Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

COX-2 but Not mPGES-1 Contributes to Renal PGE2 Induction and Diabetic Proteinuria in Mice with Type-1 Diabetes

  • Zhanjun Jia ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Zhanjun Jia, Ying Sun

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America

  • Ying Sun ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Zhanjun Jia, Ying Sun

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America

  • Shanshan Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America

  • Ying Liu,

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America

  • Tianxin Yang

    Tianxin.Yang@hsc.utah.edu

    Affiliations Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America, Institute of Hypertension, Sun Yat-sen University School of Medicine, Guangzhou, China

COX-2 but Not mPGES-1 Contributes to Renal PGE2 Induction and Diabetic Proteinuria in Mice with Type-1 Diabetes

  • Zhanjun Jia, 
  • Ying Sun, 
  • Shanshan Liu, 
  • Ying Liu, 
  • Tianxin Yang
PLOS
x

Abstract

Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) has been implicated to play a pathogenic role in diabetic nephropathy (DN) but its source remains unlcear. To elucidate whether mPGES-1, the best characterized PGE2 synthase, was involved in the development of DN, we examined the renal phenotype of mPGES-1 KO mice subjected to STZ-induced type-1 diabetes. After STZ treatment, mPGES-1 WT and KO mice presented the similar onset of diabetes as shown by similar elevation of blood glucose. Meanwhile, both genotypes of mice exhibited similar increases of urinary and renal PGE2 production. In parallel with this comparable diabetic status, the kidney injury indices including the urinary albumin excretion, kidney weight and the kidney histology (PAS staining) did not show any difference between the two genotypes. By Western-blotting and quantitative qRT-PCR, mPGES-1, mPGES-2, cPGES and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) remain unaltered following six weeks of diabetes. Finally, a selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (50 mg/kg/day) was applied to the STZ-treated KO mice, which resulted in significant reduction of urinary albumin excretion (KO/STZ: 141.5±38.4 vs. KO/STZ + Celebrex: 48.7±20.8 ug/24 h, p<0.05) and the blockade of renal PGE2 induction (kidney: KO/STZ: 588.7±89.2 vs. KO/STZ + Celebrex: 340.8±58.7 ug/24 h, p<0.05; urine: KO/STZ 1667.6±421.4 vs. KO/STZ + Celebrex 813.6±199.9 pg/24 h, p<0.05), without affecting the blood glucose levels and urine volume. Taken together, our data suggests that an as yet unidentified prostaglanind E synthase but not mPGES-1 may couple with COX-2 to mediate increased renal PGE2 sythsesis in DN.

Introduction

PGE2 is an important modulator of renal physiology involving renin release, hemodynamics, and tubular salt and water transport [1]. Numerous studies proved that renal cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 activity and PGE2 production were increased in diabetes mellitus [2][8], which contributed to the pathogenesis of DN [2][8]. COX-2 inhibition has been shown to be renoprotective, attenuating glomerulosclerosis and albuminuria and glomerular hypertrophy in STZ-diabetic rats [9], [10]. Moreover, the profile of renal PGE2 receptor (EP1–EP 4) expression was altered in STZ diabetic mice [11] and EP1-selective antagonist strikingly retarded the progression of nephropathy as shown by significant improvement of mesangial expansion, glomerular hypertrophy and proteinuria [12]. Most recently, a study demonstrated that EP4 agonism exacerbated kidney injury in a mouse model of STZ-induced type-1 diabetes [13]. All these findings indicated that COX-2-PGE2–EP signaling pathway plays an important role in the development of DN.

