Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Mice Carrying a Hypomorphic Evi1 Allele Are Embryonic Viable but Exhibit Severe Congenital Heart Defects

  • Emilie A. Bard-Chapeau,

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore

  • Dorota Szumska,

    Affiliation Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Bindya Jacob,

    Affiliation Cancer Science Institute, Singapore, Singapore

  • Belinda Q. L. Chua,

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore

  • Gouri C. Chatterjee,

    Affiliation MYSM School of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America

  • Yi Zhang,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America

  • Jerrold M. Ward,

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore

  • Fatma Urun,

    Affiliation RIKEN Brain Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

  • Emi Kinameri,

    Affiliation RIKEN Brain Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

  • Stéphane D. Vincent,

    Affiliation Department of Development and Stem Cells, Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, CNRS UMR 7104, Inserm U964, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France

  • Sayadi Ahmed,

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore

  • Shoumo Bhattacharya,

    Affiliation Welcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford, United Kingdom

  • Motomi Osato,

    Affiliation Cancer Science Institute, Singapore, Singapore

  • Archibald S. Perkins,

    Affiliation Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, United States of America

  • Adrian W. Moore,

    Affiliation RIKEN Brain Science Institute, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako-shi, Saitama, Japan

  • Nancy A. Jenkins,

    Current address: Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore

  •  [ ... ],
  • Neal G. Copeland

    ncopeland@tmhs.org

    Current address: Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States of America

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore

  • [ view all ]
  • [ view less ]

Mice Carrying a Hypomorphic Evi1 Allele Are Embryonic Viable but Exhibit Severe Congenital Heart Defects

  • Emilie A. Bard-Chapeau, 
  • Dorota Szumska, 
  • Bindya Jacob, 
  • Belinda Q. L. Chua, 
  • Gouri C. Chatterjee, 
  • Yi Zhang, 
  • Jerrold M. Ward, 
  • Fatma Urun, 
  • Emi Kinameri, 
  • Stéphane D. Vincent
PLOS
x

Abstract

The ecotropic viral integration site 1 (Evi1) oncogenic transcription factor is one of a number of alternative transcripts encoded by the Mds1 and Evi1 complex locus (Mecom). Overexpression of Evi1 has been observed in a number of myeloid disorders and is associated with poor patient survival. It is also amplified and/or overexpressed in many epithelial cancers including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, ependymomas, and lung and colorectal cancers. Two murine knockout models have also demonstrated Evi1's critical role in the maintenance of hematopoietic stem cell renewal with its absence resulting in the death of mutant embryos due to hematopoietic failure. Here we characterize a novel mouse model (designated Evi1fl3) in which Evi1 exon 3, which carries the ATG start, is flanked by loxP sites. Unexpectedly, we found that germline deletion of exon3 produces a hypomorphic allele due to the use of an alternative ATG start site located in exon 4, resulting in a minor Evi1 N-terminal truncation and a block in expression of the Mds1-Evi1 fusion transcript. Evi1δex3/δex3 mutant embryos showed only a mild non-lethal hematopoietic phenotype and bone marrow failure was only observed in adult Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 mice in which exon 3 was specifically deleted in the hematopoietic system. Evi1δex3/δex3 knockout pups are born in normal numbers but die during the perinatal period from congenital heart defects. Database searches identified 143 genes with similar mutant heart phenotypes as those observed in Evi1δex3/δex3 mutant pups. Interestingly, 42 of these congenital heart defect genes contain known Evi1-binding sites, and expression of 18 of these genes are also effected by Evi1 siRNA knockdown. These results show a potential functional involvement of Evi1 target genes in heart development and indicate that Evi1 is part of a transcriptional program that regulates cardiac development in addition to the development of blood.

Introduction

The complexity of an organism is defined not only by the number of its genes, but also how expression of these genes is controlled. This also includes several post-transcriptional events that control protein production, including alternative splicing, translational repression, microRNA-induced mRNA degradation, and the regulated generation of distinct gene products through the alternative use of translational initiation sites. These various mechanisms provide a tremendous diversity of protein sequence, structure and function [1], [2]. Much improvement has been made in defining the molecular basis of these regulations. However, it remains a major challenge to integrate this knowledge into a complete understanding of the resulting physiological functions, in normal and pathological conditions.

The MDS1 and EVI1 complex locus (MECOM) contains several transcription start sites and alternative splice options. It produces multiple transcripts coding for nuclear transcription factors. One of its major gene products is ecotropic viral integration site 1 (EVI1), an oncogenic zinc finger transcription factor (TF) whose overexpression in myeloid disorders such as acute and chronic myeloid leukemia (AML and CML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) has been extensively studied and correlated with poor patient survival [3][5]. Amplification and/or overexpression of EVI1 have also been observed in multiple epithelial cancers, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, ependymomas, and lung and colorectal cancers [6][11]. In addition, EVI1 controls several aspects of embryonic development including hematopoiesis where it has been shown to be important for hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) renewal [12] and angiogenesis [13]. The most oncogenic human MECOM isoform, EVI1, encodes a 1051 amino acid protein containing two zinc finger domains, a central transcriptional repression domain and an acidic C-terminal region [5], [14], [15]. The seven zinc finger domains located in the N-terminus are known to bind to a GATA-like consensus motif [13], [16][19], while the three zinc finger domains in the C-terminus bind to an ETS-like motif [16], [20]. Additional alternative splicing of MECOM in human and mouse produces, amongst others, two major isoforms, EVI1δ324 and MDS1-EVI1 [5], [14], [15], [21]. MDS1-EVI1 is a larger MECOM variant. Although MDS1 was originally described as a distinct gene, it is now recognized to be an alternative transcription start site and part of the MECOM locus. MDS1-EVI1 contains a 188 amino acid extension at its N-terminus, adding the so-called PR domain, which is a derivative of the SET domain [5], [14], [15], [22]. Several lines of evidence suggest that the form of EVI1 lacking the PR domain and MDS1-EVI1 display opposite functions. The shorter isoform (EVI1) acts as an aggressive oncogene while expression of the longer isoform (MDS1-EVI1) is linked to good prognosis in cancer [23][25]. MDS1-EVI1 was also recently described as a regulator of long term HSC repopulating activity [21]. Another important MECOM isoform, called EVI1δ324, resembles EVI1 but lacks zinc fingers motifs 6 and 7, which prevents its binding to GATA-like sites. Additional alternative splicing lead to the deletion of 9aa in the repressor domain of EVI1, MDS1-EVI1, or EVI1δ324 [14], [26][28], thus producing additional isoforms.

The exact physiological roles of these various MECOM products remain to be characterized. Two mouse knockout models have been previously reported that target MECOM. The first one was produced by deletion of Evi1 exon 7 [13], [29] while the second represents a conditional deletion of exon 4 [12]. For both alleles, homozygous Evi1-/- mice resulted in the deletion of both Evi1 and Mds1-Evi1 transcripts. Both phenotypes showed embryonic lethality and impairment of hematopoiesis due to the loss of HSC renewal ability.

In this study, we analyzed a new conditional mutant allele of Mecom that was produced by flanking Evi1 exon 3, also Mds1-Evi1 exon 4, with loxP sites. The removal of Evi1 exon 3 is predicted to generate a frame shift mutation that would block the translation of Mds1-Evi1 protein. As Evi1 and Evi1δ324 both have translational initiation site located in exon3, it was also predicted that their protein expression would be blocked. However, Evi1 and Evi1δ324 proteins are produced in Evi1δex3/δex3 tissues, likely due to an alternative translation start site located in exon 4. Thus, only the Mds1-Evi1 isoform is fully disrupted in Evi1δex3/δex3 mice. Evi1δex3/δex3 animals do not die in utero and display a different phenotype compared to exon 4 and 7 knockout mice. The analysis of this new hypomorphic exon 3 Evi1 allele has uncovered novel physiological functions for MECOM in the formation of the circulatory system and provided a better understanding of the function of the various MECOM transcripts.

