Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Association Analysis of Bitter Receptor Genes in Five Isolated Populations Identifies a Significant Correlation between TAS2R43 Variants and Coffee Liking

  • Nicola Pirastu ,

    Affiliations: Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico “Burlo Garofolo,” Trieste, Italy, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy

  • Maarten Kooyman,

    Affiliation: Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  • Michela Traglia,

    Affiliation: Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy

  • Antonietta Robino,

    Affiliations: Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico “Burlo Garofolo,” Trieste, Italy, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy

  • Sara M. Willems,

    Affiliation: Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  • Giorgio Pistis,

    Affiliation: Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy

  • Pio d’Adamo,

    Affiliations: Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico “Burlo Garofolo,” Trieste, Italy, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy

  • Najaf Amin,

    Affiliation: Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  • Angela d’Eustacchio,

    Affiliation: Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico “Burlo Garofolo,” Trieste, Italy

  • Luciano Navarini,

    Affiliation: illycaffè s.p.a, Trieste, Italy

  • Cinzia Sala,

    Affiliation: Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy

  • Lennart C. Karssen,

    Affiliation: Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

  • Cornelia van Duijn,

    Affiliations: Genetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Centre for Medical Systems Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands

  • Daniela Toniolo,

    Affiliation: Division of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy

  • Paolo Gasparini

    Affiliations: Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Istituto Di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico “Burlo Garofolo,” Trieste, Italy, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy

Association Analysis of Bitter Receptor Genes in Five Isolated Populations Identifies a Significant Correlation between TAS2R43 Variants and Coffee Liking

  • Nicola Pirastu, 
  • Maarten Kooyman, 
  • Michela Traglia, 
  • Antonietta Robino, 
  • Sara M. Willems, 
  • Giorgio Pistis, 
  • Pio d’Adamo, 
  • Najaf Amin, 
  • Angela d’Eustacchio, 
  • Luciano Navarini


Coffee, one of the most popular beverages in the world, contains many different physiologically active compounds with a potential impact on people’s health. Despite the recent attention given to the genetic basis of its consumption, very little has been done in understanding genes influencing coffee preference among different individuals. Given its markedly bitter taste, we decided to verify if bitter receptor genes (TAS2Rs) variants affect coffee liking. In this light, 4066 people from different parts of Europe and Central Asia filled in a field questionnaire on coffee liking. They have been consequently recruited and included in the study. Eighty-eight SNPs covering the 25 TAS2R genes were selected from the available imputed ones and used to run association analysis for coffee liking. A significant association was detected with three SNP: one synonymous and two functional variants (W35S and H212R) on the TAS2R43 gene. Both variants have been shown to greatly reduce in vitro protein activity. Surprisingly the wild type allele, which corresponds to the functional form of the protein, is associated to higher liking of coffee. Since the hTAS2R43 receptor is sensible to caffeine, we verified if the detected variants produced differences in caffeine bitter perception on a subsample of people coming from the FVG cohort. We found a significant association between differences in caffeine perception and the H212R variant but not with the W35S, which suggests that the effect of the TAS2R43 gene on coffee liking is mediated by caffeine and in particular by the H212R variant.

No other significant association was found with other TAS2R genes. In conclusion, the present study opens new perspectives in the understanding of coffee liking. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of the TAS2R43 gene in coffee hedonics and to identify which other genes and pathways are involved in its genetics.


Coffee is one of the most widely drunk beverages in the world. It is second only to water and tea[1]. Given its widespread use and its content of different physiologically active compounds such as caffeine, polyphenols (eg chlorogenic acids), niacin, N-methylpyridinium ion and others [2], coffee has been studied in particular to verify its effects on health and to find possible relations with common diseases. In this light, it has been shown that coffee consumption has protective effects on various common pathologies such as cardiovascular diseases [3], hypertension [4], [5], Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [6], [7], type 2 diabetes [8][10], some types of cancer [11], [12] and hearing functions [13], while it may predispose to sleep disturbances [14], [15]. Studies on the genetic bases of coffee consumption are quite old, and the first description of its heritability in Italy dates back to the 1960’s [16]. Recently, different independent genome-wide association studies carried out in Northern European populations have linked coffee and caffeine consumption to variations of different genes: CYP1A1-CYP1A2 [17], [18], AHR [17] NRCAM and ULK3 [18] while moderate association has been seen with the adenosine receptor A2, which is actually one of the effector proteins of caffeine [17].