However, COX-2 inhibitors have been shown to be associated with increased cardiovascular incidence possibly due to the inhibition of prostaglandin I2 [14], [15]. Therefore, long-term treatment of COX-2 inhibitors in diabetic patients is not applicable. In this regard, developing new drugs specifically targeting PGE2 synthases is of vital importance for the DN treatment, as well as other diseases. To date, three forms of PGE2 synthases have been cloned and characterized: microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 (mPGES-1), microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-2 (mPGES-2) and cytosolic PGES (cPGES). Among them, mPGES-1 is the best-characterized PGES [16], [17] and serves as a promising target for developing the next generation of analgesics. In past decade, numerous convincing studies demonstrated the critical role of mPGES-1 in mediating PGE2 production under baseline or stimulatory conditions [16][24]. Recently, evidence showed that deletion of mPGES-2 or cPGES in mice did not reduce PGE2 levels in vivo [25][27], which argues against their PGE2 synthetic property but highlights the importance of mPGES-1 as a PGE2 synthase. In present study, mPGES-1 KO mice were employed to define: 1) if mPGES-1 is the enzymatic source of renal PGE2 production in STZ-induced type I diabetes; 2) if mPGES-1 contributes to the glomerular injury of type-1 diabetes.

Methods

Animals

mPGES-1 mutant mice were originally generated by Trebino et al.[28]. This mouse colony was propagated at the University of Utah and maintained on a mixed DBA/1lacJxC57/BL6x129/Sv background. In all studies, 3- to 4-mo-old male mice were used. All mice were maintained under a 12∶12-h light-dark cycle (lights on at 6∶00 a.m. and lights off at 6∶00 p.m.). This study was approved by the University of Utah Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Induction of type I diabetic mouse model by STZ

After 6-hour fasting, mPGES-1 WT and KO mice were administered with STZ at the dose of 120 mg/kg bodyweight by i.p. injection. STZ was dissolved in citrate buffer (pH 4.5) and injected within 10 min of its dissolution. On fourth and sixth week, mice were placed in metabolic cages (Hatteras Instruments) to collect urine. Then 24-hour urine output and water intake were measured. On the next day of urine collection, the six-hour fasting glucose was examined by using a blood glucose meter (Bayer’s Contour). At the end of the experiment, the kidney was harvested for analysis of protein and gene expression and PAS staining. In a separate experiment, mPGES-1 KO mice were treated by STZ with or without celebrex (50 mg/kg/day in diet) for six weeks.

Immunoblotting

The whole kidney was lysed and protein concentration was determined by Coomassie reagent. Protein (60 µg) from whole kidney lysates were denatured in boiling water for 10 min, separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. The blots were blocked overnight with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), followed by incubation for 1 h with rabbit anti-mPGES-1 (Cayman Chemicals), anti-mPGES-2 (Cayman Chemicals), anti-cPGES (Cayman Chemicals) or anti-15-PGDH (Cayman Chemicals) at a dilution of 1∶1000. After being washed with TBS, blots were incubated with a goat anti-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1∶1000 dilution) and visualized with ECL kits (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ USA).

qRT-PCR

Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription were performed as previously described [29]. Oligonucleotides were designed using Primer3 software (available at http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/primer3/) and the sequences are: mPGES-1, 5′-AGCA CACTGCTGGTCATCAA-3′ (sense) and 5′-CTCCACATCTGGGTCACTCC-3′ (antisense) (GenBank accession no. BC024960); mPGES-2, 5′-GCTGGGGCTGTACCACAC-3′ (sense) and 5′-GATTCACCTCCACCACCTGA-3′ (antisense) (GenBank accession no. NM 133783); cPGES, 5′-GGTAGAGACCGCCGGAGT-3′ (sense) and 5′-TCGTACCACTTTGCAGAAGCA-3′ (antisense) (GenBank accession no. NM 019766); 15-PGDH, 5′-GTTCGTCCAGTGTGATGTGG-3′ (sense) and 5′-CCTTCACCTCCGTTTTGCTT-3′(antisense) (GenBank accession no. NM 008278); β-actin, 5′-GCTCTGGCTCCTAGCACCAT-3′ (sense) and 5′-GCCACCGATCCACACAGAGT-3′ (antisense) (GenBank accession no. NM_007393). qPCR amplification was performed using the SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) and the Prism 7500 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Cycling conditions were 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 repeats of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min.

