Figures
Abstract
Background and Purpose
Currently there are more and more studies on the association between short-term effects of exposure to particulate matter (PM) and the morbidity of stroke attack, but few have focused on stroke subtypes. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between PM and stroke subtypes attack, which is uncertain now.
Methods
Meta-analyses, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the association between short-term effects of exposure to PM and the morbidity of different stroke subtypes from a number of epidemiologic studies (from 1997 to 2012).
Results
Nineteen articles were identified. Odds ratio (OR) of stroke attack associated with particular matter (“thoracic particles” [PM10]<10 µm in aerodynamic diameter, “fine particles” [PM2.5]<2.5 µm in aerodynamic diameter) increment of 10 µg/m3 was as effect size. PM10 exposure was related to an increase in risk of stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.004, 95%CI: 1.001∼1.008) and PM2.5 exposure was not significantly associated with stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 0.999, 95%CI: 0.994∼1.003). But when focused on stroke subtypes, PM2.5 (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.025; 95%CI, 1.001∼1.049) and PM10 (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.013; 95%CI, 1.001∼1.025) exposure were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke attack, while PM2.5 (all the studies showed no significant association) and PM10 (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.007; 95%CI, 0.992∼1.022) exposure were not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke attack. Meta-regression found study design and area were two effective covariates.
Citation: Yu X-B, Su J-W, Li X-Y, Chen G (2014) Short-Term Effects of Particulate Matter on Stroke Attack: Meta-Regression and Meta-Analyses. PLoS ONE 9(5): e95682. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095682
Editor: Yinping Zhang, Tsinghua University, China
Received: October 17, 2013; Accepted: March 31, 2014; Published: May 6, 2014
Copyright: © 2014 Yu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding: This research was supported by a grant from Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (Grants 200513231344), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grants 2010QNA7020), and a grant from Zhejiang University Undergraduate Zetetic Experiment Project of Public Health (2013). Additional support was provided by Zhejiang University Student Research Training Program (SRTP) (2011) and Zhejiang University Public Health Innovative Experiment Project (2011). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Many studies regarded air pollution exposure as an important factor of hospitalization and mortality worldwide. PM, playing an important role in pollutants of major public health concern, had been confirmed that it could impair the respiratory and cardiovascular system through a series of changes in autonomic nervous system activity [1] and systemic inflammation [2], giving rise to alterations in oxidative stress [3], [4], hematologic activation [5] and vascular endothelial dysfunction [6]. Most researches regarded PM10 and PM2.5 as major harmful PMs.
Nevertheless, short-term effects of PM exposure on cerebral vessels were uncertain. Wordley et al. [7] and Tsai et al. [8] found that PM10 was associated with daily stroke attack positively. While, in the works of Chan et al. [9], Henrotin et al. [10] and Andersen et al. [11], no significant association was demonstrated between PM10 and hemorrhagic stroke attack. Similarly, analyses on the relationship between PM2.5 and stroke attack also appeared to divergent results. Villeneuve et al. [12] found PM2.5 exposure wasn't related to an increased risk of ischemic stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.052, 95%CI: 0.996∼1.160), while Wellenius et al. [13] found a positive association between PM2.5 exposure and ischemic stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.278, 95%CI: 1.079∼1.525).
Our previous research focused on the association between PM exposure and stroke attack in two study designs (time-series design and case-crossover design), and the result indicated that the effects of PM to stroke attack varied in different study designs [14]. However, in addition to study design, there were still many other covariates (e.g. age, gender, economic condition, area, lags times, historical disease and temperature) among studies, which could influence the results. Of special interest was that whether PM can act differently on different stroke subtypes. So in this article we determined to do meta-analyses, meta-regression and subgroup analyses of association between PM and different stroke attack.
