Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Role of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Depressive Disorders: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

  • Giuseppe Grosso ,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Andrzej Pajak,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Population Studies, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland

  • Stefano Marventano,

    Affiliation Department “G.F. Ingrassia”, Section of Hygiene and Public Health, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Sabrina Castellano,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Fabio Galvano,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Claudio Bucolo,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Filippo Drago,

    Affiliation Department of Clinical and Molecular Biomedicine, Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Filippo Caraci

    Affiliations Department of Educational Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy, IRCCS Associazione Oasi Maria S.S. – Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging, Troina, Enna, Italy

Role of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Depressive Disorders: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

  • Giuseppe Grosso, 
  • Andrzej Pajak, 
  • Stefano Marventano, 
  • Sabrina Castellano, 
  • Fabio Galvano, 
  • Claudio Bucolo, 
  • Filippo Drago, 
  • Filippo Caraci



Despite omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) supplementation in depressed patients have been suggested to improve depressive symptomatology, previous findings are not univocal.


To conduct an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of omega-3 PUFA treatment of depressive disorders, taking into account the clinical differences among patients included in the studies.


A search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Database of RCTs using omega-3 PUFA on patients with depressive symptoms published up to August 2013 was performed. Standardized mean difference in clinical measure of depression severity was primary outcome. Type of omega-3 used (particularly eicosapentaenoic acid [EPA] and docosahexaenoic acid [DHA]) and omega-3 as mono- or adjuvant therapy was also examined. Meta-regression analyses assessed the effects of study size, baseline depression severity, trial duration, dose of omega-3, and age of patients.


Meta-analysis of 11 and 8 trials conducted respectively on patients with a DSM-defined diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) and patients with depressive symptomatology but no diagnosis of MDD demonstrated significant clinical benefit of omega-3 PUFA treatment compared to placebo (standardized difference in random-effects model 0.56 SD [95% CI: 0.20, 0.92] and 0.22 SD [95% CI: 0.01, 0.43], respectively; pooled analysis was 0.38 SD [95% CI: 0.18, 0.59]). Use of mainly EPA within the preparation, rather than DHA, influenced final clinical efficacy. Significant clinical efficacy had the use of omega-3 PUFA as adjuvant rather than mono-therapy. No relation between efficacy and study size, baseline depression severity, trial duration, age of patients, and study quality was found. Omega-3 PUFA resulted effective in RCTs on patients with bipolar disorder, whereas no evidence was found for those exploring their efficacy on depressive symptoms in young populations, perinatal depression, primary disease other than depression and healthy subjects.


The use of omega-3 PUFA is effective in patients with diagnosis of MDD and on depressive patients without diagnosis of MDD.


Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) eicosapentaeoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) have been demonstrated to be effective in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention due to their anti-inflammatory and cardio-protective effects [1]. Recently, new therapeutic indications for omega-3 PUFA have been proposed, such as treatment for certain forms of mental illness, including depressive disorders [2]. Indeed, some psychiatric diseases as depression may share certain pathophysiological mechanisms with CVD, namely increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, endothelial dysfunction, and elevations in plasma homocysteine levels [3][5]. The positive effects of omega-3 PUFA on depression may depend on their physiological abundant content in the human nervous system and their involvement in neurogenesis and neuroplasticity [6]. Moreover, their anti-inflammatory capacity may counteract inflammatory processes occurring in depression [7], [8]. Several ecological, cross-sectional, and prospective studies supported such hypotheses by reporting an inverse association between omega-3 intake and prevalence of depression [2]. Further clinical studies demonstrated lower concentration of omega-3 PUFA in plasma or red blood cell membranes of depressed subjects [9][13]. All together, these observations suggest a correlation between omega-3 PUFA and depressive disorders, justifing the rationale of a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of omega-3 PUFA supplementation for the treatment of depressive disorders. The overall analysis of these studies from previous meta-analyses suggested a general benefit of omega-3 PUFA on depressive symptoms, despite certain variability in results weakened the possible validity of the findings. Indeed, results of such studies are not univocal, jeopardizing the evidence of therapeutic implications of omega-3 PUFA in depressed patients. It has been suggested that the heterogeneity between studies may depend on clinical and methodological issues, such as severity of baseline depression and methods of assessment and diagnosis of depression. Some important issues regarding therapeutic regimen have been explored in more recent meta-analysis, reporting that the positive effects of omega-3 PUFA on depressive symptoms appeared to depend more on EPA administration rather than DHA, severity of depression, and study quality [14]. However, some concerns regarding these findings still persist [15], [16]. The analyses previously conducted focused on the effects of omega-3 PUFA supplementation on depressive symptoms, but features associated with the pathophysiological nature of the depression occurring in the patients and their comorbidity status were often lacking. It is reasonable to believe that the biological effects of omega-3 PUFA may result effective in certain subtypes of depressive disorders rather than in others due to the different type of depression or clinical phenotype of the patient. Despite a full understanding of the processes leading to the depressive status is lacking, primary psychiatric disorders, such as major depression disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorders, are specific psychiatric conditions as recognized in the American Psychiatric Association’s revised fourth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) [17], marking out specific depressive symptoms that should be present as inclusion criteria to determine MDD diagnosis. The mental health examination may include the use of rating scales, such as the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [18], the Beck Depression Inventory [19], or the MARDS [20] for MDD, and the bipolar spectrum diagnostic scale [21] for bipolar disorders. These psychiatric diseases have indeed specific biological causes and are often known to be treated with and respond to different pharmacological interventions [22]. Another specific pathological condition is perinatal depression, which indicates the occurrence of depressive and other mood-associated symptoms during pregnancy and lactation, with a range of 5–25% of women developing post-partum depression [23]. Pregnancy and lactation are challenging periods due to a higher demand of omega-3 PUFA from the fetus and the newborn, respectively, and a low DHA status may induce depressive symptoms [24]. Despite the fact that it is not clear if the depressive status is caused by or simply precipitated by pregnancy and lactation conditions, it is however likely associated with these conditions rather than with the aforementioned causes of MDD. Similarly, psychiatric disorders occurring in young populations need special attentions because major differences between adult and juvenile depression have been well-documented, despite the reasons for such dissimilarities are not clear [25]. Actually, there is very limited evidence upon which to base conclusions about the relative effectiveness of psychological interventions or antidepressant medication, but effectiveness of these interventions cannot be fully established [26]. Finally, the occurrence of depression secondary to a different primary disease, for instance schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease, and CVD, may raise doubts on the pathophysiological mechanisms that cause the depressive symptomatology. In addition, despite it is of interested to examine the role of omega-3 PUFA on potential mood depression in healthy subjects, it is important to underline that preventive and therapeutic pathways may differ each other. Thus, altogether, the choice in previous meta-analyses to pool together studies with such different baseline conditions, in which depression occurred, may have affected the quality of the studies as well as utilizability of the results [27], [28]. Moreover, the last meta-analysis included studies up to 2010 [29]. Thus, the aim of this study was to update the current knowledge about the overall clinical efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids (particularly EPA and DHA) in previous and more recent RCTs published in the last years, minimizing, from a clinical point of view, the differences among the populations of patients included in the studies, finally focusing on patients with a DSM-defined diagnosis of MDD.


