Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Bryophyte-Cyanobacteria Associations during Primary Succession in Recently Deglaciated Areas of Tierra del Fuego (Chile)

  • María Arróniz-Crespo ,

    Affiliations Dept. de Biología Vegetal II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, School of Environment Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, United Kingdom

  • Sergio Pérez-Ortega,

    Affiliation Dept. de Biología Ambiental, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC, Madrid, Spain

  • Asunción De los Ríos,

    Affiliation Dept. de Biología Ambiental, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, MNCN-CSIC, Madrid, Spain

  • T. G. Allan Green,

    Affiliations Dept. de Biología Vegetal II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain, Biological Sciences, Waikato University, Hamilton, New Zealand

  • Raúl Ochoa-Hueso,

    Affiliation Dept. de Biogeografía y Cambio Global, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain

  • Miguel Ángel Casermeiro,

    Affiliation Departamento Edafología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • María Teresa de la Cruz,

    Affiliation Departamento Edafología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Ana Pintado,

    Affiliation Dept. de Biología Vegetal II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • David Palacios,

    Affiliation Departamento Geografía Física, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

  • Ricardo Rozzi,

    Affiliations Sub-Antarctic Biocultural Conservation Program, University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, United States of America, Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity, Universidad de Magallanes, Puerto Williams, Chile

  • Niklas Tysklind,

    Affiliation School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Wales, United Kingdom

  • Leopoldo G. Sancho

    Affiliation Dept. de Biología Vegetal II, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Bryophyte-Cyanobacteria Associations during Primary Succession in Recently Deglaciated Areas of Tierra del Fuego (Chile)

  • María Arróniz-Crespo, 
  • Sergio Pérez-Ortega, 
  • Asunción De los Ríos, 
  • T. G. Allan Green, 
  • Raúl Ochoa-Hueso, 
  • Miguel Ángel Casermeiro, 
  • María Teresa de la Cruz, 
  • Ana Pintado, 
  • David Palacios, 
  • Ricardo Rozzi


18 Sep 2014: The PLOS ONE Staff (2014) Correction: Bryophyte-Cyanobacteria Associations during Primary Succession in Recently Deglaciated Areas of Tierra del Fuego (Chile). PLOS ONE 9(9): e108759. View correction


Bryophyte establishment represents a positive feedback process that enhances soil development in newly exposed terrain. Further, biological nitrogen (N) fixation by cyanobacteria in association with mosses can be an important supply of N to terrestrial ecosystems, however the role of these associations during post-glacial primary succession is not yet fully understood. Here, we analyzed chronosequences in front of two receding glaciers with contrasting climatic conditions (wetter vs drier) at Cordillera Darwin (Tierra del Fuego) and found that most mosses had the capacity to support an epiphytic flora of cyanobacteria and exhibited high rates of N2 fixation. Pioneer moss-cyanobacteria associations showed the highest N2 fixation rates (4.60 and 4.96 µg N g−1 bryo. d−1) very early after glacier retreat (4 and 7 years) which may help accelerate soil development under wetter conditions. In drier climate, N2 fixation on bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations was also high (0.94 and 1.42 µg N g−1 bryo. d−1) but peaked at intermediate-aged sites (26 and 66 years). N2 fixation capacity on bryophytes was primarily driven by epiphytic cyanobacteria abundance rather than community composition. Most liverworts showed low colonization and N2 fixation rates, and mosses did not exhibit consistent differences across life forms and habitat (saxicolous vs terricolous). We also found a clear relationship between cyanobacteria genera and the stages of ecological succession, but no relationship was found with host species identity. Glacier forelands in Tierra del Fuego show fast rates of soil transformation which imply large quantities of N inputs. Our results highlight the potential contribution of bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations to N accumulation during post-glacial primary succession and further describe the factors that drive N2-fixation rates in post-glacial areas with very low N deposition.


Cryptogamic covers account for nearly half of the biological nitrogen (N) fixation on land [1], representing an important supply of N to terrestrial ecosystems. In particular, dinitrogen (N2) fixation by cyanobacteria-moss associations has been found to contribute significantly to the N economy in high-latitude ecosystems [2][6] where it can represent the main source of new N [7][10]. For example, moss-associated cyanobacteria can provide 2–58% of the N input to Arctic ecosystems and in Antarctica the percentage can reach up to 84% [11]. In boreal forests, up to 60% of N can come from N2-fixation in mosses [12]. In early primary succession, however, the role of cyanobacteria-moss associations on N inputs has received considerably less attention, despite bryophytes being often the first plants to colonize newly exposed terrain [13]. The lack of studies is particularly marked in temperate and subpolar regions of the Southern Hemisphere, where bryophytes account for more than 50% of the plant species [14].

Rates of N2 fixation in moss associated with cyanobacteria can be highly variable. Previous studies in the 1980s and early 1990s have shown that N2 fixation varies greatly among bryophyte species [8], [15][17] which may be due to differences in the microhabitat characteristics where the mosses grow [2]. Moderate increases in temperature leads to a general increase in N2 fixation [18] whereas shading [19] and N fertilization (e.g. atmospheric N deposition or throughfall) results in reduced rates of N2 fixation in these associations [4], [12]. Moisture is also considered a major environmental factor influencing N2-fixation on moss-cyanobacteria associations, with a positive relationship between water availability and N-fixation rates [3], [20]. The diversity and density of cyanobacteria species associated with mosses have also been described as important factors explaining the variability in N2 fixation rates [21], [22]. However, little is still known about the existence of species-specific association between bryophyte and cyanobacteria species [23], although some studies have shown that host species identity could be a stronger driver of epiphytic cyanobacteria diversity and composition [22]. While these studies have already started to elucidate the factors that drive N2-fixation rates, the influence of bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations on the biogeochemical cycling of N and, in particular, during early primary succession still needs further assessment.

In Tierra del Fuego, glacial retreat has been occurring since the end of the Little Ice Age (around 1750 to 1850) [24], exposing new terrain for ecosystem development by the process of primary succession. Glacier forelands are typically nutrient-poor [25]. However, our preliminary studies at the Cordillera Darwin (Tierra del Fuego) found rapid rates of vegetation growth and quick succession to stages dominated by Nothofagus tree species [26]. These tree-dominated stages were present on the southern side of the mountain range after 34 years of soil surface exposure [26], compared to 80 years on the northern side of the mountain range (Palacios et al., unpublished). As inputs of N through atmospheric deposition are very low in such high latitude region, possibly <0.7 kg N ha−1 yr−1 [27], biological fixation can greatly exceed bulk precipitation. For example, biological N fixation inputs from bryophytes during early succession, e.g. [28] reached 22 kg N ha−1 yr−1 in a New Zealand glacier foreland. Therefore, we considered that N2 fixation and its interaction with other biotic and abiotic factors could be a key driver of early plant succession in recently deglaciated areas of Tierra del Fuego. The combination of three attributes: 1) the difference in the speed of ecological succession found between the two glaciers on southern and northern slopes; 2) the strong climatic gradients characteristic of this area: with high rates of precipitation on the southwestern side and dry conditions on the northern side of the mountain range [29]; and 3) the low rates of anthropogenic N deposition, make the Cordillera Darwin an unique site to further elucidate the potential drivers of N2 fixation rates on bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations and its impact on C and N accumulation during post-glacial primary succession.

Specifically, we aimed to evaluate the role of bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations during post-glacial primary succession because (i) moss establishment is a positive feedback process that enhance N inputs in newly exposed terrain [13] and (ii) moss-associated cyanobacteria can be an important contributor to N inputs through the process of N2 fixation [28], [30]. Our aims were (1) to describe how soil properties and N2 fixation related parameters change along two pro-glacial chronosequences at the Cordillera Darwin (Tierra del Fuego), (2) how species identity (both bryophytes and cyanobacteria), climatic conditions (wetter sv. drier), and the stage of ecological succession, influence N2 fixation rates of bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations, and thereby ecosystem N accumulation, and (3) whether any of these associations are species specific.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

The Chilean National Forestry Corporation (CONAF) issued the scientific collecting permit for each location considered in this study. This study did not involve endangered or protected species.