Despite the recent observation that food hedonics might be a better predictor of long term food consumption rather than food frequency questionnaires[19], [20], very little has been done to understand which genetic factors influence coffee liking.

Coffee has a distinctive bitter taste and the perceived bitterness has been linked to a particular haplotype which includes polymorphism on TAS2R3, TAS2R4 and TAS2R5 [21], however this association did not have an impact on its liking. Further studies have tried to link coffee liking to phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) perception and TAS2R38 genotypes. Although coffee bitterness shows positive correlation with PTC and PROP perception, no association was found with the TAS2R38 gene [21][23]. Moreover, a recent genome wide association study has linked differences in caffeine detection thresholds to the TAS2R gene cluster on chromosome 12, although it failed to identify a functional variant explaining this difference[24]. Two large twins studies [25], [26] have shown that coffee liking had a strong genetic component (42% vs 62%), while most of the remaining variance was explained by unique environmental factors (respectively 58% and 38%). In contrast, the genetic component of coffee consumption is lower (respectively 42% and 39%) and also shared environmental components explain part of the variance. From a genetic point of view these results suggest that studying the hedonic aspect of coffee may produce better results compared to studying its consumption. Therefore, we decided to focus on the relationship between bitter taste perception genes and coffee liking: in particular to verify if any bitter taste receptor variant is associated with differences in coffee preference.

Materials and Methods

Study populations

Samples have been collected in various populations from Europe and Central Asia. More specifically our study includes: 402 individuals come from INGI-CARL a population coming from Carlantino, a small village located in Puglia (Southern Italy); 749 are defined as INGI-FVG, making reference to 6 villages situated in the Friuli Venezia Region in North-Eastern Italy and finally 1160 come from INGI-VB, i.e. a population coming from the Val Borbera Valley in North-Western Italy. The Erasmus Rucphen Family (ERF) study is a cross-sectional cohort including 3,000 living descendants of 22 couples who had at least 6 children baptized in the community church around 1850-1900; 1310 samples were used from this study. Finally, Silk Road (SR) is a cohort of ∼1000 individuals resulting from the sampling of 20 communities coming from 5 nations (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Kazakhstan) located along the Silk Road.

Coffee liking ascertainment

Coffee liking was ascertained by asking each participant to rate coffee-liking on a 9-point scale in which 1 equals to “dislike extremely” whereas 9 equals to “like extremely”[27]. In order to assess individual liking in the SR population a 5-point scale coupled with smiley faces was used. This scale is commonly used in case of linguistic barriers or when working with illiterate people as was the case of the SR population [28]. Given the differences in the two scales, data have been standardized by dividing each score for the number of categories of the used scale, therefore 9 for the European populations and 5 for the SR study. Table S1 reports the demographic summary and the trait description for each population.

Genotyping and imputation

Genotyping was carried out as previously described [29][31]. Briefly, INGI-CARL, INGI-FVG and INGI-VB have been genotyped with Illumina 370k high density SNP array, while SR has been genotyped with Illumina 700k high density SNP arrays. Genotype imputation on the INGI cohorts and SR was conducted after standard QC using SHAPEIT2 [32] for the phasing step and IMPUTE2 [33] for the imputation using the1000 Genomes phase I v3 reference set [34]. ERF has been genotyped with different genotyping platform: Illumina 318k, 350k, 610k and Affymetrix 200k. Genotypes were pooled together after QC, phased and imputed to the 1000Genomes dataset phase I v3 [34] using MaCH and minimac [35]. After imputation we excluded from the statistical analyses SNPs with MAF < 0.01 or Info < 0.4 for all populations but ERF for which R2<0.3 was used instead.

Association analysis between coffee liking and selected SNPs

Association analysis was conducted using mixed model linear regression in which the standardized coffee liking was used as the dependent variable and the allele dosages as the independent variable. Sex and age were used as covariates. The kinship matrix based on all available genotyped SNPs was used as the random effect. For ERF the kinship matrix was estimated on 14.4k SNPs, common to all different genotyping platforms used. Association analysis was conducted using the GRAMMAR-Gamma method [36] as implemented in the GenABEL 1.7-2 [37]. R package was used to eliminate the effect of relatedness from the trait. MixABEL [37] was used for the actual association of the imputed SNPs. Only SNPs located inside the TAS2R genes which also passed post-imputation quality control were used for the association analysis. SNPs which did not pass quality control for more than one population were discarded as well. After these filtering steps, 89 SNPs were left for the statistical analyses. The number of SNPs used for each gene is reported in Table 1.