Enzyme Immunoassay

Urine samples were centrifuged for 5 minutes at 10,000 rpm. The whole kidney was homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline and then centrifuged for 5 min at 10,000 r.p.m. The supernatant was diluted 1∶50 with enzyme immunoassay buffer. Concentrations of PGE2 were determined by enzyme immunoassay according to manufacturer’s instructions (Cayman Chemicals). Urine albumin was determined using a murine microalbuminuria enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (EXOCELL).

Statistical Analysis

All values are presented as mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was performed using a Student t test or ANOVA. Differences were considered to be significant when P<0.05.

Results

Evaluation of the onset of diabetes in mPGES-1 WT and KO mice

We measured the fasting blood glucose (six hours fasting), urine volume, water intake and body weight at fourth and sixth week after STZ treatment. There was a significant increase of blood glucose in both WT and KO mice at fourth and sixth week after STZ injection (STZ vs. Control, p<0.01 in both WT and KO mice) without difference between two genotypes (4-week: WT/STZ 483.8±25.1 vs. KO/STZ 454.1±48.5 mg/dl, p>0.05; 6-week: WT/STZ 430.0±10.25 vs. KO/STZ 436.0±47.8 mg/dl, p>0.05) (Fig. 1A). Water intake and urine volume followed the similar pattern (Fig. 1B and C). After six weeks, a similar reduction of body weight about 2–3 g was observed in both genotypes. These data suggest that mPGES-1 did not affect the onset of STZ-induced diabetes.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Evaluation of the onset of diabetes in mPGES-1 WT and KO mice.

(A) Fasting blood glucose. (B) Water intake. (C) Urine volume. (D) Body weight changes. N = 6–9 in each group. *p<0.05 vs. basal. Data are mean ± SE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093182.g001

Evaluation of the diabetic kidney injury in mPGES-1 WT and KO mice

COX-2 and EP1/EP4 receptors have a detrimental role in diabetic nephropathy. Here we evaluated the effect of mPGES-1 deletion on diabetes-induced kidney injury via examining urinary albumin, the kidney weight and glomerular morphology. Both mPGES-1 WT and KO mice developed the comparable proteinuria after six weeks of STZ treatment (WT/Cont 20.3±4.7 vs. WT/STZ 79.61±15.1 ug/24 h, p<0.01; KO/Cont 24.15±6.9 vs. KO/STZ 84.12±15.1 ug/24 h, p<0.01; WT/STZ vs. KO STZ, p>0.05) (Fig. 2A). The kidney weight to the body weight ratio was also similar between WT and KO mice (WT/STZ 0.825±0.032 vs. KO/STZ 0.79±0.029% BW, p>0.05) (Fig. 2B). As for the glomerular morphology, the PAS staining showed the remarkable enlargement of the glomeruli and the increased mesangial area after 6 weeks of diabetes (Fig. 2C) with no difference between two genotypes (Fig. 2C). These results indicated that mPGES-1 deletion did not prevent the diabetic glomerular injury.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Evaluation of the diabetic kidney injury in mPGES-1 WT and KO mice.

(A) The urinary albumin excretion after 6 weeks of diabetes. (B) Ratio of the kidney weight to the body weight (%). (C) PAS staining of the glomeruli after 6 weeks of diabetes. N = 6–9 in each group. Data are mean ± SE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093182.g002

Urinary PGE2 Excretion and Renal PGE2 content in diabetic mice

To further elicit the reason that mPGES-1 deletion did not affect the kidney injury in diabetic mice, we measured the urinary PGE2 excretion and kidney PGE2 content. By EIA assay, we found that mPGES-1 deletion had no effect on the diabetes-induced renal PGE2 production except for a lower baseline (urine: WT/STZ 3662.0±801.7 vs. KO/STZ 3086.5±465.4 pg/24 h, p>0.05; kidney: WT/STZ 857.3±369.0 vs. KO/STZ 1049.3±277.0 pg/mg protein, p>0.05) (Fig. 3A–D). These results indicated that mPGES-1 is not responsible for the renal PGE2 induction in the present model, which is very unexpected in consideration of previous evidences from our and other groups showing the critical role of mPGES-1 in mediating the PGE2 stimulation in various models [18][21], [23], [24], [28].

thumbnail
Figure 3. Urinary PGE2 excretion and renal PGE2 content in diabetic mice.