A comprehensive search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Database systematic Reviews of all RCTs using omega-3 PUFA on patients with depressive symptoms published up to August 2013 was performed. Articles of potential interest were identified by using the following search terms: “omega-3”, “polyunsaturated fatty acids”, “PUFA”, “trial”, “EPA”, “DHA”, combined with the following terms: “depression”, “depressive disorder”, “depressed mood”, “bipolar”, combined with “perinatal”, “post-partum”, “CVD”, “schizophrenia”, “Parkinson”, “Alzheimer”, “diabetes”, “angina”. Among the 192 articles retrieved, RCTs were identified and screened by reading the abstract and, when necessary, the full text, in order to select those articles relevant for the analysis. The reference list of the relevant reports was also inspected to identify any additional trials not previously identified. The process of identification and inclusion of trials is summarized in Figure 1. Inclusion criteria were the following: (i) studies conducted on humans; (ii) randomized design; (iii) placebo controlled; (iv) use of omega-3 PUFA supplement which relative amount could be quantified; (v) exploring changes in depressive symptoms as primary or secondary outcome. Exclusion criteria were the following: (i) studies reporting insufficient statistics or results; (ii) adopted a dietary intervention design. Study quality was measured in a 13-point scale including the Jadad criteria [30] and specific information regarding (i) registration of RCT before conducting the study, (ii) adequate blinding of the researchers, (iii) the use of an intention-to-treat analysis, (iv) control for patients’ diet (i.e., number of servings of fish), (v) assessment of compliance through measurement of plasma fatty acids, (vi) significant differences at baseline, (vii) adequate sample calculation, whether (viii) depression was the primary outcome, and (ix) number and reasons of withdrawal were mentioned. Data were abstracted independently from each identified trial by GG and SM using a standard data abstraction form. This process was independently performed by two researchers and discordances were discussed and risolved.

Figure 1. Process of inclusion of trials for systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on omega-3 fatty acids and depressive symptoms.

Out of 59 originally selected studies, one [31] was excluded because of having a non-randomize non-placebo controlled design; two [32], [33], because there was used a dietary intervention design; five [34][38], because the depressive status was reported as a categorical variable rather than a rating scale; two [39], [40], because an inadequate or poorly comparable rating score of depression was used; two [41], [42], because poorly comparable omega-3 PUFA or placebo preparations. This selection strategy resulted in a final selection of 47 studies eligible to be included in the present systematic review.

The clinical outcome of interest was the standardized mean difference in the change from baseline to endpoint scores on a depression rating scale, in patients taking omega-3 PUFA supplements vs. patients taking placebo. Preferred rating scales for measuring depression severity were the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), either the 9-item short form, 17-item, 21-item or 25-items scales, and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) [20], [43], [44]. When available, HDRS scores from each study were used. If the HDRS was not available we used the MADRS. If neither HDRS nor MADRS data were available, we used the clinician rated measure of depression that the investigators identified as their primary outcome.

Among selected RCTs lacking in data, such as means and/or standard deviations (SDs), the data of one study [45] were provided by authors; SDs and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of five studies [46][50] were retrieved from graphs; data of one study [51] were medians; and data of three studies [52][54] were imputed from data from all other trials using the same measure for depression as described elsewhere [55]. Eight studies [56][63] were finally excluded from the meta-analysis due to lacking data, resulting in a total number of 39 studies to be included in the analysis.

Effects due to participant diagnosis were investigated by grouping studies according to the most relevant clinical characteristics of the population on which they were conducted, as follows: (i) Depressed patients (including DSM-defined diagnosis of MDD and general assessment of depression without clinical visit); (ii) Bipolar disorder patients (including bipolar disorder during pregnancy); (iii) Children or adolescents with depression or bipolar disorder; (iv) Women with perinatal depression (including DSM-defined diagnosis of MDD and prevention of post-partum depression); (v) Mild-cognitive impairment or AD patients; (vi) Schizophrenic patients; (vii) Parkinson’s disease patients; (viii) Patients with concomitant CVDs; and (ix) Healthy subjects.

Data regarding type of diagnosis, number of subjects enrolled in the trial, on-going therapy, (TRATT.) type of supplement used in the intervention, type of placebo, daily dose, duration of the intervention, outcome measures, and information to retrieve the study quality were collected. Those RCTs reporting more than one dose of omega-3 PUFA [54], [64][68] or more than one formulation (i.e., EPA or DHA separately) [48], [51], [69], were considered as separate studies in the pooled analyses. One study [70] enrolled different populations (MDD and non-MDD patients), thus each population was also included in the meta-analysis as a separate study.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous data were reported as mean and SDs and listed in descriptive tables. All depression scales’ means and SDs at baseline and end of follow-up period of both intervention and control groups were combined [71] and the standardized mean effect for all trials was calculated by using Hedges adjusted g in order to correct for small sample bias [72]. Both random- and fixed-effects models were used to estimate the overall effect size. Heterogeneity was investigated by using Higgins’ I2 statistic [73], [74]. When heterogeneity between results of the studies exists, the random-effect models were preferred.

Possible publication bias for the analysis regarding RCTs conducted on MDD patients (MDD group, n = 11) and those not diagnosed with DSM-IV criteria (non-MDD group, n = 9) was investigated by drawing a funnel plot to look for funnel plot asymmetry [71] and meta-regression based on study size. Meta-regression was performed using linear regression, with the effect size (SMD) of trials as the dependent variable and the variables of interest as the independent variable. The generic inverse variance method was used to weight trials. Effects due to severity of depressive symptoms, age of patients, and study quality were also investigated by using meta-regression based on standardized baseline depression scores, mean age of the study participants, and our modified Jadad scores of the studies, respectively. The effects of trial duration, EPA and DHA dose in omega-3 preparations, and the use as mono or adjuvant therapy were also examined. Particularly, the qualitative analysis of the type of supplementation used was investigated grouping the studies in those using mainly EPA (EPA >50% of the dose) and mainly DHA (DHA >50% of the dose). A further analysis was computed by splitting the grouping in mainly EPA, pure EPA, mainly DHA, and pure DHA supplementation. As well, the therapeutic approach was investigated by grouping studies using omega-3 in monotherapy or as adjuvant therapy together with antidepressant drugs. The quantitative analysis of the dose was computed by a meta-regression analysis of the EPA and DHA doses used.

Random- and fixed-effects models, forest and funnel plots, and Higgins’ I2 statistics were performed in Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.2 (Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration), meta-regression analyses were performed in SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


Overall Studies

The most relevant features of the 47 studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis are displayed in Table 1. Considerable differences among studies were found for all characteristics examined. The average quality of the studies was about 9 over a maximum score of 13 (range 5–13). The mean length of the trials was about 16 weeks (range 4–160), 36 studies used a mixed intervention with EPA+DHA, 14 pure EPA and 4 pure DHA. The average dose of EPA+DHA was 1.39 g (range 0.63–6.2 of EPA and 0.27–3.4 of DHA), whereas 1.93 g (range 1–6) and 0.86 g (range 0.22–2) were the average doses of pure EPA and DHA, respectively (Table 1). The most of RCTs used the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [46], [48], [49], [54], [57], [58], [63], [65], [69], [75][84], 10 studies [46], [49], [56], [68], [79], [85][89] used the Beck Depression Inventory, and 13 studies [47], [50], [54], [62], [64], [67], [77], [84], [90][94] the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale as the main outcome measure. Among the studies not included in the quantitative analysis,due to lack of data, one was conducted on patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [57] and one on patients with chronic fatigue syndrome [56], both reporting no relevant effects of omega-3 fatty acids compared with placebo; four studies conducted in bipolar depressed patients [58], [59], [61], [63] reporting that there were no significant differences on any outcome measure between the EPA and placebo groups; one study on diabetes mellitus patients with MDD [62] reporting no effect of omega-3 fatty acids on depression severity; and one on older adults with mild cognitive impairment suggesting that increased intakes of DHA and EPA can reduce depressive symptoms and the risk of progressing to dementia [60].

Table 1. Randomized controlled trials investigating effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on depressed mood listed in chronological order by type of depressive disorder.

