Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Tomato with rolB Gene Results in Enhancement of Fruit Quality and Foliar Resistance against Fungal Pathogens

  • Waheed Arshad,

    Affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Ihsan-ul- Haq,

    Affiliation: Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Mohammad Tahir Waheed,

    Affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Kirankumar S. Mysore,

    Affiliation: Plant Biology Division, The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, Ardmore, Oklahoma, United States of America

  • Bushra Mirza

    dr.bushramirza@gmail.com

    Affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan

Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Tomato with rolB Gene Results in Enhancement of Fruit Quality and Foliar Resistance against Fungal Pathogens

  • Waheed Arshad, 
  • Ihsan-ul- Haq, 
  • Mohammad Tahir Waheed, 
  • Kirankumar S. Mysore, 
  • Bushra Mirza
PLOS
x
  • Published: May 9, 2014
  • DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096979

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is the second most important cultivated crop next to potato, worldwide. Tomato serves as an important source of antioxidants in human diet. Alternaria solani and Fusarium oxysporum cause early blight and vascular wilt of tomato, respectively, resulting in severe crop losses. The foremost objective of the present study was to generate transgenic tomato plants with rolB gene and evaluate its effect on plant morphology, nutritional contents, yield and resistance against fungal infection. Tomato cv. Rio Grande was transformed via Agrobacterium tumefaciens harbouring rolB gene of Agrobacterium rhizogenes. rolB. Biochemical analyses showed considerable improvement in nutritional quality of transgenic tomato fruits as indicated by 62% increase in lycopene content, 225% in ascorbic acid content, 58% in total phenolics and 26% in free radical scavenging activity. Furthermore, rolB gene significantly improved the defence response of leaves of transgenic plants against two pathogenic fungal strains A. solani and F. oxysporum. Contrarily, transformed plants exhibited altered morphology and reduced fruit yield. In conclusion, rolB gene from A. rhizogenes can be used to generate transgenic tomato with increased nutritional contents of fruits as well as improved foliar tolerance against fungal pathogens.

Introduction

Tomato is an important cultivated crop that is economically attractive for medium-scale farmers due to its high yield and relatively short duration. Across the globe, in 2008, tomato production was about 136.230 million tonnes from an area of 4.837 million hectares with an average yield of 28.16 tonnes/ha [1]. Tomato fruit contains variety of compounds including antioxidants such as lycopene and ascorbic acid, which are important for human health.

Tomato crop production is affected by a number of biotic factors including viruses, bacteria, fungi and nematodes causing devastating diseases resulting in great economic losses [2]. Early blight and Fusarium wilt are two very important and devastating diseases of tomato. Early blight, also known as Alternaria leaf spots, is a common disease caused by the fungus A. solani, while Fusarium wilt is caused by the soil dwelling fungus F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Various methodologies have been developed to lower these crop losses by different diseases to ensure the food supply. Development of disease resistant plants could be the most efficient practice with less hazards [3].

In addition to modulatory role in cell differentiation and plant growth, rol genes from Agrobacterium rhizogenes are the most probable activators of secondary metabolism in transformed cells in diverse plant families including Vitaceae, Solanaceae, Rosaceae, Araliaceae and Rubiaceae [4]. The exact mode of action of rolB gene is not clearly understood. Various researchers have reported different findings regarding rolB expression. It has been reported that rolB transformed calli of Rubia cordifolia showed increase in the activity of isochorismate synthase (ICS) gene which in turn enhanced the production of anthraquinones [5]. RolB protein, β-glucosidase, enhances the concentration of active and free indole acetic acid (IAA) by its release from inactive conjugates of glucose [6]. Conversely, IAA-glucosides are not the rolB substrates in plant tissues [7]. However, they increase auxin sensitivity in the rolB transgenic cells [8], [9]. The auxin sensitivity also depends on increased tyrosine phosphatase activity in rolB transformed cells that distracts the signal transduction pathway of the hormone [10]. Such transduction and sensitivity alter the physiological pattern of the transformed cells and ultimately the whole plant [11].

The rolB gene plays a primary role in plant morphogenesis by functioning as a meristem stimulating gene for a variety of organs including shoots, roots and flowers [12]. Generally, the rolB gene in transformed plants is associated with the increased or decreased apical dominance, wider leaves, small to large flowers, reduced flower development and flower induction, low pollen viability, enhanced rooting and stunted phenotype. It has been established that the rolB gene influences the level of endogenous hormones but these dissimilar observations point towards the unpredictable effect of rolB gene in the transformed plants [13]. Expression of rolB gene has been reported in a number of plant species including tobacco [14][17], kalanchoe, carrot [14], [18], [19], Antirrhinum [20], woody plants [13], soybean [21] and tomato [22], [23]. Most of these studies concerning the expression of rol genes are related to growth and development of plants. However, the effect of these genes in relation to the improvement of nutritional contents of tomato fruit has not been investigated to date.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of rolB gene expression in tomato plants in terms of fruit quality. Changes in plant morphology were observed in tomato plants expressing rolB gene. The fruits of transgenic tomato plants exhibited higher nutritional quality and the tomato plants showed foliar tolerance to two fungal pathogens A. solani and F. oxysporum.

Materials and Methods

Plant material

The seeds of tomato variety Rio Grande, purchased from the local market, were surface sterilized with 5% (w/v) sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution adding one drop of Tween-20 for 10–15 min with continuous shaking followed by rinsing thrice with sterilized distilled water under aseptic condition. The sterilized seeds were germinated on half strength MS [24] medium (pH 5.8) with 0.8% agar. The Petri plates were kept in dark for four days and later shifted to growth room for 10 days at 25°C under 16 h light and 8 h dark cycle.

