Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genetic Influences on Hand Osteoarthritis in Finnish Women – A Replication Study of Candidate Genes

  • Satu Hämäläinen ,

    satu.hamalainen@ttl.fi

    Affiliation Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Centre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Helsinki, Finland

  • Svetlana Solovieva,

    Affiliation Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Centre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Helsinki, Finland

  • Tapio Vehmas,

    Affiliation Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Centre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Helsinki, Finland

  • Katariina Luoma,

    Affiliation University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Radiology department, Helsinki, Finland

  • Päivi Leino-Arjas,

    Affiliation Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Centre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Helsinki, Finland

  • Ari Hirvonen

    Affiliation Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Centre of Expertise for Health and Work Ability, Helsinki, Finland

Genetic Influences on Hand Osteoarthritis in Finnish Women – A Replication Study of Candidate Genes

  • Satu Hämäläinen, 
  • Svetlana Solovieva, 
  • Tapio Vehmas, 
  • Katariina Luoma, 
  • Päivi Leino-Arjas, 
  • Ari Hirvonen
PLOS
x

Abstract

Objectives

Our aims were to replicate some previously reported associations of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five genes (A2BP1, COG5, GDF5, HFE, ESR1) with hand osteoarthritis (OA), and to examine whether genes (BCAP29, DIO2, DUS4L, DVWA, HLA, PTGS2, PARD3B, TGFB1 and TRIB1) associated with OA at other joint sites were associated with hand OA among Finnish women.

Design

We examined the bilateral hand radiographs of 542 occupationally active Finnish female dentists and teachers aged 45 to 63 and classified them according to the presence of OA by using reference images. Data regarding finger joint pain and other risk factors were collected using a questionnaire. We defined two hand OA phenotypes: radiographic OA in at least three joints (ROA) and symptomatic DIP OA. The genotypes were determined by PCR-based methods. In statistical analysis, we used SNPStats software, the chi-square test and logistic regression.

Results

Of the SNPs, rs716508 in A2BP1 was associated with ROA (OR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.5–0.9) and rs1800470 in TGFB1 with symptomatic DIP OA (1.8, 1.2–2.9). We found an interaction between ESR1 (rs9340799) and occupation: teachers with the minor allele were at an increased risk of symptomatic DIP OA (2.8, 1.3–6.5). We saw no association among the dentists. We also found that the carriage of the COG5 rs3757713 C allele increased the risk of ROA only among women with the BCAP29 rs10953541 CC genotype (2.6; 1.1–6.1). There was also a suggestive interaction between the HFE rs179945 and the ESR1 rs9340799, and the carriage of the minor allele of either of these SNPs was associated with an increased risk of symptomatic DIP OA (2.1, 1.3–2.5).

Conclusions

Our results support the earlier findings of A2BP1 and TBGF1 being OA susceptibility genes and provide evidence of a possible gene-gene interaction in the genetic influence on hand OA predisposition.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) shows clinical heterogeneity in localization and progression [1]. Patients may have only one affected joint (monoarthritis) at the time of diagnosis, several affected joints within a single region (e.g. in hand OA), or several involved joints at various sites, e.g. the hip, knee, and hand (polyarticular OA, generalized OA). Twin and family studies have demonstrated a significant contribution of genetic factors that account for up to half of the risk of developing OA [2], [3].

The hand is among the most prevalent sites affected by OA, especially among women over the age of 50 [4]. The simultaneous involvement of multiple hand joints makes hand OA a heterogeneous disorder that is complex to study [5]. Hand OA, largely mirroring the generalized OA variant, is thought to be more heritable than hip or knee OA [3], [6]. It is generally accepted that as a complex disorder, the development of hand OA is modulated by many genes with small effects and gene-environment interaction. The genetic influence may involve either a structural defect (e.g., in collagen), alterations in the structural extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins of cartilage and bone, an enhanced inflammatory component in the disease process, or a genetic influence on a known risk factor for OA, such as obesity [7].

Genome-wide scans with different hand OA phenotypes suggested that chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 11, 13, 15, 16, 19, 20 may harbor susceptibility genes [8][13]. Numerous candidate gene studies have been carried out to assess the association of a particular variant with hand OA. However, according to a systematic review, specific associations between a gene and hand OA have rarely been analyzed by more than one study, and only for two genes (AGC1 and HFE) have significant associations been replicated by at least two independent studies [14].

A genome-wide association study (GWAS) is a promising tool for discovering the genetic basis of common diseases [15]. GWAS were successful in the identification of 11 loci associated with different OA phenotypes, in particular knee and hip OA [16]. Nevertheless, under the strict criteria of replication and a known functional role, the growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF5) is the only truly OA-associated gene at present [17]. To our knowledge only two GWAS of hand OA have been published so far [18], [19].