Depression (MDD and Non-MDD Groups)

A total of 19 studies were included in the first pooled analysis conducted in patients with depressive symptoms (Figure 2). Among them, 11 trials were conducted in patients with a DSM-defined diagnosis of MDD, including 8 studies conducted in adults [46], [48], [70], [76][78], [83], [84] and 3 studies in elderly patients [53], [95], [96]. The pooled standardized difference in means using a fixed-effects model for the MDD group was 0.47 SD (95% CI: 0.29, 0.66), which suggests a beneficial effect of omega-3 fatty acids on depressed mood compared with placebo in patients with diagnosis of MDD. The pooled standardized difference in means in a random-effects model was 0.56 SD (95% CI: 0.20, 0.92). The remaining 8 were those conducted on patients with an assessment of depression but not rigorously diagnosed according to the DSM criteria, and included patients with depressive symptoms despite on-going treatment [54], [69], [79], [97], women with borderline personality disorder [91], patients with recurrent self-harm [49], people with mild to severe depressed mood not taking medications [86], post-menopausal women with psychological distress and depressive symptoms [70], and subjects with a history of at least one major depressive episode [89], whereas two studies were excluded due to lack of data [56], [57]. Despite patients pooled in this analysis were not homogeneous in terms of health status, all studies clearly reported to have included subjects with no other psychiatric or neurological illnesses such as AD, Parkinson’s disease, as well as no history of any end-stage diseases, CVDs, or any unstable medical conditions, thus to make them comparable each other for our purposes. Similar results were found for this group of patients (standardized mean difference – fixed effects-model: 0.15 SD, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.30; random-effects model: 0.22 SD, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.43). For both MDD and non-MDD groups, there was evidence of heterogeneity (MDD group, I2 = 71%, P<0.001; non-MDD group, I2 = 46%, P = 0.04).

Figure 2. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 19 trials grouped in those conducted on patients with a DSM-defined diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD group, n = 11) and those on patients with an assessment of depression but not rigorously diagnosed according to the DSM criteria (non-MDD group, n = 8).

Black squares: indicate the weighting given to the trial in the overall pooled estimate; lines: indicate the 95% CIs; rhombus: indicate the combined effect size.

The overall analysis including both groups was conducted to assess whether results were different considering a mood-improving effect on depressive symptoms in patients with non-organic, metabolic, nor genetic-related neurodegenerative disease. The pooled standardized difference in means using a fixed-effects model was 0.27 SD (95% CI: 0.16, 0.39), and the pooled standardized difference in means using a random-effects model was 0.38 SD (95% CI: 0.18, 0.59). However, there was evidence of heterogeneity (I2 = 65%, P<0.001). To test this heterogeneity, a funnel plot was drawn and is shown in Figure 3.The funnel plot did not show considerable evidence of asymmetry. Meta-regression of study effect size, based on study size, did not present significant association (regression coefficient  =  −0.108, 95% CI: −0.224, 0.012; P = 0.066) indicating no role of the sample size in determining the results of the analysis.

Figure 3. Funnel plot of effect size estimates for individual trials conducted on patients with depressive disorder without secondary comordibities (MDD group and non-MDD group, n = 19).

A meta-regression analysis was performed of standardized mean depression scores on baseline depression scores to test whether the gravity of depression at baseline may play a role in the efficacy of omega-3 fatty supplementation. The analysis showed no relation between baseline depression scores and efficacy for all studies (regression coefficient  = 0.019, 95% CI: −0.009, 0.047; P = 0.167) as well as for MDD patients (regression coefficient  = 0.008, 95% CI: −0.053, 0.068; P = 0.787) and non-MDD (regression coefficient  = 0.019, 95% CI: −0.017, 0.054; P = 0.270) separately. Even taking into account the comparison of studies using the same depression scale (HDRS), no significant relation between baseline depression scores and efficacy was found (data not shown).

Analysis conducted to explore the role of type (namely, the administration of mainly EPA or DHA supplementation) and dose (separately for EPA and DHA) of omega-3 supplement used showed that the use of mainly EPA within the preparation, rather than DHA, appeared to influence final clinical efficacy (standardized mean difference – fixed effects-model: 0.46 SD, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.61; random-effects model: 0.50 SD, 95% CI: 0.27, 0.72) (Figure 4). Despite heterogeneity fallen by 55%, it remained significantly high (P = 0.002). When the analysis was split in mainly EPA, pure EPA, mainly DHA, and pure DHA supplementation, both the EPA preparations were significant (for pure EPA, standardized mean difference – fixed effects-model: 0.40 SD, 95% CI: 0.19, 0.61; random-effects model: 0.43 SD, 95% CI: 0.18, 0.68) and the heterogeneity fallen to 28% (P = 0.19). This result indicates that despite the overall heterogeneity represented an underlying true difference in effect sizes across studies, it may be strongly affected by type of formulation of omega-3 fatty acids used.

Figure 4. Forest plot examining the effect of the type of omega-3 PUFA supplementation employed on the reduction in depressive symptoms (MDD group and non-MDD group, n = 19).

The meta-regression analyses exploring the role of the dose of omega-3 fatty acids revealed that the total dose of DHA were unrelated to efficacy (regression coefficient  =  −0.066, 95% CI: −0.471, 0.603; P = 0.801), whereas the dose of EPA formulation resulted related to efficacy both for all MDD plus non-MDD patients (regression coefficient  = 0.477, 95% CI: 0.084, 0.869; P = 0.02). However, when the analyses was repeated separately for each group, the association remained significant only for MDD patients (regression coefficient  = 0.746, 95% CI: 0.100, 1.392; P = 0.028) whereas lost significance for non-MDD patients (regression coefficient  = 0.215, 95% CI: −0.288, 0.718; P = 0.359).

No relation between study size (regression coefficient  =  −0.109, 95% CI: −0.231, 0.012; P = 0.075, baseline depression severity (regression coefficient  = 0.026, 95% CI: −0.007, 0.060; P = 0.116), trial duration (regression coefficient  =  −0.058, 95% CI: −0.153, 0.038; P = 0.223), age of patients (regression coefficient  = 0.013, 95% CI: −0.10, 0.036; P = 0.879), and study quality (regression coefficient  =  −0.142, 95% CI: −0.357, 0.072; P = 0.183) and omega-3 PUFA efficacy was found, despite study quality almost reached significance when considered only for RCTs conducted on patients with MDD (regression coefficient  =  −0.403, 95% CI: −0.857, 0.052; P = 0.077). On the contrary, fixed- and random-effect models of RCTs grouped by use of omega-3 PUFA as mono- or adjuvant therapy revealed a significant effect when they were used in combination with standard antidepressant therapy (standardized mean difference – fixed effects-model: 0.26 SD, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.44; random-effects model: 0.39 SD, 95% CI: 0.06, 0.71).

Bipolar Disorder

In our systematic review we collected 7 trials conducted on patients with bipolar disorder (both type I and II) [58], [59], [61], [63], [65], [75], [80] (Table 1). The only three studies pooled for the analysis included one study [65] that accounted for more than 70% of the weight of the analysis, that together with others [75], [80] resulted in a significant effect of omega-3 fatty acids in ameliorating depressive symptoms in adults with bipolar disorder (standardized mean difference – fixed effects-model: 0.73 SD, 95% CI: 0.39, 1.07; random-effects model: 0.74 SD, 95% CI: 0.38, 1.10; I2 = 9%, P = 0.35) (Figure 5).

Figure 5. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 3 trials conducted on patients with bipolar depression.

Depression or Bipolar Disorder in Children and Adolescents

Among the studies conducted on depression occurring in youth, one study [98] documented a positive effect of omega-3 fatty acids in improving the mood of children diagnosed of MDD and one study conducted on adolescents at high risk of psychosis [92] reported that omega-3 fatty acids significantly reduced positive symptoms, negative symptoms, and improved functioning compared with placebo, but no significant effect was observed on depressive symptoms.

Perinatal Depression

There were six trials aiming to explore the effects of omega-3 PUFA on perinatal depression. We distinguished between those studies conducted on pregnant women with MDD [82], [93], [99] (Figure 6) and those on apparently healthy women (primary prevention) [51], [68], [85] (Figure 7). However, both analyses led to inconclusive results (MDD in pregnancy, standardized mean difference – fixed effects-model: 0.08 SD, 95% CI: −0.29, 0.45; random-effects model: 0.24 SD, 95% CI: −0.73, 1.21; prevention of post-partum depression, standardized mean difference – fixed effects-model: 0.05 SD, 95% CI: −0.24, 0.15; random-effects model: −0.05 SD, 95% CI: −0.24, 0.15). Only one study [82] concluded that omega-3 fatty acids might have therapeutic benefits in depression during pregnancy. Besides the clinical efficacy of omega-3, in regard to the safety issue, it is important to underline that omega-3 fatty acids supplementation was well tolerated and no adverse effects were reported on the subjects treated and newborns in all studies.