Association analysis was conducted separately for each population and results have been pooled together using the inverse-variance weighting method. In order to verify if the standardization of the traits was actually able to report them on the same scale, we performed metanalysis using the Stouffer z-score method which is based just on p-values and sample numerosity. We expected that if differences between the scale of the measure exist between the different populations, the two methods should give different results. No difference was detected in p-values between the two methods therefore we decided to report only the first, which has the advantage of giving also the effect- size estimates.

Since the size of the TAS2R genes is quite small, many SNPs are in strong Linkage Disequilibrium (LD). For this reason we decided to estimate the real number of tests performed in order to establish the significance threshold for our results. We calculated non-trivial eigenSNPs (nte) for each gene using the GRASS method [38] and used the sum of all the ntes as the number of total independent tests. This type of analysis revealed that we were performing only 40 independent tests and when applying Bonferroni correction significance, threshold was thus set at 1.25×10−3.

Association between significant SNPs and caffeine bitterness perception

Individual caffeine bitterness perception was assessed in 151 subjects coming from the FVG cohort. Each participant was asked to rate the bitterness of a solution of 1 g/l caffeine, and of a commercially available canned coffee (Illy issimo Caffè No Sugar by Ilko Coffee International), using the LMS (labeled magnitude scale) [39]. The LMS is a quasi-logarithmic 100-mm scale anchored to the labels ‘barely taste it’, ‘weak’, ’moderate’, ‘strong’, ‘very strong’ or ‘strongest imaginable’. Participants were instructed first to the verbal descriptors of the scale and also to make a mark anywhere on the scale, not only near the descriptors.

In order to avoid biases in the coffee tasting, the coffee solution was presented unbranded. To assess general taste sensitivity, we asked subjects to rate also a solution 0.1 M of NaCl on the same LMS scale.

Association analysis was conducted using a mixed model regression as implemented in the polygenic function of GenABEL. Since taste sensitivity was measured for all solutions on a logaritmic scale, as far as regression is concerned, they were all transformed using the log10 of the measure. The final regression model included sex, age, NaCl perception and coffee bitterness perception. This last variable was included in order to distinguish specific caffeine bitterness perception from general coffee bitter perception.

Given the limited number of samples available, we tested association only between the SNPs which resulted significantly associated to coffee liking.

Ethical statement

All studies adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. The ERF study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam. Informed consent was obtained after explanation of the nature and possible consequences of the study.

All subjects in the INGI-CARL, INGI-FVG and SR studies provided written informed consent before participation. Approval for the research protocol was obtained from the ethical committee of IRCCS-Burlo Garofolo Hospital.

The VB study, including the overall plan and the informed consent form was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards of San Raffaele Hospital in

Milan and by the ethical committee of the Regional Authorities of Piemonte.


Association results for all SNPs used in the analyses are shown in Table S2. After multiple testing correction, we found two SNPs significantly associated to coffee liking, rs71443637 (p = 4.9×10−4) and rs35720106 (p = 6.9×10−4) on the TAS2R43 gene.

rs68157013 also on the TAS2R43 gene was found to be close to significantly associated to coffee liking with a p of 1.7×10−3. No other significant association was found on any of the other tested genes. Given that these 3 SNPs had been excluded only on the ERF population because of the low Rsq, we decided to retrieve them and add them to the analyses.

All SNPs showed and improvement in the association with a combined p of 9.2×10−4 for rs68157013, 2.7×10−4 for rs71443637 and 4.3×10−4 for rs35720106. The first two SNPs are non-synonymous variants leading to amino acid changes, W35S and H212R respectively. In particular the wild type alleles (C for rs68157013 and T for rs71443637) are associated to higher liking of coffee. Results for rs68157013 and rs71443637 are shown in Table 2. The SNP rs35720106 is a synonymous one, and its association is most likely due to the strong LD with rs71443637 (r2≈0.75 ). A regional plot of the results on TAS2R43 gene is shown in Figure 1 [40].

Figure 1. Regional plot of the association results in the TAS2R43 gene.

