Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Amelioration of Reproduction-Associated Oxidative Stress in a Viviparous Insect Is Critical to Prevent Reproductive Senescence

  • Veronika Michalkova ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Veronika Michalkova, Joshua B. Benoit

    Affiliations Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United State of America, Section of Molecular and Applied Zoology, Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

  • Joshua B. Benoit ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Veronika Michalkova, Joshua B. Benoit

    Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, McMicken College of Arts and Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United State of America

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United State of America

  • Geoffrey M. Attardo,

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United State of America

  • Jan Medlock,

    Affiliation Department of Biomedical Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States of America

  • Serap Aksoy

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United State of America

Amelioration of Reproduction-Associated Oxidative Stress in a Viviparous Insect Is Critical to Prevent Reproductive Senescence

  • Veronika Michalkova, 
  • Joshua B. Benoit, 
  • Geoffrey M. Attardo, 
  • Jan Medlock, 
  • Serap Aksoy


Impact of reproductive processes upon female health has yielded conflicting results; particularly in relation to the role of reproduction-associated stress. We used the viviparous tsetse fly to determine if lactation, birth and involution lead to damage from oxidative stress (OS) that impairs subsequent reproductive cycles. Tsetse females carry an intrauterine larva to full term at each pregnancy cycle, and lactate to nourish them with milk secretions produced by the accessory gland ( = milk gland) organ. Unlike most K-strategists, tsetse females lack an apparent period of reproductive senescence allowing the production of 8–10 progeny over their entire life span. In a lactating female, over 47% of the maternal transcriptome is associated with the generation of milk proteins. The resulting single larval offspring weighs as much as the mother at birth. In studying this process we noted an increase in specific antioxidant enzyme (AOE) transcripts and enzymatic activity at critical times during lactation, birth and involution in the milk gland/fat body organ and the uterus. Suppression of superoxide dismutase (sod) decreased fecundity in subsequent reproductive cycles in young mothers and nearly abolished fecundity in geriatric females. Loss of fecundity was in part due to the inability of the mother to produce adequate milk to support larval growth. Longevity was also impaired after sod knockdown. Generation of OS in virgin females through exogenous treatment with hydrogen peroxide at times corresponding to pregnancy intervals reduced survival, which was exacerbated by sod knockdown. AOE expression may prevent oxidative damage associated with the generation of nutrients by the milk gland, parturition and milk gland breakdown. Our results indicate that prevention of OS is essential for females to meet the growing nutritional demands of juveniles during pregnancy and to repair the damage that occurs at birth. This process is particularly important for females to remain fecund during the latter portion of their lifetime.


Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced by mitochondrial respiration, which can be exacerbated during metabolic dysfunction, or as part of an immune response to pathogens. These factors can negatively interact with other biological molecules leading to oxidative damage [1][6]. According to the free-radical theory of aging, an organism that is unable to prevent or repair oxidative stress (OS), accumulates damage which leads to organismal dysfunction, aging and death [7]. This theory hypothesizes that presence of antioxidant enzymes (AOEs) is associated with increased longevity [6], [8][10]. However, recent studies have questioned the significance of the OS response on aging, and instead have suggested that other factors, such as dysregulation of nutrient signaling pathways, impaired proteolysis or reduced autophagy may be more important, with OS playing only a minor role in relation to aging [11][15]. In addition, the production of low levels of ROS appears critical to longevity and metabolic health by acting on intracellular signaling molecules at times of stress [16]. An alternative hypothesis that encompasses both of these ideas is that under optimal conditions ROS plays a role in stress signaling and may even have a positive effect in the prevention of aging. However, under sub-optimal conditions, or periods of high stress, individuals may not be able to mount an adequate response to high levels of ROS [13],[17],[18], leading to cellular damage and accelerated senescence.

Reproductive processes (pregnancy, parturition, lactation, and involution) have been documented to cause oxidative damage in mammalian systems [19][24]. The prevention of OS by AOE expression is critical to fecundity. In Drosophila, mosquitoes and sand flies knockdown of AOEs leads to reduced egg production [8], [9], [25]. Tsetse flies undergo viviparous reproduction, which deviates from the norm of oviparity that occurs in most insects. Tsetse females develop a single oocyte per gonotrophic cycle, and nurture a single offspring in their uterus during embryonic and larval development [26]. Unlike other K-strategists however, tsetse females don't exhibit an apparent period of reproductive senescence. Instead, tsetse females remain fertile throughout their adult lifetime to allow production of 8–10 progeny. During pregnancy, a single larva is nourished in the uterus by the milk secretions from the modified female accessory gland (referred to as milk or uterine gland) [26]. The milk gland undergoes involution (regression and breakdown of milk gland cells to pre-lactation levels) at the completion of each pregnancy cycle [27]. Nearly 20–25 mg of nutrients, consisting of a lipid-protein emulsion within an aqueous base, are transferred to each progeny during the 5–6 day period of intrauterine larval development [27], [28]. Over 50% of maternal lipid reserves are metabolized to provide the lipids and amino acids required for milk synthesis [29][32]. Larval progeny weigh as much as the mother at the time of birth. The fact that tsetse flies have such a heavy metabolic investment in their progeny makes the lack of reproductive senescence even more intriguing [33]. In addition, there is no observed difference in longevity between mated (reproductively active) and unmated tsetse females [33]. Other than a few specific examples, such as the naked mole rat [34], female fecundity typically declines or ceases with age. Furthermore, maternal investment in offspring development has other potential negative consequences on the mother, such as a reduction in longevity [35], [36]. Little is known about the processes tsetse females utilize to prevent and repair damage that occurs during lactation and intrauterine larval development to maintain the ability to produce progeny late in life.

In this study, we investigated the role of the lactation, birth and involution processes upon reproductive senescence and longevity using the viviparous tsetse fly system. We particularly focused on interplay between OS generation and the AOE response in relation to fecundity and longevity as well as on how females compensate for reproduction-induced stress to maintain high progeny output late in life. Our results support the role of the antioxidant response as a critical mechanism to prevent the premature reproductive senescence that results from the induction of OS during tsetse reproduction/lactation/birth processes. We discuss the implications of our findings in light of the interactions between reproduction, OS and antioxidant dynamics, and senescence in organisms with heavy nutritional investment in their progeny, including mammals and birds.


Milk Gland Protein Synthesis is High During Lactation and Declines Immediately After Birth

To provide a synopsis of the physiological changes that occur during the tsetse lactation and birth processes, we examined intrauterine larval size, maternal milk protein transcript abundance, and maternal lipid levels during pregnancy. Larval development occurs within the mother's uterus over a 5–6 day period. At the time of parturition the mature larva has a dry mass of over 10 mg (wet mass of 20–22 mg; Figure 1a), which is equivalent to the mass of the mother [27]. Predicted transcript levels for the twelve major milk proteins, which include Acid sphingomyelinase 1 (aSMase1 [37]), Transferrin (Trf [38]), a lipocalin (Milk Gland Protein 1; MGP1 [39]) and other milk proteins (MGP2-10 [40], [41]) account for over 47% of the total number of predicted RNA-seq reads in a library generated from lactating females carrying a mature intrauterine larva (Figure 1b). Within 24–48 h post-parturition, expression levels for all twelve major milk proteins dramatically decline to dry (non-lactating) levels where the major milk protein transcripts account for only 2% of the total reads (Figure 1b). In addition, the lipid reserves of females decline by over 50% during the later stages of the lactation period at each pregnancy cycle (based on Attardo et al. [29] and Figure 1c). The lipid breakdown that occurs at each pregnancy cycle is critical for the generation of diacylglycerol and proline [26], [42], [43], which are the major circulating nutrients in tsetse hemolymph and required for milk generation [30], [31], [44]. During pregnancy tsetse females appear to devote almost half of their nutritional/transcriptional investment towards production of milk for larval development. This process is under tight transcriptional regulation, with milk synthesis shut down within 24–48 hour post parturition [1].

Figure 1. Tsetse fly investment in their progeny during lactation.

