Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Temperature Modulates Coccolithophorid Sensitivity of Growth, Photosynthesis and Calcification to Increasing Seawater pCO2

  • Scarlett Sett ,

    ssett@geomar.de

    Affiliation Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

  • Lennart T. Bach,

    Affiliation Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

  • Kai G. Schulz,

    Affiliations Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany, Centre for Coastal Biogeochemistry, School of Environmental Science and Management, Southern Cross University, Lismore, Australia

  • Signe Koch-Klavsen,

    Affiliation Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

  • Mario Lebrato,

    Affiliation Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

  • Ulf Riebesell

    Affiliation Biological Oceanography, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany

Temperature Modulates Coccolithophorid Sensitivity of Growth, Photosynthesis and Calcification to Increasing Seawater pCO2

  • Scarlett Sett, 
  • Lennart T. Bach, 
  • Kai G. Schulz, 
  • Signe Koch-Klavsen, 
  • Mario Lebrato, 
  • Ulf Riebesell
PLOS
x

Abstract

Increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations are expected to impact pelagic ecosystem functioning in the near future by driving ocean warming and acidification. While numerous studies have investigated impacts of rising temperature and seawater acidification on planktonic organisms separately, little is presently known on their combined effects. To test for possible synergistic effects we exposed two coccolithophore species, Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica, to a CO2 gradient ranging from ∼0.5–250 µmol kg−1 (i.e. ∼20–6000 µatm pCO2) at three different temperatures (i.e. 10, 15, 20°C for E. huxleyi and 15, 20, 25°C for G. oceanica). Both species showed CO2-dependent optimum-curve responses for growth, photosynthesis and calcification rates at all temperatures. Increased temperature generally enhanced growth and production rates and modified sensitivities of metabolic processes to increasing CO2. CO2 optimum concentrations for growth, calcification, and organic carbon fixation rates were only marginally influenced from low to intermediate temperatures. However, there was a clear optimum shift towards higher CO2 concentrations from intermediate to high temperatures in both species. Our results demonstrate that the CO2 concentration where optimum growth, calcification and carbon fixation rates occur is modulated by temperature. Thus, the response of a coccolithophore strain to ocean acidification at a given temperature can be negative, neutral or positive depending on that strain's temperature optimum. This emphasizes that the cellular responses of coccolithophores to ocean acidification can only be judged accurately when interpreted in the proper eco-physiological context of a given strain or species. Addressing the synergistic effects of changing carbonate chemistry and temperature is an essential step when assessing the success of coccolithophores in the future ocean.

Introduction

Rapidly increasing fossil fuel emissions and deforestation over the past 250 years have increased atmospheric CO2 concentrations at an unprecedented pace and caused a rise in global average temperatures as well as changes in ocean carbonate chemistry [1], [2]. Presently, the ocean takes up more than 1/4 of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions, thereby mitigating global warming but changing the ocean's carbonate chemistry equilibrium towards a decrease in carbonate ions [CO32−] and pH (i.e. ocean acidification, OA) [2], [3] and an increase in bicarbonate ions [HCO3] and [CO2] (i.e. ocean carbonation). Despite the massive sequestration of anthropogenic CO2 in the oceans, global warming will still most likely result in an average temperature increase between 1 and 6°C by the end of this century [1]. Ocean warming is expected to influence metabolic rates of marine organisms with unforeseen consequences for marine biogeochemical cycling and ecosystem functioning [4],[5].

Coccolithophores are single-celled autotrophic phytoplankton capable to precipitate calcium carbonate (CaCO3) as small scales (coccoliths) to cover the organic part of the cell. They are considered the most important calcareous primary producers contributing ∼1–10% to today's oceanic primary production [6] and ∼50% to CaCO3 found in pelagic sediments [7]. Hence, they are key players in marine biogeochemical cycles [8], [9]. The most important bloom-forming coccolithophore species are Emiliania huxleyi [10], [11], [12] and Gephyrocapsa oceanica [13]. Both species have the ability to produce extensive blooms which are detectable from space [14][18]. In modern oceans, E. huxleyi is the most abundant species [19], but its contribution to CaCO3 sedimentation is relatively small owing to its low coccolith weight [20]. G. oceanica is generally less abundant than E. huxleyi but its contribution to CaCO3 export into the deep is larger because its coccoliths contain significantly more CaCO3 [21].

During the last 15 years, coccolithophores have gained considerable attention due to the sensitivity of calcification to changing seawater pCO2 [22]. To date, experiments investigating the effects of OA on coccolithophores have shown diverse and sometimes contradictory results (for a review see [23][25]). Nevertheless, the majority of studies show calcification rates to generally decrease in response to OA while growth and carbon fixation rates had less clear trends. Factors potentially responsible for the discrepancies observed have been hypothesized to be related to different culturing conditions, such as temperature and light availability [23], [24], [26][30] and strain-specific responses [23], [31]. Thus, key uncertainties remain on the synergistic effects, and most importantly the understanding of underlying physiological mechanisms, of CO2 and other environmental factors on coccolithophore physiology. The main goal of our experiments is to understand whether increasing temperature can systematically induce changes in the carbonate chemistry sensitivity of growth, calcification and organic carbon fixation rates of E. huxleyi and G. oceanica.

