated into Myc in pUAST cut with the same enzymes.

pJM877 (UAS-hPex3-Myc in pUAST attB).

hPex3 was PCR amplified from a cDNA clone (ATCC #MGC-9125) using the oligos BglII-Hs_pex3 (GCAGATCTATGCTGAGGTCTGTATGG) and Hs_pex3-EagI (CGCGGCCGTTTCTCCAGTTGC). PCR product was cut with BglII and EagI and ligated into Myc in pUAST cut with the same enzymes.

pJM630 (dPex3-His6 in pET28a(+)).

A region of dPex3 lacking the transmembrane domain was PCR amplified from a cDNA clone (DGRC #LD41491) using the oligos NdeI-PEX3 (GACATATGCGGCGATTCGTGG) and Dm_Pex3-NotI (CGGCGGCCGCAGCGGAGCTAAAGCTTTCG). PCR product was cut with NdeI and NotI and ligated into pET28a(+) cut with the same enzymes.

Drosophila Stock Construction

pJM573 and pJM623 were injected into w embryos by Genetivision (Houston, TX). Injected flies were backcrossed twice to w flies and multiple insertions were mapped to the chromosome. pJM875 and pJM877 were injected into VK37 and VK31 embryos by Genetivision (Houston, TX). Injected flies were backcrossed twice to w flies and stocks carrying insertions on chromosome two (VK37) and three (VK31) were established.

Independent P-element excision events using the P{Epgy2}pex3EY19206 line were screened for gene deletion events by PCR [67], [68]. One imprecise excision allele, pex32, carries a 789 bp deletion (3L: 15, 137, 379.15, 138, 166) covering the first non-coding exon, intron one, and part of exon two including the translational start site and 285 bp of the coding sequence.

A P[acman] BAC CH322-17C13 which contained the entire pex3 locus was selected and obtained from P[acman] resources [69], [70]. Transgenic flies were then generated using PhiC31 integrase-mediated by injection into the y[1]w[1118]; PBAC{y[+]-attP}VK00037 strain which facilitated introduction of the genomic fragment onto the 2nd chromosome [69]. This transgenic genomic fragment rescued the larval lethality in the pex32 homozygotes.

Antibody Production and Immunoblots

pJM630 was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3). Soluble Pex3-His6 was purified by nickel affinity chromatography and used as antigen to produce rabbit polyclonal antibodies (Cocalico). Anti-Pex3 serum was immunodepleted against total protein extract from pex32 mutant larvae immobilized on nitrocellulose and affinity purified using recombinant Pex3-His6 immobilized on nitrocellulose.

Total protein was extracted from ∼3 wandering 3rd instar larvae that were collected fresh or frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. Larvae were homogenized in lysis buffer (25 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1% triton X-100, 2 mM EDTA pH 8.0, Roche complete protease inhibitor). Total protein was quantified by Bradford assay and normalized prior to loading on homemade 4/12% polyacrylamide gels. Gels were transferred to nitrocellulose and probed with anti-Pex3 serum (1∶1000 dilution). Goat anti-Rabbit HRP- conjugated secondary antibodies (Rockland) were used at a 1∶10,000 dilution. Secondary antibodies were visualized by chemiluminescence using LumiGLO (Cell Signaling). Membranes were imaged on a LAS-4000 imager (FujiFilm) and band intensities were quantified in ImageJ.


Wandering 3rd instar larvae were dissected in PBS, fixed in 4% formaldehyde, washed in PBS, and mounted in vectashield mounting media with DAPI (Vector Labs). Images were collected on a Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope. GFP was excited with a 488 nm argon laser and a HFT 488 primary dichroic. GFP emission was filtered with NFT 490 and BP 500–550 IR filters before collection. DAPI was excited with a chameleon two photon laser (Coherent) at 720 nm and a HFT KP 650 primary dichroic. DAPI emission was filtered with a 480–520 IR filter before collection.

Embryos were collected on grape juice plates, dechorionated, fixed, and mounted in vectashield with DAPI. Images were collected on a Zeiss Axioplan2 epifluorescent microscope. Images were deconvoluted with MetaMorph (Molecular Devices).

