Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A Chemical Genetics Analysis of the Roles of Bypass Polymerase DinB and DNA Repair Protein AlkB in Processing N2-Alkylguanine Lesions In Vivo

  • Nidhi Shrivastav,

    Current address: McKinsey & Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America

    Affiliations Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Bogdan I. Fedeles,

    Affiliations Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Deyu Li,

    Affiliations Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • James C. Delaney,

    Current address: Visterra Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

    Affiliations Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Lauren E. Frick,

    Current address: Agilent Technologies Inc., Wakefield, Massachusetts, United States of America

    Affiliations Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • James J. Foti,

    Current address: Joule Unlimited, Bedford, Massachusetts, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • Graham C. Walker,

    Affiliation Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

  • John M. Essigmann

    jessig@mit.edu

    Affiliations Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America, Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America

A Chemical Genetics Analysis of the Roles of Bypass Polymerase DinB and DNA Repair Protein AlkB in Processing N2-Alkylguanine Lesions In Vivo

  • Nidhi Shrivastav, 
  • Bogdan I. Fedeles, 
  • Deyu Li, 
  • James C. Delaney, 
  • Lauren E. Frick, 
  • James J. Foti, 
  • Graham C. Walker, 
  • John M. Essigmann
PLOS
x

Abstract

DinB, the E. coli translesion synthesis polymerase, has been shown to bypass several N2-alkylguanine adducts in vitro, including N2-furfurylguanine, the structural analog of the DNA adduct formed by the antibacterial agent nitrofurazone. Recently, it was demonstrated that the Fe(II)- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase AlkB, a DNA repair enzyme, can dealkylate in vitro a series of N2-alkyguanines, including N2-furfurylguanine. The present study explored, head to head, the in vivo relative contributions of these two DNA maintenance pathways (replicative bypass vs. repair) as they processed a series of structurally varied, biologically relevant N2-alkylguanine lesions: N2-furfurylguanine (FF), 2-tetrahydrofuran-2-yl-methylguanine (HF), 2-methylguanine, and 2-ethylguanine. Each lesion was chemically synthesized and incorporated site-specifically into an M13 bacteriophage genome, which was then replicated in E. coli cells deficient or proficient for DinB and AlkB (4 strains in total). Biochemical tools were employed to analyze the relative replication efficiencies of the phage (a measure of the bypass efficiency of each lesion) and the base composition at the lesion site after replication (a measure of the mutagenesis profile of each lesion). The main findings were: 1) Among the lesions studied, the bulky FF and HF lesions proved to be strong replication blocks when introduced site-specifically on a single-stranded vector in DinB deficient cells. This toxic effect disappeared in the strains expressing physiological levels of DinB. 2) AlkB is known to repair N2-alkylguanine lesions in vitro; however, the presence of AlkB showed no relief from the replication blocks induced by FF and HF in vivo. 3) The mutagenic properties of the entire series of N2-alkyguanines adducts were investigated in vivo for the first time. None of the adducts were mutagenic under the conditions evaluated, regardless of the DinB or AlkB cellular status. Taken together, the data indicated that the cellular pathway to combat bulky N2-alkylguanine DNA adducts was DinB-dependent lesion bypass.

Introduction

The genome is vulnerable to damage from exogenous and endogenous chemical reactions, including alkylation, oxidation, and deamination [1], [2]. Not surprisingly, several different lesion tolerance and repair pathways have evolved to deal with these types of DNA damage. DNA adduct bypass by translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases allows for genome replication in the presence of DNA damage, while canonical DNA repair pathways, which include direct repair, base-excision repair, nucleotide-excision repair, non-homologous end joining and homologous recombination remove such damage prior to replication. A holistic approach for addressing the impact of such variables on lesion toxicity and mutagenicity is shown in Figure 1.

thumbnail
Figure 1. The structures of the N2-alkylguanine lesions and the experimental strategy.

(A) The synthesis of the 16-mer oligonucleotides containing N2-alkylguanine lesions. The lesion-containing 16-mer oligonucleotides were synthesized by using the convertible nucleoside 2-fluoro-O6-(trimethylsilylethyl)-2′deoxyinosine (bottom). The 2-fluoro atom (shown in blue) was then substituted with an amine group in parallel reactions with 2-fold molar excess of methyl-amine, ethyl-amine, furfurylamine and tetrahydrofurfuryl amine to yield m2G, e2G, FF and HF, respectively (top). See Materials and Methods for details. (B) Toxicity and mutagenicity assays. To determine the bypass and mutagenic properties N2-alkyl guanine lesions in vivo, the oligonucleotide 16mers were synthesized and ligated into the genome of M13 bacteriophage, which was then replicated within E. coli cells lacking or expressing DinB or AlkB protein (4 strains in total). The viral progeny DNA was recovered and analyzed to determine two endpoints: 1) the relative reduction in progeny from lesion vs. a non-lesion competitor estimated the extent to which the N2-alkylguanine lesions are blocks to DNA replication; 2) the base composition at the lesion site in the progeny indicated the extent and type of mutations induced by the studied lesions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094716.g001

The present work explored the in vivo consequences (replication efficiency and fidelity) and genetic requirements (presence or absence of bypass polymerases or DNA repair enzymes) of four N2-guanine DNA alkyl adducts: N2-furfurylguanine (FF), 2-tetrahydrofuran-2-yl-methylguanine (HF), 2-methylguanine (m2G), and 2-ethylguanine (e2G) (Figure 1A). Previously, we have shown that the direct reversal DNA repair enzyme AlkB can repair these lesions in vitro [3]; the present study explored the relevance of AlkB repair of these lesions in living cells. Additionally, we have shown that both DinB and pol κ are capable of bypassing the FF lesion in vitro [4]; however, it remained unknown whether the same were true in vivo. Given these previous observations, both AlkB and DinB were selected as genetic variables for our in vivo chemical genetics study.