Materials and Methods

Experimental set-up

Six experiments are presented in this study with generally similar design. Differences in experimental set-up were restricted to growth temperatures. Monospecific cultures of the coccolithophores E. huxleyi (strain PML B92/11 isolated from Bergen, Norway) and G. oceanica (strain RCC 1303 isolated from Arcachon Bay, France) were grown in dilute batch cultures [32] in a broad CO2 gradient (see carbonate chemistry) at three different temperature regimes. The temperature range for each strain was chosen according to its specific biogeographical distribution: 10, 15 and 20°C for E. huxleyi [33] and 15, 20 and 25°C for G. oceanica [34]. Temperatures will be referred from now on as: “low”, “intermediate” and “high”, respectively. Note that data points for the 15°C experiment with E. huxleyi were taken from the constant total alkalinity experiments on Bach et al. 2011 [28]. Cultures were incubated in a thermo constant (+/−0.05°C) climate chamber (RUMED Rubarth Apparate GmbH) at a light∶dark cycle of 16∶8 and photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) of 150 µmol m−2 s−1. Cells were pre-acclimated to experimental conditions for at least 7 generations which varied between 5–15 days depending on cell division rate. Initial cell densities varied between 50–600 cells ml−1 depending on treatment. The treatments with the highest cell densities were those at either extremes of the CO2 range since those had the lowest growth rates. Final cell densities in the main experiments did not exceed 30,000 cells ml1, minimizing dissolved inorganic carbon drawdown to less than 8% and preventing major changes in the carbonate chemistry speciation [32].

Growth medium

All cultures were grown in artificial seawater (ASW) prepared as described in Kester et al. 1967 [35] but initially without the addition of sodium carbonate (see below carbonate chemistry). ASW was enriched with 64 µmol kg−1 nitrate, 4 µmol kg−1 phosphate, trace metals and vitamins (according to f/4 Guillard and Ryther 1962 [36]), 10 nmol kg−1 selenium, 2 ml kg−1 of 0.2 µm filtered North Sea water.

The nutrient enriched ASW solution (free of dissolved inorganic carbon, DIC, and total alkalinity, TA) was sterile filtered through a 0.2 µm nylon membrane (Whatman® Polycap ™ 75 AS) directly into acclimation (0.5 L Nalgene™) or experimental bottles (2 L Nalgene™) leaving only minimal headspace.

Carbonate chemistry

Carbonate chemistry parameters, TA and DIC, were added to the culture medium by calculated additions of hydrochloric acid (certified HCl with a concentration of 3.571 mol L−1, Merck) and Na2CO3 (Merck, Suprapur quality and dried for 2 hours at 500°C). This resulted in a DIC gradient of ∼1300–2300 µmol kg−1 at constant TA, ∼2325±40 µmol kg−1. Samples for TA were taken at the beginning and end of the experiment, respectively. TA samples were filtered through GF/F filters, stored at 4°C and processed within 14 days. Otherwise samples were poisoned with HgCl2. TA samples were measured in a Metrohm Basic Titrino 794 titration device according to Dickson et al. 2003 [37].

Unfortunately, DIC samples were lost due to storing problems and had to be estimated from TA and acid additions as described in Bach et al. 2011 [28]. Briefly, initial DIC concentrations (DICinitial) were estimated as: (1)where TA refers to the measured initial total alkalinity (µmol kg−1) and Volumeacid refers to the amount of acid added (µl kg−1) and 3.571 being the molarity of the acid (µmol µl−1). The accuracy of this method is explained in detail in Bach et al. 2011 [28] and shows that the maximum offset of ∼30 µmol kg−1 between DIC calculated with equation 1 and DIC calculated from measured TA and pH is small relative to the large DIC ranges (∼1300–2600 µmol kg−1). Final DIC concentrations were calculated by subtracting the measured total particulate carbon build-up from DICinitial calculated with equation 1, assuming that the potential error from dissolved organic matter production is small compared to the broad ranges in DIC concentrations [28]. Carbonate chemistry parameters (pH, HCO3, CO32−, CO2) were calculated using the program CO2SYS (Lewis and Wallace 1998 [38]) from measured TA, estimated DIC, temperature, salinity and [PO43−], and the dissociation constants determined by Roy et al. 1993. pH values are given on the free scale. Note that horizontal error bars on all figures denote for the change of CO2 concentrations during the course of the experiments and that biological response data is plotted against the average of initial and final [CO2]. The degree of change in carbonate chemistry conditions from beginning to end of the experiment depended on final cell densities. In some cases, final cell densities were not high and changes in carbonate chemistry were so small that they appear absent in Figure 1.

thumbnail
Figure 1. Physiological response of G. oceanica and E. huxleyi to increasing CO2 and temperature.

