Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Real-Time Electrochemical Recording of Dopamine Release under Optogenetic Stimulation

  • Wen-Tai Chiu,

    Affiliations Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

  • Che-Ming Lin,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

  • Tien-Chun Tsai,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

  • Chun-Wei Wu,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

  • Ching-Lin Tsai,

    Affiliation Department of Marine Biotechnology and Resources, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

  • Sheng-Hsiang Lin,

    Affiliation Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

  • Jia-Jin Jason Chen

    chenjj@mail.ncku.edu.tw

    Affiliations Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, Medical Device Innovation Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, National Applied Research Laboratories, Taipei, Taiwan

Real-Time Electrochemical Recording of Dopamine Release under Optogenetic Stimulation

  • Wen-Tai Chiu, 
  • Che-Ming Lin, 
  • Tien-Chun Tsai, 
  • Chun-Wei Wu, 
  • Ching-Lin Tsai, 
  • Sheng-Hsiang Lin, 
  • Jia-Jin Jason Chen
PLOS
x

Abstract

Dopaminergic PC12 cells can synthesize and release dopamine, providing a good cellular model for investigating dopamine regulation. Optogenetic stimulation of channelrhodopsin-2 provides high spatial and temporal precision for selective stimulation as a powerful neuromodulation tool for neuroscience studies. The aim of this study is to measure dopamine release from dopaminergic PC12 cells under optogenetic stimulation using electrochemical recording of self-assembled monolayers modified microelectrode with amperometric measurement in real time. The activation of PC12 cells under various optogenetic stimulation schemes are characterized by measuring single-cell Ca2+ imaging. After 10 seconds of optogenetic stimulation, the evoked intracellular Ca2+ level and dopamine current of channelrhodopsin-2-transfected PC12 cells were 1.6- and 3.5-fold higher than those of the control cells. The optogenetic stimulation effects on Ca2+ influx and dopamine release were 81% and 63% inhibition by using a Ca2+ channel antagonist Nifedipine. The results indicate that optogenetic stimulation can evoke voltage-gated Ca2+ channel-dependent dopamine exocytosis from PC12 cells in a cell specific, temporally precise and dose-dependent manner. This proposed dopamine recording system can be developed to be a good cell model for dopamine regulation and drug screening in vitro, or dopaminergic cell implantation therapy in vivo using optogenetic stimulation in a precise and convenient way.

Introduction

Dopamine is an important catecholamine neurotransmitter implicated in physiological functions. Abnormal neurotransmission of dopamine can lead to numerous neurological disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease [1], [2], [3], [4]. Studies on dopamine regulation have shown that PC12 cells, a rat pheochromocytoma cell line, synthesize, release, and reuptake dopamine in a manner similar to that of dopaminergic neurons [5], [6]. Compared to brain neuron cultures or tissue slices, PC12 cell culture consists of a homogeneous dopamine-containing population, which had been widely used in dopaminergic cell investigations, including those on cell differentiation, neural protection, drug screening, and cell implantation therapies [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Conventional approaches for regulating dopamine release in PC12 cells are pharmaceutical or electrical stimulation (ES) techniques, which have critical limitation on controlling dopamine release. Pharmaceutical stimulation such as KCl solution has poor temporal resolution and untargetable regulation of dopamine release from PC12 cells [15], [16]. Few studies have used ES for dopamine release because crosstalk and imprecise stimulation site control might result in controversial outcomes [17]. Among them, only some studies have demonstrated the inhibition effect of ES on dopamine release [17], [18]. These limitations restrict the application of dopamine release from PC12 cells as a precise cellular model for dopamine regulation.

Optogenetic stimulation approach that uses channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) has been developed for providing more precise and targeted stimulation effect on cells. ChR2-transfected neurons can be depolarized by exposure to ∼473 nm blue light in a very short duration (within 1 to 3 milliseconds), which immediately stops after the light is turned off. Because ChR2 expression can be targeted in specific types of cells, optogenetic stimulation allows potential therapeutic strategies to be investigated for neuroscience research and applications [19], [20], [21]. A lot of studies that utilized ChR2 for in vivo dopaminergic neuron stimulation successfully induced dopamine release in brain and conditioned animal behaviors [21], [22]. An optogenetic approach can thus be an effective tool for the dopaminergic regulation of cells, which could be an alternative model for the controlled release of dopamine in the Parkinson’s animal model.

Various techniques, including neuroimaging [23], microdialysis [24], and electrochemical [25] methods, have been developed for detecting dopamine levels. Compared to off-line neuroimaging and microdialysis methods, electrochemical detection provides higher temporal resolution in real time. To further improve the selectivity and sensitivity of dopamine sensing, various approaches using surface modifications on the sensing electrode have been developed [26]. The surface can be modified using self-assembled monolayers (SAMs), which provide a simple, convenient, and flexible method for functionalizing the chemical properties of the electrode-electrolyte interface [27], [28], [29]. Moreover, various nano-material-based modifications, such as those using gold nanoparticle (Au-NP) can provide larger effective areas for sensitivity enhancement to have low detection limit for dopamine recording [30], [31].