The first GWAS study detected and replicated an association with an SNP (rs716508) in the first intron of the ataxin 2-binding protein 1 gene (A2BP1) [18]. In the second GWAS, a novel common variant (rs3815148) in intron 12 of the component of the oligomeric Golgi complex 5 gene (COG5) was associated with knee and/or hand OA in both discovery and replicated samples. This SNP is in almost complete linkage disequilibrium with rs3757713 (68 kb upstream of GPR22), which could be the link to OA association. In the same GWAS, three loci in the GDF5 gene (rs4911494, rs6088813, rs6087705) were associated with hand OA in the discovery sample, but were not replicated [19].

In order to devise future prevention and treatment, strategies for OA replication studies that verify positive findings from GWAS are needed. Such studies will also enable us to determine whether the effect is specific to a certain OA phenotype, and/or to a particular population. Furthermore, GWAS have made it evident that most of the genetic risk of complex diseases will be attributed to numerous genes with small to moderate effect sizes [16]. In order to understand the manner in which the individual genes that are implicated in OA exert their effect, gene-gene combination effect and interaction need to be explored.

Our aims were to replicate some previously reported associations with hand OA for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five genes (A2BP1, COG5, GDF5, HFE, ESR1) and to examine whether variants in nine genes (BCAP29, DIO2, DUS4L, DVWA, HLA, PTGS2, PARD3B, TGFB1 and TRIB1) are associated with hand OA among Finnish middle-aged women. All selected SNPs were located on genes with prior evidence from GWAS or candidate gene association studies of an association with different OA phenotypes.

Participants and Methods

Study Population

The study participants were identified from the registers of the Finnish Dental Association and the Finnish Teachers Trade Union, and randomly selected from both occupational groups by using the place of residence (Helsinki or its neighboring cities) as an inclusion criterion. The samples were restricted to women aged 45 to 63. Of those who received the questionnaires in 2002, 295 (68%) dentists and 248 (57%) teachers participated in a clinical examination.

Ethics Statement

Participation in the study was voluntary and based on written informed consent. The study proposal was approved by the Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa Ethics Committee for Research in Occupational Health and Safety.

Hand Radiography and Image Analysis

Both hands of the study participants were radiographed by exposing Kodak X-ray films with Siemens X-ray equipment (48 kV, 10 mA, focus film distance = 115 cm; Siemens, Munich, Germany). The analogue radiographs were evaluated by an experienced radiologist who was blinded to the occupation, age, and all health data of the participants. Each distal interphalangeal (DIP), proximal interphalangeal (PIP), thumb interphalangeal, and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of both hands was graded separately, and classified for the presence of OA using a modified Kellgren and Lawrence system [20]. The classification criteria were: grade 0 = no OA, grade 1 = doubtful OA, grade 2 = mild OA, grade 3 = moderate OA, and grade 4 = severe OA. Reference images were used; their description is given elsewhere [21]. A second experienced radiologist interpreted 46 randomly chosen radiographs. A second reading of these 46 radiographs was independently performed by the primary radiologist (TV). The reliability of the OA classification was estimated by measuring intra-observer and inter-observer agreements using the weighted Cohen’s kappa coefficient with quadratic weights [22]. The inter-observer agreement for OA ranged from 0.67 to 0.85 (good) for DIP joints, from 0.39 to 0.61 (moderate) for PIP joints, and from 0.18 to 0.69 (poor to good) for MCP joints. The intra-observer agreement for OA ranged from good to very good, 0.73 to 0.88 for DIP joints, from 0.67 to 0.92 for PIP joints, and from 0.59 to 1.0 for MCP joints. [21].

Questionnaires and Interviews

All study participants received a self-administered questionnaire that included questions on anthropometric measures. Information on symptoms (pain, tenderness) in each joint studied was collected with the prompt: ‘Please point out on the picture below in which finger joint you have felt pain or tenderness during the past 30 days.’ The participants were also asked to mark the intensity of the pain: 0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain, 3 = severe pain. Weight was measured without shoes to the accuracy of 0.1 kg. Body mass index (BMI) (weight (kg) per height squared (m2)) was calculated on the basis of self-reported height and measured weight.

Hand OA Phenotypes

Two hand OA phenotypes were used. If the participant had radiographic findings (grade ≥2) in at least three finger joints she was classified as having radiographic OA (ROA). Otherwise, the participant was classified as not having ROA. If the participant had both radiographic findings (grade ≥2) and symptoms (grade ≥1) in at least two DIP joints, she was classified as having symptomatic DIP OA. Otherwise, the subject was classified as not having symptomatic DIP OA.