Agrobacterium strain and transformation vector

Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harbouring binary vector pLBR30 was used for transformation. Plasmids pLBR30 (Figure 1A) contains the rolB gene sequences from TL-DNA of A. rhizogenes, under the control of double 35SCaMV promoter and 35S CaMV terminator, ligated into the KpnI/XbaI sites of the vector pRT99 [25]. The vector also contains a selectable marker neomycin phosphotransferase II gene (NPTII) that confers resistance to antibiotic kanamycin. This vector was provided by Dr. David Tepfer from the Institut National de la Recherché Agronomique (INRA), Versailles, France. In addition, A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 carrying binary vector p35SGUSint (Figure 1A) containing GUS reporter gene under CaMV35S promoter was used to generate GUS transformed tomato plants which were used as control. This binary vector was kindly provided by Dr. Sarah Grant, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Molecular analysis of rolB transformed plants.

(A) T-DNA region of (a) pLBR30 with rolB gene (b) p35SGUSint with GUS gene. LB: Left border; 35S P: CaMV35S promoter; 35S T: CaMV35S terminator; NOS P: Nopaline synthase promoter; NOS T: Nopaline synthase terminator; NPTII: Neomycin phosphotransferase II gene; GUS: β-glucuronidase gene; int: intron; RB: Right border (B) PCR amplification of rolB gene in rolB and GUS gene in GUS transformed tomato plants cv. Rio Grande. Lanes 1 to 6 = rolB transformed lines RB I to RB VI; Ma = DNA Marker (100 bp); Mb = DNA Marker (1 kb); P = Plasmid DNA (+ve control); C = Untransformed WT control (-ve control) (C) Southern blot hybridization of rolB transformed tomato plants. Lanes 1–6 = rolB transformed lines RB I to RB VI; C = Untransformed WT control

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.g001

Transformation procedure

A single colony of A. tumefaciens from LB agar plates kept at 4°C was picked and inoculated in 50 mL LB broth supplemented with 50 mg/L kanamycin and 10 mg/L rifampicin. The culture was placed overnight at 28°C with continuous shaking at 225 rpm in a shaker incubator. Agrobacterium culture was centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended in MS liquid medium (inoculation medium) containing 200 µM acetosyringone and density was set to OD600 = 0.75. The cotyledons explants from 10 days old aseptically grown seedlings of Rio Grande were wounded carefully with a fine needle at multiple sites and transferred to the Petri plates having inoculation medium. Total 266 cotyledons were infected for 30 min with A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 harbouring rolB gene. Later the explants were co-cultivated for 48 h on co-cultivation medium (CCM: MS medium supplemented with 2 mg/L zeatin +0.1 mg/L IAA) in dark and then transferred to selection medium (SM: MS medium supplemented with 2 mg/L zeatin, 0.1 mg/L IAA, 250 mg/L cefotaxime, 250 mg/L ticarcillin, 100 mg/L kanamycin) after washing with half strength MS liquid medium supplemented with 500 mg/L cefotaxime. The plates were kept in dark for one week at 25±2°C and finally transferred to growth room. The explants with emerging shoot primordia were carefully shifted to shoot elongation medium (SEM: MS medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/L zeatin, 0.1 mg/L IAA, 250 mg/L cefotaxime, 250 mg/L ticarcillin, 100 mg/L kanamycin). The elongated shoots with 3–4 cm length were cultured on rooting medium (RM: MS medium supplemented with 0.05 mg/L IBA and 100 mg/L kanamycin) for root development. The plantlets with well developed roots were then shifted to pots and raised to maturity. The control plants transformed with A. tumefaciens strain LBA4404 carrying p35SGUSint were also raised in the same way as described above. The morphological characteristics were observed and recorded for both transformed (rolB and GUS) and untransformed wild-type (WT) plants. Data for plant height, number of fruits per plant and fruit weight was taken after 16 weeks of sowing whereas the root development was assessed after four weeks.

Molecular analysis of putative transformed plants

The putative transformants that survived on kanamycin containing medium were subjected to molecular analysis through PCR and Southern blot hybridization in order to confirm the stable transformation. The genomic DNA was isolated from leaves of putatively transformed tomato plants using protocol described by [26]. About 50–100 ng genomic and 10 ng plasmid DNA was used for PCR amplification in 50 µL reaction volume comprising of 1x PCR buffer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.25 µM of both oligonucleotide primers and 1.5 U Taq polymerase. PCR reactions were carried out to amplify 779 bp fragment of rolB gene by using rolB gene specific primers (RB F 5′ATGGATCCCAAATTGCTATTCCTTCCACGA-3′ and RB R 5′-TAGGCTTCTTTCTTCAGGTTTACTGCAGC-3′) and 895 bp fragment of GUS gene by using GUS gene specific primers (GUS F 5′-AACGGCAAGAAAAAGCAGTC-3′ and GUS R 5′-GAGCGTCGCAGAACATTACA-3′). The PCR reactions were subjected to 1 cycle at 94°C for 5 min; 35 cycles at 94°C for 35 sec, 55°C (rolB) or 56°C (GUS) for 35 sec, 72°C for 45 sec and 1 cycle at 72°C for 10 min.

To confirm integration of the transgene, Southern blot hybridization of transformed plants was performed [27] using the DIG High Prime DNA Labelling and Detection Kit (Roche, Germany). The extracted genomic DNA (20 µg) was digested enzymatically with KpnI (Promega) at 37°C over night and then separated on 0.8% agarose gel. DNA from agarose gel was shifted to a positively charged Hybond N+ nylon membrane in the presence of 20x SSC buffer solution (NaCl + Na-Acetate, pH 7). The membrane was hybridized with the probe (Digoxygenin-11-dUTP labelled 779 bp PCR product of rolB gene) at 40°C and then washing, blocking and immunological detection on X-ray film using chemiluminescence substrate CSPD were performed.