All of the N2-alkylguanine lesions in this study are important biomarkers or structural mimics of exposure to known mutagens or carcinogens. The m2G adduct, the smallest alkyl adduct in the series, is a mimic of the imino or hydroxymethyl adducts formed by the reaction N2-amino group of guanine with formaldehyde [5], [6]. Classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a human carcinogen [7], formaldehyde is an ubiquitous pollutant in vehicle exhaust and cigarette smoke and a common endogenous metabolism byproduct [7]. The m2G adduct can also form when cellular DNA is exposed to exogenous [5] or endogenous [8] methylating agents. The e2G DNA adduct is a well-established biomarker of exposure to acetaldehyde [9][14]. Acetaldehyde, classified as an animal carcinogen, and as a possible human carcinogen (group 2B) by IARC [15], is both an exogenous pollutant in cigarette smoke [16], [17] and an endogenous metabolite of ethanol [18][20]. The FF lesion is a mimic of the N2-guanine adduct of nitrofurazone (NFZ) [21], a potent antibacterial agent commonly used for treating serious skin conditions (burns, grafts) [22], [23]. NFZ reduction metabolites have been shown to be mutagenic and carcinogenic in rodent models [22], [24] and to cause free radical damage, strand breaks, and N2-dG adducts in DNA [25][27]. HF, the saturated analog of FF is included here to study the effect of aromaticity on bypass and repair of a bulky N2-alkylguanine.

In Escherichia coli, the dinB gene encodes the Y family DNA polymerase pol IV (DinB) [28], [29], which is one of the three TLS polymerases that is part of the SOS pathway [30]. The dinB gene was first identified as one of the damage inducible genes in E. coli [31][34], and it is the only Y-family DNA polymerase that is conserved across all domains of life (bacteria, eukaryotes, and archaea) [35], a result of selective constraints imposed on the encoding gene [36]. It is also present at a relatively high intracellular concentration of 250 molecules per cell, more than that of DNA pol III (10–30 molecules/cell) and on par with the level of the β-processivity clamp [37], [38]. Upon SOS induction, the concentration of DinB escalates to 2500 molecules per cell [39]. DinB is implicated in both the insertion and extension steps in the bypass of lesions that block replicative polymerases [40]. It may also have a role in alleviating the cytotoxicity of alkyl DNA adducts as demonstrated by Bjedov et al., who showed that DinB is essential for the survival of ΔalkA Δtag cells exposed to the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate [38]. In vitro experiments have shown that DinB can perform DNA synthesis, with efficiency and accuracy, across a variety of base modifications [29], such as FF [4] and N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine (N2-CEdG) [41]. In vivo bypass is observed for site-specifically placed benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) lesions [42][45], and for lesions induced by chemical treatment of cells with 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) and NFZ [4] as well as incorporation of reactive oxygen species-derived dNTPs [46], [47]. The function of DinB (and also its human homolog pol κ) is of particular importance as cells are exposed to alkylating agents from both endogenous and exogenous sources, including cancer, inflammation and chemotherapy [2].

The AlkB enzyme is an Fe(II)- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase that repairs DNA alkyl lesions by a direct reversal of damage mechanism as part of the adaptive response in E. coli [48], [49]. Different homologs of AlkB exist in prokaryotic and eukaryotic species; nine such homologs exist in mammalian cells (ABH1-8 and FTO). The conservation of this enzyme across species underlies its importance as a defensive weapon in the cellular arsenal against DNA and RNA alkyl damage [50], [51]. AlkB can efficiently repair all N-methyl lesions on the Watson-Crick base pairing side of the four DNA bases [3]. These alkyl lesions include the simple adducts of 3-methylcytosine (m3C), 3-ethylcytosine, 1-methyladenine, 1-ethyladenine [52], 3-methylthymine, 1-methylguanine [53], as well as the recently reported 4-methylcytosine, and the four N2-alkylguanines in the current study (m2G, e2G, FF and HF) [3]. Although AlkB can repair many of these lesions in a double-stranded DNA context, AlkB is much more efficient at repairing lesions in single-stranded DNA [54][56]. In the case of the N2-alkylguanines, we have shown that in vitro, AlkB repairs these lesions only in single-stranded DNA; no repair was detected in double-stranded context [3].

In this work, we characterized the in vivo consequences of four N2-dG lesions as a function of the bypass polymerase DinB and the DNA repair enzyme AlkB. Using genome site-specific mutagenesis methods [57], we inserted each of the four N2-dG lesions at a specific location in single-stranded M13 phage DNA, which was then introduced into E. coli cell strains proficient or deficient for DinB and AlkB (a total of 4 possible strains). The mutation frequencies at the lesion site and bypass efficiencies across the lesions were measured in vivo using the restriction endonuclease and postlabeling (REAP) and competitive replication of adduct bypass (CRAB) assays, respectively [57].

Materials and Methods

Cell strains

All the E. coli strains used in this work contain the F′ episome, which enables infection by M13 phage. GW5100 strain was used for large scale preparation of M13 phage DNA; SCS110 (JM110, endA1) was used for amplification of progeny phage post-electroporation; NR9050 strain was used for double agar plating with X-gal for blue-clear detection of plaques. HK81 (as AB1157, but nalA) and HK82 (as AB1157, but nalA alkB22; AlkB-deficient) were the DinB+AlkB+ and DinB+AlkB strains used in the study.

P1 vir phage transduction was used to create HK83 (as HK81, but dinB-deficient) and HK84 (as HK82, but dinB-deficient). Briefly, recipient cells (HK81 and HK82) from 1 ml of overnight saturated cultures were resuspended in 500 µl LB containing 10 mM MgSO4 and 5 mM CaCl2. Approximately 100 µl of these solutions were mixed with 0, 25, 50, or 100 µl of P1 lysate containing a chloramphenicol resistance gene (cam) flanked by frt sequences designed for insertion at the dinB site. After 30 min incubation at 30°C, 100 µl of 1 M sodium citrate was added to stop the P1 infection. Following an additional incubation at 30°C for 1 h to allow expression of the chloramphenicol gene, the cells were plated on LB + chloramphenicol (10 µg/ml) plates. After an overnight incubation at 37°C, colonies were obtained, replated on LB + chloramphenicol plates and genotype confirmed by PCR.