Experimental Procedures

Animals

The Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal protocols used in this study. The Evi1 exon 3 floxed allele, Evi1fl3 [21], was maintained in a pure C57BL/6 background. After crossing to a β-actin-Cre deleter strain to generate the Evi1δex3 null allele, Evi1δex3 bearing mice were a mixture of strains 129/Sv and C57BL/6. They were made congenic on a C57BL/6 background over the course of the study, with no observed change in the experimental results. Mice were genotyped by PCR using primers F1 (5′- GGAGTGTTAAGCTTGAATTCC-3′), F2 (5′-GAAGAGCTCTTGCTGTTCATG-3′), and R7 (5′- CAGCTTAGACCTCAGCTAAC-3′). F2 and R7 were used to discriminate between the Evi1fl3 (375 bp) and wild type (269 bp) alleles. F1 and R7 were used to detect the Evi1δex3 allele (125 bp) (Fig. S1A,B in File S1). Vav-iCre was genotyped using Cre-F (5′-GCCTGCATTACCGGTCGATGCAACGA-3′) and Cre-R (5′-GTGGCAGATGGCGCGGCAACACCATT-3′) primers (700 bp amplicon). Blood was obtained by retro-orbital bleeding for adult mice, and by decapitation for embryos. Blood counts were performed with a Hemavet 950 device.

Quantitative real time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

RNA was isolated from mouse tissues using Trizol and an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen), and 0.5–2 µg were used for cDNA synthesis (SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis; Invitrogen) with oligodT. qPCR was performed with the ABI-Prism 7500 (Applied Biosystems), SYBR green Master Mix, and primers designed with Primer Express Software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems). A primer list is provided in File S1. We used the 2−δδCt method [30] to calculate the fold change of expression. Relative expression was normalized to Tubg1 mRNA levels.

Protein extraction and immunoblotting

Snap frozen tissues were processed for protein extraction as previously described [31]. Immunoblotting was performed using a protocol previously described [16]. Evi1 antibody was produced in rabbits [19] and γ-tubulin antibody was from Sigma.

HSC characterization

Hematopoietic cells were extracted from the fetal liver or bone marrow. Flow cytometric analyses and cell sorting were performed using a LSR II, a fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) Vantage, or a FACSAria as previously described [32]. Antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences: PE-conjugated anti-Gr1 (RB6-8C5), Mac-1 (M1/70), Ter119 (TER-119), CD4 (RM4-5), CD3 (145-2C11), CD8 (53–6.7), B220 (RA3-6B2), IL7Ra (SB/199), PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-c-Kit (2B8), APC-conjugated anti-Sca-1 (E13-161.7) and FITC-conjugated CD34 (RAM34). Colony forming unit-culture (CFU-C) assays, using fetal liver cells or bone marrow cells, were performed as previously described [32]. Briefly, fetal liver or bone marrow cells were cultured in 35-mm dishes in triplicate in Methocult M3231 methylcellulose medium (StemCell Tec., Vancouver, BC, Canada) supplemented with 20 ng/mL recombinant mouse IL-3, 100 ng/mL mouse SCF, 200 ng/mL mouse G-CSF and 10 ng/mL mouse EPO. Colonies were counted on day 10.

Histology

Mice received a complete necropsy after which their tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin overnight and embedded in paraffin. Embryos were fixed and embedded whole before sectioning. Sections of 5 µm were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin or Giemsa.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 3D reconstruction

Embryos were harvested at E15.5, euthanized and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) with 2 mM Gd-DTPA (gadolinium- diethylenetriaminepentacetate) as a contrast agent. Multi-embryo imaging was conducted as previously described [33]. The raw MR data were reconstructed as described previously [34]. The files were analyzed using Amira 5.3.3 software.

In situ hybridization in embryos

Evi1 mRNA in situ hybridization was carried out using a full length Evi1 cDNA probe [35] using standard protocols. Probes were labeled using a DIG RNA Labeling Kit (Roche Applied Science, Tokyo, Japan). Detection was via an anti-DIG antibody coupled to alkaline phosphatase (Roche, Tokyo, Japan) followed by staining with BCIP-NBT (Bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl Phosphate/Nitro Blue Tetrazolium) (Nacalai, Tokyo, Japan) as previously described [36].

Results

Deletion of Evi1 exon 3 results in postnatal lethality

Mice homozygous for an Evi1 exon 3 deletion (designed Evi1δex3/δex3) have recently been generated and used to access the function of Mecom in hematopoiesis ex vivo [18]. Deletion of exon3 is predicted to prematurely abrogate the expression of Mds1-Evi1 due to the presence of an out-of-frame stop codon in exon 4 (Fig. 1A). Exon 3 also encodes the ATG translation start site for Evi1 and Evi1δ324 (Fig. 1A). Evi1δex3 is thus predicted to be a Mecom null allele (Fig. S1A in File S1). We therefore expected that similar to other Evi1 knockout mice [12], [13], [29], deletion of exon 3 would lead to embryonic lethality between E10.5 and E16 due to defects in HSC self-renewal and subsequent hematopoietic failure. Surprisingly, this was not the case. Homozygous Evi1δex3/δex3 knockout mice (Fig. S1B,C in File S1) were born with a normal Mendelian ratio (Fig. 1B). They were indistinguishable from their control littermates, there were no gross morphological defects and they were normal in size (Fig. S1D in File S1). The presence of grossly visible milk-filled stomachs a few hours after birth also attested to their ability to feed, which was confirmed by histology (Fig. S1E in File S1). However, several hours to a few days after birth, Evi1δex3/δex3 mice became weak, lost weight and eventually died, with no Evi1δex3/δex3 animals surviving longer than three days (Fig. 1C,D). These results suggest that Evi1fl3 might encode a hypomorphic allele rather than a null allele.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Deletion of Evi1 exon3 generates a hypomorphic allele.

(A) Sequenced products obtained after 5′RACE from wild type or Evi1δex3/δex3 mutant embryos. (B) Table showing the fraction of embryos of each genotype detected at different stages of embryonic development. The Mendelian ratios were not affected by the Evi1 exon3 deletion. (C) Pictures of 28 hr-old littermates highlight the poor health of dying Evi1δex3/δex3 pups. (D) Kaplan-Meyer curves for wild type, Evi1δex3/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 progeny indicate lethality of all Evi1δex3/δex3 pups by three days after birth (n = 5 to 16 per genotype). Log rank test, Chi square p value <0.0001. (E) RT-qPCR from cDNA of E14.5 embryos. The primers used amplified the regions between Evi1 exons 2 and 3, 3 and 4 or 13 and 14. Mean of three different samples per condition. The standard deviation is shown. (F) Expression of Evi1 and γ-tubulin protein products in E14.5 wild type or E17.5 Evi1δex3/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 mutant embryos (100 µg protein/lane). (G) Nucleotide sequence of Evi1 cDNA in the exon 3 and 4 genomic region. Two ATG sites are present in exon 3 and one in exon 4. All ATGs are conserved in higher vertebrates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.g001