To better understand the optogenetic regulation of dopamine release from PC12 cells, the present study evaluates dopamine release from ChR2-tranfected PC12 cells using a surface-modified dopamine sensing electrode under various optogenetic stimulation schemes. Since intracellular Ca2+ is known to be essential for dopamine release from PC12 cells [32], studying the Ca2+ cascade effect in PC12 cells under optogenetic stimulation could provide in-depth information of the underlying mechanism. The results from Ca2+ signaling and real-time electrochemical monitoring of dopamine according to molecular imaging, we can delineate the Ca2+ dependency of dopamine release using blue light stimulation under different various Ca2+ buffers and voltage-gated Ca2+ channel (VGCC) antagonist. Combination of the ChR2-transfected PC12 cells, optogenetic stimulation and electrochemical recording could be a powerful model for dopamine research in vitro, which also has a high potential application to therapeutic treatment in animals.

Materials and Methods

Construction of the ChR2 Plasmid

The green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (UTEX 2247) was purchased from the University of Texas Algal Collection (UTEX, USA). Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription by Trizol® Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and SuperScript® III (Invitrogen, USA) were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA encoding the first 315 amino acids of ChR2 (GenBank accession no. AF461397) was gendered by polymerase chain reaction amplified with the primers 5′-AACTGCAGATGGATTATGGAGGCGCCCT and 3′-GGATCCCGCTTGCCGGTGCCCTTGTTGA. The cDNA fragment of ChR2 was then inserted into cloning vector pEGFP-N1 (Clontech, USA) via the restriction sites of PstI and BamHI. The ChR2-EGFP plasmid was verified by DNA sequencing.

Establishment of ChR2-transfected PC12 Cells

PC12 cells (BCRC 60048, Taiwan), a cell line derived from a pheochromocytoma of the rat adrenal medulla, were cultured at 37°C in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 15% horse serum, 5% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 25 units/mL penicillin, and 25 units/mL streptomycin. For plasmid DNA transfection, the ChR2-EGFP plasmid was transfected using Lipofetamine® 2000 (Invitrogen, USA). The ChR2-EGFP or the controlled EGFP stable expressing PC12 cells were selected by 600 mg/mL G418 over one month.

Au-NP/SAM Modified Microelectrodes for Dopamine Release Recording

For dopamine release recording, SAM-modified microelectrodes with high sensitivity and selectivity to dopamine were designed and fabricated. The working electrode was prepared with platinum micro-wire (Φ = 75 µm, A–M Systems, USA) and inserted into a glass capillary which was drawn with a microelectrode puller. The end of the glass capillary was sealed with silicone rubber (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning, USA) and cured at 90°C for 12 hours. The tip of platinum microelectrode was cut by a scalpel, and the length of platinum micro-wire is extended ∼0.5 mm from the glass seal. For cleaning, the platinum plate (1.0 mm×1.2 mm) or microelectrode was cleaned for 30 minutes in each of ethanol and deionized water (18 MΩ·cm resistivity) and then immersed in 0.5 M H2SO4. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed using an electrochemical analyzer (CHI 615C, CH Instruments, USA) from −0.2 V to 1.5 V (vs. Ag/AgCl electrode) until the CV curves were stable. In order to coat Au-NP, the platinum plate or microelectrode was immersed in 0.1 M HClO4 solution (Sigma, USA) containing 10 mM hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (HAuCl4, Sigma). A constant voltage of −0.5 V relative to the Ag/AgCl was applied. Au-NP were uniformly coated onto the surfaces of platinum plates and microelectrodes via electrodeposition. The surface morphologies of native platinum and Au-NP deposited platinum plates were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JSM-7001F, JEOL Ltd., Japan). To modify the self-assembled Au-NP monolayer, Au-NP deposited microelectrode was immersed in solutions of 5 mM mercaptopropionic acid (MPA, Sigma) dissolved in 95% ethanol for 15 minutes. The microelectrodes were finally washed copiously with ethanol to remove any non-binding thiols. Cells were stimulated by blue laser and recorded extracellular dopamine by electrode simultaneously at the sampling rate of 10 Hz.

Optogenetic Stimulation of ChR2-transfected PC12 Cells

For all optogenetic stimulation experiments, a 473-nm fiber-coupled diode-pumped solid-state (DPSS) laser (MBL-III-473-50 mW, Laser 2000 Ltd., UK) with TTL modulation was used. The output power of the laser was adjusted to 10 mW/mm2 and confirmed by an optical power meter (Ophir Optronics Ltd., Israel). The tip of the 400-µm fiber was fixed on a micromanipulator for guiding the blue light laser to the targeted cells. 1×106 cells/mL of ChR2-EGFP or EGFP stable expressing PC12 cells were seeded on a 25 µg/mL poly-D-lysine (PDL)-coated 6-well plate (NUNC, Denmark) with complete growth medium before optogenetic stimulation experiments. After culture for 24 hours at 37°C, the medium was replaced by 1.8 mM Ca2+-contained phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Ca2+-free PBS, or 10 µM Nifedipine (Sigma, USA) in Ca2+-containing PBS. For optogenetic stimulation and dopamine sensing, the optical fiber and electrodes were fixed on the micromanipulator and aimed at the targeted cell as closely as possible, as shown in Figure 1. The reference electrode and counting electrode were immersed in medium in dish. The working electrode for dopamine sensing and laser fiber were fixed together and manipulated to close to cells. Each experiment consisted of a 20-second baseline recording, 10-second blue laser stimulation, and at least a 3-minute recovery time before the subsequent stimulation. The optogenetic stimulations were validated at stimulation frequencies of 10, 20, and 30 Hz at pulse duration of 10, 20, and 30 ms. The illumination was fixed at 30 Hz and 30 ms in this study after observing the effects of varied stimulation parameters.

thumbnail
Figure 1. The in vitro real-time dopamine recording system.