Response of growth, POC production, calcification rates and PIC:POC to increasing CO2 and temperature of G. oceanica (left, open symbols) and E. huxleyi (right, closed symbols). Horizontal bars indicate change of CO2 from beginning to end of experiment. In some cases the changes were small and thus appear absent. Shaded areas represent OA relevant ranges (∼280–1000 µatm pCO2). Note that the investigated CO2 range (x-axis) is only half as broad for experiments with G.oceanica compared to the one of E.huxleyi.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088308.g001

Particulate organic and inorganic carbon

Sampling started two hours after the onset of the light period and lasted no longer than 2 hours. Samples for particulate carbon were filtered (200 mbar) onto GF/F filters (Whatmann, combusted at 500°C for 6 hours) and stored in glass petri- dishes (pre-combusted at 500°C for 6 hours) at -20°C until analysis. Filters for total particulate carbon (TPC) were dried overnight at 60°C while filters for particulate organic carbon (POC) were first placed in a desiccator above fuming (37%) HCl for 2 hours to remove all inorganic particulate carbon (PIC) and subsequently dried overnight at 60°C. Both TPC and POC samples were analyzed with a EuroEA analyzer according to Sharp 1974 [39] except for experiments with E. huxleyi at 15°C and G. oceanica at 25°C, for which TPC and POC were measured with an Elemental analyzer coupled to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (EuroEA, Hekatech GmbH). Both methods use the same analysis but the latter is coupled to an isotope mass spectrometer which gives additional information on isotopic composition, if desired. PIC was calculated by subtracting POC from TPC.

Growth

Cell densities were determined at the beginning and end of the experiment with a Beckman Z2 Coulter®Particle Count and Size Analyzer. Growth rates (μ) were calculated according to: (2)where Ct-final represents cell densities at the end of the experiment, Ct0 represents initial cell densities and d represents the number of days between t0 and tfinal. Calcification and POC production rates were obtained by multiplying growth rates with particulate inorganic or organic carbon cellular quotas, respectively.

Statistics

A nonlinear regression model was used to analyze the data, with a higher number of treatment levels at the expense of replication. This approach is more informative for ecological modelling than the analysis of variance (ANOVA), nevertheless without the loss of statistical power[40]. The Michaelis-Menten kinetics can be used to describe the increase of growth and organic and inorganic carbon production with increasing CO2 concentrations levelling off at saturating conditions: (3)where V is the growth or production rate at a certain CO2 concentration, Vmax is the maximum growth or production rate and Km is the CO2 concentration at which the rate is half-saturated. In our experiments growth and production rates decreased after reaching maximum values and thus a linear term was subtracted from equation 3 and the Michaelis-Menten equation modified as follow:(4)where X and Y are random fit parameters and s the ‘sensitivity’ constant which describes the linear negative effect of increasing CO2 (decreasing pH)[28]. From the differentiated fit equation (explained in detail in [28]) we calculated optimum CO2 concentrations for growth, photosynthesis and calcification rates as well as maximum production rates (Vmax) and half saturation constants (Km). Coefficients of determination (R2), p-values, F-values and degrees of freedom for each fit are presented in Table 1 and 2. In the following sections optimum and maximum production rates refer to those calculated from the fit equation. Note that in some cases the highest measured values deviated from those determined using the fit equation. The first derivative of eq. 4 was calculated to detect temperature-dependent changes in calcification at specific [CO2] as follow:(5)a positive value of the first derivative (i.e. a positive slope of a tangent at certain [CO2]) indicates that there is a positive correlation between increasing CO2 and the investigated metabolic process while a negative value indicates the opposite. We calculated our values at [CO2] of 18 µmol kg−1, approximately 375–575 µatm pCO2, depending on temperature, and thus were able to compare the different temperature-dependent response at the same CO2 concentration.

Results

The coccolithophores E. huxleyi and G. oceanica were incubated in a broad CO2 gradient and three different temperatures. All investigated metabolic processes in both species displayed an optimum-curve response pattern along the CO2 gradient. However, temperature clearly modified the shape of this response (Figure 1).

Optimum CO2 concentrations, Vmax and Km for growth, photosynthetic carbon fixation and calcification rates were assessed with fit equation (4). Resulting Vmax, Km and pCO2/CO2 optima as well as statistical results (coefficients of determination (R2), p-values, F values and degrees of freedom) are presented in Table 1 and 2. The underlying carbonate chemistry is presented in the supplement Tables S1S2 and shows the average values from initial and final calculated CO2, pCO2, DIC, pHfree and ΩCa. Physiological responses (i.e. growth, POC production, calcification rates and PIC∶POC ratios) are also given in supporting information Table S1S2.

Growth rates (μ)

Increasing temperature stimulated growth rates of E. huxleyi and G. oceanica (Figure 1A–B). Approximately a doubling in maximum growth rates was observed in both species between the lowest and highest temperature tested (Figure 1 A–B, Table 12). The CO2 half-saturation for growth slightly but constantly increased in G. oceanica throughout the investigated temperature range (Table 1). In E. huxleyi, CO2 half-saturation slightly decreased from low to intermediate temperatures but increased strongly from intermediate to high temperature (Table 2). Optimum growth for G. oceanica was observed at [CO2] of ∼11–13 µmol kg−1 (∼300–400 µatm pCO2) at low and intermediate temperature and ∼18 µmol kg−1 (∼600 µatm pCO2) at high temperature (Table 1). Optima for E. huxleyi was observed at [CO2] of ∼19–23 µmol kg−1 (∼520–620 µatm pCO2) at low and intermediate temperature and ∼35 µmol kg−1 (∼1300 µatm pCO2) at high temperature (Table 2).

