Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Real Time RT-PCR Assays for Detection and Typing of African Horse Sickness Virus

  • Katarzyna Bachanek-Bankowska,

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Sushila Maan,

    Current address: College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Javier Castillo-Olivares,

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Nicola M. Manning,

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Narender Singh Maan,

    Current address: College of Veterinary Sciences, Lala Lajpat Rai University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Hisar, Haryana, India

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Abraham C. Potgieter,

    Affiliations Deltamune (Pty) Ltd, Lyttelton, Centurion, South Africa, Department of Biochemistry, Centre for Human Metabonomics, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, South Africa

  • Antonello Di Nardo,

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Geoff Sutton,

    Affiliation Division of Structural Biology, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Carrie Batten,

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

  • Peter P. C. Mertens

    Affiliation Vector-borne Viral Diseases Programme, The Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom

Real Time RT-PCR Assays for Detection and Typing of African Horse Sickness Virus

  • Katarzyna Bachanek-Bankowska, 
  • Sushila Maan, 
  • Javier Castillo-Olivares, 
  • Nicola M. Manning, 
  • Narender Singh Maan, 
  • Abraham C. Potgieter, 
  • Antonello Di Nardo, 
  • Geoff Sutton, 
  • Carrie Batten, 
  • Peter P. C. Mertens


1 Aug 2014: The PLOS ONE Staff (2014) Correction: Real Time RT-PCR Assays for Detection and Typing of African Horse Sickness Virus. PLOS ONE 9(8): e104665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104665 View correction


Although African horse sickness (AHS) can cause up to 95% mortality in horses, naïve animals can be protected by vaccination against the homologous AHSV serotype. Genome segment 2 (Seg-2) encodes outer capsid protein VP2, the most variable of the AHSV proteins. VP2 is also a primary target for AHSV specific neutralising antibodies, and consequently determines the identity of the nine AHSV serotypes. In contrast VP1 (the viral polymerase) and VP3 (the sub-core shell protein), encoded by Seg-1 and Seg-3 respectively, are highly conserved, representing virus species/orbivirus-serogroup-specific antigens. We report development and evaluation of real-time RT-PCR assays targeting AHSV Seg-1 or Seg-3, that can detect any AHSV type (virus species/serogroup-specific assays), as well as type-specific assays targeting Seg-2 of the nine AHSV serotypes. These assays were evaluated using isolates of different AHSV serotypes and other closely related orbiviruses, from the ‘Orbivirus Reference Collection’ (ORC) at The Pirbright Institute. The assays were shown to be AHSV virus-species-specific, or type-specific (as designed) and can be used for rapid, sensitive and reliable detection and identification (typing) of AHSV RNA in infected blood, tissue samples, homogenised Culicoides, or tissue culture supernatant. None of the assays amplified cDNAs from closely related heterologous orbiviruses, or from uninfected host animals or cell cultures.


African horse sickness (AHS) is a rapidly lethal disease of horses, caused by the African horse sickness virus (AHSV), which is transmitted primarily via the bite of infected Culicoides midges [1]. There are nine distinct serotypes of AHSV (AHSV-1 to AHSV-9) that can be distinguished in serum neutralisation tests by the specificity of their reactions with neutralising antibodies [2], [3]. These different serotypes are all classified within the species, African horse sickness virus, genus Orbivirus, family Reoviridae [4]. Clinical signs of AHS can be very severe in populations of naïve horses, where mortality rates can exceed 95%. However, zebras, donkeys and mules develop milder disease which can easily be missed [5]. Due to its economic importance and the occurrence of large ‘transboundary’ outbreaks AHS has been ‘listed’ by the World Organisation for Animal Health [6].

Like other orbiviruses, the AHSV genome consists of 10-segments of linear double-stranded (ds) RNA (genome segments 1 to 10 [Seg-1 to Seg-10]), most of which encode a single viral protein [4], [7], [8]. The outer-most protein of the AHSV capsid and the primary determinant of serotype is VP2, encoded by Seg-2. Consequently Seg-2 and VP2 of AHSV (like those of the Orbivirus type species, ‘Bluetongue virus’ [BTV]) both vary in a serotype-specific manner and are the most variable AHSV genome segment and protein respectively [9][12].

In contrast, the viral polymerase VP1 (encoded by Seg-1), and the sub-core shell protein VP3 (encoded by Seg-3) are the two most conserved of the orbivirus structural-proteins, showing sequence variations that correlate with the virus species/serogroup and with the geographic origins of the virus isolate [13][15]. The ability of orbiviruses within a single virus species to exchange genome segments by reassortment has resulted in an absence of any detectable correlation between sequence variation in Seg-1 (VP1) or Seg-3 (VP3-T2) and the virus serotype.

At present, AHSV is considered to be endemic only in sub-Saharan Africa, with outbreaks involving all nine serotypes of AHSV occurring in South Africa [5], [16]. Until 2007, AHSV-9 was the main serotype circulating in the equine populations of Central Africa [1]. However, other AHSV serotypes have subsequently also been reported in the region, including AHSV-2 in Senegal and Nigeria in 2007, in Ethiopia in 2008 and Ghana in 2010 [17][20]; AHSV-4 in Kenya in 2007 [21], and AHSV-7 in Senegal in 2007 [21]. In 2010 an outbreak involving multiple serotypes of AHSV also took place in Ethiopia [22], [23].

However, AHSV has caused devastating outbreaks in indigenous horse populations outside of its current endemic zone, including AHSV-9 in the Middle East, India and Pakistan (1959–1961) and in North Africa and Europe (1965) [1]. Importation of an infected zebra from Namibia to Madrid in 1987, led to an outbreak caused by AHSV-4 in Spain, that spread to Portugal and North Africa (1987–1990) [24][26].

Since 1998, multiple different serotypes of bluetongue virus (BTV), which are transmitted by similar Culicoides vectors to AHSV, have emerged in Southern Europe [27], leading up to the very severe outbreak caused by BTV-8 which started in 2006, the first ever recorded in northern Europe [28]. The virus overwintered and spread over most of Europe causing massive losses to the livestock industries of several countries over a number of years [29], [30]. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the northern European strain of BTV-8 is most closely related to a strain from Central Africa [31], although the route of introduction has not yet been identified.