A. Changes in dry mass of single intrauterine larva throughout development. B. Predicted read abundance for the 12 major milk protein genes (milk gland protein 1–10, transferrin and acid sphingomyelinase 1) throughout lactation based on fold changes in milk proteins in relation to transcriptome analysis measured at the peak of lactation (17–18 d) and 24–48 h after parturition according to Benoit et al. [40]. C. Total lipid content in females through pregnancy.

Lack of Increased OS Markers during Tsetse Lactation, Birth and Involution

To determine if there is an increased level of oxidative damage throughout the tsetse pregnancy and birth cycle, we measured levels of two types of oxidative damage, protein carbonyls (proteins damaged by OS) and malondialdehyde (MDA; marker of lipid peroxidation), throughout reproduction. We found no difference in lipid peroxidation or protein carbonyls levels between pregnant mothers harboring an (embryo, 1st, 2nd or 3rd instar larva) and mothers immediately after birth (Figure 2). Our results indicate that there is no significant oxidative damage that results from the substantial physiological changes associated with viviparous reproduction in tsetse.

Figure 2. Levels of oxidative stress markers recovered from mothers through the 1st gonotrophic cycle.

A. Lipid oxidation levels by measurement of lipid peroxidation. Samples were collected from female flies after progeny removal throughout reproduction. Mean ± SE of five groups of 3 flies. B. Protein oxidation by measurement of protein carbonyl levels. Mean ± SE of five groups of 3 flies.

Antioxidant (AOE) Gene Expression Increases during Lactation, Birth and Involution

We next measured transcript levels for nine genes that code for antioxidant enzymes throughout the first and the beginning of the second reproductive cycle to determine if lack of OS could result from increased AOE expression. Transcript levels for 6 of the 9 genes did not vary throughout pregnancy significantly (Table S2). However, there was a substantial increase in the expression of Cu/Zn sod, Mn/Fe sod and catalase genes during lactation, and this expression profile continued up to 24–48 h post parturition during milk gland involution (Figure 3a). The expression of all three AOE genes declined to their lowest level 48–72 h after parturition before increasing again during the second pregnancy cycle (Figure 3a). The AOE activity followed a similar pattern to that of the AOE gene expression with higher antioxidant activity detected during the latter periods of lactation continuing until 24–48 hours post parturition (Figure 3b).

Figure 3. Antioxidant gene expression and activity levels throughout tsetse pregnancy.

A. Transcript levels for Mn/Fe superoxide dismutase (Mn/Fe sod), Cu/Zn sod and catalase measured 24 h after the last blood meal. Each point represents the mean ± SE of four measurements. B. Antioxidant activity. Each sample represents the mean ± SE of four samples.

Due to the drastic changes in transcript abundance during pregnancy, Cu/Zn sod, Mn/Fe sod and catalase expression levels were measured before and during lactation, as well as during the involution period post parturition in different tissues of the mother, including fat body/milk gland and uterus (Figure S1a–e). These analyses allowed us to determine that the substantial increase in the AOE response during the tsetse reproductive cycle is localized to the fat body/milk gland and uterine tissues. AOE transcripts were found to increase in the fat body/milk gland and reproductive tract during lactation and involution (Figure S1a–c). A similar pattern was observed in regards to antioxidant activity with increased levels observed in the fat body/milk gland (Figure S1d). Separation of pure milk gland tissue is nearly impossible in tsetse females as it is intertwined with the fat body and trachea. Thus our dissections and measurements included both fat body and milk gland tissues. However, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis with gene specific primers indicates that the expression of both Mn/Fe sod and Cu/Zn sod occurs within the milk gland organ (Figure S2). These results show a substantial increase in AOE gene transcript levels and enzyme activity in response to lactation, birth and involution that is predominantly localized in tissues associated with larval growth and lactation.

Reduction of SOD Expression Impairs Lactation and Results in Loss of Fecundity

To determine the functional role of the AOE response during tsetse reproduction, we utilized RNA interference to suppress the transcript levels of sod genes. Injection of siRNA targeting Cu/Zn sod and Mn/Fe sod yielded a reduction in transcript abundance of over 65% for both genes, respectively (Figure S3a). Antioxidant enzymatic activity was also significantly reduced by 20–30% when individual genes were silenced, and was further suppressed by combined interference of both SOD genes by 60–70% (Figure S3b). We next evaluated the ability of pregnant females injected with both siCu/Zn sod and siMn/Fe sod to survive an exogenous H2O2 treatment, as an indication of their ability to respond to OS. We found that knockdown of SOD genes rendered reproductively active females over 50% less tolerant to H2O2 treatment as measured by survival in relation to control counterparts (Figure S3c). It appears that the two most abundant AOE gene products (Cu/Zn sod and Mn/Fe sod) likely enable flies to cope with pregnancy associated OS.

After demonstrating effective reduction of the antioxidant response by SOD gene knockdown, we assessed the effect of this phenotype on reproduction and lactation over the first three reproductive cycles in tsetse females by measuring progeny output. Knockdown of Cu/Zn or Mn/Fe sod individually during the first pregnancy cycle did not cause a significant reduction in pupal production during the next cycle relative to the control group that received siGFP treatments (Figure 4a). The combined knockdown of Cu/Zn and Mn/Fe sod in the first pregnancy cycle resulted in a slight reduction in progeny production in the second cycle (Figure 4a). However, the reduction of Cu/Zn sod alone during both the first and second cycles yielded nearly a 30% loss of fecundity during the third cycle (Figure 3a). Combined knockdown of both SOD genes during the first two cycles resulted in the lowest fecundity levels during the third cycle with a reduction of over 50% (Figure 4a). In addition to reduced progeny output, the length of the larval intrauterine development period was also extended by 15–20% following knockdown of a single SOD gene, and by over 30% when both SOD genes were suppressed in the earlier lactation cycles relative to the control treatment group (Figure 4b). The levels of protein carbonyl and markers of lipid peroxidation were also increased during subsequent pregnancy cycles following sod knockdown (Figure 5a and b). Collectively, our results indicate that SOD expression during periods of lactation and birth appears to be critical for the prevention of oxidative damage, and for the maintenance of tsetse's fecundity during subsequent reproductive cycles.

Figure 4. Effect of RNA interference of Mn/Fe sod and Cu/Zn sod on tsetse fecundity.

A. Average number of pupae produced per female during generation of the 1st (L1), 2nd (L2) and 3rd (L3) pregnancy cycle after sod knockdown in the 14th day of the fly development and 5th day of subsequent pregnancy cycles. Mean ± SE of three groups of 15 flies. B. Length of the gonotrophic cycles analyzed under similar treatment as A. Mean ± SE of three groups of 15 flies are shown. Expression of milk gland proteins (mgp1, mgp7 and asmase1) during the early (C, 1st instar larva present in uterus) and late stages (D, 3rd instar larva present in uterus) of lactation after sod knockdown during the first two pregnancy cycles.

Figure 5. Oxidative stress markers recovered from females during their third pregnancy following sod knockdown during the first two reproductive cycles.

A. Protein oxidation by measurement of protein carbonyl levels. Mean ± SE of five groups of 3 flies. B. Lipid oxidation levels measured by lipid peroxidation. Samples were collected from mothers carrying a 3rd instar larvae in their uterus. Mean ± SE of five groups of 3 flies.

To determine the underlying aspects that lead to extended larval development period in SOD knockdown flies, we measured the transcript abundance of the three major milk proteins (MGP1, MGP7 and aSMase1) during the third pregnancy cycle after siRNA injection in the previous two pregnancy cycles (either siGFP or siMn/Fe and siCu/Zn sod). We noted no significant differences in the expression levels of the milk protein genes between the two groups when analyzed early in the lactation period when a first instar larva was present in the uterus (Figure 4c). However, there was a 2–3 fold reduction in milk protein gene expression levels later in lactation when a second or third instar larva was present in the uterus and milk production is normally peaking (Figure 4d). Along with reduced transcript levels of three major milk proteins, we documented a 30–35% decrease in protein level for the major milk protein MGP1 after SOD knockdown (Figure S4). These results indicate that the reduced fecundity observed in the older females after SOD knockdown is likely due to the reduced levels of milk proteins generated by the milk gland, which is insufficient to support adequate larval development.