SNP Selection

We aimed primarily to replicate the associations for the candidate genes that have been identified by two recent GWAS of hand OA [18], [19] and genes with a known association with hand OA pathology. We chose two SNPs (rs716508 and rs3815148) that reached a genome-wide level of significance for association with hand OA [18], [19], and variants in the GDF5 (rs143383) [23], HFE (rs1799945) [24], and ESR1 (rs2234693, rs9340799) [25], [26] genes. The latter genes were chosen on the basis of the rapidly increasing prevalence of hand OA in women over the age of 45. In addition, we searched PubMed for studies reporting an association between any OA phenotype and the candidate genes located on the chromosomes identified by genome-wide linkage studies as harboring susceptibility genes for hand OA [8][13] (Leppävuori et al. 1999, Demissie et al. 2002, Stefánsson et al. 2003, Hunter et al. 2004, Greig et al. 2006, Livshits et al. 2007). Studies published by 10.11.2010 were reviewed in order to select relevant SNPs. Whenever at least one significant functional SNP was reported for a given candidate gene in hand OA, the SNP was selected for analyses in our samples. Finally, we selected variants from nine candidate genes (BCAP29, DIO2, DUS4L, DVWA, HLA, PTGS2, PARD3B, TGFB1 and TRIB1) from seven publications [27][33] for exploratory analysis in our study. Several predicted functional effects were found in the F-SNP database for the studied polymorphisms [34]. The description of SNPs selected for replication is given in Table S1.

Genotyping Analysis

Blood samples were taken from each study participant at the clinical examination and stored at +4°C until we extracted DNA using a DNA extraction kit (PUREGENE DNA Purification Kit; Gentra Systems, Plymouth, MN, USA).

The ESR1 PvuII, and Xbal polymorphisms (rs2234693, and rs9340799 respectively) were genotyped using the RFLP method as essentially described in [35]. The TGFB1 Leu10Pro (29T>C, rs1800470 formerly known as rs1982073) polymorphism was genotyped by the TaqMan PCR method as described in [36] with somewhat altered PCR conditions (2 min +50°C, 10 min +95°C and 40 cycles 15 s +95°C, 1 min +62°C).

We analyzed the rest of the studied polymorphisms in A2BP1 (rs716508), BCAP29 (rs10953541), COG5 (rs3757713 and rs3815148), PTGS2 (rs4140564), DIO2 (rs225014), DUS4L (rs4730250), DVWA (rs7639618), GDF5 (rs143383), HFE (rs1799945), HLA (rs10947262), PARD3B (rs1207421) and TRIB1 (rs4512391) simultaneously using OpenArray equipment and the TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays (Applied Biosystems, C__1224093_10, C__2618842_20, C_27475119_10, C_25994114_10, C_31274663_20, C_15819951_10, C_32373604_10, C__1176713_10, C__1270479_1, C__1085600_10, C_32201424_10, C__8807483_10 and C___310264_20, respectively).

Genotyping completion rate was from 99.8 to 100%.

Statistical Analysis

The potential deviation of the allele frequencies from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was tested from total population using the chi-square test. The degree of pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) for two SNPs in the COG5 gene and two SNPs in the ESR1 gene were calculated using SNPStats software [37]. Each SNP was analyzed in turn. Haplotypes were constructed and analyzed by the SNPStats program. Logistic regression analysis was used to test the associations between selected SNPs and two hand OA phenotypes. For each SNP, a log additive model of inheritance was fitted. Gene-occupation interaction was tested for all SNPs, to evaluate whether the association between the SNPs and OA was modified by occupation. In addition, gene-gene interactions and gene-gene combination effects were evaluated by a logistic regression model with a dummy variable (0, 1) for the SNPs to compare the magnitude of their odds ratios (ORs). From each gene, we selected a representative SNP that showed the lowest p-value in the replication analysis. We used the dominant model, with the homozygous genotype of the major allele as the reference. Both crude and adjusted ORs and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated. We adjusted the ORs for the potential confounding effects of age (continuous), occupation (dentists vs. teachers) and BMI (continuous). Since the crude and adjusted ORs did not differ significantly, only the adjusted ORs are shown.

All analyses were hypothesis driven. We have used p<0,05and p<0.008 as significance level in replication and exploration analyses, respectively. In exploratory analyses p-values were adjusted for multiple testing using Sidák’s method [38]. We used SNPStats software [37] for the analyses.

Results

The prevalence of ROA and symptomatic DIP OA were 29.5%, and 9.0%, respectively. The ROA prevalence was statistically significantly higher among the teachers than the dentists (Table 1). The genotype distributions of the selected SNPs did not deviate from the HWE. There was no difference between the minor allele frequencies for any SNPs of the two occupations.

Replication Analyses of Hand OA-associated SNPs

Of the two SNPs identified in GWAS, only the rs716508 located in the A2BP1 gene was associated with ROA (OR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.93) (Table 2). However it was not associated with symptomatic DIP OA (Table 3). The risk of symptomatic DIP OA was marginally, though not statistically significantly, elevated with the occurrence of the minor alleles of two SNPs (rs3757713, rs3815148) in the COG5 gene.

thumbnail
Table 2. Association of studied polymorphisms with ROA in the total material and by occupation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097417.t002

thumbnail
Table 3. Association of studied polymorphisms with symptomatic DIP OA in the total material and by occupation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097417.t003

We found no statistically significant associations between the SNPs in the GDF5, HFE and ESR1 genes and hand OA. Linkage disequilibrium was very strong between the two COG5 SNPs (rs3757713 and rs3815148) as well as the two ESR1 SNPs (PvuII rs2234693 and XbaI rs9340799) (D’ = 0.95, p<0.0001 and D’ = 0.99, p<0.0001, respectively). Haplotypes comprised of the two COG5 SNPs or of the two ESR1 SNPs were not associated with hand OA.