Triangles represent non-synonymous SNPs whereas squares represent synonymous SNPs.. The colors represent the LD between the SNPs and rs71443637 with respect to the 1000 Genomes CEU population. The violet point is the index SNP which the LD refers to. The plot was created with the LocusZoom software [40].

Table 2. Association results between coffee liking and the two non-synonymous SNPs.

Given that rs71443637 shows a stronger association as compared to the other ones, Figure 2 shows the forest plot for the different populations for this marker. Strikingly, the SNP has a very similar effect across the different populations except for INGI-FVG in which rs71443637 seems to have no effect. Overall rs71443637 explains 0.32% of the total variance.

Figure 2. Forest plot of the normalized effect for the various populations for rs71443637.

Points represent the effect estimates and bars indicate is the 95% confidence interval. The diamond represents the pooled effect. For each population p-values are also shown. INGI-FVG clearly shows no effect of the SNP on coffee liking.

Testing the three identified SNPs with perceived caffeine bitterness in the FVG sub-sample showed significant association with rs71443637 (p = 2.7×10−3) and rs68157013 (p = 0.01) while we detected no association with rs35720106 (p = 0.17). Similarly to what was found on coffee liking, T allele of rs71443637 was associated with a higher perception of caffeine bitterness, thus explaining an overall 5.7% of caffeine bitter perception.


In this work we describe a novel association of a functional variant of TAS2R43 with coffee liking and differences in caffeine bitter perception. The results on caffeine are consistent with a recent genome wide association study that has identified the bitter receptor gene cluster on chromosome 12 as being strongly associated to caffeine thresholds, explaining up to 8,9% of the variation in caffeine perceived bitterness [24]. The TAS2R43 receptor could contribute to the bitter aftertaste of sulfonyl amide sweeteners bitter aftertaste [41] and, more importantly, together with TAS2R7, TAS2R10, TAS2R14 and TAS2R46, it is activated by caffeine in in vitro studies [42]. The associated variants we found, produce two amino acid changes (W35S and H212R), which cause largely diminished protein functionality [43]. In particular, Pronin et al. compare three different proteins: hTAS2R43-WH which carries tryptophan and histidine at positions 35 and 212 respectively, hTAS2R43-SH which carries serine at position 35 and arginine at position 212 and finally hTAS2R43-SR with arginine in position 212. While hTAS2R43-WH shows good activity when stimulated with aloin, both hTAS2R43-SH and hTAS2R43-SR responded very weakly, thus suggesting that the amino acid substitution W35R is the factor leading to the observed difference. In our study we found that H212R variant shows a stronger association than W35R on coffee liking while we detected no association between the W35R variant and caffeine perceived bitterness. Many possible explanations may account for this difference. While W35R is important for aloin recognition H212R could be responsible for the activation by caffeine, however further functional studies are needed to unravel this issue.

Nevertheless, our results clearly demonstrate that people carrying the non-functional allele show lower liking for coffee and lower caffeine perception. Although the percentage of variance explained by the identified variant appears to be small (0.32% of coffee liking and 5.6% of caffeine perceived bitterness), this result is in line with previous outcomes. For example, although TAS2R38 explains up to 49% of PTC bitter perception [44], its effect on cruciferous vegetables consumption is extremely small (∼0.8%) [45]. The fact that people capable of perceiving caffeine bitterness through hTAS2R43 actually show increased preference for coffee may seem in contrast with the bitter-equal-aversion paradigm, however we must consider it in the light of flavor-nutrient learning. Although this effect in humans is still controversial [46], our results seem to suggest that this relationship actually exists. In this particular case it is possible that people associate coffee’s positive effects to the particular bitterness given by caffeine, thus explaining the apparent paradox between higher perception of bitterness and higher liking. Our results are consistent with the previously observed increase in liking of beverages due to caffeine [47], [48]. This is usually obtained with near- or below- threshold concentrations and it is thought to be due to some other interaction, for example with the adenosine receptor [49]. The present findings, however, may lead to a different interpretation, suggesting that this effect might be mediated by TAS2R43. Among compounds which are known to activate TAS2R43 [42] only caffeine is present in coffee, therefore, although we cannot exclude that other untested bitter compounds with physiological positive effects could be responsible for the observed association, our results suggests that, at least for TAS2R43, caffeine could actually be responsible for differences in liking.