Reduction of Lactation-Associated AOEs Reduces Longevity and Development of Reproductive Senescence: Comparison with Reproductive Output in Other Animals

We compared data on reproductive rate relative to lifespan between tsetse and other organisms to examine how reproduction/aging dynamics of this fly relates to that of other organisms (Figure 6). In general, there is a period of time before an organism becomes reproductively active (Figure 6a). A decline in reproductive capacity usually occurs as organisms age. This typically happens gradually in insects such as med fly and Drosophila (Fig. 6a; [45][48]), but more rapidly after a critical age in the case of mammals, lions, and most other K-strategists. This rapid loss of fecundity represents declining reproductive fitness with age, or reproductive senescence (Figure 6a). Tsetse flies represent a drastic deviation from other animals in that they maintain their fecundity late in life (Figure 6a). Suppression of the two sod genes during lactation, birth and involution, however reduce tsetse's fecundity, making it more comparable with the fecundity parameters of other organisms. This is marked by a decline in the fecundity observed with age, and by a period of reproductive senescence late in life (Figure 6b). These results indicate that the increased expression of AOEs during lactation, birth and involution are critical for the prevention of reproductive decline and senescence.

Figure 6. Age-related fecundity patterns in various species in comparison to tsetse flies.

A. Medfly, (eggs/day) [46], [47], human (traditional Ache population, progeny/year) [101], lions (progeny/year) [102], Drosophila melanogaster (eggs/day) [103] and tsetse fly (this study, [33]). B. Age-related fecundity patterns in tsetse fly after knockdown Mn/Fe sod and Cu/Zn sod. Mean ± SE for three groups of 15 flies.

Tsetse flies unique ability to maintain a high level of fecundity late in life is comparable to that of the naked mole rat, a rodent known for extreme longevity and high fecundity in old age [34]. Tsetse flies also live longer than other related insects and have no apparent decline in fecundity [34]. The lifespan (longevity) of both tsetse and the naked mole rat does not seem to be impacted by the act of reproduction. Our findings in tsetse implicate AOE expression at critical periods during each pregnancy cycle as a necessary mechanism that allows tsetse to maintain reproductive fitness and minimizes end of life reproductive senescence.

Pregnancy Stress can be Experimentally Induced by Exogenous H2O2 Treatment Followed by sod Knockdown

We noted a decrease in overall longevity upon sod knockdown, with the effect being more prominent in reproductively active flies (Figure 7a). Next we investigated whether increased lactation associated OS may also be responsible for the noted decrease in tsetse's longevity. We used exogenous H2O2 treatment to induce OS at critical times, mimicking the pregnancy-induced responses in age matched virgin females for comparison with pregnant but untreated counterparts. We injected virgin females with H2O2 at 10 day intervals, which correspond to the beginning of each pregnancy cycle starting on day 20 when females typically carry their first late stage third instar larva prior to parturition. These experiments were to specifically address if the bouts of oxidative stress associated with reproduction impact fly longevity without other physiological changes associated with lactation and birth, specifically after the reduction of the AOE response. We followed these flies for effects on longevity until death. Injection of virgin females with exogenous H2O2 resulted in a substantial decline in longevity with 50% mortality occurring nearly 50 days earlier than in the control virgin female group that received H2O injections (Figure 7b). We next treated a group of virgin females with siMn/Fe and siCu/Zn sod, and found a small but significant reduction in their longevity when compared to control groups similarly injected with H2O and siGFP, respectively (Figure 7b). However, injection with H2O2 after knockdown of Mn/Fe and Cu/Zn sod resulted in a drastic reduction in lifespan, which was not observed in either the siGFP or the H2O2 treatment groups (Figure 7b). These results indicate that OS, similar to that which occurs during lactation and parturition in tsetse, is particularly more detrimental to lifespan at times when SOD levels are low.

Figure 7. Survival of pregnant and virgin females following sod knockdown and exogenous treatment with H2O2.

A. Longevity following sod knockdown in mated and unmated females. Mean ± SE of 15 flies. B. Survival of groups of virgin flies to mimic subjected to one of four treatments: H2O or H2O2 injections at intervals during the peak of lactation that matched those of tsetse fly pregnancy, Mn/Fe and Cu/Zn sod during the first three pregnancy cycles and Mn/Fe and Cu/Zn sod during the first three pregnancy cycles along with H2O2 at intervals that match those of pregnancy. Survival data was measured using a Kaplan-Meier plot along with a log rank test. Arrows indicate treatment with H2O or H2O2.

The SOD Response is Essential for Tsetse Population Sustainability

We performed population modeling to determine how suppression of the lactation-associated SOD response might alter population growth dynamics using our data. Based on the modeling analysis, siGFP treated control flies had a probability of positive growth of 62.8% (Figure 8a). When flies were treated with siMn/Fe sod and si Cu/Zn sod double knockdown, we noted a negative impact on population growth, with only a 0.3% probability of a positive growth rate, the level necessary to support replacement of flies dying in the population (Figure 8a). Direct comparison of the growth rates between control and knockdown flies revealed an absolute difference in growth rate of 1.61 per year (95% CI = −0.214, 3.473, p-value for difference >0 = 4.06%; Figure 8b). The absolute values correspond to a decline in population size of 80.0% [95% confidence interval = −23.9%, 96.9%] after one year in the absence of an adequate SOD response during lactation. The modeling results indicate that the reproductive-associated antioxidant response is likely critical to maintain tsetse populations in the wild.

Figure 8. Population modeling following sod knockdown.

A. Frequency of growth rate. B. Reduction in growth rate between sod knockdown and control (siGFP). Results represent 10,000 simulated replicates.


In this study we used the viviparous tsetse fly to investigate the role of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes in reproductive senescence and female longevity. Tsetse females remain fertile for much of their adult-life, and once mated undergo multiple pregnancies (8–10) with no evidence of significant reproductive senescence. During this pregnancy period, they lactate to nurture their progeny to full term in their uterus by milk secretions produced from the milk gland organ. It appears that tsetse females can successfully manage reproduction-associated OS during the lactation, parturition and involution periods of the reproductive cycle. We found high levels of expression of the antioxidant pathway genes (Cu/Zn sod, Mn/Fe sod and catalase) late in pregnancy, and immediately after birth in reproduction associated tissues (milk gland/fat body and uterus). This increase in AOE appears to be important to maintain homeostasis with each subsequent pregnancy cycle, to prevent direct damage to the milk gland, and prevent interference with other underlying mechanisms necessary for lactation. Knockdown of the SOD response during lactation reduces milk protein generation in the subsequent reproductive cycles, results in reproductive senescence in older flies, and reduces longevity, particularly in reproductively active females. These results suggest that the spatially and temporally regulated AOE responses are a critical mechanism that protects the female reproductive system from OS over multiple cycles of lactation, parturition and involution. Population modeling predicts that if tsetse females lack this lactation associated AOE response, natural population growth would decline by 80% within the year. We summarize the role of AOE expression during tsetse reproduction in Figure 9.

Figure 9. Summary for the role of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzyme expression during tsetse fly reproduction.

Developmental images adapted from Benoit et al. [104]. Cross sections adapted from Ma and Denlinger [28], Hecker and Moloo [105] and Yang et al. [41].