Wings were removed from adult flies in ethanol, mounted in euparal, and incubated overnight at 37°C. Wings, larvae, and pupal cases were imaged on a Leica MSV269 stereoscope.


pex32 and pex3rev flies were reared on cornmeal/molasses media and wandering 3rd instar larvae were collected for analysis. Glycerophospholipids from homogenized Drosophila larvae of different genotypes were extracted using a modified Bligh and Dyer procedure [71]. Briefly, each sample was homogenized in 800 µL of ice-cold 0.1 N HCl∶CH3OH(1∶1) by vortexing for one minute at 4°C. Suspension was then vortexed with 400 µL of cold CHCl3 for one minute at 4°C and the extraction proceeded with centrifugation (5 min, 4°C, 18,000×g) to separate the two phases. Lower organic layer was collected and solvent evaporated. The resulting lipid film was dissolved in 100 µL of isopropanol∶hexane∶100 mM NH4COOH(aq) 58∶40∶2 (mobile phase A). Quantification of glycerophospholipids was achieved by the use of an LC-MS technique employing synthetic odd-carbon diacyl and lysophospholipid standards. Typically, 200 ng of each odd-carbon standard was added per sample. Glycerophospholipids were analyzed on an Applied Biosystems/MDS SCIEX 4000 Q TRAP hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and a Shimadzu high pressure liquid chromatography system with a Phenomenex Luna Silica column (2×250 mm, 5-µm particle size) using a gradient elution as previously described (Ivanova et al., 2007; Myers et al., 2011). The identification of the individual species, achieved by LC-MS/MS, was based on their chromatographic and mass spectral characteristics. This analysis allows identification of the two FA moieties but does not determine their position on the glycerol backbone (sn-1 versus sn-2). Neutral lipids (DAG and TAG) were extracted by homogenizing weighed larvae samples in the presence of internal standards (300 ng 24∶0 DAG and 600 ng 42∶0 TAG) in 2 mL 1X PBS and extracting with 2 mL ethyl acetate∶trimethylpentane (25∶75). After drying the extracts, the lipid film was dissolved in 1 mL hexane∶isopropanol (4∶1) and passed through a bed of Silica gel 60 Å to remove remaining polar phospholipids. Solvent from the collected fractions was evaporated and lipid film was redissolved in 90 µL 9∶1 CH3OH∶CHCl3, containing 10 µL of 100 mM CH3COONa for MS analysis essentially as described (Lord et al., 2012). Samples were analyzed in triplicates and lipids are presented as pmol/mg weight for neutral lipids and pmol/mg protein for glycerophospholipids.

Larval Starvation

Approximately 50 mating pairs were placed on 6 cm grape juice (20% grape juice, 2.4% agar, 2% ethanol, 1% acetic acid) plates at 25°C in the dark. Embryos were collected for 2 hours and incubated at 25°C. 66±1 hr old larvae were placed in 6 cm petri dishes without vents (Nunc, #150326) on a 3 cm square piece of Whatman blotting paper (GB004) soaked with PBS. Plates were wrapped with parafilm and incubated at 25°C in a humid chamber. Surviving larvae were counted every 24 hours.

Climb Test

Adult flies were placed in 13×100 mm test tubes and gently vortexed. Video was captured with a Canon SD750 digital camera until the flies reached the top of the vial. The time required to crawl 5 cm was obtained from each video using VirtualDub (

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

pex3 knockdown causes aberrant lipid metabolism. Total lipid extracts from wandering 3rd instar larvae were analyzed by mass spectrometry at the Kansas lipidomics research center. (A) MS analysis of larval lipids shows that the levels of polar lipids are unchanged in larvae with reduced Pex3 (DaG32>pex3.IR,dcr) compared to controls (DaG32>lacZ). Diacylglycerol (DAG) levels are reduced and triacylglycerol (TAG) levels are elevated in larvae with reduced Pex3 compared to controls. (B) Larvae with reduced Pex3 also have elevated longer acyl chain length and reduced shorter acyl chain length TAG species.


Figure S2.