Oligonucleotides

All unmodified oligonucleotides and primers were obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT, Coralville, IA) unless specified otherwise. The lesion-containing 16mer oligonucleotides of the sequence 5′-GAAGACCTXGGCGTCC-3′ (where X denotes an N2-alkylguanine lesion or controls) were synthesized using phosphoramidite solid-phase methods described before [3], [4], [58]. A convertible nucleoside, 2-fluoro-O6-(trimethylsilylethyl)-2′deoxyinosine (ChemGenes, Wilmington, MA) was initially incorporated at the X position (Figure 1A). After hydrolysis from the resin and deprotection with 0.1 M NaOH for 8 h at 25°C, the oligonucleotides were desalted (SepPak, Millipore) and lyophilized. The 2-fluoro atom was then substituted with an amine group in parallel reactions with 2-fold molar excess of methyl-amine, ethyl-amine, furfurylamine and tetrahydrofurfuryl amine to yield m2G, e2G, FF and HF, respectively. The reactions were carried out in DMSO, in the presence of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (5X molar excess) at 60°C for 12 h. Finally, the trimethylsilylethyl group was removed with by treatment with an excess solution of 5% acetic acid at room temperature for 4 h. The deprotected oligonucleotides were purified by reversed-phase HPLC using an analytical column (Varian Microsorb-MV 100-5 C18 250×4.6 mm) at a flow of 1 ml/min and a gradient of 0 to 30% B over 60 min (A: 100 mM triethylammonium acetate; B: 100% acetonitrile).

Sixteen-mer oligonucleotides with the above sequence but with X = G, A, T, or C, were used as controls. Scaffold oligonucleotides (5′ GGTCTTCCACTGAATCATGGTCATAC 3′ and 5′ AAAACGACGGCCAGTGAATTGGACGC 3′) were used to ligate the 16mers into the M13 vector. The 19-mer of the sequence 5′GAAGACCTGGTAGCGCAGG 3′ was used to construct the “+3 competitor” for the CRAB assay.

DinB status of the constructed cell lines was confirmed using the upstream primer 5′ GATTATGGTGCTGACCAAAAGTGCG 3′ and the downstream primer 5′ CGCTGGCACTTAAGAGATATCCTGCGGG 3′. The M13 progeny DNA was amplified in the CRAB/REAP assays using the following: 5′ YCAGCTATGACCATGATTCAGTGGAAGAC 3′ (CRAP/REAP forward primer), 5′ YCAGGGTTTTCCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAA-3′ (CRAB reverse primer) and 5′ YTGTAAAACGACGGCCAGTGAATTGGACG 3′ (REAP reverse primer).

Enzymes and chemicals

All restriction enzymes, T4 DNA Ligase, T4 DNA polymerase and their enzyme reaction buffers were from New England Biolabs. Shrimp alkaline phosphatase (SAP) was from Roche. P1 nuclease, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galactopyranoside (X-gal) and isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) were from Sigma Aldrich. T4 Polynucleotide kinase was from Affymetrix. Sephadex G-50 Fine resin was from Amersham Biosciences. Hydroxylapatite resin, 19∶1 acrylamide:bisacrylamide solution, and N,N,N′,N′-tetra-methyl-ethylenediamine (TEMED) were from Bio-Rad. Phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (25∶24∶1; pH 8) was from Invitrogen. 32P-γ-ATP was from Perkin Elmer. Non-radioactive ATP was from GE Healthcare Lifesciences.

Construction of genomes

M13mp7(L2) phage single-stranded DNA starting material was isolated as described previously [57] (See Supporting Methods S1 in File S1). The oligonucleotides containing site-specific lesions were subsequently cloned in using reported methods [57]. Briefly, M13 single-stranded wild-type genomes were linearized with EcoRI, and scaffolds annealed to the ends. The16-mer oligonucleotide inserts were then annealed and ligated using T4 DNA ligase. The exonuclease activity of the T4 DNA polymerase was then used to digest the scaffolds. Finally, the constructed genomes were purified using phenol extraction and three TE washes in Microsep 100K spin dialysis columns. For details, see Supporting Methods S1 in File S1.

Lesion bypass and mutagenesis assays

The relative bypass of each lesion was measured using the CRAB assay; mutational analysis was performed by using the REAP assay [57]. Briefly, the constructed viral genomes were first normalized using an established protocol [57]. Each lesion-containing genome was then mixed with the “+3” competitor genome in a 75∶25 ratio (ratio empirically determined, see Supporting Methods S1 in File S1) and then electroporated into E. coli strains of all combinations of AlkB and DinB proficiency and deficiency. After 6 h incubation at 37°C, the progeny phage were isolated and amplified by infecting SCS110 wild-type cells, to dilute out any lesion-containing genomes that did not electroporate and replicate in cells. Single-stranded M13 DNA was then isolated from the amplified progeny, using the M13 Qiaprep columns (Qiagen). The region of interest was then PCR amplified using the CRAB primers for the lesion bypass assay, or the REAP primers for the mutagenesis assay. The PCR products were subsequently digested with BbsI, HaeIII and radiolabeled to yield an 18-mer DNA fragment that contains at its 5′ end the specific site that initially contained the lesion of interest. The “+3” competitor genome was only amplified by the CRAB primers and yielded a 21-mer fragment. To quantitate the lesion bypass, the ratio between the intensities of the 18-mer and 21-mer fragments was determined and normalized to the ratio of the same bands for the unmodified “G” control, considered 100% bypass. To analyze the mutagenicity of a lesion, the radiolabeled 18-mer band was cut out from the gel and digested to single nucleotide monophosphates with nuclease P1. The nucleotides were then separated on PEI-TLC plates using a saturated solution of ammonium phosphate (pH = 5.8), and the radioactive signals quantitated using phosphorimagery. An approximately equimolar of GATC control genome mixture, which yielded four distinct TLC spots corresponding to the four normal nucleotides, was used as a mixture of standards. The detailed protocols for the CRAB and REAP assays are included in the Supporting Methods S1 in File S1.