Along with the recent disease outbreak caused by Schmallenberg virus [32], [33], this demonstrates the capacity for Culicoides transmission and the risk posed by these arboviruses in the region. With on-going climate change and increasing global trade, the distribution of vector-borne diseases (including the orbiviruses) is also considered likely to change [27], [34], [35], suggesting that the AHSV endemic regions within Africa could expand, and the virus could again emerge to threaten horse populations in other parts of the world. Previous AHS outbreaks have spread very rapidly and could persist for extended periods (years) in previously non-endemic areas, causing extensive damage to equine industries by direct losses and restrictions on animal movements [24][26], [36].

Live-attenuated AHSV vaccines are currently available from Onderstepoort Biological Products (OBP), South Africa [5]. These strains are currently used in AHSV endemic areas (in Africa), as part of polyvalent vaccine preparations. However, their use risks introduction of additional AHSV serotypes into the vaccinated region, with potential for reassortment with other vaccine and/or wild-type ‘field’ strains. Alternative vaccine candidates are in the process of being developed, which include individual AHSV proteins, delivered by recombinant poxviruses [37][40].

There is a need for accurate, reliable and rapid diagnostic systems for AHS, for use in surveillance programmes and identification of specific AHSV serotypes in clinical samples, to support the design and rapid deployment of appropriate control/vaccination strategies. These diagnostic systems are also important to demonstrate absence of the virus in individual animals or animal products (for safe movements/export/import), as well as for declaration of a ‘virus free’ status, especially after outbreaks in non-endemic countries or zones (OIE, 2011).

Historically, members of the AHSV serogroup/virus-species have been identified by serological methods, including complement fixation (CF) and ELISA tests [41][43]. AHSV virus-species-specific antibodies can also be detected by cELISA [44], [45]. However, these methods are labour intensive and require virus isolation and/or access to standard reagents (antibodies and antigens) that may themselves represent a potential biosecurity risk.

AHSV RNA can be detected by amplification in conventional or real-time RT-PCR assays. Different ‘conserved’ AHSV genome segments have previously been targeted by conventional RT-PCR assays, including the genes encoding VP3, VP7, NS1 and NS2 [46][50]. Post amplification analyses of conventional PCR assays involve agarose gels electrophoresis (AGE). This could lead to contamination and potentially false positive reactions in subsequent assays using the same laboratory space. In contrast, the design of real-time RT-PCR assays allows detection of the amplified target in a closed tube format, which significantly improves sample throughput and reduces contamination risk (false positives). These assays also offer enhanced sensitivity over the conventional PCR methods. Several real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of different AHSV genome segments have already been described, including those encoding VP7, VP7 & NS2, NS1 and NS2 genes [51][56].

The “gold standard” method for the determination of AHSV serotype is the virus neutralisation test (VNT) where the specificity of reactions between the virus and a panel of reference antisera, representing each of the known serotypes, is tested in tissue cultures [2], [3]. However, these serotyping assays are labour intensive, time consuming, require prior virus isolation and can sometimes give inconclusive results. They are also dependent on availability of reference virus strains (as controls) and reference antisera which are highly characterised and may therefore be difficult to obtain. These assays may also require disease-secure laboratory facilities for safe handling the live virus.

Molecular methods for determination of AHSV type, have recently been developed based on detection of Seg-2, including both conventional RT-PCR [57], [58] and probe-hybridisation methods [59], [60].

This paper describes the development and evaluation of real-time RT-PCR assays for detection and typing of AHSV. Two independent virus-species-specific assays, each of which detects all nine serotypes of AHSV, were designed to amplify specific regions of Seg-1 or Seg-3 respectively. A set of nine individual ‘typing’ assays were also designed to detect and identify Seg-2 of each AHSV serotype. Assay specificity was evaluated using a wide range of AHSV isolates from the Orbivirus Reference Collection (ORC), including reference, vaccine and field strains [61].

Materials and Methods

Primers and Probe Design

The design of primers and probes for the detection and typing of AHSV was based on Seg-1, Seg-2 and Seg-3 nucleotide sequences of the AHSV reference strains, that were generated during this study (as previously described [62]) and nucleotide sequences available in the public domain (GenBank) (Table 1 and Figure S1 in File S1).

Sequences for genome segments 1, 2 and 3, were aligned and analysed using MEGA v. 4 [63]. Conserved regions in Seg-1 and Seg-3 respectively were identified across all nine serotypes allowing primers and probes to be designed for separate assays, in accordance with TaqMan specifications (Table 2 and Figure S1 in File S1). Genome segment 2 sequences were analysed collectively and separately for each of the nine AHSV serotypes. Unique regions in Seg-2 of each serotype were identified as targets for primers and probes (Table 2 and Figure S1 in File S1). The probes were labelled at their 3′ and 5′ ends with BHQ-1 (Black Hole Quencher-1) and FAM respectively. All oligonucleotides were synthesised by Eurogentec, UK.

Table 2. List of primers and probes for AHSV virus-species- and type-specific assays.

The sequences of the different primers and probes were evaluated in silico to ensure no cross-reactions with closely related orbiviruses. Sequences for the relevant genome segments of all 22 orbivirus species of were used for in silico analysis [12], [13], [15], [64].

Virus Isolates

A panel of 42 isolates representing all nine of the known AHSV serotypes, including monotypic reference, field and vaccine strains from different geographical locations, were used for initial validation of real-time RT-PCR assays (Table 3). Representative isolates of other orbiviruses were used to assess specificity of the virus-species-specific assays. All isolates used in the study were obtained from the ORC at The Pirbright Institute [61] and were grown in BHK-21 clone 13 cells (European Collection of Animal cell Cultures [ECACC–84100501]), Vero cell monolayers (ECACC–84113001), or in KC cells derived from Culicoides sonorensis [65]. Infected mammalian cells were harvested when 40–100% cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed, while KC cells were harvested 7 days post infection.

Table 3. AHSV isolates used to validate real time RT-PCR assays for AHSV.

The original diagnostic samples collected from horses, showing clinical signs of disease, were not for taken for research purposes but were collected as part of routine veterinary investigations carried out by qualified veterinarians in the respective countries of origin. The viruses studied here include isolates that were subsequently recovered from these diagnostic samples (from naturally infected animals - blood and/or spleen or lung), as well as the previously established reference strains of AHSV [66], [67]. No animals were infected, and no samples were taken from animals specifically for these studies. Further ethical approval was not therefore sought or obtained.