Evi1fl3 encodes a hypomorphic allele

To determine whether Evi1fl3 encodes a hypomorphic allele we used 5′ RACE to confirm that exon3 was deleted from all Mecom transcripts expressed in Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos. We also performed RT-qPCR to quantify the level of the Mecom transcripts expressed in Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos using primers located in exons 2 and 3, 3 and 4 or 13 and 14. No significant amplification was detected in Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos using the two first sets of primers (Fig. 1E), confirming that exon3 was deleted from all Mecom transcripts in Evi1δex3/δex3 animals. Transcripts encoding Evi1 exons 13 and 14 were, however, produced at normal levels, confirming that stable Evi1 transcripts are expressed in Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos. Western blot analyses showed that proteins with a similar size to Evi1, Evi1δ105, and Evi1δ324 were also expressed in Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos (Fig. 1F). Evi1δ105 is a splice variant present in mouse but not in human tissues [37]. Deletion of exon3 thus did not appear to affect Evi1 protein translation as would have been expected by removal of exon 3. We therefore decided to look for alternative ATG translation start sites that might be located downstream of exon 3. We found a potential ATG start site in exon 4, which contains a Kozak sequence [38] and is in frame with the rest of the protein. This start site is well conserved in higher vertebrates and provides a better Kozak sequence than the start site in exon 3 (Fig. 1G, S2). The use of this alternative start site would remove 42 amino acids from the N-terminus of Evi1 including the first zinc finger motif of the proximal Evi1 zinc finger domain (Fig. S2 in File S1). Evi1δ105, an isoform specifically present in mice [37] and Evi1δ324 would be similarly affected since they share the same transcription start site as Evi1. These results support the notion that Evi1fl3 encodes a hypomorphic allele that results from the expression of an N-terminally truncated Evi1 protein initiated in exon 4.

Evi1δex3/δex3 newborn pups have a milder hematopoietic phenotype than that observed in Evi1δex4/δex4 embryos

The embryonic lethality in Evi1 exon 4 knockout mice has been ascribed to defective HSC self-renewal and subsequent hematopoietic failure. [12]. To determine whether Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos have similar defects, we counted the number of two immunophenotypically defined HSC populations, c-Kit+, Sca-1+, lineage- (KSL) and c-Kit+, lineage-, CD34+ (KL-CD34+) cells from E14.5 wild-type, Evi1δex3/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 fetal livers (Fig. 2A). The number of KSL HSCs and KL-CD34+ progenitor cells was significantly reduced in Evi1δex3/δex3 fetal livers as compared to wild type livers, while Evi1δex3/+ fetal livers presented an intermediate phenotype (Fig. 2A). In addition, there was a slight reduction in the number of B220+ B-lymphocytes (Fig. 2B) and colony-forming cells (Fig. 2C) in E14.4 Evi1δex3/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 fetal livers. These results show that deletion of Evi1 exon 3 leads to a reduction in the number of HSC and progenitor cells, but this deletion does not affect the differentiation of progenitors once they are formed. This hematopoietic phenotype is milder than that described for Evi1δex4/δex4 mice [12] as the HSC counts were reduced by only 76% versus 93% for Evi1δex4/δex4 mice. Blood counts from Evi1+/+, Evi1δex3/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 newborn animals (Fig. 2D) also showed that erythropoiesis was normal in Evi1δex3/δex3 newborn animals. Mild leucopenia was however detected, which equally affected all hematopoietic compartments. Hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia was the most prominent phenotype linked to the Evi1 exon 3 deletion. Histological analyses showed that 31% of the Evi1δex3/δex3 pups had grossly visible focal hemorrhages in various tissues at birth (4 out of 13 pups) (Fig. 2E), while no control animals were seen with hemorrhagic lesions (0 out of 8 controls). These hemorrhages were unlikely to be the cause of embryonic lethality, however, because other genetically engineered mouse models with much lower platelet counts have been shown to survive to adulthood [39].

thumbnail
Figure 2. Disruption of hematopoiesis in Evi1δex3/δex3 newborn mice.

(A,B) Flow cytometric profiles of wild type, Evi1δex3/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 littermate fetal livers at E14.5. (A) HSC and progenitor cell subpopulations were detected by a combination of markers (KSL: c-Kit+, S: Sca-1+, L: lineage, or KL-CD34+). We found a significant reduction of cells in the Evi1-deleted samples; p values are from an unpaired t-test between +/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 fetal livers. (B) Bar graph shows the number of granulocytes (Gr1), B-lymphocytes (B220) and erythroid cells (Tert119) in fetal livers of various different genotypes. (C) Colony forming counts from cells of 3 fetal livers of each genotype at E14.5 We observed a significant reduction in colony formation between +/+ and Evi1δex3/δex3 fetal livers, p = 0.0057 (unpaired t-test). No BFU-E or CFU-Mix colonies were identified. (D) Hemogram results for 4 hr- to 24 hr-old wild type (N = 17), Evi1δex3/+, (N = 30) and Evi1δex3/δex3 (N = 16) littermate pups. Mean ± SEM is indicated. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, unpaired t-test. Leukocyte counts in peripheral blood and white blood cell differentials reveal a mild leucopenia in Evi1δex3/δex3 newborn mice. Platelet (PLT) counts and mean platelet volume (MPV) results show a mild hypoproliferative thrombocytopenia in Evi1δex3/δex3 pups. Normal erythrocyte counts, hemoglobin quantification and hematocrit assessment in the peripheral blood of Evi1δex3/δex3 animals. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) and red cell distribution widths (RDW) are shown. (E) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of 5 µm sections of 24 hr- to 48 hr-old Evi1δex3/δex3 pups. Mild hemorrhages were seen in 31% of the mice (4 out of 13 pups).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.g002

Spontaneous lethal bone marrow failure in the hematopoietic compartment of Evi1δex3/δex3 animals

To further characterize the hematopoietic phenotype linked to the Evi1 exon3 deletion, we crossed Evi1fl3/fl3 animals with Vav-iCre transgenic mice [40]. Vav-iCre is expressed in all hematopoietic, but few other cell types, and as expected Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 animals displayed a selective loss of Evi1 exon3 in the hematopoietic compartment (Fig. S3A in File S1). These mice did not die during prenatal development but instead died between 2.8 and 24.8 weeks of age (N = 37), with a median survival of 6.3 weeks (Fig. 3A). Heterozygous deletion of exon 3 did not affect the mortality rate compared to control mice (Fig. 3A). Most mice became weak and lost weight before dying (Fig. S3B in File S1). Hemograms were subsequently performed on Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 weak animals and corresponding littermate controls +/+, Evi1fl3/fl3. The hematopoietic phenotype was dramatic, with severe thrombocytopenia, anemia and leucopenia in this conditional exon 3 deletion (Fig. 3B). Moreover, the number of KSL HSCs and KL progenitor cells in the bone marrow was close to zero (Fig. 3C). In addition, no colonies could be formed from Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 bone marrow cells ex vivo (Fig. 3D). These results demonstrated a profound depletion of HSC and progenitor cells as well as downstream hematopoietic cells. Histological analysis of the bones of sick animals confirmed the spontaneous bone marrow hypoplasia (Fig. 4A), as hematopoietic cells were few or undetectable in the bone marrow cavity. This phenotype was accompanied by compensatory erythropoiesis in the spleen (Fig. 4B). Erythrophagocytosis with rosettes (Fig. S3C in File S1) was also identified in two animals, demonstrating immune perturbations. Bone marrow depletion can lead to hemorrhages due to lack of megakaryocytes and platelets. Indeed, bleeding in vital organs like the brain was observed in Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 mice and was likely to be one major cause of lethality in these animals (Fig. 4C, S3D in File S1). Another major etiology was severe bacterial infections due to loss of immune defense. Gram-positive bacteria were found in the blood of the lungs, kidneys, and hearts of Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 mice, indicating bacteremia (Fig. 4D). Collectively, these results describe a spontaneous lethal bone marrow failure upon deletion of Evi1 exon3 in the hematopoietic system. This hypomorphic phenotype is consistent with the profound HSC depletion seen in Evi1 exon 4 conditional knockout at E10.5–16.5 [12], but it occurs at a much later stage, in Evi1 exon 3 deleted adult mice.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Profound depletion of hematopoietic cells in adult mice carrying an Evi1 exon3 deletion.