Results

DinB Bypasses FF and HF Lesions In Vivo

The CRAB assay is a quantitative tool used to determine to what extent a given lesion blocks DNA replication in vivo (Figure 1B) [57]. In essence, a lesion-bearing genome is mixed with a nonlesion competitor genome in a specific input ratio and replicated in E. coli cells of a given repair/bypass genetic background. The output ratio of progeny phage from the lesion-bearing genome with respect to the nonlesion competitor genome indicates the relative amount of replication from the lesion-bearing genome. A decrease in the lesion:competitor output ratio signifies a lesion-induced replication block (i.e., lower bypass efficiency). The competitor genome, lacking a replication-inhibiting lesion, acts as an internal standard in this competitive assay. The CRAB assay was performed on the N2-dG lesions (m2G, e2G, FF, and HF) in E. coli strains that capture all possible combinations of DinB and AlkB proficiency/deficiency (a total of 4 strains). The genomes of m3C, a good substrate for AlkB both in vivo and in vitro [53], and unmodified “G” were used as controls.

The results of the CRAB assay for toxicity are summarized in Figure 2 and Table S1 in File S1. To tease out the relative contribution of each genetic variable (DinB and AlkB) to the bypass efficiency of N2-dG lesions, data were graphed in pairs in which one of the variables was kept constant. Based on the previously reported in vitro findings, it was hypothesized that both DinB and AlkB might act on N2-dG lesions; therefore, the most relevant pair wise comparisons are those in which one of these enzymes is knocked out. To understand the effect of DinB on the in vivo bypass of N2-dG lesions (independent of AlkB), the two AlkB strains were compared (AlkBDinB vs. AlkBDinB+) (Figure 2A). To understand the effect of AlkB (independent of DinB), the two DinB strains were compared (AlkBDinB vs. AlkB+DinB).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Bypass efficiency of m2G, e2G, FF, and HF as a function of DinB status (A) or AlkB status (B).

M13 genomes containing the four N2-alkylguanine lesions were constructed and normalized to one another before being combined with a competitor genome; genomes containing m3C and undamaged G were used as controls. Each mixture was transformed into the E. coli cell strains indicated at the top of each graph in triplicate, and bypass efficiencies were calculated by using the signal from the undamaged G genome mixture as 100% bypass; error bars represent one standard deviation. For the FF and HF lesions, the significance of the difference between two populations was tested using the Student's two-tailed t test. (*** indicates p-value <0.001, N.S. indicates not significant). All bypass data are summarized in Table S1 in File S1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094716.g002

In the absence of DinB, the bulky lesions FF and HF are strong blocks to replication, with measured bypass efficiencies of only 36% and 40%, respectively (Figure 2A). However, the presence of DinB more than doubled the bypass efficiencies of FF and HF to ∼99% (p-value  = 0.0006) and ∼87% (p-value  = 0.0015), respectively (Figure 2A), thus greatly relieving the replication block. By contrast, the presence of AlkB did not change the bypass efficiencies of FF and HF; no significant difference in bypass was observed between the two DinB strains (Figure 2B). This finding was unexpected, given that AlkB is biochemically competent to repair the FF and HF lesions in vitro [59]. Possible reasons for AlkB's lack of effect on the bypass efficiencies of FF and HF are included in the discussion section.

The simple-alkyl lesions m2G and e2G were not significant replication blocks in the double mutant strain (AlkBDinB); the presence of DinB (Figure 2A), AlkB (Figure 2B) or both (Table S1 in File S1) did not significantly change the relative bypass of these lesions. From the point of view of this assay, these two modified guanines behave like a normal guanine, being virtually invisible to the replication machinery.

Consistent with previously published data [53], the m3C lesion was a good control for AlkB activity. In AlkB strains, m3C was a very strong block to replication (relative bypass ∼10%). The presence of DinB did not alleviate the toxicity of m3C (Figure 2A). However, in AlkB+ strains, the relative bypass of m3C jumped to ∼100%, consistent with the expectation that this lesion is efficiently repaired by AlkB, before being encountered by replicating polymerases.

The N2-dG Lesions are Not Significantly Mutagenic in any Cell Strain

The REAP assay determines the mutation frequency and mutation type after the lesion of interest has been processed by the intracellular replication machinery [57]. The REAP assay was performed on all of the N2-dG lesions, the control m3C, unmodified G, and an approximately equimolar mixture of genomes carrying unmodified ‘G’, ‘A’, ‘T’, and ‘C’ bases at the lesion site (denoted as GATC, Figure 3).

thumbnail
Figure 3. Mutagenesis of m2G, e2G, FF, and HF in the four strains of E. coli cells lacking or expressing DinB or AlkB.

Each panel (A to D) corresponds to the E.coli strain indicated at the top of the graph. Genomes containing m3C, undamaged G, and an approximately equimolar mixture of unmodified G/A/T/C bases at the site of inquiry (denoted as GATC) were used as controls. Genomes containing the lesions of interest were transfected into E. coli in triplicate. The percentage of G, A, T, and C at the lesion site reveals the mutagenicity of the lesions, with error bars representing one standard deviation. All mutagenesis data are summarized in Table S2 in File S1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094716.g003

One could not predict a priori whether or not these lesions would be mutagenic in vivo, but the results clearly show that none of the N2-dG lesions are significantly mutagenic in the presence or absence of DinB or AlkB (Figure 3 and Table S2 in File S1). HF and FF show mutation frequencies of ∼1% regardless of DinB status, which is essentially the same as the mutation frequency we detected for the control genome having a normal G at the lesion site. m2G and e2G also show a small non-G signal of 1 to 4% in all cell strains (Table S2 in File S1), but this mutation frequency is not statistically different from the control genome baseline.