RNA Sample Preparation

dsRNA was extracted either from tissue culture supernatant by BioRobot Universal (Qiagen, UK), or from AHSV infected cells (using Trizol Reagent, Invitrogen, UK) [68]. In the first method, 240 μl of infected-tissue-culture supernatant was added to 40 μl of protease (Qiagen, UK) and 360 μl of Lysis Buffer (Roche, UK). Total nucleic acid (50 μl) was extracted from this solution using the BioRobot platform UNIrcV23A V3.0 protocol. Each of the isolates was handled with care to avoid any cross-contamination. Total nucleic acid from uninfected tissue culture supernatants, horse blood or homogenised Culicoides was also extracted using BioRobot Universal (Qiagen, UK).


The different primers-probe sets were used to amplify a fragment of the targeted genome segment, using SuperScript III/Platinum Taq One-Step qRT-PCR Kit (Invitrogen, UK). In order to achieve low cycle threshold (Ct) values and high fluorescence signals, the individual steps of the method were optimised for each of the assays, including: primers concentrations, primers-probe ratios, magnesium concentration, reverse transcription temperature, reverse transcription period, annealing temperature and annealing period. The composition of the individual assays, after optimisation, is presented in Table 4. dsRNA samples were heat denaturated prior to addition to the reaction mix [69]. To avoid accidental contamination, assembly of the reaction mix was conducted in a ‘clean work’ dedicated laminar flow hood, separate to an RT-PCR assembly hood. Amplification for all of the assays was carried out in MX3005p (Stratagene, UK) using the same conditions: 55°C for 30 min, 95°C for 10 min followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 30 s and 55°C for 1 min. Fluorescence was measured during the 55°C annealing/extension step. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were measured at the point at which the sample fluorescence signal crossed a threshold value (the background level). Negative results (for assays that did not exceed this level of signal) are reported as ‘No Ct’.

Diagnostic Sensitivity and Specificity

A panel of AHSV isolates from different geographical locations, including all nine serotypes (Table 3), was tested in duplicate, using both of the virus-species-specific assays targeting Seg-1 or Seg-3 respectively. The Seg-2 based assays (type-specific assays) were also tested with both homologous and heterologous serotypes to ensure specificity and diagnostic sensitivity. Representative isolates of other Orbivirus species, including BTV, Epizootic haemorrhagic disease virus (EHDV), Equine encephalosis virus (EEV) and Peruvian horse sickness virus (PHSV) were used to assess diagnostic specificity of Seg-1 and Seg-3 based assays, as listed in Table 5. To ensure that there were no false positives caused by cross-reactions with the host-species, total nucleic acid extracted from uninfected BHK and KC cell culture supernatants, horse blood (n = 8) and three individually homogenised C. sonorensis, were also tested with uniformly negative results (Table 5).

Table 5. Specificity of AHSV virus-species-specific assays (Seg-1 and Seg-3).

Assay Sensitivity and Efficiency

The analytical sensitivity of the virus-species-specific assays (Seg-1 and Seg-3) was assessed separately using two independent methods, either with a dilution series of the nine AHSV viruses, or with a dilution series of the quantified dsRNA genome of AHSV-1 (RSArah01/03). In the type-specific assays (Seg-2) these qualities were assessed by analysis of a dilution series of the homologous AHSV reference strain.

A tenfold dilution series of the nine monotypic (plaque purified) AHSV reference strains were prepared in cell culture medium, starting at a titre of 105 TCID50/ml, down to 1 TCID50/ml (titrated in BHK cells). The viral dsRNA was extracted from the dilution series using BioRobot Universal (Qiagen, UK), as described above and tested in duplicate with each of the optimised assays.

To determine the analytical sensitivity of both virus-species-specific assays (Seg-1 and Seg-3) with quantified RNA, dsRNA standards were prepared as follows: viral dsRNA (RSArah01/03) was extracted as previously described [68], assessed for any ssRNA remains in 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and the concentration of dsRNA was determined with NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The number of dsRNA copies was calculated with the formula: Y = (X/a×680)×6.022×1023, where: Y  =  molecules/μl; X = g/μl dsRNA; a  =  viral genome length in nucleotides; 680 is the average molecular weight per nucleotide of dsRNA.

To test the analytical sensitivity of each of the virus-species-specific assays, a 10-fold dilution series of dsRNA (109 to 100 copies per μl) was made in a sample of RNA extracted from uninfected BHK cells supernatant, then tested in quadruplicate.

In all the assays tested (Seg-1, Seg-3 and Seg-2), virus dilution series were used to generate standard curves by linear regression method setting the Ct values as dependent and the log-titre of virus dilution (TCID50/ml) as independent variables. The slope of the standard curves for the nine AHSV reference strains in all optimised virus-species- and serotype-specific assays, were then used to estimate the efficiency of the individual assays in detection of each of the reference strain. The efficiency was calculated by the formula . The slopes values of the nine reference strains in the individual assays were than compared to the respective common regression line using analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure. All statistical analyses were performed and graphs were plotted in R 2.15.2 [70].

Efficiencies of Seg-1 and Seg-3 assays were also estimated on the basis of standard curves plotting Ct values against corresponding log dsRNA copy number per reaction.


Sequence Comparison and Assay Design

Seg-1 and Seg-3 based (serogroup/virus-species-specific) assays.

Comparisons of Seg-1 or Seg-3 nucleotide sequences, from the nine reference strains of AHSV, along with publicly available sequence data (Table 1), identified conserved regions suitable for the development of virus-species -specific RT-PCR assays (Figure S1 in File S1 and Table 2). Some redundant/ambiguous bases were introduced within the Seg-1 probe and Seg-3 forward and reverse primers, to accommodate nucleotide differences between individual virus strains (Table 2) and ensure assay sensitivity and specificity. Although some differences in the target-footprints still remain in some of the isolates, compared to the primers and probes, these were shown to have little impact on the specificity and sensitivity of the respective assays with the isolates used here for validation (Table 6).

Table 6. Diagnostic sensitivity of virus-species- (Seg-1 and Seg-3) and type-specific (Seg-2) assays.

Seg-2 based assays.

Publicly available and newly generated nucleotide sequences for Seg-2 of the nine AHSV serotypes, were analysed and compared (Table 1 and Figure S1 in File S1) to identify regions unique to each of the virus types (Table 2). Type-specific primers and probes were subsequently designed targeting these regions for each serotype (Figure S1 in File S1).

Assay Specificity

Seg-1 and Seg-3 based assays.

A panel of nine monotypic AHSV reference strains, representing the nine known serotypes of AHSV (Table 3) were tested in duplicate with both of the virus-species-specific assays, targeting Seg-1 or Seg-3. The resulting mean Ct values for most of the strains tested in the Seg-1 assay were similar to those obtained in Seg-3 assay, indicating that these tests detect viral RNA with similar efficiencies (Table 6).