Estimation of lycopene content from transgenic tomato fruits

Fully mature red tomatoes were harvested from selected homozygous rolB lines along with control plants (GUS transformed and WT) and lycopene content was extracted and quantified using protocol described by [28] with some modifications. The tomatoes were ground into a fine paste. About 3.0 g sample was taken in a beaker and 100 mL extraction solution comprising mixture of n-hexane:acetone:ethanol (2:1:1; v/v/v) was added to the tomato paste. The homogenate was sonicated for 10 min and 15 mL distilled water was added. In a separating funnel hexane phase was separated and evaporated. The dried sample was resuspended in 1 mL of ethyl acetate:tetrahydrofuran:acetonitrile:met​hanol(50:7.5:15:27.5). The sample was analyzed for the lycopene content using high pressure liquid chromatography (Agilent 1200) at 475 nm wavelength. The column used for lycopene analysis was Supelco C18 with 4.6×250 mm and 5 µm particle size. The flow rate was maintained at 1.5 mL/min. The mobile phase was a mixture of methanol:acetonitrile:ethyl acetate:n-hexane (7:7:2:2). Lycopene quantification was carried out by using a standard calibration curve based on peak area (y = 44.62x –123.2, R2 = 0.998) by using 10 to 50 µg/mL standard lycopene (>98%; Shanghai Angoal Chemicals Co. China). The relative increase in lycopene content of each transgenic line was calculated by using the following formula:

Estimation of ascorbic acid and total phenolics from transgenic tomato fruits

Methanol extracts of three tomatoes from each rolB transgenic lines and control (GUS transformed and untransformed) were prepared for ascorbic acid and total phenolic analysis. Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) content in tomato fruit was determined using iodine titration method as described by [29]. Crude methanol extracts (10 mg) of transgenic tomatoes were dissolved in 1 ml of 100% methanol. The mixture was sonicated for 5 min and 150 µL of 1% starch indicator solution was added and mixed well. The samples were titrated against 0.1N iodine solution until an endpoint blue colour persists for more than 20 sec. Volume of the 0.1N iodine solution used in each titration was recorded and used for quantification of ascorbic acid in the sample (1 µL of 0.1N iodine used = 8.8 µg of ascorbic acid). All the samples were analyzed in triplicate. The relative increase in ascorbic acid content of each transgenic line was calculated by using the following formula:

Total phenolic content of methanol extracts of transgenic and control tomatoes were determined with the help of Folin Ciocalteu assay as described by [30]. Crude methanol extracts of fruits were dissolved in 50% (v/v) aqueous methanol to a final concentration of 2 mg/mL. An aliquot of 200 µL of each sample was thoroughly mixed with 200 µL of the Folin Ciocalteu reagent. After 5 min 2 mL of 6% (w/v) Na2CO3 solution was added and total volume was made upto 5 mL with double distilled water. After incubation of 30 min at room temperature, absorbance was measured at 765 nm with the help of UV-vis spectrophotometer (Agilent technologies). Standard calibration curve was prepared by using various concentrations (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 mg/L) of gallic acid. Total phenolics were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g fresh weight. All the samples were analyzed in triplicate. The relative increase in total phenolics of each transgenic line was calculated by using the following formula:

Determination of antioxidant activity

The antioxidant activity of the fruit extracts from both transformed (rolB and GUS) and untransformed plants were determined by measuring their potential to scavenge the free radicals 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl (DPPH) according to the modified protocol of [31]. An amount of 3.2 mg of DPPH was dissolved in 100 mL of 82% aqueous methanol. Crude methanol extracts (15 mg/mL) were dissolved in 1.5 mL of 67% aqueous methanol and samples were sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 5 min. DPPH solution (2.8 mL) was added to each vial along 200 µL aliquots of diluted methanol extract (10, 100, 1000 ppm). The mixture was vortexed and after one hour, absorbance was taken at 517 nm by using UV-vis spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies). Aqueous methanol solution (82%) was used as blank while mixture of DPPH and methanol (14:1 v/v) was taken as control. All the samples were analyzed in triplicate and their scavenging potential was calculated by applying following formula:

EC50 values of samples were calculated by means of graphical method. Moreover, the relative increase in antioxidant activity of each transgenic line was calculated by using the following formula:

Disease response assays of rolB transformed plants

The response of rolB gene transformants for pathogen infection was determined by using electrolyte leakage test and detached leaf assay.

Electrolyte leakage test was conducted on leaves from 24 plants of 9 homozygous rolB lines in the presence of 5 mM fusaric acid (Sigma) following the protocol described by [32]. One gram leaf discs (~8 mm diameter) from different mature transgenic lines and control plants (GUS transformed and untransformed) were incubated in 25 mL of 3% sucrose solution supplemented with 5 mM fusaric acid and conductivity of solution was measured using digital conductivity meter. The data was statistically analyzed using MSTATC.

Resistance of rolB transformed plants was tested against two fungal strains (F. oxysporum and A. solani) by using detached leaf assay. Fungal strains were inoculated on 4% Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA) medium and incubated at 28°C for two weeks till sporulation stage. Detached leaves were rinsed with sterile distilled water, blotted dry and cultured on SDA medium containing fungal cultures. Petri plates were sealed with parafilm and stored at 28°C for 7 days. Twenty four leaflets (8 leaflets from 3 plants) from each transgenic line were inoculated on each fungal strain. Experiment was performed with three replicates for each treatment. Visual observations were taken regularly for fungal growth and development of disease symptoms on leaves. After 7 days, the numbers of infected leaves were counted for each treatment and disease incidence was calculated as:

The total infected area of 24 leaves was measured by using optical planimeter and the percentage of their mean value was calculated and finally the disease severity was estimated according to the scale described by [33].

Results

Agrobacterium-mediated tomato transformation was successfully used to produce transgenic tomato plants expressing A. rhizogenes rolB gene. Out of 266 cotyledons co-cultivated with A. tumefaciens, 102 regenerated shoots after six weeks on regeneration medium containing 100 mg/L kanamycin. Shifting of elongated shoots to rooting medium supplemented with 100 mg/L kanamycin resulted in root development in 61 shoots (Table S1). Similarly, 47 regenerated shoots from 100 explants that were transformed with p35SGUSint (control) were rooted on rooting medium containing 100 mg/L kanamycin.