The lack of associations between the other bitter receptors and coffee liking is consistent with previously described research [21]. Our findings not only describe the first association between a bitter receptor and coffee liking, but show also that this relationship is probably mediated by caffeine in the context of flavor-nutrient learning. Moreover, the study implies that we are able to distinguish one bitter compounds from another and that when we commonly refer to bitter taste, we are referring to a range of sensations mediated by a wide variety of molecules and receptors.

Roudnitzky et al. [50] have described a long range haplotype spanning most of the TAS2R gene cluster. Given the use of imputed SNPs we were unable to assess the presence of long-range haplotypes in our samples. However such a shared-across-populations’ haplotype is unlikely to exist since no further association signal was observed in the same locus. This also suggests that using such different populations was extremely important for fine mapping of the identified locus.

Finally the H212R variant explains little of the total variance of coffee liking (r2≈ 0.4%), further confirming that genome-wide studies (GWAS) on larger numbers of samples are needed to clarify which genes/receptors/pathways are determining people’s preferences for coffee.

In conclusion, the present study is a good starting point to understand which genes may be involved in coffee liking, thus opening new perspectives for food industries and nutritionists.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Cohort descriptives.



Table S2.

Complete association results.




We would like to thank all the participants in the study for their contribution and support. We would also like to thank Raffaella Agosti for her support in correcting the manuscript.

We wish to thank the inhabitants and the administrators of Val Borbera for their participation in the study. Special thanks also to Prof. Clara Camaschella, Dr Silvia Bione, Dr Laura Crocco, Ms Maria Rosa Biglieri, Dr Diego Sabbi for their help with data collection.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: NP LN PG. Performed the experiments: NP SMW MT GP LCK AR PDA AD. Analyzed the data: NP MK CS. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CVD DT PG NA. Wrote the paper: NP MK LCK PG.