Site description and chronosequence establishment

The study area is located at the Cordillera Darwin in the southwestern part of Tierra del Fuego (Chile) (Fig. 1a). Around 80% of the mountain range is glaciated. One glacier was selected on each side of the mountain range for the present study; both glaciers have been receding steadily for several decades and present a well-defined sequence of moraine bands. The south-side glacier, SG (Pia Glacier, 54°46′S 69°40′W) flows into the east arm of Bahia Pia; plant succession goes from bare ground to full forest (stage of succession dominated by Nothofagus spp. >10 m high) in 34 years [26]. At the north-side glacier, NG (Parry Glacier, 54°41′S 69°23′W) the succession is slower and the equivalent stage of succession dominated by Nothofagus appears after 80 years of soil exposure (Palacios et al., unpublished data). A characteristic feature of the area is the steep meteorological gradients across the Cordillera Darwin with heavy precipitation and solid cloud cover being typical over the southern and western fjords, whilst to the north and east conditions are much drier [29]. This results in a stark contrast in annual precipitation between both glaciers. Precipitation rates where SG flows, Bahia Pia (1600 mm) are twice as high as at where NG flows, Seno Almirantazgo fjord (800 mm) [29]. Mean annual air temperature, however, is relatively constant over the entire region, with only a slight drop from 5.9°C at Punta Arenas to 4.5°C at Bahia Pia [31].

Figure 1. Study area and chronosequence description.

(a) Map of the study area at the Cordillera Darwin in the southwestern part of Tierra del Fuego (Chile) showing the location of the south-side (SG) and north-side (NG) glaciers on each side of the mountain range. (b) Four representative sites along north-side glacier and south-side glacier chronosequences at Cordillera Darwin. At both glaciers, the younger site corresponds to bare ground close to the glacier front whereas the older site was covered within Nothofagus forests. Years since deglaciation per site are included in the picture.

The chronosequence in each glacier has been established by using several independent techniques to date surfaces: aerial photographs, dendrochronology, (sampling tree rings), and lichenometry (dating of rock surface from lichens growth) utilizing the growth rate and thallus size of the lichen Rhizocarpon geographicum (L.) DC [26].

Forest vegetation in the area consists of Nothofagus antarctica (G. Forst.) Oerst., and N. betuloides (Mirb.) as dominant tree species. After glacier retreat, the successional sequence at NG is characterized by pioneer lichens (Placopsis perrugosa (Nyl.) Nyl., Rhizocarpon geographicum (L.) DC., Xanthoria candelaria (L.) Th. Fr.) and mosses (Dendroligotrichum squamosum (Hook. f. & Wilson) Cardot and Andreaea spp.), followed by dwarf shrubs (Empetrum rubrum Wahl. Ex Willd., Gaultheria mucronata (L. f.) Hook. & Arn.), perennial herbs (Gunnera magellanica Lam) and moss (Racomitrium spp.) vegetation assemblage. At SG the successional sequence goes from pioneer lichen (same species as in NG plus Placopsis stenophylla (Hue) I.M. Lamb and Placopsis pycnotheca I.M. Lamb) and the moss Ditrichum cylindricarpum (Müll. Hal.) F. Muell, followed by perennial herbs vegetation assemblage (Gunnera magellanica Lam and Uncinia tenuis Poepp. ex Kunth) and the development of Nothofagus spp. forest (Fig. 1b).

Sample collection and transport

Field work took place in 2009 during the summer season which corresponds to the active period for N2 fixation at high southern latitudes [32]. Sampling sites were established at increasing surface ages in front of both glaciers. There were six sites at SG with surface ages of 1, 4, 7, 10, 19 and 34 yrs and six sites at NG with surface ages of 5, 18, 20, 26, 66 and 80 yrs. At both glaciers, the younger site corresponds to bare ground close to the glacier front whereas the older site was covered within Nothofagus forests. Three transects were randomly established along the chronosequence in each glacier foreland and one independent sample was collected in each transect per site (surface age) so that there were three replicates per surface age for soil, each bryophyte species and cyanobacteria measurements.

Soil sampling.

200 g of soil samples were collected using the core method, samples were collected from the upper 0–4 cm of the soil. Samples were placed into, and sealed in, suitably sized plastic bags. Collected samples were immediately frozen at −20°C and returned frozen to the Universidad Complutense de Madrid for soil characterization.

Bryophyte sampling.

The dominant bryophyte species at each site (surface age) along the chronosequence were collected. In total 16 bryophyte species (including both mosses and liverworts) with varying morphologies, life forms and habitats (saxicolous and terricolous species) were selected. These included 10 mosses Dendroligotrichum squamosum (Hook. f. & Wilson) Cardot, Andreaea laxifolia (Hook. f. & Wilson), A. alpina (Hedw.), Acroschisma wilsonii (Hook. f.) A. Jaeger, Racomitrium didymum (Mont.) Lorentz, R. laevigatum (A. Jaeger), R. lanuginosum (Schimp. ex R.S. Williams), R. subcrispipilum (Müll.Hal.) A. Jaeger, Dicranoloma chilense (De Not.) Ochyra & Matteri and Ditrichum cylindricarpum (Müll. Hal.) F. Muell; and 6 leafy liverworts Cryptochila grandiflora (Lindenb. & Gott.) Grolle, Heteroscyphus magellanicus (Steph.) Engel & Schust., Blepharidophyllum densifolium (Hook.) Ångström ex C. Massal., Anastrophyllum involutifolium, Clasmatocolea humilis (Hook. f. & Tayl.) Grolle and Chiloscyphus leptanthus (Hook. f. & Tayl.) Engel & Schust. Eight species were sampled at more than one site and the other eight were sampled at a single site on the chronosequence. A full description of bryophyte species sampled by site are shown in (Table S1). Monospecific patches of fresh bryophytes species were collected, air dried and sent to the Universidad Complutense de Madrid in paper bags for analysis that included: (1) rates of N2 fixation, (2) quantification of the abundance of epiphytic cyanobacteria, and (3) abundance of stable isotopes (14N and 15N) and shoot N and C contents.

Cyanobacteria sampling.

The diversity and distribution of cyanobacteria associated with bryophytes at each site (surface age) was determined by molecular analysis. A second set of bryophyte samples (around 10 shoots per species) were collected in the same bryophyte patches described above. Collectors used disposable laboratory latex gloves when taking samples. Samples were placed into, and sealed in suitably sized plastic bags. Collected samples were immediately frozen at −20°C and returned frozen to the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales in Madrid (CSIC) where DNA from epiphytic cyanobacteria was extracted and analysed.

Soil chemical properties

Samples were stored at −20°C. Soils were air-dried, sieved (<2 mm) homogenized before conducting the following analysis:

Soil pH.

Soil pH was measured in water suspension (soil∶water, 1∶2.5) [33].

Total soil N (TN) and total soil carbon (TC) were analysed in an autoanalyser system LECO CNS 2000I.

Soil extractable nitrogen.

Soil nitrate (NO3-N) and nitrite (NO2-N) were extracted by shaking soil aliquots (30 g DW) in (1∶5) water [33], filtered and analysed by ionic chromatography Metrohm 761 compact IC. Ammonium (NH4-N) was extracted by shaking 10 g of soil in 50 ml of 0.5 M K2SO4 for 30 min, filtered and colorimetrically assessed [34].