Similar to mammalian lactation, tsetse females nourish their progeny via secretion of milk from the milk gland organ [37], [39], [40]. Tsetse milk composition and production shares several similarities with mammalian systems. Mammalian systems have highly specialized lactating cells that cycle through periods of high activity during lactation to low/no activity following involution during the dry period [49], [50]. The protein composition of tsetse and mammalian milk also show functional analogy between the two systems [51], [52]. Comparable protein types include a lipocalin (MGP1 in tsetse versus β-lactoglobulin in mammals [39], [53][56]), an iron-binding protein (Transferrin in tsetse versus Lactoferrin in mammals [38], [57]), sphingomyelinase present either in milk or in the gut contents of nursing progeny [37], [58][60] as well as immune proteins (peptidoglycan recognition protein PGRP-LB and UBASH3A in tsetse versus multiple mammalian immune proteins [40], [51], [54], [61], ). The lipid content of the milk secretions transferred to the developing offspring during lactation is also similar in both systems, both in composition and concentration [29], [31], [63]. In tsetse, the obligate symbiont Wigglesworthia, which provides critical nutrients for maintaining fecundity and for immune maturation, is transferred maternally in milk secretions [53], . Symbiotic bacteria in maternal milk secretions are also found in mammalian systems, and are thought to function as probiotics [64][65]. Lastly, tsetse and mammals have an expanded family of lactation-specific proteins (MGP 2–10 family in tsetse versus casein family in mammals [40], [66], [67]). The convergence between these disparate systems suggests that tsetse flies have developed alternative yet functionally similar solutions to the problem of providing immature offspring with essential nutritional requirements.

The critical role of OS in relation to reproduction and progeny nourishment has been documented in many organisms, including Drosophila [68], [69], birds [70], [71], mammals [2], [72], [73] and blood feeding insects, such as sand flies and mosquitoes [8], [9]. In terms of milk production, dairy cows express increased OS markers during lactation and in the subsequent period of involution [74]. However, increased OS during reproduction has not been documented for all organisms. Female house mice and bank voles do not show increased markers for OS during reproduction [75], [76]. The lack of oxidative damage is not surprising as reproductive evolution has likely equipped animals with the ability to mitigate immediate and long-term damage associated with reproduction to maintain fecundity [77]. Similarly, in tsetse flies OS damage does not increase over the course of reproduction, and does not differ between fertile and infertile individuals. This is most likely due to increased AOE response mediated by the expression of two SOD genes and a catalase gene late in intrauterine larval development, at parturition and during the subsequent period of involution that likely prevents excess ROS. Indeed, when RNA interference was utilized to reduce AOE genes during lactation, we observed a significant increase in oxidative damage during the subsequent periods of lactation and pregnancy. This damage resulted in impaired progeny output due to direct milk gland dysfunction or other mechanisms by which milk protein synthesis is impaired (i.e. reduction of available nutrients for milk protein synthesis). These results support the hypothesis that tsetse flies are adapted to mitigate the OS generated by the high energy demands of their intrauterine progeny by utilizing AOE pathways.

One of the most interesting findings from this study is there is no or minimal decline in fecundity as tsetse flies age. A few organisms, such as the naked mole rat [34], have high levels of progeny output during the later periods of life. For our studies, it is important to mention that our flies were held under laboratory conditions with regular access to meals throughout the course of the study. Although these conditions would seem to be optimal, flies do experience mechanical damage to their wings and bodies from housing within cages, suggesting that these flies likely experience stress throughout their lifetimes. However, colony conditions may be more stable than field conditions, thus OS is likely to be one of the many contributing factors involved in tsetse reproductive senescence. As an example, tsetse flies maintain tight control of lipid levels during the transition between lactation and dry periods [29], [78]. These lipid reserves are critical for providing fat for incorporation into the milk and their breakdown generates amino acids necessary for milk protein generation [29][32]. If aging prevented lipid accumulation between periods of lactation,, potentially through dysregulation of insulin or juvenile hormone signaling that have been shown to regulate lipid homeostasis [78], flies may experience reproductive senescence due to the inability of older mothers to produce milk at adequate levels. Thus, there may be other factors beyond oxidative stress that could contribute to reproductive senescence in field flies. Even so, our study demonstrates that tsetse females lacking an oxidative stress response during lactation and birth have a discernible period of reproductive senescence and will be unable to maintain reproduction above replacement levels based on population modeling.

In relation to aging, mated and unmated tsetse females have the same lifespan (this study; [33]). This indicates that under laboratory conditions, there is no trade-off between fecundity and life span. This finding supports the discoveries reported in recent studies across multiple animal systems ranging from insects to mammals, which show that reproduction apparently has little to no effect on longevity [45], [48], [72], [79]. Other studies have shown the fitness consequences due to reproduction such as impaired immunity and reduced resistance to environmental stress [25], [72], [80][82]. Our finding in tsetse shows that fecundity has a substantial cost on longevity when the AOE response is suppressed during reproduction. Recent studies have questioned the role of the OS response in relation to aging, since little to no change in lifespan was shown to occur after knockdown of sod genes [18], [83], and overexpression of AOEs did not appear to extend lifespan in multiple model species [11], [83]. Many of these studies however have utilized optimal rearing conditions, and it has been suggested that under suboptimal conditions OS could play a more important role in relation to aging [13]. It is possible that the observed impact on longevity in tsetse may not be due solely to oxidative damage, but may include other factors as well. A recent theory that has garnered support is the hyperfunction theory of aging, proposed by Williams [84] and Hamilton [85] with mechanisms focused on by Blagosklonny [86][89]. This theory argues that unregulated processes associated with early-life fitness, such as growth and reproduction, can be damaging later in life. These uncontrolled processes can lead to negative-age related phenotypes and death. We have observed increased lipid levels in older flies, specifically in flies with a reduced ability to respond to OS during lactation. The inability to maintain lipid homeostasis suggests possible disruptions in the target of rapamycin (TOR), insulin signaling, or alternative nutrient sensing pathways, which is a major hallmark of aging [90]. Along with improper nutrient signaling, other hallmarks of aging, such as mitochondrial dysfunction and loss of proteostasis, may be altered in flies without their normal response to OS during lactation. Additional studies will be necessary to pinpoint the underlying pathologies that result from interference with the AOE response during tsetse lactation. Even so, our study suggests that reproductive-associated OS will lead to decreased longevity if the mechanisms for its suppression are impaired.


In this study, we show that the AOE response is critical for tsetse flies to manage OS generated during pregnancy and to maintain fecundity, particularly late in life. In the absence of the AOE response, there is a precipitous decline in fecundity, which is due, at least in part, to the inability of tsetse mothers to synthesize the milk nutrients required for progeny development. Population modeling reveals that in the absence of a well-regulated AOE response, the population growth rate will fall below replacement levels. These results suggest that the AOE response is likely a critical aspect that functions to compensate for the OS resulting from the massive metabolic demands generated by lactation in tsetse. In relation to organismal reproduction and senescence, it is likely that OS occurs during reproduction in most organisms, but females may have adapted to prevent the accumulation of oxidative damage during this period to allow for normal reproductive output as aging occurs.

Materials and Methods

Flies and antioxidant genes

Laboratory colonies of Glossina morsitans morsitans, established from a population collected in Zimbabwe, are utilized at Yale University for at least 20 years. Flies are maintained at 25°C and 50–60% RH using an artificial membrane feeding system [91]. Females were mated 3–5 d after emergence and collected according to developmental markers based on oocyte, embryo and larva presence [26], [39]. Multiple antioxidant genes have been identified from tsetse flies based on previous studies (Table S1; [92]). Flies were stored in groups of 5 throughout our experiments for uniformity. We have provided a diagram of the experimental set-up to more easily interpret the results (Figure S5).

RNA and protein extraction

Temporal samples were acquired from pregnant flies with developing progeny removed so that transcript levels reflect only the changes occurring within the mother. Spatial samples were acquired from pregnant females with a 3rd instar larvae present within the uterus. Each sample was collected 24 h after blood feeding to remove effects of digestion. RNA and protein were extracted from whole flies and tissues using Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using Superscript III reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen) based on the manufacturer's protocol, with the exception that cDNA synthesis was extended to 60 min. RNA and cDNA were stored at −70°C until use. Protein was stored in protein pellet solubilization buffer (8M urea, 3M thiourea, 1% dithiothreitol and 4% CHAPS) at −20°C.