Confirmation of transgene integration

Out of 61 tested plants, 58 showed an expected PCR product of 779 bp for rolB gene (Figure 1B, data shown for six rolB lines). Transformation frequency was calculated on the basis of rolB PCR positive plants with respect to total number of co-cultivated explants and was found to be 21.80% (Table S1). In case of GUS transformed plants, PCR yielded amplification of 895 bp fragment of GUS gene while no such band was observed in WT plants (Figure 1B, data shown for six transformed lines). In case of GUS transformed plants, transformation efficiency was 37% (Table S1).

Southern blot analysis for rolB transformants showed that all the samples except negative control gave significantly high signals with DIG-labelled rolB probe, indicating the presence of rolB gene in these lines. It was observed that in one rolB transformed line RB I two copies of rolB gene were inserted in the tomato genome compared to rest, which contained only one copy (Figure 1C, data shown for six rolB lines). The band pattern was slightly different between different transgenic lines suggesting the independent transformation events. As expected, no band was observed in WT (negative control).

Morphological analysis of rolB transgenic lines

Transgenic lines that exhibited stable integration of transgene and produced viable seeds were selected for further analyses. Seeds of the T0 transgenic tomato plants were germinated on selection medium to obtain transgenic T1 progeny. Results, as shown in Table S2, indicate that the transgene was inherited successfully in the T1 progeny of rolB gene transformed plants and followed the Mendelian ratio of 3:1. One of the rolB expressing transgenic lines (RB I) exhibited the Mendelian segregation pattern of 15:1. T2 generation was raised from the transgenic tomato seeds in the same way as described above. Homozygous lines from T2 progeny which showed 100% kanamycin resistance were selected for further analyses.

The rolB expressing transgenic plants had a change in their vegetative growth and morphology when compared to WT tomato plants. However, no significant difference was observed between transformed control (GUS transformed plants) and WT tomato plants. All rolB transgenic lines were significantly shorter and produced smaller fruits when compared to WT plants (Figure 2a). The rolB expressing tomato plants had an average height of 42.3 cm as compared to 94 cm for WT plants. A reduction in apical dominance along with shorter internodal length was also observed in rolB expressing plants. Leaves were also smaller, less serrated and more oval in shape as compared to GUS control and WT. In some rolB transformed plants, mild wrinkled leaves were observed (Figure 2c). Interestingly, rolB expressing plants had profuse, long and hairy root system as compared to control (Figure 2d). The flowers were normal in size but some of them were infertile and did not produce fruits. Fruits that developed in rolB transgenic plants were smaller in size (Figure 2b) and matured earlier when compared to the fruits of control and WT plants. Number of fruits and their weight was calculated from 24 rolB expressing plants that were derived from nine independent transgenic lines. The rolB expressing tomato plants produced an average of 11 fruits per plant whereas control and WT plants produced and an average of 15 fruits per plant. Average fruit weight of rolB transgenic tomatoes was 38 g and was significantly lower than control/WT plants that had 74 g.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Morphological analysis of rolB transgenic tomato plants cv. Rio Grande.

(a) mature plants (b) leaves (c) roots (d) tomato fruit (whole and TS).

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.g002

Fruits of rolB transformed plants showed enhanced nutritional quality

To investigate the effect of rolB expression on important nutritional contents, biochemical analyses were performed on the fruits generated from rolB expressing plants. Strikingly, all the rolB expressing tomato lines showed significant increase (18 to 62%) in their lycopene content when compared to control and WT. The line RB I exhibited maximum increase of 62% in lycopene content (76 µg/g) while two other lines RB VII and RB IX showed an increase of 59% (74 µg/g) and 58% (74 µg/g), respectively in their lycopene content when compared to controls (Figure 3A). All the tested rolB expressing tomato fruits showed significantly higher (24 to 225%) ascorbic acid content than the controls. The highest relative increase (225%) in ascorbic acid level was observed for RB I with 333 µg/g ascorbic acid (Figure 3B). In addition, rolB expressing tomato fruits exhibited 11% to 58% increase in total phenolic content. Two rolB lines RB IX and RB VII exhibited maximum increase of 58% (21 mg/g) and 53% (20 mg/g), respectively, in their phenolic contents (Figure 3C). Considerable increase in the antioxidant activities was also observed for all rolB transformed plants as compared to controls. Highest relative increase (26%) in antioxidant activity was exhibited by RB I (EC50 = 536 µg/mL) followed by RB VII (EC50 = 558 µg/mL) and RB IX (EC50 = 564 µg/mL) which showed 23% and 22% increase in their antioxidant capacities, respectively (Figure 3D).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Biochemical analysis of rolB transformed tomato plants.

(A) Determination of Lycopene content (B) Ascorbic acid content (C) Total phenolic content and (D) Antioxidant activity along with their relative increase in fruits of rolB transgenic lines of tomato. RB = rolB transformed; GUS = GUS transformed control; WT = Wild-type (untransformed control). Data represents mean of three replicates. Any two values with same alphabet did not differ significantly at 5% probability level using LSD test.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.g003

Transgenic plants showed enhanced foliar tolerance to fungal pathogens

Analysis of data exhibited that the difference between rolB transgenic lines and controls (both untransformed wild type and GUS transformed) was highly statistically significant at 1% α level (P<0.01, Table 1). Results of electrolyte leakage assay showed that rolB expressing tomato plants exhibited moderate to high level of tolerance to the toxin, fusaric acid, when compared to control and WT tomato plants (Figure 4A). Less electrolyte leakage due to the toxin could be an indicative of enhanced defence response. Least electrolyte leakage was observed in rolB expressing tomato line RB V while the highest was observed in transgenic line RB III.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Disease response of rolB transformed tomato leaves.

