Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

A New Phylogeographic Pattern of Endemic Bufo bankorensis in Taiwan Island Is Attributed to the Genetic Variation of Populations

  • Teng-Lang Yu,

    Affiliation: Department of Life Science and Institute of Biotechnology, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan

  • Hung-Du Lin,

    Affiliation: The Affiliated School of National Tainan First Senior High School, Tainan, Taiwan

  • Ching-Feng Weng

    Affiliation: Department of Life Science and Institute of Biotechnology, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan

A New Phylogeographic Pattern of Endemic Bufo bankorensis in Taiwan Island Is Attributed to the Genetic Variation of Populations

  • Teng-Lang Yu, 
  • Hung-Du Lin, 
  • Ching-Feng Weng
  • Published: May 22, 2014
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098029



To comprehend the phylogeographic patterns of genetic variation in anurans at Taiwan Island, this study attempted to examine (1) the existence of various geological barriers (Central Mountain Ranges, CMRs); and (2) the genetic variation of Bufo bankorensis using mtDNA sequences among populations located in different regions of Taiwan, characterized by different climates and existing under extreme conditions when compared available sequences of related species B. gargarizans of mainland China.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Phylogenetic analyses of the dataset with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) D-loop gene (348 bp) recovered a close relationship between B. bankorensis and B. gargarizans, identified three distinct lineages. Furthermore, the network of mtDNA D-loop gene (564 bp) amplified (279 individuals, 27 localities) from Taiwan Island indicated three divergent clades within B. bankorensis (Clade W, E and S), corresponding to the geography, thereby verifying the importance of the CMRs and Kaoping River drainage as major biogeographic barriers. Mismatch distribution analysis, neutrality tests and Bayesian skyline plots revealed that a significant population expansion occurred for the total population and Clade W, with horizons dated to approximately 0.08 and 0.07 Mya, respectively. These results suggest that the population expansion of Taiwan Island species B. bankorensis might have resulted from the release of available habitat in post-glacial periods, the genetic variation on mtDNA showing habitat selection, subsequent population dispersal, and co-distribution among clades.


The multiple origins (different clades) of B. bankorensis mtDNA sequences were first evident in this study. The divergent genetic clades found within B. bankorensis could be independent colonization by previously diverged lineages; inferring B. bankorensis originated from B. gargarizans of mainland China, then dispersal followed by isolation within Taiwan Island. Highly divergent clades between W and E of B. bankorensis, implies that the CMRs serve as a genetic barrier and separated the whole island into the western and eastern phylogroups.


Biogeography focuses on the study of the distribution of organisms and populations in distinct geographic space through geological time. Organisms and populations commonly vary in a highly regular fashion with geographic gradients of latitude and altitude, and population differentiation is the result of vicariance and dispersal [1], [2], [3]. Phylogeographic studies examine the present-day distributions of species which can be determined by exploring the relationship between their population genealogy and geographical distribution via the analysis of molecular characteristics, e.g., their demographic history, spatial distribution, population differentiation, and genetic diversity [2], [4], [5]. The effects of geological events on the diverse biota of islands have become the subject of increasing numbers of phylogeographic studies focused on the genetic patterns and processes involved in colonization and speciation [6]. Taiwan Island, a small island (35,830 km2) located off the southeastern coast of mainland China and separated from China by the shallow Taiwan Strait, emerged above sea level as the result of a series of collisions between the Philippine Sea Plate and the Eurasian Continental Plate approximately 5 million years ago (Mya) in the Pliocene [7], [8], [9] (Figure 1). The continuous glacial-interglacial cycles of the Pleistocene had an intensive effect on the population distributions of living organisms. At the time of the glacial maxima, temperate regions were largely covered by ice, forcing species to migrate south toward refugia in the Northern Hemisphere [10], while most tropical and subtropical zones displayed cooler and drier climates than today, leading to the displacement of moist forests by xerophytic vegetation [10], [11]. Glaciations might also have provided opportunities for species to migrate between different altitudes. Quaternary climate oscillations often occurred at an extreme speed and resulted in repeated severe environmental changes, causing massive range shifts among biota [10], [12], [13]. The ongoing arc-continent collision resulted in the dramatic rise of the Central Mountain Ranges (CMRs) are aligning from the north of the Taiwan island to the south (Figure 1B), which reached their current elevations approximately 1 to 2.5 Mya [14], [15]. The CMRs, which include more than 260 peaks above 3,000 m, are a major biological barrier along the north-south axis and provide the niches leading to the genetic diversification of endemic organisms [16], such as freshwater fish [17], [18], [19], frogs [20], and squirrels [21]. Two additional topographic barriers, the Miaoli Plateau and Formosa Bank, divided western Taiwan into three phylogeographical areas [18], [20]. This scenario is supported by the phylogenetic signatures obtained for a number of taxa, including frogs such as Buergeria robusta [20] and Sylvirana latouchii [22], and freshwater fishes such as Acrossocheilus paradoxus [23], Varicorhinus barbatulus [18], Hemimyzon formosanus [24], and Formosania lacustre [25]. Due to differences in the dispersal ability of species and ecological constraints, various phylogeographic patterns should be observed among different scenarios. Whether these patterns can be applied to other amphibians particularly toad remains to be verified.

Figure 1. Genetic and topographic maps in Taiwan and mainland China.

(A) B. gargarizans in various regions (23, a-w) of mainland China retrieved from NCBI GenBank correspond to the locations and sampling site (28, Shanghai). (B) The topographic landscape of Taiwan and B. bankorensis sampling localities (27, 1–27) given in Table 1. (C) Genetic landscape deduced from B. bankorensis D-loop sequences as compared to the topographic landscape of Taiwan. The colors are used in the pie charts corresponding to the proportion of haplotype frequencies of clade or lineage given in Figure 2. Yellow: Lineage I; Blue: Lineage II; Red: Lineage III; Green: Clade S.


The toad species Bufo bankorensis (Barbour, 1908) is widely dispersed across all of Taiwan Island at altitudes between 0 and 3000 m [26]. B. bankorensis belongs to the family Bufonidae, which is one of the most species rich (with more than 350 species) and widely distributed amphibian families. According to previous studies, the classification of B. bankorensis has been generally debated. Some authors have recognized it as a distinct species [27], [28], [29], while others have synonymized it with B. gargaizans, which is distributed throughout mainland China [30]. B. gargarizans and B. bankorensis were classified as two subspecies present in Taiwan by Kawamura [31], [32] and Nishioka [33] based on the reproductive isolation mechanisms elucidated by crossing experiments, while B. bankorensis was reclassified as a distinct endemic species of Taiwan Island by analysis of numerous morphometric characters [28]. Moreover, B. bankorensis has been included in the B. gargarizans species complex (e.g. [34], [35], [36], [37]). Recent molecular phylogenetic studies in Asian Bufo mtDNA [34], [38] demonstrated that B. bankorensis should be synonymized with B. gargarizans as it constitutes one lineage of this species. However, these results are based on a limited sampling of individuals and localities in Taiwan Island. Many studies have been focused on the structure of genetic variability on the family Bufonidae at different regions to clarify the evolutionary relationships and biogeography patterns e.g. Bufo bufo in the Far East and Europe [39], Bufo woodhousei [40], Bufo fowleri at the Lake Erie basin [41], and Bufo punctatus in western North America [42]. Recently, one report revealed that various ecological conditions in a relatively small area have little effect on genetic variation in the green toad Pseudepidalea viridis throughout Israel [43]. Toads have often demonstrated both strong site fidelity for breeding ponds and low dispersal ability [44], [45]. As a result of restricted dispersal capabilities, the varying levels of physiological fitness observed under different environments tend to promote differentiation and speciation [46]. On the other hand, frogs are an excellent taxon for conducting studies of phylogeographic diversification [47], [48], [49], [50] and frog species often show the increased population-genetic structure relative to species without such dispersal limitations [51], [52]. Moreover, frogs are highly sensitive to climatic fluctuations due to their complex amphibian life histories, permeable skin and exposed eggs, and past climatic records from eastern Asia indicate the potential to promote the population divergence and speciation processes [53]. Two major hypotheses have been proposed to explain the genetic variation pattern happened on the island. One is in situ geographical differentiation, where variation has been generated due to discontinue of gene flow by physical barriers within-island. The other is the immigration from the mainland or nearby islands, in which historical climatic oscillations combined with species or population multi-invasion by land bridge, then dispersal followed by isolation, have changed the demographic and distributional patterns of species. To examine the possibility of multiple invasions and isolation hypothesis to the phylogeographic patterns of B. bankorensis, this study attempted to examine the genetic variation of B. bankorensis using mtDNA sequences among populations located in different regions of Taiwan, characterized by different climates and existing under extreme conditions when compared available mtDNA sequences of related species B. gargarizan from mainland China. This information on the genetic variation and diversity among different localities in Taiwan, where the climate and ecological conditions vary dramatically from western to eastern, is integrated to explore the unsolved biogeographical pattern of the wide distribution of Taiwanese B. bankorensis.