Figure 6. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 3 trials conducted on pregnant women with major depressive disorder.

Figure 7. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 3 trials conducted on healthy pregnant women for prevention of post-partum depression.

Depression as Secondary Outcome

Among the trials conducted in patients with primary disease other than depression, those conducted on AD or mild cognitive impairment [50], [81] (Figure 8), schizophrenia [54], [90] (Figure 9), and CVDs [87], [94], [100] (Figure 10) reported inconclusive results, whereas the only study conducted on Parkinson’s disease patients in comorbidity with MDD [47], including those treated with antidepressants and those without, reported improvement in depressive symptoms and indicate that the intake of omega-3 PUFA can be used as adjuvant therapy in Parkinson’s disease patients. However, in one study conducted on schizophrenic patients with persistent ongoing symptoms [54], the authors reported a large placebo effect in patients on typical and new atypical antipsychotics and no difference was observed between active treatment and placebo, but in patients on clozapine, there was a clinically important and statistically significant effect of 2 g/day omega-3 PUFA treatment on the PANSS and its sub-scales.

Figure 8. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 2 trials conducted on patients with Alzheimer or mild cognitive impairment.

Figure 9. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 2 trials conducted on patients with schizophrenia.

Figure 10. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 3 trials conducted on patients with cardiovascular disease.

Depressive Symptoms in Healthy Subjects

The trials conducted on healthy subjects aimed to explore potential beneficial effects of omega-3 fatty acids as mood improving medicaments in the general population (Figure 11). Among the tot studies included [52], [66], [67], [88], [101], [102], the overall analysis showed a nearly null effect of this supplement on depressive symptoms in healthy subjects (standardized mean difference – fixed and random effects-model: 0.00 SD, 95% CI: −0.13, 0.13).

Figure 11. Forest plot showing individual and combined effect size estimates and 95% CIs for 6 trials conducted on healthy individuals for prevention of depressive symptoms.


We demonstrated that the use of omega-3 PUFA as therapeutic agents was effective in patients with diagnosis of MDD and on depressive patients without a diagnosis of MDD, whereas inconclusive results were found for patients with other pathological conditions (namely schizophrenia and AD) as well as in healthy subjects and perinatal depression. The analysis of the studies on bipolar disorder showed a positive effect of the omega-3 PUFA, but the evidence is weakened due to the exclusion from the quantitative analysis of three studies that may affect the overall effect of the supplement. When the studies conducted on patients with MDD or those on patients with depressive symptoms but not rigorous evaluation by health professionals were pooled together, a general positive effect of omega-3 PUFA was found.

As previously reported [15], the studies that mostly negatively influenced the pooled results of the non-MDD patients included non-homogenous individuals, since their enrolment was in settings such as general practice surgeries, shopping malls, and university freshman fairs [86], newspaper, radio and television advertising, and flyers posted [70], and through a Community Mental Health Service, general practices, and advertisements in community newspapers [79]. Despite the idea of a widely available low cost supplement that could assist those being treated for a current depressive episode in a community setting is highly desirable, a lack of rigor in patients’ selection may lead to the inclusion of subjects with normal emotional states, eventually affecting the results and, thus, challenging the model’s credibility. It is noteworthy that negative results came out mostly from studies sharing this methodology [70], [79], [86]. Moreover, as reported by the authors [79], [86], both experimental and control groups improved significantly, usually indicative of a major placebo response which is expected to exert a meaningful clinical effect in the treatment of such “subthreshold” depressed subjects [103]. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that the relative efficacy of the active drug compared to placebo in clinical trials for MDD is highly heterogeneous across studies, with a worse performance in showing a superiority of the drug versus placebo for studies with placebo response rates ≥30% [104]. Thus, the studies quality decreased when placebo response rates were not mantained below this critical threshold that may depend on the non-homogenous depressive “phenotypes” of the subjects enrolled. The non-MDD group also included four studies conducted on patients with depressive disorders despite ongoing antidepressant therapy [54], [69], [79], [97]. These results should be considered with caution, because these studies may include those “non-responder” subjects that generally fail to reach remission with the first anti-depressant therapy and have higher relapse rates and poorer outcomes than those who remit [105]. Studies conducted in this subgroup of patients can explain not clearly favorable effects of omega-3 PUFA on depressive symptoms in these studies and puzzling results.

Previous meta-analyses included all RCTs with little distinction among population groups, leading to controversial results, such as overall benefit [106], [107] and negligible effects [27], [28] of omega-3 PUFA against depressive symptoms, especially due to the high heterogeneity of studies. The following studies improved some methodological issues (i.e., better definition of inclusion criteria, especially in the distinction between the definition of MDD and other depressive disorders) and focused attention on specific aspects of omega-3 administration (i.e., dosage, EPA:DHA ratio) leading to the conclusion that administration of EPA, rather than DHA, is responsible for the beneficial effects of omega-3 PUFA intake as therapeutic agents in patients with depressive disorders [108], [109] and supplements containing EPA ≥60%, in dose range from 200 to 2200 mg EPA in excess of DHA, were effective against primary depression. On the contrary, the last meta-analytic study [14] reported small, non-significant benefit of omega-3 PUFA for the treatment of MDD, generally in contrast with the aforementioned previous meta-analyses, but some methodological issues in study selection have arisen [15], [16]. Taking into account that pathophysiological processes of depressive symptoms involved in MDD patients are likely to be very different from those in patients with depression occurring in other clinical conditions (i.e., bipolar disorder, pregnancy, primary diseases others than depression) and in non-homogenous patients (i.e., community sample of individuals), we used a different approach to analyze the RCTs using omega-3 PUFA supplementation against depressive symptoms, grouping the studies by type of diagnosis of depression and taking into account any possible health condition that may influence the onset of the depression as well as the response to therapy. Other meta-analyses reported that the more severe was the depression, the more likely omega-3 PUFA supplementation would reduce depressive symptoms. We failed to demonstrate such a result, and we consider this finding as a surrogate of our observation that, overall, the efficacy of omega-3 PUFA was mostly related to a specific DSM-based diagnosis of MDD. Hence, this latter has been translated in a correlation of efficacy to more severe symptoms whereas, according to our results, we hypothesized that this efficacy may be more related to the specific pathophysiological processes of the MDD rather than to its severity. Compared with previous meta-analyses, the differences of findings may depend on the additional number of RCTs published since the publication of the last study [37], [40], [53], [60], [61], [66], [68], [69], [84], [89], [92], [94][97], [100][102], the increasing number of participants which vary the overall weight of previous studies, the requirement for public registration of trials resulting in an increase of general studies’ quality and may be responsible for the decreased evidence of publication bias.

Since the pathophysiological mechanisms and the therapeutic approach for bipolar disorder differ from those of MDD [22], [23], when previous analyses included and pooled findings of studies conducted on these groups of different patients, they led to inconclusive results. It has been hypothesized that the efficacy of omega-3 PUFA may be different in the depressive phase rather than the maniacal episode [110], and recent systematic analysis of trials focused on this topic showed positive effects of omega-3 PUFA as an adjunctive treatment for depressive but not mania in bipolar disorder patients [111], [112]. Thus, we separately grouped the studies conducted on patients with bipolar disorder and explored efficacy of omega-3 PUFA in ameliorating the depressive symptoms, finding a significant efficacy of the supplement in two [65], [75] out of the three trials. Despite the positive results, it is noteworthy to underline that we had to exclude, due to missing of data, four studies [58], [59], [61], [63] conducted on bipolar patients reporting poor effect of the omega-3 PUFA intervention, thus weakening our findings. There is a need of well-designed, high quality studies, which may clarify the potential effects of omega-3 PUFA supplement in patients with rigorously diagnosed bipolar disorder.