(A) 24-hour urinary PGE2 excretion after 6 weeks of diabetes. (B) Increase of 24-hour urinary PGE2 excretion after 6 weeks of diabetes. (C) Kidney PGE2 content after 6 weeks of diabetes. (D) Increase of kidney PGE2 content after 6 weeks of diabetes. N = 6–9 in each group. Data are mean ± SE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093182.g003

Regulations of renal PGESs and 15-PGDH in diabetic mice

We further determined the mPGES-1 protein and mRNA levels in the kidney of control and diabetic mice. Consistent with the renal PGE2 level, renal mPGES-1 expression was not changed in this STZ diabetic mouse model (Fig. 4A–C). This stimulated our interest to test expression of other PGE2 synthesis enzymes. But neither mPGES-2 nor cPGES expression at protein and mRNA levels was altered in this model (Fig. 5A and B & Fig. 6A and B). The expression of 15-PGDH, an important enzyme responsible for degradation of PGs also remained unchanged at both protein and mRNA levels (Fig. 5C & Fig. 6C). These results excluded the role of mPGES-1 in mediating type-1 diabetes-induced renal PGE2 production and also did not favor the involvement of mPGES-2, cPGES and 15-PGDH in this process.

thumbnail
Figure 4. Expressions of mPGES-1 protein and mRNA in diabetic mice.

(A) mPGES-1 protein analysis by Western blotting (n = 4–5 in each group). (B) Densitometry analysis of mPGES-1 Western blotting. (C) mPGES-1 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR (N = 6–9 per group). Data are mean ± SE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093182.g004

thumbnail
Figure 5. Protein expressions of mPGES-2, cPGES and 15-PGDH in diabetic mice.

(A) mPGES-2 protein analysis by Western blotting (N = 4 per group). (B) cPGES protein analysis by Western blotting (N = 4–5 per group). (C) 15-PGDH protein analysis by Western blotting (N = 3–4 per group). (D) Densitometry analysis of mPGES-2 Western blotting. (E) Densitometry analysis of cPGES Western blotting. (F) Densitometry analysis of 15-PGDH Western blotting. Data are mean ± SE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093182.g005

thumbnail
Figure 6. mRNA expressions of mPGES-2, cPGES and 15-PGDH in diabetic mice.

(A) mPGES-2 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR (N = 6–9 per group). (B) cPGES mRNA expression by qRT-PCR (N = 6–9 per group). (C) 15-PGDH mRNA expression by qRT-PCR (N = 6–9 per group). Data are mean ± SE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093182.g006

Effects of celebrex on the proteinuria and kidney PGE2 induction

mPGES-1 deletion did not affect the renal PGE2 production or urinary albumin excretion in STZ diabetic mouse. To elucidate whether COX-2 plays a role in the renal PGE2 production and the proteinuria in these mPGES-1 KO mice with type-1 diabetes, we treated the diabetic KO mice with a selective COX-2 inhibitor celebrex. STZ treatment remarkably increased urinary albumin excretion in these KO mice, which was significantly attenuated by celebrex (KO/STZ 141.5±38.4 vs. KO/STZ + Celebrex 48.7±20.8 ug/24 h, p<0.05) (Fig. 7A). Meanwhile, Celebrex significantly suppressed the PGE2 production in diabetic mPGES-1 KO mice (Kidney: KO/STZ 588.7±89.2 vs. KO/STZ + Celebrex 340.8±58.7 ug/mg protein, p<0.05; Urine: KO/STZ 1667.6±421.4 vs. KO/STZ + Celebrex 813.6±199.9 pg/24 h, p<0.05) (Fig. 7B and C). Although celebrex showed its significant effect on both proteinuria and renal PGE2 production, it did not affect blood glucose (KO/STZ 421.4±44.4 vs. KO/STZ + Celebrex 375.8±28.8 mg/dl, p>0.05) (Fig. 7D) and urine volume (Fig. 7E) after six-week STZ treatment.

thumbnail
Figure 7. Effects of celebrex treatment on proteinuria and kidney PGE2 production in diabetic mPGES-1 KO mice.