The specificity of the AHSV virus-species-specific assays was further evaluated using 33 different field and vaccine strains of AHSV serotypes 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, and 9, collected from different geographical locations in central Africa (Table 3). All of the isolates were detected (produced amplification) in both assays (Table 6). Most of the isolates tested (17/33) were detected with similar sensitivity (within 2 Ct value difference). While the Seg-1 assay amplified the RNA target earlier (lower Ct) in thirteen isolates, the Seg-3 based assay was more efficient in amplification (lower Ct) with RNA samples from the three Ethiopian isolates of AHSV-4. These variations suggest minor differences in the ‘target’ nucleotide sequences for primers or probes in Seg-1 and Seg-3, between the isolates tested.

“No Ct” results, were consistently generated with nucleic acid of C. sonorensis, uninfected horse bloods or cell culture supernatants (KC cells, BHK and Vero cells), or dsRNA from other closely related Orbivirus species (EEV, PHSV, EHDV and BTV) (Table 5). In silico analysis of Seg-1 and 3 sequence data for 22 Orbivirus species [64], indicated that neither primers nor probes of the AHSV virus-species-specific assays, would bind to, or amplify their RNA.

Seg-2 based (type-specific) assays.

The RNAs of the nine monotypic AHSV reference strains were also tested with ‘typing-assays’ targeting Seg-2 of the different AHSV serotypes (Table 3). In each case amplification was only observed with the homologous assay (Table 6). Further testing using field strains of AHSV serotypes 2, 4, 6, 7, 8 and 9, only produced positive signals with the homologous serotype (Table 6). These RT-PCR results were confirmed by sequencing and phylogenetic analyses of Seg-2 for majority of the isolates tested (Table 3).

The AHSV-9 vaccine strain produced by the National Veterinary Research Institute, in Senegal (SENvvv1/09), and the three vaccines (AHSV-2, AHSV-7 and AHSV-9) manufactured at the National Veterinary Institute, Ethiopia (ETH2010/02, ETH2010/09 and ETH2010/18, respectively), were also tested using the real-time RT-PCR typing assays. Although, positive results were obtained in each case with the assays for the homologous serotype, heterologous types were also detected (Table 6). The AHSV-2 vaccine strain (ETH2010/02) also contained AHSV-3; the AHSV-7 vaccine strain (ETH2010/09) also contained AHSV-5; and the AHSV-9 vaccine strain (ETH2010/18) contained AHSV-5. These real-time RT-PCR data were confirmed by Seg-2 sequencing of the mixed Ethiopian vaccine strains and two distinctive consensus sequences were generated in each case. Comparison of the sequence data to the Seg-2 dataset of the nine AHSV reference strains, confirmed the real-time RT-PCR typing results.

Seg-2 from ETH2010/02 (the ‘AHSV-2’ vaccine) showed 96% and 99.7% nucleotide identities with RSArrah/02 (AHSV-2) and RSArrah/03 (AHSV-3) respectively, suggesting that it had been contaminated with the AHSV-3 reference strain, or a very similar virus.

Seg-2 of ETH2010/09 (‘AHSV-7’ vaccine) showed 99% and 98.1% nucleotide identities with KENrrah/07 (AHSV-7) and RSArrah/05 (AHSV-5) respectively, indicating contamination with an AHSV-5 that is related to but may be distinct from the reference strain.

Seg-2 of ETH2010/18 (AHSV-9 vaccine) showed 96.6% and 99.4% nucleotide identities with PAKrrah/09 (AHSV-9) and RSArrah/05 (AHSV-5), again indicating contamination with the AHSV-5 reference strain or a very similar virus strain. The close relationship of the ‘second’ strains detected in each of these vaccines to the reference strains suggests laboratory derived contamination.

Nucleic acid preparations derived from the uninfected host species (horse blood and C. sonorensis) or uninfected cell culture supernatants (KC cells, BHK cells and Vero cells) gave ‘no Ct’ values in any of the nine type-specific assays.

Assay Sensitivity and Efficiency

Seg-1 and Seg-3 based (virus-species-specific) assays.

The efficiency rates of both virus-species-specific assays (Seg-1 and Seg-3) were calculated based on a dilution series of infectious virus, showing variations between 98% to 108%, or 102% to 115% respectively depending on the reference strain used (Table S1 in File S1). The slope, which is a measure of individual assay efficiency, showed only minor variations in either assay (from −3.0 to −3.4 with a good linear correlation (R2>0.98) for all AHSV types (Table S1 in File S1; Figure 1). No significant difference (p<0.05) was reported between the individual slopes in either assay by ANOVA test (Figure S2 in File S1).

Figure 1. Standard curves for Ct value against virus titre for AHSV virus-species-and type-specific RT-PCR assays.

Comparison of standard curves generated by plotting Ct values against RNA extracted from log virus dilutions with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). All nine monotypic reference strains were analysed for each virus-species-specific assay while the homologous strains were analysed for each of the type-specific assays.

Efficiency rates for the Seg-1 and Seg-3 assays were also calculated, based on a dilution series of viral RNA purified from AHSV-1 (RSArah1/03), showing values of 101% and 96% efficiency, estimated over eight (101–108) and seven (101–107) log dilutions respectively. Over these dilution ranges a linear dynamic with R2 exceeding 0.99 was observed for both of the assays (Table S2 in File S1; Figure 2).

Figure 2. Standard curves for Ct value against RNA copy number for Seg-1 and Seg-3 RT-PCR.

Standard curves generated by plotting Ct values against corresponding log copy number of viral dsRNA (RSArah01/03) in Seg-1 and Seg-3 assays. Each dilution was tested in quadruplicate. Non-linearity of the lowest and highest dilutions were excluded from the analysis.

All nine serotypes of AHSV were detected with both virus-species-specific assays (Seg-1 and Seg-3) down to 1 TCID50/ml (since each PCR reaction contains RNA extracted from 0.029 ml of sample, this is equivalent to 0.029 TCID50 detected per assay). For AHSV-1 (RSArah1/03) this gave a Ct value of 33.77 in the Seg-1 specific assay, and 35.46 in the Seg-3 specific assay (Table S1 in File S1, Figure 1). This suggests that virus isolation would become increasingly difficult for samples showing Ct values higher than 33 or 35 respectively in these assays.