(A) Kaplan-Meyer survival curves indicate significant lethality in Vav-iCre; Evi1fl3/fl3 mice, with a median survival of 7.7 weeks (Log rank test, Chi square p value <0.0001). (B) Hemograms for 6 to 9 week-old Vav-iCre; Evi1fl3/fl3 mice. These adult mice displayed leucopenia, severe anemia and thrombocytopenia. Mean ± SEM is indicated. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, unpaired t-test. (C) Flow cytometric profiles of bone marrow cells from Vav-iCre/+;Evi1fl3/fl3 and littermate control mice (Evi1fl3/+ or Evi1fl3/fl3). HSC and progenitor cell subpopulations were detected by a combination of markers (KSL: c-Kit+, S: Sca-1+, L: lineage). We found a significant reduction of cells in Evi1-deleted samples, p = 0.00011 and p = 0.0024, for KSL and KL, respectively (unpaired t-test). (D) Colony forming counts for cells from bone marrow of Vav-iCre;Evi1fl3/fl3 and littermate control mice (Evi1fl3/+ or Evi1fl3/fl3). N = 3 for each group, p = 0.0019 (unpaired t-test). No BFU-E and CFU-Mix colonies were identified.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.g003

thumbnail
Figure 4. Spontaneous lethal bone marrow depletion in mice harboring an Evi1 exon3 deletion in the hematopoietic system.

(A) Histology was performed on sick Vav-iCre; Evi1fl3/fl3 and littermate control mice. Bone marrow depletion was observed in the mutant mice. Adipose tissue replaced the hematopoietic cells in the bone marrow. (B) Increased erythropoiesis in the spleen of Vav-iCre; Evi1fl3/fl3 mice. No visible border was found between the red pulp and white pulp. Erythroid cells are shown by the arrows. Excess erythropoiesis in spleen likely happens to compensate for bone marrow loss. (C) H&E stained sections of the brain of a dying Vav-iCre; Evi1fl3/fl3 mouse. Hemorrhages (red areas) were visible at several locations (also see Fig. S3E in File S1). (D) Histological sections of tissues from dying Vav-iCre; Evi1fl3/fl3 animals showing bacteremia. Red arrows indicate the presence of bacteria in alveolar capillaries. Giemsa stains reveal the presence of cocci or small rods within glomerular capillaries. No sign of immune system defense (inflammatory cells) was observed despite the infection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.g004

Congenital heart defects in Evi1δex3/δex3 newborn mice

Since it was unlikely that the perinatal lethality observed in Evi1δex3/δex3 mice was caused by the hematopoietic defects we looked for other possible causes. We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to visualize organ formation in six Evi1δex3/δex3, three Evi1δex3/+ and six E15.5 control littermates, as previously described [41]. Structural abnormalities were observed in the hearts of all six Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos (Fig. 5A,B), while small benign bilateral cysts were observed in the jugular lymphatic sacks of two Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos (Fig. S4 in File S1). No defects were observed in wild type or heterozygous mutant animals. Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos displayed several congenital heart defects (Fig. 5C).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Cardiac malformations and failure in Evi1δex3/δex3 mice.

(A) Transverse sections and (B) 3D reconstruction (left-ventral oblique view) of hearts from Evi1δex3/δex3 or wild type littermate (+/+) E15.5 embryos analyzed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The aorta (Ao), right ventricle (RV), left ventricle (LV), ventricular septum (VS), trachea (Tr), aortic arch (AoA) and ductus arteriosus (DA) are indicated. Ventricular septal defect (VSD), interrupted aortic arch (IAA) and common arterial trunk (CAT) were observed in Evi1δex3/δex3 hearts. (C) List of the congenital heart defects identified in fifteen E15.5 embryos of various different genotypes by MRI and 3D reconstruction. (D) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of 5 µm sections of a sick Evi1δex3/δex3 pup. Subcutaneous and other tissue edema (white spaces) was present, consistent with heart failure.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.g005

All six Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos had ventricular septal defects (VSD) - failure to form the septum between the ventricles of the heart (Fig. 5B,C).

Common arterial trunk (CAT), where two great arteries fail to separate and leave the heart as one common vessel, was also observed in 3 out of 6 Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos. Double outlet right ventricle (DORV), where both the aorta and pulmonary trunk leave one ventricle, was also observed in half of the Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos (Fig. 5B,C). In addition, overriding aorta (aorta originating just above the VSD) was seen in one Evi1δex3/δex3 embryo. Finally, aortic arch formation impairments were found in 4 out of 6 Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos (Fig. 5B,C). These impairments were manifested as an interrupted aortic arch (IAA), with a complete discontinuation between the ascending and descending parts of the aorta. These type of congenital heart defects are known to be viable in utero but lethal during the neonatal phase of life for other mouse knockouts [42], and thus likely represent the major cause of the perinatal lethality seen in Evi1δex3/δex3 pups. Consistent with this, heart failure was sometimes accompanied by oedema and congested lungs in Evi1δex3/δex3 pups (Fig. 5D).

Mecom expression in the developing heart

We next examined Mecom expression by mRNA in situ hybridization. At E8.5 Mecom was expressed in the forming heart tube (Fig 6A-C). By E9.5-E10.5 Mecom expression could clearly be localized to the endothelial cells and in the endocardium (Fig. 6D–J), and its expression was strong in the cushions of the atrio-ventricular canal (AVC). In the outflow tract, Mecom was not clearly expressed in the myocardium outer layer, but rather in the mesenchyme cells that are composed of cardiac neural crest. There was also clear expression in the neural crest cells which generates the majority of mesenchyme of aortic arches 1 and 2 (Fig 6E). We also saw Mecom in the stream of neural crest cells situated behind the heart (Fig 6D, arrowhead). Finally, there was additional Mecom signal in the mesenchyme cells of the secondary heart field (Fig 6E,F).Overall, we found that Mecom expression overlaps with the key cell populations in which defects could lead to the heart malformations we have described, especially the endocardium, the endocardial cushions, and the neural crest cells [42], [43]

thumbnail
Figure 6. Expression of Mecom mRNA in cardiac structures of wild type embryos.

(A–D) Whole mount mRNA in situ hybridization to show Mecom expression. A–C) Expression during subsequent stages of heart tube formation E8.5 (black brackets). D) At E9.5 Evi1 is expressed in the endothelial cells and in the endocardium of the heart and in the mesenchyme of the aortic arches. Expression also includes a population of migrating neural crest cells (white arrowhead). E–J) E10.5 Sagittal sections (from right to left) showing Evi1 in the aortic arches (a), mesenchyme of the secondary heart field (black arrowheads), outflow and atrio-ventricular canal endocardium including the cushions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.g006

Evi1 controls the expression of genes that regulate heart development

How might Evi1 act to control heart development? Because Evi1 is a transcription factor that can both activate or repress its target genes [16] we hypothesized that it might be part of the transcriptional program that controls heart development. To determine this, we searched the Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) database [44] and found 143 Congenital Heart Defect (CHD) genes whose mutant heart phenotypes were similar to those observed in Evi1δex3/δex3 mice (Table S1). These genes were linked to the MGI Mammalian Phenotype identifications MP:0010402 (VSD), MP:0002633 (persistent truncus arteriosis, another name for CAT), MP:0000284 (DORV), MP:0004157 (IAA), and MP:0000273 (overriding aorta) [45]. We cross-compared these 143 genes with available EVI1 ChIP-Seq and differential microarray data [16]. Forty-two of these 143 genes contain known EVI1-binding sites, which constituted a significant enrichment (p = 0.0453, Chi-square with Yates correction), suggesting them as possible Evi1-target genes in heart (Fig. 7A). Similarly, the expression of 26 genes is known to be affected by Evi1 siRNA knock-down in SKOV3 cells (significant enrichment, p = 0.0276, Chi-square with Yates correction) [16], while 18 genes contain known Evi1-binding sites and are also effected by Evi1 siRNA knockdown (Fig. 7A, Table 1). This represents a very significant enrichment of CHD genes in Evi1 direct target genes (p<0.0001, Chi-square with Yates correction), strongly suggesting a functional involvement of these EVI1 target genes in heart development.

thumbnail
Figure 7. Evi1 regulates the expression of other CHD genes during embryonic heart development.