Neuronal and muscle morphology are unaltered in pex3 mutants. Larvae were dissected, fixed, and stained with Alexa 594-conjugated anti-HRP antibodies. Boutons at muscles 6 and 7 were visualized in pex3rev control (A) and pex32 mutant larvae (B) by fluorescence confocal microscopy. Larvae were also dissected, fixed, and stained with Alex 647-conjugated Phalloidin. One hemisegment was visualized in pex3rev control (C) and pex32 mutant larvae (C) by fluorescence confocal microscopy. In C and D, anterior is to the left and the ventral midline is to the bottom. The scale bar for A and B is 10 µm and the scale bar for C and D is 50 µm.


Figure S3.

Excitatory junction potentials (EJPs) at the neuromuscular junction are unaltered in pex3 mutants. Larvae were dissected in HL3.1 [72] with 0.8 mM CaCl2. Peripheral nerves were cut and stimulated with a suction electrode. Muscle recordings were taken from muscle 6 in abdominal segments A3, A4, or A5. (A) Representative traces for pex3rev control and pex32 mutant larvae show very similar EJP amplitudes. (B) Average EJP amplitudes ± standard error of the mean of pex3rev control (39.8±4.3 mV) and pex32 mutant larvae (35.4±1.9 mV) were not significantly different (P = 0.38, Student’s t-Test).


Video S1.

Peroxisome loss in muscles impairs locomotion. Adult flies with reduced pex3 in muscles (Mef2>pex3.IR, dcr, right vial) climb slower and spend more time idle than control flies (Mef2>dcr, left vial).



We would like to thank Miguel Betancourt and Enrique Martinez for critical reading of the manuscript, Bonnie Bartel for the use of her stereoscope, Tyler Moss and Philip Chu for Pex3 purification, and Richard Travers, Eileen Brady, and Adriana Bracho for unpublished studies with the pex3 mutant.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: JAM JEF MS HAB. Performed the experiments: JEF AM PTI SBM JBS MW. Analyzed the data: JAM JEF MS HAB PTI SBM MW. Wrote the paper: JAM JEF.