Discussion

The Effect of DinB on N2-dG Lesions

In this study, the role of the E. coli DNA TLS polymerase DinB in bypassing a spectrum of N2-alkylguanine lesions in vivo was investigated. In 2006, it was discovered that in vitro, the TLS polymerase DinB efficiently bypasses the FF adduct (Figure 1A), a homolog of the major adduct formed by the reaction of NFZ with guanine [4]. Catalytically, DinB is about 15-fold more proficient at inserting a cytosine opposite the FF adduct than opposite undamaged guanine [4]. Additionally, due to its increased affinity for dCTP, DinB is 25-fold more efficient at extending beyond a cytosine opposite the FF lesion than opposite guanine [40]. The current study is the first in vivo quantitative analysis of the mutagenic and toxic properties of the FF lesion and its saturated homolog HF, as a function of the DinB genotype of the cell. The key findings of this study are: 1) FF and HF are strong blocks to replication when introduced in DinB cells on a single-stranded vector; 2) The replication inhibition caused by FF and HF is substantially alleviated by the presence of DinB in vivo, further supporting the role of DinB in N2-alkylguanine lesion bypass observed previously in vitro [4]; 3) The lesion bypass occurs in an error-free manner, as the correct base (cytosine) is always inserted opposite the guanine lesions by DinB. This last finding is also in concordance with previously published in vitro bypass results [4], [40]. Taken together with the in vitro data available for DinB and its homologs, the current study suggests that these Y-family polymerases bypass bulky N2-guanine adducts, such as the one formed by NFZ, in an error-free manner, in vivo. Given that NFZ is an antibiotic, DinB may be an important biochemical shield evolved for the defense of E. coli against certain types of ‘chemical warfare’ from other species. This finding is also consistent with the proposed role of DinB in transcription-coupled translesion synthesis across N2-dG lesions formed by NFZ [60]. It is worth noting that, while FF and HF are strong blocks to replication in the absence of DinB, the level of bypass detected in the DinB cells (28 to 40%) was higher than that seen for the concurrently run positive control m3C (∼10%) or other alkyl lesions (i.e., m1G or m3T) tested previously in AlkB-negative cells [53]. One possible explanation is that there might be other bypass/repair mechanisms at play (i.e., Pol V) that assist with lesion tolerance in the absence of DinB to the extent observed in this study. While it has been proposed that nucleotide excision repair (and not TLS) might be the primary repair pathway that deals with NFZ-induced damage [61], that pathway requires a double-stranded DNA context, which is obviated by our experimental system that utilizes single-stranded M13 genomes.

In contrast to the bulky FF and HF lesions, the small N2-alkylguanine lesions m2G and e2G were neither replication blocks nor were they mutagenic in any of the E. coli cells tested. Since no replication inhibition was seen in DinB cells, the presence of DinB did not change the bypass efficiencies of m2G and e2G; in fact, there is no evidence that DinB was actually recruited at the replication fork, when m2G or e2G lesions were encountered. This in vivo result under physiological conditions is in contrast with what has been observed for e2G in in vitro assays with other Y-family and replicative polymerases [62][64]. It could be that there is another enzyme or enzymes that preferentially and efficiently repairs or bypasses these lesions such that the supplementary role of DinB in the bypass of m2G and e2G is overshadowed beyond the detection limit of our assay.

One possible explanation for the non-toxic phenotype of FF and HF seen in DinB+ cells is that DinB can tolerate the N2-alkyl dG lesions. These lesions can occupy the minor groove of DNA [65] and interfere with polymerase-minor groove interactions [66][68], should the alkyl group swivel near the N3 atom of guanine. Several B-family polymerases are known to have a conserved motif that scans the DNA minor groove for lesions and misincorporations [69], which is lacking in the Y-family DNA polymerases. It is speculated that this may be the case for the Y-family mammalian pol κ, as deduced from X-ray crystal structure studies of the catalytic core of the polymerase with a primer-template DNA and an incoming nucleotide; the structure reveals the lack of a “steric gate” in scanning the minor groove at the primer-template junction [70]. It is proposed that DinB can accommodate minor groove lesions to enable bypass with correct base pairing, even for lesions such as BaP [45], containing alkyl groups much bulkier than those used in the current study.

The FF and HF lesions, while they are strong replication blocks, are not mutagenic in any repair/bypass background; these results can be explained by the availability of a hydrogen atom at the N2 position of guanine and the possibility of free rotation around guanine's exocyclic nitrogen-carbon bond. This free rotation can generate a guanine-like Watson-Crick hydrogen bonding pattern with cytosine. In addition, free rotation around the carbon-nitrogen bond would enable the extraneous alkyl group, irrespective of size, to swivel away from the base pairing face of guanine into the minor groove, thus alleviating steric hindrance caused by attachments to the N2 position. Similar freely rotating small alkyl modifications, such as N6-methyladenine and N4-methylcytosine, are very well tolerated and even utilized as DNA replication biomarkers in prokaryotic cells [71]. Alternative mechanisms to explain the correct base pairing of N2-dG lesions with cytosine, such as ‘wobble’ base pairing [63], or Hoogsteen base pairing [62], [72] have been proposed or observed. However, for an N2-dG lesion to pair correctly with a cytosine using either mechanism, the cytosine base has to be in its protonated form (for Hoogsteen base pairing), or its imine tautomeric form (for wobble base pairing), which is rarely observed in duplex DNA under physiological conditions.

The Effect of AlkB on N2-dG Lesions

A number of N2-dG lesions were tested as possible substrates for AlkB, in line with the theme of this study on the cellular processing of N2-guanine DNA lesions. While all the four N2-dG lesions studied are repaired by AlkB in vitro [59], the results from this study show that AlkB does not have a discernible effect on either the polymerase bypass or mutagenicity of these lesions in vivo. FF and HF are replication blocks in the absence of DinB (Figure 2A and Table S1 in File S1). While the presence of DinB alleviates the replication inhibition, AlkB has no significant effect on the bypass efficiencies of FF and HF lesions in DinB cells (Figure 2B and Table S1 in File S1). There are two possible explanations for these experimental observations: 1) Given AlkB's low cellular concentration (2 molecules/cell) [73], it does not effectively repair the bulky HF and FF lesions in vivo, before they are encountered by the replication machinery; or 2) AlkB does perform the initial oxidation step on these lesions, but the subsequent intermediates, (such as FF-2H and HO-HF, described in our previous paper [59]), may be long-lived and equally strong replication blocks. By contrast, the smaller N2-dG lesions (m2G and e2G) were not toxic or mutagenic in any of the four cell strains studied (Figures 2 and 3). This suggests that at least in AlkB cells, a mechanism of tolerance of small minor groove lesions by replicative polymerases is operating; as mentioned above, these lesions may rotate into the minor groove during replication [59], [70]. However, effective repair of m2G or e2G by AlkB in vivo may still occur in the AlkB+ cell strains, supplementing the free rotation mechanism.