Transcript expression levels

The PCR amplification conditions were 95°C for 3 min, thirty cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 52 or 56°C for 1 min, and 1 min at 70°C in a Bio-Rad DNA Engine Peltier Thermocycler (Hercules, CA) with gene-specific primer sets. PCR products were purified and the amplified regions were validated by sequencing at the DNA Analysis Facility at Yale University. Levels of antioxidant and lactation-specific gene expression were determined by qPCR utilizing the iCycler iQ real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) using gene specific primers (Table S1). The data were obtained in triplicate samples and were normalized to tsetse tubulin (tub, DQ377071.1) expression levels and analyzed with software version 3.1 (Bio-Rad). Transcript levels were assessed throughout the course of pregnancy for antioxidant genes, following knockdown of specific genes for validation and to determine if transcript levels of milk proteins were alters after perturbation of lactation-associated antioxidant responses (Figure S5).

RNA interference of antioxidant genes

Short interfering RNAs (siRNA) were synthesized commercially (IDT, Coralville, IA) and consist of two duplex sequences for Cu/Zn sod (CCGACGUGACGUAUCUCA and GUACUGAUGAGAUACGUC) and Mn/Fe sod (AAUUGGAGCCAAAGCACC and CGACUAUGGUGCUUUGGC). Control siRNAs were designed against green fluorescent protein (GFP; GAUGCCAUUCUUUGGUUUGUCUCCCAU and CUUGACUUCAGCACGUGUCUUGUAGUU). The concentration was determined by spectrophotometer and adjusted to 1 µg/µl. Each fly in the first treatment group was injected with 1.5 µl siRNA13d after emergence (single treatment) and flies in a second treatment group were injected again at 23 d (two treatments). This treatment procedure allowed for interference of the lactation-associated antioxidant response. For validation, transcript expression levels were determined by qPCR, antioxidant capacity and H2O2 tolerance was assessed 5–6 d after siRNA injections. Fecundity of the flies was measured over multiple gonotrophic cycles and displayed as the duration of pregnancy and the number of progeny generated per females during each gonotrophic cycle

Western blot analysis of tsetse milk proteins

Equal volumes of protein from three flies were combined for each time point, and analyzed by standard western blot protocol [39]. Antisera against Tubulin (Tub), Milk Gland Protein (MGP1) and Transferrin (Trf) were previously generated against recombinant tsetse proteins [38], [39]. Analysis of Tubulin and MGP were performed utilizing the protein equivalent of 1/100th of a fly per well. Blots were blocked overnight in PBS, 3% BSA and 0.5% Tween 20 (blocking buffer). Tub and MGP1/Trf antisera were utilized at 1∶5,000 and 1∶20,000, respectively [38], [39]. Signals were visualized with Supersignal West Pico Substrate (Pierce, Wobrun, MA) on an Image Station 2000R (Kodak, New Haven, CT). Western blot analysis was conducted for flies during the 3rd gonotrophic cycle after reduction of the AOE response in the previous two reproductive cycles (Figure S5).

In situ hybridization

Milk gland tubules together with fat body were collected from female flies carrying third instar larva and placed into Carnoy's fixative for a five day fixation period [53]. Digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes were generated using the MAXIscript T7 transcription kit following manufacturer's protocol (Ambion, Austin, TX) using a primer set with a T7 primer (Table S1) [52]. Antibody solutions were made featuring anti-Digoxigenin-rhodamine Fab fragments for FISH probe detection (1∶200 dilution) (Roche) and rabbit anti-GmmMGP (1∶2500) antibodies [39], [53]. Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) at a dilution of 1∶500 was added as a secondary antibody for immunohistochemistry [53]. Slides were mounted in VECTASHIELD Mounting Medium with DAPI (Vector laboratories Inc. Burlingame, CA). Samples were observed using a Zeiss Axioskop2 microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY) equipped with a fluorescent filter. Samples were viewed and imaged at 400× magnification. Images were captured using an Infinity1 USB 2.0 camera and software (Lumenera Corporation, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada).

Trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) assay

The TEAC assay was conducted according to Re et al [93], with modification by Lopez-Martinez et al. [88]. Female flies and dissected tissues were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70°C until analysis. TEAC was measured using 2,2′-azino-bis-(3- ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) radical cation decolorization assay. Samples were compared to a Trolox standard curve [0–150 µmol l−1 (ml−1)] and results were expressed at Trolox equivalents per me soluble protein. Three pools of three samples were homogenized in PBS and centrifuged at 5000 g for 5 min at 4°C. The fly homogenate was diluted to a concentration of 2 mg protein ml−1. The ABTS (7 mmol l−1 in 2.45 mmol l−1 potassium persulfate; Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) was prepared before the assay and allowed to equilibrate in the dark at 25°C overnight. The protein samples and Trolox standard were combined with ABTS and incubated for 10 min at 25°C. Antioxidant capacity was measured at 734 nm on Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (BioTek). TEAC levels were assessed through the tsetse pregnancy cycle from females after removal of an embryo, 1st instar, 2nd instar and 3rd instar larva from the uterus along with those immediately birth (no progeny in the uterus). In addition, TEAC levels were assessed following knockdown of Cu/Zn sod and Mn/Fe sod to determine if their knockdown impaired antioxidant levels.

Lipid peroxidation assay

Lipid peroxidation was measured by the amount of malondialdehyde (MDA), the main aldehyde product of lipid peroxidation, utilizing the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances test (TBARS). This assay was adapted from those previously described [94][97]. Individual flies, or tissues dissected from three individuals were pooled and homogenized in RIPA buffer with EDTA, respectively. The samples were split into two aliquots: one was used to determine the protein concentration as standardization and the second was treated with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) then incubated in ice to precipitate proteins. Following TCA treatment, the sample was centrifuged for 2200 g for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was combined with 0.6% (w/v) thiobarbituric acid solution and heated at 95°C for 1 h. The samples were then allowed to cool to 25°C on ice and centrifuged (2200 g for 5 min) prior to absorbance measurement at 532 nm. MDA quantification was determined using an eight point MDA standard curve [0–50 µmol l−1] standardized in relation to total protein. MDA levels were assessed through the tsetse pregnancy cycle from females after removal of an embryo, 1st instar, 2nd instar and 3rd instar larva from the uterus along with those immediately birth (no progeny in the uterus; Figure S5). In addition, MDA levels were assessed in the third reproductive cycle following knockdown of Cu/Zn sod and Mn/Fe sod in the first two gonotrophic cycles to determine if their knockdown resulted in increased MDA levels.

Protein carbonyl assay

Protein oxidation was measured according to Levine et al. [98] with modifications by Lopez-Martinez et al. [95]. Whole flies and tissues were homogenized in a 5% sulfosalicylic acid. Excess amount of 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH, Sigma) was utilized to extract carbonyls, the carbonyls were precipitated with TCA and multiple washes with ethanol∶ethyl acetate solutions was utilized to remove excess DNPH. The resulting proteins were diluted in 6M guanidine hydrochloride. Sample absorbance was measured at 370 nm and compared to a BSA standard (nine points, 0.2 mg/ml) curve. Data are presented as nmol mg−1 soluble protein. Protein carbonyl levels were assessed through the tsetse pregnancy cycle from females after removal of an embryo, 1st instar, 2nd instar and 3rd instar larva from the uterus along with those immediately birth (no progeny in the uterus; Figure S5). In addition, protein carbonyl levels were assessed in the third reproductive cycle following knockdown of Cu/Zn sod and Mn/Fe sod in the first two gonotrophic cycles to determine if their knockdown resulted in increased protein carbonyl levels.

Effect of exogenous OS on nonreproductive (virgin) flies

For testing the periodic OS, unmated female flies were utilized under four separate treatment groups (Figure S5). The first treatment group was injected with 2 µl of 0.5% H2O2 at intervals of pregnancy (20, 30 and 40 d) during the first three reproductive cycles. The second treatment group was injected with water control, Mn/Fe sod and Cu/Zn sod siRNA (200 ng/µl) to determine the effect of SOD knockdown on survival, respectively. The third treatment group received Mn/Fe sod and Cu/Zn sod siRNA (200 ng/µl) along with 0.5% H2O2 to determine the effect of increased OS after SOD knockout, respectively. Flies were held under standard colony rearing protocols and monitored until 100% mortality was reached. An outline of the experimental design is provided in Figure S5.