  1. 1. Wanders RJ, Waterham HR (2006) Biochemistry of mammalian peroxisomes revisited. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 295–332.
  2. 2. Schrader M, Fahimi HD (2006) Peroxisomes and oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763: 1755–1766.
  3. 3. Distel B, Erdmann R, Gould SJ, Blobel G, Crane DI, et al. (1996) A unified nomenclature for peroxisome biogenesis factors. J Cell Biol 135: 1–3.
  4. 4. Hoepfner D, Schildknegt D, Braakman I, Philippsen P, Tabak HF (2005) Contribution of the endoplasmic reticulum to peroxisome formation. Cell 122: 85–95.
  5. 5. Kragt A, Voorn-Brouwer T, van den Berg M, Distel B (2005) Endoplasmic reticulum-directed Pex3p routes to peroxisomes and restores peroxisome formation in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex3Delta strain. J Biol Chem 280: 34350–34357.
  6. 6. Matsuzono Y, Fujiki Y (2006) In vitro transport of membrane proteins to peroxisomes by shuttling receptor Pex19p. J Biol Chem 281: 36–42.
  7. 7. Shibata H, Kashiwayama Y, Imanaka T, Kato H (2004) Domain architecture and activity of human Pex19p, a chaperone-like protein for intracellular trafficking of peroxisomal membrane proteins. J Biol Chem 279: 38486–38494.
  8. 8. Tam YY, Fagarasanu A, Fagarasanu M, Rachubinski RA (2005) Pex3p initiates the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280: 34933–34939.
  9. 9. Hettema EH, Girzalsky W, van Den Berg M, Erdmann R, Distel B (2000) Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex3p and pex19p are required for proper localization and stability of peroxisomal membrane proteins. EMBO J 19: 223–233.
  10. 10. Nakayama M, Sato H, Okuda T, Fujisawa N, Kono N, et al. (2011) Drosophila carrying pex3 or pex16 mutations are models of Zellweger syndrome that reflect its symptoms associated with the absence of peroxisomes. PLoS One 6: e22984.
  11. 11. South ST, Sacksteder KA, Li X, Liu Y, Gould SJ (2000) Inhibitors of COPI and COPII do not block PEX3-mediated peroxisome synthesis. J Cell Biol 149: 1345–1360.
  12. 12. Motley AM, Hettema EH (2007) Yeast peroxisomes multiply by growth and division. J Cell Biol 178: 399–410.
  13. 13. Ma C, Agrawal G, Subramani S (2011) Peroxisome assembly: matrix and membrane protein biogenesis. J Cell Biol 193: 7–16.
  14. 14. Fang Y, Morrell JC, Jones JM, Gould SJ (2004) PEX3 functions as a PEX19 docking factor in the import of class I peroxisomal membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 164: 863–875.
  15. 15. Jones JM, Morrell JC, Gould SJ (2004) PEX19 is a predominantly cytosolic chaperone and import receptor for class 1 peroxisomal membrane proteins. J Cell Biol 164: 57–67.
  16. 16. van der Zand A, Braakman I, Tabak HF (2010) Peroxisomal membrane proteins insert into the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol Biol Cell 21: 2057–2065.
  17. 17. Gould SG, Keller GA, Subramani S (1987) Identification of a peroxisomal targeting signal at the carboxy terminus of firefly luciferase. J Cell Biol 105: 2923–2931.
  18. 18. Dammai V, Subramani S (2001) The human peroxisomal targeting signal receptor, Pex5p, is translocated into the peroxisomal matrix and recycled to the cytosol. Cell 105: 187–196.
  19. 19. Swinkels BW, Gould SJ, Bodnar AG, Rachubinski RA, Subramani S (1991) A novel, cleavable peroxisomal targeting signal at the amino-terminus of the rat 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase. EMBO J 10: 3255–3262.
  20. 20. Faust JE, Verma A, Peng C, McNew JA (2012) An inventory of peroxisomal proteins and pathways in Drosophila melanogaster. Traffic 13: 1378–1392.
  21. 21. Motley AM, Hettema EH, Ketting R, Plasterk R, Tabak HF (2000) Caenorhabditis elegans has a single pathway to target matrix proteins to peroxisomes. EMBO Rep 1: 40–46.
  22. 22. Motley AM, Nuttall JM, Hettema EH (2012) Pex3-anchored Atg36 tags peroxisomes for degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 31: 2852–2868.
  23. 23. Munck JM, Motley AM, Nuttall JM, Hettema EH (2009) A dual function for Pex3p in peroxisome formation and inheritance. J Cell Biol 187: 463–471.
  24. 24. Steinberg SJ, Dodt G, Raymond GV, Braverman NE, Moser AB, et al. (2006) Peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta 1763: 1733–1748.
  25. 25. Sarnat HB, Machin G, Darwish HZ, Rubin SZ (1983) Mitochondrial myopathy of cerebro-hepato-renal (Zellweger) syndrome. Can J Neurol Sci 10: 170–177.