(A) Urinary ulbumin excretion (N = 5–6 per group). (B) Kidney PGE2 content (N = 5–6 per group). (C) Urinary PGE2 excretion. (D) Blood glucose levels (N = 5–6 per group). (E) Urine volume. Data are mean ± SE.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093182.g007

Discussion

Although COX-2 inhibitors are widely used as the anti-inflammatory drugs in clinic, the numerous side effects, particularly the cardiovascular concerns, significantly limited its long-term use in patients. This situation instigates us to pursue the next generation of anti-inflammatory drugs. In light of its critical role in pain and inflammatory response, mPGES-1 is viewed as the most promising target for developing new anti-inflammatory drugs [28], [30]. To date, many mPGES-1 inhibitors have been generated and some of them are being under the clinical trials [31][33]. Therefore, it is very important to assess the role of mPGES-1 in different pathological processes.

Previously, numerous investigations revealed that COX-2 activity and PGE2 production are increased in the kidneys of diabetic animals [4],[7],[8], and the inhibition of COX-2 or antagonism of PGE2 receptor EP1 [2][10], [34] remarkably ameliorated the renal injury in STZ-induced diabetic animal models or diabetic patients with DN [35]. The present study was designed to assess the potential involvement of mPGES-1-derived PGE2 in the development of DN. mPGES-1 is very abundant in the kidney, with a significant higher level in the renal medulla than in the renal cortex, similar to COX-1 and COX-2. mPGES-1 expression can be detected in macula densa, distal convoluted tubule, collecting duct, and renal medullary interstitial cells [36]. A series of studies from our and other groups demonstrated a remarkable role of mPGES-1 deletion on PGE2 production in various models including lithium-induced NDI, water or salt loading, Ang II or DOCA-salt- hypertension, aldosterone escape, LPS or cisplatin-induced renal failure [16][24]. Therefore, it is worthwhile to evaluate that whether mPGES-1 serves as a valuable target for DN treatment.

In present study, mPGES-1 deletion did not affect the blood glucose level in these diabetic mice, which demonstrated a paralleled diabetes onset and suggested a similar pancreatic β-cell injury in mPGES-1 WT and KO mice. This result agrees with a recent study showing that mPGES-1 in islet played no role in IL-1β-caused inhibitory effect on insulin secretion [37]. In agreement with this observation, mPGES-1 deletion did not suppress renal PGE2 induction in STZ-induced diabetic mice. Accordingly, the expression of mPGES-1 in the kidney remained unchanged in WT diabetic mice compared with the WT controls. In line with these negative phenotypes, the mPGES-1 deletion did not alter the renal phenotypes in response to the STZ-induced type-1 diabetes as shown by the comparable proteinuria, kidney hypertrophy andglomerulopathy. These results suggested no role mPGES-1 may play in diabetes-associated kidney injury and PGE2 production, at least in STZ diabetic mouse.

To further elicit the possible sources of renal PGE2 production in present type-1 diabetic model, we measured renal protein levels of mPGES-2, cPGES and 15-PGDH. The mPGES-2 is synthesized as a Golgi membrane-associated protein, and spontaneous cleavage of the N-terminal hydrophobic domain leads to the formation of mature cytosolic enzyme [38]. No specific phenotype was found in the mPGES-2 KO mice, as well as the basal PGE2 levels in different organs [25]. LPS stimulated PGE2 release from mPGES-2 KO macrophages was also unaltered compared with WT cells [25]. As for cPGES, it is abundant in the cytosol of various tissues and cells [39]. The expression of cPGES is not changed by proinflammatory stimuli in most cases with a few exceptions [39], [40]. Similar as mPGES-2 KO mice, cPGES deletion can not lower the PGE2 levels in vivo. Therefore, although mPGES-2 and cPGES presented their in vitro property of PGE2 generation, their in vivo role of PGE2 production is still uncertain. In present study, both mPGES-2 and cPGES protein levels were not affected in kidneys of STZ diabetic mouse. This suggested that both mPGES-2 and cPGES were unlikely involved in the PGE2 production in this model.