Materials and Methods


Some animal collections in the area of national parks were permitted by the Headquarters of Taroko National Park (permission numbers 0990010921, 0990011963, 1000011365, and 1010011630), Yangmingshan National Park (permission number 20110118) and Yushan National Park (permission number 1010210), respectively. B. bankorensis is not an endangered or a protected species in Taiwan, the other locations that no specific permissions are required. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Dong Hwa University, Taiwan, and conformed to the guidelines set forth by the International Association for the Study of Pain [54]. From 2010 to 2012, different populations of B. bankorensis were sampled around Taiwan Island, with a total 279 individuals being collected from 27 localities and 4 individuals of B. gargarizans from Shanghai (mainland China) as related species were also collected and analyzed (Table 1; Figure 1). Samples were obtained from either tadpole fin clips or adult toe clips from live specimens, followed by release of the sampled individuals at their capture localities. The tissue samples were preserved in 95% ethanol and then transferred to a −20°C freezer.

Table 1. List of sampling locations and the latitudes and longitudes, sample sizes, haplotype numbers, haplotype diversities (h), nucleotide diversities (π), and haplotypes of mtDNA D-loop region sequences for each location.


Molecular Analyses

Total DNAs were extracted using genomic QuickExtract DNA Extraction Solution (DNA Extraction Kit, Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer's manual. A section of the mtDNA control region (D-loop) was sequenced following PCR amplification with the following primers: forward (Bu-con-15971F: GAG CCT TCC CTT GGT TTA AGA GTA) and reverse (Bu-con-16582R: CCA GGT TAA GGT CTT TAA GGT ACC AG) (designed in this study). PCR amplifications were carried out in a 25 µl reaction volume through 35 cycles of denaturing at 94°C for 30–45 sec; annealing at 56°C for 30–45 sec, and 72°C extension for 30–45 sec. The reaction products were mixed with Novel juice (GeneTex, San Antonio, TX, USA) and separated via gel electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels. The gels were stained with ethidium bromide, and the desired DNA band was excised and eluted using an agarose gel purification kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA). The PCR products were then subjected to cycle sequencing reactions conducted by Genomics Biotec Co., Ltd. (Taiwan) using an ABI PRISM 3730XL sequencer with the BigDye Terminator kit (Applied Biosystems). All sequences have been deposited in GenBank under the following inclusive accession numbers: KF692208-KF692283.

Data Analyses

Genetic Diversity, Phylogenetic, and Phylogeographic Analysis.

Partial sequences of the mtDNA D-loop gene were aligned using the program Clustal X v1.81 [55] and optimized manually. Firstly, 80 mtDNA D-loop (348 bp) haplotypes of this study with 38 sequences of B. gargarizans in various regions of mainland China were retrieved from NCBI GenBank (Figure 1A, Table 2). One closely related species Bufo tibetanus as an outgroup was also obtained from GenBank (UX878885.1). The haplotype genealogy of B. bankorensis was separately reconstructed by maximum likelihood (ML) tree, neighbor-joining (NJ) tree and Bayesian analysis using PhyML 3.0 [56], MEGA v5.0 [57] and MrBayes v3.1.2 [58]. Neighbor-joining tree nodes and branch lengths were statistically tested using a bootstrap method of 10,000 replicates and an interior branch test, respectively. The jModelTest program [59] was used to determine the most appropriate model for the analyses using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were run for 5,000,000 generations with trees sampled every 1000 generations. Then Bayesian posterior probabilities were estimated after omitting the initial 1,000,000 generations. We sampled a tree every 100 generations and calculated a consensus topology for 7500 trees by omitting the first 2500 trees.

Table 2. Accession numbers of the control region of B. gargarizans mtDNA sequence in various regions of mainland China retrieved from NCBI GenBank.


The second dataset was limited to the samples collected of this study. Partial sequences (564 bp) of 279 individuals of B. bankorensis from 27 populations in Taiwan and 4 individuals of B. gargarizans from Shanghai (mainland China) were analyzed. The numbers of haplotypes (N) and the values of haplotype diversity (h; [60]) and nucleotide diversity (π; [61]) were calculated using the DnaSP v5.0 software [62] (Table 1). The numbers of mutations between DNA haplotypes calculated in pairwise comparisons with MEGA v5.0 were employed to construct a minimum spanning network with the aid of MINSPNET [63]. Two measures of population differentiation, GST [64], which only considers haplotype frequencies, and NST [64], which considers similarities between haplotypes in addition to their frequencies, were compared to infer phylogeographic structure. A greater NST means that more closely related haplotypes occur in the same population, indicating the existence of phylogeographic structure at this scale [64]. The existence of phylogeographic structure was tested following Pons and Petit [64] by calculating two measures of genetic differentiation: GST and NST. The global NST (0.792) was significantly higher than the global GST (0.312), providing evidence of the existence of phylogeographic structure because closely related haplotypes would be detected more frequently than that are less closely related in the same area [64]. The determination of GST and NST was carried out using DnaSP v5.0 [62].

Historical Demography.

To analyze the population demographic history of B. bankorensis, Tajima's D statistic [65] and Fu's Fs test [66] of neutrality, the frequency distribution of pairwise differences between mtDNA haplotypes (mismatch distribution), and Bayesian skyline plots (BSP) were examined. The significances of Fu's Fs and Tajima's D values were evaluated using the coalescent algorithm in DnaSP v5.0 [62]. Evidence of population expansion within the lineages was obtained by determining mismatch distributions, implemented in DnaSP v5.0 [62]. This method is based on the premise that compared with a constant population size, population growth or decline leaves a distinctive signature in DNA sequences. A smooth and often unimodal pattern of the mismatch distribution (i.e., a large number of closely related haplotypes, indicating non-equilibrium conditions) reflects population expansion, whereas for stationary populations, the distribution is ragged and often multimodal (i.e., neutral, under equilibrium conditions) [67]. Furthermore, Harpending's raggedness index (Rg) [68] and the sum of squared deviations (SSD) were calculated using Arlequin v3.5 [69] to test whether the sequence data deviated significantly from the expectations of a population expansion model. Finally, for each BSP, the appropriate model of nucleotide substitution was determined using jModelTest. Genealogies and model parameters for each lineage were sampled every 1000th iteration for 20 million generations under a strict molecular clock with uniformly distributed priors and a pre burn-in of 2000. The effective sample size (ESS) for each of the Bayesian skyline analyses was greater than 200, suggesting that the 50 million generations were sufficient to estimate the demographic history for each lineage. This coalescent-based approach estimates the posterior distribution for the effective population size at intervals along a phylogeny, thereby allowing the inference of population fluctuations over time. These analyses were run for 1,000,000 generations, discarding the burn-in period. Plots for each analysis were drawn using Tracer v1.5 [70].