  26. 26. Wolff J, Nyhan WL, Powell H, Takahashi D, Hutzler J, et al. (1986) Myopathy in an infant with a fatal peroxisomal disorder. Pediatr Neurol 2: 141–146.
  27. 27. Baes M, Van Veldhoven PP (2012) Mouse models for peroxisome biogenesis defects and beta-oxidation enzyme deficiencies. Biochim Biophys Acta 1822: 1489–1500.
  28. 28. Chen H, Liu Z, Huang X (2010) Drosophila models of peroxisomal biogenesis disorder: peroxins are required for spermatogenesis and very-long-chain fatty acid metabolism. Hum Mol Genet 19: 494–505.
  29. 29. Mast FD, Li J, Virk MK, Hughes SC, Simmonds AJ, et al. (2011) A Drosophila model for the Zellweger spectrum of peroxisome biogenesis disorders. Dis Model Mech 4: 659–672.
  30. 30. Beard ME, Holtzman E (1987) Peroxisomes in wild-type and rosy mutant Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84: 7433–7437.
  31. 31. St Jules R, Beard M, Holtzman E (1989) Cytochemical localization of a D-amino acid oxidizing enzyme in peroxisomes of Drosophila melanogaster. Tissue Cell 21: 661–671.
  32. 32. St Jules R, Setlik W, Kennard J, Holtzman E (1990) Peroxisomes in the head of Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Eye Res 51: 607–617.
  33. 33. Southall TD, Terhzaz S, Cabrero P, Chintapalli VR, Evans JM, et al. (2006) Novel subcellular locations and functions for secretory pathway Ca2+/Mn2+-ATPases. Physiol Genomics 26: 35–45.
  34. 34. Gutierrez E, Wiggins D, Fielding B, Gould AP (2007) Specialized hepatocyte-like cells regulate Drosophila lipid metabolism. Nature 445: 275–280.
  35. 35. Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401–415.
  36. 36. Cook RK, Christensen SJ, Deal JA, Coburn RA, Deal ME, et al. (2012) The generation of chromosomal deletions to provide extensive coverage and subdivision of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Biol 13: R21.
  37. 37. Rietveld A, Neutz S, Simons K, Eaton S (1999) Association of sterol- and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-linked proteins with Drosophila raft lipid microdomains. J Biol Chem 274: 12049–12054.
  38. 38. Zinke I, Schutz CS, Katzenberger JD, Bauer M, Pankratz MJ (2002) Nutrient control of gene expression in Drosophila: microarray analysis of starvation and sugar-dependent response. EMBO J 21: 6162–6173.
  39. 39. Gresham D, Boer VM, Caudy A, Ziv N, Brandt NJ, et al. (2011) System-level analysis of genes and functions affecting survival during nutrient starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 187: 299–317.
  40. 40. Wang S, Horn PJ, Liou LC, Muggeridge MI, Zhang Z, et al. (2013) A peroxisome biogenesis deficiency prevents the binding of alpha-synuclein to lipid droplets in lipid-loaded yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 438: 452–456.
  41. 41. Acosta IF, Farmer EE (2010) Jasmonates. Arabidopsis Book 8: e0129.
  42. 42. Zolman BK, Martinez N, Millius A, Adham AR, Bartel B (2008) Identification and characterization of Arabidopsis indole-3-butyric acid response mutants defective in novel peroxisomal enzymes. Genetics 180: 237–251.
  43. 43. Cutler RG, Mattson MP (2001) Sphingomyelin and ceramide as regulators of development and lifespan. Mech Ageing Dev 122: 895–908.
  44. 44. Carvalho M, Sampaio JL, Palm W, Brankatschk M, Eaton S, et al. (2012) Effects of diet and development on the Drosophila lipidome. Mol Syst Biol 8: 600.
  45. 45. Ghosh A, Kling T, Snaidero N, Sampaio JL, Shevchenko A, et al. (2013) A Global In Vivo Drosophila RNAi Screen Identifies a Key Role of Ceramide Phosphoethanolamine for Glial Ensheathment of Axons. PLoS Genet 9: e1003980.
  46. 46. Hanada K, Kumagai K, Tomishige N, Yamaji T (2009) CERT-mediated trafficking of ceramide. Biochim Biophys Acta 1791: 684–691.
  47. 47. Vacaru AM, Tafesse FG, Ternes P, Kondylis V, Hermansson M, et al. (2009) Sphingomyelin synthase-related protein SMSr controls ceramide homeostasis in the ER. J Cell Biol 185: 1013–1027.
  48. 48. Vacaru AM, van den Dikkenberg J, Ternes P, Holthuis JC (2013) Ceramide phosphoethanolamine biosynthesis in Drosophila is mediated by a unique ethanolamine phosphotransferase in the Golgi lumen. J Biol Chem 288: 11520–11530.
  49. 49. Haghighi AP, McCabe BD, Fetter RD, Palmer JE, Hom S, et al. (2003) Retrograde control of synaptic transmission by postsynaptic CaMKII at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Neuron 39: 255–267.