To further test whether PGE2 degradation contributes to the renal PGE2 level in these diabetic mice, we examined the 15-PGDH protein expression by Western blotting. 15-PGDH is a member of short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase (SDR) family catalyzing the PGE2 catabolic pathway [41]. Its functional role in cardiovascular and pulmonary systems has been extensively studied. However, its pathophysiological role in kidney remains poorly understood. In present study, we did not find any alteration of renal 15-PGDH protein level following 6-week diabetes in both WT and KO mice. But this result can not entirely rule out the involvement of 15-PGDH in renal PGE2 generation without the evidence of enzyme activity change.

Finally, we treated diabetic mPGES-1 KO mice with a selective COX-2 inhibitor celebrex and found that inhibition of COX-2 significantly reduced the kidney PGE2 content, as well as the urinary albumin level, without affecting the hyperglycemia. These results demonstrated that COX-2 contributed to the diabetes-related kidney PGE2 induction and was significantly involved in the diabetic proteinuria.

In summary, the present study examined the role of mPGES-1 along with COX-2 in diabetic kidney injury and PGE2 overproduction. Although mPGES-1-derived PGE2 played an important role in many pathophysiological conditions, we found no evidence supporting involvement of this enzyme in diabetes-related PGE2 production and glomerular injury, or the onset of STZ-induced diabetes, at least in the current mouse model. This discrepancy of mPGES-1 regulation and function between the type-1 diabetes-associated kidney injury and other kidney diseases may be due to the different pathogenic mechanisms among various diseases. Moreover, renal expression of other components of the PGE2 synthesis and degradation pathway including mPGES-2, cPGES, and 15-PGDH remained unaltered in the diabetic kidney. These negative observations contrast sharply with the remarkable effect of COX-2 inhibition on kidney injury and PGE2 levels. Together, these results suggest that an as yet unidentified PGE2 synthase may exist to couple with COX-2 to mediate renal PGE2 production in diabetes.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: TY ZJ. Performed the experiments: ZJ YS SL YL. Analyzed the data: ZJ YS. Wrote the paper: TY ZJ.