POC production

POC production was stimulated from low to intermediate temperatures in both species (Figure 1C–D). The highest temperature did not enhance POC production in G. oceanica (Figure 1C) and reduced the rate in E. huxleyi (Figure 1D). CO2 half-saturation showed no clear trend in G. oceanica throughout the entire temperature range (Table 1) while the half-saturation remained unaffected in E. huxleyi from low to intermediate temperature but strongly increased at high temperature (Table 2). Optimum CO2 concentrations for POC production rates in G. oceanica were observed at ∼13–16 µmol kg−1 (∼420 µatm pCO2) at low and intermediate temperature and ∼20 µmol kg−1 (∼835 µatm pCO2) at high temperature (Table 1). The CO2 optima for E. huxleyi were found at ∼24–28 µmol kg−1 (∼600–650 µatm pCO2) at low and intermediate temperature and 50 µmol kg−1 (∼1535 µatm pCO2) at high temperature (Table 2).

Calcification rates

Maximum calcification rates increased in G. oceanica from low to intermediate temperature but did not accelerate any further at high temperature levels (Figure 1E, Table 1). In E. huxleyi, maximum calcification rates increased steadily over the investigated temperature range (Figure 1F). The CO2 half-saturation showed in both species very little change from low to intermediate temperatures but increased substantially from intermediate to high temperature (Table 12). Optimum calcification rates for G. oceanica were observed at [CO2] of ∼10 µmol kg−1 (∼260–300 µatm pCO2) at low and intermediate temperature and at ∼16 µmol kg−1 (∼550 µatm pCO2) at the highest temperature (Table 1). For E. huxleyi optimum calcification rates were observed at [CO2] of ∼15–18 µmol kg−1 (∼400 µatm pCO2) at low and intermediate temperature and at ∼30 µmol kg−1 (∼875 µatm pCO2) at the highest temperature (Table 2).

Increasing temperature did not modulate the effect of increasing CO2 on the PIC∶POC ratio (Figure 1G–H). The PIC∶POC ratio was temperature-independent in G. oceanica and linearly decreased with increasing CO2 (Figure 1G). G. oceanica had a large fraction of the assimilated particulate carbon as inorganic carbon (calcite) which was then reflected in the higher PIC∶POC compared to E. huxleyi (Figure 1G–H). Although no clear trends could be observed for E. huxleyi, the highest PIC∶POC were found at the highest temperature while lowest ratios were observed at intermediate temperature and linearly decreased with a possible stabilization at [CO2] levels >100 µmol kg−1 (Figure 1H).

Discussion

Ocean acidification and warming are two ongoing processes potentially affecting marine phytoplankton - in particular calcifying species [5]. Here, we investigated how temperature modulates the sensitivity of key metabolic processes (i.e. growth, photosynthesis and calcification) to increasing CO2 in the two most abundant coccolithophores E. huxleyi and G. oceanica. Our experiments confirm that the optimum-curve response of growth, photosynthesis and calcification obtained for E. huxleyi over a broad CO2 gradient [28] also holds under different temperature conditions. Likewise, this response pattern was also displayed by G. oceanica at all investigated temperatures.

Despite this similarity in the overall response pattern, the position of optima varied between temperature treatments. In most cases, optimum [CO2] where maximum rates were achieved was shifted towards higher CO2 concentrations with increasing temperature. This underlines the importance of temperature not only in determining absolute growth and production rates but also in systematically modulating sensitivities of these metabolic processes to changing seawater carbonate chemistry speciation.

Additionally, we observed species-specific sensitivities to increasing CO2 of E. huxleyi and G. oceanica, as previously pointed out by Riebesell et al. 2000 [22] and Zondervan et al. 2001 [41]. Optimum CO2 levels for calcification rates were remarkably lower than those for organic carbon fixation rates in both species (Tables 12). However, G. oceanica had a narrower CO2 tolerance range (compare x-axis in Figure 1) and thus the sensitivity constants obtained from the fit equation (4) were about four times higher than in E. huxleyi at similar overall rates (compare “sensitivity constant” Tables 1 and 2). Interestingly, sensitivity constants for calcification were about twice as high as those for organic carbon fixation, suggesting that the former process is more susceptible to changes in carbonate chemistry in the high CO2 range (Table 1). Potentially, G. oceanica is more representative of larger coccolithophore species with higher calcification than carbon fixation rates such as C. leptoporus and C. braarudii [42], [43]. For instance, C. braarudii stopped calcifying at levels higher than ∼80 µmol kg−1 CO2 (approx. 2380 µatm pCO2 [43]) while C. leptoporus had an optimum curve response in an even narrower range of ∼4–35 µmol kg−1 CO2 (approx. 180–1000 µatm pCO2 [42]) suggesting that higher CO2 concentrations (most likely concomitantly lower pH) would be more detrimental to highly calcifying strains compared to those with PIC∶POC ratios closer to 1 (i.e. E. huxleyi).