In conclusion, this work demonstrates that inside living cells, DNA adduct bypass by DinB is the mechanism of choice to overcome the deleterious consequences of bulky N2-dG adducts, such as FF and HF. While we have shown that AlkB can repair these lesions and the simpler m2G and e2G adducts in vitro, the AlkB effect on FF and HF in vivo is not significant, possibly because the repair intermediates are also strong replication blocks, long-lived and not cleared efficiently before encountering replication machinery. Our study highlights the fact that even though multiple DNA repair or tolerance pathways can act on N2-alkylguanine DNA lesions in vitro, one pathway, lesion bypass, is the preferred mechanism for maintaining genomic integrity in vivo.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Supporting Methods S1, Supporting Tables S1–S2 and Supporting References.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094716.s001

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank the Tannenbaum/Wishnok Laboratory and the MIT Center for Environmental Health Sciences for providing the ESI-TOF Mass spectrometry facility and Agilent Technologies for providing the UHPLC system. We also thank Dr. John. S. Wishnok and Dr. Vipender Singh for helpful discussions.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NS BIF DL JCD LEF JJF GCW JME. Performed the experiments: NS BIF DL JCD LEF JJF. Analyzed the data: NS BIF DL JCD JME. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: LEF JJF. Wrote the paper: NS BIF DL JCD LEF JJF GCW JME.