Population modeling following reduction of SOD response

To estimate the impact of reproductive-associated antioxidant response at the population scale, we built a simple mathematical model of a tsetse population growth. The model population for impaired reproductive-associated antioxidant response was parametrized with data from the siMn/FE and siCu/Zn sod treatments, while the non-impaired model population was parametrized with data from the control treatment, siGFP treatment (Table S3). For both model populations, we assumed normal, non-antioxidant-impaired mortality. We calculated the mean and standard deviation of fecundity and gonotrophic-cycle length for the control group and for the combined siMn/FE and siCu/Zn sod treatment group for 12 gonotrophic cycles (Table S3). For each gonotrophic cycle and each treatment group, we modeled fecundity Fjk as a beta random variable with parameters chosen to match the mean and standard deviation of the data. Similarly, we modeled gonotrophic-cycle length tjk as a log normal random variable with parameters chosen to match the mean and standard deviation of the data for each gonotrophic cycle and each treatment group.

Given values of fecundity and gonotrophic cycle length, number of female offspring produced by a single female tsetse over its lifetime is Rj = pFjk Sjk where p is the probability than a deposited pupa is female, which we took to be 55% [99] and Sjk is the survival, the probability of surviving to gonotrophic cycle k. We modeled survival as Sjk = Spupa sTjk, where Spupa is the probability that a deposited pupa survives to emerge as an adult, which we took to be a conservative number at 85% [99], [100]; s is the probability of surviving each adult day, which we took to be 98% [99], [100], and Tjk = ∑ tjk is the number of days from emergence until the end of gonotrophic cycle k. The population growth rate is then rj = RjD, with the generation time defined to be D = Dpupa+Dadult is the mean duration of the pupal stage, which we took to be 31.4 days [100]; and Dadult = −(log s)−1 is the mean adult lifespan. We calculated the population growth rate rj for each treatment group and the difference in growth rate between the two treatment groups, r1r2, for 10,000 samples of our model.

Statistical analysis

Results were compared utilizing JMP or SAS statistical software programs (Cary, North Carolina, USA). Mean differences utilized between treatments were compared with one-way or two-way ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction followed by Tukey's post-hoc test. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was utilized to measure survival differences following treatment with H2O2.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Antioxidant gene and activity levels in specific tissues before, during and after lactation. A, B and C. Transcript levels for Mn/Fe superoxide dismutase (Mn/Fe sod), Cu/Zn sod and catalase, respectively Each point represents the mean ± SE of four measurements. D. Antioxidant activity determined as Trolox-equivalent assay (µmol l−1 mg−1 protein). Each sample represents the mean ± SE of three samples.


Figure S2.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Red for Mn/FE sod (A) and Cu/Zn sod (B) green for milk gland protein (MGP) immunohistochemistry. DAPI staining of nuclei in blue, is shown in a cross section of milk gland tubules. 1 = milk gland lumen; 2 = nuclei; 3 = secretory reservoir. Negative controls not treated with Digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes displayed no signal.


Figure S3.

RNA interference of Mn/Fe sod and Cu/Zn sod. A. Transcript levels. Mean ± SE of three samples. B. Antioxidant activity. Mean ± SE of four samples. C. Resistance to H2O2 injection. Mean ± SE of 15 flies.


Figure S4.

Reduction in milk gland protein levels after SOD gene knockdown. Tubulin was utilized as an internal control. Relative protein levels were determined with densitometry through the utilization of ImageJ. Mean ± SE of three blots.


Figure S5.

Diagram outlining experimental design.


Table S1.

Quantitative PCR primer information utilized in this study.


Table S2.

qPCR expression of multiple oxidative stress genes through tsetse pregnancy.


Table S3.

Gonotrophic cycle length and fecundity by cycle number for control and siMn/Fe and siCu/Zn sod treatment groups. Cycle length is the duration of the gonotrophic cycle in days. Fecundity is probability that pupa was deposited during the cycle.



We thank Oleg Kruglov and Yineng Wu for their technical expertise.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: VM JBB GMA JM SA. Performed the experiments: VM JBB. Analyzed the data: VM JBB GMA JM SA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: VM JBB GMA JM SA. Wrote the paper: VM JBB GMA JM SA.