  1. 1. Grigg D (2002) The worlds of tea and coffee: Patterns of consumption. GeoJournal 57: : 283–294. Available: Accessed 25 November 2013.
  2. 2. Farah A (2012) Coffee Constituents. In: Chu Y-F, editor. Coffee: Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 1–20. Available:
  3. 3. Kleemola P, Jousilahti P, Pietinen P, Vartiainen E, Tuomilehto J (2000) Coffee consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease and death. Arch Intern Med 160: : 3393–3400. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  4. 4. Robertson D, Hollister AS, Kincaid D, Workman R, Goldberg MR, et al.. (1984) Caffeine and hypertension. Am J Med 77: : 54–60. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  5. 5. Umemura T, Ueda K, Nishioka K, Hidaka T, Takemoto H, et al.. (2006) Effects of acute administration of caffeine on vascular function. Am J Cardiol 98: : 1538–1541. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  6. 6. Lindsay J, Carmichael P-H, Kroeger E, Laurin D (2012) Coffee and Alzheimer’s Disease – Epidemiologic Evidence. In: Chu Y-F, editor. Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 97–100. doi:10.1002/9781119949893.ch5.
  7. 7. Lim J-W, Tan E-K (2012) Coffee and Parkinson’s Disease. In: Chu Y-F, editor. Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 111–122. doi:10.1002/9781119949893.ch6.
  8. 8. Van Dam RM, Feskens EJM (2002) Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Lancet 360: : 1477–1478. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  9. 9. Tuomilehto J, Hu G, Bidel S, Lindström J, Jousilahti P (2004) Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus among middle-aged Finnish men and women. JAMA 291: : 1213–1219. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  10. 10. Carlsson S, Hammar N, Grill V, Kaprio J (2004) Coffee consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in Finnish twins. Int J Epidemiol 33: : 616–617. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  11. 11. Dórea JG, da Costa THM (2005) Is coffee a functional food? Br J Nutr 93: : 773–782. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  12. 12. Nkondjock A (2012) Coffee and Cancers. In: Chu Y-F, editor. Coffee: Emerging Health Effects and Disease Prevention. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 197–209.
  13. 13. Dragana V, Ginevra B, Francesco P, Mario P, Paolo GG (2013) Lifestyle and normal hearing function in Italy and Central Asia: a significant role of coffee. Hear Balanc Commun in press.
  14. 14. Goldstein A, Warren R, Kaizer S (1965) Psychotropic effects of caffeine in man. I. individual differences in sensitivity to caffeine-induced wakefulness. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 149: : 156–159. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  15. 15. Heath AC, Eaves LJ, Kirk KM, Martin NG (1998) Effects of lifestyle, personality, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and genetic predisposition on subjective sleep disturbance and sleep pattern. Twin Res 1: : 176–188. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  16. 16. Conterio F, Chiarelli B (1962) Study of the inheritance of some daily life habits. Heredity (Edinb) 17: : 347–359. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  17. 17. Cornelis MC, Monda KL, Yu K, Paynter N, Azzato EM, et al.. (2011) Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies regions on 7p21 (AHR) and 15q24 (CYP1A2) as determinants of habitual caffeine consumption. PLoS Genet 7: : e1002033. Available: Accessed 28 July 2011.
  18. 18. Amin N, Byrne E, Johnson J, Chenevix-Trench G, Walter S, et al.. (2012) Genome-wide association analysis of coffee drinking suggests association with CYP1A1/CYP1A2 and NRCAM. Mol Psychiatry 17: : 1116–1129. Available: Accessed 18 June 2013.
  19. 19. Duffy VB, Lanier SA, Hutchins HL, Pescatello LS, Johnson MK, et al.. (2007) Food preference questionnaire as a screening tool for assessing dietary risk of cardiovascular disease within health risk appraisals. J Am Diet Assoc 107: : 237–245. Available: Accessed 12 July 2011.
  20. 20. Duffy VB, Hayes JE, Sullivan BS, Faghri P (2009) Surveying food and beverage liking: a tool for epidemiological studies to connect chemosensation with health outcomes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1170: 558–568. Available: Accessed 17 January 2014.
  21. 21. Hayes JE, Wallace MR, Knopik VS, Herbstman DM, Bartoshuk LM, et al.. (2011) Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors toward common bitter beverages in adults. Chem Senses 36: : 311–319. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  22. 22. Drewnowski A, Henderson SA, Shore AB, Barratt-Fornell A (1998) Sensory responses to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) or sucrose solutions and food preferences in young women. Ann N Y Acad Sci 855: : 797–801. Available: Accessed 8 July 2013.
  23. 23. Lanier SA, Hayes JE, Duffy VB (2005) Sweet and bitter tastes of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiol Behav 83: : 821–831. Available: Accessed 13 November 2013.
  24. 24. Ledda M, Kutalik Z, Souza Destito MC, Souza MM, Cirillo CA, et al.. (2013) GWAS of human bitter taste perception identifies new loci and reveals additional complexity of bitter taste genetics. Hum Mol Genet: ddt404–. Available: Accessed 17 November 2013.