Regarding the substantial inefficacy of the omega-3 PUFA in patients with primary diseases other than depression, it may be possible that these studies are more likely to suffer from publication bias, since depression was often a secondary outcome. Despite this methodological issue, the effects of the omega-3 PUFA may have been also affected by factors particularly related to the primary disease. Regarding the studies conducted on patients with CVDs, the analysis included very heterogeneous populations, namely patients with coronary heart disease [87], with diabetes mellitus [94], and post myocardial infarction [100], that may have been responsible for the inconclusive results. Moreover, it has been recently reported that supplementation of EPA in diabetes mellitus patients with comorbid MDD poorly affect biological risk factors for adverse outcome observed in this category of patients [113]. The RCTs conducted on patients with mild cognitive impairment or AD revealed poor efficacy of omega-3 PUFA in ameliorating the depressive symptoms. It has been reported that molecular mechanisms and pathways that underlie the pathogenesis of depression (i.e., impairment in the signaling of some neurotrophins such as Transforming-Growth-Factor-β1 and Brain-derived-neurotrophic-factor) are also involved in the pathogenesis of AD [114], [115], thus the omega-3 PUFA supplementation may not be the optimal pharmacological approach for this specific group of patients [116][118]. The two trials (including different dosages) conducted on schizophrenic patients with persistent ongoing symptoms resulted in limited effects of the omega-3 PUFA on patients’ affective states. These results may be attributable to some psychotic symptoms (i.e., negative symptoms) that may directly influence (i.e., improve) depression-rating scores. Moreover, these patients were receiving different types of antipsychotics such as first- and second-generation antipsychotics that may differently affect (positively or negatively) the final effects of omega-3 PUFA on depressive symptoms. Equally, we also reported that trials focused on perinatal depression demonstrated scarce efficacy of omega-3 on depressive symptoms. The supplemented omega-3 PUFA may have compensated the increased demand of the developing fetus during pregnancy and neonate during lactation rather than contributing to therapeutic efficacy by reducing depressive symptoms [119]. Finally, depression examined as secondary outcome could suffer by changing of the measurement depending on the improvement (or worsening) of the underlying primary disease.

Regarding the different efficacy of EPA compared with DHA and EPA-DHA combinations, the analysis of RCTs grouped according to type of omega-3 PUFA administered confirmed the findings of previous meta-analysis and substantial stronger pooled results of studies using EPA rather than DHA. However, as previously reported [109], the aforementioned methodological issues may have biased the results in favor of efficacy for EPA-containing preparations suggesting that the reported benefits on depressive symptoms in this group of studies may not therefore be definitively attributed only to the EPA content of the supplementation regimen and also that further studies are needed in this field. Whether EPA, rather than DHA, is effective in ameliorating depression in specific groups of patients, the different effects of these classes of omega-3 PUFA is a challenge to be explained convincingly, since DHA is a major structural component of neuronal membranes, and we can hypothesize that increasing its nutritional availability would have beneficial effects on brain function, rather than EPA, which is present at levels several hundred-fold lower [120]. Possible explanations of the beneficial role of EPA are the following: (i) the anti-inflammatory effects of EPA-derived eicosanoids [121] and its oxidized derivatives [122] (ii) its efficacy at reducing the inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), IL-6, and IL-1b [123] through inhibition of the activity of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kB) [124]; (iii) in vivo evidence of a more effective anti-inflammatory action of dietary EPA compared with DHA [125]. Moreover, DHA has been reported to be poorly incorporated in the human brain [126], and EPA may facilitate an increase in brain DHA levels after its conversion [127]. Finally, EPA supplementation has been associated with N-acetyl-aspartate increase in brain, a marker for neuronal homeostasis, suggesting its role as a neuroprotective agent [80]. Together with the inflammation theory of depression [8], chronic intake of omega-3 fatty acids has been reported to play an important role in neuronal structure and function [128]. However, such hypotheses are not completely exhaustive and further research is needed to better identify the specific molecular mechanisms underlying clinical efficacy of omega-3 PUFA (both EPA and DHA) in preventing or ameliorating depression.

The studies excluded from this systematic review were not comparable in terms of methodology used, and their exclusion was needed in order to reduce differences among RCTs and improve data quality (i.e., reduce selection bias). On the other hand, these trials may still be directly relevant to the topic of the present study, and a specific discussion (e-discussion) may strengthen conclusion retrieved from this meta-analysis. Moreover, we discussed in a specific section of the e-discussion about the studies quality and potential sources of heterogeneity.

The main limitation of this study was the inability to control all the many potential sources of heterogeneity. Despite the fact that a logical grouping of trials was performed, a non-modifiable degree of heterogeneity, due to specific characteristics of all trials included, still weakened the pooled analysis of these studies. However, compared with older studies, the inclusion of the updated RCTs strengthened the conclusions of the effects of omega-3 PUFA intake on depressive disorders.

To sum up, trials conducted in individuals with a diagnosis of MDD provided evidence that omega-3 PUFA supplementation has beneficial clinical effects on depressive status. Evidence of their efficacy was provided also for patients with bipolar disorder, whereas no evidence was found for individuals included in the other diagnostic groups. According to our findings, in RCTs with omega-3 PUFA supplementation in healthy subjects and patients with schizophrenia, AD and CVD seems to result ineffective.

Supporting Information

Checklist S1.

PRISMA checklist for meta-analyses studies.


Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: GG AP FD. Performed the experiments: GG SM FG SC. Analyzed the data: GG SM CB. Wrote the paper: GG FC.