(A) Schematic diagram of working electrode (WE), counter electrode (CE), and reference electrode (RE) for dopamine sensing of ChR2-transfected PC12 cells under optogenetic stimulation at 473 nm. (B) Fluorescence and (C) phase-contrast images of ChR2-EGFP-expressing PC12 cells and electrode (arrows) under wide-field fluorescence microscope.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089293.g001

Recording of Intracellular Ca2+ Levels

Intracellular Ca2+ levels were measured using the ratiomatric fluorescent dye fura-2/AM (Invitrogen, USA) under a single-cell fluorimeter (TILL Photonics, Germany). 1×106 PC12 cells/mL were seeded on a 25 µg/mL PDL-coated glass bottom dish and cultured in complete growth medium at 37°C for 24 hours. Cells were loaded with 5 µM fura-2/AM in PBS at 26°C for 1 hour. After loading, cells were washed three times with PBS and recovered for 30 minutes. Dishes were then placed on the stage of the single-cell fluorimeter for Ca2+ measurement. The ratiometric Ca2+ indicator, fluorophore fura-2/AM, was excited by fast switched 340 nm and 380 nm wavelengths for 50 ms, and emissions were the same at 510 nm. The duration between fast switched 340 nm and 380 nm wavelengths is 2 ms, and the illumination intensity is 10 mW. The relative Ca2+ level was calculated from the ratio of the emission intensities with excitations of 340 nm and 380 nm (ratio 340/380). Intracellular fura-2 fluorescence was sequentially imaged and the mean fluorescence intensity of individual PC12 cells was quantitatively analyzed by TILLvisION software of the TILL Photonics system (TILL Photonics, Germany). The Ca2+ imaging techniques were applied to ChR2-transfected PC12 cells with various optogenentic stimulation schemes.

Statistical Analysis

All data were represented as mean ± SEM (standard error of the mean) in each experiment. Student’s t-test and ANOVAs were used for statistical analyses. A p value < 0.05 is considered as significantly different.

Results

Dopamine Sensing Using Au-NP/SAM Modified Microelectrodes

Figure 2A shows that cyclic voltammograms (CV) of native platinum (open triangles) and Au-NP/SAM (open circles) modified microelectrodes with 10 µM dopamine. The CV scans were applied from −0.2 V to 0.7 V in PBS containing dopamine at a rate of 10 V s−1. A pair of well-defined peaks for dopamine redox can be observed at Au-NP deposited microelectrode, with an oxidative peak potential at 0.25 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and corresponding reductive peak potential at around 0.16 V. In contrast, these peaks of dopamine redox were not obvious on the CV curves of native platinum microelectrodes. In Figures 2B and 2C, the surface morphologies of native platinum and Au-NP deposited platinum substrates were obtained by SEM. The SEM images show that the Au-NP uniformly covered the entire surface and formed a well-ordered distribution on the substrate under electrodeposition. Figure 2D exhibits a step-like increment of current corresponding to the successive additions of dopamine solution. The insert in Figure 2D reveals the correlation between the responsive current and the dopamine concentration at Au-NP/SAM modified microelectrode. The linear working range of dopamine is obtained from 0.1 µM to 5 µM at this microelectrode. The linear regression has a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.999 and a detection limit of 7 nM at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3.

thumbnail
Figure 2. Characterization of Au-NP/SAM modified electrodes.

(A) CV curves of 10 µM dopamine recorded by native (-Δ-) and Au-NP/SAM (-•-) platinum microelectrodes at a scan rate of 10 V s−1. The inserted picture represents the CV curve after background subtraction. SEM images showing the surface morphologies of (B) native and (C) Au-NP/SAM platinum electrodes. (D) Amperometric i-t curves of Au-NP/SAM microelectrodes recorded in PBS for dopamine calibration at a scan potential of 0.25 V (vs. Ag/AgCl).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089293.g002

Dopamine Release from ChR2-activated PC12 Cells

The controlled EGFP- or ChR2-EGFP-expressing PC12 cells were cultured in dish for dopamine release monitoring. After the medium was replaced with PBS, the sensing electrode recorded the extracellular concentration of dopamine change upon 10 seconds of blue light illumination. As shown in Figures 3A and 3B, upon optical illumination, the photoelectrical artifact of 0.31±0.03×10−9 C can be observed in the controlled EGFP-expressing cells. In contrast, optogenetic stimulation evoked immediate elevations of dopamine signals about 1.36±0.08×10−9 C in ChR2-EGFP-expressing cells, which is significantly higher than that of the control (t(8) = −11.91, p<0.001; Student’s t-test). After termination of the blue light, the dopamine signals slowly decreased and returned towards the base values. Then, four durations (5, 10, 15, and 20 seconds) of blue light illumination were used to investigate the influence of stimulation duration on dopamine release from ChR2-expressing PC12 cells. As shown in Figures 3C and 3D, the detected dopamine levels gradually and linearly (R2 = 0.996) increased from 0.33±0.02, 0.99±0.03, 1.55±0.07 to 2.06±0.10×10−9 C for 5, 10, 15, and 20 seconds of stimulation duration, respectively. The photoelectrical artifacts were removed by direct subtraction.

thumbnail
Figure 3. Dopamine release by optogenetic stimulation.