We found an interaction between the ESR1 rs9340799 SNP and occupation (p = 0.0064) in relation to symptomatic DIP OA. The teachers with the minor allele were at an almost three-fold increased risk of symptomatic DIP OA (OR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.25–6.48) while the dentists carrying the allele were at a lower risk (OR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.19–1.33) than those with the major allele. Adjustment for the use of hormone therapy did not affect the observed associations.

Exploratory Analyses of Nine OA-associated SNPs

Of nine SNPs associated with different OA phenotypes (knee, hip, spine and multiple joints) in previous studies, only the TGFB1 Leu10Pro (rs1800470) SNP was associated with symptomatic DIP OA (Table 3, OR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.16–2.91). We observed a suggestive (p = 0.047) interactive effect between the PTGS2 rs4140564 SNP and occupation in relation to ROA. The teachers with the minor allele were at a 1.44-fold (95% CI 0.69–3.02) increased risk, and the dentists were at a lower risk (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.13–1.21) (Table 2).

Gene-gene Combination Effects and Interaction

To evaluate possible gene-gene combination effects and interactions, we selected two SNPs from the genes located on chromosome 7 (COG5 rs3757713 and BCAP29 rs10953541) and two SNPs from the genes located on chromosome 6 (HFE rs179945 and ESR1 rs9340799) that showed relatively stronger associations with our hand OA phenotypes. We found a statistically significant interaction (p = 0.034) between the COG5 rs3757713 and BCAP29 rs10953541 SNPs and a suggestive interaction (p = 0.096) between the HFE rs179945 and ESR1 rs9340799 SNPs (Table 4). Carriage of the COG5 rs3757713 C allele increased the risk of ROA only in women with the BCAP29 rs10953541 CC genotype. However, the likelihood of ROA in the carriers of the minor allele of either SNPs (rs3757713 or rs10953541) was 1.49 (95% CI 1.07–2.06) times higher than that in the non-carriers of these alleles. The carriage of the HFE rs179945 G allele increased the risk of symptomatic DIP OA in women homozygous for the ESR1 rs9340799 major allele (AA genotype). Carriage of the minor allele of either SNP (rs179945 or rs9340799) was associated with an approximately two-fold increased risk of symptomatic DIP OA (OR = 2.12, 95% CI 1.28–2.50).

thumbnail
Table 4. Individual and joint effect of selected SNPs on ROA and symptomatic DIP OA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097417.t004

Discussion

In this study we attempted to replicate some previously reported genetic associations with hand OA. Of the two SNPs identified in GWAS, we found a statistically significant association between the A2BP1 rs716508 SNP and radiographic hand OA. In addition, we observed evidence of an interactive effect between the COG5 rs3757713 and the BCAP29 rs10953541, and radiographic hand OA, and between the HFE rs179945 and the ESR1 rs9340799 and symptomatic DIP OA. Moreover, our exploratory analysis of the SNPs in nine selected genes that have a hypothetical association with hand OA provided evidence of an association between the TGFB1 Leu10Pro (rs1800470) SNP and symptomatic DIP OA.

In order to succeed in the replication of genotype-phenotype associations, both the initial and replication studies should preferably have the same gene variants, disease phenotypes, genetic models, and population segment (e.g. the same gender), and should be adjusted for the same confounding factors. We selected two hand OA phenotypes (ROA in at least three finger joints and symptomatic DIP OA), that are alike or very similar to those in the discovery studies. Both our phenotypes were defined on the basis of a K–L score of grade 2 or more (at least mild OA), which has been commonly used for classification in other studies [24], [26], [39]. Radiographic hand OA in our study was based solely on radiographic evidence of joint destruction, while symptomatic DIP OA was defined on the basis of the simultaneous presence of radiographic changes and pain in the most commonly affected joint (DIP).

GWAS with two discovery and four replication samples reported an association between the rs716508 SNP located in the first intron of the A2BP1 gene and hand OA in the population of European ancestry [18]. Meta-analysis suggested that the minor allele of this SNP diminished the risk of hand OA by 33–41%, with the protective effect larger for the severe hand OA phenotype (at least three joints affected). In line with the initial study, we observed a 32% reduction in the risk of radiographic OA per minor allele. However, we found no association between the rs716508 SNP and symptomatic DIP OA.

The A2BP1 gene is known to be associated with several human diseases, such as autism [40], cancer [41] and obesity [42], though its role in the development of hand OA needs further exploration. Since the A2BP1 gene is abundantly expressed in the skeletal muscle [43], it is possible that the association between the rs716508 SNP and hand OA could be via muscle strength. We have earlier reported an association between pinch grip strength and symptomatic ROA, but radiographic findings or pain were not associated with pinch grip strength [44]. In the present study, the rs716508 SNP was not associated with pinch grip strength and the odds of ROA remained unchanged after adjustment for pinch grip strength (data not shown).