Nitrogen-fixation measurements

Prior to N2-fixation measurements, all bryophyte samples were reactivated for 48 h in a growth chamber, photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 100 µmol m−2 s−1 over the waveband 400–700 nm, 10°C, with a 18 ∶ 6 h phototoperiod (light ∶ dark) and maintained hydrated to ensure recovery (confirmed by chlorophyll fluorescence, data not shown). N2-fixation rates of bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations were estimated under controlled conditions using the acetylene reduction assay (ARA) [35]. Revitalized shoot apices (around 10–15 shoots or 0.07–0.20 dry weight basis) were placed into 10 ml glass incubation vessels and sealed with a rubber septum. 1 ml of headspace was removed and replaced by 1 ml of acetylene (generated from CaC2 and water), resulting in headspace enrichments of 10–20% (enrichment was determined individually for each species allowing for the different vial headspaces, see in (Appendix S1). Four samples were randomly chosen as control samples and were treated in the same manner except for the headspace substitution; another set of four samples with deionized water and acetylene was used as blank samples to assess the concentration of ethylene in the acetylene used. All incubation vessels were placed in a growth chamber (200 µmol m−2 s−1 PAR, 10°C) and incubation took 18 h. Before incubation, acetylene reduction was demonstrated to be linear over an 18-h period in 10 samples with known different cyanobacteria abundance (data not shown). Ethylene resulting from the reducing activity was measured by gas chromatography. N2-fixation rates were calculated as nanomoles of acetylene reduced per gram bryophyte dry weight per hour (nmol C2H2 g−1 dw h−1). Theoretical stoichiometric ratio of acetylene to nitrogen (3∶1) is recommended to be corrected by parallel uptake of labelled 15N2 for each organism and also, possibly, for location [36], [37]. Thus, to estimate N2 fixation rates (15N2 uptake), consecutive incubations of the same samples with 15N2 after ARA was performed following [9]. 2 ml of headspace were replaced by 2 ml 15N2 gas (98 atom % 15N enriched), resulting in headspace enrichments of 20–30% and, after 18 h incubation at the same conditions as ARA, samples, were immediately oven dried (60°C for 48 h), ground in a ball mill and sent for 15N enrichment and total N analysis (UCDavis Stable Isotope Facility, University of California, Davis, USA). Three control samples for each bryophyte-cyanobacteria association were used to determine the natural abundance 15N. The amount of N fixed was calculated according to [6], [38]. N2-fixation rates were calculated as micrograms of 15N incorporated per hour per gram of bryophyte on a dry weight basis and expressed as micrograms of fixed N per day (µg N g−1 dw bryophyte d−1).

ARA was highly correlated with 15N2 uptake (N = 89, R2 = 0.689 P<0.001). ARA measurements were used to compare N2 fixation rates between taxa and rates reported by other authors. 15N2 uptake was used to evaluate the potential impact of N2 fixation on ecosystem nitrogen (N) accumulation.

Stable isotope analysis and shoot N and C content

All isotopic analyses were conducted at the UCDavis Stable Isotope Facility, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, USA. δ15N analyses were performed by elemental analyser/continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry using a ANCA-GSL elemental analyser interfaced coupled with a PDZ Europa 20-20 isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Atom% was calculated from δ15N values. Total tissue C and N was also analysed.

Cyanobacteria abundance, composition and phylogenetic analysis

Cyanobacteria abundance by HPLC analysis of echinenone.

Bryophyte samples (∼3–10 cm2 of fresh tissue per sample depending on the species) were deep-frozen until pigment analyses. Pigments were extracted in 95% cool acetone in the presence of sodium ascorbate. Echinenone (a cyanobacterial pigment used as a proxy of cyanobacteria abundance) was separated by HPLC according to the method of [39] slightly modified. After passing through a 0.45 µm nylon filter, 25 µL of the extract was injected into a C18 column. The mobile phase rate was 1.2 mL min−1 and the elution time lasted 30 min. Solvents for HPLC analysis were degassed before use by bubbling helium. The HPLC system was equipped with a photodiode array detector. For peak identification and quantification, a pure commercial standard was used. The relative abundance of cyanobacteria was expressed as the amount of echinenone on a bryophyte surface area basis (nmol echinenone/cm2 bryophyte). Digital pictures of each sample were taken before freezing and the surface area of each sample was calculated using a image analysis program.

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE).

For cyanobacteria DNA extraction, bryophyte samples (around 200 mg dry weight) were introduced into 15 ml falcon tubes with distilled water and vigorously shaken (maximum speed) for 10 minutes in a vortex using a falcon tube adapter to release the epiphytic cyanobacteria from bryophytes. The extracted cyanobacteria contained in the water were removed with a 5 ml pipette and cells were concentrated by centrifugation in an ultracentrifuge at 3000 rpm for 5 min. The concentrated cyanobacteria cells were used for DNA extraction.

Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of cyanobacterial PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments was used to survey the genetic diversity of isolated epiphytic cyanobacteria. Total genomic DNA for DGGE analysis was extracted in three replicates from the cyanobacteria isolates samples using CTAB extraction method described in [40]. A fragment of the cyanobacterial 16S rRNA gene suitable for DGGE analysis was amplified in each sample from total genomic DNA using the following primer pair: CYA359fGC and CY781r [41]. Each 25 µl volume of PCR mix [75 mM Tris pH 9.0/50 mM KCl/20 mM (NH4)2SO4] contained 1 unit of Taq polymerase, 0.2 mM of each of the four dNTPs, 0.4 mM of each primer, 100 mg of bovine serum albumin, 1.5 mM of MgCl2, 5 ml de 5xTaq Master PCR enhancer (Prime) and ca 10–50 ng genomic DNA. Annealing conditions were 60°C. The DGGE system was used for the analysis of cyanobacterial fragments of 16S rRNA gene according to the manufacturer's instructions). Acrylamide gels (6%) with a 30 to 60% urea-formamide denaturing gradient were prepared. Lanes were loaded with 22 µl of PCR product, run at a constant 200 V for 7 h at 60°C, and EtBr stained to visualize and photograph the resultant bands according to [42]. The most predominant bands were excised and incubated 1 h at 60°C in water before PCR amplification. The eluted DNA was reamplified as described above but using primers devoiding the GC clamp. The PCR products were cleaned on Quick Spin columns. Both complementary strands were sequenced separately at the MACROGEN sequencing company.

For sequence analysis, we obtained closely related sequences with known taxonomy using Blast searches in Gen Bank. Later, sequences obtained from DGGE bands were reduced to OTUs in mothur v.1.28 [43] using a cutoff of 0.01% [44]. A reference sequence for each OTU was chosen for subsequent analysis by means of the command get.outrep in mothur v.1.28. 20 sequences corresponding to each of the 0.01% cut-off OTUs were aligned with a total of 29 sequences retrieved from the GenBank (Table S2). Alignment of all sequences were carried out in Muscle 3.8.31 [45] and visually checked in Bioedit [46]. Nucleotide substitution model was statistically selected with the help of jModelTest [47], program available at Model selection was made according to the Akaike′s information criterion (AIC, [48]; the General Time Reversible substitution model [49], with estimation assuming a gamma distribution (GTR+G) had the lowest –lnL value. Phylogenetic relationships among OTUs and sequences with known taxonomy were studied by means of Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian phylogenetic inference. ML analysis were carried out in PHYML 3.0 [50] through the webserver using 1,000 bootstrap repetitions in order to assess node support. Bayesian analyses were carried out in Mr. Bayes 3.1.2 [51] running eight different chains and 5,000K generations. 50% majority rule consensus tree is shown in (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree.

Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree (50% majority rule consensus tree) from alignments of 16S rRNA genes showing the phylogenetic relationships among all OTUs of epiphytic cyanobacteria found on bryophytes collected along the chronosequence in both glacier and sequences with known taxonomy, for Accession numbers (Table S1).