(A) Extracellular dopamine level recording with blue light illumination for 10 seconds on EGFP- and ChR2-EGFP-expressing PC12 cells. (C) ChR2-mediated dopamine release under different illumination durations, from 5 seconds to 20 seconds. Arrow indicates the start of illumination. (A) and (C) are dopamine signals in current vs. time. (B) and (D) are integrations of evoked currents with time during blue light illumination. Each column represents mean ± SEM from five independent experiments. ***, P<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089293.g003

Characterization of the Role of Ca2+ during ChR2-evoked Dopamine Release

It is well known that L-type VGCC plays an important role on dopamine release in PC12 cells. However, the optogenetic effect on the Ca2+ cascade is not clear. To investigate the optogenetic effect on the Ca2+ cascade, optogenetic stimulation were applied to PC12 cells in Ca2+-free buffer, 1.8 mM Ca2+ buffer and L-type VGCC antagonist Nifedipine-containing buffer (10 µM Nifedipine in 1.8 mM Ca2+ buffer). Relative intracellular Ca2+ levels are presented as the ratiometric fura-2 fluorescence intensity (ratio 340/380) by single-cell fluorimeter (two-way ANOVA of ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+ vs. EGFP/Ca2+ (p<0.001), ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+ vs. ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+-free (p<0.001), ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+ vs. ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+/Nifedipine (p<0.01); ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+/Nifedipine vs. ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+-free (p<0.001), ChR2-EGFP/Ca2+/Nifedipine vs. EGFP/Ca2+ (p<0.001) with Bonferroni’s post test; Figure 4A). As shown in Figure 4B, the intracellular Ca2+ change of ChR2-EGFP-expressing PC12 cells (Δ ratio 340/380 = 0.121±0.007) was significantly higher than that of the controlled EGFP-expressing PC12 cells (Δ ratio 340/380 = −0.002±0.001) after 10 seconds of blue light illumination. In contrast, the intracellular Ca2+ change was inhibited (Δ ratio 340/380 = 0.009±0.004) when ChR2-EGFP-expressing PC12 cells were immersed in Ca2+-free buffer. Similarly, Nifedipine significantly inhibited the change of Ca2+ level (Δ ratio 340/380 = 0.045±0.003) upon optogenetic stimulation (F(3,12) = 146.8, p<0.001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test).

thumbnail
Figure 4. Extracellular calcium influx during optogenetic stimulation.

(A) Relative intracellular Ca2+ levels of ratiometric fura-2 fluorescence intensity (ratio 340/380) for EGFP- and ChR2-EGFP-expressing PC12 cells in 1.8 mM Ca2+ buffer with or without 10 µM Nifedipine, or Ca2+-free buffer under illumination of blue light for 10 seconds. The Ca2+ signals during light illumination that could not be read out are depicted as dotted lines. (B) The changes of relative intracellular Ca2+ levels (mean ± SEM) by the fura-2 ratiometric imaging (Δ ratio 340/380) from at least 50 cells of four independent experiments. ***, P<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089293.g004

It is known that that the L-type VGCC antagonist Nifedipine could block Ca2+ influx during optogenetic stimulation from Figure 4. As shown in Figure 5A, we further recorded the extracellular dopamine during optogenetic stimulation from ChR2-expressing cells under normal, Ca2+-free buffer (0.17±0.02×10−9 C) and Nifedipine/1.8 mM Ca2+ (0.09±0.01×10−9 C) (two-way ANOVA of Ca2+ vs. Ca2+-free (p<0.001), Ca2+ vs. Ca2+/Nifedipine (p<0.001), Ca2+-free vs. Ca2+/Nifedipine (p>0.05, non-significant) with Bonferroni’s post test). The dopamine currents were significantly inhibited in both Ca2+-free buffer (0.17±0.02×10−9 C) and Nifedipine/1.8 mM Ca2+ (0.19±0.01×10−9 C) conditions in comparison to that for the 1.8 mM Ca2+ buffer (1.00±0.13×10−9 C) condition with the artifacts removed (F(2,12) = 33.52, p<0.001; one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; Figure 5B).

thumbnail
Figure 5. Effect of calcium influx on ChR2-mediated dopamine release.