References

  1. 1. Loeb LA, Harris CC (2008) Advances in chemical carcinogenesis: a historical review and prospective. Cancer Res 68: 6863–6872
  2. 2. Shrivastav N, Li D, Essigmann JM (2010) Chemical biology of mutagenesis and DNA repair: cellular responses to DNA alkylation. Carcinogenesis 31: 59–70
  3. 3. Li D, Fedeles BI, Shrivastav N, Delaney JC, Yang X, et al. (2013) Removal of N-Alkyl Modifications from N(2)-Alkylguanine and N(4)-Alkylcytosine in DNA by the Adaptive Response Protein AlkB. Chem Res Toxicol 26: 1182–1187
  4. 4. Jarosz DF, Godoy VG, Delaney JC, Essigmann JM, Walker GC (2006) A single amino acid governs enhanced activity of DinB DNA polymerases on damaged templates. Nature 439: 225–228
  5. 5. Lu K, Craft S, Nakamura J, Moeller BC, Swenberg JA (2012) Use of LC-MS/MS and stable isotopes to differentiate hydroxymethyl and methyl DNA adducts from formaldehyde and nitrosodimethylamine. Chem Res Toxicol 25: 664–675
  6. 6. McGhee JD, von Hippel PH (1975) Formaldehyde as a probe of DNA structure. I. Reaction with exocyclic amino groups of DNA bases. Biochemistry (Mosc) 14: 1281–1296.
  7. 7. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2006) Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxypropan-2-ol. IARC Monogr EvalCarcinogRisks Hum 88: 1–478.
  8. 8. Crean C, Geacintov NE, Shafirovich V (2009) Methylation of 2′-deoxyguanosine by a free radical mechanism. J Phys Chem B 113: 12773–12781
  9. 9. Brooks PJ, Theruvathu JA (2005) DNA adducts from acetaldehyde: implications for alcohol-related carcinogenesis. Alcohol Fayettev N 35: 187–193
  10. 10. Wang M, Yu N, Chen L, Villalta PW, Hochalter JB, et al. (2006) Identification of an acetaldehyde adduct in human liver DNA and quantitation as N2-ethyldeoxyguanosine. Chem Res Toxicol 19: 319–324
  11. 11. Upton DC, Wang X, Blans P, Perrino FW, Fishbein JC, et al. (2006) Replication of N2-ethyldeoxyguanosine DNA adducts in the human embryonic kidney cell line 293. Chem Res Toxicol 19: 960–967
  12. 12. Terashima I, Matsuda T, Fang TW, Suzuki N, Kobayashi J, et al. (2001) Miscoding potential of the N2-ethyl-2′-deoxyguanosine DNA adduct by the exonuclease-free Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I. Biochemistry (Mosc) 40: 4106–4114.
  13. 13. Matter B, Guza R, Zhao J, Li Z, Jones R, et al. (2007) Sequence distribution of acetaldehyde-derived N2-ethyl-dG adducts along duplex DNA. Chem Res Toxicol 20: 1379–1387
  14. 14. Cheng T-F, Hu X, Gnatt A, Brooks PJ (2008) Differential blocking effects of the acetaldehyde-derived DNA lesion N2-ethyl-2′-deoxyguanosine on transcription by multisubunit and single subunit RNA polymerases. J Biol Chem 283: 27820–27828
  15. 15. International Agency for Research on Cancer (1999) Acetaldehyde. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum World Health Organ Int Agency Res Cancer 71 Pt 2: 319–335.
  16. 16. Cheah NP, Pennings JLA, Vermeulen JP, van Schooten FJ, Opperhuizen A (2013) In vitro effects of aldehydes present in tobacco smoke on gene expression in human lung alveolar epithelial cells. Toxicol Vitro Int J Publ Assoc BIBRA 27: 1072–1081
  17. 17. Singh R, Sandhu J, Kaur B, Juren T, Steward WP, et al. (2009) Evaluation of the DNA damaging potential of cannabis cigarette smoke by the determination of acetaldehyde derived N2-ethyl-2′-deoxyguanosine adducts. Chem Res Toxicol 22: 1181–1188
  18. 18. Abraham J, Balbo S, Crabb D, Brooks PJ (2011) Alcohol metabolism in human cells causes DNA damage and activates the Fanconi anemia-breast cancer susceptibility (FA-BRCA) DNA damage response network. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 35: 2113–2120
  19. 19. Singh R, Gromadzinska J, Mistry Y, Cordell R, Juren T, et al. (2012) Detection of acetaldehyde derived N(2)-ethyl-2′-deoxyguanosine in human leukocyte DNA following alcohol consumption. Mutat Res 737: 8–11
  20. 20. Balbo S, Meng L, Bliss RL, Jensen JA, Hatsukami DK, et al. (2012) Time course of DNA adduct formation in peripheral blood granulocytes and lymphocytes after drinking alcohol. Mutagenesis 27: 485–490
  21. 21. Jarosz DF (2007) Novel function and regulation of mutagenic DNA polymerases in Escherichia coli. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: PhD Thesis. Available: http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/39742. Accessed 5 December 2012.
  22. 22. Hiraku Y, Sekine A, Nabeshi H, Midorikawa K, Murata M, et al. (2004) Mechanism of carcinogenesis induced by a veterinary antimicrobial drug, nitrofurazone, via oxidative DNA damage and cell proliferation. Cancer Lett 215: 141–150
  23. 23. Rodgers GL, Mortensen JE, Fisher MC, Long SS (1997) In vitro susceptibility testing of topical antimicrobial agents used in pediatric burn patients: comparison of two methods. J Burn Care Rehabil 18: 406–410.
  24. 24. Takegawa K, Mitsumori K, Yasuhara K, Moriyasu M, Sakamori M, et al. (2000) A mechanistic study of ovarian carcinogenesis induced by nitrofurazone using rasH2 mice. Toxicol Pathol 28: 649–655.
  25. 25. McCalla DR, Reuvers A, Kaiser C (1971) Breakage of bacterial DNA by nitrofuran derivatives. Cancer Res 31: 2184–2188.
  26. 26. Tu Y, McCalla DR (1975) Effect of activated nitrofurans on DNA. Biochim Biophys Acta 402: 142–149.
  27. 27. Zampieri A, Greenberg J (1964) Nitrofurazone as a mutagen in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 14: 172–176.
  28. 28. Wagner J, Gruz P, Kim SR, Yamada M, Matsui K, et al. (1999) The dinB gene encodes a novel E. coli DNA polymerase, DNA pol IV, involved in mutagenesis. Mol Cell 4: 281–286.
  29. 29. Walsh JM, Hawver LA, Beuning PJ (2011) Escherichia coli Y family DNA polymerases. Front Biosci J Virtual Libr 16: 3164–3182.
  30. 30. Friedberg EC (2006) DNA Repair And Mutagenesis 2nd ed. Washington DC: ASM Press. 1118 p.
  31. 31. Kenyon CJ, Walker GC (1980) DNA-damaging agents stimulate gene expression at specific loci in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77: 2819–2823.
  32. 32. Brotcorne-Lannoye A, Maenhaut-Michel G (1986) Role of RecA protein in untargeted UV mutagenesis of bacteriophage lambda: evidence for the requirement for the dinB gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83: 3904–3908.
  33. 33. Kim SR, Maenhaut-Michel G, Yamada M, Yamamoto Y, Matsui K, et al. (1997) Multiple pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: an overexpression of dinB/dinP results in strongly enhancing mutagenesis in the absence of any exogenous treatment to damage DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94: 13792–13797.
  34. 34. Wagner J, Nohmi T (2000) Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV mutator activity: genetic requirements and mutational specificity. J Bacteriol 182: 4587–4595.
  35. 35. Ohmori H, Friedberg EC, Fuchs RP, Goodman MF, Hanaoka F, et al. (2001) The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol Cell 8: 7–8.
  36. 36. Bjedov I, Lecointre G, Tenaillon O, Vaury C, Radman M, et al. (2003) Polymorphism of genes encoding SOS polymerases in natural populations of Escherichia coli. DNA Repair 2: 417–426.