(A) The number of CHD genes represented in Evi1 ChIP-Seq data (Evi1 bound genes) or in the list of genes regulated by Mecom. An enriched number of CHD genes were found bound or regulated by Mecom (50 out of 143 genes), p = 0.0453 and p = 0.0276, respectively. These genes represent potential Mecom target genes in heart development. (B) Mecom regulates the expression of 23 CHD genes, which contain Evi1-binding sites specifically in heart. Heart and head (neural crest) tissues were harvested from WT and Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos of somite number 9 to 18. RT-qPCR assays were performed. Genes considered to be mis-regulated in Evi1δex3/δex3 hearts were increased or decreased in expression by at least three fold in average for all samples of the same time-point. These graphs are representative of two to five independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.g007

thumbnail
Table 1. List of 23 congenital heart defect (CHD) genes whose expression is disrupted in Evi1δex3/δex3 developing hearts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.t001

These computational comparative analyses have provided a list of 50 genes that are likely to be enriched for genes that are regulated by Evi1 during heart development (Table S1, Figure 7A). To provide additional evidence for this, we dissected hearts, and heads as a control, from a range of Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos between E8 and E10, in order to determine if these candidates are deregulated due to the disruption of Mecom activity.

We extracted mRNA from mutant and wild-type embryonic hearts and heads, and performed reverse transcription (RT) and qPCR to quantitate the level of expression of 31 of the Evi1 candidate target genes (Fig. 7B, S5). Due to limited amount of RNA from embryonic heart, we chose to assess the 18 CHD genes previously found occupied and regulated by Evi1, plus 14 CHD genes bound by Evi1. We then used the 2−ÄÄCt method [30] to calculate the fold change in expression between wild type and mutant embryos. We found that the Evi1 exon3 deletion had no effect on the expression of eight genes (Fig. S5 in File S1), while three were downregulated and 20 were upregulated in expression in Mecom mutant hearts (Table1, Fig. 7B). This was consistent with MECOM being a known dynamic modulator of transcription that can either activate or repress genes, depending on the recruitment of coactivators or corepressors [46].Of the 13 genes regulated by Evi1 both in cardiac development and in SKOV3 ovarian carcinoma cells, 9 genes showed Evi1-mediated changes in expression level in a similar manner (Jun, Thbs1, Adam9, Hey1, Jag1, Nrp2, Rarg, Sox4, and Tgfbr2). Some of these regulatory relationships were also consistent with previous reports. For instance, in cell line models, Jun expression was found up-regulated by Evi1 through its direct binding to Jun promoter [16], [47][50]. The Sox4 transcription factor and Evi1 cooperate to induce myeloid leukemia [51]; and Evi1 was shown to bind to Sox4 promoter and regulate its gene expression [16], providing evidence of transactivation of Sox4 by Evi1. Collectively, these results demonstrate that Evi1 modulates, in embryonic heart, the expression of genes that are important for controlling heart development.

We also performed a literature search to compare the gene expression patterns of these Mecom-deregulated factors to the Mecom embryonic heart expression pattern we describe (Fig.6). This analysis (Table 2) confirmed common expression in the endocardium and endocardial cushions, as well as in the aortic arches and outflow tract - especially in the neural crest cells.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that deletion of Evi1 exon 3 produces a hypomorphic allele compared to previous studies involving Evi1 exons 4 and 7, where their removal produced complete null alleles [12], [29]. Deletion of exon 3 indeed does not affect Evi1, Evi1δ105 [37] and Evi1δ324 protein production but does block the generation of Mds1-Evi1 protein production. All Evi1 isoform proteins expressed in these mice are expected to carry a 42 amino acid truncation at the N-terminus that constitutes nearly 4% of the protein. Such truncated proteins would be predicted to lack one zinc finger motif out of the seven present in the proximal DNA-binding site. It is not completely clear if and how this truncation affects Evi1 transcriptional activity or function. Several findings suggest that translation from Evi1 exon4 ATG start site produces a functional protein. First, the exon4 contains the best Kozak sequence with highest cross-species conservation. Thus, it is possible that the exon4 translation start site may be naturally produced in vivo. Secondly, a previous study has suggested that Evi1 protein initiated from exon 4 is oncogenic and able to give rise to leukemic clones in mice [52]. Retroviral insertional mutagenesis screens in mice have identified Evi1 isoform as a targeted mutant gene in myeloid leukemia [53], [54]. Sequencing of the retroviral insertion sites from these tumors has shown that the majority of insertions are located upstream of Evi1 coding sequence, where they serve to upregulate the expression of oncogenic Evi1 but block the expression of Mds1-Evi1. The genomic region located between exons 3 and 4 is only 4 kb compared to the rest of the Evi1 upstream region which is 90 kb in size, thus providing 23 times less chance to contain a retrovirus insertion by random chance. However, retroviral insertions located between exon 3 and 4 have been described in tumors, which would serve to activate Evi1 translation from the alternative translation start site located in exon 4 [52].

The profound embryonic lethal disruption of HSC renewal seen in other studies [12], [13] was not present in our Evi1δex3/δex3 mutant embryos and newborn pups. However, we did identify a dramatic perturbation of hematopoietic repopulation activity in Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 young adult mice. To our knowledge, there is no current genetically-modified mouse model that mimics spontaneous bone marrow failure as seen in the Vav-iCre/+, Evi1fl3/fl3 mice. They therefore constitute the first model of spontaneous lethal bone marrow failure in the adult. Surprisingly, the hypomorphic deletion of Evi1 could delay the phenotype of hematopoietic failure and the appearance of bone marrow depletion. This in is line with a previous study [21] that specifically implicated Mds1-Evi1 in the regulation of long term HSC repopulating activity [55] and Evi1 in short term HSC renewal activity [12], [29].

The delay in acquisition of the hematological phenotype in Evi1δex3/δex3 knockout mice allowed the embryos to survive to the perinatal period and the congenital heart defects found in these mice to be observed. Our results are also consistent with those reported for Evi1 exon 7 knockout mice published in 1997, which reported that E10.5 Evi1-/- mutant embryos displayed heart failure. Although their data based on only one histology section are not clear, Evi1δex7/δex7 knockout embryos were reported to display arrested heart development with a looping defect of the posterior part of the heart and a poorly developed constriction between atria and ventricle [29], which is different from our findings. At the time of this previous study, the technologies to study embryonic cardiac development were based only on histological methods, which could not allow precise interpretations of the pathology. In our studies we used MRI and 3D modeling to clearly define the pathology and heart developmental defects in Evi1 exon 3 knockout embryos.

We provide evidence that Mecom belongs to a transcriptional regulatory network that controls heart development. Mecom expression overlaps with the expression of multiple other factors required to form the heart (Table 2). These factors can be Mecom targets, and their expression is deregulated expression in the Evi1δex3/δex3 mutant heart. Of particular interest may be factors in the Notch and TGFβ pathways as that Mecom or its homologues interact with these pathways [22]. In the endocardium for example, there is clear overlap of Mecom with the Notch ligand Jag1 and the TGFβ receptor Tgfbr2.