Both coccolithophores show highest metabolic activity at temperatures significantly higher than experienced at isolation site

Stimulating effects of increasing temperature have been widely observed in phytoplankton through accelerating metabolic activities [44][46]. In accordance with this, we observed a pronounced acceleration of growth in both species within the investigated temperature range (Figure 1A–B). Maximum growth rates doubled for each 10°C increase, closely matching values reported in the literature for these two species between 6 and 25°C [13], [31], [47][49]. Interestingly, each species had highest growth rates at temperatures 5–10°C higher than the maxima observed at their isolation sites when they are the most abundant (Table 12 [33], [34]). Conte et al. 1998 [47] also observed that an E. huxleyi strain had the highest growth rates at temperatures 10°C above those occurring at the strain's natural environment. This could have several implications. Either their biogeographic distribution is relatively broad and both coccolithophore strains tested here occur in large areas which include locations with significantly higher maximum seasonal temperatures or both strains have physiological flexibility which allows them to exploit high temperature anomalies. Both of which, based on the assumption that the strain has optimized its temperature response to its specific environment. The biogeographic distribution and local temperature adaptation of coccolithophores has not been studied in great detail but recent evidence points towards a certain degree of isolation between coccolithophore populations [50], [51]. However, there appears the be a strong link between the local environment and the thermal tolerance of marine phytoplankton in the global ocean. Thomas et al. 2012 [52] showed that phytoplankton from polar and temperate regions had optimum growth at temperatures above the annual mean of their region and wider thermal tolerance curves while tropical phytoplankton had their optimum growth below (or at) their annual mean with narrower thermal tolerance curves. They suggested that phytoplankton in the tropics might have a greater risk to future warming scenarios due to their narrow thermal tolerance sensitivities. Nevertheless, for temperate and polar species, being able to exploit high temperature anomalies may be an ecological advantage, in particular for E. huxleyi which often blooms during early summer in highly stratified shallow mixed layers [53]. This could have been the case when a large E. huxleyi bloom occurred in the Bering Sea in 1997, a year characterized with a particularly shallow mixed layer depth, exceptionally high water temperatures (∼4°C above mean), and high irradiances [54]. Although the occurrence of such blooms was not observed regularly in this oceanic region, there was some indication that E. huxleyi progressively entered the region and benefited in this particular year from such climatic anomalies [55].

Rising temperature affects organic carbon fixation and calcification differently

Maximum growth rates increased consistently with increasing temperature in both species suggesting that overall metabolism is generally accelerated within these temperature ranges (Figure 1 A–B; Table 12). Nevertheless, the temperature sensitivity of both species differed in terms of the maximum organic and inorganic carbon fixation rates. In G. oceanica, maximum organic carbon fixation increased strongly from low to intermediate temperature but showed little change thereafter (Figure 1C; Table 1). Maximum calcification rates showed a similar trend from low to intermediate temperatures but even slightly decreased towards the highest investigated temperature (Figure 1E; Table 1). In E. huxleyi, maximum organic carbon fixation nearly doubled from low to intermediate temperature but decreased thereafter, while maximum calcification rates increased linearly over the entire temperature range (Figure 1D, F; Table 2).

The importance of temperature for modulating resource allocation in marine phytoplankton was recently pointed out by Toseland et al. 2013 [56]. Results from their pair-wise gene ontology analysis, as well as their model for optimal resource allocation, indicated that at low temperatures (i.e. temperate and polar regions) cells would preferentially allocate resources into biosynthesis rather than photosynthesis leading to higher allocation of P into rich rRNA and a subsequent decrease of the N∶P stoichiometry. Antagonistically, at warmer temperatures resource allocation would preferentially go into photosynthesis and thus higher N∶P ratios.

In our experiments, a re-distribution of inorganic carbon among requiring pathways (i.e. photosynthesis and/or calcification) could have occurred. This becomes particularly apparent in E. huxleyi at the high temperature treatment (i.e. 20°C) where maximum POC fixation rate clearly has a lower temperature optimum than calcification rate (compare Figure 1D and F; Table 2). Whereas total particulate carbon was similar between the high and intermediate temperature treatments, a high PIC∶POC suggested that inorganic carbon was incorporated towards calcification rather than photosynthesis at the high temperature treatment (Figure 1H). Indeed, it was recently postulated that changes in carbonate chemistry affect the redox state inside E. huxleyi cells which subsequently causes a reorganization of carbon flux networks within and across cellular compartments (e.g. cytosol, chloroplast and calcification vesicle) [57]. Increasing pCO2, for example, diverted inorganic carbon away from calcification into pathways involved in the production of organic carbon [30], [57].

In this respect it is worth noting that cellular PIC∶POC in coccolithophores is a measure for carbon allocation to photosynthesis and calcification and cannot be used to infer potential feedbacks to atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. The latter is ultimately affected by the PIC∶POC of export production and while about half of pelagic PIC stems from coccolithophores most of the POC is contributed by other phytoplankton groups such as diatoms. Therefore, it is the changes in the absolute amount of PIC produced by coccolithophores and not in cellular PIC∶POC which need to be considered for global biogeochemical element cycling.