  1. 1. Kotwal S, Jun M, Sullivan D, Perkovic V, Neal B (2012) Omega 3 Fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5: 808–818.
  2. 2. Grosso G, Galvano F, Marventano S, Malaguarnera M, Bucolo C, et al. (2014) Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Depression: Scientific evidence and Biological Mechanisms. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2014: 313570.
  3. 3. Machado-Vieira R, Mallinger AG (2012) Abnormal function of monoamine oxidase-A in comorbid major depressive disorder and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiological and therapeutic implications (review). Mol Med Rep 6: 915–922.
  4. 4. Do DP, Dowd JB, Ranjit N, House JS, Kaplan GA (2010) Hopelessness, depression, and early markers of endothelial dysfunction in U.S. adults. Psychosom Med 72: 613–619.
  5. 5. Severus WE, Littman AB, Stoll AL (2001) Omega-3 fatty acids, homocysteine, and the increased risk of cardiovascular mortality in major depressive disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry 9: 280–293.
  6. 6. Bourre JM (2004) Roles of unsaturated fatty acids (especially omega-3 fatty acids) in the brain at various ages and during ageing. J Nutr Health Aging 8: 163–174.
  7. 7. Hennebelle M, Balasse L, Latour A, Champeil-Potokar G, Denis S, et al. (2012) Influence of omega-3 fatty acid status on the way rats adapt to chronic restraint stress. PLoS One 7: e42142.
  8. 8. Maes M, Yirmyia R, Noraberg J, Brene S, Hibbeln J, et al. (2009) The inflammatory & neurodegenerative (I&ND) hypothesis of depression: leads for future research and new drug developments in depression. Metab Brain Dis 24: 27–53.
  9. 9. Rees AM, Austin MP, Owen C, Parker G (2009) Omega-3 deficiency associated with perinatal depression: case control study. Psychiatry Res 166: 254–259.
  10. 10. Schins A, Crijns HJ, Brummer RJ, Wichers M, Lousberg R, et al. (2007) Altered omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid status in depressed post-myocardial infarction patients. Acta Psychiatr Scand 115: 35–40.
  11. 11. Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Julien P (2004) Major depression is associated with lower omega-3 fatty acid levels in patients with recent acute coronary syndromes. Biol Psychiatry 55: 891–896.
  12. 12. Parker GB, Heruc GA, Hilton TM, Olley A, Brotchie H, et al. (2006) Low levels of docosahexaenoic acid identified in acute coronary syndrome patients with depression. Psychiatry Res 141: 279–286.
  13. 13. Assies J, Pouwer F, Lok A, Mocking RJ, Bockting CL, et al. (2010) Plasma and erythrocyte fatty acid patterns in patients with recurrent depression: a matched case-control study. PLoS One 5: e10635.
  14. 14. Bloch MH, Hannestad J (2012) Omega-3 fatty acids for the treatment of depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 17: 1272–1282.
  15. 15. Martins JG, Bentsen H, Puri BK (2012) Eicosapentaenoic acid appears to be the key omega-3 fatty acid component associated with efficacy in major depressive disorder: a critique of Bloch and Hannestad and updated meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 17: 1144–1149 discussion 1163–1147.
  16. 16. Lin PY, Mischoulon D, Freeman MP, Matsuoka Y, Hibbeln J, et al. (2012) Are omega-3 fatty acids antidepressants or just mood-improving agents? The effect depends upon diagnosis, supplement preparation, and severity of depression. Mol Psychiatry 17: 1161–1163; author reply 1163–1167.
  17. 17. Association AP (2000) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; 4th, editor. Washington, DC. 317–345 p.
  18. 18. Hamilton M (1967) Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 6: 278–296.
  19. 19. Beck AT (1978) Depression Inventory. Center for Cognitive Therapy; Philadelphia.
  20. 20. Montgomery SA, Asberg M (1979) A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry 134: 382–389.
  21. 21. Picardi A (2009) Rating scales in bipolar disorder. Curr Opin Psychiatry 22: 42–49.
  22. 22. Geddes JR, Miklowitz DJ (2013) Treatment of bipolar disorder. Lancet 381: 1672–1682.
  23. 23. Vesga-Lopez O, Blanco C, Keyes K, Olfson M, Grant BF, et al. (2008) Psychiatric disorders in pregnant and postpartum women in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 65: 805–815.
  24. 24. Otto SJ, de Groot RH, Hornstra G (2003) Increased risk of postpartum depressive symptoms is associated with slower normalization after pregnancy of the functional docosahexaenoic acid status. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 69: 237–243.
  25. 25. Bylund DB, Reed AL (2007) Childhood and adolescent depression: why do children and adults respond differently to antidepressant drugs? Neurochem Int 51: 246–253.
  26. 26. Cox GR, Callahan P, Churchill R, Hunot V, Merry SN, et al. (2012) Psychological therapies versus antidepressant medication, alone and in combination for depression in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11: CD008324.
  27. 27. Appleton KM, Hayward RC, Gunnell D, Peters TJ, Rogers PJ, et al. (2006) Effects of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on depressed mood: systematic review of published trials. Am J Clin Nutr 84: 1308–1316.
  28. 28. Appleton KM, Rogers PJ, Ness AR (2010) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on depressed mood. Am J Clin Nutr 91: 757–770.
  29. 29. Sublette ME, Ellis SP, Geant AL, Mann JJ (2011) Meta-analysis of the effects of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in clinical trials in depression. J Clin Psychiatry 72: 1577–1584.
  30. 30. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, et al. (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17: 1–12.
  31. 31. Clayton EH, Hanstock TL, Hirneth SJ, Kable CJ, Garg ML, et al. (2009) Reduced mania and depression in juvenile bipolar disorder associated with long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation. Eur J Clin Nutr 63: 1037–1040.
  32. 32. Ness AR, Gallacher JE, Bennett PD, Gunnell DJ, Rogers PJ, et al. (2003) Advice to eat fish and mood: a randomised controlled trial in men with angina. Nutr Neurosci 6: 63–65.
  33. 33. Beezhold BL, Johnston CS (2012) Restriction of meat, fish, and poultry in omnivores improves mood: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Nutr J 11: 9.
  34. 34. Marangell LB, Suppes T, Ketter TA, Dennehy EB, Zboyan H, et al. (2006) Omega-3 fatty acids in bipolar disorder: clinical and research considerations. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 75: 315–321.
  35. 35. Krauss-Etschmann S, Shadid R, Campoy C, Hoster E, Demmelmair H, et al. (2007) Effects of fish-oil and folate supplementation of pregnant women on maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of docosahexaenoic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid: a European randomized multicenter trial. Am J Clin Nutr 85: 1392–1400.
  36. 36. Mattes E, McCarthy S, Gong G, van Eekelen JA, Dunstan J, et al. (2009) Maternal mood scores in mid-pregnancy are related to aspects of neonatal immune function. Brain Behav Immun 23: 380–388.
  37. 37. Andreeva VA, Galan P, Torres M, Julia C, Hercberg S, et al. (2012) Supplementation with B vitamins or n-3 fatty acids and depressive symptoms in cardiovascular disease survivors: ancillary findings from the SUpplementation with FOLate, vitamins B-6 and B-12 and/or OMega-3 fatty acids (SU.FOL.OM3) randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 96: 208–214.
  38. 38. Makrides M, Gibson RA, McPhee AJ, Yelland L, Quinlivan J, et al. (2010) Effect of DHA supplementation during pregnancy on maternal depression and neurodevelopment of young children: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 304: 1675–1683.
  39. 39. Behan PO, Behan WM, Horrobin D (1990) Effect of high doses of essential fatty acids on the postviral fatigue syndrome. Acta Neurol Scand 82: 209–216.
  40. 40. Sohrabi N, Kashanian M, Ghafoori SS, Malakouti SK (2013) Evaluation of the effect of omega-3 fatty acids in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome: “a pilot trial”. Complement Ther Med 21: 141–146.
  41. 41. Sampalis F, Bunea R, Pelland MF, Kowalski O, Duguet N, et al. (2003) Evaluation of the effects of Neptune Krill Oil on the management of premenstrual syndrome and dysmenorrhea. Altern Med Rev 8: 171–179.
  42. 42. Puolakka J, Makarainen L, Viinikka L, Ylikorkala O (1985) Biochemical and clinical effects of treating the premenstrual syndrome with prostaglandin synthesis precursors. J Reprod Med 30: 149–153.
  43. 43. Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J (1961) An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 4: 561–571.
  44. 44. Hamilton M (1960) A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 23: 56–62.
  45. 45. Giltay EJ, Gooren LJ, Toorians AW, Katan MB, Zock PL (2004) Docosahexaenoic acid concentrations are higher in women than in men because of estrogenic effects. Am J Clin Nutr 80: 1167–1174.
  46. 46. Grenyer BF, Crowe T, Meyer B, Owen AJ, Grigonis-Deane EM, et al. (2007) Fish oil supplementation in the treatment of major depression: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 31: 1393–1396.