References

  1. 1. Breyer MD, Jacobson HR, Breyer RM (1996) Functional and molecular aspects of renal prostaglandin receptors. J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 8–17.
  2. 2. Craven PA, DeRubertis FR (1989) Role for local prostaglandin and thromboxane production in the regulation of glomerular filtration rate in the rat with streptozocin-induced diabetes. J Lab Clin Med 113: 674–681.
  3. 3. DeRubertis FR, Craven PA (1993) Eicosanoids in the pathogenesis of the functional and structural alterations of the kidney in diabetes. Am J Kidney Dis 22: 727–735.
  4. 4. Gerrard JM, Stuart MJ, Rao GH, Steffes MW, Mauer SM, et al. (1980) Alteration in the balance of prostaglandin and thromboxane synthesis in diabetic rats. J Lab Clin Med 95: 950–958.
  5. 5. Ishibashi R, Tanaka I, Kotani M, Muro S, Goto M, et al. (1999) Roles of prostaglandin E receptors in mesangial cells under high-glucose conditions. Kidney Int 56: 589–600.
  6. 6. Komers R, Lindsley JN, Oyama TT, Schutzer WE, Reed JF, et al. (2001) Immunohistochemical and functional correlations of renal cyclooxygenase-2 in experimental diabetes. J Clin Invest 107: 889–898.
  7. 7. Schambelan M, Blake S, Sraer J, Bens M, Nivez MP, et al. (1985) Increased prostaglandin production by glomeruli isolated from rats with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest 75: 404–412.
  8. 8. Williams B, Schrier RW (1993) Glucose-induced protein kinase C activity regulates arachidonic acid release and eicosanoid production by cultured glomerular mesangial cells. J Clin Invest 92: 2889–2896.
  9. 9. Komers R, Lindsley JN, Oyama TT, Anderson S (2007) Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibition attenuates the progression of nephropathy in uninephrectomized diabetic rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 34: 36–41.
  10. 10. Quilley J, Santos M, Pedraza P (2011) Renal protective effect of chronic inhibition of COX-2 with SC-58236 in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 300: H2316–2322.
  11. 11. Nasrallah R, Xiong H, Hebert RL (2007) Renal prostaglandin E2 receptor (EP) expression profile is altered in streptozotocin and B6-Ins2Akita type I diabetic mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292: F278–284.
  12. 12. Makino H, Tanaka I, Mukoyama M, Sugawara A, Mori K, et al. (2002) Prevention of diabetic nephropathy in rats by prostaglandin E receptor EP1-selective antagonist. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1757–1765.
  13. 13. Mohamed R, Jayakumar C, Ramesh G (2013) Chronic administration of EP4-selective agonist exacerbates albuminuria and fibrosis of the kidney in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice through IL-6. Lab Invest 93: 933–945.
  14. 14. Francois H, Athirakul K, Howell D, Dash R, Mao L, et al. (2005) Prostacyclin protects against elevated blood pressure and cardiac fibrosis. Cell Metab 2: 201–207.
  15. 15. Grosser T, Fries S, FitzGerald GA (2006) Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. J Clin Invest 116: 4–15.
  16. 16. Mancini JA, Blood K, Guay J, Gordon R, Claveau D, et al. (2001) Cloning, expression, and up-regulation of inducible rat prostaglandin e synthase during lipopolysaccharide-induced pyresis and adjuvant-induced arthritis. J Biol Chem 276: 4469–4475.
  17. 17. Murakami M, Naraba H, Tanioka T, Semmyo N, Nakatani Y, et al. (2000) Regulation of prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis by inducible membrane-associated prostaglandin E2 synthase that acts in concert with cyclooxygenase-2. J Biol Chem 275: 32783–32792.
  18. 18. Jia Z, Wang N, Aoyagi T, Wang H, Liu H, et al. (2011) Amelioration of cisplatin nephrotoxicity by genetic or pharmacologic blockade of prostaglandin synthesis. Kidney Int 79: 77–88.
  19. 19. Jia Z, Aoyagi T, Kohan DE, Yang T (2010) mPGES-1 deletion impairs aldosterone escape and enhances sodium appetite. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 299: F155–166.
  20. 20. Jia Z, Aoyagi T, Yang T (2010) mPGES-1 protects against DOCA-salt hypertension via inhibition of oxidative stress or stimulation of NO/cGMP. Hypertension 55: 539–546.
  21. 21. Jia Z, Wang H, Yang T (2009) Mice lacking mPGES-1 are resistant to lithium-induced polyuria. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 297: F1689–1696.
  22. 22. Soodvilai S, Jia Z, Wang MH, Dong Z, Yang T (2009) mPGES-1 deletion impairs diuretic response to acute water loading. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F1129–1135.