Population Genetic Differentiation.

The program Arlequin v3.5 [69] was employed to estimate the FST values and their statistical significance between population pairs, i.e., the significance of population differentiation, with the following settings: 1000 permutations for significance and 10,000 steps in the Markov chain. When multiple comparisons were performed, the P values were adjusted using the sequential Bonferroni procedure [71]. A hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was conducted using Arlequin v3.5 [69] to evaluate the most probable population configuration and geographic subdivision. The samples collected from different localities were grouped into 2 and 5 groups, according to the different geographic hierarchies that matched the geographic proximity. Samples collected from different localities were grouped together as follows to investigate the potential effects of various geographic barriers: (1) in two independent western and eastern groups (1–19; 20–27), which were primarily divided by the CMRs; and (2) in five groups (1–5; 6–12; 13–18; 19; 20–27) according to the major biogeographic zones in Taiwan based on the freshwater fish fauna [15] and other studies in frogs [18]. The Spatial Analysis of Molecular Variance (SAMOVA) 1.0 program [72] implements a simulated annealing procedure to define groups of geographically homogeneous populations that maximize the proportion of total genetic variance due to differences among population groups (FCT). These analyses were performed based on 1000 simulated annealing steps, and comparisons with the maximum indicators of differentiation (FCT values) were conducted when the program was instructed to identify K  =  2–10 partitions for each sampling area within each analysis. The Mantel test [73] was performed using the computer program Alleles in Space (AIS) [74] to identify the correlations between the genetic and geographical distances among populations. Statistical significance was tested using 10,000 random permutations. Geographical distances were calculated based on the latitude and longitude of each population's collection location (Table 1). Finally, the genetic landscape shape of B. bankorensis was calculated using AIS. Using geographic data (projected in Universal Transverse Mercator) and the genetic distance scores calculated in AIS, a three-dimensional landscape, with genetic distance indicated by the z dimension was created. The output 3-dimensional values were projected onto a map of Taiwan Island to perform comparisons between the topographic and simulated genetic landscape.

Asymmetrical gene flow was observed among three regions: the western region, including localities 1–18; the eastern region, including localities 20–27; and the southern region, including locality 19. To estimate contemporary and historical gene flow among the three regions, maximum likelihood inference was performed using MIGRATE software, v 3.2.6 [75], [76]. The MIGRATE analyses were conducted using a full migration model (θ and M were estimated jointly from the data), which was compared with a restricted model (θ was averaged, and M was symmetrical between populations). The MIGRATE analyses were run five times to generate replicates using ten short chains (sampling 10,000 trees) and three long chains (sampling 100,000 trees), with a burn-in period of 10,000 trees, using an adaptive heating scheme. A migration matrix model with unequal population sizes and different migration rates was assumed [75].

Molecular Dating.

The software BEAST v1.7.5 [77] was used to estimate the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of the major mitochondrial lineages under an MCMC Bayesian approach by first dataset. Based on multiple fossil data and sequence comparisons, a divergence rate of approximately 3.50% per million years [36], [78] was estimated for the D-loop of Bufo mtDNA, and absolute TMRCA values were subsequently obtained [79], [80]. All analyses were performed using the HKY model of nucleotide substitution for the best-fitting model using jModelTest. Two independent Monte Carlo Markov chains were run for 100 million generations, with sampling every 10,000 generations and 10% burn-in of the posterior samples. The effective sampling size (ESS) parameter was found to exceed 200, which suggests acceptable mixing and sufficient sampling. The analysis was run five times to test the stability and convergence of the MCMC chains in plots of posterior log likelihoods in Tracer v1.5 [70]. The posterior samples from all runs were combined and analyzed in Tracer v1.5 to obtain mean estimates and the 95% highest posterior densities (HPD) of the TMRCA values.


Phylogenetic Analysis

For phylogenetic reconstruction, two approaches were used. Firstly, we combined 76 mtDNA D-loop haplotypes from 279 individuals in Taiwan and 4 haplotypes from Shanghai in mainland China of this study with 38 sequences of B. gargarizans in mainland China retrieved from NCBI GenBank (accession numbers listed in Table 2). This dataset had only 348 bp in alignment length. The optimum model of substitution selected by jModelTest was HKY+I for the D-loop gene. The topologies produced by ML, NJ and Bayesian analyses were highly similar, and branch support values were generally similar or identical, thus only the Bayesian trees are shown (Figure 2). Phylogenetic analyses of the dataset with a length of 348 bp recovered a closed relationship between B. bankorensis and B. gargarizans (Figure 2). Three distinct lineages were identified: (1) Lineage I, including B. gargarizans from the Sichuan, Gansu and Liaoning in mainland China; (2) Lineage II, including B. gargarizans from the Shanghai, Hubei, and Shandong in mainland China and B. bankorensis form Clade W in Taiwan; (3) Lineage III, including B. gargarizans from the Fujiang and Jiangxi in mainland China and B. bankorensis form Clade E and S in Taiwan. B. gargarizans from mainland China were split into two lineages (II & III) approx. 1.349 million years apart. B. bankorensis was also found in these two lineages. The second dataset was limited to the samples collected for this study. The mtDNA D-loop (564 bp length) of 279 individuals of B. bankorensis from 27 localities in Taiwan and 4 individuals of B. gargarizans from Shanghai (mainland China) were analyzed. The alignment of all D-loop sequences revealed 80 unique haplotypes and the minimum-spanning network was reconstructed based on mutational changes (Figure 3). The network showed that 4 main clades were congruent with the phylogenetic reconstruction and showed great genetic differentiation (22 mutational steps between Clade W and Clade S; 12 mutational steps between Clade E and Clade S; 10 mutational steps between Clade W and population from Shanghai, Figure 3). Additionally, Clade W and Clade E were widespread in the western and eastern CMRs, respectively. While Clade S only distributed in southern Taiwan (Figure 3). The divergence between Clade E and Clade S was lower than that of Clade E and Clade W. The average genetic distance between the clades corresponded to 5.0%, which was approximately six-fold greater than that within the clades (averages of 0.7 and 0.8% for Clade W and Clade E plus Clade S, respectively). Clade W contained a total of 51 haplotypes from 186 samples, Clade E consisted of 21 haplotypes from 86 samples, and Clade S was 5 haplotypes from 7 samples (Table 3). Most haplotypes of B. bankorensis found in the western and eastern sides of the CMRs were unique accordingly to geography. Only four haplotypes shared across the CMRs occurred at localities 26 and 27, which included haplotypes from two highly divergent lineages (Clade W and Clade E) (Table 1).

Figure 2. Phylogenetic trees reconstructed with MRBAYES from sequences of the mitochondrial D-loop gene in B. bankorensis and B. gargarizans.

The values above the branches are the posterior probabilities for the Bayesian analysis and bootstrap values for the NJ and ML analyses. Bayesian phylogeny based on D-loop sequences (348 bp, n = 119) showing the relationships among Taiwan and mainland China phylogroups. Clade W, E and S were distributed in the western, eastern and southern CMRs in Taiwan Island, respectively.