(A) Simultaneous optical stimulation, dopamine current recording and Ca2+ imaging. Blue light illumination on ChR2-EGFP-expressing cells in controlled 1.8 mM Ca2+ buffer without or with 10 µM Nifedipine, and Ca2+-free buffer. The light-related artifact is not removed. (B) Significant inhibition in dopamine current during blue light illumination in Ca2+-free and Ca2+ buffer with Nifedipine. Each column represents mean ± SEM from five independent experiments. ***P<0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089293.g005

Dopamine Release and Ca2+ Influx Under Various Optogenetic Stimulation Schemes

To examine the effect of different stimulation schemes including stimulation frequency and pulse duration on the dopamine release and influx of Ca2+ from ChR2-EGFP-expressing PC12 cells. For comparison, continuous illumination (CI) and stimulatory pulses of blue light with frequencies of 10, 20, and 30 Hz and durations of 10, 20, and 30 ms were applied to cells for 10 seconds. Figure 6A shows that the Ca2+ levels of PC12 cells increased with the increase of stimulatory frequency from 10 Hz to 30 Hz as well as with the increase of stimulation pulse duration. The highest elevation of Ca2+ (Δ ratio 340/380 = 0.130±0.020) occurred at stimulation pulses of 30 Hz and 30 ms which is about 3-fold of 10 Hz/10 ms stimulation pulse (Δ ratio 340/380 = 0.043±0.006). CI led to lower Ca2+ elevation (Δ ratio 340/380 = 0.095±0.004) compared to the 30 Hz/30 ms illumination (10 Hz/30 ms vs. 10 Hz/10 ms, t(4) = 3.135, p<0.035; 20 Hz/30 ms vs. 20 Hz/10 ms, t(4) = 4.855, p<0.0083; 20 Hz/20 ms vs. 20 Hz/10 ms, t(4) = 2.854, p<0.0462; 30 Hz/30 ms vs. 30 Hz/10 ms, t(4) = 5.048, p<0.0072; 30 Hz/10 ms vs. 10 Hz/10 ms, t(4) = 3.264, p<0.031; 30 Hz/20 ms vs. 10 Hz/20 ms, t(4) = 2.835, p<0.0471; 30 Hz/30 ms vs. 10 Hz/30 ms, t(4) = 4.467, p<0.0111; 30 Hz/10 ms vs. 20 Hz/10 ms, t(4) = 2.858, p<0.046; 30 Hz/30 ms vs. 20 Hz/30 ms, t(4) = 3.704, p<0.0.0208 with Student’s t-test).

thumbnail
Figure 6. Effect of stimulation parameters of blue light on calcium influx and dopamine release.

Optogenetic stimulation at frequencies of 10, 20, and 30(CI) of blue laser light were applied for 10 seconds. (A) Changes of relative intracellular Ca2+ levels by the fura-2 ratiometric imaging (Δ ratio 340/380). Each column represents mean ± SEM from at least 60 cells of three independent experiments. *: significant difference within the same group; #: significant difference between groups. # and *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01. (B) Background current of stimulatory artifacts and (C) dopamine release under 10 Hz/10 ms, 30 Hz/30 ms, and CI of blue light.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089293.g006

The dopamine release of controlled EGFP- and ChR2-EGFP-expressing cells under various stimulation schemes was also observed. The photoelectrical artifacts of detected currents of EGFP-expressing PC12 cells under various stimulation schemes of blue light illumination were examined. The results are shown in Figure 6B. As expected, CI (0.368±0.026×10−9 C) and the 30 Hz/30 ms pulse (0.314±0.034×10−9 C) of blue light illumination evoked higher background dopamine currents compared to the 10 Hz/10 ms pulse (0.007±0.011×10−9 C). Figure 6C shows the dopamine signals from ChR2-expressing PC12 cells under various schemes of blue light stimulation. The dopamine current from 10 Hz/10 ms stimulation (0.319±0.029×10−9 C) was far lower than those of the 30 Hz/30 ms stimulation (1.215±0.135×10−9 C) and CI (1.006±0.128×10−9 C) with artifacts removed.

Discussion

It is important to develop a delicate tool for effective control of dynamic process of dopamine, release or reuptake, from cells and real-time monitoring of extracellular dopamine levels for neuroscience investigation or clinical application. The developed microelectrodes at a diameter of 0.1 µm was enhanced with Au-NP sensing surface area for high sensitivity of detection limit of 7 nM for monitoring dopamine release from cells. Previous studies recorded the elevation of environmental dopamine levels at 10 nM/min/5×104 PC12 cells in 100 µL of medium under long period (5 hours) of high K+ stimulation [33]. In contrast, our highly sensitive electrodes were placed at the vicinity of stimulated PC12 cells for immediate (on the order of seconds) sensing of dopamine release. Our approach combines optogenetic stimulation and amperometry of Au-NP/SAM microelectrode is capable of monitoring the rapid dopamine release from ChR2-expressing PC12 cells compared to the common use of high K+ buffer (60 mM) for PC12 cell membrane depolarization. Our approach overcomes the disadvantages of a long diffusion time and the continuous replacement of K+ buffer, which is infeasible for studies in vivo. The present study validated that the evoked dopamine signals in ChR2-EGFP-expressing cells are significantly higher than those of EGFP-expressing cells (p<0.001, unpaired t-test). ChR2-mediated Ca2+ influx can active depolarized dopaminergic PC12 cells. An immediate dopamine release signal of around ∼30 pA (artifact-removed) can be recorded within 100 ms. On the other hand, the evoked dopamine signals can reach to 155 pA after 10 seconds of optogenetic stimulation. The signal stops rising immediately and slowly returns to the basal line in around 3 minutes upon dopamine reuptake and diffusion after turn off blue light.