Sequences generated in this study were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers KJ576732-KJ576783.

Statistical and data analyses

We calculated the Shannon index (H′ = -Σ (ni/N) ln (ni/N) [52], where ni is the number of times we found each ith OTU and N is the total number of unique OTUs (N = 20) found in the study area, in order to evaluate changes in diversity of epiphytic cyanobacteria along the chronosequence (H′site) and between bryophytes species (H′species).

To be able to compare parameters between glacier chronosequences with different sampling site ages we first tested if the different stages of ecological succession, identified by the soil development transformation trends observed along the chronosequence, were comparable between the two glacier chronosequences; we used TC, TN and soil pH as descriptors of soil development status at each site and extracted one general factor component of soil development using principal component analysis [53]. The resulting scores were tested with two-way ANOVA to detect differences on the stage of ecological succession along the chronosequence and between glaciers, with sampling sites (0 to 5) and glacier location (north sv. south) as fixed factors. These analyses indicated that the two chronosequences were comparable despite the different absolute soil ages where the samples were collected (Fig. S1). Differences between glaciers on soil chemical properties, N2-fixation rates (15N2 uptake), abundance of epiphytic cyanobacteria, and C : N ratio in bryophyte tissue were then tested with two-way ANOVAs. All data were tested for homoscedasticity (Levene's test for equal variances) and normality (IBM SPSS statistics, Armonk NY, USA). When data did not meet these assumptions, they were rank or Log10 +1 transformed prior to statistical analyses. Analyses were carried out with IBM SPSS Statistics 19 (IBM SPSS statistics, Armonk NY, USA).

A fundamental assumption about chronosequences is that the communities and ecosystems of the younger sites are developing in the same temporal sequence as the older sites developed (termed a space-for-time substitution). At any location on the chronosequence the vegetation present represents what will eventually form on younger sites and which will, itself, change to that found on the older sites present. As such, the assumption of independence is violated. We used non-parametric Krukall-Wallis test to evaluate changes of parameters measured at the different stages of ecological succession (mean values per site) along each glacier chronosequence separately, using stage of ecological succession (sampling site) as the grouping factor. When significant differences were found, Mann–Whitney U-test post hoc tests were run to detect differences between sites. Bonferroni's correction was used to determine the level of significance of the post hoc tests.

At species level, we used conditional inference trees (CTREE) [54] to assess and visualise the relative importance of bryophyte species identity (species effect), climatic conditions (glacier location: north sv. south), and stage of ecological succession (sampling site effect) in determining N2 fixation capacity and cyanobacteria abundance on bryophytes. CTREE work by first testing the null hypothesis of independence between the predictors (here bryophyte species, glacier and site) and response variable (here N2 fixation and cyanobacteria abundance); if dependence is found, then determining the best split value for the predictor with the strongest effect on the response; and third, repeating the first two steps with each branch until independence cannot be rejected. Relationships are represented as dichotomous trees with nodes indicating split points for significant predictor variables, and terminal nodes for the final groups of responses. Being nonparametric, CTREE make no assumptions about the data, and are appropriate where nonlinear relationships between predictive and response variables and complex interactions between variables, such as covariance, may be expected [54]. CTREE were constructed in R 3.0.1 (R Development Core Team, 2013) with the package PARTY [55], with 10,000 resamples of Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.05 significance levels and with at least one observation into each daughter node. N2 fixation and cyanobacteria abundance data were log +1 transformed and site included as an ordered categorical variable.

Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate whether abundance of epiphytic cyanobacteria or its diversity on host bryophyte (H′species) had a larger influence on the rate of N2 fixation.

Correspondence analysis in each glacier separately were used to graphically examine the relationships between OTUs of cyanobacteria and the different stages of ecological succession and also to detect selectivity associations between cyanobacteria OTUs and bryophyte species (6 species with cyanobacteria colonies sampled at more than one site were used in this analyses). Analysis were carried out in R 3.0.1 (R Development Core Team, 2013) using the package ca [56].


Genetic diversity of isolated epiphytic cyanobacteria

A total of 52 bands (18 from NG and 34 from SG) were recovered from DGGE analyses and subsequently sequenced, producing 28 unique sequences. After their collapse into OTUs (0.01% cutoff), 20 cyanobacteria putative taxa were obtained. The phylogenetic analysis of the relationships between these OTUs and sequences with known taxonomy obtained from the GenBank is depicted in Fig. 2. Seven 0.01% cutoff OTUs could be assigned to the species aggregate Nostoc commune. Six OTUs (5, 7, 9, 12, 15, 17) were assigned to unidentified Nostocaeae because no clear relationship was found in the phylogenetic tree with any certain genus. A similar case is presented for OTUs 10, 13, 14, 16, and 18, which did not show a clear and well supported clade with sequences of Stigonema included in the phylogenetic analysis. Nevertheless, BLAST searches of these OTUs recovered sequences identified as Stigonema. In both cases, the most likely explanation for such lack of phylogenetic support in our tree for these two OTU groups is the shortness of fragment of the 16S gene used in the analyses. Finally, OTU 20 is clearly and statistically supported related to Leptolymbya and OTU 19 is likewise related to Microcoleus (Fig. 2).

Soil properties of glacier forelands

Overall comparisons between both glaciers (two-way ANOVAs) showed no differences on pH, TC and TN between glaciers (NG vs SG) and higher concentration of inorganic N at SG (ANOVA P = 0.037). At NG, the concentration of inorganic N in young soils (younger than 26 years) was lower (from 0.16 to 8.23 mg kg−1) compared to concentrations observed in soils at SG very early after glacier retreated (13.42 mg kg−1 after 4 years soil exposure and 34.83 mg kg−1 after 10 years, Fig. 3d). Within the Nothofagus forests inorganic N concentration in the soil was nearly 3-fold higher at SG (135.08 mg kg−1) compared to NG (45.28 mg kg−1). All soil parameters showed a significant overall site effect (ANOVA P<0.001) and no interaction between glacier location (north sv. south) and site (0 to 5). Within each chronosequence (non-parametric tests), soil pH decreases from 6.4 to 4.4 in NG (P<0.01) and from 6.81 to 4.55 in SG (P<0.05), with the higher values always found in the younger soils (Fig. 3a). TC increased from very low values (0.33% at NG and 0.24% at SG) to over 35% at NG (P<0.05) and 39% at SG (P<0.05) in the oldest soils (80 and 34 years of soil exposure respectively) inside the Nothofagus spp. forest (Nothofagus-dominated state, Fig. 3b); TN also increased along the chronosequence from 0.02% in NG and undetectable levels in SG to 0.99% in NG (P<0.05) and 1.51% in SG (P<0.05) inside the forest site (Fig. 3c). Soil extractable inorganic N (NO3+NO2+NH4+) followed a similar trend increasing with time since deglaciation at both glaciers (P<0.05 for NG and P<0.01 for SG, Fig. 3d).

Figure 3. Patterns of soil properties and N2 fixation related parameters along chronosequences.

Site characteristics along the chronosequence in the north-side glacier (NG: black circles) with site soil (surface) age of 5, 18, 20, 26, 66 and 80 yrs and south-side glacier (SG: white circles) with site soil (surface) age of 1, 4, 7, 10, 19 and 34 yrs. At both glaciers, the younger site corresponds to bare ground close to the glacier front whereas the older site was covered within Nothofagus forests. Significant changes of parameters along each glacier chronosequence is indicated by *, p<0.05*, p<0.01**, p<0.001*** (Krukall-Wallis test). Different letters indicate significant differences between site ages after Mann–Whitney U-test post-hoc (Bonferroni corrected), bold letters are used for NG. Statistical differences on soil properties and N2 fixation related parameters between the two glacier chronosequences are indicated in the result section.