Methods
1. Studies selection
We identified studies published in English and Chinese up to March 2013, by literature search using PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and reference lists of relevant articles. Search terms included “Air Pollution/Particulate Matter” plus “Cardiovascular disease/Stroke”, besides, key terms “hospitalization/Hospital Administration/Emergencies/Morbidity”, “cardiovascular disease” were used to enlarge the searching range. We chose ICD9: 430–438 or ICD10: I60–I69 as the definition of “stroke” or “cerebrovascular disorders”, ICD9: 430–432 or ICD10: I60–I62 for “hemorrhagic stroke”, ICD9: 433–434 or ICD10: I63–I66 for “ischemic stroke”.
Eligible studies were selected by two reviewers (X.L., J.S.) independently according to following inclusion criteria: (1) The outcome focused on the effect of PM to stroke or cerebrovascular disease (2) Published full-text articles (3) focused on PM10 and/or PM2.5 (4) Studies with similar effects [e.g. risk ratios (RR), 95% CIs] that could approximate ORs. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Duplications (2) Reviews or Meta-analysis (3) Long-term effects articles (4) air pollution from industrial and occupational environment (5) Articles that did not provide calculable or reported ORs and 95% CIs. The two reviewer reached consensus on the eligibility of each study. When there was disagreement, a third reviewer (G.C.) took the final decision.
Using a standardized form, data from eligible studies were extracted by two reviewers (X.L., J.S.) independently, From each study, we collected name of first author, year of publication, number of participants, PM, country, age, gender, types of stroke, lags of air pollutants' concentrations, study design and ORs or RRs with 95% CI. In Meta-regression, covariates were gender, area, lag times, study design and research period. Gender was represented as female, male and the whole population. Areas included Asia, Europe, North America and Oceania. Lag times were the same day on stroke attack and the previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 day. Study designs were classified into time-series and case-crossover designs. Research period was divided into early stage (1992–1997), middle stage (1997–2004) and late stage (2004–2009). Given there were 5 covariates (gender, area, lag times of air pollutants' concentrations, study design and research period), we used Meta-regression model to detect any possible influence factors (P<0.05).
2. Statistical analysis
Pooled ORs of PM with 95%CI for stroke attack were calculated by using the fixed or random effects Meta-analysis of with Q and I2 statistics given as the chosen measure of heterogeneity (The null hypothesis of this test is homogeneity). The Q and I2 statistics were used to assess heterogeneity, where P≤0.05 or I2>50% were considered as significant heterogeneity. We presented random effects pooled estimates when heterogeneity was detected; otherwise, we used the fixed model. We also produced forest plots to show ORs from each of the individual studies included in the meta-analyses and the estimation of the pooled OR. The sizes of the markers of each OR in the plots represent the relative weight each study contributed to the pooled estimation. We assessed publication bias visually through funnel plots and a weighted Egger's test. We also performed sensitivity analyses, whereby each article was omitted in turn, recalculating the pooled estimates under extreme conditions. Moreover, Meta-regression analysis was performed to figure out whether the association between PM and stroke attack was influenced by covariates. With a positive Meta-regression coefficient presented (P≤0.05), we could recognize the influence of the given factor. All analyses were performed using software STATA version 12.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).
Results
1. Study selection and data extraction
A total of 107 potentially relevant researches were identified by searching electronic databases and reference lists. 19 full-text articles were eligible for inclusion in this analysis and data were extracted from these studies [7]–[13], [15]–[26]. The details of the selection process were presented in a flow chart in Figure 1. Publication years ranged from 1997 and 2012. In total, 9 countries were involved including Australia, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, UK and US. 14 articles focused on PM10 and 9 were about PM2.5. In our previous research [14], we only extracted adjusted maximum effective value in each study. However, in this article, we took advantage of all the effect values (33 for PM2.5, 68 for PM10, 29 for hemorrhagic stroke, 42 for ischemic stroke) that fulfilled our study aim. The basic overview of the 19 included articles is given in Table 1.