Moreover, the dopamine signal was elevated about 3.5-fold higher than those of cells without optogenetic stimulation, whereas the conventional high K+ stimulation passive depolarized cells only elevated 1.8-fold of dopamine level in 20 minutes from 5×105 cells/well of PC12 cells [34]. The proposed optogenetic stimulation with sensitive dopamine sensing microelectrode approach could provide immediate response of controlled dopamine release, which is a powerful model for investigate the effects of optogenetic stimulation on dopamine regulation of dopaminergic cells.

Previous studies have demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation can induce cell membrane depolarization of PC12 cells. The relation between blue light intensity and evoked potential has been examined [35]. Moreover, Chang etal. measured Ca2+ dynamics in PC12 cells upon optogenetic stimulation by fluorescent indicators [36]. Based on these results, the present study further examined the optogenetic effects on the voltage-dependent Ca2+ influx and the relationship to dopamine release. Single-cell Ca2+ measurement of fura-2/AM was used to characterize the optogenetic stimulation effect on the Ca2+ cascade in PC12 cells. In our findings, blue light did not affect the intracellular Ca2+ level in PC12 cells without ChR2 expression. In contrast, the Ca2+ level was significantly elevated by activation of ChR2 upon blue light illumination. The 340/380 ratio was elevated about 1.6-fold of control upon 10 seconds of optogenetic stimulation. However, the elevation immediately stopped and slowly returned to the basal level after the blue light was turned off. These results show the specific effect and temporal precision of optogenetic stimulation. Moreover, our findings indicate that PC12 cells with ChR2-EGFP expression had a higher basal intracellular Ca2+ level than that of EGFP-expressing cells, which might be caused by the self-leakage of ChR2 itself and/or activation of ChR2 by the ultraviolet light (340 nm and 380 nm) used for Ca2+ recording. Ca2+-free buffer and the L-type VGCC antagonist, Nifedipine, were used to explore the effect of optogenetic stimulation on extracellular Ca2+ influx. Nifedipine is a kind of L-type VGCC inhibitor, which can be a blocker in Ca2+-dependent dopamine release. Abu-Raya etal. showed that Nifedipine can block about 25% of intracellular Ca2+ elevation upon high K+ stimulation [34]. Our results show that Nifedipine significantly inhibited about 63% of Ca2+ elevation induced by optogenetic stimulation. Additionally, the intracellular Ca2+ level barely changed when cells were immersed in Ca2+-free buffer. These results indicate that extracellular Ca2+ influx is the major source for cytosolic Ca2+ elevation during optogenetic stimulation. Then, the L-type VGCC plays an essential role in optogenetic stimulation-evoked Ca2+ influx. This phenomenon can be explained as ChR2-mediated extracellular Ca2+ influx slightly depolarized PC12 cells, which turns to activate L-type VGCC then following large Ca2+ influx. Compared to those using high K+ buffer, the optogenetic approach is more controllable and can be easily manipulated using Ca2+-free buffer or L-type VGCC blocker.

The effects of Ca2+-free buffer and Nifedipine on the modulation of dopamine release were examined after the cascade of Ca2+ influx was characterized. Our results in Figure 5 indicate that 83% (Ca2+-free PBS) and 81% (Nifedipine in 1.8 mM Ca2+ PBS) inhibition of dopamine signals were found in comparison to that of the controlled group (1.8 mM Ca2+-containing PBS). The high correlation between Ca2+ influx and dopamine release indicates that L-type VGCC might play a major role in dopamine release from PC12 during optogenetic stimulation. As shown in Figure 6, the intracellular Ca2+ elevation by blue light is in a frequency- and time-dependent manner. The effects of illumination parameters were similar in Ca2+ influx and dopamine release experiments. However, a higher power-level of blue light caused stronger artifacts in the dopamine signal as Figure 6B, which should be removed for accurate estimation. Either duration or averaged power of the laser is an important component in increasing the artifact current. Both parameters are related to the total energy exerted on the dopamine-sensitive electrode. So, the light stimulation-induced thermal effects on the electrode might be the major factor.

The problem and limitation on this study is the overlap between excitation wavelengths for Ca2+ imaging (340 nm and 380 nm) and for activation of ChR2 (325–550 nm). It may cause a large portion of ChR2 has already activated by 340 nm and 380 nm before a start of 473 nm pulses. Also, 380 nm is more efficient in activating ChR2 than 340 nm, causing a biased readout on the 340/380 ratio. In order to obtain continuous Ca2+ measurement during 473 nm illumination for ChR2 excitation, the potential solutions to overcome this problem by using red Ca2+ indicator with ChR2, green Ca2+ indicator with red-shifted ChR2, or using the bioluminescent Ca2+ indicator Nano-lantern [37] with ChR2 to avoid spectrum overlapping. To date, many red Ca2+ indicators are available with the apply on ChR2 stimulation, including synthetic dyes (e.g., Calcium Orange™ and CaTM-2/AM) and protein-based red Ca2+ sensors (e.g., R-GECOs, RCaMPs, O-GECO and CAR-GECO) [38], [39], [40]. Furthermore, optogenetic stimulation can be performed within the “dead time” of the charge-coupled device camera to apply simultaneous optical stimulation and fluorescence imaging [36].