Nitrogen-fixation, cyanobacteria abundance and shoot C : N contents

N2 fixation rates (15N2 uptake) and epiphytic cyanobacteria relative abundance, when averaged across all bryophyte species per site, were higher at SG compare to NG (ANOVA P<0.001 and P<0.01 respectively). A significant overall interaction (ANOVA P<0.001) between glacier locations (north sv. south) and the stage of ecological succession (sampling site:1 to 5) suggested that variation of N2 fixation rates and cyanobacteria abundance along each chronosequence differed between glaciers. At NG, N2 fixation rate (Fig. 3e) showed an optimum increasing from the lowest rates at 18 and 20 year old sites (0.52 and 0.5 µg N g−1 DW bryo. d−1, respectively) to rates that were 2-fold higher in intermediate-aged sites (0.94 and 1.42 µg N g−1 DW bryo. d−1, 26 and 66 years old site respectively) and then declined in the 80 years old forest site (0.80 µg N g−1 DW bryo. d−1). Epiphytic cyanobacteria abundance (Fig. 3f) followed a similar trend with the highest concentration at 66 years old site (42.09 nmol echin. cm−2) and lowest concentration at 80 and 20 years old soil (4.5 and 7.94 nmol echin. cm−2). In contrast, at SG the highest N2 fixation rate and cyanobacteria abundance was found in young soils (4.60 and 4.96 µg N g−1 DW bryo. d−1 and 51.50 and 53.33 nmol echin. cm−2, at 4 and 7 year old sites respectively) compared to older sites (ranging from 0.64 to 1.34 µg N g−1 DW bryo. d−1 and 6.46 to 23.96 nmol echin. cm−2, at soil age 10 to 34 years old; Fig. 3e,f).

Shoot C : N ratios of bryophyte tissue, when averaged across all bryophyte species per site, did not differed between glacier (ANOVA P = 0.165) but change with soil age (ANOVA P<0.001). Shoot C : N increased with time since deglaciation at NG (P<0.001) with the lower values always found in the younger soil (Fig. 3g). At SG shoot C : N ratios showed the same pattern but the effect of soil age was not significant (Fig. 3g).

Differences on bryophyte N2 fixation capacity and cyanobacteria abundance

The conditional inference tree (Fig. 4a) revealed that both species identity and the stage of ecological succession (sampling site), were important variables in the N2 fixation rates at species level (ARA, nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) Three species of mosses (Ditrichum cylindricarpum, Racomitrium subcrispipilum and R. laevigatum) showed the highest rates of N2 fixation (Table 1 and node 3 in Fig. 4a); Intermediate N2 fixation rates were found for a second group of species (node 4), namely Racomitrium didymium, R. lanuginosum, Acroschisma wilsonii and the liverwort Cryptochila grandiflora. An increment of N2 fixation rates was detected between younger sites (node 5: sites 1–3) and older sites (node 6: sites 4 and 5) for node 4. However, a more detailed analysis by individual species, revealed that there was an effect of the stage of ecological succession on N2 fixation rates only on the two most common species sampled in this study, R. didymium and A. wilsonii (statistical data not shown). The remainder of the species (node 7) had either low N2 fixation rates as detected in Dicranoloma chilense, Andreaea laxifolia, Andreaea alpina and Anastrophyllum involutifolium, or zero N2 fixation rates, as in the liverworts Clasmatocolea humilis, Blepharidophyllum densifolium, Chiloscyphus leptanthus, Heteroscyphus magellanicus and the endohydric moss Dendroligotrichum squamosum (Table 1 and Fig. 4a). With our dataset, no effect was detected for glacier location (north sv. south) at species level.

Figure 4. Conditional inference tree of: a) N2 fixation capacity (nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) and b) cyanobacteria abundances (nmol echinenone/bryophyte cm2) on bryophytes from both glaciers.

Bubbles (nodes) indicate the variable with the strongest effect on the response, best split value, and associated probability (Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.05). Boxplots (terminal nodes) summarize the rate of N2 fixation (log+1 transformed) or cyanobacteria abundances (log+1 transformed) in cases classified into each terminal node (n). Predictor variables included: bryophyte species identity (species effect), glacier locations (glacier effect) and the stage of ecological succession (sampling site effect). The bryophyte species name and their corresponded number are shown in the table within the graph.

Table 1. Mean (N = 3) N2 fixation rates (nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) cyanobacteria abundance (nmol echinenone/bryophyte cm2) and cyanobacteria genera associated with each individual bryophyte species along both glacier chronosequences.

The conditional inference tree (Fig. 4b) also showed a significant effect of bryophytes species identity on cyanobacteria relative abundance (nmol echinenone/cm2 bryophyte) with the highest colonization found in the mosses Ditrichum cylindricarpum, Racomitrium subcrispipilum, R. laevigatum, R. lanuginosum and the liverwort Cryptochila grandiflora (Table 1 and node 2 in Fig 4b). Variability of N2 fixation rates between bryophyte species was best explained by changes in epiphytic cyanobacteria abundance (positive linear regression: R2 = 0.44, P<0.001, Fig. 5a) rather than the Shannon diversity index of cyanobacteria on host bryophytes (positive linear regression: R2 = 0.19, P = 0.012, Fig. 5b).

Figure 5. Relationship between N2 fixation and the abundance and diversity of epiphytic cyanobacteria.

Relationship between N2 fixation (µg N g−1 DW bryo. d−1) on each individual bryophyte species and the abundance (nmol echine. cm-2) and diversity (Shannon Index) of their host cyanobacteria. Bryophyte species from both glaciers are included. The results of the linear regression analysis are shown in the upper left side of the figure.

Community structure of epiphytic cyanobacteria

The Shannon index of epiphytic cyanobacteria OTUs per site (H′site) at NG rose from 0.29 to a maximum of 0.96 at 26 years followed by a steady decline to original level at the oldest site. At SG, H′site increased sharply from 0.38 and 0.32 at the two youngest sites to 1.37 at the oldest site within Nothofagus forest (Fig. 3h). Correspondence analysis showed a clear relationship between cyanobacteria genera and the stage of ecological succession at both glaciers. At NG (Fig. 6a), sites 2 and 3 share similar cyanobacteria communities; Nostoc commune was present at site 2 (OTU 1 & 3) and site 3 (OTU 6) whereas unidentified Nostocaceae was confined to site 3 (OTU 5, 7 & 15) and site 4 (OTU 17); Stigonema spp was found just at site 4 (OTU 16) and Microcoleus spp. (OTU 19) at site 5. At SG (Fig. 6b), all sites differed in their cyanobacteria communities, Nostoc commune was present at sites 1 (OTU 2), site 2 (OTU 1), site 3 (OTU 4 & 8) and site 5 (OTU 11); unidentified Nostocaceae at site 4 (OTU 9) and site 5 (OTU 15 & 12) and Stigonema spp. at site 4 (OTU 18) and site 5 (OTU 16, 13, 10 & 14). Leptolyngbya spp. (OTU20) was found at site 1. No relationship was observed between the genus of cyanobacteria and bryophyte species (Table 1 and Fig. S2).

Figure 6. Relationships between cyanobacteria and the stages of ecological succession.

Relationships between OTUs of epiphytic cyanobacteria obtained at a 0.01% cut-off and the different stages of ecological succession (triangles) -the younger site (site 1) correspond to bare ground close to the glacier front whereas the older site (site 5) correspond to Nothofagus forests- in the north-side glacier (a) and south-side glacier (b) after correspondence analysis. Site 1 is not included in (a) because cyanobacteria were not found epiphytically on bryophytes at that site. For OTUs identification please see Fig. 2.