(A) Effect of rolB on disease response of leaves of transgenic tomato plants in ion leakage experiment (B) Detached leaf assay of rolB expressing tomato plants (1) Leaves of rolB transformed plants infected with Alternaria solani (2) Control leaves infected with A. solani (3) Leaves of rolB transformed infected with Fusarium oxysporum (4) Control leaves infected with F. oxysporum.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.g004

thumbnail
Table 1. Analysis of variance for electrolyte leakage.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.t001

Mature rolB expressing transgenic T2 plants were directly assayed for their defence response against two fungal pathogens (A. solani and F. oxysporum), by using detached leaves assay (Table 2). Interestingly, leaves of rolB expressing tomato plants exhibited moderate to high levels of tolerance to both fungal pathogens tested (Table 2; Figure 4B). It is evident from the results that all the tested rolB transgenic lines showed disease symptoms. However, they varied in disease incidence and severity level when compared to controls. In case of A. solani, DI ranged from 4.17% (RB IX) to 25% (RB III and RB IV) while DI varied from 4.17% (RB V) to 27.67% (RB III) for Fusarium wilt (Table 2). Moreover, the DS ranged from 1.75% (RB IX) to 16.75% (RB IV) for A. solani and 2.50% (RB V) to 18.75% (RB III) for F. oxysporum. Strikingly, Six rolB lines (RB I, RB II, RB V, RB VI, RB VII and RB VIII) displayed less than 10% disease severity for both A. solani and F. oxysporum and were considered resistant (R) against both these pathogenic fungi. Leaves of WT tomato plants showed very high DI (91.67 and 95.83%) and DS (67.88 and 59.75%) for A. solani and F. oxysporum, respectively. GUS transformed control tomato plants (GUS) were also susceptible to both these fungal pathogens since they had high percentages of DI (79.17 and 83.33%) and DS (63.75 and 52.50%) for A. solani and F. oxysporum, respectively.

thumbnail
Table 2. Disease response of leaves from rolB gene transformed plants against two fungal pathogens on the basis of detached leaf assay.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.t002

Discussion

Improvement of fruit quality is desirable for important cultivated crops that are consumed in human diet. Tomato fruit is a rich source of many compounds such as antioxidants, which are important for human health. Antioxidants have a potential role in preventing and repairing damages caused by oxidative stress [34]. Since individual rol genes of A. rhizogenes are considered as potential enhancers of secondary metabolism in transformed plant cells and are capable of increasing the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites [4], we were interested to investigate the effect of rolB gene on the production of secondary metabolites. We measured lycopene, ascorbic acid and phenloic contents of different lines of rolB expressing tomato plants as well as antioxidant activities of these transgenic lines. We found that tomato plants transformed with rolB gene exhibited enhanced production of secondary metabolites in fruits. Various rolB transgenic tomato fruits differed significantly for their lycopene, ascorbic acid and phenolic contents as well as antioxidant activity compared to control plants. Among different transgenic lines, RB I showed the highest increase in lycopene and ascorbic acid contents as well as exhibited highest antioxidant activity. Compared to other rolB expressing lines, this increased level in RB I could be attributed to the insertion of two copies of rolB gene in the genome, as evident from Southern blot hybridization. In case of phenolic content, highest increase was observed in transgenic line RB IX. A 100 fold increase in resveratrol production has been reported in Vitis amurensis rolB transformed plants [35]. Similarly, Rubia cordifolia calli transformed with rolB gene also showed enhanced antioxidant activity and suppression of reactive oxygen species [5], [36]. Thus, it can be suggested that expression of rolB gene in transformed tomato plants boosted the antioxidant activities of fruits by synergistically altering the secondary metabolism that resulted in enhanced production of lycopene, ascorbic acid and total phenolic contents.

Disease responses of the leaves of rolB transformed plants were evaluated by using electrolyte leakage test and detached leaf assay. Electrolyte leakage is an important indicator linked with the hypersensitive response in plants reacting to pathogen assault [37]. We estimated ion leakage from leaf discs after treating them with a solution of fusaric acid (a toxin produced by Fusarium oxysporum). The results showed that leaves from rolB gene transformed tomato plants exhibited higher degree of tolerance to the toxin as compared to both GUS transformed and WT tomato plants. The results also revealed a significant positive correlation between the quantity of electrolyte loss and the extent of plant susceptibility to pathogens. Some earlier reports have shown that tomato plants transformed with rolD gene exhibited enhanced tolerance against fusaric acid [32]. In general, loss of electrolyte is associated with disruption of cell membrane due to toxins or enzymes resulting in remarkable increase in shifting of K+ and H+ ions across the cell membrane [38].

In detached leaf assay, typical disease symptoms like wilting, chlorosis and necrosis were observed on leaves of all transgenic lines of tomato. However, the degree of diseases incidence and severity in rolB gene transformed plants was significantly lower than WT and GUS transformed control plants. In case of A. solani, seven out of nine rolB transformed lines of tomato exhibited complete resistance while two were moderately resistant. Among different rolB expressing lines, leaves of RB IX showed highest tolerance to A. solani infection. Similarly, in case of F. oxysporum, leaves of seven rolB transformed lines showed complete tolerance while two lines exhibited moderate tolerance. In contrast to A. solani, rolB transgenic line RB V exhibited highest foliar tolerance to F. oxysporum. One possible reason for such improved response could be the defence related compounds such as phenolics [39]. The variable foliar tolerance of different transgenic lines towards A. solani and F. oxysporum might reflect the species specific response of plants against pathogens. The effect of rolD and rolC genes on plant disease resistance has been reported in tomato [32] and strawberry [40], respectively. It is evident that different rol genes have different effects on the growth and metabolism of plants [41]. It has been shown that plant defence response in rol genes transformed plants is activated by a protein kinase/phosphatase cascade through signal transduction [42], [43] and phytoalexin synthesis by Ser/Thr phosphatases [44], [45], [46]. The expression of rol genes under CaMV35S promoter also modifies calcium balance and stimulate the PR-2 protein synthesis [4] leading to phytoalexins synthesis involved in plant defence [47]. Different reports have shown that expression of rol genes also results in altered expression and activity of calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPK) genes in transformed cells, leading to increase in the level of resistance of these transgenic plants against pathogens [48], [49].