Although we failed, in the sample of Finnish female dentists and teachers, to replicate the associations of the other SNPs with reported effects on hand OA, the effect sizes of the risk alleles on ROA and symptomatic DIP OA were similar to those found in the initial studies. Reasons for the lack of replication could be due to differences in phenotypes, in minor allele frequencies, and the high likelihood of false negative findings, because our study was not large enough to detect very small effects.

Multiple susceptibility variants with small effect sizes may also interact with each other or with environmental factors in their influence on hand OA predisposition.

In agreement with this, our result suggests that the effect of the rs3757713 SNP (that is in complete linkage with rs3815148) on hand ROA might be diluted by the carriage of the BCAP29 rs10953541 minor allele. The COG5 and BCAP29 genes together with the other four genes (PRKAR2B, HBP1, GPR22 and DUS4L) are located on chromosome 7q22 within a block with high-linkage disequilibrium. The GWAS meta-analyses of knee OA showed that this LD block contains an OA susceptibility locus [27]. Both genes were expressed in OA joint tissue but were down-regulated in OA cartilage compared to normal control cartilage [45].

In addition, we found that the effect of the HFE rs1799945 on symptomatic DIP OA was diluted by the carriage of the ESR1 rs9340799 minor allele. Both genes may play a role in hand OA, which is particularly prevalent among women, especially post menopause. The rs1799945 variant in the HFE (hemochromatosis Fe) gene is the most common genetic factor in hereditary hemochromatosis. A high risk of developing OA has been observed in iron overload patients, who carry an HFE mutation [46]. Increasing evidence shows that a link between defective iron metabolism and tissue responses may drive the OA phenotype [47]. A significant increase occurs in women’s iron levels during menopausal transition [48]. Therefore, iron increase could be a risk factor in age-related OA. Candidate gene association studies consistently showed associations between mutations within the HFE gene and different hand OA phenotypes [49]. Inverse changes have been observed between iron and estrogen levels in healthy women during menopausal transition [50].

The estrogen receptor 1 alpha (ESR1) gene has been investigated in several genetic studies of knee OA, but very little in relation to hand OA. Valdes et al. [51] reported an association between the gene and clinical knee OA in women but not in men. Bergink et al. [52] found an association between the ESR1 haplotype and radiographic knee OA in elderly men and women. One study of Japanese women that investigated the association of PvuII (rs2234693) and XbaI (rs9340799) SNPs in the ESR1 gene with generalized hand OA observed an approximately two-fold increase in the risk of severe generalized OA among participants carrying heterozygous genotypes for both rs2234693 and rs9340799 loci [53]. However, these associations have not been replicated in European descent for hand OA [26]; in European descent the PvuII variant allele has been associated with a reduced risk of hip OA in elderly women [54].

The SNPs selected for exploratory analysis in our study are located in potential candidate genes for OA identified by GWAS. We found that the variants in the BCAP29, DIO2, DUS4L, DVWA, HLA, PARD3B, PTGS2, TGFB1 and TRIB1 genes were associated with OA across multiple sites [27][33]. We also discovered that the TGFB1 (rs1800470, formerly known as rs1982073) variant allele (Leu10) was associated with a substantially increased risk of symptomatic DIP OA, but not radiographic OA. Transforming growth factor-β (TGFB) is a multifunctional growth factor with widespread effects on multiple tissues, including an important role in cartilage matrix metabolism. Elevated TGFB1 levels have been identified in the synovial fluid of patients with OA [55], and levels after meniscectomy are reflective of future bone and cartilage changes [56]. The functional role of the Leu10Pro polymorphism remains largely unknown, but some evidence exists that it affects TGFB1 secretion and functions in hepatic cells [57]. Earlier, this polymorphism was believed to be associated with a radiographic spinal OA among Japanese women [32].

Our study had both strengths and limitations. The main limitation was the relatively small sample size, due to which the study had low power to detect small effects. One major strength was that it consisted of random samples of ethnically relatively homogenous Finnish origin. The Finnish population is one of the best-studied genetic isolates, which originated from a small founder population some 2000 years ago. Therefore, the Finnish population has a relatively homogenous gene pool [58] offering optimal material for association studies. We also chose to have only women in our study, thus findings that might be restricted to men were left undetected. Moreover, the age range (45–63 years) of the participants was selected to cover the age of occupationally active women, whose prevalence of hand OA is rapidly increasing. Finally, dentists and teachers have a similar level of education, although occupational exposures related to hand use, and lifestyle factors such as obesity, differed.