2. Meta-analysis of different PMs exposure to different stroke types
2.1 Effects of PM2.5、 PM10 exposure to stroke attack.
There were nine articles (containing 33 studies) that referred to the association of PM2.5 and stroke attack. Since heterogeneity existed among studies (Q = 67.09, P<0.05), the random effect model was conducted to calculate a pooled OR with 95%CI. The Meta-analysis results indicated that PM2.5 exposure wasn't related to an increased risk of stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 0.999, 95%CI: 0.994∼1.003), Forest plot and Funnel plot were shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3(A), respectively. Egger's test (t = 0.98, P = 0.336) didn't find evidence of publication bias. Sensitivity analysis suggested that no individual study significantly affected the pooled effect size, indicating that the results for PM2.5 and daily stroke attack were statistically robust (Table S1 in File S1).
OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
OR indicates odds ratio. (A) Funnel plot of Meta-analysis of PM2.5 exposure to stroke attack. (B) Funnel plot of Meta-analysis of PM10 exposure to stroke attack. (C) Funnel plot of Meta-analysis of PM10 exposure to hemorrhagic stroke attack. (D) Funnel plot of Meta-analysis of PM2.5 exposure to ischemic stroke attack. (E) Funnel plot of Meta-analysis of PM10 exposure to ischemic stroke attack.
Fourteen articles (containing 68 studies) were included. The heterogeneity was significant (Q = 223.25, P<0.05). With the random effect model, we pooled all 68 studies into the meta-analysis and found PM10 exposure was statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.004; 95%CI, 1.001∼1.008). Forest plot was shown in Figure 4. Funnel plot was shown in Figure 3(B). Egger's test supported that publication bias was unlikely (t = 0.80, P = 0.427). Sensitivity analysis showed that results for PM10 and stroke attack were not robust to the inclusion of Tsai study [8] and Vidale study [25] (Table S1 in File S1).
OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
2.2 Effects of PM2.5、 PM10 exposure to hemorrhagic stroke attack.
Since the effect values of all studies included were not statistically significant, so it had no sense to do the Meta-analysis. As a result, we could not just simply determine the association between PM2.5 exposure and hemorrhagic stroke attack.
We conducted meta-analysis for nineteen combinative effects of PM10 and hemorrhagic stroke attack. Heterogeneity was detected (Q = 39.82, P = 0.002) through heterogeneity test. With random effect model, we found no evidence for the association between PM10 exposure and hemorrhagic stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.007; 95%CI, 0.992∼1.022). Forest plot was shown in Figure 5, Funnel plot was shown in Figure 3(C). Egger's test showed that publication bias was unlikely in the meta-analysis on association between PM10 and hemorrhagic stroke attack (t = 0.71, P = 0.487). Sensitivity analysis suggested the results for PM10 and hemorrhagic stroke attack were statistically robust (Table S1 in File S1).
OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
2.3 Effects of PM2.5、 PM10 exposure to ischemic stroke attack.
Heterogeneity was observed among five articles (Q = 24.00, P = 0.031). With random effect model, PM2.5 exposure was related to the risk of ischemic stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.025; 95%CI, 1.001∼1.049). Forest plot was shown in Figure 6. Funnel plot was shown in Figure 3(D). Egger's test (t = 3.71, P = 0.003) showed publication bias existed among studies. Sensitivity analysis showed that results for PM2.5 and ischemic stroke attack were not robust to the inclusion of Lisabeth study [22], Villeneuve study [12] and Wellenius study [13] (Table S1 in File S1).
OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Significant heterogeneity existed among six articles included (Q = 98.04, P = 0.000). Association was demonstrated between PM10 exposure and ischemic stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.013; 95%CI, 1.001∼1.025) using random effect model. Forest plot was shown in Figure 7. Funnel plot was shown in Figure 3(E). Egger's test (t = −1.61, P = 0.120) indicated no publication bias existed among studies of association between PM10 and ischemic stroke attack. Sensitivity analysis showed that results for PM10 and ischemic stroke attack were not robust to the inclusion of Andersen study [11] and Vidale study [25] (Table S1 in File S1).