Changing temperature shifts the optimum CO2 concentration for growth, photosynthesis and calcification

CO2 optima for growth, organic carbon fixation and calcification rates shifted towards higher CO2 concentrations from intermediate to high temperatures in both coccolithophores examined in this study (Table 12). The temperature-induced optimum shift in E. huxleyi was even strong enough to reverse the response of calcification rates within the ocean acidification relevant range (i.e. ∼7–45 µmol kg−1 CO2, approx. 280–1000 µatm pCO2) from negative at low and intermediate temperatures to positive at high temperature (Figure 2). Hence, a coccolithophore strain can respond to ocean acidification, with both, increasing and decreasing calcification rate, depending on the temperature it was cultured at. This has major implications when trying to compare the responses of different coccolithophore strains cultured at different experimental settings to increasing seawater CO2. To account for the modulating effect of temperature on the CO2/pH sensitivity, a direct comparison of species/strain specific responses should occur in the same range of their temperature optimum curves. Investigating the effect of ocean acidification on metabolic processes in coccolithophores therefore requires a sound understanding of the influence of experimental culture conditions (in this study temperature conditions but the same probably also applies to other parameters such as light [30]). If this understanding is missing, then interpretation of the response of coccolithophores to future ocean pCO2 from laboratory incubations can be misleading because all responses (increase, plateau, decrease) within the OA-relevant pCO2 range can be attained when growing the investigated cells at certain culture conditions (Figure 3).

thumbnail
Figure 2. Calcification rate of E. huxleyi in response to elevated CO2 at different temperatures.

Depending on the growth temperature the rate of calcification can decrease strongly or moderately or even increase with rising CO2 levels. The “low”, “intermediate” and “high” refers to experimental temperature of 10, 15 and 20°C, respectively. The slope of a tangent at [CO2] of 18 µmol kg−1 in the 10°C treatment of E. huxleyi is almost 0 which means that the optimum curve has reached a plateau in the OA relevant CO2 range. At 20°C there is a positive slope which means that cells have not yet reached the optimum CO2 for calcification at 18 µmol kg−1 in this temperature.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088308.g002

thumbnail
Figure 3. Conceptual graph depicting the modulating effect of temperature on the CO2/pH sensitivity of key metabolic rates in coccolithophores.

The arrows emphasize the trends of key metabolic processes (i.e. calcification, photosynthesis and growth) vs. CO2 relationship in the range relevant to future ocean acidification.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088308.g003

The reason for the observed CO2 optimum shift for growth, organic carbon fixation and calcification at the highest temperature is presently unclear. Possibly the strongly accelerated metabolism at high temperatures, and concomitantly higher demand of inorganic carbon, benefits more from the increased CO2 substrate availability than it is negatively affected by the increase in proton concentrations (low pH). Or in other words, the balance between a fertilizing effect of additional inorganic carbon and a metabolic repression by high proton concentration observed in previous studies [28], [58] is apparently modulated by increasing temperature.

In our study, increasing temperature partly compensates the negative effect of increasing proton concentrations on calcification rates to some extent. However, Feng et al. 2008[59] and De Bodt et al. 2010 [60] found the opposite – i.e. a negative feedback of increasing temperature on calcification rates under high CO2 conditions at very different temperature regimes (13 and 18°C and 20 and 24°C, respectively). This apparent contradiction can potentially be resolved when considering the diverse temperature sensitivities among strains [47], [49]. In case increasing temperature stimulates the investigated strain (as in our study) a partial compensation of the negative influence of high proton concentrations seems to be likely. However, as soon as increasing temperature becomes a stress factor, excess proton concentrations may exacerbate the temperature effect. In the latter case, rising temperature and proton concentration could synergistically reduce metabolic rates in coccolithophores.

Supporting Information

Table S1.

Carbonate chemistry and physiological parameters for G. oceanica.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088308.s001

(PDF)

Table S2.

Carbonate chemistry and physiological parameters for E. huxleyi.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088308.s002

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Aljosa Zavisic and Kerstin Nachtigall for their support on particulate carbon measurements and Prof. Andreas Oschlies for valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: KGS ML SS. Performed the experiments: SS LTB SKK. Analyzed the data: SS LTB SKK. Wrote the paper: SS KGS LTB SKK ML UR.