Our results demonstrated that optogenetic stimulation could evoke and precisely control dopamine signals from PC12 cells. The extracellular dopamine signals can be evoked immediately within 100 ms when the ChR2-expressing cells were illuminated by blue light and slowly returned to the baseline after the stimulation was turned off. Optogenetic stimulation could be a powerful tool for activation of PC12 cells and controlling of dopamine release at high temporal resolution, easy manipulation and less side effects. In addition, the L-type VGCC on membrane might play a key role in the evoked Ca2+ influx and dopamine release under optogenetic stimulation. Furthermore, varied stimulation schemes to modulate ChR2 activation of PC12 cells have been examined. The 30 Hz with 30 ms pulse duration evoked more dopamine release than CI stimulation. The cationic channel ChR2 with sequenced activation and inactivation cycles based on its channel nature. So, the CI stimulation didn’t evoke more dopamine release compared to the 30 Hz with 30 ms pulse duration might due to it unreached the maximal activation of ChR2. The traditional stimulation approaches for dopamine release always limited the therapeutic potential of their studies by used of pharmaceutical or electrical stimulations. Based on our result, novel optogenetic stimulation approach would open powerful modulation scheme for further clinical application and investigation of dopamine regulation.

Acknowledgments

We thank many technical and instrumental supports for Ca2+ imaging from the National Cheng Kung University Medical College Core Research Laboratory.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: WTC CML. Performed the experiments: WTC CML TCT CWW. Analyzed the data: WTC CML TCT SHL JJJC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: CLT SHL JJJC. Wrote the paper: WTC JJJC.