The assays targeting Seg-1 and Seg-3 consistently detected 60 copies of AHSV-1 (RSArah1/03) RNA per reaction in four independent repeats, with average Ct values of 33.96 in the Seg-1 specific assay and 35.16 in the Seg-3 specific assay (Table S2 in File S1). However, at 6 copies per reaction, the viral RNA was only detected in two of the four repeats in the Seg-1 assay, and one out of four in the Seg-3 assay. Based on the observation that they produce similar Ct values (see above), 60 copies of the viral genome per reaction appears to be approximately equivalent to 0.029 TCID50 (representing 2068 genome copies per ml, or 1 TCID50/ml of the original virus sample).

Seg-2 based assays (serotyping assays).

The RNA of the homologous AHSV serotype was detected by eight of the ‘typing’ assays, at all five dilutions down to 1 TCID50/ml (0.019 TCID50/assay). However, the AHSV-6 specific assay only gave consistent positive results down to 10 TCID50/ml (0.19 TCID50/assay) (Table S1 in File S1).

Efficiency rates calculated for the different typing assays, on the basis of the dilutions series of infectious virus, varied between 90–113% (Table S1 in File S1) reflected by a range of slope values (between −3 and −3.6). All nine of the Seg-2 assays showed linearity (R2>0.98) (Table S1 in File S1; Figure 1). No statistical difference was identified between slopes using ANOVA analysis (p<0.05) (Figure S2 in File S1).


Real-time methods offer many advantages over conventional RT-PCR for the detection of viral RNAs. This includes high sensitivity and specificity, the ability to quantify viral RNA templates (copy number) and the detection of short amplicons, reducing potential problems caused by partial degradation of the RNA target. The reactions and detection also take place in a closed tube, reducing risks of laboratory based cross-contamination and false positive results. In addition, automation can be used to increase throughput and reproducibility. However, the very high specificity of real-time RT-PCR primers and probes can also lead to false negative results [72]. The most conserved genome segments or regions, that are also unique to the target virus-species, should therefore be selected for the design of real-time RT-PCR assays and a wide selection of diverse samples (including field and historical isolates) should be used for assay validation.

We report the development of real-time RT-PCR assays based on TaqMan technology for detection, identification and typing of AHSV RNA extracted from diagnostic samples, insects or infected tissue cultures. The typing assays targeting Seg-2 were validated alongside virus-species-specific assays detecting highly conserved regions of Seg-1 and Seg-3. These assays are considerably more sensitive than conventional RT-PCR assays previously published for typing AHSV RNA [57], [58]. The combination of virus-species - and type-specific diagnostic systems provides a complete set of tools for rapid and accurate detection and identification of AHSV. Both assays targeting Seg-1 and Seg-3 were shown to be entirely specific for AHSV. There was also no evidence for cross-amplification of RNA from heterologous serotypes by any of the type-specific assays (Seg-2).

All of the assays detected a wide range of reference, field and vaccine strains confirming their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, indicating that they can be used for molecular diagnosis, surveillance and molecular epidemiology studies of AHSV. Some AHSV isolates were detected with different sensitivities by assays targeting Seg-1 and Seg-3, suggesting minor differences in the primer binding-regions, between these virus isolates. Both of the virus-species-specific assays were designed to target highly conserved regions of the most-conserved genome-segments (encoding structural proteins VP1 and VP3 respectively). However, it is possible that novel strains of AHSV will arise in the field that have further changes in these target ‘footprints’, significantly reducing the efficiency of one or other of these assays. This would require a ‘redesign’ of the assay to maintain its effectiveness. It is considered unlikely that both virus-species-specific assays would fail simultaneously and their use in tandem would maintain diagnostic capability reducing the risk of false negatives.

AHSV infection generates a relatively low level of viraemia in horses (up to ∼105 TCID50/ml) and an even lower circulating titre in donkeys and zebras (<103 TCID50/ml) [73]. Studies of analytical sensitivity reported here for the RT-PCR assays, indicate that a viraemic animal would be detected reliably using either the virus-species-specific or type-specific assays.

Both the virus-species- and type-specific assays are highly efficient, doubling amplicon quantity during each round of amplification in the geometric phase of the reaction (Figure 1 and 2). The virus-species-specific assays (Seg-1 and Seg-3) can be used to quantify the amounts of viral dsRNA, even at very low concentrations (down to 60 copies of viral dsRNA per reaction) (Figure 2). These assays were also considerably more sensitive than infectivity tests (∼2000 fold) indicating that (depending on the volume of inoculum used) a Ct of<33–35 would be needed before virus isolation is likely to be successful in cell culture.

Detection of AHSV RNA by RT-PCR assay is limited by the sample size that can be added to a single PCR reaction. However, our ability to isolate AHSV in cell cultures depends on the absence of neutralising antibodies, the level of virus-adaptation to cell culture, the type of cells used (e.g. insect or mammalian), the volume of inoculum, and the storage history (level of degradation of the sample).

In previous studies of BTV infectivity in BHK cells it was found that ∼1000 copies of the disaggregated and purified virus particle were equivalent to 1 TCID50 [71]. The lower infectivity to genome-copy ratio calculated here (2068 genome copies per TCID50) may reflect RNA losses during extraction from the virus, or an aggregated state of the unpurified virus.

As previously demonstrated for BTV, real-time RT-PCR assays are the most sensitive and reliable methods (that are currently available) for orbivirus detection and typing [74][76]. The virus-species-specific assays reported here can detect similar levels of RNA to other published real-time AHSV detection methods [51], [54][56]. However, the relatively small number of AHSV isolates that were available for this study (n = 42), especially for serotypes 1, 3 and 5, has implications for the wider validation of these assays, particularly for the type-specific (Seg-2) based assays. The diagnostic specificity of the nine typing assays described here, relates primarily to their inability to detect Seg-2 of non-homologous types, while still detecting all available isolates from the homologous AHSV type. If a novel isolate of the virus is identified (e.g. by the virus-species-specific assays) that fails to amplify using the typing assays, it should be sequenced (Seg-2) to provide a basis for further development/refinement of the relevant primers and probes. Similar problems have been addressed with conventional and real-time RT-PCR assays detecting Seg-2 of BTV, in order to maintain their specificity and sensitivity [77].