Figure 3. A minimum spanning network constructed using the 80 mitochondrial D-loop haplotypes identified in B. bankorensis and B. gargarizans.

Haplotype designations (Table 1) are indicated next to each circle. Locality designations (see Figure 1) for specimens possessing each haplotype are indicated inside the circles. The sizes of the circles are proportional to the number of individuals represented. The length of the lines between circles is roughly proportional to the estimated number of mutational steps between the haplotypes.


Table 3. Summary of the samples sizes, haplotype numbers, haplotype diversities (h), nucleotide diversities (π), Tajima's D and Fu's (Fs) tests, Ramos-Onsins and Rozas' R2 and mismatch estimation results, including SSD and Rg values, for D-loop region sequences in the total population and each clade in Taiwan Island.


Genetic Diversity of B. bankorensis

The sample size, number of haplotypes, and values of nucleotide diversity (π) and haplotype diversity (h) within each population are presented in Table 1. Overall, the mean haplotype diversity (h) among the 279 samples was estimated to be 0.973, and the mean nucleotide diversity (π) was 0.026 (Table 1). Haplotype diversity ranged from 0.000 to 1.000, and the nucleotide diversity (π) within populations varied from 0.000 to 0.032 (Table 1). The localities showing the highest nucleotide diversities in ZJ, CM, and SK (localities 15, 26, and 27 with diversities of 0.016, 0.032, and 0.014, respectively) resulted that individuals from two different clades, eg. Clades W and E. The most common haplotype (hap 6) was found in 23 individuals across 8 localities in the western populations. Among the eastern populations, the most common haplotype (hap 56) was found in 14 individuals across 3 localities. The geographical distribution of the mtDNA haplotype frequency is illustrated in Figure 1B.

Population Genetic Structure

The genetic variation of B. bankorensis was highly structured, as indicated by significant FST values and genealogical estimates. Some of the mitochondrial haplotypes were geographically widespread, but most of the shared haplotypes occurred between closely related populations in geographically proximate populations, indicating current gene flow or expansion over a long distance. Pairwise FST tests indicated significant genetic differentiation among the localities (−0.126 to 1.000). Most of the pairwise FST values were significant (P < 0.05). The overall standardized FST value among all samples was 0.790. In the hierarchical analysis, all localities were separated into two groups and tested via AMOVA. In the first group was tested CMRs geographic division, most of the molecular variance (80.10%) was corresponded to variation between groups, while 12.50% was attributed to variation within populations, and 7.40% of the molecular variance was related to variation among populations within groups. In the second group was tested five biogeographic zones, most of the variation was attributed to between group variation (75.37%), while 18.36% corresponded to the variation within populations, and 6.27% of the molecular variance was related to the variation among populations within groups (Table 4). The spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) indicated that the FCT value was the highest for K  =  3 (FCT  =  0.825, P  =  0.000): KT (locality 19) was assigned to one group, and the remaining populations formed two groups, corresponding to the western region (localities 1–18) and the eastern region (localities 20–27). Most of the remaining variation was found within populations (12.57%) or among populations within groups (4.88%). All of the variance components were significant (P  =  0.000). The Mantel test (r  =  0.0448, P  =  0.074) was detected a very weak correlation between genetic distances and geographic distances. This result indicated that localities within the same region are comparatively homogenous and that localities in different regions present high genetic differentiation. An analysis of the shape of the genetic landscape for B. bankorensis was calculated using AIS [74] and projected onto a map of Taiwan (Figure 1). This simulated landscape (Figure 1C) exhibited an almost identical shape as compared to the actual topographic landscape (Figure 1B), with CMRs separating the island into the eastern and western regions.

Table 4. AMOVA results testing the genetic subdivision between populations based on mtDNA sequences among geographic districts of Taiwan Island.


The estimates of historical migration rates (M) calculated using MIGRATE indicated asymmetrical gene flow among regions over the long term at both sides of CMRs. The results revealed that the degree of historical gene flow from the western region to the eastern and southern regions was greater (MW→E  =  106.63, MW→S  =  87.87) than it was in the opposite direction (ME→W  =  12.24, MS→W  =  12.58). Furthermore, the similar asymmetrical direction and strength of individual migration toward the south was also detected in southeast Taiwan (ME→S  =  163.18, MS→E  =  53.84). Accordingly, the mtDNA evidence, characterized by a distinct inheritance mode, indicated that the western region acts as a source, while the populations of the eastern and southern regions act as a sink (Table 5).

Table 5. Summary of B. bankorensis immigration rates among the western, eastern, and southern regions estimated using MIGRATE.


Demographic History

An examination of demographic histories revealed marked differences between clades and total populations in this study. The sequence variation (Table 3) observed in each clade was similar to our estimated h and π values. A significant negative deviation from the neutrality test could reflect past population expansion events. The mismatch analysis generated an unimodal curve showing non-significant SSD and Rg index values (P> 0 .05, Table 3), suggesting significant population expansion for the total population and Clade W. However, Tajima's D value for the total population was positive (0.216) and statistically non-significant. Fu's Fs test has been shown to be much more sensitive in detecting population growth than Tajima's test [66]. Based on the estimated divergence rate of approximately 3.50% per million years [36], [78], the expansion time for Clade W and total population were estimated approximately 0.07 and 0.08 Mya, respectively (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Bayesian skyline plot of the effective population sizes over time for B. bankorensis.

The X axis is the time before the present in units of million years ago, and the Y axis is the estimated effective population size in units of Neτ, i.e., the product of the effective population size and the generation length in years (log transformed). (a) Total populations and (b) Clade W.


Molecular Dating

The evolutionary rate within B. bankorensis was calculated to be 3.50% per million years [36], [78] via MCMC simulation. A strict clock model was implemented in BEAST to estimate the TMRCA values of the different clades and the time since clade separation [77]. The analyses using BEAST indicated that the TMRCA for Lineage II and Lineage III dated to 1.349 Mya (effective sampling size, ESS = 5892.001, 95% credibility interval 0.964–1.737 Mya). Molecular dating estimated that the Lineage II and Lineage III coalesced to their TMRCA values of 0.654 ± 0.279 and 0.540 ± 0.285 Mya, respectively. The TMRCA values for Clades W, E, and S were dated to 0.286 ± 0.150, 0.240 ± 0.163, and 0.242 ± 0.159 Mya, respectively. This result suggests that the molecular dating of B. bankorensis was tightly coupled with the formation of the CMRs after the Pleistocene epoch.


Genetic Variation within B. bankorensis

The evolution of a recently established population on an island is affected by the founder event itself, but genetic drift shapes the diversity and the divergence of island populations over time: island species generally present lower genetic variability and higher differentiation among populations than do closely related species on the mainland [81], [82]. Our results revealed lower genetic variability in B. bankorensis (mean π =  0.026) than has been found in other studies on Bufo species from mainland China based on D-loop sequences, e.g., B. gargarizans (mean π =  0.047) [79]. The existence of a high h and relatively high π value (0.973 and 0.026) in the total population appears to reflect the mixing of differentiated clades analyzed together [2], [83], [84]. Furthermore, the h and π values (0.960 and 0.009, respectively) obtained for the western region (localities 1–18) were similar to those for the eastern region (localities 20–27) (0.919 and 0.009) (Table 1). Concerning the pattern of nucleotide diversity among B. bankorensis populations, the western region showed a similar π value to the eastern region, which is contrary to previous studies in B. robusta [20] and S. latouchii [22] showing higher π value in the western region of the CMRs. The colonization ability of B. bankorensis at higher altitudes may broaden its distribution range, thus enabling the east to harbor more genetic variation due to a larger population size than is observed in other frog species [85]. The higher nucleotide diversities observed at three localities (ZJ, CM, and SK) were due to the co-existence of individuals from two clades (W&S; W&E). Furthermore, the similar haplotype compositions observed in populations on both sides of the CMRs indicate a dispersal mechanism possibly associated with secondary contact or human activity. However, migration along traffic routes or via unintended carriers does not appear to be dominant. The involvement of refugia or secondary contact seems most likely; though verifying the roles of these phenomena require further study.