The endocardium is major site of Mecom expression in the heart, and it is possible that Mecom regulates gene expression directly in this tissue. The cushions cells of the AVC originate from endocardium via an epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and they form the partition between the ventricles and the atria (atrio-ventricular canal and later valves). This partition provides the matrix for the growing ventricular and atrial septa [42], [43]. Another possible site of Mecom action is in the neural crest cells. The spectrum of phenotypes seen in the Evi1δex3/δex3 knockout heart could also be attributed to defects in these cells causing disrupted remodelling of the aortic arches, and to a failure to septate the outflow tract [43]. Further studies (perhaps using a floxed-Evi1 null allele [12] and specific Cre lines) can be used address if Mecom is required in a particular heart cell population, or in multiple populations to drive heart development.

Supporting Information

File S1.

Figure S1, Targeting and knockout of Evi1 exon3. Figure S2, An alternative protein translation site located in Evi1 exon 4 and structure of the translated protein. Figure S3, Deletion of Evi1 exon 3 in the hematopoietic compartment. Figure S4, Small bilateral cysts in jugular lymphatic sacks of Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos. Figure S5, CHD gene expression in Evi1δex3/δex3 embryos.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.s001

(DOCX)

Table S1.

List of 143 congenital heart defect genes with similar heart phenotypes as thosed observed in Evi1δex3/δex3 mice. All 143 genes linked to the Mammalian Phenotype identifications MP:0010402 (VSD), MP:0002633 (persistent truncus arteriosis, other name for CAT), MP:0000284 (DORV), MP:0004157 (IAA), MP:0000273 (overriding aorta) in the MGI database [88]. The genes found in previous Evi1 ChIP-Seq and microarray experiments [89] provide potential Mecom target genes in heart development.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089397.s002

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Keith Rogers, Susan Rogers and the IMCB core histopathology laboratory for their necropsy and histotechnology assistance. We also thank Pearlyn Cheok, Nicole Lim and Dorothy Chen for their technical help with mouse breeding and monitoring.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: EAB-C AP NAJ NGC. Performed the experiments: EAB-C DS BJ BQC GCC YZ EK FU SDV. Analyzed the data: EAB-C DS JMW AWM SB MO SA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: EAB-C DS SDV AWM SB MO AP. Wrote the paper: EAB-C SDV AWM NAJ NGC.