The assays described here are currently being used for diagnostic and/or research purposes in a wide range of host and insect vector species, by the reference laboratories and research groups at The Pirbright Institute. The Seg-1 based virus-species-specific assay was used to detect AHSV-4 dsRNA in blood from IFNAR-/- mice [37], while replication of AHSV-4 in orally infected C. sonorensis was assessed using the Seg-3 specific assay [78]. The AHSV types which caused recent multi-serotype outbreaks in Ethiopia (2010) [22] were characterised using the Seg-2 based typing assays and results were confirmed by sequencing. The protocol for all of the assays has been optimised to maximise sensitivity and uses the same thermal profile, allowing multiple assays to proceed on a single machine at the same time.

In conclusion, these studies have provided an easy to use ‘TaqMan’ real-time RT-PCR based methods, which represent fast, robust and reliable tools for the detection and identification (typing) of AHSV. They provide a basis for the design and timely implementation of control measures for AHSV, including vaccination programmes. These diagnostic methods (particularly if linked to sequencing and phylogenetic studies) could be used for epidemiology studies to improve our understanding of the prevalence, distribution and movements of specific AHSV strains.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Figures S1–S2 and Tables S1–S2. Table S1: Analytical sensitivity and efficiency of virus-species-specific (Seg-1 and Seg-3) and type-specific (Seg-2) assays with serially diluted infectious virus. Table S2: Analytical sensitivity and efficiency of virus-species-specific (Seg-1 and Seg-3) assays, with serially diluted dsRNA standards (RSArrah/01). Figure S1: Nucleotide alignments for the design of AHSV virus-species (Seg-1 and Seg-3) and type-specific (Seg-2) assays. Seg-1 and Seg-3 indicate the virus-species-specific assays while SRT-1 to SRT-9 indicate respective type-specific assays. The nucleotide sequence of primers and probes for individual assays, including redundant bases, are listed in Table 2. Figure S2: Slopes values in relation to the slope of the common regression line for virus-species and type-specific RT-PCR assays. Comparison of slopes of the nine reference strains to the respective common regression line in virus-species-specific (Seg-1 and Seg-3) and type-specific (Seg-2) assays with corresponding 95% CI. Slopes of all nine serotypes of AHSV are highly similar in each of the virus-species-specific or individual type-specific assays respectively. Solid red line represents common regression line while dotted lines mark defines the 95% CI.




The authors would like to thank all collaborators for providing virus isolates for tests and analysis. P. Mertens is a Jenner Investigator.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KB SM NSM PM CB. Performed the experiments: KB SM NSM NM. Analyzed the data: KB SM NSM AD PM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: KB SM NSM PM GS JC CB ACP. Wrote the paper: KB SM PM.