Phylogeography of B. bankorensis

Phylogeographic and landscape genetic analyses provide insight into the history of populations across their geographic range at different spatial scales. Two monophyletic lineages were obtained in our phylogeographic analysis: lineage II and lineage III (Figure 2). In the linage II, the clade W of B. bankorensis formed a monophyletic clade with B. gargarizans samples from northern China (Shanghai, Hebei, and Shandong), while the clades E and S of B. bankorensis in the linage III clustered together with B. gargarizans samples from southern China (Fujiang and Jiangxi) composed another monophyletic lineage. Accordingly, this result suggested a colonization history of B. bankorensis in Taiwan that could be explained by two distinct origins: populations on the west side of CMRs originated from northern China, while populations on the east side of CMRs initiated from southern China (Figure 1A, 1B), respectively. Our observations of B. bankorensis revealed significant levels of genetic structure across its distribution in Taiwan (Figure 1B, 1C and Figure 3). All of our analyses indicated the presence of two genetically well-differentiated clades (Clade W and Clade E plus Clade S) of B. bankorensis within Taiwan. This implies that the CMRs serve as a genetic barrier to B. bankorensis and separated the whole island into the eastern and western sides during its formation. A general pattern of E-W deviation is consistent with previous phylogeographic studies in other taxa on Taiwan Island, such as freshwater fishes (V. barbatulus [18]; A. kikuchii [19]), frogs (Fejervarya limnocharis [86]; B. robusta [20]; S. latouchii [22]), reptiles (Trimeresurus stejnegeri [87]; Naja atra [88]), and mammals (Callosciurus erythraeus [89]).

Three biogeographical scenarios can be suggested according to the obtained phylogenetic trees and network (Figure 2 and Figure 3). Clade E occurs in the eastern region of the CMRs along the coast of the Pacific Ocean, while individuals collected from the south of Taiwan constitute Clade S (Figure 1). Some individuals from Clade S coexisted in the members of Clade W, though Clade S distribution was largely restricted to the southern part of the Kaoping River. The Kaoping River is the largest river drainage system in southern Taiwan and may act as an effective geographical barrier for isolating populations of B. bankorensis. In addition, the southern region harbors the distinct B. bankorensis haplotypes, which has also been observed in freshwater crabs (Candidiopotamon rathbunae [90]), freshwater fishes (Candidia barbatus [91]), and frogs (Sylvirana latouchii [22]). This pattern of phylogeographic outliers suggests that these populations show a history of isolation from the populations in southern Taiwan and present a relatively high conservation value. In previous studies, two topological barriers, the Miaoli Plateau and Formosa Bank, have been found to represent significant barriers to gene flow in species from various taxa in western Taiwan, such as bagrid catfishes [92], cyprinids [18], [23], [93], frogs [20], [22], [94], snakes [87], [88], and squirrels [89]. Despite the previously reported evidence of amphibian species divergence being caused by a combination of topological barriers and river systems, as for B. robusta [20], such effects are not detected in B. bankorensis populations. Two mechanisms are postulated for the neutral effects of topological barriers on B. bankorensis. Firstly, male B. bankorensis are able to mate with females in river streams as well as temporary ponds during the breeding season. Secondly, B. bankorensis shows a broad distribution at various altitudes and presents excellent mobility over long distances.

Genetic Structure and Differentiation in B. bankorensis

The average FST value of the overall population was 0.790 (P<0.05), which indicates a high degree of genetic differentiation among populations of B. bankorensis. The genetic differentiation among B. bankorensis populations showed a weak pattern of isolation by distance (Mantel test, r  =  0.0448, P  =  0.074), as expected for a toad separated by the CMRs, revealing that the isolation by distance pattern might not be the driving force for the differentiation of the identified clades. Although isolation by distance is typically considered to be a consequence of restricted contemporary gene flow, differentiation over distance can also result in an interplay between modern and vicariant forces, because particularly historical events are more likely to be detected at larger geographical scales [95]. The phylogenetic trees (Figure 2) showed that the W, E and S clades of B. bankorensis are nested with B. gargarizans lineages from mainland China. Furthermore, the fact that Clades E and W of B. bankorensis are not closely related indicates that they represent distinct evolutionary origins. The divergent genetic clades were found within B. bankorensis thus represent species polyphyly as a result of independent colonizations by previously diverged lineages of B. gargarizans complex. This is consistent with our recent study of genetic structure of B. bankorensis cyt b [96], which concluded that one linage (western group 1, uncut by BamHI and cut by TspRI) is most likely B. gargarizans, a second one (western group 2, uncut by both BamHI and TspRI) is B. bankorensis, and a third one (eastern clade, cut by BamHI but not cut by TspRI) may be a new subspecies. B. bankorensis has been historically recognized as one endemic species [28], has distinct morphological characters as compared with B. gargarizans and is restricted to Taiwan, however the molecular evolutionary relationships fail to support this taxonomy. Hence, the taxonomic status of B. bankorensis and B. gargarizans is still unclear and needs further exploration.

The results of AMOVA and SAMOVA revealed that the mtDNA D-loop dataset from B. bankorensis can be best partitioned into three groups. These three groups correspond to topological barriers plus the major mtDNA clades identified in B. bankorensis. A large proportion (82.5%) of the genetic variability found in B. bankorensis can be explained by variance among groups (Table 4). This can primarily be attributed to the deep divergence observed among clades. The high genetic variability among populations is also evident in the many significant pairwise FST values obtained, suggesting a low level of gene flow between populations, even among clades. Asymmetrical gene flow was observed among three regions. Kaouping River was used to be significant a landscape barrier for species in the southern Taiwan, i.e. Zacco pachycephalus [93], and Candidia barbata [91], where the north-south gene flow would be blocked and then lead to population diversification. In this study, the populations 15, 16, 17, and 18, located in the Kaouping River region, should geographically share closer genetic proximity to population 19 than others in the western Taiwan. However, the anthropogenic activities, such as developed traffic network, would contribute to counteract the effect of geographical barrier and promote the reconnection among populations. Thus, except for population 19 at the extreme south, the west region including populations from 15 to 18, was genetically separated from the southern population due to homogenizing effect on the W clade. In addition, the asymmetrical individual migration toward the south would be associated closely with the relatively smaller population size in S clade, which was more vulnerable to population disturbance than the vice versa.

The TMRCA analysis traced the divergent time between lineage II and lineage III back to approximately the Pleistocene (1.349 Mya), which is similar to the previous results of B. robusta [20]. Given such a distant time of divergence and the fact that the rise of the CMRs occurs approximately 2.50–1.00 Mya [97], [98], the populations appear to exhibit largely independent histories with limited gene flow. The estimated TMRCA for Clade E and Clade S is more recent than that of Clade W, which has also been observed for B. robusta [20]. We conclude that the recent migration from the western region toward the eastern sink region might be largely responsible for such a scenario. Nevertheless, the gene flow between Clade W and Clade E plus Clade S (i.e., haplotype sharing among localities) was found to be extremely low, revealing either gene flow or the retention of ancestral polymorphisms. These historic complexities in the landscape have likely played important roles in the distribution of habitat availability and possibly even resulted in the later recolonization of the eastern and southern locations from the western region as the area of suitable habitat expanded during glacial recessions in the Pleistocene. This scenario implies that migration was asymmetric, and the western region is suggested to be the most important contributor to gene flow. In some cases, high migration rates were suggested, particularly from the eastern region to the southern region. However, secondary contact may have occurred with the increasing amount of shoreline along the Hengchung peninsula during the Middle Pleistocene [14], which facilitated communication between the southern and eastern populations (e.g., in the Loxoblemmus appendicularis complex [99]).