References

  1. 1. Koonin EV, Wolf YI (2010) Constraints and plasticity in genome and molecular-phenome evolution. Nat Rev Genet 11: 487–498.
  2. 2. Nerlov C (2010) Transcriptional and translational control of C/EBPs: the case for “deep” genetics to understand physiological function. Bioessays 32: 680–686.
  3. 3. Lugthart S, van Drunen E, van Norden Y, van Hoven A, Erpelinck CA, et al. (2008) High EVI1 levels predict adverse outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: prevalence of EVI1 overexpression and chromosome 3q26 abnormalities underestimated. Blood 111: 4329–4337.
  4. 4. Ogawa S, Kurokawa M, Tanaka T, Mitani K, Inazawa J, et al. (1996) Structurally altered Evi-1 protein generated in the 3q21q26 syndrome. Oncogene 13: 183–191.
  5. 5. Goyama S, Kurokawa M (2009) Pathogenetic significance of ecotropic viral integration site-1 in hematological malignancies. Cancer Sci 100: 990–995.
  6. 6. Bei JX, Li Y, Jia WH, Feng BJ, Zhou G, et al. (2010) A genome-wide association study of nasopharyngeal carcinoma identifies three new susceptibility loci. Nat Genet 42: 599–603.
  7. 7. Brooks DJ, Woodward S, Thompson FH, Dos Santos B, Russell M, et al. (1996) Expression of the zinc finger gene EVI-1 in ovarian and other cancers. Br J Cancer 74: 1518–1525.
  8. 8. Choi YW, Choi JS, Zheng LT, Lim YJ, Yoon HK, et al. (2007) Comparative genomic hybridization array analysis and real time PCR reveals genomic alterations in squamous cell carcinomas of the lung. Lung Cancer 55: 43–51.
  9. 9. Koos B, Bender S, Witt H, Mertsch S, Felsberg J, et al.. (2011) The transcription factor Evi-1 is overexpressed, promotes proliferation and is prognostically unfavorable in infratentorial ependymomas. Clin Cancer Res.
  10. 10. Starr TK, Allaei R, Silverstein KA, Staggs RA, Sarver AL, et al. (2009) A transposon-based genetic screen in mice identifies genes altered in colorectal cancer. Science 323: 1747–1750.
  11. 11. Yokoi S, Yasui K, Iizasa T, Imoto I, Fujisawa T, et al. (2003) TERC identified as a probable target within the 3q26 amplicon that is detected frequently in non-small cell lung cancers. Clin Cancer Res 9: 4705–4713.
  12. 12. Goyama S, Yamamoto G, Shimabe M, Sato T, Ichikawa M, et al. (2008) Evi-1 is a critical regulator for hematopoietic stem cells and transformed leukemic cells. Cell Stem Cell 3: 207–220.
  13. 13. Yuasa H, Oike Y, Iwama A, Nishikata I, Sugiyama D, et al. (2005) Oncogenic transcription factor Evi1 regulates hematopoietic stem cell proliferation through GATA-2 expression. EMBO J 24: 1976–1987.
  14. 14. Nucifora G, Laricchia-Robbio L, Senyuk V (2006) EVI1 and hematopoietic disorders: history and perspectives. Gene 368: 1–11.
  15. 15. Goyama S, Kurokawa M (2010) Evi-1 as a critical regulator of leukemic cells. Int J Hematol 91: 753–757.
  16. 16. Bard-Chapeau EA, Jeyakani J, Kok CH, Muller J, Chua BQ, et al. (2012) Ecotopic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) regulates multiple cellular processes important for cancer and is a synergistic partner for FOS protein in invasive tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 2168–2173.
  17. 17. Delwel R, Funabiki T, Kreider BL, Morishita K, Ihle JN (1993) Four of the seven zinc fingers of the Evi-1 myeloid-transforming gene are required for sequence-specific binding to GA(C/T)AAGA(T/C)AAGATAA. Mol Cell Biol 13: 4291–4300.
  18. 18. Perkins AS, Fishel R, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG (1991) Evi-1, a murine zinc finger proto-oncogene, encodes a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Mol Cell Biol 11: 2665–2674.
  19. 19. Yatsula B, Lin S, Read AJ, Poholek A, Yates K, et al. (2005) Identification of binding sites of EVI1 in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 280: 30712–30722.
  20. 20. Funabiki T, Kreider BL, Ihle JN (1994) The carboxyl domain of zinc fingers of the Evi-1 myeloid transforming gene binds a consensus sequence of GAAGATGAG. Oncogene 9: 1575–1581.
  21. 21. Zhang Y, Stehling-Sun S, Lezon-Geyda K, Juneja SC, Coillard L, et al. (2011) PR-domain-containing Mds1-Evi1 is critical for long-term hematopoietic stem cell function. Blood 118: 3853–3861.
  22. 22. Hohenauer T, Moore AW (2012) The Prdm family: expanding roles in stem cells and development. Development 139: 2267–2282.
  23. 23. Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Erpelinck C, van Putten WL, Valk PJ, van der Poel-van de Luytgaarde S, et al. (2003) High EVI1 expression predicts poor survival in acute myeloid leukemia: a study of 319 de novo AML patients. Blood 101: 837–845.
  24. 24. Nanjundan M, Nakayama Y, Cheng KW, Lahad J, Liu J, et al. (2007) Amplification of MDS1/EVI1 and EVI1, located in the 3q26.2 amplicon, is associated with favorable patient prognosis in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 67: 3074–3084.
  25. 25. Sood R, Talwar-Trikha A, Chakrabarti SR, Nucifora G (1999) MDS1/EVI1 enhances TGF-beta1 signaling and strengthens its growth-inhibitory effect but the leukemia-associated fusion protein AML1/MDS1/EVI1, product of the t(3;21), abrogates growth-inhibition in response to TGF-beta1. Leukemia 13: 348–357.
  26. 26. Bartholomew C, Clark AM (1994) Induction of two alternatively spliced evi-1 proto-oncogene transcripts by cAMP in kidney cells. Oncogene 9: 939–942.
  27. 27. Bordereaux D, Fichelson S, Tambourin P, Gisselbrecht S (1990) Alternative splicing of the Evi-1 zinc finger gene generates mRNAs which differ by the number of zinc finger motifs. Oncogene 5: 925–927.
  28. 28. Morishita K, Parganas E, Parham DM, Matsugi T, Ihle JN (1990) The Evi-1 zinc finger myeloid transforming gene is normally expressed in the kidney and in developing oocytes. Oncogene 5: 1419–1423.
  29. 29. Hoyt PR, Bartholomew C, Davis AJ, Yutzey K, Gamer LW, et al. (1997) The Evi1 proto-oncogene is required at midgestation for neural, heart, and paraxial mesenchyme development. Mech Dev 65: 55–70.
  30. 30. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ (2008) Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc 3: 1101–1108.
  31. 31. Bard-Chapeau EA, Hevener AL, Long S, Zhang EE, Olefsky JM, et al. (2005) Deletion of Gab1 in the liver leads to enhanced glucose tolerance and improved hepatic insulin action. Nat Med 11: 567–571.
  32. 32. Yamashita N, Osato M, Huang L, Yanagida M, Kogan SC, et al. (2005) Haploinsufficiency of Runx1/AML1 promotes myeloid features and leukaemogenesis in BXH2 mice. Br J Haematol 131: 495–507.
  33. 33. Schneider JE, Bose J, Bamforth SD, Gruber AD, Broadbent C, et al. (2004) Identification of cardiac malformations in mice lacking Ptdsr using a novel high-throughput magnetic resonance imaging technique. BMC Dev Biol 4: 16.
  34. 34. Szumska D, Pieles G, Essalmani R, Bilski M, Mesnard D, et al. (2008) VACTERL/caudal regression/Currarino syndrome-like malformations in mice with mutation in the proprotein convertase Pcsk5. Genes Dev 22: 1465–1477.
  35. 35. Palmer S, Brouillet JP, Kilbey A, Fulton R, Walker M, et al. (2001) Evi-1 transforming and repressor activities are mediated by CtBP co-repressor proteins. J Biol Chem 276: 25834–25840.
  36. 36. Kinameri E, Inoue T, Aruga J, Imayoshi I, Kageyama R, et al. (2008) Prdm proto-oncogene transcription factor family expression and interaction with the Notch-Hes pathway in mouse neurogenesis. PLoS One 3: e3859.
  37. 37. Alzuherri H, McGilvray R, Kilbey A, Bartholomew C (2006) Conservation and expression of a novel alternatively spliced Evi1 exon. Gene 384: 154–162.
  38. 38. Harhay GP, Sonstegard TS, Keele JW, Heaton MP, Clawson ML, et al. (2005) Characterization of 954 bovine full-CDS cDNA sequences. BMC Genomics 6: 166.
  39. 39. Ware J, Russell S, Ruggeri ZM (2000) Generation and rescue of a murine model of platelet dysfunction: the Bernard-Soulier syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97: 2803–2808.
  40. 40. Ogilvy S, Elefanty AG, Visvader J, Bath ML, Harris AW, et al. (1998) Transcriptional regulation of vav, a gene expressed throughout the hematopoietic compartment. Blood 91: 419–430.
  41. 41. MacDonald ST, Bamforth SD, Chen CM, Farthing CR, Franklyn A, et al. (2008) Epiblastic Cited2 deficiency results in cardiac phenotypic heterogeneity and provides a mechanism for haploinsufficiency. Cardiovasc Res 79: 448–457.
  42. 42. Conway SJ, Kruzynska-Frejtag A, Kneer PL, Machnicki M, Koushik SV (2003) What cardiovascular defect does my prenatal mouse mutant have, and why? Genesis 35: 1–21.
  43. 43. Vincent SD, Buckingham ME (2010) How to make a heart: the origin and regulation of cardiac progenitor cells. Curr Top Dev Biol 90: 1–41.
  44. 44. Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, Richardson JE, Eppig JT (2011) The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): premier model organism resource for mammalian genomics and genetics. Nucleic Acids Res 39: D842–848.
  45. 45. Bentham J, Bhattacharya S (2008) Genetic mechanisms controlling cardiovascular development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1123: 10–19.