The current findings were also unlikely to have been influenced by selection bias. The prevalence of the studied hand OA phenotypes was similar to those observed in other studies [59], [60]. Yet, the ‘healthy worker effect’ may have led to an underestimation of associations between SNPs and hand OA, especially for symptomatic DIP OA. Dentists suffering from severe pain in the hand joints may not be able to continue in their profession and therefore were outside the occupationally active group that was our target population. In contrast, teachers with symptomatic hand OA may remain active in their profession. Indeed, occupation-stratified analyses revealed that most of the studied SNPs had a different effect on hand OA in the two occupational groups.

To summarize, by replicating and partly confirming earlier studies of OA susceptibility polymorphisms, our results further support the theory that the A2BP1 and TBGF1 genes are hand OA susceptibility genes. OA is a globally significant medical, social, and economic problem and therefore merits attention in order to develop better prevention methods and therapies that can be applied worldwide. The identification of susceptibility genes is a promising basis for OA prevention and treatment.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Description of SNPs selected for replication and exploratory analyses. References for Table S1 [61], [62].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097417.s001

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Sirpa Hyttinen for the genotyping results, and Mari Kukkonen who transferred the data to the database.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: SH SS TV KL PL-A AH. Performed the experiments: SH SS TV KL. Analyzed the data: SH SS TV KL. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AH. Wrote the paper: SH SS TV KL PL-A AH.