Historical Population Demography

Nucleotide and haplotype diversities can provide information on evolutionary histories. Our results revealed high haplotype diversity and low nucleotide diversity in the tested B. bankorensis populations, which is a pattern that could occur following population expansion [84] (Table 3). In the Pleistocene, glacial advances transformed the physical and biological environments of southern Asia [100]. The climatic changes accompanying with the beginning of glaciation drove high-latitude populations into more southern habitats in the Northern Hemisphere [101], [102]. In Taiwan, the contraction-expansion model predicts that populations are affected by these habitat shifts underwent rapid population expansion as previously unsuitable habitat became available for colonization. Despite differences in geography, rapid or step-wise colonizations would be characterized by low levels of genetic diversity, as each new founder population represents only a fraction of the ancestral population's genetic diversity [10], [103]. Our demographic analyses show that the intra-clade genetic structure of B. bankorensis contains signatures of demographic expansion consistent with Pleistocene glacial retreat. Specifically, the demographic and genetic variation analyses of total populations and Clade W provide a strong support for the existence of recent population expansions, represented by significantly negative Fs values and unimodal mismatch distributions with a low Rg index (Table 3), and the BSPs is consistent with the estimated times of these expansions range from 0.07 to 0.08 Mya (Figure 4). In contrast, no population expansion was detected in Clade E and Clade S, which is inconsistent with the previous results for the other frog species, e.g., B. robusta [20] and S. latouchii [22], demonstrating historical population expansion in the same region. The eastern Taiwan populations of B. bankorensis presented a smaller scaled effective population size (θ) than populations in western Taiwan (Table 5), which is consistent with a history of spatial expansion. Based on the broad distribution of B. bankorensis, ranging from the sea level to above 3,000 m in altitude, population expansion is expected to have occurred according to habitat release during the glaciated period, especially in the western Taiwan is associated with a significant decline of the sea level. In contrast, the eastern Taiwan is surrounded by the Mariana Trench, where a dramatic decline in depth would further constrain the rapid outward colonization of B. bankorensis, hence greatly reducing the probability of typical population dynamics occurring during glacial-interglacial periods. The CMRs of Taiwan approach to an elevation of nearly 4,000 m, rising steeply from the eastern coast and giving way to a broad western plain. The land mass on the eastern side of Taiwan, which faces the margin of the Pacific Ocean, was not considerably altered during glacial–interglacial periods, resulting in limited range expansion for the eastern clade. In contrast, the decrease in sea level on the western side of the island caused the Taiwan Strait to dry up. Consequently, the habitat of B. bankorensis was reconnected with the mainland China, giving rise to new ecosystem through gene flow by means of re-migration and/or population expansion.


We are grateful to the Yushan National Park and Taroko National Park Headquarters grants for Ching-Feng Weng. We thank our field assistants, particularly Ho-Tsung Chu, Kou-Wei Li and Li-Hsuen Chen, and Institutes granted access to collections including Kenting National Park, Taroko National Park, Yangmingshan National Park and Yushan National Park Headquarters. We address sincerely thank to senior Professor Sin-Che Lee and Dr. Chien-Hsien Kuo for incredible advice, and Hui-Ling Chang and Yu-Bao Wang for technical assistance. We would like to extend our thanks to all staff of the Yushan National Park involved in the B. bankorensis collaboration. Of course, this work also dedicates a memorial to the animals of Taiwan.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TLY CFW. Performed the experiments: TLY HDL. Analyzed the data: TLY HDL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TLY. Wrote the paper: TLY HDL CFW.