References

  1. 1. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. J Environ Qual 37: 2407
  2. 2. Wolf-Gladrow DA, Riebesell U, Burkhardt S, Bijma J (1999) Direct effects of CO2 concentration on growth and isotopic composition of marine plankton. Tellus 51B: 461–476.
  3. 3. Calderia K, Wickett ME (2003) Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH. Nature 425: 365.
  4. 4. Taucher J, Oschlies A (2011) Can we predict the direction of marine primary production change under global warming?. Geophys Res Lett 38. doi: 10.1029/2010GL045934.
  5. 5. Riebesell U, Tortell P (2011) Effects of ocean acidification on pelagic organisms and ecosystems. Ocean Acidification. Oxford University Press. pp. 99–116.
  6. 6. Poulton AJ, Adey TR, Balch WM, Holligan PM (2007) Relating coccolithophore calcification rates to phytoplankton community dynamics: Regional differences and implications for carbon export. Deep Sea Res Part II 54: 538–557.
  7. 7. Broecker W, Clark E (2009) Ratio of coccolith CaCO3 to foraminifera CaCO3 in late Holocene deep sea sediments. Paleoceanography 24: PA3205
  8. 8. Balch W, Drapeau D, Bowler B, Booth E (2007) Prediction of pelagic calcification rates using satellite measurements. Deep Sea Res Part II 54: 538–557.
  9. 9. Bollmann J, Klaas C (2008) Morphological variation of Gephyrocapsa oceanica Kamptner 1943 in plankton samples: implications for ecologic and taxonomic interpretations. Protist 159: 369–381.
  10. 10. Balch WM, Holligan PM, Kilpatrick KA (1992) Calcification, photosynthesis and growth of the bloom-forming coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi. Cont Shelf Res 12: 1353–1374.
  11. 11. Winter A, Jordan RW, Roth PH (1994) Biogeography of living coccolithophores in ocean waters. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  12. 12. Broerse T, Tyrrell T, Young J, Poulton A, Merico A (2003) The cause of bright waters in the Bering Sea in winter. Cont Shelf Res 23: 1579–1596.
  13. 13. Rhodes LL, Peake BM, Mackenzie AL, Marwick S (1995) Coccolithophores Gephyrocapsa oceanica and Emiliania huxleyi (Prymnesiophyceae  =  Haptophyceae) in New Zealand's coastal waters: characteristics of blooms and growth in laboratory culture. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 29: 345–357.
  14. 14. Holligan PM, Viollier M, Harbour DS, Camus P, Champagne-Phillippe M (1983) Satellite and ship studies of coccolithophore production along a continental shelf edge. Nature 304: 339–342.
  15. 15. Holligan PM, Fernandez E, Balch WM, Boyd P, Peter H (1993) A biogeochemical study of the coccolithophore, Emiliania huxleyi, in the North Atlantic. Global Biogeochem Cycles 7: 879–900.
  16. 16. Groom SB, Holligan PM (1987) Remote sensing of coccolithophore blooms. Adv Sp Res 7: 73–78.
  17. 17. Balch M, Holligan PM, Ackleson SG, Voss KJ (1991) Biological and optical properties of mesoscale coccolithophore blooms in the Gulf of Maine. Limnol Oceanogr 36: 629–643.
  18. 18. Tyrrell T, Taylor AH (1996) A modelling study of Emiliania huxleyi in the NE Atlantic. J Mar Syst 9: 83–112.
  19. 19. Paasche E (2002) A review of the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi (Primnesiophyceae), with particular reference to growth, coccolith formation, and calcification-photosynthesis interactions. Phycologia 40: 503–529.
  20. 20. Baumann EA, Böckel B, Frenz M (2004) Coccolith contribution to South Atlantic carbonate sedimentation. Coccolithophores: from molecular processes to global impact. Springer. pp. 99–125.
  21. 21. Saavedra-Pellitero M, Flores JA, Baumann KH, Sierro FJ (2010) Coccolith distribution patterns in surface sediments of Equatorial and Southeastern Pacific Ocean. Geobios 43: 131–149.
  22. 22. Riebesell U, Zondervan I, Rost B, Tortell PD, Zeebe RE, et al. (2000) Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric CO2. Nature 407: 364–367.
  23. 23. Ridgwell A, Schmidt DN, Turley C, Brownlee C, Maldonado MT, et al. (2009) From laboratory manipulations to Earth system models: scaling calcification impacts of ocean acidification. Biogeosciences 6: 2611–2623.
  24. 24. Hoppe CJM, Langer G, Rost B (2011) Emiliania huxleyi shows identical responses to elevated pCO2 in TA and DIC manipulations. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 406: 54–62.
  25. 25. Benner I, Diner RE, Lefebvre SC, Li D, Komada T, et al.. (2013) Emiliania huxleyi increases calcification but not expression of calcification-related genes in long-term exposure to elevated temperature and pCO2. Philo Trans R Soc B 368. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0049.
  26. 26. Zondervan I (2007) The effects of light, macronutrients, trace metals and CO2 on the production of calcium carbonate and organic carbon in coccolithophores–A review. Deep Sea Res Part II 54: 521–537.
  27. 27. Shi D, Xu Y, Morel FMM (2009) Effects of the pH/pCO2 control method on medium chemistry and phytoplankton growth. Biogeosciences 6: 1199–1207.
  28. 28. Bach LT, Riebesell U, Schulz KG (2011) Distinguishing between the effects of ocean acidification and ocean carbonation in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol Oceanogr 56: 2040–2050.
  29. 29. Raven J, Crawfurd K (2012) Environmental controls on coccolithophore calcification. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 470: 137–166.
  30. 30. Rokitta SD, Rost B (2012) Effects of CO2 and their modulation by light in the life-cycle stages of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol Oceanogr 57: 607–618.
  31. 31. Langer G, Nehrke G, Probert I, Ly J, Ziveri P (2009) Strain-specific responses of Emiliania huxleyi to changing seawater carbonate chemistry. Biogeosciences 6: 2637–2646.