References

  1. 1. Driban JB, Sitler MR, Barbe MF, Balasubramanian E (2010) Is osteoarthritis a heterogeneous disease that can be stratified into subsets? Clinical rheumatology 29: 123–131.
  2. 2. Loughlin J (2005) The genetic epidemiology of human primary osteoarthritis: current status. Expert reviews in molecular medicine 7: 1–12.
  3. 3. Spector TD, Cicuttini F, Baker J, Loughlin J, Hart D (1996) Genetic influences on osteoarthritis in women: a twin study. Bmj 312: 940–943.
  4. 4. Kalichman L, Hernandez-Molina G (2010) Hand osteoarthritis: an epidemiological perspective. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 39: 465–476.
  5. 5. Kloppenburg M, Kwok WY (2012) Hand osteoarthritis–a heterogeneous disorder. Nature reviews Rheumatology 8: 22–31.
  6. 6. MacGregor AJ, Antoniades L, Matson M, Andrew T, Spector TD (2000) The genetic contribution to radiographic hip osteoarthritis in women: results of a classic twin study. Arthritis Rheum 43: 2410–2416.
  7. 7. Cicuttini FM, Spector TD (1996) Genetics of osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 55: 665–667.
  8. 8. Leppavuori J, Kujala U, Kinnunen J, Kaprio J, Nissila M, et al. (1999) Genome scan for predisposing loci for distal interphalangeal joint osteoarthritis: evidence for a locus on 2q. Am J Hum Genet 65: 1060–1067.
  9. 9. Demissie S, Cupples LA, Myers R, Aliabadi P, Levy D, et al. (2002) Genome scan for quantity of hand osteoarthritis: the Framingham Study. Arthritis Rheum 46: 946–952.
  10. 10. Stefansson SE, Jonsson H, Ingvarsson T, Manolescu I, Jonsson HH, et al. (2003) Genomewide scan for hand osteoarthritis: a novel mutation in matrilin-3. Am J Hum Genet 72: 1448–1459.
  11. 11. Hunter DJ, Demissie S, Cupples LA, Aliabadi P, Felson DT (2004) A genome scan for joint-specific hand osteoarthritis susceptibility: The Framingham Study. Arthritis Rheum 50: 2489–2496.
  12. 12. Greig C, Spreckley K, Aspinwall R, Gillaspy E, Grant M, et al. (2006) Linkage to nodal osteoarthritis: quantitative and qualitative analyses of data from a whole-genome screen identify trait-dependent susceptibility loci. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 65: 1131–1138.
  13. 13. Livshits G, Kato BS, Zhai G, Hart DJ, Hunter D, et al. (2007) Genomewide linkage scan of hand osteoarthritis in female twin pairs showing replication of quantitative trait loci on chromosomes 2 and 19. Ann Rheum Dis 66: 623–627.
  14. 14. Ryder JJ, Garrison K, Song F, Hooper L, Skinner J, et al. (2008) Genetic associations in peripheral joint osteoarthritis and spinal degenerative disease: a systematic review. Ann Rheum Dis 67: 584–591.
  15. 15. Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ (2005) Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nature reviews Genetics 6: 95–108.
  16. 16. Gonzalez A (2013) Osteoarthritis year 2013 in review: genetics and genomics. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 21: 1443–1451.
  17. 17. Ikegawa S (2013) The genetics of common degenerative skeletal disorders: osteoarthritis and degenerative disc disease. Annual review of genomics and human genetics 14: 245–256.
  18. 18. Zhai G, van Meurs JB, Livshits G, Meulenbelt I, Valdes AM, et al. (2009) A genome-wide association study suggests that a locus within the ataxin 2 binding protein 1 gene is associated with hand osteoarthritis: the Treat-OA consortium. J Med Genet 46: 614–616.
  19. 19. Kerkhof HJ, Lories RJ, Meulenbelt I, Jonsdottir I, Valdes AM, et al. (2010) A genome-wide association study identifies an osteoarthritis susceptibility locus on chromosome 7q22. Arthritis Rheum 62: 499–510.
  20. 20. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16: 494–502.
  21. 21. Solovieva S, Vehmas T, Riihimaki H, Luoma K, Leino-Arjas P (2005) Hand use and patterns of joint involvement in osteoarthritis. A comparison of female dentists and teachers. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44: 521–528.
  22. 22. Cohen J (1968) Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull 70: 213–220.
  23. 23. Vaes RB, Rivadeneira F, Kerkhof JM, Hofman A, Pols HA, et al. (2009) Genetic variation in the GDF5 region is associated with osteoarthritis, height, hip axis length and fracture risk: the Rotterdam study. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 68: 1754–1760.
  24. 24. Carroll GJ (2006) HFE gene mutations are associated with osteoarthritis in the index or middle finger metacarpophalangeal joints. The Journal of rheumatology 33: 741–743.
  25. 25. Riancho JA, Garcia-Ibarbia C, Gravani A, Raine EV, Rodriguez-Fontenla C, et al. (2010) Common variations in estrogen-related genes are associated with severe large-joint osteoarthritis: a multicenter genetic and functional study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 18: 927–933.
  26. 26. Wise BL, Demissie S, Cupples LA, Felson DT, Yang M, et al. (2009) The relationship of estrogen receptor-alpha and -beta genes with osteoarthritis of the hand. The Journal of rheumatology 36: 2772–2779.
  27. 27. Evangelou E, Valdes AM, Kerkhof HJ, Styrkarsdottir U, Zhu Y, et al. (2011) Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies confirms a susceptibility locus for knee osteoarthritis on chromosome 7q22. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 349–355.
  28. 28. Meulenbelt I, Min JL, Bos S, Riyazi N, Houwing-Duistermaat JJ, et al. (2008) Identification of DIO2 as a new susceptibility locus for symptomatic osteoarthritis. Human molecular genetics 17: 1867–1875.
  29. 29. Miyamoto Y, Shi D, Nakajima M, Ozaki K, Sudo A, et al. (2008) Common variants in DVWA on chromosome 3p24.3 are associated with susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis. Nature genetics 40: 994–998.
  30. 30. Nakajima M, Takahashi A, Kou I, Rodriguez-Fontenla C, Gomez-Reino JJ, et al. (2010) New sequence variants in HLA class II/III region associated with susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis identified by genome-wide association study. PLoS One 5: e9723.
  31. 31. Valdes AM, Loughlin J, Timms KM, van Meurs JJ, Southam L, et al. (2008) Genome-wide association scan identifies a prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 variant involved in risk of knee osteoarthritis. Am J Hum Genet 82: 1231–1240.
  32. 32. Yamada Y (2000) Association of a Leu(10)–>Pro polymorphism of the transforming growth factor-beta1 with genetic susceptibility to osteoporosis and spinal osteoarthritis. Mech Ageing Dev 116: 113–123.