  1. 1. Mellor PS, Hamblin C (2004) African horse sickness. Veterinary Research 35: 445–466.
  2. 2. Howell P (1962) The isolation and identification of further antigenic types of African horse sickness virus. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 29: 139–149.
  3. 3. McIntosh B (1958) Immunological types of horse sickness virus and their significance in immunisation. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 27: 465–538.
  4. 4. Mertens PPC, Maan S, Samuel A, Attoui H (2005) Orbivirus, Reoviridae. In: Fauquet CM, Mayo MA, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA, editors. Virus Taxonomy, VIIIth Report of the ICTV. London: Academic Press. 466–483.
  5. 5. Coetzer J, Guthrie A (2004) African horse sickness. In: Coetzer J, Tustin R, editors. Infectious diseases of livestock. Cape Town: Oxford University Press. 1231–1246.
  6. 6. OIE (2011) Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Paris, France: OIE.
  7. 7. Belhouchet M, Mohd Jaafar F, Firth AE, Grimes JM, Mertens PPC, et al. (2011) Detection of a Fourth Orbivirus Non-Structural Protein. PLoS one 6: e25697.
  8. 8. Ratinier M, Caporale M, Golder M, Franzoni G, Allan K, et al. (2011) Identification and Characterization of a Novel Non-Structural Protein of Bluetongue Virus. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002477.
  9. 9. Potgieter AC, Cloete M, Pretorius PJ, van Dijk AA (2003) A first full outer capsid protein sequence data-set in the Orbivirus genus (family Reoviridae): cloning, sequencing, expression and analysis of a complete set of full-length outer capsid VP2 genes of the nine African horsesickness virus serotypes. Journal of General Virology 84: 1317–1326.
  10. 10. Hofmann MA, Renzullo S, Mader M, Chaignat V, Worwa G, et al. (2008) Genetic Characterization of Toggenburg Orbivirus, a New Bluetongue Virus, from Goats, Switzerland. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14: 1855–1861.
  11. 11. Maan S, Maan NS, Nomikou K, Batten C, Antony F, et al. (2011) Novel Bluetongue Virus Serotype from Kuwait. Emerging Infectious Diseases 17: 886–889.
  12. 12. Maan S, Maan NS, Samuel AR, Rao S, Attoui H, et al. (2007) Analysis and phylogenetic comparisons of full-length VP2 genes of the 24 bluetongue virus serotypes. Journal of General Virology 88: 621–630.
  13. 13. Belaganahalli MN, Maan S, Maan NS, Tesh R, Attoui H, et al. (2011) Umatilla Virus Genome Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis: Identification of Stretch Lagoon Orbivirus as a New Member of the Umatilla virus Species. PLoS one 6: e23605.
  14. 14. Attoui H, Jaafar FM, Belhouchet M, Aldrovandi N, Tao S, et al. (2005) Yunnan orbivirus, a new orbivirus species isolated from Culex tritaeniorhynchus mosquitoes in China. Journal of General Virology 86: 3409–3417.
  15. 15. Belaganahalli MN, Maan S, Maan NS, Nomikou K, Pritchard I, et al. (2012) Full Genome Sequencing and Genetic Characterization of Eubenangee Viruses Identify Pata Virus as a Distinct Species within the Genus Orbivirus. PLoS one 7.
  16. 16. von Teichman BF, Dungu B, Smit TK (2010) In vivo cross-protection to African horse sickness Serotypes 5 and 9 after vaccination with Serotypes 8 and 6. Vaccine 28: 6505–6517.
  17. 17. ProMED-mail (2007) African horse sickness - Senegal: serotype 2. 23-JUN-2007 ed: ProMED-mail.
  18. 18. OIE (2007) Summary of Immediate notifications and Follow-ups - 2007 African horse sickness. In: Database WI-OWAHI, editor.
  19. 19. OIE (2008) Summary of Immediate notifications and Follow-ups - 2008 African horse sickness. In: Database WI-OWAHI, editor.
  20. 20. ProMED-mail (2008) African horse sickness - Ethiopia (02): serotype 2, update. 200809303087: ProMED-mail.
  21. 21. Mertens PPC, Ross-Smith N, Diprose J, Attoui H (2009) The structure of bluetongue virus core and proteins. In: Mellor PS, Baylis M, Mertens PPC, editors. Bluetongue. 101–133.
  22. 22. Aklilu N, Batten C, Gelaye E, Jenberie S, Ayelet G, et al. (2012) African Horse Sickness Outbreaks Caused by Multiple Virus Types in Ethiopia. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases: n/a-n/a.
  23. 23. Bachanek-Bankowska K (2012) Genetic studies of Africa horse sickness virus: University of Oxford.
  24. 24. Lubroth J (1988) African horse sickness and the epizootic in Spain 1987. Equine Practice 10: 26–33.
  25. 25. Rodriguez M, Hooghuis H, Castaño M (1992) African horse sickness in Spain. Veterinary Microbiology 33: 129–142.
  26. 26. Sanchez-Vizcaino JM (2004) Control and eradication of African horse sickness with vaccine. In: Schudel A, Lombard M, editors. Control of Infectious Animal Diseases by Vaccination. 255–258.
  27. 27. Purse BV, Mellor PS, Rogers DJ, Samuel AR, Mertens PPC, et al. (2005) Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe. Nature Reviews Microbiology 3: 171–181.
  28. 28. Saegerman C, Berkvens D, Mellor PS (2008) Bluetongue epidemiology in the European Union. Emerging Infectious Diseases 14: 539–544.
  29. 29. Carpenter S, Wilson A, Mellor PS (2009) Culicoides and the emergence of bluetongue virus in northern Europe. Trends in Microbiology 17: 172–178.
  30. 30. de Koeijer A, Boender G, Nodelijk G, Staubach C, Meroc E, et al. (2011) Quantitative analysis of transmission parameters for bluetongue virus serotype 8 in Western Europe in 2006. Veterinary Research 42: 53.
  31. 31. Maan S, Maan NS, Ross-Smith N, Batten CA, Shaw AE, et al. (2008) Sequence analysis of bluetongue virus serotype 8 from the Netherlands 2006 and comparison to other European strains. Virology 377: 308–318.
  32. 32. Saeed MF, Li L, Wang H, Weaver SC, Barrett ADT (2001) Phylogeny of the Simbu serogroup of the genus Bunyavirus. Journal of General Virology 82: 2173–2181.
  33. 33. Gibbens N (2012) Schmallenberg virus: a novel viral disease in northern Europe. Veterinary Record 170: 58.
  34. 34. Purse BV, Brown HE, Harrup L, Mertens PPC, Rogers DJ (2008) Invasion of bluetongue and other orbivirus infections into Europe: the role of biological and climatic processes. Revue Scientifique Et Technique-Office International Des Epizooties 27: 427–442.
  35. 35. MacLachlan NJ, Guthrie AJ (2010) Re-emergence of bluetongue, African horse sickness, and other Orbivirus diseases. Vet Res 41: 35.
  36. 36. Portas M, Boinas F, Oliveira J, Sousa E, Rawlings P (1999) African horse sickness in Portugal: a successful eradication programme. Epidemiology and Infection 123: 337–346.
  37. 37. Castillo-Olivares J, Calvo-Pinilla E, Casanova I, Bachanek-Bankowska K, Chiam R, et al. (2011) A Modified Vaccinia Ankara Virus (MVA) Vaccine Expressing African Horse Sickness Virus (AHSV) VP2 Protects Against AHSV Challenge in an IFNAR −/− Mouse Model. PLoS one 6: e16503.
  38. 38. Chiam R, Sharp E, Maan S, Rao S, Mertens P, et al. (2009) Induction of antibody responses to African horse sickness virus (AHSV) in ponies after vaccination with recombinant modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA). PLoS one 4: e5997.
  39. 39. Guthrie AJ, Quan M, Lourens CW, Audonnet JC, Minke JM, et al. (2009) Protective immunization of horses with a recombinant canarypox virus vectored vaccine co-expressing genes encoding the outer capsid proteins of African horse sickness virus. Vaccine 27: 4434–4438.
  40. 40. El Garch H, Crafford JE, Amouyal P, Durand PY, Edlund Toulemonde C, et al. (2012) An African horse sickness virus serotype 4 recombinant canarypox virus vaccine elicits specific cell-mediated immune responses in horses. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 149: 76–85.
  41. 41. McIntosh B (1956) Complement fixation with African horse sickness. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 27: 165–169.
  42. 42. Hamblin C, Mertens PP, Mellor PS, Burroughs J, Crowther J (1991) A serogroup specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection and identification of African horse sickness viruses. Journal of Virological Methods 31: 285–292.
  43. 43. Laviada M, Babin M, Dominguez J, Sanchez-Vizcaino J (1992) Detection of African horse sickness virus in infected spleen by sandwich ELISA using two monoclonal antibodies specific for VP7. Journal of Virological Methods 38: 229–242.