References

  1. 1. Morikawa H, Paladini CA (2011) Dynamic regulation of midbrain dopamine neuron activity: intrinsic, synaptic, and plasticity mechanisms. Neuroscience 198: 95–111.
  2. 2. Speelman AD, van de Warrenburg BP, van Nimwegen M, Petzinger GM, Munneke M (2011) etal (2011) How might physical activity benefit patients with Parkinson disease? Nat Rev Neurol 7: 528–534.
  3. 3. Hallett M (2012) Parkinson’s disease tremor: pathophysiology. Parkinsonism & Relat Disord 18: S85–S86.
  4. 4. Romito LM, Albanese A (2010) Dopaminergic therapy and subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: a review of 5-year reports. J Neurol 257: S298–S304.
  5. 5. Zhang M, Lee HJ, Park KH, Park HJ, Choi HS (2012) etal (2012) Modulatory effects of sesamin on dopamine biosynthesis and L-DOPA-induced cytotoxicity in PC12 cells. Neuropharmacology 62: 2218–2225.
  6. 6. Hondebrink L, Meulenbelt J, Meijer M, van den Berg M, Westerink RH (2011) High concentrations of MDMA (‘ecstasy’) and its metabolite MDA inhibit calcium influx and depolarization-evoked vesicular dopamine release in PC12 cells. Neuropharmacology 61: 202–208.
  7. 7. Perry SW, Barbieri J, Tong N, Polesskaya O, Pudasaini S (2010) etal (2010) Human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat activates calpain proteases via the ryanodine receptor to enhance surface dopamine transporter levels and increase transporter-specific uptake and Vmax. J Neurosci 30: 14153–14164.
  8. 8. Uezato T, Sato E, Miura N (2012) Screening of natural medicines that efficiently activate neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells in C2C12-cultured medium. Biomed Res 33: 25–33.
  9. 9. Lassiter TL, MacKillop EA, Ryde IT, Seidler FJ, Slotkin TA (2009) Is fipronil safer than chlorpyrifos? Comparative developmental neurotoxicity modeled in PC12 cells. Brain Res Bull 78: 313–322.
  10. 10. Xu F, Chang X, Lou D, Wu Q, Zhou Z (2012) Chlorpyrifos exposure causes alternation in dopamine metabolism in PC12 cells. Toxicol Mech Methods 22: 309–314.
  11. 11. Deng C, Tao R, Yu SZ, Jin H (2012) Sulforaphane protects against 6-hydroxydopamine-induced cytotoxicity by increasing expression of heme oxygenase-1 in a PI3K/Akt-dependent manner. Mol Med Rep 5: 847–851.
  12. 12. Zhu TG, Wang XX, Luo WF, Zhang QL, Huang TT (2012) etal (2012) Protective effects of urate against 6-OHDA-induced cell injury in PC12 cells through antioxidant action. Neurosci Lett 506: 175–179.
  13. 13. Yoshida H, Date I, Shingo T, Fujiwara K, Kobayashi K (2003) etal (2003) Stereotactic transplantation of a dopamine-producing capsule into the striatum for treatment of Parkinson disease: a preclinical primate study. J Neurosurg 98: 874–881.
  14. 14. Lindvall O, Wahlberg L (2008) Encapsulated cell biodelivery of GDNF: a novel clinical strategy for neuroprotection and neuroregeneration in Parkinson’s disease? Exp Neurol 209: 82–88.
  15. 15. Tatard VM, Venier-Julienne MC, Benoit JP, Menei P, Montero-Menei CN (2004) In vivo evaluation of pharmacologically active microcarriers releasing nerve growth factor and conveying PC12 cells. Cell Transplant 13: 573–583.
  16. 16. Kobayashi K, Yasuhara T, Agari T, Muraoka K, Kameda M (2006) etal (2006) Control of dopamine-secretion by Tet-Off system in an in vivo model of parkinsonian rat. Brain Res 1102: 1–11.
  17. 17. Xia R, Berger F, Piallat B, Benabid AL (2007) Alteration of hormone and neurotransmitter production in cultured cells by high and low frequency electrical stimulation. Acta Neurochir 149: 67–73.
  18. 18. Opler M, Rukenstein A, Cote L, Goodman R (1997) Reduced dopamine levels in PC12 cells exposed to low frequency electromagnetic fields. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 42: 235–239.
  19. 19. Kravitz AV, Freeze BS, Parker PR, Kay K, Thwin MT (2010) etal (2010) Regulation of parkinsonian motor behaviours by optogenetic control of basal ganglia circuitry. Nature 466: 622–626.
  20. 20. Nagel G, Szellas T, Huhn W, Kateriya S, Adeishvili N (2003) etal (2003) Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 13940–13945.
  21. 21. Tsai HC, Zhang F, Adamantidis A, Stuber GD, Bonci A (2009) etal (2009) Phasic firing in dopaminergic neurons is sufficient for behavioral conditioning. Science 324: 1080–1084.
  22. 22. Bass CE, Grinevich VP, Vance ZB, Sullivan RP, Bonin KD (2010) etal (2010) Optogenetic control of striatal dopamine release in rats. J Neurochem 114: 1344–1352.
  23. 23. Meyer JH (2012) Neuroimaging markers of cellular function in major depressive disorder: implications for therapeutics, personalized medicine, and prevention. Clin Pharmacol Ther 91: 201–214.
  24. 24. Bazzu G, Calia G, Puggioni G, Spissu Y, Rocchitta G (2010) etal (2010) alpha-Synuclein- and MPTP-generated rodent models of Parkinson’s disease and the study of extracellular striatal dopamine dynamics: a microdialysis approach. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets 9: 482–490.
  25. 25. Wei D, Bailey MJ, Andrew P, Ryhanen T (2009) Electrochemical biosensors at the nanoscale. Lab Chip 9: 2123–2131.
  26. 26. Hsueh CC, Brajter-Toth A (1994) Electrochemical preparation and analytical applications of ultrathin overoxidized polypyrrole films. Anal Chem 66: 2458–2464.
  27. 27. Xiao YH, Guo CX, Li CM, Li YB, Zhang J (2007) etal (2007) Highly sensitive and selective method to detect dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid by a new polymeric composite film. Anal Biochem 371: 229–237.
  28. 28. Dalmia A, Liu CC, Savinell RF (1997) Electrochemical behavior of gold electrodes modified with self-assembled monolayers with an acidic end group for selective detection of dopamine. J Electroanal Chem 430: 205–214.
  29. 29. Malem F, Mandler D (1993) Self-assembled monolayers in electroanalytical chemistry: application of.omega.-mercapto carboxylic acid monolayers for the electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of a high concentration of ascorbic acid. Anal Chem 65: 37–41.
  30. 30. Qiu HJ, Zhou GP, Ji GL, Zhang Y, Huang XR (2009) etal (2009) A novel nanoporous gold modified electrode for the selective determination of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 69: 105–108.
  31. 31. Kumar SS, Mathiyarasu J, Phani KL (2005) Exploration of synergism between a polymer matrix and gold nanoparticles for selective determination of dopamine. J Electroanal Chem 578: 95–103.
  32. 32. Shafer TJ, Atchison WD (1991) Transmitter, ion channel and receptor properties of pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells: a model for neurotoxicological studies. Neurotoxicology 12: 473–492.
  33. 33. Chen Y, Guo C, Lim L, Cheong S, Zhang Q (2008) etal (2008) Compact microelectrode array system: tool for in situ monitoring of drug effects on neurotransmitter release from neural cells. Anal Chem 80: 1133–1140.
  34. 34. Abu-Raya S, Bloch-Shilderman E, Lelkes PI, Trembovler V, Shohami E (1999) etal (1999) Characterization of pardaxin-induced dopamine release from pheochromocytoma cells: role of calcium and eicosanoids. J Pharmacol and Exp Ther 288: 399–406.
  35. 35. Ishizuka T, Kakuda M, Araki R, Yawo H (2006) Kinetic evaluation of photosensitivity in genetically engineered neurons expressing green algae light-gated channels. Neurosci Res 54: 85–94.
  36. 36. Chang YF, Arai Y, Nagai T (2012) Optogenetic activation during detector “dead time” enables compatible real-time fluorescence imaging. Neurosci Res 73: 341–347.
  37. 37. Saito K, Chang YF, Horikawa K, Hatsugai N, Higuchi Y, Hashida M (2012) etal (2012) Luminescent proteins for high-speed single-cell and whole-body imaging. Nat Commun 3: 1262.
  38. 38. Zhao Y, Araki S, Wu J, Teramoto T, Chang YF (2011) etal (2011) An expanded palette of genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators. Science 333: 1888–1891.
  39. 39. Akerboom J, Carreras CN, Tian L, Wabnig S, Prigge M (2013) etal (2013) Genetically encoded calcium indicators for multi-color neural activity imaging and combination with optogenetics. Front Mol Neurosci 6: 2.
  40. 40. Wu J, Liu L, Matsuda T, Zhao Y, Rebane A (2013) etal (2013) Improved orange and red Ca2+ indicators and photophysical considerations for optogenetic applications. ACS Chem Neurosci 4: 963–972.