  33. 33. Panoutsopoulou K, Southam L, Elliott KS, Wrayner N, Zhai G, et al. (2011) Insights into the genetic architecture of osteoarthritis from stage 1 of the arcOGEN study. Ann Rheum Dis 70: 864–867.
  34. 34. Lee PH, Shatkay H (2008) F-SNP: computationally predicted functional SNPs for disease association studies. Nucleic Acids Res 36: D820–824.
  35. 35. Jin SY, Hong SJ, Yang HI, Park SD, Yoo MC, et al. (2004) Estrogen receptor-alpha gene haplotype is associated with primary knee osteoarthritis in Korean population. Arthritis Res Ther 6: R415–421.
  36. 36. Andreassen CN, Alsner J, Overgaard J, Herskind C, Haviland J, et al. (2005) TGFB1 polymorphisms are associated with risk of late normal tissue complications in the breast after radiotherapy for early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 75: 18–21.
  37. 37. Sole X, Guino E, Valls J, Iniesta R, Moreno V (2006) SNPStats: a web tool for the analysis of association studies. Bioinformatics 22: 1928–1929.
  38. 38. Sidak Z (1967) Rectangular Confidence Regions for the Means of Multivariate Normal Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association 62: 626–633.
  39. 39. Ross JM, Kowalchuk RM, Shaulinsky J, Ross L, Ryan D, et al. (2003) Association of heterozygous hemochromatosis C282Y gene mutation with hand osteoarthritis. The Journal of rheumatology 30: 121–125.
  40. 40. Sarachana T, Hu VW (2013) Genome-wide identification of transcriptional targets of RORA reveals direct regulation of multiple genes associated with autism spectrum disorder. Molecular autism 4: 14.
  41. 41. Huang YT, Heist RS, Chirieac LR, Lin X, Skaug V, et al. (2009) Genome-wide analysis of survival in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 27: 2660–2667.
  42. 42. Ma L, Hanson RL, Traurig MT, Muller YL, Kaur BP, et al. (2010) Evaluation of A2BP1 as an obesity gene. Diabetes 59: 2837–2845.
  43. 43. Nakahata S, Kawamoto S (2005) Tissue-dependent isoforms of mammalian Fox-1 homologs are associated with tissue-specific splicing activities. Nucleic acids research 33: 2078–2089.
  44. 44. Ding H, Solovieva S, Vehmas T, Takala EP, Leino-Arjas P (2010) Hand osteoarthritis and pinch grip strength among middle-aged female dentists and teachers. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology 39: 84–87.
  45. 45. Raine EV, Wreglesworth N, Dodd AW, Reynard LN, Loughlin J (2012) Gene expression analysis reveals HBP1 as a key target for the osteoarthritis susceptibility locus that maps to chromosome 7q22. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 71: 2020–2027.
  46. 46. Husar-Memmer E, Stadlmayr A, Datz C, Zwerina J (2014) HFE-related hemochromatosis: an update for the rheumatologist. Current rheumatology reports 16: 393.
  47. 47. Guggenbuhl P, Brissot P, Loreal O (2011) Miscellaneous non-inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions. Haemochromatosis: the bone and the joint. Best practice & research Clinical rheumatology 25: 649–664.
  48. 48. Jian J, Pelle E, Huang X (2009) Iron and menopause: does increased iron affect the health of postmenopausal women? Antioxidants & redox signaling 11: 2939–2943.
  49. 49. Alizadeh BZ, Njajou OT, Hazes JM, Hofman A, Slagboom PE, et al. (2007) The H63D variant in the HFE gene predisposes to arthralgia, chondrocalcinosis and osteoarthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases 66: 1436–1442.
  50. 50. Huang X, Fung ET, Yip C, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A (2008) Serum prohepcidin is associated with soluble transferrin receptor-1 but not ferritin in healthy post-menopausal women. Blood cells, molecules & diseases 41: 265–269.
  51. 51. Valdes AM, Van Oene M, Hart DJ, Surdulescu GL, Loughlin J, et al. (2006) Reproducible genetic associations between candidate genes and clinical knee osteoarthritis in men and women. Arthritis and rheumatism 54: 533–539.
  52. 52. Bergink AP, van Meurs JB, Loughlin J, Arp PP, Fang Y, et al. (2003) Estrogen receptor alpha gene haplotype is associated with radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee in elderly men and women. Arthritis Rheum 48: 1913–1922.
  53. 53. Ushiyama T, Ueyama H, Inoue K, Nishioka J, Ohkubo I, et al. (1998) Estrogen receptor gene polymorphism and generalized osteoarthritis. The Journal of rheumatology 25: 134–137.
  54. 54. Lian K, Lui L, Zmuda JM, Nevitt MC, Hochberg MC, et al. (2007) Estrogen receptor alpha genotype is associated with a reduced prevalence of radiographic hip osteoarthritis in elderly Caucasian women. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 15: 972–978.
  55. 55. Schlaak JF, Pfers I, Meyer Zum Buschenfelde KH, Marker-Hermann E (1996) Different cytokine profiles in the synovial fluid of patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondylarthropathies. Clin Exp Rheumatol 14: 155–162.
  56. 56. Fahlgren A, Andersson B, Messner K (2001) TGF-beta1 as a prognostic factor in the process of early osteoarthrosis in the rabbit knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 9: 195–202.
  57. 57. Gu X, Ji X, Shi LH, Yi CH, Zhao YP, et al. (2012) Transforming growth factor beta1 gene variation Leu10Pro affects secretion and function in hepatic cells. Digestive diseases and sciences 57: 2901–2909.
  58. 58. Peltonen L, Jalanko A, Varilo T (1999) Molecular genetics of the Finnish disease heritage. Hum Mol Genet 8: 1913–1923.
  59. 59. van Saase JL, van Romunde LK, Cats A, Vandenbroucke JP, Valkenburg HA (1989) Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: Zoetermeer survey. Comparison of radiological osteoarthritis in a Dutch population with that in 10 other populations. Ann Rheum Dis 48: 271–280.
  60. 60. Hirsch R, Guralnik JM, Ling SM, Fried LP, Hochberg MC (2000) The patterns and prevalence of hand osteoarthritis in a population of disabled older women: The Women’s Health and Aging Study. Osteoarthritis and cartilage/OARS, Osteoarthritis Research Society 8 Suppl A: S16–21.
  61. 61. Miyamoto Y, Mabuchi A, Shi D, Kubo T, Takatori Y, et al. (2007) A functional polymorphism in the 5′ UTR of GDF5 is associated with susceptibility to osteoarthritis. Nature genetics 39: 529–533.
  62. 62. Evangelou E, Chapman K, Meulenbelt I, Karassa FB, Loughlin J, et al. (2009) Large-scale analysis of association between GDF5 and FRZB variants and osteoarthritis of the hip, knee, and hand. Arthritis Rheum 60: 1710–1721.