  23. 23. Jia Z, Guo X, Zhang H, Wang MH, Dong Z, et al. (2008) Microsomal prostaglandin synthase-1-derived prostaglandin E2 protects against angiotensin II-induced hypertension via inhibition of oxidative stress. Hypertension 52: 952–959.
  24. 24. Jia Z, Zhang A, Zhang H, Dong Z, Yang T (2006) Deletion of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 increases sensitivity to salt loading and angiotensin II infusion. Circ Res 99: 1243–1251.
  25. 25. Jania LA, Chandrasekharan S, Backlund MG, Foley NA, Snouwaert J, et al. (2009) Microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-2 is not essential for in vivo prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 88: 73–81.
  26. 26. Lovgren AK, Kovarova M, Koller BH (2007) cPGES/p23 is required for glucocorticoid receptor function and embryonic growth but not prostaglandin E2 synthesis. Mol Cell Biol 27: 4416–4430.
  27. 27. Nakatani Y, Hokonohara Y, Kakuta S, Sudo K, Iwakura Y, et al. (2007) Knockout mice lacking cPGES/p23, a constitutively expressed PGE2 synthetic enzyme, are peri-natally lethal. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 362: 387–392.
  28. 28. Trebino CE, Stock JL, Gibbons CP, Naiman BM, Wachtmann TS, et al. (2003) Impaired inflammatory and pain responses in mice lacking an inducible prostaglandin E synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9044–9049.
  29. 29. Paliege A, Mizel D, Medina C, Pasumarthy A, Huang YG, et al. (2004) Inhibition of nNOS expression in the macula densa by COX-2-derived prostaglandin E(2). Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 287: F152–159.
  30. 30. Kudo I, Murakami M (2005) Prostaglandin E synthase, a terminal enzyme for prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis. J Biochem Mol Biol 38: 633–638.
  31. 31. Wang J, Limburg D, Carter J, Mbalaviele G, Gierse J, et al. (2010) Selective inducible microsomal prostaglandin E(2) synthase-1 (mPGES-1) inhibitors derived from an oxicam template. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20: 1604–1609.
  32. 32. Chiasson JF, Boulet L, Brideau C, Chau A, Claveau D, et al. (2011) Trisubstituted ureas as potent and selective mPGES-1 inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 21: 1488–1492.
  33. 33. Xu D, Rowland SE, Clark P, Giroux A, Cote B, et al. (2008) MF63 [2-(6-chloro-1H-phenanthro [9,10-d] imidazol-2-yl)-isophthalonitrile], a selective microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 inhibitor, relieves pyresis and pain in preclinical models of inflammation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 326: 754–763.
  34. 34. Nasrallah R, Robertson SJ, Hebert RL (2009) Chronic COX inhibition reduces diabetes-induced hyperfiltration, proteinuria, and renal pathological markers in 36-week B6-Ins2(Akita) mice. Am J Nephrol 30: 346–353.
  35. 35. Hommel E, Mathiesen E, Arnold-Larsen S, Edsberg B, Olsen UB, et al. (1987) Effects of indomethacin on kidney function in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with nephropathy. Diabetologia 30: 78–81.
  36. 36. Schneider A, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Lu WJ, Rao R, et al. (2004) Membrane-associated PGE synthase-1 (mPGES-1) is coexpressed with both COX-1 and COX-2 in the kidney. Kidney Int 65: 1205–1213.
  37. 37. Parazzoli S, Harmon JS, Vallerie SN, Zhang T, Zhou H, et al. (2012) Cyclooxygenase-2, not microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1, is the mechanism for interleukin-1beta-induced prostaglandin E2 production and inhibition of insulin secretion in pancreatic islets. J Biol Chem 287: 32246–32253.
  38. 38. Murakami M, Nakashima K, Kamei D, Masuda S, Ishikawa Y, et al. (2003) Cellular prostaglandin E2 production by membrane-bound prostaglandin E synthase-2 via both cyclooxygenases-1 and -2. J Biol Chem 278: 37937–37947.
  39. 39. Tanioka T, Nakatani Y, Semmyo N, Murakami M, Kudo I (2000) Molecular identification of cytosolic prostaglandin E2 synthase that is functionally coupled with cyclooxygenase-1 in immediate prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis. J Biol Chem 275: 32775–32782.
  40. 40. Moore AH, Olschowka JA, O’Banion MK (2004) Intraparenchymal administration of interleukin-1beta induces cyclooxygenase-2-mediated expression of membrane- and cytosolic-associated prostaglandin E synthases in mouse brain. J Neuroimmunol 148: 32–40.
  41. 41. Ensor CM, Tai HH (1995) 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase. J Lipid Mediat Cell Signal 12: 313–319.