  46. 46. Bard-Chapeau EA, Gunaratne J, Kumar P, Chua BQ, Muller J, et al. (2013) EVI1 oncoprotein interacts with a large and complex network of proteins and integrates signals through protein phosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: E2885–2894.
  47. 47. Kurokawa M, Ogawa S, Tanaka T, Mitani K, Yazaki Y, et al. (1995) The AML1/Evi-1 fusion protein in the t(3;21) translocation exhibits transforming activity on Rat1 fibroblasts with dependence on the Evi-1 sequence. Oncogene 11: 833–840.
  48. 48. Mitani K (2004) Molecular mechanisms of leukemogenesis by AML1/EVI-1. Oncogene 23: 4263–4269.
  49. 49. Ogawa S, Kurokawa M, Tanaka T, Tanaka K, Hangaishi A, et al. (1996) Increased Evi-1 expression is frequently observed in blastic crisis of chronic myelocytic leukemia. Leukemia 10: 788–794.
  50. 50. Tanaka T, Nishida J, Mitani K, Ogawa S, Yazaki Y, et al. (1994) Evi-1 raises AP-1 activity and stimulates c-fos promoter transactivation with dependence on the second zinc finger domain. J Biol Chem 269: 24020–24026.
  51. 51. Boyd KE, Xiao YY, Fan K, Poholek A, Copeland NG, et al. (2006) Sox4 cooperates with Evi1 in AKXD-23 myeloid tumors via transactivation of proviral LTR. Blood 107: 733–741.
  52. 52. Modlich U, Schambach A, Brugman MH, Wicke DC, Knoess S, et al. (2008) Leukemia induction after a single retroviral vector insertion in Evi1 or Prdm16. Leukemia 22: 1519–1528.
  53. 53. Metais JY, Dunbar CE (2008) The MDS1-EVI1 gene complex as a retrovirus integration site: impact on behavior of hematopoietic cells and implications for gene therapy. Mol Ther 16: 439–449.
  54. 54. Wieser R (2007) The oncogene and developmental regulator EVI1: expression, biochemical properties, and biological functions. Gene 396: 346–357.
  55. 55. Morrison SJ, Uchida N, Weissman IL (1995) The biology of hematopoietic stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 11: 35–71.
  56. 56. Weskamp G, Cai H, Brodie TA, Higashyama S, Manova K, et al. (2002) Mice lacking the metalloprotease-disintegrin MDC9 (ADAM9) have no evident major abnormalities during development or adult life. Mol Cell Biol 22: 1537–1544.
  57. 57. Horiuchi K, Zhou HM, Kelly K, Manova K, Blobel CP (2005) Evaluation of the contributions of ADAMs 9, 12, 15, 17, and 19 to heart development and ectodomain shedding of neuregulins beta1 and beta2. Dev Biol 283: 459–471.
  58. 58. Liu W, Selever J, Wang D, Lu MF, Moses KA, et al. (2004) Bmp4 signaling is required for outflow-tract septation and branchial-arch artery remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 4489–4494.
  59. 59. Beppu H, Malhotra R, Beppu Y, Lepore JJ, Parmacek MS, et al. (2009) BMP type II receptor regulates positioning of outflow tract and remodeling of atrioventricular cushion during cardiogenesis. Dev Biol 331: 167–175.
  60. 60. Danesh SM, Villasenor A, Chong D, Soukup C, Cleaver O (2009) BMP and BMP receptor expression during murine organogenesis. Gene Expr Patterns 9: 255–265.
  61. 61. Cohen AW, Park DS, Woodman SE, Williams TM, Chandra M, et al. (2003) Caveolin-1 null mice develop cardiac hypertrophy with hyperactivation of p42/44 MAP kinase in cardiac fibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 284: C457–474.
  62. 62. Sanlaville D, Etchevers HC, Gonzales M, Martinovic J, Clement-Ziza M, et al. (2006) Phenotypic spectrum of CHARGE syndrome in fetuses with CHD7 truncating mutations correlates with expression during human development. J Med Genet 43: 211–217.
  63. 63. Weninger WJ, Lopes Floro K, Bennett MB, Withington SL, Preis JI, et al. (2005) Cited2 is required both for heart morphogenesis and establishment of the left-right axis in mouse development. Development 132: 1337–1348.
  64. 64. Lopes Floro K, Artap ST, Preis JI, Fatkin D, Chapman G, et al. (2011) Loss of Cited2 causes congenital heart disease by perturbing left-right patterning of the body axis. Hum Mol Genet 20: 1097–1110.
  65. 65. Guris DL, Fantes J, Tara D, Druker BJ, Imamoto A (2001) Mice lacking the homologue of the human 22q11.2 gene CRKL phenocopy neurocristopathies of DiGeorge syndrome. Nat Genet 27: 293–298.
  66. 66. Tissir F, Wang CE, Goffinet AM (2004) Expression of the chemokine receptor Cxcr4 mRNA during mouse brain development. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 149: 63–71.
  67. 67. Norris RA, Moreno-Rodriguez R, Wessels A, Merot J, Bruneval P, et al. (2010) Expression of the familial cardiac valvular dystrophy gene, filamin-A, during heart morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 239: 2118–2127.
  68. 68. Wang B, Weidenfeld J, Lu MM, Maika S, Kuziel WA, et al. (2004) Foxp1 regulates cardiac outflow tract, endocardial cushion morphogenesis and myocyte proliferation and maturation. Development 131: 4477–4487.
  69. 69. Brewer AC, Alexandrovich A, Mjaatvedt CH, Shah AM, Patient RK, et al. (2005) GATA factors lie upstream of Nkx 2.5 in the transcriptional regulatory cascade that effects cardiogenesis. Stem Cells Dev 14: 425–439.
  70. 70. Lepore JJ, Mericko PA, Cheng L, Lu MM, Morrisey EE, et al. (2006) GATA-6 regulates semaphorin 3C and is required in cardiac neural crest for cardiovascular morphogenesis. J Clin Invest 116: 929–939.
  71. 71. Fischer A, Steidl C, Wagner TU, Lang E, Jakob PM, et al. (2007) Combined loss of Hey1 and HeyL causes congenital heart defects because of impaired epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Circ Res 100: 856–863.
  72. 72. Nakagawa O, Nakagawa M, Richardson JA, Olson EN, Srivastava D (1999) HRT1, HRT2, and HRT3: a new subclass of bHLH transcription factors marking specific cardiac, somitic, and pharyngeal arch segments. Dev Biol 216: 72–84.
  73. 73. Leimeister C, Externbrink A, Klamt B, Gessler M (1999) Hey genes: a novel subfamily of hairy- and Enhancer of split related genes specifically expressed during mouse embryogenesis. Mech Dev 85: 173–177.
  74. 74. Loomes KM, Underkoffler LA, Morabito J, Gottlieb S, Piccoli DA, et al. (1999) The expression of Jagged1 in the developing mammalian heart correlates with cardiovascular disease in Alagille syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 8: 2443–2449.
  75. 75. Zhang T, Liu J, Zhang J, Thekkethottiyil EB, Macatee TL, et al. (2013) Jun is required in Isl1-expressing progenitor cells for cardiovascular development. PLoS One 8: e57032.
  76. 76. Baek ST, Tallquist MD (2012) Nf1 limits epicardial derivative expansion by regulating epithelial to mesenchymal transition and proliferation. Development 139: 2040–2049.
  77. 77. Gammill LS, Gonzalez C, Bronner-Fraser M (2007) Neuropilin 2/semaphorin 3F signaling is essential for cranial neural crest migration and trigeminal ganglion condensation. Dev Neurobiol 67: 47–56.
  78. 78. Gammill LS, Gonzalez C, Gu C, Bronner-Fraser M (2006) Guidance of trunk neural crest migration requires neuropilin 2/semaphorin 3F signaling. Development 133: 99–106.
  79. 79. Lee MK, Slunt HH, Martin LJ, Thinakaran G, Kim G, et al. (1996) Expression of presenilin 1 and 2 (PS1 and PS2) in human and murine tissues. J Neurosci 16: 7513–7525.
  80. 80. Nakajima M, Moriizumi E, Koseki H, Shirasawa T (2004) Presenilin 1 is essential for cardiac morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 230: 795–799.
  81. 81. Mollard R, Viville S, Ward SJ, Decimo D, Chambon P, et al. (2000) Tissue-specific expression of retinoic acid receptor isoform transcripts in the mouse embryo. Mech Dev 94: 223–232.
  82. 82. Dolle P, Fraulob V, Kastner P, Chambon P (1994) Developmental expression of murine retinoid X receptor (RXR) genes. Mech Dev 45: 91–104.
  83. 83. Ya J, Schilham MW, de Boer PA, Moorman AF, Clevers H, et al. (1998) Sox4-deficiency syndrome in mice is an animal model for common trunk. Circ Res 83: 986–994.
  84. 84. Roelen BA, Lin HY, Knezevic V, Freund E, Mummery CL (1994) Expression of TGF-beta s and their receptors during implantation and organogenesis of the mouse embryo. Dev Biol 166: 716–728.
  85. 85. Wang YQ, Sizeland A, Wang XF, Sassoon D (1995) Restricted expression of type-II TGF beta receptor in murine embryonic development suggests a central role in tissue modeling and CNS patterning. Mech Dev 52: 275–289.
  86. 86. Mariano JM, Montuenga LM, Prentice MA, Cuttitta F, Jakowlew SB (1998) Concurrent and distinct transcription and translation of transforming growth factor-beta type I and type II receptors in rodent embryogenesis. Int J Dev Biol 42: 1125–1136.
  87. 87. Iruela-Arispe ML, Liska DJ, Sage EH, Bornstein P (1993) Differential expression of thrombospondin 1, 2, and 3 during murine development. Dev Dyn 197: 40–56.
  88. 88. Bentham J, Bhattacharya S (2008) Genetic mechanisms controlling cardiovascular development. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1123: 10–19.
  89. 89. Bard-Chapeau EA, Jeyakani J, Kok CH, Muller J, Chua BQ, et al. (2012) Ecotopic viral integration site 1 (EVI1) regulates multiple cellular processes important for cancer and is a synergistic partner for FOS protein in invasive tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 2168–2173.