  1. 1. Avise JC (1986) Mitochondria DNA and the evolutionary genetics of higher animals. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 312: 325–342. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0011
  2. 2. Avise JC (2000) Phylogeography: the history and formation of species. Harvard UnivCambridge, MAPress.
  3. 3. Harrison S, Hastings A (1996) Genetic and evolutionary consequences of metapopulation structure. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 180–183. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(96)20008-4
  4. 4. Avise JC (2009) Phylogeography: retrospect and prospect. Journal of Biogeography 36: 3–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2008.02032.x
  5. 5. Manel S, Schwartz MK, Luikart G, Taberlet P (2003) Landscape genetics: combining landscape ecology and population genetics. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 189–197. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00008-9
  6. 6. Knowles LL (2009) Statistical phylogeography. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 593–612. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095702
  7. 7. Teng LS (1990) Geotectonic evolution of late Cenozoic arc-continent collision in Taiwan. Tectonophysics 183: 57–76. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90188-e
  8. 8. Liu TK, Chen YG, Chen WS, Jiang SH (2000) Rates of cooling and denudation of the early Penglai Orogeny, Taiwan, as assessed by fission-track constraints. Tectonophysics 320: 69–82. doi: 10.1016/s0040-1951(00)00028-7
  9. 9. Sibuet JC, Hsu SK (2004) How was Taiwan created? Tectonophysics 379: 159–181. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2003.10.022
  10. 10. Hewitt GM (2000) The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages. Nature 405: 907–913. doi: 10.1038/35016000
  11. 11. Goudie AS (1999) The ice age in the tropics and its human implications. In: Environments and Historical Change (ed Slack P), pp. 10–32. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  12. 12. Ono YG, Aoki T, Hasegawa H, Liu DL (2005) Mountain glaciation in Japan and Taiwan at the global last glacial maximum. Quaternary international 138: 79–92. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2005.02.007
  13. 13. Hebenstreit R, Bose M, Murray A (2006) Late Pleistocene and early Holocene glaciations in Taiwanese mountains. Quaternary international 147: 76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2005.09.009
  14. 14. Huang CY, Wu WY, Chang CP, Tsao S, Yuan PB, et al. (1997) Tectonic evolution of accretionary prism in the arc-continent collision terrain of Taiwan. Tectonophysics 281: 31–51. doi: 10.1016/s0040-1951(97)00157-1
  15. 15. Teng LS (1990) Geotectonic evolution of late Cenozoic arccontinent collision in Taiwan. Tectonophysics 183: 57–76. doi: 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90188-e
  16. 16. Yu HT (1995) Patterns of diversification and genetic population structure of small mammals in Taiwan. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 55: 69–89. doi: 10.1016/0024-4066(95)90029-2
  17. 17. Tzeng CS (1986) Distribution of freshwater fishes of Taiwan. Journal of Taiwan Museum 39: 127–146.
  18. 18. Wang JP, Lin HD, Huang S, Pan CH, Chen XL, et al. (2004) Phylogeography of Varicorhinus barbatulus (Cyprinidae) in Taiwan based on nucleotide variation of mtDNA and allozymes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31: 1143–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.10.001
  19. 19. Lin HD, Hsu KC, Shao KT, Chang YC, Wang JP, et al. (2008) Population structure and phylogeography of Aphyocypris kikuchii based on mitochondrial DNA variation. Journal of Fish Biology 72: 2011–2025. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01836.x
  20. 20. Lin HD, Chen YR, Lin SM (2012) Strict consistency between genetic and topographic landscapes of the brown tree frog (Buergeria robusta) in Taiwan. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62: 251–262. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.09.022
  21. 21. Oshida T, Lin LK, Chang SW, Chen YJ, Lin JK (2011) Phylogeography of two sympatric giant flying squirrel subspecies, Petaurista alborufus lena and P. philippensis grandis (Rodentia: Sciuridae), in Taiwan. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 102: 404–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01576.x
  22. 22. Jang-Liaw NH, Lee TH, Chou WH (2008) Phylogeography of Sylvirana latouchii (Anura, Ranidae) in Taiwan. Zoological Science 25: 68–79. doi: 10.2108/zsj.25.68
  23. 23. Wang JP, Hsu KC, Chiang TY (2000) Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of Acrossocheilus paradoxus (Cyprinidae) in Taiwan. Molecular Ecology 9: 1483–1494. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01023.x
  24. 24. Wang TY, Liao TY, Tzeng CS (2007) Phylogeography of the Taiwanese endemic hillstream loaches, Hemimyzon formosanus and H. taitungensis (Cypriniformes: Balitoridae). Zoological Studies 46: 547–560.
  25. 25. Wang TY, Tzeng CS, Teng HY, Chang T (2007) Phylogeography and identification of a 187-bp-long duplication within the mitochondrial control region of Formosania lacustre (Teleostei: Balitoridae). Zoological Studies 46: 569–582.
  26. 26. Lue KY, Lin CY, Zhuang KS (1990) Wildlife Data Bank of Taiwan (1) Amphibians (II). Taipei: Council of Agriculture, [in Chinese].
  27. 27. Frost DR (Ed.) (1985) Amphibian Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographical Reference, Allen Press and Assoc. Syst. Coll., Lawrence.
  28. 28. Matsui M (1986) Geographic variation in toads of the Bufo bufo complex from the Far East, with a description of a new subspecies. Copeia 1986: 561–579. doi: 10.2307/1444939
  29. 29. Zhao E, Adler K (Eds.) (1993) Herpetology of China, SSAR, St. Louis, MO. Inger, R. F. (1972). Bufo of Eurasia. In Evolution of the Genus Bufo (W. F. Blair, Ed.) 102118Univ. of Texas, Austin
  30. 30. Lue GY, Chen SH (1982) Toad species of Taiwan. In: Chang CH (ed) Amphibians of Taiwan. Natural Press, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1–190.
  31. 31. Kawamura T, Nishioka M, Ueda H (1980) Inter- and intraspecific hybrids among Japanese, European and American toads. Scientific report of the Laboratory for Amphibian Biology 4: 1–125.
  32. 32. Kawamura T, Nishioka M, Kondo Y, Wu Z (1982) Viability of hybrids among Japanese, Taiwan, European and American toads. Japan Journal Genetics 57: 677–678.
  33. 33. Nishioka M, Kodama Y, Sumida M, Ryuzaki M (1990) Genetic relationship among 13 Bufo species and subspecies elucidated by the method of electrophoretic analyses. Scientific report of the Laboratory for Amphibian Biology 10: 53–91.
  34. 34. Fu J, Weadick CJ, Zeng X, Wang Y, Liu Z, et al. (2005) Phylogeographic analysis of the Bufo gargarizans species complex: a revisit. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 37: 202–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.03.023
  35. 35. Inger RF (1972) Bufo of Eurasia. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
  36. 36. Macey JR, Shulte JA, Larson A, Fang Z, Wang Y, et al. (1998) Phylogenetic relationships of toads in the Bufo bufo species group from the eastern escarpment of the Tibetan Plateau: a case of vicariance and dispersal. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 9: 80–87. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0440
  37. 37. Matsui M (1984) Morphometric variation analyses and revision of the Japanese toads (Genus Bufo, Bufonidae). Contributions from the Biological Laboratory, Kyoto University 26: 209–428.
  38. 38. Liu W, Lathrop A, Fu J, Yang D, Murphy RW (2000) Phylogeny of East Asian bufonids inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences (Anura: Amphibia). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 14: 423–435. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1999.0716
  39. 39. Igawa T, Kurabayashi A, Nishioka M, Sumida M (2006) Molecular phylogenetic relationship of toads distributed in the Far East and Europe inferred from the nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial DNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 38: 250–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.09.003
  40. 40. Masta SE, Laurent NM, Routman EJ (2003) Population genetic structure of the toad Bufo woodhousii: an empirical assessment of the effects of haplotype extinction on nested cladistic analysis. Molecular Ecology 12: 1541–1554. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01829.x
  41. 41. Smith MA, Green DM (2004) Phylogeography of Bufo fowleri at its northern range limit. Molecular Ecology 13: 3723–3733. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02301.x
  42. 42. Jaeger JR, Riddle BR, Bradford DF (2005) Cryptic Neogene vicariance and quaternary dispersal of the red-spotted toad (Bufo punctatus): insights on the evolution of North American warm desert biotas. Molecular Ecology 14: 3033–3048. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.2005.02645.x
  43. 43. Degani G, Goldberg T, Gasith A, Elron E, Nevo E (2013) DNA variation of the green toad Pseudepidalea viridis (syn. Bufo viridis) from various habitats. Zoological Studies 52: 1–15. doi: 10.1186/1810-522x-52-18
  44. 44. Hisai N, Chiba S, Yano M, Sugawara T (1987) Ecological studies of Bufo japonicus formosus boulenger (IX) Strong Migration to Breeding Site and Homing. National Science Museum, Miscellaneous Reports of the Natural Park for Nature Study 18: 1–13 (in Japanese with English summary)..
  45. 45. Kusano T, Muruyama K, Kaneko S (1995) Post-breeding dispersal of the Japanese toad, Bufo japonicus formosus. Journal of Herpetology 29: 633–638. doi: 10.2307/1564755
  46. 46. Hewitt GM (1996) Some genetic consequences of ices ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 58: 247–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01434.x
  47. 47. Duellman WD (1999) Patterns of Distribution in Amphibians: A Global Perspective. Johns Hopkins University Press. 648 pp.
  48. 48. Vences M, Wake DB (2007) Speciation, species boundaries and phylogeography of amphibians. In Amphibian biology, Vol. 7. Amphibian systematics: 2613–2669. Heatwole, H. & Tyler, M. (Eds). Chipping Norton, Australia: Surrey Beatty & Sons.
  49. 49. Zeisset I, Beebee TJC (2008) Amphibian phylogeography: a model for understanding historical aspects of species distributions. Heredity 101: 109–119. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2008.30