  47. 47. da Silva TM, Munhoz RP, Alvarez C, Naliwaiko K, Kiss A, et al. (2008) Depression in Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of omega-3 fatty-acid supplementation. J Affect Disord 111: 351–359.
  48. 48. Jazayeri S, Tehrani-Doost M, Keshavarz SA, Hosseini M, Djazayery A, et al. (2008) Comparison of therapeutic effects of omega-3 fatty acid eicosapentaenoic acid and fluoxetine, separately and in combination, in major depressive disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 42: 192–198.
  49. 49. Hallahan B, Hibbeln JR, Davis JM, Garland MR (2007) Omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in patients with recurrent self-harm. Single-centre double-blind randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 190: 118–122.
  50. 50. Freund-Levi Y, Basun H, Cederholm T, Faxen-Irving G, Garlind A, et al. (2008) Omega-3 supplementation in mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease: effects on neuropsychiatric symptoms. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23: 161–169.
  51. 51. Doornbos B, van Goor SA, Dijck-Brouwer DA, Schaafsma A, Korf J, et al. (2009) Supplementation of a low dose of DHA or DHA+AA does not prevent peripartum depressive symptoms in a small population based sample. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 33: 49–52.
  52. 52. Fontani G, Corradeschi F, Felici A, Alfatti F, Bugarini R, et al. (2005) Blood profiles, body fat and mood state in healthy subjects on different diets supplemented with Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Eur J Clin Invest 35: 499–507.
  53. 53. Rondanelli M, Giacosa A, Opizzi A, Pelucchi C, La Vecchia C, et al. (2011) Long chain omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation in the treatment of elderly depression: effects on depressive symptoms, on phospholipids fatty acids profile and on health-related quality of life. J Nutr Health Aging 15: 37–44.
  54. 54. Peet M, Horrobin DF (2002) A dose-ranging study of the effects of ethyl-eicosapentaenoate in patients with ongoing depression despite apparently adequate treatment with standard drugs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59: 913–919.
  55. 55. Furukawa TA, Barbui C, Cipriani A, Brambilla P, Watanabe N (2006) Imputing missing standard deviations in meta-analyses can provide accurate results. J Clin Epidemiol 59: 7–10.
  56. 56. Warren G, McKendrick M, Peet M (1999) The role of essential fatty acids in chronic fatigue syndrome. A case-controlled study of red-cell membrane essential fatty acids (EFA) and a placebo-controlled treatment study with high dose of EFA. Acta Neurol Scand 99: 112–116.
  57. 57. Fux M, Benjamin J, Nemets B (2004) A placebo-controlled cross-over trial of adjunctive EPA in OCD. J Psychiatr Res 38: 323–325.
  58. 58. Hirashima F, Parow AM, Stoll AL, Demopulos CM, Damico KE, et al. (2004) Omega-3 fatty acid treatment and T(2) whole brain relaxation times in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 161: 1922–1924.
  59. 59. Keck PE Jr, Mintz J, McElroy SL, Freeman MP, Suppes T, et al. (2006) Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of ethyl-eicosapentanoate in the treatment of bipolar depression and rapid cycling bipolar disorder. Biol Psychiatry 60: 1020–1022.
  60. 60. Sinn N, Milte CM, Street SJ, Buckley JD, Coates AM, et al. (2012) Effects of n-3 fatty acids, EPA v. DHA, on depressive symptoms, quality of life, memory and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a 6-month randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr 107: 1682–1693.
  61. 61. Gracious BL, Chirieac MC, Costescu S, Finucane TL, Youngstrom EA, et al. (2010) Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of flax oil in pediatric bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord 12: 142–154.
  62. 62. Bot M, Pouwer F, Assies J, Jansen EH, Beekman AT, et al. (2011) Supplementation with eicosapentaenoic omega-3 fatty acid does not influence serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in diabetes mellitus patients with major depression: a randomized controlled pilot study. Neuropsychobiology 63: 219–223.
  63. 63. Chiu CC, Huang SY, Chen CC, Su KP (2005) Omega-3 fatty acids are more beneficial in the depressive phase than in the manic phase in patients with bipolar I disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 66: 1613–1614.
  64. 64. Peet M, Horrobin DF (2002) A dose-ranging exploratory study of the effects of ethyl-eicosapentaenoate in patients with persistent schizophrenic symptoms. J Psychiatr Res 36: 7–18.
  65. 65. Frangou S, Lewis M, McCrone P (2006) Efficacy of ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid in bipolar depression: randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study. Br J Psychiatry 188: 46–50.
  66. 66. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Belury MA, Andridge R, Malarkey WB, Hwang BS, et al. (2012) Omega-3 supplementation lowers inflammation in healthy middle-aged and older adults: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun 26: 988–995.
  67. 67. van de Rest O, Geleijnse JM, Kok FJ, van Staveren WA, Hoefnagels WH, et al. (2008) Effect of fish-oil supplementation on mental well-being in older subjects: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 88: 706–713.
  68. 68. Mozurkewich EL, Clinton CM, Chilimigras JL, Hamilton SE, Allbaugh LJ, et al. (2013) The Mothers, Omega-3, and Mental Health Study: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 208: 313 e311–319.
  69. 69. Mozaffari-Khosravi H, Yassini-Ardakani M, Karamati M, Shariati-Bafghi SE (2013) Eicosapentaenoic acid versus docosahexaenoic acid in mild-to-moderate depression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 23: 636–644.
  70. 70. Lucas M, Asselin G, Merette C, Poulin MJ, Dodin S (2009) Ethyl-eicosapentaenoic acid for the treatment of psychological distress and depressive symptoms in middle-aged women: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 89: 641–651.
  71. 71. Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 323: 101–105.
  72. 72. deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradbrun MJ (2001) Statistical methods for examining heterogeneity and combining results from several studies in metaanalysis. London. 285–312 p.
  73. 73. Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21: 1539–1558.
  74. 74. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327: 557–560.
  75. 75. Stoll AL, Severus WE, Freeman MP, Rueter S, Zboyan HA, et al. (1999) Omega 3 fatty acids in bipolar disorder: a preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 56: 407–412.
  76. 76. Nemets B, Stahl Z, Belmaker RH (2002) Addition of omega-3 fatty acid to maintenance medication treatment for recurrent unipolar depressive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 159: 477–479.
  77. 77. Marangell LB, Martinez JM, Zboyan HA, Kertz B, Kim HF, et al. (2003) A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the omega-3 fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid in the treatment of major depression. Am J Psychiatry 160: 996–998.
  78. 78. Su KP, Huang SY, Chiu CC, Shen WW (2003) Omega-3 fatty acids in major depressive disorder. A preliminary double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 13: 267–271.
  79. 79. Silvers KM, Woolley CC, Hamilton FC, Watts PM, Watson RA (2005) Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fish oil in the treatment of depression. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 72: 211–218.
  80. 80. Frangou S, Lewis M, Wollard J, Simmons A (2007) Preliminary in vivo evidence of increased N-acetyl-aspartate following eicosapentanoic acid treatment in patients with bipolar disorder. J Psychopharmacol 21: 435–439.
  81. 81. Chiu CC, Su KP, Cheng TC, Liu HC, Chang CJ, et al. (2008) The effects of omega-3 fatty acids monotherapy in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a preliminary randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 32: 1538–1544.
  82. 82. Su KP, Huang SY, Chiu TH, Huang KC, Huang CL, et al. (2008) Omega-3 fatty acids for major depressive disorder during pregnancy: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 69: 644–651.
  83. 83. Mischoulon D, Papakostas GI, Dording CM, Farabaugh AH, Sonawalla SB, et al. (2009) A double-blind, randomized controlled trial of ethyl-eicosapentaenoate for major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 70: 1636–1644.
  84. 84. Gertsik L, Poland RE, Bresee C, Rapaport MH (2012) Omega-3 fatty acid augmentation of citalopram treatment for patients with major depressive disorder. J Clin Psychopharmacol 32: 61–64.
  85. 85. Llorente AM, Jensen CL, Voigt RG, Fraley JK, Berretta MC, et al. (2003) Effect of maternal docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on postpartum depression and information processing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188: 1348–1353.
  86. 86. Rogers PJ, Appleton KM, Kessler D, Peters TJ, Gunnell D, et al. (2008) No effect of n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (EPA and DHA) supplementation on depressed mood and cognitive function: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr 99: 421–431.