OR indicates odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
3. Results of Meta-regression of different PMs exposure to different stroke types
We had detected heterogeneity among studies about PM2.5 exposure to stroke attack, PM10 exposure to stroke attack, PM10 exposure to hemorrhagic stroke attack, PM2.5 exposure to ischemic stroke and PM10 exposure to ischemic stroke. Meta-regressions were done in these studies to detect the influence factors. (Table S2 in File S1).
When studying PM2.5 exposure to stroke attack, we found study design (coefficient 0.032, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.062, P = 0.035) the influence factor. Among studies of PM10 exposure to stroke attack, area (coefficient 0.007, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.012, P = 0.007) were found to be the possible influence factor. (Table S2 in File S1).
4. Subgroup analyses
Results above supported that design was the main covariate of studies about PM2.5 exposure to stroke attack, so we divided these studies into subgroups (time-series group and case-crossover group) according to study design. Case-crossover group revealed the positive association between PM2.5 exposure and stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.029; 95%CI, 1.003∼1.055). And area was found to be the main covariate of studies about PM10 exposure to stroke attack, subgroups (Asia, Europe, North America and Oceania) analysis showed that in Asia and Europe, PM10 was associated with stroke attack (Table 2).
Discussion
The pooled results of meta-analyses showed that PM10 exposure was related to an increase in risk of stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.004, 95%CI: 1.001∼1.008) and PM2.5 exposure was not significantly associated with stroke attack (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 0.999, 95%CI: 0.994∼1.003). So it's meaningful to explore the effects of PM10 and PM2.5 to stroke attack, separately.
However, as we all know, ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke are two different types of stroke. The mechanisms differ from each other. So the PM may affect different strokes in different ways. Thus, it is valuable to explore the association between PM and ischemic stroke or hemorrhagic stroke, respectively. This was the first Meta-analysis that focused on the association between particular matter and different stroke subtypes attack. Our research showed that PM2.5 (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.025; 95%CI, 1.001∼1.049) and PM10 (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.013; 95%CI, 1.001∼1.025) exposure were statistically significantly associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke attack, while PM2.5 (all the studies showed no significant association) and PM10 (OR per 10 µg/m3 = 1.007; 95%CI, 0.992∼1.022) exposure were not associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke attack. We inferred that this phenomenon might be caused by the different formation mechanisms of different stroke types. For the biological mechanisms of PM to cerebrovascular disease are not clearly clarified at present, we can just supposed that PM's effect to ischemic stroke attack might be regulated by systemic inflammation and the activation of coagulation system, which leading to atherosclerosis, vasoconstriction, increase of fibrinogen and acceleration the formation of acute thrombus. And PM's effect to hemorrhagic stroke attack might be caused by systemic inflammation, giving rise to alterations in oxidative stress, vascular endothelial damage and rupture of plaque. According to our results, it might be easier for PM to activate coagulation system and constriction of blood vessels than simply destroy the vascular endothelial. But it was just a hypothesis that needed to be tested.
Heterogeneity in the studies we retrieved could come from inherent differences between study settings, as well as from differences in age, gender, area, lag times of air pollutants' concentrations, study design and so on. With respect to these influence factors, we used randomized effect model to minimize the heterogeneity and do Meta-regression to find the possible covariates. As a result, we only found design and area were the influence factors in the studies.
Sensitivity analysis revealed that results for PM and ischemic stroke were not robust, but results for PM and hemorrhagic were more robust than the former. Except for the studies of PM2.5 and ischemic stroke, all the studies showed a symmetric inverted funnel shape, which indicated publication bias was unlikely. Besides, Egger's test, of which the results support funnel shape, was used to quantitatively assess the publication bias.