Patterns of soil properties and N2 fixation related parameters along chronosequences

The trend observed in soil development followed the classic sequence reported for glacier foreland chronosequences [57], [58]. Soil pH fell and total C and N contents increased with surface age along both chronosequences. However, the time required differs significantly to rates reported in other proglacial areas. Soils developed from barren rocks to Histosol, an organic soil, with 39% C in SG and 35% C in NG after 34 and 80 years of soil exposure, respectively (Fig. 3b). This contrasts with 2% C reported in other studies reached 80 years after deglaciation [57]. Total soil N increased from very low or undetectable values at the youngest sites to 1.5% in SG and 0.99% in NG in the forest soil over this short period, again contrasting with concentration of 0.2% TN after 80 years exposure observed in the Central Alps [57]. These results suggest that conditions for vegetation succession are more favourable under the oceanic climatic conditions of Southern Hemisphere high latitude regions, such as Tierra del Fuego.

Soil development along the two chronosequences, from bare ground to full forest, showed similarities in soil pH and total C and N concentration, indicating similar stages of soil development at both sites (Fig. 3a,b,c and Fig. S1). However, the time-required for C and N accumulation was much less at SG (Fig. 3d). In addition, after 4 and 7 years of soil exposure extractable inorganic N concentration was already much higher in the soil at SG (13.42 mg kg−1 and 12.51 mg kg−1 respectably, Fig. 3d) than at NG, where values remained low (0.16 to 8.23 mg kg−1) even after 26 years of soil exposure. We also found the highest rates of N2 fixation and cyanobacteria abundance in the pioneer terricolous moss Ditrichum cylindricarpum at 4 and 7 years soil exposure in SG (Fig 3e,f Table 1), where it forms a dense carpet in the soil (Fig. 1b). By contrast, in NG biological N2 fixation and epiphytic cyanobacteria abundance on bryophytes was very low during the early stages of succession (Fig. 3e,f). It is likely that higher annual rainfall on SG is associated with higher rates of N2 fixation on bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations in young soils, since fixation of N is strongly controlled by moisture availability [30]. Earlier studies have shown the importance of free living colonies of diazotrophs for C and N inputs during early stages of succession in glacial forelands [59][62] which could contribute to nutrient accumulation at our sites. Fixation of N by cyanobacteria associated with bryophytes that colonize soil surfaces very early after glacier retreat, as shown by our results, could also help accelerate soil development in recently deglaciated areas under wetter conditions.

As succession proceeds in SG, terricolous mosses are replaced by perennial herbs like Gunnera magellanica, which forms symbiotic associations with the cyanobacterial genus Nostoc [63], and becomes the dominant species together with Uncinia tenuis, which are likely to be a major factor promoting C and N accumulation on soil. In intermediate-aged sites, mosses are confined to rock outcrops (Fig. 1b) where, together with lichen species like Placopsis perrugosa [64], form a thick layer of organic material on rock surfaces (Fig. 1b). Despite rock outcrops possibly being a less favourable surface for N2 fixation, we found high rates of fixation, abundance and diversity of epiphytic cyanobacteria on species like Racomitrium subcrispipilum, Racomitrium didymium and Acroschisma wilsonii which formed moss mats on rock surfaces at intermediate-aged sites (19 years old sites in SG) and even within Nothofagus forest (Table 1 and Fig. 3h). However, at the drier side of the mountain range where NG flows, intermediate-aged sites are dominated by the dwarf shrub Empetrum rubrum which allows the development of dense mats of terricolous bryophyte species such as Racomitrium lanuginosum, R. laevigatum and Cryptochila grandiflora (Fig. 1b). It is at this stage of succession that we found the highest rate of N2 fixation and cyanobacteria colonization on bryophytes at NG (Fig. 3e,f and Table 1). In this drier area dominated by dwarf shrub vegetation, cyanobacteria in association with bryophytes are possibly one of the main sources of fixed N, since cyanobacteria in the soil decrease with increasing vegetation development, and the occurrence of N-fixing Nostoc host, Gunnera magellanica, is reduced under drier conditions.

It remains unclear, however, how the newly fixed N in the bryophyte-cyanobacteria system becomes available to vascular plants. We consider two pathways, described by [30], which may occur during primary succession in our study area. First, direct transfer of N from the moss system to vascular plants by mycorrhizal linkages: most vascular plant species in the study area form mycorrhizal association (e.g. ectomycorrhizal association with Nothofagus species or ericoid mycorrhizal with Empetrum spp.). Second, release of the newly fixed N retained in the bryophyte-cyanobacteria system after disturbance events, for example after membrane damage from desiccation following wet/dry cycles [65], [66].

Overall, glacier forelands in Tierra del Fuego show fast rates of soil transformation, implying large quantities of N inputs to allow fast vegetation succession. Our results highlight that bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations have the potential to contribute to N accumulation and cycling in these areas with very low inputs of N from atmospheric deposition.

Differences on bryophyte N2 fixation capacity and cyanobacteria abundance

Few studies have investigated interspecific or intraspecific variation in N2 fixation capacity on bryophytes, particularly in the context of post-glacial primary succession. In our study, most bryophyte species have the ability to support an epiphytic flora of cyanobacteria. However, N2 fixation rates varied between and within bryophyte species (Table 1). In line with results reported in previous studies [5], we detected differences in N2 fixation rates between mosses and liverworts. Five of the six studied liverworts showed no or very low rate of N2 fixation and cyanobacteria abundance (Table 1), and only one species, the terricolous liverwort Cryptochila grandiflora, showed high fixation rates (52.6 nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) and cyanobacteria colonization. Among moss species, Dendroligotrichum squamosum also showed no N2 fixation or cyanobacteria colonization, possibly due to their rigid, water repellent leaves which may confer less favorable moisture conditions. However, morphology or habitat could not explain variations found among other moss species. Both terricolous (Ditrichum cylindricarpum, Racomitrium laevigatum, R. lanuginosum) and saxicolous species (Racomitrium subcrispipilum, R. didymum, Acroschisma wilsonii) showed high N2 fixation rates (over 40 nmol C2H2 g−1 dm bryo. h−1) compared to rates reported in Arctic [8] and sub-Antarctic [16] ecosystems. Regarding intraspecific variations, we observed that the rates of N2 fixation of the saxicolous mosses Racomitrium didymium and Acroschisma wilsonii (the most frequently sampled species in the study area) were affected by the stages of ecological succession. The rate of N2 fixation significantly increases on R. didymium and Acroschisma wilsonii populations that grow at sites that have been longer deglaciated, reflecting growth of the cyanobacterial population as vegetation develops when growing epiphytically on these mosses.

Community structure of epiphytic cyanobacteria

In the present study, we also aimed to evaluate the influence of cyanobacteria community structure on bryophyte N2 fixation rates. We found that abundance of epiphytic cyanobacteria appears to be a better factor explaining differences in N2 fixation rates (Fig. 5) than epiphytic cyanobacteria diversity on host bryophyte species (Fig. 5). It is also noteworthy that Nostoc commune-associated bryophyte species, both mosses and liverworts, showed the highest rate of N2 fixation (Table 1), which is in agreement with the suggestion that Nostoc commune, in particular, is an important contributor of soil N in both polar regions [32].

Specific affinities of individual cyanobacteria genera with particular bryophyte species were not apparent, as the same bryophyte species can support the three main cyanobacteria genera found here (Nostoc, unidentified Nostocaceae group and Stigonema) (Table 1 and Fig. S2). However, a relationship between cyanobacteria genera and the different stages of succession was apparent in both glaciers. With increasing age along the chronosequences, cyanobacteria shifted from: Nostoc commune-dominated communities at young sites; to unidentified Nostocaceae-dominated communities at intermediate sites; and finally to Stigonema spp-dominated communities at older sites (Fig. 6). Such procession correlated with the soil development trends found here and contrasts with results observed in mature boreal forests where moss species identity serves as an important determinant of cyanobacterial communities that inhabit mosses [22]. With our data set, our results suggest that the stage of succession acts as a strong driver in determining the composition of epiphytic cyanobacteria on bryophytes during primary succession. Despite this similarity between the two glaciers, diversity of epiphytic cyanobacteria at SG was higher than at NG and increased with time since deglaciation (Fig. 3h), reflecting more favourable conditions for cyanobacteria growth on the wetter southern side of Cordillera Darwin.