Although, among the rol genes, rolB is the most powerful activator of secondary metabolism, it also has growth suppressing effect [4]. In this report, we studied the effect of rolB on the morphology of transformed plants. The rolB expressing tomato plants showed reduction in plant height, smaller and wider leaves with mild wrinkling. Reduced apical dominance and short inter-nodal distances were also the factors influencing the plant height. Although, average number of flowers were approximately same in rolB transformed plants and controls (GUS transformed and WT), flower infertility resulted in lesser yield. It has been reported that loss of pollen viability in rolB transformed plants inhibits fruit development [50]. The fruits produced on rolB expressing plants were also smaller in size and ripening time was shorter as compared to control plants. Among different rolB expressing lines, RB I was the most affected line, with least average plant height and lowest average number of fruits. It has been reported that expression of rolB gene increases the secondary metabolites [5]; however, excessive expression of gene has a growth suppressive effect. In general, in most cases, nuclear transformation is accompanied with detrimental effects on plants, which can be overcome by chloroplast-based expression of foreign genes [51]. In addition, the use of pathogen-inducible promoters can also be considered. In case of rolB transformed plants, the enhanced expression of rolB gene can be a reason for this phenomenon as two copies of rolB gene were inserted in RB I, which in turn might have affected the morphology more severely compared to other transgenic lines. Due to insertion of rolB gene, variations in various plant morphological characters have been reported in a number of plant species such as tobacco and tomato [14], [15], [23], Antirrhinum [20], Rose [17], Pear [52], grape [53] and soybean [21]. Overall, these changes could be attributed to increase in sensitivity of rolB transformed cells toward auxin [8], [9], increased tyrosine phosphatase activity that alters the signal transduction pathway of the hormone [54], H+ ATPase and ionic imbalance [8]. All these changes synchronize the metabolic pathways leading to variation in flower and fruit development [21]. Variations in flower/fruit number and phenotype are also elemental demarcations based on active auxin release that collectively increases the production of endogenous gibberellins [55].

In conclusion, the data obtained in the present study suggest that the activation of secondary metabolism is modulated by the signals provided by rolB gene expression in the transformed tomato plants. Transgenic plants show altered morphology, which could be directly linked with the inserted copy number of rolB gene and consequently to its enhanced expression. We report the possible role of rolB gene in increasing the level of different antioxidants such as ascorbic acid and lycopene that can benefit human health. Moreover, defence response of rolB expressing tomato plant leaves was significantly enhanced against two fungal pathogens A. solani and F. oxysporum, as evident from pathogenicity assays. Taken together, these data can aid in the development of nutritionally improved tomato plants with improved foliar resistance against fungal infections.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Transformation summary of tomato cv. Rio Grande. α Percentage of PCR positive plants divided by total number of co-cultivated explants.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.s001

(DOC)

Table S2.

Inheritance and segregation of transgene in T1 progeny of different rolB transgenic lines. Tabulated χ2 value for 1 degree of freedom at 5% probability is 3.84. All χ2 values indicate a good fit to the expected Mendelian segregation ratio as the calculated χ2-value is less than the χ2 table value.

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096979.s002

(DOC)

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was conducted at The Samuel Roberts Noble Foundation, USA and we thank Srinivasa Rao Uppalapati, Ajith Anand and Zarir Vaghchhipawala for their cooperation. We are grateful to Dr. David Tepfer, INRA, France and Dr. Sara Grant, University of North Carolina, USA, for providing the vectors. Furthermore, we acknowledge the intellectual support provided by Dr. Muhammad Zia, Dr. Abdul Mannan and Dr. Waseem Ahmad.

Author Contributions

Carried out the transformation, regeneration, pathogenicity assays: WA. Drafted the manuscript: WA BM. Carried out the biochemical and molecular analyses of transgenic plants: IH MTW. Critically revised the manuscript: IH MTW. Helped in molecular analysis of transgenic plants: KSM. Helped in revision of the manuscript: KSM. Conceived the study design: BM. Supervised the study: BM. Read and approved the manuscript: WA IH MTW KSM BM.