  37. 37. Benson RW, Norton MD, Lin I, Du Comb WS, Godoy VG (2011) An active site aromatic triad in Escherichia coli DNA Pol IV coordinates cell survival and mutagenesis in different DNA damaging agents. PloS One 6: e19944
  38. 38. Bjedov I, Dasgupta CN, Slade D, Le Blastier S, Selva M, et al. (2007) Involvement of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV in tolerance of cytotoxic alkylating DNA lesions in vivo. Genetics 176: 1431–1440
  39. 39. Fuchs RP, Fujii S, Wagner J (2004) Properties and functions of Escherichia coli: Pol IV and Pol V. Adv Protein Chem 69: 229–264
  40. 40. Jarosz DF, Cohen SE, Delaney JC, Essigmann JM, Walker GC (2009) A DinB variant reveals diverse physiological consequences of incomplete TLS extension by a Y-family DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21137–21142
  41. 41. Yuan B, Cao H, Jiang Y, Hong H, Wang Y (2008) Efficient and accurate bypass of N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine by DinB DNA polymerase in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 8679–8684
  42. 42. Napolitano R, Janel-Bintz R, Wagner J, Fuchs RP (2000) All three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V) are involved in induced mutagenesis. EMBO J 19: 6259–6265
  43. 43. Seo KY, Nagalingam A, Miri S, Yin J, Chandani S, et al. (2006) Mirror image stereoisomers of the major benzo[a]pyrene N2-dG adduct are bypassed by different lesion-bypass DNA polymerases in E. coli. DNA Repair 5: 515–522
  44. 44. Benasutti M, Ezzedine ZD, Loechler EL (1988) Construction of an Escherichia coli vector containing the major DNA adduct of activated benzo[a]pyrene at a defined site. Chem Res Toxicol 1: 160–168.
  45. 45. Chandani S, Loechler EL (2009) Y-Family DNA polymerases may use two different dNTP shapes for insertion: a hypothesis and its implications. J Mol Graph Model 27: 759–769
  46. 46. Katafuchi A, Sassa A, Niimi N, Grúz P, Fujimoto H, et al. (2010) Critical amino acids in human DNA polymerases eta and kappa involved in erroneous incorporation of oxidized nucleotides. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 859–867
  47. 47. Yamada M, Nunoshiba T, Shimizu M, Gruz P, Kamiya H, et al. (2006) Involvement of Y-family DNA polymerases in mutagenesis caused by oxidized nucleotides in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 188: 4992–4995
  48. 48. Yi C, Yang C-G, He C (2009) A non-heme iron-mediated chemical demethylation in DNA and RNA. Acc Chem Res 42: 519–529
  49. 49. Sedgwick B, Bates PA, Paik J, Jacobs SC, Lindahl T (2007) Repair of alkylated DNA: recent advances. DNA Repair 6: 429–442
  50. 50. Aas PA, Otterlei M, Falnes PO, Vågbø CB, Skorpen F, et al. (2003) Human and bacterial oxidative demethylases repair alkylation damage in both RNA and DNA. Nature 421: 859–863
  51. 51. Ougland R, Zhang C-M, Liiv A, Johansen RF, Seeberg E, et al. (2004) AlkB restores the biological function of mRNA and tRNA inactivated by chemical methylation. Mol Cell 16: 107–116
  52. 52. Duncan T, Trewick SC, Koivisto P, Bates PA, Lindahl T, et al. (2002) Reversal of DNA alkylation damage by two human dioxygenases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 16660–16665
  53. 53. Delaney JC, Essigmann JM (2004) Mutagenesis, genotoxicity, and repair of 1-methyladenine, 3-alkylcytosines, 1-methylguanine, and 3-methylthymine in alkB Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14051–14056
  54. 54. Yang C-G, Yi C, Duguid EM, Sullivan CT, Jian X, et al. (2008) Crystal structures of DNA/RNA repair enzymes AlkB and ABH2 bound to dsDNA. Nature 452: 961–965
  55. 55. Falnes PØ, Johansen RF, Seeberg E (2002) AlkB-mediated oxidative demethylation reverses DNA damage in Escherichia coli. Nature 419: 178–182
  56. 56. Trewick SC, Henshaw TF, Hausinger RP, Lindahl T, Sedgwick B (2002) Oxidative demethylation by Escherichia coli AlkB directly reverts DNA base damage. Nature 419: 174–178
  57. 57. Delaney JC, Essigmann JM (2006) Assays for determining lesion bypass efficiency and mutagenicity of site-specific DNA lesions in vivo. Methods Enzymol 408: 1–15
  58. 58. Delaney JC, Smeester L, Wong C, Frick LE, Taghizadeh K, et al. (2005) AlkB reverses etheno DNA lesions caused by lipid oxidation in vitro and in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 855–860
  59. 59. Li D, Fedeles BI, Shrivastav N, Delaney JC, Yang X, et al. (2013) Removal of N-Alkyl Modifications from N(2)-Alkylguanine and N(4)-Alkylcytosine in DNA by the Adaptive Response Protein AlkB. Chem Res Toxicol. doi:10.1021/tx400096m.
  60. 60. Cohen SE, Walker GC (2011) New discoveries linking transcription to DNA repair and damage tolerance pathways. Transcription 2: 37–40
  61. 61. Ona KR, Courcelle CT, Courcelle J (2009) Nucleotide excision repair is a predominant mechanism for processing nitrofurazone-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 191: 4959–4965
  62. 62. Pence MG, Blans P, Zink CN, Fishbein JC, Perrino FW (2011) Bypass of N2-ethylguanine by human DNA polymerase κ. DNA Repair 10: 56–64
  63. 63. Pence MG, Blans P, Zink CN, Hollis T, Fishbein JC, et al. (2009) Lesion bypass of N2-ethylguanine by human DNA polymerase iota. J Biol Chem 284: 1732–1740
  64. 64. Perrino FW, Blans P, Harvey S, Gelhaus SL, McGrath C, et al. (2003) The N2-ethylguanine and the O6-ethyl- and O6-methylguanine lesions in DNA: contrasting responses from the “bypass” DNA polymerase eta and the replicative DNA polymerase alpha. Chem Res Toxicol 16: 1616–1623
  65. 65. Seeman NC, Rosenberg JM, Rich A (1976) Sequence-specific recognition of double helical nucleic acids by proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73: 804–808.
  66. 66. Kool ET (2002) Active site tightness and substrate fit in DNA replication. Annu Rev Biochem 71: 191–219
  67. 67. McCain MD, Meyer AS, Schultz SS, Glekas A, Spratt TE (2005) Fidelity of mispair formation and mispair extension is dependent on the interaction between the minor groove of the primer terminus and Arg668 of DNA polymerase I of Escherichia coli. Biochemistry (Mosc) 44: 5647–5659
  68. 68. Morales JC, Kool ET (1999) Minor Groove Interactions between Polymerase and DNA: More Essential to Replication than Watson-Crick Hydrogen Bonds? J Am Chem Soc 121: 2323–2324
  69. 69. Swan MK, Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S, Aggarwal AK (2009) Structural basis of high-fidelity DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase delta. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 979–986
  70. 70. Lone S, Townson SA, Uljon SN, Johnson RE, Brahma A, et al. (2007) Human DNA polymerase kappa encircles DNA: implications for mismatch extension and lesion bypass. Mol Cell 25: 601–614
  71. 71. Wion D, Casadesús J (2006) N6-methyl-adenine: an epigenetic signal for DNA-protein interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 183–192
  72. 72. Choi J-Y, Angel KC, Guengerich FP (2006) Translesion synthesis across bulky N2-alkyl guanine DNA adducts by human DNA polymerase kappa. J Biol Chem 281: 21062–21072
  73. 73. Nieminuszczy J, Grzesiuk E (2007) Bacterial DNA repair genes and their eukaryotic homologues: 3. AlkB dioxygenase and Ada methyltransferase in the direct repair of alkylated DNA. Acta Biochim Pol 54: 459–468.