  25. 25. Vink JM, Staphorsius AS, Boomsma DI (2009) A genetic analysis of coffee consumption in a sample of Dutch twins. Twin Res Hum Genet 12: : 127–131. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  26. 26. Luciano M, Kirk KM, Heath AC, Martin NG (2005) The genetics of tea and coffee drinking and preference for source of caffeine in a large community sample of Australian twins. Addiction 100: : 1510–1517. Available: Accessed 21 June 2013.
  27. 27. Jones LV, Peryam DR, Thurstone LL (1955) Development of a scale for measuring soldiers’ food preferences b. J Food Sci 20: : 512–520. Available: Accessed 25 November 2013.
  28. 28. Coetzee H, Taylor JRN (1996) The use and adaptation of the paired-comparison method in the sensory evaluation of hamburger-type patties by illiterate/semi-literate consumers. Food Qual Prefer 7: : 81–85. Available: Accessed 25 November 2013.
  29. 29. Girotto G, Pirastu N, Sorice R, Biino G, Campbell H, et al.. (2011) Hearing function and thresholds: a genome-wide association study in European isolated populations identifies new loci and pathways. J Med Genet 48: : 369–374. Available: Accessed 18 July 2011.
  30. 30. Aulchenko YS, Heutink P, Mackay I, Bertoli-Avella AM, Pullen J, et al.. (2004) Linkage disequilibrium in young genetically isolated Dutch population. Eur J Hum Genet 12: : 527–534. Available: Accessed 5 July 2013.
  31. 31. Pardo LM, MacKay I, Oostra B, van Duijn CM, Aulchenko YS (2005) The effect of genetic drift in a young genetically isolated population. Ann Hum Genet 69: : 288–295. Available: Accessed 5 July 2013.
  32. 32. Delaneau O, Zagury J-F, Marchini J (2013) Improved whole-chromosome phasing for disease and population genetic studies. Nat Methods 10: : 5–6. Available: Accessed 28 May 2013.
  33. 33. Howie BN, Donnelly P, Marchini J (2009) A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet 5: : e1000529. Available: Accessed 18 July 2012.
  34. 34. Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, et al.. (2012) An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491: : 56–65. Available: Accessed 21 May 2013.
  35. 35. Howie B, Fuchsberger C, Stephens M, Marchini J, Abecasis GR (2012) Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat Genet 44: : 955–959. Available: Accessed 13 June 2013.
  36. 36. Belonogova NM, Svishcheva GR, van Duijn CM, Aulchenko YS, Axenovich TI (2013) Region-based association analysis of human quantitative traits in related individuals. PLoS One 8: : e65395. Available: Accessed 8 July 2013.
  37. 37. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, van Duijn CM (2007) GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23: : 1294–1296. Available: Accessed 13 July 2012.
  38. 38. Chen LS, Hutter CM, Potter JD, Liu Y, Prentice RL, et al.. (2010) Insights into colon cancer etiology via a regularized approach to gene set analysis of GWAS data. Am J Hum Genet 86: : 860–871. Available: Accessed 18 June 2013.
  39. 39. Green BG, Dalton P, Cowart B, Shaffer G, Rankin K, et al.. (1996) Evaluating the “Labeled Magnitude Scale” for measuring sensations of taste and smell. Chem Senses 21: : 323–334. Available: Accessed 20 November 2012.
  40. 40. Pruim RJ, Welch RP, Sanna S, Teslovich TM, Chines PS, et al.. (2010) LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics 26: : 2336–2337. Available: Accessed 21 May 2013.
  41. 41. Kuhn C, Bufe B, Winnig M, Hofmann T, Frank O, et al.. (2004) Bitter taste receptors for saccharin and acesulfame K. J Neurosci 24: : 10260–10265. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  42. 42. Meyerhof W, Batram C, Kuhn C, Brockhoff A, Chudoba E, et al.. (2010) The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem Senses 35: : 157–170. Available: Accessed 21 May 2013.
  43. 43. Pronin AN, Xu H, Tang H, Zhang L, Li Q, et al.. (2007) Specific alleles of bitter receptor genes influence human sensitivity to the bitterness of aloin and saccharin. Curr Biol 17: : 1403–1408. Available: Accessed 19 June 2013.
  44. 44. Genick UK, Kutalik Z, Ledda M, Destito MCS, Souza MM, et al.. (2011) Sensitivity of genome-wide-association signals to phenotyping strategy: the PROP-TAS2R38 taste association as a benchmark. PLoS One 6: : e27745. Available: Accessed 2 December 2013.
  45. 45. Sacerdote C, Guarrera S, Smith GD, Grioni S, Krogh V, et al.. (2007) Lactase persistence and bitter taste response: instrumental variables and mendelian randomization in epidemiologic studies of dietary factors and cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 166: : 576–581. Available: Accessed 2 December 2013.
  46. 46. Yeomans MR (2012) Flavour-nutrient learning in humans: an elusive phenomenon? Physiol Behav 106: : 345–355. Available: Accessed 27 November 2013.
  47. 47. Griffiths RR, Vernotica EM (2000) Is caffeine a flavoring agent in cola soft drinks? Arch Fam Med 9: : 727–734. Available: Accessed 2 December 2013.
  48. 48. Yeomans MR, Mobini S, Chambers L (2007) Additive effects of flavour–caffeine and flavour–flavour pairings on liking for the smell and flavour of a novel drink. Physiol Behav 92: : 831–839. Available: Accessed 2 December 2013.
  49. 49. Schiffman SS, Gill JM, Diaz C (1985) Methyl xanthines enhance taste: evidence for modulation of taste by adenosine receptor. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 22: : 195–203. Available: Accessed 24 June 2013.
  50. 50. Roudnitzky N, Bufe B, Thalmann S, Kuhn C, Gunn HC, et al.. (2011) Genomic, genetic and functional dissection of bitter taste responses to artificial sweeteners. Hum Mol Genet 20: : 3437–3449. Available: Accessed 28 January 2014.