  1. 1. Attardo GM, Benoit JB, Michalkova V, Patrick KR, Krause TB, et al. (2013) The homeodomain protein Ladybird Late regulates milk protein gene expression during pregnancy in the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans). PLoS Neg Trop Dis DOI 10.1371journal.pntd.0002645/journal.pntd.0002645.
  2. 2. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma RK (2005) Role of oxidative stress in female reproduction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 3: 28.
  3. 3. Murphy MP, Holmgren A, Larsson NG, Halliwell B, Chang CJ, et al. (2011) Unraveling the biological roles of reactive oxygen species. Cell Metab 13: 361–366.
  4. 4. Pamplona R, Costantini D (2011) Molecular and structural antioxidant defenses against oxidative stress in animals. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 301: 843–863.
  5. 5. Lushchak VI (2011) Adaptive response to oxidative stress: Bacteria, fungi, plants and animals. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol 153: 175–190.
  6. 6. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC (2007) Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. 704 p.
  7. 7. Harman D (1956) Aging - a theory based on free-radical and radiation-chemistry. J Gerontol 11: 298–300.
  8. 8. DeJong RJ, Miller LM, Molina-Cruz A, Gupta L, Kumar S, et al. (2007) Reactive oxygen species detoxification by catalase is a major determinant of fecundity in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 2121–2126.
  9. 9. Diaz-Albiter H, Mitford R, Genta FA, Sant'Anna MRV, Dillon RJ (2011) Reactive oxygen species scavenging by catalase is important for female Lutzomyia longipalpis fecundity and mortality. PLoS One 6: e17486.
  10. 10. Le Bourg E (2001) Oxidative stress, aging and longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. FEBS Lett 498: 183–186.
  11. 11. Cabreiro F, Ackerman D, Doonan R, Araiz C, Back P, et al. (2011) Increased life span from overexpression of superoxide dismutase in Caenorhabditis elegans is not caused by decreased oxidative damage. Free Radic Biol Med 51: 1575–1582.
  12. 12. Lewis KN, Andziak B, Yang T, Buffenstein R (2012) The naked mole-rat response to oxidative stress: Just deal with it. Antioxid Redox Signal
  13. 13. Salmon AB, Richardson A, Perez VI (2010) Update on the oxidative stress theory of aging: does oxidative stress play a role in aging or healthy aging? Free Radic Biol Med 48: 642–655.
  14. 14. Speakman JR, Selman C (2011) The free-radical damage theory: Accumulating evidence against a simple link of oxidative stress to ageing and lifespan. Bioessays 33: 255–259.
  15. 15. Back P, Braeckman BP, Matthijssens F (2012) ROS in aging Caenorhabditis elegans: damage or signaling. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2012: 1–14.
  16. 16. Ristow M, Zarse K (2010) How increased oxidative stress promotes longevity and metabolic health: The concept of mitochondrial hormesis (mitohormesis). Exp Gerontol 45: 410–418.
  17. 17. Hekimi S, Lapointe J, Wen Y (2011) Taking a “good” look at free radicals in the aging process. Trends Cell Biol 21: 569–576.
  18. 18. Van Raamsdonk JM, Hekimi S (2012) Superoxide dismutase is dispensable for normal animal lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 5785–5790.
  19. 19. Piccione G, Alberghina D, Marafioti S, Giannetto C, Casella S, et al. (2012) Electrophoretic serum protein fraction profile during the different physiological phases in Comisana ewes. Reprod Domest Anim 47: 591–595.
  20. 20. Gillespie MJ, Haring VR, McColl KA, Monaghan P, Donald JA, et al. (2011) Histological and global gene expression analysis of the ‘lactating’ pigeon crop. BMC Genomics 12: 452.
  21. 21. Piccione G, Borruso M, Giannetto C, Morgante M, Giudice E (2007) Assessment of oxidative stress in dry and lactating cows. Acta Agriculturae Scand, Section A 19: 1–11.
  22. 22. Singh K, Davies SR, Dobson JM, Molenaar AJ, Wheeler TT, et al. (2008) cDNA microarray analysis reveals that antioxidant and immune genes are upregulatd during involution of the bovine mammary gland. J Dairy Sci 91: 2236–2246.
  23. 23. Castillo C, Hernandez J, Valverde I, Pereira V, Sotillo J, et al. (2006) Plasma malonaldehyde (MDA) and total antioxidant status (TAS) during lactation in dairy cows. Res Vet Sci 80: 133–139.
  24. 24. Castillo C, Hernandez J, Bravo A, Lopez-Alonso M, Pereira V, et al. (2005) Oxidative status during late pregnancy and early lactation in dairy cows. Vet J 169: 286–292.
  25. 25. Williams TD (2005) Mechanisms underlying the costs of egg production. Bioscience 55: 39–48.
  26. 26. Tobe SS, Langley PA (1978) Reproductive Physiology of Glossina. Annu Rev Entomol 23: 283–307.
  27. 27. Denlinger DL, Ma W-C (1974) Dynamics of the pregnancy cycle in the tsetse Glossina morsitans. J Insect Physiol 20: 1015–1026.
  28. 28. Ma WC, Denlinger DL, Jarlfors U, Smith DS (1975) Structural modulations in the tsetse fly milk gland during a pregnancy cycle. Tiss Cell 7: 319–330.
  29. 29. Attardo GM, Benoit JB, Michalkova V, Yang G, Roller L, et al. (2011) Analysis of lipolysis underlying lactation in the tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 42: 360–370.
  30. 30. Langley PA, Bursell E (1980) Role of fat body and uterine gland in milk synthesis by adult female Glossina morsitans. Insect Biochem 10: 11–17.
  31. 31. Langley PA, Bursell E, Kabayo J, Pimley RW, Trewen MA, et al. (1981) Haemolymph lipid transport from fat body to uterine gland in pregnant females of Glossina morsitans. Insect Biochem 11: 225–231.
  32. 32. Pimley RW, Langley PA (1981) Hormonal control of lipid synthesis in the fat body of the adult female tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans. J Insect Physiol 27: 839–847.
  33. 33. Langley PA, Clutton-Brock TH (1998) Does reproductive investment change with age in tsetse flies, Glossina morsitans morsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae)? Funct Ecol 12: 866–870.
  34. 34. Buffenstein R (2008) Negligible senescence in the longest living rodent, the naked mole-rat: insights from a successfully aging species. J Comp Physiol B 178: 439–445.
  35. 35. Jasienska G (2009) Reproduction and lifespan: Trade-offs, overall energy budgets, intergenerational costs, and costs neglected by research. Am J Hum Biol 21: 524–532.
  36. 36. Dao A, Kassogue Y, Adamou A, Diallo M, Yaro AS, et al. (2010) Reproduction-longevity trade-off in Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 47: 769–777.
  37. 37. Benoit JB, Attardo GM, Michalkova V, Takac P, Bohova J, et al. (2012) Sphingomyelinase activity in mother's milk is essential for juvenile development: a case from lactating tsetse flies. Biol Reprod 87: 17, 1–10.
  38. 38. Guz N, Attardo GM, Wu Y, Aksoy S (2007) Molecular aspects of transferrin expression in the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans). J Insect Physiol 53: 715–723.
  39. 39. Attardo GM, Guz N, Strickler-Dinglasan P, Aksoy S (2006) Molecular aspects of viviparous reproductive biology of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans): Regulation of yolk and milk gland protein synthesis. J Insect Physiol 52: 1128–1136.
  40. 40. Benoit JB, Attardo GM, Michalkova V, Bohova J, Zhang Q, et al. (2013) A novel highly divergent protein family from a viviparous insect identified by RNA-seq analysis: a potential target for tsetse fly-specific abortifacients. PLoS Genetics DOI 10.1371journal.pgen.1003874./journal.pgen.1003874.
  41. 41. Yang G, Attardo GM, Lohs C, Aksoy S (2010) Molecular characterization of two novel milk proteins in the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans). Insect Mol Biol 19: 253–262.
  42. 42. Bursell E (1977) Synthesis of proline by the fat body of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans): metabolic pathways. Insect Biochem 7: 427–434.
  43. 43. Pimley RW, Langley PA (1982) Hormone stimulated lipolysis and proline synthesis in the fat body of the adult tsetse fly, Glossina morsitans. J Insect Physiol 28: 781–789.
  44. 44. Tobe SS (1978) Changes in free amino acids and peptides in haemolymph of Glossina austeni during reproductive cycle. Experientia 34: 1462–1463.
  45. 45. Wit J, Sarup P, Lupsa N, Malte H, Frydenberg J, et al. (2013) Longevity for free? Increased reproduction with limited trade-offs in Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased life span. Exp Gerontol 48: 349–357.
  46. 46. Carey JR, Liedo P, Muller HG, Wang JL, Chiou JM (1998) Relationship of age patterns of fecundity to mortality, longevity, and lifetime reproduction in a large cohort of Mediterranean fruit fly females. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 53: B245–251.
  47. 47. Carey JR, Liedo P, Muller HG, Wang JL, Vaupel JW (1998) Dual modes of aging in Mediterranean fruit fly females. Science 281: 996–998.
  48. 48. Khazaeli AA, Curtsinger JW (2013) Pleiotropy and life history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: uncoupling life span and early fecundity. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68: 546–553.
  49. 49. McManaman JL, Neville MC (2003) Mammary physiology and milk secretion. Advanced Drug Deliv Rev 55: 629–641.
  50. 50. Neville MC, Picciano MF (1997) Regulation of milk lipid secretion and composition. Annu Rev Nutr 17: 159–183.
  51. 51. Lemay DG, Lynn DJ, Martin WF, Neville MC, Casey TM, et al. (2009) The bovine lactation genome: insights into the evolution of mammalian milk. Genome Biol 10: R43.