References

  1. 1. FAOSTAT (2010) Available: http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopD​efault.aspx? PageID = 567#.
  2. 2. Erinle ID (1979) Tomato diseases in the northern states of Nigeria. Extension Bulletin No. 31. Nigeria: Agricultural Extension and Research Liaison Services. 37 p.
  3. 3. Grunwald NJ, Flier WG, Sturbanum AK, Garay-Serrano E, van den Bosch TBM, et al. (2001) Population structure of Phytophthora infestans in the Toluca valley region of central Mexico. Phytopathology 91: 882–890. doi: 10.1094/phyto.2001.91.9.882
  4. 4. Bulgakov VP (2008) Functions of ROL genes in plant secondary metabolism. Biotechnol Adv 26: 318–324. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.03.001
  5. 5. Shkryl YN, Veremeichik GN, Bulgakov VP, Tchernoded GK, Mischenko NP, et al. (2008) Individual and combined effects of the ROLA, B and C genes on anthraquinone production in Rubia cordifolia transformed calli. Biotechnol Bioeng 100: 118–125. doi: 10.1002/bit.21727
  6. 6. Estruch JJ, Schell J, Spena A (1991) The protein encoded by rolB plant oncogene hydrolyses indole glucosides. EMBO J 10: 3125–3128.
  7. 7. Nilsson O, Crozier A, Schmülling T, Sandberg G, Olsson O (1993) Indole-3-acetic acid homeostasis in transgenic tobacco plants expressing the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolB gene. Plant J 3: 681–689. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313x.1993.00681.x
  8. 8. Maurel C, Barbier-Brygoo H, Spena A, Tempe J, Guern J, et al. (1991) Single ROL genes from the Agrobacterium rhizogenes TL-DNA alter some of the cellular responses to auxin in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Physiol 97: 212–216. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.1.212
  9. 9. Maurel C, Leblanc N, Barbier-Brygoo H, Perrot-Rechenmann C, Bouvier-Durand M, et al. (1994) Alterations of auxin perception in rolB transformed tobacco protoplast. Plant Physiol 105: 1209–1215. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.4.1209
  10. 10. Filippini F, Lo Schiavo F, Terzi M, Constantino P, Trovato M (1994) The plant oncogene rolB alters binding of auxin to plant membranes. Plant Cell Physiol 35: 767–77l.
  11. 11. Nilsson O, Olsson O (1997) Getting to the root: the role of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes ROL genes in the formation of hairy roots. Plant Physiol 100: 463–473. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03050.x
  12. 12. Altamura MM (2004) Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolB and rolD genes: regulation and involvement in plant development. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 77: 89–101. doi: 10.1023/b:ticu.0000016609.22655.33
  13. 13. van der Salm TPM, Hanisch ten Cate ChH, Dons HJM (1996) Prospects for applications of ROL genes for crop improvement. Plant Mol Biol Rep 14: 207–228. doi: 10.1007/bf02671656
  14. 14. Cardarelli M, Mariotti D, Pomponi M, Spanò L, Capone I, et al. (1987) Agrobacterium rhizogenes T-DNA genes capable of inducing hairy root phenotype. Mol Gen Genet 209: 475–480. doi: 10.1007/bf00331152
  15. 15. Schmülling T, Schell J, Spena A (1998) Single genes from Agrobacterium rhizogenes influence plant development. EMBO J 7: 2621–2629.
  16. 16. Mariotti D, Fontana GS, Santini I, Costantino P (1989) Evaluation under field conditions of the morphological alterations (hairy root phenotype) induced on Nicotiana tabacum by different Ri plasmid T-DNA genes. J Genet Breed 43: 157–164.
  17. 17. van der Salm TPM, van der Toorn CJG, Bouwer R, Hanisch ten Cate CH, Dons HJM (1997) Production of ROL gene transformed plants of Rosa hybrida L. and characterization of their rooting ability. Mol Breed 3: 39–47.
  18. 18. Spena A, Schmülling T, Koncz C (1987) Independent and synergistic activity of ROL A, B and C loci in stimulating abnormal growth in plant. EMBO J 6: 3891–3899. doi: 10.5580/13a4
  19. 19. Capone I, Cardarelli M, Trovato M, Costantino P (1989) Upstream non-coding region which confers polar expression to Ri plasmid root inducing gene rolB. Mol Gen Genet 216: 239–244. doi: 10.1007/bf00334362
  20. 20. Spena A, Esttruch JJ, Prinsen E, Nacken W, Vanonckelen H, et al. (1992) Anther-specific expression of the rolB gene of Agrobacterium-rhizogenes increases IAA content in anthers and alters anther development and whole flower growth. Theor Appl Genet 84: 520–527. doi: 10.1007/bf00224147
  21. 21. Zia M, Mirza B, Malik SA, Chaudhary MF (2010) Expression of ROL genes in transgenic soybean (Glycine max L.) leads to changes in plant phenotype, leaf morphology, and flowering time. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 103: 227–236. doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9771-z
  22. 22. Shabtai S, Salts Y, Kaluzky G, Barg R (2007) Improved yielding and reduced puffiness under extreme temperatures induced by fruit-specific expression of rolB in processing tomatoes. Theor Appl Genet 114 (7): 1203–1209. doi: 10.1007/s00122-007-0511-7
  23. 23. van Altvorst AC, Bino RJ, van Dijk AJ, Lamers AMJ, Lindhout WH, et al. (1992) Effects of the introduction of Agrobacterium rhizogenes ROL genes on tomato plant and flower development. Plant Sci 83: 77–85. doi: 10.1016/0168-9452(92)90064-s
  24. 24. Murashige T, Skoog E (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  25. 25. Tepfer R, Schell J, Steinbiss HH (1988) Versatile cloning vector for transient gene expression and direct gene transfer in plant cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16: 1875. doi: 10.1093/nar/16.17.8725
  26. 26. Ahmed I, Islam M, Arshad W, Mannan A, Ahmad W, et al. (2009) High quality plant DNA extraction for PCR: an easy approach. J Appl Genet 50: 105–107. doi: 10.1007/bf03195661
  27. 27. Safdar N, Yasmeen A, Mirza B (2011) An insight into functional genomics of transgenic lines of tomato cv. Rio grande harbouring yeast halotolerance genes. Plant Biol 13: 620–631. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2010.00412.x
  28. 28. Barba AIO, Hurtado MC, Mata MCS, Ruiz VF, de Tejada MLS (2006) Application of a UV–Vis detection-HPLC method for a rapid determination of lycopene and β-carotene in vegetables. Food Chem 95: 328–336. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.02.028
  29. 29. Helmenstine AM (2007) Vitamin C determination by iodine titration. Available: http://chemistry.about.com/od/demonstrat​ionsexperiments/ss/vitctitration.htm.