We have compared, from a multidisciplinary perspective, chronosequences in front of two receding glaciers with contrasting climatic conditions (wetter vs drier) and differing rates of ecological succession in Tierra del Fuego (Chile). In doing so, we have shown that bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations have the potential to contribute to N accumulation very early after glacier retreat, a process that could help promote soil development. At intermediate-aged sites, and under drier conditions, bryophytes can grow among dwarf shrub plants, forming dense mats that host cyanobacteria species and exhibit high N2 fixation rates, contributing to N accumulation and cycling. We also found that differences in N2 fixation capacity between bryophyte species were primarily driven by the abundance of epiphytic cyanobacteria rather than cyanobacterial community composition. Most liverworts showed low colonization, whilst in mosses rates of N2 fixation did not exhibit consistent differences across life forms and habitat (saxicolous vs terricolous). Finally, we identified that the main factor structuring community composition of epiphytic cyanobacteria was the stage of ecological succession, with no relationship to host species identity.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Scores variation of the general factor component of soil development along the glacier chronosequence in the north-side (black bars) and south-side (white bars) of Cordillera Darwin. Sites with higher loadings reflect a more developed soil. The general factor component of soil development was obtained by reduction of soil pH and total soil carbon and nitrogen by principal component analysis. Mean values (± SE) of three replicate transect are shown.


Figure S2.

Correspondence analysis between OTUs of cyanobacteria obtained at a 0.01% cut-off and each individual bryophyte species, just the six most abundance bryophyte species with cyanbacteria colonies were used in this analysis, identification of OUTs can be see in Fig.2.


Table S1.

Changes in bryophyte species along two proglacial chronosequence at the Cordillera Darwin (Tierra del Fuego, Chile).


Table S2.

Gen Bank accession numbers corresponding to species and specimens used for tree inference.


Appendix S1.

Calculation of different vial headspaces for ARA and 15N2 uptake essays.



MA-C benefited from a postdoctoral Juan de la Cierva grant of the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación of Spain and a position as Associate Member at the University of Sheffield (UK). We are indebted to Gisela Oliván, Carolina Leon, William R. Buck, Juan Larraín, John J. Engel, Barbara Murray and Esther Fuertes for their inestimable help with the identification of the bryophyte specimens and Ma Jose Malo, Victoria Santonaya (CSIC) and José M. Blanquer, Carlos M Castilla and M. Pilar Villar Gil (UCM) for their technical assistant. We thank Dolores Saco for their support in the lab work and Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez and Jesús Aboal for helping on statistical analysis. We are grateful to the Universidad de Magallanes (UMAG) and the Institute of Ecology and Biodiversity for logistic and scientific support. Francisca Massardo (UMAG and Fundación Omora) are particularly thanked for their excellent organization of the fieldwork in the complex area of the Darwin Mountains.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: MA-C SPO TGAG LGS. Performed the experiments: MA-C SPO. Analyzed the data: MA-C SPO ADLR NT MC MTDLC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ROH DP. Wrote the paper: MA-C SPO. Carried out sampling field work: AP. Organised field logistics: AP RR LGS. Selected field sites: DP RR. Arranged required permissions and permits: RR. Discussed the results and commented on the manuscript: MA-C SPO TGAG LGS ADLR ROH RR NT MC MTDLC AP.