  50. 50. Ranganayakulu G, Schulz RA, Olson EN (1996) Wingless signaling induces nautilus expression in the ventral mesoderm of the Drosophila embryo. Dev Biol 176: 143–148.
  51. 51. Tweedie S, Ashburner M, Falls K, Leyland P, McQuilton P, et al. (2009) FlyBase: enhancing Drosophila Gene Ontology annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 37: D555–559.
  52. 52. Suster ML, Martin JR, Sung C, Robinow S (2003) Targeted expression of tetanus toxin reveals sets of neurons involved in larval locomotion in Drosophila. J Neurobiol 55: 233–246.
  53. 53. Maxwell M, Bjorkman J, Nguyen T, Sharp P, Finnie J, et al. (2003) Pex13 inactivation in the mouse disrupts peroxisome biogenesis and leads to a Zellweger syndrome phenotype. Mol Cell Biol 23: 5947–5957.
  54. 54. Müller-Höcker J, Walther JU, Bise K, Pongratz D, Hübner G (1984) Mitochondrial myopathy with loosely coupled oxidative phosphorylation in a case of Zellweger syndrome. A cytochemical-ultrastructural study. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 45: 125–138.
  55. 55. Faust PL, Hatten ME (1997) Targeted deletion of the PEX2 peroxisome assembly gene in mice provides a model for Zellweger syndrome, a human neuronal migration disorder. J Cell Biol 139: 1293–1305.
  56. 56. Baumgart E, Vanhorebeek I, Grabenbauer M, Borgers M, Declercq PE, et al. (2001) Mitochondrial alterations caused by defective peroxisomal biogenesis in a mouse model for Zellweger syndrome (PEX5 knockout mouse). Am J Pathol 159: 1477–1494.
  57. 57. Dirkx R, Vanhorebeek I, Martens K, Schad A, Grabenbauer M, et al. (2005) Absence of peroxisomes in mouse hepatocytes causes mitochondrial and ER abnormalities. Hepatology 41: 868–878.
  58. 58. Goldfischer S, Moore CL, Johnson AB, Spiro AJ, Valsamis MP, et al. (1973) Peroxisomal and mitochondrial defects in the cerebro-hepato-renal syndrome. Science 182: 62–64.
  59. 59. Kovacs WJ, Shackelford JE, Tape KN, Richards MJ, Faust PL, et al. (2004) Disturbed cholesterol homeostasis in a peroxisome-deficient PEX2 knockout mouse model. Mol Cell Biol 24: 1–13.
  60. 60. Müller CC, Nguyen TH, Ahlemeyer B, Meshram M, Santrampurwala N, et al. (2011) PEX13 deficiency in mouse brain as a model of Zellweger syndrome: abnormal cerebellum formation, reactive gliosis and oxidative stress. Dis Model Mech 4: 104–119.
  61. 61. Ferdinandusse S, Denis S, Dacremont G, Wanders RJ (2009) Toxicity of peroxisomal C27-bile acid intermediates. Mol Genet Metab 96: 121–128.
  62. 62. Komen JC, Distelmaier F, Koopman WJ, Wanders RJ, Smeitink J, et al. (2007) Phytanic acid impairs mitochondrial respiration through protonophoric action. Cell Mol Life Sci 64: 3271–3281.
  63. 63. Aberle H, Haghighi AP, Fetter RD, McCabe BD, Magalhaes TR, et al. (2002) wishful thinking encodes a BMP type II receptor that regulates synaptic growth in Drosophila. Neuron 33: 545–558.
  64. 64. Yeh E, Gustafson K, Boulianne GL (1995) Green fluorescent protein as a vital marker and reporter of gene expression in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 7036–7040.
  65. 65. Sepp KJ, Auld VJ (1999) Conversion of lacZ enhancer trap lines to GAL4 lines using targeted transposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 151: 1093–1101.
  66. 66. Waddell S, Armstrong JD, Kitamoto T, Kaiser K, Quinn WG (2000) The amnesiac gene product is expressed in two neurons in the Drosophila brain that are critical for memory. Cell 103: 805–813.
  67. 67. Bellen HJ, Levis RW, He Y, Carlson JW, Evans-Holm M, et al. (2011) The Drosophila gene disruption project: progress using transposons with distinctive site specificities. Genetics 188: 731–743.
  68. 68. Bellen HJ, Levis RW, Liao G, He Y, Carlson JW, et al. (2004) The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics 167: 761–781.
  69. 69. Venken KJ, Carlson JW, Schulze KL, Pan H, He Y, et al. (2009) Versatile P[acman] BAC libraries for transgenesis studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Methods 6: 431–434.
  70. 70. Venken KJ, He Y, Hoskins RA, Bellen HJ (2006) P[acman]: a BAC transgenic platform for targeted insertion of large DNA fragments in D. melanogaster. Science 314: 1747–1751.
  71. 71. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37: 911–917.
  72. 72. Feng Y, Ueda A, Wu CF (2004) A modified minimal hemolymph-like solution, HL3.1, for physiological recordings at the neuromuscular junctions of normal and mutant Drosophila larvae. J Neurogenet 18: 377–402.