  52. 52. O'Donnell R, Holland JW, Deeth HC, Alewood P (2004) Milk proteomics. Int Dairy J 14: 1013–1023.
  53. 53. Attardo GM, Lohs C, Heddi A, Alam UH, Yildirim S, et al. (2008) Analysis of milk gland structure and function in Glossina morsitans: milk protein production, symbiont populations and fecundity. J Insect Physiol 54: 1236–1242.
  54. 54. Wickramasinghe S, Rincon G, Islas-Trejo A, Medrano JF (2012) Transcriptional profiling of bovine milk using RNA sequencing. BMC Genomics 13: 45.
  55. 55. Kontopidis G, Holt C, Sawyer L (2004) Invited review: beta-lactoglobulin: binding properties, structure, and function. J Dairy Sci 87: 785–796.
  56. 56. Lefevre CM, Digby MR, Whitley JC, Strahm Y, Nicholas KR (2007) Lactation transcriptomics in the Australian marsupial, Macropus eugenii: transcript sequencing and quantification. BMC Genomics 8: 417.
  57. 57. Strickler-Dinglasan PM, Guz N, Attardo G, Aksoy S (2006) Molecular characterization of iron binding proteins from Glossina morsitans morsitans (Diptera : Glossinidae). Insect Biochem Mol Biol 36: 921–933.
  58. 58. Nyberg L, Farooqi A, Blackberg L, Duan RD, Nilsson A, et al. (1998) Digestion of ceramide by human milk bile salt-stimulated lipase. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 27: 560–567.
  59. 59. Duan RD (2011) Physiological functions and clinical implications of sphingolipids in the gut. J Dig Dis 12: 60–70.
  60. 60. Duan RD (2007) Sphingomyelinase and ceramidase in the intestinal tract. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 109: 987–993.
  61. 61. Clarkson RW, Wayland MT, Lee J, Freeman T, Watson CJ (2004) Gene expression profiling of mammary gland development reveals putative roles for death receptors and immune mediators in post-lactational regression. Breast Cancer Res 6: R92–109.
  62. 62. Hettinga K, van Valenberg H, de Vries S, Boeren S, van Hooijdonk T, et al. (2011) The host defense proteome of human and bovine milk. PLoS One 6: e19433.
  63. 63. Cmelik SHW, Bursell E, Slack E (1969) Composition of the gut contents of thrid-instar tsetse larvae (Glossina morsitans Westwood). Comp Biochem Physiol 29: 447–453.
  64. 64. Pais R, Lohs C, Wu Y, Wang J, Aksoy S (2008) The obligate mutualist Wigglesworthia glossinidia influences reproduction, digestion, and immunity processes of its host, the tsetse fly. Appl Environ Microbiol 74: 5965–5974.
  65. 65. Weiss BL, Wang J, Aksoy S (2011) Tsetse immune system maturation requires the presence of obligate symbionts in larvae. PLoS Biol 9: e1000619.
  66. 66. Rijnkels M (2002) Multispecies comparison of the casein gene loci and evolution of casein gene family. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 7: 327–345.
  67. 67. Ginger MR, Grigor MR (1999) Comparative aspects of milk caseins. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 124: 133–145.
  68. 68. Salmon AB, Marx DB, Harshman LG (2001) A cost of reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster: stress susceptibility. Evolution 55: 1600–1608.
  69. 69. Wang Y, Salmon AB, Harshman LG (2001) A cost of reproduction: oxidative stress susceptibility is associated with increased egg production in Drosophila melanogaster. Exp Gerontol 36: 1349–1359.
  70. 70. Alonso-Alvarez C, Perez-Rodriguez L, Garcia JT, Vinuela J, Mateo R (2010) Age and breeding effort as sources of individual variability in oxidative stress markers in a bird species. Physiol Biochem Zool 83: 110–118.
  71. 71. Heiss RS, Schoech SJ (2012) Oxidative cost of reproduction is sex specific and correlated with reproductive effort in a cooperatively breeding bird, the Florida scrub jay. Physiol Biochem Zool 85: 499–503.
  72. 72. Harshman LG, Zera AJ (2007) The cost of reproduction: the devil in the details. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 80–86.
  73. 73. Agarwal A, Gupta S, Sharma R (2005) Oxidative stress and its implications in female infertility - a clinician's perspective. Reprod Biomed Online 11: 641–650.
  74. 74. Sharma N, Singh NK, Singh OP, Pandey V, Verma PK (2011) Oxidative stress and antioxidant status during transition period in dairy cows. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 24: 479–484.
  75. 75. Garratt M, Vasilaki A, Stockley P, McArdle F, Jackson M, et al. (2011) Is oxidative stress a physiological cost of reproduction? An experimental test in house mice. Proc Biol Sci 278: 1098–1106.
  76. 76. Oldakowski L, Piotrowska Z, Chrzaacik KM, Sadowska ET, Koteja P, et al. (2012) Is reproduction costly? No increase of oxidative damage in breeding bank voles. J Exp Biol 215: 1799–1805.
  77. 77. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P (2013) Does reproduction cause oxidative stress? An open question. Trends Ecol Evol 28: 347–350.
  78. 78. Baumann AA, Benoit JB, Michalkova V, Mireji P, Attardo GM, et al. (2013) Juvenile hormone and insulin signaling pathways regulate lipid levels during lactation and dry periods of tsetse fly pregnancy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 372: 30–41.79.
  79. 79. De Loof A (2011) Longevity and aging in insects: Is reproduction costly; cheap; beneficial or irrelevant? A critical evaluation of the “trade-off” concept. J Insect Physiol 57: 1–1180.
  80. 80. Norris K, Evans MR (2000) Ecological immunology: life history trade-offs and immune defense in birds. Behav Ecol 11: 19–26.
  81. 81. Owens IPF, Wilson K (1999) Immunocompetence: a neglected life history trait ot comspicuous red herring. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 170–172.
  82. 82. Fedorka KM, Zuk M, Mousseau TA (2004) Immune suppression and the cost of reproduction in the ground cricket, Allonemobius socius. Evolution 58: 2478–2485.
  83. 83. Van Remmen H, Ikeno Y, Hamilton M, Pahlavani M, Wolf N, et al. (2003) Life-long reduction in MnSOD activity results in increased DNA damage and higher incidence of cancer but does not accelerate aging. Physiol Genomics 16: 29–37.
  84. 84. Williams GC (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection and the evolution of senesence. Evolution 11: 398–411.
  85. 85. Hamilton WD (1966) The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol 12: 12–45.
  86. 86. Blagosklonny MV (2012) Answering the ultimate question “what is the proximal cause of aging?”. Aging 4: 861–877.
  87. 87. Gems D, Partridge L (2013) Genetics of longevity in model organisms: debates and paradigm shifts. Annu Rev Physiol 75: 621–644.
  88. 88. Blagosklonny MV (2007) Paradoxes of aging. Cell Cycle 6: 2997–3003.
  89. 89. Blagosklonny MV (2006) Aging and immortality: quasi-programmed senescence and its pharmacologic inhibition. Cell Cycle 5: 2087–2102.
  90. 90. Lopez-Otin C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G (2013) The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153: 1194–1217.
  91. 91. Moloo SK (1971) An artificial feeding technique for Glossina. Parasitology 63: 507–512.
  92. 92. Munks RJ, Sant'Anna MR, Grail W, Gibson W, Igglesden T, et al. (2005) Antioxidant gene expression in the blood-feeding fly Glossina morsitans morsitans. Insect Mol Biol 14: 483–491.
  93. 93. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, et al. (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26: 1231–1237.
  94. 94. Lopez-Martinez G, Elnitsky MA, Benoit JB, Lee RE, Denlinger DL (2008) High resistance to oxidative damage in the Antarctic midge Belgica antarctica, and developmentally linked expression of genes encoding superoxide dismutase, catalase and heat shock proteins. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 38: 796–804.
  95. 95. Lopez-Martinez G, Hahn DA (2012) Short-term anoxic conditioning hormesis boosts antioxidant defenses, lowers oxidative damage following irradiation and enhances male sexual performance in the Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa. J Exp Biol 215: 2150–2161.
  96. 96. Uchiyama M, Mihara M (1978) Determination of malonaldehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarituric acid test. Anal Biochem 86: 271–278.
  97. 97. Ohkawa H, Ohishi N, Yagi K (1979) Assay for lipid peroxides in animal tissues by thiobarbituric acid reaction. Anal Biochem 95: 351–358.
  98. 98. Levine RL, Garland D, Oliver CN, Amici A, Climent I, et al. (1990) Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol 186: 464–478.
  99. 99. Madubunyi LC (1989) Survival and productivity of the tsetse, Glossina morsitans morsitans Westwood (Diptera: Glossinidae) maintained under different feeding regimens through four successive reproductive cycles in Zambia. Insect Sci Applic 10: 75–80.
  100. 100. Jarry M, Khaladi M, Gouteaux JP (1996) A matrix model for studying tsetse fly population. Entomol Exp Appl 78: 51–60.
  101. 101. Hill K, Hurtado M (1996) Aché life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. 570 p.
  102. 102. Packer C, Tatar M, Collins A (1998) Reproductive cessation in female mammals. Nature 392: 807–811.
  103. 103. Novoseltsev VN, Novoseltseva JA, Boyko SI, Yashin AI (2003) What fecundity patterns indicate about aging and longevity: insights from Drosophila studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58: 484–494.
  104. 104. Benoit JB, Yang G, Krause TB, Patrick KR, Aksoy S, et al. (2011) Lipophorin acts as a shuttle of lipids to the milk gland during tsetse fly pregnancy. J Insect Physiol 57: 1553–1561.
  105. 105. Hecker H, Moloo SK (1983) Quantitative morphological changes of the uterine gland cells in relation to physiological events during a pregnancy cycle in Glossina morsitans morsitans. J Insect Physiol 29: 651–658.