  1. 1. Elbert W, Weber B, Burrows S, Steinkamp J, Budel B, et al. (2012) Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen. Nature Geosci 5: 459–462.
  2. 2. Solheim B, Zielke M (2002) Associations Between Cyanobacteria and Mosses. In: Rai ANB, B.; Rasmussen, Ulla (Eds.), editor. Cyanobacteria in Symbiosis: Springer. pp. 137–152.
  3. 3. Zielke M, Solheim B, Spjelkavik S, Olsen RA (2005) Nitrogen fixation in the high arctic: Role of vegetation and environmental conditions. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research 37: 372–378.
  4. 4. Zackrisson O, DeLuca TH, Gentili F, Sellstedt A, Jaderlund A (2009) Nitrogen fixation in mixed Hylocomium splendens moss communities. Oecologia 160: 309–319.
  5. 5. Gavazov KS, Soudzilovskaia NA, van Logtestijn RSP, Braster M, Cornelissen JHC (2010) Isotopic analysis of cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation associated with subarctic lichen and bryophyte species. Plant and Soil 333: 507–517.
  6. 6. Stewart KJ, Coxson D, Grogan P (2011) Nitrogen Inputs by Associative Cyanobacteria across a Low Arctic Tundra Landscape. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research 43: 267–278.
  7. 7. Chapin DM, Bliss LC, Bledsoe LJ (1991) Environmental-regulation of nitrogen-fixation in a high arctic lowland ecosystem. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique 69: 2744–2755.
  8. 8. Solheim B, Endal A, Vigstad H (1996) Nitrogen fixation in Arctic vegetation and soils from Svalbard, Norway. Polar Biology 16: 35–40.
  9. 9. DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Nilsson MC, Sellstedt A (2002) Quantifying nitrogen-fixation in feather moss carpets of boreal forests. Nature 419: 917–920.
  10. 10. Sorensen PL, Jonasson S, Michelsen A (2006) Nitrogen fixation, denitrification, and ecosystem nitrogen pools in relation to vegetation development in the subarctic. Arctic Antarctic and Alpine Research 38: 263–272.
  11. 11. Dodds WK, Gudder DA, Mollenhauer D (1995) The ecology of nostoc. Journal of Phycology 31: 2–18.
  12. 12. DeLuca TH, Zackrisson O, Gundale MJ, Nilsson MC (2008) Ecosystem feedbacks and nitrogen fixation in boreal forests. Science 320: 1181–1181.
  13. 13. Bowden RD (1991) Inputs, outputs, and accumulation of nitrogen in an early successional moss (polytrichum) ecosystem. Ecological Monographs 61: 207–223.
  14. 14. Rozzi R, Armesto JJ, Goffinet B, Buck W, Massardo F, et al. (2008) Changing lenses to assess biodiversity: patterns of species richness in sub-Antarctic plants and implications for global conservation. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 131–137.
  15. 15. Basilier K (1979) Moss-associated nitrogen-fixation in some mire and coniferous forest environments around uppsala, sweden. Lindbergia 5: 84–88.
  16. 16. Smith VR, Russell S (1982) Acetylene-reduction by bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations on a sub-antarctic island. Polar Biology 1: 153–157.
  17. 17. Line MA (1992) Nitrogen-fixation in the sub-antarctic macquarie island. Polar Biology 11: 601–606.
  18. 18. Gundale MJ, Nilsson M, Bansal S, Jaderlund A (2012) The interactive effects of temperature and light on biological nitrogen fixation in boreal forests. New Phytologist 194: 453–463.
  19. 19. Sorensen PL, Lett S, Michelsen A (2012) Moss-specific changes in nitrogen fixation following two decades of warming, shading, and fertilizer addition. Plant Ecology 213: 695–706.
  20. 20. Gundale MJ, Gustafsson H, Nilsson MC (2009) The sensitivity of nitrogen fixation by a feathermoss-cyanobacteria association to litter and moisture variability in young and old boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 39: 2542–2549.
  21. 21. Pandey KD, Kashyap AK, Gupta RK (1992) Nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria associated with moss communities in Schirmacher Oasis, Antarctica. Israel Journal of Botany 41: 187–198.
  22. 22. Ininbergs K, Bay G, Rasmussen U, Wardle DA, Nilsson MC (2011) Composition and diversity of nifH genes of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria associated with boreal forest feather mosses. New Phytologist 192: 507–517.
  23. 23. Bates JW (2009) Mineral nutrition, substratum ecology, and pollution. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B, editors. Bryophyte Biology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 2990–0356.
  24. 24. Masiokas MH, Villalba R, Luckman BH, Lascano ME, Delgado S, et al. (2008) 20th-century glacier recession and regional hydroclimatic changes in northwestern Patagonia. Global and Planetary Change 60: 85–100.
  25. 25. Kohls SJ, Baker DD, van Kessel C, Dawson JO (2003) An assessment of soil enrichment by actinorhizal N-2 fixation using delta N-15 values in a chronosequence of deglaciation at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Plant and Soil 254: 11–17.
  26. 26. Sancho LG, Palacios D, Green TGA, Vivas M, Pintado A (2011) Extreme high lichen growth rates detected in recently deglaciated areas in Tierra del Fuego. Polar Biology 34: 813–822.
  27. 27. Dentener F, Stevenson D, Ellingsen K, van Noije T, Schultz M, et al. (2006) The global atmospheric environment for the next generation. Environmental Science & Technology 40: 3586–3594.
  28. 28. Menge DNL, Hedin LO (2009) Nitrogen fixation in different biogeochemical niches along a 120 000-year chronosequence in New Zealand. Ecology 90: 2190–2201.
  29. 29. Koppes M, Hallet B, Anderson J (2009) Synchronous acceleration of ice loss and glacial erosion, Glaciar Marinelli, Chilean Tierra del Fuego. Journal of Glaciology 55: 207–220.
  30. 30. Lindo Z, Nilsson MC, Gundale MJ (2013) Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change. Global Change Biology 19: 2022–2035.
  31. 31. Santana A, Porter C, Butorovic N, Olave C (2006) First climatologic antecedents of automatic weather stations (AWS) in the Beagle Channel, Magallanes, Chile. An Inst Patagonia 34: 5–20.
  32. 32. Vincent WF (2000) Cyanobacterial dominance in the polar regions. In: Whitton BA, Potts M, editors. The ecology of cyanobacteria, Dordrecht: Kluwe. pp. 321–340.
  33. 33. ISRIC (2002) Procedures for soil analysis; Centre ISRal, editor.
  34. 34. America SSSo (1982) Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties; Page AL, Miller RH, Keeny DR, editors. Winsconsin, USA: Madison.
  35. 35. Weber MG, Vancleve K (1984) Nitrogen transformations in feather moss and forest floor layers of interior alaska black spruce ecosystems. Canadian Journal of Forest Research-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 14: 278–290.
  36. 36. Millbank JW (1981) The assessment of nitrogen-fixation and throughput by lichens. 1. the use of a controlled environment chamber to relate acetylene-reduction estimates to nitrogen-fixation. New Phytologist 89: 647–655.
  37. 37. Basilier K (1980) Fixation and uptake of nitrogen in sphagnum blue-green-algal associations. Oikos 34: 239–242.
  38. 38. Liengen T (1999) Conversion factor between acetylene reduction and nitrogen fixation in free-living cyanobacteria from high arctic habitats. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 45: 223–229.
  39. 39. Val J, Monge E, Baker NR (1994) An improved hplc method for rapid analysis of the xanthophyll cycle pigments. Journal of Chromatographic Science 32: 286–289.
  40. 40. Cubero OF, Crespo A, Fatehi J, Bridge PD (1999) DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium-stored, lichenized, and other fungi. Plant Systematics and Evolution 216: 243–249.
  41. 41. Nubel U, GarciaPichel F, Muyzer G (1997) PCR primers to amplify 16S rRNA genes from cyanobacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63: 3327–3332.
  42. 42. de los Rios A, Valea S, Ascaso C, Davila A, Kastovsky J, et al. (2010) Comparative analysis of the microbial communities inhabiting halite evaporites of the Atacama Desert. International Microbiology 13: 79–89.
  43. 43. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, et al. (2009) Introducing mothur: Open-Source, Platform-Independent, Community-Supported Software for Describing and Comparing Microbial Communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75: 7537–7541.
  44. 44. Stackebrand E, Ebers J (2006) Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiology Today 33: 152–155.
  45. 45. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797.
  46. 46. Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis.
  47. 47. Posada D (2008) jModelTest: Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256.
  48. 48. Akaike H (1974) New look at statistical-model identification. Ieee Transactions on Automatic Control AC19: 716–723.
  49. 49. Tavare S (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of dna sequences. Miura, R M. pp. 57–86.
  50. 50. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. (2010) New Algorithms and Methods to Estimate Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenies: Assessing the Performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59: 307–321.
  51. 51. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574.
  52. 52. Hill TCJ, Walsh KA, Harris JA, Moffett BF (2003) Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. Fems Microbiology Ecology 43: 1–11.
  53. 53. Filzmoser P (1999) Robust principal component and factor analysis in the geostatistical treatment of environmental data. Environmetrics 10: 363–375.
  54. 54. Hothorn T, Hornik K, Strobl C, Zeileis A (2010) Party: A laboratory for recursive partytioning. Citeseer
  55. 55. Hothorn T, Hornik K, Zeileis A (2006) Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15: 651–674.
  56. 56. Nenadic O, Greenacre M (2007) Correspondence analysis in R, with two- and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software 20.
  57. 57. Bernasconi SM, Bauder A, Bourdon B, Brunner I, Bunemann E, et al. (2011) Chemical and Biological Gradients along the Damma Glacier Soil Chronosequence, Switzerland. Vadose Zone Journal 10: 867–883.
  58. 58. Chapin FS, Walker LR, Fastie CL, Sharman LC (1994) Mechanisms of primary succession following deglaciation at glacier bay, alaska. Ecological Monographs 64: 149–175.
  59. 59. Schmidt SK, Reed SC, Nemergut DR, Grandy AS, Cleveland CC, et al. (2008) The earliest stages of ecosystem succession in high-elevation (5000 metres above sea level), recently deglaciated soils. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 275: 2793–2802.
  60. 60. Knelman JE, Legg TM, O'Neill SP, Washenberger CL, Gonzalez A, et al. (2012) Bacterial community structure and function change in association with colonizer plants during early primary succession in a glacier forefield. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 46: 172–180.
  61. 61. Zumsteg A, Luster J, Goransson H, Smittenberg RH, Brunner I, et al. (2012) Bacterial, archaeal and fungal succession in the forefield of a receding glacier. Microbial Ecology 63: 552–564.
  62. 62. Brankatschk R, Towe S, Kleineidam K, Schloter M, Zeyer J (2011) Abundances and potential activities of nitrogen cycling microbial communities along a chronosequence of a glacier forefield. Isme Journal 5: 1025–1037.
  63. 63. Fernandez-Martinez MA, de los Rios A, Sancho LG, Perez-Ortega S (2013) Diversity of Endosymbiotic Nostoc in Gunnera magellanica (L) from Tierra del Fuego, Chile. Microbial Ecology 66: 335–350.
  64. 64. Raggio J, Green TGA, Crittenden PD, Pintado A, Vivas M, et al. (2012) Comparative ecophysiology of three Placopsis species, pioneer lichens in recently exposed Chilean glacial forelands. Symbiosis 56: 55–66.
  65. 65. Wilson JA, Coxson DS (1999) Carbon flux in a subalpine spruce-fir forest: pulse release from Hylocomium splendens feather-moss mats. Canadian Journal of Botany-Revue Canadienne De Botanique 77: 564–569.
  66. 66. Wickland KP, Neff JC, Aiken GR (2007) Dissolved organic carbon in Alaskan boreal forest: Sources, chemical characteristics, and biodegradability. Ecosystems 10: 1323–1340.