  44. 44. Hamblin C, Graham SD, Anderson EC, Crowther JR (1990) A competitive ELISA for the detection of group-specific antibodies to African horse sickness virus. Epidemiology and Infection 104: 303–312.
  45. 45. Kweon CH, Kwon BJ, Ko YJ, Kenichi S (2003) Development of competitive ELISA for serodiagnosis on African horsesickness virus using baculovirus expressed VP7 and monoclonal antibody. Journal of Virological Methods 133: 13–18.
  46. 46. Aradaib IE (2009) PCR detection of African horse sickness virus serogroup based on genome segment three sequence analysis. Journal of Virological Methods 159: 1–5.
  47. 47. Zientara S, Sailleau C, Moulay S, Cruciere C (1993) Diagnosis and molecular epidemiology of the African horse sickness virus by the polymerase chain reaction and restriction patterns. Veterinary Research 24: 385–395.
  48. 48. Mizukoshi N, Sakamoto K, Iwata A, Ueda S, Kamada M, et al. (1994) Detection of African horsesickness virus by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using primers for segment 5 (NS1 gene). Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 56: 347–352.
  49. 49. Bremer CW, Viljoen GJ (1998) Detection of African horsesickness virus and discrimination between two equine orbivirus serogroups by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 1–8.
  50. 50. Stone-Marschat M, Carville A, Skowronek A, Laegreid WW (1994) Detection of African horse sickness virus by reverse transcription-PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 32: 697–700.
  51. 51. Quan M, Lourens CW, MacLachlan NJ, Gardner IA, Guthrie AJ (2010) Development and optimisation of a duplex real-time reverse transcription quantitative PCR assay targeting the VP7 and NS2 genes of African horse sickness virus. Journal of Virological Methods 167: 45–52.
  52. 52. Guthrie AJ, MacLachlan NJ, Joone C, Lourens CW, Weyer CT, et al. (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of a duplex real-time reverse transcription quantitative PCR assay for detection of African horse sickness virus. Journal of Virological Methods 189: 30–35.
  53. 53. Aguero M, Gomez-Tejedor C, Cubillo MA, Rubio C, Romero E, et al. (2008) Real-time fluorogenic reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of African horse sickness virus. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 20: 325–328.
  54. 54. Fernandez-Pinero J, Fernandez-Pacheco P, Rodriguez B, Sotelo E, Robles A, et al. (2009) Rapid and sensitive detection of African horse sickness virus by real-time PCR. Research in Veterinary Science 86: 353–358.
  55. 55. Rodriguez-Sanchez B, Fernandez-Pinero J, Sailleau C, Zientara S, Belak S, et al. (2008) Novel gel-based and real-time PCR assays for the improved detection of African horse sickness virus. Journal of Virological Methods 151: 87–94.
  56. 56. Monaco F, Polci A, Lelli R, Pinoni C, Di Mattia T, et al. (2011) A new duplex real-time RT-PCR assay for sensitive and specific detection of African horse sickness virus. Molecular and Cellular Probes 25: 87–93.
  57. 57. Sailleau C, Hamblin C, Paweska J, Zientara S (2000) Identification and differentiation of the nine African horse sickness virus serotypes by RT-PCR amplification of the serotype-specific genome segment 2. Journal of General Virology 81: 831–837.
  58. 58. Maan NS, Maan S, Nomikou K, Belaganahalli MN, Bachanek-Bankowska K, et al. (2011) Serotype Specific Primers and Gel-Based RT-PCR Assays for ‘Typing’ African Horse Sickness Virus: Identification of Strains from Africa. PLoS one 6: e25686.
  59. 59. Koekemoer JJO, Potgieter AC, Paweska JT, Van Dijk AA (2000) Development of probes for typing African horsesickness virus isolates using a complete set of cloned VP2-genes. Journal of Virological Methods 88: 135–144.
  60. 60. Koekemoer JJO, van Dijk AA (2004) African horsesickness virus serotyping and identification of multiple co-infecting serotypes with a single genome segment 2 RT-PCR amplification and reverse line blot hybridization. Journal of Virological Methods 122: 49–56.
  61. 61. Mertens PPC, Attoui H (2011) The dsRNA genome segments and proteins of African horse sickness virus (AHSV) (genus Orbivirus: family Reoviridae). In: Mertens PPC, Attoui H, editors. The RNAs and Proteins of dsRNA Viruses.
  62. 62. Maan S, Rao SJ, Maan NS, Anthony SJ, Attoui H, et al. (2007) Rapid cDNA synthesis and sequencing techniques for the genetic study of bluetongue and other dsRNA viruses. Journal of Virological Methods 143: 132–139.
  63. 63. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) Software Version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24: 1596–1599.
  64. 64. Mertens PPC, Attoui H (2014) ReoID; Phylogenetic sequence analysis and improved diagnostic assay systems for viruses of the family Reoviridae.
  65. 65. Wechsler SJ, McHolland LE (1988) Susceptibilities of 14 cell lines to bluetongue virus infection. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 26: 2324–2327.
  66. 66. O’Hara RS, Meyer AJ, Burroughs JN, Pullen L, Martin LA, et al. (1998) Development of a mouse model system and identification of individual genome segments of African horse sickness virus, serotypes 3 and 8 involved in determination of virulence. Archives of Virology S14: 259–279.
  67. 67. House C, Mikiciuk P, Berringer M (1990) Laboratory diagnosis of African horse sickness. Comparison of serological techniques and evaluation of storage methods of samples for virus isolation. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2: 44–50.
  68. 68. Attoui H, Billoir F, Cantaloube JF, Biagini P, de Micco P, et al. (2000) Strategies for the sequence determination of viral dsRNA genomes. Journal of Virological Methods 89: 147–158.
  69. 69. Shaw AE, Monaghan P, Alpar HO, Anthony S, Darpel KE, et al. (2007) Development and initial evaluation of a real-time RT-PCR assay to detect bluetongue virus genome segment 1. Journal of Virological Methods 145: 115–126.
  70. 70. The R Development Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
  71. 71. Mertens PPC, Burroughs JN, Anderson J (1987) Purification and properties of virus particles, infectious subviral particles, and cores of bluetongue virus serotypes 1 and 4. Virology 157: 375–386.
  72. 72. Jiménez-Clavero MA, Agüero M, Miguel ES, Mayoral T, López MC, et al. (2006) High Throughput Detection of Bluetongue Virus by a New Real-Time Fluorogenic Reverse Transcription–Polymerase Chain Reaction: Application on Clinical Samples from Current Mediterranean Outbreaks. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 18: 7–17.
  73. 73. Hamblin C, Salt J, Mellor PS, Graham S, Smith P, et al. (1998) Donkeys as reservoirs of African horse sickness. Archives of Virology Suppl. 14 37–47.
  74. 74. Hoffmann B, Eschbaumer M, Beer M (2009) Real-Time Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays Specifically Detecting Bluetongue Virus Serotypes 1, 6, and 8. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 47: 2992–2994.
  75. 75. LeBlanc N, Rasmussen TB, Fernández J, Sailleau C, Rasmussen LD, et al. (2010) Development of a real-time RT-PCR assay based on primer–probe energy transfer for the detection of all serotypes of bluetongue virus. Journal of Virological Methods 167: 165–171.
  76. 76. Yin H-q, Zhang H, Shi L-j, Yang S, Zhang G-p, et al. (2010) Detection and quantitation of bluetongue virus serotypes by a TaqMan probe-based real-time RT-PCR and differentiation from epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus. Journal of Virological Methods 168: 237–241.
  77. 77. Maan NS, Maan S, Belaganahalli MN, Ostlund EN, Johnson DJ, et al. (2012) Identification and Differentiation of the Twenty Six Bluetongue Virus Serotypes by RT–PCR Amplification of the Serotype-Specific Genome Segment 2. PLoS one 7: e32601.
  78. 78. Veronesi E (2012) Temperature and strain related veriation in the infection and dessemination of bluetongue virus in Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae): Royal Veterinary College.