  50. 50. Pröhl H, Ron SR, Ryan MJ (2010) Ecological and genetic divergence between two lineages of Middle American túngara frogs Physalaemus ( = Engystomops) pustulosus. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 146. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-146
  51. 51. Johns GC, Avise JC (1998) A comparative summary of genetic distances in the vertebrates from the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 1481–1490. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025875
  52. 52. Semlitsch RD, Todd BD, Blomquist SM, Calhoun AJK, Gibbons JW, et al. (2009) Effects of timber harvest on amphibian populations: understanding mechanisms from forest experiments. Bioscience 59: 853–862. doi: 10.1525/bio.2009.59.10.7
  53. 53. Hamer AJ, McDonnell MJ (2008) Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world: a review. Biological Conservation 141: 2432–2449. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.020
  54. 54. Zimmermann M (1983) Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals. Pain 16: 109–110. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90201-4
  55. 55. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4876–4882. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876
  56. 56. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. (2010) New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol 59: 307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010
  57. 57. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, et al. (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
  58. 58. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
  59. 59. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn083
  60. 60. Nei M, Tajima F (1983) Maximum likelihood estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions from restriction sites data. Genetics 105: 207–217.
  61. 61. Nei M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
  62. 62. Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187.
  63. 63. Excoffier L, Smouse PE (1994) Using allele frequencies and geographic subdivision to reconstruct gene trees within a species: molecular variance parsimony. Genetics 136: 343–359.
  64. 64. Pons O, Petit RJ (1996) Measuring and testing genetic differentiation with ordered vs. unordered alleles. Genetics 144: 1237–1245.
  65. 65. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123: 585–595.
  66. 66. Fu Y (1997) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking, and background selection. Genetics 147: 915–925.
  67. 67. Harpending HC, Batzer MA, Gurven M, Jorde LB, Rogers AR, et al. (1998) Genetic traces of ancient demography. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 1961–1967. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1961
  68. 68. Harpending H (1994) Signature of ancient population growth in a low resolution mitochondrial DNA mismatch distribution. Human Biology 66: 591–600.
  69. 69. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite version 3.5: A new series of programs toperform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 564–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x
  70. 70. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2007) Tracer version 1.5. Available: Accessed 2011 December 9.
  71. 71. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223–225. doi: 10.2307/2409177
  72. 72. Dupanloup I, Schneidera S, Excoffier NL (2002) A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Molecular Ecology 11: 2571–2581. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2002.01650.x
  73. 73. Mantel N (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer research 27: 209–220.
  74. 74. Miller MP (2005) Alleles in space: Computer software for the joint analysis of inter-individual spatial and genetic information. Journal of Heredity 96: 722–724. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esi119
  75. 75. Beerli P, Felsenstein J (2001) Maximum likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population size in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 4563–4568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.081068098
  76. 76. Beerli P (2010) MIGRATE Documentation Version 3.2. Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
  77. 77. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-214
  78. 78. Rowe G, Harris D, Beebee TJC (2006) Lusitania revisited: A phylogeographic analysis of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita across its entire biogeographical range. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.08.021
  79. 79. Hu YL, Wu XB, Jiang ZG, Yan P, Su X, et al. (2007) Population genetics and phylogeography of Bufo gargarizans in China. Biochemical Genetics 45: 697–711. doi: 10.1007/s10528-007-9107-9
  80. 80. Rowe R, Harris DJ, Beebee TJC (2006) Lusitania revisited: a phylogeographic analysis of the natterjack toad Bufo calamita across its entire biogeographical range. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 335–346. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.08.021
  81. 81. Bollmer JL, Kimball RT, Whiteman NK, Sarasola JH, Parker PG (2006) Phylogeography of the Galápagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis): a recent arrival tothe Galápagos Islands. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 39: 237–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.11.014
  82. 82. Clegg SM (2010) Evolutionary changes following island colonization in birds: empirical insights into the roles of microevolutionary processes. In: Losos, J., Ricklefs, R.E. (Eds.), The Theory of Island Biogeography Revisited. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 293–325.
  83. 83. Frankham R (1996) Relationship of genetic variation to population size in wildlife. Conservation Biology. 10: : 1500–1508
  84. 84. Grant WS, Bowen BW (1998) Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. Journal of Heredity 89: 415–426. doi: 10.1093/jhered/89.5.415
  85. 85. Huang WS, Lin JY, Yu YL (1996) The male reproductive cycle of the toad, Bufo bankorensis, in Taiwan. Zoological Studies 35: 128–137.
  86. 86. Toda M, Nishida M, Matsui M, Lue KY, Ota H (1998) Genetic variation in the Indian rice frog, Rana limnocharis (Amphibia: Anura) in Taiwan, as revealed by allozyme data. Herpetologica 54: 73–82.
  87. 87. Creer S, Malhotra A, Thorpe RS, Chou WH (2001) Multiple causation of phylogeographical pattern as revealed by nested clade analysis of the bamboo viper (Trimeresurus stejnegeri) within Taiwan. Molecular Ecology 10: 1967–1981. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01332.x
  88. 88. Lin HC, Li SH, Fong J, Lin SM (2008) Ventral coloration differentiation and mitochondrial sequences of the Chinese Cobra (Naja atra) in Taiwan. Conservation Genetics 9: 1089–1097. doi: 10.1007/s10592-007-9418-8
  89. 89. Oshida T, Lee JK, Lin LK, Chen YJ (2006) Phylogeography of Pallas's squirrel in Taiwan: Geographical isolation in an arboreal small mammal. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 247–254. doi: 10.1644/05-mamm-a-123r1.1
  90. 90. Shih HT, Hung HC, Schubart CD, Chen CA, Chang HW (2006) Intraspecific genetic diversity of the endemic freshwater crab Candidiopotamon rathbunae (Decapoda, Brachyura, Potamidae) reflects five million years of the geological history of Taiwan. Journal of Biogeography 33: 980–989. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01472.x
  91. 91. Wang CF, Hsieh CH, Lee SC, Wang HY (2011) Systematics and phylogeography of the Taiwanese endemic minnow Candidia barbatus (Pisces: Cyprinidae) based on DNA sequence, allozymic, and morphological analyses. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 161: 613–632. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00646.x
  92. 92. Watanabe K, Jang-Liaw NH, Zhang CG, Jeon SR, Nishid M (2007) Comparative phylogeography of bagrid catfishes in Taiwan. Ichthyological research 54: 253–261. doi: 10.1007/s10228-007-0398-y
  93. 93. Wang HY, Tsai MP, Yu MJ, Lee SC (1999) Influence of glaciation on divergence patterns of the endemic minnow, Zacco pachycaphalus, in Taiwan. Molecular Ecology 8: 1879–1888. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00787.x
  94. 94. Jang-Liaw NH, Lee TH (2009) Intrapecific relationships of populations of the brown frog Rana sauteri (Ranidae) on Taiwan, inferred from mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. Zoological Science 26: 608–616. doi: 10.2108/zsj.26.608
  95. 95. Bossart JL, Prowell DP (1998) Genetic estimates of population structure and gene flow: limitations, lessons and new directions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13: 202–206. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(97)01284-6
  96. 96. Chen CC, Li KW, Yu TL, Chen LH, Sheu PY, et al. (2013) Genetic structure of Bufo bankorensis distinguished by amplified restriction fragment length polymorphism of cytochrome b. Zoological Studies 52: 48. doi: 10.1186/1810-522x-52-48
  97. 97. Huang CY, Wu WY, Chang CP, Tsao S, Yuan PB, et al. (1997) Tectonic evolution of accretionary prism in the arc-continent collision terrain of Taiwan. Tectonophysics 281: 31–51. doi: 10.1016/s0040-1951(97)00157-1
  98. 98. Lin CC (1966) An outline of Taiwan's Quaternary geohistory with a special discussion of the relation between natural history and cultural history in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Department of Archaeology and Anthropology 23: 7–44.
  99. 99. Yeh WB, Chang YL, Lin CH, Wu FS, Yang JT (2004) Genetic differentiation of Loxoblemmus appendicularis complex (Orthoptera: Gryllidae): speciation through vicariant and glaciation events. Annals of the Entomological society of America 97: 613–623. doi: 10.1603/0013-8746(2004)097[0613:gdolac];2
  100. 100. Voris HK (2000) Maps of Pleistocene sea levels in Southeast Asia: shorelines, river systems and time durations. Journal of Biogeography 27: 1153–1167. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00489.x
  101. 101. Hewitt GM (1999) Postglacial recolonization of European Biota. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 68: 87–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01160.x
  102. 102. Hewitt GM (2004) Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 359: 183–195. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1388
  103. 103. Nichols RA, Hewitt GM (1994) The genetic consequences of long distance dispersal during colonization. Heredity 72: 312–317. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1994.41