In this research, the following issues needed to be considered: (1) there were limitations for selecting studies. First, Meta-analysis articles [27]–[30] were not included in our research, because the methods authors used were different from ours, and they only provided pooled effects of PM exposure to stroke attack. Second, long-term effects articles [31]–[33] were not included, for there existed more covariates [e.g. body-mass index (BMI), smoking status, blood pressure, educational level, household income and historical disease] in long-term effect articles. Third, articles [34]–[37] proving quantitative relationship between PM and stroke attack but didn't provide calculable or reported ORs and 95% CIs were removed, too. Hence, removing these three kinds of articles might decrease bias but could lose some evidence of the association between PM and stroke attack. (2) Measurement of air pollution exposure varies within and between studies. The air pollution monitor apparatus itself had measurement error and was different from study to study. Besides, it was certainly known that personal pollution exposure levels were very different from those measured at a nearby fixed monitoring station [38]. Thus standardized measurement should be established. (3) In our research, meteorological condition was not included as a covariate, because only some of retrieved studies provided mean or median temperature data. Besides, the association between PM10 and stroke attack was different from season to season [16]. Hence, it's not suitable to regard the mean or median temperature data as covariate in our research. Nevertheless, meteorological condition was an important covariate between studies. What's more, age is another important covariate to be considered, but current studies didn't provide sufficient data, they just provide the age range of study objects rather than the mean age. Future researches should provide more accurate data of age, temperature and pay more attention to the influence of age and temperature to stroke attack. (4) We only detect study design and area as important influence factors among PM and stroke by Meta-regression and subgroup analysis, however, there might exist other covariates that we didn't focus on, such as age, historical disease and meteorological condition. Besides, adding more studies may bring us more valuable covariates. (5) Lots of studies showed that different compositions of PM could cause diverse health outcomes. However, till 2012, there were no such articles, except Halonen's [23] study, which could provide detail data concentrating on the short-term effects of some composition of PM on stroke attack. In some studies [10]–[13], [15], [18]–[20], authors just mentioned traffic exhaust emission was the main origin of PM without providing the accurate data about the association between some composition of PM and stroke attack. While in other studies [7], [8], [16], [21], [22], [24]–[26], authors even didn't mention the effect of composition of PM to stroke attack. As a result, we could only focus on the whole PM's effect on stroke attack. We urged future studies should pay more attention to the different composition of PM on health effect.
Conclusions
This Meta-regression and Meta-analysis raised significant issues that might help guide the future research in this area. PM2.5 and PM10 exposure had different effect on different stroke subtypes. So it's worthwhile to study the effects of PM to ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively. Standardizing of exposure measurement, bringing more covariates, exploring mechanisms and adding more studies in respective subtype are needed.
Supporting Information
File S1.
Table S1, sensitivity analysis of Meta-analysis in different particular matter to different stroke types. PM10 indicates particular matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤10 µm; PM2.5, particular matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval. Table S2, meta-regression of different particular matters exposure to different stroke types. PM2.5 indicates particular matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm; PM10, particular matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤10 µm; Coef., regression coefficient; Std. Err., standard error of logOR; CI, confidence interval. *Sex was not contained as a covariate for these studies were all about the whole population.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095682.s001
(DOC)
Acknowledgments
I would like to show my deepest gratitude to Dr. Li Xiuyang and Dr. Chen Gao, who have provided me with valuable guidance in every stage of doing this research. I'd like to thank my partner and all my friends for their encouragement and support.
Author Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: XL. Analyzed the data: XY JS. Wrote the paper: XY JS. Collected data: XL JS GC.
References
- 1.
Liao D, Creason J, Shy C, Williams R, Watts R, et al. (1999) Daily variation of particulate air pollution and poor cardiac autonomic control in the elderly. Environ Health Perspect 107:521–525. PubMed: 1566669.
- 2. Ghio AJ, Kim C, Devlin RB (2000) Concentrated ambient air particles induce mild pulmonary inflammation in healthy human volunteers. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162: 981–988
- 3. Kelly FJ (2003) Oxidative stress: its role in air pollution and adverse health effects. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 60: 612–616
- 4.