  30. 30. McDonald S, Prenzler PD, Autolovich M, Robards K (2001) Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chem 73: 73–84. doi: 10.1016/s0308-8146(00)00288-0
  31. 31. Obeid HK, Allen MS, Bedgood DR, Prenzler PD, Robards K (2005) Investigation of Australian olive mill waste for recovery of biophenols. J Agric Food Chem 53: 9911–9920. doi: 10.1021/jf0518352
  32. 32. Bettini P, Michelotti S, Bindi D, Giannini R, Capuana M, et al. (2003) Pleiotropic effect of the insertion of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes ROLD gene in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Theor Appl Genet 7: 831–836. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1322-0
  33. 33. Vakalounakis DJ (1983) Evaluation of tomato cultivars for resistance to Alternaria blight. Annals Appl Biol 102: 138–139.
  34. 34. Pham-Huy LA, He H, Pham-Huy C (2008) Free radicals, antioxidants in disease and health. Int J Biomed Sci 4: 89–96.
  35. 35. Kiselev KV, Dubrovina AS, Veselova MV, Bulgakov VP, Fedoreyev SA, et al. (2007) The rolB gene-induced overproduction of resveratrol in Vitis amurensis transformed cells. J Biotechnol 128: 681–692. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.11.008
  36. 36. Bulgakov VP, Gorpenchenko TY, Veremeichik GN, Shkryl YN, Tchernoded GK, et al. (2012) The rolB gene suppresses reactive oxygen species in transformed plant cells through the sustained activation of antioxidant defence. Plant Physiol 58(3): 1371–1381. doi: 10.1104/pp.111.191494
  37. 37. Bailey BA, Dean JFD, Anderson JD (1990) An ethylene biosynthesis-inducing endoxylanase elicits electrolyte leakage and necrosis in Nicotiana tabacum cv Xanthi leaves. Plant Physiol 94: 1849–1854. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.4.1849
  38. 38. Agrios GN (1997) Plant Pathology. 4th edition. San Diego CA: Academic Press. 635 p.
  39. 39. Lattanzio V, Lattanzio VMT, Cardinali A (2006) Role of phenolics in the resistance mechanisms of plants against fungal pathogens and insects. In: Imperato F, editor. Phytochemistry advances in research. India: Research Signpost. pp. 23–67.
  40. 40. Landi L, Capocasa F, Costantini E, Mezzetti B (2009) ROLC strawberry plant adaptability, productivity and tolerance to soil-borne disease and mycorrhizal interactions. Transgenic Res 18: 933–942. doi: 10.1007/s11248-009-9279-7
  41. 41. Bulgakov VP, Shkryl YN, Veremeichik GN, Gorpenchenko TY, Vereshchagina YV (2013) Recent Advances in the Understanding of Agrobacterium rhizogenes-Derived Genes and Their Effects on Stress Resistance and Plant Metabolism. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 134: 1–22. doi: 10.1007/10_2013_179
  42. 42. Shirasu K, Nakajima H, Rajasekhar VK, Dixon RA, Lamb CJ (1997) Salicylic acid potentiates an agonist-dependent gain control that amplifies pathogen signals in the activation of defence mechanisms. Plant Cell 9: 261–270. doi: 10.2307/3870546
  43. 43. Zhao J, Davis L, Verpoorte R (2005) Elicitor signal transduction leading to production of plant secondary metabolites. Biotechnol Adv 23: 283–333. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2005.01.003
  44. 44. Bulgakov VP, Kusaykin M, Tchernoded GK, Zvyagintseva TN, Zhuravlev YN (2002) Carbohydrase activities of the rolC gene transformed and non transformed ginseng cultures. Fitoterapia 3: 638–643. doi: 10.1016/s0367-326x(02)00231-9
  45. 45. Bulgakov VP, Tchernoded GK, Mischenko NP, Khodakovskaya MV, Glazunov VP, et al. (2002) Effects of salicylic acid, methyl jasmonate, etephone and cantharidin on anthraquinone production by Rubia cordifolia callus cultures transformed with rolB and rolC genes. J Biotechnol 97: 213–221. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1656(02)00067-6
  46. 46. Bulgakov VP, Veselova MV, Tchernoded GK, Kiselev KV, Fedoreyev SA, et al. (2005) Inhibitory effect of the Agrobacterium rhizogenes rolC gene on rabdosiin and rosmarinic acid production in Eritrichium sericeum and Lithospermum erythrorhizon transformed cell cultures. Planta 221: 471–478. doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1457-5
  47. 47. Ramani S, Chelliah J (2007) UV–B-induced signaling events leading to enhanced-production of catharanthine in Catharanthus roseus cell suspension cultures. BMC Plant Biol 7: 61–68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-61
  48. 48. Kiselev KV, Gorpenchenko TY, Tchernoded GK, Dubrovina AS, Grishchenko OV, et al. (2008) Calcium-dependent mechanism of somatic embryogenesis in Panax ginseng cell cultures expressing the rolC oncogene. Mol Biol 42: 243–252. doi: 10.1134/s0026893308020106
  49. 49. Kiselev KV, Turlenko AV, Zhuravlev YN (2009) CDPK gene expression in somatic embryos of Panax ginseng expressing ROLC. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 99: 141–149. doi: 10.1007/s11240-009-9586-y
  50. 50. Roder FT, Schmülling T, Gatz C (1994) Efficiency of the tetracycline-dependent gene expression system: Complete suppression and efficient induction of the rolB phenotype in transgenic plants. Mol Gen Genet 243: 32–38. doi: 10.1007/bf00283873
  51. 51. Lössl AG, Waheed MT (2011) Chloroplast-derived vaccines against human diseases: achievements, challenges and scopes. Plant Biotechnol J 9(5): 527–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00615.x
  52. 52. Zhu LH, Holefors A, Ahlman A, Xue ZT, Welander M (2001) The rooting ability of the dwarfing pear rootstock BP10030 (Pyrus communis) was significantly increased by introduction of the rolB gene. Plant Sci 165: 829–835. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9452(03)00279-6
  53. 53. Geier T, Eimert K, Scherer R, Nickel C (2008) Production and rooting behaviour of rolB-transgenic plants of grape rootstock ‘Richter 110’ (Vitis berlandieri x V. rupestris). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 94: 269–280. doi: 10.1007/s11240-008-9352-6
  54. 54. Filippini F, Rossi V, Marin O, Trovato M, Costantino P, et al. (1996) A plant oncogene as a phosphatase. Nature 379: 499–500. doi: 10.1038/379499a0
  55. 55. Ross JJ, O'Neill DP, Smith JJ, Kerckhoffs LHJ, Elliott RC (2000) Evidence that auxin promotes gibberellin A1 biosynthesis in pea. Plant J 21: 547–552. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00702.x