  32. 32. LaRoche J, Rost B, Engel A (2010) Bioassay, batch culture and chemostat experimentation. Guide for best practices for ocean acidification research and data reporting. Publications Office of the European Union. pp. 81–94.
  33. 33. Brattström H, Høisæter T (1992) The Biological station 1892–1992: An historical review. Bergen: Univ. i Bergen.
  34. 34. Glé C, Del Amo Y, Sautour B, Laborde P, Chardy P (2008) Variability of nutrients and phytoplankton primary production in a shallow macrotidal coastal ecosystem (Arcachon Bay, France). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 76: 642–656.
  35. 35. Kester DR, Duedall IW, Connors DN, Pytkowicz RM (1967) Preparation of artificial seawater. Limnol Oceanogr 12: 176–179.
  36. 36. Guillard RR, Ryther JH (1962) Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (cleve) gran. Can J Microbiol 8: 229–239.
  37. 37. Dickson AG, Afghan JD, Anderson GC (2003) Reference materials for oceanic CO2 analysis: A method for the certification of total alkalinity. Mar Chem 80: 185–197.
  38. 38. Lewis E, Wallace DWR (1998) Program developed for CO2 system calculations [Internet]. ORNL/CDIAC-105. OakRidge (Tennessee): Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, U.S. Department of Energy. Available: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/ftp/co2sys.
  39. 39. Sharp JH (1974) Improved analysis for particulate organic carbon and nitrogen from seawater. Limnol Oceanogr 19: 984–989.
  40. 40. Cottingham KL, Brown BL, Lennon JT (2005) Knowing when to draw the line: designing more informative ecological experiments. Front Ecol Environ 3: 145–152
  41. 41. Zondervan I, Zeebe RE, Rost B, Riebesell U (2001) Decreasing marine biogenic calcification: A negative feedback on rising atmospheric pCO2. Global Biogeochem Cycles 15: 507–516.
  42. 42. Langer G, Geisen M, Baumann KH, Kläs J, Riebesell U, et al. (2006) Species-specific responses of calcifying algae to changing seawater carbonate chemistry. Geochemistry, Geophys Geosystems 7: Q09006
  43. 43. Krug S, Schulz KG, Riebesell U (2011) Effects of changes in carbonate chemistry speciation on Coccolithus braarudii: a discussion of coccolithophorid sensitivities. Biogeosciences 8: 771–777.
  44. 44. Lund JWG (1949) Studies on Asterionella: I. The origin and nature of the cells producing seasonal maxima. J Ecol 37: 389–419.
  45. 45. Talling JF (1955) The Relative Growth Rates of Three Plankton Diatoms in Relation to Underwater Radiation and Temperature. Ann Bot XIX: 329–341.
  46. 46. Eppley RW (1972) Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea. Fish Bull 70: 1063–1085.
  47. 47. Conte MH, Thompson A, Lesley D, Harris RP (1998) Genetic and physiological influences on the alkenone/alkenoate versus growth temperature relationship in Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa oceanica. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 62: 51–68.
  48. 48. Buitenhuis ET, Pangerc T, Franklin DJ, Le Quere C, Malin G (2008) Growth rates of six coccolithophorid strains as a function of temperature. Limnol Oceanogr 53: 1181–1185.
  49. 49. Langer G, Gussone N, Nehrke G, Riebesell U, Eisenhauer A, et al. (2007) Calcium isotope fractionation during coccolith formation in Emiliania huxleyi: Independence of growth and calcification rate. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 8: Q05007
  50. 50. Eynaud F, Giraudeau J, Pichon JJ, Pudsey CJ (1999) Sea-surface distribution of coccolithophores, diatoms, silicoflagellates and dinoflagellates in the South Atlantic Ocean during the late austral summer 1995. Deep Sea Res Part I 46: 451–482.
  51. 51. Hagino K, Bendif EM, Young JR, Kogame K, Probert I, et al. (2011) New evidence for morphological and genetic variation in the cosmopolitan coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Prymnesiophyceae) from the COX1b-ATP4 genes. J Phycol 47: 1164–1176
  52. 52. Thomas MK, Kremer CT, Klausmeier C, Litchman E (2012) A global pattern of thermal adaptation in marine phytoplankton. Science 338: 1085–1088.
  53. 53. Tyrrell T, Merico A (2004) Emiliania huxleyi: bloom observations and the conditions that induce them. Coccolithophores: from molecular processes to global impact. Springer pp. 75–98.
  54. 54. Merico A, Tyrrell T, Lessard EJ, Oguz T, Stabeno PJ, et al. (2004) Modelling phytoplankton succession on the Bering Sea shelf: role of climate influences and trophic interactions in generating Emiliania huxleyi blooms 1997–2000. Deep Sea Res Part I 51: 1803–1826.
  55. 55. Merico A, Tyrrell T, Brown CW, Groom SB, Miller PI (2003) Analysis of satellite imagery for Emiliania huxleyi blooms in the Bering Sea before 1997. Geophys Res Lett 30: 1337
  56. 56. Toseland A, Daines SJ, Clark JR, Kirkham A, Strauss J, et al. (2013) The impact of temperature on marine phytoplankton resource allocation and metabolism. Nat Clim Chang 3: 979–984.
  57. 57. Rokitta SD, John U, Rost B (2012) Ocean acidification affects redox-balance and ion-homeostasis in the life-cycle stages of Emiliania huxleyi. PLoS One 7: e52212.
  58. 58. Bach LT, Mackinder LCM, Schulz KG, Wheeler G, Schroeder DC, et al. (2013) Dissecting the impact of CO2 and pH on the mechanisms of photosynthesis and calcification in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. New Phytol 199: 121–134.
  59. 59. Feng Y, Warner ME, Zhang Y, Sun J, Fu FX, et al. (2008) Interactive effects of increased pCO2, temperature and irradiance on the marine coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi (Prymnesiophyceae). Eur J Phycol 43: 87–98
  60. 60. De Bodt C, Van Oostende N, Harlay J, Sabbe K, Chou L (2010) Individual and interacting effects of pCO2 and temperature on Emiliania huxleyi calcification: study of the calcite production, the coccolith morphology and the coccosphere size. Biogeosciences 7: 1401–1412.