Gurgueira SA, Lawrence J, Coull B, Murthy GG, Gonzalez-Flecha B (2002) Rapid increases in the steady-state concentration of reactive oxygen species in the lungs and heart after particulate air pollution inhalation. Environ Health Perspect 110: 749–755. PubMed: 1240944.
- 5. Peters A, Doring A, Wichmann HE, Koenig W (1997) Increased plasma viscosity during an air pollution episode: a link to mortality? Lancet 349: 1582–1587
- 6. Brook RD, Franklin B, Cascio W, Hong Y, Howard G, et al. (2004) Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the expert panel on population and prevention science of the American heart association. Circulation 109: 2655–2671
- 7.
Wordley J, Walters S, Ayres JG (1997) Short term variations in hospital admissions and mortality and particulate air pollution. Occup Environ Med 54:108–116. PubMed: 1128660.
- 8. Tsai SS, Goggins WB, Chiu HF, Yang CY (2003) Evidence for an association between air pollution and daily stroke admissions in kaohsiung, taiwan. Stroke 34: 2612–2616
- 9. Chan CC, Chuang KJ, Chien LC, Chen WJ, Chang WT (2006) Urban air pollution and emergency admissions for cerebrovascular diseases in taipei, taiwan. Eur Heart J 27: 1238–1244
- 10. Henrotin JB, Besancenot JP, Bejot Y, Giroud M (2007) Short-term effects of ozone air pollution on ischaemic stroke occurrence: a case-crossover analysis from a 10-year population-based study in dijon, france. Occup Environ Med 64: 439–445
- 11. Andersen ZJ, Olsen TS, Andersen KK, Loft S, Ketzel M, et al. (2010) Association between short-term exposure to ultrafine particles and hospital admissions for stroke in copenhagen, denmark. Eur Heart J 31: 2034–2040
- 12. Villeneuve PJ, Johnson JY, Pasichnyk D, Lowes J, Kirkland S, et al. (2012) Short-term effects of ambient air pollution on stroke: who is most vulnerable? Sci Total Environ 430: 193–201
- 13. Wellenius GA, Burger MR, Coull BA, Schwartz J, Suh HH, et al. (2012) Ambient air pollution and the risk of acute ischemic stroke. Arch Intern Med 172: 229–234
- 14. Li XY, Yu XB, Liang WW, Yu N, Wang L, et al. (2012) Meta-analysis of association between particulate matter and stroke attack. CNS Neurosci Ther 18: 501–508
- 15.
Wong TW, Lau TS, Yu TS, Neller A, Wong SL, et al. (1999) Air pollution and hospital admissions for respiratory and cardiovascular diseases in hong kong. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE 56:679–683. PubMed: 1757671.
- 16. Linn WS, Szlachcic Y, Gong H, Kinney PL, Berhane KT (2000) Air pollution and daily hospital admissions in metropolitan los angeles. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 108: 427–434
- 17. Dominici F, Peng RD, Bell ML, Pham L, McDermott A, et al. (2006) Fine particulate air pollution and hospital admission for cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. JAMA 295: 1127–1134
- 18. Jalaludin B, Morgan G, Lincoln D, Sheppeard V, Simpson R, et al. (2006) Associations between ambient air pollution and daily emergency department attendances for cardiovascular disease in the elderly (65+ years), sydney, australia. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 16: 225–237
- 19. Villeneuve PJ, Chen L, Stieb D, Rowe BH (2006) Associations between outdoor air pollution and emergency department visits for stroke in edmonton, canada. Eur J Epidemiol 21: 689–700
- 20. Bell ML, Levy JK, Lin Z (2008) The effect of sandstorms and air pollution on cause-specific hospital admissions in taipei, taiwan. Occup Environ Med 65: 104–111
- 21.