  87. 87. Carney RM, Freedland KE, Rubin EH, Rich MW, Steinmeyer BC, et al. (2009) Omega-3 augmentation of sertraline in treatment of depression in patients with coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 302: 1651–1657.
  88. 88. Antypa N, Van der Does AJ, Smelt AH, Rogers RD (2009) Omega-3 fatty acids (fish-oil) and depression-related cognition in healthy volunteers. J Psychopharmacol 23: 831–840.
  89. 89. Antypa N, Smelt AH, Strengholt A, Van der Does AJ (2012) Effects of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation on mood and emotional information processing in recovered depressed individuals. J Psychopharmacol 26: 738–743.
  90. 90. Fenton WS, Dickerson F, Boronow J, Hibbeln JR, Knable M (2001) A placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acid (ethyl eicosapentaenoic acid) supplementation for residual symptoms and cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 158: 2071–2074.
  91. 91. Zanarini MC, Frankenburg FR (2003) omega-3 Fatty acid treatment of women with borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Am J Psychiatry 160: 167–169.
  92. 92. Amminger GP, Schafer MR, Papageorgiou K, Klier CM, Cotton SM, et al. (2010) Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids for indicated prevention of psychotic disorders: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry 67: 146–154.
  93. 93. Rees AM, Austin MP, Parker GB (2008) Omega-3 fatty acids as a treatment for perinatal depression: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 42: 199–205.
  94. 94. Bot M, Pouwer F, Assies J, Jansen EH, Diamant M, et al. (2010) Eicosapentaenoic acid as an add-on to antidepressant medication for co-morbid major depression in patients with diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Affect Disord 126: 282–286.
  95. 95. Rondanelli M, Giacosa A, Opizzi A, Pelucchi C, La Vecchia C, et al. (2010) Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on depressive symptoms and on health-related quality of life in the treatment of elderly women with depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Nutr 29: 55–64.
  96. 96. Rizzo AM, Corsetto PA, Montorfano G, Opizzi A, Faliva M, et al. (2012) Comparison between the AA/EPA ratio in depressed and non depressed elderly females: omega-3 fatty acid supplementation correlates with improved symptoms but does not change immunological parameters. Nutr J 11: 82.
  97. 97. Tajalizadekhoob Y, Sharifi F, Fakhrzadeh H, Mirarefin M, Ghaderpanahi M, et al. (2011) The effect of low-dose omega 3 fatty acids on the treatment of mild to moderate depression in the elderly: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 261: 539–549.
  98. 98. Nemets H, Nemets B, Apter A, Bracha Z, Belmaker RH (2006) Omega-3 treatment of childhood depression: a controlled, double-blind pilot study. Am J Psychiatry 163: 1098–1100.
  99. 99. Freeman MP, Davis M, Sinha P, Wisner KL, Hibbeln JR, et al. (2008) Omega-3 fatty acids and supportive psychotherapy for perinatal depression: a randomized placebo-controlled study. J Affect Disord 110: 142–148.
  100. 100. Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Kromhout D (2011) Effects of n-3 fatty acids on depressive symptoms and dispositional optimism after myocardial infarction. Am J Clin Nutr 94: 1442–1450.
  101. 101. DeFina LF, Marcoux LG, Devers SM, Cleaver JP, Willis BL (2011) Effects of omega-3 supplementation in combination with diet and exercise on weight loss and body composition. Am J Clin Nutr 93: 455–462.
  102. 102. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Belury MA, Andridge R, Malarkey WB, Glaser R (2011) Omega-3 supplementation lowers inflammation and anxiety in medical students: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun 25: 1725–1734.
  103. 103. Barbui C, Cipriani A, Patel V, Ayuso-Mateos JL, van Ommeren M (2011) Efficacy of antidepressants and benzodiazepines in minor depression: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 198: 11–16, sup 11.
  104. 104. Iovieno N, Papakostas GI (2012) Correlation between different levels of placebo response rate and clinical trial outcome in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 73: 1300–1306.
  105. 105. Souery D, Papakostas GI, Trivedi MH (2006) Treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry 67 Suppl 616–22.
  106. 106. Freeman MP, Hibbeln JR, Wisner KL, Davis JM, Mischoulon D, et al. (2006) Omega-3 fatty acids: evidence basis for treatment and future research in psychiatry. J Clin Psychiatry 67: 1954–1967.
  107. 107. Lin PY, Su KP (2007) A meta-analytic review of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressant efficacy of omega-3 fatty acids. J Clin Psychiatry 68: 1056–1061.
  108. 108. Ross BM, Seguin J, Sieswerda LE (2007) Omega-3 fatty acids as treatments for mental illness: which disorder and which fatty acid? Lipids Health Dis 6: 21.
  109. 109. Martins JG (2009) EPA but not DHA appears to be responsible for the efficacy of omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in depression: evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Coll Nutr 28: 525–542.
  110. 110. Balanza-Martinez V, Fries GR, Colpo GD, Silveira PP, Portella AK, et al. (2011) Therapeutic use of omega-3 fatty acids in bipolar disorder. Expert Rev Neurother 11: 1029–1047.
  111. 111. Montgomery P, Richardson AJ (2008) Omega-3 fatty acids for bipolar disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD005169.
  112. 112. Sarris J, Mischoulon D, Schweitzer I (2012) Omega-3 for bipolar disorder: meta-analyses of use in mania and bipolar depression. J Clin Psychiatry 73: 81–86.
  113. 113. Mocking RJ, Assies J, Bot M, Jansen EH, Schene AH, et al. (2012) Biological effects of add-on eicosapentaenoic acid supplementation in diabetes mellitus and co-morbid depression: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 7: e49431.
  114. 114. Caraci F, Copani A, Nicoletti F, Drago F (2010) Depression and Alzheimer’s disease: neurobiological links and common pharmacological targets. Eur J Pharmacol 626: 64–71.
  115. 115. Caraci F, Bosco P, Signorelli M, Spada RS, Cosentino FI, et al. (2012) The CC genotype of transforming growth factor-beta1 increases the risk of late-onset Alzheimer’s disease and is associated with AD-related depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 22: 281–289.
  116. 116. Salomone S, Caraci F, Leggio GM, Fedotova J, Drago F (2012) New pharmacological strategies for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: focus on disease modifying drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 73: 504–517.
  117. 117. Caraci F, Spampinato S, Sortino MA, Bosco P, Battaglia G, et al. (2012) Dysfunction of TGF-beta1 signaling in Alzheimer’s disease: perspectives for neuroprotection. Cell Tissue Res 347: 291–301.
  118. 118. Caraci F, Battaglia G, Bruno V, Bosco P, Carbonaro V, et al. (2011) TGF-beta1 pathway as a new target for neuroprotection in Alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurosci Ther 17: 237–249.
  119. 119. Markhus MW, Skotheim S, Graff IE, Froyland L, Braarud HC, et al. (2013) Low omega-3 index in pregnancy is a possible biological risk factor for postpartum depression. PLoS One 8: e67617.
  120. 120. Arterburn LM, Hall EB, Oken H (2006) Distribution, interconversion, and dose response of n-3 fatty acids in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 83: 1467S–1476S.
  121. 121. Calder PC (2006) n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and inflammatory diseases. Am J Clin Nutr 83: 1505S–1519S.
  122. 122. Brooks JD, Milne GL, Yin H, Sanchez SC, Porter NA, et al. (2008) Formation of highly reactive cyclopentenone isoprostane compounds (A3/J3-isoprostanes) in vivo from eicosapentaenoic acid. J Biol Chem 283: 12043–12055.
  123. 123. Bhattacharya A, Sun D, Rahman M, Fernandes G (2007) Different ratios of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic omega-3 fatty acids in commercial fish oils differentially alter pro-inflammatory cytokines in peritoneal macrophages from C57BL/6 female mice. J Nutr Biochem 18: 23–30.
  124. 124. Zhao Y, Joshi-Barve S, Barve S, Chen LH (2004) Eicosapentaenoic acid prevents LPS-induced TNF-alpha expression by preventing NF-kappaB activation. J Am Coll Nutr 23: 71–78.
  125. 125. Sierra S, Lara-Villoslada F, Comalada M, Olivares M, Xaus J (2008) Dietary eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid equally incorporate as decosahexaenoic acid but differ in inflammatory effects. Nutrition 24: 245–254.
  126. 126. Umhau JC, Dauphinais KM, Patel SH, Nahrwold DA, Hibbeln JR, et al. (2006) The relationship between folate and docosahexaenoic acid in men. Eur J Clin Nutr 60: 352–357.
  127. 127. Gao F, Kiesewetter D, Chang L, Ma K, Rapoport SI, et al. (2009) Whole-body synthesis secretion of docosahexaenoic acid from circulating eicosapentaenoic acid in unanesthetized rats. J Lipid Res 50: 2463–2470.
  128. 128. Chang CY, Ke DS, Chen JY (2009) Essential fatty acids and human brain. Acta Neurol Taiwan 18: 231–241.