Guo YM, Liu LQ, Chen JM, Yang MJ, Wich M, et al. (2008) Association between the concentration of particulate matters and the hospital emergency room visits for circulatory diseases: a case-crossover study. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 29:1064–1068. PubMed: 19173924.
- 22. Lisabeth LD, Escobar JD, Dvonch JT, Sanchez BN, Majersik JJ, et al. (2008) Ambient air pollution and risk for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Ann Neurol 64: 53–59
- 23. Halonen JI, Lanki T, Yli-Tuomi T, Tiittanen P, Kulmala M, et al. (2009) Particulate air pollution and acute cardiorespiratory hospital admissions and mortality among the elderly. Epidemiology 20: 143–153
- 24.
Ye Y, Li XY, Chen K, Liu QM, Xiang HQ (2009) A case-crossover study on the relationship between air pollution and acute onset of cerebral hemorrhage in hangzhou city. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 30: 816–819. PubMed: 20193205.
- 25. Vidale S, Bonanomi A, Guidotti M, Arnaboldi M, Sterzi R (2010) Air pollution positively correlates with daily stroke admission and in hospital mortality: a study in the urban area of como, italy. Neurol Sci 31: 179–182
- 26. Willocks LJ, Bhaskar A, Ramsay CN, Lee D, Brewster DH, et al. (2012) Cardiovascular disease and air pollution in scotland: no association or insufficient data and study design? BMC Public Health 12: 227
- 27. Wellenius GA, Schwartz J, Mittleman MA (2005) Air pollution and hospital admissions for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke among medicare beneficiaries. Stroke 36: 2549–2553
- 28. O'Donnell MJ, Fang J, Mittleman MA, Kapral MK, Wellenius GA (2011) Fine particulate air pollution (pm2.5) and the risk of acute ischemic stroke. Epidemiology 22: 422–431
- 29. Larrieu S, Jusot JF, Blanchard M, Prouvost H, Declercq C, et al. (2007) Short term effects of air pollution on hospitalizations for cardiovascular diseases in eight french cities: the psas program. Sci Total Environ 387: 105–112
- 30.
Le Tertre A, Medina S, Samoli E, Forsberg B, Michelozzi P, et al. (2002) Short-term effects of particulate air pollution on cardiovascular diseases in eight european cities. J Epidemiol Community Health 56: 773–779. PubMed: 1732027.
- 31. Miller KA, Siscovick DS, Sheppard L, Shepherd K, Sullivan JH, et al. (2007) Long-term exposure to air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular events in women. N Engl J Med 356: 447–458
- 32. Atkinson RW, Carey IM, Kent AJ, van Staa TP, Anderson HR, et al. (2013) Long-term exposure to outdoor air pollution and incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Epidemiology 24: 44–53
- 33. Maheswaran R, Pearson T, Smeeton NC, Beevers SD, Campbell MJ, et al. (2012) Outdoor air pollution and incidence of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a small-area level ecological study. Stroke 43: 22–27
- 34. Corea F, Silvestrelli G, Baccarelli A, Giua A, Previdi P, et al. (2012) Airborne pollutants and lacunar stroke: a case cross-over analysis on stroke unit admissions. Neurol Int 4: e11
- 35. Johnson JY, Rowe BH, Villeneuve PJ (2010) Ecological analysis of long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and the incidence of stroke in edmonton, alberta, canada. Stroke 41: 1319–1325
- 36. Oudin A, Stromberg U, Jakobsson K, Stroh E, Bjork J (2010) Estimation of short-term effects of air pollution on stroke hospital admissions in southern sweden. NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY 34: 131–142
- 37. Maheswaran R, Haining RP, Brindley P, Law J, Pearson T, et al. (2005) Outdoor air pollution and stroke in sheffield, united kingdom: a small-area level geographical study. Stroke 36: 239–243
- 38.
Lebowitz MD (1995) Exposure assessment needs in studies of acute health effects. Sci Total Environ 168: 109–117. PubMed: 7481728.